The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1994-07-13 FIN A L 7:00 P.M. July 13, ·1994 Room 7, County Office Building 1) Call to Order. 2) Pledge of Allegiance. 3) Moment of Silence. 4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. 5) Consent Agenda (on next sheet) . 6) Public Hearing on an Ordinance to amend and reordain Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, Section 2.1-4(u) of the Code of Albemarle known as the "Pasture Fence Agricultural/Forestal Dis- trict". This amendment will add one parcel containing 453.5 ac located W of Mount Fair off Rt 756 to the existing district. TM13,P5. White Hall Dist. 7) Public Hearing on an Ordinance to amend and reordain, Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, Section 2.1-4(d) of the Code of Albemarle known as the "Blue Run Agricultural/Forestal District" to extend the life of the district for an additional eight years to June 18, 2002. The district consists of 24 parcels totalling 3,675.911 ac and is located on Rt 20N, Rt 231, Rt 640, Rt 641, Rt 645 & Rt 777. Rivanna Dist. 8) SP-94-12. Todd Shields. Public Hearing on a request to establish commercial recreational facility on 6.0 ac zoned HC. Located on S sd of Rt 649 approx 700 ft W of Rt 29 on boundary of areas recom- mended for regional service & office service in Community of Holly- mead. TM32,P41H1. Rivanna Dist. (This site is located on the boundary of areas recommended for Regional Service and Office Service in the Community of Hollymead.) 9) SP-94-14. Harcros Lumber & Building Supplies, Inc. Public Hearing on a request for outdoor storage & display on 4.87 ac zoned HC & EC located on S sd of Rt 250 approx 400 ft E of Rt 20. Site, in Neighborhood 3, is recommended for regional services. Rivanna Dist. 10) Request to set a public hearing to amend Chapter 4, Animals and Fowl of the County Code, to provide authority to control dangerous or vicious dogs. 11) Approval of Minutes: July 1, 1992. 12) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. 13 ) Adj ourn . COBS_NT AGEIfDA "OR APH.OV~: 5.1 Response to Governor's Commission on Citizen Empowerment. "OR IDOItllM"IOII: 5.2 Copies of Planning Commission minutes for June 7 and June 28, 1994. 5.3 Copy of the Comparative Report of Local Government Revenues and Expendi- tures for the year ended June 30, 1993. 5.4 Letter dated June 29, 1994 from J. H. Shifflett, Jr., Maintenance Opera- tions Manager, Department of Transpgrtation, addressed to Ella Carey, Clerk, re: VDoT intends to repair the existing superstructure over North Fòrk Rivanna River (Route 743, between Routes 664 & 641) during the period of July 12, 1994 through July 14, 1994. 5.5 Copy of Final 1994-95 Allocations for the Interstate, Primary and Urban Highway Systems, Public Transit, Ports and Airports, including the update. Six Year Improvement Program through fiscal year 1999-2000. 5.6 Copies of minutes of the Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Board of Direc- tors for May 23 and June 4, 1994. 5.7 Letter dated July 1, 1994, from David R. Gehr, Commissioner, Department of Transportation, re: notice of the addition of Route 1000 (Stoney Ridge Road) in Mill Creek Industrial Park to the Secondary System of Highways, effective July 1, 1994. David P. Bowennan Charlottesville Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville TO: FROM: DATE: COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 MEMORANDUM Amended Board Actions of July 13, 1994 Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director/Planning & Community Development Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC l~~"ZV (/ SUBJECT: Board Actions of July 13, 1994 (Night Meeting) August 2, 1994 EWC/jng Attachment Agenda Item No. 12. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. Mrs. Thomas requested that ZMA-94-11, George Clark, be expedited. The Board concurred. cc: Larry W. Davis * Printed on recycled paper Charles S. Martin Rivanna Walter F. Perkins White Hall Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller ':10, it/a- ~ Q{()7/3·t./-;f5 ~ 30JN9.1f dllùm: ~ ~~/£~~Z~·:~ £¿; m:::;t~~ fk !1/lj(~ C¡J;¡ /3 ~ JJ J ~ ~.tuÍt£ ~1at£u 3 /~ ;;r-c11J'W& .s~ ~ . ~ tl c2~ ~~1~~ ~E/JÆL µ M ak ~ a~ ~ ~ 0; fk ~ '--fMt M- AM' ¥ ~ .¡4; ~ r ~ ~~j(r~~Mfh¡~/) Jtwn- ~~Ja:nñ~ ~ W¿rrwc ~ft ~P?L- 14- ß/)/VJd ct( ~ ~. ~ ~ /3 ~ M~wtd Þ m<¡j · ! tvf ¡ßY-~ thld~· ~ S~ \h ~ (J. ~ ¡hJ 4f¿ ý/ue ~ ~ i~' Y~{rnr ~ ~~. ~. M1í/M- Yr~ ð . ~~~ tJlJ-f35cxZ Earlysville Area Residents' League Survey Results - May 1994. Services and Quality of Life Strengths Weaknesses Recreational Needs/Desires (2 choices) (2 choices) (4 choices) Diversity of Res. Community Development 1% 4% Pool 50% Types of Comm. Community Development 2% 8% Center 45% Road System 2% 20% Tennis Courts 30% Housing Affordability 1% 10% Par Course 10% Small Town Environment 60% -0- Walking Path 60% Natural Beauty/ Children's Rural Landscape 75% -0- Playground 35% Sidewalk Downtown Public Schools 26% 6% to Broadus Wood 10% Police Protection 1% 25% Sidewalk to Murray 5% Fire Protection 10% 1% Senior Activities 20% Shopping Facilities 3% 20% Teen Activities 30% Rec. Areas -0- 45% Bike Paths 65% Public Transit <1% 30% Ball Field 35% Professional Amusement Services 14% 2% Parks 5% Property Taxes and Services: I am willing to have a moderate increase in taxes in order to have additional County services. I am satisfied with things as they are and want no additional services or increases in property taxes. General Pop. EARL 40% 50% 50% 43% 10% 7% I want a decrease in property taxes and am willing to have a reduction in County services. Growth: General Pop. EARL I would like to see a push for greater residential, commercial and industrial growth in Earlysville. 2% -0- I would like to see growth in Earlysville continue at a slow and controlled pace. 60% 75% I would not like to see any further growth in Earlysville 38% 25% Residential Development-Affordable Housing: strongly somewhat no somewhat strong 1 y support support opinion oppose oppose Apartments 1% 10% 5% 24% 60% Mobile Homes 1% 1% 4% 5% 89% Duplexes 5% 31% 15% 16% 33% Single Family Homes 48% 30% 8% 3% 11% Homes interspersed throughout the Homes clustered in a designated community in small pods high density housing area 70% 30% Transportation-Major Commute Routes: 29-South 29-North 743-South 743-North 660 Other 7% 8% 60% 5% 15% 5% Economic Development strongly somewhat no somewhat strongly support support opinion oppose oppose assembly 3% 15% 13% 24% 45% manufacturing 1% 9% 9% 21% 60% distribution 5% 12% 15% 20% 48% office space 15% 30% 19% 15% 21% cottage industries 21% 26% 20% 11% 22% dry-cleaners 16% 28% 20% 10% 25% local retail 22% 34% 15% 10% 19% restaurants 28% 40% 12% 7% 13% hotel/motel 3% 8% 13% 20% 56% hardware store 40% 32% 10% 3% 14% pharmacy 38% 34% 8% 3% 17% amusement parks 4% 5% 7% 10% 74% research & 13% 16% 17% 15% 38% development department store 2% 5% 6% 11% 76% major chain 6% 10% 5% 15% 64% Prepared by Lisa Kerwien-Harman 973-9352 Dear Earlysville Residents, Albemarle County is in the process of revising the Comprehensive Plan establishing a blueprint for the County's future. Decisions on land use & development, transportation, public facilities and utilities, resources, housing and public services will be made. This type of review takes place once every five years providing us with an opportunity for us to examine our community. This survey is being conducted by the Earlysville Area Residents' League. We urge you to fill it out and return it so that your ideas and concerns will be heard. QUALITY OF LIFE & SERVICES Please rank the following items in order of priority from 1 to 6 with I being the most important: QUALITY OF LIFE _Diversity of residential development _Types of commercial development _Quality of road system _Housing affordability _Small town environment _Natural beauty/Rurallandscape Please rank the following items in order of priority from 1 to 7 with I being the most important: SERVICES _Quality of public schools _Quality of police protection _Quality of fire protection _Availability of shopping facilities _Availability of recreational areas _Availability of Public transit _Availability of Professional services,(med., vet., dental...) Please list the two items from above that are the most outstanding strengths in Earlysville: Please list the two items from above that are the most glaring weaknesses in Earlysville: ECONONITCDEVELOPMENT If Earlysville were to work to attract additional industry or commercial businesses how would you rate each of the following: 1 strongly support 2 somewhat support 3 no opinion 4 somewhat oppose 5 strongly oppose assembly 1 2 345 local retail 1 2 3 4 5 manufacturing 1 2 3 4 5 restaurants 12345 distribution 1 2 3 4 5 hotel/motel 1 234 5 office space 1 2 3 4 5 hardware store 1 2 345 cottage industries 1 2 345 pharmacy 1 2 345 dry-cleaners 1 2 345 amusement parks 1 2 345 research & development labs 1 2 345 major department store 1 2 345 major chain grocery store 1 2 345 TRANSPORTATION Please check your most common commute direction on weekday mornings: Route 29 South _Route 660 _Route 29 North _Other _Route 743 South _Route 743 North Plea~e list any state/county roads you know of in Earlysville that are in desperate need of repaIr. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Albemarle County presently has a shortage of affordable housing. It is probable that Earlysville will be expected to play its part in working to alleviate this shortage. Please rate each of the following options: I strongly support 2 somewhat support 3 no opinion 4 somewhat oppose 5 strongly oppose apartment complexes 1 2 3 4 5 mobile home parks 1 2 3 4 5 duplexes single family units 1 234 5 1 234 5 How would you prefer to see these homes situated: _interspersed throughout the community in small pods or _clustered in a designated high density housing area RECREATION Please put a check next to the four most important recreational needs in Earlysville from the list below: _Community Pool _Community Center _tennis courts _Par Course _walking path _children's playground _sidewalk from Downtown to Broadus Wood School _sidewalk from Downtown to the Murray Plant _Other _Senior activities _Teen activities _bike paths _amusement parks _ball field PROPERTY TAXES & SERVICES Please put a check next to the statement below that best describes your feelings: _I am willing to have a moderate increase in taxes in order to have additional County services _I am satisfied with things as they are and want no additional services or increases in property taxes. _I want a decrease in property taxes and am willing to have a reduction in County services. GROWTH Please put a check next to the statement below that best describes your feelings: _I would like to see a push for greater residential, commercial and industrial growth in Earlysville. _I would like to see growth in Earlysville continue at a slow and controlled pace. _I would not like to see any further growth in Earlysville. Thank-you for taking the time to participate in this survey. If you have areas of concern not addressed by this survey we urge you to attend the Public Hearings that will be held by the Board of Supervisors and/or bring your ideas to the next EARL meeting. You can return this survey to or drop it off at the Earlysville Florist or mail to: EARL, P.O. Box 684, Earlysville, V A 22936 Surveys should be returned by March 7 .i - Charles S Martin David P. Bowerman Charlollesvi\le COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 229024596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 July 7,1994 Rivdnnd Walter F. PerKinS WhIte Hall Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack .Jouett Sally H Thomas Sðmue! Miller Forrest R. Marshall, Jr Scottsville Kay Coles James, Chair Governor's Commission on Citizen Empowerment 730 East Broad Street, 8th Floor Richmond, Virginia 23219 Dear Secretary James: Thank you for providing this opportunity to respond to the Governor's proposed workfare initiative outlined in his May 4 speech and to offer our comments and recommendations on welfare reform and related empowerment issues. We commend the Governor's efforts to address some of these complex and far reaching social issues facing the Commonwealth today and look forward to being an active local partner in the Commission's assessment and implementation efforts. Although this letter format precludes us from conveying all of our concerns on specific programs, there are four major issues that we would like the Commission to consider as it begins to make major changes in the current welfare system. Issue I: Consider the success and vitality of current programs at the local level before restructuring and replacing what is an effective community effort. As an example, the current federally funded JOBS initiative is working well in our community. With JOBS funding, clients are being trained for productive and sustainable jobs through a coordinated program of various community organizations and agencies. This program currently has all the components of a successful workfare program, ie. funds for day care, transportation, tuition, training, books, etc. However, what this current program lacks is adequate funding to make it truly effective and to reduce the number of people on the waiting list. As you know, this program has been funded at only 70% capacity by the State. Rather than diverting limited resources to a new program, we ask that you carefully review the potential effectiveness of the current JOBS program throughout the State if it were fully funded before replacing it with something new. You asked us to tell you about programs that are working well. Our locally designed JOBS program that brings together the local community college, a family services program offering child-care referral and information, and a displaced homemaker/single parent program offering educational counseling and training is an example of such a comprehensive job training program. We have a long waiting list of people wanting to enter that program. <Ð Printed on recycled paper #"" ....... There is some concern that job training programs will be initiated to get people very quickly into jobs. However, short term training for minimum wage jobs will not create economic self-sufficiency for a family, but will continue to keep them constantly on the edge of poverty and ready to slip back to welfare dependency at the first crisis. In Albemarle County a minimum wage job at $5.50Ihour will gross $946 a month or possibly net $800. This will not pay for an apartment, transportation, child care, utilities, and food, much less cover the other needs of a stable family life. Health insurance is not even considered among these expenses. Our community already has long waiting lists for subsidized housing, child care scholarships, and family counseling, etc. Jobs that provide a living wage and long-term economic self-sufficiency often require more extensive training, which takes longer and costs more money. However, for long term family self-sufficiency, we encourage you to implement job training programs that will have lasting benefits, not short term results. Issue IV: Recognize that the welfare system is not the only problem to be fIXed. We were pleased to see in the Governor's speech the recognition that poverty is a societal issue, not just a governmental issue. In the same vein, we hope the Commission will continue to recognize that the welfare system is not the only problem to be fixed. Just as the school system cannot be called upon to fix all the problems of family disintegration, the welfare system can not be called upon to "fix" all the problems of our society. The burgeoning "welfare problem" is only an end product or a symptom of breakdowns in other systems within our community, such as education and training, housing, and employment. Because the economic self-sufficiency of a family is tied to so many other systems within the community, the welfare system must not be looked at in a vacuum, but must be examined within the context of the larger economic system. To this end, it is important for the Commission to insist upon agreement and coordination between agencies at the state level if coordination and cooperation are to be effective at the local level. Albemarle is implementing in the current fiscal year an innovative Family Self-Sufficiency program between Social Services and Housing. It is extremely important that agencies at the very top level of state government share a common vision that will allow local agencies the administrative flexibility to be innovative and creative across agency boundaries and regulations. Due to the relatively short notice of the public hearings being held around the State this week, Albemarle County representatives were not able to attend. In light of this, I hope the Commission will consider future opportunities for additional citizen and jurisdictional input. Thank you again for the opportunity to present our views to the Commission. Sincerely, elcw.:TF3 ~ {~~ ~ Charlotte Y. Humphris, Vice Chair Board of Supervisors Attachments RWW/rww -- ~ COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE to MtM~~!\\i ~~T:~fë~'~, ~ __4.. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Response to the Governor's Empowerment Commission AGENDA DATE: July 13, 1994 ITE~~M'~R: . qL/. LJ 1 [3· i.,~), i \ INFORMATION: ACTION: SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST: Response to the Governors Commission on Citizen Empowerment on welfare reform and the proposed workfare program CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: x INFORMATION: STAFF CONTACT(S): Mr. Tucker, Ms. White, Ms. Morris REVIEWED BY: ATTACHMENTS: yes BACKGROUND: The Governor's Commission on Citizen Empowerment has set up meetings around the state for public input on the Governor's proposed welfare reform initiatives and a new workfare program. They are also soliciting input tTom local jurisdictions on these same issues. DISCUSSION: The attached letter for your approval responds to a June 15th letter from the Empowerment Commission asking for the County's ideas and recommendations concerning welfare reform and related empowerment initiatives, including a response to the Governor's proposed workfare program that is described in a April 4 speech (also attached). This response has been generated by discussions with the Social Services staff. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the document to be forwarded under the Chairman's signature to the Commission on Citizen Empowerment EMPOWEREXE 94.095 ".- David P. Bowennan Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Charles S. Martin R ivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller July 7, 1994 Kay Coles James, Chair Governor's Commission on Citizen Empowerment 730 East Broad Street, 8th Floor Richmond, Virginia 23219 Dear Secretary James: Thank you for providing this opportunity to respond to the Governor's proposed workfare initiative outlined in his May 4 speech and to offer our comments and recommendations on welfare reform and related empowerment issues. We commend the Governor's efforts to address some of these complex and far reaching social issues facing the Commonwealth today and look forward to being an active local partner in the Commission's assessment and implementation efforts. Although this letter format precludes us from conveying all of our concerns on specific programs, there are four major issues that we would like the Commission to consider as it begins to make major changes in the current welfare system. Issue I: Consider the success and vitality of current programs at the local level before restructuring and replacing what is an effective community effort. As an example, the current federally funded JOBS initiative is working well in our community. With JOBS funding, clients are being trained for productive and sustainable jobs through a coordinated program of various community organizations and agencies. This program currently has all the components of a successful workfare program, ie. funds for day care, transportation, tuition, training, books, etc. However, what this current program lacks is adequate funding to make it truly effective and to reduce the number of people on the waiting list. As you know, this program has only been funded at 70% capacity by the State. Rather than diverting limited resources to a new program, we ask that you carefully review the potential effectiveness of the current JOBS program throughout the State if it were fully funded before replacing it with something new. You asked us to tell you about programs that are working well. Our locally designed JOBS program that brings together the local community college, a family services program offering child-care referral and information and a displaced homemaker/single parent program offering educational counseling and training is an example of such a comprehensive job training program. We have a long waiting list of people wanting to enter that program. * Printed on recycled paper Issue II: Recognize that changing some of the basic AFDC policies that are "disincentives" to independence and empowerment may be more important than redirecting resources to a new 'workfare' program. Many of the issues addressed in the Governor's letter may be resolved more effectively by changing AFDC policy than by implementing a new workfare program. Examples of such current policies are: · consequences for quitting ajob. Both Food Stamp and AFDC programs have voluntary quit provisions, but are weak in implementation. · Arbitrary income limits cut people off too quickly when they begin a new job. What is needed are higher income disregards to allow a transitional period between the beginning of a job and the first actual paycheck. · Reporting requirements are different for Housing, AFDC and Food Stamp programs, causing confusion at best and potential fraud at worst. · The AFDC program looks only at gross income, not net, thus ignoring the real expenses for struggling families. · Current resource/asset limits do not allow people on AFDC to save money with the exception of a savings account for education or a house downpayment. This current system does not encourage families to save money in order to make a significant change in their circumstances. · There are no consequences for having additional children. In the JOBS program, which is mandatory for AFDC recipients with chilren over the age of 3, a new baby actually relieves the mandatory status of either training or looking for work. · Women under twenty years of age with children of any age are mandatory JOBS participants. Howcver, once they turn 20 they are no longer mandatory if they have a child under 3 years. In this case, current policy creates an incentive for a 20-year old to have another child and drop out of the program. The stick is gone. Policies such as these often tie the hands of local social service departments to provide specific individuals with the best solution to their unique problems or circumstances. Programs need flexibility at the local level; we need to be able to tailor programs to our community, to apply solutions that are creative and work for specific, real life situations. In the Governor's speech, he states "There is no need to wait for Washington or the Clinton administration to act. We can control our own destiny with our broad-based Virginia approach. Just turn us loose and let us figure it out for ourselves." We hope that the Commission will heed the Governor's words and apply these same sentiments to the localities that are struggling with these same issues, but are often hampered by administrative and regulatory mandates from providing effective programs. Just turn us loose and let us figure it out for ourselves. Issue III: Be willing to implement programs that provide long-term solutions to complex societal issues, even though the cost may be greater. Shortftxes are not cost-effective in the long run. There is some concern that job training programs will be initiated to get people very quickly into jobs. However, short term training for minimum wage jobs will not create economic self-sufficiency for a family, but will continue to keep them constantly on the edge of poverty and ready to slip back to welfare dependency at the first crisis. In Albemarle County a minimum wage job at $5.50/hour will gross $946 a month or possibly net $800. This will not pay for an apartment, pay for transportation, pay for child care, pay for utilities, pay for food, much less cover the other needs of a stable family life. Health insurance is not even a consideration. As far as subsidies for these expenses, our community already has long waiting lists for subsidized housing, child care scholarships, family counseling, etc. Jobs that provide a living wage and long-term economic self-sufficiency often require more extensive training, training that takes longer and costs more money. However, for long term family self-sufficiency, we encourage you to implement job training programs that will have lasting benefits, not short term results. Issue IV: Recognize that the welfare system is not the only problem to be fIXed. We were pleased to see in the Governor's speech the recognition that poverty is a societal issue, not just a governmental issue. In the same vein, we hope the Commission will continue to recognize that the welfare system is not the only problem to be fixed. Just as the school system can not be called upon to fix all the problems of family disintegration, the welfare system can not be called upon to "fix" all the problems of our society. The educational system, the housing system, the religious comunity, and private enterprise all contribute to the "welfare problem". All must be called upon to help heal the whole system. The welfare system is only the end product. To this end, it is important for the Commission to insist upon full agreement and coordination between agencies at the state level if coordination and cooperation is to be effective at the local level. With Albemarle's implementation in the current fiscal year of an innovative Family Self-Sufficiency program between Social Services and Housing, it is extremely important that agencies at the very top level of state government share a common vision that will allow local agencies the administrative flexibility to be innovative and creative across agency boundaries and regulations. Due to the relatively short notice on the public hearings being held around the State this week, Albemarle County representatives were not able to attend. In light of this, I hope the Commission will consider future opportunities for additional citizen and jurisdictional input. Thank you again for the opportunity to present our views to the Commission. Sincerely, Charlotte Y. Humphris, Vice Chair Board of Supervisors Attachments RWW/rww COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Governors Commission on Citizen Empowennent George Allen Governor Kay Coles James Secretary of Health and Human Resources Chairman David L Caprara Executive Director June 15, 1994 ') . I <- '(A /1 <, The Honorable_~n Chairman, Board of Supervisors Ablemarle County 401 Berwick Ct. Charlottesville, Virginia 'T> (. I 1<--. ;( s Dear Chairman ß.owerIfíãn: In his Inaugural address to the citizens of the Commonwealth, Governor George Allen proclaimed that welfare reform would be a major priority of his administration. On May 4, 1994, the Governor took the first step towards realizing that goal through the creation of Governor's Commission on Citizen Empowerment. The Commission has embarked upon a very aggressive and bold agenda -- that of crafting comprehensive solutions that will transform Virginia's public assistance program into one that enables and empowers recipients to take charge of their lives and control their own destinies. This will be done by providing low-income citizens with access to the necessary tools and skills to perform adequately in the work place and to assume a productive role with their families and in their communities. These solutions must include the promotion of a positive work ethic, the encouragement of stable two-parent families, and the promotion of individual responsibility. The Empowerment Commission's work will build on the positive gains made with the recently passed welfare reform legislation, including the Virginia Independence Program and the Virginia Initiative for Employment Not Welfare. Commission members will develop comprehensive implementation strategies that promote home ownership, work experience, community service, full utilization of enterprise zones, and a range of measures that buttress the two-parent family. Rather than locality-specific pilot programs, the Commission's work will produce statewide change. 