HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO201600056 Review Comments WPO VSMP 2017-06-16 •
,Cee
ot
to.4e ominion
y r� ki Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
s `, , Charlottesville, VA 22911
d11 ,
iy 434.979.8121 (p)
s'eo�•�•►� 434.979.1681 (f)
eets DominionEng.com
June 16, 2017
Megan Yaniglos
Principal planner
Community Development
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Rd
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: SDP-2016-055 Moscane Center-Final Site Plan
Dear Megan,
Please find enclosed for your review, five (5) sets of Final Site Plan. These plans have been revised to
address the Final Site Plan comments dated March 27th, 2017.
CDD ARB—Margaret Maliszewski
1. This site falls within the Rt. 250 Entrance Corridor(EC). Development on this parcel is eligible for
staff level design review. The applicant should submit an ARB application, checking the box in
Part B under"Countywide Certificate of Appropriateness"for"Structures located behind a
structure that fronts the EC," and the corresponding checklist. It is recommended that site
sections illustrating the degree of visibility of the buildings as viewed from RT. 250 be included
with the submittal. Portions f the proposed buildings that are not visible from the EC are not
subject to review.
RESPONSE: Per email confirmation with Margaret Maliszweski 5/9/2017 "no ARB application
is needed at this time". She has also said that her comment has been updated in County
View.
CDD Engineering —Matthew Wentland
1. An approved WPO plan will be required before site plan approval.
RESPONSE: Comment noted.
2. A copy of the PPP will need to be included in the SWPPP before beginning construction. Areas of
possible pollutants will need to be identified on the plan sheet(such as concrete washouts,
dumpsters, and portable toilets).
RESPONSE: PPP areas have been identified on all phases of this project.
3. Provide verification that the existing SWM pond is still operating as designed and is still adequate
for the new development.
RESPONSE: The amendment for SWM pond was submitted 5/26/17 to Matthew Wentland.
*4- Dominion
C"
Engineering Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
n y � 434.979.8121 (p)
4t
e ew 434.979.1681 (f)
ets
DominionEng.com
Albemarle County Department of Community Development
1. [32.5.2(1)] A plat and associated deeds will be required for all easements outside of the right of
way prior to final site plan approval. Revi: Plat has not been submitted to date.Comment not
addressed.
RESPONSE: A plat and associated deeds will be submitted under separate cover.
2. [32.7.9.5(e)] Where parking is located so that parked cars are visible from an off-site street, low
shrubs between the street and parking lot are needed. Provide shrubs for any of the parking
areas that are visible from Olympia Drive. Rev1:Additional screening shrubs need to be
provided.The parking in front of Building#2 needs to be screened,as well as the parking
areas from Rolkin Road.
RESPONSE: Additional shrubs have been provided in front of all parking areas and areas that
are visible from Rolkin Road on SP6 (Landscape plan).
3. [4.12.13; 32.5.2(n)]Two loading spaces are required. Provide the loading spaces and adjust your
parking calculations accordingly.Also list the loading spaces on sheet 2. Rev1:A note on the
plan requesting that loading spaces not be required is not sufficient. Please provide written
justification for the loading spaces for the Zoning Administrator and County Engineer to
review.The justification should include information addressing 4.12.13(f)below:
f The requirements of this subsection may be modified or waived in an individual case if the
zoning administrator_ m consultation with the county engineer_ finds that the public health.
safety or welfare would be equally or better served by the modification or waiver: that the
modification or waiver mould not be a departure from sound engineering and design practice:
and that the modification or waiver would not otherwise be contrary to the purpose and intent
of this chapter In granting a modification or waiver_ the zoning administrator may impose
such conditions as deemed necessary to protect the public health.safety or welfare
RESPONSE: The modification request has been withdrawn. Adequate loading spaces and
dumpsters have been provided and the calculations have been updated on sheet SP2.
4. Additional Comments:The site plan cannot be approved until the Architectural Review Board
application and review/approval occurs.To do date, an ARB application has not been submitted
for this site plan.
RESPONSE: Per email confirmation with Margaret Maliszweski 5/9/2017 "no ARB
application is needed at this time". She has also said that her comment has been updated
in County View.
