Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-12-02 · pwo~ ioo~os ~IIYN no ;ymyI p~ds no dn-xoiio~ :x~on~ ';qB!I Pe~H s,~Po~ ~w dn 6uy~seq s~sn iw!2us2od uo uoy2wm~ogu7 ~aom 'g~nH ~oI~ pu~ '2dTso~ BUTITg go Xdoo ~ SOTggO pmwo~ ~pTAoad pue ~OTggO s,M~IO uT ~ITM '~OTggO px~os o~ Xdoo u~n2~ '~n~uBTs s,~on~ qo~ ~T~qo '~ :X~u~o~ X2UnOD 'euoN '~ou~pu~22~ uT ~ s~osTA~dnS go p~o~ ~q2 go s~qu~m II~ 'm'~ 00:6 ~ ~p~o o~ P~TTWO swm BuT2~m ~ql 'did H~IM GHSS~DSIG · s~oM oTIqnd pu~ BuT~aUlBU~ IooqDs J~2u~m~l~ 2~ZO~D PIO BUT2w~do 000E/666I i~ P~STA~ ' (0P086# m~oM) [9'99S'~ 'UOTqwonpH :uoT2wTado~dd~ 'G~AOE~dV '~AW~q X~PTIOH Oi ~AIJ~/D~X~ XANIIOD ~ZI~OH~ ~c[ns pu~ s~TqM '2~2Tq~H ~og o2 ~AI2nD~xz J2unoD ~zyioq2nV 'MNON · ~apxo o2 IIWD -£ 9'S £'S ~'S I'S 'I 866I 866I 'g ~qtu~o~ ~o BuTtesM smosT~m~dnS go p~o~ SNOI,l, Olf 8 o 10. 11. Presentation: Albemarle County Social Services Advisory Board FY 1998 Annual Report. MARTHA HARRIS MADE PRESENTATION. Update: Purchase of Development Rights (PDR) Funding Options. COMMITTED IMMEDIATE FUNDING TO PDR PROGRAM. Presentation: FY 1999/2000 Recommended Capital Improvements Program. ROXANNE WHITE MADE PRESENTATION. PH to consider ordinance to amend & reordain Chapter 4, Animals & Fowl, Article II, Dogs & Other Animals, of Code of Albemarle, in §4-213, In certain areas, to add subsec (36) to readopt & reordain designation of Lexington Ms. Tucker: Follow-up on VDoT's ongoing study of the synchronization of traffic lights. Ms. Tucker: Follow-up on safety of the Polo Grounds Road underpass. Ms. Tucker: At Ms. Thomas's request, will continue to try to conuact residents of North Garden area (reason not stated). None. Staff: Prepare transfer appropriation for $500,000 from the General Fund balance. County Executive Staff: In January or February, provide Board interim plan for court facilities to last until permanent solution is decided upon. ~ounty Executive Staff: Apply for Tea-21 funds to help pay for Ivy Road bike lanes. County Executive's Staff: Prepare cash flow analysis of current debts and present to Board. County Executive Staff: Begin including CIP figures on all regular budget materials so Board is kept up-to-date on them. ~lerk: Send memo to Marsha Davis along w/copy of signed ordinance. 2 12. 13. 16. Subdiv as previously adopted on 3/12/97, as one of those areas where dogs are prohibited from running at large, & to add subsection (37) to include Bedford Hills Subdiv as one of those areas where dogs are prohibited from running at large. ADOPTED ORDINANCE. Discussion: Request from The Municipal Band of Ch'ville, Inc., for one-time contribution to Band's new building. APPROVED $30,000 CONTRIBUTION FROM TOURISM FUND. Other Matters from the Board. Appointments: --Appointed Leo Mallek to Joint Airport Commission, with said term to expire 12/1/2001. --Appointed Joy Mathews to Housing Committee, with said term to expire 12/31/2001. --Appointed Leslie Reed to Rivanna Solid Waste Citizens Advisory Committee, with said term to expire 12/31/2000. --Reappointed Bryson Glover to Commission On Children and Families, with said term to expire 1/31/2000. --Appointed Michael Stewart Rio appointee to Equalization Board, with said term to expire 12/31/99. ~lerk: Send notice of contribution to The Municipal Band of Charlottesville, Inc. and copy to Roxanne White. County Executive Staff: Provide information to Board on rental rates to determine whether to renew lease for Northside Library space. Staff: In February, present report on the effect of additional officers on duty during this hunting season. Clerk: Send notification letters to those selected and those not. Update Boards and Commissmons files. Prepare certificates of appreciation for outgoing members. 3 /lbh Distribution list: Board of Supervisors (6) County Executive and staff (10) Kevin Castner Larry Davis John Grady Wayne Cilimberg Bill Mawyer 4 I N T E R Offic* of thc ¢1~'~ to ~ B~ 0 F F I g E , To-' From: Subject: Date: Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance Laurel B. Hall, Senior Deputy Clerk Appropriation Approved on December 2, 1998 December 4, 1998 Attached is the original appropriation form for the fOllowing item whicti was approved by the Board at its meeting on December 2, 1998: 1) Appropriation: Education, ($3,566.63) (Form #98040). In addition, the Board approved the transfer appropriation for $500,000 from the General Fund balance for the purchase of development rights. Attachments: (sent to appropriate persons) CC: Roxanne White Richard E. Huff, II Kevin Castner Jackson Zimmerman APPROPRIATION REQUEST FISCAL YEAR: 98/99 TYPE OF APPROPRIATION: ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? FUND: NUMBER 98040 ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW X YES NO X SCHOOL PURPOSE OFAPPROPRIATION: DONATIONS FOR V L MURRAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. EXPENDITURE CODE DESCRIPTION . AMOUNT 1 2215 61101 601300 INST/REC SUPPLIES $6.63 1 3104 60216 152100 SUB/VVAGE-TEACHER 110.00 1 3104 60216 135000 P/TWAGES-OFC. CLERICAL 1 099.78 I 3104 60216 200000 FICA ' ' ' 100.22 1 3104 60216 550400 MILEAGE 800.00 I 3104 60216 601300 INST/REC SUPPLIES 1,450.00 TOTAL $3,566.63 REVENUE CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 2 2000 18100 181109 DONATION $6.63 2 3104 18000 189919 INT'L READING ASSOC. GRANT 3,560.00 TOTAL $3,566.63 TRANSFERS REQUESTING COST CENTER: EDUCATION APPROVALS: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE BOARD OF SUPERV!SORS SIGNATURE DATE ~<~' t., v~ o~ SI IPERVISORS 100 Bedford Place '1 'I - 0 5 - 9 8 A ~ 'i: 0 ? Charlottesville, Virginia 22903 September 7, 1998 ~CV£~ Mr. Timothy Frazier Principal Virginia L. Murray Elementary School 3251 Morgantown Road Charlottesville, Virg'mia 22903 Dear Tim, The enclosed check, my 1998 car tax rebate, is more ora symbolic gesture than a substantive contribution. I was opposed to the car tax rebate and my vote in the last gubernatorial race was cast against GoVernor Gilmore rather than for Don Beyer because I strongly feel that the state budget surpius should have been used to repair and upgrade aging school facilities and for in-service training for teachers so we can attain the high standards we have set for our students and teachers. Instead we got a car tax rebate and a budget crisis. In protest to the car tax rebate program I contribt~te my rebate to Virginia L. Murray Elementary School. This is a very small contribution (You have seen the car I drive.) but perhaps other parents will consider doing the same and together we can make a difference. Sincerely, ,I Kathryn C. Thornton COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Esmont Park Property Purchase SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Request for authorization for the County Executive to execute purchase agreements for Esmont Park properties. STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Huff, Mullane¥ December 2, 1998 ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: X INFORMATION: INFORMATION: In 1996, the Albemarle County Neighborhood Team began working with the Esmont community to help determine the needs and improve the level of County services. One of the major needs identified by the community was the need for a park. While Esmont is within the planned service radius of Walnut Creek Park and the Scottsville Community Center, a lack of transportation options makes those park facilities unusable by a large number of Esmont residents. Compounding this problem is the lack of space at the Yancey Elementary School which does not have sufficient land for the recommended community park facilities as outlined in the Community Facilities Plan. After looking at several possible sites, staff became aware of a potential site directly across Route 627 from Yancey Elementary School. The site contains approximately 13.6 acres and involves three property owners. On the enclosure, the property is identified as lot 7 and parcel A owned by Habitat for Humanity, and the adjacent parcels owned by Suber and White. A consultant hired by the County has found the park site to be feasible and has developed the enclosed conceptual plan. This past June, the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors found the proposed park development in this location to be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff has been authorized by the Property Committee to negotiate the purchase of all three properties subject to final approval by the Board of Supervisors. Based upon the Property Committee's recommendation, staff has negotiated the purchase of the Suber and White parcels at $12,200 each which is equal to the January 1, 1999 County assessments. The purchase of the Habitat property has been negotiated at $17,500 which is the mid point between a value placed on the property by a private appraiser hired by Habitat ($19,000) and an opinion of value of the County Assessor ($16,000) after review of that appraisal. The County currently has $100,000 appropriated in the Parks and Recreation Department Capital Improvement Program for this project. The total park development is estimated at over $500,000 and will be phased in as funding becomes available. This site for the Esmont Park has been unanimously endorsed by the Southern Albemarle Organization. The County Attorney's office has developed the attached purchase agreements for the properties. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the County Executive to execute purchase agreements for the Habitat, White and Suber properties. I '1-20-0 8A09: t© RCVD 98.252 '?, SEP 17 '98 15:32 HANTZMOH, WIEBEL g: CO PiRCEC'87 ~ 128 550']8 O0'w cz) 0 SUBDTVIS~ON PLAT SNOWING PORTBRS; V~L'LAGE AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF REAL ESTATE THIS AGREEMENT made this aC+4clay of-~77/~/e(/~f7''~ , 1998, by and between PATRICIA WHITE SUBER (hereafter the"Seller"), anff the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA (hereafter referred to as "Buyer"). 1. Sale and Description of Property. In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, Seller agrees to sell and Buyer agrees to buy certain real estate w/th all improvements thereon and appurtenances thereto (the "Property"), located in the County of Albemarle, Virginia, and described as that portion of land containing approximately 2.245 acres, more or less, and being described further as Albemarle County Tax Map Parcel 128-86B. 2. Purchase Price. The purchase price for the property is Twelve Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($12,200.00), and shall be paid by Buyer to Seller as follows: A. One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) shall be paid upon execution of this Agreement by Seller. B. The balance of $11,200.00 shall be paid by Buyer to Seller at closing. 3. Title. The Seller agrees to convey the Property by appropriate deed containing general warranty and English covenants of title, which title shall be good, marketable, and insurable, free and clear of all liens, indebtednesS, encumbrances and tenancies, and subject only to such easements, covenants, and restrictions of record which do not adversely affect marketability and insurability of title. In the event Buyer's attorney finds title to be defective, and should Seller fail to remedy any default within sixty (60) days of notice thereof, this Agreement may be declared null and void by Buyer, and all funds paid to Seller by Buyer shall be refunded within thirty (30) days. 4. Expenses and Prorations. Buyer agrees to pay the expenses of preparing the deed, and Seller agrees to pay the recordation tax applicable to grantors. Except as otherwise agreed herein, all other expenses incurred by Buyer in connection with the purchase, including, without limitation, title examination, survey costs, preparation of a plat of subdivision, environmental reports, and recording costs shall be borne by Buyer. All taxes, assessments, interest, and rent, if any, shall be prorated as of the date of closing and paid by Seller. 5. Inspection. The Buyer and its agents shall have the right to enter upon:the Property at any time prior to closing for purposes of engineering, surveying, site analysis, and such other work, so long as the studies do not result in a change in the character or topography of the Property. This Agreement is contingent upon the Property being free of hazardous wasteor other dangerous environmental contamination. If the Buyer determines, in its sole judgment, that such contamination exists, Buyer may declare this Agreement null and void and all funds paid to Seller by Buyer shall be refunded within thirty (30) days. 6. Deed and Other Legal Documents. The Seller agrees to execute a deed and other legal documents necessary to convey the Property to Buyer. 7. Time Is of the Essence. The Seller agrees that, with respect to all obligations specified herein, time is of the essence. 8. Closing. Closing shall take place at the Albemarle County Attorney's Office on or before September 15, 1998, or earlier if Buyer and Seller agree, or as soon thereafter as title can be examined and papers prepared. 9. Risk of Loss. All risk of loss or damage to the Property by fire, windstorm, casualty or other cause are assumed by, and shall be borne by the Seller, until closing. In the event of any material loss, destruction or damage to the Property, Buyer may declare the Agreement null and void and all funds paid to Seller by Buyer shall be refunded within thirty (30) days. 10. Condition of Property. Seller warrants that the Property shall be in substantially the same condition at closing as it is at the time o£the execution of this Agreement. 11. Constmctiom Benefit and Effect. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties, constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties, and may not be modified or changed except by written instrument executed by all parties. 12. Agreement Survives Closing. It is expressly understood and agreed by Buyer and Seller that all agreements, promises, stipulations and representations contained herein shall survive closing and shall bind the heirs, executors, administrators, agents, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 13. Approval by Board of Supervisors. This Agreement is expressly contingent upon its approval by the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors (hereafter referred to as "Board"). If the Board fails to approve this Agreement within sixty (60) days of its execution by Seller, Buyer or Seller may declare this Agreement null and void and all funds paid to Seller by Buyer shall be refunded within thirty (30) days. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Agreement as of the day first above written. SELLER: BUYER: C ~~B ~T~~LBEMARLE, TIRGINIA LINTY EXECUTIVE Lk/ Approved as to form: ~ty ~mey STATE OF ~ CITY/COUNTY OFf_~ /) The for/r.e~oing Agreement for Purchase of R -- -_ ta.-- - _ : , wledged before me this t:~day of ~ , 1998~Whi~ Notary Public My Commission Expires: O//~C)//~ STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE: The foregoing Agreement for Purchase of Real Estate was acknowledged before me this 6/`'vi day of .MI~J~_~j ,1998, by Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, County of Albemarle, Virginia. Notary Pfiblick- My Commission Expires: · C:~vIARKDOCS',,PAR KSREC.G EN~S U B E R.AG 1 3 AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF REAL ESTATE THIS AGREEMENT made this q'~ day of ~)~,jgry~l~F' , 1998, by and between JOSEPH SAMUEL WHITE (hereafter the "Seller"), and the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA (hereafter referred to as "Buyer"). 1. Sale and Description of Property. In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, Seller agrees to sell and Buyer agrees to buy certain real estate with all improvements thereon and appurtenances thereto (the "Property"), located in the County of Albemarle, Virginia, and described as that portion of land containing approximately 2.245 acres, more or less, and being described further as Albemarle County Tax Map Parcel 128-86A. 2. Purchase Price. The purchase price for the property is Twelve Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($12,200.00), and shall be paid by Buyer to Seller as follows: A. One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) shall be paid upon execution of this Agreement by Seller. B. The balance of $11,200.00 shall be paid by Buyer to Seller at closing. 3. Title. The Seller agrees to convey the Property by appropriate deed containing general warranty and English covenants of title, which title shall be good, marketable, and insurable, free and clear of all liens, indebtedness, encumbrances and tenancies, and subject only to such easements, covenants, and restrictions of record which do not adversely affect marketability and insurability of title. In the event Buyer's attorney finds title to be defective, and should Seller fail to remedy any default within sixty (60) days of notice thereof, this Agreement may be declared null and void by Buyer, and all funds paid to Seller by Buyer shall be refunded within thirty (30) days. 4. Expenses and Prorations. Buyer agrees to pay the expenses of preparing the deed, and Seller agrees to pay the recordation tax applicable to~ grantors. Except as otherwise agreed herein, all other expenses incurred by Buyer in connection with the purchase, including, without limitation, title examination, survey costs, preparation of a plat of subdivision, environmental reports, and recording costs shall be borne by Buyer. All taxes, assessments, interest, and rent, if any, shall be prorated as of the date of closing and paid by Seller. 5. Inspection. The Buyer and its agents shall have the right to enter upon the Property at any time prior to closing for purposes of engineering, surveying, site analysis, and such other work, so long as the studies do not result in a change in the character or topography of the Property. This Agreement is contingent upon the Property being free of hazardous waste or other dangerous environmental contamination. If the Buyer determines, in its sole judgment, that such contamination exists, Buyer may declare this Agreement null and void and all funds paid to Seller by Buyer shall be refunded within thirty (30) days. 6. Deed and Other Legal Documents. The Seller agrees to execute a deed and other legal documents necessary to convey the Property to Buyer. 7. Time Is of the Essence. The Seller agrees that, with respect to all obligations specified herein, time is of the essence. 8. Closing. Closing shall take place at the Albemarle County Attorney's Office on or before September 15, 1998, or earlier if Buyer and Seller agree, or as soon thereafter as title can be examined and papers prepared. 9. Risk of Loss. All risk of loss or damage to the Property by fire, windstorm, casualty or other cause are assumed by, and shall be borne by the Seller, until closing. In the event of any material loss, destruction or damage to the Property, Buyer may declare the Agreement null and void and all funds paid to Seller by Buyer shall be refunded within thirty (30) days. 10. Condition of Property.. Seller warrants that the Property shall be in substantially the same condition at closing as it is at the time of the execution of this Agreement. 11. Construction, Benefit and Effect. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties, constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties, and may not be modified or changed except by written instrument executed by all parties. 12. Agreement Survives Closing. It is expressly understood and agreed by Buyer and Seller that all agreements, promises, stipulations and representations contained herein shall survive closing and shall bind the heirs, executors, administrators, agents, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 13. Approval by Board of Supervisors. This Agreement is expressly contingent upon its approval by the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors (hereafter referred to as "Board"). If the Board fails to approve this Agreement within sixty (60) days of its execution by Seller, Buyer or Seller may declare this Agreement null and void and all funds paid to Seller by Buyer shall be refunded within thirty (30) days. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Agreement as of the day first above written. SELLER: BUYER: '2 COU~Y OF AIgBEM&RLE, VIRGINIA w. TUCKER, '\ } Approved as to form: fW; 'om y STATE OF CITY/COUNTY OF/' The foregoing Agreement for Purchase of Real Estate was acknowledged before me this day of/t~/-] f__v- ' 1998' bY ~x~ ~ Jose amue White. OLEVELAND D. JONES ?IOTARYlaJSUC OF NEW JERSEY lty r, ara~bn.~ Aug. 2I, 1909 Notary Public / My Commission Expires: STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE: The foregoing Agreement for Purchase of Real Estate was acknowledged before me this day of ~_m~,~,/ ,1998, by Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, County of Albemarle, Virginia. My Commission Expires: Notary PulJlic "- · C:'~¥1ARKDOCS~PARKSREC.GEN\WHITE.AG 1 AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF REAL ESTATE THIS AGREEMENT made this hi4~ day of ~)e___.P~mJ3e~ , 1998, by and between GREATER CHARLOTTESVILLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY (hereafter the "Seller"), and the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA (hereafter referred to as "Buyer"). 1. Sale and Description of Property. In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, Seller agrees to sell and Buyer agrees to buy certain real estate with all improvements thereon and appurtenances thereto (the "Property"), located in the County of Albemarle, Virginia, and described as follows: (a) "Parcel A" containing approximately 5.429 acres, more or less, and being described further as part of Albemarle County Tax Map Parcel 128-85; and (b) "Lot 7" containing approximately 3.737 acres, more or less, and being described further as part of Albemarle County Tax Map Parcel 128-85. 2. Purchase Price. The purchase price for the Property is Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($17,500.00), and shall be phid by Buyer to Seller at closing. 3. Title. The Seller agrees to convey the Property by appropriate deed containing general warranty and English covenants of title, which title shall be good, marketable, and insurable, free and clear of all liens, indebtedness, encumbrances and tenancies, and subject only to such easements, covenants, and restrictions of record which do not adversely affect marketability and insurability of title. In the event Buyer's attorney finds title to be defective, and should Seller fail to remedy any default within sixty (60) days of notice thereof, this Agreement may be declared null and void by Buyer, and all fimds paid to Seller by Buyer shall be refunded within thirty (30) days. 4. Expenses and Prorations. Buyer agrees to pay the expenses of preparing the deed, and Seller agrees to pay the recordation tax applicable to grantors. Except as otherwise agreed herein, all other expenses incurred by Buyer in connection with the purchase, including, without limitation, title examination, survey costs, preparation of a plat of subdivision, environmental reports, and recording costs shall be borne by Buyer. All taxes, assessments, interest, and rent, if any, shall be prorated as of the date of closing and paid by Seller. 5. Inspection. The Buyer and its agents shall have the right to enter upon the Property at any time prior to closing for purposes of engineering, surveying, site analysis., and such other work, so long as the studies do not result in a change in the character or topography of the Property. This Agreement is contingent upon the Property being free of hazardous waste or other dangerous environmental contamination. If the Buyer determines, in its sole judgment, that such contamination exists, Buyer may declare this Agreement null and void and all funds paid to Seller by Buyer shall be refunded within thirty (30) days. 6. Deed and Other Legal Documents. The Seller agrees to execute a deed and other legal documents necessary to convey the Property to Buyer. 7. Time Is of the Essence. The Seller agrees that, with respect to all obligations specified herein, time is of the essence. 8. Closing. Closing shall take place at the Albemarle County Attorney's Office on or before December 15, 1998, or earlier if Buyer and Seller agree, or as soon thereafter as title can be examined and papers prepared. 