HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201700042 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2017-08-23COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 229024596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
Memorandum
To: Michael F. Myers, PE (none ers ,dominioneng com)
From: Tim Padalino, AICP
Division: Planning
Date: August 23, 2017
Subject: SDP201700042 — Springhill / Towneplace Suites (Final Site Plan dated July 12, 2017)
The major site plan amendment referred to above (dated July 12, 2017) has been reviewed by the Department
of Community Development and other applicable agencies.
The Planning Division will approve the above -referenced final site plan after the outstanding issues
identified in this letter have been addressed and resolved to the satisfaction of the applicable reviewer.
Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.
Please work directly with each reviewer to address and resolve their comments. Approvals from each
reviewer or outside agency should be forwarded to the lead planner upon receipt.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or requests for assistance, or if require
any clarification or additional information.
Sincerely,
1� x PA-44��
Tim Padalino, AICP
Senior Planner
(434)-296-5832 x 3088
tadalino a;albemarle.or�
Pagel of 2
Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner) — Tim Padalino, tpadalino@albemarle.org — Requested changes:
1. Please continue to coordinate directly with ARB staff to obtain the required Certificate of Appropriateness. Please
see the attached review comments from Ms. Margaret Maliszewski, Chief of Planning/Resource Management,
dated August 11.
2. Please continue to coordinate directly with Engineering Services to address and resolve all issues identified in the
most recent review comments. Please see the attached review comments from Mr. David James, Civil Engineer
I, dated August 23.
3. Please continue to coordinate directly with Building Inspections to address and resolve the issue of accessible
parking spaces. Please see the attached review comment from Mr. Michael Dellinger, Albemarle County Building
Official, dated July 25.
The issue appears to be whether a minimum of six (6) ADA accessible spaces are required [as indicated by the
Parking Requirements notes on Sheet SP2 which state that "6 total accessible spaces" are required "with 1 being
van accessible," citing "ADA Standard for Accessible Design Section 4.1.2 (5)(A)"]; or if a minimum of seven
(7) ADA accessible spaces are required [as indicated by Building Inspections, citing Mr. Jay Schlothauer's review
comments (dated December 9, 2016) pertaining to the initial site plan for this project (SDP201600070)].
4. Please continue to coordinate directly with ACSA. Please see the attached review comments from Mr. Alexander
Morrison, PE, dated August 14, which request three (3) copies of the construction plans, along with water and
sewer data sheets, for ACSA review. This review comment was previously forwarded to you on August 15.
5. Please continue to coordinate directly with VDOT to address and resolve all issues identified in the most recent
review comments. Please see the attached review comments from Mr. Adam Moore, PE, dated August 10.
Albemarle County Architectural Review Board (ARB) — Margaret Maliszewski, mmaliszewskigalbemarle.org —
Requested Changes (see attached).
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) — David .lames, diames &albemarle.org — Requested Changes
(see attached).
Albemarle County Building Inspections — Michael Dellinger, mdellingergalbemarle.org — Denied (see attached).
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue — Shawn Maddox, smaddox@albemarle.org — No Objection (see
attached).
Albemarle County Information Services (E911) — Elise Kiewra, ekiewraLalbgmarle.org— No Objection (see
attached).
Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) — Alex Morrison, PE, aorrison(acr�serviceauthority.org_— Requested
Changes (see attached).
Virginia Department of Transportation — Adam Moore, PE, Adam.Mooregvdot.vir inia.gov — Requested
Changes (see attached).
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority (RWSA) — Victoria Fort, PE, vfortrivanna.org_— Pending:
To date, no review comments have been received from RWSA. All review comments from RWSA will be
forwarded to the Primary Contact upon receipt. Note: The Initial Site Plan review comments indicate that the
primary issue involving RWSA is the requirement for RWSA to review and approve the proposed sewer
connection(s).
Pace 2 of 2
Review Comment ror SDP201700042 Final Site Development Plan
Project Name: SPRINGHILLITOWNEPLACE SUITES
Date Completed: Friday, August 11. 2017 Department/Division.+Agency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Margaret Maliszewski
CDD ARB
Requested Changes
1. The photometric plan has changed since the previous review_ Light levels now exceed 20 footcandles in a few places. 20 fc is
the maximum the ARE allows. Please revise-
2- There are a number of trees proposed on the south side of the property between the dumpster and the curve in the travelway
located south of the south corner of the hotel, and some of these trees are large trees. The EC guidelines do call for large
shade trees spaced at least 40' on center. However, the trees as currently shown may be spaced too close together. Please
double-check tree species and appropriate spacing.
