HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201600004 Review Comments Preliminary Plat 2016-06-08Short Review Comments Report for:
SUB201600004
SubApplication Type:
Briarwood Phase 4 (Lots 1-50, 24A, 25A) & Phase 6 (Lots 1-4) - Preliminary
Preliminary Plat
Date Completed:02/18/2016
Reviewer:John Anderson CDD Engineering
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:01/12/2016
Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer CDD Inspections
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:Based on plat dated December 28, 2015.
No comments or conditions.
Division:
Date Completed:02/16/2016
Reviewer:Christopher Perez CDD Planning
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:02/16/2016
Reviewer:Christopher Perez CDD Planning
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:Phasing Variation Request
1. [Comment] Provide a visual with the current phasing plan that was approved by the Board of
Supervisors on September 4, 2013 alongside the proposed phasing plan. This visual will be utilized
as an attachment in the staff report.
2. [Comment] The land being platted as Lot 50 and a portion of open space adjacent to Lot 49
are part of Phase 5 on the current phasing plan. Revise the variation request to modify the phase
lines to include these portions of land in phase 4. Also, as part of the variation request include the
two lots next to Lot 4 in the request to shift lots from phase 4 to phase 6.”
3. [Comment] Engineering comments on the variation if any will be forwarded to the applicant
once received.
Division:
Date Completed:01/14/2016
Reviewer:Andrew Slack CDD E911
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:No Objection.
Division:
Date Completed:02/17/2016
Reviewer:John Anderson CDD
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:02/08/2016
Reviewer:Alexander Morrison ACSA
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:02/19/2016
Troy Austin
Page:1 of 2 County of Albemarle Printed On:August 31, 2017
Reviewer:Troy Austin VDOT
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:02/14/2016
Reviewer:Robbie Gilmer Fire Rescue
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
1. Fire flow test required before final approval.
Division:
Date Completed:04/20/2016
Reviewer:John Anderson CDD Engineering
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:05/06/2016
Reviewer:Christopher Perez CDD Planning
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:05/06/2016
Reviewer:Christopher Perez CDD Planning
Review Status:Approved
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:05/13/2016
Reviewer:Christopher Perez CDD Planning
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:05/13/2016
Reviewer:Rebecca Ragsdale CDD Zoning
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:05/13/2016
Reviewer:Christopher Perez CDD Planning
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:This item (Special Exception) has been scheduled for the June 8th BOS meeting, consent agenda.
Staff is recommending approval.
Division:
Date Completed:06/08/2016
Reviewer:Christopher Perez CDD Planning
Review Status:Approved
Reviews Comments:The BOS approved the phasing variation on consent agenda at their 6-8-16 meeting.
Division:
Page:2 of 2 County of Albemarle Printed On:August 31, 2017
1i✓
Christopher Perez
From: Christopher Perez
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 3:09 PM
To: 'Scott Collins'
Cc: Rebecca Ragsdale; David Benish
Subject: RE: Briarwood Variation request
Attachments: LAYOUT-color- New variation2.pdf; Briarwood Phasing Variation-revised 5-13-16.pdf
Scott,
Thanks for the quick turnaround on revising the plan, excellent work. The visual and the written request
matching up and are ready to move forward.
I've spoken to David Benish about the request and am awaiting a final review from Zoning. I should have
Zoning's review complete by Wednesday of next week. At this time staff is recommending denial of the request
because it utilizes land that is part of phase 4 without fulfilling proffer 4 (the primary rec area being
built/bonded prior to 1st final plat for phase 4). I'll have my final decision once I get Zoning's review
If staff is recommending denial of the variation we'll have to pull the item from the June 8th BOS consent
agenda and take this item to the Planning Commission 1st, then schedule it for the BOS. I'll keep you posted.
Thanks
Christopher P.Perez 1 Senior Planner
Department of Community Development 1County of Albemarle,Virginia
401 McIntire Road 1 Charlottesville,VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext. 3443
From:Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 2:11 PM
To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>
Cc: Rebecca Ragsdale<rragsdale@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Briarwood Variation request
Chris-
Thank you again for the help with this. Attached is the updated plan and variation request. We have corrected the plan
and updated the variation request.
Thx!