9. Risk of Loss. All risk of loss or damage to the Property by fire, windstorm, casualty or other cause are assumed by, and shall be borne by the Seller, until closing. In the event of any material loss, destruction or damage to the Property, Buyer maY declare the Agreement null and void and all funds paid to Seller by Buyer shall be refunded within thirty (30) days. 10. Condition of Property_. Seller warrants that the Property shall be in substantially the same condition at closing as it is at the time of the execution of this Agreement. 11. Construction, Benefit and Effect. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties, constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties, and may not be modified or changed except by written instrument executed by all parties. 12. Agreement Survives Closing. It is expressly understood and agreed by Buyer and Seller that all agreements, promises, stipulations and representations contained herein shall survive closing and shall bind the heirs, executors, administrators, agents, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 13. Approval by Board of Supervisors. This Agreement is expressly contingent upon its approval by the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors (hereafter referred to as "Board"). If the Board fails to approve this Agreement within 60 days of its execution by Seller, Buyer or Seller may declare this Agreement null and void and all funds paid to Seller by Buyer shall be refunded within thirty (30) days. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Agreement as of the day first above written. SELLER: GREATER CHARLOTTESVILLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY By: MAR~RETA SWANSON VICE-CHAIRMAN BUYER: Approved as to form: STATE OF "k[~; fi, ~. CITY/COUNTY OF COU _~OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA ROBERT W. TUCKER, Jl~. COUNTY EXECUTIVE The foregoing Agreement for Purchase of Real Estate was acknowledged before me this i ~ day of \q o,J ~ ~, ~ ~ ,1998, by Margreta Swanson on behalf of Greater Charlottesville Habitat for Humanity. Notary Public My Commission Expires: Akt~1%1, .~oc ~ STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE: The foregoing Agreement for Purchase of Real Estate was acknowledged before me this 4/~ day of .r,c(.~'~,r~_J,q/tJ ,1998, by Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, County of Albemarle, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission Expires: ~ Ja, c~OO I COUNTY OF ALBEMARI E MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive November 24, 1998 / Holiday Leave As most of you may know, Governor Gilmore recently provided State employees with extra holidays for Thanksgiving and Christmas in addition to their normal holiday leave time. The Governor has authorized a half-day for November 25th prior to the Thanksgiving Holiday, a half-day on December 23rd, and all of New Year's Eve (December 31st). While we will be unable to consider the November 25th leave time for our employees, I am requesting that you authorize the half-day on December 23rd and New Year's Eve which would be consistent with the Governor's additional holiday time granted to State employees. This item has been placed on your Consent Agenda so, pending your approval, we will institute this schedule that is equitable to holiday leave granted to State employees by Governor Gilmore. RWT,Jr/dbm 98.081 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' . AGENDA TITLE: Appropriation - Education SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Request approval of appropriation #98040 in the amount of $3,566.63 for V. L. Murray Elementary School. STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Huff, Castner, Breeden AGENDA DATE: December 2, 1998 ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: × ATTACHMENTS: INFORMATION: BACKGROUND: At its meeting on October 26, 1998, the School Board approved the following appropriations for V. L. Murray Elementary School. · Appropriation of $6.63 for V. L. Murray Elementary School. Kathryn C. Thornton donated her car tax rebate to V. L. Murray Elementary School to purchase instructional supplies. Appropriation of $3,560.00 for V. L. Murray Elementary School. The International Reading Association awarded Paula E. White, teacher at Murray Elementary School, a Teacher As Researcher Grant in the amount of $3,560.00. This grant will fund the project Expanding Definitions: A Study of the Roll of Electronic Books in the Literacy Process. This qualitative study will examine the role of electronic books in the literacy acquisition process of early elementary students. From this information, case studies will be written and examined for categories related to the expanding definition of literacy, which includes all media. Outcomes may offer information for how teachers will use this new technology to guide children's literacy growth. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors approve the appropriations, totaling $3,566.63, as detailed on Appropriation #98040. 98.248 David P. Bowerman Charlotte Y. Humphris F-on-est R. Marshall, Jr. COUNTY OF Al REMA~I _F Office of Board of Super,~rs 401 Mclntim Road Charlottesville, Vnginia 22902.-~96 (804) 296.-5843 FAX (804) 296--5800 December 15, 1998 Charles S. Martin Walter E PenMns ,Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller Ms. Kathryn C. Thomton 100 Bedford Place Charlottesville, VA 22903 Dear Ms. Thornton: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, please accept our sincere thanks for your recent donation to V. L. Murray Elementary School. These funds will be used to help enhance the quality of education provided to students in our school system. Again, thank you. Sincerely, Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Chairman FRM/lbh CC.' Members, Board of.Supervisors Dr. Kevin C. Castner Printed on recycled paper COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Revised FY 1999/00 Operating Budget Calendar SUBJECT/PROPOSALIREQUEST: Request Approval of Revised FY 1999/00 Operating Budget Calendar STAFF CONTACT(S): Tucker, White, Gulati AGENDA DATE: December 2, 1998 ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: × ATTACHMENTS: REVIEWED BY: ITEM NUMBER: INFORMATION: INFORMATION: Yes / BACKGROUND: On October 7, the Board approved the FY 1999/00 Operating Budget Calendar, which included the following significant items: April 14- Public Hearing on Board of Supervisors' Proposed Budget April 16 - Additional Work Session (if Needed) April 21 - Boarc~ Adopts FY 1999/00 Budget, Sets Tax Levy Board Adopts FY 1999/00 CIP Budget Board Approves FY 1999/00 - 2003/04 CIP DISCUSSION: In order to meet the traditional April 15 ado ption date, and to set the County tax rates prior to the April 1999 tax mailing, the aforementioned April, 1999 budget dates have been moved forward by one week. The revised dates are: April 7- Public Hearing on Board of Supervisors' Proposed Budget April 9 - Additional Work Session (if Needed) April 14 - Board Adopts FY 1999/00 Budget, Sets Tax Levy Board Adopts FY 1999/00 CIP Budget Board Approves FY 1999/00- 2003/04 CIP A copy of the updated FY 1999/99 Operating Budget Calendar is attached. Revised dates are highlighted in bold print. The public will be informed of these changes through different media during the budget process. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the revised FY 1999/00 Operating Budget Calendar. 98.260 October 98 S MT WT F S I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 November 98 S MT WT F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 December 98 S MT WT F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 '8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 January 99 S MT WT F S i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 February 99 S MT WT F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 March 99 S MT WT F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 lg 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 FY 1999/00 Budget Calendar 1998-99 October 13 Revenue Projections Submit- ted By Finance November 4 Budget Guidance From Board of Supervisors Joint Board Meeting 1'7 Planning Commission Work- session on CIP December 2 4:00 PM Joint Meeting w/ School Board (Legislative Issues) Board Worksession on CIP January 13 Board Holds Public Hearing on CIP 19 Presentation of School Budget to School Board 21 Public Budget Discussion- Schools 23 School Board Budget Worksession 26 Public Budget Discussion- Schools School Board Budget 28 Worksession 29 General Fund Balanced February I School Board Budget Worksession 3 School Budget Public Hearing & Worksession Supervisors/School Board Budget Discussion ] 0 Board approves FY 99/00- 03/04 CIP School Budget Final Workes- sion & Adoption ] 7 School Budget Submitted to County Executive March 3 Budget & Final Agency Report Sent to Board 10 Public Hearing on Recom- mended Budget 15 Board Worksession March 17 Board Worksession 22 Board Worksession 24 Board Worksession 25 Additional Work Session, if needed April 7 Public Hearing on Proposed Budget 9 Additional Worksession (if needed) 14 Board Adopts FY99/00 Budget, Sets Tax Levy Board Adopts FY99/00 CIP Budget Board Approves FY 99/00 - 03/04 CIP April 99 S MT WT F S I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 May 99 S MT WT F S 1 i 3 4 5 6 7 8 I0 11 12 13 14 15 I 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 June 99 S MT WT F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 July 99 S MT WT F S t 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3l August 99 S MT WT F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 September 99 S MT WT F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 11/23/98 I N T E R Albemarle Board of Co,my Supcin,isors Office of thc Clerk to the Board 401 Mclntke Road Charlotlesville, Virginia 22902-4596 804-296-58¢3 0 F F I C E MEMO To: From: Subject: Date: Tina Pendleton-Fuller, Clerk to School Board Laurie Hall, Senior Deputy Clerk Revised FY1999/2000 Operating Budget Calendar November 25, 1998 At its December 2, 1998 meeting, the Board of Supervisors adopted the attached revised FY 1999/2000 Operating Budget Calendar. Attachment DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER , ..~ :~..~ OF SUPERVISORS COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 701 VDOT WAY CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22911 November 20, 1998 A. G. TUCKER RESIDENT ENGINEER Board of Supervisors Meeting November 4, 1998 Ms. Ella Carey, Clerk Albemarle Board of Supervisors 401 Mctntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Dear Ms. Carey: We offer the following comments regarding transportation matters that were discussed at the November 4th Board meeting. Please note that resolutions to adopt "Children at Play" Signs within neighborhoods should be corrected from "Child at Play" wording. We have placed orange construction flags on the Through Truck Restriction signs along Route 631, Rio Road, to assist in alerting truckers to the sharp curves. We are reviewing the addition of other signs and will advise the Board when this study is complete. i am continuing to gather information in response to questions about STP funding and the Meadowcreek Parkway, Phase II project. I will share this information with the Board after the first of the year. Please share this information with the Board. the December 2, '[998, Board meeting. I will be prepared to discuss these and other matters at Sincerely, A. G. Tucker AGTlsmk TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY COUNTy OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Old Crozet School SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Report on the status of the facility from the Engineering & Public Works Department. STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Huff, Mawyer AGENDA DATE: December 2, 1998 ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA: ITEM NUMBER: INFORMATION: ACTION: ' INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: REVIEWED BY: X BACKGROUND: The original Crozet Elementary School was constructed in 1924. The structure is two story, wood frame with brick veneer and totals 15,000 sr. A one story, 10,000 sf addition was constructed in 1961. Classes were held in the facility until a new elementary school was opened in 1991. The building is currently leased to Crossroads Waldorf School. DISCUSSION: The roof membrane, brick parapet and gutters serving the 1924 section of the building were replaced during the summer to maintain a water-tight condition ($325,000). Unforeseen damage to the roof structure was also temporarily corrected with shoring located in several classrooms ($40,000). Permanent repairs to the roof structure will be required next summer for an estimated cost of $90,000. Replacement of the roof membrane covering the 1961 section ($110,000) and all of the windows in the 1924 section of the building ($90,000) is also planned for next summer to maintain the environmental integrity of the building. Students from the University of Virginia School of Architecture completed a study of the facility funded by Engineering in 1997. The study recommended the building be renovated and converted to a public use center due to the history and status of the school in the Crozet community. To convert the building to a community facility, further renovations will be required to provide current ADA, life safety and building systems, including air conditioning, at an estimated cost of $2.5 million. Demolition and replacement of the building with new construction will cost an estimated $3.5 million. Funding to renovate or replace the building has not been included in the five year CIP program. RECOMMENDATION: Engineering will continue to maintain the major building systems as planned. S'~OS~IA~l~idflg =10 Q~dVO{I )8.253 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Bill Mawyer, Director Steve Hart, Senior Project Manager ~ November 16, 1998 Crossroads Waldorf School Per your direction, I have documented the capital improvements recently completed at the Crossroads Waldorf School and the upcoming work scheduled for completion during the next fiscal year. Project scope and budgets have been 'included. Lastly, this memorandum reviews the renovation costs outlined in the 1997 Adaptive Reuse of The Crozet Elementary School Document. Items a and b below outline the construction and temporary shoring work recently completed at the Crossroads Waldorf School. a) Replace the entire roofing system on the original Old Crozet School section constructed in 1924. This scope of work was outlined in the 98/99 Approved CIP. Included in this scope are the following: 1) Replace the assorted roofing systems on the old 1924 structure; 2) Provide new brick parapet around the perimeter of the structure; 3) Provide new gutter system; 4) Replace exterior cornice/outriggers. The total project costs for this effort will be $325,000 and the work will be completed by 12/01/98. b) Provide temporary structural support to stabilize the roofing systems in the original Old Crozet School. The need for this work was identified during selective demolition of the roofing project. The following work has been identified: 1) Provide 6" x 6" shoring posts as instructed be the structural engineering firm Dunbar, Milby, & Williams in the grade 6-8 and German classrooms. These modifications will provide only a temporary fix until permanent work can be completed next summer. 2) Reinforce the existing truss system, which supports the roofing system above the Music Room. This modification will be a permanent fix. 3) Provide 6" x 6" shoring posts as instructed be the structural engineering firm Dunbar, Milby, & Williams in the cafeteria and office areas if required. These modifications will provide only a temporary fix until permanent work can be completed next summer. The total project costs for this effort will be $40,000 and the work will be completed by 12/01/98. Items c and d outline construction work scheduled to occur during summer 1999. c) Provide permanent structural support to stabilize the roofing systems, which have been temporarily shored in item b above. The following areas will need to be treated: 1) Grade 6-8 classrooms and German room; 2) Cafeteria and Office areas. The total project costs for this effort will be $90,000 ($35,000 A/E fees & $55,000 Construction) and the work will be completed by 8/01/99. d) Replace the entire roofing system on the 1961 Old Crozet School Addition and replace windows in the Original Crozet School Building constructed in 1924. This scope of work was outlined in the original fiscal year 99/00 CIP budget, which allocated $200,000 for this project. Included in this scope is the following: 1) Replace roofing systems on the 1961 Addition ($110,000 construction); 2) Provide new windows and doors on the 1923 structure ($90,000). The total project costs for this effort Mil be $200,000 and the work will be completed by 8/01/99. Engineering documentation for this effort was completed during the FY98/99 project. In summary, the County spent approximately $365,000 during the fiscal year 98/99 on work outlined in a and b above. The County anticipates funding approximately $290,000 in fiscal year 99/00 to address permanent structural concerns, replace windows in the 1924 structure, and replace the roofing system in the 1961 addition. The CIP group has also been tasked to review the renovation cost estimate outlined in the 1997 Adaptive Reuse of the Old Crozet Elementary School. This docUment reported renovation construction costs would be between $2.2 to $2.5 million or approximately $100 per square foot to renovate the existing Crossroads Waldorf School. Architectural and engineering fees would be an additional $150,000. These figures do not include site work, grading, or recreation fields. The estimate identified in the report based renovation construction scope on a variety of public use options and based costs per square foot value. The CIP group reviewed the construction estimate in order to verify the scope of work upon which it was based, the accuracy 0fthe estim ate, and how much of the ongoing Old Crozet construction work ($655,000) could be applied to a future large scale renovation of the building. The CIP group verified the square footage of the existing Crossroads Waldorf School to be approximately 25,000 square feet. The original 1924 section is 15,000 square feet and the 1961 addition is 10,000 square feet. In conclusion, the CIP group reviewed the report and felt the detailed scope of work upon which the cost estimate was based was accurate. Major divisions of work including mechanical, electrical, ADA, architectural, and fire safety were outlined and priced fairly. Construction estimates based on square foot costs were verified. In addition, Means Facilities Cost Data supports the $100 per square foot figure for renovations based on this type of public use. The CIP group would like to recommend $200,000 of additional funds be applied to structural concerns especially if the future public use for the facility will be a library requiring increased floor loading. Lastly, the CIP group would like to report how much of the ongoing Old Crozet construction work ($655,000) could be applied to a future large-scale renovation of the building. The CIP group anticipates approximately $500,000 of the $655,000 construction funds would be applied to a future Old Crozet renovation project. This is primarily due to the fact the majority of funds spent to date at Old Crozet School have been applied to the roofing, window, and exterior systems designed to stabilize the structure from the elements. Please contact me by e-mail or by telephone at extension 3264 if you have any questions. SH/cj Attachments: 1. Crozet School 1997 Renovation Cost File: i:\dept\engineer\hart\oldcrozct melno.doc Adaptive Reuse of the Old Crozet Elementary School July 1997 ThiS item was scanned under Land Use Reports 1998 Building Code Information (804) 296-5832 .~ ,~..,,,~.D OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF ALBEMARI F Deparlrnent of Building Code and Zoning Services 401 Mclnfire Road, Room 223 Charlottesville, Wrginia 22902-4596 FAX (804) 972-4126 TTD (804) 972-4012 Zoning Infon-nation '(804) 296-5875 November 4, 1998 Joseph M. Cochran P. O. Box 559 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Re: Official Determination, Statement of Development Rights Tax Map 58 Parcel 82 Dear Joe: On behalf of your clients, Jonathan and Judith Baker, you have asked the development rights on the above noted parcel as allowed in the RA, Rural Areas, zoning district. These rights are only hypothetical in nature but do represent the maximum number of lots of less than 21 acres allowed. In addition to the development right lots, a "parent parcel" may create as many parcels with a minimum of 21 acres as it has land to make. The subject property of 39 acres would have a maximum development potential of six lots. Of the six ots, one must be a minimum of 21 acres. The other five would be required to have a minimum of 2 acres each. Those same rights apply to dwelling units. In other words, the maximum number of dwellings allowed for this 39 acres would be six, also. In order to utilize the rights, either for subdivision purposes or for dwelling unit construction, you must meet all applicable regulations. For dwelling unit construction, these would include but not be limited to: · demonstrating that you can meet regulations for subdividing, e.g., siting dwellings at east 50 feet apart so that a property line could be placed between dwellings and both lots meet their individual 25-foot side yard requirements; · demonstrating Health Department approval of septic disposal field sites for both primary and 100% reserve areas; and, · providing adequate frontage and road access. With regard to multiple dwellings on one parcel, we routinely approve building permits for second dwellings without consulting other county departments or state agencies such as the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). However, if we were aware of an unsafe entrance we would definitely consult VDOT. (Health Department approval is always required for new construction.) At all times, the third dwelling on any one parcel requires Development Rights, TMP 58-82 Page 2 November 4, 1998 the approval of a site plan or aPproval of a site plan waiver request by the Planning Commission. Both of these items require at a minimum, that our road standards are applied and that the road from the state road to the dwellings, meets those standards. There may also be other regulations that would be identified and required under either review. This informatiOn is based on your letter of September 8, 1998, the fax transmitted on October 16, 1998, the plats that you supplied, the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances of Albemarle County in effect at this time, and current policies of the development review departments. There is no guarantee of these regulations in the future. Any requests for future development will be reviewed under the applicable regulations at the time of application. If you are aggrieved by this determination, you have the right to appeal it within thirty (30) days of the date notice of this determination is given, in accordance with Section 15.2-2311 of the Code of Virg'nia. If you do not file a timely appeal, this determination shall be final and unappealable. An appeal shall be taken only by filing with the Zoning Administrator and the Board of Zoning Appeals a notice of appeal which specifies the grounds for the appeal. In order for an appeal to be considered complete, it shall include a completed application and $95 fee. The date notice of this determination was given is the same as the date of this letter. I hope this addresses all the issues in which your clients have interest. If not, please let me know and I will try to address any further questions. Sincerely, Janice D. Sprinkle Deputy Zoning Administrator Cc: Cardinal Hil Corporation Reading, TM-P'58-82 Gay Carver, Real Estate Department Ella Carey, Clerk Board of Supervisors Maynard Sipe, Planning Department 1998 THIRD QUARTER BUILDING REPORT County of Albemarle Departmen{-~3fPl~-r~-n'ing and Community Development' 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5823 INDEX I. Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Month (Charts A & B) II, Comparison of Residential Dwelling Units by Type (Charts C& D) II!,Comparison of All Building Permits (Chart E) IV. Comparison of Certificates of Occupancy (Charts F-H) KEY TO TYPES OF HOUSING *REFERRED TO IN REPORT SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC AA Single-Family (includes modular) Single-Family Attached Single-Family Townhouse Duplex Multi-Family Mobile Home in the County (not in an existing park) AcceSsOry Apartment -2- During the third quarter of 1998, 210 permits were issued for 363 dwelling units. In addition, 8 permits were issued for mobile homes in existing parks at an average exchange value of $2,500, for a total of $20,000. I. COMPARISON OF NEW' RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS BY MONTH Chart A. Nine Year Comparison of New Residential Dwelling units by Month MONTH 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 JAN 56 64 183 49 190 50 26 54 38 FEB 68 31 72 56 53 43 44 44 39 MAR 92 57 64 58 72 47 61 57 65 APR 82 62 72 76 69 46 71 75 62 MAY 75 44 62 45 60 41 63 118 65 JUN 85 54 48 79 70 62 41 89 85 JUL 42 58 62 81 186 51 87 71 74 AUG 87 58 126 116 49 44 105 34 221 SEP 90 55 ' 48 45 47 56 54" 52 ' 68 OCT 48 39 43 68 51 42 186 216 NOV 37 42 49 65 60 66 43 49 DEC 42 50 37 67 32 48 44 62 I TOTAL 804 614 866 805 939 596 835 921 717 Chart B. Three Year Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Month IChart B: Three Year comparison of New Residential D.U,s by Month 24o , 200 180  160 ' ~,, 140 IJJ 120 I00 Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development, Office of Mapping, Graphics, and Information Resources -3- Quarter 3 II. COMPARISON OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS Chart C. Breakdown of New Residential Dwelling Units by Magisterial District and Dwelling Unit Type MAGISTERIAL DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL % TOTAL DISTRICT SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC AA D.U. D.U. RIO 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1% JACK JOUE3-r 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 1% RIVANNA 58 10 20 0 164 1 3 - 256 71% SAMUEL MILLER 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 8% SCOTTSVILLE 28 2 0 0 0 2 0 32 9% WHITE HALL 34 4 0 0 0 I 0 39 11% TOTAL 155 16 20 0 164 4 4 363 100% Chart D. Breakdown of New Residential Dwelling Units by Comprehensive Plan Area and Dwelling Unit Type COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AREA DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC AA UNITS URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 1 2 0 0, 0 0 0 0 2 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 2 6 4 16 0 0 0 0 26 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 3 3 2 0 0 164 0 0 169 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 4 10 2 0 01 0 0 0 12 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CROZET COMMUNITY 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 15 HOLLYMEAD COMMUNITY 15 2 4 . 0 0 0 2 23 PINEY MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY O= 2 0 0 (3 0 0 2 RIVANNA VILLAGE 16 0 0 0 0 0 1 17 DEVELOPMENT AREA SUBTOTAL 73 16 20 0 164 0 3 276 RURAL AREA 1 23 0 0 0 0 1 1 25 RURAL AREA 2 16 0 0 0 0 I 0 17 RURAL AREA 3 21 0 0 0 0 0 (3 21 · RURAL AREA 4 22 0 01 0 0 2 0 24 RURAL AREA SUBTOTAL 82 0 0 0 0 4 I 87 TOTAL 155 16 '20 (] 164 4 4 363 Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development, Office of Mapping, Graphics, and Information Resources Quarter 3 III. COMPARISON OF ALL BUILDING PERMITS Chart E. Estimated Cost of Construction by Magisterial District and Construction Type MAGISTERIAL NEW *NEW NON-RES. NEW COMMERCIAL FARM BUILDING TOTAL DISTRICT ~ RESIDENTIAL & ALTER. RES. & NEW INSTITUT. & ALTER. COMM. No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ RIO 2 230,000 30 530,162 I 389,000 23 2,833,548 56 3,982,710 JOUETT 4 1,055,000 18 299,100 1 2,643,050 2 101,000 25 4,098,150 RIVANNA 102 19,878,523 68 1,092,750 9 2,460,000 37 3,246,724 216 26,677,997 S. MILLER 33 7,463,834 55 2,084,830 5 461,800 13 892,086 106 10,902,550 SCOTTSVILLE 32 3,147,000 37 2,111,689 3 2,565,000 10 13,240,675 82 21,064,364 WHITE HALL · 39 8,430,897 46 738,042 2 20,941 7 1,430,000 94 10,619,880 TOTAL 212 40,205,254 254 6,856,573 21 8,539,791 92 21,744,033 579 77,345,651 ;)hal value of mobile homes placed in existing parks is included in Residential Alteration Category. IV. CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY Chart F. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by Elementary School District and Dwelling Unit Type SCHOOL DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL PERCENT DISTRICT SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC AA D.U. TOTAL D.U. Agnor-Hurt 13 2 6 0 0 0 1 22 9.87% Broadus Wood/Sutherlan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Broadus Wood/Jouett 7 0 0 0 0 . (3 0 7 3.14% Brownsville 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 4.93% Crozet 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 1.79% Greer 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.90% Hollymead 6 6 0 ' 0 0 0 1 13 5.83% Meriwether Lewis/Henley 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1.79% Meriwether Lewis/Jouett 9 (3 0 0 0 0 0 9 4.04% Murray 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2.69% Red Hill 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.90% Cale/Burtey 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.90% Cale/Walton 22 7 0 0 0 0 0 29 13.00% Scottsville 2 0 0: 0 0 1 0 3 1.35% Stone Robinson/Burley 19 0 13 0 0 0 0 19 8.52% Stone Robinson/Walton 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.45% Stony PointJBurley 0 0 0 0 0 (3 0 0 0.00% Stony PointJsutherland 6 0 0 0 (3 0 0 6 2.69% Woodbrook 12 0 4 0 54 0 0 80 35.87% Yancey 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1.35% TOTAL 129 17 10 0 64 I 2 223 100.00% Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development Office of Mapping, Graphics, and Information Resources Quarter 3 IV. CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY (continued) Chart G. Breakdown of CO's for Residentiai Dwelling Units by Magisterial District and Dwelling Unit Type MAGISTERIAL DVVELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL DISTRICT SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC AA RIO 51 0 0 0 64 0 0 69 JACK JOUETT 7 0 0 0 0 (] 0 7 RIVANNA 57 8 10 0 0 0 2 77 SAMUEL MILLER 25 4 0 0 0 0 0 29 SCOTTSVlLLE 19 3 O 0 0 I ' 0 23 WHITE HALL 16 2 Oi 0 0 0 0 18 TOTAL 129 17 10 0 64 I 2 223 Chart H. Breakdown of CO's for Res dent a ~Dwelling Units by Comprehensive Plan Area and Dwelling Unit Type CQMPREHENS VE PLAN AREA DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL SF SFA SF/TH DUP MF MHC AA UNITS URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 2 1 3 2 6 0 64 0 (3 85 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 · URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 4 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 16 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 5 9; 4 0 0 0 0 (3 13 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 6 3 0 O 0 0 0 0 3 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 7 0 0 01 0 0 ' 0 0 0 CROZET COMMUNITY 4 2 0 0 '0 0 0 6 HOLLYMEAD COMMUNITY 18 3 4 0 0 0 2 27 PINEY MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 RIVANNA VILLAGE 17 0 0 0 0 0; 0 17 ELOPMENT AREA SUBTOTAL 79 1 7 10 0 64 01 2 172 RURAL AREA 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 RURAL AREA 2 8 0 0 0 01 0 0 8 RURAL AREA. 3 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 RURAL AREA 4 7 0 0 0 0 I 0 8 RURAL AREA SUBTOTAL 50 (3 0 0 0 1 0 51 TOTAL 129 17 10 0i 64 1 2 22: Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development, Office of Mapping, Graphics, and Information Resources COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUM MARY AGENDA TITLE: September 1998 Financial Report SU BJ ECT/PROPOSAL/REQU EST: September 1998 Financi~i'R~'~f°~' th~ General, School, and Capital Funds STAFF CONTACT(S): Ms. White, Messrs. Tucker, Breeden, Waiters AGENDA DATE: December 2, 1998 ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA: ITEM NUMBER: INFORMATION: ACTION: X INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Yes REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: Attached are the September 30, 1998 Monthly Financial Reports for the General, School, and Capital Funds. General Fund revenue projections were revised September 30, 1998 as part of the 1999/2000 budget process. It is anticipated that they will be next revised as of December 31, 1998 General Fund expenditure projections have not been revised at this time. Education revenue projectiOns have not been revised at this time. EduCation expenditure projections have been revised to reflect a 7.5% operating expense holdback, net compensation adjustment. RECOMMENDATION: staff reCommends acceptance of the SePtember 1998 Financial Report. 98.254 ALBEMARLE COUNTY OPERATIONS MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 REVENUES: LOCAL(GENERAL FUND) LOCAL(SCHOOLS) SELF-SUSTAINING FUNDS STATE FEDERAL TOTAL REVENUES TRANSFERS IN TOTAL WITH TRANSFERS ADOPTED MID-YEAR CURRENT BUDGET APPROPS. BUDGET $92,242,287 612,099 6,746,260 30,960,497 3,554,282 134,115,425 1.,305,563 135,420,988 EXPENSES: GENERAL GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS NON-DEPARTMENTAL TRANSFERS 'SUBTOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT SCHOOL FUND OPERATIONS SELF-SUSTAINING FUNDS SUBTOTAL SCHOOL DIVISION TOTAL EXPENSES 35,352,278 6,049,666 9,881,748 51,28~,692 77,391,036 6,746,260 84,137,296 135,420,988 BALANCE OF REVENUES OVER EXPENSES $0 $92,242,287 1,500 613,599 0 6,746,260 151,150 31,111,647 (30,000) 3,524,282 122,650 134,238,075 102,250 1,407,813 224;900 135,645,888 222,400 35,574,678 0 6,049,666 ~ 9,881,748 222,400 51,506,092 2,500 77,393,536 Q 6,746,260 2,500 84,139,796 224,900 135,645,888 6.09% 9.36% 7.70% 19.59% 10.71% 9.44% -0.61% 9.34% 30.09% 0.09% 28.47% 26.26% 15.24% 16.39% 15.33% 19.48% T(~tals may not balance due to rounding ALBEMARLE COUNTY GENERAL FUND MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT SEPTEMBER30, 1998 ADOPTED MID-YEAR CURRENT BUDGET APPROPS. BUDGET REVENUES: LOCAL STATE FEDERAL TOTAL REVENUES TRANSFERS IN TOTAL WITH TRANSFERS $92,242,287 5,410,678 2,607.834 100,260,799 69,916 100,330,715 EXPENSES: GENERAL GOVT ADMINISTRATION JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC SAFETY PUBLIC WORKS HUMAN DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION PARKS/RECREATION/CULTURE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NONDEPARTMENTAL TRANSFERS TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 5,779,233 2,106,855 11,113,901 2,289,742 7,632,929 49,047,023 3,751,919 2,677,699 6,049,666 9,881,748 100,330,715 BALANCE OF REVENUES OVER EXPENSES $0 $92,242,287 150,150 5,560,828 (30,000) 2,577,834 120,150 100,380,949 102,250 172,166 222,400 100,553.115 0 5,779,233 0 2,106,855 0 11,113,901 0 2,289,742 0 7,632,929 0 49,047,023 150 3,752,069 222,250 2,899,949 0 6,049,666 Q 9,881,748 222,400 100,553,11~ PERCENT YTDIBUD 6.09% 15.64% 14.64% 6.84% 0.00% 6.83% 26.21% 23.51% 27.29% 32.95% 38.31% 0.02% 23.15% 38.44% 0.09% 28.47% 13.46% To~tals may not balance due to rounding ALBEMARLE COUNTY SCHOOL FUND MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 REVENUES: LOCAL-SCHOOLS STATE FEDERAL TOTAL REVENUES TRANSFERS IN TOTAL WITH TRANSFERS EXPENSES: INSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION, ATTENDANCE, HEAL PUPIL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FACILITIES OPERATION/MAINTAINANC FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION/MODIFICA TRANSFERS TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES ADOPTED MID-YEAR CURRENT BUDGET APPROPS. BUDGET $612,099 25,549,819 946,448 27,108,366 50,282,670 77,391 036 59,998,552 3,543,079 5,064,906 7,746,337 25,600 1,012,562 77,391,036 BALANCE OF REVENUES OVER EXPENSES $1,500 $613,599 1,000 25,550,819 0 946,448 2,500 27,110,866 0_ 50,282.670 2,500 77,393.536 7,500 60,006,052 0 3,543,079 0 5,064,906 0 7,746,337 0 25,600 (5.000) 1,007,562 2,500 77,393,536 PERCENT YTD/BUD 9.36% 20.45% 0.00% 19.49% 0.00% 6.83% 13.15% 30.08% 16.02% 25.77% 131.69% 0.00% 15.24% Tdtals may not balance due to rounding ALBEMARLE COUNTY OF'EP, ATiONS FUND BALANCE REPORT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 GENERAL CAPITAL SCHOOL CAPITAL FUND GENERAL FUND EDUCATION PRELIMINARY FUND BALANCE 06-30-98 APPROVED APPROPRIATIONS: BUDGETED ANTICIPATED FUND BALANCE CARRYOVER REAPPROPRIATIONS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANT $!4,872,557 $4,126,767 $1,860,364 $10,698,652 (69,916) (365,000) (1,035,512) (100,000) (72,250) TOTAL APPROVED APPROPRIATIONS (142,166) (365,000) (!,_035,S12) (loo,ooo) FUND BALANCE $14,730,39_l $824,852 $10,598,652 Totals may not balance due to rounding BG - F1NA! IClAL SERVICES, INC. November 9, 1998 EO. Box 8 Ci IURCHVILLE. MARYLAND 21028 410-879-9918 FAX 410-838-5360 Ms. Arlene Hernandez Assistant Treasurer The Bank of New York 101 Barclay Street, 21W New York, New York 10286 11-12-98A't~1 :'i8 RCVD B O ARD OF SUPERVIS ORS Re: Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.) Dear Ms Hernandez: Enclosed please find a copy of the Bond Program Report for the above referenced project for the month of October 1998. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, Sheila H. Moynihan Project Monitor /shm enclosure CC: Ms. Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC Albemarle County Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 MONTHLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 7(a) OF TRE DEED INSTRUCTIONS TO: ABG Financial Services, Inc. P.O. Box 8 Churchville, MD 21028 Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.) Charlottesville, VA 21202 Pursuant to Section 7(a)of the Deed Restrictions (the "DEED Restrictions"), as defi~ed in an Indenture of TRUST DATED AS OF April 1, 1983, between the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia (the "Authority"), and your bank, as trustee, the undersigned authorized representative of Richmond -Albemarle Limited Partnership, a Virginia Limited Partnership (the "Purchaser"), hereby certifies with respect to the operation and m~nagement of Hydraulic Road Apartments, Charlottesville, VA (THE "PROJECT"), that as of the date shown below: t) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) The n~m~er of units in the Project occupied by lower income tenants is 15. The number of units in the Project unoccupied and held available for Lower Income Tenants is 0. THE number of units rented and the number of units held available for rental other than as described in (1) and (2) is 51. The percentage that th~ number of units described in (1) and (2) hereof constitute of the total number of units in t~e Project is 23%. The information contained in this report is true, accurate and correct as of the date hereof As of the date hereof, the Purchaser is not in default under any covenant or agreement contained in the Deed Restriction or in an Agreement of Sale dated as of. April 1, 1983, between the Authority and the Purchaser. IN %fITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has s~gned this report as of November 4( 199S. RICH~O~ -~~ LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A VIRGINIA limited partnership Property: Location: BOND PROGRAM REPORT For October 1998 Arbo~ Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.) Project #: 051-35371 Charlottesville, VA Number of Units: Community Director November 4, 1998 (Date) 1. LOWEF INCOME Total Occupied: 66 Bond Occupied: 15 The f'oilov,,ing units have been designated as "lower income" units t 4 Arbor Crest Drive Beverly T. Lane 2 6 Arbor Crest Drive Wilma M. AtkinsOn 3 7 Arbor Crest Drive Ruth M. Jones 4 9 Arbor Crest Drive Virginia Burton 5 14 Arbor Crest Drive Lennie P. Leake 6 18 Arbor Crest Ddve Ann S. I~emp 7. 30 Arbor Crest Drive Mary COx Allen 8. 44 Arbor Crest Drive Carolynn Atherton 9. 56 Arbor Crest Drive Helyn E.O'Boyle 10. 70 Arbor Crest Drive Ernest M. Nease 11. 76 Arbor Crest Drive Ann G. Sayior 12. 84 Arbor Crest Drive Juanita Boliek 13. 88 Arbor Crest Drive Nancy G. Foley 14. 90 Arbor Crest Drive Betty B. Elliott 15. 94 Arbor Crest Drive M. Eileen Knick 16. 18. 19. 20. The changes from previous report reflected in the above listing are: Deletions 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 Additions RD OF SUPERVISORs 1~-~19-9SA7)9:79 RCVD Post Office Box 26666 Richmond. Virgi~zia 2.3261 VIRGINIA POWER November 13.1998 VIRGINIA CASE NO. PUE980727 APPLICATION OF VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY TO REVISE ITS FUEL FACTOR PURSUANT TO VIRGINIA CODE § 56-249.6 To: Local Government Officials Pursuant to ordering paragraph no. I of the State Corporation Commission's Order of November 13, 1998, Virginia Power is providing you a copy of the following Orders: Order Establishing 1998-99 Fuel Factor Proceeding, issued on October 21. 1998 Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time, issued on November 13. I c198 Please take notice of the contents of these Orders. A complete copy of Virginia Power's Application in Case No. PUE980727 may be obtained from Virginia Power at no cost by written request to Karen L. Bell. Virginia Power. P.O. Box 26666, Richmond, Virginia 23261. Karen L. Bell Counsel Enclosures 00T.-21' 98(WED) 16:28 0FO GENERAL O0UNSEL TEL:8043719549 P, 002 COlvlIViON',VI~ALTH OF VIRGINIA t"'i ~''' i' ' .... 'S?AT~ COP, POKATION COMMISSION AT RICHMOND, OCTOBER 21, lqq80Cl21 {~ 4:21 ~PLICA?ZON VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY CASE NO. To revise its fuel factor pursuant =o Virginia Code § 56-249.6 98 02020 ORDER ESTABLISHING 1998-99 FUEL FACTOR PROCEEDIN~ On October 19, 1998, Virginia Electric and Power Company ("Virginia Power" or "the Company") filed with the Commission an application, exhibits, and a proposed tariff intended to increase its current fuel factor from 1.050¢ per kwh to 1.152¢ per kWh, effective December 1, 1998. The proposed fuel factor would result in an increase in annual fuel revenues of approximately $55.8 million. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) This ma=~er is docketed and assigned Case No. PUE980727. (2) A hearing is hereby scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on Monday, November 30, 1998, in the Commission's Second Floor Courtroom for the purpose of receiving evidence related to the establishment of virginia Power's fuel factor to be effective December 1, 1998, pursuant to § 56-249.6 of the Code of Virginia. (3) Virginia Power shall forthwith make copies of its application and prefiled testimony and exhibits available for · OCT,-'21' 98(WED) 16:29 OFC GENERAL COUNSEL TEL:8043719549 P, 005 public inspection during regular business hours at all company offices in Virginia where customer bills may be paid. (4) On or before November 10, 1998, any person desiring to participate as a Protestant, as defined in Rule 4:6 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and ~rocedure -("S.C.C. Rules"), shall file with the Clerk, Document Control Center, P.O. Box 2118, Richmond, Virginia 23218, an original and fifteen (15) copies of a Notice of Protest as provided in S.C.C. Rule 5:16(a) and serve a copy on counsel for the Company as follows: Karen L. Bell, Esquire, Virginia Electric and Power Company, One James River Plaza, P.O. Box 26666, Richmond, Virginia 23261. (5) On or before November 16, 1998, each Protestan~ shall file an original and fifteen (15) copies of a Protest (S.C.C. Rule 5:16(b)) and of the prepared testimony and exhibits Protestant intends to present at the hearing, and serve two (2) copies of each on Virginia Power and all other Protestants. (6) On or before November 18, 1998, the Commission Staff shall investigate the reasonableness of virginia Power's estimated costs and proposed fuel factor and file testimony with the Clerk, sending a copy to the Company and each Protestant. (7) On or before November 23, 1998, Virginia Power shall file an original and fifteen (15) copies of all testimony it expects to introduce in rebuttal to all direct prefiled testimony and exhibits. Additional rebuttal evidence may be · OCT.-21' 9$(WED) 16:29 OFC GENERAL COUNSEL TEL:8043719549 P, 004 presented without preflling, provided it is in response to evidence which was not prefiled but elicited at the time of hearing and provided further the need for additional rebuttal evidence is timely addressed by motion during the hearing and leave to present said evidence is granted by the Commission. A copy of the prefiled rebuttal evidence shall be served upon all other Protestants. (8) Discovery shall be in accordance with Part VI of the S.C.C. Rules except that the Company and Protestant(s) shall respond to written interrogatories or data requests within five (5) days of service. Protestants shall provide the Company, other Protestants, and Staff with any work papers or documents used in preparation of their filed testimony promptly upon request. (9) On or before October 30, 1998, Virginia Power shall cause a copy of the following notice to be published as display adver=ising (not classified), on one occasion in newspapers of general circulation throughout its service territory: NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC OF THE 1998-99 FUEL FACTOR PROCEEDING FOR VIRGINIA_ELECTRICAND POWRR COMPANY On October 19, 1998, Virginia Electric and Power Company ("Virginia Power" or the "Company") filed an application with the State Corporation Commission for ~n increase in its fuel factor from 1.050¢ per kWh to 1.152¢ per kWh, effective December 1, 1998. · OCT.-'21' 98{WED) 16:29 OPe GENERAL COUNSEL TEL:804 719549 P. 005 Pursuant to Virginia Code ~ 56-249.6, the Commission has scheduled a public hearing to commence at 2:00 p.m. on Monday, November 30, 1998, in the Commission's Second Floor Courtroom, Tyler Building, 1300 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia, for the purpose of receiving evidence related to the establishment of virginia Power's fuel factor. Individuals with disabilities who require an accommodation to participate in the hearing should contact the Commission at 1-800-552-7945 (voice) or 1-804-371-9206 (TDD) at least seven days before the scheduled hearing date. Ail testimony, exhibits, and other data filed by Virginia Power will be available for public inspection at all of the Company's offices in Virginia where bills may be paid, and at the Commission's Document Control Center, First Floor, Tyler Building, Richmond, Virginia. Any interested person (public witness) desiring to make a statement at the hearing should appear in the Commission's courtroom at 1:45 p.m. on the hearing date and identify himself or herself to the bailiff. On or before November 10, 1998, persons desiring to participate as Protestants, as defined in Rule 4:6 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure ("S.C.C. Rules"), to present evidence and cross- examine witnesses, shall file an original and fifteen (15) copies of a Notice of Protest, as described in S.C.C. Rule 5:16(a) with the Clerk of the Commission, and serve a copy upon Virginia Power. Service upon Virginia Power shall be directed to Karen L. Bell, Esquire, virginia Electric and Power Company, One James River Plaza, P.O. BOX 26666, Richmond, Virginia 23261. OOT. :21' 98(WED) 16:29 OFO GENERAL GOUNSEL TEL:8043719549 P. O06 On or before November 16, 1998, each Protestant shall file an original and fifteen (15) copies of a Protest (S.C.C. Rule 5:16(b)) and an original and fifteen (15) copies of the prepared testimony and exhibits Protestant intends to present at =he public hearing, and serve two (2) copies each upon Virginia Power and each Protestant. All written communications to the Commission regarding this proceeding shall identify Case No. PUE980727 and be directed to William J. Bridge, Clerk,. State Corporation Commission, Document Control Center, P.O. Box 2118, Richmond, Virginia 23218. VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY (10) On or before October 30, 1998, Virginia Power shall serve a cody of this Order on the County Attorney and Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of each county (or equivalent officials in counties having alternate forms of government) in which the Company offers service, and on the Mayor or Manager and the Attorney of every city and town (or an eql/iva!ent official in cities and towns having alternate forms of government) in which the Company offers service. Service shall be made by either personal delivery or by first-class mail to the customary place of business or the residence of the persons served. (11) At or before the commencement of the hearing scheduled herein, Virginia Power shall provide proof of service and notice as required in this Order. -OCT.