2 of 6
• e(sSloe V
ce o(s
0�,ee►�•,i Dominion
Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
�1, ,' Charlottesville, VA 22911
i4% "wai IooI 434.979.8121 (p)
'et ets 434.979.1681 (f)
cts
DominionEng.com
VDOT—Charles A. Kilpatrick
1. Sight distance profiles are required
RESPONSE: Sight distance profiles have been shown on SP12.
2. The minimum entrance radius, without separate truck access, is 42 feet.
RESPONSE: The entrance radius has been increased to 42'for the main entrance without
separate truck access. See SP4.
3. In a previous email correspondence with the applicant concerning the proposed parallel parking
on Olympia Drive we noted that this area must have adequate drainage. It is unclear how this has
been addressed.
RESPONSE: Spot shots and grading lines have been provided to show that there will be
positive drainage for the water in the parking lane so that there will be no ponding.
Albemarle County Service Authority-Alexander Morrison
• General Comments and Sheet SP1
o The PE signature on the cover page must be original.
RESPONSE: The signature on the cover page is original with this submittal.
o Resubmit with final water/sewer data sheets and ensure they only include
the public ACSA infrastructure that is proposed.
RESPONSE: New water/sewer data sheets have been provided with only public infrastructure
that is proposed.
o Confirm that there is no desire for irrigation on this site.
RESPONSE: There is no desire for irrigation on this site.
o Provide fixture counts if available so the ACSA can determine if a 1"
connection will suffice for each building or if a large service tap is required.
RESPONSE: Fixture counts will be provided when the owner applies for the building permit.
3 of 6
• e s S11011 '*01110,
Dears •
40#01 Dominion
v yi'� h Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
434.979.8121 (p)
1df0* 434.979.1681
� 4. 7 .1 1
is 3 9 9 68 (f)
Cts DominionEng.com
o Confirm that sprinkler systems are not required for these building (I have
also reached out to Fire/Rescue separately to confirm).
RESPONSE: No sprinkler system will be necessary for Building 2 per conversation with Keith
Huckstep.
• Sheet SP3
o Propose a new manhole for MH E-D. Due to the existing cored
connections in the existing manhole the new connection cannot be
completed. A new manhole will be required.
RESPONSE: A new manhole has been proposed for MH E-D with this submittal.
o Add notes that the pump around plan will be required for review and
approval by the ACSA prior to the pre-construction meeting.
RESPONSE: A note has been provided on sheet SP4 that the pump around plan will be
required for review and approval by ACSA prior to the pre-construction meeting.
• Sheet SP4
o Call out the 8" gate valve and plug to be restrained to the tee.
RESPONSE: The 8" valve and plug has been called out to be restrained to the tee.
o Move the proposed building 1 meter between the sidewalk and curb.
RESPONSE: The building 1 meter has been moved between the sidewalk and curb.
o Propose a 1" tap for building 1 water service.
RESPONSE: A 1"tap has been proposed for the water service for building 1.
o Provide a new easement for the relocated fire hydrant on Olympia Drive.
RESPONSE: A new easement has been provided for the relocated fire hydrant on Olympia
Drive.
o Confirm if a fire hydrant will be required on site to meet spacing
requirements through Fire/Rescue.
RESPONSE: Access has been provided within 150'of all outside building areas. A FH has
been provided in front of Building 2. Robbie Gilmer has requested a FH to be adjacent to
Building 2 if no sprinkler is proposed.
4 of 6
•
ecs NW, '`✓
�o logs a
6„ �0 Dominion
:Ap , Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
11.
e�I 434.979.8121 (p)
�, rs 434.979.1681 (f)
cts
DominionEng.com
o Call out the water services as 1" Domestic line tap.
RESPONSE: Domestic water services have been called out as 1" line taps.
o Call out all vertical and horizontal bends by size and degree.
RESPONSE: All vertical and horizontal bends have been called out by size and degree on
sheer SP4.
o Call out the sewer lateral connection to the main as a wye connection.
RESPONSE: The sewer lateral connection to the main has been called out as a wye
connection.
o Call out manhole EX-D as a new manhole. Note that is a drop manhole and call out size and drop
configuration (60" internal drop of 48" external drop).
RESPONSE: Manhole EX-D has been called out as a new manhole. A note has been added to
SP4 that it is a drop manhole with size and drop configuration of 48"external drop. See
profile sheet SP9.
o Call out manhole C to D as private.
RESPONSE: Manhole C to D has been called out as private.
o Provide a curb cut or roll top curb in the parking space near the rear of the lot where the water main
leaves the parking lot.
