HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-02-08
FIN A L
7:00 P.M.
February 8, 1995
Room 7, County Office Building
1) Call to Order.
2) Pledge of Allegiance.
3) Moment of Silence.
4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
5) Consent Agenda (on next sheet).
6) Public Hearing to receive comments on a request to transfer property
currently owned by the County of Albemarle and the City of Char-
lottesville to the American National Red Cross. The property is
located at the intersection of Rose Hill Drive and Madison Avenue in
the City of Charlottesville, Virginia, and consists of approximately
13,498 square feet in area, and designated as Parcel 82 on City Real
Estate Tax Map 37.
7) ZMA-94-14. Highlands West Land Trust (applicant), Lady B. Walton
(owner). (Deferred from December 21, 1994.) (Defer until
March 15, 1995.)
8) SP-94-35. Quarry-Direct Monument Company. (Applicant requests
withdrawal.)
9) SP-94-37. Centel Cellular Company of Charlottesville. Public Hearing on
a request to construct a communication tower/antennas & support
bldgs on 234.16 ac zoned RA located on S sd of Rt 53, is Carter's
Mtn. TM91,P28. Scottsville Dist. (This site is not located in a
designated growth area.)
10) Executive Session: Legal Matters.
11) Certify Executive Session.
12) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
13) Adjourn to February 13, 1995, 5:00 p.m. for Joint Meeting with School
Board.
CONSBNT
AGBNDA
FOR APPROVAL:
5.1 Request to amend resolution for Industrial Access Funding for GE Fanuc to
split fiscal years.
5.2 Appropriation Requests:
a) FY 1994-95 Capital Projects
b) At-Risk Four Year Old Planning Grant
5.2a Resolution to take Beau Mont Farm Road in Beaumont Farm Subdivision
(SUB-90-022) into the State Secondary System of Highways.
FOR INFORMATION:
5.3 Copy of Planning Commission minutes for January 10, 1995.
, 1 . I
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
While Hal1
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
ScottsviJle
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
MBMORANDUM
TO:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director, Planning & Community Development
Ella W. Carey, clerk:flV C:...--
FROM:
DATE: February 9, 1995
SUBJECT: Board Actions of February 8, 1995
Following is a list of actions taken by the Board of Supervisors at its
meeting on February 8, 1995:
Agenda Item No.1. Call to Order. The meeting was called to order at
7:04 p.m., by the Chairman, Mr. Perkins.
Agenda Item No.4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the
PUBLIC. There were none.
Agenda Item No.5. Consent Agenda. Motion was offered by Mrs.
Humphris, seconded by Mrs. Thomas, to approve items 5.1 through 5.2a, and to
accept item 5.3 as information.
Item 5.1. Request to amend resolution for Industrial Access Funding for
GE Fanuc to split fiscal years.
ADOPTBD the attached Resolution.
Item 5.2a. Appropriation Request: FY 1994-95 Capital Projects.
APPROVED. Appropriation form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Item 5.2b. Appropriation Request: At-Risk Four Year Old Planning Grant.
APPROVED. Appropriation form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Item 5.2a. Resolution to take Beau Mont Farm Road in Beaumont Farm
Subdivision (SUB-90-022) into the State Secondary System of Highways.
ADOPTED the attached Resolution.
*
Printed on recycled paper
To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
February 9, 1995
2
Date:
Page:
Agenda Item No.6. Public Hearing to receive comments on a request to
transfer property currently owned by the County of Albemarle and the City of
Charlottesville to the American National Red Cross. The property is located
at the intersection of Rose Hill Drive and Madison Avenue in the City of
Charlottesville, Virginia, and consists of approximately 13,498 square feet in
area, and designated as Parcel 82 on City Real Estate Tax Map 37.
ADOPTED the attached Resolution and conveyed the property by deed of gift
to the Red Cross.
Agenda Item No.7.
Lady B. Walton (owner).
15, 1995.)
ZMA-94-14. Highlands West Land Trust (applicant),
(Deferred from December 21, 1994.) (Defer until March
DEFERRED until March 15, 1995.
Agenda Item No.8. SP-94-35. Quarry-Direct Monument Company.
cant requests withdrawal.)
(Appli-
APPROVED request to withdraw.
Agenda Item No.9. SP-94-37. Centel Cellular Company of Charlottes-
ville. Public Hearing on a request to construct a communication
tower/antennas & support bldgs on 234.16 ac zoned RA located on S sd of Rt 53,
is Carter's Mtn. TM91,P28. Scottsville Dist. (This site is not located in a
designated growth area.)
APPROVED subject to the following conditions:
1. Tower height shall not exceed 200 feet;
2. Compliance with Section 5.1.12 of the Zoning Ordinance;
3. There shall be no lighting of the tower unless required by a federal
agency. All tower lighting shall be shielded so as to minimize
visibility from the ground;
4. Staff approval of additional antennae installation. No administra-
tive approval shall constitute or imply support for or approval of,
the location of additional towers, antennae, etc., even if they may
be part of the same network or system as any antennae administra-
tively approved under this section;
5. The tower must be designed and adequate separation provided to
property lines such that in the event of structural failure, the
tower and components will remain within the lease area; and
6. Tower shall be located within lease area shown on Attachment C (on
file) .
Agenda Item No. 12. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the
BOARD.
Mrs. Thomas asked Board members if they had any problems with security
lights in rural areas being a nuisance to neighbors. The Board members
indicated that they had not encountered any such problems.
To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
February 9, 1995
3
Date:
Page:
Mrs. Humphris said she wanted to commend the assessors in the Real Estate
office for the job they did during this last reassessment.
Agenda Item No. 13. Adjourn to February 13, 1995, 5:00 p.m. for Joint
Meeting with School Board.
At 8:15 p.m., Mr. Bowerman made motion, seconded by Mr. Martin, to
adjourn to February 13, 1995, 5:00 p.m., for Joint Meeting with the School
Board.
EWC/jng
Attachments (3)
cc: Larry Davis
Jo Higgins
Amelia McCulley
Rick Huff
Roxanne White
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, GE Fanuc owns property in the County of Albemarle and is in the process of
entering into contracts to expand its facilities on that property for the purpose of
expanding its product lines; and
WHEREAS, this new facility is expected to involve a new private capital investment in land,
building and manufacturing equipment exceeding $50.0 million; and
WHEREAS, GE Fanuc is expected to employ an additional 250 persons at this facility; and
WHEREAS, manufacturing operations are expected to begin in this new facility to be phased
between 1994 and 1 997; and
WHEREAS, the existing public road network does not provide for adequate access to this facility
and it is deemed necessary that improvements be made to Route 763; and
WHEREAS, the County of Albemarle hereby warrants that the necessary right-of-way for this
improvement and utility relocations or adjustments, if necessary, will be sought from non-
County funds if the project is to proceed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors
hereby requests that the Commonwealth Transportation Board provide Industrial Access
Road Funding in the amount of $267,000 to provide an adequate road to this expanded
manufacturing facility with $100,000 of said funds to come from the State's 1994-1995
allocation and the balance from the 1995-96 allocation.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that this is a true, correct copy of a Resolution
unanimously adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a regular meeting held
on February 8, 1995.
The Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, in regular
meeting on the 8th day of February, 1995, adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the street in Beaumont Farm Subdivision (SUB-90-022) described
on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated February 8, 1995, fully incorporated
herein by reference, is shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of Albemarle County, Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation
has advised the Board that the street meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County
Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the road in
Beaumont Farm Subdivision as described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A)
dated February 8, 1995, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-
229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted
right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage as
described on the recorded plats; and
FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to
the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
*****
Recorded vote:
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Mrs. Humphris.
Mrs. Thomas.
Yeas:
Mrs. Humphris, Messrs. Marshall, Martin, Perkins,
Mrs. Thomas and Mr. Bowerman.
Nays:
None.
MC
, .
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, by Resolution dated October 10, 1994 the School Board of
Albemarle County, Virginia declared surplus a certain parcel of real estate located in
the City of Charlottesville and more fully described below;
WHEREAS, by Deed dated November 14, 1994, and recorded in Deed
Book 139, page 271 in the Circuit Court for the City of Charlottesville, Virginia, the
School Board of Albemarle County, Virginia conveyed the parcel to the County of
Albemarle, Virginia pursuant to Virginia Code Section 22-1-129, as amended;
WHEREAS, the Central Virginia Chapter of the American National Red
Cross is seeking the donation of this parcel of real estate from the Board of Supervisors
of Albemarle County, Virginia and from the City Council of the City of Charlottesville,
Virginia, for the purposes of future on-site parking improvements.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the County of Albemarle,
Virginia hereby authorizes the conveyance of its interest in the property described
below to the Central Virginia Chapter of the American Red Cross:
All that certain lot or parcel of land in the City of
Charlottesville, Virginia, shown and designated as Lot 13
and Lot 12, Block 42, "Rose Hill", being in all respects the
same property conveyed to the Trustees of the County
School Board of Albemarle County, Virginia, by deed
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City
of Charlottesville, Virginia, in Deed Book 139, page 271,
being a portion of the property identified as Tax Map 37,
Parcel 82 on plat of Kirk Hughes & Associates dated March
4, 1994; and conveyed to the County of Albemarle by deed
dated November 14, 1994 and recorded in the aforesaid
Clerk's Office in Deed Book 643, page 270.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia is hereby authorized to sign a deed on
behalf of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, conveying the above-described property to
the Central Virginia Chapter of the American National Red Cross. The Clerk of the
Board is directed to record a copy of this Resolution along with the deed to the property
with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Charlottesville.
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true and
correct copy of a Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors or Albemarle
County, Virginia by a vote of Í- to ~ on Februarv 8 , 1995.
Clerk, County Board of SUR
Albemarle County, Virgini
94-133.003
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, GE Fanuc owns property in the County of Albemarle and is in the process of
entering into contracts to expand its facilities on that property for the purpose of
expanding its product lines; and
WHEREAS, this new facility is expected to involve a new private capital investment in land,
building and manufacturing equipment exceeding $50.0 million; and
WHEREAS, GE Fanuc is expected to employ an additional 250 persons at this facility; and
WHEREAS, manufacturing operations are expected to begin in this new facility to be phased
between 1994 and 1997; and
WHEREAS, the existing public road network does not provide for adequate access to this facility
and it is deemed necessary that improvements be made to Route 763; and
WHEREAS, the County of Albemarle hereby warrants that the necessary right-of-way for this
improvement and utility relocations or adjustments, if necessary, will be sought from non-
County funds if the project is to proceed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors
hereby requests that the Commonwealth Transportation Board provide Industrial Access
Road Funding in the amount of $267,000 to provide an adequate road to this expanded
manufacturing facility with $100,000 of said funds to come from the State's 1994-1995
allocation and the balance from the 1995-96 allocation.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that this is a true, correct copy of a Resolution
unanimously adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a regular meeting held
on February 8, 1995.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
:z., Q3 .q?~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Industrial Access Funding-GE F ANUC
AGENDA DATE:
February 1, 1995
ITEM NUMBER: )
CfS·o2Cß ·(6.'