-'21' 9${WED) 16:29 OPe GENERAL COUNSEL TEL:8043719549 ?,007 AN ATTESTED COPY hereof shall be sent by the Clerk of the Commission to: Karen L. Bell, Esquire, Virginia Electric and Power Company, P.O. Box 2~g66, Richmond, Virginia 2326~ John F. Dudley, Senior Assistant A~torney General, Division of Consumer Counsel, the Office of Attorney General, 900.East Main Street, Second Floor, Richmond, Virginia 23219; and the Commission's Divisions of Energy Regulation, Public Utility Accounting, and Economics and Finance. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION AT RICHMOND, NOVEI~ER 13, 1998 APPLICATION OF VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY CASE NO. PUE980727 To revise its fuel factor pursuant to Virginia Code § 56-249.6 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME On October 19, 1998, Virginia Electric and Power Company ("Virginia Power" or "the Company") filed with the Commission an application, exhibits, and a proposed tariff intended to increase its current fuel factor from 1.050¢ per kWh to 1.152¢ per kWh, effective December 1, 1998. On October 21, 1998, the Commission issued an Order Establishing 1998-99 Fuel Factor Proceeding ("the Order"). Pursuant to Paragraph (10) of the Order, on or before October 30, 1998, Virginia Power was required to serve a copy of the Order on the officials of the counties, cities, and towns in which Virginia Power offers service. On November 12, 1998, the Company filed with the Commission a motion requesting an extension of time in which to provide notice to local government officials of Virginia Power's 1998-99 Fuel Factor proceeding. Virginia Power states that, due to an oversight, it has not served a copy 'of the Order on the local government officials, as required by Paragraph (10) of the Order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED TEAT: (1) Virginia Power shall serve a copy of both the October 21, 1998, Order and this Order on the County Attorney and Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of each county (or equivalent officials in counties having alternate forms of government) in which the Company offers service, and on the Mayor or Manager and the Attorney of every city and town (or an equivalent official in cities and towns having alternate forms of government) in which the Company offers service. Service shall be made as soon as possible. (2) The time within which any local government or municipality may file a Notice of Protest shall be extended from November 10, 1998, to November 20, 1998; and the time within which such entity may file a Protest and prepared testimony and exhibits shall be extended from November 16, 1998, to November 25, 1998. (3) In the event that any local government official is unable, for good cause shown, to file the documents within the prescribed time periods, it may file an appropriate motion with the Commission. 2 (4) Ail provisions of the October 21, 1998, Order not modified herein shall remain in effect. AN ATTESTED COPY hereof shall be sent by the Clerk of the Commission to: Karen L. Bell, Esquire, Virginia Electric and Power Company, P.O. Box 26666, Richmond, Virginia 23261; John F. Dudley, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Division of Consumer Counsel, the Office of the Attorney General, 900 East Main Street, Second Floor, Richmond, Virginia 23219; Louis R. Monacell, Christian & Barton, 909 East Main Street, Suite 1200, Richmond, Virginia 23219; and the Commission's Divisions of Energy Regulation, Public Utility Accounting, and Economics and Finance. Gilrk of the 3 DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ? ~-23-95A~ COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RO. BOX 11649 LYNCHBURG, 24506 RCVD W.T. RAMEY, P.E. DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR November 18, 1998 Route 29 Corridor Proj: 6029-963-F01, PE-100 From: 1-64 To: North Carolina State Line File # IM-52-98 PPMS: 16600 Amherst, Appomattox, Nelson, Albemarle, Bedford, Pittsylvania, and Campbell Counties Interested citizens: Attached is a public notice and map advising of a proposed highway ~improvement project. Should you desire additional information or have any questions or comments concerning this highway matter, please refer to the above project number and description when you contact this office. Sincerely, Connie Allman for Location and Design Division WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING WHAT DO yOu WANT ROUTE 29 TO LOOK LIKE IN 20 YEARS Route 29 Corridor Development Study Phases II and III from Danville to Charlottesville · What do you think about the need for transportation improvements to the Route 29 corridor ? · What kind of transportation improvements would address these needs ? · Where should the improvements be implemented ? We want to hear your answers to those questions and any other thoughts you may have at the next set &project workshops to be held in December. These workshops will be held bom 4:00 pm to 7:00 pm at the following locations: Tuesday, December 1, 1998 Red Hilt Elementary School Red Hill School Road (Route 710 just north of North Garden, 0.25 mile east-of Route 29 in Albemarle County Wednesday, December 2, 1998 Amherst County High School on Route 29 Business Town of Amherst Tuesday, December 8, 1998 Vocational Technical Center Route 29 (near Route 24) south of Lynchburg in CamPbell Count7 Thursday, December 3, 1998 Tye River Elementary School on Route 29 1.4 miles north of Colleen in Nelson County Wednesday, December 9, 1998 1 Vocation Technical Center Route 29 near White Oak Hountain Pittsytvania County Please plan to .attend one of these workshops and help us improve the transportation system on the Route 29 Corridor ! Device for the Hearing Impaired (TTY): 1-800-307-4630 ,1111' I Virginia Department of Transportation /' BE Df: ORI Ct) / Pi [ TSYLVANI CO NORTH ,~AROLINA Indicates Corridor Study · I 111 Ii. Project: 6029-963-F01,PE-! 00 DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 'i-Z4-98A'i'! :Z3 RCVt) COMMONWEALTH of VIRQINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 ORANGE ROAD CULPEPER. VA 22701-3819 DO NALD R. ASKEW DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR November 20, 1998 Ms. Ella W. Carey Clerk 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Route 29 Corridor Development Proj.: 6029-963-F01, PE-100 From: 1-64 To: North Carolina State Line Amherst, Appomattox, Nelson, Albemarle, Bedford, Pittsylvania and Campbell Counties Dear Ms. Carey: A Public Workshop will be held for the above mentioned project between 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. in the following locations: DATE: TIME: PLACE: Albemarle County Tuesday, December 1, 1998 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. Red Hill Elementary School Red Hill School Road (Route 710) Just north of North Garden, 0.25 mile east of Route 29 in Albemarle County Amherst County Wednesday, December 2, 1998 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. Amherst County High School on Route 29 Business in the Town of Amherst DATE: TIME: PLACE: Nelson County Thursday, December 3, 1998 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. Tye River Elementary School On Route 29 1.4 miles north Colleen in Nelson County Campbell County Tuesday, December 8, 1998 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. Vocational Technical Center on Route 29 (near Route 24) south of Lynchburg in Campbell County Pittsylvania County DATE: Wednesday, December 9, 1998 TIME: 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Vocational Technical Center On Route 29 near White Oak Mountain In Pittsylvania County Representatives of the Department will be present with maps and displays to explain the project to all interested individuals. We hope that ,you can attend. wlr Attachment Pc: Ms. A. G. Tucker Mr. M. W. Coffey Robert H. o District Construction Engineer TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY couNTY OF ALB[[MARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Citizen Participation in the 1999/00 Budget Process SU BJ ECT/PROPOSAL/REQU EST: An OUtline of Strategies Intended to Increase Citizen Awareness of and Participation in This Year's Budget Process AGENDA DATE: December 2, 1998 ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA: ITEM NUMBER: INFORMATION: ACTION: INFORMATION: X ATTACHMENTS: NO STAFF CONTACT(S): /~r~ Messrs. Tucker, Ms. White, Gulati, Catlin REVIEWED BY: / BACKGROUND: During recent years staff has noticed a lack of meaningful citizen participation in the early stages of the budget process, with county residents seeming to be unaware of or uninterested in the initial discussions of funding priorities that create the basic foundations of the operating and capital improvement program budgets. This is evidenced by the lack of attendance at public hearings and other forums aimed at gaining public input. Because the budget in its ideal form should be a document that lays Out a shared vision of the community's needs and priorities, anything less than full participation by informed and aware citizens ~llurts the process significantly. DISCUSSION: As the county strives for quality improvement and customer-oriented approaches to its services, the budget process seems to be an appropriate place to try some new and different strategies. County staff held a focus group with invited citizens to brainstorm some ways that the county could be more proactive and effective in disseminating budget information as a first step towards increased citizen participation in and understanding of the process. Lee Catlin and Anne Gulati met with representatives from county businesses, organizations, neighborhoods, advocacy groups and citizens at large to discuss existing perceptions of the budget process and how budget information could be made more accessible and meaningful to citizens. From that discussion, several potential action steps were identified: · County staff will develop a slide presentation on the budget process that will be made available to interested groups who want to sponsor a discussion on that topic. Staff members will be available to talk to the groups and any Board members who wish to participate in these discussions or who may want to schedule a budget talk for any group should contact Lee Catlin · The county's website will feature indepth, frequently-updated budget information including the slide presentation mentioned above as well as a survey feature that will permit instant feedback from citizens - this will include mailing the information to organizations that have their own publications so that articles can be included in those as well · County staff will look into the possibility of developing a newspaper insert that will provide bUdget information as well as outline avenues for citizen involvement and feedback. The insert will be timed to present the most critical budget information prior to the Board's public hearing on the proposed budget. · Staff will also explore preparing public service announcements and other free information outlets RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Board's information only. Any Board member who Would like to be more aCtively involved in the above formation strategies should contact the Community Resources Office. 98.257 ?o; Members, Board of Supervisors I~mm: Ella Washington Carey, CMC, Clerk~ $,,bject; Reading List for December 2, t 998 Date: November 23, 1998 ,/ March 20(A), 1995 ,/ February 14(A), 1996 ~. March 24(A), 1997 March 4, 1998 September 9, 1998 September 6, 1998 ,J~October 14, 1998 Mr. Martin Mr. Bowerman Ms. Humphris pagesl-15-Mr. Marshall ~:~!~·, ,/-~ages 16-end - Mr. Perkins ~ ~"~'~ pages 1-23 (Item # 10) - Ms. Thomas pages 22 (Item #7) - end - Ms. Humphris Mr. Martin /~WC February 14, 1996 (Afternoon Meeting) ~(Page 9) Cilimberg said not on collector roads or arterial roads. Mr. Benish said "no". Mr. Bowerman asked where sidewalks were~~ded on East Rio. Mr. Cilimberg said there are sidewalks on one side only. Mr. Bowerman asked if urban-scale would indicate sidewalks should be on both sides. Mr. Cilimberg said "yes". Mr. Benish said any road with four lanes or more would have sidewalks on both sides. Urban-scale roadways can also imply the level the road is constructed to. The roads in a city are typically designed to a level of service "D", so it allows less traffic to flow through so the roads could be somewhat smaller in scale. The CATS Committee for the urbanized area is discussing what level of service is expected, because county roads are basically built to a scale that would be seen in a rural area, with higher speeds and wider roadways to channel more traffic to a city. Staff wants the CATS Committee to recognize the County's urban area as part of the City. Ms. Thomas said when she was chairing the CATS Committee in 1977, they were trying to protect city neighborhoods and said the roads should go to a Level of Service "C" in order to protect neighborhoods in the City. Nobody was thinking about neighborhoods in the county at that point, and everyone was expecting that roads should be built so you could zip along everywhere. Basically, a city is being planned from Rio Road to where G.E. is on Route 29 North. She thinks there is no more than a five-year window of opportunity in which to do the planning. Most people think Route 29 has been lost up to that point, so she was distressed when she realized that Neighborhood 1 and 2 stopped where she thought the County should be thinking in urban terms. Mr. Benish said that right now the terms ~urban" and "community" are irrelevant. He said urban-scale development will apply to Hollymead and Piney Mountain and it should apply to Crozet as well. The citizens in Crozet have already established (so he understands), what they want. Ms. Thomas said the County has not been paying any attention to that. Mr. Benish said to the extent possible, staff has tried to take their recommendations into consider- ation. Mr. Cilimberg said last week the Board endorsed seeking Airport Access Funds for Airport Road (Route 649). In discussing that project with VDOT, staff tried to convince VDOT that Airport Road is now an urban road and not the country road it has been in the past. It was a discussion that centered on designing that road with sidewalks on both sides, bike lanes, and, possibly street lights. That is the kind of design talked about when moving toward urbanizing. Mr. Tucker said it is important to talk in those terms, but the Board has to remember that the developer is required to put in those roads. That can have an impact on the level of housing, the affordability of housing, etc. The City shares in the construction of streets. There is a difference in the standard the County may require, and the impact that might have on other things such as affordable housing. Mr. Cilimberg said part of the concept of in-fill is that there is more public involvement in what happens. The "public" in this case is the county potentially. Mr. Benish said he would now discuss Neighborhood Two where the changes proposed are: 1). The area north of Rio Road (across from CATEC) between the rail- road and the proposed Meadow Creek Parkway is recommended for Urban Density Residential use (previously recommended for Low Density Residential. 2) The area east of Rio Road between Pen Park Road and Pen Park Lane is recommended for Urban Density Residential use (previously recommended for Low Density Residential). Mr. Benish said in Neighborhood Three the change is: 1) A general redesignation of areas previously recommended for Medium and High Density Residential to Urban Density Residential. A portion of the area on the north side of Route 250, west of Westminster Canterbury, has been designated to Neighborhood COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: FY98 Department of Social Services Annual Report SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: FY98 Annual Report presented by the Albemarle County Social Services Advisory Board STAFF CONTACT(S): Mr. Tucker, Ms. White, Ms. Ralston AGENDA DATE: December 2, 1998 ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: ATTACHMENTS: REVIEWED BY: ITEM NUMBER: INFORMATION: × INFORMATION: BACKGROUND: The Virginia Code Ann. Section 63.1-38 directs all counties in Virginia to establish a local board to oversee the provision of social services to their residents. Albemarle County established an Advisory Board to adVise the Director with respect to the duties and functions of the Department. DISCUSSION: One of the duties of the Social Services Advisory Board isto make an annual report to the governing body concerning the administration of the public welfare program. Attached to this summary is a copy of the first annual report for the department for fiscal year 1998. RECOMMENDATION: This report is for information only and requires no action from the Board. 98.258 Albemarle County Department of Social Services Annual Report to Board for Fiscal Year 1998 Service Mission The mission of Albemarle Social Services is to provide services that promote responsibility, individual worth, family integrity, and commitment to community. In Albemarle County, social services are provided via throe broad program areas. They are: Benefit Programs - provide medical, financial and food stamp assistance to the citizens of Albemarle, paid from Federal, State, and local funds. - Food Stamps - This program provides coupons to income- eligible persons for the purchase of vital foodstuffs. - General Relief- This program provides temporary maintenance payments for disabled persons, as well as payments for care of children not living with blood relatives. It also provides burial assistance for those who have no family and no means to pay burial expenses. - Auxiliary Grants: Aged and Disabled - These programs provide payments to Homes for Adults on behalf of income eligible clients to pay for shelter, food and some personal care. - TANF - Temporary Assistance to Needy Families - Provides temporary financial assistance to income-eligible families. - State/Local Hospitalization - This program uses local funds to match State funds to reimburse hospitals for care given to indigent residents. - Refugee Resettlement - Provides temporary financial assistance to refugees. - Energy Assistance - Provides assistance to low-income households for wood, coal, gas, oil, or electricity, and is administered by Social Services from October through February. - Medicaid - Determination of eligibility for Federal medical assistance. Service Programs - provide the following services directly, or via purchase of service: Adult Prevention and Support, Adult Protective Services, Child Protective Services, Foster Care and Adoption, Home Based Companion Services, Family Prevention and Support Services, Transportation, the Emergency Utility Program, and Foster Family/Provider Recruitment and Training. - Adult Protective Services - The investigation of complaints and the provision of services for adults who are abused, neglected, or exploited. - Adult Services - Program enabling an adult to remain in the least restrictive setting and to function independently. - Child Protective Services - Program investigating complaints and providing services both to children who are abused or neglected, and to their families. - Foster Care and Adoption - Services provided on behalf of children in the custody of the Department and assistance for families who adopt children. This program also performs court-ordered custody investigations. - Prevention and Support Services - Services designed to prevent family break-up and violence by strengthening family functioning. - Intake Services - Screening families in need of emergency services and the provision of information administered through a contract with the City DSS at the Community Assessment Program. - Tri-Area Foster Families - (TAFF) - This program provides for the recruitment and training of foster parents. It includes an Independent Living Program for older foster care children whose goal it is to live independently from a family. TAFF is provided through a contract between Charlottesville DSS, Greene County DSS, and Albemarle DSS. Employment and Day Care Services - provide employment, education and training, child care, transportation, and other support services to low income working families and families receiving public assistance. Day Care services assist families who are either working and/or are attending school and whose children have day care needs. Day care services are provided to families who are receiving TANF and are working towards self- sufficiency. Day care services are also provided to families who are employed in entry level positions and need day care support to allow them to be able to work and/or attend school. Special Programs: Bright Stars Program - The purpose of the program is to reduce disparities among young children upon formal school entry and to reduce or eliminate those risk factors that lead to early academic failure. The program is a collaborative effort between the Department of Social services, County schools, and community agencies to provide supportive services to at-risk four year-old children. Currently, there are Bright Stars programs in three of the County's fifteen elementary schools: Stone Robinson, Agnor-Hurt, and Greer. Administration - While this unit does not directly provide any social service, it provides the support network necessary for the delivery of services within the Department. Organizationally, the unit reflects the administrative costs of implementing and supervising all of the service and benefit progran~s of the Department. Personnel include the Switchboard Operator, the Receptionist, the Office Manager, an Administrative Secretary, clerical staff, a Management Analyst, and the Director and Assistant Director. Other activities associated with this cost center include personnel management such as payroll and leave, monitoring and reporting expenditures and statistics, budgeting, records management, policy development, program supervision, research and preparation of reports, grant applications, program evaluation, and the overseeing of the Department's mandates. Department Highlights and Accomplishments The development of an intervention program with families of elementary school children. The concept behind this innovative Family Support Program is to bridge the gap and form a partnership between Social Services, community agencies, the County elementary schools, and the families of at-risk children. Completion of the first year of the Virginia Initiative for Work not Welfare (VIEW) program. Initiation of conversion to ADAPT, a role-based computer application used to automate eligibility and benefits determinations. Preparation for the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). Sixty-four million dollars will be allocated to Virginia with program implementation set for July 1998. Virginia could serve as many as 150,000 more children upon program implementation. For Albemarle this means adding a potential 700 more cases to our current Medicaid caseload. Development of a client file database to increase the efficiency of record searches and chent information management. Automation of data collection and charting tools to enhance planning, forecasting, and £mancial management capabilities. June 4, 1998 - Inauguration of the Department's Professional Development Center (PDC). The Center houses an impressive inventory of resource materials aimed at professional development. The first of its kind in Virginia, Albemarle's PDC draws heavily on interactive media, automation, and Internet Technology. Temporary Assistance to Needy Families Caseload Indicators: Since the implementation of Welfare Reform in the County (July 1997), Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) has continued to decline. Over