730 East Broad Street, 8th Floor . Richmond, Virginia 23219 . (804) 692-1800 . FAX (804) 692-1808 REMARKS OF GOVERNOR ALLEN ANNOUNCEMENT OF EMPOWERMENT COMMISSION MAY 4, 1994 I am pleased to be here today in the company of so many Virginians who are inclined and dedicated to empowering all Virginians with expanded opportunity to control their own destiny. Weare here to launch an effort whose basic goal is to transform our welfare system so that women like Lydia are encouraged to become all that they can be, instead of being hindered by government bureaucracy. Lydia's story represents exactly what our welfare system should be -- a temporary help for those in need. But a helping hand should not lead to a paralyzing dependency on government. All too often welfare is more like a bottomless pit -- that, once fallen into, becomes a struggle to escape. We are here to make sure that individuals like Lydia lead the way in transforming the system -- individuals who, through individual initiative and hard work, make the successful transition from welfare recipient to productive citizen. As I travel across our Commonwealth, I hear people talk about our welfare system. From small business owners and school teachers to civic and community leaders, Virginians believe the current system is not working. I also know of another group of Virginians who are disgruntled about the welfare system: welfare recipients themselves. They know too well the perverse disincentives of the current system. These disincentives help foster dependency, instability and unemployment. For many recipients, the tragic result is the destruction of very skills and attitudes that are essential for success. These citizens here along with many others all across the Commonwealth want a change in the system. * They want to change a system that penalizes a father who marries the mother of his child and provides for his family. * They want to change a system that discourages savings and isolates recipients away from the world of work. Welfare's legacy has been one of more programs, bigger government and higher costs. Yet despite all of the money spent, our current welfare system is an example of how the most important form of capital -- the capital of the human spirit -- can be squandered. Today, for the welfare recipients who aspire to something better, and for all the hardworking taxpayers who are paying for this failed, counterproductive welfare system that seems to reward idle behavior, we launch this Commission on Citizen Empowerment. As I said in my Inaugural address, the words of Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson were fighting words of empowerment. Empowerment is an approach to helping people that emphasizes building a person's lifelong capacity to become self-sufficient. Previous efforts to reform welfare have mistakenly focused virtually all resources on ending poverty by providing cash benefits rather than skills or promoting the values of self reliance and individual initiative. But you don't empower people by simply handing them a check every month. Our goal and the goal of this Commission will be to provide a guiding hand-up rather than a hand-out. And we will achieve that goal by providing incentives that capitalize upon and encourage a person's natural desire to be productive, by reinforcing the values that built this Commonwealth -- perseverance, individual initiative, and personal responsibility -- and by helping them to obtain the skills necessary to compete in the job market. Our success in this area is critical to the future of this great Commonwealth. Empowering citizens and communities will assist in our efforts to combat crime and drug use. Empowerment will be the motivating force in our campaign to spur 2 ---.-- .. ,.,-....-. - inner-city revitalization through strategies such as home ownership, entrepreneurship and savings opportunities. Empowerment is the key to rolling back government impediments from the path of private enterprise, as we're doing through our Blue Ribbon Strike Force and regulatory reform effort. And Empowerment is the core principle of a bold initiative to replace the bottomless pit of welfare with a system based upon the work ethic and the nurturing relations of family and community. This Commission is not going to study poverty. It's time to implement comprehensive, far-reaching solutions to this current problem that we have. I've charged the Commission to empower people and not the government bureaucracy, by crafting an implementation plan for welfare reform by this fall -- a Workfare plan that will be comprehensive in scope, with both intermediate and long-term objectives and action steps. The central components of that plan will 1) give recipients productive long-term incentives, 2) require able-bodied welfare recipients to work in exchange for their benefits, 3) help recipients re-enter the work force, and 4) provide child care to single working parents. Implementing these bold, innovative solutions will transform Virginia's public assistance program, save taxpayer dollars, and promote a positive work ethic. During the receñt General Assembly session, through a bipartisan effort, we took an important first step by passing enabling legislation that will allow us to hit the ground running in reforming the welfare system. But -the hard work of welfare reform lies ahead. The work of this Commission will be the work of civic engagement as well as policy reform. Kay James, the Empowerment Commission's Chair, will enlist the views of a broad spectrum of Virginians and build on the extraordinary efforts of community leaders across the Commonwealth. Standing with me today are some members of the Commission. I am proud to be able to appoint some of Virginia's finest talent from private 3 industry, the legislature, and from religious and community organizations -- including former and current welfare recipients, who will show us how they beat the cycle of poverty . I am pleased to announce today the appointment of David Caprara, the founder of the Alexandria-based Empowerment Network Foundation, as Executive Director of the Commission. He understands that effective reforms must attack the disincentives at the root of poverty -- rather than accepting poverty as a permanent condition. The members of this Commission realize, as I do, that .poverty is a societal issue, not just a governmental issue. We will seek to mobilize all aspects of our society and to tap the ingenuity and dedication of the individuals who are active in Virginia's private sector -- in churches and synagogues, in businesses, and in non-profit community associations. The Commission will work in sub-groups to consider the role of several sectors in empowering all Virginians. These sectors include: * Education, the key to a lifetime of opportunity and self- determination; * Housing, where home ownership opportunities can uplift both families and neighborhoods. Because when you own your own property you care more about it and you have a stake in the community . * Health Care, because affordable and accessible health coverage is crucial to sustained independence. Virginia must continue to engage in health care improvements that do not undermine the best features of our market-driven system. My plan stresses the value of work. both to the individual and to the Commonwealth. My administration will involve the private sector in combining employment incentives with intensive on-the-job training. We will facilitate the provision of private-sponsored child care -- including home-based care like our Commission member Bell Tate provides -- so that single parents can pursue job and educational opportunities. And, as is the case throughout 4 the private sector, there will be a time limit set on how long one can receive benefits. I want to take a moment now to focus on one especially troubling aspect of our current welfare system -- its incentives for out-of-wedlock childbearing, and its disincentives for marriage. As former Education Secretary Bill Bennett and others have rightly pointed out, the steady climb in the proportion of children who are being raised in fatherless families has reached crisis proportion. While there are many courageous single mothers successfully juggling the demands to support their children financially and nurture them alone at home, it is an uphill battle. All the data suggests that kids do best in homes with two parents, and our Administration's initiatives are going to reflect what we know to be true in this important area. The increasingly popular decision among Virginian's teens to have children for which they are neither emotionally nor financially equipped to care has devastating effects. In 1991, families headed by a teenage mother cost Virginia's budget almost $285 million in AFDC, food stamps and Medicaid. Forty-two percent of AFDC welfare payments go to women who were 19 or younger when they first became mothers. I firmly believe that the key tó turning the tide on teenage pregnancy and rising dependency is tö reassert the moral authority of parents in our communities. The hallmark of our Administration's empowerment initiative will be affirming the standard of parental responsibility that flows from the natural bonds between parents and their children. Parents have a right and responsibility to guide their children's development. That is why we insisted on parental notification, not parental bypass, in the legislation that was before the recent session of the General Assembly. Expanding the parental voice in education will also be a major focus of our Champion Schools initiative, which we will be formally launching in a few 5 weeks. I recently met a man named Charles Ballard who shares my vision for empowering parents to raise and nurture their children. He has worked successfully all over the country, and here in Virginia, to encourage inner-city fathers to reconnect with their children. These fathers often feel relieved of all obligation -- and forced out of the picture -- when the government intervenes. Our vigorous child support enforcement initiatives will be complemented by private-sector activities like Ballard's -- taking government out of the role of parent and replacing it with real fathers. Through the work of this Empowerment Commission, we will seek to affirm the positive alternatives to the present welfare state in community settings and private initiatives all across the Commonwealth of Virginia. While it is correct and easy to rail against failed programs which subsidize out of wedlock births, we must understand that the cultural underpinnings of family decline, and that this will not be resolved primarily by government action. There is no government quick-fix for this problem; it must be attacked on a much broader front, and we must marshal our forces -- public and private -- if we are to succeed. The advocates of a superficial quick-fix seem to be winning the day in Washington. There is no need to wait for Washington or the Clinton administration to act. We can control our own destiny with our broad-based Virginia approach. Just turn us loose and let us figure it our for ourselves. By empowering people through comprehensive welfare reform, through job creation, through education, and through private initiatives that foster cohesive families, we give them hope and opportunity, and we begin to restore the fabric of a prosperous society based on individual responsibiliW. Today marks the first day of a promising new day and a new chapter in Virginia's history of revolutionary leadership. We have joined together to return our government to the people of Virginia, and the appointment of this Citizens Commission is the first shot in a revolution from dependency on government to true independence and personal responsibility for all Virginians. 6 I look forward to joining our Commission members in bringing this message to the people of Virginia, and enlisting the creative ideas of citizens in every section and region of our Commonwealth. It is now my pleasure to sign the executive order creating the Governor's Commission on Citizen Empowerment. Thank You. #### 7 I Governor's Commission on Citizen Empowerment Governor's Cabinet Members The Honorable Kay Coles James - Secretary of Health and Human Resources and Chair The Honorable Jerry W. Kilgore - Secretary of Public Safety The Honorable Beverly H. Sgro - Secretary of Education The Honorable Robert T. Skunda - Secretary of Commerce and Trade General Assem bly Mem bers Delegate David G. Brickley, Woodbridge - Member of the Virginia House of Delegates Delegate Terry G. Kilgore, Gate City - Member of the Virginia House of Delegates Senator Benjamin 1. Lambert, III, Richmond - Member of the Virginia Senate Senator Stephen H. Martin, Chesterfield County - Member of the Virginia Senate Senator Walter A. Stosch, Henrico County - Member of the Virginia Senate Citizen Mem bers Mr. T. Coleman Andrews, McLean - President of WorldCorp Ms. Ellen Bray, Lancaster - Member of Rappahannock Regional Arts Commission Mr. R. Victor Brungart, Bristol - Directs the Small Business Center at Southwest Virginia Community College The Honorable William Cleveland, Alexandria - Vice Mayor of the City of Alexandria Sister Janet Delperdang, Richmond - Principal of All Saints Catholic School Mr. Robert G. DePosada, Alexandria - Heads the R. G. dePosada & Associates public relations consulting firm Mr. Joe Elton, Richmond - President of The Assembly Group Ms. Madelyn Ferguson, McLean - Long-time professional volunteer Mr. Terone B. Green, Richmond - Administrator of Green Medical Center Ms. Patricia A. Henry, Roanoke - Member of the Board of Directors of Roanoke Catholic School Foundation Mr. Charles D. Hobbs, McLean - Oversaw all welfare reforn1 efforts for President Ronald Reagan Ms. Angelnett Johnson, Newport News - Director of the Ivy Towers Community Development Corporation Mr. Johnny Johnson, Richmond - President of Community Pride grocery stores Mr. Frank Joseph, Danville - Retired Superintendent of the Danville Department of Social Services Mr. Benjamin T. King, Jr., Abingdon - Director of Human Resources for U. S. Gypsum Mr. Chuck Lewis, Charlottesville - Owner of Kathy's Produce Reverend B. Courtney McBath, Norfolk - Senior Pastor of Calvery Revival Church Ms. Lydia F. Millington, Richmond - Graduate of the Single Mothers Program Mr. Mark Obenshain, Harrisonburg - Partner in law firm of Wharton, Aldhizer, and Weaver Ms. Lynda Owens, Richmond - Executive Director of Carver Promise Mentoring College Dr. Cullen B. Rivers, Richmond - Physician at Chippenham Hospital Rabbi Laurence A. Schlesinger, Richmond - Rabbi at Congregation Beth Ahabah Father Harry B. Scott, III, Christiansburg - Rector of Church of St. Peter the Apostle Ms. Joan Ellyn Cooper Stanley, Arlington County - Arlington Police Department Community Service Technician Ms. Isabella Tate, Alexandria - Proprietor of Grandmama's House Mr. Wilbert L. (Bill) Thomas, Norfolk - President of Price Group, Limited Ms. Renee Walker, Newport News - President of People Earning a Real Living (PEARL) Mr. James M. Wells, III, Richmond - President of Crestar Financial Corporation Ms. Felicia Rochelle White, Roanoke - Student at Virginia Western Community College Reverend Micheal Williams, Richmond - President of Richmond Branch of NAACP Ms. Phyllis Withers, Richmond - Coordinator of the Empowerment Network of Virginia .; Staff Mr. David Caprara - Executive Director of the Governor's Commission on Citizen Empowerment Mr. Jeff Brown - Deputy Director of the Governor's Commission on Citizen Empowerment 6/14/94 1 IV' /Î¡' ,/.. ". L",,,,......,,t'--/ .... fjstributecl y> '.\(}3. r(: ~--'-'.·-'::;·?;3. \ : QI L .en¡ í.J 1/)1. I) ~. Item No__::t-- . ..J...~ WALTER J. KUCHARSKI AUDITOR COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Auditor of Public Accounts ~P05T OFFIGEIiOX 1.295 RICHMOND. VIRGINIA 23210 IB041 225-3350 June 27, 1993 TO: MEMBERS AND CLERKS OF LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES OF COUNTIES, CITIES, AND TOWNS RE: COMP ARA TIVE REPORT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Enclosed is a copy of the Comparative Report for the year ended June 30, 1993. The clerk to the local governing body should give a copy of this report to each member of the Board of Supervisors or City or Town Council. Extra copies are available by writing this office. WJK:jeh enclosure I 'I! 'II 11 ~ -'ì ,...r¡,. 0'- > ~~,_~.......t:; < ~- ,. '-¡u, r\-I\;:'~ !.,:, '-\.- ) '~"L..¡....:J..¿'...¡... .....\-. , COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 2013 CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902 D. S. ROOSEVELT RESIDENT ENGINEER June 29 ~ 1994 Route 743 Between Routes 664 & 641 Albemarle County Ms. Ella Carey Albemarle County Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville~ VA. 22902 Dear Ms. Carey: The Virginia Department of Transportation intends to repair the existing superstructure over North Fork Rivanna River during the period of July 12~ 1994 through July 14~ 1994. Attached is a sketch indicating the location of the bridge and signing to assist traffic while the structure is closed. Should you have any questions, please call this office. t1k1 r;, . H. Shifflett~ Jr. Maint. Opere Mgr. JHS/ldw Attachments cc: Mr. D. R. Askew Mr. Bob Tucker Board of Supervisors Fire Department Rescue Squad Ch'ville. Post Office Coun ty Pol i ce State Police Mr. J. R. Howe Mr. S. C. Dean Free Union HQ. TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY <-... m c I I I I I\. .T RT£6\ I I . ._---------~---------_. 1\" £ ~. "i:," o lJ EARL YSV fOUR TIME \~ ") o~ .q, , ) " '\ ') ! I ) "- \ 16761 s e· \ 00 . It;:. ~...1f'. .. ~1~1 ~<""tJ_ _ \ -.."'" Å. tJ ¡ A;. ~ \ \ \ ) ;/ 16581 / 99 " ~ Distributed Ì) Board: I' (:'e, l~ , ()¡ iln,.fQ I,..:; 5) ~ Item No. ~..", / ,. COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA JUL DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, 23219 '~''''..-'~_'''''·.d.'