Review Comment for SDP201700042 ;Final Site Development Plan
Project Name: SPRINGHILLITOWNEPLACE SUITES
Date Completed: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 l Department+Division?Agency: Review Status:
Reviewer:!,David James �I CDD Engineering Fw] Requested Changes
1. The parcel 061Z0030000200 is 3.70 acres in size according to County GIS_ Provide where the additional acreage is coming
from, or update area-
2- Sheet SP1 - Under Site Data the area disturbed and impervious area shown do not match what's shown on the WPO plans-
3- Proposed offsite construction/grading should be shown in an easement, and be in joint agreementment with adjacent
property owners_ Obtain VDOT permit for construction work in the ROW.
4. Show roads ROW & width information.
5. Label property line.
6. Sheet SP4 - Show soils map_
7. An existing overhead powerline runs close to the hotel, and I don't know if this could be an issue/problem?
8_ Sheet SP6 — Provide retaining wall details, and callouts to details sheet.
9. Sheet SP6 — Provide guardrail details, and callouts to details sheet_
10. Sheet SP6 — Show callout to grasscrete detail & show extent of usage.
11 _ Provide safety railing for any walls over 4' in height_
12_ Engineered design plans required for wall supporting roads and parking_
13_ Parking spaces will have to be removed along ramp leading to upper parking deck where vehicles backing out may interfere
with those exiting.
14_ Sheet SP9 — Relocate trees outside of drainage easement_
15. Provide stationing for roads & road name/labels-, show profiles for roads (Design Standards Manual, Sect_ 7(C)).
16. Label curb radii for travelway near Str 7A.
17. Provide the design AADT & estimate truck traffic_
18. Show that drainage design easement widths are met (Ref. Design Standards Manual, Sect_ 6)_ Show drainage easements
for any proposed permenant drainage outside of property line.
19. Storm drainage design will be approved with an approved WPO plan_
Review Comment_ for SDP201700042 Final Site Development Plan
_
Project Name: SPRINGHILL/TOWNEPLACE SUITES
Date Completed: Tuesday, July 25. 2017 Department/DivisionlAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer [Michael Dellinger �; CDD Inspections F,] (Denied
Per Jays previous comments, one additional accessible space with proper markings needs to be provided. I only count 6
spaces on Sheet SP7_ mad
Review Comment, for SDP201700042 Final Site Development Plan
Project Name: SPRING H I LL/TOWNEPLACE SUITES
Date Completed: Saturday, July 29, 2017 DepartmentiDivisionlAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: rrShawn Maddox F ri a Rescue No Objection
i_ _ -- _ - _ I _ _
Thank you for addressing previous comments. Eire Rescue has no objections to the plans as submitted_ SNM
Review Comment_ for SDP201700042 ;Final Site Development Plan
Project Name: SPRINGHILLITOWNEPLACE SUITES
Date Completed: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 Department/DivisionlAgency: Review Status: (�
-- -- -- - -- - U Reviewer !Elise Kiewra Dj CDD E911 No Objection
-._ - _
no objections per site plan dated 7/12/17
Review Comment_ for SDP201700042 Final Site Development Plan ❑
Project Name: SPRINGHILLrTO'WNEPLACE SUITES
Date Completed: Monday, August 14, 2017 DepartmentUivision/Agency: Review Status:
Reviewer ;Alexander Morrison ACSA _- 1 Requested Changes
The above referenced project requires a construction plan review submittal to the ACSA for the proposed utilities. Please
instruct the applicant to submit 3 copies of the plan, along with water and sewer data sheets, to the ACSA. The submittal can
be made to my attention.
Review Comment for SDP201700042 'Final Site Development Plan
Project Name: SPRINGHILLITOWNEPLACE SUITES
Date Completed: Thursday, August 10, 2017 Department/DivisionfAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Adam Maare VDOT Requested Changes ❑
1. The Access Management Exception Approval Letter should be included on the plans.
2. Provide a cross-section showing the flow line along Route 29 ensuring positive drainage at the proposed emergency access
entrance.
3. CG12's at the proposed entrance should be in line with the existing/proposed sidewalks, parallel to Route 29 and
perpendicular to the entrance.
4. We recommend providing mountable curb at the proposed emergency access entrance.
5. The minimum entrance radius for a commercial entrance without a separate truck access is 42 feet.