The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1995-02-01 FIN A L 9:00 A.M. February 1, 1995 Room 7, County Office Building 1) Call to Order. 2) Pledge of Allegiance. 3) Moment of Silence. 4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. 5) Consent Agenda (on next sheet) . 6) Transportation Matters: a) Other Transportation Matters. 7) Request from Edward Cooper to participate in private/public partnership to get professional baseball league in Charlottesville/Albemarle area. 8) COReideration of rcsolution of intcnt to afficna the Gccnic Gtrcaffi CreeBin~ Ordinance. (Delete from agenda.) 9) Update on Revenue Projections. 10) Work Sessions: a) FY 1995-96 through FY 1999-2000 Capital Improvements Program. b) CPA-94-04. Economic Development Policy. 11) 12:30 P.M. - Executive Session: Personnel and Legal Matters. 12) 2:45 P.M. - Presentation by Greg Leroy on techniques to ensure public benefits from taxpayers' subsidies for economic development based on experience throughout the nation. 13) Appointments. 14) Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. 15) Adjourn. CON S E N T AGENDA FOR APPROVAL: 5.1 proclamation in support of the "League of Women Voters". 5.2 Appropriation Requests: a) Education, $65,791.99 - (Form #940047). b) Virginia Institute of Government, $2500 - (Form #940048) . 5.3 Resolution of support for the City of Danville, Virginia for a regional visitor's center. 5.4 Authorize Chairman to sign Service Agreements for Advanced Allocation Fund Loan: a) Charlottesville/Albemarle Rescue Squad - $45,000 for ambulance purchase. b) Scottsville Volunteer Rescue Squad - $45,000 for ambulance purchase. FOR INFORMATION: 5.5 Status Report on Mountain/Ridgetop Protection Ordinance. 5.6 Memorandum dated January 24, 1995, from Jo Higgins, Director of Engineering & Public Works, to Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, re: Berkmar North Extension Status. 5.7 Letter dated January 17, 1995, from The Honorable L. F. Payne, House of Representatives, re: unfunded federal mandates. 5.8 Letter dated January 20, 1995, from The Honorable Governor George Allen, re: proposal to eliminate Business, Professional and Occupational License (BPOL) Tax . 5.9 Letter dated January 23, 1995, from A. G. Tucker, Resident Engineer, Department of Transportation, to Ella W. Carey, Clerk, re: monthly update on highway improvement projects currently under construction and quarterly report of projects under design in Albemarle County. 5.10 Letter dated January 12, 1995, from James S. Givens, State Secondary Roads Engineer, re: changes to the Secondary System of State Highways within Albemarle County during 1994. 5.11 Copy of letter dated January 18, 1995, from David J. Toscano, Mayor, City of Charlottesville, to David R. Gehr, Commissioner, Virginia Department of Transportation, re: resolution regarding proposed grade-separated interchange at Route 29 and Hydraulic Road. 5.12 Copy of Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1994 (on file in Clerk's office). 5.13 Copy of Rivanna Solid Waste Authority's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1994 (on file in Clerk's office). 5.14 Copy of application dated January 5, 1995, filed with the State Corporation Commission by Central Virginia Electric Cooperative for a change in electric rates and to revise its tariffs. 5.15 Bond Program Report and Monthly Report for Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apartments) for the month of December, 1994. 5.16 Copy of letter dated January 11, 1995, from Julie L. Vosmik, Director, Division of Survey and Register, to F. Palmer Weber, stating that the State Review Board and the Board of Historic Resources will consider Malvern, Albemarle County for nomination to the National Register and inclusion in the Virginia Landmarks Register. 5.17 Copy of Planning Commission minutes for January 17 and January 24, 1995. 5.18 Copy of minutes of the Board of Directors of the Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority for December 19, 1994. 5.19 December 1994 Financial Report. 5.20 Memorandum dated January 26, 1995, from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., re: Buck Mountain Creek Permitting and Design Schedule. David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMAF Office of Board of Superviso 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 2~ M E M 0 RAN DUM Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive Ella W. Carey, Clerk ~ FROM: DATE: February 3, 1995 Board Actions of February 1, 1995 SUBJECT: At the Board of Supervisors' meeting held on February 1, 1995, the following actions were taken: Agenda Item No.1. Call to Order. The meeting was called to order at 9:04 a.m., by the Chairman, Mr. Perkins. Agenda Item No.4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. There were none. Item 5.1. Proclamation in support of the "League of Women Voters." ADOPTED the Proclamation. Item 5.2a. Appropriation: Education, $65,791.99, (Form #940047). APPROVED. Appropriation form forwarded to Melvin Breeden under separate cover. Item 5.2b. Appropriation: Virginia Institute of Government, $2500 (Form #940048). APPROVED. Appropriation form forwarded to Melvin Breeden under separate cover. Item 5.3. Resolution of support for the City of Danville, Virginia, for a regional visitor's center. ADOPTED the attached Resolution. Item 5.4a. Authorize Chairman to sign Service Agreement for Advanced Allocation Fund Loan: Charlottesville/Albemarle Rescue Squad - $45,000 for ambulance purchase. AUTHORIZED the Chairman to sign the Service Agreement. Item 5.4b. Authorize Chairman to sign Service Agreement for Advanced Allocation Fund Loan: Scottsville Volunteer Rescue Squad - $45,000 for ambulance purchase. AUTHORIZED the Chairman to sign the Service Agreement. * Printed on recycled paper Memo To: Date: Page 2 Robert W. Tucker, Jr. February 2, 1995 Item 5.8. Letter dated January 20, 1995, from The Honorable George Allen, re: proposal to eliminate Business, Professional and Occupational License (BPOL) Tax. Mrs. Humphris said she read the material and reviewed the attachment. She did not feel that this material was clear and realized that although the localities are complaining about the "hit" that they will take if the BPOL tax is eliminated, the Governor's phasing program extends over five years before this goes into effect. The chart that shows the effect lists a benefit to our locality of $4,626,600 that will be an income tax reduction that will come to some of the residents. The total amount returned to our locality will be $7,868,400. The problem with that account- ing is that this money does not come to the County to provide services that residents are requesting, but stays in the community. She does not think the documentation sent in justification presents a fair case as to the effect of abolishing the BPOL tax as proposed. Item 5.9. Letter dated January 23, 1995, from A. G. Tucker, Resident Engineer, Department of Transportation, to Ella W. Carey, Clerk, re: monthly update on highway improvement projects currently under construction and quarterly report of projects under design in Albemarle County. Mrs. Humphris said, in the future, when a change is made in an advertisement date it would be helpful to have a footnote added to indicate the reason for the change. It would also serve as a written record. Item 5.18. Copy of minutes of the Board of Directors of the Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority for December 19, 1994. Mrs. Thomas said there was a letter included in the minutes regarding water loss. Nationwide the best way to conserve water is to take care of the invisible water losses that take place when pipes are leaking, water leaking from the Authority's own pipes. This is apparently a continuing problem and she urges Mr. Tucker since he sits on the RWSA Board of Directors to take this issue seriously. It may be worth spending money up-front to detect water losses and do the kind of maintenance necessary. Mr. Tucker said the Albemarle County Service Authority has purchased some sophisticated equipment for testing of such problems and has an on- going testing program. The City also has this same program. Agenda Item 6. Other Transportation Matters. Mrs. Angela Tucker said she is developing a list of gravel road improvements by working with each individual Board member. She is setting up a hand-out showing whether right-of-way is available, what magisterial district the project is in, the estimated cost and other general data that she feels would be helpful in expediting gravel road projects in the future. This will be shared with the public, through the Board, once it is completed. Mr. Robert Tucker said he received a call asking if VDoT would consider installing rumble strips at Proffit Road and Route 20 before the intersection to slow vehicles and alert people that they are approaching an intersection. Mrs. Tucker said she will review this suggestion. Mr. Martin said he talked with Mrs. Tucker last week about Hollymead Drive. He asked Mrs. Tucker if she will contact Mr. Al Reaser directly to let him know what Memo To: Date: Page 3 Robert W. Tucker, Jr. February 2, 1995 VDoT decided it could or could not do. Mrs. Tucker said "yes". She will also send a copy to Mr. Martin. Mrs. Thomas said she thinks the residents of Grassmere have reached a consensus as to what they remember having been promised and would like to have that remembered promise fulfilled, but it needs to be discussed. Mrs. Thomas said she had called a meeting concerning Route 250 at Ivy and VDoT has come up with plans to widen Route 250. However, people were fearful this would produce a through lane and make it more dangerous to enter from Owensville Road. In reality, the residents were requesting blinking lights, stop lights, and the kind of solutions that a city/county would have to put into effect, things VDoT does not normally do, although it would be less expensive than the $250,000 it would cost to add the lane on Route 250. She encourages VDoT to continue along this line. The residents would also like some design help regarding what to do in the more commercial area in Ivy where there are no new proposals and the County does not have any ability to use its site development plan provisions or the entrance corridor overlay to require the landowners to do anything. The residents would like to get together with those landowners to see if something can be done to improve the unsafe situations. Mr. Marshall asked Mrs. Tucker who chose the new guard rails four miles out on Route 20 where the construction was recently completed. Mrs. Tucker said the guard rails were a special request by Ms. Jean Mickiewicz. The guard rails are "cortin" steel and fabricated to blend with the rural scenery. Mr. Marshall said these residents have only lived there about six months moving here from New York. He has received a number of complaints from other people in the area who do not like these guard rails. Mr. Marshall said he would like to be kept abreast of these things in the future. Mr. Marshall said he will advise the residents they can get a petition against these guard rails and present it to VDoT. Mrs. Tucker said these guard rails are being requested in many different areas. She apologized for not sharing this decision with the Board, but proceeded with the assumption that this is the preference people have expressed to VDoT. The residents can call her office and her staff will explain why these guard rails were chosen. Mr. Bowerman said he would like to publicly compliment VDoT and Mega Contrac- tors, Inc., for the on-going work on Route 29. Recently they switched to the new signalization at Rio Road and Route 29. This was done smoothly, Albemarle County police participated. Traffic was rerouted and it is amazing that the disruption on Route 29 is as minimal as it is for such a large project. Mr. Tucker said the snow removal last weekend was well-done. Mr. Perkins said the schools are also well-pleased. Agenda Item No.7. Request from Edward Cooper to participate in private/ public partnership to get professional baseball league in Charlottesville/Albemarle area. Motion by Martin to allow Tucker and Davis to proceed with further discussion for additional advice so the Board can move to the next step. Seconded by Bowerman. It was noted that this is just a part of the process, and the public will now have the ability to talk to the individual members of the Board and express their opinion on this request. Memo To: Date: Page 4 Robert W. Tucker, Jr. February 2, 1995 Agenda Item No.8. Consideration of resolution of intent to amend the Scenic Stream crossing Ordinance was deleted from the agenda. Agenda Item No.9. Update on Revenue Projections. RECEIVED. NO ACTION. Agenda Item No. lOa. Work Session: Improvements Program. Motion to accept the Capital Improvements Program as presented with changes proposed for FY 1995-1996 through FY 1999-2000 underlining the fact that the remove- ment of the Forest Lakes/Hollymead Dam Road will be brought back to the Board in the context of the Meadow Creek Parkway even though it is being removed from the CIP at this point, and that the Board follow through with staff's recommendation for the Crozet Park of $50,000 in FY '95-96 with $100,000 in FY '96-97 for the pool with the idea in mind that the Crozet community will negotiate with others and submit bids, and if that formula needs to be changed, they have the opportunity to come back to the Board. FY 1995-96 through FY 1999-2000 Capital Agenda Item No. lOb. Work Session: CPA-94-04. HELD. Set for a public hearing on February 15, 1995. Economic Development Policy. It will be advertised once. Agenda Item No. 11. Executive Session: Personnel and Legal Matters. HELD AND CERTIFIED. Agenda Item No. 12. Presentation by Greg LeRoy on techniques to ensure public benefits from taxpayers' subsidies for economic development based on experience throughout the nation. HEARD. FOR INFORMATION ONLY. A copy of the booklet "No More Candy Store" sent to each Board member, and executive staff. Agenda Item No. 13. Appointments. REAPPOINTED Hiawatha Green to the 1995 Equalization Board as the Rivanna representative. APPOINTED Jacqueline A. Rice to the Library Board with term to expire on June 30, 1999. 1999. APPOINTED Marian Schwartz to the Library Board with term to expire on June 30, APPOINTED Stanford Wilcox to JABA, to replace Lawrence D. Cabot, Jr. with term to expire on March 31 1997. APPOINTED G. Blair Turner to the Industrial Development Authority as the at- large member with a term to expire on January 19, 1999. Agenda Item No. 14. Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. Mr. Perkins asked that the record show that although he did vote for approval of the CIP Program earlier in this meeting, he opposes the use of Revenue Sharing funds for highway improvements. He believes that the state gas tax should be used for this purpose and not real or personal property tax moneys. Memo To: Date: Page 5 Robert W. Tucker, Jr. February 2, 1995 Mrs. Humphris mentioned something about a China request. Mr. Bowerman mentioned a meeting of the Sustainability Council in this building on February 11, 1995, from 9:45 A.M. and 4:30 A.M. He suggested that the Board members attend some of the meetings during the day. Agenda Item No. 15. ADJOURNED at 3:55 P.M. Attachments (5) cc: Richard E. Huff, II Roxanne White v. Wayne Cilimberg Larry W. Davis File RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR REGIONAL TOURIST CENTER DANVILLE, VIRGINIA ROUTE 29 - CENTRAL VIRGINIA AREA WHEREAS, there has been a long standing need for development of the tourism industry along the Route 29 corridor; and WHEREAS, this area of the Commonwealth is the only major area unserved by a regional visitors center; and WHEREAS, a regional visitors center would significantly enhance regional tourism development efforts currently underway within the Region under the auspices of Centerstate 29; and WHEREAS, Governor George Allen has included $200,000 in his recommended FY 1995-96 Budget for the establishment of a regional visitors center on Route 29 in Danville; NOW, lHEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, that it does endorse and support the proposed budgetary allocation of $200,000 for a regional visitors center on Route 29 in Danville which would service communities along the Route 29 Corridor as well as Route 58 and within the Central Virginia area; BE IT FUR TIlER RESOLVED that the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, does suggest the concept of a multi-jurisdiction effort to operate a regional visitors center and will coordinate with other localities within the Region under the auspices of the Budget funding. Adopted this M day of Pe-bi(/(aJ 1995, by the following recorded vote: ~ aye; ~ nay. w~~~'VU> CHAIRMAN BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS ATTEST: frfk;J~ FISCAL YEAR TYPE OF APPROPRIATION APPROPRIATION REQUEST 94/95 NUMBER ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? FUND YES NO SCHOOL PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: FUNDING FOR VARIOUS SCHOOL PROGRAMS. 940047 x X X EXPENDITURE COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 1300163100800100 AHS FOOD SERVICE MACH & EQUIP $11,319.49 1340093010930001 1211461101602000 1310460211600000 1310463324601300 1310463366580500 TEXTBOOKS TRANSFER TO SCH FUN TEXTBOOKS 24,302.25 27,302.25 150.00 810.00 1,908.00 $65,791.99 REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 2300151000510100 2340051000510100 2200016000161203 2200051000512012 2310424000240273 2310433000330112 2310424000240276 NATURE GRANT MISC SUPPLIES $11,319.49 24,302.25 3,000.00 24,302.25 150.00 810.00 1,908.00 ( ************************************************************************ $65,791. 99 LEARNING GRANT MATERIALS/SUPPLIES LANGUAGE/SPEECH STAFF DEVELOPMENT TOTAL AHS FOOD SERVICE TEXTBOOK FUND BALANCE FUND BALANCE TEXTBOOKS TRANSFER/TEXTBOOKS NATURE GRANT LEARNING GRANT LANGUAGE/SPEECH TOTAL APPROVALS: REQUESTING COST CENTER: EDUCATION DIRECTOR OF FINANCE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SIGNATURE DATE /--?~ -:9c:7 0(-:; -75- APPROPRIATION REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 94/95 NUMBER 940048 TYPE OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW x ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES NO x FUND GENERAL PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: FUNDING FOR THE VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENT. EXPENDITURE COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ,AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 1100011010580100 INST OF GOVT DUES/MEMBERSHIPS $2,500.00 1100095000999990 CONTINGENCY FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS (2,500.00) TOTAL $0.00 REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ $0.00 TOTAL $0.00 I ************************************************************************ REQUESTING COST CENTER: COUNTY EXECUTIVE APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE /- ::::z ~ - :;.s- .2 - } - 7--5- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS THIS SERVICE AGREEMENT, made for purposes of identification, this ~ day of h}rt~ti/ ,19<6: by and between the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), and the SCOTTSVILLE VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD (" Scottsville"); WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the County had previously entered into service agreements with Scottsville, dated October 15, 1987; July 19, 1989; and March 16, 1993, providing for the withholding of certain sums each year by the County from the County's annual grant to Scottsville, as set forther in said agreements, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibits A, B, and C; and WHEREAS, as a result of said agreements, the outstanding indebtedness now totals $35,700; and WHEREAS, Scottsville now desired to receive from the County Forty-Five Thousand Dollars ($45,000.00) to be used for the purchase ofa new ambulance; and WHEREAS, Scottsville now desires to enter into an agreement consolidating its annual withholding of payments by the County; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the operation by Scottsville of a rescue squad which will protect human life and the purchase of ambulance vehicles during the term of this agreement, the County shall pay to Scottsville Forty-Five Thousand Dollars ($45,000.00), which payment shall be made when needed from the County's fire fund. Thereafter, the sum of Ten Thousand Eighty-Five Dollars ($10,085.00) per year shall be withheld each year from the County's annual grant to Scottsville for a period of seven (7) years beginning July 1995 and extending through July 2001, with a balance ofTen Thousand One Hundred Five Dollars ($10,105.00) due in the eighth year (July 2002). Thus, at the end of the eighth year, which is the term of this service agreement, a total of Eighty Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars ($80,700.00) will have been withheld. This withholding consolidates the balance of all prior advancements as a result of prior service agreements with Scottsville dated October 15, 1987; July 19, 1989; and March 16, 1993. If at any time during the term of this agreement, Scottsville is no longer in the business of providing rescue squad services, Scottsville covenants that it will convey its interest in the ambulances to the County at no cost to the County for the County or its assigns to use for rescue squad services, All covenants set forth in the agreements dated October 1987; July 19, 1989; and March 16, 1993 remain in full force and effect. Scottsville further covenants that is shall not convey the ambulances or any interest therein to any party other than the County without the County's prior written consent during the term of this agreement. A copy of the title of each ambulance shall be delivered to the County within 60 days of the purchase of the new ambulance. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA By:Wd ~ 'l[~~L~LA - Walter F. Perkins, Chairman Board of Supervisors (SEAL) SCOTT VILLE VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD ( SEAL) ? -r;Le-~( {"l~,f.~/L STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this t -Ih day of j/,6A1.I.1iAj , 1995, by Walter F. Perkins, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, My Commission Expires: ~4i<. ~ ?(J, /19 ? / ~1te, ttr~a otary Public ?- STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTYOFALBE~E The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / q'!' day of l~l()l,nJ,I{/?) ,1994, by ~(}-I\a-c/'la/'--' rln9f) ) ~liL1."j).,t/LL' G , Scottsville Volunteer Rescue Squad. My Commission Expires: Y1X2cd \3/, } 1 q7 ~{(~ / (l~/J)c:/~:J Notary Public Approved as to form: ~#_L ~~.h"t torney ~~, C:IWPWIN60\PERISVRS. WPD , '. I Exhibit A t:b THIS AGREEMENT, made this /q - day OfY~ (the .County.) , 1989, by and between the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA, and the SCOTTSVILLE RESCUE SQUAD, INC. (the "Rescue Squad"), WIT N E SSE T H : That for and in consideration of the operation by the Rescue Squad of a rescue squad company to protect human life during the period of this agreement and the purchase by the Rescue Squad of a new ambulance for use during the term of this agreement, the County shall pay to the Rescue Squad in August, 1989, the sum of Thirty-Six Thousand Dollars ($36,000.00). The County, by agreement dated October 15, 1987, gave the Rescue Squad Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00), of which Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) is still owed. The sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) shall be withheld each year from the County's annual grant to the Rescue Squad for a period of four (4) years, beginning July, 1990, with a balance of Six Thousand Dollars ($6,000.00) due in the fifth year (July, 1994). \ Thus, at the end of the fifth year, which is the term of this service agreement, a total of Forty-Six Thousand Dollars ($46,000.00) will have been withheld. This withholding consolidates the balance of all prior advancements as a result of the service agreement with the Rescue Squad dated October 15, 19 87 . If at any time during the term of this agreement, the Rescue Squad is no longer in the business of providing rescue squad services, the Rescue Squad agrees to convey its interest in the ambulance and the ambulance purchased with funds per the October . j j 1 t 4 I 15, 1987 agreement to the County at no cost to the County so long as the County, or its assigns, will use the ambulances for rescue squad purposes. WITNESS the fOllowing signatures and seals: COUN RLE, VIRGINIA (SEAL ) of Supervisors By Clerk, Board 0 By SCOTTSVILLE VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD, INC. ~~~c::..~d i ~~. . fi~ 1# STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE The foregoing was acknowledged before me this .;?(j)U, day of ..Ju.,L;. 1989, by f?~ ~ ~~ Chairman, Albemarle County Board of Supervisors. My Commission EXPires:;4{~ w; (JCu..4 Notary Publ ic ;) '1 /993 STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE My Commission Expires: CZi ~~t;.f:J !/;/;:;; J.9/ /993 befor.e me this ~ day of ~~0. A /J ~ r.rlilllici8n~(JJ /~. I~. n 1M- The fore~oing was acknowledged 1989, by t'~ 1'". W~ Scottsville Volunteer Rescue Squad, #Leu; . Exhibit B r t"~ THIS AGREEMENT, made this I:; - day of Ocroa~ 1987, by and between the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), and the SCOTTSVILLE RESCUE SQUAD, INC. ("Scottsvillen); WIT N E SSE T H: That for and in consideration of the operation by Scottsville of a rescue squad company to protect human life during the period of this agreement and the purchase by scottsville of a 1987 Ford Horton 30l-P Professional Series Ambulance for use by Scottsville during the period of this agreement, the County has paid to Scottsville Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00). Henceforth, the sum of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) per year shall be withheld each year from the County's annual grant to Scottsville, for a period of five (5) years, beginning with fiscal year 1987-88, and extending through fiscal year 1991-92, so that at the end of the fifth year, which is the term of this service agreement, a total of Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00) will have been withheld. If at any time during the term of this agreement, Scottsville is no longer in the business of providing rescue squad services, Scottsville covenants that it will convey its interest in the 1987 Ford Horton 30l-P Professional Series Ambulance to the County at no cost to the County so long as the County or its assigns will use the property for rescue squad purposes. I . , .. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA ~-6Uk Lettie E. Neher, Clerk Board of Supervisors By ~ ~ J-' (Seal) SCOTTSVILLE RESCUE SQUAD, INC. By W'~~ c:....--- President (Seal) STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE . . The foreg.oing instrument was acknowl ged before me thisn ,., / fJ? day of (Or ~tj,{f.G , 1987, by' r . ,tf' --- ~l >,-;, ~(fr(l d{(lL- of the Board of Supervi ors of Ibemarle County,l Virginia. L My commission expires: 7-,ds--J1 QJ~ 0, 6l..~q-l ) tit /- NC)tary Public" STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE .,"2 The foregoing jnstrument was acknowledged be{ore~e~ ~3s cxd- day of Q~, 1987, by CLJ~1.u~ ~ , President, Scottsville Rescue Squad, nc. My commission expires: 7-~j~fJ ~ , ! Exhibit C , l ,1 I. 'i . , .. ~..'# THIS SERVICE AGREEMENT, made for purposes of identification, this /c- J'1I day of/1J/'ffZc/./ , 1993, by and between the COUNTY OF :i t 1 ; ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), and the SCOTTSVILLE VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD ("Scottsville"); WITNR-SSETH: WHEREAS, the County. had previoa:sly entered into service agreements with scottsville, dated October 15, 1987 and July 19, 1989, providing for the withholding of certain sums each year by the County from the County's annual grant to scottsville, as set forth in said agreements, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibits A and B; and WHEREAS, as a result of said agreements, the outstanding indebtedness now totals $16,000; and WHEREAS, scottsville now desires to receive from the County Thirty-Four Thousand Dollars ($34,000.00) to be used for the purchase of a new ambulance; and WHEREAS, scottsville now desires to enter into an agreement consolidating its annual withholding of payments by the County; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the operation by Scottsville of a rescue squad which will protect human life and the purchase of ambulance vehicles during the term of this agreement, the County shall pay to scottsville Thirty-Four Thousand Dollars ($34,000.00), which payment shall be made when needed from the County's fire fund. Thereafter, the sum of Seven Thousand One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($7,150.00) per year shall be withheld each year from the County's annual grant to scottsville for a period of six (6) years beginning July 1993 and extending through July 1998, ~ f ~ " ~-. - with a balance of Seven Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($7,100.00) due in the seventh year (July 1999). Thus, at the end of the seventh year, which is the term of this service agreement, a total of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) will have been withheld. This withholding consolidates t~ balance of all prior advancements as a result of prior seryice agreements with scottsville dated October 15, 1987 and July 19, 1989. If at any time during. the term of this agreement, scottsville is no longer in the business of providing rescue squad services, scottsville covenants that it will convey its interest in the ambulances to the County at no cost to the County so long as the County or its assigns will use the property for rescue squad services. All covenants set forth in the agreements dated October 15, 1987 and July 19, 1989 remain in full force and effect. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA ~ By . ~ vid . Bowerman, Chairman Board of Supervisors ( SEAL) SCOTTSVILLE VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD ~~ By ~, C 1I/9/~/If 41'// ~ (SEAL) &7_ -....... r;rz; /9.-f' U cJ ,c:: ,u /!?.-€ c.n /? ~ STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE The foregoing instrument /;(.~^- day of ~ ! was acknowledged before me this , 1993, by David P. Bowerman, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia. '. ~, f>\ [! ;\ '~ i ...... . ~ STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE My Commission Expires: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~''''.41 d. fl, Jl \J ",,' -r- It,-f!::- day of ,If j{v~l , 1993, by David P. Do....crman, j)~tc..t.,~ ~~."1f.l,..J1<!. Chairman of the Board of Superuisors of Albemarle County -: Virginia. My Commission Expires: '1- .!fJ'- 7'1 L...., -t' _~<-....:..._~- (j ~ Notary Public e ! TillS SERVICE AGREEMENT, made for purposes of identification, this ?rd day of Ff_bru.aj , 1995, by and between the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), and the CHARLOTTESVILLE-ALBEMARLE RESCUE SQUAD, INe. ("CARS "); WITNESSETH THAT, for and in consideration of the operation by CARS ofa rescue squad which will protect human life in Albemarle County during the term of this agreement, the County shall pay to CARS Forty-Five Thousand Dollars ($45,000.00) for the purchase of a new ambulance. This payment shall be made when needed by CARS from the County's fire fund. Thereafter, the sum of Nine Thousand Dollars ($9,000.00) per year shall be withheld each year from the County's annual grant to CARS for a period of five (5) years beginning July 1995 and extending through July 1999. Thus at the end of the fifth year, which is the term of this service agreement, a total of Forty-Five Thousand Dollars ($45,000.00) will have been withheld. If at any time during the term of this agreement, CARS is no longer in the business of providing rescue squad services, CARS covenants that it will convey its interest in the ambulance to the County at no cost to the County for the County or its assigns to use for rescue squad services. CARS further covenants that it shall not convey the ambulance or any interest therein to any party other than the County without the County's prior written consent during the terms of this agreement. A copy of the title to the ambulance shall be delivered to the County within 60 days of the purchase of the ambulance. , AI ." WITNESS the following signatures and seals: CO~TY OF ALBEM~, VIR~INIA By: L{) aJj;1J q-t~) (SEAL) Walter F. Perkins, Chairman Board of Supervisors CHARLOTTESVILLE-ALBEMARLE RESCUE SQUAD, INC. By: Jr:f>4-.:2;;, /k~~ Its: (I/Y'm;Ai / 2J~t?eT"cR... I ... (SEAL) STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this & M day of j{,~ ' 199<<, by Walter F. Perkins, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle /!ounty, Virginia. (/ My Commission Expires: p ~ Iu.-- :Jt-, /1'1 7 7/J/A /,L y ~~ Public fA/ ~ STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE fa VA- The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I - day of /.O'lj1nrJl ~) \ fJj Jjj;, U ~_,\ I - ~ ~ ~', I i,l , 1994, by /i/l,^ '{II ~, 0,j\J{jj~'(u I ,) J \. ) - ilc.J , Charlottesville-Albemarle Rescue Squad, Inc. My Commission Expires: L'7'r\(j;. ,31 --_iJ ;Q'11 {~,~ ' C!J1..<</lQ..r,J Notary PublIc c:\ WPWIN60IPER\CARS. WPD Approved as to form: -?~~ .::~t~torney ~. -.~~~ , ~ \' nS::10QI::] - '~~'''--'-'-----' I g;a L Z HWf PROCLAMA TION L.__ ~]_~ 1M D ~_. ~-- Distributed to EJoard: /-;2_7-:~ Agend. Item No. 1~ t!..~C7~~-?7 WHEREAS, February 14, 1995 marls the 75th anniversary 01 the loundinx 01 the Leaxue 01 Women Voters 01 the United States; and WHEREAS, the Leaxue 01 Women Voters, which was lounded in 1920 to help 20 million new women voters CArry out their new responsibilities, has worled lor 75 years to be a voice lor citizens and a lorce lor chanxe; WHEREAS, the Leaxue 01 Women Voters has provided nonpartisan inlormation on CAndidates and issues lor elections, encouraxed voter rexistration and inlormed votinx, helped xenerations 01 voters understand the structure and lunction 01 xovernment; provided nonpartisan, balanced inlormation on public policy issues to citizens, and worled to achieve xovernment policies that promote public interest; and WHEREAS, the Leaxue 01 Women Voters 01 Charlottesville/Albemarle 50th year oloperation, havinx been established in 1946; . IS In its NOW, THEREFORE, I, David J. Toscano, Mayor 01 the City 01 Charlottesville, and Walter F. Perlins, Chairman 01 the Board 01 Supervisors 01 Albemarle County, do hereby recoxnize the contributions made by the Leaxue 01 WODlen Voters 01 the United States over the past 75 years, extend heartiest conxratulations to the Dlembers 01 the Leaxue on the occasion 01 this anniversary, and oller best wishes lor the continued success 01 the Leaxue in the lu ture Sixned and sealed this 14th Jay 01 February, 1995. David J. TOSCAno Mayor Walter F. Perlins, Chairman, Board 01 Supervisors ,. \ I '!',. ,; -r~ y--- , "1 .,,1Jllcf ~ i JANI71$ To: Ella Carey, Clerk of the Board County Office BUilding 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22901 , iL From: Carla Sykes, Charlottesville/Albemarle 311-B Second St. N.W. (295-1254) '----. ---- RO 0'" S ---,,- ". "- . r-"""-.UPERV' League of Women Voters Last week I spoke with Sally Thomas about the possibility of naming 1995 "League of Women Voters Year" in Charlottesville and Albemarle County in recognition of the 75th anniversary of the founding of the League. The actual date of the League's beginning was Feb. 14, 1920 and we thought any celebration of the founding would be most appropriate if it could be held on that date. Since the beginning, the League has been an activist, grass- roots organization that believes citizens should playa critical role in advocacy. The League has always been strictly non- partisan. Our non-partisan efforts to provide voter services have included the sponsorship of debates among candidates for public office, servicing registration sites, and publishing information on candidates and issues prior to elections so that voters can become more familiar with them. Throughout its existence as a local chapter of the League, our members have worked to call attention to any number of issues at the local, state, and national level. One of our main efforts in the past year was to get "Motor Voter" passed and we were very active in marshalling the support that carried the vote in Virginia last November. Through our studies and publications in Charlottesville and Albemarle, we have also provided information on local issues, such as the recent study of governmental boards and commissions and the study of area transportation needs. In addition, we have held public forums on health care and a variety of other subjects of local and national interest. And through our annual legislative luncheons and other events open to the public, we have provided local representatives an opportunity to share their views with the community. The League would be honored to have the City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County recognize its contributions and would be happy to cooperate in any way to facilitate whatever ceremony you think fitting. Please call to let me know how I can help. And thank you in advance for your consideration of this proposal. Sincerely, ~~ Public Relations , .. RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT REGIONAL TOURIST CENTER DANVILLE, VIRGINIA ROUTE 29 - CENTRAL VIRGINIA AREA WHEREAS: There has been a long standing need for development of the tourism industry along the Route 29 corridor; and WHEREAS: This area of the Commonwealth is the only major area unserved by a regional visitors center; and WHEREAS: A regional visitors center would significantly enhance regional tourism development efforts currently underway within the Region under the auspices of Centerstate 29; and WHEREAS: Governor George Allen has included $200,000 in his recommended FY 1995-96 Budget for the establishment of a regional visitors center on Route 29 in Danville; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the of Virginia that it does endorse and support the proposed budgetary allocation of $200,000 for a regional visitors center on Route 29 in Danville which would service communities along the Route 29 Corridor as well as Route 58 and within the Central Virginia Area; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the of , Virginia does suggest the concept of a multi-jurisdiction effort to operate a regional visitors center and will coordinate with other localities within the Region under the auspices of the Budget funding. Approved this_day of Vote: _yes no. 1995 by the following Mayor ATTEST: Clerk f. ~ ~ David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S. Martin R ivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller MEMO TO: Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance FROM: Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC DATE: February 6, 1995 SUBJECT: Appropriations Approved on February 1, 1995 At the Board's meeting on February 1, 1995, the following appropriations were approved: Appropriation Form #940047 for Various school Programs in FY 1994-95 in the amount of $65,791.99. Appropriation Form #940048 for funding for the Virginia Institute of Government in FY 1994-95 in the amount of $2,500.00. The signed appropriation forms are attached. EWC:len Attachments (4) cc: Carole A. Hastings Roxanne White File * Printed on recycled paper ( .. FISCAL YEAR TYPE OF APPROPRIATION APPROPRIATION REQUEST 94/95 NUMBER ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? FUND YES NO SCHOOL PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: FUNDING FOR VARIOUS SCHOOL PROGRAMS. 