the course of fiscal year 1998, the number of cases under care has declined by 24%. (See Chart 1). · The number of incoming TANF applications has decreased by 11%. This represents a drop from an average of 44 applications per month to 39. Service Efforts: The County has maintained an excellent level of customer service as evidenced by accuracy measures. On average, 98.8% of cases were processed within 45 days. Beyond this, delays were usually due to incomplete client information TANF Cases Pending over 45 Days 1.2% 98.8% TANF Cases Under Care Since 1995 (Chart 1) 350- 300- 250- 200- 150 100- 50- ~ ~ 0 ~ ~onth TANF assistance per case increased by 4.6% from $202.81 per month to $212.18 per month during FY 1998. This was due to an overall increase in household size, which in turn increased the amount of assistance for which an individual could qualify. Food Stamr}s Caseload Indicators: Statistics show that the food stamp caseload has also been on the decline this year. It is important to note that since Virginia's Welfare Reform only affects TANF recipients, it will only impact food stamp recipients that are also receiving TANF. However, Federal Welfare Reform does affect food stamp recipients, and this may account in part for the caseload trend. Since June of 1997, the food stamp caseload has decreased by 9.1%. (See Charts 1 and 2). · The number of incoming food stamp applications did not change significantly this year. The average number of applications received each month was 98. Service Efforts: Despite the major changes that the Benefits Program area has undergone this year, food stamp accuracy has not been compromised. In fact, 98.2% of the food stamp caseload was processed within 60 days. Food Stamp Cases Under Care FY 1998 (Chart I) 920 900 880 860 840 820 800 780 Month Food Stamp Cases Pending 31-60 Days 1.8% 98.2% Average Food Stamp Caseload Since FY 1996 (Chart 2) 1000 950~ 900 70 95/96 96/97 97/98 Fiscal Year Average food stamp issuance per person decreased frOm $148.90 to $147.20, a difference of 1.1%. This is attributed to a slight increase in the number of adult food stamp cases, which in general receive lower benefits than families and children cases. General Relief Caseload Indicators: The number of cases under care in the General Relief program has diminished quite significantly since July 1997. A full 32% reduction in caseload has been realized. This Can be attributed to several factors: First, the monthly GR benefit dropped slightly for a one-person household. Secondly, there was a reduction in the number of unattached child cases (cases in which payments are made to care for children not living with their blood relatives), and this brought the overall caseload down. (See Chart 1). Service Efforts: A mechanism has been implemented whereby the General Relief program is evaluated on a periodic basis. This evaluation takes into account community resources and allows modifications to be made to the program based on client usage. Auxiliary Grants Both the Aged and Disabled Auxiliary Grant caseloads have remained constant, attesting to the fact that Albemarle County consistently provides assistance to residents Auxiliary Grant Caseload (FY 97/98) g 40 ~ 30 ~sabled ~ 20t~~~~,o 10 IClAged Month General Relief Cases Under Care (Chart 1) Month · In January of 1998, the benefit paid on behalf of clients was raised from $725 to $737 monthly. This has helped to keep pace with the rising cost of medical care. Service Efforts: on an on-going basis. One would normally expect the number of disabled cases to have declined, given that fewer beds in the community are being devoted to the category of patient served by auxiliary grants. Yet the trend in Albemarle has been to provide an undiminished level of assistance on behalf of income eligible clients. Medicaid Caseload Indicators: The number of cases under care in the Medicaid Program has increased since July of 1997. By the end of the fiscal year, Medicaid cases had increased in number by 7.0% The factors that contributed to an increased caseload are as follows: Fewer cases were closed or transferred, fewer applications were denied, and several new categories were added to the Medicaid Program. The addition of these new categories to Medicaid effectively allows the Department to provide benefits to a larger population. Service Efforts: Increasingly, many of the medical facilities in the community are requiring that patients apply for Medicaid before the facilities will provide any financial assistance with medical bills. As a result, the Medicaid Program has seen an increase in the number of incoming applications each month and a corresponding increase in caseload numbers. This year's Average Medicaid Caseload Since FY 1996 2500- 2400- 2300- 2200- 2100- 2000 190£ 95/96 96/97 97/98 FY increase in Medicaid cases is not unexpected. As the chart on the left shows, historical data presents a picture of growth. Last fiscal year the increase in average number of cases was 8.3%. This fiscal year, the rate of growth has slowed to 5.1%. Medicaid Cases Under Care FY 1998 2550 25OO 2450 2400 2350 2300 2250 2200 Month Foster Care and Adoption Caseload Indicators: The increasing number of children in Foster Care with Albemarle County continues to be the topic of much discussion in both the public and internal arenas. The alarming growth trends are compounded by the fact that more and more children are requiring specialized placement, and this is causing a large burden on DSS funds. The foster care caseload increased by 94% during FY 98 alone. Although several measures have been taken to curtail spending in this program, the number of children entering foster care continues to increase, as does the severity of the children's emotional and behavioral problems. The percentage of cases requiring specialized care has grown steadily since 1994. Temporary care for seriously emOtionally disturbed children with a history of aggressiveness, chronic runaway behavior and/or suicidal behavior can cost as much as $300 per day. This maintains the child in a secure setting in order to stabilize them enough to transition to a less restrictive and less costly setting. Service Efforts: Children placed in foster care in Virginia spend an average of 2.9 years in the foster care system. This is a daunting statistic. On July 1, 1997, new legislative changes took effect in Virginia, which govern the way in which the courts and other parties involved move toward permanency for children in foster care. These changes came as a result of the Court Improvement Project. The goals of this project are to ensure that each child has a permanent home within two years of entering foster care, and to ensure the quality of the court process for these children. Foster Care Caseload Trend Over Ten Years 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 Fiscal Year New Cases Requiring Specialized Placement 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Fiscal Year [DNew FC Cases BReq. Spec. Placement ] Adult and Child Abuse / Neelect Caseload Indicators: Adult abuse and neglect cases under care increased sharply at the beginning of the fiscal year. This increase was due to an incident at a local nursing home. Subsequent to the resolution of this issue, the caseload dropped to pre-FY 1998 levels. Child Abuse/Neglect Cases have seen an in increase of 23% Over the course of the fiscal year. This trend is also a contributing factor to the increased expenditures we have seen in the foster care program area. Service Efforts: The Multiple Response System is a three year Child Protective Services pilot that allows CPS to respond to allegations of child abuse and neglect with one of three tracks based on the severity of the alleged abuse or neglect. The investigation track is reserved for the most serious abuse and neglect allegations. The assessment track allows the social worker to assess the child's safety and the family's need without making a finding of abuse or neglect. This is less adversarial and punitive and may result in a family's working with us or seeking help from a community agency. The response track is reserved for those allegations which are not valid complaints, but which indicate a need for some sort of follow-up. Child Abuse/Neglect CPS Cases Under Care FY 1998 Month Types of Complaints Received for New CPS Investigations (FY 97/98) 35% 8% 57% ~i Neglect ~a Abuse El Sexual Abuse Adult Abuse/Neglect Cases Under Care FY 1998 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Month Types of Adult Abuse FY 1997-1998 10%  3;7% ta Self-Neglect ~Abuse ElNeglect 36% Q Exploitation 17% Employment Services Program The Virginia Department of Social Services has been collecting data on the Virginia Initiative for Employment not Welfare (VIEW), and has been compiling reports on a monthly basis. In addition, Albemarle County has implemented a reporting mechanism to better track the success of the VIEW program. Since the VIEW program is so new, we compare data across our Economic Development District (EDD 8). Cumulative Number of Individuals Enrolled in VIEW (as of June '98) 800- ~ 600 '~ 400 -: 200 :~ 0 , , Locality Percent of Individuals Still Employed after 3 and 6 Months (as of June '98) 100%~~ 80%~ 60% ~ 40% ~ 20% ~~ Locality I~! 3 Months Employ ment 16 Months Employ ment Average Wage for VIEW Participants (As an Aggregate of Full/Part Time Wages) $7.00 $6.50 $6.00 $5.50 $5.00 Locality Average Monthly Earnings for VIEW Participants (as of June '98) $1,500 $1,ooo $500 $0~ Locality vIEW Day Care Profile FY 98 400 300 200 100 0 [] Families [] Children Locality Fee Day Care Prof'de FY 98 300 200 100 0~ Locality ]Families Children] Transitional Day Care Prof'de FY 98 30 " 20 1 Locality [] Families [] Children V1EW Expenditure Data FY 98 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $o Locality ~! VIEW 1 TRANS [3FEE Budget and Finance Final budget data for each Program in fiscal year 1997/98 is compiled and charted below: FY 97/98 Expenditure Data $5,000,000$6,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,0O0,000 $1,00o,000 $0 Cost Center Budget Amount IActual Expense Source of Funds in Social Services Budget Local State/Federal 74% As evidenced in the chart to the left, Services was the only cost center that was over budget during fiscal year 1997/1998. Services exceeded the budget amount by $470,075. This was due to the ever-increasing foster care caseload, and the subsequent expenditures in CSA, special needs adoption, and foster care prevention. Despite the spending patterns in Services, the overall departmental budget was not affected. The under budget spending in other cost centers meant that bottom line, ACDSS came out $80,544 to the good in fiscal year 1997/98. Overall during FY 1997/98 seventy-four percent of funds came from State and Federal sources. Strategic Planning Strategic planning provides a written process for strategic improvement, which in turn allows for concrete goals and objectives to be worked towards. Of course, this also provides a process for linking the Department to the County's previously defined mission and goals. The' strategic improvement plans are designed to 1) assess department needs, 2) set specific objectives, 3) determine effective strategies, and 4) determine relevant performance measures. The strategic planning process is the key element in connecting the County's mission and goals to what is actually occurring in the Department. It is also an opportunity for each staff member to have input into the vision, goals, and objectives of the Department and to be actively involved in developing a work plan that is realistic and achievable. ACDSS has a well-developed strategic plan in place, and is aligning itself with the objectives set forth therein in preparation for FY 98/99. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Purchase of Development Rights (PDR) Funding Options SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Funding options and information related to PDR's for Albemarle County. I!STAFF CONTACT{S}: Mr. 'Tucker, Ms. White, Mr. Davis AGENDA DATE: December 2, 1998 ITEM NUMBER: ACTION: INFORMATION: X CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: no REVIEWED BY: z¢~/~'~ BACKGROUND: At the November 4th meeting, the Board requested additional information on potential funding sources for a Purchase of Development (PDR) program for Albemarle County, specifically on the use of Tourism Fund revenues and a possible countywide referendum. DIScussION; When considering potential funding sources for a PDR program, the following options are available to the Board: Tourism Fund Revenues. Tourism Fund revenues will average approximately $715,000 a year for the next five years, al'th°Ugh Several commitments already' exist for those funds. The chart below shows these commitments for the next five years, leaving available funds of approximately $350,000 a year except for FY01/02 when tourism revenues are expected to fund the Ivy Road Bike Lanes. Proiected TOurism Fund Bud,qet Revenues, Contributions (Developer, Proffer) State Reimbursements Transfer from General Fund (1) Total Visitors' Bureau (2) Toudsm Development (3) Virginia Film & Book Festivals Toudsm Reserve Ivy Road Bike Lanes River Access Improvements Route 250/616 Turn Lane Rivanna Greenway Access & Path Total FYO0 FYQ0 39,200 - 25,000 585,600 664,380 624,800 689,380 124,315 128,044 150,000 170,179 20,000 - 116,985 311,156 5,500 - 30,000 100,000 lO8,OOO 5o,oo,q, 624,800 689,380 FY0! FY02 FY03 Fy04,~ 684 300 704,829 729,498 753 205 684,300 704,829 729,498 753,205 131,886 135,842 139,918 144,115 175,282 180,540 186,859 192,932 352,132 131,946 377,721 357,158 231,500 - 34,000 25000 ,25,00~ 25,000 25000 684,300 704,829 729,498 763,206 FY 00.0,4 25,000 3 536 212 3,561,212 679,8O5 905,792 1,530,114 231,500 64,000 150,000 3,561,212 AGENDA TITLE: Purchase of Development Rights (PDP,) Funding Options December 2, 1998 Page 2 These Tourism Fund reserve revenues could be available to the PDP, program, but only on a case by case basis. State law allows the County to use 3% of the transient tax revenues only for tourism and travel related expenditures, so eligibility would need to be tied to the specific development rights being purchased and the use of those development fights. Public Referendum on General Obligation Bonds for a PDR Proaram. A public referendum could be held to issue General Obligation Bonds to finance a PDR Program. HoWever, prior tu proceeding with plans for a referendum, the Board would need to decide how much it wants to borrow to implement a countywide PDP, program. Although the PDP, committee's report requested an initial commitment of $1 million dollars for the program, the amount of funding required to sustain a successful or meaningful program has not yet been determined. Before considering a referendum, the ongoing cost of a PDP, program for Albemarle requires further investigation and the possible assistance of a financial advisor. An advisor would provide a better understanding of the long-term costs of a PDR program and help establish maximum and minimum funding levels prior to a bond referendum. A financial advisor would also be able to assist staff in developing the most effective way to raise the required funds without jeopardizing the county's bond rating or our ability to borrow for other needed capital projects. If the Board only wishes to commit to an annual investment of $1 million dollars to the PDR program, combining a PDR bond referendum with a bond referendum for other capital related projects makes more sense. Since issuing general obligation bonds requires a great deal of preparation time and expense, i.e. hiring a bond consultant, preparing a bond portfolio, and obtaining a bond rating, it would be relatively expensive to issue the GO bond unless the issue was large enough that the reduced cost of borrowing would outweigh the issuance costs. The Department of Finance has indicated that a referendum should be for a minimum $20 million bond. The PDP, question could be presented to the public along with several other major capital projects for general government, such as a new juvenile courthouse, library, public safety facilities, etc. to create a viable GO bond package Virginia State law does not allow a County to hold an Advisory P,eferendum simply to pose the question of whether a Board should take a particular action. The referendum has to address the question of whether to issue long term debt for a particular project. Public Referendum on an A.qreement to Commit (x) cents on the tax rate to a PDR program. The Board could authorize a public referendum on an agreement, similar to the P,evenue Sharing Agreement, to commit a certain amount of the tax rate to a PDR program. This option would provide an opportunity for public discussion and, if approved, would give the Board the mandate to increase the tax rate to fund a PDP, program. This option would provide public input and direction without the expense of issuing GO bonds for a PDP, program. This option would require identifying an entity that the county could enter into a contract with requiring the county to expend funds for a PDP, program, which would bind future boards to what would legally be called "long term debt". A formula or benchmark for the amount of mandated payment by future boards would be a critical element of that contract. The referendum would be to accept or reject this tong-term debt. ~' Fund Balance. Should the Board wish to fund the PDP, program within current revenues and without increasing taxes, $500,000 could be approved and transferred from the county's General Fund fund balance. However, unless an immediate commitment is required to begin this program, the Board may want to defer a funding decision until they have had an opportunity to review both the FY99/00 capital and operating budgets. Although the PDP, program is important, committing sizeable funding to PDP,'s at this time may be premature outside the context of other public needs reviewed in the normal budget review process. RECOMMENDATION: · Should the Board wish to pursue the idea of funding PDR's through a referendum for GO bonds, staff will begin to develop costs and a proposed timeline to present to the Board in February. To assess the true financial costs of an effective PDR program, staff would recommend hidng a financial consultant to provide some additional fiscal analysis of the program and the bond referendum process. · Should the Board wish to commit immediate funding to the PDR program, staff will prepare a transfer appropriation for $500,000 to begin implementing the program. Tourism funds of approximately $350,000 will be available to the PDR program on a case by case basis depending on the link to tourism or travel related. 18.255 COUNTY oF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: FY 1999/00- FY 2003/04 Recommended Capital Improvement Program SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Worksession on the FY 1999/00 - FY 2003/04 Capital Improvement Program. STAFF CONTACT(S): Mr. Tucker, Ms. White, Ms. Gulati AGENDA DATE: December 2, 1998 ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: ITEM NUMBER: INFORMATION: X INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Yes REVIEWED BY: ~~""'"~ / BACKGROUND: Attached for your review is the Recommended Capital Improvement Program for FY1999/00 to FY2003/04 from the CIP Technical Review Committee. The December 2® worksession will provide an overview of the recommended capital projects for the next five years for both general government and the school division. A public hearing is tentatively scheduled for January 13th with approval the five-year plan on February 10th- Final adoption of the FY99/00 CIP budget is scheduled for April 14th in conjunction with the operating budget. DISCUSSION: The FY1999/00 - FY2003/04 CIP totals $50.520 million, which includes $15.744 million for general government projects, $34.220 million for school division projects, $0.445 million for tourism projects and $0.110 million for stormwater projects. The CIP Technical Committee balanced the FY99/00 - FY03/04 projects within available revenues, i.e. general fund transfers and debt service levels, that were approved in the FY98/99 - FY02/03 ClP. This left approximately $12 million of requested general government projects unfunded and $10.5 million in unfunded school division projects. A summary of the general government reductions and project changes is found on page 7. The Technical Committee does not recommend changes to school division projects, but only recommends a funding level for the general fund transfer and debt service around which the school division can build their CIP budget. If the school CIP is approved as recommended, the School Board will then need to reduce their requested CIP by $10.5 million dollars, however, other o~3tions will be discussed at the worksession. The specific project reductions or deferrals would be determined by the School Board prior to the January public hearing. The attached CIP document begins with the general guidelines under which the CIP Technical Committee reviews projects and an overview of their recommendations. An overview of all the CIP funds is found on page 15, followed by individual project sheets for all general government projects, as well as the tourism fund and the stormwater fund. A summary of the school division CIP fund begins on page 93, although individual project summaries for school projects are found in a separate document presented to the School Board on August 24 (attached). The Planning Commission reviewed and approved the proposed CIP on November 17% A copy of their action letter is attached. RECOMMENDATION: information ~s provided for the Board's review at the December 2nd meeting. During the'worksession, staff will discuss some ,~f the projects, present several funding options and be available to address questions on specific projects. Should you have any questions prior to the worksession, please feel free to call Ms White or Ms. Gulati. )8.256 Dept, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE of Planning & Community Development 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5823 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Robert W. Tucker, County Executive ~ David Benish, Chief of Community Development November 23, 1998 Capital Improvements Program, FY 1999/00 -2003/04 The Albemarle Planning Commission, at its meeting on November 10, 1998, unanimously recommended approval of the proposed Capital Improvements Program and provided the following additional comments for consideration by the Board of Supervisors. The Commission questioned the high cost for the Burley Middle School Addition/Renovation project (in the Public Schools CIP) and whether all alternatives to renovation had been fully evaluated, The Commission also indicated a desire to ensure funding of the Police Transport Vehicle for Arrests. If you have any further questions, please contact me. Cc: Roxanne White Anne Gulati file ALBEMARLE COUNTY FY1999/00 - FY2003/04 Recommended Capital Improvement Program FY1999/00 - FY2003/04 ALL CIP FUNDS General Government School Division Tourism Fund Stormwater Fund Total CIP $15.744 $34.220 $0.445 $o.~o $50.520 General Govt. Fund Overview Requested vs. Funded P~ojects FY99/O0 FYO0101 FY01/02 FY02/03 FY03/04 q FYO0-04 equested $4.487 $2.874 $5.100 $5.371 $9.920 $27.752 Funded ....~31716 $2.358 $:~:595 $3~064 $4:'01~'' $'15.74~ Unfunded $0.77:[ $0,516 $2.505 $2.307 $5.909 $12.008 General Govt- Admin/Courts County Computer Upgrade County IVlaint/Replace Court Square Maint/Replace. ] & D Court Maint/Replace. $1.020 00-04 $2.884 00-04 $0.400 00-04 $0.075 00-04 Unfunded Courthouse Replacement $5 -$15 01-03 Public Safety Projects Bldg.