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
Request to Amend Resolution for Industrial Access Funding to
Split Fiscal Years
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Huff
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
On December 14, 1994, the Board adopted the attached resolution (Attachment 1) requesting that the Commonwealth Transportation
Board provide Industrial Access FlU1ding in the amolU1t of $267 ,000 for improvements related to a significant expansion at GE F anuc.
At that time, staffrecommended that those fimds be requested from Albemarle County's 1995-96 allocation of $300,000 in unmatched
state fimds. Since that time, staff has been advised that it is possible to request that $100,000 be taken from 1994-95 (current year's
allocation) and the remaining $167,000 be taken from 1995-96. The advantage of splitting the request in this fashion is that using
lU1allocated funds in the current year will allow the Board flexibility in approving any future requests which might come forward in
1995-96 since there will be $133,000 left lU1allocated lU1der this recommendation rather than only $33,000 if all of GE Fanuc's request
comes from 1995-96.
DISCUSSION:
GE Fanuc officials have been advised of this recommendation and are supportive of requesting that funding be split over two fiscal
years, if approved by the Commonwealth Transportation Board.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staffrecommends that the attached draft resolution (Attachment 2) be adopted and forwarded to the Commonwealth Transportation
Board for approval.
95.008
~(~-~Aß~ L~
""'\RD OF SUPERV'c
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, GE Fanuc owns property in the County of Albemarle and is in the process of
entering into contracts to expand its facilities on that property for the purpose of
expanding its product lines; and
WHEREAS, this new facility is expected to involve a new private capital investment in land,
building and manufacturing equipment exceeding $50.0 million; and
WHEREAS, GE Fanuc is expected to employ an additional 250 persons at this facility; and
WHEREAS, manufacturing operations are expected to begin in this new facility to be phased
between 1994 and 1997; and
WHEREAS, the existing public road network does not provide for adequate access to this facility
and it is deemed necessary that improvements be made to Route 763; and
WHEREAS, the County of Albemarle hereby warrants that the necessary right-of-way for this
improvement and utility relocations or adjustments, if necessary, will be sought from non-
County funds if the project is to proceed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors
hereby requests that the Commonwealth Transportation Board provide Industrial Access
Road Funding in the amount of $267,000 to provide an adequate road to this expanded
manufacturing facility with said funds to come from the State's 1995-1996 allocation.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of
a resolution, adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors, on motion by Mr. Martin,
seconded by Mrs. Thomas, at a regularly scheduled meeting on December 14, 1994, by a vote
of six to zero.
, .
Attachment 2
DRAFT
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, GE Fanuc owns property in the County of Albemarle and is in the process of
entering into contracts to expand its facilities on that property for the purpose of
expanding its product lines; and
WHEREAS, this new facility is expected to involve a new private capital investment in land,
building and manufacturing equipment exceeding $50.0 million; and
WHEREAS, GE Fanuc is expected to employ an additional 250 persons at this facility; and
WHEREAS, manufacturing operations are expected to begin in this new facility to be phased
between 1994 and 1997; and
WHEREAS, the existing public road network does not provide for adequate access to this facility
and it is deemed necessary that improvements be made to Route 763; and
WHEREAS, the County of Albemarle hereby warrants that the necessary right-of-way for this
improvement and utility relocations or adjustments, if necessary, will be sought from non-
County funds if the project is to proceed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors
hereby requests that the Commonwealth Transportation Board provide Industrial Access
Road Funding in the amount of $267,000 to provide an adequate road to this expanded
manufacturing facility with $100,000 of said funds to come from the State's 1994-1995
allocation and the balance from the 1995-96 allocation.
I f ~\
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Peter Parsons, Civil Engineer II
Ella Carey, Clerk, Board of Supervisors [1'--' L/
February 9, 1995
Resolution - Beau Mont Farm Road in Beaumont Farm Subdivision
Attached is the original resolution (plus three copies) adopted by the Board on February
8, 1995, requesting aceptance of Beau Mont Farm Road in Beaumont Farm Subdivision (SUB-
90-022) into the State Secondary System of Highways.
EWC/jng
FORMS\ROADRES.FRM
Attachments (8)
I' ,'.
The Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, in regular
meeting on the 8th day of February, 1995, adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the street in Beaumont Farm Subdivision (SUB-90-022) described
on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated February 8, 1995, fully incorporated
herein by reference, is shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of Albemarle County, Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation
has advised the Board that the street meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County
Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the road in
Beaumont Farm Subdivision as described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A)
dated February 8, 1995, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-
229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted
right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage as
described on the recorded plats; and
FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to
the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
*****
Recorded vote:
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Mrs. Humphris.
Mrs. Thomas.
Yeas:
Mrs. Humphris, Messrs. Marshall, Martin, Perkins,
Mrs. Thomas and Mr. Bowerman.
Nays:
None.
MC
J
. .J
~
,...¡
(/)
~ ....
ffi 0
H
\:I: ,...¡
~ -u
Q) Q)
...., ...., r-t
n
E-i ¡:¡ ¡:1 ~
(/) ] m
%, ...., 0
0 i n ~
....,
~ ....,
..c
....,
(/) m
~ ¡:1
(/) H
>-
~ ....,
~
;oj
~ rJ)
0
:î
(/) ¡:1
0
~ -.-I
....,
;oj
.-i
0
0 m
Q)
E-i P:
~ m
I-<
0
m
H -.-I
E-i ~
H Q)
~ g.
00
ß .... e
0
-u It!
tf.I %,
0 I-<
n
~~ .w
o ø:¡ !
~
~
>.
Q)
.-i ~
¡:1
.( 0
II) Q) §
I §
~ 'n
(/) ~ (Q
0 -n
~ Q) >
.<1
0 ~
%, 0
....,
~ (/)
....,
¡:1 4-1
H ] 0
E-i
H 0 !
~ n
....,
....,
..c
I-
- :>
"., - 15
~ V>
~ - 0
<t
2!. - 0
'"
~ jiÞ"
'? ~ ~
~ Ô
ê ~
~ ---_._--~
II
.<1Q)
""'.-i
Ö)..-t r")
~:I: '" IX)
'" .
...:lID Ò 0
¡:1.~
O.-i
..-tl-<
....,«)
..-t....,
:g~
,.¡:u
m AA ~
ID ,;,;
...., .~.~
~ Q)
. r-t
m 11 i
;oj
0
Q) r-t
~ . -.
J~ It!
.-i '" .w
.-i t~ . 0
ID E-i
0
m
..-t -II B: B:
:I:
jM"
"'oil
......
MM
~
~;::: 0
I~ oil
0.<1
I....,
P:-u
..-t
~
-.-I " ~
¡:1 I Do
-.-I .. ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ] '" Do Do Do Do
Q) M
.-I
E-< M
¡:1 ... ï
0 r- 1 1 1 1
..-t '"
...., '"
-.-I ... ]
~ v> ] ] ] ]
r-
'"
...., .¡ :;:
Q) '" ,
Q) r-
I-< I ~
...., U r-
oo .
.
~ ., ., ., ., .,
~ .!! .!! .!! .!! .!!
.. I i ~ ~ ~
0
f ..
0 J J J J
i
j ., j ., j ., j ., j .,
. . . . .
~ ~ ~ ... ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ...
Do Do Do
....,
Q)
Q) 1
I-<
....,
00
.... 9
0 ..
~ ¡
z j
...;.
~~ M
'" '" ... oil
Q)
Ö)
n
¡:1
..-t
n
~
-u
~
m
.-i
.-i
..-t
....
m
....,
;oj
0
I-<
0
....
m
....,
I
m
oj
Q)
~
n
m
m
Q) {'
0
Q)
¡:1
§
....
0
~
..-t .. .
m ~
;oj
.-i 0
0 {j
><
Q)
>- -u
Q)
~ ....,
oj
I I 0
.... ..-t
0 "8
1
...., -.-I
.g, ....,
-.-I ~
I-< ~
.... '"
0 ~ 0 .~
.<1 .g
...., %, Q) ..¿
-u 0
..-t ¡j ~
~ ~ ....~
-u
Q) H 0
Q) ð
...., ...., j
~ I-<
oj
I-< H ø.
n %, .......
;oj n
ø H S
~ m
n
..
m -u
Q) Q)
. J ..-t
~ ....
..-1
....,
I-<
Q)
0
m
-.-I
....,
¡:1
Q)
]
0
oj
....,
....,
n
m
-.-I
t:
The road described on Additions Form SR-5(A) is:
1) Beau Mont Farm Road from the edge of pavement of State Route 676,
4397 lineal feet to the end of the cul-de-sac as shown on plat recorded 7-
27-90 in Deed Book 1112, pages 205-216, in the Office of the Clerk of the
Circuit Court of Albemarle County, with a right-of-way width of 50 feet.
Other drainage easements in Deed Book 1431, pages 210-213, and, in
Deed Book 1452, pages 193-207.
Total mileage, 0.83 mile.
· .
'''I __' :.'
( 1__",
t.. ~' ..-.:
ì'. I 'U D.. -Ii
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
('! t-) (. C L '-(
,.,:- '7(" )
J. ¡:;...- .-
_, ,"""'_.·"'u...___-....·--·
";;1 m n I:!
'" S 1\'
<'I i1 '..1 '
FEB - 6 199~
1
'\\RD OF SUPERV!S....
~- .. ~~-~'-'.
-,_ ¡Of;
¡
..._c."~_,,..,....,...____
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ella Carey, Board of Supervisors Clerk
FROM: Peter Parsons, civil Engineer II f)'Ç
DATE: February 2, 1995
RE: Beaumont Farm Subdivision (SUB-90-022)
The road serving the above referenced subdivision is substantially
complete and ready for a VDOT acceptance inspection. Attached is
the completed SR-5(A} form for a resolution, which I request be
taken to the Board for adoption at your next opportunity. Once the
resolution has been adopted, date and sign the SR-5(A}, and please
provide me with the original and four copies.
Thanks for your assistance.
questions.
Please call me if you have any
PJp/sms
Attachment
..
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
May 7, 1993
Mr. Peter L. Sheeran
246 East High Street
Chalottesville, VA 22902
Dear Mr. Sheeran:
Your request to have Beaumont Farm Road taken into the State
Secondary System of Highways was received and has now been
referred to the County Engineer. When she has certified that all
work has been completed in accordance with approved plans, this
request will be placed before the Board of supervisors for
adoption of the necessary resolution.
sincerely,
Ý ~ ~1 êcklúf--
ifia w. Carey, Cler~ CMC
EWC:mms
cc: Jo Higgins, County Engineer
@
Printed on recycled paper
Peter L. Sheeran, AlA
Architecture · Planning
28 April 1993
Ms. Ella Carey
Oerk of the Board of Supervisors,
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
Re: BeauMont Farm Subdivision
Road Dedication to The State
Dear Ms. Carey,
As advised my Mr. Peter Parsons, of the County Engineering Staff, this letter is our formal request to
be included on the Board of Supervisors agenda for having BEAUMONT FARM ROAD included in the
state system.