Scott
From:Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 7:52 AM
To:Scott Collins
Cc: Rebecca Ragsdale
Subject: RE: Briarwood Variation request
Scott,
I have reviewed the revised variation plan and I have the following comments:
1
1)The proposed variation schematic should be revised to omit incorrect statements with regard to unit mix
within phases on the visual/map. The labels which need to be revised are as follows:
- "Phase 4: 52 SFD (and/or SFA)" is incorrect and it truly should read"Phase 4: 52 SFD"as SFA units are not
permitted in the lot mix for this phase per Proffer 9. Revise.
- "Phase 5: 18 SFD (and/or SFA)" is incorrect and it truly should read "Phase 5: 18 SFD" as SFA units are not
permitted in the lot mix for this phase per Proffer 9. Revise.
- "Phase 1A: 50 SFD (and/or SFA units)" is incorrect and it truly should read"Phase 1 A 28 SFD and 22
Townhomes", as written it appears the developer is permitted 50 SFD units in this phase which is not permitted
in the lot mix for this phase per Proffer 9. Revise.
2) The amount of lots being relocated out of phase 4 and into phase 6 is more than the variation request of Jan 4,
2016 initially requested, which was 4-6 lots at the intersection of Sparrow and Sunset Drive. Revise the written
request to also include the 12 lots and portion of open space being depicted on the visual. (Original request
attached)
3)Also,because you are attempting to take such a large portion of land out of phase 4 (approximately 1/)
through a phasing variation and reclassify it as phase 6, I need to get Zoning staff and the Director of Planning
to review this to assure they are good with it with regard to Proffer 4 which requires the primary recreation area
to be built/bonded prior to any final plats in phase 4. As I understand it from our brief discussion at SRC your
reasoning for this is because the 52 lots in phase 4 are to be reduced in size due to market demand and you will
be able to get all 52 lots in the remaining land that is phase 4. Will you be able to get all 52 lots in the remaining
space or will you be coming back in for a variation to put a second block of phase 4 somewhere else in the
development? Please clarify this in the variation request.
Thanks
Christopher P. Perez Senior Planner
Department of Community Development 1County of Albemarle,Virginia
401 McIntire Road 1 Charlottesville,VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext.3443
From:Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com]
Sent:Thursday, May 12,2016 5:23 PM
To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Briarwood Variation request
Chris-
Thank you again. Attached is the updated Variation phasing plan.
Scott
From:Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 7:18 AM
To:Scott Collins
Subject: RE: Briarwood Variation request
2
Scott,
Sounds good. Wednesday will work fine and allows me to keep the item on the June 8th meeting. Thanks.
Christopher P.Perez Senior Planner
Department of Community Development 1County of Albemarle,Virginia
401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext. 3443
From:Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com]
Sent: Monday, May 09,2016 6:32 AM
To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Briarwood Variation request
Chris-
Thanks! I will proceed with option A. We will send over the updated plan by Wednesday.
Thx.
Scott
From:Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org]
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 1:17 PM
To:Scott Collins
Cc: Rebecca Ragsdale;John Anderson;Jenni Pack
Subject: RE: Briarwood Variation request
Scott,
SUB2016-4_Briarwood Phasing Variation
I've reviewed the revised variation request to the phasing plan and find that this request as presented in the
attached `Briarwood Phasing Variation Exhibit-April 2016" goes beyond what is permitted by a variation and
cannot move forward as proposed. The proposal attempts to modify the approved lot mixes defined in proffer 9.
In order to move forward as proposed the request would need to go through as a rezoning request to modify
proffer 9.
History: The variation request from January 4, 2016 submitted with the preliminary plat(SUB2016-4)merely
requested to move a few lots out of phase 4 and relocate them back to phase 6, as was previously approved prior
to the last phasing variation. However, the visual provided on 4-18-16 does not match the written request and
attempted to expand the request to modify lot mixes defined in proffer 9.
Let me know how you wish to proceed: Option A) Revise visual to only modify the phasing and leave the lot
mixes as previously approved or Option B) Pursue a rezoning.
If you choose Option A, it is suggested that the phasing variation also include a modification of phase lines for a
portion of Phase IB so that one of the tot lots in phase IA is located in phase IB as required by proffer#4.
Christopher P. Perez 1 Senior Planner
Department of Community Development 1County of Albemarle,Virginia
401 McIntire Road 1 Charlottesville,VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext. 3443
3
400
From:Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.corn]
Sent: Monday,April 18, 2016 9:11 AM
To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>
Cc:Jenni Pack<jenni@collins-engineering.com>
Subject: Briarwood Variation request
Chris-
Attached is the exhibit to go along with the Variation request that was made back in January to modify the phasing for
the Briarwood project. Let me know if you need anything else to process the variation. Also, let me know if you think
we can wrap this up and get it on the June BOS consent agenda. I will drop off(2)copies of this plan to your office
today.