940047 x X X EXPENDITURE COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 1300163100800100 AHS FOOD SERVICE MACH & EQUIP $11,319.49 1340093010930001 1211461101602000 1310460211600000 1310463324601300 1310463366580500 TEXTBOOKS TRANSFER TO SCH FUN TEXTBOOKS 24,302.25 27,302.25 150.00 810.00 1,908.00 $65,791.99 REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 2300151000510100 2340051000510100 2200016000161203 2200051000512012 2310424000240273 2310433000330112 2310424000240276 NATURE GRANT MISC SUPPLIES $11,319.49 24,302.25 3,000.00 24,302.25 150.00 810.00 1,908.00 I ************************************************************************ $65,791.99 LEARNING GRANT MATERIALS/SUPPLIES LANGUAGE/SPEECH STAFF DEVELOPMENT TOTAL AHS FOOD SERVICE TEXTBOOK FUND BALANCE FUND BALANCE TEXTBOOKS TRANSFER/TEXTBOOKS NATURE GRANT LEARNING GRANT LANGUAGE/SPEECH TOTAL APPROVALS: REQUESTING COST CENTER: EDUCATION DIRECTOR OF FINANCE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SIGNATURE DATE /-,<~-;;~ 0<-1-75- . , " APPROPRIATION REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 94/95 NUMBER 940048 TYPE OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW x ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES NO x FUND GENERAL PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: FUNDING FOR THE VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENT. EXPENDITURE COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION . AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 1100011010580100 INST OF GOVT DUES/MEMBERSHIPS $2,500.00 1100095000999990 CONTINGENCY FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS (2,500.00) TOTAL $0.00 REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ $0.00 TOTAL $0.00 I ************************************************************************ REQUESTING COST CENTER: COUNTY EXECUTIVE APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE /- ;:z ~ - ~.s- ,2 - J- J.s- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE '\ \ .!, lJ JAN 2 6 \9Clj EXECUTNE SUMMARY \RD OF SU~.~~VI(, AGENDA TITI,E: Appropriations - Education AGENDA DA TR: February 1, 1995 ACTION: Di~,~r;hut,;,; to H~m)\f ~:-~~~~ I~.~",~-!, lit'.'~1 I']" ~t!J?:."A~ 5""2- 'L'....,LI'!:l.....il...:.J.~~_ INFORMATION: SITRJRCT/PROPOSA I JREQTTEST: Request approval of Appropriation # 940047 in the amount of $65,791.99 CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: X INFORMATION: ST A FF CONT ACT(S): Mr. Tucker, Ms. White, Mr. Breeden REVIEWED RV: RACKGROIJND: At its meeting of January 9, 1995, the School Board approved and requested appropriation / reappropration of funds for several education funds and grants. DISCTTSSION: 'The reappropriation of the Albemarle High School Food Service Program Fnnd Balance. The Albemarle High School Food Service Program had a fund balance of$II,391.49 at the end of the 1993-94 fiscal year. The funds will be used to purchase new equipment for the program. The reappropriation of the fund balance for the Textbook Fund in the amount of $24,302.25. Also request appropriation of $3,000 for anticipated collection as a result of debt set-off collections. These funds will be used to purchase new textbooks. The appropriation of the Gardening for Nature Grant received by Stony Point Elementary School in the amount of $150.00 from the Department of Natural Resources, Virginia Museum of Natural History. This grant is designed to actively demonstrate to children the mutual and symbiotic relationships that plants have with animals, natural environmental elements, and people. Through project activities all children at Stony Point Elementary will be involved in planting and maintaining the Companion garden and also in follow up activities to observe the garden areas over time, data collection, and development of journal entries describing their observations through both personal written entries and scientific illustrations. The appropriation from the Department of Education for the Learn and Service America Program in the amount of $810.00 for Henley Middle School. This project will allow students to enhance their academic, citizenship, and personal skills by participating in school/community service-learning programs. The appropriation of $1,908.00 from the Department of Education for the Sign Language/Speech Minigrant. The funds will be used to increase school-based interpreting skills of our interpreters through course work provided by community colleges and Emersion Week Virginia School for the Deaf and Blind. RECOMMRNDA TION: Staff recommends approval of Appropriation #940047 in the amount of $65,791.99 as detailed. 94oo47.WP5 95.013 APPROPRIATION REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 94/95 NUMBER TYPE OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES NO FUND SCHOOL PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: FUNDING FOR VARIOUS SCHOOL PROGRAMS. 940047 x X X EXPENDITURE COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 1300163100800100 AHS FOOD SERVICE MACH & EQUIP $11,319.49 1340093010930001 TEXTBOOKS TRANSFER TO SCH FUN 24,302.25 1211461101602000 TEXTBOOKS 27,302.25 1310460211600000 NATURE GRANT MISC SUPPLIES 150.00 1310463324601300 LEARNING GRANT MATERIALS/SUPPLIES 810.00 1310463366580500 LANGUAGE/SPEECH STAFF DEVELOPMENT 1,908.00 TOTAL $65,791. 99 REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 2300151000510100 2340051000510100 2200016000161203 2200051000512012 2310424000240273 2310433000330112 2310424000240276 AHS FOOD SERVICE TEXTBOOK FUND BALANCE FUND BALANCE TEXTBOOKS TRANSFER/TEXTBOOKS NATURE GRANT LEARNING GRANT LANGUAGE/SPEECH TOTAL $11,319.49 24,302.25 3,000.00 24,302.25 150.00 810.00 1,908.00 I ************************************************************************ $65,791. 99 REQUESTING COST CENTER: EDUCATION APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DATE /--?~-?~ cX-1-fs- ., . .....<-... ;"'_.. IS ~1 \ \ \'(, ~ t~~;c- ~"'." c."... c r"""-- 1'; 1Ml, ~ 9J5 ~. \.. i JIIIW' ~~;;~-:. "RO OF ' <_~"O -'.,<-",,,,,...,..-~.""'~ ALBEMARLE COUN1Y PUBLIC SCHOOLS Memorandum DATE: January 16, 1995 TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive I." ~ Carole A. Hastings, Acting superintendent~J FROM: RE: Request for Appropriation At its meeting on January 9, 1995, the School Board approved the following: o The reappropriation of the Albemarle High School Food Service Program Fund Balance. The Albemarle High School Food Service Program had a fund balance of $11,319.49 at the end of the 1993-94 fiscal year. The funds will be used to purchase new equipment for the program. o The reappropriation of the fund balance for the Textbook Fund in the amount of $24,302.25. Also request appropriation of $3,000 for anticipated collection as a result of debt set-off collections. These funds will be used to purchase new textbooks. o The appropriation of the Gardening for Nature Grant received by stony Point Elementary School in the amount of $150.00 from the Department of Natural Resources, virginia Museum of Natural History. This grant is designed to actively demonstrate to children the mutual and symbiotic relationships that plants have with animals, natural environmental elements, and people. Through project activities all children at stony Point Elementary will be involved in planting and maintaining the Companion garden and also in follow up activities to observe the garden areas over time, data collection, and development of journal entries describing their observations through both personal written entries and scientific illustrations. o The appropriation from the Department of Education for the Learn and Serve America Program in the amount of $810.00 for Henley Middle School. This project will allow students to enhance their academic, citizenship, and personal skills by participating in school/community service-learning programs. o The appropriation of $1,908.00 from the Department of Education for the Sign Language/Speech Minigrant. The funds will be used to increase school-based interpreting skills of our interpreters through course work provide by community colleges and Emersion Week at virginia School for the Deaf and Blind. It is requested that the Board of Supervisors amend the appropriation ordinance to receive and disburse these funds as displayed on the attachment. CAH/smm xc: Melvin Breeden Ed Koonce t/Ella Carey ." " Revenue 2-3001-51000-510100 Expenditures 1-3001-63100-800100 Revenue 2-3400-51000-510100 2-2000-16000-161203 2-2000-51000-512012 Expenditure 1-3400-93010-930001 1-2114-61101-602000 Revenue 2-3104-24000-240273 Expenditures 1-3104-60211-600000 ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1994-95 APPROPRIATION REQUEST Reappropriation - AHS Food Service Program Appropriation Fund Balance Machinery/Equipment-New Reappropriation - Textbook Fund Appropriation Fund Balance Textbook Fund Transfer-Textbook Fund Transfer School Operations Textbooks Gardenin~ for Nature Grant Gardening for Nature Grant Miscellaneous Supplies $11,319.49 $11,319.49 $24,302.25 $3,000.00 $24.302.25 $51,604.50 $24,302.25 $27.302.25 $51,604.50 $150.00 $150.00 Learn & Serve Virginia School Based Services Learning Grant REVENUE 2-3104-33000-330112 EXPENDITURE 1-3104-63324-601300 REVENUE 2-3104-24000-240276 EXPENDITURE 1-3104-63366-580500 Learn & Serve Grant Materials & Supplies Sign Language/Speech Minigrant Sign/Language/Speech Minigrant Staff Development $810.00 $810.00 $1,908.00 $1,908.00 ...,.,... <)~lli~~\'!l~ COUNTY OF ALBEMARLri~j lU . 2 6 III) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY \RD OF SUPERVlc AGENDA TITLE: Appropriation Virginia Institute of Government AGENDA DATI':: February 1, 1995 AC.TION: Distributed l~~~cr'~~: ~5 ~5 e?~t?(fV .Agenda Item No___ INFORMATION: SIJRJEC.T IPROPOSA I JREQlJEST: Request approval of Appropriation #940048 in the amount of $2,500 for membership in the Virginia Institute of Government. C.ONSENT AGENDA: Af:TION: X INFORMATION: A TT AC.HMF:NTS: yes STAFF C.ONTAC.T(S): Mr. Tucker, Ms. White REVIEWED BY: r- RAf:KGROIJND: The Virginia Institute of Government was formed in 1994 through a coaltion of public officials, associations and university faculty to provide a comprehensive program of training, technical assistance and information resources to local governments throughout the state. Funding for the Institute was to come from the State, as well as anticpated contributions from localities interested in accessing their services. Last year the General Assembly appropriated $525,000 for the biennium to enable the Institute to begin its intitial work program, although the second year funding of $350,00 has been recommended for elimination in the Governor's budget. Budget amendments to restore funding have been submitted and Institute leaders are hopeful that the Legislature will continue the initial start up fund. The Insitute has assured localties that the program will continue even if state funding is not forthcoming. mSf:nSSION: The Institute has requested a contribution of $2,500 from Albemarle County for the second half of FY 1994-95; a full year contribution, which will be submitted as part of the FY 1995-96 budget request, would be $5,000.This is based on a membershiop contribution formula recommended by a task force of public officials, which for Albemarle is based on a population bracket of 70,000 to 100,000. Attached for your information is a detailed workprogram for the Institute over the next two years, which includes technical assistance and traininig opportunitie, as well as the ability to join an information network with other public officials throughout the state. REf:OMMRNDATION: Staff recommends appropriating $2,500 as Albemarle's voluntary contribution to the Institute for the remainder of the fiscal year. If the Institute is able to become the information clearing house and training network for local governments that it proposes, it will be a valuable resource for Albemarle County and one worth joining. However, staff will continue to assess the services and benefits of the Institue as it develops to determine if future contributions are in the County's best interest. INSTITUTE.WP5 95.012 APPROPRIATION REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 94/95 NUMBER 940048 TYPE OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW x ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES NO x FUND GENERAL PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: FUNDING FOR THE VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENT. EXPENDITURE COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION . AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 1100011010580100 INST OF GOVT DUES/MEMBERSHIPS $2,500.00 1100095000999990 CONTINGENCY FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS (2,500.00) TOTAL $0.00 REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ $0.00 TOTAL $0.00 ( ************************************************************************ REQUESTING COST CENTER: COUNTY EXECUTIVE APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE /- ::Z~-)J.s- .2 - J-J..s- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS . Work Program Highlights Virginia Institute of Government li!I'!II~'III!I.,III.~~11111'1:1.11 This work program for the Institute of Government's first biennium highlights 20 targeted initiatives that have grown out of a series of 7 regional dialogues and a statewide Summit meeting, held in the fall of 1994, to assess the needs of Virginia's local governments. At those forums a total of almost 350 representatives of local governments, professional associations, higher education institutions, and state agencies identified a list of over 200 urgent local government priorities. Those priorities are set forth in the Final Report of the Regional Dialogues on Local Government Needs and the Final Report of the November Summit, both issued by the Institute. The Institute is charged with delivering and broke ring programs and services to Virginia's local governments in three main areas: + education and leadership development for elected and appointed officials; + technical data, information banks, and data bases on local government statistics, operations, and trends; + information and applied research on various aspects of local government. The items highlighted is this work program are those identified as: (a) being the most visible and responsive; (b) having the greatest impact; (c) reaching the most people; and (d) being the most feasible, given the available resources and time needed to accomplish them. The Institute will continue to work with its major shareholders in developing and delivering these programs and services. ,:::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::'1 Year 1 (Ending June 30 1995) ...........,................................... , ::I::~:lar.Qlla.t.lQnrI: ;:;::;::t::~;::~;::::::t:::;;;tt}:::::::::{;:;}}tt{t} 1. Design and implement a local government forum as part of the Virginia Govemor's Forum Online, the Commonwealth's public information system on American Online. Reconfigure, enhance and expand the database of the electronic bulletin board currently maintained by the Center for Public Service, to make it mor~ accessible, expansive and user-friendly to local governments. 2. In conjunction with Technical Advisory Group, design and procure the necessary resources to develop a common database for the Institute to support Virginia local government through major nationwide networks, such as Internet and commercial telecommunication services. Also provide user-friendly interfaces to other available databases provided by third parties. 3. Develop an inventory of existing types of local government data and technical resources, along with the information on how data can be accessed and obtained. Page 1 Work Program Highlights Vlrg/n/lllnstitute of Government 4. Create and regularty issue a statewide training calendar that identifies seminars, conferences, and other training opportunities available to local govemment officials within Virginia. This calendar will be available through the Governor's Forum Online and the bulletin board, as well as more traditional means. 5. Develop a clearinghouse and 'one-stop shop' that will identify those localities (and contact persons) who are involved in innovative strategies for implementing high performance organizations, total quality management, re-engineering or reinventing government, and improving customer service. This clearinghouse will be developed in cooperation with the Vifginia Innovation Group and be made available through the Governor's Forum Online, the Innovation Group's Prodigy service and the Institute's bulletin board, as well as more traditional means. Yellr 2 (July 1, 1995 to June 30, 1996) 6. Develop and implement the Institute database with a common interface with other available local government data services. Access to these databases will be provided through Internet, various regional freenets, commercial services, and through a bulletin board service. 7. Produce a directory of the inventory of available local government data sources and technical resources serving the localities in Virginia. 8. Expand the clearinghouse to include information on: a. training resources--in organizational development, human resources management, skills areas. b. university internships. c. other innovations & best practices. I::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::t::::::t::::::::::t:::::t:::::::::}::::::::::::::I Yellr 1 (Ending June 30 1995) ...................................................................................... ' i::ii::i:::::::::::::I1:B{I{ftl::i:::::::::i::::: .............................................................. 9. Make available technical training provided in-house and through third- party sources in areas of technology specifically needed by local government, such as in basic computer applications and communications. 10. Offer a series of 1- and 2-day seminars in specific strategies and skills needed to promote effective organizational change-for example, Managing Groups and Teams, Using the Myers-Briggs to Understand Leadership Styles. These seminars will be delivered either regionally or on-site, as requested by local governments, boards, authorities, commissions, and similar local and regional entities. 11. Deliver two 1-day seminars on local government personnel law and related issues for managers and department heads, conducted by the Local Govemment Attomeys of Virginia, Inc. These seminars will be presented regionally, one in Southwest Virginia and the other in the Richmond metro area. 12. Work with the appropriate legislative and local govemment officials and professional associations to deliver a 1-day seminar on issues related to the BPOL tax and audits, scheduled soon after the 1995 General Assembly session. Page 2 Work Program Highlights Virginia Institute of Government 13. To reexamine the current curriculum of SEI and MEP to take advantage of current training approaches in creating high performance organizations. In collaboration with all Virginia universities, offer an expanded program of leadership development training, to include the Management Excellence Program (MEP) and the Senior Executive Institute (SEI), as well as an enhanced SEI Alumni program. 14. Establish a task force of representatives from the Virginia Municipal League, the Virginia Association of Counties, the Virginia Association of Locally Elected Constitutional Officers, the Virginia Tech Cooperative Extension Service, and the Institute to identify the most critical training needs for mayors, board chairs, constitutional officers, and other local elected officials. Year 2 (July 1, 1995 to June 30, 1996) 15. Make available needed technical training in (a) accessing the Institute electronic database and (b) in specialized software programs to support the database. 16. Design and begin to deliver training programs for mayors, board chairs, constitutional officers and other local elected officials, as identified by the special task force (see item 14, above). 17. Identify qualified persons to design and deliver a training program on benchmarking. 18. Continue to offer a series of regional or on-site seminars in strategies and skills needed to promote effective organizational change; continue to offer MEP and SEI. Include similar regional programs from Virginia universities, as requested by localities. _'.11I1 ~:r 1 :::I~:::ln:~~U:~~;a::9:egiOnal Summi~. which are geographically or topically oriented, done in partnership with local government, and are community-generated and community-based. 1<<<:I'fIII:r:::':':lr'i:I<li':<<<1 Vi 1 ................................................................................ ear ............................................. .............................. il:I:lilll~il~:.~!II~1120. (Ending June 30, 1995) Work with Institute liaisons to identify specific technical assistance needs of boards, commissions, authorities, and similar local and regional entities. November 18, 1994 Page 3 .! .c:: .~ ..... .c:: .~ ::t e e 0) ~ ~ .. ~ .. . .. - &I >- c:: CD e e f 0 (!) .... 0 .! ::s Ol ~ ~ e ~ CI) c oS 8 ::J III "!! &I .1" 11> 8 ~ o~ ..... 2' .!! ~ e ~ C 2' 81 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0:: II Oc; 0 .S ~ II ~ 2: l!! i Oil!! ~ 2' ) :! ~ e>> 0:: 0 E l! ..... ~ E c( E ~ e e c( C 2' S 2 E .r; 'e ~ III 0 E vi "2 &l c iij 'il!! ~ ~ 0 'c; II II II ::J "E C '" ..... II 0 ~ ~ ..... ~ C/) u. .r; ~ E C/) e ~ C &l 3l "2 E ~ a. ~ III '" iij 8 :c 0 il iij .r; ~ ~ II ..... E ~ II 0 E '" > l!! ...J ; i E U e 0 '0 E ~ "2 ~ ftI ftI 8 ftI ~ Iv IE II i' lii lii e " i 2' In ~ i II II '" .... Cl 0 0 81 E e i 0 0:: > E ~ ftI ~ ~ ~ "is ~ ~ 0 i ~ II ~ ~ II ...J W ::> i .!! Cl " 0 "S C/) C/) '0 ~ .... i Ol .; Z .r; ...J ~ e iij ~ Cl 2' II II .2 e W 8 '" C ...J il .... 2' Q. ~ E Oc; i 81 ~ 0 '0 E ~ -c: .2 B ...J 2' w 'il!! .s e ...J 2' .I ftI C ::J ~ U. ~ ~ ~ OIl .r; ~ c( :; ~ c ..... I!! ~ ~ 'c; 3l ...J e 0 -g 'E "!! l! -g j 0 Oc; ~ S ~ Oil!! ~ E '0 'il!! ) E '" ~ ..... ...J j tII '" III ::J } c( .r; ! ~ II ~ Ii II 0 Cl ..... ~ ..... ~ ; 0 ~ ~ Q. II 2' u. 1ii II ~ I ~ .~ ..... i ~ ~ "S ~ 1 'C ~ ... e i ) i e III ...J " III .r; II " "" " C e ~ 0 e '" &l .r; il ...J (3 e is .r; ftI ~ ..... " &l E e E j;j III E &l OIl Q. ..... e i' ftI III ~ U) 8 0 ...J lD .r; '" 0:: 0 ..... a. a. .!/! Z c e 0 0 0 " ..... I; I; W II e ~ 0:: ii ~ .x .2" OIl C II Qj Qj :J e :0 :2 OIl III II Oil II ::J > > ~ ~ ~ I; .~ .2: I; III e Oil ~ ~ j 'E > ~ II II it: Qj Qj it: iil ~ ~ ~o 0 E 0 0 Q. W 0 0 0 0 0 W Q. 0 0 c( "" .:.: N p) .,. 0 - N p) .,. I/) co ,... IlO 0) ~ III I/) co ,... IlO 0) ftI - - - ..... N .. I >- . COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE \ f?IQlRn\ll1R I.J ,.,J~. !i;i.. Ls._~ ~ LS I' ,. I ~ji JAN 2 5 ~ ' t ~"_'_"_m' Distributed to Bo~HCJ_/~?-PJ Agenda Item No. 28~{'.5" ~ MEMORANDUM , RD OF SUPERV'" TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors /'f ~ Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive /(fIJ / January 24, 1995 Resolution of Support for the City of Danville, Virginia The City ofDanville has obtained an amendment to the Governor's budget that will provide $200,000 in planning money for a regional visitor's center to be located near the City ofDanville, Virginia. The City of Dan vi lie is requesting support of this budget amendment from all localities along Route 29 to promote the tourism industry in this region. If you support this attached resolution, they are requesting that certified copies be sent to Senator Charles Hawkins, Governor Allen, Delegate Whit Clement as well as our own local legislators. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. RWT,Jr/dbm 95.015 Attachment David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S. Martm Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkms White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scoftsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller February 7, 1995 The Honorable George Allen Governor, Commonwealth of Virginia state Capitol Richmond, Virginia 23219 Dear Governor: Enclosed is a resolution adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors on February 1, 1995, supporting the proposed budgetary allocation of $200,000 for a regional visitors venter on Route 29 in Danville. ~~~~lerk EWC:len cc: The Honorable Charles Hawkins The Honorable Whit Clement The Honorable Mitchell Van Yahres The Honorable Edgar Robb The Honorable Peter T. Way * Printed on recycled paper RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR REGIONAL TOURIST CENTER DANVILLE, VIRGINIA ROUTE 29 - CENTRAL VIRGINIA AREA WHEREAS, there has been a long standing need for development of the tourism industry along the Route 29 corridor; and WHEREAS, this area of the Commonwealth is the only major area unserved by a regional visitors center; and WHEREAS, a regional visitors center would significantly enhance regional tourism development efforts currently underway within the Region under the auspices of Centerstate 29; and WHEREAS, Governor George Allen has included $200,000 in his recommended FY 1995-96 Budget for the establishment of a regional visitors center on Route 29 in Danville; NOW, TI-lEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, that it does endorse and support the proposed budgetary allocation of $200,000 for a regional visitors center on Route 29 in Danville which would service communities along the Route 29 Corridor as well as Route 58 and within the Central Virginia area; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, does suggest the concept of a multi-jurisdiction effort to operate a regional visitors center and will coordinate with other localities within the Region under the auspices of the Budget funding. Adopted this M day of f~;(}.a.J 1995, by the following recorded vote: L aye; -1L nay. w~ j ~w, CHAIRMAN BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS ATTEST: ~fkuJ~ David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S. Martin Rlvarmd Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouell Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scoltsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller MEMO TO: Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance FROM: Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC, Clerk ~& DATE: February 6, 1995 SUBJECT: Agreements Approved on February 1, 1995 At the Board's meeting on February 1, 1995, the following Service Agreements were approved: Service Agreement between the County of Albemarle and the Char- lottesville-Albemarle Rescue Squad for $45,000 for purchase of a new ambulance. Service Agreement between the County of Albemarle and the Scotts- ville Volunteer Rescue Squad for $45,000 for purchase of a new ambulance. I have retained the original copy of these agreements for the Board's records. EWC:len Attachments (2 of each agreement) * Printed on recycled paper (2 jt~ CJr/CJ//td ;;;;/ ~~ _. / / , JAN2bl995 //~, W/U#7t"'P~~ " I / //1'/ COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE "'-, '.-'-~"'-" ',RD OF SUPEn\i ~~~ ~ ..H_~___"_ _ ~'~ . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ~;:~.~:'!~:~o,,~agf~,;::;- AGENDA TITLE: Service Agreement with the Scottsville Volunteer Rescue Squad AGENDA DATE: February I, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: ACTION: INFORMATION: SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST: To authorize the Chairman to sign the service agreement with the Scottsville Volunteer Rescue Squad advancing $45,000 to purchase a ambulance, CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: X INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Yes STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Huff, Pumphrey REVIEWED BY: tf~ BACKGROUND: Several years ago Albemarle COlll1ty established a revolving fimd to be used by the ten volunteer fire and rescue companies in the County. This fimd, currently fimded at two million dollars, provides the volunteer companies a means of acquiring needed fire-fighting and rescue equipment and buildings, interest free, with repayments being deducted from their annual County appropriation. Requests for disbursements from the fund are monitored and approved by the Jefferson Country Fire and Rescue Association (JCFRA). DISCUSSION: The current amount available for loan in the $2.0 million revolving fund is $321,839. Scottsville Volunteer Rescue Squad has requested, through JCFRA, an advance of$45,000 to purchase a new ambulance. Repayment of this loan will be over a seven year period beginning FY 95/96. JCFRA has approved this request. RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends authorizing the Chairman to execute the service agreement. SRS.EXE 95.007 /~/ :0"~ P~kJ:ObNTY wY~~ft -;/~m~~, OF ALBEMARLE ',J } !> , ! If- ...~,;;--;. -'I ~ ""-,,,_,,-,,-,,_~ rr..~.l J~ U-~~~. ',- ~_i.~1 L~ ~I "- -...... .~--""~'---.::..............:,..:.....-r: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY '11 UL ~ 26/995 \RD OF AGENDA TITLE: Service Agreement with the Charlottesville/Albemarle Rescue Squad, Inc. AGENDA DATE: February 1, 1995 ACTION: ITEM NUMBER: ..,' , ' t ., [J~ rrl' /_;z. -7_ <i1~ u-;s..riuU ~_~d to ova \.~. -'----~. Ager.111 lttfqIi9RMf~~~,?,~3 ~ SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREQUEST: To authorize the Chairman to sign theservice agreement with the Charlottesville/Albemarle Rescue Squad, Inc. advancing $45,000 to purchase a ambulance. CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: X INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Yes STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Huff, Pumphrey REVIEWED BY: ~Err BACKGROUND: Several years ago Albemarle County established a revolving fimd to be used by the ten volunteer fire and rescue companies in the County. This fimd, currently fimded at two million dollars, provides the volunteer companies a means of acquiring needed fire-fighting and rescue equipment and buildings, interest free, with repayments being deducted fi.om their annual County appropriation. Requests for disbursements from the fimd are monitored and approved by the Jefferson Country Fire and Rescue Association (JCFRA). DISCUSSION: The current amount available for loan in the $2.0 million revolving fimd is $321,839. CARS has requested, through JCFRA, an advance of $45,000 to purchase a new ambulance. Repayment of this loan will be over a five year period beginning FY 95/96. JCFRA has approved this request. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends authorizing the Chairman to execute the service agreement. CARS.EXE 95.006 , ~, ) COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iUL .MN 2519% =?!~RD OF SUPE',W;:-- AGENDA TITLE: Status ofMountain/Ridgetop Protection Ordinance AGENDA DATE: February 1, 1995 [i'stIIJHM NlBMIJER;L-z.7~ !\geM. Item NJ. 227'~!L::€:_ INFORMATION: ACfION: SUBJECfIPROPOSALIREOUEST: Request from 1/11/95 Board of Supervisors Meeting CONSENT AGENDA: ACfION: INFORMATION: X STAFF CONT ACf(S): Messrs. Tucker, Cilimberg REVIEWED BY: - ATTACHMENTS: BACKGROUND: At its January 11, 1995 meeting, the Board of Supervisors requested that a status of the Mountain/Ridgetop Protection Ordinance be provided. This Executive Summary is to provide that update. DISCUSSION: The Open Space and Critical Resources Plan recommends as a short term strategy, "Develop a mountain protection district to protect the scenic and aesthetic values associated with mountains, and to further protect their environmental characteristics." Development of such ordinance provisions was included in the Department of Planning and Community Development's FY 1992-93 work program, During that year, the Planning Commission requested the staff delay initiating work on this item, as well as other work program items, until the Commission completed its review of the Housing Report, economic development policy, and other matters that had been forwarded by the Board of Supervisors (most specifically several Comprehensive Plan amendments). MountainlRidgetop Protection again appeared on the Department's FY 1993- 94 work program. Because of continuing work on previously identified items, most specifically several Comprehensive Plan amendments, and the anticipated beginning of the review of the full Comprehensive Plan, staff advised the Commission in February of 1994 that it would propose taking up Mountain/Ridgetop Protection with the Comprehensive Plan review. The Commission indicated no objection to this approach. This item will be taken up as part of the second phase of the Comprehensive Plan review schedule proposed to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors at its joint meeting in August. (The second phase review will follow the Planning Commission recommendation of the Land Use Plan to the Board of Supervisors in August, 1995.) RECOMMENDATION: As this summary is provided as a status, no recommendation has been anticipated. Staff continues to believe that the aforementioned schedule is most reasonable considering workload obligations and the timing of review of relevant components of the Comprehensive Plan. I:\GENERAL\SHARE\CILIMB\MTNPROT.SUM 95,011 L1 ..IAN 2 5 9I5 COU~)TV OF ,A.L.BEMARLE rf.'l rf::!~i f>'''"\fJI~~ \ n ! \ lIv " It \ II L,i:;; JAN 25 '995 li I ;~ I. \ : lj I ! \' ~ ... 'U U ' _.; J :"'::t L Distributed 7:'&~~i'(:;j 7~Y Ai'e~"(:~ item ~Jn}'5')f'Jt:J,/.% ---- ~.. r"" " I,:"' COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE ) ,RD OF SUPERV MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Robert w. TU~Ker, Jr., County Executive Jo Higgins~ector of Engineering & Public Works 24 January 199J DATE: RE: Berkmar North Extension status Notice to proceed was given to Mega Contractors, Inc., on October 31, 1994. The project duration is 200 days which establishes a target substantial completion date of May 19, 1995. As of January 1995, the work is approximately 40% complete which is slightly behind schedule. This delay can be attributed to unforeseen difficulties encountered in the relocation (lowering) of two existing waterlines in the path of the road, and the time of year the bulk excavation work is being performed (wet and cold weather conditions limit when proper earth compaction can be accomplished). The actual work completed through January should include all of the clearing and grubbing, all of the roadway culverts and most of the associated endwall structures, 75% of the grading, the lowering of the existing waterlines, and the beginning of the new 30" waterline installation along Woodburne Road. By February, the curb and gutter work and roadway surface drainage work should commence on the east side of the road and at both sides behind Jim Price Chevrolet. The stone base will not begin until a significant portion of the curbing and surface drainage is completed. This is anticipated in early April. Since it will be critical to have the road accepted by VDOT at the time it is placed into service, we anticipate opening the road by early July. The contract amount, including change orders to date, is $902,307.54. The February, 1995, pay request will exceed the 50% milestone and thereby trigger our first reimbursement request from the revenue sharing agreement with VDOT. We have been notified by VDOT that the two traffic signals proffered and required as part of the Sam's and Wal-Mart developments must now be installed in conjunction with the opening of Berkmar North. One of these signals is to be located at the intersection of Woodbrook Drive and Berkmar Drive. The other is to be located at the SheratonjWal-Mart intersection on Hilton Heights Road. According to our documentation, it is the developer's responsibility to pay the cost of one signal and install the second. Due to the project schedule and the difficulty to coordinate, we anticipate offering an alternative to the developer to reimburse the County for both signals. Provided the developer is responsive, the traffic signals should be in place at the time the road is scheduled to open. If not, the road opening may be impacted. Please call me if you have any questions or comments. JH/sms cc: Melvin Breeden L. F. PAYNE 5TH DISTRICT, VIRGINIA WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE 2412 RAYBURN BUilDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515-4605 (202) 225-4711 . fAX: (202) 226-1147 TOLL-fAEE 1-800-535-4008 SUBCOMMI1TEES: TRADE ,~ titi f tit ?h 't ~ A.t t SOCIAL SECURITY ~ongrtl;Jl;J 0 Ijt ~nl tu ;;p a ~lr:hul;!(l to Board' L::~Z=~? 1!JoU~t of l\tprt~tntatibt~ Ager.Gi Item Nil..f?5 q~/. !?/ _a5'bington, 1D<tt 20515-4605 January 17, 1995 Ms. Ella W. Carey Clerk Albemarle County Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville I Virginia 22902 l ~ RD OF SUPERVW :-'\;, 1\.....4 ~:..~. Dear Ms. Carey: As you knowl I have long supported legislation to curb the use of unfunded federal mandates by the federal government. I am writing to inform you that I have cosponsored legislation that will make it very difficult for Congress to pass new mandates. H.R. 51 the Unfunded Mandates Relief Act of 1995, would require that bills brought to the floor of the House and Senate establishing a new mandate be accompanied by a cost/benefit analysis as well as funding for the mandate. Bills not complying with this rule would be ruled out of order and thus rejected. Waiving the point of order would require House members to cast a separate recorded vote on the mandate itself. . The legislation I am cosponsoring will also require federal regulators to notify and consult with local government officials before writing new regulations that would affect them. H.R. 5 establishes a federal commission to review all existing mandates and determine which ones can be terminated or modified. I believe H.R. 5 will help restore balance to the federal/state relationship. Enactment of this important legislation will help rein in the federal government and make it more responsive to the needs of all our citizens, particularly those in small and rural towns, cities and counties. I will continue to keep you informed of the progress of this and other important legislation. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or if I may be of assistance. ftl!t~ . DISTRICT OfFICES: o JENNIFER MOOREfiElD, CASEWORK SUPERVISOR DAN DANIEL P.O. BUilDING 700 MAIN STREET, SUITE 301 DANVILLE, VA 24541-1827 TELEPHONE: (804) 792-1280 FAX: (804) 797-5942 o MARGARET WATKINS, OFFICE MANAGER ABBln FEDERAL BUilDING 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET FARMVILLE, VA 23901-1701 TELEPHONE: (804) 392-8331 FAX: (804} 392.~448 o GREG KEn Y, DISTRICT MANAGER P.O. Box 2017 103 EAST WATER STREET, SUITE 302 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902-2017 TElEPHONE: (804} 295-6372 FAX: (804) 295-6059 THIS STATIONERY PRINTED ON PAPER MADE OF RECYCLED FrRfHS George Allen Governor J. [~ ({iJ f2 0 Wi ,~-- --I !~, t >.1 Il l~' U r'" ,.....:..-~_h-, ru; JAN 2 3 i9flj i L "_.__ COMMONWJE.ALTl-iI of VIRGINIA RD,2F...~UPcr" r-. ,..., . . /-27-;7.:5" O,f.ji f th G tJ!smouteu t~1 U(:l3l~J: .~---- JJ ce 0 e overnor -:- Ag!'f1d~ it,';;; NG. ~q.-::.~3-~~ J' January 20, 1995 Dear Colleague: Please forgive the form of this communication, but I wanted to respond immediately to the concerns expressed by some local government leaders regarding my proposal to eliminate the Business, Professional and Occupational License (BPOL) Tax, or gross receipts tax. There has been a great deal of misinformation circulating in recent days regarding this proposal, and some local leaders would not have unjustified concerns regarding the revenue impact of my plan if they knew the truth. First, let me emphasize that a growing economy and growing revenues are the chief ends of both of my tax proposals -- the individual income tax cut for working families and the gross receipts tax elimination. These proposals will leave $2.1 billion in the hands of the people in the cities, counties, and towns throughout Virginia during the next five years. Enclosed is a locality-by-locality breakdown of the additional resources that will remain in your communities over the next five years, if my proposals are approved. In my conversations with business men and women throughout Virginia during the last year, I have heard again and again that the gross receipts tax is especially destructive to our efforts to bring new jobs and resources to the Commonwealth. And while not every locality levies the gross receipts tax, every locality suffers when our Commonwealth loses jobs and revenue because small businesses do not expand and out-of-state prospects select business sites outside Virginia. In crafting a plan to phase out this regressive, job-killing tax, I was determined not to place the burden on local governments. I have also listened carefully to the genuine concerns voiced by local government leaders in recent weeks. State Capitol · Richmond, Virginia 23219 . (804) 786-2211 . TDD (804) 371-8015 ~'." t A~rdingly, I have asked Delegate John Watkins and Senator Walter Stosch to introduce legislation that will phase out the gross receipts tax over the next five years, with these key features: . During the five-year phase-out period, localities will be required to reduce gross receipts tax revenues by an amount equal to the replacement revenue provided by the Commonwealth. . There is no obligation on the part of localities to reduce BPOL revenue if the state fails to provide replacement revenue. . During the five-year phase-out, localities will continue to enjoy the benefit of BPOL revenue increases resulting from economic _.~_ _... <-4t.. ~lVWUl. . The promise of continuing state support after the five-year phase- out is backed up by this explicit guarantee: If state replacement revenues are not provided. authority to levy the gross receipts tax will be restored. These provisions reflect my commitment to holding localities harmless during the five-year period in which this regressive tax is eliminated. These provisions also should allay fears that state support will evaporate after the gross receipts tax is eliminated, or that other local taxes will have to be raised. I believe this program is balanced, fair, and beneficial to Virginia's competitive position in attracting new jobs. Because of the replacement revenue guarantee, the elimination of this egregious tax will be funded primarily through reductions in state, not local, spending. I have also kept my commitment to veto unfunded mandates on localities. My actions have enhanced local flexibility by effectively halting the insidious practice of imposing new obligations without corresponding state funding. Finally, I have made clear my desire to move forward comprehensively during the next year in forging a new partnership between the Commonwealth and its cities, counties, and towns. I want to join local government leaders and members of the General Assembly in a bipartisan search for a more coherent and equitable allocation of resources and responsibilities at the state and local levels. I will be responding more directly to your individual communications, and I hope you will contact me if you have further questions. In the meantime, I trust this information has been helpful. Sincerely, Governor's Tax Reduction Plan Benefit to Each Locality When Fully Phased In (FY 2000) (thousands) Share of Income $300 Million Total Tax BPOL Amount Counties Reduction Payment Returned Accomack $1,941.5 $166.5 $2,107.9 Albemarle 4,626.6 3,241.9 7,868.4 Alleghany 883.9 308.8 1 ,192.7 Amelia 639.4 62.8 702.1 Amherst 1,873.1 272.7 2,145.8 Appomattox 855.2 1.0 856.3 Arlington 13,607.1 31,294.1 44,901.2 Augusta 4,154.8 1,202.5 5,357.3 Bath 380.5 0.0 380.5 Bedford 3,591.2 0.5 3,591.7 Bland 377.0 0.0 377,0 Botetourt 1,911.9 433.8 2,345.7 Brunswick 858.4 0.5 858.9 Buchanan 1,512.1 0.0 1,512.1 Buckingham 729.0 0.0 729.0 Campbell 3,324.0 2.8 3,326.8 Caroline 1,347.3 395.5 1,742.8 Carroll 1,615.7 0.0 1,615.7 Charles City 456.5 0.0 456.5 Charlotte 745.3 0.0 745.3 Chesterfield 17,710.9 12,220.1 29,931.0 Clarke 771.0 9.4 780.4 Craig 300.2 0.0 300.2 Culpeper 1,965.9 0.0 1,965.9 Cumberland 428.3 0.0 428.3 Dickenson 835.0 0.0 835.0 Dinwiddie 1,415.6 178.3 1,593.9 Essex 629.4 0.0 629.4 Fairfax 66,241.8 52,964.5 119,206.3 Fauquier 3,821.2 593.5 4,414.7 Floyd 765.3 0.0 765.3 Fluvanna 913.7 0.0 913.7 Franklin 2,696.9 4.9 2,701.8 Frederick 3,523.0 1,241.2 4,764.1 Giles 1,084.0 0.0 1,084.0 Gloucester 2,053.8 610.6 2,664.4 Goochland 1,029.9 201.2 1,231.1 Grayson 1,019.6 0.0 1,019.6 Greene 782.3 100.3 882.6 Greensville 601.2 199.3 800.5 Halifax 1,870.0 162.9 2,032.9 Hanover 5,401.8 260.3 5,662.1 Henrico 16,897.6 17,514.6 34,412.2 1 Governorts Tax Reduction Plan Benefit to Each Locality When Fully Phased In (FY 2000) (thousands) Share of Income $300 Million Total Tax BPOL Amount Counties Reduction Payment Returned Henry 4,083.0 908.3 4,991.3 Highland 148.8 0.0 148.8 Isle of Wight 1,901.3 340.6 2,241.9 James City 2,710.3 2,125.9 4,836.2 King George 938.1 354.2 1,292.3 King and Queen 377.0 0.0 377.0 King William 839.0 0.0 839.0 Lancaster 754.8 0.0 754.8 Lee 1,116.3 0,0 1,116.3 Loudoun 7,784.9 3,905.2 11,690.1 Louisa 1,375.4 106.3 1,481.8 Lunenburg 674.3 0.0 674.3 Madison 771.4 0.0 771.4 Mathews 556.1 104.4 660.5 Mecklenburg 1,871.5 0.0 1,871.5 Middlesex 572.1 0.4 572.5 Montgomery 3,872.0 0.0 3,872.0 Nelson 816.2 19.9 836.1 New Kent 844.1 257.7 1,101.8 Northampton 690.5 0.1 690.6 Northumberland 718.6 0.0 718.6 Nottoway 852.7 116.8 969.5 Orange 1,566.1 0.0 1,566.1 Page 1,389.3 59.8 1,449.0 Patrick 1,074.5 0.0 1,074.5 Pittsylvania 3,680.5 121.9 3,802.4 Powhatan 1,076.8 38.6 1,115.3 Prince Edward 879.5 0.0 879.5 Prince George 1,586.6 465.7 2,052.2 -- Prince William 15,758.1 6,187.6 21,945.7 Pulaski 2,183.5 0.0 2,183.5 Rappahannock 466.3 0.0 466.3 Richmond 460.2 0.0 460.2 Roanoke 6,215.6 2,465.9 8,681.6 Rockbridge 1,209.3 352.5 1,561.8 Rockingham 4,435.2 0.0 4,435.2 Russell 1.607.6 0.0 1,607.6 Scott 1,303.8 0.0 1,303.8 Shenandoah 1,764.1 0.0 1,764.1 Smyth 2,031.9 0.0 2,031.9 Southampton 1,085.5 85.6 1,171.1 Spotsylvania 4,630.5 1,390.4 6,020.9 Stafford 4,869.9 0.0 4,869.9 2 Governor's Tax Reduction Plan Benefit to Each Locality When Fully Phased In (FY 2000) (thousands) Share of Income $300 Million Total Tax BPOL Amount Counties Reduction Payment Returned Surry 426.5 49.9 476.4 Sussex 632.9 0.1 633.0 T azewell 2,639.8 0.0 2,639.8 Warren 2,291.3 451.3 2,742.5 Washington 2,976.8 0.0 2,976.8 Westmoreland 996.7 0.0 996.7 Wise 2,245.9 0.0 2,245.9 Wythe 1,659.3 0.0 1,659.3 York 3,091.1 1,739.6 4,830.7 Total Counties $288,692.5 $145,293.1 $433,985.6 Cities Alexandria $8,497.3 $12,569.3 $21,066.5 Bedford 400.0 190.7 590.7 Bristol 1,730.2 861.1 2,591.3 Buena Vista 382.2 146.3 528.5 Charlottesville 2,337.7 2,722.9 5,060.6 Chesapeake 11,000.7 10,490.6 21,491.3 Clifton Forge 290.3 134.6 424.9 Colonial Heights 1,217.5 901.5 2,119.1 Covington 449.0 421.8 870.8 Danville 3,337.3 2,312.0 5,649.3 Emporia 355.0 334.4 689.5 Fairfax 1,446.7 4,178.7 5,625.4 Falls Church 918.2 1,859.3 2,777.5 Franklin 533.2 470.1 1,003.3 - Fredericksburg 1,240.9 1,637.7 2,878.6 - GaJax 372.2 571.8 944.1 Hampton 7,495.3 6,274.0 13,769.3 Harrisonburg 1,589.2 2,852.7 4,441.8 Hopewell 1,422.1 1,289.5 2,711.6 Lexington 329.6 280.6 610.2 Lynchburg 3,819.7 4,721.4 8,541.1 Manassas 2,376.8 988.7 3,365.4 Manassas Park 485.8 230.9 716.7 Martinsville 1,132.8 908.2 2,041.0 Newport News 9,594.2 7,909.0 17,503.2 Norfolk 10,695.4 14,038.6 24,734.0 Norton 232.8 489.6 722.4 Petersburg 2,098.8 1,599.8 3,698.7 Poquoson 812.7 157.5 970.2 3 Governor's Tax Reduction Plan Benefit to Each Locality When Fully Phased In (FY 2000) (thousands) Share of Income $300 Million Total Tax BPOL Amount Cities Reduction Payment Returned Portsmouth 5,820.2 4,345.3 10,165.5 Radford 645.9 309.5 955.4 Richmond 10,751.5 20,454.7 31,206.2 Roanoke 5,561.7 8,155.0 13,716.7 Salem 1,638.4 2,255.0 3,893.5 South Boston 472.6 362.5 835.0 Staunton 1,462.5 1,139.1 2,601.6 Suffolk 3,369.1 1,708.8 5,077,9 Virginia Beach 22,415.0 19,011.1 41,426.1 Waynesboro 1,295.0 1,026.0 2,321.0 Williamsburg 493.3 1,040.9 1,534.2 Winchester 1,488.9 2,164.8 3,653.7 Total Cities $132,007.5 $143,516.1 $275,523.6 Separate Total for 32 Selected Towns $0.0 $11,190.8 $11,190.8 Aggregate $420,700.0 $300,000.0 $720,700.0 The income tax reduction by locality was computed as follows. For each locality, the average number of exemptions per return is multiplied by the number of returns whose last dollar of taxable income tails into each of the state's four tax brac;j(ets. Each of these four figures is then multiplied by $1600 (the exemption increase in TY 1999) and the appropriate marginal tax rate. These four figures are then added together. The final step requires converting this TY 1992 total tax reduction figure to a TY 1999 figure. Each of the tax reduction amounts is scaled to represent its share of $420.7 million, the FY 2000 statewide tax reduction estimate. The major weakness with this methodology is its inability to account for the cumulative effects of economic growth and inflation which will push many more taxpayers into higher marginal brackets between TY 1992 and TY 1999. The tax reduction estimates will be too low for those localities which experience the greatest income growth per return (especially at the lower income levels); estimates will be too high for localities which experience relatively slower average growth. The $300 million payment by the state to localities to compensate them for lost BPOL revenue has been divided by locality according to each locality's share of statewide FY 1993 BPOL collections. That data is collected by APA. BPOL taxes administered by towns (in addition to or in the absence of a county levy) are not taken into account in computing the counties' share of the state payment APA maintains data on only 32 towns. These towns' share of the 5300 million FY 2000 payment is shown separately in the chart above. The share that would be distributed to towns other than those 32 is not known; that money has been distributed proportionately among all localities for the purposes of preparing this chart. Because of the lac;j( of complete BPOL data by locality, this chart's $300 million BPOL repayment distribution should be viewed strielly as an estimate. it 4 _I . DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER JAN 2 4 gf) L_____, RD 0\0 s~Ef1'o/5 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGIN~f1but~d, \:),~r ~::p" DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Ager.di '\Ef!1 ,L .7!:. .. P.O BOX 2013 CHARLOTTESVILLE. 22902-2013 A. G. TUCKER RESIDENT ENGINEER ';i' '" January 23, 1995 Current Projects Construction Schedule Ms. Ella W. Carey, Clerk Board of Supervisors County Office Building 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22901 Dear Ms. Carey: Attached find the monthly update on highway improvement projects currently under construction and the quarterly report of projects under design in Albemarle County. Please see that this information is forwarded to the Board of Supervisors members. I will be prepared to discuss this matter with them at the next meeting if they so desire. Yours truly, /-l ;j~((7A:c ~^ A. G. Tucker AGT/smk attachment cc: R. W. Tucker, Jr. w/attachment David Benish w/attachment TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY " ~ PROJECT LISTING ALBEMARLE COUNTY FEBRUARY 1, 1995 CURR. PREVo EST. RTE LOCATION - DESCRIPTION ADV. ADV. CONST. NO. DATE DATE TIME 29 FROM RIO ROAD TO RIVANNA RIVER (WIDEN TO 6 LANES) 03-95 ** 07-94 24 MO. 29 S.FORK RIVANNA RIV. TO AIRPORT RD. (WIDEN TO 6 LANES 08-99 ** 06-97 24 MO. 29 INTERCHANGES-GREENBRIER DRIVE, RIO RD.,HYDRAULlC RD. 11-97 610 FROM ROUTE 20 TO 1.8 MI. E. RTE. 20 (GRAVEL ROAD) 1 0-96 6MO. 631 FROM GREENBRIER DR. TO ROUTE 29 08-95 * 6 MO. 631 FROM ROUTE 743 TO GREENBRIER DR. 09-97 ** 12-96 12 MO. 631 FROM NCL CH'VILLE TO CSX RR (RIO ROAD) MEADOWCREEK PKY. 07-97 ** 01-97 12 MO. 637 FROM ROUTE 635 TO 0.55 MI.W. RTE. 682 (GRAVEL ROAD) 1 0-99 12 MO. 649 FROM ROUTE 29 TO ROUTE 606 (AIRPORT ROAD) 12-00 9 MO. 656 FROM ROUTE 654 TO ROUTE 743 04-01 6 MO. 671 BRIDGE & APPROACHES OVER MOORMANS RIVER (MILLlNGTION) 03-95 ** ? 12 MO. 682 FROM ROUTE 250 TO 1.7 MI. S. RTE. 250 (GRAVEL ROAD) 08-95 12 MO. 711 FROM ROUTE 712 TO ROUTE 29 (GRAVEL ROAD) 10-97 5MO. 712 FROM ROUTE 29 TO ROUTE 692 (GRAVEL ROAD) 1 0-96 9MO. 743 FROM ROUTE 657 (LAMBS ROAD) TO ROUTE 631 01-96 12 MO. 759 FROM ROUTE 616 TO FLUVANNA CO. LINE (GRAVEL ROAD) 1 0-99 5 MO. 760 FROM ROUTE 712 TO ROUTE 29 (GRAVEL ROAD) 1 0-98 12 MO. 866 FROM ROUTE 743 TO ROUTE 1455 09-99 9 MO. * INDICATES NEW PROJECT ** INDICATES REVISED DATE ADV. INDICATES THAT PROJECT HAS BEEN ADVERTISED " " Projects Under Construction Albemarle County February 1, 1995 Route Location Status Estimated No. Compo DatE 29 From Hydraulic Rd. (Rte. 743) Construction 55% Complete Dec 95 To N. of Rio Road (route 631) I I I * Revised Date ** New Project ,- . 1"'" 1 ':' n 'il i (:~,v~~l__'~_,.~,L. ~I. ......11,. <-'\; ;.__""'~_'h__.";"'" COMMONWEALTH 0/ VIRGINIA ~'... . .....~m . 'H'.'C'.' ;RD~UPER\.Ilr"' DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND,23219 January 12, 1995 JAMES S. GIVENS STATE SECONDARY ROADS ENGINEER D:Stflbutp,(i it; &Jard L -2,. 7 -es; 4p:~m1a Item No. 7!:r:~~d/:.._SZ't? Mr. David Bowerman, Chairman Albemarle County Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 Reference: Changes to the Secondary System of State Highways Dear Members of the Goveming Body: On December 1, 1994, this office implemented a new procedure that allows us to accelerate acceptance of new street additions by nearly two months. Under old, "first-in first-ouf procedures, street acceptances were delayed as earlier requests were reviewed and processed in detail. This new procedure avoids that delay by accepting new street additions based on a preliminary audit. We will still conduct a detailed audit of changes to the system as they are coordinated with other Department offices, doing so after official acceptance. The enclosed report presents all changes made to the secondary system, within your jurisdiction, during 1994. Future notices of such changes will follow this format, but will reflect only changes made during the previous month. If you have any questions regarding this material, please call this office at (804) 786- 2746 or your local residency office. 2. S. Givens State Secondary Roads Engineer cc: District Administrator Resident Engineer w. copy of report ~~ ~;t)a.-"';"J fv{; cL- ~ !'>/~"PJi~) TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY .. " . .., .. . I-??-q~ ".""I"',,~','.~,r r" ,rj1"-,. ~ /..::.;:J t}'.:..t. ,..'u:+:,(.' [\; .~!,,-~l..... _._ ..___.. '.",. ._ Age~dl Item lin ff/~;; ..::;- ~ Office of the Mayor P.O. Box 911 . Charlottesville, Virginia. 22902 Telephone 804-971-3113 January 18,1995 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE Mr. David R. Gehr, Commissioner Virginia Department of Transportation 1401 East Broad Street Richmond, VA 23219 ~ [;1 (P) ~ 0 W ,,' 1? ,!n Ie . ',.... .-.., D r- .~--_....; ~, ~;9!995 1 I ".RD OF SUPERV' Dear Mr. Gehr: I am transmitting herewith a resolution regarding the proposed grade-separated interchange at Route 29 and Hydraulic Road in Charlottesville which was unanimously passed by the City Council at its meeting last night. This resolution summarizes Council's concern about the visual and economic impact this interchange would have on our community. The resolution asks the Department of Transportation to not proceed with the design and construction of this proposed interchange while at the same time acknowledging that the City, County and University need to continue to playa dominate role in determining the future traffic improvement projects in the urban area. On an allied note, the Council requests that the Department of Transportation move expeditiously to design and build the Meadowcreek Parkway. The Council would appreciate an update on the status of this project and stands ready to review preliminary designs as soon as they are available. If there are any questions about Council's resolution, please do not hesitate to call me at 295-8888 or 971-3101. S~, ~~ ~~j~ David J. Toscano Mayor DJT:tbg cc: H. Carter Myers, III William S. Roudabush 1. S. Hodge Le.9t<ard W. Sandridge, Jr. ~alter Perkins J A RESOLUTION BY THE CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY COUNCIL REGARDfNG THE PROPOSED GRADE SEPARATED fNTERCHANGE AT U. S. ROUTE 29 AND HYDRAULIC ROAD WHEREAS, on January 10, 1995, this City Council and the City Planning Commission held a joint public hearing on the urban diamond interchange proposed by the Virginia Department of Transportation (UVDOTU) for the intersection of U.S. Route 29 and Hydraulic Road~ and, WHEREAS, in 1991 the City, the County of Albemarle and the University of Virginia issued a joint resolution that endorsed the concept of a grade separated interchange at the Hydraulic Road intersection as part of efforts to improve traffic flow in the Route 29 North corridor; and, WHEREAS, City Council deems it necessary to re-examine the appropriateness of a grade-separated interchange at this location because: (1) of the specific interchange design proposed by VDOT, (2) of new estimates of the proposed cost of the project, (3) of new data on the economic impact of the interchange on City businesses, and (4) of new information on the fiscal impact of the proposed project on City revenues~ and, WHEREAS, City Council has considered the recommendations from the City's planning staff and the Planning Commission, and reviewed the design, plans, and projections prepared by the consultant for VDOT~ NOW, TIlEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Charlottesville that the Virginia Department of Transportation is hereby requested not to proceed with the design and construction of the proposed grade-separated interchange at the intersection of Hydraulic Road and U.s. Route 29, for the following reasons: 1. Construction of the proposed interchange would destroy four commercial buildings and would have an adverse economic impact on a significant number of additional City businesses~ 2. A significant percentage of the road improvements now being constructed on Route 29 would be eliminated by the construction of the interchange; 3. In terms of cost, aesthetics, environmental impact, and traffic movement, this grade-separated interchange is not in character with the size and nature of the community, and is inappropriate as a major entrance corridor into the City. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council beljeves that the City of Charlottesville, Albemarle County, and the University of Virginia should continue to play the predominant role in determining the type, nature, and sequencing of road improvements in the Route 29 corridor, and that Virginia Department of Transportation should continue 'to seek their input before any further decisions are made. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be transmitted to the Virginia Secretary of Transportation, the Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization, the County of Albemarle Board of Supervisors, and to the University of Virginia. Approved by Council January 17, 1995 ~~ rk of City Council i j CENTRAL VIRGINIA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE to Soard:L:!'? -~;r .ll.ger.dJ Itern No. %/~L-?~C,"J. l: @~ n W ~.1 \J r'-M-'-" JU, JfIN' 3 915 l --- \~~ OF SUP~S""' January 12, 1995 Certified Mail - Return ReceiDt TO THE COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY AND CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING COUNTIES IN WHICH CENTRAL VIRGINIA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE OFFERS SERVICE, AND TO THE MAYOR AND ATTORNEY OF THE BELOW LISTED TOWNS IN WHICH IT OFFERS SERVICE. Albemarle County Amherst County Appomattox County Augusta County Buckingham County Campbell County Cumberland County Fluvanna County Goochland County Greene County Louisa County Nelson County Orange County Prince Edward County Town of Appomattox Town of Gordonsville Town of Scottsville Enclosed is a copy of the ORDER FOR NOTICE AND HEARING in Case No. PUE940075 which was issued by the State Corporation Commission as a result of our application for a change in electric rates and revision of tariffs. Very truly yours, !~If~ Howard L. Scarboro General Manager HLS/jsp Enclosure Post Office Box 247. Lovingston, VA 22949. Telephone: 804/263-8336 . Fax: 804/263-8339 I L COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 95 0 11 021 6 f Jij STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION ,,~ _ .. -. "t'-" \ T I~ f1 ,. ~.~ ~':' t') ~ AT . II \ It; .~. - .... - \ l' . .. -' .... L;~uvl ~_I' I V -' . RICHMOND, JANUARY 5, 1995 APPLICATION O~~,:\~ :'~, -~ {,;.: 8. 32 ,...._~ ....-.1'\ ..... CENTRAL VIRGINIA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE CASE NO. PUE940075 For a change in electric rates and to revise its tariffs ORDER FOR NOTICE AND HEARING On December I, 1994, Central Virginia Electric Cooperative ("CVEC" or lithe Cooperative") filed an application with the State Corporation Commission ("Commission") to revise its base rates to reflect a $2.3 million reduction in the annual cost of electric capacity purchased by the Cooperative from Virginia Power. Normally, this reduction in capacity costs would be passed through CVEC's Wholesale Power Cost Adjustment Clause ("WPCAC") to CVEC's customers as a reduction to energy charges. CVEC's application requested the Commission to suspend its WPCAC as to -the reduction in purchased capacity costs, effective January 1, 1995, and allow the Cooperative's proposed restructured base rates to become effective on an interim basis, without suspension, effective January 1, 1995. The rate changes proposed by CVEC include increases in certain customer and demand charges. As a result, although the overall effect of the rate change is to pass through to customers a $2.3 million reduction in the cost of purchased power, certain minimum use and low load factor customers would, if the proposed new rates were approved, receive increases in their bills. The Cooperative has represented that if the proposed new rates are permitted to become effective on an interim basis on January 1, 1995, it will bill its customers at the lesser of the rates proposed in the application or the existing effective rates until such time as the Commission's final order is entered in this case. Finally, CVEC has proposed to revise portions of its Terms and Conditions of Service. The Cooperative filed financial and operating data for the 12 months ending December 31, 1993, in support of its application. On December 19, 1994, the Commission entered an order docketing the proceeding; suspending the effect of CVEC's WPCAC as to the approximately $2.3 million reduction in the annual cost of electric capacity purchased from Virginia Power; and permitting the Cooperative's restructured rates to become effective for service rendered on and after January 1, 1995, subject to refund with interest and conditioned upon the Cooperative billing its customers the lesser of its proposed restructured rates or the rates in effect before the captioned application was filed. The December 19 Order suspended the proposed changes to CVEC's Terms and Conditions of Service through April 30, 1995. NOW, upon consideration of the Cooperative's application and the applicable statutes, the Commission finds that CVEC should be required to give notice to the public of its application; that members of the Commission's Staff should investigate the reasonableness of the proposed tariff revisions and should present their findings in testimony in this proceeding; and that 2 a public hearing should be convened before a hearing examiner to receive evidence relevant to CVEC's application. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: (1) That, pursuant to Rule 7:1 of the Commissions Rules of Practice and Procedure ("Rules"), a hearing examiner is appointed to conduct all further proceedings in this matter; (2) That a hearing before a hearing examiner is hereby scheduled for July 18, 1995, at 10:00 a.m., in the Commission's second floor courtroom located in the Tyler Building, 1300 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia, for the purpose of receiving evidence relevant to the cooperative's application; (3) That, on or before January 31, 1995, CVEC shall prefile with the Commission an original and fifteen (15) copies of any additional direct testimony it intends to present in support of its application during the public hearing to be convened on July 18, 1995; (4) That, on or before January 31, 1995, the Company shall make copies of its application, prefiled testimony, and other documents filed in this matter available for public inspection during regular business hours at all offices where customer bills may be paid. Copies of these documents shall also be made available for public review from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the State Corporation Commission's Document Control Center located on the first floor of the Tyler Building, 1300 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219; 3 (5) That the Commission's staff shall investigate the reasonableness of CVEC's application and present its findings and recommendations in testimony at the July 18 public hearing; (6) That, on or before May 19, 1995, any person desiring to participate as a Protestant, as defined in Rule 4:6, shall file an original and fifteen (15) copies of a Notice of Protest, as provided in Rule 5:16(a), and shall serve a copy of same on the Company's counsel, Evans B. Brasfield, Esquire, Hunton & Williams, Riverfront Plaza, East Tower, 951 East Byrd street, Richmond, Virginia 23219-4074; and upon other parties of record; (7) That within five (5) days of the receipt of any Notice of Protest, CVEC shall serve upon each Protestant a copy of all materials now or hereafter filed with the Commission; (8) That any person who expects to submit evidence, cross- examine witnesses, or otherwise participate in the proceeding as a Protestant, pursuant to Rule 4:6, shall file on or before June 5, 1995, an original and fifteen (15) copies of a Protest with the Clerk of the state Corporation Commission, c/o Document Control Center, P.o. Box 2118, Richmond, Virginia 23216, referring, to Case No. PUE940075, and shall simultaneously send a copy thereof to CVEC's counsel: Evans B. Brasfield, Esquire, Hunton & Williams, Riverfront Plaza, East Tower, 951 East Byrd street, Richmond, Virginia 23219-4074, and to any other Protestant. The Protest shall set forth (i) a precise statement of the interest of the Protestant in the proceeding; (ii) a full and clear statement of the facts which the Protestant is prepared to prove by competent evidence; and (iii) a statement of the 4 specific relief sought and the legal basis therefor. Any corporate utility that wishes to submit evidence, cross-examine witnesses, or otherwise participate as a Protestant must be represented by legal counsel in accordance with the requirements of Rule 4:8 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure; (9) That on or before June 5, 1995, each Protestant shall file with the Clerk of the'Commission an original and fiftee~ (15) copies of the prepared testimony and exhibits the Protestant intends to present at the July 18, 1994 hearing and shall simultaneously send a copy to counsel for CVEC and other Protestants. Service upon counsel for CVEC shall be made upon Evans B. Brasfield, Esquire, Hunton & Williams, Riverfront Plaza, East Tower, 951 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219-4074; (10) That, on or before June 19, 1995, the Commission Staff shall file with the Clerk of the Commission an original and fifteen (15) copies of the prepared testimony and exhibits Staff intends to present at the public hearing and shall send a copy of the same to counsel for CVEC at the address set forth above and to each Protestant; (11) That on or before July 3, 1995, CVEC shall file with the Clerk of the Commission an original and fifteen (15) copies of all testimony it expects to introduce in rebuttal to all of the direct prefiled testimony and exhibits of Staff and Protestants; additional rebuttal evidence may be presented without prefiling, provided it is in response to evidence which was not prefiled but elicited at the time of the hearing and, provided further, the need for additional rebuttal evidence is 5 timely addressed by motion during the hearing and leave to present said evidence is granted by the hearing examiner. A copy of the prefiled rebuttal evidence shall be served upon the Cooperative and all other parties to the proceeding; (12) That any person desiring to comment in writing on CVEC's application may do so by directing such comments on or before May 19, 1995, to the Clerk of the Commission, c/o Document Control Center, P.o. Box 2118, Richmond, Virginia 23216. Such comments must refer to Case No. PUE940075. Any person desiring to make a statement at the public hearing concerning the application need only appear in the Commission's second floor courtroom at 9:45 a.m., on the day of the hearing and identify himself or herself to the Bailiff as a public witness; (13) That the Cooperative shall respond to written interrogatories within ten (10) days after the receipt of the same. Protestants shall provide to CVEC, other Protestants, and Staff any workpapers or documents used in preparation of their filed testimony promptly upon request. Except as so modified, discovery shall be in accordance with Part VI of the Rules; (14) That, on or before February 16, 1995, CVEC shall complete publication of the following notice, to be published as display advertising (not classified) once a week for two consecutive weeks in newspapers of general circulation within CVEC's service territory: 6 NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC OF AN APPLICATION BY CENTRAL VIRGINIA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE FOR A CHANGE IN ELECTRIC RATES AND TO REVISE ITS TARIFFS - CASE NO. PUE940075 On December 1, 1994, Central Virginia Electric Cooperative ("CVEC" or lithe Cooperative") filed an application with the state Corporation Commission ("Commission') to revise its base rates to reflect a $2.3 million reduction in the annual cost of electric capacity purchased by the Cooperative from Virginia Power. Normally, this reduction in capacity costs would be passed through CVEC's Wholesale Power Cost Adjustment Clause ("WPCAC") to CVEC's customers as a reduction to energy charges. The Cooperative's application has requested the Commission to suspend CVEC's WPCAC as to the reduction in purchased capacity costs, effective January 1, 1995, and to allow CVEC's proposed restructured base rates to become effective on an interim basis, without suspension effective January 1, 1995. The Cooperative's application advises that its proposed rate changes include increases in certain customer charges and demand charges. For example, customer charges for Farm and Home Service - Schedule A, General Service - Schedule B, and Large Power Service - Schedule LP have been increased. The demand charges for Large Power Service - Schedule LP and Commercial and Industrial Service - Schedule I have been increased. As a result, although the overall effect of the rate change is to pass through to customers a $2.3 million reduction in the cost of purchased power, certain minimum use and low load factor customers on these and other schedules would, if the proposed new rates were approved, receive increases in their bills. In addition, CVEC proposes to revise portions of its Terms and Conditions of Service, including but not limited to, deletion of language referring to CVEC's bimonthly meter reading option and to provide for a new construction advance charge of $200, to recover CVEC's anticipated engineering and investigation expenses in those cases where an application for electric' 7 service will not result in an electric service connection. The Cooperative has also revised the availability provisions of General Service - Schedule B and the calculation of a minimum bill under CVEC's Large Power Schedule - Schedule LP. Further, the minimum charge conditions for Commercial and Industrial Service - Schedule I have been revised to eliminate a seasonal ratchet clause. Finally, the cooperative proposes to terminate the Athletic Field Lighting Service - Schedule EE, and to offer a new coincident peak service, Schedule CPo The details of these and other tariff revisions are set out in CVEC's application. Interested persons are encouraged to review CVEC's application and supporting documents for the details of these and other proposals. The Commission has permitted CVEC's proposed restructured rates to become effective for service rendered on and after January 1, 1995, subject to refund with interest and conditioned upon CVEC billing its customers the lesser of its proposed restructured rates or the rates in effect before this application was filed. Interested persons should be advised that, after considering all of the evidence, the Commission may in its final order adopt rates and revisions to CVEC's tariffs and Terms and Conditions of Service which differ from those appearing in CVEC's application. A public hearing on CVEC's application is scheduled before a hearing examiner for July 18, 1995, at 10:00 a.m., in the Commission's second floor courtroom, Tyler Building, located on 1300 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia, to hear evidence relevant to the Cooperative's application. Copies of CVEC's application are available for public inspection during regular business hours at all CVEC offices where customer bills may be paid, and from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the state Corporation commission's Document Control Center, located on the first floor of the Tyler Building, 1300 East Main street, Richmond, Virginia 23219. 8 Any person desiring to comment in writing on CVEC's application may do so by directing such comments on or before May 19, 1995, to the Clerk of the Commission, c/o Document Control Center, P.o. Box 2118, Richmond, virginia 23216. These written comments must refer to Case No. PUE940075. Any person desiring to make a statement at the public hearing concerning CVEC's application need only appear in the Commission's second floor courtroom at 9:45 a.m. on the day of the hearing and identify himself as a public witness to the Commission's bailiff. On or before May 19, 1995, persons desiring to participate as Protestants, as defined in Rule 4:6 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure ("Rules"), and to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses shall file an original and fifteen (15) copies of a Notice of Protest, as provided in Rule 5:16(a), with the Clerk of the Commission at the address set forth below and shall serve a copy upon CVEC and upon all parties of record. Service upon CVEC shall be directed to its counsel: Evans B. Brasfield, Esquire, Hunton & Williams, Riverfront Plaza, East Tower, 951 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219-4074. Any person who expects to submit evidence, cross-examine witnesses, or otherwise participate in the proceeding as a Protestant, pursuant to Rule 4:6, shall file on or before June 5, 1995, an original and fifteen (15) copies of a Protest conforming to Rule 5:16(b) with the Clerk of the State Corporation Commission, c/o Document Control Center, First Floor, Tyler Building, 1300 East Main street, Richmond, Virginia 23216, referring to Case No. PUE940075, and shall simultaneously send a copy thereof to CVEC's counsel at the address set forth above and to any other Protestant. The Protest shall set forth (i) a precise statement of the interest of the Protestant in the proceeding, (ii) a full and clear statement of the facts which the Protestant is prepared to prove by competent evidence; and (iii) a statement of the specific relief sought and the legal basis therefor. Any corporate entity that wishes to submit evidence, cross-examine witnesses, or otherwise participate as a 9 Protestant must be represented by legal counsel in accordance with the requirements of Rule 4:8 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. On or before June 5, 1995, each Protestant shall file with the Clerk of the Commission an original and fifteen (15) copies of the prepared testimony and exhibits the Protestant intends to present at the July 18 hearing, and shall simultaneously mail a copy of same to CVEC's counsel and other Protestants. Service upon CVEC shall be directed to its counsel: Evans B. Brasfield, Esquire, Hunton & Williams, Riverfront Plaza, East Tower, 951 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219-4074. All written communications to the Commission concerning the Cooperative's application should be directed to William J. Bridge, Clerk of the state Corporation Commission, c/o Document Control Center, P.O. Box 2118, Richmond, Virginia 23216, and should refer to Case No. PUE940075. CENTRAL VIRGINIA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE (15) That, on or before February 16, 1995, CVEC shall serve -a copy of this Order upon the chairman of the board of supervisors of each county and upon the mayor or manager of every city and town (or on equivalent officials in counties, towns, and cities having alternate forms of government) in which CVEC offers service. Service shall be made by first-class mail to the customary place of business or residence of the person served; and (16) That, at the commencement of the hearing scheduled herein, CVEC shall provide to the Commission proof of the notice and service required by Ordering Paragraphs (14) and (15) herein. AN ATTESTED COpy hereof shall be sent by the Clerk of the Commission to: Evans B. Brasfield, Esquire, Hunton & W~lliams, 10 . . Riverfront Plaza, East Tower, 951 East Byrd street, Richmond, Virginia 23219-4074; Edward L. Petrini, senior Assistant Attorney General, Division of Consumer Counsel, Office of the Attorney General, 900 East Main street, Second Floor, Richmond, Virginia 23219, and the Commission's Divisions of Public utility Accounting, Economics and Finance, and Energy Regulation. . ATruecopy/!l\f/J~~ -r ~ T~~tei VVt...