·''''' ......., July 1, 1994 Final 1994-95 Construction Allocations and Six-Year Improvement Program County Boards of Supervisors Dear Board Members: A copy of the tentative 1994-95 allocations for the Interstate, Primary, and Urban Highway Systems, Public Transit, Ports, and Airports, including the updated Six-Year Improvement Program through fiscal year 1999-2000 was submitted to you by my letter of May 25, 1994. The Commonwealth Transportation Board, on June 23, gave final approval to the 1994-95 allocations and updated Six-Year Improvement Program with some adjustments as a result of the public hearings. A copy of the Program is enclosed. Very truly yours, Ìà~ David R. Gehr Commissioner Enclosure CC: The Honorable Robert E. Martinez TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY \' HOW TO READ THE SIX- YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - the Virginia Department ) Within each district, the divided into the nine construction districts that comprise an abbreviated program that covers only your distric Primary, The Six- Year Improvement Program IS ,.", on. (You may be looking at ided into four sections: Interstate of TranspoI .....i program is which are divided into subcolumns Urban and Secondary Systems some of Program have eight columns, functions within the program the statewide Six- Year Improvement describe each column and how n The pages This text wi the n numerica city where (PE Only) the county or are listed column identifies the route number on which the project IS located that will be done on this project, and the length of the project. T""I ,. the Urban System. Urban projects are listed alphabetically b) y/town ninary engineering work have been allocated to date. ) . .1 ,vJects nerally self-explanatory, this s located, the type of work by route number, except fo, means funds to finance only pre road order are known route number and the length of the project neating where the work will take place The del a location description of the project limits column. This column gives reference points DESCRIPTION This column gives from the previous NEERING he estimated costs given under the PLANNING estimate can be developed. The estimated costs time of the final on, when plans are costs the ESTIMATED COST (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PLANNING/ENGI This column has two subcolumns: PLANNING and ENGINEERING. T subcolumn are in Hal cost estimates. As work progresses, a better cost the ENGINEERING subcolumn are done around the more development stage of field inspectl Depending on project never both the final but ned and estimates can be relied upon to closely compare with estimates will appear under PLANNING or ENGINEERING, presented under defi cost the mates to esti the cost with the letters PE, RW. CN and TO appear of the ESTIMATED COST cOlumn box eft To the far right r PE This stands for preliminary engineering. In this phase a preliminary field survey, utility location, environmental/historical studies, road design alternatives, drawings, final field inspections and public hearings will be done. This process can take a few months to several years to complete. A time line showing how long this phase will last for this project can be found on this row in the ACTUAL ALLOCATION and PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS columns This is the portion of the project in which negotiations with property owners with utility companies are finalized, to obtain the land necessary for the project. to the right, followed by the time line for the work in this part of the project. most steps . take place, payments As with the PE RW This stands for right of way. are made and arrangements the cost estimates are Right of way not begin unt portIOn, work generally wi are complete. of the prelimmary engineering CN This the bids are opened is advertised to prospective contractors for bids. Once The cost estimate and time line are shown to the right. In this phase the project construction can begin. means construction and a contract awarded, TO This IS a VDOT of the project. a four- or tive-digit number. This is It is referred to as a PPMS number mates and should represent the tinal estimated cost there is the project ower left - hand corner of the ESTIMATED COST column box Program Project Management System number used to traçk est total of all cost the In the nterna PREVIOUS FUNDING This column indicates or Program n PREVIOUS FUNDING. except "S" the years preceding the current Six- Year Improvement the amount All designations ADD'L FUNDING REQUIRED/FUND SOURCE This column shows the total allocation needed to complete funding of the project, less The funding designation is indicated by a letter at the bottom of the box in the column ndicate that federal funds are to be used for at least a portion of the project. n project to this ons given allocat pn nterstate ,porta tion CM = congestion funds, IR = M = urban . BR = bridge replacement funds, railway-high Hay crossing funds, RRS = railway-highway nterstate (4-R) funds, 1M = funds, STP = surface tran" federal funds, I = interstate completion highway system funds, F = primary funds, mmation program funds, RS = rural secondary funds, S = state construction funds maintenance funds, NH - ", funds, HES = hazard eli' mi':(t' qualit) provement program funds, RRP = gn APD = 'palachian Development Funds. OnlY, no -= ..ationa 'Ie-ation and air on separati ACTUAL ALLOCATION This column shows how much money has It is the current the Six- Year Improvement n which the fiscal year the project for been allocated to allocation year's ACTUAL ALLOCATION and PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS are fiscal years that begin July 1 and line that starts at the far left of the allocation year box indicates that phase of the project will start in the tiscal year published. The years shown under end June 30. A time first quarter of the Program was ~ ACTUAL ALLOCATION box, there is with dashes and letters. This is the official state documents and correspondence related to the project. In the Urban portion of the number is found in the DESCRIPTION PROJECT NUMBER column long number a At the bottom of the number. This number appears on all Improvement Program, the project projec Six- Year number can be broken as follows The project Example: 0340-007 -106,PEI04,R W204,C504 project is located on Route 340. A project beginning with UOOO ~,., and located only in a city. Those projects beginning with a :an the road is an arterial corridor means that this is an urban projt:VL 6, such as 6522, 0340- section number sequential ;"..., this project trom others first digit represents a r" Ises and a "V" represer : Icess number also County. County. route. This on Route 340 in Augusta Augusta y along each for 007 is the code assigned ty code sa helps different''''Lv SIt in place of s a county/c 007- 106- An federa "",fety project, an "F" represents no federal oversight past the na environmenta oversight A 104 ng the number us 101 s project s the prelimmary engineering number. Usually this is a number indicates that three other projects relating to th 0340-007 -106 number are or have been in existence PE104- A 1 number usuallY IS 20 have been or are the PE number, this this project of way number. As with ndicates other projects related to is the 204 number planned to be built ght n R W204- above follows L = landscaping, B = bridge, M = IlllnImUm plan, N = no plan structure, FS = flashing signal (railroad crossing), S = sign plan as PE and RW format on number and follows the same is the construct Other codes are as P = paving, G = gradmg, D = box culvert/drainage C504- ~ Each column.shows the amount of money anticipated to be available m long the Preliminary Engineering (PE), Right of Way (RW), and the ·oject. isted by fiscal year. Time lines show hOn ast for PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS This column has five subcolumns for the project for that fiscal year Construction (CN) phases are expected to BALANCE TO COMPLETE This column shows allocations needed in future years, beyond the current Six- Year Improvement Program, to complete paying for the project. Adding the BALANCE TO COMPLETE, PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS and ACTUAL ALLOCATION will equal the amount shown in ADD'L FUNDING REQUIRED/FUND SOURCE column road ncluded in this program. The secondary Iy, each county has its own Six- Year are not with VDOT. Consequent Secondary roads (generally roads with route numbers 600 and above) program is developed by each county in conjunction Improvement Program for secondary roads. . " " .. " " " " ... .. .. ~ A. .. N w4rE S COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONSTRUCTION DISTRICTS i " ml ',' 1 'DUll / 'Ilol IDol ~ - .., ~ Mow . WIS C: r- /' / J " SCII f TENNESSEE NORTH CAROLINA FOREWORD This program IS the Commonwealth Transportation Board's plan for the use of funds anticipated to be available for ports, airports, public transit, and highway construction in the 1994-95 fiscal year. The Board also uses this Six- Year Program to distribute funds anticipated for the next five fiscal years through 1999-2000. The revenue projections on which this program is based include all funds anticipated, both federal and state, to be available for distribution by the Board as mandated by State statutes for preliminary engineering, right of way, and construction on the Interstate, Primary, Secondary, and Urban Systems, as well as funds anticipated to be available for ports, airports, and public transportation. To seek the maximum input from the public, hearings are held yearly in each of the nine construction districts in the Commonwealth. Advice and input are solicited from members of the General Assembly, members of the county boards of supervisors, city council members, other public officials, and the general public. This year hundreds of individuals attended these hearings, and their input into this program is highly significant. The Board's principal objectives in developing this particular update of the program are to complete the financing of projects that are under way or completed, to upgrade the most pressing needs on the Primary System, to respond to the transportation needs of cities and towns, support public transit and provide funds from the Commonwealth Transportation Trust Fund to upgrade ports and airports. 1 ) em - MAI~ PUBl CON NI-I Nl-' PR UF SE C~ Dl Sl Sl ~ T: UF - MA PUI CO l' l' F l ~ ( I ~ , l The Federal I ntermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 drastically changed the federal funding picture through the year 1997. This created the separate federally funded CMAQ, Enhancement, and Safety Programs, which are identified in separate sections in the back of this document. In 1989 the Virginia General Assembly enacted House Bill 1836, establishing the Route 58 Corridor Development Program. This bill authorized the sale of bonds. Future bonds will be sold with the concurrence and action by the General Assembly. This program is identified in a separate section in the back of this document. Federal legislation passed in 1991 requires that ten percent of the Federal Surface Transportation Program funds available to each state be set aside for safety purposes. You will notice that those projects financed with these funds are segregated in a separate section of the program. In 1988 the U. S. Congress passed legislation requiring federal agencies to convert to the metric system, and in 1991 the Federal Highway Administration developed an implementation plan, which is intended to lead to complete metrication by 1996. As a consequence, you wi notice some entries in this program indicated by the metric measure and the unit of measure in miles. * * * * 2 CURRENTSŒ-YEARIMPROVEMENTPROGRAM AS COMPARED TO UPDATED SŒ-YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (In Thousands of Dollars) CURRENT SIX-YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TOTAL 5,048,625 471.311 1999-00 1998-99 974,095 82,534 1997-98 917,096 80,816 1996-97 863,025 79,244 1995-96 811,701 78,114 1994-95 763,314 76,547 1993-94 719,394 74,056 MAlNTEN ANCE PUBLIC TRANSIT 083,650 87,202 873,486 697,275 945,689 117,247 128,611 62,520 48,784 216,269 252,697 4,513,430 153,120 12,932 159,615 125,306 166,528 19,551 o 7,450 7,450 30,352 20,804 703,108 53,120 12,932 153,841 120,975 161,330 19,551 o 7,450 7,450 30,352 20,804 687.805 53,120 12,932 146,630 117,029 158,645 19,551 29,828 9.492 9,492 36,162 47,353 740,234 152,586 13,532 142,964 114,329 155,492 19,551 29,828 9,492 9,492 36,362 48,023 731.65 55,764 13,572 134,220 105,744 142,299 19,551 29,828 7,450 7,450 28,301 13,929 758.108 215,940 21,302 136,216 113,892 161,395 19,492 39,127 21.186 7,450 54,740 101,784 892,524 CONSTRUCTION NHS -INTERSTATE NHS - NONINTERSTATE PRIMARY (formula) URBAN (formula) SECONDARY (formula + unpaved roads) CMAQ DEMONSTRATION STP - ENHANCEMENTS STP - SAFETY STP - URBANIZED REGIONAL STP - ST ATEWIDE SUBTOTAL UPDATED SIX-YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TOTAL 4,926,564 1999-00 893,894 1998-99 361.156 1997-98 830,084 1996-97 800,624 1995-96 780,234 79,202 1994-95 7f1J,572 1993-94 MAlNTEN ANCE ,444 ,013,493 78,832 ,022,811 801.194 ,064,352 122,885 89,484 47,386 61,122 189,487 148,068 4,639,114 nè''IIj::,:;.¡.., 49 86,867 52,608 12,932 80,580 40,559 84,991 20,491 o 7,217 7,217 29,374 16,090 752,059 84,533 52,608 12,932 72,200 34,274 77 ,465 20,491 o 7,217 7,217 29,374 16,090 729,868 82,575 52,608 12,932 67,336 30,626 73,095 20,491 o 7,217 7,217 29,374 16,090 716,986 80,774 152,608 12,932 163,624 129,533 174,138 20,491 29,828 9,259 9,259 36,075 42,639 780,386 52,073 13,532 60,077 26,923 71,122 20,491 29,828 9,259 9,259 36,275 43,310 772,149 77,493 3 250,988 13,572 178,994 139,279 183,541 20,430 29,828 7,217 20,953 29,015 13,849 887,666 roads) unpaved PUBLIC TRANSIT CONSTRUCTION NHS -INTERSTATE NHS - NONINTERSTATE PRIMARY (formula) URBAN (formula) SECONDARY (formula + CMAQ DEMONSTRATION STP - ENHANCEMENTS STP - SAFETY STP - URBANIZED REGIONAL STP - STATEWIDE SUBTOTAL TOTAL .5 PLANNING ESTIMATE TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND DETAIL DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIAL SESSION REVENUE (In Thousands of Dollars) - 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 TOTAL de\ pre fur tra Ye 5,987 5,987 2,994 1ft~ØØØ: 5,721 5.721 2,860 'L4~$Ø~ 5,497 5,497 2,749 I~~ZI~; 5,291 5,291 2,646 J~;ggø 5,118 5,118 2,560 ·tg~~øø: 4,940 4,940 2,470 :1g~~Bº M· 93,978 49,018 14?~¡~§ 15,663 10,619 ?e~2$2 15,663 9,453 Ø$~116 15,663 8,475 ?4n~a: : 15,663 6,071 . .....d......... <S"·1· ....~':t:jIj.. ~~:..]t~~~ rel fll! Il1l 111 743 12,386 36,413 4:~~?4.g 714 11,896 34,975 4Z~$~$ 687 11 ,446 33,651 45··784· :·;~:~.~.jUj>:..-:·:-.:¡ 663 11,053 32,496 44~1~ : 638 10,626 31,239 4gk~º~ AIRPORT FUND Air Carrier Airports Air Carrier and reliever Airports General Aviation Airports *$tå.IC· .. PORT FUND: Port Capital Facilities Preservation of Capital Facilities motåf····:··::·········································· . PUBLIC TRANSIT FUND Special Programs Capital Assistance Formula Assistance :·2··:·"···833······· . /6······B······Q·:..··· ..... '" . . - . . ",. . .. /...,t...:;.. .:.. ,t....::.:-.<-::; ;§ß.? 5.Z1 ,................... #~7;~7~: ..................... ......."......,..... ·4·· ·"7°·:;¡·B·oS·:· <.)f;Pt:t:.:./.:...i ................... #§g~~ª .......... ... ##ªi~~. ....-........-.-.-........ .................... 4~g~$~t N. ................. ~~ªªª N ........-..............-.-.....-....... ......................... s······4·..·oo..·····..··3···9···7···· ... ... :::)(...:..:..:..:..1:..::.:-::::./ : ~¡t?$ø: .-.-.-.-..-............... .................... 6....2...3.......3...3...7.... :..:..:..:.::.....;t....~.:...~:); ~~Ø$ø. .................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P~?~?9~ ª~§ªº . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................... P:tg~ø.1 ~~Øªø: .................... .................... ~gg~¡~g9 : 4 ~¡W!j .~:f.).f) ·!7BB ~n:>..<. : ................. ................. 1p¡t?Zg . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~gª~§~~l : : TÖUL.ËÄÖltJrtISS.ASlØC\l:ING ...................................................................................... seçøIÂû~þ~p~Na~çN~ç~ . FY 1995 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL ELEMENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FY 1997 FY 1996 FY 1995 Fund Type Fund Source Description Project Metro Area City of Charlottesville Sec.9 j ! Formula I * I NA 1_ ~ I -+ Total!~ $ I I I ' iCalÛt ect~ ¡ ! I I r I! Sec.9 I $0 I $3,780,000 $2,875,200 Capital ! $0 I $264,600 $194,076 I j NA I $0 I $680,400 $524,724 ----_L ~ Total lu .~ $0 I _~j4,725,00Q_L___'p,59~00Q. ---- I ---,--- I . 1--' . ¡ I I F All Types¡ I All Types! I Local NA Tota $526,056 $329,759 $2,640,529 $3,496,344 $526,056 $323,357 $874,637 ,724,050 $ $526,056 $319,520 $677,620 ,523,196 ITA c:----:-~- ~ LJ $526,056 $329,759 $2,640,529 $3,496,344 $526,056 $323,357 $874,637 ,724,050 $ $526,056 $319,520 $677,620 $1,523,196 Agency Funding Totals 19 and local subsidy * Local share includes operating revenues .. FYi ~ FY 1995 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL ELEMENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IMetrm ~ecipielll FY 1997 FY 1996 FY 1995 Fund Type Fund Source Description Project Dan vii Mdro City oj f). $95,594 $0 $0 $95.594 $95,594 $0 $0 $95,594 $95,594 $0 $0 $95.594 Sec.9 Formula NA Total FTA State Local * U A Section 9 Operating Charlottesville Metro Area (continued) fA UNT,Inc (see also Section 18 Program) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $69,965 $0 $0 $69,965 Sec.9 Capita NA Total FTA State Local Capitalh.ojerts Van purchase $95,594 $0 $0 $95.594 $95,594 $0 $0 $95.594 65,559 $0 $0 65.559 I I $ $ All Types All Types NA Tota Fede.·al State Local Agency Funding Totals $621,650 $329.759 $621,650 $323.357 $621,650 $319,520 Sec.9 Formula FTA State Å ro. Dan Fu $2,875,200 $194.076 $3,496,850 $523.835 $3,780,000 $264,600 $4,401,650 $587,957 $69,965 $0 $691,615 $319,520 Sec.9 Capital All Types All Types FTA State Federal State (':¡nit:¡1 Proie.cts Charlottesville Metro Area Funding Totals Totals * Local sh 20 and local subsidy. revenues * Local share includes operating CULPEPER DISTRICT t es of Primary System highways and has four cities or towns I contains 713 m istrict o The nIne-county Culpeper receive urban allocations that to promote nterest its ndicate district this n top priorities s Commonwealth Transportation Board The ity ncrease capac safety and to enhance economic development and These improvements the continuation of projects on Route 3 between Culpeper and Fredericksburg and nc1ude top priority Warrenton. and Charlottesville to be a Louisa Route 29 north of Charlottesville continues * * * * 59 mprovements around The widening of several ROUT COUNTY / TYP LENG 64- Albemarl ï Upgrade j Sewer , System (PE Only District I , : District District, ! i I CULPEPER DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (In Thousands of Dollars) 1994-1995 through 1999-2000 FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS . - ACTUAL PROJECTED 11996-97 - SYSTEM ... 1994-95 1995-96 1997-98 199899 1999 - 00 TOTAL INTERST A TE 217 59 62 64 67 70 NHS - NONINTERSTATE 2,000 2,000 1,000 - - - PRIMAR Y 15,471 13,806 14,228 14,709 15,084 15,730 89,028 URBAN 3,499 3,305 3,363 3,311 3,396 3,542 20,416 SECONDARY 14,028 13,237 13,453 13.261 13,581 14,132 81,692 STP STATEWIDE 1,503 3,056 2,029 880 879 8,347 i:!:i:i~:¡:¡:¡!:i:¡¡:¡i:¡i:i!:i:i:i::!~:!:¡i:illlll:îlllii~iil[!I.IBli!I~:¡liilli~ I 60 CT I STR I CULPEPER D INTERSTATE SYSTEM MPROVEMENT PROGRAM Thousands of Dollars) FY95 thru FYOO I BALANCE TO COMPLETE ONS 1998-99 I PROJECTED ALLOCAT ACTUAL ALLOCATION 1994-95 n ADD'L FUNDING OUSIREQUIREDI NG FUND SOURCE I ( I I PREV FUND MATED COST I EST ON I PT [ DESCR ROUTE COUNTY IC I TV TYPE LENGTH 1999-00 1997-98 1996-97 96 1995 NEER I NG IENG 136 136 I PLANN PE RII CN TO Area 3 At Rest II & E e l 64- Albemar Upgrade Sewer System 136 136 ) (L80 , 0064-002-F07:PE101 1M 14656 Only PE 60 57 54 52 49 46 318 gns i New S ctwide i Distr rAL 539 Beautification Improvements ctwide i Distr 5,000 10 10 10 10 10 30 80 9,028 5 5 14668 Interstate Matching Funds Required for Federal Enhancement Program ctwide i str D 0,416 70 70 67 67 64 64 62 62 - 59 59 217 217 61 CT SUMMARY I 1M NHS TOTAL I STR I D 1,692 Ii 8,347 ROL COUNn n LE~ - 15 & 2~ Fauqui! Cons t rt Turn Li Sout hb( - 15 & 2( Fauqui' Constrt Turn L. 4 Loca' - 15 - F l uvan' B ridge Replac, - 15 - Fluvan Bridge Replac 15 - Fluvan (PE - 15 - Fluvan Real ig Inters PRIMARY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CULPEPER DISTRICT (In Thousands of Dollars) FY95 thru FYOO ROUTE ADD'L COUNTY /C!TY ESTIMATED COST FUNDING ACTUAL PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS BALAN TYPE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUIRED ALLOCATION TO LENGTH PLANNING ENGINEER FUNDING FUND COMPL . SOURCE 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 3 - 2. 5 Mil es IJes t PE 399 Culpeper Culpeper and Orange RIJ 996 Parallel Lane County Line - CN 2,942 ¡-- (2 to 4 Lanes) 0.3 Mi le IJest TO 4,337 4,192 145 145 - - - - - - Culpeper and Orange County Line CONSTRUCTION UNDER IJAY 4417 STP 0003-023-104 PE103,RIJ203;V04,C503 3 - 4.0 km/2.5 Mi. IJest PE 820 Culpeper Culpeper and Orange RIJ 525 ¡ 4 Lanes on County Line - CN 5,510 . I New Location 7.2 km/4.5 Mi. IJest TO 6,855 100 6,755 1,290 1,415 2,100 510 540 900 Culpeper and Orange I County Line 3.2 km/2.0 Mi. 10186 STP 0003-023-V04 PE104,RIJ204,C504 3 - 7.2 km/4.5 Mi. IJest PE 500 ! Culpeper Culpeper and Orange RIJ - Parallel Lane County Line - CN - i (2 to 4 Lanes) 0.5 km/0.3 Mi. East TO 500 - 500 - - - - - 500 - I (PE Only) Route 29 I 13 .2 km/ 14657 I 8.2 Mi. 14658 S 0003-023-107 PE101,(RIJ201 C501),PE102,(RIJ202,C502) I 15 & 29 - 0.3 Mile North Route PE 200 Fauquier 15/29 Bypass - RIJ 252 Construct 3rd 1.4 Miles North Route CN 2,078 Lane Only 15/29 Bypass TO 2,530 350 2,180 700 950 530 - - - - NBL and SBL 1.1 Mi les 11044 STP 0015-030-F12 PE101,RIJ201, 501 1 5 & 29 - At Intersection PE 4 Fauquier Routes 17/15 Business RIJ - Extend Left /29 Business CN 21 ¡-- Turn Lane - TO 25 25 - - - - - - - . Northbound CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 12770 S 0015-030-113 PE101,N501 15 & 29 - 1. 7 Miles South PE 2 Fauquier Prince IJilliam RIJ - Close County Line CN 13 - Crossover TO 15 15 - - - - - - - - CONSTRUCTION UNDER IJAY 12771 S 0015-030-114,PE101,N501 I ! 62 PRIMARY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CULPEPER DISTRICT (In Thousands of Dollars) FY95 thru FYOO ROUTE ADD'L COUNTY IC ITY ESTIMATED COST FUNDING ACTUAL PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS BALANCE TYPE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUIRED ALLOCATION TO LENGTH PLANNING ¡ENGINEER FUNDING FUND COMPLETE SOURCE 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999·00 15 & 29 - 1.6 Mi les South PE 4 Fauquier Prince IJilliam RIJ - Construct Left County Line CN 31 ~ Turn Lane - TO 35 35 - - - - - - - - Southbound CONSTRUCTION UNDER IJAY 12767 S 0015-030-114 PE102,N502 15 & 29 - Route 17 (Opal) - PE 3 ~ Fauquier Prince IJilliam RIJ - Construct Left County Line CN 77 Turn Lanes at TO 80 - 80 80 - - - - - 4 Locations 14659 S 0015-030-116 PE101,M501 15 - JAMES RIVER: PE 700 Fluvanna (Str.# 1987) RIJ - Br i dge CN 705 Replacement TO 1 ,405 * 200 1,205 100 200 305 300 300 - - 12768 STP 0015-032-V07 PE101,C501 15 - RIVANNA RIVER: PE 385 Fluvanna (Str.# 1004) RIJ 140 Bridge CN 2,585 Replacement TO 3,110 - 3,110 100 300 700 700 475 835 - 12769 BRISTP 0015-032-V04 PE101,RIJ201, 501,B601 15 - Palmyra Bypass PE 50 Fluvanna RIJ - CN - TO 50 - 50 50 - - - - - - FEASIBILITY TUDY BY TPD (PE Only) 14660 S 0015-032-109 PE100 15 - At Route 6 (Dixie) PE - Fluvanna RIJ - Realignment of CN 35 - Intersection TO 35 35 - - - - - - - - 12904 S 0015-032-108,PE101,RIJ201,M501 * Cooperative Project with Lynchburg Distr1ct 63 , :j BALANCl TO ----1 COMPLE I . I I I Þ I ,. J J ROUT I COUNTY II TYPI LENG 29 - Albemarl Yiden fr to 6 Lns Cont. R1 Di rectic 1.3 Mi 6.3 29 - Albemarl Yiden fr to 6 Lar R 29 Culpep€ Cons t rL Right 1 Lane 29 Albemar Yiden fr to 6 Lns Cont. RT Directio 1.8 Mi kml 29 - Albemar Interch 29 - Albemar PE thru Stage & Plans f Hardshi Acquisi & PE PRIMARY SYSTEM I IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CULPEPER DISTRICT (In Thousands of Dollars) FY95 thru FYOO ROUTE ADD'L COUNTY/CITY ESTIMATED COST FUNDING ACTUAL PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS BALANC¡ TYPE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUIRED ALLOCATION TO LENGTH PLANNING ¡ENGINEER FUNDING FUND COMPLE SOURCE 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 15 - Town of Gordonsville: PE 50 I--- Orange CSX RR Underpass RII - Improve CN 130 Vertical TO 180 50 130 90 40 - - - - - Clearance 13490 S 0015-068-107 PE101,C501 17- liAR RENTON BYPASS PE 2,602 - Fauquier SPUR: RII 7,060 - 4 Lanes on Route 29 Bypass CN 23, 171 5,1811 New Location North of lIarrenton - TO 32,833 9,198 20,050 1,800 1,775 1,610 2,065 1,097 1,760 Route 17 (1)3,585 (1) 503 (1) 2,056 (1) 2,029 (1) 166 f , 2.6 Miles 2522 STP 6017-030-F08 PE101,RII201,C501,B601 thru B609 , , ~ 20 . 3.4 Hiles South PE 141 Albemarle Route 53 - RII 79 ~- Improve Hor i - 3.8 Miles South CN 640 - zontal and Route 53 TO 860 680 180 180 - - - - - - í Vertical ¥ Alignment CONSTRUCTION UNDER YAY í 0.4 Mi le 10336 HES/STP 0020-002-V21 PE101,RII201,C501 , '. r 20 - Between Route 1-64 PE 55 ¡ . Albemarle and Route 388 RII 80 - ! Extend CN 350 Acceleration TO 485 - 485 80 175 130 100 - - - Lane 12772 S 0020-002-123 PE101,RII201,M501 20 - BLUE RUN: PE 276 Orange 0.6 Mile East RII 44 Bridge and Route 231 - CN 1,575 Approaches 0.1 Hi le North TO 1,895 1,090 805 805 - - - - - . Route 231 (Str.# 1009) OJ Hi le 9801 BR/STP 0020-068-V12 PE101,RII201, 501,B604 28 - Prince lIilliam PE 50 Fauquier County Line - RII - (PE Only) Route 15/29 (North CN - of Remington) TO 50 - 50 - 50 - - - - - 22.0 km/ CORRIDOR STUiY TO DETERHljE METHOD OF MPROVEMENT 13.7 Hi. 13491 S 0028-030-109,PE100 (1) STP Statewide Allocatl0ns 64 PRIMARY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CULPEPER DISTRICT (In Thousands of Dollars) FY95 thru FYOO ROUTE ADD'L COUNTY/CITY ESTIMATED COST FUNDING ACTUAL PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS BALANCE TYPE DESCR I PTI ON PREVIOUS REQUIRED ALLOCATION TO LENGTH PLANNING IENGINEER FUNDING FUND COMPLETE SOURCE 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 29 - North Corporate PE 1,841 Albemarle Limits Charlottes- RIJ 3,866 Widen from 4 vill e - CN 13,253 to 6 Lns. with 0.2 Mile North Rio TO 18,960 11,125 7,835 2,700 2,200 1,500 1,435 - - - Cont. R TL each Road (Route 631) Direction 13348 CONSTRUCTION UNDER IJAY 1.8 Miles 2521 STP 6029-002-119 PE101,RIJ201;F19,C501 29 - 0.2 Mile North Rio PE 707 Albemarle Road (Route 631) - RIJ 1,048 Widen from 4 South Fork Rivanna CN 4,100 to 6 Lns. with River TO 5,855 3,595 2,260 1,285 500 475 - - - - Cont. RTL each Direction 1 .3 Miles 2304 STP 6029-002-F19 PE102,RIJ202, 502 29 - South Fork Rivanna PE 1,795 Albemarle River - RIJ 2,849 Widen from 4 Airport Road CN 11,715 to 6 Lanes TO 16,359 3,389 12,970 1,055 1,170 1,315 1,840 2,550 4,161 - (1 ) 879 6.3 km/3.9 Mi. 3160 STP 6029-002-F21 PE101,RIJ201,C501 29 - CHARLOTTESVILLE PE 6,000 Albemarle BYPASS: RIJ 15,292 PE thru PH Alternative 10 CN - Stage & RIJ (lies tern Route) TO 21,292 2,700 12,592 2,000 2,000 900 1,000 . - 4,692 Plans for 5,000 * (1) 1,000 (1) 1,000 Hardsh i p (1)1,000 Acquisitions 11771 S/NH/STP 6029-002-F22 PE100,RIJ201 29 - At Greenbrier Drive, PE 3,620 Albemarle Rio Road and RIJ 26,000 Interchanges Hydraul ic Road CN - TO 29,620 200 27,420 - - - 1,000 5,692 4,965 10,763 2,000* 2,000* 2,000* 1,000* 12778 12780 (PE & RIJ Only) 12779 12781 S/NH 6029-002-F19 PE103,RIJ203, IJ204,RIJ205 29 - At Route 666 PE 1 - Culpeper RIJ - Construct CN 14 - Right Turn TO 15 - 15 15 - - - - - - Lane 14661 STP 0029-023-V10,PE101,M501 (1) STP Statewide Allocations * National Highway System Funds 65 , :J BALANCE TO -1 COMPLET. I . 