HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201700134 Review Comments Final Plat 2017-10-06 (3)t'rttct��''
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Phone 434-296-5832
Memorandum
To: David Jordan (djordan@roudabush.com)
From: Rachel Falkenstein, Senior Planner
Division: Planning
Date: October 6, 2017
Subject: SUB201700134 Wintergreen Farm Phase 3 — Final Subdivision Plat
Fax 434-972-4126
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plat referenced above once the
following comments have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been
identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further
review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning
Ordinances unless otherwise specified.
General Comments
1. [14-302(A)(3)] Ensure street names/spelling match on all sheets.
2. [14-302(A)(5)] Provide a deed of easement for the public access easements and public drainage
easements for county review and signature.
3. [14-317] Provide supplemental declaration to the covenants and restrictions for any easements to be
maintained by the HOA for review and approval by the County Attorney.
4. [18-13.4.1] Density information is confusing/redundant. Please simplify. Provide the following:
a. General Development Area density calculation — show once
b. General Rural Area density— show once
c. Density Table: lots and acreage per phase; cumulative units, cumulative acreage, cumulative
density.
d. Open Space Table: Open space acreages, cumulative open space acreage and cumulative
percentage; acreage and percentage of open space within flood plain.
5. Can open space lots be joined with open space in previous phases? If so, combine the following and
revise boundary lines accordingly:
a. Common Open Space 1-III and Common Open Space 1
Common Open Space 1F and 113
Common Open Space 1C and 1G
6. [18-13.4.1] Provide an exhibit demonstrating that all tree preservation areas meet the definition of a
wooded area from Section 3.1 of the zoning ordinance. Please note the following:
a. Show floodplain with the tree preservation areas, as they cannot overlap.
From the easement plat, it appears that parts of these tree preservation areas are 5-feet wide.
The shape and area of the tree preservation areas on lots 82, 83, 84, 85 and OS 3 are not
conducive to tree preservation. For lot 84, the preservation area appears to be close to the
potential building site.
On lots 75, 76, 77 and 78 — it appears the tree preservation area overlaps with the existing
Virginia Power Easement. This easement likely allows the power company the ability to
remove any vegetation from their easement. Consequently, the tree preservation area cannot
exist in this area. Reevaluate location of tree areas.
7. [14-303] Show the Comp Plan Development Area boundary. Please note, the boundary has changed
since the time of the approval for the preliminary plat for this project. Consult GIS Web to see new
location. Update density calculations accordingly.
Sheet 1—Cover Sheet [14-302(B)]
8. Note 15 — include Entrance Corridor overlay in zoning note.
9. Note 15 Setbacks — Minimum side setback is 10'. Revise note, show side SBL on plat.
10. Note 18 — reference deed book and page number for open spaces 1D & 1E
Sheet 2 — Overall Exhibit [14-303 & Sec. 14-302 (B)]
11. The Area tabulations reference the wrong TMP numbers
12. The Area tabulations misname the parcels, compared to the plat
Sheet 4 — Subdivision Plat
13. Show SBL on plat
Sheet 5 — Miscellaneous Easement Plat
14. Above the label "Common Open Space 1-III," there is a line with the label "TE-X N." This is not
identified in the legend on Page 11. Please clarify.
15. For lots 79 is there not enough room for a standard setback line?
16. For lot 74, it appears the front setback line could be closer to the street.
Sheet 6 — Miscellaneous Easement Plat
17. The hatching at the ingress/egress does not appear to match the legend on Page 11.
Sheet 9, 10 & 11— Storm Easement Plat & Tables and Tabulations
18. The following labels are not defined in the legend on Page 11: SAE-X, SWM-X, CL SAE
General Comment
19. This plat cannot be approved until Engineering, ACSA, and E911 complete their reviews and grant their
approval. E911 and Engineering comments are attached. Additional reviewer's comments will be
forwarded upon receipt.
Please contact Rachel Falkenstein in the Planning Division by using rfalkenstein@albemarle.org or 434-296-
5832 ext. 3272 for further information.
Engineering Comments (David James):
1. Cover sheet:
a. Owner/agent needs to sign the signature panel.
b. Notary signature required.
2. Sheet 2 — Bonus density factor calculations shown will need to be revised (doesn't add up right).
3. Sheet 5/6 — HMA & TE easements are not defined.
4. Sheet 9/10 — SAE easement is not defined.
E911 Comments (Elise Kiewra)
1. Page 1 says had Ridge Top Dr as seperate words, please update to "Ridgetop Dr"
2. Page 2 says Round Top Dr, this should be Ridgetop Dr as it is a continuation across from the existing
Ridgetop Dr.
3. Owl Creek Ct is an acceptable road name.