We are anxious to complete this project and turn the road and right of way over to the State. Thank
you in advance for you cooperation.
Sincerely, _
.-' /"'7
~/...··
l
It ?;z ,//' {ffi~,,---
Peter (..sh.eeran
cc: Peter Parsons
246 East High Street
Charlottesville
Virginia
22902
804.979.1830
FAX 804.979.5681
...
-
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Melvin Breeden, Director of Finance
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC tfliJU
February 9, 1995
Board Actions of February 8, 1995
At the Board of Supervisors meeting on February 8, 1995, the Board took the follow-
ing action:
Item 5.2a. Appropriation Request: FY 1994-95 Capital Projects.
APPROVED the attached Appropriation.
Item 5.2b. Appropriation Request: At-Risk Four Year Old Planning Grant.
APPROVED the attached Appropriation.
EWC/jng
FORMS\APPROP.FRM
Attachments (2)
cc: Kevin Castner
Larry Davis
Robert Tucker
Roxanne White
~.
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
94/95
NUMBER
940050
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
GENERAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
PLANNING GRANT FOR AT-RISK-FOUR-YEAR-OLDS.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1100059010567205 AT-RISK-PLANNING GRANT $5,000.00
TOTAL
$5,000.00
2100024000240121
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
STATE AT-RISK-PLANNING GRANT
$5,000.00
TOTAL
$5,000.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
COUNTY EXECUTIVE
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
~ - -:z. - 'j>..5;>-
02- ?-9.s~
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
·
- ...
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
94/95
NUMBER
940049
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
CAPITAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
MID YEAR ADJUSTMENTS TO CIP PROJECTS.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1900043100800901 CTY OFFICE BLDG RENOVATIONS $26,250.00
1900060100800671 SCHOOL BOARD WATER LINES (55,727.44)
1900060100950014 SOIL MONITORING (74,414.59)
1900060100950042 UNDERGROUND TANKS 25,000.00
1900060201312350 BROADUS WOOD PLANNING (343.99)
1900060201800200 FURNITURE & FIXTURES 250.00
1900060201800605 CONSTRUCTION (12,439.33)
1900060201800700 ADP EQUIPMENT 239.25
1900060211800901 STONY POINT RENOVATIONS (3,252.72)
1900060215800605 AGNOR-HURT CONSTRUCTION 10,000.00
1900060252800901 HENLEY RENOVATIONS 1,167.00
1900060253800605 JOUETT CONSTRUCTION 4,130.00
1900060255312350 SUTHERLAND PLANNING (27,857.68)
1900060255312375 TESTING (6,593.23)
1900060255580000 MISC (32,080.57)
1900060255800605 CONSTRUCTION 78,818.23
1900060255800670 UTILITIES-CONST (388.47)
1900060255999999 CONTINGENCY (187,367.96)
1900060301312350 ALBEMARLE PLANNING (300.00)
1900060301800200 FURNITURE & FIXTURES (960.00)
1900060301800605 CONSTRUCTION 12,254.45
1900060301800901 RENOVATIONS (2,114.28)
1900060302800901 WARS RENOVATIONS 136,188.25
1900060302800905 CLASS RECONFIG (7,529.02)
1900060302950020 ROAD CROSSING (8,360.64)
1900060303800660 MURRAY ALTERATIONS (2,940.26)
1900060303800901 RENOVATIONS 12,041.60
1900060303800903 ASBESTOS REMOVAL (9,101.34)
1900062420800901 FACILITY MAINT RENOVATIONS 4,592.32
TOTAL
($120,840.42)
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2100051000510100
CIP FUND BALANCE
($120,840.42)
TOTAL
($120,840.42)
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
SCHOOLS/ENGINEERING
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
~ - .2. - Y:!!7
~-tJ-1~
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
'2.D~· q.s
"'.,n,:.."".<"-,~..,~.......·,.".........,,.·~,.-
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUM1\1ARY
AGRNnA TITI,R:
Appropriation - Capital Projects
AGRNnA DA TR:
February 8, 1995
ITRM NUMBRR:
C¡6·0WB '[6'20..)
AC.TION:
INFORMATION:
SIJRJFTTIPROPOSA I JRRQIJRST:
Request approval of Appropriation #940049 adjusting the
appropriation of several capital projects based on the mid-year
review of expenditures.
C.ONSRNT AGRNnA:
AC.TION: X
A TT AC.HMRNTS:
STAFF C.ONTAC.T(S):
~r. Tucker, ~s. VVlllte, ~r. Breeden
RRVTRWRD BY:
BAC.KGROIJND:
A mid-year review of capital programs has been completed. This review is done annually to adjust appropriations based on the current status
of the project. Some projects have been completed with minor overexpenditures for unanticipated expenses; other projects have been
completed for less than the projected expense.
mSc.nSSION:
The current adjustments requested are as follows:
School Board Miscellaneous Projects:
Water line improvements will cost $55,727.44 less than anticipated.
Soil monitoring will cost $74,414.59 less than anticipated.
Underground Storage Tanks will cost $25,000 more than anticipated primarily due to the removal of the tank
at the old Crozet School.
Broadus Wood - Project is completed for $12,294.07 less than anticipated.
Stony Point - Project completed at a cost of $3,252.72 less than anticipated.
Agnor-Hurt - Project will cost $10,000.00 more than anticipated for replacement of a damaged sidewalk.
Henley - Project completed at a cost of $1,167.00 more than anticipated.
Jack Jouett - Project completed at a cost of $4,130.00 more than anticipated.
Sutherland - Project will be completed at a cost of $175,469.68 less than anticipated.
Albemarle High - Project will be completed at a cost of $8,880.17 more than anticipated.
Western Albemarle High - Project will be completed at a cost of $4,701.41 less than projected. This balance plus an additional
$120,298.59, totaling $125,000, is being requested to fimd an emergency replacement of the HV AC chiller ($125,000). A detailed
justification for the chiller replacement is attached.
..
AGENDA TITLE: Appropriation - Capital Projects
February 8, 1995
Page 2
Murray - Project will be completed within projection; this action will authorize the reallocation of funds between phases of the
projects.
Facility Maintenance Building - Project was completed at a cost of $4,592.32 more than projected.
County Office Building - This project will require an additional $26,250 to complete the departmental renovations for improved
customer service, visitor's directory and signage, and painting.
The net result of these adjustments will free up $120,840.42 for other capital projects in addition to funding the additional request at Western
Albemarle High School.
RRC.OMMRNnA TTON:
Staff recommends approval of appropriation #940049 in the amount of ($120,840.42), which reallocates funds among various 1994/95
projects, approves the use of funds to replace a chiller at W AHS and returns $120,840.42 to the CIP Fund balance.
APP9449.EXE
95.018
;:'~ 0~
-"""'--',._~,,,,,,--'<.
D¡ ~ I1n ,"
,: ~ ¡ \fl i;;
~, c l..i ~ j
--~
FFR - .? ¡qqs
·
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Memorandum
DATE:
January 25, 1995
TO:
L. A. Reaser, Acting Assistant Superintendent
George Shifflett, Deputy Director of Building Services ~ ~
/
FROM:
RE:
WAHS Chiller Replacement
The chiller at Western Albemarle High School is in need of a motor
replacement. Although the chiller is currently in operation, I do not feel that
the motor will be capable of operating through the end of the school year. I
recommend that the complete chiller be replaced as the current chiller is 17
years old and this will be the third time the motor has been replaced. The life
expectancy of a chiller is 20 to 25 years. Also EPA guidelines indicate that the
R-II refrigerant used by the existing chiller cease to be produced after December
of 1995. Therefore, it could be difficult to obtain refrigerant for the chiller
after this date and it will most likely be at a premium rate above the current
$a.OO/lb.
It is also important to note that the FY95/96 - 99/2000 capital Improvements
Program schedules this chiller for replacement in 1996, due to CFC Regulations.
Therefore, it is not cost effective to repair the chiller at an estimated cost
of $30,000 and then to replace the chiller one year later.
The estimated cost of a chiller replacement is $125,000. If we begin now,
it is possible to have the new chiller in operation for the spring/summer of
1995. The new chiller would meet current CFC Regulations, regarding Ozone
safety, and would reduce operating costs from .89KW per ton to .57KW per ton.
Another benefit to the replacement is that the current R-11 refrigerant could be
transferred to other chillers in the Division and would provide a cost avoidance
of $4,800. Also, the High Efficiency Purge Unit, which was recently installed
in accordance with CFC guidelines, could be salvaged and utilized on existing
chillers, which would provide a $4,500 cost avoidance.
Another other option would be to convert the existing chiller from R-11 to
R-123 refrigerant. The estimated cost for this is $72,000, including the motor
replacement. However, a 10% - 15% reduction in tonnage capacity would be
expected. Therefore, I do not feel that this is a feasible solution. It should
be noted that this price is somewhat elevated since the motor replacement
constitutes $24,000 of the estimated conversion cost.
Based on the operating and maintenance costs of the existing chiller, which
were obtained from the firm of Simmons, Rockecharlie and Prince, the simple
payback for the chiller replacement would be 4.2 years. The approximate annual
operating and maintenance cost savings would be $23,940. There would be no
savings/payback to repair the chiller. After reviewing this information and all
factors, it is my recommendation that the chiller be replaced as soon as possible
so that it can be operational before the warm weather arrives.
GES/sjc
cc: J. Higgins, Engineering
Z~Q3' tiS
I?'. (¡l). R n !.'....!
~'!:. -J:?_ t.c; u \
~,J
FEB - 3~5
I
'RD OF SUPER'
ITEM NUMBER:
Qõ·02.Œ . (þ;2b)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Appropriation - At Risk Four Year Old Planning Grant
AGENDA DATE:
February 8, 1995
SUBJECTfPROPOSAL/RE UEST:
equest approval of Appropriation #940050 in the amount of
$5,000 to develop a community based program for At- Risk
our- Year Olds.
ACTION:
INFORMA TION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
STAFF CONTACT:
Mr. Tucker, Ms. White
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
During the 1994 General Assembly Session, as part of the recommendation from the Commission on Equity in Education, $10.3 million
was allocated across the state for quality preschool programs for at-risk four-year old children. This Virginia initiative, which is intended to
increase at-risk children's potential for success in school, allocates funds to localities based on serving 30% of the local at-risk-four year
olds as identified by the school free lunch statistics. Funding is on a per child allocation of $5,400 to be shared by the state and local
government based on the composite index. Albemarle County, one of the 103 localities identified as eligible for the state funds under this
initiative, may use the funds to either initiate new or expand existing programs. Programs developed under this grant must be community
based and must demonstrate interagency coordination. The Program must include quality preschool education, health services, social
services, parental involvement and transportation and operate at least the full school day and school year.