89 I . I . , 5, 33 Gre Par Lan 3 33 Lou 2 L Lan New (PE 2.9 33 Lou IJid (PE 0.8 21 Rap! Dev· 4 L. 2 211 Cull Fau, Bri, Rep on \ Lan, 229 Culr Bri' Rep' PRIMARY SYSTEM ¡ ~ IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CULPEPER DISTRICT t (In Thousands of Dollars) > t FY95 thru FYOO [ ROUTE ADD'L f: COUNTY /C!TY ESTIMATED COST FUNDING ACTUAL PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS "LMf TYPE DESCR I PT /ON PREVIOUS REQUIRED ALLOCATION TO ! LENGTH PLANNING ¡ENGINEER FUNDING FUND COMPL ' SOURCE 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 29 - \.Iarrenton - PE 50 r Fauquier Prince IJi II iam RIJ - ,. (PE Only) County Line CN - , TO 50 - 50 50 - - - - - - ! 10.2 km/ ENGINEERING TO DETERMINE METHOD OF IMPROVEMENT 6.4 Mi. 13492 S 6029-030-111 PE100 29 . At Intersection Route PE 30 Fauquier 29 Bypass and Route RIJ - Constr. Temp. 643 Interchange CN 425 \.leigh/Safety (Meetz Road) TO 455 330 125 75 50 - - - - - Inspection , Facility on ¡ NBL 13690 S 0029-030-V12 PE101,M501 ,. ,I 29 - Between IJarrenton PE 1,600 Fauquier, and Charlottesville RIJ - Culpeper, CN - Greene, TO 1,600 100 - - . - - - - - Albemarle & 1 ,500* Madison ENGINEERING o DETERMINE METHOD OF IMPROVEMENT (PE Only) 12782 S/DEMO 6029-967-101 PE100 , 29 - ROBINSON RIVER: PE 175 ~- Madison (Str.# 1009) RIJ 25 B ridge CN 1,200 Replacement TO 1,400 - 1,400 50 150 200 300 700 - _ ,f. Northbound ,- r Lane I, 14662 BR 6029-056-113 PE101,RIJ201, 501,B604 t 29 - At Route 230 PE 1 - Madison RIJ - Construct CN 14 - Right Turn TO 15 - 15 15 - - - - - Lane 14663 S 0029-056-114 PE101,N501 33 - Stanardsville Bypass PE 100 I Greene RIJ 50 2 Lanes on CN 7,130 2,~ 4-Lane R/IJ on TO 7,280 100 7,180 145 215 640 950 1,230 1,995 New Locat i on I 2523 S 6033-039-101,PE102,RIJ203, 503,B601 . * SpecIal Federal Grant Funds 66 PRIMARY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM n Thousands of Dollars) FY95 thru FYOO I >TRICT I CT BALANCE TO COMPLETE I STR [ CULPEPER 0 ONS 1998 I PROJECTED ALLOCAT ACTUAL ALLOCATION 1994-95 I ADD'L FUNDING OUSIREQUIRED NG FUND SOURCE ( I I PREV FUND MATED COST I EST PTION ( DESCR ROUTE COUNTY /C /TY TYPE LENGTH BALANCE TO - COHPLEI 1999-00 99 997-98 1 1996-97 1995-96 NEER 367 75 541 983 I NG IENG I PLANN PE RLJ CN TO 0.1 Mile LJest Route 29 (Ruckers- vi lle) - 2.2 Miles East East Corporate Limits Stanardsville 33 - Greene Parallel Lane - 3.983 , , 3 3 CONSTRUCTION UNDER LJAY 6033-039-105.PE101,RLJ201;V05.C501 STP 2394 13349 328 3,657 3,270 7.255 PE lies t I RII Limits CN TO LOUISA BYPASS 0.8 km/0.5 Mi. LJest Corporate Louisa - Lock Lane Drive es 33 Louisa 2 Lanes on 4- Lane R/LJ on New Location (PE Only) 2.9 km/1.8 Mi l i 3.6 M I I 925 2 040 , 1 70 1 , 1 695 300 275 6,405 850 . C501 , RLJ201 , 108~PE101 0033-054 S 1045 244 4,933 870 6.047 PE RLJ CN TO LOUISA BYPASS: Lock Lane Drive 0.5 km/0.3 Hi East Route 33 33 Louisa lIidening J----. 845 2 845 965 595 300 275 825 , 5 222 . 0033-054-108.PE102.RII202.C502 S 321 542 043 906 11046 PE RLJ CN TO 0.3 Mile East Covington River 0.5 Mi le East Route 522 i M 211 - Rappahannock Develop to 4 Lanes (PE Only) 0.8 km/0.5 +-I - 4,906 , , 4 4 CONSTRUCTION UNDER LJAY 6211-078-105~PE104.RII204.C504.B604.D60 S 405 60 515 980 2 2 2412 PE RLJ CN TO : RAPPAHANNOCK RIVER At Culpeper and Fauquier County Line (Str.# 1910) es 211 - Culpeper and Fauquier Bridge Replacement on LJestbound Lane l i 2.0 M I . 710 970 625 575 2.880 100 , , B602 , C501 RLJ20 , 6211-030-V02.PE101 ; 501 , RLJ201 , -023-V04;PE101 62 BR/STP 261 106 926 293 2436 2437 PE RW CN TO HAZEL RIVER: 7.3 Mi les North North Corporate Limits Culpeper (Near Rixeyville) (Str.# 1013) 229 - Culpeper Bridge Replacement I I - CONSTRUCTION UNDER LJAY 0229-023-102jPE101,RLJ201;V02.C501.B60 67 BR/STP 2.293 , , 1 2 9803 e l i M 1 o 2.00~ I , CT I STR I CULPEPER 0 PRIMARY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (In Thousands of Dollars) FY95 thru FYOO ROUT COUN TV I TVP LENG ADD'L FUNDING PREVIOUS I REQUIRED FUNDING FUND SOURCE ROUTE COUNTY IC I TY TYPE LENGTH BALANCE TO COMPLE, ONS 1998-99 PROJECTED ALLOCAT ACTUAL ALLOCATION MATED COST I EST ON I DESCRIPT DistrIct New Instal Ie 999-00 1 997-98 1 996-97 1 995-96 1 994-95 1 2, 100 NEER I PLANNING 1ENG 202 55 973 230 , , 1 2 ROBINSON RIVER: PE 7.9 km/4.9 Mi. North RW North Corporate CN Limits Madison (Route TO 609 West) (Str.# 1006) 12m 231 - Madi so, B ridge Replacement n 630 800 400 300 130 Distrlc Safety I mproven t i 0231-056-V04:PE101,RW201,C501,B604 BR/STP 420 420 PE RW CN TO 1 I Route 211 - Route 522/23 (At Sperryvi 231 Ext.- Rappahannock New Location 420 420 e) I Distrlc . 0231-078-103:PE101 S 45 30 300 375 12783 PE RW CN TO Route 605 At (PE Only) 522 Louisa Improve Intersect 125 200 50 375 on i c Distr ¡ C501 , RW201 , 12:PE101 0522-054 S 300 300 14664 PE RW CN TO Route 250 Bypass Massie Road (Northgrounds UVA Campus) Albemarle Connector Road to UVA 150 100 250 50 Distrlc 100 100 100 100 100 PE101 RUVA-OD2-101 150 S 650 12784 Structure Numbers: 1013 (Owens Creek) - Louisa 1001 (Robinson River) - Madison 1008 (White Oak Run) - Madison 1114 (Limestone Creek) Albemar Only) Districtwide Strengthening and Widening Bridges (PE e I Distrlc i ctwide i Distr New Insta gns S i II 100 100 100 100 100 154 68 654 3963 ons at PRIMARY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CULPEPER DISTRICT (In Thousands of Dollars) FY95 thru FYOO ROUTE ADD'L COUNTY IC I TY ESTIMATED COST FUNDING ACTUAL PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS BALANCE TYPE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUIRED ALLOCATION TO LENGTH PLANNING ¡ENGINEER FUNDING FUND COMPLETE SOURCE 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Districtwide Signals New Ins ta II at ions 1,000 . 200 200 200 200 200 . 3962 Districtwide High Hazard and Safety Roadside Obstacle Improvements El imination (Future Projects 161 24 29 26 27 28 27 - to be Determined) 3691 Districtwide State Traff i c Operat ions and Safety Improvement Program 372 172 40 40 40 40 40 (Spot Improvements) 6263 Districtwide Beautification Improvements 163 53 22 22 22 22 22 - 14669 Districtwide Guardrail 475 100 75 75 75 75 75 - Districtwide Pavement Markers 400 100 7S 75 50 50 50 - . :J BALANCE TO COMPLETE 69 .- MUNICIP /STREE TYPE 1M LENG [ I t I BALANl TO COMPLE CULPEPER DISTRICT PRIMARY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (In Thousands of Dollars) FY95 thru FYOO - ADD'L ESTIMATED COST FUNDING ACTUAL PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS jPREVIOUSIREQUIRED ALLOCATION FUNDING FUND - - - - PLANNING ¡ENGINEER SOURCE 1994-95 1995-96 I 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 ON I PT I DESCR ROUTE COUNTY/CITY TYPE LENGTH Charlot' Fontaine 4 Lane 0.8 km/( Charlot' 250 Byp' Bridge Replacer 4 Lane 0.5 Mi l, Charlot \Jest Ma Street Bridge Replace ~~ Charlot I vy ROE 4 Lane 0.8 km¡ -- Charlol Mclnti I Meadow parkwa' 4 Lane 0.8 km -- Charlo Ridge Bridge Replac i I: tj i' '" f ~ i i I: ~ i ~" II ~ , t· . 1 2""1 i i ~ t ,f j 1999-00 15,730 15,084 879 709 166 14 14,228 2,029 1.000 25 - 300 - - 8 8 - 15,471 13 , 806 1,503 3,056 2,000 2,000 - - 70 25 300 ONS I Districtwide \Jet land Mitigation Monitoring Districtwide Advance Funding for Preliminary Engineering Primary Matching Funds Required for Safety Program Primary Matching Funds Required for Enhancement Program DISTRICT SUMMARY STP STATEWIDE ALLOCATIONS NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM ALlOCAT · URBAN SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CULPEPER DISTRICT (In Thousands of Dollars) URBAN SYSTEM FY 95 THRU FY 00 MUNICIPALITY ADD'L /STREET DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST PREVIOUS FUNDING ACTUAL PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS BALANCE FUNDING REQUIRED ALLOCATION TO TYPE IMPROVE PROJECT NUMBER PLANNINGIENGINEER /FUND COMPLETE LENGTH SOURCE 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Char lot' vi lle IJCL to Fontaine Ave. Jefferson Park Ave. PE 250 Rio' 500 CN 1,450 * 4 Lane TO 2,200 400 1,800 249 210 474 417 200 250 0 7029-104-V03, PE101, 0.8 km/0.5 M RIJ201, C501 14643 I STP * 400 of Prior Allocati?n from 9th St./10th St. Charlot'ville St. Clair Ave. (Under conltruction) 250 Bypass to ECL PE 386 Free Bridge over Rio' 1,800 Bri dge Rivanna River CN 4,310 - Replacement TO 6,496 6,496 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Lane 0250-104-102, PE101, 0.5 Mi le RIJ201, C501 3416 S Charlot'vi lle Bridge Over Norfolk lIest Main Southern Railroad PE 300 - Street Rio' 400 - Bridge CN 2,800 * Replacement TO 3,500 0 3,500 1,232 868 0 0 0 0 0 7250-104-102, PE101, RIJ201, C501, B606 14654 S * 1,400 to be Provided by Norfolk Southern Railroad Charlot'vi lle IJCL to Ivy Road Errmett Street PE 250 Rio' 500 CN 2,050 * 4 Lane TO 2,800 600 2,200 200 200 537 478 485 300 0 7250-104-V04, PE101, 0.8 km/0.5 M RIJ201, C501 14644 I STP * 600 of Prior Allocation from 9th St./10th St. Charlot'vi lle Route 250 Bypass McInti re Rd./ to NCL PE 1,464 Meadow Creek Rio' 935 Parkway CN 1,952 4 Lane TO 4,351 1,112 3,239 683 700 662 682 512 0 0 UOOO-104-V02, PE101, 0.8 km/O.5 M RIJ201, C501 2529 M/STP In Conjunction with Route 63 Project in Albemarle County Char l ot ' vi II e Bridge over CSX Ridge St. Railroad PE 260 Rio' 158 (Under Construction) Bridge CN 1,265 - Repl acement UOOO-104-104, PE102, TO 1,683 1,683 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIJ202, UOOO-104-V04, C502,B604 2312 BR/STP :j BALANCE TO -4 COMPLETEI I . I . 28.419 71 r · MUNICIPAL /STREET TYPE I MPF LENGTI 'oIarrenton Shirley A' 4 & 5 Lan 0.7 Mi le 'oIarrentor, 'oIalker Dr 2 Lane 0.5 Mi le -- CULPEPER ~~ ~ URBAN SYSTEM I IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CULPEPER DISTRICT (In Thousands of Dollars) URBAN SYSTEM FY 95 THRU FY 00 i MUN I CI PAll TY ADD'L f!i /STREET DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST PREVIOUS FUNDING ACTUAL PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS BALANCE !' FUNDING REQUIRED ALLOCATION TO ~, TYPE IMPROVE PROJECT NUMBER PLANNINGENGINEER /FUND COMPLE1l~ LENGTH SOURCE 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1;;' , Charlot'ville Cherry Ave. to 9th St. - Main St. PE 1,200 10th St. R'oI 2,250 Realignment CN 6,376 * I.-La Underpass UOOO-104-V08, PE101, TO 9,826 7,010 2,816 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NS & CSX RR RW201, C501, B605, 0.3 Mi le B606 2525 1 RRS/STP 2,816 to be Provided by Safety Improvement Program Charlot'ville Bridge over Norfolk Jefferson Park Southern Railroad PE 250 Ave. RW 250 B ridge CN 1,376 * Replacement TO 1,876 299 1,577 0 255 600 550 172 0 0 UOOO-104-V09, PE101, 0.2 km/0.1 M RW201, C501, B607 14645 I BR/STP * 299 of Prior Allocati?n from 9th St./10th St. Culpeper Rte. 15/29 to (Under conltruction) Sperryvi lle West St. PE 0 Pike RW 205 4 Lane Phase 1A CN 550 - TO 755 685 70 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0522-204-101, RW201, 0.1 Mi le 0522-204-V01, C503, 2367 F/STP Culpeper West St. to Sperryvi lle Gardner St. PE 0 Pike RW 1,020 (Construction Complete) 4 Lane Phase 1 CN 1,312 Bridge TO 2,332 2,271 61 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rep l acement 0522-204-101, RW201, 0.2 Mi le C501, B601 2367 BR I Culpeper Gardner St. Sperryvi lle Virginia Ave PE 478 Pike RW 500 4 Lane Phase 2 CN 1,751 0522-204-101, PE101 TO 2,729 478 2,251 392 493 502 494 370 0 0 0522-204-V01, RW202 0.3 Mi le C502 2367 & 9794 F/STP Orange Spicers Mill Rd. Madison Rd. to Nelson St. PE 122 R'oI 450 Drainage CN 911 * Improvement TO 1,483 450 1,033 238 223 227 226 119 0 0 UOOO-275-101, PE101, 0.3 Mi le RW201, C501 12539 S * Inclu?es Prior All?cation from rimary Project 0015-68-10 , PE101 72 URBAN SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CULPEPER DISTRICT (In Thousands of Dollars) URBAN SYSTEM FY 95 THRU FY 00 HUN I C I PAll TY ADD I L /STREET DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST PREVIOUS FUNDING ACTUAL PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS BALANCE FUNDING REQUIRED ALLOCATION TO TYPE IMPROVE PROJECT NUMBER PLANNINGENGINEER /FUND COMPLETE LENGTH SOURCE 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Warrenton Green St. to Shi r ley Ave. Garrett St. PE 490 R\oI 1,850 CN 3,243 4 & 5 Lane TO 5,583 481 5,102 74 356 361 357 365 378 3,211 7029-156-101, PE101, 0.7 Mi le R\oI202, C502 2516 I F/STP PE & R\oI ONLY and Accrue Funds Toward Construction Warrenton Lee Street (Meetz Walker Drive Road) to Academy Hill PE 0 Road R\oI 0 CN 300 2 Lane TO 300 0 300 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 Mi le UOOO-156-104, C501 14721 S In Conjunction with Industrial Access Project APPORTIONMENTS NOT ALLOCATED 0 0 0 107 1,173 2,614 CULPEPER DISTRICT TOTALS ALLOCATIONS 3,499 3,305 3,363 3,204 2,223 928 TOTAL 3,499 3,305 3,363 3,311 3,396 3,542 CT - BALANCE TO COMPLETE 0 0 0 -\ I o o o 73 Counties Included: Louisa Madison Orange Rappahannock Prelimil18ry snginøing and/or riçh1 of 6 WBY atquismon lor inœrsection, rBSl arsa, paåiOQ 01 otheI spot improwments ... In~on. rast an!8. parting or other .. spot Improvsmsnts ... Corridor Study Only ~ roads and highwtIy$ /I6C8S$8f'f to IoœIa projects 819 :;hewn on 1M map. N W E9E S and/OI right of _ ConstrUCtion Improvement ~ Bridgs constrUCtion or imprO'i!ll118l1lS ,--.. Albemarle Culpeper Fauquier Fluvanna Greene _ _ _ Preliminary .engineering way aCQUIsition only Interstate & Primary System Transportation District: Culpeper ~ ~ @ 1 ~ 74 Urban System & Urban Interstate Transportation District: Culpeper City of Charlottesville N -w EBE---- S F~ ^ Preftminary enoinaering andior right of L.":>, w~ acquisition for intenl8Ction, rBSt area, JðIking or other spot i~aments ... Intersection, rast area, parldno or other .. S1OIlmprowmentJi ... Comdor S!iJdy Preliminary angineering amVor righ1 of - - - way a~uisition only - Construction Improvement '--.J 60008 construction or imprtMlments ~ Other cities and towns in this district with projects described in the urban section of the program: 0fI/y !hose roads aOO highwIIys neœsS8l)' to llXate projects ere shown on this me(J. 75 Culpeper Orange Warren ton CULPEPER DISTRICT SECONDAR Y SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR ALLOCATIONS COUNTY ACTUAL PROJECTED I 1994-95 1995 -96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 TOTAL Albemarle 3,817,570 3,626,658 3,684,895 3,610,846 3,697,929 3,847,876 22,285,774 Culpeper 1,490,355 1,396,956 1,420,212 1,406,747 1,441,138 1,500,346 8,655,754 Fauquier 2,760,389 2,615,225 2,656,728 2,613,144 2,674,872 2,781,162 16,101,520 Fluvanna 885,668 833,552 847,406 837,254 857,585 892,596 5,154,061 Greene 644,082 610,382 620,097 609,835 624,249 649,071 3,757,716 Louisa 1,569,531 1,471,491 1,496,223 1,481,966 1,518,315 1,580,901 9,118,427 Madison 946,011 885,908 900,743 892,757 914,661 952,370 5,492,450 Orange 1,276,274 1,204,269 1,223,750 1,206,882 1,235,778 1,285,530 7,432,483 Rappahannock 638,474 593,095 603,440 601,309 616,469 642,566 3,695,353 Total 14,028,354 13,237,536 13,453,494 13,260,740 13,580,996 14,132,418 81,693,538 ! J 76 I TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS ncluded in the Federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (lSTEA) is the establishment of an Enhancement Program, which allows the Department broad apportionments and federal dollars to take unique and creative actions to integrate transportation into our communities and the natural environment. Following the preliminary recommendation of the SJR 188 allocation study, the General Assembly agreed to amend the 1993 State Appropriations Act to set aside funding for the Enhancement Program prior to the application of the system distribution formula. This provides the Commonwealth Transportation Board the opportunity to implement the stand-alone Enhancement Program envisioned by the authors of ISTEA. This program provides a means of financing activities that go beyond the normal elements of a transportation improvement project. Transportation enhancement activities are funded under the Surface Transportation Program (STP) of ISTEA. Ten percent of each state's STP is set aside for enhancements. Transportation enhancement activities can be a stand-alone project or can be implemented as part of an on-going project. In either case, it must relate to the intermodal transportation system in function, proximity, or impact. Transportation enhancement activities are activities which increase the value or worth of a project or make it more aesthetically pleasing. They should provide a "quality-of-life" benefit A project is enhanced by doing something that is not common practice. 332 ':, ~, II I . Eligible transportation enhancement activities must fal nto one or more of the following categories as defined by federal legislation: 1. Provision of facilities for bicycles and pedestrians; 2. Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites; 3. Scenic or historic programs; 4. Landscaping and other scenic beautification; 5. Historic preservation; 6. Rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures, or facilities including historic railroad facilities and canals; 7. Preservation of abandoned railway corridors including the conversion and use thereof for pedestrian and bicycle trails; 8. Control and removal of outdoor advertising; 9. Archaeological planning and research; and, 10. Mitigation of pollution due to highway run-off. The Commonwealth Transportation Board allocates funds to specific projects on a statewide, competitive basis. Project proposals are examined by a I5-member (non-V DOT) Transportation Enhancement Advisory Committee representing a cross section of the enhancement categories. Based upon the recommendations of the Advisory 333 Committee and a review by the Commonwealth Transportation Board's Environmental Committee, projects are selected for implementation * * * * 334 , I I. ~ I 4 j i ..;¡ ~ :4. ~ j I TRANSPOR T A TION ENHANCEMENTS (In Thousands of Dollars) 1994-95 through 1999-00 ROUTE COUNTY/C FEDERAL FUND ALLOCATIONS TYPE LENGTH Ilty of ACTUAL I PROJECTED anvi lle ai l Passel ,. tation 1995-96 19.98+'99 r999~OO / ehabilita 1994-95 1996-97 1997- 98 TOTAL ---------- ~ ~ ~ ~ 7,217 9,259 9.259 7.217 7,217.\ 7,217 I 4738, -- , i ty 0 f har l ot tes nion Stat ¡1¡11111\\¡llgll\\! :~~~~j :~~~:~: l¡j\\i~l\\¡¡iil,j,_I\\\¡ 335 jjl¡\j: IIISi\j¡' il I SYSTEM TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS ¡¡:\\\:¡~¡\¡[:~:\i\~\:\j¡\¡¡¡¡¡\¡:\)i\¡\\:[¡¡\¡\~¡j¡\¡\\¡j~¡\\\¡:\\\¡\:\\\:i\\\\\¡\j\:¡j¡III.I\llii\~1ij¡\I\111\lj\j¡ljillljlllll~ TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS FEDERAL FUND ALLOCATION (In Thousands of Dollars) FY95 thru FYOO ~1 PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS ~ BALANCE TO - - COMPLETE 996-97 1997-98 998-99 I 1999-00 ACTUAL ALLOCATION (Federal Share) 994-95 ADD'L FUNDING REQUIRED FUND SOURCE PREVIOUS FUNDING COST TOTAL TY ROUTE ¡ruNTY IC TYPE LENGTH 995-96 937 130 390 230 750 937 EN PE RII CN TO ON The purchase, rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of station building. The interior and exterior will be repaired and the inside rehabilitated including restrooms, ADA compliance and heating and air- conditioning. Partial funding DESCRIPT of lle il Passenger ation abi l i tat i on 336 762 400 506 987 5,332 6.825 762 EN 3 497 500 400 EN PE RII CN TO PE RII CN TO ¡The restoratl0n of e the seriously deteriorated historic train station building and supporting infrastructure. Funding approved with the exception of the Clock Tower Project involves decorative lights, pedestrian signage appropriate landscape buffer, attractive signage street furniture, etc., lining both sides of Settlers Landing Road from Eaton Street to Bridge Street and Kings lIay from Settlers Landing to Kings lIay on ape ents of ottesv on Stat ty of ton ty ar 47,38 TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS FEDERAL FUND ALLOCATION (In Thousands of Dollars) FY95 thru FYOO PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS ~ "LANŒ ROUTE TO COUNTY /C - - COMPLETE TYPE 1996-97 997-98 998-99 I 1999-00 LENGTH Shenandoah Coun t y ACTUAL ALLOCATION (Federal Share) 1994-95 ADD'L FUNDING REQUIRED FUND SOURCE OUS NG PRE V FUND TOTAL COST ON DESCRIPT Strasburg Museum Strasburg Depot Sui ldi ng 995-96 500 190 200 990 380 500 EN , 2 , PE R'W CN TO Phase I financing to develop traffic corridor as a true parkway, this will include scenic and safety enhancement of roadside landscaping, a bike-hiking trail connecting visitor's center to Monticello, a native plant arboretum, scenic overlooks and pond and foot trails. ROUTE COUNTY/CITY TYPE LENGTH Albemarle County Thomas Jefferson Parkway Roadside, Safety, and Aesthetic Improvements and Biking and Hiking Trail Seal an 240 60 240 300 240 EN PE R'W CN TO wide '.2 mi le 8- foot bicycle and pedestrian paths utilizing off-road trails, side roads and both sides of Columbia Pike to provide a safer and more convenient al ternative for conmuters. 337 4 6 6 4 EN PE R'W CN TO Approximately one acre of landscaping at the intersection of Route 7 Bypass and Route 7 Business. This will serve as a Gateway project for the Town of Berryvi lle and Clarke County. Arl ; ngton County Columbia Pike- Pentagon Trail Clarke County Route 7 Beautification Project PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS ~ BAL"" TO - - COMPLETE 996-97 997-98 998-99 I 1999-00 rk County rkto\,/n 1,1" reet ver\,/a l k ENHANCEMENTS ALLOCATION of Dollars) FYOO TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL FUND In Thousands FY95 thru ACTUAL ALLOCATION (Federal Share) 994-95 ADD'L FUNDING OUSREQUIRED NG· FUND SOURCE PRE V FUND COST TOTAL ON PT DESCR TY ROUTE COUNTY/C TYPE LENGTH 995-96 400 00 400 500 400 EN PE RII CN TO lIidening of Rugby Road from University Avenue to Lambeth Lane, so that designated bicycle lanes can be incorporated into the roadway. A sidewalk is proposed for the east side of the road e City of Charlottesv University of Virginia Rugby Road omas fferson mori al undat i on omas fferson rkway - ue R idg(, erra Clul River 702 100 83 440 377 900 702 EN EN 532 532 100 PE RII CN TO PE RII CN TO Mathews County Land Conservancy intends to acquire this property to preserve significant hist. features of this local landmark whi le creating a contemporary use for the public. Floating dock stage will be constr. to recreate historical aspects of Chesapeake Bay culture. of Traveler's information and interpretation Iprogram. Phase 11 includes the ghway implementation of actual radio broadcasts County l,iharf Secretary Natural Resources H Route 58 Talking Mathews wi II iams Landing I 349 ~ ENHANCEMENTS ALLOCATION of Dollars) FYOO TRANSPORT A T ION FEDERAL FUND (In Thousands FY95 thru PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS ~ BALANCE TO - - - COMPLETE 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 I 1999-00 ACTUAL ALLOCATION (Federal Share) 1994-95 ADD'L FUNDING REQUIRED FUND SOURCE OUS NG I I PREV FUND COST TOTAL 1995-96 528 000 8 350 1 35 100 525 660 528 EN EN 3 12 15 8 EN 130 450 035 615 000 , , , 1 1 1 PE R\I CN TO PE R\I CN TO DESCR I PT ION Pedestrian linkage IPE between visitor R\I attractions including CN streetscape TO improvements and riverwalk along the York River Conversion of dump area into a river park including river access, Hurricane Camille flood memorial and landscaping of scenic rest area c i Phase II including safety and aesthet improvements, pedestrian and bicycle access to Monticello and Park/Arboretum development OOlBS fferson IOri a l lI1dation OOlBS fferson r~way Ridge rra Club River Park .~ i BALANCE ROUTE TO NTY/CITY --I COMPLET TYPE LENGTH ~ County ~town \later eet erwa l k SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS nCluded in the Federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 199 (lSTEA) is the establishment of a Safety Improvement Program funded under the Surface Transportation Program (STP) of ISTEA. Ten percent of each state's STP must be used by safety improvements. ISTEA further directs that from this set-aside each state must, as a minimum, continue funding hazard elimination, rail-highway protective devices, and rail-highway grade separation improvements at the levels existing prior to the passage of ISTEA legislation. Following the preliminary recommendations of the SJR 188 allocation study, the General Assembly agreed to amend the 1993 State Appropriations Act to set aside funding for the Safety Improvement Program prior to the application of the system distribution formula. Projects are to be selected by the Commonwealth Transportation Board on a statewide competitive basis. This will provide the Board a better opportunity to implement the program required by ISTEA. Rather than charging the full cost of an improvement to a locality's construction allocation, the locality will be able to use the state matching share from its construction allocation to leverage the federal share of the proposed improvement. The improvements identified in this program were selected from a statewide priority list for hazard elimination mprovements and rail-highway grade crossings. * * * * 365 ., .<f: .. ROUTE COUNTY IC I TYPE LENGTH ~ SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (In Thousands of Dollars) 1994-1995 through 1999-2000 FEDERAL FUND ALLOCATIONS PROJECfED ACfUAL 1995 -96 1994-95 SYSTEM TOT. 1999-00 1998-99 1997 -98 1996-97 - th rade ects 7 Mi les 61,1 Turn Lane Improve ght Distanc 5 I Mi le - :hanan 'l i gn Curve Mile - ,ington 'ove Inmen ~n Pa Mile F i x( 7.217 7.217 7,217 9,259 9,259 20.953 500 ··..