&, Equip Fund $1.870 00-04 .luvenile Det. Facility $1.466 00 Regional Police Firing Range and Training Facility $1.200 02-04 Police LAN upgrade $0.165 03 Mobile Command Ctn $0.150 .03-04 Transport Vehicle $0.040 02 Unfunded Fire/Rescue Mge. Software Public Safety Facility $0.043 $4.630 00/04 Highway/Transportation Georgetown Rd. Sidewalk Greenbr. Dr Pedestr./Bike Path Neighborhood Improve. Rev. Sharing/Traffic Calming Sidewalk Construction Unfunded Greenbr/Hydrau.Streetlgts. Neighborhood Improve. Traffic Calming Sidewalk Construction $0.060 04 $0.075 00 $0.155 02-04 $2.200 00-04 $0.225 01-04 $0.018 O0 $0.115 00-01 $0.300 00-02 $0.150 00-01 Library Projects ! Computer Upgrade ! Maintenance/Repair $0.146 00-01 $0.187 00-04 Parks/Recreation Projects Chris Greene Property Athletic Fields Devel. Crozet Park Fields Ivy Landfill Rec. area Cashier Booth Improve $0.069 $0.113 $0.759 $0.499 $o.3oo Monticello Rec. Facility $0.050 PVCC Softball Lighting $0.166 Athletic Field Irrigation $0.137 Scottsville Comm. Ctr. $0.125 03-04 04 00-04 00-03 01 02 02-03 02-03 00-02 4 Parks/Recreation (cont) ! So.Albemarle Park ! T°we Irrigation ! Walnut Creek Improv. ! Maintenance/Replace. $0.200 00-04 $0.02O O2 $0.051 0-01 $0.306 00-04 Unfunded ADA Improvements Athletic Field Devel. Urban Area Gym · $0.073 00 $0.055 o~/o4 $1.53 04 Utility Improvement PrOjects ! Keene Landfill Closure $0.475 00-04 5 General Govt. Summary Revenues General Fund Transfer $12.716 Borrowed Funds $ 1.465 Courthouse Maintenance Funds $ 0.234 ......... $ '01313 " Interest/carry-over Misc. Reimbursements (city, uva)$ 1.014 Total Revenue $15.744 Tourism Fund Projects ! Ivy Road Bike Lanes ! Rivanna Greenway ! River Access $0.232 02 $o.~5o 00/04 $0.064 00-04 6 Stormwater Projects I Master Drainage Prog. ! Drainage/Erosion $0.060 O1 $0.050 o~ School Projects Requested ProJects Funded pro~ects * Shortfall $44.696 $34.220 $10.476 · Based on approved VPSA bond amounts in FY99-03 CIP) School Fund Summary FY99/O0 FYO0/01 FYO1/02 FY02/03 FY03/O TI FYO0-04. Requested $3.836 $12.648 $9.482 $8.494 10.236 $44.696 Funded $4.049 $8.644 $5.453 $7.374 $8.700 $34.220 Unfunded -$0.213. $4.094._ $4.029 .$!.._!20 $1.536 $10.476 Requested School Projects I No~h,e~l~~e Southern Elem. Recreation AHS restoration Brownsville addition CATEC cosmetology lab Crozet kitchen Henley renovation Hollymead gym/restrms Monticello HS addition Hurray High renovations Northern Elementary WAHS renovations $0.335 04 $0.649 02 $1.2 02-03 $0.038 O0 $0.065 02 $0.200 04 $0.857 03-04 $0.330 04 $0.864 02 $10.319 00-01 $0.502 O0 School Projects (cont.) ! WAHS window replacement $0.230 ! Burley LibraryAdd./Renovation $6.800 ! 3ouett Addition/Renovation $2.615 ! Scottsville Library Addition $0.075 ! Southern Urban Elementary $8.935 ! Walton Addition $0.606 ! ADA structural changes $0.245 ! Maintenance/Replacement $1.339 04 00-02 02.03 04 02-04 03-04. oo/o4 OO-04 Added Projects I boutnern ' Northern Elementary Burley Addition/Renov. Jack 3ouett Addition/Ren Maintenance/Replace. Other Misc Changes Cale Addition Red Hill Expansion Net Increase $2.411 $4.623 $2.448 $0,447 $0.261 ($o.88o) ($1,260) $11.52 Impact of Requested Projects on Annual Debt Service FY99/00 FY00/01 FYOU02 FY02/03 FY03/04 FY04/05 Current Annual Increase $291,252 $300,000 $350,000 $300,000 $350,000 $350,000 Total New Debt Each Year Add'ti New Debt Service Required $95.990 $1oo,ooo $~5o,ooo $3oo,ooo $250,000 $250,000 $1.145 mill Funding Options Fund as recommended. $12 - $22 mill. unfunded gen govt.projects. $10.5 mill. unfunded school projects. Increase resources for projects and/or debt service. Eliminate or defer specific projects. Lease purchase general government projects. Use school transfer funds for debt service instead of maintenance and repair Consider referendum for general govt projects, i.e.courthouse, public safety facilities, 800 Mhz radio system, libraries, COB space 10 Using School Transfer for Debt Service Current Budgeted Debt Service* i i FY99 I FYO0 ! FY01 i FY02 ! FY03 I FY04 I FY0S I T~00/04 Bonded Amount i $4 245 $2,~9_j. $7,244i $4,0721 ' $5,674 $6,8001 $26,23S Budgeted Paymenl ~7,-~'$7,85~I $8,300i $8,700i $9,00(~ ........... _$_9_, .3_0.0_ 1 i~o~-~o~ " ~'i MT' h-0~i $300t $300i Uses Transfer for Debt Service i iFY99 FYO0 i FY01 i FY02i FY03 } FY04 i FY0$ TI O0/04 Bond Amount i $4,24~ $2,8361 $11,948i $~7.83i $7 794i $9,536i $40,89.~6 Budgeted Paymeni $'7,55S $8;4501 $8,850i $9 181i $9,8001 $10,350i $10,900 $57,531 !es..~.~..apj!..a.!..!~l~.¥~r............................--"--"-, ..... ii.i...~ ~.~.iii.~i.ii..ii...........~i ............... ~!..~O..OOj ............. ~H;i~!....` .$1,450 i $7,850[ $8.150i $8,500i $8,800 $9,150{ $9,450 $5t,900 'i' 211';i'Fi' ............ i ....................................................... ~ ................................... i ............................... ~ ................................ 1 ................................ i ........................................................... ~nco~r~'~'y~'i .................................... i~'~il ............... i~'0-~'. .... i~'~', ~.~! ............... '{~i ......... '{~'~ ............................... mcludesjuvend¢ detention debt service Bond Increase $14.657 Budgeted Debt Service Increase $4.781 Transfer Funds Used for Debt Service $5.631 Debt Service Ratios * 10.0% 9.5% 9.0% 8.5% 8.0% 7.5% 7.0% 6.5% 6.0% 9.5% 9.3% 9.3% 9.1% 9.0% 8.90/o~ 8.2% ~' 7.9% 7.8% FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 Recommended -'-Alternate * Includes Gen. Govt. Debt Service on 800MHz, & Juv. Det. Recommended CIP Draft FY1999/00-2003/04 This item was scanned under School Board Reports 1998 Recommended CIP FY1999/00-2003/04 This item was scanned under Financial Reports 1998 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Public Hearing on Leash Law for Bedford Hills & Lexington Subdivisions SU BJECT/PROPOSAL/REQU EST: Public hearing to amend County Code to add Bedford Hills & Lexington Subdivisions to the list of areas requiring leashes for dogs STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Huff, Davis AGENDA DATE: December 2, 1998 ACTION: X CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: ATTACHMENTS: REVIEWED BY: ITEM NUMBER: INFORMATION: IN FORMATION: BACKGROUND: Under section 4-213 of the County Code, homeowners may request the restriction of dogs running at large in certain areas approved by the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors DISCUSSION: 1) The Bedford Hills Homeowners Association requests to be inCluded in the County's dog leash ordinance. Of the 52 homeowners located in Bedford Hills Subdivision, 29 have signed a petition supporting the adoption of the leash law request; 13 homeowners are opposed to this request and 10 homeowners are neither in favor nor opposed to the request. The petition is on file in the Clerk's Office for the Board's informatiOn and review. 2) The Lexington Subdivision had previously submitted the required doCumentation for inclusion in the dog leash ordinance, but was omitted from the current list during the recodification process. Therefore, a public hearing is required to amend the County Code. RECOMMENDATION: 1) The petition Submitted by the Bedford Hills Subdivision meets the criteria for the Board to authorize amending the County Code. With over 55.% of the homeowners signing the petition, the 51% threshold has been reached to include Bedford Hills Subdivision in the dog leash ordinance. 2) It is recommended that the Board readopt and reordain the designation of the LeXington SubdiVision as previously adopted on March 12, 1997 as one of those areas where dogs are prohibited from running at large. BOARD OF sUPERVISORS I t-gO-98?12:d4 RCVD 98.250 From: Laurie Hall Subject: Ordinance Adopted by Board on Decemb , Date: December 4, 1998 The attached ordinance was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on December 2, 1998. The ordinance is forwarded to you for inclusion in your next update of the County Code. (~) to amend and reordain Chapter 4, Animals and fowl, Article II, Dogs and Other Animals, of the Code of Albemarle, in §4-213, In certain areas, to add subsection (36) to readopt and reordain the designation of Lexington Subdivision as previously adopted on March I2, 1997, as one of those areas where dogs are prohibited from running at large, and to add subsection (37) to include Bedford Hills Subdivision as one of those areas where dogs are prohibited from running at large. Attachments ( 1 ) ORDINANCE NO. 98-4(1_) AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 4, ANIMALS AND FOWL, OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA. BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 4, Animals and Fowl, Article II, Dogs and Other Animals, Division 2, Running At Large, is hereby amended and reordained as follows: By Amending: Section 4-213 In certain areas. CHAPTER 4. ANIMALS AND FOWL ARTICLE II. DOGS AND OTHER ANIMALS DIVISION 2. RUNNING AT LARGE Sec. 4-213 In certain areas. A. It shall be unlawful for the owner of any dog to permit such dog to run at large at any time within the following designated areas of the county: (1) University of Virginia grounds lying within the county. (7-19-73) (2) Orchard Acres Subdivision, Crozet, as platted and put to record in the clerk's office of the county: Section I, Deed Book 322, page 146; section 2, Deed Book 471, page 401. (7-19-73) (3) Woodbrook Subdivision as platted and put to record in the clerk's office of the county: Section I, Deed Book 358, page 297; section 2, vacated, Deed Book 414, page 115; section 3, Deed Book 386, page 39; section 4, Deed Book 397, page 177; section 4A, Deed Book 408, page 215; section 5, Deed Book 402, page 111; section 6, Deed Book 408, page 215; section 7, Deed Book 419, page 359; section 8, Deed Book 459, page 209; section 8A, Deed Book 481, page 231. (8-22-73) (4) Georgetown Green as platted and put to record in the clerk's office of the county in Deed Book 440, page 93. (9-26-73) (5) Crozet areas, beginning at a point, a corner common to parcels 96, 46 and 45B of section 56 of the county tax maps; thence in a westerly direction and 45B of section 56 of the county tax maps; thence, in a westerly direction along the southern boundaries of parcels 45B and 39, section 56 of the county tax maps to the centerline of State Route 240; thence with State Route 240 north to the intersection of the northeastern corner of parcel 11 of section 56 of the county tax map; thence, in a westerly direction with the northern boundary of parcel 11 to a corner with parcel 10D of section 56 of the county tax map; thence, in a southerly and westerly direction with the 'eastern and southern boundaries of parcels 10D, 10 and 9 of section 56 and parcel 69 of section 55 to a corner with parcels 69 and 71A of section 55; thence, with the boundaries of parcel 71A of section 56 in a southerly, westerly and northerly direction to the corner with parcel 70F of section 55; thence, in a westerly direction with the southern boundaries of parcels 70F, 72 (13), and 72B of section 55 to the southwestern corner of parcel 72B, a corner common with parcels 74 and 75 of section 55; thence, with the eastern boundary of parcel 74 in a northerly direction to the center of State Route 691 and continuing in a northerly direction across State Route 691 and along the eastern boundary of parcel 66 of section 55 to a corner with Orchard Acres, (section 55C); thence, with Orchard Acres in a clockwise direction to its intersection with the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway and continuing across the railway to its northern right-of- way; thence, in an easterly direction along the C & 0 right-of-way to its intersection with the weStern boundary of parcel 51 of section 55 extended; thence, in a northeasterly direction across State Route 788 to its intersection with the western boundary of parcel 51 of section 55; thence, in a northeasterly direction along the western boundaries of parcels 51, 50, and 49 section 55 and parcel 1 of section 56 to a corner with parcel 48 of section 55; thence, in a northwesterly and northeasterly direction along the southern boundary of parcel 48 of section 55 and the southern and western boundary of parcel 47 of section 55 continuing in a northeastern direction along the western boundaries of parcels 1, 3 and 5E of section 56 to a corner with parcel 5E of section 55, parcel 17 of section 40 and Sunrise Acres (section 40A); thence, with Sunrise'Acres in a clockwise direction to the intersection with the centerline of State Route 810; thence, in a southwesterly and south-easterly direction with State Route 810 to the intersection with the southern boundary of parcel 64 of section 56; thence, in an eastern direction with the southern boundary of its inter-section with parcel 66 of section 56; thence, in a southerly and easterly direction around the western and southern boundaries of parcel 66 of section 56 to its intersection with parcel 66B of section 56; thence, in an eastern direction along the southern boundary of parcel 66B, section 56, to a corner with parcel 58 of section 56A (2); thence, in a southerly and easterly direction along the western boundary of parcel 58 to section 56A (2) to its inter-section with State Route 240 and continuing across State Route 240 and parcel 60 to section 56A (2) and the C & 0 Railway to a corner common to parcels 67 and 68 of section 56A (2) on the southern right-of-way of the C & 0 Railway; thence, with the southern right-of-way of the C & 0 Railway in a westerly direction to its intersection with a corner common to parcel 58 of section 56 and parcel 71B of section 56A (2); thence, in a southerly and easterly direction along the western and southern boundary of parcel 58 of section 56 to a corner with parcel 57A (1) of section 56; thence, in a southerly and easterly direction along the western and southern boundary of parcel 57A (1) of section 56 and the southern boundary of parcel 57 of section 56 to a corner with parcel 55 of section 56; thence, with parcel 55 of section 56 in a northeasterly direction to a corner with parcel 54 of section 56; thence, in a southeasterly direction with the southern boundary of parcel 54 of section 56 to its intersection with parcel 48 of section 56; thence, in a southeasterly and southern direction along the eastern boundary of parcel 48 of section 56 to its corner with parcel 47 of section 56; thence, in a southerly direction along the eastern boundaries of parcels 47 and 46 of section 56 to the point of beginning. (6) Jefferson Village Subdivision as platted and put to record in the clerk's office of the county in Deep Book 449, page 637 and Deed Book 452, page 87. (12-19-73) (7) Camelot Subdivision as platted and put to record in the clerk's office of the county in Deed Book 450, pages 127 through 129, Deed Book 545, page 68 and Deed Book 653, page 79. (1'23-74; 5-21-86) (8) Sherwood Manor Subdivision as platted and put to record in the clerk's office of the county in Deed Book 504, page 114 and Deed Book 514, page 505. (1-23-74) (9) Four Seasons as platted and put to record in the clerk's office of the county in Deed Book 467, page 378 and Deed Book 481, page 417. (3-27-74) (10) Earlysville Heights Subdivision as platted and put to record in the clerk's office of the county in Deed Book 452, page 165 and Deed Book 491, page 3. (3-27-74) (11) Westmoreland Subdivision as platted and put to record in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, as section 1, Deed Book 402, page 91; section 2, Deed Book 414, page 29; section 3, Deed Book 419, page 265, and section 4, Deed Book 423, page 19. (5-22-74) (12) Hessian Hills Subdivision as platted and put to record in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, as section 1, Deed Book 316, page 254; section 2, Deed Book 327, page 327; section 3, Deed Book 370, page 145; Deed Book 379, page 365 and section 4, Deed Book 378, page 107. (10-9-74) (13) Knollwood Subdivision as platted and put to record in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, in Deep Book 272, page 3. (Does not include Old Forge Road or Hessian Hills Apartments.) (10-9-74) (14) Stonehenge Subdivision as platted and put to record in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, in Deed Book 543, page 409; Deed Book 545, page 660; Deed Book 548, pages 326, 345, 346, 347, 348, 522 and Deed Book 550, page 320. (1-22-75) (15) Queen Charlotte Subdivision as platted and recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, in Deed Book 395, page 6. (3-10-76) (16) Country Green Apartments as platted and recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, in Deed Book 453, page 553. (12-7-77 (17) Oak Hill Subdivision as platted and recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, in Deed Book 360, page 105; Deed Book 362, page 22; Deed Book 391, page 483; Deed Book 396, page 291; Deed Book 398, page 317; Deed Book 401, page 228; Deed Book 405, page 433; Deed Book 441, page 299 and Deed Book 468, page 85. (5-22-78) (18) Westgate Apartments (County Tax Map 61, parcels 42, 42C and 42D) as platted and recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, in Deed Book 497, page 636; and Deed Book 529, page 147. (5-22-78) (19) Solomon Court Apartments (County Tax Map 61, parcels 42 and 43D) as platted and recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, in Deed Book 349, page 390; Deed Book 353, page 145 and Deed Book 430, page 181. (5-22-78) (20) Carrsbrook Subdivision as platted and recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, in Deed Book 357, page 55; Deed Book 361, page 127; Deed Book 376, page 224, Deed Book 380, pages 249, 251 and 253; Deed Book 384, page 27 and Deed Book 387, page 469. (6-21-78) (21) Deerwood Subdivision as platted and recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, in Deed Book 426, page 457; and Deed Book 455, page 16. (6-21-78) (22) Greenbrier Heights Subdivision as platted and recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, in Deed Book 550, page 601. (10-7- 81) (23) Huntwood Subdivision as platted and recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court in Deed Book 728, page 377; and Deed Book 728, page 378. (5-13-87) (24) Hollymead as platted and recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court for the following areas: Sections 1 and 2 in Deed Book 531, pages 309 through 313; section 3 in Deed Book 714, page 444; Hollymead Square in Deed Book 633, page 330; tax map 46, parcel 28G in Deed Book 418, page 440; tax map 46, parcel 26B2 in Deed Book 741, page 304; and tax map 46B1-01-1 in Deed Book 489, page 381. (9-16-87) (25) The urban area of the county, the communities of Hollymead and Crozet and the village of Scottsville, all as defined in the Comprehensive Plan for Albemarle County, Virginia, and as shown on a map which is on file in the office of the clerk to the board of supervisors, (11-4-87) 4 (26) Waverly Subdivision as platted and recorded in the office of the clerk of. the circuit court of the county, in Deed Book 697, page 382; and Deed Book 781, pages 267 and 270. (12-16-87) (27) Whipporwill Hollow as platted and recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, in Deed Book 643, pages 285 to 292; Deed Book 644, pages 269 and 270; Deed Book 646, pages 220 to 221; Deed Book 657, pages 789 to 790; Deed Book 659, pages 561 to 565; Deed Book 694, pages 544 to 545; and Deed Book 867, page 253. (12-16-87) (28) Key West/Cedar Hills Subdivision as platted and recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, in Deed Book 353, pages 193 to 197; Deed Book 365, page 202; Deed Book 371, page 474; Deed BOok 388, page 514; Deed Book 393, page 417; Deed Book 410, page 577; Deed Book 420, page 259; Deed Book 505, page 607; Deed Book 530, page 351; Deed Book 543, page 114; Deed Book 661, page 44; Deed Book 692, page 453; and Deed Book 809, page 623. (9-7-88) (29) North Pines Subdivision as platted and recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, in Deed Book 703, pages 742, 743 and 744. (1- 17-90) (30) The Meadows in Crozet as platted and recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, in Deed Book 651, page 149. (8-8-90) (31) Milton Heights Subdivision as platted and recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the County, in Deed Book 343, page 64. (8-17-94) (32) Shadwell Estates Subdivision as platted and recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the County, in Deed Book 339, page 458. (8-17-94) (33) Thurston Subdivision as platted and recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the County, in Deed Book 637, page 456. (12-7-94) (34) Glenmore Planned Residential Development as recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the County in Deed Book 1074, page 203 and Deed Book 1209, page 257. (1-4-95) (35) Peacock Hill as recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the County in Deed Book 589, pages 205-212; Deed Book 708, pages 286; Deed Book 777, pages 039; Deed Book 904, pages 182, Deed Book 960, page 174; Deed Book 1025, page 610; Deed Book 1123, pages 071; Deed Book 1189, page 407; Deed Book 1310, page 128. (9-6-95) (36) Lexington Subdivision as platted and recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the County in Deed Book 564, page 088. (3-12-97) 5 (37) Bedford Hills SubdiVision as platted and recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the County, in Deed Book 365, page 212. (12-2-98) B. For the purposes of this section, a dog shall be deemed to be running at large while roaming, running or self-hunting off the property of its owner or custodian and not under its owner's or custodian's immediate control. Any person who permits his dog to run at large shall be deemed to have violated the provisions of this section, and, upon conviction, shall be fined not less than five dollars ($5.00) nor more than twenty- five dollars ($25.00). It shall be the duty of the animal control officer to enforce the provisions of this section. I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of an Ordinance duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, by a vote of 6 to 0 , as recorded below, at a regular meeting held on December 2, 1998 Aye Nay Mr. Bowerman x Ms. Humphris x Mr. Marshall x Mr. Martin x Mr. Perkins x Ms. Thomas x lerk, Board of County Superv~ Bedford Hills Homeowners Association 930 Bedford Hills Drive Earlysville, VA 22936 (804) 973-8376 October 27, 1998 County of Albemarle Office of the Board of Supervisors 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22901 Honorable Members: The Bedford Hills Homeowners Association is requesting your approval of the "Leash Law" petition signed by 56 percent of homeowners in Bedford Hills. Of the 52 homeowners, 29 signed in favor of adopting a Leash Law, 13 are opposed to a Leash Law and 10 homeowners are neither in favor of, nor opposed to a Leash Law. Two lots are vacant (lots # 11 and # 12). These lots are owned by Homeowner # 50 who chose to abstain from voting either pro or con on a Leash Law. For your convenience, we have included the plat of Bedford Hills along with our own subdivision map that should make identification easier. Plat is by W~T. Decker, Engineer. Also attached is a copy of the current restrictions governing Bedford Hills, recorded in the clerk's office of the Circuit Court of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Respectfully submitted, The Bedford Hills Homeowners Association PETITION FOR DOG "LEASH" ORDINANCE We, residents of ~-~~ ~',1~~ i~(%\~:~ ~-~, (subdivision or o~her area), respectfully request ~ha'~-th~'Alb%~arle County Board of Supervisors . include this area under the provisions of County Code Section 4-19(b) which makes it unlawful for any dog t'o roam, run, or self-hunt off of the property of its owner or custodian and not be under the owner's or custodian's immediate control,, the law commonly referred to as the "Leash" Ordinance· o 32. of yl J~ed.~ord 0C BEDFORD HILLS SL~DfVISIO,N, eentum of Ch( gross proceeds of sale and to .lischarg,~. the amount of the debt h~reby secured then unpald~ which i~ l;o be t),,':n pa.i.! whether due ~t t~at time or not and if there be any residue, the same shall be made payable at such time and s ~cured in such manner as the said Clinton f;. i~yalls and Virginia i{. i{yal!s~ their hei's or assigns shall in writing prior to advertisement dlrect~ or in case of faill :e to give such ,'tirection~ as the Trustees :;hall think fit. Witness the following s'|6natures arid seals the day and year first above written. STATE OF VIi{GINIA~ COUNTY OF ALBi']~,AilLE~ TO-WIT: Clinton S. Ryails (SEAL Virginia 1{. i{yal, ls (SEAL I, Gladys II. Ward, a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid, do certify that Clinton S. ]{yulls and VJ. rg~nia .;{. Hyalls~ w~o~e nam are signed to the foregoing writingS, bearing date on the 26th day of January~ 1960, have arid each has acknowledged the same before me J.n my County aforesaid My commission exp.