RESPONSE: A curb cut has been provided at the parking space near the rear of the lot where
the water main leaves the parking lot.
o Call out a horizontal bend for the proposed water connection at the existing gate valve.
RESPONSE: This comment has become null and void due to the change in waterline
alignment. The horizontal bend has been abandoned for extending the existing waterline to a
proposed 8"x8"tee.
o Revise manhole E location so it is not within a parking space. You can also propose an island in
lieu of the parking space so you do not need to revise the alignment. It appears you will still meet the
parking requirements if you eliminate I parking space.
RESPONSE: The location of manhole E has been revised so it is not within a parking space.
5 of 6
oo c s
*ss W Dominion
Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
°� Charlottesville, VA 22911
n d� , ,� 434.979.8121 (p)
l'ie el. 434 .979.1681 (f)
yrs DominionEng.com
• Sheet SP6
o Revise the trees in conflict with the proposed ACSA infrastructure as shown on the plans.
RESPONSE: The trees in conflict with ACSA infrastructure have been moved.
• Sheet SP9
o Decrease the slope from MH-A to EX-D so the drop connection inverts
difference is at least 24".
RESPONSE: The slope from MH-A to EX-D has been decreased so the difference in the drop
connection is at least 24".
o Propose a new manhole for MH EX-D as either a 60"with an internal drop
or 48"with an external drop.
RESPONSE: A new manhole, 48"with external drop has been proposed for MH EX-D with
designation proposed MH "Al".
o Call out PVC as SDR-26.
RESPONSE: SDR-26 has been called out or the PVC.
o Call out manhole EX-2A to EX-2B as private.
RESPONSE: EX-2A and EX-2B has been called out as private
• Sheet SP14 and SP15
o New technical details have been adopted by the ACSA. I will send a PDF
binder of all new technical details. The following technical details should be included:
RESPONSE: The new details have been updated for all details.
We trust the above adequately addresses your comments. Please let me know if you have any questions
or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Dustin E. Greene, EIT
6 of 6
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
VSMP Permit plan review
Project title: Monscane Center
Project file number: WP0201600056
Plan preparer:
Dominion Engineering [mmyers@dominioneng.com]
Owner or rep.:
Albemarle Land LLC
Plan received date:
23 September 2016
(Rev. 1)
27 February 2017
Date of comments:
21 October 2016
(Rev. 1)
22 March 2017
Reviewers:
Matt Wentland
County Code section 17-410 and Virginia Code §62.1-44.15:34 requires the VSMP authority to
act on any VSMP permit by issuing a project approval or denial. This project is denied. The
rationale is given in the comments below. The application may be resubmitted for approval if all
of the items below are satisfactorily addressed. The VSMP application content requirements can
be found in County Code section 17-401.
A. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
The SWPPP content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-405. A SWPPP must
contain (1) a PPP, (2) an ESCP, (3) a SWMP, and (4) any TMDL measures necessary.
1. Copies of the approved ESC and SWM plans will need to be included in the SWPPP before beginning
construction. (Rev. 1) Response noted.
B. Pollution Prevention Plan (PPP)
The PPP content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-404.
1. A copy of the PPP will need to be included in the SWPPP before beginning construction. Areas of
possible pollutants will need to be identified on the plan sheet (such as concrete washouts, dumpsters,
and portable toilets). (Rev. 1) Response noted.
C. Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP)
VSMP Regulation 9VAC25-870-108 requires the VSMP authority to approve or disapprove a
SWMP. This plan is disapproved, and the reasons are provided in the comments below. The
stormwater management plan content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-403.
Provide a copy of the previously issued DEQ permit referred to in the grandfathering narrative on
the cover sheet. Otherwise, the note will need to be changed to reflect the grandfathering language
in 9VAC25-870-48, which allows for coverage under one additional permit cycle. As this plan has
less impervious area than the previous plan (WP0200900002) and does not increase the runoff or
phosphorus leaving the site, it will still be subject to the previous regulations. (Rev. 1) Comment
addressed.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 2
2. Provide verification that the existing SWM pond is still operating as designed and is still adequate
for the new development. (Rev. 1) Response noted. The amendment will need to be approved
prior to approval of this plan.
D. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESOP)
Virginia Code §62.1-44.15:55 requires the VESCP authority to approve or disapprove an ESOP.
This plan is approved, and the reasons are provided in the comments below. The erosion control
plan content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-402.