One-hundred and six children have been identified as being at-risk and unserved in Albemarle County, 30% of whom, or 32, would be
eligible to receive services under this grant.
DISCUSSION:
In October, a team representing four community groups, including the Department of Social Services, the School Division, Children, Youth
and Family Services, and MACAA attended a technical symposium in Richmond on the application and grant requirements. Subsequent to
this briefing, the County Executive's Office submitted an application on behalf of the group for a $5,000 Planning Grant to develop a plan
to implement a model comprehensive community based program for at-risk four year olds in Albemarle County. Community agencies
involved in designing the program will be MACAA, Department of Social Services, the School Division, Children Youth and Family
Services, the Health Department, Region Ten Mental Health, the Children and Youth Commission and, hopefully, the University of
Virginia and several community churches. The goal of the planning group will be to design a model program for at-risk four year olds and
their families that will bring together community resources that could be the beginning of a comprehensive and ongoing community based
program, which will benefit both the at-risk child and the parents.
This $5,000 state planning grant, which requires no local match, will fund research, data collection and program design over the next two
months with a final application submitted to the Council of Child Day Care and Early Childhood Programs by May 15. If funded, $72,000
will be available from the state matched by $96,509 in local funds. Twenty-five percent of the local share may be provided by in-kind
contributions. The largest County match needed to develop such a model program would be $70,000, although the initial planning group
feels that only a portion of the total grant will be requested in the first year to get the program started, therefore substantially lowering the
required local matching funds.
Based on an initial assessment of underserved four-year olds in the county, a new head start program at Stone Robinson and/or an
expanded, more comprehensive program at Yancey are program possibilities.
RECOMMENDA TION:
Staff recommends approval of Appropriation #940050 in the amount of $5,000 for the planning grant to develop a program design and
implementation plan for an At-Risk Four-Year Old Program. If at the end of the planning grant, the submitted application is approved and
funded by the state, the Board is under no obligation to provide the matching funds. The Board will have the opportunity to review the
program design in May and to determine at that time if they wish to either support or deny local funds for the project.
BRSTARS.Sam
Q,017
-,. 2..~œ ':.g~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
i'
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
FEB vi i~
1 ____~_~~<,~--l
.RD OF SUPERV~C':
AGENDA TITLE:
Public Hearing on Request to Transfer Property Owned by the
County of Albemarle and City of Charlottesville to the
American Red Cross
AGENDA DATE:
February 8, 1995
ITEM NUMBER:
qð·02Œ· Ci£;;;J
ACfION: X
INFORMATION:
SUBJECfIPROPOSALIREQUEST:
Authorization for Chairman to execute a deed conveying the
County's interest in a specific parcel of land to the American
Red Cross,
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACfION:
INFORMATION:
A TT ACHMENTS:
(1) Resolution authorizing the Chairman to execute deed.
STAFF CONTACf(S):
Messrs, Tucker and Trank
(2) Deed conveying County int
American Red Cross.
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
This matter involves the disposition of certain real estate located in the City of Charlottesville and jointly owned by the City of
Charlottesville and County of Albemarle north of Burley Middle School and west of Rose Hill Drive. The Central Virginia Chapter
of the American Red Cross is seeking the donation of the property ITom City Council and the Board of Supervisors for the purpose
of future on-site parking improvements. The intent of the Red Cross is to exchange a portion of the top of two parcels for a like-
sized parcel owned by a third party which is contiguous to the rear of the existing Red Cross property. The Red Cross believes
this exchange will allow them to create a secure parking compound behind and to the east side of the Red Cross property.
The Albemarle County School Board has declared the property surplus as required by state law and has conveyed the parcel to
the Board of Supervisors; the Charlottesville School Board has taken similar action.
DISCUSSION:
The property transfer would be accomplished by a Quitclaim Deed, which conveys only that right, title or interest which the County
has, and which does not require that the County pass good title. No warranties of title are to be conveyed. The Red Cross has
undertaken initial environmental site assessment at the property, since it was apparently once used as a dump site in the 1920s.
The Red Cross has indicated that it will do additional testing once City Council and the Board of Supervisors approve the
conveyance of the property to the Organization. The Red Cross understands that neither the County nor the City will be expected
to pay any of these testing costs.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the attached Resolution and convey the property by Deed of Gift to the Red Cross.
94-133.004
95.016
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, by Resolution dated October 10, 1994 the School Board of
Albemarle County, Virginia declared surplus a certain parcel of real estate located in
the City of Charlottesville and more fully described below;
WHEREAS, by Deed dated November 14, 1994, and recorded in Deed
Book 139, page 271 in the Circuit Court for the City of Charlottesville, Virginia, the
School Board of Albemarle County, Virginia conveyed the parcel to the County of
Albemarle, Virginia pursuant to Virginia Code Section 22-1-129, as amended;
WHEREAS, the Central Virginia Chapter of the American National Red
Cross is seeking the donation of this parcel of real estate from the Board of Supervisors
of Albemarle County, Virginia and from the City Council of the City of Charlottesville,
Virginia, for the purposes of future on-site parking improvements.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the County of Albemarle,
Virginia hereby authorizes the conveyance of its interest in the property described
below to the Central Virginia Chapter of the American Red Cross:
All that certain lot or parcel of land in the City of
Charlottesville, Virginia, shown and designated as Lot 13
and Lot 12, Block 42, "Rose Hill", being in all respects the
same property conveyed to the Trustees of the County
School Board of Albemarle County, Virginia, by deed
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City
of Charlottesville, Virginia, in Deed Book 139, page 271,
being a portion of the property identified as Tax Map 37,
Parcel 82 on plat of Kirk Hughes & Associates dated March
4, 1994; and conveyed to the County of Albemarle by deed
dated November 14, 1994 and recorded in the aforesaid
Clerk's Office in Deed Book 643, page 270.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia is hereby authorized to sign a deed on
behalf of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, conveying the above-described property to
the Central Virginia Chapter of the American National Red Cross. The Clerk of the
Board is directed to record a copy of this Resolution along with the deed to the property
with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Charlottesville.
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true and
correct copy of a Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors or Albemarle
County, Virginia by a vote of ~ to ~ on Februarv 8 , 1995.
Clerk, County Board of SUR
Albemarle County, Virgini
94-133.003
THIS DEED OF GIFT, made and entered into this ____ day of
19 by and among THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE,
VIRGINIA and THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA, Grantors, and
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS, hereinafter "Red Cross" , Grantee,
whose address is 1105 Rose Hill Drive, Charlottesville, Virginia
22903.
WITNESSETH:
That for and 1n consideration of the sum of ONE DOLLAR
($1.00), cash in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, Grantors do GIVE, GRANT and CONVEY unto Grantee, its
successors and assigns, any and all right, title and interest
Grantors may possess in and to the following described real estate,
to-wit:
All that certain lot or parcel of land located at the
intersection of Rose Hill Drive and Madison Avenue in the
City of Charlottesville, Virginia, approximately 13,498
square feet in area, and designated as Parcel 82 on City
Real Estate Tax Map 37, as shown on a plat made by Kirk
Hughes & Associates, dated March 4, 1994, revised
November 16, 1994, attached hereto and made a part
hereof. The portions of the subject property labeled
Parcel "A" and Parcel "B" on said plat were conveyed to
the City of Charlottesville by deed of George and Dorothy
Barkley, dated December 12, 1949, of record in the
Charlottesville Circuit Court Clerk's Office in Deed Book
148, page 239; the portions of the subject property
labeled Lot 12 and Lot 13 were conveyed to the County of
Albemarle, Virginia by deed dated November 14, 1994, of
record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 643,
page 270, and to the City of Charlottesville, Virginia by
deed dated January 11, 1995, of record in the aforesaid
Clerk's Office in Deed Book 646, page 181.
The foregoing conveyance which is made as a gift 1S by
QUITCLAIM only and, accordingly, is made without any warranty as to
title on the part of Grantors.
As evidenced by its acceptance and recordation of this deed,
-1-
Grantee acknowledges that Grantors make no representations or
warranties, whether express or implied, concerning the absence of
any "hazardous substances"
(as defined by the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, 42
D.S.C. Section 9601 et ~, as amended) or "haza.rdous wastes" (as
defined by the Resource Conservation Act, 15 D.S.C. Section 2601 et
~, as amended) .
Grantee further acknowledges that the Grantors make no
guarantee, representation or warranty regarding the condition of
the premises,
and Grantors expressly disclaim any and all
obligation and liability to Grantee regarding any physical or
environmental defects which may exist with respect to the premises.
Grantee hereby covenants that:
(1) No access onto Madison Avenue will be permitted across
that westernmost portion of the property hereby conveyed
which currently separates from Madison Avenue both the
Easter Property (Tax Map 37, parcel 85) and the existing
Red Cross property (Tax Map 37, Parcel 81).
(2) Buffer vegetation along Madison Avenue shall be retained
along the same westernmost portion of the property hereby
conveyed.
(3) Drainage and utility easements in locations shown on the
attached plat are hereby dedicated to the City of
Charlottesville.
This conveyance is exempt from recordation tax pursuant to
§58.1-811(D) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
WITNESS the following signatures and seals.
THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA
BY
David Toscano, Mayor
-2-
THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
BY
(J~~
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
The foregoing deed was acknowledged before me
Toscano, Mayor of the City of Charlottesville, on this
, 19
My commission expires:
Notary Public
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
\ A ( Il!~.~ ~ ~egO:i..ng deed was
V\J(l; U::/í \--, c:.r~Uì'S, Chairman of
Albemarle County, on this ~ day
acknowledged before me
the Board of Sy,p~rvisors
of ~~ ' 1~.
My commission expires, IL~y~é)
~ot ry ~
-3-
by David
day of
by
of
E)('^\ 'ò \ t A-
aTY
OF
CHARLOTTESVILLE
I
--J Uic"
OXRJRo
....
..
~~
010-. !WI"
RoAO
/
L1
0)
; 42 , 4' ~
@>
~ ;' 2 ) 4 ~ 6 7 0 . 10 " '2 ') ,. I~"
F @ (~®~ ('Ð 013 ~ @) -) (!> ,./(;;) ~ ~/(õ; 00 b 017, ( ø
~ 'h ~. 0 ø 05 @) (~@@ (D~.
" 370 )7" 370 21 20 ,;--,. 17 II
)II @) "ò.. .... 0 0 ~ii Îo)oò,¡¡,-s; ¡¡";¡';¡.. ...;¡,....
' )n RUTLEDGE AVE.