······..·....·..·....··....·..1' :}}:::::::::{:Z:·:·:';::I::-::::>g·:::·:·'s.::·:·:·:3::':':::::: ................ .... . .. ... .......................'.. .... ....,. ,', .... .... .................."".. .';';" ..... .... ~::::::::::::;::::::::::.:.:.:::.:...::.oP::::::,:.:.:.:.::;.:.:.::;:;: SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS FEDERAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY GRANT .. '::møm~Ii ~rrtrrrt:7:::::::I:Z:::::::::lrtæ:?:II ................. ...... ... "'1 ::::::::::{::::::::::::::;:::::.,:::t.:.:.:::,..::;:...:::::: ... if@:ffffH.ffiM~lØ: :::tf?:rr:fB,6.i:J.tb? ,~t~~i :::::::1 ::fff:{::{:f::::""f'Z':::::::'t::::tæ::::::t ...............rt...... .. ... ::tt::::::::::::::::::::::!);:::.:,::,.:::::::.::::::¡ "1 ¡¡¡¡¡.!¡¡:!¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡g;'Œg¡¡!! 366 :::;::::::::':::'::::::::::::9.:::::::::':::Sjf:a::: j¡:¡¡¡¡!::::¡::¡:::¡:::¡!¡:¡:i:.:;);~i~I ... ~ .. .'1 HAZARD ELIMINATION SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (In Thousands of Dollars) FY95 thru FYOO ROUTE ADD I L !UNTY/CITY ESTIMATED COST FUNDING ACTUAL PROJECTED ALLOCATIONS BALANCE TYPE DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS REQUIRED ALLOCATION TO LENGTH FUNDING STP FUND COMPLETE PLANNING ¡ENGINEER SOURCE 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Intersection PE 6 wth Route 775 RW- tall CN 51 -- . ... t-Turn TO 57 51 0 ..... 51 STP i····· .....<\ 13865 0011-086-V07 PE101,M501 ... ........ 'C\TA - 5.7 Miles North of PE 15 - ~ 1 th the Grayson County RW - ~rade Fixed Line - Grayson County CN 425 jects Line TO 440 - 396 300 96 396 STP 7 Mi les 12336 0016-086-S04 PE101,N501 61 12' Bus. - Intersection PE - , ~ of Wi se Route 757 RW- f:truct CN 245 .. aining Wall TO 245 - 221 200 21 . Install 221 STP : t- Turn Lane ; 14813 7023-329-V01 C501 j- 0.7 Mi le West of PE 160 I" Route 58A - 1.0 Mile RW 261 ... Turn Lane Wes t of Route 58A CN 380 . Improve TO 801 313 408 368 40 ht Distance 721 STP 50 Mile 11936 0058-052-V21 PE101 ,RIJ201 ,M501 2.7 Miles East of PE 3 ----- hanan Rout e 639 RIJ- l i gn Curve CN 275 TO 278 - 250 200 50 250 STP Mile 14815 0083-013-V12 PE101,C501 ::::¡::::::¡:::~W\~, . Route 762 - 0.7 Mil e PE 77 ~ :t~~tfib. ington N. Route 762 RIJ 119 I-- ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.....:.......:0:,. ove CN 491 grvnent and TO 687 605 13 13 !en Pavement 618 STP Mile 13866 0091-095-V04\PE101 ,RIJ201 '7501 ;RIJ202,C5 2 367 ¿ HAZARD ELIMINATION SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM n Thousands of Dollars) FY95 thru FYOO " RO COUNT T' LH ADD'L FUNDING REQUIRED STP FUND SOURCE ESTIMATED COST TY ROUTE COUNTY /C TYPE LENGTH ACTUAL ALLOCATION 994-95 BALAN' TO CC»IPL ONS PROJECTED ALLOCAT PREVIOUS FUNDING ON DESCRIPT 3 - Spotsy Extend Left-Tu 999-00 998-99 997-98 996-97 995 - 96 ~INEER 300 200 500 000 700 STP PLANN 2 3 2 PE RII CN TO of 10.0 Miles East Bristol - East Corporate Limits Bristol 647 lIashington IIi den Pavement and I~rove Al ignment i 100 700 ,900 2.700 17/360 Essex ¡hi ft CrossoVf l ign wi ide Str 0647-095- 15 15 115 145 131 4812 PE RII CN TO on Intersect Route 53 ght es e S 0.0 M 20 - Albemar I~rove Distance 3 00 3 STP 18 - tafford ut Slop. ~rove 50 RII20 0020-002-V25;PE101 5 20 25 23 STP 4854 PE RII CN TO on Intersect Route 666 29 Culpeper Construct Left-Turn Lane on Southbound Lane 23 23 C50 0029-023-V09:PE101 - 8 15 50 73 66 14694 PE RII CN TO Intersectlon Route 600 53 - Fluvanna I~rove Sight Distance 66 66 STP es or M50 0053-032-V02:PE101,RII201 15 20 80 15 04 STP 3976 PE RII CN TO e of o M 652 1.0 Mi le East Route 652 - 1 lIest of Route 208 - Louisa I~rove A l i gnment 24 80 04 M50 RII201 0208-054-V04.PE101 6 60 66 59 STP 3977 PE RII CN TO Bypass e Fork Route Four-M es 1 Spotsylvania Extend or Add Left-Turn Lanes at 6 Crossovers 2.0 M C501 59 0001-088-V17;PE101 59 4736 368 ·....«'" . flsltlbuted I> \Joa~) fIendt Item No. COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA JUt. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND. 23219 DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER Cc \ July 1, 1994 Secondary System Addition Albemarle County Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22901 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: As requested in your resolution dated March 16, 1994, the following addition to the Secondary System of Albemarle County is hereby approved, effective July 1, 1994. ADDITION LENGTH MILL CREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK Route 1000 (Stoney Ridge Road) - From Route 1165 to 0.23 mile Northeast Route 1165 Very truly yours, \~ 1<. ~ David R. Gehr Commissioner () -- I'~-U- ¿~8î f\LLni\ ~ 'D f I o.Jl IÌ', "j ~J TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY 0.23 Mi ORDINANCE NO. 94-2.1(7) AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 2.1, AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTAL DISTRICTS SECTION 2.1.4, DISTRICTS DESCRIBED OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, is hereby amended and reordained by amending Section 2.1.4 (u), Pasture Fence Agricultural and Forestal District, as follows: Sec. 2.1-4. Districts described. * * * * * (u) The district known as the "Pasture Fence Mountain Agricultural and Forestal District" consists of the following described properties: Tax map 13, parcels 1, 4, 5, 8, 10 and 12. This district shall be reviewed no more than ten (10) years from November 17, 1993. I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that this is a true, correct copy of a Ordinance adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a regular meeting held on July 13, 1994. ~....) {ll{Z ¡." / L t0U1 ! / . / ORDINANCE NO. \JtiuIed - ~ 7 glCfd ~ Item No. 4' 13-43C1 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 2.1, AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTAL DISTRICTS SECTION 2.1.4, DISTRICTS DESCRIBED OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Supervisors of the county of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, is hereby amended and reordained by amending Section 2.1.4 (u), Pasture Fence Agricultural and Forestal District, as follows: Sec. 2.1-4. Districts described. * * * * * (u) The district known as the "Pasture Fence Mountain Agricultural and Forestal District" consists of the following described properties: Tax map 13, parcels 1, 4, ~ 8, 10 and 12. This district shall be reviewed no more than X years from November 17, 1993. ADDITION TO PASTURE FENCE MOUNTAIN AGRICULTURAL/FORESTAL DISTRICT Pasture Fence Mountain District was created on November 17, 1993 for a time period of ten years. Location: Pasture Fence Mountain District is located adjacent to Shenandoah National Park, west of Mount Fair off Rt. 756. Acreage: parcels. parcel. Time Period: The proposed time period is the same as for the original district, or ten years from November 17, 1993. The existing district contains 870.42 acres in five The proposed addition contains 453.5 acres in one Aqricultural/Forestal Siqnificance: Land in the proposed addition is being used for forestry. Significant Lands Not in Agricultural or Forestal Production: The use value assessment program is a good indicator or the actual use of the property. Approximately 150 acres are enrolled under agriculture, and 303.5 acres are enrolled under forestry. However, the old pasture area is reverting to woodland; the use value records are being updated to reflect this change. Land Uses Other Than Agriculture and Forestry: There are no other land uses. Land Development Patterns and Needs: The Pasture Fence Mountain Area is steep, wooded, remote and undeveloped. Comprehensive Plan and Zoninq Regulations: Pasture Fence Mountain District is designated Rural Area in the Comprehensive Plan, and is zoned RA, Rural Areas. The nearest Growth Area is Crozet Community, a distance of approximately seven (7) miles to the south. A Comprehensive Plan objective is, "All decisions concerning the Rural Areas shall be made in the interest of the four major elements of the Rural Areas, with highest priority given to preserving agricultural and forestal activities rather than encouraging residential development" (p. 203). A strategy is, "Actively promote and support voluntary techniques such as agricultural/forestal districts..." (p. 53). Environmental Benefits: The Open Space Plan shows the Pasture Fence Mountain District area as recommended for mountain protection (above the 1,000 foot contour). The proposed addition is located within the South Fork Rivanna River Reservoir Watershed. Environmental benefits include protection of ground and surface water, drinking water supplies, wildlife habitat, open space and critical slopes. staff Comment: staff recommends approval of this parcel which connects the parcels in the existing district. The location is ideal for protection in an agricultural/forestal district. Advisory Committee Recommendation: The Advisory Committee at its meeting on May 23, 1994, recommended unanimously to approve this addition. (Minutes attached). Planninq Commissin Recommendation: The Albemarle County Planning commission at its meeting on June 7, 1994 recommended unanimously to approve this addition. ADDITION TO PASTURE FENCE MOUNTAIN AGRICULTURAL/FORESTAL DISTRICT TM/P TOTAL ACREAGE USE VALUE ACREAGE AG. FOR. NON-QUAL. OWNER DWELLI NGS 13-5 453.500 150.000 303.500 Stuart Johnson and John E. Sayre and Gaynell W. Johnson o (a:j~7.rpt) I W --l a:::~ <1: 2 w 1) .-J <1: I- o a:: I- en o " \\. \ -: --". . ""- o r o w Cf) r I- Z :::) o o W --l a::: ~ <1: 2 w CO --l <1: ~ :j 4 :I: w I- :I: ~ il ¡: J - ., , I ~ ;1 ~ ~ II r0 . ""'. z o r o w Cf) r I- Z :::) o o r z o \ r ~ \ 1\ . g f ..--./ . «! .. ~.. ~ r "~..,~ .-.J !) I I- o a:: I- (/J o of> -J '" -J < J: l.L I- J: ~ ~.; ~ / / J .. Advisory Committee Report May 23, 1994 The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by the chairman, Stephen Murray. Other members present were Joe Jones,' vice- chairman, Bruce Hogue, Jacquelyn Huckle, Marcia Joseph, Dan Maupin, Scott Morrill, Bruce Woodzell, and Gordon Yager. Rob Bloch entered the meeting later. Also present were Mary Joy Scala, Senior Planner and Anita Edstrand, a property owner in the Blue Run District. The chairman asked staff to present the report for Review of Blue Run District. There was some discussion of the time period. None of the property owners in the district has expressed an opinion regarding the time period. If the time period is to be changed from 8 years, then all the owners must submit new applications which reflect the new time period. If it remains at 8 years, new applications are not necessary. The final determination is between the property owners and the Board of Supervisors. Gordon Yager, District Conservationist, gave a soils report. The open land is used for grassland and pasture. The steeper land is woodlands. Wildlife is abundant here, especially turkey and deer. It is a good agricultural/forestal district. The soils are as follows: Class II 25% Class 12% Excellent for Hay III Class IV 17% Pasture Class VI 19% Class Woodland VII 27% Mr. Yager noted that the Southwest Mountains have some of the best site indexes for hardwood species in the County, possibly in the state. Anita Edstrand expressed her concern that the adjacent property owner (Kady) had plans to develop as soon as he was able to get out of the district. She said his land is very steep and he plans to put lots on the top of the mountain. She questions the benefit of the district of this could occur. She said that she and Young wanted to preserve the Blue Run valley, but now she may have to sell her property. 1 · The chairman told her she should let the Board of Supervisors know how she feels. He said this Committee can only address the review of the district. Ms. Scala said she told Ms. Edstrand that it would be a benefit for her to remain in the district because the Board of, Supervisors must take into account the presence of the district when the adjacent property comes in for development approval. Even if the approval is by-right, a buffer has been required in cases in the past. However, if Ms. Edstrand plans on selling the property, she may wish to withdraw for that reason. Ms~ Edstrand said she understood it is difficult to withdraw from a district before the time period, however, she could join again at any time. Therefore, she confirmed that she wants to withdraw her property at this time. Ms. Joseph noted that the withdrawal of Ms. Edstrand's parcels nearly divides the core into two parts. Ms. Joseph suggested that the Committee discuss extending the district to 10 years. It was noted that a recommendation from the Committee was not binding on the property owners. Ms. Joseph made a motion to accept the staff report, and to recommend a change in the time period from 8 to 10 years. Mr. Maupin seconded the motion. The Committee unanimously approved the motion. The chairman asked staff to present the Addition to Pasture Fence Mountain report. staff noted the remote location adjacent to Shenandoah National Park. Mr. Yager presented the soils report. He said it is all mountain land: Class VI Class VII 22% 78% Woodland Mr. Maupin noted that there is no longer pasture in this area. Mr. Woodzell said that the use value records would be updated. Mr. Maupin noted that the 7 mile distance to Crozet, the nearest Growth Area, would be much greater by road travel. 2 · . Mr. Jones noted that they tried to get this parcel into the district when it was originally approved, but there are a lot of heirs who needed to agree on it. They finally were able to meet and come to an agreement. Mr. Maupin made a motion to recommend approval of the addition. Ms. Huckle seconded the motion. The Committee voted unanimously to approve the motion. The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. 3 (í' ~ -------"------ /J J , / i' / .' / .~ /' /. .;y_-" I ," I \ ,I / -,' \ ~~~.. / :" I Iv ~ / ~ \ '- ~ . -----~~ ) / ~--~ ..------f" \ ~ / ~ ,,/ ./ 'y > /1 \ NORTH FORK MOORMANS ~" k RIVER NF DISTRICT / / / / /o.~ . I r \ f \) ~, .., ! I , \ ~ ¡ I I . ----- --7 . -------~' .~~) ft>1'PVf£'(/C IS/1 (46"- ~~~f/l7 ! iJ.,f/ ,(J L: Ý E Ü. ð w . (),(!.¿; t5- ~ ..---- '---- ~X3Ò¡/E ~_/ ~-- --,J ì-- (I {/ ~. ':> ... .- .... YfPIO'r-r H."" I !J1r;T'l!(",¡ <;F~TION 13' - -\--::'""---"" .,.. WHITE HM_l D:STr.rGT I I . -, 0 ~íl 'it ~~ \ \ [ "i \ ¡ I: D ~'It J.~w~l/I))))))))\\' j / ,,- '~,iI\'- -, <; ,!I}/ I' \/::.-0::/ "\\\\'\\-~' 12'bo" ¡'¡{) Ii ( II' /8/1! ' ~ / -- I)" \ ~~: 'h~,/Ør !II U I I~II ,,_'0 ,~c5/;:;;:¿;/ é ' , ,," ~ \ v, ,~ ù ,,-/" I'" "- , ,Ii I '¿'I'"..'\IO:: ~ '. 'r'<~ \~ ,'1\\' i/{. 1 ,/ ' ;I .! II \ OÞ \~ 'Î II , \i ÌI\\""~0 '" .' " -'tï ' ' , : \, ';-¡'~ ì, \\\~ '~7}j(~ ~~'l $ \,-' .¿ --~ ~8i I ',. \,\\\\,~;~"" 'I JflU " ~ '- ~~~~ ... ~~'-~\\ \\' '\\"~~ i))/ m " 7"//:-'='=" ~~,~:",~:,,\iY-'f~,'(ØI ~ (\()ré; 1./ I ¡,¡~~ I\~' I~, )\ ,\.",' , , \ ~ Dm~ \ \ ~- - k' ~ )1'" ,_ 'I. 0 I \ ~ \' \~ //1 ¡'\ 'r ~ I~_~ J\\\~~;~~(( ~ ~~4ì) ~\ )));" '~ ~) ,~~.c') ¡~ 175"-:1Î.L~~~'f~ ~?-j~ ,I" '1(!!/3~~" (/I~f~ I~~)~ .~~"".\J I ~~) i~,~"" zoO )\\\<~~~J ! ~~~. (\ 'lr\ '1J~ $\,~~""""" .... ,"" =-' I II ( '/H)' ~ <~<\\ \ r;:;,');,~~I)~{' ~ ' \I" r 1;'", " \" '-"< I) IY). iJ\ ~ .- /'''' ,,/~ S~ ~\,~" ~~: í ' "fft~I' · ri ¡í ::, ~~~__~~--'~;;7fFUí/ \ \ 4229~~~~~ '~~~/~/IJ· I{~ ~lil, f))\...~~ ~I¡'~,\. Þ;:+'4Øl{:ý;~C~-- _ _ ~ ~'b \ ~"f)\\1~ ,I ~ ~ ,. .' II '"~\;,''' ,,"," ~ ~'S.-s-J ,) ~ ~(/I,,:i) [.;' .~;' ,~, \':\ \ ~~~~/ìi!..:.:~ {; _..,~,~...... ~ \\\"~_'fj__.,,,j//iJ. ., . "~'\\\ \''':~''~' ~." ~~'ifjìi{~1 ':\ - -7 ... :: ,.1//8 vJ) \\."" , , ' ~~~ ' .'-'l:>~ :''',Ò} . ' ." ~, (. . 'W~!¡ý/A;)Jt"- ~ ~ÞI 0: i .... ':, \i.~.~' ~ ~ ,~a " 'I'//f/Il(¡,: ~jl, '!h)&J!t)))))'!{f! ~ .="~ ~Æi.~)~"\Ù {r[{t~~(C\ (Ç~ f/~' ~,~, '~)<;<:~~5\ i,;>' 7::'JI~ ' ' '-'\\\\1 \$ " ~""" \,¡¡¡j\~' . ,~,~ I Jffil !)) )\~,~~~ ~((I,,, 1 .'\.C( ""¡,~1! ~ fb:/ ~ ~ I ~)r·~\~~'· I (<<'@I \ ~ \ < (~, j~~ .-;:¡ II , (/) "" »~ J I" ,'\ I ~ ') D j ,~ I~;( ~,.....v '~ ,\ ,\ If/A II ~~ , · _: ~ ,-,,<.<..0 :~, ~ ,({ 011' ~.~ íF-~: 'ft ",w ' , ' , r,'êißI0 (f!')j, , Gf'-\ ' T.. @ ,,~ '.,~.: ~ ; ¡) II ./~ '¡/?/), ,t. ' ' jf¡)1 ¡It:: F ,;¡ '\\\' ' '" ~ (/ 0$)1' 1\\ ~1~JJ!Il~flj/·'.J y.J;, ,- , N, /' ~\\ 1\1" ,':.\ <t ~{, (P ))1)\'I~~~-; >;'J) -, -",-, m ."...1 #ll~, ~[J( : t: \~ rnll/,0~Ø11;Yi q, -' ç-- ~'~ ,~:, '0)' ri~.I\\\(1 ,\I,~' ?!)1~1~ ~~~~r!(~~~~ }' ~f~!/;,~I~\'~\~I(I~' f 0~f,~~'\ ìì .~1»}-::4-!~}J1«~~ \ "" ~~\ I~ ~~~ \i~~,~>\\\( b i, 0(rm \~J ~))"M\'~I~ K~8 ,-'. ~;,. . _ ~;'f(~ ~ ,~/;:; ?t' "-, I'J ~' l~)" ' .. ~_.) , :s: ') J, I / I 'f02è 1¡1?,fi,I';?'¡ r , "...' ";", : " I , ,,/ I II' ',11<\ ,,' /.r'''''', Y' ~ " I~ /~ I ,'\ /<: I / r ~ '~/." '"" "''-'0 'j-- .'" ,;<~' "y r/// IT ,," !,.m 0:,' / " 1--;'-' .If ~ ,~ ;~ ~ ¡~ ,y\Y¿IJD¡/r' ( ,.t' /).. °1\' ~ . ~~J ,'; ~ 1':;'1:Y¿(~' ..1 ¡/':, ,á~~I»lif((ri, ,~~" ' ~>;A~~Qd, ~' -) ,~l!~ "" m I II II ORDINANCE NO. 94-2.1(6) AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 2.1, AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTAL DISTRICTS SECTION 2.1.4, DISTRICTS DESCRIBED OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, is hereby amended and reordained by amending Section 2.1.4 (d), Blue Run Agricul tural and Forestal District, as follows: Sec. 2.1-4. Districts described. * * * * * (d) The district known as the "Blue Run Agricultural and Forestal District" consists of the following described properties: Tax map 35, parcels 22, 22A, 23, 24A, 26, 26B, 26C, 29, 29B, 31, 32A, 43; tax map 36, parcels 9, 20; tax map 49, parcels 24; tax map 50, parcels 5, 5B, 32A, 45B, 47, 47A, 47B. This district shall be reviewed no more than eight (8) years from June 18, 1994. * * * * * I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that this is a true, correct copy of a Ordinance adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a regular meeting held on July 13, 1994. I 7 ¿l>le; h {JL ;) " . t ø.trHwtod m qj ¿' B· qiJ ~ Item No. . 113· 'iL/o ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 2.1, AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTAL DISTRICTS SECTION 2.1.4, DISTRICTS DESCRIBED OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, is hereby amended and reordained by amending Section 2.1. 4 (d), Blue Run Agricultural and Forestal District, as follows: Sec. 2.1-4. Districts described. * * * * * (d) The district known as the "Blue Run Agricultural and Forestal District" consists of the following described properties: Tax map 35, parcels 17, 17A, 22, 22A, 23, 24A, 26, ~ 26B, 26C, ~ 29, 29B, 31, 32A, 43; tax map 36, parcels 9, 20; tax map 49, parcels 4A, ~, 24; tax map 50, parcels 5, 5B, ~ 32A, 45B, 47, 47A, 47B. This district shall be reviewed no more than eight (8) years from June 18, 1994. * * * * * , - , . COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596 (804) 296-5823 June 10, 1994 Harold E. Young, Jr Spencer F. Young Harold E. Young, Sr Frank A. Thomas, III Tr Drew C. or Elise Pinkow Arena Ralph or Mary E. Morony Florence Robinson Cox Margaret G. Augustus Mark or Ellora Young Richard B. & Hazel D. williams Anne S. Zimmerman RE: Blue Run Agricultural/Forestal District Review Ladies and Gentlemen: This letter is to notify you as an applicant that the Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on June 7, 1994 recommended unanimously that the Blue Run District be approved with a time period of eight (8) years. The Albemarle County Board of supervisors will hold a public hearing and make a final decision on Wednesday, Julv 13. 1994, 7:00 p.m., Meeting Room #7, Second Floor, County Office Building. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~~ Mary Joy Scala Senior Planner MJS/jcw ~ Ella Carey , , ~ COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596 (804) 2965823 June 10, 1994 E. Ritchie Fishburne, ETAL Martha H. Fishburne Elaine B. Fishburne John E. Sayre RE: Addition to Pasture Fence Mountain Agricultural/Forestal District Ladies and Gentlemen: This letter is to notify you as an applicant that the Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on June 7, 1994 recommended unanimously that the Addition to Pasture Fence Mountain Agricultural/Forestal District be approved as submitted. The Albemarle County Board of supervisors will hold a public hearing and make a final decision on Wednesday. Julv 13. 1994. 7:00 p.m., Meeting Room #7, Second Floor, County Office Building. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, M~S:::- Senior Planner MJS/jcw ~ Ella Carey j r . STAFF PERSON: ADVISORY COMMITTEE: PLANNING COMMISSION: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: MARY JOY SCALA MAY 23, 1994 JUNE 7, 1994 JULY 13, 1994 REVIEW OF BLUE RUN AGRICULTURAL/FORESTAL DISTRICT ADDITION TO PASTURE FENCE MOUNTAIN AGRICULTURAL/FORESTAL DISTRICT Purpose: The purpose of an agricultural/forestal district is "to conserve and protect and to encourage the development and improvement of the Commonwealth's agricultural/forestal lands for the production of foods and other agricultural and forestal products..." and "to conserve and protect agricultural and forestal lands as valued natural and ecological resources which provide essential open space for clean air sheds, watershed protection, wildlife habitat, as well as for aesthetic purposes." Factors to Consider The following factors must be considered by the Planning Commission and the Advisory Committee and at any public hearing when a proposed district is being considered: 1. The agricultural and forestal significance of land within the district and in areas adjacent thereto; 2. The presence of any significant agricultural lands or significant forestal lands within the district and in areas adjacent thereto that are not now in active agricultural or forestal production; 3. The nature and extent of land uses other than active farming or forestry within the district and in areas adjacent thereto; 4. Local developmental patterns and needs; 5. The Comprehensive Plan and, if applicable, the zoning regulations; 6. The environmental benefits of retaining the lands in the district for agricultural and forestal uses; and 7. Any other matter which may be relevant. Effects of a District: 1. The proposed district provides a community benefit by conserving and protecting farmlands and forest; environmental resources such as watershèds, air quality, open space, wildlife habitat; and scenic and historic resources. \ " ". 2. The state Code stipulates that the landowner receive certain tax benefits*, and restrictions on public utilities and government action (such as land acquisition and local nuisance laws) to protect the agricultural/forestal use of the land. In exchange, the landowner agrees to not develop his property to a "more intensive use" during the specified number of years the district is in effect. *since Albemarle County currently permits all types of use value assessment, a district designation may not provide any additional real estate tax reductions. Land in a district is protected from special utility assessments or taxes. 3. The state Code stipulates that, "Local ordinances, comprehensive plans, land use planning decisions, administrative decisions and procedures affecting parcels of land adjacent to any district shall take into account the existence of such district and the purposes of this chapter." The district may have no effect on adjacent development by right, but could restrict proposed rezonings or uses by special use permit which are determined to be in conflict with the adjacent agricultural/forestal uses. Districts must now be shown on the official Comprehensive Plan map each time it is updated. 