Thanks.
Scott
4
Christopher Perez
From:
Christopher Perez
Sent:
Friday, May 13, 2016 7:52 AM
To:
'Scott Collins'
Cc:
Rebecca Ragsdale
Subject:
RE: Briarwood Variation request
Attachments:
Variation Request.pdf
Scott,
I have reviewed the revised variation plan and I have the following comments:
1) The proposed variation schematic should be revised to omit incorrect statements with regard to unit mix
within phases on the visual/map. The labels which need to be revised are as follows:
- "Phase 4: 52 SFD (and/or SFA)" is incorrect and it truly should read "Phase 4: 52 SFD" as SFA units are not
permitted in the lot mix for this phase per Proffer 9. Revise.
- "Phase 5: 18 SFD (and/or SFA)" is incorrect and it truly should read "Phase 5: 18 SFD" as SFA units are not
permitted in the lot mix for this phase per Proffer 9. Revise.
- "Phase IA: 50 SFD (and/or SFA units)" is incorrect and it truly should read "Phase I 28 SFD and 22
Townhomes", as written it appears the developer is permitted 50 SFD units in this phase which is not permitted
in the lot mix for this phase per Proffer 9. Revise.
2) The amount of lots being relocated out of phase 4 and into phase 6 is more than the variation request of Jan 4,
2016 initially requested, which was 4-6 lots at the intersection of Sparrow and Sunset Drive. Revise the written
request to also include the 12 lots and portion of open space being depicted on the visual. (Original request
attached)
3) Also, because you are attempting to take such a large portion of land out of phase 4 (approximately 1/4)
through a phasing variation and reclassify it as phase 6, I need to get Zoning staff and the Director of Planning
to review this to assure they are good with it with regard to Proffer 4 which requires the primary recreation area
to be built/bonded prior to any final plats in phase 4. As I understand it from our brief discussion at SRC your
reasoning for this is because the 52 lots in phase 4 are to be reduced in size due to market demand and you will
be able to get all 52 lots in the remaining land that is phase 4. Will you be able to get all 52 lots in the remaining
space or will you be coming back in for a variation to but a second block of phase 4 somewhere else in the
development? Please clarify this in the variation request
Thanks
Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner
Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle, Virginia
401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville, VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext. 3443
From: Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 5:23 PM
To: Christopher Perez <cperez@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Briarwood Variation request
Chris -
Thank you again. Attached is the updated Variation phasing plan.
Scott
From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 7:18 AM
To: Scott Collins
Subject: RE: Briarwood Variation request
Scott,
Sounds good. Wednesday will work fine and allows me to keep the item on the June 8th meeting. Thanks.
Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner
Department of Community Development ICounty of Albemarle, Virginia
401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville, VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext. 3443
From: Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 6:32 AM
To: Christopher Perez <cperez@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Briarwood Variation request
Chris -
Thanks! I will proceed with option A. We will send over the updated plan by Wednesday.
Thx.
Scott
From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org]
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 1:17 PM
To: Scott Collins
Cc: Rebecca Ragsdale; John Anderson; Jenni Pack
Subject: RE: Briarwood Variation request
Scott,
SUB2016-4 _ Briarwood Phasing Variation
I've reviewed the revised variation request to the phasing plan and find that this request as presented in the
attached `Briarwood Phasing Variation Exhibit - April 2016" goes beyond what is permitted by a variation and
cannot move forward as proposed. The proposal attempts to modify the approved lot mixes defined in proffer 9.
In order to move forward as proposed the request would need to go through as a rezoning request to modify
proffer 9.
History: The variation request from January 4, 2016 submitted with the preliminary plat (SUB2016-4) merely
requested to move a few lots out of phase 4 and relocate them back to phase 6, as was previously approved prior
to the last phasing variation. However, the visual provided on 4-18-16 does not match the written request and
attempted to expand the request to modify lot mixes defined in proffer 9.
Let me know how you wish to proceed: Option A) Revise visual to only modify the phasing and leave the lot
mixes as previously approved or Option B) Pursue a rezoning.
If you choose Option A, it is suggested that the phasing variation also include a modification of phase lines for a
portion of Phase IB so that one of the tot lots in phase IA is located in phase IB as required by proffer #4.
Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner
Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle, Virginia
401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville, VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext. 3443
From: Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 9:11 AM
To: Christopher Perez <cperez@albemarle.org>
Cc: Jenni Pack <lenni@collins-engineering.com>
Subject: Briarwood Variation request
Chris -
Attached is the exhibit to go along with the Variation request that was made back in January to modify the phasing for
the Briarwood project. Let me know if you need anything else to process the variation. Also, let me know if you think
we can wrap this up and get it on the June BOS consent agenda. I will drop off (2) copies of this plan to your office
today.
Thanks.
Scott
Christopher Perez
From: Christopher Perez
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 1:17 PM
To: 'Scott Collins'
Cc: Rebecca Ragsdale; John Anderson; 'Jenni Pack'
Subject: RE: Briarwood Variation request
Attachments: Briarwood Phasing Variation Exhibit-April 2016.pdf; Variation Request.pdf
Scott,
SUB2016-4_Briarwood Phasing Variation
I've reviewed the revised variation request to the phasing plan and find that this request as presented in the
attached `Briarwood Phasing Variation Exhibit - April 2016" goes beyond what is permitted by a variation and
cannot move forward as proposed. The proposal attempts to modify the approved lot mixes defined in proffer 9.
In order to move forward as proposed the request would need to go through as a rezoning request to modify
proffer 9.
History: The variation request from January 4, 2016 submitted with the preliminary plat (SUB2016-4)merely
requested to move a few lots out of phase 4 and relocate them back to phase 6, as was previously approved prior
to the last phasing variation. However, the visual provided on 4-18-16 does not match the written request and
attempted to expand the request to modify lot mixes defined in proffer 9.
Let me know how you wish to proceed: Option A) Revise visual to only modify the phasing and leave the lot
mixes as previously approved or Option B) Pursue a rezoning.
If you choose Option A, it is suggested that the phasing variation also include a modification of phase lines for a
portion of Phase IB so that one of the tot lots in phase IA is located in phase IB as required by proffer#4.
Christopher P.Perez Senior Planner
Department of Community Development 1County of Albemarle,Virginia
401 McIntire Road 1 Charlottesville,VA 22902 00 �
434.296.5832 ext.3443 --T ;, �„ .—de
2ot )ue� . 305
From:Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com] CXet:- tc 4-c_ fy4 ' 2571-'..,t,
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 9:11 AM
To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> 114k . 7t&*
Cc:Jenni Pack<jenni@collins-engineering.com>
Subject: Briarwood Variation request
Chris-
Attached is the exhibit to go along with the Variation request that was made back in January to modify the phasing for
the Briarwood project. Let me know if you need anything else to process the variation. Also, let me know if you think
we can wrap this up and get it on the June BOS consent agenda. I will drop off(2)copies of this plan to your office
today.
Thanks.
Scott
Christopher Perez
From: Christopher Perez
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 1:17 PM
To: 'Scott Collins'
Cc: Rebecca Ragsdale; John Anderson; 'Jenni Pack'
Subject: RE: Briarwood Variation request
Attachments: Briarwood Phasing Variation Exhibit - April 2016.pdf; Variation Request.pdf
Scott,
SUB2016-4 _ Briarwood Phasing Variation
I've reviewed the revised variation request to the phasing plan and find that this request as presented in the
attached `Briarwood Phasing Variation Exhibit - April 2016" goes beyond what is permitted by a variation and
cannot move forward as proposed. The proposal attempts to modify the approved lot mixes defined in proffer 9.
In order to move forward as proposed the request would need to go through as a rezoning request to modify
proffer 9.
History: The variation request from January 4, 2016 submitted with the preliminary plat (SUB2016-4) merely
requested to move a few lots out of phase 4 and relocate them back to phase 6, as was previously approved prior
to the last phasing variation. However, the visual provided on 4-18-16 does not match the written request and
attempted to expand the request to modify lot mixes defined in proffer 9.
Let me know how you wish to proceed: Option A) Revise visual to only modify the phasing and leave the lot
mixes as previously approved or Option B) Pursue a rezoning.
If you choose Option A, it is suggested that the phasing variation also include a modification of phase lines for a
portion of Phase IB so that one of the tot lots in phase IA is located in phase IB as required by proffer #4.
Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner
Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle, Virginia
401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville, VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext. 3443
From: Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 9:11 AM
To: Christopher Perez <cperez@albemarle.org>
Cc: Jenni Pack <jenni@collins-engineering.com>
Subject: Briarwood Variation request
Chris -
Attached is the exhibit to go along with the Variation request that was made back in January to modify the phasing for
the Briarwood project. Let me know if you need anything else to process the variation. Also, let me know if you think
we can wrap this up and get it on the June BOS consent agenda. I will drop off (2) copies of this plan to your office
today.
Thanks.
Scott
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper ylrginia 22701
Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E.
Commissioner
February 19, 2016
Mr. Christopher Perez
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Re: SUB -2016-00004 Briarwood Phase 4 (Lots 1-50, 24A, 25A) & Phase 6 (Lots 1-4)
Preliminary Plat
Dear Mr. Perez,
We have reviewed the preliminary plat for Briarwood Phase 4 and a portion of Phase 6 dated
I2/28/15 as submitted by Collins Engineering and offer the following comments:
1. This project will need to be coordinated with RWSA to ensure access to their water
treatment plant at the end of St. Ives Drive during construction. Furthermore, an entrance
off of the cul-de-sac needs to be provided for the treatment plant.
2. The stormwater management facility at the intersection of St. Ives Road and Sunset Drive
is located relatively close to the right-of-way. It would be preferred if the facility could
be moved further from the right-of-way.
3. Generally, VDOT has no objection to the proposed preliminary plat.
If you need additional information concerning this project, please do not hesitate to contact me at
(434) 422-9782.
Sincerely,
" -i "_ /M K
Tray ustin, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Culpeper District
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
Project:
Briarwood Phase 4 (Lots 1-50, 24A, 25A) & Phase 6 (lots 1 – 4)
Plan preparer:
Scott Collins; Collins Engineering [200 Garrett St., Suite K
Charlottesville, VA 22902, scott(gacollins-en ing eering com]
Owner or rep.:
Wendell Wood and Nena Harrell [ulcwww@embarqmail.com]
Woodbriar Associates [P. O. Box 5548, Charlottesville, VA 22905]
Plan received date:
12 Jan 2016
Date of comments:
18 Feb 2016
Reviewer:
John Anderson
Plan Coordinator:
Christopher Perez
Plat (SUB2016-00004 –Preliminary)
(A plat is a record of property division or reservation. Code Chapter 14)
1. Ref. image below from Approved WP0200600066/SWM Only, sheet 8, plan d. 1/12/10; ref. text:
i
tR F'�QRA1NS 1N TNiS'AR£A
r t)RAIN TO SWM FACILME5l2!
Aamift— I` 11; i4, i i lq! , 7 /',-
After discussion with C. Perez/Planning, include Note on Final Plat to require that Roof Drains for each
separate and independent dwelling built on Lots 1-32, and on Lots 24A and 25A be routed to Pond #4.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 4
SWIM ya
PLAN VIE VIEW
2. Alternatively, Amend SWM Plan/WP02006-00066. If roof drain runoff to Pond #4 is eliminated, then
update Application WP02016-00001. Part IIC technical criteria [9VAC25-870-96] is preserved for Phase
4 provided project layout is not "modified or amended in a manner resulting in an increase in the amount of
phosphorus leaving each point of discharge, and such that there is no increase in the volume or rate of
runoff." [9VAC25-870-48]. Unless WP0200600066 is Amended to remove roof drain collection/routing
to Pond 44, provide Note with Final Plat (ref. #1). Also: #3.
3. (Related to 41, 2) Lots 1-32, and Lots 24A and 25A/sheet 1 —Provide/show properly -sized roof drain
(connections) between storm drain system, and each Lot.
4. Show WP02006-00066 Limits of Clearing & /or Grading on west side of Sunset Drive between Lots 32
and 33 in area of proposed (preserved steep slope) roadway embankment grading. Least impact to steep
slopes in this area (required to construct Sunset Drive) was approved with SDP2006-00041 (ROAD Plan).
[ESOP WP02006-00066 (plan date 3/3/11, The Engineering Groupe, Inc.) Approved 6/3/11, sheet 10 images follow]
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 4
Superimpose WP02006-00066 Limits of Clearing &/or Grading on preliminM plat. Alternatively, eliminate proposed
grading of preserved slopes, 410' to 440'(±); propose retaining wall. Provide geotechnical design for retaining wall for
review/approval prior to Final Plat Approval (similar to Briarwood Commercial ROAD Plan, 2014).