II> ,\: e . ", ~~, .... ~. _. _. ~
-t
~ 37. )7) 372 U 2] 24 2> 26 27 2!1
.., ~ "e;l~ »".,C!J ø 0 \",,-ii\~ ¡¡\"'!ÌI'~iò:",; I!!I"," a>,';¡,í; ¡",¡,,,
(/3) øØ0.~
o 0 )~ ,. )] \"V32 ], 30 2'! æ
](, 0 .!J'1;(. ·;;.ri)(i Õ0'ôy;;- 0
~.. .;'¡ - - ··T' - -, T".- r' ,...
-f. "G -.e
..... ...,
r-
SEE I.tAP
""
1
'---
r-
..." ~t\
tt.
~"..
o
'40 "Olf C
~~
RUGBY
~
.~' I ro~' r~\~ -" i ~
o 'P~'~\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oj
0~. \. "', ~.."~~~ ~é!5 (;5 @)?;~~"-~ é'Jø". ;.:f
(õ)"@ :~ lIS 26 I ..'" lIS'" ¡. e,,,
~ . .. .".~, '" . .-' $
.. " AlIGUsrA ~ ..", ---:
AVE. - " "'/~' I "' I·' ..~,~ ~t. IIS)Q@; 8 ~
~.~, 0 f .." j J I , !(,ò)!?~ !
~ ... ,1, /:""... ""t7~ ""..~ !!III! ~ , "")le~~
.' .'r:t\., .. ., ; ~:0\\", e . '" 1 ~ /~ ~ ~é-'" _, :'
@ @)~LJe @)@)0'-1"..l '" ~ .,~,. . ~ , !!I32@)~~I1>~
. _. ~,.~ ~.. 0 ,'" .. .
\ @ . 0, @ß¡;~ë"f;¡"'~~I® "," ª(Þ)<"~.. m .ø10l:~ :;" "\;.,-~". S"', "'~
\.. .~ .. "H-'._ ..,... _ ~¡\)., ~"".,. ,~.. -.
¡' ...... ""~"'m~. J -¡: {'þ eo ~
AMHERsT ~" _ _ 853 85.16 85"" "",.~ ~ ~
\~~ '. ·::~.rllQ~' ... .", (.. .. ..... - .>~ .. .. 01 0 0 e;:; :1
i OAf "".. M"n Il 8~.1, 8'54. e~4' 'r ê?fS' D~M~); 0~42 85.' Ii;' S:2 .<:) 0' .':: '~d'" J
o 0· . 0 0 ~ ".0 '" '" . c '" 0 0 I 0'"'' \
.. ..... . ,. '.. ... ,. "- w
\... ..... ... .. P'· ,~.. =.., , ~
.. '" "e""@"",,,.,., -0 ...._...~_.... __...... 60
8.,. 861 ~ !
.. ., ";" "'",; .... . 'Õ".. 8 ~,:2- ~~
.. · ~ ~ ~'" 'C-' \ ,
\.... ....... ... .." .... .... > r-- . "
\ ","",,, ,v,. I )¡
'\ ~ "~l~zXb
\\\"' ··or .."
'£
..., . 4) 00 4~
'.'~ ~~. ø Q.) 0
'ø - '~\ ® @>
0"~ .",,~~ 62 6'
r&4' 641~ .
. @ '....~ -~ ,<.
WESTWOOD
AVENuE
'~, ,,.,, ~. ..,., "
.. .. O. 50 " ~ "
0 ~0 0 0 0 0 @
@ ~0 e e ® ® ®
60 " ~ " ~ ~~ ..
..
ROAO
'-
r--
~
,
~ r;:
,
'0J
66
~
~
..,
1)
10
"
16
17
10
19
~
4
,
@
o
61
HARDWOOD
.....
-
!
SCALE
I"
100
, SECTION 37
° ·90-Þ6 :;)MèJO 90-Þ6 :37U
Zý69-96Z-ÞOg
Z06ZZ VINl;)èJIII '377/I1S31107èJVH:J
133H1S H;)IH lSV3 OZZ
SH3NNV7d J? SèJO)3I1HnS ONV7
S31 'v'IJOSS'v' :ì? S3HDnH >f~/>f
'9l '/ION 03S1113èJ
Þ66l 'Þ H:JHVW ,0Þ="l :37V:JS
'v'INID~/1I '377/I1S31107~'v'HJ
GB 73:JèiVd
'L r dVJIV XVi
:.10
,UIIHns ;)NIMOHS 1 V7d
-----
---
Þ66l
fuawaso3
aÕoujo..lO W..I0fS
fuaUDWJad
------
------
------
fuawaSD3
..laMas ¡(..IDfjUDS
,OZ fuaUDWJad
Cu/,y ,09)
...;> 171\1"';>/1/>' 1\10 S/O/>'J1'
73:JèJVd
>fIOM Uj fas
"x" palaSjl../::J
sfuawaSD3
aÕOUjD..IO WJOfS
fuaUOW..Iad
rr-¡
~
:::,.
o
:::J
,.
.
'N/'rf7d 0007.1 HV3Á DOl 'O'n'H V iON '":J,,
3NOZ 0007.1 NIH11M S3/7 ALH3dOtid SIH1
'.:13/738 ONV 3;)037MON>I ÁW .10 1S38
3H1 01 1:J3HtiO:J SI 11 1 VH1 ONV 1 'rf7d SIH1
NO 031 VIN1730 ALèJ3dOèJd 3H1 03ßllèJnS
). 77n.13èJV:J 311 VH I 1 VH1 )Jl1èJ3:J Á83èJ3H 00
'VINI;)èJIII .:10 31V1S 3H1 N/ èJoßllèJnS ON'rf7
03UI1H3:J Á 7nO V 'S3H;)nH ">ltil>l,, '/I';) 'I
NOll 'v'J/.JI1~3J S,~O)3I1~nS
,.00,80090 S
(0310N 3SIMèJ3H10 SS37Nn)
¡Did f'BZ.õ ' 13S OOèJ NOèJI S31 V:JIONI
¡D/d BLf' 'õ'd /6 L '8'0
9Lf"õ cj L6L '8"0
../a¡SD'3 .~ ) 6 L '8'0
v /1a/JDH I/.
qB /a:JJD'd L r d. .:1/ N
.l. DfY XDj
f'-M
l
69
"OO,ZÇøf'8 N
\
,
I
/
01 031 V:JI030 Á83èJ3H 3HV S1N3W3SV3 3;)VNIVtiO Wti01S 1N3NVWti3d '9
'377/I1S31107èJVH:J .10 ).JJ:J 3H1
01 031NVti;) Á83ti3H SI ONV NIVW ti3M3S ÁHVlINVS ;)NI1SIX3 3H1 NO 03ti31N3:J
ONV 301M ,OZ 38 01 030N31NI SI 1N3W3SV3 H3M3S ÁHV11NVS 1N3NVWti3d 3H1 '9
'073U N/ ONnO.:l SV SI NMOHS 3N/7 Á VM - .10-1H;)lèJ ·ONnO.1
SVM 3nN311V NOSIOVW tio.1 N0I1V:J1030 ÁVM-.10-1H;)lti .10 OtiO:J3ti ON 'Þ
1 'rf7d Zf' Z 'l £ Z 3DVd .'gþ l >1008 0330
377/I1S31107tiVH:J .10 ALI:J - "8,, 73:JèJVd
1 'rf7d Z£Z '6£Z 3D'r/d .'gþ l >1008 0330
377/I1S31107èJ'r/H:J .10 ).JJ:J -" 'r/" 73:JèJ'r/d
1'rf7d ZLZ 'lLZ 3D'r/d .'6£ t >1008 0330
377/I1S31107èJ'r/H:J .:10 ALI:J 3H1 .10 Oti'r/08 700H:JS
3H1 ON'r/ ALNnO:J 37ti'r/W387'r/ .:10 OèJV08 700HJS ALNnO:J 3H1
- ,,77/H 3S0èJ" 'ZÞ >I:J078 'z l 107 J? £ l 107
:S3JèJnOS 37111 '£
'1èJOd3èJ 37111 1N3èJèJnJ 'r/ .:10 1U3N38 3H1 1nOH11M 03tiVd3tid S'r/M Á311èJnS SIH1 ·z
SSOèJ:J 03èJ 7'r/N0I1 'r/N N'r/:JlèJ3W'r/ :èJO.:1 03ti'r/d3èJd ,UIIHnS 'l
:S31 ON
-M
ID/d OÇ '6'd '8L Z '8"0
L ÞL 'õ'd '8Þþ '8'0
sso../J pa¿¡ /DuoffDN UD:Jj..IaLUV .:I/N
L B /é):J../D'd Lf' dDfY XD}
3sn J/78nd
è]
'Q..
C/)j'è;'
C) c:
0) :::J
~ Q..
c:)
q
- ,
~
i!:::,.
. 0
è:J :::J
'"
,0
ji
.Q..
~
~
~
f"'"
".....
~
-....;;
~
~
C)
...
~
~
~
!=O
I\)
......
'15);)
NlJ
~
<J¡
a
'b
--
Q
......
"
~ .;
"
Ct4 -03-'15
96 ~J~~:·?~t··· \/,...:::2
'--" . , I . , . r " "T
[I: l... . (-.1.' (.:::....::.' k(_. >.'~ { .. r ,p'-'
j (.c·".V-·.J
.. I
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development Œ ~ W Œ
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 J'U\
(804) 296-5823 ~ I 3 1995
January 12, 1995
j
'\~RD OF SUPERVISe
M. E. Gibson, Jr
Tremblay & Smith
P. O. Box 1585
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: SP-94-37 Centel Cellular Company of Charlottesville
Tax Map 91, Parcel 28
Dear Mr. Gibson:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on January 10, 1995 unanimously
recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that
this approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Tower height shall not exceed 200 feet;
2. Compliance with Section 5.1.12 of the Zoning Ordinance;
3. There shall be no lighting of the tower unless required by a federal agency. All tower
lighting shall be shielded so as to minimize visibility from the ground;
4. Staff approval of additional antennae installation. No administrative approval shall
constitute or imply support for or approval of, the location of additional towers, antennae,
etc., even if they may be part of the same network or system as any antennae
administratively approved under this section;
5. The tower must be designed and adequate separation provided to property lines such that
in the event of structural failure, the tower and components will remain within the lease
area;
6. Tower shall be located within lease area shown on Attachment C.
...
,
Page 2
January 12, 1995
Please note that the Planning Commission also approved a modification of Section 4.10.3.1 of
the Zoning Ordinance subject to approval of the special use permit.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and
receive public comment at their meeting on Februarv 8,1995. Any new or additional
information regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
V~/:;:fr
William D. Fritz
Senior Planner
WDF/jcw
\./~c: Ella Carey
Crown Orchard Company
e
e
e
,
..
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
WILLIAM D. FRITZ
JANUARY 10, 1995
FEBRUARY 8, 1995
SP-94-37 - CENTEL CELLULAR COMPANY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has submitted a description and justification for the
request (Attachment C). Please note that the plan submitted indicates a revised building size.
The applicant proposes to construct a tower approximately 180 feet tall and an equipment
building. The tower is to be designed to accommodate cellular telephone.