4. In general, a district may have a stabilizing effect on land use. The property owners in the district are making a statement that they do not intend to develop their property in the near future, and that they would like the area to remain in the agricultural and forestal uses. . Adjacent property owners may be encouraged to continue agricultural uses if they do not anticipate development of adjacent lands. REVIEW OP BLUE RUN AGRICULTURAL/FORESTAL DISTRICT Blue Run District was created on June 18, 1986 for a time period of eight years. An addition to the district was approved on January 4, 1989. Procedure: A 1993 amendment to the state Code made review of districts optional rather than mandatory. The Board of Supervisors has established a procedure to determine if a review is necessary. In this case, a review has been determined to be necessary because several of the property owners have chosen to withdraw from the district. In conducting a review, the Board shall àsk for the recommendations of the local Advisory Committee and the Planning Commission in order to determine whether to terminate, modify, or continue the district. The Board may stipulate conditions to continùation of the district and may establish a period before the next review of the district, which may be different from the conditions or period established when the district was created. Any such different \ . conditions or period must be described in a notice sent to landowners in the district, and published in a newspaper at least two weeks prior to adoption of the ordinance continuing the district. Unless the district is modified or terminated by the Board of Supervisors, the district shall continue as originally constituted, with the same conditions and period before the next review (8 years) as were established when the district was created. When each district is reviewed, land within the district may be withdrawn at the owner's discretion by filing a written notice with the Board of Supervisors at any time before the Board acts to continue, modify, or terminate the district. Location: Blue Run District consists of a core area located east of Rt. 20 North, and on Rts. 640, 641, and 777. Two additional areas within one mile of the core are located on Rts. 640, 645, and 231. Acreaqe: The original Blue Run District contains 4,134.75 acres in 29 parcels. The area being reviewed consists of 3,634.891 acres in 22 parcels. Requests for withdrawals have been received for Sally M. Carle (50-7), Darren J. or Deborah Kady (35-17 and 17A), Anne S. Zimmerman (49-4A and 4A5), and Anita Edstrand (35-26A, 28 and 28A). Time Period: The time period for Blue Run District is eight (8) years. Aqricultural and Forestal Siqnificance: Land in the district is being used for hay, pasture for cattle, horses and sheep, and forestry. Significant Lands Not in Aqricultural/Forestal Production: The use value assessment program is a good indicator of the actual use of the properties. Approximately 1,027 acres are enrolled under agriculture; 2,552 acres are enrolled under forestry; 23 acres are non-qualifying due to dwellings; and 33 acres are not enrolled. Land Uses Other Than Agriculture and Forestry: There are 19 dwellings in the Blue Run District. Land DeveloDmental Patterns and Needs: The Blue Run District area consists of large farms and scattered r~sidences. The Southwest Mountains divide the district. ComDrehensive Plan and Zoning Regulations: Blue Run District is designated Rural Area in the Comprehensive Plan, and is zoned RA, Rural Areas. The nearest Growth Area is Hollymead Community, a distance of approximately five (5) miles to the southwest. J. A Comprehensive Plan objective is, "All decisions concerning the Rural Areas shall be made in the interest of the four major elements of the Rural Areas, with highest priority given to preserving agricultural and forestal activities rather than encouraging residential development" (p. 203). A strategy is, "Actively promote and support voluntary techniques such as agricultural/forestal districts..." (p. 53). Environmental Benefits: The Open Space Plan shows the Blue Run District area as either important farmlands/forests or recommended for mountain protection (above the 700 foot contour). Rt. 20 and Rt. 231 are designated Virginia Byways and Entrance Corridors. The entire Blue Run District is located within the Southwest Mountain National Register Rural Historic District. Historic sites are Keswick Farm, House, and outbuildings, Edgeworth, Maury School site, and Sunnydale. Blue Run is designated a major stream valley. Blue Run drains into the Rapidan River, the water source for the Town of Orange. Environmental benefits include protection of ground and surface water, wildlife habitat, open space, critical slopes, and the historic landscape. Staff Comment: Blue Run District is an extremely important district, considering the number of resources it helps protect. Staff recommends continuation of Blue Run District for as long as the property owners wish, (8-10 years). [Note it has been determined that the property owners want an 8 year time period.] Advisorv Committee Recommendation: The Advisory Committee at its meeting on May 23, 1994 unanimously recommended to accept the staff report, and to recommend a change in the time period from 8 to 10 years. (Minutes attached). Planninq Commission Recommendation: The Albemarle County Planning Commission at its meeting on June 7, 1994, unanimously recommedned approval with a time period of 8 years. TM/P TOTAL USE VALUE ACREAGE WNER DWELLINGS ACREAGE AG. FOR. NON-QUAL. 35-31 351.500 189.000 159.500 3.000 Harold E. Young, Jr 2 35-23 34.932 34.932 0 35-268 17.827 16.827 1. 000 Spencer F. Young 1 35-43 11.689 2.838 8.851 0 35-26C 195.930 108.776 86.154 1.000 1 35-26 31.620 17.172 14.448 0 35-32A 11.900 11. 900 0 35-29 27.300 27.300 Harold E. Young, Sr 0 35-29B 50.043 50.043 0 36-9 122.078 122.078 Frank A. Thomas, III, Trustee 0 35-22 445.560 445.560 0 35-22A 8.520 7.520 1. 000 1 35-24A 1.030 Drew Charles or Elise Pinkow Arena 49-24 522.750 8.000 511. 750 3.000 Ral 2 50-47 1,117.114 325.114 788.000 4.000 Florence Robinson Cox 2 50-47A 2.000 1 50-478 71.600 30.600 41.000 0 50-32A 25.860 Margaret G. Augustus 0 50-5 512.658 267.764 242.894 2.000 3 50-5B 8.900 3.900 5.000 2 36-20 3.880 Mark C. or Ellora Young 50-45B 60.200 57.200 3.000 Richard B. & Hazel D. Williams 2 TOTAL 3,634.891 1,027.191 2,551.930 23.000 19 / ALBEMARLE COUNTY ALBEMARLE COUNTY ~ BLUE RUN AGRICÙL TURAL/FOREST AL DISTRIC EW JJ \ .____""-_-=--_-o._;.:-_---'~ RIVANNA DISTRICT SECTION 49~__:~"'-~~' "'="- R IVANNA DISTRICT SECTION 50' ... ."..,...,.."","".·,,,.v·,,.,...,,..o,,...,,> '. J , ADDITION TO PASTURE FENCE KOUNTAIN AGRICULTURAL/FORESTAL DISTRICT Pasture Fence Mountain District was created on November 17, 1993 for a time period of ten years. Location: Pasture Fence Mountain District is located adjacent to Shenandoah National Park, west of Mount Fair off Rt. 756. The existing district contains 870.42 acres in five The proposed addition contains 453.5 acres in one Acreaqe: parcels. parcel. Time Period: The proposed time period is the same as for the original district, or ten years from November 17, 1993. Aqricultural/Forestal Siqnificance: Land in the proposed addition is being used for forestry. Significant Lands Not in Aqricultural or Forestal Production: The use value assessment program is a good indicator or th~ actual use of the property. Approximately 150 acres are enrolled under agriculture, and 303.5 acres are enrolled under forestry. However, the old pasture area is reverting to woodland; the use value records are being updated to reflect this change. Land Uses Other Than Aqriculture and Forestrv: There are no other land uses. Land Develooment Patterns and Needs: The Pasture Fence Mountain Area is steep, wooded, remote and undeveloped. Comorehensive Plan and Zoninq Requlations: Pasture Fence Mountain District is designated Rural Area in the Comprehensive Plan, and is zoned RA, Rural Areas. The nearest Growth Area is Crozet Community, a distance of approximately seven (7) miles to the south. A Comprehensive Plan objective is, "All decisions concerning the Rural Areas shall be made in the interest of the four major elements of the Rural Areas, with highest priority given to preserving agricultural and forestal activities rather than encouraging residential development" (p. 203). A strategy is, "Actively promote and support voluntary techniques such as agricultural/forestal districts..." (p. 53). Environmental Benefits: The Open Space Plan shows the Pasture Fence ~ountain District area as recommended for mountain protection (above the 1,000 foot contour). The proposed addition is located within the South Fork Rivanna River Reservoir Watershed. Environmental benefits include protection of ground and surface water, drinking water supplies, wildlife habitat, open space and critical slopes. J . . staff Comment: staff recommends approval of this parcel which connects the parcels in the existing district. The location is ideal for protection in an agricultural/forestal district. Advisory Committee Recommendation: The Advisory Committee at its meeting on May 23, 1994, recommended unanimously to approve this addition. (Minutes attached). Planninq Commissin Recommendation: The Albemarle County Planning Commission at its meeting on June 7, 1994 recommended unanimously to approve this addition. ::::::.:::.jóbtttðkfÒÞÁ~tû~~~éibi~iriÂí~Â~~jæBùüti~ijtt~fÁM:'H~i¡ìti ...._-..-.....--,....." ". ..............--.-............... ........... ....----........"... .......",.".............,.., ..... c' .....................-............... ............ .................... '," .................................,.,. . ................................ . ...............-................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. ..................... .................. TM/P TOTAL ACREAGE USE VALUE ACREAGE AG. FOR. NON-QUAL. OoINER DIÆLLI NGS 13-5 453.500 150.000 303.500 ----- Stuart Johnson and John E. Sayre and Gaynell W. Johnson o (a:june7.rpt) >- I- Z ~ "~f'~ o .0,.......... -- j<"'N ) / o t- O w (j) >- I- Z :J o o l- e a: W ...J o:::~ <1: 2 w CD ...J <1: U. l- I .... - ., r - ( I ~ '\ \ "'r" ! - => z 0 o a: - C) - \ g f ./ ~"''- . ..~~ I J ''?- '----1-_.1 ) I ~.; I , . . , . Advisorv Committee Report Mav 23. 1994 The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by the chairman, Stephen Murray. Other members present were Joe Jones,' vice- chairman, Bruce Hogue, Jacquelyn Huckle, Marcia Joseph, Dan Maupin, Scott Morrill, Bruce Woodzell, and Gordon Yager. Rob Bloch entered the meeting later. Also present were Mary Joy Scala, Senior Planner and Anita Edstrand, a property owner in the Blue Run District. The chairman asked staff to present the report for Review of Blue Run District. There was some discussion of the time period. None of the property owners in the district has expressed an opinion regarding the time period. If the time period is to be changed from 8 years, then all the owners must submit new applications which reflect the new time period. If it remains at 8 years, new applications are not necessary. The final determination is between the property owners and the Board of Supervisors. Gordon Yager, District Conservationist, gave a soils report. The open land is used for grassland and pasture. The steeper land is woodlands. Wildlife is abundant here, especially turkey and deer. It is a good agricultural/forestal district. The soils are as follows: Class II 25% Class Excellent for Hay III 12% Class IV 17% Pasture Class VI 19% Class 27% Woodland VII Mr. Yager noted that the Southwest Mountains have some of the best site indexes for hardwood species in the County, possibly in the state. Anita Edstrand expressed her concern that the adjacent property owner (Kady) had plans to develop as soon as he was able to get out of the district.' She said his land is very steep and he plans to put lots on the top of the mountain. She questions the benefit of the district of this could occur: She said that she and Young wanted to preserve the Blue Run valley, but now she may have to sell her property. 1 ~ . The chairman told her she should let the Board of Supervisors know how she feels. He said this Committee can only address the review of the district. Ms. Scala said she told Ms. Edstrand that it would be a benefit for her to remain in the district because the Board of, Supervisors must take into account the presence of the district when the adjacent property comes in for development approval. Even if the approval is by-right, a buffer has been required in cases in the past. However, if Ms. Edstrand plans on selling the property, she may wish to withdraw for that reason. Ms~ Edstrand said she understood it is difficult to withdraw from a district before the time period, however, she could join again at any time. Therefore, she confirmed that she wants to withdraw her property at this time. Ms. Joseph noted that the withdrawal of Ms. Edstrand's parcels nearly divides the core into two parts. Ms. Joseph suggested that the Committee discuss extending the district to 10 years. It was noted that a recommendation from the Committee was not binding on the property owners. Ms. Joseph made a motion to accept the staff report, and to recommend a change in the time period from 8 to 10 years. Mr. Maupin seconded the motion. The Committee unanimously approved the motion. The chairman asked staff to present the Addition to Pasture Fence Mountain report. Staff noted the remote location adjacent to Shenandoah National Park. Mr. Yager presented the soils report. He said it is all mountain land: Class VI Class VII 22% 78% Woodland Mr. Maµpin noted that there is no longer pasture in this area. Mr. Woodzell said that the use value records' would be updated. Mr. Maupin noted that the 7 mile distance to Crozet, the nearest Growth Area, would be much greater by road travel. 2 · Mr. Jones noted that they tried to get this parcel into the district when it was originally approved, but there are a lot of heirs who needed to agree on it. They finally were able to meet and come to an agreement. Mr. Maupin made a motion to recommend approval of the addition. Ms. Huckle seconded the motion. The Committee voted unanimously to approve the motion. The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. 3 · 'H~ . 10 QeAf oj; r~q q. t'oV'í1 ~~ Ii 10 ~J¡~~_cgm ..' .dül/ !:-1~~ ~/ I , :~æM~ Q~ ib ~... c&l5bm¿) ~~~. -rA-)\ Nt!p Go - ~ ~ .. 'd IC1Wll ...... _io,~.tQæ, ~... uJ¿ . ,'~.. m~m~oLL- .. - -800.L m o (jI) G\.v..Lì; ---- -- -- , .1.- u g?~01.~_~ ~fCEIVED ~3 ¡qqL} PI~!~~~ ¡~:! 1~~)rt· ·.<_n ¡ ! , . . L ... . RICHARD A. DAVIS ATTORNEY AND COUNSELLOR AT LAW n 408 EAST MARKET STREET . ~~C~\~\:.V SUITE 201 B ð~ .ý P.O. Box 2487 ~ q \qq~ CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22902 ~~~ ~ oe?-\EA CODE 804 (\\{\9 979-5980 '('\ð.{\ FAX (804) 977-7930 March 29, 1994 Mary Joy Scala, Senior Planner Albemarle County Dept. of Planning & Community Development Albemarle County Planning Commission Albemarle County Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 RE: Blue Run Agricultural/Forestal District Review Tax Map 35-17 - 11.044 Acres Tax Map 35-17A - 186.848 Acres Owners - Darren J. & Deborah Kady Dear Ms. Scala, the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors: Please be advised the my clients, Darren and Deborah Kady, elect to withdraw by right from the referenced Blue Run Agricultural/Forestal District and submit this written notice as directed by correspondence from the planning commission and the brochure. Please call me if you have any questions. yours, Richard A. Davis RAD/klh cc: Darren J. & Deborah Kady ,t II ,.'." ... ;:¡ECEMVED MAR 2 9 1994 Planning Dept. 27 Mar-ch 1994 County of Albemar-le Boar-d of Super-visor-s ATTN: Mar-y Jo Scala, 401 McIntir-e Road Char-lottesville, VA Dept of Planning & Community Development 22902-4596 Dear- Ms. Scala: , Although I believe I had successfully withdr-awn my pr-oper-ty fr-om the Ag-For-estal distr-ict after- my for-eclosur-e pr-oceeding of Mar-ch 1, 1993, I am r-esponding to your- notice of my r-ight to withdr-aw pur-suant to the cur-r-ent pr-oceedings. Even though I have withdr-awn or- am withdr-awing at this time I r-emain a suppor-ter- of the Ag-For-estal concept. However-, I have placed my pr-oper-ty for- sale and do not wish to encumber- its tr-ansfer- to the new owner-. I have, wher-e appr-opr-iate, encour-aged pr-ospective pur-chaser-s to r-e-join the Distr-ict at their- ear-liest oppor-tunity. Thank you. Sincer-ely, ~ Anne S. Z' mer-mann par-eels 49-4A 49-4A5 é- l..·;;'· ¡:.~, t ! L~.CG 'J ·L< / . <7 ~ 2.1 lQqy l ¡( /-) f., ,C- /'-t:-{~ ( L' I fir c:/nu í?¿ .( ~ ~~~ 1 £UJtUú '. /}1, S¿c&~ I tk-&~ GnS' ~~:kók ~ ~ðC~ ~ )q;¿ ~ ~{;L Q ~ ì t'-JL . L W æo (1,u~' ~~~ -t-i L~~ uk-. W~ d{¿,i rW¡-~~ k~ ð<..Ð¡¿- ¿hz¿j) h ~ ~ ~~ (~&w-ai U~. We- tuwL ;¡cr ~«- ~ ~ ~ ~ £:]i (Wit-- L.6ki15k. ~ JÌt.¿ iku~Øllu1í€b tÍ..t~MvJ- ~ í'b ,~ to k ().. iìuZ~ ~ct rw; k ~ ~w& &.\ ~€M. ~ ~~ ~ 6k -;:h ~ . ÅUk~ ~I ~~~ AN r\ A f.YSTt2-At0]) ~ \ "Öo>, ..it b1) '3-kf-'Þ()~\)ll-LE:. ) Vir t2.cq~ f~ E C EJv t~:\ij\ ,Sit¿ l41M- -fõ -/JIL 4f U1vJ1J'1 ~V1j\¡f~~ MM~ ~i 0 199~1 ~~ r;vJ ~ -£tJ. P-{L{ lAZU. J.¿J i{ ~"" .1'1 t'n i¡ c:.q¡ (j t" , a I ,! I I ~1 IJ ~f Ì'" ~. \pr~~L<a.W fµc, Ct~ fuMcJ) i!HI ¿~, - YYu:-" .. ..... Ii RICHARD A. DAVIS ATTORNEY AND COUNSELLOR AT LAW 408 EAST MARKET STREET SUITE 201 B P.O. Box 2487 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22902 1 . , , ""''''.''''./ AREA CODE 804 979-5980 FAX (804) 977·7930 March 29, 1994 Mary Joy Scala, Senior Planner Albemarle County Dept. of Planning & Community Development Albemarle County Planning Commission Albemarle County Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 RE: Blue Run Agricultural/Forestal District Review Tax Map 35-17 - 11.044 Acres Tax Map 35-17A - 186.848 Acres Owners - Darren J. & Deborah Kady Dear Ms. Scala, the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors: Please be advised the my clients, Darren and Deborah Kady, elect to withdraw by right from the referenced Blue Run Agricultural/Forestal District and submit this written notice as directed by correspondence from the planning commission and the brochure. Please call me if you have any questions. yours, Davis RAD/klh cc: Darren J. & Deborah Kady '1· J3 .qLj AGENDA ITEII NO. ~. OrJJ 3 . ~ I -r ~~-Qid ·12- AGENDA ITEM NAME J oeJd / Db L£1cL ~ DEFERRED UNTIL 6· ~ I q Y DATE Form.3 7/25/86 Ðtstributed II Board: 1, 00 ·q,4 . It!ndt Item No. qg~1ß.JjLf~ COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept of Planning & Community Development 401 Mcintire Road JUN Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5823 .. ~ . -~ .-_____A. June 8, 1994 Harcros Lumber & Building Supply, Inc T I A Moore's P. O. Box 2908 Roanoke, VA 24022 RE: SP-94-14 Harcros Lumber & Building Supplies, Inc Dear Sir: The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on June 7, 1994, unimously recommended approval of the above-noted request to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that this approval is subject to the following condition: 1. Issuance of Certificate of Appropriateness by the Architectural Review Board~ 2. While the items placed in the display areas may vary, the display area shall be limited to areas highlighted on the plan initialed Y AH and entitled "Attachment B" of this report. The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this request and receive public commetn at their meeting on July 13, 1994. Any new or additional information concerning this request must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors seven days prior to the scheduled meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. ~i~ 4~ Yolanda Hipski Planner cc: Ella Carey Amelia McCulley Jo Higgins 1 e . . STAFF PERSON PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD OF SUPERVISORS YOLANDA A. HIPSKI JUNE 7, 1994 JULY 13, 1994 fSP-94-014) - HARCROS LUMBER AND BUILDING SUPPLY Petition: Harcros Lumber and Building Supply Incorporated (T/A Moore's Lumber) petitions the Böard of Supervisors to issue a special use permit for outdoor storage display and/or sales serving a permitted use visible ITom an Entrance Corridor street (30.6.3.2[b]). Property, described as Tax Map 78, Parcel 16, is located on the south side of Route 250 approximately 400 feet east of Route 20 in the Rivanna Magisterial District. Zoned HC, Highway Commercial and EC, Entrance Corridor.This site is recommended for Regional Service in Neighborhood 3 (see Attachment A). Character of Area: This property is currently developed with Moores Building Supply. Applicant's Proposal: Originally, the applicant proposed placing 4 sheds, a deck. a swing set, lawn, fence and mulch for display. These items will be adjacent to the existing building (see Attachment B). After further discussion with the applicant and the Architectural review Board, the applicant intends to delineate approximately 25 x 7 feet along the building and locate the sheds along the fence. PlanniDl! and Zonine Historv: lSDP-240) Moores Buildine Supplv Site Plan - On July 17, 1972, the Albemarle County Planning Commission approved a site plan to locate a 5,600 square foot addition to an existing building. lSDP-91-076) - Moores Buildine Supplv Maior Site Plan Amendment - November 26, 1992, the Planning Commission approved a proposal to locate two sheds totalling 8,250 square feet. Summarv and Recommendations: The original site plan did not provide for outdoor storage sales or display areas. During staff review of the 1991 site plan, the Zoning Administrator determined that in order to allow outdoor display, the applicant must obtain a special use permit. The Architectural Review Board has reviewed this plan (see Attachment C). The use shall not commence until a Certificate of Appropriateness has been issued by the Architectural Review Board. With the Architectural Review Board addressing aesthetic issues, staff has confined its review to physical aspects of the proposal. The Zoning Department recommends deleting two or four spaces parking located in the middle parking area in order to provide a 20 foot travel lane. 1 e . . Staffhas reviewed this application for compliance with Section 31.2.4 of the Zoning Ordinance. Given Architectural Review Board issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness, this use should not change the character of the district. Given staff review of a minor site plan amendment, this use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and should be in harmony with the purposes and intent of the regulations of the Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Issuance of Certificate of Appropriateness by the Architectural Review Board; 2. While the display items may vary, display areas shall be limited to areas highlighted on the plan initialed Y AH and entitled "Attachment B" of this report. Attachments: A-Location Map B-Proposed Location C-ARB Information 2 I I I I I I . -----..\ ,\ I I I I 1 -' " I I I I I C horloltesvi lie I RtserWH , I I 4jJ 9t:ãJ I .'------ ~ ~. $' Ca.'.' Mln '1 I I ~ \ "', '- Q~ [§J' ~ "-ð \ '""«>', \ " , I " , r../" ;' , I "- I ~ ' '10 ~ [!yJ-] , , , .. " , ,,, , , ,. Bt, , '- ': '. \.. , , RPd_ \ ': \~1j j~~ ..~ ~':;.\... ',\ WIII\ >.J ..~ 0' .. t> 600 '\@'- , .-' 7 . t.,...~ ""' '. ~"" .. l6iõl 'oo"...~ ~-.. \...., .. h .....§II IlliJ \ ~ ... " ~ ...:.t,.11:j " , , .-'/ ;.:: . " p "C?: ~ <? SP-94-l4 Lumber & Building .. .. , , ~..~~ / e<,_",," ~ ~ ..., <c v o (, \>' ~ ~ '< ,a::r I ->.. ..... ~ , r·"-- , '- o " , I I , , , I , , [110,1 , , , ' , I , , I I I ~ F' / /-------~ e ALBEMARLE COUNTY 62 I ATTACHMENT A I [ Page 2J . :..) f.._ --" '" . ""- . ----1 MONTICELLO u ~ ""J ___.~~.~. /,;::f~ .---- /'- /(.... - \ - /1- ~//-_/\'-_J(~' \ ..~. ~'J /j -r- ) / _::::.-----'~ '_l_'j~....{ / -y}~/ \K \ /' -l.¡~.". I .-:.71 ) SCAU Iff FEET _. ... ,_ ~_ SCOTTSVlLLt A / RIVANNA . DISTRI~~S . ... --- SECTION 78 .' i 0:::> \"\ 10:::' Jf;.:;;:~~~l\~~~~~'~~q - o7:"·,':'!~r.- '-- /J ~ ~1d..~.. _6/,//9'--___ ·~~r41. Cc""lY' st'I"lc~iJthorltr "'~r.r________~_ -f- ""AUh Or".,t..r"t .~.~L'-r~~7c ÎG;;-.-'ò;:;~~{~~~t- J3jJf.'ik ",-"1l:qP?_~l.1J'lL_ lon1nq tlrp'ltl'\n\ -------.--.- --- .(( ~V^t.fI ..," ~ f , ) ¡.::..: --> , ! ;\h; ~..,"I ,.. ~- - - -- (hor-Ir. _C~t.:..~____ ....... .. ...... .. ',::::::::. ==I- I -1- ._J.-~ c. Sect-J.o", x--v - -... ...---------- 1" . '0 tt ~~_.!~_1!. ðol.~........ ...-- ton:ht1l of un. e .ltt·34y occuplt'~ !uppJ)' on lIout. J. on'lJ' 9,.,15ln9 to 0":(,' .,ea outlined; tl to. the ne..... y~fd ~; I':t.. plohet ; ....0 new o~tn ItO: he Install.:r.llCln ' ton:lI c!r.an prior II. o.,,::! by f.!LICICi). L\;:';:;'.. r...,.. Itlo141r.9 .. "oolc.1 )00. 'nl project h b:: O"'",cUon ..tth V1rçlnh L_ ,,}nd 0..1\01. rel pIO~:tt:r 1. I . rontd IUç~.....:r.y I c.1 1'. 1'. IUp '} , rer~tton ....s oþt.1nt~ fIe;,:, "zttl",r r. [d.....r/h, .nt H: h~d p.:uc:~h l)C , U 'ö:!:lt i'. Count)' T.a. r..p"., und,'_· c: .urve)' "".S ptrforc:.cð C.L.t.. ð.H~d April H. ;,:: .. r~ ,,·11 11'1 utl1!ty ~ ~ .., .. '.';. ..I 101)-)'~,;¡r 110005 lor.. .liS Id~nttf sev.r lines or ..t.:'I'I.... In conjunction ..ath pro: 1'11101'1 I a pl.nñtd l tviou51y pJ.annl'd .. In P.antops dr.aln: 01 I_ Aubr.y ",,¡ffr eDt!nt ....Ith Albtoar loc.t,d CO:-'::"lcl cont.::.ln .'p .=~ ty .V.1.C I~ .-.".16:/ .1: '1',' '1 ,-~. T' s n ,:.JJ.''- J¡Jv< ~:':;~. J" ! ._;{ :: ! / .J): ,,' I, 1-- 1,\: r"~ I .I C:~~'I~ - I^ .,. -1.: : ~ I: ; Ii : ¡ ~ L" 0 ,"1 II - - ct'. -, ....0..,,, \ ð L - ~. --c==- ! ~ ~ : , .' ;~~~:'~-:~§'::i,~~' !,;:;,~-------- ""~ ~ ~) .. E"ß,sr",,,,( £ß.... 'tIf..,.ç Sr·~~F r. .c ........(. ".TI. I?C......"F~ - I -"hIe 5.·...101 -c.- ~... :-' R~.,~..~ (.. Lf'_q) _, __ _ .___ , n "E-\.t.. -----~------------~-~--~~:~; h· I, t Pr I: It .. :.; ~ )" ~'~ t ~ B3:CO:::l-H.l. Inc.. 0,. ", ,. &&., r._. '& _ ",. (& -- , ". ~. IC....ln S~lth P. 17 .... ..... ....- '"1.. II?~Q",'" ..... -, ......-----. ,...£. . Itf:..... -- / , / , -.......;j-- ":'<:-:: - ~,- ,; ,;,.;; - - - ~::_"'-'::' - --:"- . - - - - - - - .- '¿:ø,.. II r .. 7 __...-, ,....~~TC\ A~ - JSS .. I>.antops Ottlce 114Q. T""O J¥'J.1t 0,. ., , ~ " .-------------- . .. ,...:.:L·.!:..E.J..~~'___Í:l·tJ~u..r_1.1 . . &"Jl r.I'CL:O, at ;. at. p~1 lOCO. , .~ - ·.oc:y-wlntec 11'1 at 1/1 lb. pec lOCO l:.Þ..!.!.~".~. . I...U hl.c.,;a .t I U:s Fer lCOO ., A~r.I.::Jl 1)'- at 1/2 lb. p~¥ HOG ., ~~!' t.-.L...tÞ_"~"...Lt-':.::.~~. .c...Jl t:::-c~. ct I It-I fee- Uto .t eCH.:" c.Jllc.t i.t 1/2 It-. ru H(O If t.!'