1. This requirement appears adequately addressed at this time.
The VSMP permit application and all plans may be resubmitted for approval when all comments have
been satisfactorily addressed. For re -submittals please provide 2 copies of the complete permit package
with a completed application form.
Engineering plan review staff are available from 2-4 PM on Thursdays, should you require a meeting to
discuss this review.
Process;
After approval, plans will need to be bonded. The bonding process is begun by submitting a bond estimate
request form and fee to the Department of Community Development. One of the plan reviewers will
prepare estimates and check parcel and easement information based on the approved plans. The County's
Management Analyst will prepare bond agreement forms, which will need to be completed by the owner
and submitted along with cash, certificates or sureties for the amounts specified. The agreements will need
to be approved and signed by the County Attorney and County Engineer. This may take 2-4 weeks to
obtain all the correct signatures and forms.
Stormwater Management Facilities Maintenance agreements will also need to be completed and recorded.
The County's Management Analyst or other staff will prepare the forms and check for ownership and
signature information. The completed forms will need to be submitted along with court recording fees.
After bonding and agreements are complete, county staff will need to enter project information in a DEQ
database for state application processing. DEQ will review the application information based on local
VSMP authority approval. At this time, the DEQ portion of the application fees will need to be paid
directly to the state. For fastest processing, this is done electronically with the emails provided on the
application. DEQ should notify applicants with instructions on how to pay fees. When DEQ approves the
application, they will issue a permit coverage letter. This should be copied to the county.
After DEQ coverage is issued, via the coverage letter, the County can hold a pre -construction conference.
Applicants will need to complete the request for a pre -construction conference form, and pay the remainder
of the application fee. The form identifies the contractor and responsible land disturber, and the fee
remaining to be paid. This will be checked by county staff, and upon approval, a pre -construction
conference will be scheduled with the County inspector. At the pre -construction conference, should
everything proceed satisfactorily, a joint VSMP and grading permit will be issued by the County so that
work may begin.
County forms can be found on the county website forms center under engineering;
http://www.albemarle.org/deptforms.asp?department=cden.gwpo
File: WP0201600056 Monscane Center Revl 03-22-17.doc
�s
'4"40,.sce�s
e r• Dominion
Cy,' Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
ig
Charlottesville, VA 22911
"e taA � 434.979.8121 (p)
4e eps 434.979.1681 (f)
°ts DominionEng.com
February 24, 2017
Mr. Wentland, Matthew
Civil Engineer II
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Rd
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: Moscane Center- WPO 2016-00056 - VSMP- Comment-Response Letter
Dear Mathew,
Please find enclosed for your review, two(2) sets of the VSMP plan along with the resubmission Pavilion
Pond VSMP Amendment. These plans have been revised to address the Initial Site Plan comments
dated October 21st, 2016.
VSMP Albemarle County Engineering- Matthew Wentland
SWPPP
1- Copies of the approved ESC and SWM plans will need to be included in the SWPPP before
beginning construction.
RESPONSE: Copies of the approved ESC and SWM plans will be included in the SWPPP
before beginning construction.
PPP
1- A copy of the PPP will need to be included in the SWPPP before beginning construction. Areas
of possible pollutants will need to be identified on the plan sheet(such as concrete washouts,
dumpsters, and portable toilets).
RESPONSE: A copy of the PPP will need to be included in the SWPPP before beginning
construction.
SWMP
1- Provide a copy of the previously issued DEQ permit referred to in grandfathering narrative on the
cover sheet. Otherwise, the note will need to be changed to reflect the grandfathering language in
9VAC25-870-48, which allows for coverage under one additional permit cycle. As this plan has less
impervious area than the previous plan (WPO200900002) and does not increase the runoff or
phosphorous leaving the site, it will still be subject to the previous regulations.
RESPONSE: The note has been changed.
2- Provide verification that the existing SWM pond is still operating as designed and is still adequate
for the new development.
'far+' `o.I0'
js
ce ots
�%,,'4�• Dominion
�? 1 k Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
f, Charlottesville, VA 22911
^0:0�, 434.979.8121 (p)
ens 434.979.1681 (f)
-Cs DominionEng.com
RESPONSE: A VSMP Amendment for the SWM pond is being submitted simultaneously under
separate cover.
We trust the above adequately addresses your comments. Please let me know if you have any questions
or require additional information.