The applicant currently has equipment on another tower on Carter's Mountain. That tower is
unable to accommodate the additional equipment needed to handle the increased usage of cellular
technology. For that reason, the applicant is proposing a new tower.
Petition: To construct a communication tower/antennas and support buildings on 234.16 acres
zoned RA, Rural Areas [10.2.2(6)]. Property, described as Tax Map 91, Parcel 28, is located on
the south side of Route 53 and is Carter's Mountain. This site is not located in a designated
growth area (Rural Area 4).
Character of the Area: This location is the top of Carter's Mountain. The area is currently used
as an orchard and a tower farm. There are more than 10 towers currently on the site.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff has reviewed this request for compliance
with the provisions of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance and recommends approval of
SP-94-37.
Plannine and Zonine History:
October 4, 1978 - The Board of Supervisors approved SP-78-42 (Motorola), a request for
a 200 foot communication tower.
January 18, 1980 - The Board of Supervisors approved SP-79-76 (Jefferson Cable), a
request for a five meter satellite receiving dish.
March 19, 1980 - The Board of Supervisors approved SP-80-02 (Shenandoah Valley
TV), a request to remove an existing 230 foot tower and replace it with a 186 foot
television tower.
e
e
e
May 4, 1988 - The Board of Supervisors approved SP-88-14 (Central Virginia
Educational TV), a request for 293 foot television tower.
September 19, 1990 - The Board of Supervisors approved SP-9--74 (Charlottesville
Cellular) a request for a 150 foot cellular telephone tower.
August 7, 1991 - The Board of Supervisors approved SP-91-23 (Charlottesville Quality
Cable) a request for a 200 foot wireless cable transmission tower.
June 9, 1993 - The Board of Supervisors approved SP-93-10 (WVIR- TV) a request for a
60 foot reception tower.
July 14, 1993 - The Board of Supervisors approved SP-93-15 a request for a 300 foot
multi-purpose tower.
Comprehensive Plan: A stated design standard of the Comprehensive Plan is "design public
utility corridors to fit the topography. Corridors should be shared by utilities, when possible.
Distribution lines should be placed underground." The intent of this statement is to consolidate
locations; therefore, since the tower is located in an area with many other towers, the application
is consistent with this standard. The opportunity to cluster towers is limited by topography.
Staff has encourage consolidation of new towers in existing tower farms such as on Carter's
Mountain.
STAFF COMMENT:
Staff will address the issues of this request in three sections:
1. Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
2. Section 4.10.3.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. Characteristics of Cellular Telephone Technology.
Section 31.2..4.1 of the Zonin~ Ordinance
Staff will address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zomng Ordinance.
The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the ri2ht to issue all special use
permits permitted hereunder. Special use permits for uses as provided in this ordinance
may be issued U'pon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of
substantial detriment to adiacent property.
The nearest dwelling to the proposed tower site is located approximately 2,500 feet distant. The
2
e nearest dwelling on adjacent property is located approximately 3,400 feet distant. This tower is
proposed to be located approximately 75 feet from the nearest Rural Area property. Lighting of
the tower is unlikely due to the fact that the tower is under 200 feet in height and other taller
towers nearby are lighted. Should this special use permit be approved, staff has recommended as
a condition no lighting except as required by the F .A.A. or other federal agencies.
Staff opinion is that the proposed tower will not limit use of any adjacent private property or be
of substantial detriment to those properties. As to the effect on adjacent property, please see
Section 4.10.3.1 discussion later in this report.
that the character of the district will not be chan~ed thereby.
As stated previously, this site is the location of a tower farm. Attachment C shows the location
of the proposed tower in relation to existing towers. Due to the existing use of this site, the
character of the district will not be changed.
and that such use will be in harmony with the pw:pose and intent of this ordinance.
e
Staff has reviewed the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as stated in Sections 1.4, 1.5
and 1.6 with particular reference to Sections 1.4., 1.4.4, and 1.5 (Attachment D). All of these
provisions address, in one form or another, the provision of public services. The use of cellular
telephones clearly provides a public service as evidenced by the expanded and rapid increase in
use. Sprint Cellular is a public utility as identified by the State. Based on the provision of a
public service staff opinion is that this request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the
ordinance.
with the uses permitted by ri~ht in the district.
The surrounding land is a fruit orchard and the orchard use will remain. (Approximately 30 fruit
trees will be disturbed during construction). Based on the limited impact caused by this tower to
surrounding activity, this use will not restrict permitted uses in the district.
with additional re~ulations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance.
Section 5.1.12 of the ordinance contains regulations governing tower facilities and appropriate
conditions are proposed to ensure compliance with this provision of the ordinance.
and with the public health. safety and ~eneral welfare.
e
The provision of increased communication facilities may be considered consistent with the
public health and safety and general welfare by providing increased communication services in
the event of emergencies and increasing overall general communication services. This facility
may be able to accommodate emergency service providers.
3
e Section 4.10.3.1 of the Zonin~ Ordinance
Section 4.10.3.1 states:
The height limitations of this chapter shall not apply to barns, silos, farm buildings,
agricultural museums designed to appear as traditional farm buildings, residential
chimneys, spires, flag poles, monuments or transmission towers and cables, smokestack,
water tank, radio or television antenna or tower, provided that except as otherwise
permitted by the commission in a specific case, no structure shall be löcated closer in
distance to any lot line than the height of the structure; and, provided further that such
structure shall not exceed one hundred (100) feet in height in a residential district. This
height limitation shall not apply to any of the above designated structures now or
hereafter located on existing public utility easements.
By the requirements of this provision the proposed tower would need to be located a minimum of
180 feet from the property line. The proposed tower is located approximately 75 feet from tþe
property line. This location was determined by the topography of the area and the existing
access road. The location of the tower is on the ridge in an area where the property narrows.
Existing towers occupy other portions of the ridge. Any location, other than on the ridge, will
require construction on steeper land. In addition more fruit trees would require removal in order
to provide access and utilities.
e
Staff opinion is that this provision is designed to prevent undue crowding of the land and to
prevent safety hazards should a tower fall. Historically, towers reviewed by the County are
approved subject to a condition requiring approval of a tower designed to collapse in the lease
area in the event of structural failure (such a condition is proposed by staff for this request).
This condition will protect the public safety. Relocation of the tower is not a viable option in the
opinion of staff as it would result in a taller tower and an increase in disturbance to the orchard.
Therefore, staff is able to support this request should the special use permit be approved.
Characteristics of Cellular Telephone Technology
The Board has previously requested staff research future tower needs in the County as related to
communication trends or technology. Although staff is still researching technology and demand,
staff can provide the following information regarding cellular technology. The technology of
cellular phones results in a demand for tower locations unlike the demands of other users of the
airwaves. The public has general familiarity with commercial broadcast on A.M., F .M. and
Television, including wireless cable. A.M. stations generally require a cluster of towers in low
locations. This is due to the fact that this type of broadcast relies on ground modulation for the
transmission of the signal. F .M. and television, including wireless cable broadcast utilize single
e
4
e towers for broadcast. Towers for this type of use are generally found at the highest available
location. These broadcast are generally only receivable in a line of sight with the tower.
However, with the use oflarge wattage for the transmission (in this area up to 5,000,000 watts)
small obstructions will not block the signal. This characteristic allows a single broadcast
location to serve a broad area.
e
e
All of the commercial broadcasts listed above are received in a single direction. That is, the
broadcast is made from the tower and received by the individual with no return of information.
Cellular use differs from standard commercial broadcasts in several ways which results in a
different demand for tower locations.
Cellular broadcast rely on line of sight for the transmission and reception of signals. This results
in the need to locate towers at higher elevations. The broadcast power at the cellular tower is
limited to 100 watts, effective radiating power. At this low power small obstructions, including
but not limited to foliage, can block signals. Even if the transmission power could be increased,
(the signal strength is limited by the F.C.C.), transmission range is limited by the power of the
hand held or car phone unit. The power of the personal units ranges from approximately 0.6 to 3
watts. This low power limits the broadcast range and increases the potential of obstruction of the
signal from small obstructions. Alone these two transmission power limitations result in the
need for multiple tower locations.
Another factor resulting in increased demand for tower locations is the limitation on the number
of calls which can be processed at each tower location at a given time. Currently, one cellular
provider has indicated that on one given hour, peak hour, up to 4,000 blocked calls were
recorded. These blocked calls are due in part to the limitation on the handling capacity of the
existing cellular towers. Increases in technology may enable each tower location to
accommodate more calls at on time. However, the limiting factor will be and is the number of
channels available for cellular telephone use. Using multiple towers effectively increases the
number of available channels in the system. This is due to "handing off' of calls which occurs
automatically within the cellular system. That is, when an individual places a call, the nearest
tower receives that call and utilizes a channel to complete the call. (As an individual moves
away from the original tower another tower takes over the call.) The fewer number of towers
within the system the fewer number of calls which can be handled. As the system matures the
coverage area for each tower is reduced due to the placement of new towers. These new towers,
by virtue of their reduced coverage area may be constructed at lower elevations.
Cellular use requires uninterrupted service, particularly for data transmission, such as faxes and
computer connections. This sets a high standard of reliability and quality. Technology to reduce
the need for multiple towers, such as satellite technology, currently is unavailable. The use of
monopole, guyed or free standing lattice towers is possible. The use of existing structures for the
provision of cellular coverage is preferred by the County and the service providers, due to
reduced cost. However, as has been stated previously the nature of cellular communication is
such that limited opportunities to use existing structures exists.
5
SUMMARY:
e
The hilly to mountainous terrain of Albemarle County, which results in "dead spots" in a
cellular system, has resulted in a number of request for cellular towers. This tower request is due
to a need to increase the capacity of the cellular system to accommodate the increased usage of
cellular technology. This request is located within a tower farm as is encouraged by the County.
The applicant did attempt, but w~ unable, to identify existing towers able to accommodate the
needed facilities. This tower is designed to accommodate the existing and future demands of
Centel and limited surplus capacity is anticipated.
Staff opinion is that this request is in accord with the provisions of Section 31.2.4.1 of the
Zoning Ordinance. It should not be of detriment to adjacent properties nor change the character
ofthe Rural Area District. However, the request does require modification of Section 4.10.3.1 of
the Zoning Ordinance. Relocation of the tower will result in a taller tower in a less favorable
location. Staff opinion is that the proposal is acceptable in terms of provisions of Section
31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance, as they relate to the Rural Areas District. Staff recommends
approval of this special use permit request and modification of Section 4.1 0.3.1 by the Planning
Commission and approval of this special use permit by the Board of Supervisors subject to the
following conditions of approval for the special use permit:
Recommended Conditions of Approval:
e
1.