'.. I / /J•p/ /!!.' A //fA-Il.•, IL / \ Y / / :G XYIIA� Y��1
Sheets 1, 2, 3 (comments 45, 6):
5. Revise Proposed SWM Facility label to: SWM Facility/Pond 4; ref. WP02016-00001 &WP02006-00066.
6. Revise Existing SWMFacility label to: SWM Facility/Pond 3; ref WP02016-00001 &WP02006-00066.
7. Sheet 4 —Revise Pond 4 label to: Proposed relocation and redesign of Pond #4 (WP02016-00001 &
WP02006-00066).
8. Sheet 4 —Revise Post -Development SWM Plan to include Pond 4 adequate outfall. Copy/use Approved
WP02006-00066 design.
9. Sheet 3 —Delete 100'stream buffer label that points to SWM Facility/Pond 3.
10. Sheet 4 —Revise Stormwater Management Narrative, last sentence, to read: "Pond #4 is proposed in a new
location. Pond #4 is also redesigned/currently under review under WPO Amendment WP02016-00001."
11. All streets and infrastructure must be approved and bonded prior to plat approval for subdivisions.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 4 of 4
12. WPO2016-00001 (Amendment to WPO2006-00066) must be approved prior to plat approval.
13. Engineering endorses Planning Div. review comments d. 16 -Feb, especially #2, 5, 10, 16, 18, 20, 22.
14. Show/label `permanent stormwater management facility easements.'
15. Show/label SWM facility access easements. If Pond #3 Access easement is platted, provide DB/PG ref.
16. Provide deed of dedication of easement for access to private SWM facilities.
17. Show/label sight easements, as necessary.
Thank you
Please call if any questions.
434.296-5832 -x3069
SUB201600004-Briarwood Phase 4 (Lots 1-50, 24A, 25A) & Phase 6 (lots 1 — 4)_021816.doc
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
February 16, 2016
Scott Collins
200 Garrett Street, Suite K.
Charlottesville VA 22902
SUB2016-4 Briarwood Phase 4 (Lots 1-50, 24A, 25A) & Phase 6 (lots 1— 4) — Prelim Subdivision
Mr. Collins:
The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Initial comments
for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as
applicable, are attached:
Albemarle County Planning Services
Albemarle County Information Services (E911)
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue
Albemarle County Building Inspections
Albemarle County Service Authority
Virginia Department of Transportation [Comments to be forwarded once received]
Albemarle County Engineering Services [Continents to be forwarded once received]
Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should
not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that
will be required to be resolved prior to Final Subdivision Plat approval. The Lead Reviewer will either
approve with conditions or deny the Preliminary Subdivision Plat within 15 days of the Site Review
Meeting.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Senior Planner
��rna
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Phone 434-296.5832 Fax 434-9724126
Memorandum
To: Scott Collins
From: Christopher P. Perez, Senior Planner
Division: Planning
Date: February 16, 2016
Subject: SUB2016-4 Briarwood Phase 4 (Lots 1-50, 24A, 25A) & Phase 6 (lots 1— 4) - Preliminary Subdivision
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will grant or recommend approval of the Subdivision Plat referenced above
once the following comments have been addressed: [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the
Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.]
1. [Comment] Pay the $255 public notification fee prior to any further review/action of the plan.
2. [2MA2004-14 Application plan, Proffer 4, and Proffer 1] The primary recreation area south of Camelot shall
be built or bonded prior to final plat approval of Phase 4. The recreational area shall consist of a
baseball/multipurpose field, two half basketball courts, playground equipment, and picnic facilities. Prior to final
plat approval an approved site plan and WPO plan shall be required for the primary recreational area and the off
street parking, access aisles, and commercial entrance serving this area.
3. [ZMA2004-14 Application plan, Proffer 1, and 4.12.6] On the site plan provide the required parking.
Baseball field - 20 spaces per field
Basketball courts - 2 spaces per basket
Playground equipment - I space per one hundred twenty-five (125) square feet of useable recreation area
4. [ZMA2004-14 Application plan, Proffer 1 & 4, and ZMA95-20 Proffer 19] The final plat shall depict and
dedicate to the HOA the primary recreational area and its access. The alignment of the access road is required to
go through TMP 3213-2 within the area reserved for access as approved on ZMA95-20, which is an amendment to
ZMA79-32. Provide the owner signature of TMP 32E-2 on the final plat.