Sincerely,
-12
Dustin E. reeve, EI Al-A.
2 of 2
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
VSMP Permit plan review
Project title:
Monscane Center
Project file number:
WP0201600056
Plan preparer:
Dominion Engineering [mmyers@dominioneng.com]
Owner or rep.:
Albemarle Land LLC
Plan received date:
23 September 2016
Date of comments:
21 October 2016
Reviewers:
Matt Wentland
County Code section 17-410 and Virginia Code §62.1-44.15:34 requires the VSMP authority to
act on any VSMP permit by issuing a project approval or denial. This project is denied. The
rationale is given in the comments below. The application may be resubmitted for approval if all
of the items below are satisfactorily addressed. The VSMP application content requirements can
be found in County Code section 17-401.
A. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
The SWPPP content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-405. A SWPPP must
contain (1) a PPP, (2) an ESOP, (3) a SWMP, and (4) any TMDL measures necessary.
1. Copies of the approved ESC and SWM plans will need to be included in the SWPPP before beginning
construction.
B. Pollution Prevention Plan (PPP)
The PPP content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-404.
1. A copy of the PPP will need to be included in the SWPPP before beginning construction. Areas of
possible pollutants will need to be identified on the plan sheet (such as concrete washouts, dumpsters,
and portable toilets).
C. Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP)
VSMP Regulation 9VAC25-870-108 requires the VSMP authority to approve or disapprove a
SWMP. This plan is disapproved, and the reasons are provided in the comments below. The
stormwater management plan content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-403.
1. Provide a copy of the previously issued DEQ permit referred to in the grandfathering narrative on
the cover sheet. Otherwise, the note will need to be changed to reflect the grandfathering language
in 9VAC25-870-48, which allows for coverage under one additional permit cycle. As this plan has
less impervious area than the previous plan (WP0200900002) and does not increase the runoff or
phosphorus leaving the site, it will still be subject to the previous regulations.
2. Provide verification that the existing SWM pond is still operating as designed and is still adequate
for the new development.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 2
D. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP)
Virginia Code §62.1-44.15:55 requires the VESCP authority to approve or disapprove an ESCP.
This plan is approved, and the reasons are provided in the comments below. The erosion control
plan content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-402.
1. This requirement appears adequately addressed at this time.
The VSMP permit application and all plans may be resubmitted for approval when all comments have
been satisfactorily addressed. For re -submittals please provide 2 copies of the complete permit package
with a completed application form.
Engineering plan review staff are available from 2-4 PM on Thursdays, should you require a meeting to
discuss this review.
Process;
After approval, plans will need to be bonded. The bonding process is begun by submitting a bond estimate
request form and fee to the Department of Community Development. One of the plan reviewers will
prepare estimates and check parcel and easement information based on the approved plans. The County's
Management Analyst will prepare bond agreement forms, which will need to be completed by the owner
and submitted along with cash, certificates or sureties for the amounts specified. The agreements will need
to be approved and signed by the County Attorney and County Engineer. This may take 2-4 weeks to
obtain all the correct signatures and forms.
Stormwater Management Facilities Maintenance agreements will also need to be completed and recorded.
The County's Management Analyst or other staff will prepare the forms and check for ownership and
signature information. The completed forms will need to be submitted along with court recording fees.
After bonding and agreements are complete, county staff will need to enter project information in a DEQ
database for state application processing. DEQ will review the application information based on local
VSMP authority approval. At this time, the DEQ portion of the application fees will need to be paid
directly to the state. For fastest processing, this is done electronically with the emails provided on the
application. DEQ should notify applicants with instructions on how to pay fees. When DEQ approves the
application, they will issue a permit coverage letter. This should be copied to the county.
After DEQ coverage is issued, via the coverage letter, the County can hold a pre -construction conference.
Applicants will need to complete the request for a pre -construction conference form, and pay the remainder
of the application fee. The form identifies the contractor and responsible land disturber, and the fee
remaining to be paid. This will be checked by county staff, and upon approval, a pre -construction
conference will be scheduled with the County inspector. At the pre -construction conference, should
everything proceed satisfactorily, a joint VSMP and grading permit will be issued by the County so that
work may begin.
County forms can be found on the county website forms center under engineering;
http://www.albemarle.org/deptforms.asp?department=cden.gwpo
File: WP0201600056 Monscane Center 10-21-16.doc