.ru.r:.~J~LtJ'...~.J'-.1.~' &-!J. fuc\:Q «t I St.. rt!1 lOCO II &ar.col. KrO .r.t 1/2 lb. r'l l[CD I.'. I.lt.o r"c'IIl(c Lr.d c~,I)' III cccol'(rr,c. ..1th ar.ll,:LtlJ' ct.:.r.C:.:rto ... 1. ru1\"rhcd cçrl'cvltcrcl l"r:~rt(.r.. ct it, ltIa rc:c 1000 ct J.," ~-2C:-1.O "l'tll1l:'(1 Lt , Ib:l. ptr lOCO ). ):-C'-O fClltlJlI:c.1' ct J lta. rlr ICeo c 'i'c::pita:...r;¡ (ce.:lr., 1c: to cc.r.a::1ct .t cr.nl"o1 t;¡CÇI...::a «[';,,11'4 Æt . 1,0.1.0 at 1 1/2 It:». CCI' lCcO ct - , , , , , I;VlrC]1n14 L..:....--::1.Tl"'\:t. D ð. 7,T ,. '.J ~,... "I' _ ",., I.. , , \ , I , , , , , , , " , , , , " Vlr1,jJlnl.:a .L..,¡:r.cI Tn.I:c.t. 0" ,J< , ., r_ ." -,.., tJd9 ,.. Oll1e ~.:.r'tc;" t;í;,'~ .n H'..tlon per't.alnlnq to ..IntIS Iro::ll .. ....rlet)' 11~ld v.rUled prIor Hty I. to b, on TH .I1Hf . t. -~1-: I.olnn:'''',". -~ï,. '.1".),. cr..Jbh¡,,'t c",., .~ ~:>tclflc'l1y t¡ P"'r,Hlr~~t wl11 ".) b.' o p""! t ~ \011 ~.., 'J! vHer tint' ertC'r t..ð In fror:t of f IIn~ piJn~ ,t,..l thr AJ::'!~.:¡r1t C.. ,j.:."21. .n' It 11'911 I'll to It. çr.aðln1 I. . nd .='t!:::ef,t. "'.II' . pr 0"" IC ~A,'L ~('... , .... ~l~.. IßI" ~ ......... ~.., 1 ,.,..r C..'I,....~ "'_···'Ir ~'; " ..... '" ~ ~ 1.1 'I'~':¡ ~: I I~ 11,1,1 . 11,1 ..' ': . I, , . 1 J~ ~ ('_!. . I r. ' " . : J t '..." , ..., ..,1....., : .., * - < /; i ~ St..er. ..; .'\ ~\- i'" ~) ~ '9.:r 0'>' ...1 ~ I j ;.."~...t-"" c,(')'\J :;~ ~ ~~ t~,' .,' ~: _ ~rH Ill__ III ft.~.. .V1r'J}nLoJ l.<!"d TruJt., ./ 08 ,,-I I" '1''''''' "lJ ~ l'lh\'· .tÓU,q ~~h\el,:io " rur lII"n n.:l..'..., Jbl "nl-y In. '. , , I , , , , I , , , ' , ~ I...... \ . , , , '...- -~"":..' "fill. if-.. £0 t.'. uad : øl 'Moore-s' ",..hlet,. "dlJC'~'~td ItJtul.al" , , ~ ili~:~:~!:l~:;~i~;;, ,~~~~:~::~, ;~~:~,~:,ì:' ~: \ ~:~:I::I"! .:~i~~';. :. .:~:: :~:.:''':.:'Z"''': \\~:~::, :\,\ ., ",:..o.t. ...hn .lll..... .~... '\ \ \ \ ::::~~M~_:~~'"::~·:~::: ~~:~.:r.:~:~: :ï,:'~,~':L:~ ::...~~:::~~ t.h' ,. -: ..I..,. "r".' ,~...\ \ \ ::l ~~:;:.~,.~~~:,: '";:I:"~c~;'~:~;:"~l ;~~.~ ::':.'::":;~~~,:~"I""< IIU c'~¡.c. ., U .. ,\,~U\ "U .U~.U. 1110.. _".n . J-I"c~ ,~.~ ".~"'h\ 1I',"'.r ",..., II..~ .IU) .., too ,..qo.o.l..<I...... 1.,,,.\ :r~ ":::1 ~'~~'·I: I~":: :~-:::. ~:: ~::'. ~:.~:~":::1.7: i.~ ..d.,.,.CU,,",.\. ~~i·~t~~l;'~llli·~~:)I:~:,f1;p'~~.. V.Io.. .~....I.. ..u<l .n ....:.... .114 H.U M "I"'~". ·';"'I'UU ,1,. - (10.. III. U1,":n.th. IDr u..!.. _1\. c~:o~ It.n~..:. '~I '"' U2H ~1 "'. u... "":"'I.,·o.ø ....Ilf"IIl... ....!:,....... '''al .'~.I..I 1,,11 ,IL~ lor '''" Co.'"" " All.:..I. .... r.H 0.0<."..11 ...~lcnl "11¡I.t. t.;..v:u.1 t.."'.....\I\IO<\ Ivwr ::;::::!1:: I::Î ::Z;:g::;:;: ;:::~ ::. !i:~; ~~!~~ '!t' 1Io.!UI..." IOr--1.. &.:.~¡u uuUltt.u .1 .:....¡~. Jéít' 1~:~£~/Æ, (¡1L- !!.:'~~i-!Y ,. .. , _ ,¡.., ~.....". ! PJ<ln M~J()¡"cs Lumber & DuilùlIl£ ~l1pplLl \I~2~:.ín j\lbcmar1~ COD-TIt!). ·Vf~i.Îii;ia DeVClOiHr.!:::r tc s -~/!'. '-¡,'.J¡ /'-;'<1·3' "../.. ,/ ~-""·,/t 4 - ".-... ~ -'(-.'!- dull h. .'í 't"~ I' ¡~ fì;i';~t tT!;?m:·~·E:~[ }.~:';::\'~F;~:: . . . , N~t"l V~'o' plnu "~!f\ phÞ~~d. .n·d ¡;·NÙ~'~;EU~.':-/~ . . ,~ [L---------J ~:~~~.~~ :~:~:<;~::;"~'~~;~ ::::- ::::' ::~~::~.:,,~:.." 'H" . -=-~:~::~;:~. .~_o n -: ,,,,,, ..¡.... - ".,1" ~ _.. .... ll. .,...) ,cz<!!,,,," .. c~,..,rt... r..t ,."'t..,.....; ...,~y" Jìl...!-I. ¡;: ", :'.: '..' ~,-"..;},~-J\::-.J~- . '. \., .. .' . .I~ '- I '.-.. ..'... -··.f '....r;....J.~. (.·.U" <t~t~J.."tw,...~ ~~"L ð"'''',"d) ~..?_" ft'·. . ~fS1:~'·~~l::~:~ ':::~;',:;;':'~ :: L~~~, ,:' :'~'~.\"":'-r;}:,}{ ¡.', . 0:;', . '. ':" ~_~~~~~'~~'.~:'¥'~. ~;--,~ 11!.€ -';/,,', . ~~¡"'L. .,. ¡ii\W~,fg¡i¡!¡t.\¡j~~l:';) ,~ l if, ~ / ; ¡ . e I ATTACHMENT CI COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Zoning 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5875 FAX (804) 972-4060 TDD (804) 972-4012 May 18, 1994 Mi,) 1 f, ì9S! Gary Huffman 3517 Brandon Avenue P.O. Box 2908 Roanoke, Virginia 24022 . Re: ARB-P(SDP)-94-1O Moore's Lumber Tax Map 78 Parcel 16 Dear Mr. Huffman: The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board reviewed the above noted item at its meeting on Monday May 16, 1994. The board has no objection to the request for a special permit for outdoor sales and display, and has granted staff administrative approval of the certificate of appropriateness if the following information is submitted and approved: 1) Installation of a wood fence (5' tall and partially opaque) designed to obscure the view of the items displayed (see enclosed plan). 2) The fence should be located in the area parallel and perpendicular to Route 250E, on the front of the building from the entrance to the corner of the building closest to Route 250E (see enclosed plan). 3) The enclosed application form must be completed and the appropriate fee submitted. If you have questions please call me. . . cc: Bill Fritz '" DATE 1tl~~~ AGENDA ITEM NO. q4 0113· qL}3 AGENDA ITEM NAME ])~OU.6/V;V-DU'",') 4ð Orc&pr¡Cl..L DEFERRED IIN'l'IL ,,3 J pu túÍ' J ~a Litì~ ŒCij J I Q4, Form. 3 7/25/86 . "' David P. Bowennan Charlottesvil1e Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. ScottsviUe TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 M E M 0 RAN DUM Board of Supervisors -OJ LV Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC~ July 8, 1994 Reading List for July 13, 1994 Ulstributed ~ Board: 1, æ -It 1"1 4gendt Item No. @.. 01/3· /o.-j' Charles S. Martin Rivanna Walter F. Perkins White Hall Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller July 1, 1992 - pages 13 ..( )L1 (#8) end - Mr. Martin 1~Ll( EWC:mms * Printed on recycled paper \ , Acme DIST~UTED T~"U ,'MòMBERS ON . cf3 Tel: 804-823-4351 Fax: 804-823-1625 Design Technology, Co. 1000 Allview Drive, Croze!, VA 22932 June 30, 1994 Ms. Ella W. Carey Clerk of Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Dear Ms. Carey: The following is Acme Design Technology, Co.'S May 1994 operating results: Sales, Marketina & Service: Our May bookings were below our 1994 May plan but considerably ahead of May 1993! Our bookings were $570,135 vs. a plan of $790,000. Bookings for May 1993 were $400,582. Mav 1994 Product Plan Actual Variance DataVue $ 8,000 $ 4,510 ($ 3,490) (43.6%) Visible Steel $ 95,000 $ 36,502 ($ 58,498) (61.6%) Product Service $ 65,000 $ 41,368 ($ 23,632) (36.4%) Storage Products $522,000 $352,499 ($169,501 ) (32.5%) Freight/Misc. $ 10,000 $ 14,360 $ 4,360 43.6% OEM $ 90,000 $120,896 $ 30,896 34.3% Totals $790,000 $570,135 ($219,865) (27.8%) Product May 1994 Year-To-Date Plan Actual Variance DataVue Visible Steel Product Service Storage Products Freight/Misc. OEM $ 40,000 $ 475,000 $ 315000 $2,165:000 $ 50,000 $ 395,000 $3,440,000 $ 25,894 $ 240,779 $ 167,128 $1,377,365 $ 70,943 $ 591,011 $2,473,120 ($ 14,106) ($234,221 ) ($147,872) ($787,635) $ 20,943 $196,011 ($966,880) (35.3%) (49.3%) (46.9%) (36.4%) 41.9% 49.6% Totals (28.1%) Ma 1993 vs. Ma 1994 Product Actual 93 Actual 94 Variance DataVue $ 5,704 $ 4,510 ($ 1, 194) (20.9%) Visible Steel $ 95,792 $ 36,502 ($ 59,290) (61.9%) Product Service $ 39,153 $ 41,368 $ 2,215 5.7% Storage Products $168,583 $352,499 $183,916 109.1 % Freight/Misc. $ 9,258 $ 14,360 $ 5,102 55.1% OEM $ 82,092 $120,896 $ 38,804 47.3% Totals $400,582 $570,135 $169,553 42.3% As I stated last month, our visible steel shortfall is very large. We had budgeted an increase of $10,000 per month over last year's actual. I again believe we are on track when you look at May to May. We will rebudget based on our May for- ward results. I will attempt to have this to everyone in early July. Storage prod- ucts continue to lag from where we should be. Total Quotes Month Received May 94 78 2 76 Quotes Turned Into PO's Dates PO's Received 13 1/Sep. 93 1/Jan. 94 1/Mar. 94 6/Apr. 94 4/May 94 YTD 94: 373 21 352 47 The close ratio is the second highest for the year. Workable quotes remain very high. In fact, in June we have not been able to keep ahead of the incoming quotes. Manufacturing, Material & EQuipment: Our order position is much improved over the last couple of months for the fac- tory. Our bookings for the first five months have been $2,473,120 with our shipments at $2,156,209. This gives us a carry-over of $316,911. At the end of the first quarter, our carry-over was only $122,520 which caused a lot of our factory problems in April. As stated last month, if our orders available to the factory are two to three weeks of open orders, our performance should be excellent and our costs very much in line. Our material purchases of steel have been much too high over the last couple of months. This will be brought in line in June. Enaineerina & Qualitv: Our Engineering work load is very high. Most of our storage products and OEM require some engineering. We are trying to funnel all the work through four key people who also have factory and quote responsibility. In some cases, pres- sures are more than they can effectively handle. I will be looking to redefine some responsibility. Our quality remains high in all areas. The reports from the field on storage products is very good. Hopeman Brothers, Inc. and other OEM accounts say they never worry about products produced for them from Acme. OEM: A new OEM account is A. J. Associates, Inc. of Charlottesville, VA. They are an engineering company with radar antenna systems as their specialty. We have been manufacturing some radar prototypes for them out of aluminum. I am not sure of the volume of work we might expect in the future. Thus far it has been very low. We continue to strive for at least one new OEM account per month. Financials: Our over 90-day accounts increased slightly from April: Days: 0-30 $547,798 43.3% 31-60 $280,187 22.1% 61-90 $204,220 16.1% 91-999 $233,562 18.5% Total $ % $1,265,767 100% Note Attachment A for complete details of the major over 90-day accounts. Commercial Filing & Storage, whom we had a suit against, paid the $5,467 during May. We had two additions this month -- Acme Business Systems for $10,428 and Plug-In Storage Systems. Both are slow pay and use Acme. Plug- In will probably go up next month before coming down. We will collect both ac- counts. Note on the balance sheet the addition of Deferred Income Taxes in the amount of $66,000. This now brings our balance sheet current to the audited statement. We also put an additional $50,000 into the business in May. This brings our total contribution this year to $125,000. :L~,dI Thomas D. Hall President ahd Enclosures ATTACHMENT A May 31, 1994 1. Absolute Filing Solutions $ 20,254 Former master distributor. (Working out @ $500/monthly.) 2. Acme Business Systems $ 10,428 Slow pay. 3. Commercial Products Company $ 21,352 Has been turned over to a collection agency. (Has been to Crozet to discuss with me.) Working on GSA business on the West Coast. 4. Hagiazo-Systematic Storage $ 64,239 Suit in process; May 1994 hearing. 5. Innovative Business Systems $ 3,249 Slow pay. Will work out. 6. LFI Associates $ 5,353 Slow pay. Will work out. 7. Medical Forms & Equipment $ 11 ,446 Have personal guarantee. Attorney is working on. Seeking judgment. 8. New England Visible $ 13,850 $1000/month plus commissions. Will work out. 9. Office of Fiscal Operations $ 15,709 Installation delayed; building not finished. 10. Osborne Office Systems $ 38,150 This dealer is working with the U. S. Fish & Wildlife account. 11. Plug-In Storage Systems $ 7,335 OEM account that is slow pay. 12. SES Contract $ 3,074 Slow pay. Will work out. 13. Star Production Services $ 9,305 Suit in process. Will collect. Judgment issued for $16,000. 14. U. S. Fish & Wildlife $ 4.755 Dealer layout incorrect. Will supply more equipment. (Will pay.) Should see payments in next two months. Sub Total: $228,499 97.8% All Other: $ 5,063 2.2% Grand Total: $233,562 100% ACME DESIGN TECHNOLOGY, CO. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE Pursuant to the Security Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of January 28, 1993, between ACME DESIGN TECHNOLOGY, CO., (the "Company") and NATIONSBANK OF VIRGINIA, N .A., the undersigned President of the Company hereby certifies as follows: 1. The Company is in compliance with all terms, covenants, and conditions of the Agreement that are binding upon the Company. Compliance with the financial covenants as of the statement dated ..May 31, 1"994 . is outlined below: (a) Ouick Ratio. Maintain a ratio of (i) cash plus accounts receivable to (ii) Current Liabilities of not less than 1.0: to 1.0 as of the end of the Fiscal Year ending December 31, 1993, and at all times thereafter. Cash $ 30,937 Accounts Receivable +1,104,081 Total $ 1,135,018 Current Liabilities $ 1,072,557 Ratio: 1.06 (b) Current Ratio. Maintain a ratio of Current Assets to Current Liabilities of not less than 2.0 to 1.0 as of the end of the Fiscal Year ending December 31, 1993, and at all times thereafter. Current Assets Current Liabilities $ 2,255,853 1,072,557 Ratio.: 2.10 (c) Total Liabilities less Subordinated Debt to Ad;usted Tanqib1e Net Worth. Maintain a ratio of Senior Indebtedness to Adjusted Tangible Net Worth as of December 31, 1993, and at any time thereafter during the respective applicable periods set fo~th below, of not more than the ratio set forth opposite such date of period: Date of Period 12/31/93 1/1/94 - 12/31/94 Thereafter Ratio 3.5 to 1.0 2.5 to 1.0 1.5 to 1.0 Total Liabilities Subordinated Debt Total $ 2,439,049 - 400,000 $ 2,039,049 Net Worth Intangibles Subordinated Debt Adj. Tang. Net Worth Ratio: $ 364,953 78,445 + 400,000 $ 686,508 2.97 (d) Debt Service Ratio. Not permit its Debt Service Ratio as of December 31, 1993, and at any time thereafter during the respective periods set forth below, to be less than the ratios set forth opposite such applicable date or period: '. Date or Period 12/31/93 1/1/94 - 12/31/94 Thereafter Net Income Depreciation & Amort. Other Noncash Charges Other Noncash Income Cash Flow Interest Expense Principal Paid Cap. Lease pymts Fixed Charges Ratio: (e) Ratio 1.0 to 1.0 1.3 to 1.0 1.5 to 1.0 $ (152,210) + 44,550 + -0- -0- $ (107,660) $ 52,729 + 95,877 + 3,509 $ 152,115 (1.41 ) Capital Expenditures. Not make or permit any Subsidiary to make Consolidated Capital Expenditures at any time during the respective applicable periods set forth below, if the Consolidated Capital Expenditures would exceed the amount set forth opposite each such applicable period. '- . ApPlicable Period 1/1/93 - 12/31/93 1/1/94 - 12/31/94 Each calendar year thereafter Amount $100,000 100,000 150,000 Applicable Period: 1/1/94 - 5/31/94 Net Fixed Assets at start of period: Net Fixed Assets at end of period: Depreciation charged during period: Capital Expenditures during period: $ 443,824 - 413,074 + 31,497 $ 747 2. The representations and warranties of the Company set forth in the Agreement and all representations and warranties which are contained in any certificate, document, or financial or other statement furnished pursuant to or in connection with the Agreement are true and correct on and as of the date hereof with the same effect as if made on the date hereof. 3. Immediately prior to and immediately after the making of any Advance requested to be made pursuant to Section 2 of the Agreement, no Event of Default (as defined in the Agreement) will have occurred and will be continuing under the Agreement. 4. The Borrowing Base (as defined in the Agreement) as of May 31, 1994 , calculated in accordance with the Agreement, is shown on the Schedule annexed hereto and the Borrowing Base is equal to or exceeds the aggregate principal amount of the Term Loan outstanding to the Company ~an~ to the/Ai'd7nt. ~ £:¿'-MIf-- Title: President Dated: ACME DESIGN TECHNOLOGY, CO. Schedule to Borrowing Base'Certificate Computations are as· of May 31, 1994 I. COMPUTATION OF NET SECURITY VALUE OF INVENTORY INVENTORY (valued at lower . of cost or FMV at FIFO) LESS: Inventory charged off or written down as unsaleable $( $ 1,059,313.97 Other unqualified Inventory $ ( $ 1,059,313.97 ELIGIBLE INVENTORY x .50 NET SECURITY VALUE. - INVENTORY $ 529,656.99 Page 1 of 3 ·. Acme Design Technology, Co. II. COMPUTATION OF NET SECURITY VALUE OF ACCOUNTS TOTAL ACCOUNTS LESS: Affiliate or Employee Accounts Accounts not Invoiced Accounts :more than 90 days past due Disputed Accounts Insolvent Debtor Accounts Foreign Accounts Consignment Accounts Government Accounts Unshipped Accounts . Other unqualified Accounts ELIGIBLE ACCOUNTS NET SECURITY VALUE - ACCOUNTS $ $( $( '$'(' . $( $. ( $ ( $ ( $ ( $ ( $( $ x $ 1,265,766.98 233,362.02 1,032,204.96 744,153.72 Page 2 of 3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) .75 Acme Design Technology, Co. III. BORROWING BASE VALUE Net Security Value - Inventory $ Net Security Value - ~ccounts $ Total Net Security'Value $ 529,656.99 774,153.72 1,303,810.71 Page30f3 Pa9~ '. [ .. 06/15/94 00:52 mass1~ Curr~nt Period Compared to Prior Periods For Periods Ending MAY 1994 Acme Design Technology Co BALANCE SHEET This Period Last Period Chang~ From Last Year Change From Description Balance Balance Last Period This Period Last Year ------------------------. ----------- -- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------------.. CURRENT ASSETS CASH 30,936.57 52,662.06 (21,725.49 59.013.22 (28.076.65J ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE INSTALLMENT RECEIVABLES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - CUST 265,766.98 197,629.61 68,137.37 .168.899.16 96,867.82 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - GOVT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RESERVE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCTS 147,645.44) 149,535.70 1,890.26 [120,589.58 (27,055.86) RESERVE FOR EST CREDIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE CONTRA (1'4,040.65) (14,040.65 0.00 C37, 441 .33 23,400.68 -_. ----------- --. ---------- ---------- ----------- ...--------------- TOTAL ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 104.080.89 034,053.26 70.027.63 ,010.868.25 93,212.64 INVENTORY FINISHED GOODS 175,214.50 157,950.46 17.324.04 236,298.14 (61,023.64) FINISHED PARTS 522.050.06 489,855.89 32,194.17 585,891.12 (63,841.06) WORK IN PROCESS 51,270.90 62.704.13 : 11 ,433.23 53,769.00 (2,498.10) RAW MATERIALS 361,989.41 340,846.78 21,142.63 551,399.19 (189,409.78) FACTORY SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CAPITALIZED INDIRECT COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INVENTORY CONTRA ACCOUNT (87,945.75) (87.945.75 0.00 810,704.98 722,759.23 --- ----------- --- ---------- .--------- .---------- .-------------- TOTAL INVENTORY 022.639.12 963,411.51 59,227.61 616,652.47 405,986.65 OTHER CURRENT ASSETS ADVACES TO EMPLOYEES 3.300.00 3.040.00 260.00 2,800.00 500.00 TRANSPORTATION CLAIMS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OTHER RECEIVABLES 28.896.72 30,047.72 (1,151.00 34.710.87 (5,814.15 NOTE RECV - RELATED PARTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NOTE RECV - CUSTOMER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NOTE RECV - EMPLOYEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INTEREST RECV-RELATED PRTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 66,000.00 0.00 66,000.00 0.00 66,000.00 --- ---------- --- ---------- --------- ---------- -------------- TOTAL OTHER CURRENT ASSETS 98,196.72 33,087.72 65,109.00 37,510.87 60.685.85 --- ---------- --- ...--------- --------- --------- ------ ------ TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 2,255,853;30 2.083.214.55 72.638.75 724,044.8 53 808.49 2 Pag~ 06/15/94 03:30 maSSle Current Period Compared to Prior Periods For Periods Ending MAY 1994 Acme Design Technology Co. BALANCE SHEET This Period Last Period Change From Last Year Change From Descr1ptlon Balance Balance Last Period This Period Last Year ------------------------, ----------- --- ---------- ---------- .------------ --------------- NOTES RECV - RELATED PARTIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT LAND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 IMPROVEMENTS TO LAND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BUILDINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 451,662.98 451,662.98 0.00 440,775.00 10,887.98 FURN, FIXT & OFF MACHINES 34,840.67 34,840.67 0.00 34,094.00 746.67 EQUIP. UNDER CAPITAL LEASES 2?,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 TRUCKS & AUTOS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CONSTRUCTION IN PROCESS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ----------- --- ---------- ,--------- ------------ --------------- TOTAL FIXED ASSETS - COST 516,503.65 516,503.65 0.00 474,869.00 41,634.65 ALLO~ANCE FOR DEPRECIATION 103,429.98) (97,130.49 (6,299.49 (30,988.52 <72,441.46 ----------- --- ---------- --------- ------------ --------------- NET FIXED ASSETS 413,073.67 419,373.16 (6,299.49 443,880.48 (30,806.81 OTHER ASSETS PREPAID INSURANCE 24,417.66 28,194.41 (3,776.75 14,339.33 10,078.33 PREPAID RENT 7,771.51 7,771.51 0.00 12,000.00 (4,228.49 OTHER PREPAID EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,409.61 (3,409.61 PATENTS LESS AMORTIZATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEFERRED ORGANIZATION EXPENS 78,444.92 80,487.05 (2,042.13 99,133.38 (20,688.46 OTHER DEFERRED EXPENSES 24,440.77 25,009.16 (568.39 0.00 24,440.77 --- ---------- --- ---------- --------- ------------ -------- ----- TOTAL OTHER ASSETS 135,074.86 141,462.13 (6,387.27 128,882.32 6 92.54 --- ------ -- --- ---------- ----- -- ----------- -------- ----- TOTAL ASSETS 2,804,00 83 2,644,049.84 59,95 99 2,296,807.6 507 94.22 3 Page Current Period Compared to Prior Periods For Periods Ending MAY 1994 Acme Design Technology Co BALANCE SHEET Last Period Change From Last Year Change From Balance Last Period This Peri'od Last Year ---------- .--------- ..---------- --------------- 506,890.65 49,130.78 225,623.71 330,397.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,301.31 2,209.84 1,059.31 2,451.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44,912.13 (4,944.69 27,491 .68 12,475.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ---------- .--------- .---------- --------------- 553,104.09 46,395.93 254,174.70 345,325.32 50,693.16 945.79 62,562.80 (10,923.85 87,324.38 12,143.01 99,610.73 (24,429.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26,927.94 4,881.42 2,224.08 29,585.28 5,806.56 0.00 19,938.92 (14,132.36 (271.91 3,255.79 6,102.75 (3,118.87 ---------- --------- ---------- --------------- 170,480.13 <3,060.01 190,439.28 (23,019.16 199,092.00 8,523.00 35,088.00 172,527.00 8,421.72 0.00 0.00 8,421.72 89,132.94 466.75 82,505.00 7,094.69 ---------- --------- ---------- --------------- 296,646.66 8,989.75 117,593.00 188,043.41 ---------- --------- ---------- --------------- 020.230.88 52.325.67 562,206.98 510,349.57 This Period Balance ---------- 556,021.43 0.00 0.00 3,511.15 0.00 39,967.44 0.00 0.00 ---------- 599,500.02 51,638.95 75,181.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,809.36 5,806.56 2,983.88 ---------- 167,420.12 207,615.00 8,421.72 89,599.69 ---------- 305,636.41 ---------- 072,556.55 06/15/94 04 7 maSSle DescriptIon -------------- -------- CURRENT LIABILITIES ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TRADE PAYABLES PAYROLL ~.H. FEDERAL PAYROLL U.H. STATE & LOCAL SALES TAX OTHER ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DEFERRED INCOME - SERVICE DEFERRED INCOME - PENSION DEFERRED INCOME - OTHER TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ACCRUED EXPENSES SALARIES & UAGES COHMISSIONS PENSIONS/PROFIT SHARING FEDERAL INCOME TAX STATE & CITY INCOHE TAXES TAXES - OTHER INTEREST OTHER ACCRUED EXPENSES TOTAL ACCRUED EXPENSES CURRENT PORTION LTD BANKS OBLIGATIONS-CAPITAL LEASES OTHER-NOTES PAYABLE TOTAL CURRENT LTD TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 4 Page 06/15/94 05:59 massie Current Period Compared to Prior Periods For Periods Ending MAY 1994 Acme Design Technology Co. BALANCE SHEET This Period Last Period Change From Last Year Change From DescriptIon Balance Balance Last Period This Period Last Year ------------------------ ----------- --- ---------- ,--------- ------------ --------------- LONG TERM DEBT NATIONS BANK - NOTE #1 FIXED 103,793.23 112,316.23 (8,523.00 276,320.23 (172,527.00 NATIONS BANK - NOTE #2 LINE 315,000.00 330,000.00 15,000.00 200,000.00 115,000.00 VA. ECONOMIC DEV. AUT.-VRLF 535,768.50 543,204.70 (7,436.20 617,495.00 (81,726.50 VEDCORP INC. 400,000.00 400,000.00 0.00 400,000.00 0.00 OBLIGATIONS-CAPITAL LEASES 11,930.77 12,632.58 (701.81 0.00 11,930.77 ----------- --- ---------- --------- ------------ --------------- TOTAL LONG TERM DEBT 366,492.50 398,153.51 31,661.01 1,493,815.23 ( 127,322.73 DEFERRED INCOME TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CAPITAL COMMON STOCK 20,000.00 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00 DEBENTURES PAYABLE 125,000.00 75,000.00 50,000.00 0.00 125,000.00 PAID IN SURPLUS 480,000.00 480,000.00 0.00 480,000.00 0.00 ---------- --- ---------- --------- ------------ --------------- 625,000.00 575,000.00 50,000.00 500,000.00 125,000.00 RETAINED EARNINGS-BEGIN PERIOD 107,837.47 173,837.47 66,000.00 0.00 (107,837.47 NET INCOME 152,209.75 175,497.08 23,287.33 (259,214.60 107.004.85 --- ---------- --- ---------- --------- ------------ -------- ----- TOT AL CAP IT AL 364,952.78 225,665.45 39,287.33 240,785.40 124 67.38 --- ------ -- --------------- ----- -- ----------- -------- ----- TOTAL LIABILITIES ¿ EQUITY 2.804,00 83 2,644,049.84 59,95 99 2,296,807.6 507 94.22 06/13/'1'1 3:30:2'1 maSSle Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year Page For periods MAY 1'1'14 thru MAY 1994 Acme Design Technology Co. INCOME STATEMENT Current Period Variance Variance Last Year Variance to Description Current Period Pct Budget to Budget Percent This Period Last Year ------------------------ -- ---------- ---- -- .