5. [ZMA2004-14 Application plan, Proffer 41 The open space in Phase 4 shall contain a walking/jogging trail. On
the final plat depict, label ( "Passive Recreational Area consisting of walking/jogging trails'), and dimension the
trail. At a minimum the trail shall be platted from behind Lot 18 on through to Lot 42 and connect to the existing
trail in phase 4. Also, provide a trail connection to either the St. Ives cul-de-sac or Sunset Drive at either the
proposed SWM facility (pond 4) or in the open space area between Lots 32 and 33.
6. [ZMA2004-14 Application plan, Proffer 41 Prior to final plat approval the trail shall be built. Provide a trail plan
exhibit which shall be used by the County to approve the design of the trail. The exhibit shall contain a cross-
section of the trail, topography (elevation contours 50' on either side of the tram), and a plan view of the trail. Once
the trail plan has been approved provide the above mentioned information on the amended WP0201600001
currently under review. Once approved please construct the trail and then request an inspection of the trail.
7. [14-302(B)(10)] Stream buffers. Provide the following note: "The stream buffer(s) shall be managed in
accordance with the Albemarle County Water Protection Ordinance".
8. [14-428] Dedication of streets. Provide the following note: "51 ' Public R1W 1s hereby dedicated for public use. "
9. [14-428] Dedication of open space. Provide the following note: "Open Space is hereby dedicated to the HDA. "
10. [14-302(A)(8)] Proposed Lots. Provide the area of each proposed lot.
11. [14-303(A)] Statement of consent to division. Provide the following note: "The platting or dedication of the
following described land (insert correct description of the land subdivided] is with free consent and in accordance
with the desire of the undersigned owners, proprietors and trustees, if any. "
12. [14-302(A)(15)] Identification of all owners and certain interest holders. Provide the address for each owner of
record, to include the owner of TMP 32E-2.
13. [14-303(0)&(P)] Signature panels. Provide owner signature lines and notary statements for each owner of record.
Under the owner signature lines provide a signature panel for the "Agent for the Board of Supervisors". This will
be used by the Subdivision Agent to approve the plat.
14. [14-303(Q)] Water Supply. Provide the following note: "Under current county policy, public water and/or sewer
will be available to this property. "
15. [14-302(5)8] Yards. Under setbacks include "12' building separation". Also, provide the following note: No
minimum lot area is specified".
16. ]14-311) Infrastructure improvement plans. Road Plan and WPO Plan must be approved, all required
improvements must be built or bonded, and all required Deeds and Declarations must be reviewed and approved
prior to final plat approval.
17. [14-317] Instrument evidencing maintenance of certain improvements. With the final plat submit an instrument
assuring the perpetual maintenance of the stormwater management facilities, open space area and the trails,
primary recreational area, and any other improvements that are to be maintained by the HOA in perpetuity. County
Attorney approval is required prior to final plat approval.
18. [14-302(A)4&5] Easements. Provide the deed book and page reference information for all existing easements.
Include the 10' walking(jogging trail easement previously platted in Phases 4 and 5, and the existing 20' drainage
easement.
19. [14-302(B)7] Agricultural-Forestal District. Provide the following note: "This site does not lie within an
agricultural forestal district. "
20. [14-302(A)4&5] Drainage Easements. On the plat label all drainage easements as either public or private.
21. [14-302(A)3] Existing or platted streets. Provide the State Route Number 1511 for St. Ives Road.
22. [Comment] Under general notes revise the retaining wall note as follows: "Retaining walls are proposed "
23. [Comment] For tracking purposes it is suggested that the numbering of Lots 24A and 25A be revised to Lots 51
and 52.
24. [14-303F] Identification of sections, blocks, and lots. On the final plat provide a current phasing plan.
25. [Comment] Prior to inial plat approval the phasing variation request shall be approved by the Board of
Supervisors. Planning's comments on the variation are provided below. Engineering comments on the variation
will be forwarded to the applicant once received.
Phasing Variation Request
1. [Comment] Provide a visual with the current phasing plan that was approved by the Board of Supervisors on
September 4, 2013 alongside the proposed phasing plan. This visual will be utilized as an attachment in the staff
report.
2. [Comment] The land being platted as Lot 50 and a portion of open space adjacent to Lot 49 are part of Phase 5 on
the current phasing plan. Revise the variation request to modify the phase lines to include these portions of land in
phase 4. Also, as part of the variation request include the two lots next to Lot 4 in the request to shift lots from
phase 4 to phase 6."