~_ - - \ ~. ':~ Clerk gf the . Sfaf~ COfpofatiori Coml1ilssion ._~y 11 ABG A FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. January 10, 1995 . .T. PO Box 334 BELCAMP, MARYLAND 21017\Z::::~.t 410.575.7412 :t;j;->i ""L-"~ "vl"'" -- ."l(1.v. --.~, ... "j ~;:?20,/. S-/..s ,.~ ,........~..__., .--.------.......,..""""".. FAX 410.273.9524 ~"..............-'- Mr. Bob Richardson Sovran Bank, N.A. Post Office Box 26904 Richmond, Virginia 23261 " \ I~ <. 1\1; ..7~ L ,..' --.:>.""- "'A~O OF S~JP_~.~\ll' -:1 n 'Ii \?, JL..]..-, Re: Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.) Dear Mr. Richardson: Enclosed please find the Bond Program Report and Monthly Report Pursuant to Section 7(a) of the Deed Restrictions for the month of December 1994. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 410-575-7412. Sincerely, ~ ~ 0 I ~4 vN. V(y7/}, J/I/I~htJ-A_ ~i~. Moynih1~v~--y~ Project Monitor /shm enclosures cc: Ms. Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC Albemarle County Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 Effective December 31, 1994 MONTHLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 7(a) OF THE DEED RESTRICTIONS TO: ABG Associates, Inc. 300 E. Lcrnba.rd Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202 RE: Hydraulic Road Apartments - Arbor Crest Apart:rre.nts Charlottesville, Virginia Pursuant to Section 7(a) of the Deed Restrictions (the "Deed Restrictions"), as defined in an Indenture of Trust dated as of April 1, 1983, between the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia (the "Authority"), and your bank, as trus tee, the under signed au tho r i zed representa t ive of Richmond-Albemar le Limited Partnership, a Vi rg in ia Limited Pa rtner ship (the "Purchaser"), her eby cert if ies with respect to the operation and management of Hydraulic Road Apartments, Charlottesville, Virginia (the "Project"), that as of the date shown below: 1) The number of units in the Project occupied by lower income tenants is 18 . 2) The number of units in the Project unoccupied and held available for Lower Income Tenants is -0- 3) The number of units rented and the number of units held available for rental other than as described in (1) and (2) is 48 4) The percentage that the number of units described in (1) and (2) hereof constitute of the total number of units in the Project is 27% . 5) The information contained in this report is true, accurate and correct as of the date hereof. 6) As of the date hereof, the Purchaser is not in default under any covenant or agreement contained in the Deed Restrictions or in an Agreement of Sale dated as of April 1, 1983, between the Authority and the Purchaser. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Report as of January 5, 1995 RICHMOND-ALBEMARLE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Virginia limited partnership By: resentative aONO PROGRAM R~PORT Month December VM' ~ P ". Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.) PrO;.cl': 051-35371 rope y. lOCllion: Charlottesville, VA N",mbe, of Unilt 66 S",bm.ntC2 Dy: January 5, 1995 Effective 12/31/94 MA~~r OAT. Total Occupied 66 Bond Occupied 18 I. LOwt" INCOME The following ",nIl a "A~ t>c-cn dc"gr\Ated as '"10-., Incom..' unll. 1 Arbor Crest Dr 21 Dorothy B. Hubicsak 4' ". 2 Arbor Crest Dr 22 Betty N. Meador 42 12. 2 4 Arbor Crest Dr 23 Beverly T. Lane 43 13, 3 6 Arbor Crest Dr 24 Wilma M. Atkinson 44 .... 4 S 9 Arbor Crest Dr 25 Virginia Burton 45 6$. 6 12 Arbor Crest Dr 26 G. Robert Stone 46 oe, 7 14 Arbor Crest Dr 27 Betty L. Reed 47 17. a 20 Arbor Crest Dr 28 Evelyn Mandeville 48 61 9 30 Arbor Crest Dr 29 Mary Cox Allen 49 68. 10 44 Arbor Crest Dr 30 Sam M. Atherton ~ 70. \1 56 Arbor Crest Dr 31 Violet DuCharme ~1 7'. 12. 76 Arbor Crest Dr 31 Ann G. Saylor ~2 72 13 78 Arbor Crest Dr 3) Ernest M. Nease ~3 73 14 84 Arbor Crest Dr 34 Juanita Boliek 54 74. tS 90 Arbor Crest Dr 3~ Betty B. Ell iott ~~ 75. 16 92 Arbor Crest Dr 36 Dorothy H. Reese ~ 76 11 94 Arbor Crest Dr j7 Sarah E. Fischer ~7 77. 18 106 Arbor Crest Dr 38 Katherine T. Nowlen ~. 78. t9 r 39 ~9 7.. 20 40 60 10. 1~ cn.n~s Irom P/evIOUS rcpc,,' ...lIeeted in Ih. abo",. hSlIng II. O.'.llona A6dhSON H 2 Arbor Crest Dr ". Betty N. Meador 1 12 2 '2. 3 13 3 '3 4 14 4. '4. 5 1~ $ '5. 6 16 6 " 7 \7 7 '7. I 18 . ,.. I " t ,.. . \0 20 10. 20. _ I -. .r;.~ ~ > j 1 .:t 11f' 1< 1 JU j JAN Z- Iggj ''J/:\.RD OF SUPERV!c' '"'_I I "k-;l ?j'-~HJhtJ~ n i'v7. U '.. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: FY 1995-96 Capital Improvement Program AGENDA DATE: February 1, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: ACTION: INFORMATION: X SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST: Proposed Changes for the FY 1995/96 - FY 99/00 Capital Improvement Program W orksession CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMA TION: ATTACHMENTS: STAFF CONTACT(S): Mr. Tucker, Ms. White REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: At the January 11 th Public Hearing on the proposed FY 1995-96 - FY 1999-00 Capital Improvement Program, County residents spoke to the following projects: Red Hill Outdoor Recreation Improvements, Greer Outdoor Recreation Improvements, Scottsville Community Center Recreation Improvements, Forest LakesIHollymead Dam, Crozet Park and the Forloines Study. The attached documents propose an alternative to the prior plan that incorporates comments from the public hearing, as well as comments from the Board's first worksession. DISCUSSION: The total FY 1995-96 - FY 1999-00 CIP reflected in the attached documents is $60.4 million, approximately $1 million less than the $61.4 funded over the 5-year period in the prior plan. This overall reduction is the result of eliminating the Forest LakesIHollymead Dam, Carrsbrook Road Extension, the Forloines Study, and all the jail projects that are now being incorporated into the $16 million expansion project to be funded outside of the County's CIP possibly in FY 1997-98. By deleting these projects, the revised CIP plan now funds the three outdoor playground/recreation projects at Greer, Red Hill and Scottsville. It also increases the overall contribution to Crozet Park by $50,000 and funds it over a two-year period, $50,000 in FY 95/96 and $100,000 in FY 96-97. An additional result of eliminating these projects is increased funding for the contingency/reserve account in the amount of $431,525 mainly in the last two years of the plan when unanticipated, albeit critical, projects may need to be added. Attachment 1 is a summary of the changes to the proposed plan. Attachments 2 and 3 are the original project sheets marked with the proposed changes. Attachments 4 and 5 are the revised project sheets reflecting the proposed changes and final totals. Attachment 6 is a summary of the projects by functional category, a summary of the major revenue sources with the changes highlighted and a list of the School projects, some of which will be funded by VPSA bonds and some with the projected split billing revenues of $15 million in FY 1996-97. RECOMMENDA TION: This information is presented to the Board as an alternative plan to the one presented at the January 11 public hearing. If the Board is satisfied with these proposed changes, the five year FY 1995-96 - 1999-00 CIP plan may be approved at this time. The actual approval and appropriation of the CIP budget for the 1995-96 fiscal year may be done in March or April, a timeframe that would allow the Board further review of the CIP budget in conjunction with the operating budget, if necessary. CIPEXE 94.014 Changes to Projects and Revenues Prior Current Change Project Recommend Recommend Not Funded: Joint Security HV AC,ADA,Intake $839,492 $0 ($839,492) Forrest Lakes/Hollymead Dam $315,000 $0 ($315,000) Carrsbrook Road Extension $359,500 $0 ($359,500) Forloines Study $25,000 $0 ($25,000) Increased Funding: Crozet Park Contribution $100,000 $150,000 $50,000 ($50,000 in FY 95-96; $100,000 in FY96-97) Contingency (FY96-97 to FY99-oo) $1,384,000 $1,815,525 $431,525 Projects Moved to Another Year Red Hill Recreation Project ($67,000) FY 96-97 FY 95-96 Greer Recreation Project ($77,000) FY 96-97 FY 95-96 Scottsville Comm. Ctr. Recreation ($63,525) FY 96-97 FY 95-96 Walnut Creek Park FY98-oo FY97 -99 Landscaping Route 29 $18,500 spread out over 5 year period Keene Landfill ($100,000) FY 95-96 FY 98-99 Revenues Changes: Joint Security Prior Funding Balance $196,900 $0 $0 ($196,900) ($315,000) $21,495 Developer Contribution (Forrest Lakes Dam) $315,000 CIP Fund Balance $219,299 $240,794 01/26/95 1 CIPCHGS.WK4 Improvement Program 1995-96 Recommended Capital FY TOTAL FY 95 to 9 $103,320 $75,000 $80,000 $221,000 $535,000 $164,771 1999-20 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 1998-99 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 1997-98 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $0 1996-97 $51,160 $0 $0 $111,000 $140,000 $118,850 1995-96 $52,160 $75,000 $80,000 $110,000 $155,000 $45,921 CURRENT REQUEST $103,320 $75,000 $80,000 $221,000 $535,000 $164,791 PRIOR $130,630 $150,000 $431,250 $109,000 $65,000 $0 COUNTY $233,950 $225,000 $511,250 $330,000 $600,000 $164,791 TOTAL PROJECT $233,950 $225,000 $1,022,500 $330,000 $600,000 $164,791 $~,13S 0 $31,682: 0 5165,399 0 tSS7 e3:! 0 $2,018,553 $0 $0 $0 iO. $50,000 $0 $0 $0 iO. $50,000 $0 $0 $0 o $140,000 $0 $0 $0 Ui? 93~ 0 $988,042 $li4,ng 0 ili~,gg~ 0 l1ili,399 0 o $790,511 $89,389 $52,892 $165,399 $567 0321 $2,053,823 $35,250 $0 $0 iO. $921,130 $89,389 $52,892 $165,399 $567 062 $2,939,733 $357,555 $211,567 $661,596 $2.362 438 $6,169,397 COB ADA renovations Computerized Assessment System Health Dept. Clinic Wing Replace Voting Machines Gen Govt Computer Upgrade County Office Bldg. Maintenance/Repairs Joint Security Complex Renovations a. ADA renovations b. Kitchen/Laundry/Canteen c. HVAC/electrical upgrade d. Intake Center SUBTOTAL N 1 ~ ~ ~ $363,851 $126,242 $0 $15,000 $1,250,000 $250,000 $340,800 $2,345,893 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $250,000 $363,851 $0 $15,000 $250,000 $0 $628,851 $0 $56,242 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $306,242 $0 $70,000 $0 $250,000 250,000 $340,800 $910,800 $363,851 $139,457 $947,573 $15,000 $1,250,000 $325,000 $340,800 $3,381,681 $246,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $396,000 $501,183 $139,457 $947,573 $15,000 $1,400,000 $325,000 $128,750 $3,456,963 $501,183 $139,457 $947,573 $15,000 $1,400,000 $325,000 $1,028,000 $4,356,213 Police Department Radio Receiver System Computer System Police Satellite Facility NCIC 2000 Upgrade Fire/Rescue Building/Equipment Fire Pumper Replacement E-911 Building SUBTOTAL 31li,000 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $315,999 0 $0 0 $27,850 $0 $27,850 o 0 $0 l31i9,S99 0 $0 S3Se,SSe 0 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,500,000 o $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 o 10,000 $90,000 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 53,500 $0 $0 $53,500 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 $0 $1,750 $17,500 $0 $19,250 $0 $0 $27,500 $0 $0 $27,500 $0 $0 $2,900 $29,000 $0 $31,900 $0 $0 $0 $53,500 $0 $53,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 mM aoao StJ. 2,,Q()O ~ 3.000 iD. 6.600 .i01.000$18,500 $833,500 $530,000 $675,650 $1,037,350 $500,000 $3,576,500 $315,000 $557,000 $359,500 $2,500,000 $20,000 $100,000 $53,500 $50,000 $19,250 $27,500 $31,900 $53,500 $9,051,449 m.soo $13,157,099 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $43,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 iO. $43,000 $315,000 $557,000 $359,500 $2,500,000 $20,000 $100,000 $96,500 $50,000 $19,250 $27,500 $31,900 $53,500 $9,051,449 m.soo $13,200,099 $315,000 $557,000 $359,500 $5,000,000 $55,000 $110,000 $226,000 $50,000 $19,250 $62,500 $31,900 $125,000 $9,051,449 S6MQO $16,031,099 Hi n Forest lakes/Hollymead Dam Road Zan Road Extension Carrsbrook Road Extension(p.92) Revenue Sharing Road Proj.(p.94) Meadow Creek Pkwy to Rio Bicy/Ped Path Route 250-Route 616 Turn Lane Hydraulic Rd/Rio Bicycle Path/Sidewalk Avon IRt 20 Interchange Study Greenbrier/Hydraulic Streetlights Greenbrier Dr. Ext. Sidewalks Ivy Road Street Lights Old Ivy Bicycle Path and Sidewalk Rte. 29 Underground Powerlines Landscaping Route 29 SUBTOTAL $0 $0 $42,500 CIP96RECWK4 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,500 $0 $0 o $0 $0 $0 $3,390,000 $20,000 $85,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,390,000 $20,000 $85,000 $3,390,000 $40,000 $170,000 Libraries Crozet Replacement Building Central Library Recarpeting Reconstruct/expand Gordon Lib/parking 01/26/95 1995-96 Recommended Capital Improvement Program FY TOTAL FY95to9 $293,447 $0 $163500 $499,447 1999-20 $0 $0 mooo $25,000 1998-99 ~ $0 m.ooo. $30,000 1997-98 $293,447 $0 S!Q.QOO $375,947 1996-97 ~O $0 m.soo $28,500 1995-96 ~O $0 ~ $40,000 CURRENT REQUEST $293,447 $147,500 $162.500 $4,098,447 PRIOR $0 $0 so. $0 COUNTY $293,447 $147,500 $162500 $4,098,447 TOTAL PROJECT $535,000 $147,500 $290 000 $4,572,500 Main Frame Comput.Upgrade New Library Branch Study/Land Purchase Maintenance/Replacement Projects SUBTOTAL $160,556 $178,750 $67,000 $77,000 $49,600 $131,000 $143,144 $350,000 $635,000 $30,000 $71,500 $118,925 $1ee,eee 1/50,000 $30,000 $172,730 $20,000 ~ZMOO 0 $2,360,205 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 25,000 $0 $250,000 $635,000 $0 $71,500 $0 ~ $0 $11,730 so. $0 $0 $0 $0 31,000 $0 $0 o $0 $0 $0 $29,999 $34,000 so. $80,278 $89,375 87,999 77,9ge 49,600 $143,144 $25,000 $0 30,000 $0 $0 ii,i:llli $55,400 t29,gfQtXl.OO~2e,eee $20,000 $27,000 so. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 75,000 o $50,000 $23,000 so. $0 $25,000 $0 6'!a.&~~ 60.~99 $10,000 $77,000 $20,000 ~O $346,653 $160,556 ~ $80,278 $178,750 $89,375 $67,000 6'7.0000 $77,000 1770000 $49,600 · $0 $131,000 $143,144 $350,000 $635,000 $30,000 $71,500 $118,925 $72,000 $30,000 $172,730 =1 $2,332,205 $226,445 $96,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so. $322,695 $387,001 $275,000 $67,000 $77,000 $49,600 $131,000 $143,144 $350,000 $635,000 $30,000 $71,500 $118,925 $72,000 $30,000 $172,230 $20,000 S2MQQ $2,654,400 $441,500 $275,000 $67,000 $77,000 $49,600 $131,000 $246,800 $350,000 $635,000 $30,000 $71,500 $118,925 $72,000 $30,000 $179,230 $20,000 mooo $2,819,555 Parks & Recreation ADA Compliance at parks ADA compliance on School playgrounds Red Hill Elementary Rec, Improvements Greer Outdoor Rec. Improvements Outdoor Rec project completion Walnut Creek Park Improvements Towe Park Rec. Improv. Rivanna Greenway Access and Path Northem Park Improvements Swimming Beach Playground structures Northem Area Elementary School Rec Scotlsville Community Ctr. Outdoor Improv Crozet Park Contribution Milton/Chris GreenelMlnt Sprgs.Security Maintenance/Replacement Summary Warren Ferry Forloines Study SUBTOTAL $1 ,013,230 $85,000 $223,400 $691,922 Education (General Govt) PVCC Social Science Bldg. <Y\ ~ $62,335 $750,000 $300,000 $250,000 $1,300,000 I.glS:5"~ $1,384,888 $0 $300,000 $60,000 i5Q.QQ.Q $410,000 6~1.~ $848,880 $0 .~.ooo 100,000 $199,999 $60,000 $60,000 S5O..QOO i5O..QQO. $210,000 $210,000 ISctoco g'"lJCO '18,888 '584, 8 $0 $0 $150,000 $60,000 S5O..QOO $260,000 $62,335 o 199,999 $60,000 S5O..QOO $210,000 $62,335 $750,000 $300,000 $250 000 $1,300,000 $76,351 $1,790,808 $255,000 so. $2,045,808 $138,686 $2,540,808 $510,000 $250 000 $3,300,808 $5,171,059 $2,540,808 $570,000 $250 000 $3,360,808 Utilities Improvements Keene Landfill Closure County Master Drainage Stormwater Projects SUBTOTAL ~ I:l.. C 'J.5 81,1180 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CIP Capital Projects/Debt Service Reserv 13,546,933 $16,096,933 S2.550.000 13,546,933 $0 f2,888,230 $3,588,230 S700.000 2,888,230 $0 $0 2,351,848 ~2,246,850 $2,851,848 $2,846,850 S500.0oo S600,OOO 2,351,848 2,246,850 $0 $0 $0 $0 2,866,206 $3,266,206 $400.000 2,866,206 $0 $0 $3,543,799 S350.000 3,193,799 $0 f26,385,590 I $3,804,9841 f29,789,136 I $42,480,6311 Total General Fund Cip Expenditures Total Available Revenues Transfer to School Maintenance Net Available Revenues Over/Short Cumulative Over/Short CIP96RECWK4 2 01/26/95 TOTAL FY 95 to 9 $103,320 $75,000 $80,000 $221,000 $535,000 $164,771 $0 $0 $0 .so. $1,179,091 $0 $0 $0 .so. $50,000 $0 $0 $0 .so. $50,000 $0 $0 $0 o $140,000 $89,389 $52,892 $165,399 $567 032 $2,053,823 $35,250 $0 $0 .so. $921,130 $421,010 ~ $363,851 $126,242 $0 $15,000 $1,250,000 $250,000 $340,800 $2,345,893 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $27,850 $0 $2,500,000 $20,000 $100,000 $53,500 $50,000 $19,250 $27,500 $31,900 $53,500 $0 $18,500 $2,902,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,500 $293,447 $0 $163500 CIP96RECWK4 1999-20 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 o $27,850 $0 I ?niii:!::! miiimil~l $500,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $90,000 $0 53,500 $0 $50,000 $17,500 $0 $29,000 $53,500 $0 $1,750 $27,500 $2,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 .s25..OQO. $678,650 $684,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,500 $0 $293,447 $0 $0 $0 ~ m.ooo $532,000 $0 $0 o $0 $0 S2MOO 1998-99 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $363,851 $0 $15,000 $250,000 $0 $628,851 $0 o $500,000 $20,000 10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ~ $3,390,000 $20,000 $85,000 $293,447 $147,500 $162500, 4 1997-98 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $0 $0 $56,242 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $306,242 o $500,000 o o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 )~if ii S3;QQJ; $503,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 .so. TOTAL PROJECT COUNTY $233,950 $233,950 $225,000 $225,000 $1,022,500 $511,250 $330,000 $330,000 $600,000 $600,000 $164,791 $164,791 $357,555 $89,389 $211,567 $52,892 $661,596 $165,399 $2 362 438 $567 062 $6,169,397 $2,939,733 $501,183 $501,183 $139,457 $139,457 $947,573 $947,573 $15,000 $15,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $325,000 $325,000 $1,028,000 $128,750 $4,356,213 $3,456,963 $315,000 $315,000 $557,000 $557,000 $359,500 $359,500 $5,000,000 $2,500,000 $55,000 $20,000 $110,000 $100,000 $226,000 $96,500 $50,000 $50,000 $19,250 $19,250 $62,500 $27,500 $31,900 $31,900 $125,000 $53,500 $9,051,449 $9,051,449 S68..5OO S1.a.5OO $16,031,099 $13,200,099 $3,390,000 $3,390,000 $40,000 $20,000 $170,000 $85,000 $535,000 $293,447 $147,500 $147,500 $290 000 $162500 1996.97 $51,160 $0 $0 $111,000 $140,000 $118,850 1995-96 $52,160 $75,000 $80,000 $110,000 $155,000 $45,921 CURRENT REQUEST $103,320 $75,000 $80,000 $221,000 $535,000 $164,791 PRIOR $130,630 $150,000 $431,250 $109,000 $65,000 $0 COB ADA renovations Computerized Assessmen Health Dept. Clinic Wing Replace Voting Machines Gen Govt Computer Upgrade County Office Bldg. Maintenance/Repairs Joint Security Complex Renovations a. ADA renovations b. Kitchen/Laundry/Canteen c. HVAC/electrical upgrade d. Intake Center SUBTOTAL System $0 $70,000 $0 $250,000 250,000 $340,800 $910,800 $363,851 $139,457 $947,573 $15,000 $1,250,000 $325,000 $340,800 $3,381,681 $246,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $396,000 Police Department Radio Receiver System Computer System Police Satellite Facility NCIC 2000 Upgrade Fire/Rescue Building/Equipment Fire Pumper Replacement E-911 Building SUBTOTAL $315,000 $557,000 $359,500 $2,500,000 $20,000 $100,000 $53,500 $50,000 $19,250 $27,500 $31,900: $53,500 $9,051,449 S1.a.5OO $13,157,099 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $43,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so. $43,000 Forest lakeslHollymead Dam Road Zan Road Extension Carrsbrook Road Extension(p.92) Revenue Sharing Road Proj.(p.94) Meadow Creek Pkwy to Rio Bicy/Ped Path Route 250-Route 616 Tum Lane Hydraulic Rd/Rio Bicycle Path/Sidewalk Avon /Rt 20 Interchange Study Greenbrier/Hydraulic Streetlights Greenbrier Dr. Ext. Sidewalks Ivy Road Street Lights Old Ivy Bicycle Path and Sidewalk Rte. 29 Underground Powerlines Landscaping Route 29 SUBTOTAL Libraries Crozet Replacement Building Central Library Recarpeting ReconstrucUexpand Gordon Lib/parking Main Frame Comput.Upgrade New Library Branch Study/Land Purchase MaintenancelReplacement Projects 01/27/95 COUNTY ,098,447 TOTAL PROJECT $4,572,500 10 1 $160,556 $178,750 $67,000 $77,000 $49,600 $131,000 $143,144 $350,000 $635,000 $30,000 $71,500 $118,925 $150,000 $30,000 $172,730 $20,000 $0 $2,385,205 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 o $0 $250,000 $635,000 $0 $71,500 $0 $0 $0 $11,730 so. 1998-99 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 o o $0 $0 $0 $0 $34,000 so. 1997-98 375,947 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 o $50,000 $0 $55,400 $0 $23,000 so. 1996-97 $28,500 $80,278 $89,375 o o $143,144 $25,000. $0 30,000 $0. o $20,00.0 $27,000 so. $0 $0 $25,000 $226,445 $96,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0. $0 $0 so. $322,695 $387,001 $275,000 $67,000 $77,000. $49,600 $131,000 $143,144 $350,000 $635,000 $30,000 $71,500 $118,925 $72,000 $30,000 $172,230 $20,000 S25.QOO $2,654,400 $441,500. $275,000 $67,000 $77,00.0 $49,600 $131,000 $246,80.0 $350,000. $635,000 $30,000. $71,500 $118,925 $72,000 $30,000 $179,230 $20.,000 S25.QOO $2,819,555 SUBTOTAL Parks & Recreation ADA Compliance at parks ADA compliance on School playgrounds Red Hill Elementary Ree. Improvements Greer Outdoor Ree. Improvements Outdoor Ree project completion Walnut Creek Park Improvements Towe Park Ree. Improv. Rivanna Greenway Access and Path Northern Park Improvements Swimming Beaeh Playground structures Northem Area Elementary School Ree Scottsville Community Ctr. Outdoor Improv Crozet Park Contribution Milton/Chris GreenelMlnt Sprgs.Seeurity Maintenance/Replacement Summary Warren Ferry Forloines Study SUBTOTAL $968,230 $59,000 $159,400 $639,397 $559,178 Education (General Govt) PVCC Social Science Bldg. $62,335 $750,000 $300.,000 $250,000. $1,300,000 $0 $300,000 $60,000. S5MOO $410,000 $0 100,00.0. I;m ;@;;i;.2~~_1 $60.,000 $60,000. S5MOO S5MOO $210,000 $310,000 $0 $0 $150,00.0 $60,000 S5MOO $260,000 $62,335 $60,00.0 S5MOO $110,000 $62,335 $750,000 $300,000. 5250 000 $1,300,000 $76,351 $1,790,808 $255,000 so. $2,045,808 $138,686 $2,540,808 $510,000 5250 000 $3,300,808 $5,171,059 $2,540,808 $570,000 $250 000 $3,360,808 Utilities Improvements Keene Landfill Closure County Master Drainage Stormwater Projects SUBTOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CIP Capital Projects/Debt Service Reserv 2,888,230 $12,489,496 $15,039,496 $2.550.000 12,489,496 $0 CIP96RECWK4 $3,588,230 $700.000 2,888,230 $0 $0 $2,846,850 $600.000 2,246,850 $0 $0 $2,851,848 $500.000 2,351,848 $0 $0 2,299,174 $2,699,174 $400,000 2,299,174 $0 $0 $3,053,394 $350.000 2,703,394 $0 5 I $42,480,63111 $29,789,13611 $3,804,984[ Total General Fund Cip Expenditures Total Available Revenues Transfer to School Maintenance Net Available Revenues Over/Short Cumulative Over/Short 01/27/95 FY 95/96 - 99/00 PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 Total Expenditures Administration 518,081 421,010 140,000 50,000 50,000 1,179,091 Fire,Rescue, Safety 910,800 306,242 628,851 250,000 250,000 2,345,893 Highways, Transportation 503,000 532,000 678,650 684,350 504,000 2,902,000 Libraries 40,000 28,500 375,947 30,000 25,000 499,447 Parks/Recreation 559,178 639,397 159,400 59,000 968,230 2,385,205 Education (General Govt) 62,335 0 0 0 0 62,335 School Division Projects 7,853,335 18,369,345 15,176,270 4,680,830 1,818,700 47,898,480 Solid Waste 110,000 260,000 210,000 310,000 410,000 1,300,000 Contingency Q 112,025 159,000 863,500 681,000 1,815,525 TOTAL PROJECTS 10,556,729 20,668,519 17,528,118 6,927,680 4,706,930 60,387,976 EXISTING RESOURCES CIP FUND BALANCE * 240,794 249,174 201,848 196,850 188,230 1,076,896 # GEN FUND APPROPRIATIONS 2,300,000 2,300,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 12,600,000 RESCUE PAYMENT 21,800 0 0 0 21,800 INTEREST EARNED 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 E-911 REVENUES 340,800 340,800 STORMWATER FUND BALANCE 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 0 STATE FUNDS (Rivanna) 250,000 250,000 JAIL PRIOR FUNDS/BONDS 0 0 0 VPSA BONDS 2,969,345 14,676,270 4,080,830 1,118,700 30,348,480 SPLIT BILLING 15,000,000 TOTAL RESOURCES 10,556,729 20,668,519 17,528,118 6,927,680 4,706,930 60,387,976 REQUESTED PROJECTS 10,556,729 20,668,519 17,528,118 6,927,680 4,706,930 60,387,976 OVER/(SHORT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 ACCUMULATED OVER/(SHORT) 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL PROJECTS New High School 2,400,000 7,800,000 12,820,350 23,020,350 WAHS Renovations 943,650 843,650 80,000 1,030,200 2,897,500 AHS Phase II, Phase III 1,007,000 539,000 20,000 249,000 1,815,000 Wood brook Renovation 200,000 1,750,550 0 0 0 1,950,550 Cale Addition 78,000 680,000 0 758,000 Stony Poiint Renovation/Addition 70,000 1,048,000 0 0 0 1,118,000 Brownsville Renovation 100,000 1,199,470 0 0 0 1,299,470 Crozet Addition 80,000 714,890 0 0 794,890 Murray High Renovation 95,000 0 70,000 755,000 0 920,000 Northern Elementary 0 0 0 25,000 300,000 325,000 Red Hill Expansion 0 0 0 300,000 300,000 VHF Underground storage tanks 0 0 180,000 180,000 360,000 CATEC ADA Compliance 0 14,000 14,000 Burley Roof Replacement 140,000 140,000 ADA structural changes 186,485 186,485 425,000 0 797,970 Instructional Technology 1,080,000 939,000 605,070 544,480 489,700 3,658,250 Administrative Technology 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 350,000 Vehicular Maintenance Facility Recon 0 17,500 294,000 143,000 0 454,500 Security Systems - all schools 44,900 44,900 Maintenance/Replacement 1,358,300 2,566,800 611,850 1,864,150 479,000 6,880,100 SUBTOTAL 7,853,335 18,369,345 15,176,270 4,680,830 1,818,700 47,898,480 01/27/95 6 CIP96RECWK4 " '~3rd /-;L ~-;d . g,[J__:I ... )\ COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA 221 GovemQi;~Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 H. Alexander Wise, Jr., Director Department of Historic Resources .~ .....-~ JAN I A 1995 L-----,-,... . R.Q.~~~~\" January 11, 1995 Mrs. F. Palmer Weber Malvem Farm Route 3, Box 162 Charlottesville, VA 22903 RE: Malvern, Albemarle County (DHR No 02-92) Dear Mrs. Weber: At meetings on February 14 and 15, the State Review Board and the Board of Historic Resources, respectively, will consider Malvem for nomination to the National Register and for inclusion in the Virginia Landmarks Register. The national and state registers are the official lists of places in Virginia recognized as having architectural, archaeological or historic significance at the local, state or national level. The enclosed material, explaining the register programs, contains information about the results of listing in the registers and describes the process by which property owners may comment on or object to listing in the registers. You are invited to attend the meetings, both of which will start at 10:00 am on the dates noted above at The Virginia War Memorial Auditorium, 621 S. Belvidere Street, Richmond, Virginia 23220. We hope that you can come. If you have any questions or need additional information about this nomination before the board meetings, please contact me or James Hill, our National Register Coordinator, at (804) 786- 3143. Sincerely, ,..--.,. . ~ / . (/~C91'/ ~/~/n~ I . <../ Julie L. V osmik, Director Division of Survey and Register Enclosures JLV/sdm TELEPHONE: (804) 786-3143 TDD: (804) 786-1934 FAX: (804) 225-4261 An Equal OpportuniJy Agency January 11, 1995 Mrs. F. Palmer Weber RE: Malvem Page 2 c: The Honorable Walter F. Perkins, Chairman Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Robert W. Tucker, Jr., Albemarle County Executive V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director Albemarle County Planning Department Jacquelyn Huckle, Chairman Albemarle County Planning Commission Nancy K. O'Brien, Executive Director Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission Melinda Frierson, Albemarle County Historical Society << << << << 38000' 78037'30" MILE ROAD CLASSIFICATION ..J/"-"" . ~" VIRGINIA .' Primary highway, hard surface Secondary highway, hard surface 1:-) Interstate Route "-./ Unimproved road ========= )~ U S. Route () State Route ',-----, . ~ Light-duty road, hard or improved surface --=------ CROZET, VA. 38078-A6-TF-024 QUADRANGLE LOCATION J2, Revisions shown in Durple and woodland complied In cooperation with Commonwf-A.ltn of Virginia agencies from aerial photographs taken 1984 and Jther sources. This information not field checked 1973 PHOTOREVISED 1987 DMA 5260 II SW - SERIES Y834 M ^' \/t::"";) " I I fiL.-Vl.-I,i\l UltV\ \i-1l01-04D I 4JJ IL 4209000m.N. ~ <~ .$'",.$' <:.<'1) ""/ <:.<'"1.- 1.-<,,~ National Register and Virginia Landmarks Register Criteria for Evaluation The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archreology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Properties may be nominated under one or more of the following criteria: Criterion A: Properties that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. Criterion B: Properties that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. Criterion C: Properties that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. Criterion D: Properties that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations (Exceptions) Ordinarily cemeteries, birthplaces, or graves of historical figures, properties owned by religious institutions or used for religious purposes, structures that have been moved from their original locations, reconstructed historic buildings, properties primarily commemorative in nature, and properties that have achieved significance within the past 50 years shall not be considered eligible for the National Register. However, such properties will qualify if they are integral parts of districts that do meet the criteria or if they fall within the following categories: A. a religious property deriving primary significance from architectural or artistic distinction or historical importance; or B. a building or structure removed from its original location but which is significant primarily for architectural value, or which is the surviving structure most importantly associated with a historic person or event; or C. a birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance if there is no other appropriate site or building directly associated with his or her productive life; or D. a cemetery which derives its primary significance from graves of persons of transcendent importance, from distinctive design features, or from association with historic events; or E. a reconstructed building when accurately executed in a suitable environment and presented in a dignified manner as part of a restoration master plan, and when no other building or structure with the same association has survived; or F. a property primarily commemorative in intent if design, age, tradition, or symbolic value has invested it with its own historical significance; or G. a property achieving significance within the past 50 years if it is of exceptional importance. COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA H. Alexander Wise. Jr.. Director 221 Governor Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Department of Historic Resources RESULTS OF LISTING IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Eligibility for Federal tax provisions: If a property is listed in the National Register, certain federal tax provisions may apply. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 revises the historic preservation tax incentives authorized by Congress in the Tax Reform Act of 1976, the Revenue Act of 1978, The Tax Treatment Extension Act of 1980, the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, and the Tax Reform Act ~f 1984 and as of January 1, 1987, provides for a 20 percent invesmzent tax credit with a full adjustment to basis for rehabilitating historic, commercial, industrial, and residential rental buildings. The fonner 15 percent and 20 percent investment tax credits for rehabilitation of older commercial buildings are combined into a single 10 percent investment tax credit for commercial or industrial buildings built before 1936. The Tax Treatment Extension Act of 1980 provides federal tax deductions for charitable contributions for conservation purposes of partial interests in historically important land areas or structures. Whether these provisions are advantageous to a property owner is dependent upon the particular circumstances of the property and the owner. Because tax aspects outlined above are complex, individuals should consult legal counselor the appropriate local Internal Revenue Service office for assistance in determining the tax consequences of the above provisions. For further information on certification requirements, please refer to 36 CFR 67. Consideration in planning for Federal, Federally licensed, and Federally assisted projects: Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 requires that Federal agencies allow for the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation to have an opportunity to comment on all projects affecting historic properties listed in the National Register. For further information, please refer to 36 CFR 800. Consideration in issuing a surface coal mining permit: In accordance with the Surface Mining and Control Act of 1977, there must be consideration of historic values in the decision to issue a surface coal mining permit where coal is located. For further information, please refer to 30 CFR 700 et seq. Qualification for Federal grants for historic preservation when funds are available: Funding is unavailable at present. TELEPHONE: (804) 786-3143 TDD: (804) 786-1934 FAX- (804) 225-4261 A n Equal Opportunity Agency COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA H. Alexander Wise, Jr.. Director 221 Governor Street Richmond. Virginia 23219 Department of Historic Resources FACTS REGARDING NATIONAL REGISTER DESIGNATION 1. National Register designation officially recognizes the cultural, architectural, and landscape features of a historically significant property, bringing it to the attention of the community, state, and nation. 2. National Register designation does not restrict an owner's use of his or her property in any way as long as private, non-federal funds are used. It does not, for example, prohibit any owner from altering or demolishing any buildings, nor does it restrict subdivision or sale. 3. National Register designation can help lessen the negative impact on a historic property from government-funded projects. By law, an environmental impact study is requires for any federally-funded projects such as road building, utility installation, and public housing. Also, certain state projects are reviewed for their impact on historic resources. If any project is deemed to have an adverse effect on historic buildings, archreological sites, or landscape features, the project may be redesigned to lessen that effect. 4. National Register designation confers two types of financial benefits on historic property owners. First, it allows the owner to claim investment tax credits for certified rehabilitations if the building is used for income-producing purposes. For additional information on the investment tax credit program, contact the Department of Historic Resources, 221 Governor . Street, Richmond, Virginia, 23219 (804-786-3143). Secondly, National Register designation makes properties eligible for matching federal grants for historic preservation. Currently, however, federal funds are not available for preservation projects. 