~res tl~e 2].3't day of July~ 1963. Given under my hand this 26th day of January~ ]960. G]m~.ys H. Ward~ Notary Public. 'VIRGINIA~ IN TtIE CLERK'S OFFICE OF ALBEM.',HLE CIi{CUIT C0URT~ JANUA]{Y 26, 1960. This deed was presented to me in said office and with certificate annexed admitted to record at 3:%0 P. M. Teste; ~Clerk. ~s TIIIS DEED made this Plst lay of January, 19~.~'~ by und between Bellemoore R Corporation Bellemoore /~ea!ty Corporation~ a New Jersey Corporat~on~ }: 're,halter referred To: B/S to as the Grantors; George K. ~{oper~ and Marilyn B. ltop..:~],~ husband and w]fe~ George K. Ro hereinafter referred to as the Grantees~ and James F. ]3l:-~hop and Marilyn D. ,3 t. Tax 2 B/shop~ husband and w.iFe~ pal'tl'es o~' the th]r(~part~ and E. Bishop Tax Traus. and Louise B. Bishop~ husband anti wife~ part~es of the fourth part% Plat Fee W [ T N E S S E T H: ~d. $ That for and in consideration of the sum of Seventeen Thousand, nine hundred and ninety-six ,]el. Jars (;~]7~996.OO) cash ~n hand pat~ by t~e Grantees to the Grantor, th(: r:zceipt of which is hero, by acknow]:ed~ed~ the Grantor hereby grants, bargatns~ se.['In and conv~ys vlith ge~h:~ral wurranty of title unto the Gran~s as tonant;; Ly the ~m~;Jr~sty with full ri/j]~tu of survivorship as at common law and not as tenants in common~ a].l that cel'ta~n tract or parcel of land situated in the Riw~nna Mag.ister'lal District of .~]b~mar].e County, VirginJa~ contalniDg ~b.99 acres more or le[;s~ shown and described as Tract "D" on the plat of M. T. Decker~ Eng~oeer~ date,'] Nov~mber, 19~9, entitled "Be]ford Hl].ls Subdtvlslon"~ and hereto attached ami to be recorded with this deed. Said Tract "D" does not include any of the land shown as a fifty- foot right-of-way along it's southwest side. ': The property hereby conveyed is a portion of the land conveyed to the Grantor by deed of' James S. Farish and Alice Farish dated April !~ 19~7~ o[ record in the Clerk's O~fice of the Circuit Court of said County in Deed Book 331~ page 1~8. It is expressly umierstood however/that~his plat is recorded herewi?l for the sole purpose of des~.]bi, ng said Tract "D" and the b~,low mentioned ease~ ments from Tract "D" to State ]loute Ko. '/1~3. In all other respects the property of the Grantor .is res~.~rved from any eff~;ct off the record&t:~on of this plat. ~ls appurtenant to the property hereby conveyed the Grantor hereby grants and conveys a non-exclusive easement of right of way for ingress and egress between Tract "l): and State Rout~ No.' 71,3 over the right of way and mot particularly describe~ as follows: From State Route No. 7q'3, over Culpeper Drive to the intersection Staunton lload, thence over Staunton Street to the intersection with Williamsb~ Street~ thence over Williamsburg Street for 3~+2.79 feet. ,'is appurtenant also to Tract "D" the Grantor hereby grants and a non-exclusive easement for utilities, such as electricity and telephone serv which may be constructed and maintained in a strip ten feet in width along the southern side of Culpeper drive for its eutire length. This easement 'includes 'the right to cut branches~ limbs and undergrowth adjacent to said right-of-way which might endanger wires running within tho right-of-way. A non-exclusive easement for such utilities is reserved by the Grantor in a ten foot; wide strip oF Tract "D" along its southwest side~ indic.a on said plat as %88.~'9' in length~ together with the right to cut branches~ li: ,and undergrowth adjacent to said' right of way which might endanger wires runni: within said righto£ way. By deed dated Apt.il ll~ 19~8, and of record in the Clerk's Office cf the Circuit Court of said County in Do. ed Book'339 page 398~ the Grantor con~eyed certain lands to E.Morrts Chisholm subject to the rest;fiction that no buildings shall be erected upon them prior to Apri.! IO, ]978. Its entire right to enforce or release that restrlct'.ot, i:; hereby reserved to the Grantor exclusively. Hewers. r, the Grantor agrees w~th tho Grantees that if the existing restriction on Tract "D2"~ so conveyed to E. Morris Chisholm is rel~.~ased a cond]tion of the release will be that the same restrictions as then ~fcvern Tract "D" will Be imposed upon said Tract "D2". By ,Iced d!~ted ,'~p.ri] ]5'~ ]9~8, and of record in said Clerk's Office. in Deed Book 339, page 393, the Grantors conveyed certain lands to the parties of the third ani fourth parts. ..;~id deed created certain restrictions numbered (1) (a) through (6) (:~), inclusive, affecting Tracts "~.~"~ "!~"~ and "C" as show~ on the plat recorded with said deed. Iiaving decided that other restrictions hereinafter set forth would be moro su.i. table than the said existing restrictions, the Grantor and the part:ies of the th.i,,'i and fourth parts hereby cancel and eliminate the said ex:isting rcstrlcl',]ons on said Tract:, "1%": "If"~ a'nd "C" and hereby establish th~ following re:;tricti°ns to gove]-~ sa~'l Tracts ".~". , "B" and "C" which of course~ ~nc].udes ']'fact "D" conveyed by this deed. (1) Tracts ,~, B~ D and the remainder of Tract C mhy be subOivided into lots v;ith a minimum siize of 1.6 acres but the average lot :~n each of thos~ foul' acres shall be at ]east 2 acres. Lots which may be so established may be further subdividec] only Jn order e~ther to establish a water system lot for well and storage site or to increase the area of an adjoininff lot or lots. No such lot shall be subdivided For t}'[~ purpose of ei. ecting an additional residen, e. (2) Only one residence shall be const/'ucted on each lot but ague. t cottage or servants quarters shall not be deemed a residence. ,~11 lots shall be used solely for resiclentiai purposes or for purposes not objectionable in a residential area such as a private schoolsm places of worshlp} librariesm musems~ art galleries, recreation buildJngsm w~3].l sites, water storage sJtesm play-grounds and parks; however~ no shopm store~ mobile homem temporary living} struetur~ factory~ hospital~ asylum, tourist home~ funeral home~ cemetery, apartment house or business house of any kind shall be erected or maintained on said property. Residences may contain no more than one apartment for separate family use} and may contain an office for use in the practice of the following~ professions only-- tile ministry~ law} medicine} dentistry~ engineering} and arehitecture~ except with the prior written consent of the ,'%rchltecutral Control Committee ~hose decisio~l sh~t]l in all. respects b~Flnal ~n(1 binding. 1.1o such {. lot shall be used as 4~ roadway for access to property outside the subdivision in which it is located} except with the prior written eons()nt of the Architectural Control Committee. ' (3)(a) No building~ wal]~ swimmin{~ poo].~ driveway or fencing of any kind shall be erected~ altered or enlarged on any such lot or any portion of Tracts A} B} dm or the remafnder of Tract C except aceorci.ing to plans and specifieiattons (including exterior co]or scheme, ;rrad.in{: plans and the location of such building~ wall, swimming peo].~ driveway or fencinz) which have been submitted to the Architectural Control Committee and approvod by J t before the beginning constructlon} alteratien or enlargement. (b) The :'~rchltectural Control Committee may approve or disapprove said plans in writing within thirty days of receipt of written application and plans from the applicant. ]f said plans are not disapproved within the sai~ thirty days~ they shall be conclusively presumed to hav~ been approved. ].lailing of notice of disspprow{] by regular mail to the address [;.iven by applicant shall constitute delive~'y of notice of disapprova.l to (c) 1f no legal action wi th respect to a breach of this covenant shall have been commenced and no notice of lis pen,-tens with respect thereto recorded in'the approp'~'iate Clerk's O.ffJce w.ithin sixty days after completion of such building~ a] teratJon~ or enlar~lemen~, it .... . conclusively presumed that there has been full compliance with this provision, except as specifieri below. (~) ~{o buibling shall be ].ocated neaper than ~0 feet to Shy street. No b~filding shall be locate~] nearer than PO feet to the property of a dif?erent owner. For the purpose oD-this covena[l~;, eaves~ steps and open porches shall not be considered] as a part of ~ b~[ilding: (~) No signboards or advertising posters shall be erected or maintaine on any lot, except s~t.'ns or notices whici~ may off,.~r the property for refit or s~l~, and which shall not exceed a measurement of three feet in largest dimension and also except small professional signs not over one hundred square ].nches in size~ designating the location of professional offices on the property. (6) No nuisance shall be maintained on said property and any unsightly accumulation of debris shall be considered a nuisance. (?) Enforcement of these restrictions shall be by proceedings at law or in equity against a~ person violating or attempting to violate any covenant either to restrain violation, or to recover damage. (8) Inva].idat:lon of any one of these restr.ictions by judgment or court order shall in no wise effect any of the other provisions which shaIi remain in full force and effect. (9) These restrictions are to run with the land and shall, be bindin,~ on ail parties and all persons claiming under them for a period of twenty-five years from the date these restrictions are recorded, after which time said restrictions shall automatically extend for one successive period of ten years unless an instrument s'!gned by the majority of the then owners of thc lots has been record'led, agreeing to terminate or to change said restrictions in whole or in part. (10) The Architectural Control Committee is composed of James F. Bishop, William E. Bishop, Henry Koch~ and George K. Roper~ all of Charlottes- ville, Virg~.nia. A majority of the committee may designate a representative to act for it. In the event of death, disability or resignation of any member of the committee, the remain:!ng members shall have full authority to designate a successor. (]1) Unitl such time as each tract is fully subdivided Jnto lots~ it may be used for agrlculture~ 'lJvestock, and ordinary farming purposes without regard to the ].imitation to residential use. (12) The possih!e future conveyance of an area smaller than 1.6 acres of the land now owned by the parties of the third part to increase the area of the land now owned by the parties of the fourth part shall not violatethese restrictions. It is understood between the Grantor and the Grantees that any party who desires to construct fences upon the boundary lines of ~ract D shall have no ri~;ht to eel. l/upon the other for contribution to the cost of such fencing. The Grantor covenants with the Grantees that it' is seised in fee simple of the property hereby conveyed and has a perfect right .to convey the same, that it has done no act to encumber sa.id land, that the Granteeslshall have quiet possession of said Jand free from encumbrances and that it, the Grantor, shall execute such other and further assurances of title as may be requisite. lin WITNESS WHEREOF, BEJ. Jcmoore Hea].ty Corporation has caused its name to be signed hereto by Henry Koch~ tts President and agent hereunto duly authorized and its sea]. to be afflxe,~ and attested by Joan 3. Koch~ its Secretary. (SEAL) ATTEST: Joan S. Koch Secretary STATE OF VII{G]NIA~ COUNTY 01,' ,klJB~ARLE: TO-WIT: BELLEMOORE itEALTY COI{POI{ATION i~y Ilenry Koch President i, Magruder Dent, Jr., a Notary Public in and for the County of Albemarle~ in the State of V~rginl'a~ do hereby certify that Henry Koch~ whose name is signed to the foregoing writing as President of Bel]emoore Realty Corporation, has acknowledged the same before me in my County and State afore said. Given under my hand this 26th day of January, ].960. My Commission expires August ].~ 1.962, Magruder Dent~ Jr.~ Notary Public. STATE OF VIRGINIA, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, TO-WIT James F. Bishop Marilyn D. Bishop W~lliam E. Bishop Louise B. Bishop (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) I, Charles A. Via, Jr., a Notary Public in and for the County of Albemarle in the State of Virginia, do hereby certify that James F. Bishop~ Earilyn B. Bishop, William E. Bishop, and Louise B. Bishop, whose names are signed to the foregoing writing have and each has acknowledged the same before me in my County and State aforesaid. Given under my han~ th~s 26th day of January, 1960. My comm~ssion expires Sept. ]5, 1963. Char/es A. Via, Jr., Notary Public. (SEE NEXT P,'~.GE FOi{ PLAT) (SEE NEXT P.'\(;E FOil PL^T) VIHGINIA~ IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE OF ALBEMARLE CIRCUIT COU[IT, JANUARY 26~ 1960' ~ This deed was presented to me in said office and ~ith certificate a~nexed admitted to record at ~:~O P. M. & $19'80 Stamp Affixed & Plat Attached., Teste: FISCAL YEAR: TYPE OF APPROPRIATION: APPROPRIATION REQUEST 98~99 NUMBER ADD ITIONAL TRANSFER NEW 98062 ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES NO X FUND: TOURISM PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: CONTRIBUTION TO CHARLOTTESVILLE MUNICIPAL BAND. EXPENDITURE CODE DESCRIPTION, AMOUNT 1 1810 72030 560408 MUNICIPAL BANO $ 30,000.00 TOTAL $ 30.000.00 REVENUE CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 2 1810 51000 510100 TOURISM FUND BALANCE $ 30,000.00 TOTAL $30.000.00 TRANSFERS REQUESTING COST CENTER: COUNTY EXECUTIVE APPROVALS: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SIGNATURE DATE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Municipal Band Funding Request SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Request for a $30,000 one-time contribUtion to the Municipal Band,s new building STAFF CONTACT(S): Mr. Tucker, Ms. White AGENDA DATE: December 2, 1998 ACTION: × CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: ATTACHMENTS: REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: ITEM NUMBER: INFORMATION: INFORMATION: No ~ The Charlottesville Municipal Band began a fund raising campaign five years ago to build a Municipal Arts Center, which will provide a permanent home for the band, as well as space for other arts organizations in the area. To date the band has raised over $360,000 toward the projected $600,000 cost of the facility. They anticipate receiving' an additional $80,000 to $100,000 from in-kind donations. Ground was broken for the facility on October 17 and they project a fourteen-month completion date. DISCUSSION: The MunidPal Band is requesting a one-time contribution of $30,000 from the County and the City to help reach their fundraising goal of $600,000. The Band performs approximately 15 concerts each year to an estimated combined audience of approximately fifteen thousand persons. It is also estimated that approximately 10% of their audience members come from the Central Virginia area (Harrisonburg, Wayn~sboro, Madison, Orange and Richmond) Since the MuniciPal Band is an arts organization that brings visitors and tourists to the area from the surrounding counties, a one-time donation could be considered from the Tourism Fund. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a $30,000 one-time contribution to the Municipal Band for their new building with funds to be appropriated from the County's Tourism Fund. 98.259 P.O. Box 1201 · Charlottesville, Virginia · ~22902-1201 Or~a#iz~l in 1922 November 19, 1998 Forrest R. Marshall, Chairman Albemarle County Board County Office Building~ Charlottesville, 'i'~-1-9-98P025:2,:'~ RCVD Dear Mr. The Ch: with free ten At of Su would match a would help of the Munici operating community far into the millennium. We would be happy to appear at anY' ~'eeting to explain our building project and support this request. We look forward to answering any further questions you might have. Sincf~ely,/~ (_~nnes W. Simmons, Music Director P.O. Box 1201 · Charlottesville, Virginia · 22902-1201 Orf~#/zrd /# 19££ Forrest 1~ Marshall, Chairman - page 2 Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Copies: Mrso Mr. Mrs. Mr. Mr. David P. Bowerman Charlotte Y. Humphris Ja~ Jouett ~on~st R. Ma~hall, Jr. COUNTY OF AI_BF__MARI E Office of Board of Superviso~ 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902--4596 (804) 296-584~ FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S. Martin Walter E Perkins White Hall Sally H. Thoma, Samuel ~ December 4, 1998 Mr. Steve Layman, President The Municipal Band of Charlottesville, Inc. P.O. Box 1201 Charlottesville, VA 2 22902-1201 Dear Mr. Layman: At its December 2, 1998 meeting, the Board of supervisors approved a request from The Municipal Band of Charlottesville, Inc,, for a one-time contribution to the Band's new building in the amount of $30,000. The Board extends its appreciation for the years of enjoyment the Band has contributed to our community. Sincerely, , Laurel B. Hall Senior Deputy Clerk cc: Roxanne White Printed on recycled paper DECEMBER ~, 1998 EXECUTIVE SESSION MOTION I MOVE THAT THE BOARD GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT tO SECTION 2. 1-344(a) of the CODE Of VIRGINIA UNDER SUBSECTION ( I) TO CONSIDER APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS; UNDER SUBSECTION (7) TO CONSULT WITH LEGAL COUNSEL AND STAFF REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION CONCERNING THE IVY LANDFILL; UNDER SUBSECTION (7) TO CONSULT WITH LEGAL COUNSEL AND STAFF REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION CONCERNING THE TRANSITION OF THE CItY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE TO TOWN STATUS; AN d UNDER SUBSECTION (7) TO CONSULT WITH LEGAL COUNSEL AND STAFF REGARDING AN INTERJURISDICTIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT. David P. Bowerman Charlotte Y. Humphris J~ JouSt Forrest R. Marsh~, Jr. COUNTY OF A! REMA~LF Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Vaginia 229024596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-58OO MEMORANDUM Charles S. Martin W~lter E Perkins White Hall Sally H. Thomas Samuel Mi~er TO: FROM: Board of Supervisors Laurie Hall ~ Senior Deputy Clerk DATE: December 1, 1998 Applications .for Boards and Commissions (Updated) On the attached I have provided a revised list of applicants interested in current vacancies on Boards and Commissions which have been advertised. I previously sent you copies of all applications, except those for the Rio District appointee to the Equalization Board, as they were previously provided to Mr. Bowerman. All interviews are scheduled for Wednesday, December 2, 1998. Attachments cc: Bob Tucker Larry Davis Printed on recycled paper BOARD OR COMMISSION NEW TERM APPLICANT/ INTERVIEW, EXPIRE INCUMBENT IF DATE SCHEDULED ~lek, D~ 1:00 p.m. Susan M. Cabell --- William J. Abbott 1:10 p.m. Edmund W. Kitch 1:40 p.m. George W. Ray, Jr. 1:20 p.m. Frederic F. Catlin ~-~ A. Gordon Gledhill William C. Johnson ,, ~aurfr~J~erney /' Joy Matthews~ Leslie~'" David P. Bowerman Charlotte Y. Humphris Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. COUNTY OF Al -REMARI F Office of Board of Supervisors 40! Mclntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 MEMORANDUM Charles S. Martin Walter E Perkins Wh~e Hall Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller TO: FROM: Board of Supervisors Laurie Hall /~ Senior Deputy Clerk DATE: December 1, 1998 Applications for Boards and Commissions (Updated) On the attached I have provided a revised list of applicants interested in current vacancies on Boards and Commissions which have been advertised. I previously sent you copies of all applications, except those for the Rio District appointee to the Equalization Board, as they were previously provided to Mr. Bowerman. All interviews are scheduled for Wednesday, December 2, 1998. Attachments cc: Bob Tucker Larry Davis Printed on recycled paper BOARD OR COMMISSION NEW TERM EXPIRE DATE APPLICANT/ INCUMBENT INTERVIEW, IF SCHEDULED Leo Mallek, D.M.D. Susan M. cabell IWilliam J. Abbott Edmund W. Kitch George W. Ray, Jr. 1:00 p.m. 1'10 p.m. 1:40 p.m. 1:20 p.m. Frederic F. Catlin A. Gordon Gledhill William C. Johnson Maurice J. Tierney Joy Matthews Leslie Reed I N T E R Offlc~ of th~ Clcr~ ~o the 0 F F I C E MEMO To: From: Subject: Date: Members Board of Supervisors Laurie Hall, Senior Deputy Clerk Boards and Commissions November 25, 1998 As I predicted in yesterday's email, I received some last minute applications for Boards and Commissions. Because I was concerned the FAX'd copies of the additional applications might not fax well, I decided to mail them to you. Attachments cc: Bob Tucker Nov. 24 1998 17:., :07 :, ;,2 12:$2PM P2 County of Albemarle Char- l~le. VA 22902-4596 (~04) 296-5843 APPLICATION TO S~VE 0N BOA~ / ~0~MISSION / COMMt~E Appli~t'~ N~e ~k~_. ~~ .... Home Phon~ .~o~% Magisterial Digtrict in which .~ur homo residenc~ is loomed Busincs~ Address ."~- o. ~o~ - - ' RD OF SUPERVISORS Membe~hi? in Fraternal: Butanes.q: Church and/or 5oc.;,2 Group.~ R~asonfst for. Desire. to~.~rve nr~ th{~ Rom-d I t ,,_ mm~.q~on / Commtt~e TI~c informa~;.oa proVided oa ~s application will be mleZ~cd to ~e publlc upon County of Albem r't v'? sv .a v so Office o£B. 9.ar~l' of Coun_ty Supervisors 4ui McIntim Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 Home Phone I . Phone APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD / COMMISSION / COMMITTEE (please type or print) Comm ion Applicant's Name Magisterial District in Which Your home residence is located Employer Business Address '- Date of Employment Occupation / Title Years Resident in Albemarle' County ~-~._A-' Previous Residence Spouse's Nan~ ~ 6. Number of Children Education (Degrees and Grad~uation Dates) /~. g. - / q~2- Memberships in Fratemal: Business: Church and/or Social Groups Public. Civic and Charitable Office and / or Other Activities or Interests Re.on(s) for Desire to Se~e on ~is Bored / Commission / COmmi~ee ~o ~om~on provided on ~s ~plic~on ~ll be mle~ed to &e public upon reque~. Return to: O~rk, Boar~ of CoanW Supe~sor~ ~x lvlcmur~oaa Chario~es~e, VA 229024596 David P. Bowerman Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Joueff Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. COUNTY OF Al REMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-584,3 FAX (804) 296-5800 MEMORANDUM Charles S. Martin P-dvanna Walter E Perkins White Halt Sally H. Thomas Samuel ~iller TO: FROM: Board of Supervisors Laurie Hall ~- Senior Deputy Clerk DATE: November 23, 1998 Applications for Boards and Commissions On the attached I have provided a list of applicants interested in current vacancies on Boards and Commissions which have been advertised. I have also attached copies of all applications, except applications for the Rio District appointee to the Equalization Board, as they were previously provided to Mr. Bowerman. All interviews are scheduled for Wednesday, December 2, 1998. Note: The closing date for the Route 250 East Corridor Study Advisory Committee is tomorrow, Tuesday, November 24. Since I may receive applications after the Board packets have been delivered tomorrow, I will FAX you any other applications received by the deadline. Similarly, the closing date for applications on the Housing Committee, the Equalization Board (RIO), and the Rivauna Solid Waste Authority Citizens Advisory Committee is Wednesday, November 24. I will FAX any other applications received by the end of that day, as well. Please also note that Ms. Susan M. Cabell was not able to come on December 2, as she is out of town on that date. Please let me know if you wish to set up another interview date for her. Attachments cc: Bob Tucker Larry Davis Printed on recycled paper BOARD OR COMMISSION EXPIRE DATE APPLICANT/ INCUMBENT INTERVIEW, IF SCHEDULED Leo Mallek, D.M.D. 1:00 p.m. susan Mi Cabel1 ___ William J. Abbott 1'10 p.m. Edmund W. Kitch 1:40 p.m. George W. Ray, Jr. 1:20 p.m. Frederic F. Catlin A. Gordon Gledhill William C. Johnson Maurice J. Tierney County of Albemarle Office of Boardof Coun.ty Supervisors 401 Mclntire Rbad Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD / COMMISSION / COMMITTEE (please type or prinO Commission/Committee j 2ninf. Ai~,nnrt: P. nmmi~on amc LEO MALLEK~ D.M.D. Homo Phone 804L978-1150 Address ~87K fidvonee M~)l~ Rd. p. n_ Rnx ?D7 Earlysvilie~ VA 2293~ District in wkich your home residence is located, W h i t e h a 1 i Self . Phone 804-964-1116 ss 690 Bent Oaks Dr. P. 0. Box 651 Earlysville, VA 22936 of Employment Occupation / Title D e n t i s t Resident in Albemarle County 1 7 Previous Residence A m h e r s t ~ M A .,Ann Huckle Mallek Number of Children 2 (Degrees and Graduation Dates) Trinity College, Hartford, CT. B.S. Biology,1969 dent( Board of Directors, Mulberry Commons Condominium Unit Owner'sAssoc. cal Assoc. Board of Directors, Chair, July 4th Ctte, EARL~ Earlysville AreaResident': est in sustainable qrowth of industry and transportation in tl,e ~ea served by the Charlottesville/Albemarle Airport and the impact of that information provided On this applic ' ' ' r leased to the public upon request. I Signature to: (~]¢rk, Bqar. g of .County Supervisors OCtober 25~ 1998 Dam Albemarle County Board of Supervisors 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 o, ..... tl~, /q,.F,._.:~?:.._. .... . November 12, 1998 Dear Board Members, I am writing in support of Dr. Leo Mallek, one of the candidates for a position on the Airport Advisory Committee. I have known Dr. Mallek for several years. During that time he has been very involved in the Earlysville community. He has been an active member of the Earlysville Area Residents' League and has helped at general meetings and Candidate Forums offered to residents. He has also organized our Earlysville Fourth of July parade for the past two years. Leo has repeatedly demonstrated a commitment to being involved in his community and has worked to involve others. He has given freely of his time and has been willing to see a project through to the end. I highly recommend him to you with the belief that he would be an asset to the Airport Advisory Committee. Ms. Lis~ Harman '4530 Mill Run Ln. Earlysville, VA 22936-9759 MJH ADMINISTRATION ~_~ COUNTY Fax: 804-982-7524 County of Albemarle Office of Bonnl of ~..oun~t~ 401 M~l~m AP~CA~ON TO S~VE ON BOA~ / C0~15~[0~ / CO~I~ . . ,/~ . (~~) 5~inc= A~d~sz. ~ ~ ~ ..... - ........ ~-t~~ ~ c.~ ~, ,,~,,,~ -,.~,~.~ ~x~s...~ ~~ ~ ~'. Return to: ¢l~rk, Board. of Cmaoty Supervisors AlUm nrke. c~n_ t_Y~ County of Albemar[%Am OF SUPERVISORS Office of Board of County Surx:rvisors 401 Mcl. nfirc Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-.4596 (804) 296-51143 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD / COM~flSSION (please type or print) Board / Commission / Committee ~ im4- ~ ; r ~°o r-t- Co/,m;,(~ i Magisterial. District in which your home residence is Iocated_btJ~ ~'--t~e_ ~// Employer_ 5'g./F Phone Business Address ~arne , ,,q$ ct,b c ce Date of Employment ! q9 ~ ~ Occupation / Title Years Resiiteht in Albemarle County _ 1 9 Previous Residence r%t ;r.~-o,~ Spouse'sNmne O;a~ _!23-/0-. ~o. 7~ ,, NmnMrofChildrcn. Education (Degrees and ~.~duatm,; Dates) ~ ~4 1.7.65-, ~~1Ed 1c1~6 . p,~ D Igor3 Membemhips in Fralemai. Business. C. hureh and/or Social . Ca~o+~y- .~2o r o ~ro l,'t? ~_oh, ~a~'o% ~,.c.., Eublic. Civic_and Charitable.Office and / or CCh. er Activities or Interest,:. Reason(s) for D,csire to ,qs:rve on this Board / Commission / Commi_~.~ n requeaL Th, information provided on this application w~i!l bo ~ p, ubJio?.po Signature Return to: Clerk, Bom'd of Couaty Supervisors Albemarle County 401 Mclmtire Road Charlott~s-vJlle, VA 22902-4596 County of Albemarle Office of Board o_-~-Cou~.ty Supervisors 401 Mcintire Rbad Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD / COMMISSION / COMMITTEE ~ , . (ple,4se type or print) Board/Commission/~Co.mittee , ~) O' q] ~- ,~' ~ t~20-~'~ Magisterial District in which your horns re. sid~m~e is located .~ a.C. ~ , ~ ~ ' Da o mfym nt 0/,up on, i, '%0 Years Resident in '1 ~9 &Ibemarle, County Previous Residence Spouse's Name'~ [, ~ Number of Children Education (Degrees and Graduation Dates) 3,0' I~ 6 Membershins in Fraternal_ Business. Church and/or Social Grouvs Public. Civic and Charitable Office and / or O,t,her ^ctivitie~ or Intcr~_~ts f~ . , Return to: ~22902-4596 Date County of Albemarle B(!ARD OF SUPERVISORS Office of Board of CounW Supervisors 401 Mclntire Rbad Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD / COMMISSION / COMM1TFEE (please type or print) Board/Commission/Committee Applicant' s Name t~~:~ GO. ~2_/k¥ ,Xy-~. Home Phone Home Adeess ~O ~~ooP ~g%a~i M~imefifl Di~ct ~ wMch yo~ home residence is l~md ~& ~ ~~ Employer ~O~0~~ C~~ ~O~~ Phone Ogeof~olo~ent ~~ (~¢~ Occupation/Title g~ ~ Years ~sidentin ~bem~le Co~W ~ Previous ~sidence S~use's Nme ~ ~ ~ ~ Nm~r of Children ~~s i~m~~~ess~urch ~/or ~~ups Public, Civic and Charitable Office and / or Other Activities or Interests Reason(s~ for Desire to Serve on this Board / Commission/Committee The information provided on this application will be released to the public upon request. Return to: ¢Ivrk, BqarAl of .County Supervisors ~pe.m~ Ar~9. t~o~ntY. ,~oi lvlctnuret~oaa Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 Date Commonwealth Central Real Estate Investments, Inc. October 26, 1998 George W. Ray, Jr. President Jane H. Ray Vice President County of Albemarle Board of Supervisors County Office Building 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: I am pleased to submit herewith my application to serve as an Albemarle County appointee to the Charlottesville/Albemarle Joint Airport Commission. Some of yOU may remember me from my past professional life as the Director of Economic Development for the City of Charlottesville, a position I held for 16 or 17 years. Approximately 5 years ago, I resigned and founded Commonwealth Central Real Estate Investments, Inc. along with my wife, Jane. Among other activities, Jane and I have developed Berkmar~ Crossing at the intersection of Berkmar Drive and WeSt Rio Road. A little over 2 years ago, we purChased a home in Rivanwood and moved our family from town to Albemarle County. Our daughter graduated last year from Western Albemarle. Our son attends Jack Jouett Middle School, where he is presently a sixth grader. I have been heavily involved in public affairs for many years. However, I have had to restrict my volunteer work for the past few years while we established our new business. Now that CCI, Inc. is "up and nmning", I would like to become more involved once again. I have always had an interest if flying. While living in Florida and attending undergraduate and graduate schools, I had my private pilot's license and frequently flew out of Daytona Beach International Airport. In addition, I was City Manager of DeLand, Florida in the late 1970's. I was responsible for the operation of a 1700 acre airport that the City of DeLand had acquired from the Navy in the aftermath of World War II, when it was declared surplus property. I was involved in all aspects of the operation, including general aviation. In addition to my interest in flying, I have a stake in the future of Charlottesville and Albemarle County from a growth standpoint. While I am a native of Danville, Virginia, I have lived in this area for over 20 years and consider it my "real" home. I have been involved in the growth of the community for a number of 635 Berkmar Circle · Charlottesville, VA 22901 · Phone (804) 978-1766 * Fax (804) 978-0118 years and I support managed growth of the sort I envision in and around the airport. I hope to be able to make a contribution to truly quality planning and development in what I expect will be the single biggest growth area of the County for many years to come. I will be happy to speak with each of you individually about this appointment and all of my reasons for wanting to serve. I hope you will see fit to appoint me to the commission and that I may make some small contribution to the future of our community. Sincerely, George W. Ray, Jr. County of Albemarle B,. ARD OF SUPERVISORS 11-'35-95P12:15 2C,. Office of Board of Coun.ty Supervisors 401 McIntire Rbad ' Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD / COMMISSION / COMMrrTEE (please type or prin0 Board/Commission/Committee Applicant's Name "~'ga'~efata. ~'. Home Address 7_.1q4-C~.,.~o~.vtu_~_ Magisterial District in which your home residence is located ~a~)~c. g_t ~t_t_~=~._ Employer k&o~o~_%.5om, Cog.xs, v,o~o cry ~-goc>t- Phone Business Address .1~5~ i2.~c_a~o~o~,. '-~c,~,"~ Date of Employment ~ ] t [~ ~3 Years Resident in Albemarle County Spouse's Name L.r=a -¢. Education (Degrees and Graduation Dates) Occupation / Title Previous Residence Numar of Chil&en Memberships in Fraternal. Business, Church and/or Social Groups Public. Civic and Charitable Office and / or Other Activities or Interests Re.on(s) for Desire to Se~e on ~is Bo~d / Commission / Commi~ee ~e igo~on provided on ~s applic~on wi~be mle~ed to ~e public upon reque~. Return to: (~]l~rk, Bqar, ql of .County Supervisors ..~ e.m~ a,r Lc. t. oil n tY, Ul ClllIlr Il ~ h h~lto{ tte s~ifl e, °$9t 22902-4596 County of Albemarle ~ r.~ , BOARD OF SUPERVISORS  l-'2'i-gSP01: Office of Board of County Supervisors 401 Mclntire Rbad Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD / COMMISSION / COMMITTEE (please type or print) Board/Commission/Committee ~.~_.~ c~'~ ~ ~'A~AY/~t~ Applicant' s Name fi~o ~'A°.~&'~,] ~,,4~,,~f/_.~ fiome Home Address /'ff~ '7~~',,q.~ -~ffJd.. Magisterial District in which your home re~sidence is located Employer /~--~/4o~_~. C.~- Phone Business Address . Date of Employment Occupation / Title Years Resident in Albemarle County ~'//~--5~ Previous Residence ~/~/b~4~, Spouse's Nam? ,~°~b~fi~L Number of Children Education (Degrees and Graduation Dates) /t~/~/~., C/V/~:~/3~'~cff4~'~/ Memberships in Fraternal, Business, Church and/or Social Groups Public, Civic and Charitable Office and / or Other Activities or Interests Reason(s) for Desi~ to Se~ this Bo~d I Commission / Commi~e V~e i~om~ion prohded on &isl~plic~on- all be ~d~*~ ~le~ed to'ffi[~~p~reque~, Si~~ Da~ Return to: Clerk, Boarlt of County Supervisors .AJ~q,m. a/'l9. Co~!nty. ul clntlr 1~ ~hhTltgttes~ifle,~, 22902-4S96 County of Albemarle Office of Board of'-Coun_ty Supervisors 401 McIntirc Rbad Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD / COMMISSION / COMMITIEE (please o print · , . - ' ' - ~/c "~~: -- Magisterial Dis~ic~Lu wkich you/h~m¢ residence is loca~d '~(.~ ~] ~.~,.~ -x .... years Resident in Albem~,ounty ~ J/ _ Previous Residence /~r' ~ &),~ (..~0 ~0 D ' Spouse's Nam~ P~'~//-.Gt~.~ C~ o o/~. Number of Children' ~ '' ;'~ / /(~2~'~' ~au~on ¢~r~s ~d ~u~on ~) 7~-7,~ ~ ~. * 4Z~ ~ ' /-~'.VW U. Membemhios in Fmtemal. Business. Church and/or Social. Grouos ; ~'~¢C/_ Publ~ic. Civic and Charitable Office and / or Other Acrid,ties ar Interests . ~ --.~- . ] ,. - . .,~ ~., , ' j Reasonts/for De~ire t~ Serve on.this Board / Commissian I Committee., , .~:'~ I . / I Thc iaformation provided on this application kill b.¢ re, teased to thf'~lih/upg~qucs¢. · - $igaam// Date ~h~aTlt~ ttc ~' ~ill e~ °~ 22902-4596 ' County of Albemarle '15_33-90o~'":£4.~, ~_~ ,qC',L~ Office of Board of Co~ Supe~so~ 401 Mc~fire RbM Ch~lo~e, VA 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 ~PLICA~ON TO SER~ ON BO~ / CO~SSION / CO~E ~le~e ~ or print) Bo~d / Co~ission / Come,ce / f~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ App~c~t'sN~e ~~cE ~ ~t~WT Home Phone ~4~'~ HomeAd~ess ~ ~/~ ~~ ~ ~~o~~f~. ~'c ~~ - ~Ti~ M~istefifl Di~ ~ whch yo~ home residence is l~d ~ (%~ ~ Employer /~~ Phone ~4~-~ ~ ~ Business Address - Date of Employment Occupation / Title Years Resident in Albemarle County ~:vr~'z7 ~t~e~a.,~27t'Previous Residence Spouse's Name 7D, ~.~,5,5/E. Number of Children Education (Degrees and Graduation Dates) /a~ .~. ?~ C 570~91 Memberships in Fraternal: Business: Church and/or Social Groups Public, Civic and Charitable Office and / or Other Activities or Interests Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on this Board / Commission / Committee ~e iffo~on provided On ~is application will be rele~ed to ~e pubhc upon reque~. Return to: !~rk, BqarAl of .County Supervisors p e.m.a.r Le. L o.q nty. I Clnllr K ~h ~lt~ttes~i~le, °~ 22902-4596 Date cOUNTY OF ALB~! ~ of Board of 401 Mr~ (8O4) 296-5843 F~ (~) December 7, 1998 Mr. Michael G. Stewart 5 Lake Forest Dr. Charlottesville, VA 22901 Dear Mr. Stewart: At the Board of SUpervisors meeting held on December 2, 1998, the Board appointed you as a member of the Equalization Board for the calendar year 1999. Duties of this Board are set out in the Code of Virginia, Chapter 32, Article 14, Sections 58.1-3370 through 58.1-3389. The duties are more specifically set out in Section 58.1-3379 and read as follows: "The Board shall hear and give consideration to such complaints and equalize such assessments and shall, moreover, be charged with the especial duty of increasing as well as decreasing assessments, whether specific complaint be laid or not, if in its judgment, the same be necessary to equalize and accomplish the end that the burden of taxation shall rest equally upon on all citizens of such county or city. The (Director of Finance) of such county ... shall, when requested, ... call the attention of the board to such inequalities in real estate assessments in his county or city as may be known to him. Every board of equalization may go upon and inspect any real estate subject to equalization by it." In order to be eigible for appointment, every prospective member of such board shall attend and participate in the basic course of instruction given by the Department of Taxation under Section 58.1-206. In the near future, you will receive notice of a meeting from Bruce Woodzell, the Real Estate Assessor. Printed on recycled paper County of Albemar g^ v i0-15-98A'10:3.t RCVD Office of Board of CounW Supervisors 401 Mclntire Rbad Charlottesville. VA 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD / COMMISSION / COMMITTEE (please type or prin0 Board / Commission / Committee ~ A L ;, ~-,0-r't ~ ~,/ ,n Applicant's Name /J~//~,'-Lzt~-z.~ ,g~. ~"'~_,c:.zdA.,~._"7- Home Phone Home Address Z,~-'~ L_.~,~-' J:::,~,,~-~-'-<'-7- 2~),,(~! t~"~ Magisterial District in which your home residence is located ~ ! O Employer ~Z.ot.~,42 "7~8-F'.~ ~/-/~;','~'~e."~'--~'~2~ Phone BusinessAddress ?'D- ./~e,g 77~&; ~,,-l.~',,'~"~'~__.~w~,,~.-~ lf-,A Date of Employment ,~,'°~'/~.~ ?~ Occupation / Title ~'~ ~"3" ~- ,/~'~c~Z Years Resident in Albemarle County /~O ,j/~"~.~_<' Previous Residence ,/L/~-~A)~g,~A Spouse's Name ,~r-4 .o' O_y Number of Children /~'o ,~ ,,~ Education (Degrees and Graduation Dates) ,,/~'?-7'~2~ ~ ,~,,~/_al, ti ~-O/~c'~,,~ Memberships in Fraternal, Business, Church and/or Social Groups Public, Civic and Charitable Office and I or Other Activities or Interests Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on this Board / Commission / Committee Signature Date Return to: ~]~rk, Bgar~ of .County Supervisors ~ p e.m~ a.r Lc. L o.q n t y. ~1 clnIlr 1~. ha / o'ttes le,°0l Z2902-4S COUNTY Of ~ Rem~i F_ Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mc[ntire Road (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Walter E Perkins ~ II. Thomas December 4, 1998 Ms. Leslie Reed 407 Broad Ax Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22903 Dear Ms. Reed: At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on December 2, 1998, the Board appointed you to the Rivanna Solid Waste citizens Advisory Committee effective January 1, 1999, with term to expire on December 31, 2000. On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to serve the County in this capacity. Sincerely, Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Chairman FRM/Ibh CC; James L. Camblos, III Larry Davis Arthur Petrini c:\wpdocs\bds&comm\appoint Printed on recycled paper No',.,'. 24 1998 12:52F'f'1 P2 County of Albemarle Cks. iott, es'viff~. VA 22902~4596 (g0~) AI~PL[C~kTION TO SEKVE ON ~OA~ / COmMiSSION / COMMt~E RD OF SUPERVISORS Magisterial DL~'4a in which yoa home re$iden:6 is l~-~ted. BusL~es~ Address ~- o. ~ D~e oCF~plo~en~. ~~ ......... Occupation f Title Y~ ~sldcnt in A!b~m~l~ Com~w l ~ P~v~ou~ Membemhip5 {n Fraternal Business. Church and/or Soci~ Otoup.~ Reason(s) for. De~ir~.t:o.Setve or! tt~.b: R~rd ! t":,ommi~ion/Commirme, Thc in/ormation provide, d on uMs application will be glcascd tc -.h~ pub~Az upon request, Return to: C!grk, Bqar~ of County Supervisora I~,~:! R Bowetrmm Oum'lott~ Y. Humphfis Formst R. Maxshall, Jr. COUNTY Of ~l REMa~I _f. Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, V~nia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-~5800 December 4, 1998 Ms. Joy F. Matthews 1152 Allen Farm Ln. Earlysville, VA 22936 Dear Ms. Matthews: At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on December 2, 1998, the Board appointed you to the Housing Committee effective January 1, 1999, with said term to expire on December 31, 2001. On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this oppommity to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to serve the County in this capacity. Sincerely, Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Chairman FRM/lbh cc'. James L. Camblos, III Larry Davis Ginny McDonald c:\wpdocs\bds&comm\appoint Printed on recycled paper County of Albem rli? Office of Board of C'°un_ty Supervisor~ 401 McLutire Rbad Charlottesville, VA 229024596 (804) 296-5843 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD / COMMISSION ! COMMITTEE (please type or prinO Board / Commission / Committee ' ]-]"F~.C~ ~'~/44 ~i Applicant's Name -_~]~/-4 ~" A~d/2.~~ Home Phone I Magisterial District in which your home residence is located f,t'.)/~ t~Z-~_ ~ Employer ~ Phone Business Address Date of Employment Occupation / Title Years Resident in Albemarle County 3~~'' Previous Residence Spouse's Narn~ ~'E~ ~. Number of Children 'U Education (Degrees and Graduation Dates) ! ~ / / · Memberships in Fraternal: Business, Church and/or Social Groups Publicl Civic and Charitable Office and / or Other Activities or Interests Re.on(s) for Desire to S~ on ~is Bo~d / Commission / Commi~e~ The information provided on this apPlication will be released to the public upon request~ Return to: (~rk, Bgarj$ of .County SuperviSors o¥ :¥ tir a Data Thomas December 4, 1998 Leo Mallek, D.M.D. P.O. Box 207 Earlysville, VA 22936 Dear Dr. Mallek: At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on December 2, 1998, the Board appointed you to the Joint Airport Commission effective December 2, 1998, with term to expire on December I, 2001. On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportuniw to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to serve the County in this capacity. Sincerely, Forrest R.' Marshall, Jr. Chairman FRM]lbh CC: James L. camblos, III Larry Davis Bryan Elliott Jeanne Cox c:\wpdocs\bds&comm\appoint Printed on recycled pa~er County of Albemarle Office of Board of Coun.ty Supervisors 401 McIntire Rbad , Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD / COMMISSION / COMMITTEE (please type or print) Board / Commission / Committee 3 Applicant's Name LEO MALLEK~ D.M.D. Home Phone 8042978 1150 HomcAddress a896 ~dv_n. ncP M~ll~ Rd P. F~. Rn~ ?F~7 Earlysville~ VA 22936 Magisterial District in which your home residence is located Employer S e 1 f Phone 804 - 964 - 1116 Business Address 690 Bent Oaks Dr. P. 0. Box 651 Earlysvllle~ VA 22936 Date of Ernployment Occupation / Tide D e n t i s t Years Resident in Albemarle County 17 Previous Residence A m h e r s t ~ M A Spouse's Name Ann Huckle Mallek Number of Children 2 Educafion (Degrees and Graduation Dates) Trinity College, Hartford, CT. B.S. Biology,1969 T~'f~S lJF!~Ver$]t¥ qrhnnl nf D~n~l Mm.d~r.~nm: Bns~.nn MA D.M O. 1773 MemberShips in Fratemal; Business, Church and/or Social Groups ~resident( Board of Directors~ Mulberry Commons Condominium Unit Owner'sAssoc. ~aster of Culpeper. \/A~ M_n. SOn~e I ndgm_ M~.mh~r. Arn~.r. D~n~] As.~ne: .qf.m~ & Lncal Public, Civic and Charitable Office and / or Other ActiVities or Interest~ A s s 0 c. ember, 'Board of Directors, Chair~ July 4th Ctte, EARLy Earlysville AreaResident' I ~on,,~. Fnrrn~r m~mh~ nf C.~f~7~.n.~ Adv~snry p~n~]_ to s~.udy R~ ~9 Transportation Corridor Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on this Board / Commission / Committee A strong interest in sustainable qrowth of industry and transportation in the area served by the Charlottesville/Albemarle Airport and the impact of that own,~lfh nn fh~ nnllnfV m.q m ~-.~lfi the information provided on thil appli~ 1 ~ublic upon request. O~tober 25, 1998 l Signature Date ql~rk, Bgar~l of County Supervisors . turn to: ~4~lrmlt~ttes~i~le,°~ 22902-4596 ] 0-26~9 89:1.2:~-5 RCYD Albemarle County Board of Supervisors 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 November 12, 1998 Dear Board Members, I am writing in support of Dr. Leo Mallek, one of the candidates for a position on the Airport Advisory Committee. I have known Dr. Mallek for several years. During that time he has been very involVed in the Earlysville communitY. He h'as been an active'member of the Earlysville Area Residents' League and has helped at general meetings and Candidate .Forums offered to residents. He has also organized our Earlysville Fourth of July parade for the past two years. Leo has repeatedly demonstrated a commitment to being involved in his community and has worked to involve others. He has given freely of his time and has been willing to see a project through to the end. I highly recommend him to you with the belief that he would be an asset to the Airport Advisory Committee. [~ Ms. Lisa Harman ~"~ ~':' ~4530MillRunLn/' ~: · E f ~ arlysville, VA 22936~9759 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Members of the Board of Supervisors Laurie Hall, Senior Deputy Clerk /~ November 23, 1998 Vacancies on Boards and Commissions I have attached the updated list of vacancies on boards and commissions through February 28, 1999. Unless you indicate that you would either like to reappoint the same person, if eligible, or select your own magesterial appointment without advertising, these vacancies will be advertised in the Daily Progress on December 13 and 20. Applications for new vacancies, which will then be due no later than January 20, will be forwarded to you at the Board meeting on February 3, 1999. cc: Bob Tucker Larry Davis WISH TO BE MAGISTERIAL NEW TERM RE- APPOINTMENT BOARD OR COMMISSION MEMBER TERM EXPIRES EXPIRES APPOINTED? (Applications sent under separate Stephen Ayers 9-30-98 (moved) 12/01/2001 No cover. INTERVIEWS.) (Applications due 11/25/98.) Karen Waters 12-31-98 12-31-2001 No (Applications due 11/25/98.) Frank Rice 12-31-98 12-31-99 No Rio (Applications due 11/25/98.) G. David Emmitt 12-31-98 12-31-2000 Not eligible Preston Coiner (joint) 12-31-98 12-31-2000 Not eligible (Applications sent under separate (New committee, two TBD TBD cover.) vacancies) (Applications due 12/22/98.) G. Blab Turner to begin 01-20-00 01-20-04 No James R. Skove (not to begin 01-20-00 01-20-04 Yes advertised, per C.H.) (Applications due 12/22/98.) (New committee) (Will be a 2-year appointment) C. Timothy Lindstrom 12-13'98 12-13-2001 Has not responded Bryson Glover 01-31-99 01-31-2000 Yes ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Office of the School Board 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 November 17, 1998 The Honorable Emily Couric 25th Senatorial District P.O. Box 5462 Charlottesville, VA 22905 The Honorable Paul C. Harris House of Delegates - 58th District P.O. Box 1276 Charlottesville, VA 22902 The Honorable Mitchell Van Yahres House of Delegates - 57th District 223 West Main Street Charlottesville, VA 22902-5055 Dear Senator Couric and Delegates Van Yahres and Harris: Thank you for taking the time out of your busy schedule to meet with the Albemarle County School Board and the Board of Supervisors on Monday, December 7, 1998 at 4:00 p.m Enclosed for your review is the School Board's 1999 legislative program as approved by the Board on November 9 for the upcoming General Assembly session. The Board approved 26 legislative positions regarding a wide range of issues, and we look forward to receiving your support on these issues. We also look forward to hearing from you about upcoming legislation in the 1999 session that will affect the school system. If you have questions prior to the December 7, 1998 meeting, please call Mr. Frank Morgan. Assistant Superintendent for Support Services at 296-5877. Sincerely, Chairman C~ Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Albemarle County School Board Dr. Kevin C. Castner, Superintendent "We Expect Success" School Board Legislative Position Paper 199g General Assembly Session This item was scanned under SchOol Board Reports 1998