3. [Comment] Engineering comments on the variation if any will be forwarded to the applicant once received.
Staff has provided references to provisions of Chapter 14 of the Code of the County of Albemarle. The Code is kept up to
date by the County Attorney's office. The Code may found on the County Attorney's website which may be found under
"Departments and Services" at Albemarle.org.
1n accord with the provisions of Section 14-229(B) of Chapter 14 of the Code if the developer fails to submit a revised final
plat to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter the application shall be deemed to
have been voluntarily withdrawn by the developer.
Please contact Christopher P. Perez in the Planning Division by using cAerez _,albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext.3443 for
further information.
Christopher Perez
From: Alex Morrison <amorrison@serviceauthority.org>
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 9:25 AM
To: Christopher Perez
Subject: SUB201600004: Briarwood Phase 4 (Lots 1-50, 24A and 25A) and Phase 6 (Lots 1-4)
Preliminary Subdivision Plat
Chris,
I have reviewed the above referenced application and have the following comments:
• Construction plans are currently under review by the ACSA (Jeremy Lynn).
Contact Jeremy Lynn (ACSA) to discuss the required dedication for final approval.
• Call out the Deed Book and Page for the existing ACSA sewer easement.
• The applicable charge for the NFRPS Special Rate North Zone will be assessed during the application for each
water/sewer service.
Alexander J. Morrison, P. E.
Civil Engineer
Albemorle County Service Authority
168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22911
(0) 434-977-4511 Ext. 116
(C) 434-981-5577
(F) 434-979-0698
..r
Application for f�
Variations from Approved Plans,
Codes and Standards of Development ' "!
DATE: January 4, 2016
NAME I PLANNED D '" ' c'r: Briarwood Subdivision
TAX MAP/PARCEL NUMBER(s): 32G-1
ZMA NUMBER(s): 1991-13, 1995-005, 2004-014, and 2005-009
Contact Person: Collins Engineering
Address 200 Garrett Street, Suite K city Charlottesville State VA Zip 22902
Daytime Phone( 434 293-3719 Fax# E-mail scott@collins-engineering.com
What type of change is requested?
Q Variation to the Plan ❑Variation to the Code or Standard
Provide a copy of the existing plan(may be a reduced copy)illustrating the area for which the change is requested. Provide a
graphic representation of the requested change.
Describe the variation being sought(may attach separate sheets):
Modification to the Phasing of the Development-There is a small portion of Phase 4 incorporating about 4-6 lots at the
intersection of Sunset Drive and Sparrow Lane. We are requesting to move these lots out of Phase 4 and add them
as part of Phase 6.
What is the reason for each of the requested variations?:
We have met the total amount of development allowed within the Phase IV with the proposed lots as shown on the
preliminary plat. Therefore,we are proposing the additional 4 lots be part of Phase 6.
County of Albemarle Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 Voice: (434)296-5832 Fax: (434) 972-4126
3/9/09 Page I of 2
In accordance with § 8.5.5.3 c) of the Zoning Ordinance,in order to grant the variation, the Planning Director must
make positive findings under 5 criteria. Please provide information about these criteria for the Director's
consideration(may attach separate sheets).
1. Is the variation consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan?
Yes
2. Does the variation increase the approved development density or intensity of development?
No
3. Does the variation adversely affect the timing and phasing of development of any other development in the
zoning district?
No
4. Does the variation require a special use permit?
No
5. Is it in general accord with the purpose and intent of the approved rezoning application?
Yes
§ 8.5.5.3 VARIATIONS FROM APPROVED PLANS,CODES, AND STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENT
The director of planning and community development may allow a site plan or subdivision plat for a planned
development to vary from an approved application plan,standard of development and, also, in the case of a
neighborhood model district, a general development plan or code of development,as provided herein:
a. The director is authorized to grant a variation from the following provisions of an approved plan,code or
standard:
1. Minor variations to yard requirements,maximum structure heights and minimum lot sizes;
2. Changes to the arrangement of buildings and uses shown on the plan,provided that the major elements
shown on the plan and their relationships remain the same;
3. Changes to phasing plans;
4. Minor changes to landscape or architectural standards; and
5. Minor variations to street design.
d. Any variation not expressly provided for herein may be accomplished by rezoning.
3/9/09 page 2 of 2