5. Any restrictions on private property owners using private funds can only be enacted by the local governing body--i. e. the city or town councilor the county board of supervisors. Imposition of such restrictions does not necessarily follow from National Register designation. SUMMARY National Register designation: 1. Increases the public awareness of a community's historic resources and encourages preservation 2. Mitigates the negative impact of government-funded projects 3. Does not restrict the private property owner using private funds in any way 4. Provides financial benefits, mainly in the form of tax incentives for rehabilitation of income-producing buildings. TELEPHONE: (804) 786-3143 TDD: (804) 786-1934 FAX: (804) 225-4261 RIGHTS OF OWNERS TO COMMENT AND/OR OBJECT TO LISTING IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER Owners of private properties nominated to the National Register have an opportunity to concur with or object to listing in accord with the National Historic Preservation Act and 36 CFR 60. Any owner or partial owner of private property who chooses to object to listing may submit, to the State Historic Preservation Officer, a notarized statement certifying that the party is the sole or partial owner of the private property and objects to listing. Each owner or partial owner has one vote regardless of the portion of the property that the party owns. If a majority of private property owners object, a property will not be listed. However, the State Historic Preservation Officer shall submit the nomination to the Keeper of the National Register for a determination of eligibility of the property for listing on the National Register. If the property is then determined eligible for listing, although not formally listed, Federal agencies will be required to allow for the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation to have an opportunity to comment before the agency may fund, license, or assist a project which will affect the property. If you choose to object to the listing of your property, the notarized objection must be submitted to H. Alexander Wise, Jr., 221 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia, 23219 before the scheduled meeting of the State Review Board noted in your letter. If you wish to comment, on the nomination of the property to the National Register, please send your comments to the State Historic Preservation Officer at 221 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 before the State Review Board considers this nomination. A copy of the nomination and information on the National Register and the Federal Tax provisions are available from the above address upon request. Rev. 7/94 The Four Landmark Designations The Virginia Landmarks Register Placing properties on the Virgima Landmarks Register IS the orficial means by which the Board or Histone Resources carries out it legal mandate to "Designate historic landmarks..." (Sec. 10.1-::04. Code of Vireinia). Beginning in 1966, the General Assembly acknowledged the public benetit of idenufying historic resources. and it created the landmarks designation program as the non-regulatory vehicle for pursuing that public benetit. Under 1992 legislation. historic property can no longer be formally designated a landmark if the property owner objects or, in the case of a historic district. a majority of the owners object. The Virginia Landmarks Register is intended to encoura~e. but not to require. the preservation or a historic property by calling that historic significance to the attemion of the owner and all others responsible for land-use decisions that will determine the property's future. These decisions may range from preserving the property through compromises that save pan of the property to total destruction of the historic resource. Placement of a property on the Virginia Landmarks Register imposes absolutely no restrictions on the private owner of that property. Similarly, local governments are not required to take the state's designation into consideration in their plans and actions. Benerits for owners of Virginia landmarks include eligibility for financial assistance and technical assistance from the professional staff of the Depanment. Owners of registered landmarks may also elect to protect their properties with a preservation easement. Each owner of a new landmark receives an official state plaque with the name of the property. The Nationaj Register of Historic Places The National Register, established by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, is the list of the buildings, sites and districts that define the nation I s history. These properties may be of local. state or national significance. Like the Virginia Landmarks Register, the National Register is a fonnal planning tool to encourage the preservation of important resources by calling attention to their significance. The owner of a National Register property is not restricted in what he can do with that property. When Federal funds, licenses or permits are used, the project review process will consider the impact of the project on the property. An owner may prevent the formal listing of his property. In these cases, the Keeper of the Register will not add the property to the Register; but will make a formal tindiDg of -eligible for the Regista'. · The properties are still considered significan~ and federal agmc:ia must still take these "eligible" propedies into account in determining the impact of their undertakings. Owners of ProPClties on the National ~ are eligible for preservation grams; 0WDa'S of may also be eligible for tax credits when they rehabilitate their income-producing ptOpel ties. .. -"ational Historic Landmarks The .\fatIonai Histone Landmarks (NHU pro~ram provIdes ar'ricial federal recmmuion or natIonally slgmricant propertIes. Only 10 1 \'irg~ma la:ndmarks have been designated- as NHLs by the Secretary of the intenor. ;-..[ational Historic Landmarks desi1!nation has essentially the same effect as National Register iisting. There IS no regulation of private or nonfederal'actIons affecting National Landmarks. The Federal agency. must make every erfort to minimize harm to NHLs when contemplating a project. But even with this additional encouragement toward preservation. the federal project sponsor retaIns all final decision making about the landmark's preservation. Benetits to owners of National Historic Landmarks are similar to those for National Register propeny owners. The Depanment of the Interior also provides technical assistance and makes an annual report to the U. S. Congress listing all threatened National Historic Landmarks. Locally Designated Landmarks Local ~overnments in Vir1!inia can desi1!nate historic landmarks. Generallv. this local action is - - - . raken through the zoning ordinance: unlike the state and federal designations. it is intended to regulate the propeny owner in a way that protects the designated landmark from unnecessary destruction or insensitive alteration to the exterior. The Code of Vireinia lists protection against destruction of. or encroachment upon. historic areas as a proper function of local zoning ordinances. As a rule. historic district zones are considered "overlay" zones that regulate design but do not change the underlying zoning category. Historic district zoning at the local level is carried out in a manner consistent with other zoning actions. The decisions about these ordinances rest entirely with the locality. It isn't necessarY for the state to recognize a historic landmark before the ~pplication of a historic zone. Recog~tion of a resource by the state does not obligate a local government to protect that resource. Localities may provide tax abatements or other preservation incentives to owners of properties that have been designated "historic" or that are included in local historic districts. .. CHECKLIST FOR STATE AND NATIONAL REGISTER PROCESS IN VIRGINIA (~ denotes completed step in [he process I EvaJuation of EIUribilitv 3 Prebmmarv Informanon Form receiVed and reviewed. additional lIlformatlon requested If necessary 3 Prelimlnary Information Form reVlewed and rated by RegISter Eva.luauon Team at seau-monlhly meeang o InfOrmabOO on properties potentially affected bv federa.l undertakings reviewed and rated bv Re21ster Evaluation Team at senu-montbJy meetmg - 3 Prelimuwv Informanon Form aw.led to members ot State ReVlew Board for revtew two weeks pnor to meeting. Board ma.lces recom..-.d.tioo of ehgibility at bi-monlhly meettDsr. Seaion 106 eva.luauons are not taken betore the board. Listimr on the Re2isters if applicant ejects to pursue registration. applicant coosuJts with Department staff regarding enema. areas of significance, penod of significance and bolDldaries. a DepartmeDt staff reviews nomination drafts upon request and provides technical assistance 3 Department staff reviews completed nOIIllIWJon o Copies of nomination sent to members of both Boards two weeD pnor to meeting o Owner(s). officials. and coDSUJtIDt notified of Boards' decisiclas CJ ~~ ia loaed in at Natioaal htista' office (J 0wDer. ~Itant and local officials notified of 1CeepeI". doei-- a Ownens) and officials nouned of receipt of Prelimmarv intormauon Form. Department of Histonc Resources arcDlves cneclced for property file and any addiuona1l1liormauon a Owner(s) and officials informed of team recoIIllDeDaatlon. Douned or peQamg consideration by State ReVlew Board. Addltionat info~on requested if necessary. La the case of histone districts. public infOrmabonaJ meeungs may be held at the request or the apphcant or the locality o Officials notIfied of review team recom~tJons regarding Secrion 106 projects a ~8) anei officials nouned of Board's decision . COMPLETE nomination due to Deputmeut ~f Historic Resources bv first day of the mooch pnor to the month of the State Review Board and Virginia Board of Histonc Resources JD""'I'ings at which the nomiDauon IS to be COnsidered . Owner(s), adjacentpropeny owners. coasuJtant and local officials notJfied bv letter no less than 30 days prior to State Review Board meetiDg to initiate 30-day comment penod . In the case of a histonc distnct. Departmelll of Historie Resources holds a public heanng Within the locality not less than .thirty days pri.or ~ the Board meetings and publishes legal notICe .m the local paper to Initiate 3Ckiay comment pened o Nomination presented at State Review Board meeting. If approved. State Review Boud recolftlllfl!lld4 t&at nomiDatioD be forwarded to Keeper- of the Natiooai Register. nomi-ti.oa, ~ to Virginia Boud of Historic. ~ If approved without owner objection will be listed 011 tile Virginia { Jlndmub Register on day of pr-ntlltinn o NomiDatiOll is forwarded to the Keeper- of the Natioaal Regiat<< in Washington. D.C. a Followiaa 45 day review peri~ ~ is notified of cfeciaion. If approVed wrtbout ~ objection. ,Property is listed on National Regista'. If 0WDCn ~ KeeIa ~ p~ _pb1e. ~ 0WDe:II may raciDd 0bjecUaa. E X H I BIT I I I RIVANNA WATER & SEWER AUTHORITY P. O. BOX 18 · CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22902-0018 . (804) 977-2970 TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS .. ... /-2?-;?~ Ik,lriOUred l(: (X)tilU _. .... . ~g~11('lIltem N". zr~_~~Cl/, 5" /P EUGENE K. POTTER, ACTING EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ~~ SUBJECT: UNACCOUNTED FOR WATER LOSSES FROM: DATE: DECEMBER 13, 1994 Staff have investigated Mr. Hendrix's concern for a 24% difference between wholesale and retail billings for the fourth quarter of FY 94. As was acknowledged in the brief discussion at the October Board meeting, the timing of the several events that ultimately determine the billing can distort the apparent "loss" of water. The enclosed data sheet summarizes FY 94 billings and a 24% "loss" can be determined for fourth quarter City figures. This is, however, partially offset by third quarter "loss" of 10% with the yearly average being about 18%. The recognized industry norm for metered water systems is 10%. Particularly efficient systems may approach 8%. Our average '10ss" over the past 12 years has been 12.77%. The extremes have been 16.77% for FY 94 and 6.91 % for FY 92. These figures can be improved by tightening accountability. It is my understanding that water usage due to line flushing, line breaks and fire fighting are not accounted for at present. General water utility experience would indicate that accountability for these losses could reduce losses by 38% , or to an overall figure of 10.4% in our case. Meter slippage and leakage can comprise other significant components of losses at approximately 48%. My suggestion at this time is that representatives of the City, Service Authority and Rivanna coordinate efforts to implement tighter accountability for recognized losses and see where that takes us. Other more capital intensive aspects such as leak detection and meter change outs can be considered for future implementation. We should collectively have the resources to do this without hiring an outside consultant. EKP/ldb SERVING CHARLOTTESVILLE & ALBEMARLE COUNTY E X H I BIT I I RIVANNA WATER & SEWER AUTHORITY P. O. BOX 18 . CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22902-0018 . (804) 977-2970 TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS FROM: EUGENE K. POTIER, ACTING EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ~~( SUBJECT: STATUS OF ACTIVE CAPITAL PROJECTS DATE: DECEMBER 13, 1994 The following reflects the status of the active capital projects: URBAN WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN Notices to Proceed were issued for Divisions 'A' and 'B' on October 31, 1994. November pay request was for approximately 750 feet of 24" waterline on Division A. Most of right of way has been cleared for Berkmar Drive on Division 'B' and waterline construction has begun. LICKINGHOLE CREEK RUNOFF CONTROL BASIN Basin is now full. A contract has been executed for planting of wetlands mitigation. Greenbriar Farms of Chesapeake is the wetlands planting contractor. Plants must be installed during winter dormancy and before March 31, 1995. MOORES CREEK WWTP TOXICITY REDUCTION EVALUATION (TRE) Biological monitoring is on-going to end TRE requirements. There is currently no indication of toxicity and when monitoring is successfully concluded the TRE will end. Note agenda item on status of Moores Creek WWTP discharge permit. SCOITSVILLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS Notice to Proceed for construction contract was issued effective November 10, 1994. Construction is under way. RAW WATER MANAGEMENT STUDY Final report delivered to Board members on November 22. Agenda item noted. ADMINISTRATION BillLDING IMPROVEl\1ENTS Design is nearly complete this date and the project will be advertised for bids as soon as is feasible. Estimated completion date is April 1995. EKP / ldb SERVING CHARLOTTESVILLE 8: ALSEMARLE COUNTY E X H I BIT I RIVANNA WATER & SEWER AUTHORITY P. O. BOX 18 . CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22902-001e . (e04) 977-2970 BOARD OF DIRECTORS EUGENE K. POTTER ~~o~ DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS DATE: NOVEMBER 10~, 1994 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: OPERATIONS REPORT FOR OCTOBER 1994 Water production for the month of October was as follows: Observatory WTP 5.055 MGD S. Rivanna 5.820 MGD N. Rivanna .175 MGD TOTAL URBAN 11. 05 MGD Crozet WTP 0.680 MGD Scottsville WTP 0.119 MGD On October 31st Ragged Mountain down 8 I 0", Sugar Hollow down 10 I 3" and Beaver Creek down 6". The Moores Creek WWTP treated 10.450 MGD and averaged 1 mg/l for BOD and 4 mg/l for suspended solids for the month. Camelot WWTP treated 0.113 MGD and averaged 11 mg/l for BOD and 13 mg/l for suspended solids. Glenmore WWTP treated .039 MGD and averaged 4 mg/l for BOD and 8 mg/l for suspended solids. EKP/rll SERVING CHARLOTTESVILLE 8: ALBEMARLE COUNTY Mr. Robert Huff and Ms. Mary George of Robinson, Farmer Cox Associates presented the FY 94 Audit Report to the Board. Overall, it is a very favorable, positive report. Mr. Hendrix moved to accept the report. Mr. Tucker seconded. All voted aye. Mr. Potter reported that Rivanna has received (in today's mail) the new Discharge Permit for Moores Creek. Although he stated it has not been thoroughly reviewed, it appears to be in order. Regarding the Urban Water Line, Mr. Kent noted both divisions of work are under-way, with approximately 2,000 feet of 24-inch pipe in the' ground. He noted staff has progress meetings scheduled with both contractors for December 22 . Regarding the unaccounted for water loss issue brought to staff's attention by Mr. Hendrix last month, Mr. Potter reviewed his December 13 memorandum with the Board. That memo is attached as Exhibit III. His suggestion is that representatives of the City, Service Authority and Rivanna coordinate efforts to implement tighter accountability for recognized losses and see where that takes us. The Board concurred with this approach. Regarding the Water Management Study by Black & Veatch, Mr. Potter noted he has distributed the report to the Board. Mr. Hendrix suggested that the Board hold a Work Session on the matter, with representatives of Black & Veatch present, reviewing the whole issue, including time table for permitting procedures, conservation issues as well as alternatives! contingencies available should any major problems arise Le. failure to obtain any of the necessary permits. [il RIVANNA WATER & SEWER AUTHORITY p, O. BOX 1e · CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22~02-00;~Jf r.rO~ .j[j~,IT~ 'j \ REGULAR MEETING n\ 1M1269J) ,1\.1: ~ ; l. ~."-' :, \RD OF SU~~~VW "~,,,","...w BOARD OF DIRECTORS DECEMBER 19, 1994 The Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Board of Directors held its regular monthly meeting on December 19, 1994. Members present were Cole Hendrix, Tony Iachetta, Judith Mueller, and Robert Tucker. Authority staff present were William Sessoms, Gene Potter, Chuck Kent and Linda Bragg. Also present were Fred Landess and members of the media and the public. Dr. Iachetta called the meeting to order at 2:02 p.m. and Mrs. Mueller moved approval of the minutes of the October 31 meeting. Mr. Tucker seconded. All voted aye. Mrs. Mueller moved approval of the Consent Agenda. Mr. Tucker seconded. All voted aye. The staff reports on operations and capital projects are attached as Exhibits I and II. Mr. Fran Lawrence and two other residents of the Woolen Mills neighborhood were present and Mr. Lawrence spoke regarding the odor problems associated with the area. Staff had prepared a report on the issue and Mr. Potter gave Mr. Lawrence and the others a copy. Mr. Lawrence noted they are encouraged by the recommendation in the report. Mr. Scott Peyton, a property owner on the urban water line project, was also present and stated his concerns about his property. He stated Mr. Harding (on behalf of the Authority) had tendered an offer for the easement that was not acceptable and he had been requested [il SERVING CHARLOTTESVILLE 8: ALBEMARLE COUNTY E X H I BIT I V RES 0 L UTI 0 N WHEREAS, the Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of .Virginia requires a certification by this Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia Law; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge, (i) only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting to which this certification resolution applies, (ii) only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority. VOTE AYES: Mr. Hendrix, Dr. Iachetta, Mrs. Mueller & Mr. Tucker NAYS: NONE Absent During Vote: Mr. Brent Absent During Meeting: Mr. Brent This is certified to be a true and exact copy of Resolution passed by the Board of Directors at their meeting held on the 19th day of December 1994 J. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLEU' .. 2 6f9!1; EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i ::.~Q OF SUPE~~;':" '.."..--..---~-_." , (~] f[' n \1' .1':. i? -.!::......~L.~'...., AGENDA TITLE: December 1994 Financial Report AGENDA DATE: February 1, 1995 D!):'(Ii),~~~ ~MB~~:i--::~2_~ "~!'~;1" t'~: ~;".Z!..J~~Ul51 INFORMATION: ACTION: SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST: December 1994 Financial Report for the General Fund, School Fund, and Fund Balance CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: X ATTACHMENTS: STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Breeden, Walters REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: Attached is the December 31, 1994 Monthly Financial Report for the General and Education Funds. Projected General Flll1d revenues are based on collections through September, that were last revised in October. Revenues will be revised again with the January Financial Report. Projected General Fund expenditures have not been revised at this time. Projected Education revenues are based on the October School Financial Report. They will be revised with the January Financial Report. Projected Eduction expenditures are based on the October School Financial Report. They will be revised with the January Financial Report, RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the acceptance of the December 1994 Financial Report, 94DECRPT.WP5 95.009 ALBEMARLE COUNTY OPERATIONS MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT DECEMBER 31, 1994 PERCENT YTD/PROJ 65.30% 53.52% 29.98% 45.18% 6.84% 57.65% 53.22% 57.54% 49.37% 0.53% 71.38% 48.29% 40.92% 41.09% 40.94% 43.61% CHANGE $1,630,459 10,000 o (127,816 1,883 1,514,526 Q 1,514,526 o o o o APPROPRIATED BUDGET $67,779,010 450,311 5,297,501 27,673,125 760,904 101,960,851 2,780,659 104.741.510 REVENUES LOCAL(GENERAL FUND LOCAL(SCHOOLS) SELF-SUSTAINING FUNDS STATE FEDERAL TOTAL REVENUES TRANSFERS IN TOTAL WITH TRANSFERS 25,258,263 4,551,780 8,220,880 38,030,923 EXPENSES GENERAL GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS NON-DEPARTMENTAL TRANSFERS SUBTOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 61,413,086 5,297,501 66,710,587 510 .lQ 104.741 SCHOOL FUND OPERATIONS SELF-SUSTAINING FUNDS SUBTOTAL SCHOOL DIVISION BALANCE OF REVENUES OVER EXPENSES TOTAL EXPENSES ALBEMARLE COUNTY GENERAL FUND MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT DECEMBER 31.1994 PERCENT YTD/PROJ 65.30% 41.79% 24.22% 63.53% 100.00% 64.24% 51.92% 50.54% 55.77% 45.65% 45.11 % 50.00% 36.19% 50.62% 0.53% 71.38% 49.13% PROJECTED CHANGE $1 1,883 1,525,419 o 1,525,419 APPROPRIATED BUDGET $67,779,010 5,363,412 213,500 73,355,922 1,479,946 74.835.868 REVENUES LOCAL STATE FEDERAL TOTAL REVENUES TRANSFERS IN TOTAL WITH TRANSFERS 4,367,834 1,442,127 7,634,266 2,203,323 4,780,661 36,804,945 2,705,941 2,124,111 4,551,780 8,220,880 74,835,868 EXPENSES GENERAL GOV'T ADMINISTRATION JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC SAFETY PUBLIC WORKS HUMAN DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION P ARKS/RECREATION/CULTURE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NONDEPARTMENTAL TRANSFERS TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES .lQ BALANCE OF REVENUES OVER EXPENSES ALBEMARLE COUNTY SCHOOL FUND MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT DECEMBER 31,1994 PERCENT YTD/PROJ 53.52% 45.98% 0.00% 45.05% 48.29% 47.06% 38.57% 53.61 % 47.70% 48.02% 74.15% 41.77% 40.92% PROJECTED CHANGE APPROPRIATED BUDGET $450,311 22,309,713 647,404 23,307,428 38.105.658 61,413,086 46,647,048 2,245,648 4,925,031 6,329,591 108,306 1.157,562 61,413,086 REVENUES: LOCAL - SCHOOLS STATE FEDERAL TOTAL REVENUES TRANSFERS IN TOTAL WITH TRANSFERS INSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION, ATTENDANCE, HEALTH PUPIL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FACILITIES OPERATION/MAINTAINANCE FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION/MODIFICATION TRANSFERS TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES EXPENSES: tQ BALANCE OF REVENUES OVER EXPENSES ALBEMARLE COUNTY OPERATIONS FUND BALANCE REPORT DECEMBER 31, 1994 CAPITAL FUND SCHOOL FUND GENERAL FUND 107.688 (682,920) (321,165) $12,400 $13,580 (110,802) (35,000) (13,000) $1 197.700 (798,11 6) ($1 81 432) $1 $13.067.207 (925,000) (305,923) (1 5.000) (234,022) FUND BALANCE 06-30-94 APPROVED APPROPRIATIONS: CURRENT YEAR OPERATIONS - BUDGETED REAPPROPRIA TIONS UNEXPENDED SCHOOL SITE REAPPROPRIATION REQUEST FROM CARRYOVER FUNDS MURRAY EDUCATION CENTER GEORGETOWN ROAD HEALTH DEPARTMENT NEW WING SCHOOL BUSES RT 250 LANDSCAPING REDUCTION WAHS CROSSING REDUCTION NET SMALL PROJECT TRANSFERS ($29.219) (979.548) ~!8.152 587.261 11 TOTAL APPROVED APPROPRIATIONS FUND BALANCE - ... -. ", 1- ;z..2=z." ...-- .... "':~~;' ~ -- ... -- ~". ..'. ......J<' ,i{'::. : nf ~" j?#;,!!~c....5 ~o COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE '-~_..__. ; n WI d ',:' ,,;, JAN 2 5 J95 L.__. N """.._ "" " HD OF flU!: __. MEMORANDUM . .,....-....._~-., TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors ;/ ~ Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive 141lt January 26, 1995 Buck Mountain Creek Permitting and Design Schedule Attached is a project schedule that Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority would follow in the implementation and permitting of the Buck Mountain Creek Reservoir. You will note that the initial tasks begin in 1995-1996 and proceed through the various permitting agencies and actual construction is planned for the years 2008-2012 with operation of the reservoir in the 2013 -2015 time period. This should meet our water demand through the year 2040 based on average daily demands since 1975. County staff, along with Rivanna and Albemarle County Service Authority staff, have discussed the issue of Chris Greene Lake as a drinking water impoundment It appears, at this point, that a safe yield study for Chris Greene Lake will be conducted within the next several months, through R WSA, which will provide us with information as to whether or not Chris Greene Lake is, in fact, an impoundment worthy of usage for water demand in our community. As this project moves forward, we will keep you updated on its progress and eventually some action by the Board may be necessary as to whether to use this impoundment for drinking water or strictly recreational purposes. RWT,Jr/dbm 95.019 Attachment , >- .i::'Cl .~ .s o m -5ob ::I en <(~<Il ,-0- ~:c ::I <IlJ!l~ enal-5 a6Een :n-!t) a; E.g!, :>-e > '-a. m.s 2;: m ~j ~~:- ~~. ~~ ~~~ ~~~. -;~...: ~ ij ~ ~~: ~~ I: ~~~ ~ r . e- o o -5 .~ c o = .!ll -s <fl c o o (ij E .g c . Qj <fl <fl ::I ~ c '0. <fl <fl CD E Cll -, '- ..Q >- CD ~ ::I en II <fl <fl CD U e Q.. Ol C 'a. o u en ~ 8. CD a::: Ol c 'C CD CD C '0, C W "C C Cll S ~ CD E c e '50 c W ~ Cll C. ~ Q.. . o W o > "C C Cll <fl e- o o ,g <fl e CD E :J U o o Ol c ''E 8. c. :J en "C c Cll C o = Cll u '8. c. <( .~ CD Q.. 'E .0 ::I en . o W o > "C C Cll <fl e- o o >- .0 :;: CD '50 Q) a::: .~ <Il Q.. . al :J <fl !!!. $ '~ CD Q.. o W o > "C C Cll <fl e- o o '.-';ml" ~~~: ::.":. :.:.;:-. f:i ~;~:~~ ;:1 !If:~ f::;~::: :.:::::~ t~ ~I' :;:: :-;." :m :~~:;;~ ~ :J co CD '5 al .r::. u en <fl CD U C CD t: :J C. C. <( "C C Cll E Cll o '0 c Ol 'iij CD o . a::: o o > ,g $ c CD E :J 8 o c Ol 'ill CD o "C C Cll C o .~ '8. c. <( E CD Q.. 'E .0 :J en . a::: o o > >- .0 :;: CD '5 m a::: .~ m Q.. . "C m :J <fl !!!. E m Q.. a::: o o > Ol C u: .... '0 ~ m tIl m 0:: "C C ro tIl Q) () C Cll c m t: :J C. C. <( "C C Cll E ro o '0 c o '.cJ () 2 Vi c o o . (ij c o '.cJ ~ m c. o c o '.cJ Cll m c~ 'iijo:: :J"C OC _Cll .!ll c co m= E Cll c ~ e Ql ~'5O ~ Ql c 0 2?wo "g>o 0 Wee 'OmQl e-~ ~ o Cll Cll oc.c. m m >-00 E Cll Cll <('c 'c . '0,'0, en .... '- :j>> , ' , tIlOO:: e-w 0 000 0>> .... o ~ Q) tIl m 0:: f .. /~ &il/ 0/ . . ~,. '. . . Information Packet on Professional Baseball in Charlottesville, Virginia ,. . . Prepared by Edward Cooper, President The Centerfield Group, Inc. Post Office Box 276 Dunn Loring, Virginia 22027 703/876-4934 December 1994 . . re . .. . Professional Baseball in Charlottesville" Vir2inia . It is the intention of the Charlottesville Professional Baseball Club, L.P. to bring Class A minor league professional baseball to the greater Charlottesville, Virginia area. Charlottesville has been without a professional baseball team since the Virginia Mountain League folded in 1914. Baseball is a very popular sport in the Commonwealth of Virginia and in the greater Charlottesville area as evidenced by the many youth, adult and semi-pro leagues that operate throughout the region. Professional baseball offers the citizens of the greater Charlottesville area an excellent entertainment choice for their hard earned money. Best of all, it is good, clean, wholesome family entertainment at an affordable cost. . . About the Charlottesville Professional Baseball Club" L.P. . The Charlottesville Professional Baseball Club, L.P. (CPBC) is a group of individuals, some businesspersons others purely baseball fans, interested in acquiring, either through expansion or purchase of an existing club, and operating a Class A minor league professional baseball franchise. It is the intention of the CPBC to locate the baseball club and its operations in the greater Charlottesville area of Albemarle County, Virginia or its contiguous counties. . Current members of the CPBC bring a wide range of professional expertise and experience to the venture. With backgrounds in entertainment production, marketing, financial planning, real estate management, commercial land procurement and construction and contracts and real estate law, the project's backers are well suited to producing a successful and profitable enterprise. . . Additionally, much time and effort has been devoted to thorougWy researching the important relationships that can detennine the success or failure of the enterprise. How the major and minor leagues cooperate and relate to each other, the economic impact of baseball on local communities, and the day-to-day operations of the ball club have been, and continue to be, researched and studied. . The Centerfield Group, Inc., a company incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, will serve as the general partner for the CPBC, L.P. 1 . . . venture. Edward Cooper, of Vienna, Virginia, serves as the President and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Centerfield Group, Inc. and also serves as the Managing General Partner of the Charlottesville Professional Baseball Club, L.P. Marc Krasner, of Bethesda, Maryland, serves on the Board of Directors and holds the position of Chief Financial Officer (CFO). Gary Komarow, of Arlington, Virginia, serves on the Board of Directors and holds the position of Executive Vice President and General Counsel to the company. . . What is Minor Lea2ue Professional Baseball? . Minor League Professional Baseball is truly America's Pastime. Organized minor league baseball has been in existence for 93 years. The National Association of Professional Baseball Leagues (NAPBL or National Association), founded in 1901, is the governing body of minor league baseball. As the world's largest professional sports organization with a membership comprising over 180 teams and 18 leagues, the National Association is headquartered in St. Petersburg, Florida. Member leagues and clubs are located throughout the United States, Canada, Mexico and the Dominican Republic. The three stated basic goals of the National Association have been and continue to be to: . · perpetuate the game of baseball and provide the safeguards to warrant absolute public trust in its integrity. . · promote and protect leagues that wish to operate under it. . promote and protect the interests of players, managers, coaches, trainers, umpires and club executives, and to secure them advancement commensurate with skill. . . Before the major reorganization of the Minor Leagues in 1963, there were several different classifications of organized Minor League Baseball. In 1949, when the all-time attendance mark of39,782,717 fans was set, there were 59 leagues and 448 clubs playing in seven different classifications (AAA to Class D). After 1963, the Minor Leagues compressed to four classifications (Class AAA, AA, A and Rookie). Within Class A there is a further delineation, usually along talent level, of Short Season Class A, Class A, and Class A -Advanced. . 2 . . . Minor League Baseball Today . Minor League Baseball provides more than 180 communities in over 40 states with summer fun and excitement at affordable price levels. It is not uncommon for a family of four to go to the ballpark and find an entire afternoon or evening's entertainment for under $25. Minor League Baseball is said to be in its Renaissance. According to the National Association, in 1991, attendance exceeded 26 million fans, a figure not matched in 41 years and climbing steadily since 1981. Attendance in 1992, 1993, and 1994 was 27.1 million, 30 million and 33.4 million respectively. A total of 58 new communities acquired a franchise in the 1980's and it is expected that even greater numbers will be able to enjoy Minor League Baseball in the '90s. . According to Bob Richmond of Baseball Opportunities, the leading franchise broker, prices for Class AAA teams range from $6.5 - $8 million, Class AA from $3.8 - $6 million, Full Season Class A from $2 - $2.75 million, Short Season Class A from $600,000 to $1 million and Rookie League teams from $450,000 to $550,000. . . Approximately 5,500 players are active in the Minor Leagues annually. An average of 1,500 new players are signed each year. Of the nearly 700 players working in the major leagues, only four (Dave Winfield, Pete Incaviglia, Jim Abbott and John Olerud) did not play in the Minor Leagues. Most of today's top major league executives began their careers in the minor leagues, while all major league umpires came up through the National Association. Baseball's present and future are working in the Minor Leagues today. . The possibilities seem endless for minor league clubs to advertise, market, and license their team's name, logo, and other trademarks. Prior to 1991, total sales of officially licensed caps, T-shirts, sweat shirts and other paraphernalia averaged $2.5 million a year. But the National Association reached a licensing agreement with Major League Baseball Properties (MLBP) at the end of the 1991 season and sales have been skyrocketing ever since. Licensed merchandise generated revenue of $25 million in 1992, $40 million in 1993 and is expected to reach $60 million in 1994. As new and more creative logos, team names, and team identities are created and licensed, the Minor Leagues will benefit greatly from the licensing arrangement with MLBP into the next century. . . 3 . . . The Relationship Between Minor League and Malor League Baseball . The National Association and Major League Baseball are bound together by a one hundred and fifty page document entitled the Professional Baseball Agreement (PBA), under which responsibilities are outlined. Dating from 1901 and most recently renegotiated and ratified in 1991, the PBA runs through the 1997 season. In very simplified form, the Major League clubs are responsible for player, manager and coach assignments, and their compensation. The Minor League clubs provide stadium facilities, executive staffs, stadium employees and away from home travel expenses. . Minor League Baseball and the Community . Minor League Baseball has a very positive economic impact on a community. Studies show that every new dollar brought to a community through the presence of Minor League Baseball turns over four times. This economic impact ranges from more than $2 million annually for short season communities, to several million in larger market cities. Player salaries, visiting teams' and umpires' expenditures as well as parent club expenditures make up the new money coming into the community. The local club itself will spend anywhere from $300,000 - $1 million in its community annually. . . Since 1987, 22 new stadiums have been built through public funding. In addition, many communities have pledged substantial ftmds ($2 -$6.5 million range) for major renovations to existing stadiums in the corresponding period. Approximately 14 new ballparks are planned for construction during the next few years. . Minor League Baseball is important to the fabric of the communities it serves. Minor League clubs are commonly quite active in the communities they represent, helping in various charity causes among other worthwhile endeavors. . . 4 . . ., Process to Be Undertaken to Obtain a Baseball Franchise . . As with any business deal, there are several different ways to proceed in the acquisition of a professional sports franchise. The CPBC is committed to obtain a baseball club as inexpensively as possible. The most direct method of gaining a franchise is through the act of purchasing the assets of an existing club and moving those assets to the greater Charlottesville area. In the estimation of the CPBC's general partners, the most inexpensive method of gaining a franchise is through expansion. Both processes will be explained in this section. . Purchasing Assets of Existing Franchise . As mentioned above, there are several different methods by which a group or investors may acquire control of a franchise. The most common way in this regard is to buy an existing team and, either operate in its current territory or seek approval from the minor league and the National Association to move the franchise to the greater Charlottesville area. . The CPBC has begun the process of identifying potential Class A franchises that are currently on the market. Letters of interest in acquiring a franchise were sent to the Presidents of the five Class A leagues that operate throughout the country. As of December 1 st, four responses have been received and it has come to the attention of the CPBC, L.P. that a club operating in the southeast is available for purchase. . . Initial negotiations have been productive, but it is still unclear whether the franchise is properly valued and would be capable of being moved to the Charlottesville area. However, if efforts fail to obtain a team in Charlottesville, this franchise could be a perfect opportunity to acquire a club and learn the intricacies of operating a minor league franchise in preparation for a chance to obtain a club for Charlottesville. . The CPBC has been in contact with Bob Richmond, President of Baseball Opportunities, Inc., an Arizona-based professional baseball franchise broker. Richmond, and his company, is well known in the baseball world and has assisted in many franchise sales over the past twenty-five years. His services range from locating franchises that are on the market to appraising clubs to assisting in the negotiations and closing of the deal. On behalf of the CPBC, Edward Cooper has filled out the informal questionnaire and returned it to Mr. Richmond with a signed letter of confidentiality. . 5 . . ~ The Expansion Process . It is believed by many in the business of professional baseball that a settlement in the protracted labor strife that grips Major League Baseball will be concluded in time for the opening of spring training camps in February of 1995. Additionally, many in baseball believe that as part of the negotiated settlement, Major League Baseball will agree to expand by two or four teams, possibly as soon as 1996 or 1997. With Major League expansion will come the necessary minor league expansion. . . In preparation for this possibility, CPBC has made contact with several minor leagues that operate in the Middle Atlantic states and has inquired as to their status on expanSIOn. . As a result of these contacts, Edward Cooper was invited to make an informal presentation to the Executive Committee of the Class A South Atlantic League, on behalf of the CPBC, during the Baseball Winter Meetings held December 1-7 in Dallas, Texas. . During the meeting, it was indicated to Cooper that the South Atlantic League was very interested in placing a franchise in the greater Charlottesville area, provided a suitable playing site could be found. Furthermore, the CPBC was asked to submit a formal expansion application to the South Atlantic League no later than January 10, 1995. . Procedure for South Atlantic League Expansion . The application procedure will be divided into two phases, the first phase being the completion and filing of the application with payment of the appropriate application fee, and the second phase being applicant presentations before the Expansion Committee. . . 