Tower height shall not exceed 200 feet;
2. Compliance with Section 5.1.12 of the Zoning Ordinance;
3. There shall be no lighting of the tower unless required by a federal agency. All tower
lighting shall be shielded so as to minimize visibility from the ground;
4. Staff approval of additional antennae installation. No administrative approval shall
constitute or imply support for or approval of, the location of additional towers, antennae,
etc., even if they may be part of the same network or system as any antennae
administratively approved under this section;
5. The tower must be designed and adequate separation provided to property lines such that
in the event of structural failure, the tower and components will remain within the lease
area;
6. Tower shall be located within lease area shown on Attachment C.
----------------
e
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Location Map
B - Tax Map
C - Sketch Plan and applicant information
D - Section 1.4, 1.5 & 1.6
6
u
~I' I, '
·
I
·
·
I
I
I
I
J
7
~. \
~~
c
~
o
- ---------------
I
I
I
...........
¡.;~ÿ-I...........
- ..
. ,
" ". / .'.....'.....
^'..r",,, .
I'-A"' \.,'''',". I r
·...t;A
'"
ATTACHMENT AI
t,....
J
rw;¡-
~'..
@J./' '
, \
"* k=
. ,~
I
. G'.....
'- . .
.!.c,
·..~ð< "<~
..., "~,B
, , \
.. t
II'; J
\,.. I
I \
..
~".~,~
,~ Bu,"'.~·
01/
"I",
G("
'::'~4:
~..
./
~J
..........
"~-<-
~, ,,"
L~
It
~a'
.0')1
,.
1\
r
<J
~
...'"
,;)~
~o
~
.---~
, .
S~f
.\~
,~
c.... Mtn
"
...
'5'
........-
centel Cellular Company
of Charlottesville
-..
\
..
<¡...'
,,(
,.¡/' ,
~
~'
,
J'" I
......,
~
~'
,
ALBEMARLE COUN1
77
I ATTACHMENT B I
./~-
,~-~
'\.....
29
ì
\
)\\..-
'\
'\
+
---r ~-I-
""" .../
-----
19A
/'
/
/
/
'",
'-- \ '------..
"- "'-- )<. ""-. '- \"". ,
'" ) ) "~"-
"'\ t (I /"'1"
\ "'"" \( f / '" \.
\ "" '\
\, \ -\1-/
\ '\ VX> ---=--L \ \ ( ..
"" \. '--~ ------ "\ \ I
----.. ì '" "---- ~ ~ \ ~ "---.... ~y;"
J \.. .
1 Cellular Company_ l no \
- 37 Cente ·11 '-.J.' nc
SP-94- h lottesvl e .J' u~
of C ar ______,."
27
'\
28E
280
':1, __
SECTION 91
-
IATTACHMENT cl
DESCRIPTION OF __~QUEST: (Please attach add~~ional information l
needed)
Sprint, a public utility, proposes to install a 180' unlit cellular telecommur,
cations tower with related antennas and a 12' x 16' equIpment shelter In the
r;:¡rh~r'c: Mrnmt-;:¡in t-nwpr f;:¡rm fnr rp11n1r1r t~lPC'orrmunications. ST;'rint requests a
c::r=r;;:¡1 I1C:P r=rmit- c;pr;nt- ;:¡lc:::o rpc]lJpsts t=I modification of Section 4.10.3.1 of th,
7.nn;nCl OrrHn;:¡nrp to ;:¡llow rpnnrt;on of thp 1: 1 sptbnck as the tower will be located
;:¡pprnvim;:¡tPly Rn' frnm thp rrnpprty l;np. ~p towpr is pnqineered to collaose into
itself in the unlikely event of a failure.
JUSTIFICATION: (Please attach additional information as needed)
Sprint currently. leases tower space on Carter's Mountain for its cellular telephone
system, and that lease will expire. Sprint must construct its own tower in order
to support the necessary antennas and related telecommunications equipment to be
able to continue supplyinq reliable cellular telephone service.
T.;:¡nnnwnprc::: rnnc:::pnt- ;c::: ;:¡tt;:¡rhpn' c;;tp r1;:¡n ;:¡t-t-;:¡rnpn
I hereby certify that the information provided on this application
and accompanying information is accurate, true and correct to the
bes of my knowledge and belief.
71f'10
Receipt #
1/ -.93 ..q 'I
Date
FEES:
Private Club/Recreational Facility
810.00
-
Mobile Home Park or Subdivision
780.00
Rural Areas Division
990.00
commercial Use
780.00
Industrial Use
810.00
Public Utilities
810.00
All Other Uses
780.00
Minor Amendments
85.00
Extensions
55.00
Deferral (specific date)
(Indefinite)
25.00
60.00
For Daycare Centers
six to Nine Children
Ten or more Children
390.00
780.00
(Amended 6/3/92)
Off site Location sign
95.00
(Amended 7/8/92)
-
1~.2'·
~!-H.'
1:::~~
{--"~
,;~
.,i--=
- I
~t
", 'f'
/ . . .~) fl.~,-.
.# '. (, ( í ; "
ATTACHMENT a I Page 2J
,¡
II
1/
'1/--
-A¡:; ·VAf, '*'¿I,tIL
,,) *:.J -
:; 5! 197 ,:0,:;
/
,/'
/
/
_./; /
PROP~~"·¡; Ii. OF TOM:R % TA
roM:R ,-IEIGHT . 180'± (SnF SUPPORT)
lA nTUCé . 37"58'576" (NAG 83)
LONGiTUDE· 78'28'570" (NAD 83)
GROUND nEVA nON. 1450.2' (A"'.S.l.)
I
,
µ;:¡
~
ÞOOO4 .
U)=.
~
z~
ÞOOO4~
<,
~~
z::
::>ë
0:.:.
"':::1-
,.::t"-.
~
u)';;:
0::=
µ;:¡'
~-
o::~
<~
uc
~
-
~?
z=
ÞOOO4 r-
o::~
~.
U)
¡
i
¡
I
I~
I§
I~
,.
'~
g
¡;
"
~
~
'^
s
"
º
"
û
"
c
ð
VI
5'
...
'"
~
'-
«
;;-
4'
:.J
Jl
Z
«
c
< 0
C Q
æ,(OI.(')
..,,,,
"'N' I
tI'If"1'''''
:::::N:O)
o ....
;:::~~I
z·...
~·t3:O :C
8~~1 ;;
- ~ -
~~·ð ~
00:=
Z:;!!l.I:::
::Q=
r--.O::.I-
1'1'
1,11'.1111,1.'
II~;II/;:
., ',II
, ;;¡II
II ':'1
iWi~ill
'IIIII~I'I
himl
. '·¡W¡
TOWER GROUND AMSL rOWER AGL DISH AGL DISH AZIMUTH:J: i?EMARKS 111·:\
I":'\" - . II ·,1111
~ 1402' 296' A- ;30'! 7'06'50· i 'I
_u_.. -.-~ ----.- -.----. -- +--·---·----tU.----.----1 11111 ,.1.
Q , A-2 I 126' 127'3J'IO' I .'
~--t---- ---u¡--A_3 -,.- --,IÓ;·-n -- 313'OJ'So'-l 1111'11111
--.-. --- -.-------.------1--.-------- ..------..j 111111
Q ,A-4 105' 7'06'50' ,
~Æ=E :~:-= - ~~~_ -:_-t- -::-:-J-~_-=-= =1___ !'IiIlI~1
__~_JLu'460'-_~- ......!~________~C-_'__~---!.~---Tt_-0'02.4~. -1 DIS'!3TT!}P ~IJ·I'I.'!I
i::Q) ! :468' 310' D-" 20J' 356"49'40" I II ,
-- --.,----..-- ---~--------J--.--.- -.--t-.- --...---.....j
@ . ' ..! 0-2 ! 82'. -1 356'49'40" 11111/1111
(:¡d- -,me --,.,.- - - -; me:: ,-- t--;; t: 286';;';00- 11.1.'.::..1.'
-. @-I . - E-2! --- -:;r- -""34'30' -- 111111/'1
@ I I E-3 135; -- 216'-:s,'2~ Irllul
-i.:\ I - I I ---- -- - 1IIII'iil
\£:; 1459' 40' i I ill
_..@ 1456' 200' ----L--=-~-=-t~~-----_ -~===- IUllnl:~
~_ __C'37 _ n',""-+-~mLm __rH_ _~ /RlII;¡
......:..... 142J~ _ JOY! +__._____L___ - - .J ~lIlIIhll
Q lJ9J' 206" r ¡1/l1II1II
-(R)--I-;~~;.-- -- 90'---¡---- ¡----- ---rd-------.¡ !
(t)--!-059' - - - -- -;~--r--- - --t---------,T---·---- i :11"11
- e~H. J~;·---=t=_=----=_ 15~ ~--Õ-'::---- 'r--;98'3-:;0õ:_ 'r;lrllll
U1
'Y
Õ
>-
w
>
e:::
~
(I]
g[CINNlNC AT,..£ ,"T!.~SEC;:ON.)F FAr[' ~OUr:: 2C AND 53. "1.f~"'C£ AI.QNG SAID >.rOuTE
5J ·N ...h £ASTFRt. Y :JIP£C:!ON ~;>¡.)t:?OX/MA Tn '!' . C WfL£ -C ..4, DIRT QOAD ..¡ r THE SOUTH
q/GHr 'JF HAY :"IN[ OFîA/.') ROtd'[ 5J;"k£,~¡C=.LONG SA.'D ]fRT _~OAO; :JIRr ,~OAO 3EING
.. :5" ~IGHr OF ".,AY AS _')./-'O~ CN ~..A" iN GEED 30CK 85.1. ~"G£ 562 AND 663: .. DISTANCE
OF ù.97: 'AILES fa "¡'::>C'INi" A ~ '"7-IE Nf"S~ ~QOP:t:?-v -,,'IE ç,~ ~E\lOUNrAIN '-AND
"VuST ""NO Tk£ LAS':"" D¡;JoP~.t?rv _lYE CF ,r¡...,E C,l10ò+N ORC,LfAPD COMPANY; THENCE ALONG
5,1.10 :;/R T '?QAO, JIR ï R0.40 '¡O;~' BCING mE C£N TFRL:.'V£ QF -4 aC" .."'CRESS AND ~CR£SS
:ASEAJE,o.,¡;" AS S/-IO'MY 0/1 A ~:."';" " DEt:O aOOK ~5.J. >JA(;£ ~61.- ..\ ~ISrANCE or 2,.196.4'
'"C A POiNT A' ~E 9EGJ'VN¡NG Œ ..¡ :JRCPOS£D ::0' -4CCCSS f:AS£7tiE.'Jr.· ,"NENC£ ALONG SAID
/fiR' ROAD AIYO ,"'H£ CENn71L;N£ oF ;.AID ~OPQSED 20' ~CCCSS êASCM£NT AS SHOWN ON A Pl.Ar
9'" J.K, r"MwONS AND A!'SCOA rrs ;,1. TED S£PTÐJ8ER JD. ''1g4; ~ 0/STAN(;£ OF 5.229': ra
A POIN' ~, OkE £""0 Œ SAID PI1OPOSED ACCeSS EAS£MENr,· THENCE 5 4.178".16- Eo .'O.CO'
ro ~ 5CT ROD. rkl$ BÐNG "HE ?()iNT OF 8EGlNNlNG (PO,a.) OF A SPRINT CELLULAR i.£ASE
ARCA; ~f:Ncr ALONG SAIO ¿E"ASF .J.REA aOUNDARY ;.!HE N 46".17'.1"- E, 50.00' ro A SET
ROO. 'rk£NCE 5 4J"'28"26-::' 50.':0' "'0 A SET ::¡OO; ~ENC£ S .6'.1".14- ¡or, 50.00' ro A
SET ROO; "'CI'I(;£ N 4J"28''::6- W. :W.OO' "'0 SA.ID ROO, ~/S 8ÐNG THE p 0.8.