---- ------------- ---- ------------ ------ GROSS SALES 538,484.48 (102.80 0.00 538,484.48 0.00 461,254.50 (16.74 RETURNS ¿ ALLOWANCES 8,21'1.80 (1.57 0.00 8,21'1.80 0.00 2,285.48 259.65 COMMISSIONS 6,424.04 (1.23 0.00 6,424.04 0.00 20,012.94 (67.'10 -- ---------- --------- ---- ------------- ---- ------------ ------ NET SALES 523,840.64 (100.00 0.00 523,840.64 0.00 438,956.08 (19.34 COST OF GOODS SOLD 422,734.85 (80.70 0.00 422,734.85 0.00 410,882.83 2.88 --. .--------- .---- ---- ------------- ---- ,--------- ------ GROSS PROFIT 01.105.79 9.30 0.00 01,105.79 0.00 28,073.25 260.15 SALES, MARKETING. ¿ ADVRTI SING 30,303.37 5.18 0.00 30,303.31 0.00 34,134. 18 12.76 GENERAL ¿ ADMINISTRATIVE 43,5'15.61 8.32 0.00 43,595.61 0.00 43,372.22 0.52 INCENTIVES ¿ PROFIT SHARING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --------- ---- ---- --------- ---- --------- ----- OPERATING EXPENSES 73,8'18.98 4.11 0.00 13,898.98 0.00 78,106.40 (5.39 --------- ---- ---- --------- ---- --------- ----- NET OPERATING INCOME 27,206.81 5.19 0.00 27,206.81 0.00 50,033.15 54.38 INTEREST EXPENSE 11,152.08 2.13 0.00 11,152.08 0.00 10,539.38 5.81 OTHER INCOME OR EXPENSE (7,232.60 1.38 0.00 (7,232.60 0.00 (4,813.94 50.24 INCOME TAXES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --------- ---- ---- --------- ---- --------- - -- NET NCOME 23,287.33 4.45 0.00 23,287.33 0.00 55.758.59 4 76 2 Page or Year and Pr Current Period Compared to Budget For periods MAY 1994 thru MAY 1994 Acme Design Technology Co INCOME STATEMENT 58 massle 3:30 06/13/94 Last Year Variance to This Period Last Year (16.74 259.65 (67.90 461,254.50 2,285.48 20,012.94 Variance Percent 00 00 00 o o o Variance to Budget 538,484.48 8,219.80 6.424.04 Period Budget 00 00 00 o o o Current Pct 80 57 23 02 ( 1 ( 1 Period 538,484.48 8,219.80 6.424.04 Current Description ----------- GROSS SALES RETURNS & ALLOWANCES COMMISSIONS 34 00.00 12.62 8.86 20.56 426.89 9 08 930.60 996.61 697.41 843.57 048.88 ------ 517 .07 956 , , , , , 438 47 09 60 14 3 336 00 00 00 00 00 00 o o o o o o 64 0.00 23,874.47 74,935.29 17,895.63 16,064.17 523.840 00 00 00 00 00 00 o o o o o o ) ) ) ) 00 0.00 23.65 33.39 (3.42 (3.07 00 ( 1 64 0.00 23,874.47 74.935.29 17,895.63 16,064.17 523,840 NET SALES PURCHASED FOR RESALE-COST MATERIALS FACTORY BURDEN PRODUCT BURDEN INSTALLATION COSTS 00 o 56 332,769 00 o 63.52 56 332.769 COST OF GOODS SOLD 52 (19.49 (56.29 288.47 0.00 80.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 86 o 61,866.50 2,646.61 0.524.93 0.00 672.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 02,439 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 o o o o o o o o o 08 810.69 156.72 886.51 0.00 888.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 07 9 49 1 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 o o o o o o o o o 48 51 22 81 00 36 00 00 00 36 9 o 7 o o o o o 08 69 72 51 00 63 00 00 00 07 810 156 886 o 888 o o o 9 49 1 40 N MANUFACTURING VARIANCE PURCHASED MATERIAL VARIANCE VARIANCE TO STANDARD DISCOUNT ALLOCATION SCRAP SALES INTERIM INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT PHYSICAL INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT CAPITALIZED INVY INDIRECT COST GROSS HARG 98 5 20 260 74,365.76 25 073 28 00 00 o o 89.965.29 05.79 o 00 00 o o 7 30 7 9 965.29 05.79 89 o EXPENSES FACTORY TOTAL OTHER GROSS PROFIT 3 Page Current Period Compared to Budget and Pr10r Year For periods MAY 1994 thru MAY 1994 Acme Design Technology Co INCOME STATEMENT e 4 mass ):3 06/13/94 Last Year Variance to This Period Last Year Variance Percent 0.00 Variance to Budget ------ 668.88 Period Budget 0.00 Current Pct Per10d Current 00 74 05 27 34 28 40 00 00 36 68 88 68 08 40 20 97 58 18 97 00 00 15 00 10 66 5 12 ( 6 389 ( 6 9 3 o o 34 (23 107 20 4 ( 1 (21 42 (87 18 222 o o 89 o 62 85 5.30 426.29 569.95 068.95 304.33 616.38 383.48 0.00 0.00 754.20 146.07 246.53 046.88 118.95 560.23 425.80 345.73 606.59 083.33 836.44 0.00 0.00 311.40 0.00 338.31 681.85 9 , , , , , , , , , , , , , 64 35 22 2 5 2 2 o 2 9 7 7 2 30 1 o 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 938.78 203.87 122.66 968.29 787.29 804.32 0.00 0.00 449.36 637.97 221.32 504.13 409.35 524.26 974.87 494.30 199.53 916.67 701.48 0.00 0.00 33.78 0.00 644.28 122.44 , , , , , , , , , , , , , 6 39 21 10 4 3 2 1 2 4 1 9 8 1 2 23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 17 7.62 4.05 1.93 0.95 2.63 2.44 0.00 0.00 2.16 0.31 3.67 1.62 1 .41 0.48 4.58 0.09 0.04 2.27 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.31 0.60 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 668.88 938.78 203.81 122.66 968.29 781.29 804.32 0.00 0.00 449.36 637.97 221.32 504.13 409.35 524.26 974.87 494.30 199.53 916.67 701.48 0.00 0.00 33.78 0.00 644.28 122.44 , , , , , , , , , , , , , 6 39 21 10 4 3 ? 1 2 4 1 9 8 1 2 23 Descrlptlon ----------- DIRECT LABOR FACTORY EXPENSES INDIRECT SALARY INDIRECT LABOR OVERTIME PREMIUM OTHER COMPENSATION PAYROLL TAXES EMPLOYEE INSURANCE PENSIONS OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS FACTORY SUPPLIES REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE OUTSIDE SERVICES DPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION INSURANCE OTHER TAXES UTILITIES TELEPHONE RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT RENTAL OF BUILDING TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT BURDEN REDISTRIBUTED ENGINEERING SUPPORT IJARRANTY COSTS LOSSES AND ERRORS MISCELLANEOUS NET DELIVERY COSTS 4 1 1 3 1 3 8 2 69 78.87 00 o 95 658 200 00 o 38.3 95 658 200 TOTAL FACTORY EXPENSES 6 1 99 243,786 00 o 262,321.83 00 o 08 50 262.321.83 ACTUAL BURDEN 82 49 6 9 49 50 920 866 8 6 00 00 o o 4 69 212,511 o 8 49 00 00 o o 57 5 40 9 4 69 212.511 o 8 49 ANCE APPLIED BURDEN NG VAR UFACTUR /I MA Page 4 Last Year Variance to This Period Last Year Current Period Compared to Budget and PrIor Year For periods MAY 1994 thru MAY 1994 Acme Design Technology Co INCOME STATEMENT 06/13/94 3:31 :32 massie Description Variance Percent Variance to Budget Period Budget Current Pct Current Period SING 0.00 4.76 90.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 (3.55 0.00 (0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (4.54 0.00 0.00 37.16 0.00 00.08 25.37 0.00 00.00 4.24 0.00 00.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.76 0.00 392.30 555.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 744.26 0.00 356.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 190.17 000.00 0.00 799.77 0.00 317 .05 934.61 0.00 082.02 118.83 0.00 40.32 0.00 0.00 202.94 0.00 0.00 734 8 3 5 4 1 4 34 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 016.39 553.84 439.76 91.95 0.00 0.00 682.36 0.00 344.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000.00 000.00 0.00 096.94 0.00 (0.25 682.76 0.00 0.00 123.87 0.00 0.00 67.93 0.00 202.94 0.00 0.00 303.37 2 3 1 4 1 3 30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ) ) ) ) 29 68 27 02 00 00 32 00 26 00 00 00 00 76 19 00 21 00 00 70 00 00 02 00 00 01 00 04 00 00 78 2 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 5 ( ( ( ( 016.39 553.84 439.76 91.95 0.00 0.00 682.36 0.00 344.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000.00 000.00 0.00 096.94 0.00 (0.25 682.76 0.00 0.00 123.87 0.00 0.00 67.93 0.00 202.94 0.00 0.00 ------ 303.37 2 3 1 4 1 3 30 SALES, MARKETING & ADVERT SALARIES - MANAGEMENT SALARIES - SALESMEN SALARIES - CLERICAL OVERTIME PREMIUM INCENTIVES & AWARDS VACATIONS & HOLIDAYS PAYROLL TAXES PENSIONS INSURANCE - EMPLOYEES SALES RECRUITMENT OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS OUTSIDE MANPOWER HARKET RESEARCH PROHOTION HEETING~ & SEMINARS ADVERTISING - DIRECTORY TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT RENT - BUILDING POSTAGE TELEPHONE OTHER UTI L IT I ES OFFICE SUPPLIES INSURANCE - GENERAL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS OUTSIDE SERVICES RENT - EQUIPMENT SERVICE FEES & MAINTENANCE DEPRECIATION TAXES RIE & PIP MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL EXPENSE Page 5 Last Year Variance to This Period Last Year Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year For periods MAY 1994 thru MAY 1994 Acme Design Technology Co INCOME STATEMENT 38 masSle 3:3 06/13/94 Variance Percent Variance to Budget --------- Period Budget Current ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 0.00 40.61 26_32 (1. 21 (0.85 0.00 0.00 07.93 32.54 0.00 135.26 100.00 100.00 (30.74 (85.27 223.62 96.58 34.94 0.00 27.23 00.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 004.99 99.75 094.01 542.94 0.00 0.00 000.00 495.71 202.94 736.54 25.00 912.98 043.00 872.69 154.50 548.74 098.67 0.00 510.50 29.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------ 372.22 24 2 1 3 3 2 2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 461.55 256.73 73.50 068.74 529.82 0.00 0.00 237.89 334.42 202.94 732.78 0.00 0.00 415.04 423.05 500.00 078.74 181.20 0.00 099.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 4 2 1 6 1 4 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o Pct ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 62 72 01 39 29 00 00 19 06 04 33 00 00 27 08 10 21 80 00 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 1 2 o o o o o 1 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 8 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Period 461.55 256.73 73.50 068.74 529.82 0.00 0.00 237.89 334.42 202.94 732.78 0.00 0.00 415.04 423.05 500.00 078.74 181.20 0.00 099.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Current 8 4 2 1 (, 1 4 Description ----------- GENERAL & ADHINISTRATIVE OFFICER'S SALARIES OFFICE SALARIES OVERTIME PREHIUH PAYROLL TAXES INSURANCE - EMPLOYEES PENSIONS OTHER EHPLOYEE EXPENSES LEGAL & AUDIT OFFICE EXPENSES DEPRECIATION INSURANCE - GENERAL TAXES, FRANCHISES & lICENSES TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT TELEPHONE OFFIÇE SUPPLIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS OUTSIDE SERVICES RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT RENTAL OF AUTOS POSTAGE SERVICE FEES & MAINTENANCE BUILDING OCCUPANCY DONATIONS DIRECTORS FEES BAD DEBT EXPENSE CHARGE TO ACHE SEELY 43 00 o 6 43,595 00 o 32 43,595.6 TOTAL EXPENSES Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year Page 6 For periods HAY 1994 thru MAY 1994 Acme Design Technology Co. INCOME STATEMENT Current Period Variance Variance Last Year Variance to Pct Budget to Budget Percent This Period Last Year -- .---- .-------- .----- ---------------- .------ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.00 4,578.73 0.00 3,747.71 22.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 0.00 6,573.35 0.00 6,791.67 (3.21 ---- ---- .-------- ----- ---------------- ------ 2.13 0.00 1,152.08 0.00 10,539.38 5.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (8.30 0.00 (102.49) (91.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.00 4,400.00 0.00 (4,400.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 509.02 0.00 688.55 (26.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.00 3,333.32 0.00 (1,000.00) 233.33 --- ---- -------- ---- ---------------- ----- .38 0.00 7,232.60 0.00 4,813.94 50.24 Period 0.00 0.00 578.73 0.00 573.35 Current 4 e Description ---------- NTEREST EXPENSE INTEREST EXPENSE PARENT INTEREST EXPENSE - VISA INTEREST EXPENSE BANKS INTEREST EXPENSE CAPTL OTHER INTEREST EXPENSE mass 44 3:3 06/13/94 6 LEASE 08 0.00 0.00 8.30 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 509.02 0.00 333.32 52 4 NTEREST EXPENSE OTHER INCOHE & EXPENSE INTEREST INCOHE PARENT INTEREST INCOHE HONEY MARKET INTEREST INCOHE OTHER CAPITAL GAINS CAP IT AL LOSSES RENTAL INCOHE INVESTHENT EXPENSE BANK FEES RESTRUCTURING EXPENSE HISCELLANEOUS TOTAL 60 3 7,232 EXPENSE NCOHE ¿ TOTAL OTHER 06/13/94 3:42:30 maSSle Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year Page For periods JANUARY 1994 thru MAY 1994 Acme Design Technology Co. INCOME STATEMENT Current Period Variance Variance Last Year Variance to Description Current Period Pct Budget to Budget Percent This Period Last Year ------------------------. --------------- ---- -- .---- ------------ .---- ------------ ----- GROSS SALES 2,156,208.70 (103.72 0.00 2,156,208.70 0.00 2,738,084.55 21.25 RETURNS & ALLOWANCES 34,311.57 (1.65 0.00 34,311.57 0.00 19,718.25 74.01 COMMISSIONS 42,993.88 (2.07 0.00 42,993.88 0.00 128,808.16 66.62 --------------- --------- .---- ------------ .---- ------------ ----- NET SALES 2,078,903.25 (100.00 0.00 2,078,903.25 0.00 2,589,558.14 19.72 COST OF GOODS SOLD 841,066.58 (88.56 0.00 841,066.58 0.00 2,330,835.48 21.01 --. ---------- .---- ---- ---------- ---- ----------- ----- GROSS PROFIT 237,836.67 1.44 0.00 237,836.67 0.00 258,722.66 8.07 SALES, MARKETI NG, & ADVRTISING 149,564.87 7.19 0.00 149,564.87 0.00 174,599.16 14.34 GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE 217,759.94 0.47 0.00 217,759.94 0.00 213,999.26 1.76 INCENTIVES & PROFIT SHARING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ---------- ---- ---- ---------- ---- ----------- ----- OPERATING EXPENSES 367,324.81 7.67 0.00 367,324.81 0.00 388,598.42 (5.47 --------- ---- ---- --------- ---- --------- ----- NET OPERATING INCOME 29,488.14 6.23 0.00 29,488.14 0.00 29,875.76 0.30 INTEREST EXPENSE 52,729.36 2.54 0.00 52,729.36 0.00 49,073.19 7.45 OTHER INCOME OR EXPENSE 30,007.75 1.44 0.00 30,007.75 0.00 18,247.66 64.45 INCOME TAXES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --------- ---- ---- --------- ---- ----- -- ---- NET NCOME 52,209.75 7.32 0.00 52,209.75 0.00 60,70 29 5.28 2 Page Current Period Compared to Budget and Prlor Year For periods JANUARY 1994 thru MAY 1994 Acme Design Technology Co INCOME STATEMENT 3 mass Ie 44 3 06/13/94 Last Year Variance to This Period Last Year 25 01 62 21 74 66 2,738,084.55 19,718.25 28.808.16 Variance Percent 00 00 00 o o o Variance to Budget 70 57 88 56,208 34,311 42.993 2 Period Budget 00 00 00 o o o Current Pct 03.72 (1.65 (2.07 Perlod 56.208.70 34,311.57 42,993.88 Current 2 Descrlptlon ----------- GROSS SALES RETURNS ¿ ALLO~ANCES COMMISSIONS 72 00 04 93 75 45 9 00 21 (7 10 16 4 262.62 721.89 611.19 545.52 298.54 439.76 558 . , , , , 2,589 373 693 884 84 64 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 o o o o o o 903.25 0.00 547,764.73 814,495.08 93,632.69 74,878.36 078 2 00 00 00 00 00 00 o o o o o o ) ) ) ) 00 0.00 26.35 39.18 (4.50 (3.60 00 903.25 0.00 547,764.73 814,495.08 93,632.69 74,878.36 078 2 NET SALES PURCHASED FOR RESALE-COST MATERIALS FACTORY BURDEN PRODUCT BURDEN INSTALLATION COSTS 2 27 2 00 o 86 770 530 00 o 63 73 86 770 530 COST OF GOODS SOLD 07 3.21 37.77 369.46 0.00 8.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 8.38 091.86 368.62 201.89 0.00 266.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 489 o 7 9 6 2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 o o o o o o o o o 32.39 825.79 151.8.8 145.85 0.00 827.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 548 216 10 90 6 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 o o o o o o o o o 37 43 49 34 00 33 00 00 00 26 o o 4 o o o o o 32.39 825.79 151.88 145.85 0.00 827.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 548 216 10 90 6 GROSS MARGIN MANUFACTURING VARIANCE PURCHASED MATERIAL VARIANCE VARIANCE TO STANDARD DISCOUNT ALLOCATION SCRAP SALES INTERIM INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT PHYSICAL INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT CAPITALIZED INVY INDIRECT COST 68 07 34 8 395.72 66 258.722 230 00 00 o o 295.72 237,836.67 o 3 00 00 o o 93 44 4 295.72 237.836.67 o 3 TOTAL OTHER FACTORY EXPENSES GROSS PROF IT ~ 3 Page and Prior Year 1994 Current Period Compared to Budget For periods JANUARY 1994 thru MAY Acme Design Technology CO INCOME STATEMENT 08 maSS1e 3:45 06/1]/94 Last Year Variance to This Period Last Year Var1ance Percent 0.00 Variance to Budget -------- 276.688.69 Period Budget 0.00 Current Pct Per10d Current ) ) ) ) 05 2.47 3.43 5.33 8.61 7.32 3.40 0.00 00.00 31.51 58.48 90.27 22.03 2.45 (1.40 (2.62 22.50 88.42 57.31 5.34 0.00 0.00 556.62 0.00 (51.6] 268.20 7 333.563.48 555.54 285.43 240.08 521.65 673.48 917.40 0.00 91.50 151.48 471.74 172.81 844.37 594.75 801.15 065.72 607.76 745.52 018.42 270.80 0.00 0.00 337.86 0.00 797.82 015.67 · , , , , , , , , · · · , · , , , 85 06 12 26 65 61 55 23 42 34 35 12 32 2 6 21 9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 975.11 013.60 356.25 805.77 863.74 021.60 0.00 0.00 529.83 744.46 244.27 520.65 465.95 621.30 610.57 020.96 781. 1 0 083.33 765.80 0.00 0.00 784.70 0.00 124.99 436.48 , , , · , · , · , · , , , , 80 92 26 28 60 64 72 9 80 42 36 12 28 2 54 9 8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 3.3 8.71 4.43 1. 27 1.39 2.93 3.08 0.00 0.00 3.49 0.47 3.86 2.05 1.75 0.61 6.19 0.10 0.04 2.60 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.39 0.41 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 69 975.11 013.60 356.25 805.77 863.74 021.60 0.00 0.00 529.83 744.46 244.27 520.65 465.95 621.30 610.57 020.96 781.10 083.33 765.80 0.00 0.00 784.70 0.00 124.99 436.48 688 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 276 80 92 26 28 60 64 8 72 9 80 42 36 12 28 2 54 9 Descr1ptlon ----------- DIRECT LABOR FACTORY EXPENSES INDIRECT SALARY INDIRECT LABOR OVERTIME PREMIUM OTHER COMPENSATION PAYROLL TAXES EMPLOYEE INSURANCE PENSIONS OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS FACTORY SUPPLIES REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE OUTSIDE SERVICES DPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION INSURANCE OTHER TAXES UTILITIES TELEPHONE RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT RENTAL OF BUILDING TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT BURDEN REDISTRIBUTED ENGINEERING SUPPORT UARRAHTY COSTS LOSSES AND ERRORS MISCELLANEOUS NET DELIVERY COSTS 6 5 8 8 8 8 27 6 95 80 857 00 o 897.50 o 9 00 o 43.82 897.50 o 9 TOTAL FACTORY EXPENSES 27 o 744.43 90 00 o 9 87,586 00 o 3 57 9 87.586 ACTUAL BURDEN o 3.2 652.57 86 09 980 o 2 00 00 o o 40 825.79 760 970 6 2 00 00 o o 70 43 46 o 970,760.40 ---------------- 216,825.79 APPLIED BURDEN HG VARIANCE MAtIUF ACTUR · Page 4 Last Year Variance to This Period Last Year Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year For periods JANUARY 1994 thru MAY 1994 Acme Design Technology Co INCOME STATEMENT 45:57 massie 3 06/13/94 Variance Percent Variance to Budget Period Budget Current 0.00 0.94 (91.29 308.33 0.00 0.00 (12.91 0.00 (0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (0.94 1.30 0.00 119.96 0.00 (91.40 <37.32 0.00 (20.89 2.54 0.00 (40.48 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 378.90 4.34 0.00 123.03 770.58 73.56 0.00 0.00 395.47 0.00 782.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 190.17 000.00 0.00 803.74 0.00 861.60 447.75 0.00 156.31 594.15 0.00 40.32 0.00 163.00 014.70 0.00 182.78 --- - 599 6 17 82 9 6 20 5 2 25 2 74 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 57,968.06 17.284.57 7.205.83 300.37 0.00 0.00 8.182.06 0.00 6,724.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 5,065.00 0.00 6,167.12 0.00 74.10 15.949.50 0.00 1,705.90 609.27 75.00 24.00 339.65 0.00 1,014.70 0.00 875.34 ----------- - 49.564.87 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o Pct ) ) ) ) 2.79 0.83 0.35 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.96 0.24 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.00 0.08 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.04 7 9 ( ( ( ( Period 968.06 284.57 205.83 300.37 0.00 0.00 182.06 0.00 724.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000.00 065.00 0.00 167.12 0.00 74.10 949.50 0.00 705.90 609.27 75.00 24.00 339.65 0.00 014.70 0.00 875.34 564.87 Current 57 17 7 8 6 20 5 6 5 49 Descriptlon ----------- SALES. MARKETING & ADVERTISING SALARIES - MANAGEMENT SALARIES - SALESMEN SALARIES - CLERICAL OVERTIME PREMIUM INCENTIVES & A~ARDS VACATIONS & HOLIDAYS PAYROLL TAXES PENSIONS INSURANCE - EMPLOYEES SALES RECRUITMENT OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS OUTSIDE MANPO~ER MARKET RESEARCH PROMOTION MEETINGS & SEMINARS ADVERTISING - DIRECTORY TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT RENT - BUILDING POSTAGE TELEPHONE OTHER UTILITIES OFFICE SUPPLIES INSURANCE - GENERAL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS OUTSIDE SERVICES RENT - EOUIPMENT SERVICE FEES & MAINTENANCE DEPRECIATION TAXES RIE & PIP MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL EXPENSE . . 5 Page Pr10r Year Current Period Compared to Budget and For periods JANUARY 1994 thru MAY 1994 Acme Design Technology Co INCOME STATEMENT 2 maSSle 3:46 06/13/94 Last Year Variance to This Period Last Year Var1ance Percent Variance to Budget Period Budget Current ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 0.00 42.03 (9.20 (6.09 (0.85 0.00 0.00 74.31 35.46 0.00 58.13 (54.17 (95.06 (35.00 (68.31 (35.62 225.06 10.86 0.00 (J5.06 218.92 0.00 746.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 181.03 456.75 899.25 714.70 0.00 0.00 000.00 999.92 014.70 685.00 240.00 180.48 995.86 846.70 980.05 330.61 018.11 0.00 141.57 239.53 0.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o 7 5 1 1 4 I 9 8 3 9 7 2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 153.91 246.10 414.75 235.76 649.10 0.00 0.00 146.50 290.84 014.70 408.35 110.00 58.30 497.74 803.46 631.00 826.49 084.37 0.00 638.05 159.22 0.00 635.00 0.00 756.30 0.00 41 70 o 7 26 1 1 7 6 2 10 21 4 3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o Pct ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 98 38 02 49 37 00 00 26 06 05 36 01 00 31 13 03 52 01 00 22 15 00 03 00 08 00 1 3 o o o o o 1 o o o o o o o o o 1 o o o o o o o o o ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Per10d 153.91 246.10 414.75 235.76 649.10 0.00 0.00 146.50 290.84 014.70 408.35 110.00 58.30 497.74 803.46 631.00 826.49 084.37 0.00 638.05 159.22 0.00 635.00 0.00 756.30 0.00 Current 41 70 o 7 26 I I 7 6 2 10 21 4 3 DescriptIon ----------- GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER'S SALARIES OFFICE SALARIES OVERTIME PREMIUM PAYROLL TAXES INSURANCE - EMPLOYEES PENSIONS OTHER EMPLOYEE EXPENSES LEGAL & AUDIT OFFICE EXPENSES DEPRECIATION INSURANCE - GENERAL TAXES. FRANCHISES & LICENSES TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT TELEPHONE OFFICE .SUPPLIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS OUTSIDE SERVICES RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT RENTAL OF AUTOS POSTAGE SERVICE FEES & MAINTENANCE BUILDING OCCUPANCY DONATIONS DIRECTORS FEES BAD DEBT EXPENSE CHARGE TO ACME SEELY 76 26 999 213 0.00 217,759.94 00 o 47 217,759.94 TOTAL EXPENSES L.7 maSSle Current Period Compared to BUdget and PrIor Year Page 6 . For periods JANUARY 1994 thru MAY 1994 Acme Design Technology Co. INCOME STATEMENT Current Period Variance Variance Last Year Variance to DescrIPtIon Current Period Pet BUdget to BUdget Percent This Period last Year -----------. --------- -------------- --- ---------------- ---------------- ---------- --------------- --------- INTEREST EXPENSE INTEREST EXPENSE PARENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INTEREST EXPENSE - VISA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INTEREST EXPENSE BANKS 18,181.50 0.87) 0.00 18,181.50 0.00 13,345.38 36.24 INTEREST EXPENSE CAPTl lEASE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OTHER INTEREST EXPENSE 34,547.86 1 .66) 0.00 34,547.86 0.00 35,727.81 C3.30 ---------------- ----- ---------------- ---------------- ---------- ---------------- -------- TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE 52,729.36 2.54) 0.00 52,729.36 0.00 49,073.19 7.45 OTHER INCOME ~ EXPENSE INTEREST INCOME PARENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INTEREST INCOME MONEY MARKET (104.62) 0.01 0.00 (104.62) 0.00 C376.81 C72.24 INTEREST INCOME OTHER (46.02) 0.00 0.00 (46.02) 0.00 C398.76 (88.46 CAPITAL GAINS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CAP IT Al lOSSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RENTAL INCOME (22,000.00) 1. 06 0.00 (22,000.00 0.00 (17,600.00 25.00 INVESTMENT EXPENSE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BANK FEES 3,047.01 0.15) 0.00 3,047.01 0.00 2,754.82 10.61 RESTRUCTURING EXPENSE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MISCEllANEOUS (10,904.12) 0.52 0.00 (10,904.12) 0.00 (2,626.91) 315.09 ---------------- ---------- ---------------- ---------------- ---- ---------------- ----- TOTAL OTHER INCOME ~ EXPENSE 30.007.75 44 0.00 30.007.75 0.00 8,247.66 64.45