6 . . .. - Applications under Phase I will be evaluated with regard to four (4) major areas: . . c. d. Character and fmancial responsibility of the applicant, Baseball park facility and grounds, including lease terms and compliance with Section XVIII of the PBA (standards for minor league player facilities), Community and government support, Geographic location and market potential of the area. a. b. Phase II of the outline will not be implemented until it is determined that the . South Atlantic League is likely to receive permission to expand. It is anticipated that the entire process of determining the II short list, II the interviews, and the site visit will take approximately 60 days to complete. . Economic Impact on Greater Charlottesville Area There are many studies that show that minor league baseball has a great impact on local economic development. From jobs generated by the planning, development and construction of a new stadium facility to permanent front office positions with the club to casual summer labor to the ancillary effects brought on by pumping more entertainment dollars into the economy, baseball brings economic, as well as social, benefits to the community. . The National Association of Professional Baseball Leagues reports that a Class A baseball team will be responsible for generating an additional $4,200,000 into its economy. Some of the ways that the ball club impacts the local economy are as . follows: . Expenditures by Players, Manager, Coaches, Trainer & Families Food, Housing, Entertainment, Transportation . . Expenditures by Visiting Teams & Staff Hotels, Food, Incidentals . Expenditures by Umpires, Scouts & Other Baseball Personnel Hotels, Food, Automobiles & Incidentals . 7 . . . . Expenditures by Major League Affiliate Staff Hotels, Food, Automobiles & Incidentals, Equipment, Food & Uniform Reimbursements . . . Expenditures by Fans Souvenirs, Concessions, Programs, Parking, Apparel . Expenditures by Club Within The Community Labor, Concessions, Park Maintenance, Advertising . Involvement of Local Government and Business Leaders . To date, CPBC has had positive interaction with officials of the City of Charlottesville, Albemarle County, the University of Virginia, and the Chamber of Commerce. Edward Cooper, of CPBC, has held extensive discussions with the Charlottesville City Manager, Cole Hendrix, and the Albemarle County Executive, Robert W. Tucker, Jr., regarding their support for bringing professional baseball to Charlottesville and their interest in working with the CPBC to fmd a facility that meets the needs of the club, community and League. Talks are on-going to locate a site in Albemarle County, most likely along the Interstate 29 North corridor. The area along Interstate 29, north of the City, is currently experiencing a huge building boom. Additionally, Albemarle County is in need of a permanent location, with parking and other amenities, to site its County Fair, which takes place every year in late August and the beginning of September. Efforts are now underway to find a location that could be a multi-use site and include the fairgrounds project with a baseball stadium. . . Additionally, the CPBC has reached out to several members of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, and is working closely with them to coordinate public support for the project. David Bowerman, a member of the Board of Supervisors, has indicated that there is a great need for additional entertainment activities in the greater Charlottesville area and is willing to assist CPBC's cause on the Board. . . Jane DeSimone Dittmar, President of the Charlottesville & Albemarle County Chamber of Commerce, has indicated her support for the endeavor and has agreed to assemble several small groups of local businesspeople who are interested in seeing baseball come to Charlottesville. 8 . . t- . With regard to the University of Virginia, its current baseball facility, and its need for a new structure, James (Jim) West of Charlottesville, who served as head baseball coach and then Associate Athletic Director for the University of Virginia, has coordinated the outreach efforts to identify the possibility of temporarily using UV A's baseball facility until a permanent structure can be created. Also, West is laying the groundwork for discussions regarding a possible new facility, to be built in conjunction with the City, County and Commonwealth. - . Finally, efforts are ongoing in discussions with the Commonwealth of Virginia's Director of the Department of Economic Development to identify available matching funds or grants that could be used, in part, to fmance a new facility. South Atlantic Lea~ .. . The South Atlantic League, in its modern baseball era form, has run from 1948 to 1952 and from 1960 to the present. Previous sporadic incarnations of the South Atlantic League, known as the "Sally League," date from 1888 and eventually became the base for the current Class AA Southern League. . The present loop was founded during the minor league's boom period that started immediately after World War II. Unfortunately, the league collapsed in 1952 due, in part, to mismanagement by the major leagues and America's increased interest in television. The increase of television viewing led to poor attendance at ballparks and many failed clubs. Revived in 1960, attendance has steadily climbed breaking the one million fan mark in 1989. The South Atlantic League drew a record 1,806,495 fans for the 1994 season. . - Designated as a Class A circuit with fourteen teams covering Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and West Virginia, the league runs a 142 game schedule from early April to early September. John Moss, of Kings Mountain, North Carolina has served as the league's president since its re-emergence in 1960. . Throughout the years many excellent players, and potential future hall of famers, have played in the South Atlantic League. In 1965, Bobby Bonds of Lexington and Al Oliver of Gastonia led the league in runs and hits respectively. 1966 found a young Greenville Met named Nolan Ryan leading the league in wins (17) and, not 9 I- l . r- . . . .. . . . . . surprisingly, strikeouts (272). Don Mattingly won the league batting title in 1980 and led his team, the Greensboro Hornets, to the league title. And current Atlanta Braves phenom Tom Glavine led the league in earned run average in 1985 while with the Sumter Braves. In 1994, the following teams made up the South Atlantic League: Albany Polecats (Orioles Affiliate), Asheville Tourists (Rockies), Augusta Greenjackets (Pirates), Capital City (Columbia, SC) Bombers (Mets), Charleston (SC) RiverDogs (Rangers), West Virginia (Charleston, WV) Wheelers (Reds), Columbus (GA) Redstixx (Indians), Fayetteville Generals (Tigers), Greensboro Bats (Yankees), Hagerstown Suns (Blue Jays), Hickory Crawdads (White Sox), Macon Braves (Braves), Savannah Cardinals (Cardinals), and the Spartanburg (SC) Phillies (Phillies). For the 1995 season, Albany will affiliate with the Expos and the Phillies will leave Spartanburg and play in Kannapolis, NC. The average ticket price in the South Atlantic League in 1994 was $4.50. Stadium sizes varied from Savannah's Grayson Stadium (largest wi 8,500 capacity) to Asheville's McCormick Field (smallest wi 3,500 capacity). The Hickory Crawdads led the league in attendance, drawing 270,880 fans in 68 home dates. The league attendance totals for 1994, with number of home dates, were: Hickory Crawdads Greensboro Bats Capital City Bombers Columbus Redstixx Albany Polecats Asheville Tourists Augusta Greenjackets Hagerstown Suns Savannah Cardinals Charleston RiverDogs Fayetteville Generals West Virginia Wheelers Macon Braves Spartanburg Phillies 270,880 218,410 146,676 133,351 124,520 118,146 115,909 111,660 111,143 105,701 104,379 103,985 83,597 53,138 10 (68 home dates) (68) (62) (66) (65) (63) (64) (62) (62) (65) (64) (64) (58) (64) . . . Major Employers in the Greater Charlottesville Area . Company Name Location Approx. # of Emplovees . American Safety Razor Verona 1,000+ Charlottesville City Schools Charlottesville 500-999 City of Charlottesville Charlottesville 500-999 Comdial Telephone U.S. 29 North 500-999 ConAgra Crozet 500-999 Crutchfield Corporation Earlysville 500-999 Frank Ix & Sons, Inc. Charlottesville 250-499 GE-FANUC U.S. 29 North 500-999 Jefferson National Bank Charlottesville 250-499 . Klockner- Penta plast Gordonsville 500-999 Kroger Company Charlottesville 250-499 Liberty Fabrics Gordonsville 500-999 Martha Jefferson Hospital Charlottesville 250-499 . The Michie Company Charlottesville 500-999 Murray Electrical Products Earlysville 250-499 Nimbus Records Earlysville 250-499 Sperry Marine Inc. U.S. 29 North 500-999 . Sprint Centel of Virginia Charlottesville 500-999 State Farm Insurance Charlottesville 1,000+ University of Virginia Charlottesville 8,500 Univ. of Virginia Hospital Charlottesville 4,500 . Source: Charlottesville and Albemarle County Chamber of Commerce . 11 . . r . . ~ulation" bv Countv" of Areas Within 35 Mile Radius of . Charlottesville" Vir~inia . Countv Albemarle County Augusta County Buckingham County Cumberland County Fluvanna County Goochland County Greene County Louisa County Madison County Orange County Rockingham County City of Charlottesville City of Harrisonburg City of Staunton City of Waynesboro 1990 Population 68,040 54,677 12,873 7,825 12,429 14,163 10,297 20,325 11,949 21,421 50,848 40,341 30,707 24,461 18,549 . .' . TOTAL 398,905 . Source: 1990 U.S. Census of Population Data . 12 . . , Demognwhic Overview of Greater Charlottesville Area . . The Greater Charlottesville Area consists of the counties of Albemarle, Louisa, Nelson, Fluvanna, and Greene, as well as the City of Charlottesville. These jurisdictions also make up what is known as the Thomas Jefferson Planning . District Commission. . The Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission's population was 164,476 (1990), and is projected to increase to more than 183,000 by the year 2000. . . Charlottesville (population 40,475) is home to the University of Virginia and is the economic, cultural, and educational center of the Thomas Jefferson PDC. . In 1989, the median family income was $33,729 for the City of Charlottesville, and $42,661 for Albemarle County. . Approximately 400,000 people live within a 35-mile radius of Charlottesville. . The University of Virginia is the largest employer in the area, with more than 13,000 employees and 20,000 students, many of whom stay in Charlottesville year-round. . Other major employers in the area include ConAgra, Kroger Company, Sperry . Marine, and State Farm Insurance. . Partly due to the presence of UV A, the Thomas Jefferson PDC boasts an extremely high level of education, with 28 percent of the over-25 population . holding college degrees. . The area is a major tourism center, with $267 million in travel dollars spent in the region during 1990. . In Albemarle County, nearly 38% of the population is under 24 years of age and . nearly 70% of the households are classified as families. . 13 . * ., . . . . . . . . , . " All requests for additional information should be directed to Edward Cooper, President, The Centerfield Group, Inc., Post Office Box 276, Dunn Loring, Virginia 22027, 703/876- 4934. Nothing in this document shall be construed to be an offering of stock or other equity in The Centerfield Group, Inc., Charlottesville Professional Baseball Club, L.P., or its successors. The material contained herein is solely for educational and informational purposes. 14 . , t '. . . . ATTACHMENT D FACILITY STANDARDS AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION PROCEDURES (Rule 40) Standards Unless expressed as recommendations, these facility standards are minimum requirements for all new Minor League facilities. Notwithstanding its facility's designation as a "new facility," a Minor League Club which can demonstrate that its new facility construction planning and approval process was at such a stage as of November 17, 1990 that requiring compliance with a minimum new facilities standard (other than those outlined in Sections 11, 12 and 13) will cause it to suffer a material hardship, may apply to the President of the Minor League Association for a variance from such standard. The standards outlined in Sections 11, 12 and 13 are applicable to both new and existing facilities. New Facilities Any facility which is scheduled for a construction starting date of January 1, 1991 or later shall be considered a "new facility." All plans for new facilities, including construction time schedules, must be submitted to field inspection personnel designated by the Commissioner's office and to the President of the Minor League Association, for review and approval by the field inspection personnel prior to the start of construction. Such review must be completed within thirty (30) days after submission or the plans shall be deemed approved. If such plans meet the standards they shall be approved. . Existina Facilities Any facility other than a "new facility" as defined above shall be considered an "existing facility." All existing facilities must meet the standards outlined in Sections 11, 12 and 13 (playing field and other team facilities) by no later than April 1, 1994. All plans for additions, alterations or renovations of such facilities, including new turf installations, must be submitted to field inspection personnel designated by the Commissioner's office and to the President of the National Association, for review and approval by the field inspection personnel (including construction time schedules) prior to the start of construction. Such review must be completed within thirty (30) days after submission or the plans shall be deemed approved. If such plans meet the standards they shall be approved. D-l 4 -" . , . . SECTION SECTION SECTION SECTION SECTION SECTION SECTION SECTION SECTION 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 6.0 6.1 6.2 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 TABLE OF CONTENTS -- A'rrACHMENT 0 Seating Seating Capacity Grades Of Seating Seating Distribution Seat Spacing Handicapped Accessibility Public Comfort Stations Comfort Station Distribution Plumbing Fixtures Handicapped Accessibilities Drinking Fountains Public Telephones Concession And Vending Concession Areas Concession Vendors Concession Compliance/Codes And Regulations Concession Storage And Novelty Stands Miscellaneous Public Areas Stadium Club/Restaurant/Banquet Facility Picnic/Beer Garden Facility Family Recreation Area Ticket Windows And Entry Turnstiles Ticket Windows Turnstiles/Entry positions Handicapped Accessibility Security And First Aid Security Command Post First Aid Station Parking And Facility Access Parking Spaces Access And Control Handicapped Parking Sound System And Scoreboard Sound System Scoreboard Scoreboard Location Clock Media Facilities Press Parking And Access Public Address/Scoreboard Personnel Radio Broadcast Booths Television Broadcast And Camera Booth 0-2 - I . .. . . . , 9-.5 9.6 9.7 9.8 SECTION 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 SECTION 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 11.6 11.7 11.8 11.9 11.10 11.11 11.12 11.13 11.14 11.15 11.16 11.17 SECTION 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.7 12.8 12.9 12.10 12.11 SECTION 13.0 13.1 13.2 Print Media Area Media Toilet Facilities Media Workroom/Lounge Handicapped Accessibility To Press Box Administration Area Facility Administration Area Stadium Personnel Dressing/Locker Facilities Team Administration Area Team Facilities Home Clubhouse/Dressing Area Shower And Toilet Facilities Training Room Team Laundry Facility Team Equipment Room Coaches Lockers Field Manager's Office Visitors Clubhouse/Dressing Area Visitors Shower and Toilet Facilities Visitors Training Room Visiting Field Manager's Office Team Storage (Major League Parent Team) Umpire Facilities Field/Dugout Access Player Parking Hitting/Pitching Tunnels Pre- And Post-Game Waiting Area playing Field Field Dimensions Playing Surface Field Grade Field Wall Bul1pens Dugouts Field Equipment Field Lighting Batting Cage Gate Backstop Playing Field Tarps Maintenance Facility Maintenance And Cleanliness Field Maintenance 0-3 . . . f SECTION 1.0 SEATING This section establishes standards for the number, type and arrangement of seating in all facilities. 1.1 SEATING CAPACITY Seating capacities shall be established to be appropriate for the size of the minor league club's market. Recommended minimum capacities are as listed below. All facilities shall conform with the seating grade, seating distribution and spacing requirements described in sections 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4. 1.1.1 1.1.2 1.1.3 1.1.4 Class AAA Capacity Class AA Capacity Class A Capacity Short Season Class A/Rookie 10,000 seats 6,000 seats 4,000 seats 2,500 seats 1.2 GRADES OF SEATING In order to enhance the professional atmosphere of the facility, each facility shall provide a minimum of two separate and distinct grades of seating (three separate and distinct grades are recommended). This provision is intended to designate and define general types of seating and not to define pricing or ticketing structures. 1.2.1 TYPES OF SEATING Seating types shall be defined as in sections 1.2.2, 1.2.3, and 1.2.4. 1.2.2 BOX SEATING Defined as Arm Chair Seats with Backs. Additional seat width and leg room is recommended, with an additional three (3) inches of tread width to be provided as compared to the tread width in the other seating areas. Following the traditional definition of box seating, it is recommended that additional access to smaller groupings of box seats be provided. 1.2.3 RESERVED SEATING Defined as a bench with 'back as a minimum requirement. 1.2.4 GENERAL ADMISSION SEATING Defined as a bench as a minimum requirement. 0-4 . . . . ~ . . ' 1.3 SEATING DISTRIBUTION In no event shall more than 90% of the total seating capacity be General Admission seating. Recommended seating distributions are as follows. For two grades of seating: Box or Reserved: 25% of total capacity General Admission: 75% of total capacity For three grades of seating: Box: 25\ of total capacity Reserved: 25% of total capacity General Admission: 50\ of total capacity 1.4 SEAT SPACING The spacing and layout of all seating, aisles, vomitories, cross-aisles and concourses comprising the established exiting system shall conform to all applicable local, state and federal codes and regulations. (NFPA.IOl for Assembly Occupancies shall be considered the minimum requirement if the facility does not fall under jurisdiction of other regulations.) 1.5 HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBILITY All facilities shall comply with all applicable local, state and federal codes and regulations regarding access of Handicapped patrons and employees. (ANSI.Al17-1 shall be considered the minimum requirements.) SECTION 2.0. PUBLIC CpMFORT STATIONS This section determines and defines the number of plumbing fixtures and their arrangement at the facilities. 2.1 COMFORT STATION DISTRIBUTION The distribution of the fixtures should be in accordance with the distribution of the seating locations and exiting system to allow minimal walking distances from all parts of the facility to public toilet facilities. 2.2 PLUMBING FIXTURES The minimum plumbing fixture ratios shall be as follows: Water closets 1:125 Women 1:450 Men 0-5 ':. Lavatories (sinks) 1:150 Women 1:150 Men . Urinals 1:125 men 2.2.1 COMFORT STATION ACCESSORIES . . All public restroom facilities shall provide mirrors, purse shelves (in women's), hand drying facilities and trash cans. It is recommended that a table/platform for diaper changing be located in each restroom. 2.3 HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBILITIES All facilities shall comply with all applicable local, state and ,federal codes and regulations (ANSI. Al17-1) It is recommended that all facilities provide a minimum of one, unisex h.c. toilet facility per level. This facility shall be similar to a residential bathroom, and allow a h.c. patron to use the facility with the assistance of his/her companion of the opposite sex. 2.4 DRINKING FOUNTAINS All facilities shall provide drinking fountains per local, state and federal codes and regulations. 2.5 PUBLIC TELEPHONES All facilities shall provide telephones per local, state and federal codes and regulations. SECTION 3.0 CONCESSION AND VENDING The following standards for Concessions and Vending are recommended for all facilities. Many of the conditions may be affected by an existing operational agreement between the facility and concessionaire. It is recommended that these standards be incorporated into any new operational agreement negotiated after the effective date of this PBA. 3.1 CONCESSION AREAS It is recommended all facilities provide 5 lineal feet of counter space (with corresponding support space) per 350 seats in the total facility capacity. The distribution of the concession areas shall be commensurate with the distribution of the patrons to minimize walking distances. [Example: 12,000 seats/350 = 34.28 X 5' = 171 lineal feet of counter. Each stand averages 25' per stand. Therefore, a minimum of 7 stands, distributed throughout the facility are recommended.] 0-6 . \ . . . 3.2 CONCESSION VENDORS If concession vendors are provided at the facility, the following ratios are recommended: one vendor per 350 seats, with 15 sq. ft. of vending commissary space for each vendor separate from the concession areas. 3.3 CONCESSION COMPLIANCE/CODES AND REGULATIONS Concessionaires are responsible for compliance with all local, state and federal regulations in regard to Health Standards, Fire Department regulations, power, exhaust and ventilation requirements. The agreement between the facility and concessionaire shall define which party is responsible for required modifications. 3.4 CONCESSION STORAGE AND NOVELTY STANDS The following standards shall be minimum requirements. 3.4.1 CONCESSION STORAGE All facilities shall provide adequate storage for concession inventory. It is recommended that the storage area be of such size to store the inventory necessary to stage the number of games in an average home stand. In the Agreement between the facility and the concessionaire, the concessionaire shall provide empirical data to determine the required amount of storage space. 3.4.2 NOVELTY STANDS Any provided novelty stand(s) acting as a sales point for retail sales shall present products in a prOfessional manner commensurate with a standard retail sales areas. SECTION 4.0 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC AREAS 4.1 STADIUM CLUB/RESTAURANT/BANQUET FACILITY This type of facility shall be optional. 4.2 PICNIC/BEER GARDEN FACILITY This type of facility shall be optional. 4.3 FAMILY RECREATION AREA This type of facility shall be optional. D-7 . . . SECTION ,5.0 TICKET WINDOWS AND ENTRY TURNSTILES The following Sections 5.1.1, 5.2.1, and 5.3.1 shall be minimum requirements. 5.1 TICKET WINDOWS All facilities shall provide one (1) ticket window for each 1500 seats of total capacity. 5.2 TURNSTILES/ENTRY POSITIONS All facilities shall provide one (1) turnstile or equivalent entry position (minimum of 30" wide) for each 1500 seats of total capacity. 5.3 HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBILITY All facilities shall provide access per all applicable local, state and federal codes and regulations to all public and private areas of the facility. (ANSI A1l7.l) SECTION 6.0 SECURITY AND FIRST AID 6.1 SECURITY COMMAND POST All facilities shall provide a "command post" for event security forces, centrally located with provisions for removing unruly patrons from the facility. 6.2 FIRST AID STATION All facilities shall provide a first aid station during all events. It is recommended that certified medical personnel staff the station at all events. SECTION 7.0 PARKING AND FACILITY ACCESS The following Sections 7.1.1, 7.2.1 and 7.3.1 shall be applicable to all facilities. 7.1 PARKING SPACES It is recommended all facilities shall provide public parking spaces at a ratio of 1 space per 3 seats of total capacity. Such parking spaces shall be on-site or within a 10 minute (1/2 mile) walking distance of the stadium. 0-8 - I . " i . . . 7.2 ACCESS AND CONTROL All facilities shall coordinate with local law enforcement officials to provide controlled on-site traffic access, so as to promote a safe and trouble-free. access environment. 7.3 HANDICAPPED PARKING All facilities shall conform with all applicable local, state and federal regulations. SECTION 8.0 SOUND SYSTEM AND SCOREBOARD 8.1 SOUND SYSTEM All facilities shall provide an acoustically balanced sound system integrated with the capacity to deliver clear audio messages to the press boz, concourses and all public areas within the facility. 8.2 SCOREBOARD All facilities shall provide a scoreboard that provides the fOllowing as m1n1mum requirements. All scoreboard characters are to be large enough to be seen throughout the facility. Line Score Ball-Strike-Out Player at Bat 8.3 SCOREBOARD LOCATION No part of any scoreboard and/or associated lighted advertising panels may be located within 50' of, the center line of the playing field. 8.4 CLOCK All facilities shall provide a time of day clock which will be in full view of all field personnel from the beginning of batting practice through the close of each game. SECTION 9.0 MEDLA FACILITIES 9.1 PRESS PARKING AND ACCESS It is recommended all facilities provide a parking area for all members of the media with direct access to the facility. It is also recommended parking be provided for television vans and broadcast trucks. D-9 " .. . . . r 9.2 PUBLIC ADDRESS/SCOREBOARD PERSONNEL All facilities shall provide space in the press box for the public address announcer and scoreboard operator(s). It is recommended the PA/scoreboard area have a minimum of 50 sq. ft. of floor space in addition to the floor space required for the scoreboard equipment. 9.3 RADIO BROADCAST BOOTHS It is recommended all facilities provide two (2) radio broadcast booths (home and visitor) that provide a direct view of the entire field and facilitate the broadcast of the game. Each shall provide counters, chairs, power, lighting and telephone jack. 9.4 TELEVISION BROADCAST AND CAMERA BOOTH It is recommended all facilities provide a spare broadcast/camera booth available for local television broadcasts and local television media. The booth should have a direct view of the entire field with operable windows or closures. 9.5 PRINT MEDIA AREA It is recommended all facilities provide a separate area for 6 to 10 members of the print media with a direct view of the entire field. Counter, chairs, power, lighting and telephone . jaCk shall be provided. 9.6 MEDIA TOILET FACILITIES It is recommended all facilities provide media restroom facilities separate from public restrooms, located with direct access to the press box. 9.7 MEDIA WORKRooM/LOUNGE This type of facility shall be optional. 9.8 HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBILITY TO PRESS BOX Facilities shall conform to all applicable local, state and federal codes and regulations for accessibility to the press box. (ANSI-Al17.1) SECTION 10.0 ADMINISTRATION AREA 10.1 FACILITY ADMINISTRATION AREA It is recommended all facilities provide administrative space of 250-300 sq. ft. per person for facility and maintenance operations with separate toilet facilities directly adjacent. 0-10 '. . . . 10.2 STADIUM PERSONNEL DRESSING/LOCKER FACILITIES It is recommended all facilities provide separate dressing/locker facilities (separate for each sex) for all maintenance and event employees (including concession personnel) separate from the public. ' 10.2.1 STADIUM PERSONNEL TOILET FACILITIES It is recommended all facilities provide toilet facilities for stadium personnel separate from the public. Direct access to personnel locker rooms is desirable. 10.3 TEAM ADMINISTRATION AREA If the tenant team has a permanent administration area away from the facility, an on-site game day team administration area must be provided. If the team's permanent administration area is at the facility, it is recommended the area provide 250-300 sq. ft. per person for team operations with adjacent toilet facilities. SECTION 11.0 TEAM FACILITIES The fOllowing shall be minimum requirements. 11.1 HOME CLUBHOUSE/DRESSING AREA The number of lockers provided shall be at least five more than the club's active player limit for their classification of play. The minimum of size of each locker shall be 24" w x 72" h (36" w x 72" h is recommended). A lockable storage compartment is recommended for each locker. Minimum floorspace requirements for the team dressing area shall be as follows: New facility: 1,000 sq. ft. Existing facility: 800 sq. ft. (1,000 sq. ft. is recommended) 11.2 SHOWER AND TOILET FACILITIES All facilities shall provide separate shower, drying and toilet areas with the following minimum, fixture counts: New facility: shower heads: 8 (10 recommended) water closets: 2 urinals: 2 lavoratories: 4 (8 recommended) 0-11 'Of ,. ." ,. . . Existing facilities: shower heads: 6 (8 recommended) water closets: 2 urinals: 2 lavatories: 2 (4 recommended) 11.3 TRAINING ROOM All new facilities shall provide a separate training room of not less than 300 sq. ft. divided into three areas: treatment, whirlpool and rehabilitation. The training room shall have space for 1 or 2 treatment tables, a minimum of 2 whirlpools, hydroculator, scale, stationary bicycle, ice machine and an area for 2 or 3 pieces of rehabilitation/weight equipment. The training room shall contain a lockable storage area for training supplies. It is recommended that additional space be provided for a separate office/dressing area for the trainer and team physician. It is also recommended that a valuable storage box be installed in the training room. All existing facilities shall comply with the above paragraph, with the exception that the minimum square footage requirement shall be'175 sq. ft. (300 sq. ft. is recommended). 11.4 TEAM LAUNDRY FACILITY All facilities shall provide commercial quality laundry facilities (washer and dryer) for the home team to provide daily washing capability. This room may be combined with the Team Equipment Room. .11.5 TEAM EQUIPMENT ROOM All facilities shall provide adequate lockable equipment storage space (minimum of 300 sq. ft. in a new facility) contiguous with the clubhouse. 11.6 COACHES LOCKERS All new facilities shall provide a minimum of 4 coaches lockers (6 are recommended) in addition to the players lockers. It is recommended these lockers shall be in a separate area from the players lockers. Locker size and floor space requirements (per capita) shall be the same as in the players dressing area. Existing facilities shall comply with the above paragraph, with the exception that a minimum of 3 coaches lockers are to be provided. 11.7 FIELD MANAGER' S OFFICE All facilities shall provide a field manager's office with direct access to the home clubhouse. It shall include a separate toilet, shower and dressing area, along with a desk and 0-12 ~, . . . . adequate meeting space for 6-8 persons. At existing facilities the separate toilet, shower and dressing area is recommended and not required. 11.8 VISITORS CLUBHOUSE/DRESSING AREA The number of lockers provided shall be at least three more than the club's active player limit for their classification of play. Minimum floor space requirements shall be as follows: New facility: Existing facility: 750 sq. ft. 500 sq. ft (750 sq. ft. is recommended) 11.9 VISITORS SHOWER AND TOILET FACILITIES All facilities shall provide separate shower, drying and toilet facilities with minimum fixture counts as follows: New facility: showers heads: 6 (8 recommended) water closets: 2 urinals: 2 lavatories: 4 Existing facility: shower heads: 4 (8 recommended) water closets: 2 urinals: 2 lavatories: 2 (4 recommended) 11.10 VISITORS TRAINING ROOM All new facilities shall provide a separate training room (minimum of 150 sq. ft.) with space for one training table and one whirlpool. In existing facilities, this area may be integrated into the players' dressing area, provided that the dressing area is at least 650 sq. ft. 11.11 VISITING FIELD MANAGER'S OFFICE All facilities shall provide a separate office for the visiting field manager. It shall include a separate toilet, shower and dressing area, along with a desk and adequate meeting space for 2-4 people. At existing facilities, the separate toilet, shower and dressing area is recommended and not required. 11.12 TEAM STORAGE (MAJOR LEAGUE PARENT TEAM) It is recommended that all facilities provide a minimum of 300 sq. ft. of lockable team storage, separate from other team storage, with year round access only to the major league team. .... 0-13 .. 11.13 UMPIRE FACILITIES . All facilities shall provide a private dressing, shower, and toilet facility for umpires. This area shall provide enough lockers (each a minimum of 36" w x 72" h) to accommodate.the number of umpires typically assigned to work in the applicable classification of play. In new facilities, this area shall be a minimum of 200 sq. ft. 11.14 FIELD/DUGOUT ACCESS It is required that all new facilities and recommended that all existing facilities provide a direct access route to the dugout/playing field. Similar access is to be provided for the umpires. 11.15 PLAYER PARKING It is recommended that all facilities designate a parking area with clubhouse access for players and other uniformed team personnel. 11.16 HITTING/PITCHING TUNNELS It is recommended that all facilities provide 2 covered tunnels for players to practice hitting and pitChing in an enclosed environment. If provided, these tunnels should be reasonably ~ close to the home clubhouse with minimal public access. 11.17 PRE- AND POST-GAME WAITING AREA It is recommended that all facilities provide a pre-game and post-game waiting area for families of players and other uniformed personnel. SECTION 12.0 PLAYING FIELD 12.1 FIELD DIMENSIONS Layouts of all new fields (and modifications to existing fields) shall be submitted for approval by the parent Major League club and the National Association club. All field dimensions shall comply with the minimum dimensions specified in Section 1.04 of the Official Baseball Rules. 12.2 PLAYING SURFACE ~ All facilities shall provide a field surface (natural or synthetic) without major defects and/or "trip-hazards" that. could affect the normal play of the game. Warning track material shall identify all zones within 15' of all walls and fences. This warning track must be of a material to provide 0-14 . . . . . . visual and tactile notice of a significant change in surface type. 12.3 FIELD GRADE The maximum allowable grade from the base of the pitcher's mound to the warning track in foul territory shall be 6". The maximum allowable grade from second base to the outfield warning track shall be 20". 12.4 FIELD WALL The permanent outfield wall or fence in all new facilities shall be a minimum of S' high. 12.5 BULLPENS All facilities must provide a bullpen area for each team. These areas may be located in foul territory down the baselines or just immediately outside the field wall. Each must be visible to both dugouts and to the press box. Each shall have two regulation pitching mounds and home plates, adequate distance and clearance for each pitcher and catcher, and a bench for 10 players. If the bullpens are in foul ball areas, care shall be taken to integrate the slope of the pitcher's mound into the field so as not to create a trip hazard for fielders as they approach the bullpen. It is recommended that all facilities have phones connecting the bullpens to the dugouts. 12.6 DUGOUTS All facilities must provide two enclosed dugouts (home and visitor). Each dugout in a new facility must accommodate 25-30 uniformed personnel on a bench with seatback. Each dugout in an existing facility shall accommodate 20-25 uniformed personnel. Each dugout must have a helmet rack for a minimum of 15 helmets and a bat rack for a minimum of 30 bats. It is recommended that a bat swing/storage area be directly accessible to each dugout. It is recommended that each dugout include a refrigerated water cooler (drinking fountain) and provide direct access to a restroom. It is recommended that all facilities have telephones connecting the dugouts to the bullpens and to the press box. All dugouts shall provide as feasible an anti-skid surface as possible on steps and walkways. 12.7 FIELD EQUIPMENT All facilities shall provide the following field equipment. Examples given shall serve as guidelines for equipment quality, and the equipment provided shall meet or exceed the examples specified. 0-15 . . . . ~ 12.7.1 BATTING CAGE All facilities shall provide a full cover batting cage. New batting cages shall have minimum dimensions of 18' wide, 14' deep and 9' high. It is recommended that the cage be portable and made of an aluminum frame to provide maximum maintainability. Existing batting cages not meeting the above standards may be approved by the parent Major League club. 12.7.2 FIELD SCREENS All facilities shall provide a pitching screen, first base screen, 2nd base/double play screen, and a shag protector screen. New screens shall have the following minimum dimensions: pitching Screen - 7' h x 8' w with 4' x 4' notch in upper corner. Double play screen: 7' h x 14' w with hinged wings. First base and shag protector screens - 7' h x 8' w. All existing screens not meeting the above standards may be approved by the parent Major League club. Periodic checks of the batting cage and all screens shall be performed to verify frame and net integrity. 12.7.3 BATTER'S EYE All facilities shall provide a solid monochromatic batter's eye with minimum dimensions of 16' high and 40' wide centered in the outfield. If a centerfield camera is integrated into the batter's eye, it must be the same color as the batter's eye. It is recommended that all new facilities provide a batter's eye with minimum dimensions of 40' high and 80' wide. 12.7.4 FOUL POLES All facilities shall provide two foul poles of a bright color which are a minimum of 30' high (45' is recommended) with a screen to the fair side of the pole. No white signs shall be allowed immediately adjacent to each side of the foul pole. 12.7.5 FLAG POLE All facilities shall provide a flag pole for the United States Flag or Canadian Flag in clear view of the entire seating bowl. 12.8 FIELD LIGHTING All new lighting systems shall maintain the following minimum brightness requirements after 100 hours of burning: 0-16 - . , , . . . . Class AAA and Class AA: 100 fc average in infield/70 fc average in outfield. Class A and Rookie: 70 fc average in infield/50 fc average in outfield. The height and location of poles in all new lighting systems shall following lES standards. [See Exhibit Al. All existing lighting systems shall maintain the following brightness requirements: Class AAA and Class AA: 70 fc average in infield/50 fc average in outfield. Class A and Rookie: 60 fc average in infield/40 fc average in outfield. All lighting systems shall operate with a maximum variance ratio of 1.2/1 in the infield and 2/1 in the outfield. The variance ratios shall be computed by comparing the highest and lowest footcandle readings in the infield and the outfield. 