...E,AS£ AREA 4ND PROPOSED 20' .&CC£SS EASÐJENT ...OCAT'£O ON 'AX .'JAP ;91-28 AND
::IJRR£~Tl. r' QWNCD 3Y CROttN ~~RO COMPANY ;£ASE AREA . 1"000 SOfT (0.069 ,I.e.)
~t?OPOSED ;0' ACCESS EASCMENT . "24582 SQ.F'"" (2.860 ACR~Si
9
\.
\,
\
;
(
f
f
f
I
)
VJ
t-
~
t-
C
e:::
«
~1
0::
.......
C
--~Q ~
:c'- ./ \ --/
¿," / '\ .~ -.,. .-;;;
.,. .. , -r
. ,\ ~ / /,/
/ \, /1 _x .
~", 3 -:-~~
-(
" / 1/
," /'/;/
/ /' //
,/ ' /, / :> :/:L~:"
/ @' / /.'7' _
.. " ·x
, /. / . // ."" ·C"'·
./ 1 / /'<-uP ,
/ /"fX 5Ar ,~ // ~.-!:-e"<A' . -,.
, ¿ (}ISH ' /.
/ "'-' I " - , / ':if> '
,/ GG\' ,'x-!' /';:-~~.[ šl-"'" ro....
/ ..7:" v . C
/ '" -" -
.. /" .y/ \
,/ / ." '/ 0PROP
, "' 05ED 20'
.I ,- -/ ",~ , ~'i;m "~m'
/ ('~ CUY _5 / . / / /~" 2 860 AC':t:~NG ROAD)
,JO.a..cARAN " /
/ CE) ---x / /., /
/ . ~ / --k
.'X . ~S':'"7' r- ~ ,x. TO":' ;.
;,..:;;.; r" _ / _.. . Pf!0P0: "-
PIWI!~y , GA TE: TO":R
'8 qfþl£"~"!fi7l...' o.rA)
~.~ TOP OF Ròo.· 'l. 'u·
u:, , "!JOij':7<x -j.
J.;:'~I '\~
j,
./,'/
-/
.1
:/.".:.
/.~
/:
/
J
.,/,
_/0
Z,.
, ":::;'>~
./'
//
./'
./.
,/'
,/'
./'
./'
OJ ~/'
_<J~/~~-
./
,/'
./'
./'
./.
,/'
,/'
~.
./
.-"-/
~ /' ~I
~ 1.-(
_ ---=-- "-2
~ ~ ~
~\,,¡ ~ ..
"\.'
~... ~~.
2'
/:-'
,.
f
!
I
lO' ACCESS ~.AS[AJCN
t 'JF éX1ST:NG ~OAO)
2.'60 ,ACRC5
CROWN ORCHARD COMPAN Y
TAX MAP 191-28
234.165 ACRéS
0.8. ~ PC. _
0.8. -. PC. $OJ (PlA 'ì
;
TOWER DATA
DISH #
........... êõ
~c¿'-
lñô
V1.....,O:;
0'-'-
0: 0
UJ~
-~:..w
; t1:'l:
...0......
'"
'"
=~;::
c;(Ñ: i
OI'""N
a::N:1.O
N
=~-
-z..,.
~i3,a
v>a::~
j5,.
::l.. .,u..
<'" Z
tõð~
_. ; ¡'£l.
--'r::....
°UI_
"'-<..
1])0:::;t-
- /
,/\
, \
\
;JROPOSED
/,ALONG
,,-
I~
,
~
/.
-.
I
[
of'
EXISTINC
/
/
/
/
/
,/
../'
\ /
.. /
~/
ALE
_ .-'1, ~..
t- -. <"::;..xr:~ / !
--:'~J ""'7",' ~--~' ,-"
"- ~'" ·1-'
/, / 'J."':"""';'" .';.' -
I ~~ ~_"'$IT£/) r'· "1'
'~t - J~ .' //.
_'\ ",.:.",;:'
.\fA? ~.--.:..
f 2000
.:'
í
\
"
VICINITY
\,
\.
\.
\.
::oC
,
fEET ,
~ ~oo
" ~
:J'~ ~ :
.,
. .
SPRINT - CARTERS JlOUNTAiN, VA. SITE
LEGAL DESCRIPTIO.V
/\
/' ..
,/..
,/'
/'
./"
/'
/' r--~-
/ I .
~' ¡; .,' /
:: ;;0:'-"- - i ~ - ---/
".. ., , ,,' /------
./' .". v" ...~.')_... ./,'
. "'10 _~, .c ,.' rV "./
\I '9'-"'" .. " /./
." -c . l' ' / ¡, ,/
" /'
~' ~.";~ "
'y" ~ /
~.. A' ..
.-/ :f' ~ /
-\,/,/,' ~ /
: OCM~ /'
\ ..
. ,/
, ,/'
~"".........-.............
GRAPHIC
IS
'ncn
"
'j
." .
" ~:~~.~.
,1.- / ~.;: ',... .......""
".,\ . .,..........
. ./
." , \
'../;,ROPOSED 2d· ACCESS EAse"'eNT
"'~:':~JC ~_~6;' ~ .~~~~. -':.io.-'
··I/~
.. .:>l;J·';P;:;·:>"'E
"'w .gl-;:
g, 4/;. .;,'; J'e<
-A
..
:; ..//
~., /-
- 'J}
:;--; -
, .
. '
."-.
"
'"
..
:;
':A 5:~E.\
...
.~. ~
,
~.<:1 y~
'''':r
"
~- ..-
-'.'""
x.j
t
/
,/
j
; II.-
if
-/
../
~
t
.....
"
.
, "
_J
,',
--
-
5 :1'
.\E
J
C~"J"'=.;J:...
--- ~~
~ ~--:. '..
~ '; '.,.. ~ ~
....-'-
jf!'J' .
.
-
J.I;':
':-:)"5;-
''-'.t.:J"
:.'"J';:!
.......;
-...-..; '.
J 1 . ~:;
~. 1, .
¿-;.:
..
-"
,
J
" .:..~
.1-:'- !
-- :J ~
.-
',4,; .:.
,
\.
\,
>-
;
;.
;
/
-.
"
/
'.
- -
>
:\ :;..~' ......;..£:~ .t
-:-;~¡;-;: :-.-:;f"'¡I¡.'..
}3 :f~J "'I; j~7
15!, or: oj'),"':>~
------
'.
lJ96..- ro If}
~ r ~IYD ~5M;_
, \
, ~
;:
/
:t,
/
/
,I
./
j
/
"
"
"
,
/
Y
:/
/
,c
"F
.Æ.~-:~r;,::,... :iC'~ ~
~~ ~ç;-.¿?
:: E 747 ;>-:; 4:
'"
"
~UAS
"
"
CROWN ORCHARD COMPANY
TAX MAP 191-28
23..165 ACRES
O.B. 45.J. PC. B5IJ
¿N nR£ :.£.AS£ AR£,. '0 BE
CUARED, GRADED AND GRA \l£L£O.
U:..¡S£ AREA lJETA/£.
SCA£.£: /"= .10'
,-~AS£ AREA ~AS AP"Ro::m.,,A
JO APP/.f -"9fn ¡·:Or "'IIenj
"-A;- ~ IJC DISTURBED.
PROPOseD CHAJN-UNK F'fNcf
~.5' 'NSID£ LEAse AREA UNC5..
lEASE
AREA
(3000 50I"
--~--
-.----
,
.~,
¿
ô;,J;
',/;
:: ::: _ ,J'..!.
~ 'A .9'-
3 ~41 .:;-:;
Attachment D
1.4
PURPOSE AND INTENT
WI
..
e
This ordinance, insofar as is practicable, is intended to be in accord
with and to implement the Comprehensive Plan of Albemarle County
adopted pursuant to the provisions of Title 15.1, Chapter 11, Article
4, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and has the purposes and intent
set fo~th in Title 15.1, Chapter 11, Article 8.
As set forth in section 15.1-427 of the Code, this ordinance is
intended to improve public health, safety, convenience and welfare of
citizens I)f Albemarle County, Virginia, and to plan for the future
development of communities to the end that transportation systems be
carefully planned; that new community centers be developed with
adequate highway, utility, health, educational and recreational
facilities; that the needs of agriculture, industry and business be'
recognized in future growth; that residential areas be provided with
healthy surroundings for family life; that agricultural and forestal
land be preserved; and that the growth of the community be consonant
with the efficient and economical use of public funds. (Added 9-9-92)
1.4.4
Therefore be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors' of Albemarle
County, Virginia, for the purposes of promoting the health, safety,
convenience and general welfare of the public and of planning for the
future development of the community, that the zoning ordinance of
Albemarle County, together with the official zoning map adopted by
reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance, is designed:
To facilitate the provision of adequate police and fire protection,
disaster evacuation, civil defense, transportation, water, sewe~age,
flood protection, schools, parks, forests, playgrounds" recreat10nal
facilities, airports and other public requirements;
e
1.5 RELATION TO ENVIRONMENT
This ordinance is designed to treat lands which are similarly situated
and environmentally similar in like manner with reasonable considera-
tion for the existing use and character of properties, the Comprehen-
sive Plan, the suitability of property for various uses, the trends of
growth or change, the current and future land and water requirements
of the community for various purposes as determined by, population and
economic studies and other studies, the transportation requirements of
the community, and the requirements for airports, housing, schools,
parks, playgrounds, recreation areas and other public services; for
the conservation of natural resources; and preservation of flood
plains, the preservation of agricultural and forestal land, the con-
servation of properties and their values and the encouragement of the
most appropriate use of land throughout the county. (Amended 11-1-89)
e
I (/-, '
. ,
i I~, (l (!. ({.C
FEBRUARY 8, 1995
EXECUTIVE SESSION MOTION
I MOVE THAT THE BOARD GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 2. I -344(A) OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
UNDER SUBSECTION (7) TO CONSULT WITH LEGAL COUNSEL
REGARDING A SPECIFIC LEGAL MATTER RELATING TO A LAND USE
ISSUE.
2-S-95.WPD