12.9 BATTING CAGE GATE All new facilities shall provide a gate large enough to allow the batting cage to be freely taken to and from the playing field. 12.10 BACKSTOP All facilities shall provide a backstop behind home plate. The configuration and dimensions shall vary due to sight-lines for the press box and insurance requirements for the facility. Periodic inspections shall be performed to insure the integrity of the backstop. 12.11 PLAYING FIELD TARPS All Class AAA, Class AA and full season Class A facilities shall provide a full infield tarp and pitcher's mound, home plate, base pit, and bullpen tarps, except that this requirement may be waived by the President of the Minor League Association in the event that the facility-is located in an area that does not experience sufficient rainfall to justify the expense of tarps. The tarps shall be oversized to prevent water from running under the edge to a dirt area. The tarps shall be stored in an easily accessible location but in a way not to create a safety hazard on the playing field. Each facility is required to provide adequate manpower to operate the placement and/or removal of the tarps. 0-17 . . . . .... ' " SECTION 13.0 MAINTENANCE . . . This section outlines requirements and recommendations for overall maintenance of the facility and playing field in a professional manner. 13.1 FACILITY MAINTENANCE AND CLEANLINESS Each facility shall develop a maintenance program (both short-term and long-term) for use by i~s maintenance personnel. All public areas shall be completely free of trash and rubbish at the opening of each event, and stadium personnel shall be responsible for cleanliness during the event. Each facility shall follow its maintenance program for interior repairs and touch-ups to maintain-the ~rofessional atmosphere of the facility. Long-ter~maintenance.~all be ongoing in order to deter major facility-problems and to minimize potential disruptions to the public. 13.2 FIELD MAINTENANCE The playing field shall be maintained-at the highest possible professional, level. Every reasonable: effort shall be made to insure the safety of the' players and:.the smooth play of the game. The facility shall follow professional grounds- keeping practices and shall utilize proper maintenance equipment. Nail-drags, screens, tampers and rakes are recommended to maintain. all dirt areas. Proper turf:care equipment (mowers, tractors, etc.) shall be used, and-an" appropriate maintenance plan shall be developed and followed to care for the playing field. 13.2.1 PLAYING FIELD RECONDITIONING The pitcher's mound and base pit areas shall be reconditioned prior to each game through the use of clay materials and tampers. 13 .2.2 FIELD MAINTENANCE MATERIALS All facilities are required to have'a sufficient amount of drying material on hand at all times-for reconditioning the infield. A chemical drying-agent and/o~ calsonite clay may be used in combination with sand to stabilize areas affected by excessive moisture. Sand may not-be the sole drying agent. 13.2.3 LAYOUT OF PLAYING FIELD The entire playing field shall be laid out to coincide with the provisions of Sections 1.04~through 1.08 of the Official Baseball Rules. D-18 - . I . . . ~ t 13.2.4 IRRIGATION SYSTEM All new facilities shall provide a full field irrigation system as well as water lines 1 1/2" or larger behind both home plate and second base for watering the infield grass and base pit areas. It is recommended that a series of water outlets 1" or larger be distributed around the playing field in order to water the field if the irrigation system should become inoperable. It is recommended that a full-field irrigation system be provided at all existing facilities. 13.2.5 FIELD DRAINAGE SYSTEM All new facilities shall provide an underfield drainage system integrated into the subbase of the turf (natural or synthetic) surface. This system shall be a system of a drain tile fields in a porous collection bed (or similar system) below the turf base. It is recommended an optimal slope of .5\ be maintained from the base of the pitcher's mound to the baselines and from second base to the outfield warning track. 0-19 .~ f . Proposed Timeline and Chain of Events for Baseball in Charlottesville, Virginia Area Centerfield Group, Inc. commissions University of Virginia's Center for Survey Research to gauge public attitudes towards baseball, possible attendance at baseball games, stadium financing options, and other related issues. (January - February 1995) City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County agree to create a joint Stadium Authority to identify, build and lease stadium facility and adjoining lands. Stadium Authority is granted budget to conduct feasibility study, lease land, identify funding options for project (i.e., Industrial Development Bonds, Municipal Bonds, etc.), retain Bond Counsel, and authorize preliminary design of facility. (February 1995) Centerfield Group, Inc. prepares and releases prospectus for limited partnership interests in entity known as Charlottesville Professional Baseball . Club, Limited Partnership. (Spring 1995) South Atlantic League, after receiving surety bond from Charlottesville Professional Baseball Club, L.P., moves to officially designates Charlottesville area as South Atlantic League expansion territory. (March 1995) Stadium Authority officials work with Charlottesville Professional Baseball Club, L.P. (CPBC), City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County Public School officials, and other interested persons to identify, upgrade (if necessary), and lease temporary baseball facility. (May 1995) Tract of land (65-95 acres), zoned industrial or light commercial, is identified as suitable for multi-purpose stadium facility. (May 1995) Charlottesville-Albemarle Co. Stadium Authority negotiates and enters into, with approval from City Council and Board of Supervisors, sales contract or long-term lease for identified tract of land. (July 1995) . Request for Proposals is issued for architectural designs for stadium facility. , " . . RFPs follow generally agreed upon fonnat approved by both the City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County. (July 1995) After awarding of RFP, preliminary design plans for stadium facility are commissioned and delivered. Input is sought and received from Charlottesville Professional Baseball Club, L.P. (CPBC), Albemarle County Fair, Inc., and other interested parties. Authority officials consult with stadium architects and consultants to estimate cost to build facility and make other improvements (Le., enlarge roads, install infrastructure, etc.). (September 1995) Architects and consultants incorporate appropriate suggestions and comments into plan and produce final plan. (November 1995) Charlottesville Professional Baseball Club, L.P. awarded franchise in South Atlantic League. (Late 1995) . Stadium Authority officials negotiate lease tenns and other financing arrangements with primary tenants of facility (i.e., CPBC and Albemarle County Fair, Inc.). (December 1995) Stadium Authority issues Request for Proposals, using standard procurement regulations agreed upon by both the City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County, from parties interested in constructing stadium facility. RFPs can be issued as one large project, with subcontracting possible, or as individual projects (i.e., installation of infrastructure, creation of playing field, construction of stadium facility, construction of parking facility, etc.). (February 1996) Authorized local government entities offer bonds to finance construction of stadium. Bond offering closes at proscribed time. Funds for construction project become available. (February 1996) Construction contract is awarded. Construction of facility commences on date proscribed in contract. (May 1996) Six month review of construction site. (November 1996) . .' #.. #- . . . . . Nine month review of construction site. (February 1997) Opening day in temporary facility for South Atlantic League's Charlottesville franchise. (April 1997) Construction of stadium facility and parking facility completed. (August 1997) OPENING DAY IN NEW STADIUM! (April 1998) 11 Ii, ..I . . Information on Minor League Baseball in Charlottesville~ Virginia rrl JAN 25 IQg) \RD OF SUPERV'C The Centerfield Group, Inc., a Virginia corporation, serves as the general partner of the Charlottesville Professional Baseball Club, Limited Partnership (CPBC). The primary objective of both the Centerfield Group, Inc. and the CPBC is to operate a Class A minor league baseball franchise in the Charlottesville, Virginia, area. In order to achieve this goal, four issues need to be identified and resolved. The basic issues are: location of site and acquisition of property for stadium complex, creation and management of stadium complex, acquisition of a team, and operation/management of the team. Location of Site and Acquisition of Propertv for Stadium Complex It is estimated that a tract ofland between 65 and 95 acres large will be necessary to accommodate: 1) a multi-use stadium facility seating 5,250 fans and built to professional baseball specifications; 2) preparation and staging requirements for the annual fair presented by the Albemarle County Fair, Inc.; and 3) parking facilities sufficient to cover both the stadium and the fairgrounds. . The Centerfield Group, Inc. is currently working with the Albemarle County Fair, Inc. Board of Directors to forge an agreement to move forward together on efforts to locate a permanent site. Also, the Centerfield Group, Inc. has contacted several local real estate professionals in an attempt to locate land that is currently zoned for industrial or light commercial use. Finally, efforts have been ongoing to meet with Albemarle County and City of Charlottesville planning officials regarding identification of a suitable site. Creation and Operation of the Stadium Complex With expansion in the major leagues expected to occur as early as 1997, the minor leagues are preparing to expand accordingly. The Class A South Atlantic League has expressed interest in expanding to the Charlottesville area. However, for this to occur, a playing facility that meets professional baseball specifications must be created. Because of the unlikelihood of a permanent stadium facility in the . Charlottesville area being ready by Opening Day 1997, the first order of business 1 . . . . "' > . for the CPBC is to identify, upgrade, and lease a suitable temporary facility. At the same time it is important to encourage City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County officials to facilitate the creation of a joint, centralized, authority to oversee the design, construction and operation of a permanent facility to be most likely be located in Albemarle County. The CPBC will ask the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors and the Charlottesville City Council, at their respective regularly scheduled meetings on February 1st and February 5th, to establish a jointly controlled "Charlottesville-Albemarle County Stadium Authority" to coordinate the logistics of buying or leasing a plot of land and designing, building and overseeing the running of a stadium facility. It is contemplated that a joint Charlottesville-Albemarle Co. Stadium Authority would be empowered to conduct the following activities: · Facilitate efforts between the City, County, CPBC, and other interested parties to locate, upgrade, and lease a temporary baseball facility; . Direct efforts to identify and buy or lease tract of land for permanent facility; · Oversee Request for Proposals (RFP) for stadium complex feasibility, design, and construction; · Negotiate lease terms with primary tenants of stadium complex (CPBC and Albemarle Co. Fair, Inc.); · Work with city and county officials to identify possible funding options for stadium project and oversee agreed upon financing plan; · Oversee construction of facility and operation of facility by leasers when completed. 2 . . . Obtainine a Minor Leaeue Team for the Greater Charlottesville Area . The Centerfield Group, Inc., a Virginia business company, serves as the general partner of the Charlottesville Professional Baseball Club Limited Partnership (CPBC), which is committed to obtaining a franchise for the Charlottesville area. The Centerfield Group, Inc. plans to offer, by prospectus, limited partnership interests in the CPBC, L.P. in the spring of 1995. The Centerfield Group, Inc. is actively looking for additional potential local investors for this project, but is precluded by law from discussing specifics of the proposed partnership until a formal prospectus has been prepared. Options for acquiring a minor league team for Charlottesville include the purchase of an existing franchise followed by relocation to Charlottesville. The more cost effective and possibly more viable option for obtaining a franchise is through expansion of the minor leagues. Many experts agree that, as a by-product of the labor problems begotten Major League Baseball, the major leagues need to agree to expand their leagues to remain viable. The Major League Baseball Expansion Committee has recommended that the major leagues expand by as few as two and as many as four teams, with play to commence in 1997 or 1998. Along with major league expansion will come the necessary minor league expansion. . In preparation for this possibility, The Centerfield Group, Inc. has made contact with several minor leagues that operate in the Middle Atlantic states and has inquired as to their status on expansion. The Class A South Atlantic League has indicated to potential franchise seekers that they would like to expand, should approval come from the National Association to do so. As a result of one of these contacts, Centerfield Group, Inc. President Edward Cooper was invited to make an informal presentation to the Executive Committee of the Class A South Atlantic League, on behalf of the CPBC, during the Baseball Winter Meetings held December 1-7 in Dallas, Texas. During the meeting, it was indicated to Mr. Cooper that the South Atlantic League was very interested in placing a franchise in the Charlottesville area, provided a suitable playing site could be found. The Centerfield Group, Inc. was asked to submit a formal expansion application to the South Atlantic League no later than January 10, 1995. Because of the continued labor problems in the major leagues, the South Atlantic League granted PCBC an extension until March 15, . 1995. In the interim, efforts are ongoing to have the Charlottesville area designated 3 . . . as an expansion area for the South Atlantic League. . Applications for expansion franchises in the South Atlantic League will be judged on the following criteria: a. Character and [mancial responsibility of the applicant, b. Baseball park facility and grounds, including lease terms and compliance with Section XVIII of the PBA (standards for minor league player facilities), c. Community and government support, d. Geographic location and market potential of the area. Operation of the Baseball Club . A minor league professional baseball club has the potential to bring many returns, both tangible and intangible, to the community that it operates in. It is the desire and commitment of The Centerfield Group, Inc., and the eventual club owners that make up the CPBC, to run a minor league team in Charlottesville in such a way as to bring credit to the community, a fair deal to the local entities that have assisted the ball club with a stadium, and profits for the club's advertisers, suppliers, and supporters. The Charlottesville baseball team will thrive as the business community in Charlottesville and Albemarle County thrives. Should Charlottesville obtain a baseball club, the team plans to employ eight full time, front office staffers. These full time staff positions probably would include a General Manager, Assistant GM/Director of Ticket Sales, Director of Merchandising, Director of Marketing and Community Relations, Director of Concessions and Stadium Operations, Director of Broadcasting, Office Manager, and Receptionist/Bookkeeper. Additionally, during the baseball season the ball club plans to hire between forty and seventy temporary, part-time workers to perform jobs like concession preparation and sales and some as parking attendants, ushers, security, ticketing and ticket collection, souvenir sales, and assist with promotions. These seasonal workers will range in age from high school and college students in need of a summer job to senior citizens who want to remain active and involved. In the community, we estimate the Charlottesville baseball club will provide salaries, . payroll taxes and benefits for an estimated 21 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) 4 . . . ~ . .. ~ personnel. The baseball club will also be active in the larger Charlottesville community, providing baseball skills workshops with the ball clubs staff and participating in charity events and community functions. It is possible, for example, that the baseball club, in conjunction with the City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County School System, could design and promote a public awareness campaign in the schools (i.e., program featuring staying fit and healthy, drug abuse prevention, promotion of literacy, or the value of staying in school). The possibilities for the ball club's involvement in the community are only limited by one's imagination. Economic Impact of Minor League Baseball on the Community Minor league baseball has a very positive economic impact on a community. Studies show that every new dollar brought to a community through the presence of minor league baseball turn over four times. This economic impact ranges into the millions in mid-to-Iarger market cities. Player salaries, visiting teams' and umpires' expenditures as well as Major League affiliate club expenditures make up the bulk of new baseball related money coming into the community. Current budget plans call for the CPBC to spend upwards of $900,000 in the community annually. The National Association reports that a typical Class A baseball team will be responsible for generating more than $4,200,000 annually into its local economy. Some of the ways that the ball club impacts the local economy are as follows: . Expenditures by Players, Manager, Coaches, Trainer & Families Food, Housing, Entertainment, Transportation . Expenditures by Visiting Teams & Staff Hotels, Food, Incidentals . Expenditures by Umpires, Scouts & Other Baseball Personnel Hotels, Food, Automobiles & Incidentals . Expenditures by Major League Affiliate Staff Hotels, Food, Automobiles & Incidentals Equipment, Food & Uniform Reimbursements 5 . . . . .. If . . Expenditures by Fans Souvenirs, Concessions, Programs, Parking, Apparel . Expenditures by Club Within The Community Labor, Concessions, Park Maintenance, Advertising Finally, in an effort to ensure that the interests of both the community and the investors in the CPBC are well documented and known, the Centerfield Group, Inc. has contracted with the University of Virginia's Center for Survey Research to conduct a survey of opinion on a variety of issues relating to operating a successful business venture. Opinions will be solicited on topics such as interest in baseball, frequency of attendance at professional baseball games, preferences for location of stadium and pricing of tickets to name only a few. It is believed that the survey results will confirm the belief that professional baseball will thrive in the Charlottesville area, that it will be an economic boost to the area and that it will follow through on its promise to offer good, clean, wholesome, affordable entertainment for the families of Charlottesville, Albemarle County and the surrounding counties. 6 '" ..., .. f~{!~/ t/6~ ... t COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7<1;,~:~';j t~: /-tt?7--j?S :?;::?!?~~/6 .11 >Y:'i: f',;o. AGENDA TITLE: FY 1995-96 Revenue Update AGENDA DATE: February 1, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: ACTION: INFORMATION: X SUB.TECTIPROPOSALlREOUEST: Information on Revised FY 1995-96 Revenue Projections and State Budget Reductions CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: STAFF CONTACT(S): Mr. Tucker, Ms. White REVIEWED BY: ATTACHMENTS: Yes BACKGROUND: Preliminary revenue projections for the next fiscal year are provided by the Department of Finance in October with updated estimates available in January after tax bills are finalized and a full six months of data has been collected. January revenue projections, particularly this year, reflect potential fimding changes at the state level as reflected in the state's proposed budget. The three attachments show the state budget cuts, the impact on County general fimd revenues and community agencies, as well as adjustments to the proposed budget allocation in order to adjust to a reduced level of available revenues for the next fiscal year. DISCUSSION: The first sheet shows the proposed state budget reductions and their potential impact on the County's general fimd revenues, as well as state fimding reductions to several community agencies. As you well know, the debate over the BPOL taxes is not over, making it difficult to calculate the impact, if any, on the County's FY 1995-96 revenues. Being conservative, BPOL revenues have been revised downward from the October projection to reflect FY 1994-95 or current year levels, a reduction of $174,500. Based on current state budget estimates, 599 fimds have been reduced by $87,450. However, strong sentiment exists that some, ifnot all, of the 599 fimds may be restored by the General Assembly. The most significant impact is a reduction of $327,800 in state fimds for the administration of our Department of Finance, which reflects 82% of total revenues previously received from the state to support this office. As you can see on the attachment, the impact of these reductions is a potential loss of$607,050 from general fimd revenues. The second sheet shows the impact of the state budget reductions, which are fortunately offset by some additional state social service revenue, as well as several increases in local revenues. A reduction of$179,000 in overall property taxes reflects a projected increase of $310,000 in real estate taxes over the October projection coupled with a revised downward projection of $500,000 in personal property taxes. Offsetting the reduction of the BPOL in local taxes is a projected increase in sales tax revenues and utility taxes. The increase in other local revenues that you see of$193,500 reflects an increase in building permit related fees, increased interest on investments, and other minor increases in fees, rents and recovered costs. offsetting the net reduction of$255,862 in revenues shown on the second attachment, is a proposed change in the proposed allocation of revenues approved by the Board in November. This change would eliminate $250,000 previously set aside in a capital project/debt service reserve fund, which had been established as a reserve for unanticipated capital needs or increased debt service related to school projects, particularly the new high school facility. The ability to establish such a reserve fimd was predicated on the October projection of revenues, which made such a reserve fimd possible for the first time. The impact of not being able to establish this reserve account in the next fiscal year will mean a potential increase of approximately $40,000 in the annual debt service payment from an average annual increase over the five year period of approximately $225,000 to $270,000. RECOMMENDATION: The state budget reductions and revised revenue projections are presented for the Board's information. To offset the net revenue loss of$255,862, staff recommends foregoing the capital project/debt service reserve at this time. Should the revenue picture improve at the state level, this reserve account could be reestablished. REVUPDAT/94.015 l , . STATE BUDGET CUTS REVENUE IMPACT General Fund Revenues BPOL 599 Funding Commissioners RevenuefTreasurers ABC Profits Subtotal General Fund Revenue Loss Program Revenues School Division English as Second Language Maintenance Funds Dept Soc. Services General Relief Subtotal Program Revenue Loss ALBEMARLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT REDUCTIONS PROGRAM REDUCTIONS. COMMUNITY AGENCIES MACAA General Program Support Project Discovery Opportunity Knocks Region Ten Planning District Commission Children and Youth Commission COMMUNITY PROGRAM REDUCTIONS 01/27/95 1 l 95/96 Projection 95/96 Rev Projection 4,131.100 577.200 390.800 177,300 3,956.600 489,750 63,000 160,000 95/96 Shortfall 174,500 87,450 327,800 17,300 o 607,050 46,622 0 46.622 71,523 0 71,523 0 71 ,050 0 71 ,050 189,195 $5,465,595 $4,669,350 $796,245 25,410 21,000 35,800 50,610 20.335 35.500 $188,655 BUDCUTS.WK4 . ~ FY 1995-96 ALBEMARLE COUNTY GENERAL OPERATING FUND REVISED REVENUE PROJECTIONS - 1/95 10/14/95 01/15/95 REVENUE PROJECTION PROJECTION LOSS CHANGE IN REVENUES OVER 94/95 PROPERTY TAXES 4,756,500 4,577,500 (179,000) OTHER LOCAL TAXES 1,024,800 1,146,000 121,200 OTHER LOCAL REVENUES 339,690 533,190 193,500 STATE/FEDERAL REVENUES 124,256 (267,306) (391,562) FUND BALANCE (925,000) (925,000) 0 PROJECTED REVENUE INCREASE $5,320,246 $5,064,384 (255,862) COMMITED NEW EXPENDITURES DEBT SERVICE 0 REVENUE SHARING 574,851 574,851 0 INCREASED TRANSFER TO CIP FUND 940,000 940,000 0 CAPITAL PROJECTS/DEBT SERVICE RESERVE 250,000 0 (250,000) BOARD RESERVE FUND 175000 175000 0 TOTAL COMMITTED EXPENDITURES $1,939,851 $1,689,851 (250,000) TOTAL NET AVAILABLE REVENUE $3,380,395 $3,374,533 (5,862) PROJ96.WK4 ~~fz 01/27/95 PROJ96.WK4 ALBEMARLE COUNTY GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES FY 94-95 PRELIMINARY REVISED VARIANCE ADOPTED FY 95-96 FY95-96 NOVEMBERI DOLLAR PERCENT BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION JANUARY INC INC GENERAL GOVERNMENT 24,692,749 26,044,907 26,044,907 0 1,352,158 5.48% SCHOOL TRANSFER 36,804,945 38,833,182 38,833,182 0 2,028,237 5.51% DEBT SERVICE 6,845,880 6,845,880 6,845,880 0 0 0,00% REVENUE SHARING 4,475,120 5,049,971 5,049,971 0 574,851 12.85% CAPITAL FUND 1,360,000 2,300,000 2,300,000 0 940,000 69.12% CONTINGENCY FUND 25,660 200,660 200,660 0 175,000 682.00% CAPIT AUDEBT RESERVE 250,000 (250,000) 0 TOTAL 74,204,354 79,524,600 79,274,600 (250,000) 5,070,246 6.83% REVENUES PROPERTY TAX 47,706,900 52,463,400 52,284,400 (179,000) 4,577,500 9.60% OTHER LOCAL TAXES 17,491,400 18,516,200 18,637,400 121,200 1,146,000 6.55% OTHER LOCAL 2,580,710 2,920,400 3,113,900 193,500 533,190 STATE/FED 5,500,344 5,624,600 5,233,038 (391,562) (267,306) -4.86% FUND BALANCE 925,000 Q 0 (925,000) -100.00% TOTAL 74,204,354 79,524,600 79,268,738 (255,862) 5,064,384 6.82% SHORTFALL 0 0 (5,862) A~3 PROJ96.WK4 01/27/95 PROJ96.WK4 l COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: FY 1995-96 Capital Improvement Program AGENDA DATE: February I, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: ACTION: INFORMATION: X SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST: Proposed Changes for the FY 1995/96 - FY 99/00 Capital Improvement Program Wotksession CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMA TION: A IT ACHMENTS: STAFF CONT ACT(S): Mr. Tucker, Ms, White REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: At the January 11 th Public Hearing on the proposed FY 1995-96 - FY 1999-00 Capital Improvement Program, County residents spoke to the following projects: Red Hill Outdoor Recreation Improvements, Greer Outdoor Recreation Improvements, Scottsville Community Center Recreation Improvements, Forest Lakes/Hollymead Dam, Crozet Park and the Forloines Study, The attached documents propose an alternative to the prior plan that incorporates comments from the public hearing, as well as comments from the Board's first worksession, DISCUSSION: The total FY 1995-96 - FY 1999-00 CIP reflected in the attached documents is $60.4 million, approximately $1 million less than the $61.4 funded over the 5-year period in the prior plan, This overall reduction is the result of eliminating the Forest Lakes/Hollymead Dam, Carrsbrook Road Extension, the F orloines Study, and all the j ail projects that are now being incorporated into the $16 million expansion project to be funded outside of the County's CIP possibly in FY 1997-98, By deleting these projects, the revised CIP plan now funds the three outdoor playground/recreation projects at Greer, Red Hill and Scottsville. It also increases the overall contribution to Crozet Park by $50,000 and funds it over a two-year period, $50,000 in FY 95/96 and $100,000 in FY 96-97, An additional result of eliminating these projects is increased funding for the contingency/reserve account in the amount of $431,525 mainly in the last two years of the plan when unanticipated, albeit critical, projects may need to be added. Attachment 1 is a summary of the changes to the proposed plan, Attachments 2 and 3 are the original project sheets marked with the proposed changes, Attachments 4 and 5 are the revised project sheets reflecting the proposed changes and final totals. Attachment 6 is a summary of the projects by functional categOlY, a summmy of the major revenue sources with the changes highlighted and a list of the School projects, some of which will be funded by VPSA bonds and some with the projected split billing revenues of $15 million in FY 1996-97. RECOMMENDA TION: This infonnation is presented to the Board as an alternative plan to the one presented at the January 11 public hearing, If the Board is satisfied with these proposed changes, the five year FY 1995-96 - 1999-00 CIP plan may be approved at this time. The actual approval and appropriation of the CIP budget for the 1995-96 fiscal year may be done in March or April, a timeframe that would allow the Board further review of the CIP budget in conjunction with the operating budget, ifnecessmy. CIPEXE 94.014 . . .. . , Changes to Projects and Revenues Prior Current Change Project Recommend Recommend Not Funded: Joint Security HV AC,ADA,Intake $839,492 $0 ($839,492) Forrest Lakes/Hollymead Dam $315,000 $0 ($315,000) Carrsbrook Road Extension $359,500 $0 ($359,500) Forloines Study $25,000 $0 ($25,000) Increased Funding: Crozet Park Contribution $100,000 $150,000 $50,000 ($50,000 in FY 95-96; $100,000 in FY96-97) Contingency (FY96-97 to FY99-00) $1,384,000 $1,815,525 $431,525 Projects Moved to Another Year Red Hill Recreation Project ($67,000) FY 96-97 FY 95-96 Greer Recreation Project ($77,000) FY 96-97 FY 95-96 Scottsville Comm. Ctr. Recreation ($63,525) FY 96-97 FY 95-96 Walnut Creek Park FY98-00 FY97 -99 Landscaping Route 29 $18,500 spread out over 5 year period Keene Landfill ($100,000) FY 95-96 FY 98-99 Revenues Changes: Joint Security Prior Funding Balance $196,900 $0 $0 ($196,900) ($315,000) Developer Contribution (Forrest Lakes Dam) $315,000 CIP Fund Balance $219,299 $240,794 $21,495 01/26/95 1 CIPCHGS.WK4 o =u <0 0> :::0 m o ~ ~ C> ~ ~ 0> (D 01 :::0001 (l) (l) ~ o ::> 0 o - N ~ ~ ~ . ~r:::O c: -. (l) o 0''0 c;:QlEir ~ -< @ '0 :::0 3 ~ (l) (l) o.g~ G) -a III o (l) c: ag:B: gco:i' r co 5' -0 ~ ;>; S' co (j9 (j9 .VJ ~ (j9 VJ ~./>.<O 000 "0"0"0 000 000 (j9 VJ (j9(j9(,.) CDN<O 0100 "0"0"0 000 000 (j9 (j9 (j9 000 (j9 VJ (j9(j9-VJ CDN<O 0100 "0"0"0 000 000 (j9 (j9 (j9 000 (j9 (j9 000 (j9 ./>. N 0, o (j9 (j9 000 (j9 (j9 (j9 000 (j9 (j9 (j9 000 (j9 ./>. .N 01 o (j9 (j9 00 C> r.-:::OO<'G)G):t>:J::::OS::::OON"T1 5 mC:'< CD a; <'< 0 (1)(1) Q)O> Q a.' -:::O(l)(l)g~s.~~;;J::>(l) ~~~g~~;oS.~OEg-SJ:: CIl Clllo.::>'::>'-C)"01~(l)OIllIll c:~. ::> o' CIl ~ ~ ~ :::0 '? 0 CIl ~ a. iD ~co g.'(i iiOI_o.:::oiil ~:::o~!!!. o :::o.a CD (l) :" ~ ~ ;0 g ~ ::>. g lD B= ~g a ~;::~Ql ~ C)"m-ur5 a.~~ lD c: ~ <3', S g. III 0> ;>; :::0 m o' 3 r- ::1:7;:r -. Q) -. ...... s ><::1 NO. _ooo:J.Q 0')-< 0 _ (1) <0 iJ ~ Vl g: ~co Q. -t 0' ~ ~ ~ ~o. ~iil(l)(l)~:::OiJ~' 0 en ~ ~~!!2"'O::J era g Q) ::!.o. ;>;=.c:lllr ':-'~ 3 S' ~ Vl cg. ~ ~ ~ !!! S '!' :::0 (l) < _ CIl 0' <0 Vl III Vl _, (l) '< <0 N 0 ;;;: ~ =o~- ~ ~ (l) III a. ;<= ~ :T ~ .... (j9 (j9 !I' .<0 (j9 (j9 (j9 ? (j9 (j9 (j9 0~0~(j9(j9(j9(j9N""(j90VJ01VJ W O1NVJO>....01N....0100101.... ..... ......01......1\.)<000>0010(0.....,01 g tg~~b:ggggg~gg co <0000000000000 ~ .... (j9 (j9 ~ !D (j9 .N (j9 (j9 (j9 N~O(j9(j9(j9(j9(j9(j9""(j901W01W o O101VJN~01<OONOO101"" o ....W....~<OOO>OOO<O~01 g t~~~b:g~ggg~gg co <0000000000000 ~ r b t: g~~~~~~~g~~~~~~ ~ .... (j9 (j9 .W _<0 (j9 .!V (j9 (j9 (j9 ....~O(j9(j9(j9(j9(j9(j9....(j901W01W c.n 0101WI\.J......01010N00101...... -..j ....VJ....~<OOWOOO<O~01 b ".!>.o,-<oo,N"oo,"o"o"oo,"o"o co ./>.0000100000000 co <0000000000000 !I ! J o (j9(j9(j9(j9(j9~~ 0 ~ o 000000000000 ;~ ~~ 0 _8 ......NO o 000 b "0"0"0 g~~~~~ ~~gggo fo:>> ~B (j9 cnO ~ (j9 01 -..j ~N(j9 01<0 0 CI'I .N.~_~ _W9 0 Cn <OO1~ <.no "0 g:~~~ggg: gg~g~o~ ii ~~ ~~ ~I~ W <.no <.no 0 CD g:~~gg~gg~~~g g:~ .ft- () ~ ~() ~ o 0 o 9 b 0 0~(j9(j9(j9(j9(j9(j9(j9(j9~0(j9(j9(j9 oJl.ooooooooooooo ~g (j9 ~l ,; U.a (j9(j9(j9(j9(j9(j9....(j90' (j9 ......-a. 0'IV)l\,)......01010NO N !I' !>> .VJ .~ .~ .<0 .0 5-' 9 9 9. _~. CI'I<.n <.n<OO1NO<.nOOO CD 00(j9000<.n00000 <.n 000000000000 0 <::) m"T1"T1ZiJOiJ . ::;.::;. 0 00 0 <OCDCD_=3=' ~iJ;oO@'O@ C(DN c: CIl~3VlOg>lDl? C ='0 g 0 - ~ '0 1ll9:~CDO~~1ll -t::>:::OIllC~tIl;::l. OCO CD c:;g (l)-3 -t 'O=~"T13(l) ~ iil~~~ ;:!. @coCD=. 3 m -< (l).a ::> c: --6" 3 CD ~ 1C~fA~ ~~~ wOW./>.i/9<O....01 CI'INNO...../>.WO enCD01O<.n~<o"" N "0"0"0 "0 o.".!>.:"" ....OOOO~01CD woooow~w ~ ~ ~flt0..""" 0.... ........W./>.i/9CO....01 CI'INNO...../>.WO enCD01001~<O"" 'q,'".."j"o"o "00. ".!>.:.... en01000~01CD WOOOOW~W ~ ~ ~ co <.n ./>. b g ~ o (j9(j90i/9(j9i/90 00000000 ~ i/9 .W (j9 i/9 ~ (j9 i/9 i/9 ~~~~~'f~~ ....OUlOUl~COW CnCo"o"o"oo.".!>.Co CDOOOO~01U1 ....OOOOW~.... ~~ ~ COWNN ...../>.UI<.n 0000 'Co Co "0"0 OOOO~ 00000 ~ ~ o "0 O~ 00 (j9 o ~ ~ W N o <.n en 0 N "0 ./>.~~O~ NOOOO ~ ~ N ./>.~ NO .... en N OIl 'Co CI'I~ ....0 .... N~ 01.... o<.n "0"0 00 00 ~ W 0> W Co ~ <.n 0.... .... ~ N N UI <.n ~ g 0(j9~0~ (j9(j9 00000 00 .... ~ N N CI'I <.n ~ g O~(tOO(tO ~(tO 00000 00 .... (to ,!')....~ (It.. t~~~~ N~ ~~gg~ ~~ coOOOO~./>.01 WOOOOON.... JIC3 ch,nt~.rJ Z 2.~~~if~8 ~5::>~~.g1ll p..PO'IllCll-<G)o::Tc::t> .. (l) OCDo-o CIl5":J:^:t>OO:i.<CD~:t> 55 iii ;:; ~ 0 5. 3; 0 0 ~ N' ~ -tiDo~~-<@og:o~~ o 0 (j) ::> CD 0 Ill.g co =. :t> ~ ~CD iDr=S 03 CLC: S:::!,VlIll r~n.Ill< colDlllog::o!'. ~ :J-s ~~;,..- g.<tn g g o.o.(l) ::"C-,SVl tIl - -< ::> x !!!. '0 ~.E 3 -a?>cn~a.lQ(I) ~ COD) ::1g~ - ~::> ~Ill(l) CIl Q.(D" Q)::1 "ti CD(l) =.@ lD ::> g;o 3 Vl CD '0 III ~. CIl '< tIl lD 3 ~~~(tO~ .... O>NW en 0)......01 co ..........""-J c.. 0.0,0. co COO><.n -..j o>~<.n ~I~ Co .....t.9t.9 W O>01CD co O1NCO '".."j (")Co(,.) W COCOCD W CONCO .... co ~ N W .... <.n :... N ~~~~g: ~;~ '0 .....~~ CI'I O><.no> W <.nN<O 'Co (")Co(,.) N co <0 0> W <ON<O iJU 000 !*~~~ N'OOO o .... .... .... o b o ~~~ 00000 ~ CI'I o b g~~~~ ~ CI'I o o g~~~~ UUI 0000 ~ fIt~fIt..""'~~ ....O>WONN O>OWNNW ./>.OON<.nW '".."j "0"00. "0 <0 cooooo<.n ....00000 ~~~~~~ ....O)W<.nNN O>OW......NW .e:..00-.01(..J '".."j "0 'ON "0 <0 CO00010<.n ....00000 ~!!r!!~ o>ow<.nw O1CO....OO "o"oN"oa, ....00010W 000000 ~~~ ~ .....<.nt\>-UtoM..... O>WNO>~O ./>.<.n....OO1W '".."j"o"oo"o(,.) COOOOON ......00000 ~.... oM..... .....'-9~~ ./>.<.n....o>~<.n <.n010001N <0"0"0"0"0:"" NOOOOO> ......00000 ~c...~ ~~..... ~ O;~::: ~ 0,'0'0 ..... 0100~i/90> 000000 ~ .... ./>. o "0 ~o~c...c...~ 000000 ~ 01 o "0 ~o~~~~ 000000 ~ UI o "0 ~0~~~(j9 000000 ~~~ (j9 .....01~~-ut..... O>WNCD~O J:tr,.0lI.....00'1(".) ."'-1"0"0"0"0(,,) ~OOOON .....00000 "ll :::0 o-t c....0 m-t 0> -tr o o c: z ~ "ll :::0 i5 :::0 o :::oc m:::o :::0 em mz CIl-t -t .... co co CI'I I co en .... co co en I co -..j .... co co -..j I co OIl .... co co CD cD co .... co co 'f N o :::!-t coO UI-t -:t> o r co "T1 -< .... <0 <0 <.n cD 0> :::0 (l) o o 3 3 (l) ::> a. (l) a. o III ~. ~ 3' '0 (3 < (l) 3 (l) ~ iJ (3 co ~ 3 o ~ N Ol iD <.11 N Q 'U <0 Ol ;;0 m o ~ ;>;; ~ ~, OOZ-l-l C < ID iil 0 3~;ii1![ ~Ul<ar> ~5~"'~ ~~~o= o ii)Ul~ < ;;oOii) ~ ID5;;o - <OlD Ul ID-< ::T :J3:ID o CIll:J ~ :: :5'l~ lDlIl :J III :J o ID WI~ ~ ~ W W ....., ....., ... CO CO OCO CO ~I~ Co N 01 01 01 01 N N ... ... 0 0 0001 01 ~I~ w Co en en .... .... ......~ ~ 00Cl:l Cl:l ~ ~I~ 01 0> Co Co ......en en 000 0 ... ~It: Cl:l Cl:l Cl:l Cl:l N N ... ... W W 000 0 ~I~ ~ 0> 01 0> 'iD 'iD 'iD ~W w W OW W W -l o ![ G> ID :J ID .., !!!. -n C :J 0. o '6' m )( al :J 0. ~ C .., ID III o =0 o III " ~ "tI .., o 'CD' o Iii 13 ID ~ Ul ID :2 o. ID ;;0 ID III ID :2 UlO;>;;C ggm~ 3,;:; 1il t:!: :E '< ID ~S:!;~ ~e:ii3 1J;-2~ .., .., - 0 Ul.2. 0 0 < 5i II ~. g 3 -lUl:JC:ID o 1ll"':J -l 'lil ID Iii > r ... ~ ~ ~ Cl:l o en W .... ... o ~~tR~ W <.11<.11 0> -...j~ o 00 Co co, o 00 Cl:l 00> j j ... o ~~tR~ ~ ~~ o 00 Co co, o 00 Cl:l 00> ... o ~ tR N '" _~ '0 N-...j ~ <.11<0 ~ ~~ g~gg ~ o ~~...tR W w-...j o 0<.11 o 00 '0 '0'0 g gg ~ .... CO W ....., CO CO ... o nuo ... ~ Co 01 01 N o 01 ~ ~ltR~ 01 m<.11 o 00 '0 '0'0 o 00 o 00 ~I"''''' .... 010 o 00 '0 '0'0 o 00 o 00 l~ l; ~~!ti U\O 0 . 8 0 0 8 ~ N ~ 01 Co en o i~ ~ ~ tR tl Ii I g ~ i , ... .. :- ~~EltElt O\\WNW-...j - 0<.11 0 <.11 _ JI\ .0999 '" 0000 ;30000 U\oooo k~3 "tIm <0. OC olJ cnO: o 0 o :J ~G) UlID !2iil ID iil :J - o G> ID 0 !!!s. 0.- rp -n~S:S:OUlZUlZ;;o-l~OG>;;o>>"tI o III III = .., 8 0 :E 0 <' 0 III c: .., ID 0 0 III ~~~s2 ~-3'~Ill:E~E~e.>>~ ~ID-:JID~::T ~:JIDC:0"'I8olll ::J::JCD_.....<~3~::J",or+oo== Ulm-n~9"t15:J~:JIllIllO..,c:-3~~ cUlID:J~IllID>~"tIQ~~;;oEm",,;;o ~_~@Ul~O~~Ill~;;oID~OID3~~~ -l~ -QOOIllID~IDID~"QID:J~'" S~ ~~g33m~-3~0~o;;o~@@~ > U~~ ~~ ~- _.~~ ~ iii' :J -. c: 3 ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ 0 ...., 0 III 0 r <D CT::J ~o "'0 _;'+" "<:::J.....::s ~ ~g.~~~ ~ ?;o~ 8 3'~W-g ID ~ :J g,~ <Q 3 @ :c: 0 3 ~ 0 5' ~ acn ~,,<g~~ {ii"2.Sl-oCIJ Ul~ oW ii Iii III 3~ID3.g-o ceo C::r ::J (bO ..,or 3Ul Eo!!!, e. :J:JIDO~ 3 en 02..2 -u ur 3.~~ IllID Q;;oll ~ Ul30 -<g -IDC: ~ IDC: ~. 3 0 n; ;a a. ~ ~ en fAcn o < ... en :.. ...... .... '0 Ul CO ... ~ tR tR ~tRtR~ tR~ Cl:l~tR....tR~....tR~OlWN....~~tRN~ .... N-...jW-...j....-...jWW<.11~W~-...jOl-...j~ CO O<OONO>....0<.1100l....<O-...j-...j<.11.... ~ cNcc'iD~ccco,cmccc~ Ul OWOONOOOOOOOOOOO Ul 0000<.1100000000000 ... .... W Cl:l en Cl:l 01 ... ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~tR OI!tR....~~....~~mW....~r~~NW ~ ~~~~m~~~~~~<o~~~~ ~ cNcc'iD~ccc:"cmcccc o OWOONOOOO~OOOOOO o 0000<.110000~00000"" ... ...... 01 W Ul .... ... ~ W ~N ~ <ON ~ mOl en Nt ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<.11 .,. 01 ~ W W Ul ... ~ tR ~ ~~tR~ ~tR W~tR....tR.,......,..,.mw........~~~........ W N-...jW-...J....-...JWW<.11~W~-...JOl-...JOl ~ ONONO>....0<.110W....<O-...J-...J0>0 N c~cc'iD~ccc:..cmcc~~ g g~gg~ggggtgggg~~ . .. ...10- :-J.:..:1~~ 080>0> C> !D9 tRO 0 ~ !:::l 000<.110> ... 01 N W W Ul ... .~ ~ ~'~~~f-O\ !" 9.-...J9. ~ 01 000 Ul 000 ~ W 000 000 o ~ N <.11 '0 O~ 00 ... o ... 0> co .... 'iD ~ N -fDf'i~~ m WN o -...J-...J o <.110> ~~I~ tR~ NN W N~ -...JO 0 <.11W '0'0' - '0 '0:" IE;> 0 0 ~o~o~ 1000 oooo~ l~ .,. o ... ~ N W ~ o o ~ o tR <.11 -...J o _<.11 '0 0 o o~~~~.,. 00000000 ~ N W '0 ~g ... o ... Cl:l Ul '0 o o ~~tR~ 0000 ~ ~ '0 ~g , W ~ - '0 ~tR~ ~~o 0000000 ... o ... .... '0 .... W N W o tR I ~ ~~ -a. ......a w(,n I'\J ...I. -a. 010 0'1 ~ - ~ '0'0 '0 IE;>w~ ~O~OOtRO~~~tR~ 1000 000000000000 ... 0> ~ W W en ;ij ~,~ ~~~~ ~~ W ~~EIt ...I.EltEltm("J...I.-a.~EltElt~~ 0> N-...JW ....-...JwW<.11~W~-...JOl-...JOl o ONO O>....O<.11Ow....<O-...J-...JO>O N- c~c- 'iD~ccc:..cmoo~~ o owo NOOOO~OOOO<.11<.11 Ul 000 <.110000~000000l o ~ ~ ~ S:ZS: III ID III S' :E S' arc" cn~g-Ql C:J III 3 ~@-< ID -l_~o 0;;0"'0 -lID III 3 >~g" rlll~c: @Ul'- 3-c ID ~;g :J ~ .., --Ill "tire. .., III ID o :J (p.e. ll"tl Ul c: o ~ III Ul ID ~~~~"tI Ul ....<.11;;0 ...... ~WO-l ~ .-...J.<.11 c.... 0 en <.110m-l o 000> o oO-lr ~~tR~O o ....N co ~<oO Cl:l -...JWC t g:tZ ...... o-...J~ "tI ;;0 "'lE;>tRtRO 01000;;0 ... 0 ~~~tR;;OC o ....Nm;;o ; .~_~C~ t <.11tmz ...... g-...J~-l .... ~I :g ~ Y' o co o ~ 0> o 00 .,.~ ;;; N co Cl:l 0> U, cD o ~tR...... o 00 .... co ~~ ~~ ...... <0 I Ul wCO _ _ Cl:l co ~ ~ ~~ ...... O-...J ...~ .... W co o co - CD g "'~CD o OOco .... co co ~StR~~ ogoo ...; ~:::!-l ~ ::gcoO co WUI-i t tRto~ ...... o.....co -n -< ~ <0 <0 <.11 <b Ol ;;0 ID o o 3 3 ID :J e. ID e. o III ,!:!, ~ 3' ~ o < ID 3 ID ~ "U o co iil 3 o ~ i\3 -J <D 01 ~Z~;:O()()I mCDQ)C1)(t)-, . -, < -. 0 => 0 :J<::sO.....N arC"~ Q) ~ . ;g-Q1~;=:xJ => lU 3 c: _. CD !il-<CDg~'2. 3iJ~Q~-<~ .g~3-g;:03 -0'0 =>CD CD ~:::Ts.a.fJa 3 ~ C Glo -i3 III C:'O CDc: CDa.U)"'~= 3.~03g-~9: "Or-a.=> cE ...,Q)CDr- o => -. -, a. CT CD __ n. "0 '0 l/l c: lU o ~ :::T => lU co l/l CD ~ ill '-'Hit ~ ~OI""'''W ~(..)-J~lO -J01000 u,"o"o"o"o 00000 00000 GiIlill ~ ~NiIlill(") ~lOooNlO -J(..)0100 u,~"o"o"o O~OOO O-JOOO !Eltillillillillill 1000000 ~ ill ill ill .(..) ......"'......W ~lOooNlO -J (,,)010 0 g:t888 O-JOOO ~iIlillillillill ~OOOOO SiIlill iIlill ~OOOOO ! ~iIl lO~ (")N ~u, iIl~Oillill O-JOOO ~iIlillillillill ~OOOOO () 15 lO 0'1 ;:0 m () ~ .l>o ~iIlillillillill ~OOOOO Gill N tit lO .l>o (..) N iIlt~tltill O-JOOO :;22Q~00~~8'~~~h;'61 :J~o. CDCDOa.C:~<""':JCD g.N<8'~~::iiliPg.~:g.;:O!!l o lO'< lU CTCT;:oC: N< c: ~ 0_ C/) lU C III a. ::!. ::!. - 5' 01 ... CD 0 llJ lU e~. => O' C/) ~ ~ N '? () C/) ~ a. ~ ~CO g.~ ~O:l:~~8'~ ~;:o~!l!.. o ;:o.a iD CD :'" 'Ii a 3iJ c: ,.. ::!, 2 iP :1:0 -10-. -m..,CD-'''''' ::S-::s > s. g J1 c ~ lU 0 0 CD ~ co a.~. ~ r-CD => -co. E.:::TlllO'lS ;:omo 3 N a. :::T ~ en o' ~ .Q' m -< 0 ~ => CD lO"OllJl/la:C/)coo-,_~CD lU o=> CD-CD--'o => a. =:a. =:Cil CD!:;::o"O~, 0 CDen lUCDen"O=>-.oo lU ::La: ;if~cQ)ro~.~ 3 5' ~ l/l cg. ~ ~ ~ !!! 'S '? ;:0 ~lU en ~CD.Qio~ 0 ;if g. ::o~- ~ =: CD lU a. ;;:: J1 :T iIt ~ ill ill fI'!DiIl iIlill 9'iIlillill O!O~iIlillillillN~iIlOc..>01c..> w U1f\J(.rJm~011\)""'0I0UlO1""" .... ~01~NlOOO'10010lO-J01 fJ t 8~g:blgg8g8~~fg CD lOoooooooooooo iIt .... ill ill $..> !D ill _N ill ill ill N~Oillillillilliltill~ilt01(")01(") o 0101('')N~01lO0N00101~ o ~(..)~-JlOOO'lOOOlO-J01 fJ tg:~g:bl8g:ggg~88 CD lOoooooooooooo iIt iIt ~ ~ b ~ g~~~~~~~g~~~~~~ iIt .... iIt iIt $..> .lO ill .N ill ill ill ....~Oiltilliltiltiltill~iIlO1(..)01(..) en 0101('')N~01010N00101~ -J ~(")~-JlOO(")OOOlO-J01 b ~u,'iou,N"ou,"o"o"ou,"o"o CD .l>o0000100000000 CD lOoooooooooooo iIt~ ill ~~ ~ b~ g g8~~~~~~~00go~ iIt en W N b o o iIt ill ill ill 0000 ill iIt 01 ~NO 000 "0"0"0 iIliltOOO 000000 iIt 0> ...., I>> Co en o iIt en I>> ~ W en o ill iIt 01 O1lO 0 .c..>.o 0 010 "0 OOiltOill ill 0000000 t: ~ ~ t: ~I: ~ jg~~jg~~jgjgjg~.,ijg ill '-'> N ill N-J~ 'iou,-""" iIt ill 0 0 01 00000 iIt '-'> en 01 o 0 "'" 0 '0 "0 o tltillillill'-'>'-'>'-'>iIlillOillillill o 0000000000000 iIt iIt N '-'> .N "ioift {flifl{flifl{fl-Eft~ift01 (It 0-' (J'1WN-.01010"'O t\J NCD ("')-'-..1<00(,,)000 ...... bu, U,eoU,NOo,OOO Co 00'-'>0000100000'-'>01i1l 000000000000000 m'TI'TIZ"O()"O u,::;'::;-Oooo :::~~o[.g [ enIll3~~en;.o C:E:-o g O!2.....,.g lD9:~CD~~C/)lU -i cE ;:0 III '0 ;::;: ~ ~ o CDc:coCD-3 ~ '2.5:iil~~~ OJ 5" a. 0 .- r- !il co CD::; ;:0 3m .:< ~ ~ -g 0. - '0' ;:0 3 CD CD !il a. <' ~ en '< l/l iP 3 ~~~~ "..in WOc..>.l>o'-'>lO~01 enNNO~~(")O 0>0001001-JlO~ N"o"o"o"oU,~:"" ....0000-J0100 woooO(..)-J(..) iIt iIt $..> ill ill _~ ill ill ill .......<N~'EIl(,O.....<.n enNNO~.l>o(..)O 0>0001001-JlO~ iD-.....,"o"o"ou,~:.... 0>01000-J01oo woooO(..)-J(..) ~ ~ ~ CD 01 .l>o b g ~ Oilt'-'>O'-'>'-'>iIlO 00000000 iIt ill $..> ill '-'> .~ '-'> '-'> ill l:;;~f;:.lt7l~~w~ ....001001-JlOc..> Coo,"o"o"ou,~o, I>>OOOO-JOIOI ....0000c..>-J~ iIt '-'> ill ~~t7lt7l 0000 'Co 0,"0 "0 OOOOill 00000 ill o iIt ill W N o 01 ~ g ","iIlillO'-'> NOOOO .... 0> N I>> 'Co UI ill ....0 ill N'-'> 01 ~ 001 "0"0 00 00 .... '-'> N N en 01 ~ g o '-'>iIl 0,-,> 00000 iIt '-'> N N en 01 o .0 '0 0 o ill ill 0'-'> 00000 iIt '-'> ..t\) (A -En _-zt> .. ~ ~~t7lt7l~ N~ ~~~~~ ~~ CD 0 000'-'>"'" 01 WOOOOOI\.)...... ~4 ill -J o "0 o ill 00 ill 01 0> N ","ill NO ill c..> 0> c..> 0, '-'> 01 o~ '-'> ill 00 '-'> ill 00 ::;()G);:O:l:()() _. 0 CD (1) CD 0 0 a5=>~~.g1ll ~f>CTllJen.:<G)!il:::Tc:> C/)5":I:;.;).ll:o~ l?iP!2 e - < -, 0 c: ~ < '0 ::!. .... lll~>o....::!.o ()ar+l;: Cil -i CD ():::T.....:< CD 0 5' a. => O()(P~ Cil ()1ll.gCO Q>o ~CD lD;::=5 03 Cl:c: ~~'::: ~ r-an.llJ< coiPllJOCD= ~ ~.5 ~~~..... g.:Efn g fJ a.o (l) "",c-._.l/ll/l - " => X !!!, '0 => => 3 C:~l/l ;:o=>CO CD co (l) 'O() CDiPiill/l => tOG) ::J::Ja. - iil=> ~llJCD C/) 0.(;" Q)::J ~ (l)CD =!il iP => g3iJ 3 l/l CD '0 llJ ~. ~i'-'>'-'>'-'> ...... Oll\.)(..) Q) m-""(J1 co ................... W u,u,u, CD lOO>O1 ...., O>-JOI ~liIl Co ...."'''' to> 0'10100 00 O1NlO ~ c....o,c.... W lOlOoo W <ONlO '-'> lO ill N c..> .... 01 ':4 N ~~~~~ ~liIl b ......"'''' 01 0>0100 W OINlO 'Co c....o,w N lOlOe>> W lONlO .... "'" N .... '0 .... o ill ill ill 000 .... .... "'" o '0 o ill '-'> '-'> 00000 .... en o b g~~~~ .... en o '0 g~~~~ .... .... ..... ...., CD '0 ~~~~~ '-'> iIl'-'>'-'>:"iIl'-'> ~O'Ic..>ONN O'IOc..>i'.)N(..) ","OON01(") -""""0 "ou,"o'io lOOOOOOl ~ooooo ill '-'> ill '-'> ill '-'> ~o>c..>01NN O'IO(")~Nc..> ':::"OO--OIW -""""o"oN"o'io lOOOOlOOl ~ooooo "'~~~~ 0'I0(..)0Ic..> 0I1O~00 "o"oN"oa, ill 0 001 0 c..> 000000 '-'> ill ill ill --OIN-6't"'-. O'Ic..>NOO-JO ~0I~00l(..) -""""o"o"o"oc.... lOOOOON ~ooooo '-'> ill ""...........,..... ",.0I~00-J0I 0I01000lN 'io "0 "0"0 "0:"" NOOOOO'l ~ooooo ill ill '-'> ...... ...... -- .Eft ~~:: ~ 0,"0"0 :.... 01 0 Oill'-'>O'I 000000 '-'> ~ ",. o "0 ill 0 '-'> ill iIt ill 000000 ill 01 o "0 iIt 0 ill '-'> '-'> ill 000000 '-'> 01 o "0 '" 0 '-'> '-'> tit tit 000000 tit '-'> tit '-'> -""O'IN(It~....... O'Ic..>Noo-JO .:::..0I.......001W -""""o'Ooow -JOOOON ~ooooo "0 ::0 O-i (..0 m-i ()> -ir- o o e Z ::;! "tI ::0 (5 ::0 () ::oe m::o ::0 em mz c/)-i -i .... 00 CD 01 cD 0> .... (0 CD 0> cD ...., .... CD (0 ...., cD I>> .... <0 CD ClO cD lO .... (0 (0 lO N o :<..... (00 en..... -)> o r- oo o ~ N -..J (0 01 ooz-t-t c < CD ill 0 3!!:;:J&l =-en<;.> ~i5~"~ ~;::l.2:S'~ o CDCIlc- < "oiD ~ CDi5" en ~2.~ ::r :J3:CD o C III :J ;::l. ~ 5' & {Dill :J III :J o CD 01 ~I~ -:... 0 o UI Co> Co> W W ~CQ CQ o. . ~I~ ~ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ :.a. :.a. :.a. ~~..... ..... ..... 00. . . ~I~ w Clo UI UI .... .... ~~'k 'k 0000 00 ~I~ ~ 'k al al Clo Clo ~~U1 UI 000 0 o =0 <0 en " m o ~ ;>; . ~It: Clo 0. 00 00 00 00 N N ~~Co> Co> 000 0 ....!~ ~ UI ... 0 co Co> CQ CQ ... ... _<0 CQ oen en -t o ~ (;) CD :J CD ~ "T1 C :J a. o -0' m )( '1:l CD :J a. ;:;: C ~ III j i j .... ~ ... co CQ ... <0 en o =0 o III '1:l ~ " .2. CD o Ii!' o CD g CIl CD ~ n CD " CD III CD ~ CIlO;>;C oo~:; 35:;,;; ~-<CDiD !!!.3:~~ ~ e: 5.-5 4J~~o CIl.2. 0 0 < CCD~oCD lD g. !!!. I/l 3 -t v. '" C CD O ll.> ~ :J <cCD~ ;! CD I/l r- ~ o ;~~13 Co> 0101 en -..J. o 00 Clo co, o 00 00 00:> ~ o ~ ~ ~~~~ o 00 Clo co, o 00 00 0 0:> ~ o ~ ~ N .,.~ o N-..J . UlCO t ~~ g~g~ ~ o ~~~~ Co> W-..J o 001 o 00 o "0"0 o 00 o 00 ~ o ~!~. .... en o 0 o "0 g g<>: ~!~~ al enUl o 00 o co o 00 o 00 ~!iI't~ .... mo o 00 o "0"0 o 00 o 00 iI't I~' ~!$~......' o 0,0, o 0.0. o og, 1Z~~tl .... mo o 00 o "0"0 o 00 o 00 m'; ,~ ~ ti), ~ d\ N. UI ~ ~~"'(:R Co>N<.o>-..J o 0'1 C) (II 0000 0"0"0"0 0000 0000 "m <a. OC 00 III ..... CIl -. o 0 o :J ~Gi CIlCD ~, ~ CD ill :J _ 0(;) CD 0 ~s. 0.- cp "T1~3:3:0CllZCllZ"-t~O(;)"~~" 01llll.>=aoo~0~2I11c@CDOOIII ~~5'SN&~-~m<~a~~>>~ -CD-"'CDI/l::r3::r"'CDco~IoOIll ",,,,CD--<~3~"',,-oO=0 CIl~"T1~Q"~",~,,,1II1110~c-303~ C CD",~IIICD~<C,,(;);x.@"Em'1:l'1:l" lD~~gl/l;x.O@lDlII@"CD~03~=~ aa ~(;)03ll.>~;x.gCD^~QCD"'~~ -t~ ~~g3mo::r~~P~~~agg~ > ~..- CD ~ll.>-":1.CD'.ll.> _. r- m~fr~3,,~~3Anp~g!!!.O 0'. - -o~~-.. :J 3 ~g.~~~ ai 0 a-5 8 ~~g>-g CD"'::>01ll<g3g:<a3~0::r;x. ",-CIl q-~OCD(n <"00' OOCll - . CIl5 al/l CD (b'<~- CIl~ Ooo.CIlIll 3!:!:CD3~~ Ceo C=r ::I (DO -Dr 3C1l Eole. a. ","'CDO~ 3m 02.2 " fii a~<g IIICD Q"a!!!. CIl30 ~g -CDc::r CDC ::!. 30(1) a.~ -< ~ I/l CIl CIl o < ~ .01 .... ..... .... o UI CQ ~ ~ ~ iI't ~~~iI't ~t oo~iI't~il'til't~~il'tm<.o>N~~iI't~N .... N-..J<.o>-..J~-..J<.o><.o>01.<.o>.-..Jm-..J CQ OCOONO:>~0010m~CO-..J-..J01~ 0. "oN"o"o~~"o"o"oo,"om"oo"o~ UI O<.o>OONOOOOOOOOOOO UI 00000100000000000 iI't .... Co> 00 a. 00 en ~ ~ iI't iI't ~~~iI't ~~ allil't~il'til't~il'til'tm<.o>~""r~il'tN<.o> ~ ~~~~~~~~~e~co~~~~ ... ONO"o~~"o"oo~om"oo"o"o o O<.o>OONOOOO.OOOOOO o 0000010000.00000.... ~ ..... al W UI .... ~ ~ Co> ~N ~ CON ~ mOl a. Nt ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~01 iI't en ~ W Co> UI - en ~ W Co> UI ~ N 01 "0 O~ 00 iI't iI't 00 ~ o - o iI't iI't m ~~ ~~ ~ ~p ~ ~fti. J~ WOO;' 0 0.....) m <.0> N ~ ~gg.o~g~gt~goo~~ - o iI't .... UI CQ ... o o iI't iI't 01 01 01 .0 ... _0 ~ 00 0 iI't N <.0> "0 ~g iI't o iI't UI CQ o o o iI't~~~ 0000 -0: ~. '0 iI't~~~ ~O. 0000000:.0 ~ <.0> . "0 ~g - o - CQ al 00 N Co> o ~~ iI't ~ enN ~ ....... (..,)01 .... 010 ':...j ~ "0"0 ~~~~~g~gg~o~~~~~ - O'l N W W 01 - t ~~~~~M~~~~~~~~~~ 00 N-..J<'O>01~-..JWW01.w.-..Jen-..Jen UI ONOOO:>~0010<'O>~CO-..J-..J0:>0 N "O':...j"o"o~~"o"o"o~"om"o"o~~ ~~g~gg~ggggtgggg~~ ~d-? CIl C lD -t o -t > r- ." 0." .....O-t ,!')c...O U1m-t 00> o-tr- !'-o go ooC - Z ~:;! .... CQ CQ 0:> Co> ' oCQ - CQ o o o .~-t <0<00 CQUI-t tS'~ .....CQ '. FY 95/96 - 99/00 PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 Total Expenditures 421,010 140,000 50,000 50,000 1,179,091 Administration 518,081 Fire,Rescue, Safety 910,800 306,242 628,851 250,000 250,000 2,345,893 Highways, Transportation 503,000 532,000 678,650 684,350 504,000 2,902,000 Libraries 40,000 28,500 375,947 30,000 25,000 499,447 Parks/Recreation 559,178 639,397 159,400 59,000 968,230 2,385,205 Education (General Govt) 62,335 0 0 0 0 62,335 School Division Projects 7,853,335 18,369,345 15,176,270 4,680,830 1,818,700 47,898,480 Solid Waste HO,OOO 260,000 210,000 310,000 410,000 1,300,000 Contingency 0. 112,025 159,000 863,500 681,000 1,815,525 TOTAL PROJECTS 10,556,729 20,668,519 17,528,118 6,927,680 4,706,930 60,387,976 EXISTING RESOURCES CIP FUND BALANCE * 240,794 249,174 201,848 196,850 188,230 1,076,896 # GEN FUND APPROPRIATIONS 2,300,000 2,300,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 12,600,000 RESCUE PAYMENT 21,800 0 0 0 21,800 INTEREST EARNED 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 E-911 REVENUES 340,800 340,800 STORMWATER FUND BALANCE 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION I't ';,m!0J,',8!:'it'EE:Ei,.o.l 0 STATE FUNDS (Rivanna) 0 250,000 250,000 JAIL PRIOR FUNDS/BONDS I;E'" "'!f:,ii,i,;;rrl:!tdio.l 0 0 0 VPSA BONDS 7,503,335 2,969,345 14,676,270 4,080,830 1,118,700 30,348,480 SPLIT BILLING 15,000,000 TOTAL RESOURCES 10,556,729 20,668,519 17,528,118 6,927,680 4,706,930 60,387,976 REQUESTED PROJECTS 10,556,729 20,668,519 17,528,118 6,927,680 4,706,930 60,387,976 OVER/(SHORT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 ACCUMULATED OVER/(SHORT) 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL PROJECTS New High School 2,400,000 7,800,000 12,820,350 23,020,350 WAHS Renovations 943,650 843,650 80,000 1,030,200 2,897,500 AHS Phase II, Phase III 1,007,000 539,000 20,000 249,000 1,815,000 Woodbrook Renovation 200,000 1,750,550 0 0 0 1,950,550 Cale Addition 78,000 680,000 0 758,000 Stony Poiint Renovation/Addition 70,000 1,048,000 0 0 0 1,118,000 Brownsville Renovation 100,000 1,199,470 0 0 0 1,299,470 Crozet Addition 80,000 714,890 0 0 794,890 Murray High Renovation 95,000 0 70,000 755,000 0 920,000 Northem Elementary 0 0 0 25,000 300,000 325,000 Red Hill Expansion 0 0 0 300,000 300,000 VHF Underground storage tanks 0 0 180,000 180,000 360,000 CATEC ADA Compliance 0 14,000 14,000 Burley Roof Replacement 140,000 140,000 ADA structural changes 186,485 186,485 425,000 0 797,970 Instructional Technology 1,080,000 939,000 605,070 544,480 489,700 3,658,250 Administrative Technology 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 350,000 Vehicular Maintenance Facility Recen 0 17 ,500 294,000 143,000 0 454,500 Security Systems - all schools 44,900 44,900 Maintenance/Replacement 1,358,300 2,566,800 611,850 1,864,150 479,000 6,880,100 SUBTOTAL 7,853,335 18,369,345 15,176,270 4,680,830 1,818,700 47,898,480 01/27/95 6 CIP96RECWK4 mTE 2-/ - 4iJ s- --------------__ -L...._ -- -------------------------------- MDD\ ITIM ID. --___i!~_~L~~~~____________ NHn\ I11M__~~~~~"'~ DIlPERRID \MIL _~-./~~~____ Form. 3 7/25/86 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE "Q 'L "')" ";" /-~ 7-:-tS- . ,tl,,"':"I" '^".." . /J/ ~ '/ 1\1:"'~;;; ;te:il i,1) ~~-~/ MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Board of Supervisors Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC January 20, 1995 €1.JJ V" Appointments to Various Boards and Commissions Following is a list of vacancies that need to be filled for various boards and commissions. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: One vacancy (at-large) as of January 20, 1995. Mr. John Stewart Darrell's term ended January 19, 1995. Mr. Darrell was the at-large appointee and does not wish to be reappointed. The term of this appointment will expire January 19, 1999. JEFFERSON AREA BOARD ON AGING: One vacancy as of April I, 1995. Mr. Lawrence D. Cabot, Jr. is currently serving with term to expire March 31, 1995. Mr. Cabot does not wish to be reappointed. The term of this appointment will expire March 31, 1997. LIBRARY BOARD: Two vacancies as of July I, 1995. Mrs. Shirley B. Dorrier and Ms. Cyndy Caughron are currently serving with terms ending June 30, 1995, both are ineligible to be reappointed. The terms of these appointments will expire June 30, 1999. EWC/jng C:\., IFORMSIAPPT,LST INTERVIEW TIME SCHEDULE FEBRUARY 1, 1995 TIME NAME BOARD/COMMISSION 1:00 John Lowry IDA 1:10 Menachim "Max" Mayo IDA and Library Board 1:20 Charles Herbek IDA 1:30 -/ G. Blair Turner IDA 1:40 .j Marian Schwartz JABA and (Library Boar4) . -~ TAn A WI-!i!( VI ~..JV InnPT 2:00 / Sanford Wilcox JABA 2:10 Ken Boyd JABA 2:20 James S. Gillespie JABA and Library Board 2:30 j Jacqueline A. Rice Library Board 2:40 Paulette Ubben Library Board eUJ C PfJ-' III . I' r, \v" 10\/ LI w David p, Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296,5800 Charles S, Martin R ivanna Charlotte y, Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F, Perkins White Hal! Forrest R, Marshall, Jr. Scottsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller February 3, 1995 Mr. Hiawatha Green 308 Crest field Court Charlottesville, VA 22901 Dear Mr. Green: At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on February I, 1995 you were appointed as a member of the Equalization Board for the calendar year 1995. Duties of this Board are set out in the Code of Virginia, Chapter 32, Article 14, Sections 58.1-3370 through 58.1-3389. The duties are more specifically set out in Section 58.1-3379 and read as follows: liThe board shall hear and give consideration to such complaints and equalize such assessments and shall, more-over, be charged with the especial duty of increasing as well as decreasing assess- ments, whether specific complaint be laid or not, if in its judgment, the same be necessary to equalize and accomplish the end that the burden of taxation shall rest equally upon all citizens of such county or city. The (Director of Finance) of such county . .. shall, when requested, ... call the attention of the board to such inequalities in real estate assessments in his county or city as may be known to him. Every board of equalization may go upon and inspect any real estate subject to equalization by it." In order to be eligible for appointment, every prospective member of such board shall attend and participate in the basic course of instruction given by the Department of Taxation under Section 58.1-206. In the near future, you will receive notice of a meeting from Bruce Woodzell the Real Estate Assessor. If you have any questions about the duties of this Board, please call Mr. Bruce Woodzell at 296-5856. Sincerely, LL){t~ 1- RJ~~ Walter F. Perkins Chairman WFP/jng cc: Bruce Woodzell, County Assessor James L. Camblos, III, Commonwealth Attorney * Printed on recycled paper \ County of Albemarle __~ "I i:~ @ ~ , -1'".'~.."...-..'''~_.''__' o \VI rn I iU' .IAN, 7 .. T) OF SUPERV!C" Office of Board of County Supervisors 401 McIntire Road CharlottesviIleA, VA 22902-4596 (804) L96-5843 APPLICA TION TO SERVE ON BOARD / COMMISSION / COMMITTEE (please type or print) Board / Commission / Committee Ell.( At.; '=t r-tT!o^ BL,All D Applicant's Name --'=l,'(h,VVl,'"'Tl-IA Ci€'cr\ ~ . . (I" Home Address ,j 0'7 Ca.G6iF,'ELo C/. J! J Magisterial District in which your home residence is located Employer ell rY 0 F ~f..f~-il.lc~ vaL",::- Business Address ~ 0 b. F /'1sT' mAn K E'I SI- Date of Employment 7 /8'? Occupation/Title PoL,C8 OFFic€fL - L)€:rc;-c..Tlv"",-- Years Resident in Albemarle County 6 !L Previous Residence jC)(! 13,"cl(("J~ Ilo. ~/TY Spouse's Name 3d.../A R.. C~ Number of Children J S//$ {-r' Home Phone 2Z~ (6<'l--Cj7Y-/1 S3 f( ; vf'\/\ " Pt. Phone 9i{- ,,5 0 r Education (Degrees and Graduation Dates) /Js-- Memberships in Fraternal. Business. Church and lor Social Groups .ll!tl"n eM (jlPHA k:es-/L...n FI2AT&I?I\:rY , Public. Civic and Charitable Office and / or Other Activities or Interests Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on this Board / Commission / Committee -..L /..:j~NG- S'€Rv.;zo PRoG:v,.o.....sLY ~/l 7J.h:.J l3aAllD - R-r=(e-v n 8~ f<~.{J, ~f",'nr-cn. , The information provided on this application will be released to the public upon request. /L~~-:tL Lb:-e~l- J-/;- i...s Signature Date Return to : Clerk, Board of County Supervisors Albemarle County 40 I McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 , li6@ ~) \1 David p, Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S, Martin Rivanna Charlotte y, Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins While Hall Forrest R, Marshall, Jr. Scottsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller February 3, 1995 Mr. G. Blair Turner P.O. Box 517 Ivy, VA 22945 Dear Mr. Turner: At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on February 1, 1995, you were appointed to the Industrial Development Authority, with term to to expire January 19, 1999. Please contact Shelby Marshall, Clerk of Circuit Court at (804) 972-4084, to arrange a date and time to take an oath of office for this position. On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to serve the County in this capacity. Sincerely, WcJtL:; ~ Walter F. Perkins Chairman WFP/jng cc: The Honorable James L. Camblos, III James B. Murray, Chairman Shelby J. Marshall, Clerk, Circuit Court * Pnnted on recycled paper DEe 5 '84 12:27 FROM PRUDENTi~L CvILLE TO 2565800 P~GE.001/001 ..-' ~ MN. E.U~ W. CC{re~J Clert..JCMc.. z: County of Albemarle ~ A g 2qt; - ~ Office of Board of Coun~ Supervisors 401 Mcrntire ROad C:h~rlotte.."ille~ v A 22902--1596 (804) .l96-5843 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON ROARD J COMMISSION I COMM1.TmE (please type or print) Board/Commission I Committee :J;"d.,sf"j,} ,lJev~~.{U'lI~:n'T Aurlfr:ne/,7t,. /' ~ I' Applicant's Name _Cf1I6. r'SL..A/fl.. 7'" LNG.J2 Home Phoutl '17/ _ S..rt;..s- Home Address ~ o. ~x: 511. ~ mq45 Magi$l:~.d~l District in which your bome residence is located ~/h{j,G4- ~/~e~ Employer /jCvO~NT/Ri-" ~1.4,e/~/~ Phone _.1-';, - .PI., I Business Address '10} ,e AXr w~ .'~ LUA.II!!~~rr.,IEr "'p_L..i!' . P14 ~t6D.t ; Date of Employment 9- / - 9~ Ocoupation I Title A/I,.""", C/AL Aol1"~'()/C I Years Resident in Albemarle County ~ _ Previous Residence Spo~'sName ...t-"'M-el'V ti=-. 7U~ Number of Children _"2 Education (Degrees and G.raduation Dates) ~e'r(!L /;: r;;...,.. e~ r'fiQ~ """"'~.'i /93/ Memhe~hips in PJ'liItemal, Bus:iness., Church W'ld lor Social Groups ~-b"... .- <;"~. /6",-/../ ,4I~L.>~/./ c,ill'~ Public. Civic and Charitable Office and I or Other Activities or Interests a-/~I-',4.::H"i/~ ~~~~ ~/ 2ib...c/ t!':/4-116 R,eason(s) for Desire to Serve on this Board I Commission / Corrun.i~ z:: "wt /~rl!~~~~ ~'~/-p.o,#- ,;.... ~~, L12,'~ ~L .o......+'~ .?~_ ~/.k.....,~ c;.~""'7'" Z- H~ ~ ~~,4,.:., . ,-"s/#4 l7,/ ~/b.->~~ L~~ ~~ ~../d h"" ~~-L-"1"&-/-L: The infonnation provided on this application will be released to the public upon request, c.:.~:... J~ IZ.-P.-~y Sifllature Date Return to ; Clerk, ROSlrd of County Supervisors Albemarle County 40] McIntire Road CI,w!ottc:''VllJe, VA Z290Z-4596 ** TOT~L P~GE.001 ** David p, Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S, Martin Rivanna Charlotte y, Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F, Perkins White Hall Forrest R, Marshall, Jr Scottsvitle Sally H, Thomas Samuel Miller January 20, 1995 Mr. G. Blair Turner P.O. Box 517 Ivy, V A 22945 Dear Mr. Turner: This letter is to confirm that you have an interview with the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, February I, 1995, at 1:30 p.m., for the Industrial Development Authority (at-large). The interview will be held on the fourth floor of the County Office Building in Meeting Room 11. If you have any questions, please contact our office at 296-5843. Sincerely, ~are~G7 Clerk, CMC EWC/jng * Printed on recycled paper ,lkJWlfW -"", David p, Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles $, Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F, Perkins While Hall Forrest R, Marshall, Jr. Scotlsville Sally H, Thomas Samuel Miller February 3, 1995 Mr. Sanford P. Wilcox 3675 Colston Drive Charlottesville, V A 22903 Dear Mr. Wilcox: At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on February 1, 1995, you were appointed to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging, with term to begin April 1, 1995 and expire March 31, 1997. On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to serve the County in this capacity. Sincerely, W~7-~ Walter F. Perkins Chairman WFP/jng cc: The Honorable James L. Camblos, III Gordon Walker * Printed on recycled paper f ^ ' ',-p\l utI 0 ( .. l\C \ letS Office of Board of County Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville). V A 22902-4596 (804) L96-5843 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD I COMMISSION I COMMITTEE (please type or print) Board I Commission I Committee :..----r:Fn=--n..Su/IJ IJ-k-t:~ lSt'llf'::D fcl f( A CoI IV (, Applicant' s Name ::; /f /1) .0 h. b A (I) I l. C' ('; K Home Phone c17 7- 00 Lf. 3 Home Address /5(.7S- C()LSTOtJ /)~/{/r I Crf.tY2.LdT7CSVILL2lVA 2_.2.c7()~3 Magisterial District in which your home residence is located 51/ 1t1/JE<- MIL L t ,,<- Employer 0t.;~) WI LCO',( /(E.-,tL'l'i d) 'DT_lJELDP~1 f)Vl Phone 07S - lCJ. ( E? Business Address 3&?7'~- COLS/7Jtv Df..:.tllt , Ccjlri~L(,)T7?:~I!ILL2 \ VA .2.2....'703 Date of Employment iTlfN i {'11' 2- Occupati~n I Title Ph IIv'C ,/flL o,~ 0 K,2 v'( Years Resident in Albemarle County Five Previous Residence C HirituJrlt.'S VI LI.-C Spouse's Name \TA./u I L€ Number of Children Fou/c.. Education (Degrees and Graduation Dates) A. 7) D tJ /( E U JJ I II tk <~ IT\.( I CJ 7 ") M SA (()fJUL'LC iJA,)q)CJc-:"17....t ('17':) Memberships in Fraternal. Business. Church and lor Social Groups E:..t;{AJ.~NUcL clJt S (0/1<-. C ttulcC Ii J r;J2C:?:.~ /)JOdI) CItt1 i'LLu 7fC5 V I L- L L 1\ i2. E It /1 S:5 0 C ; I~ Pc Lk-CiL> Ie. .<';' Public. Civic and Charitable Office and I or Other Activities or Interests SC.CCt.ft, ffs"So Cl/iJIOh.) of CH-A.ILLOITI::SJJLLF - .fhI3D'IA€.I~E t6\(wH:k 13JltKb A1l:.)VfBl:ic or 'Jtji3A i1:\..~~"'x.")J'''tlO{-, COy oj Ct{trILL077f::StJ/LLt; (....Z7tkttts) Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on this Board I Commission / Committee LIFt LtYuG" j;U7-t~c:)T IN f/Uj{{tfN S"'Eh.vLCL :5EC7tJ/'t.. AN?> ?k()Vi{)/I()r/~ COOh'o/rlhf1l:.7'> f\Afi) CfY3i' pFFICI2N'j Pk(6)'UtfHID !t-'D'/)f'(s:S 5 Ttfi l- S5V0T/1\L ;Vt::"'cl)s G~- T/tE ~ G 'ED fJ (. P (h_/iTl 6/lJ jJ 0 vJ Jt](,.~ I ~T() /tfi:: FiJI {) Jet . The information provided on this application will be released to the public upon request. ___/,-\'/~f ~ 11/:.f'~~y. Signature :>>eo-, (1, 197~ I Date Return to : Clerk, Board of County Supervisors Albemarle County 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 , .. ~.''''''''" t.~' ::-.. '''\ r:.--\ ~-" .'1 ; ii~'lf'.\:}1 : .' U..' ,I I ~.U '~..i r..... UJj' 'U' ',' " I I ! \ , ~i U David p, Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S, Martin Rivanna Charlotte y, Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F, Perkins White Hall Forrest R, Marshall, Jr. Scottsville Sally H, Thomas Samuel Miller January 20, 1995 Mr. Sanford P. Wilcox 3675 Colston Drive Charlottesville, VA 22903 Dear Mr. Wilcox: This letter is to confirm that you have an interview with the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, February 1, 1995, at 2:00 p.m., for the Jefferson Area Board on Aging. The interview will be held on the fourth floor of the County Office Building in Meeting Room 11. If you have any questions, please contact our office at 296-5843. Sincerely, ~:~ Clerk, CMC / EWC/jng * Printed on recycled paper '~ David p, Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296,5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R, Marshall, Jr. Scoltsvitle Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller February 3, 1995 Ms. Marian Schwartz Route 12, Box 38 Charlottesville, V A 22901 Dear Ms. Schwartz: At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on February 1, 1995, you were appointed to the Library Board, with term to begin July 1, 1995 and expire June 30, 1999. On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to serve the County in this capacity. Sincerely, W{l~~,) Q~~,v~ Walter F. Perkins Chairman WFP/jng cc: The Honorable James L. Camblos, III Donna Selle * Printed on recycled paper ',--;;' f IL{ ,) J · ;.,~,~_~" . J . {..,' -.1 ' ./ County of Albemarle '- Office of Board of County Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville..l. VA 22902-4596 (804) L96-5843 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD I COMMISSION I COMMITTEE (please type or print) Board I Commission I Committee L.. I (?) Q..A- R.. Y 0 0 A- (7_ D Applicant's Name HIH'-IAi\) .c..,CHLOA-/2...T).. Home Phone xCl'::ll.:.'3o....] Home Address g,...-C I?- e:> u ''f.. '3 K C ,;\A~Q.. u::,n'i..S \l I U-ce.., V A- ')- '-'1 tl I , Magisterial District in which your home residence is located -:'SAM,l! ~ I- M \ I..-Lr- L Employer ~B.~ Phone ;Z 9"3 <P "3 0 7 Business Address ?.:LrYI e. Q ,o"? a laC) " e... i Date of Employment Occupation I Title ?0-8.....15t-+t- \) \.Jo~ E:L-- l "51 - \I.) e..i TeQ- Years Resident in Albemarle County ~ Previous Residence ~1J..(yt\t..-()! lN6vj lue.l<" Spouse's Name \>{\IJ.. u.. Number of Children ;l. Education(DegreesandGraduationDates)~..?.J, \~ €:.~\l...c..fIc\'\O>>' \0$,.,2.. \ tJ..,I\. .l.... ~<O\...l.S~ - 'C\I~ Memberships in Fraternal. Business. Church and lor Social Groups "DoG ~CC$ c:PQo..~e.~ Gl-lLf> Public. Civic and Charitable Office and I or Other Activities or Interests tN (V, Ac \'e:. e- Q.... Co ~ se.\rO u.... ~ ~C) c.. u.. c:, Y 6 Q... .i '{ e.afS ()~ """~b~ t\y-+,\-I'y, ~^?r9~D '-' ~()cu..S '- C~\R,~I\-'~ cV ~6G\..L~-(E:.~e.6 Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on this Board I Commission I Committee ~;I tJ\1'-\~" i ~.s. "oJ v ... 1-+ 1\ 1> \-^ 0 Q. e.. "T HA-1\.l AN ~\)!::::.j2..A<~f \\J(6t.~ \~ L\!'1,~f\Q..\~.s. -::t: t-1'4~\:) IN P>lkfrA:/...OI~''f' "'Ou..Q\\..J(; ~~c~\,,~y_\~ \\)€;.Q...e.~~\-liCO VC\1.S (;ll~\ c.\L\~A-c..\(." It--J l-\61~~12.. ~ ylltJ'DS 1\~1> At-.( A-1J.)f\1LE..-- of 6(J.cc~ h ' . . .,., ""l'e:~UeE~'-rnA'\ ~~~ u...~~-r() C.o\-l~~5A-\e T e mformatlOn proVIded on thIS applIcatIon wIll be released to the publIc upon request. ' ~Ib~ r Signature I;z.J '" / q if I I Date Return to : Clerk, Board of County Supervisors Albemarle County 40 I McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 . n~(lil~W .. .~~Jt.!~ ~J .. '~ .' '",.t i_J \ .I ... David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles 5, Martin R ivanna Charlotte y, Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F, Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scoltsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller January 20, 1995 Ms. Marian Schwartz Route 12, Box 38 Charlottesville, VA 22901 Dear Ms. Schwartz: This letter is to confirm that you have an interview with the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, February 1, 1995, at 1 :40 p.m., for the Jefferson Area Board on Aging and the Library Board. The interview will be held on the fourth floor of the County Office Building in Meeting Room 11. If you have any questions, please contact our office at 296-5843. Sincerely, f~M~ Uu; Clerk, CMC EWC/jng * Printed on recycled paper " '-'.'~ f"~ r~ n :..... ',. " ,f n' I \ ft J \..'\.1. ' , ", ., J f j. i"..I. UJ!. U "...... 'I \ !\"'""'~ Lr t j t U ; \. \ t ""'~' ,__,,'__0 :..-J David p, &wennan Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S, Martin R ivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F, Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scot!SVllle Sally H, Thomas Samuel Miller February 3, 1995 Ms. Jacqueline A. Rice Route 4, Box 142 Charlottesville, vA 22901 Dear Ms. Rice: At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on February I, 1995, you were appointed to the Library Board, with term to begin July 1, 1995 and expire June 30, 1999. On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to serve the County in this capacity. Sincerely, W~lE-vW~~ Walter F. Perkins Chairman WFP/jng cc: The Honorable James L. Camblos, III Donna Selle * Printed on recycled paper \ 1 M r ;' . "; Z ,:'1,;/11 n^ '~-\i \JL,.L.t.... ,J vi I\.. L I iCf; County of Albemarle Office of Board ofCoun~ Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville~ VA 22902-4596 (804) .l96-5843 APPLICA nON TO SERVE ON BOARD I COMMISSION I COMMITfEE (please type or print) Board I Commission I Committee LIBRARY BOARD Applicant's Name T:lrqllf>1ine A. Rice Home Address Route 4. Box 142, Charlottesville, VA Magisterial District in which your home residence is located R i V;Jnna. Employer R 111P R i rlgP Srhool Business Address Dyke, VA 22935 Date of Employment 9/89-present Years Resident in Albemarle County 10 Home Phone 973-6583 22901 Phone 9R,)-2Rll ext. 136 Occupation I Title Librarian years Previous Res'idence Malibu, California Spouse's Name C. .Jared Loewenstein Number of Children 1 - age 5 Education (Degrees and Graduation Dates) Ph.D. UCLA '79; MLS Catholic University '92 Memberships in Fraternal. Business. Church and lor Social Groups Ameri~~n T;bT~T)' A~~ori:lrion; Association of Independent School Libraries; Virginia endent Schools Professional Development Committee Public. Civic and Charitable Office and I or Other Activities or Interests Hnll)Tmp:ln PTO; Proffit Neighborhood Association; Friends of the Jefferson-Madison Regional T.ihr;Jry; Associations of the University of Virginia Library; UVA Faculty Club Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on this Board I Commission I Committe~ ve on the Librar Board is two-fold: public resource that continually nutures and supports I would like to contribute to this fine my personal information and recreational in and that of m school's library program. Secondly, I think that I ~ldt8enefit me .neJsonillly, .and my community in turn. ssen la y, III onnatton provme on thIS application will be released to the public up,on request. some of what I have received from this exemplary puolic 11brary. i}{U) i E .J(~,~ () , PU-<- ~ () Signature . Return to : Clerk, Board of County Supervisors Albemarle County 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 would learn alot that k ~lll7f I ' Date JACQUELINE A. RICE Deepdene Route 4, Box 142 Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 (804) 973-6583 EMPLOYMENr HISTORY 1989- 1986-89 1983-85 1982-83 1982 1981 1979-80 EDUCATION 1987-92 1973-79 1970-73 1965-70 Librarian, Blue Ridge School, Dyke, V A Head, Bindery Department, UV A Law Library, Charlottesville, VA Associate, Howard Karno Books, Santa Monica, CA President, Supreme Manufacturing Co., Van Nuys, CA Assistant Professor, Latin American History, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS Instructor, Latin American History, UCLA Extension Los Angeles, CA Apprentice paper conservator, Daedalus Conservatory, Oakland, CA Catholic University, Washington, DC M.S.L.S. Library Science University of California, Los Angeles Ph.D. History University of California, Los Angeles M.A. History University of California, Los Angeles B.A. History Doctoral Dissertation: The Porfirian Political Elite: Life Patterns of the Delegates to the 1892 Uni6n Liberal Convention Rice 2 SUMMARY OF PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE LIDRARY: Created and implemented at Blue Ridge School a library program designed for secondary students, the majority of whom are identified as "reluctant readers." Acted as liaison for the design and construction of the school's new 1.3 million dollar library facility. Organized the University of Virginia Law Library's binding processing system and prepared their preservation program. TEACHING: Taught Latin American and US history at the undergraduate level at UCLA and the University of Kansas. Taught high school Spanish and social studies. RESEARCH: For several years worked as freelance technical writer for such agencies as KLRN (instructional television, University of Texas, Austin) and Texas Education Agency. Also worked with the Mexican federal government (Secretar{a de Industria y Comercio, Direcci6n General de Estadfstica, Mexico City.) SIGNIFICANT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE: Founder of Trinity House collective art gallery, Austin, TX. In addition, held apprenticeship as paper conservator, Oakland, CA. Also assumed full control of family-owned automotive manufacturing plant when leadership crisis was created by owner's illness. In addition, worked as associate with large California antiquarian bookseller. COMMUNITY ACI'lVI17ES AND MEMBERSHIPS American Library Association, School Library Division (AASL) Virginia Library Association Children & Young Adults Round Table Library Instruction Forum Technical Services, Automation and Resources Forum Association of Independent School Librarians Virginia Association of Independent Schools Librarian's Roundtable LANGUAGE COMPETENCIES Spanish; fair command of Portuguese. HONORS RECEIVED Fulbright-Hayes Dissertation Fellowship, 1973, Mexico City Rice 3 PUBUCA110NS "Beyond the Cientfficos: The Educational Background of the Porfirian Political Elite." (In: Aztlcm, Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 289-306. Los Angeles, Fall 1983.) "Rare Mexican Broadsides Acquired." (In: The University Library, Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7-8. Charlottesville, Winter 1986.) "Creative Self-Reflection: The Art of Frida Kahlo. " (In: Iris, No. 16, pp. 8-12. Charlottesville, Fall 1986.) CONFERENCES AND PAPERS Facilitator/Moderator for "The Role of Virginia's Independent Schools with the State Library, VLIN and SNUAB," V AIS meeting, Richmond, November 26, 1990. Initiator and hostess for meeting of V AIS Librarians interested in networking, Blue Ridge School, March 26, 1990. "Latin American Law and Law-Related Reference Sources: Chile" for "Workshop on Latin American Law and Law-Related Reference Sources," American Association of Law Libraries annual meeting, Atlanta, 1988. Co-coordinator and moderator for "Preservation of Non-Print Materials," American Association of Law Libraries annual meeting, Atlanta, 1988. " Acquisition of Latin American Government Documents" for panel, "Latin American Documents: Access and Use," American Association of Law Libraries annual meeting, Chicago, 1987. REFERENCES Pauline H. Anderson, Consultant and Past Director of The Mellon Library at Choate-Rosemary Hall; 71 North Main Street, Broadalbin, NY 12025. (518) 883-3771. Eric Ruoss, Headmaster, The Dunn School, P.O. Box 98, Los Olivos, CA 93441. (805) 688- 2431. John Tyson, Director, Virginia State Library and Archives, 11th Street at Capitol Square, Richmond, VA. 23219. (804) 786-2337. Larry Wenger, Director, Law Library , University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22901. (804) 924-3384. /'.., l , !nl' 'II ~ \,JO \JJ '. David p, Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S, Martin Rivanna Charlotte y, Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F, Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. ScottsviUe Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller January 20, 1995 Ms. Jacqueline A. Rice Route 4, Box 142 Charlottesville, VA 2290 I Dear Ms. Rice: This letter is to confirm that you have an interview with the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, February 1, 1995, at 2:30 p.m., for the Library Board. The interview will be held on the fourth floor of the County Office Building in Meeting Room 11. If you have any questions, please contact our office at 296-5843. Sincerely, ~Mey Clerk, CMC EWC/jng * Printed on recycled paper " w- " ;?~ t/~/ i// ~ P:/;w/v// " .' FEBRUARY I, 1995 EXEClJTlVE SESSION MOTION I MOVE THAT THE BOARD GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 2. I -344(A) OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA UNDER SUBSECTION ( I) TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL MATTERS REGARDING APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS; AND UNDER SUBSECTION (7) TO CONSULT WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ON SPECIFIC LEGAL MATTERS REGARDING TWO LAND USE CASES/A++& ONE MATTER OF PROBABLE LITIGATION REGARDING A LANDFILL, A,..~ IJf'#1; I"'IA-r-T(;,c, o~ leIJ""'6 "1"11'.....,.,O.....ltc(;;I~~/"'c.. A~ " . II Aflcl4t. d"&- ~ Itll-$t>f'#,fIJel. ""~e-;t. 2195.WPD