Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-01-10 ACTIONS Board of Supervisors Meeting of January 10, 2001 Januarv 11. 2001 AGENDA ITEM/ACTION ASSIGNMENT 1. Call to Order Joint Meeting with School Board. Meeting was called to Order at 4:31 p.m., by the Chairman. All 80S members oresent. 3. Discussion: Compensation. None. . ACCEPTED the recommendations of the Committee as follows: . Base salary structure adjustment of 4.5% to reflect market competitive salary levels; . Adjust classified employees' base salaries based on years in position up to the midpoint as a means of addressing pay compression; . Use WorldatWork data base as a basis for the County Executive's and Superintendent's budget recommendation, considering available revenue (anywhere between 3.3% and 4.6%)~ for the annual merit 0001 4. Other matters not listed on the Agenda. . There were none. 5. Adjourn. . The meeting was adiourned at 6:05 o.m. 1. Call to order. Meeting was called to Order at 7:00 p.m., by the Chairman. All BOS members present. Also present was County Executive, County Attorney and Clerk. 4. Others Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the Public. I . There were none. 5.1 Appropriation: General Fund, $4,572.75 (Form #20043). Clerk: Forward to Melvin Breeden and copy . APPROVED aoorooriate persons. 5.2 Appropriation: Education, $194,676.92 (Form #20044). Clerk: Forward to Melvin Breeden and copy . APPROVED appropriate persons. 5.3 Appropriation: Education, $62,955 (Form #20045). Clerk: Forward to Melvin Breeden and copy . APPROVED appropriate persons. 5.4 Resolution concurring with the IDA of the City of Harrisonburg Clerk: Forward to Michael Graff at McGuireWoods to assist Virginia Public Television Stations. and copy County Attorney. (Attachment 1) . ADOPTED . 6. SP-OO-44. Moyer (Triton PCS CVR 361A) Sign #59). Clerk: Set out conditions of approval. (Attachment . APPROVeO subject to 11 conditions. 2) 7. ZTA-OO-01. UREF Research Park, Inc. - Signs in Public Rights- Clerk: Forward to Zoning Department and County of-Way. Attorney's office for inclusion in next update of the . ADOPTED the ordinance. County Code. (Ordinance will be forwarded under seoarate cover.) 8. Appointments. Clerk: Prepare appointment letters, update Boards . REAPPOINTED George R. Larie and James E. Clark, Jr., to and Commission books and notify appropriate the Equalization Board, with terms to expire on December 31, persons. 2001. 9. Other matters not listed on the agenda from the Board. None . VOTED to forward letter to City Council in response to the Mayor's tetter regarding the Meadow Creek Park. . CONSENSUS of Board to meet with Planning Commission to discuss issues that have been identified and need to be addressed. . Mr. Cilimberg reported that he attended a meeting on the Route 29 South Corridor Study on Tuesday, January 9, 2001. There will be a public hearing on Thursday, January 18, 2001, from 4:00 p.m. until 7:00 p.m., at Red Hill School. . Ms. Humphris mentioned a letter Board members received concerning real estate assessments. She suggested a standard letter be prepared informing individuals of the process. . Ms. Humphris said there was some excellent information in County Connections regarding the Govemor's proposed reduction in fundino. 9. Adjourn. . Meeting was adiourned at 7:55 D.m. lewe Attachment 1 _ Resolution concurring with the IDA of the City of Harrisonburg to assist Virginia Public Television Stations. Attachment 2 - Conditions of Approval Attachment 2 Agenda Item No.6. SP.2000-44. Mover (Triton PCS CVR 361A) (Sian #59). PUBLIC HEARING on a request to allow communication fac including 74" high wood pole communication tower, flush mount antenna & ground equip on 30' by 30' leased area of a 8.982 ac parcel w/access road on 9.25 ac adj parcel (TM 92, P 56B1), in accord w/Sec 10.2.2.6 of the Zoning Ord. TM 92, P 5683. Located at 1863 Thomas Jefferson Pkwy (St Rt 53) between Gobblers Ridge & Mountain Brook Dr. Znd RA & is wlin ECOD. Scottsville Dist. APPROVED SP.2000-44 subject to the following conditions: 1. The top of the pole, as measured Above Sea Level (ASL), shall never exceed seven (7) feet above the top of the tallest tree, as measured ASL, within twenty-fIVe (25) feet of the pole. No antennas or equipment, with the exception of the grounding rod, shall be located above the top of the pole. 2. The pole shall be designed, constructed and maintained as follows: a. The pole shall be a wooden pole, dark brown in color; b. Guy wires shall not be permitted; c. No lighting shall be permitted on the site or on the pole, except as provided by condition number nine (9) herein; d. The ground equipment cabinets, antenna, and all equipment attached to the pole shall be dark brown in color and shall be no larger than the specifications as shown on the attached plan entitled "Moyer PropertyNJentworth Farm;" e. A grounding rod, not exceeding two (2) feet above the top of the pole, and with a width not to exceed one (1)-inch diameter at the base and tapering to a point, may be installed at the top of the pole; 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a statement to the Planning Department by a licensed surveyor certifying the height of the tallest tree, as identified in condition number one (1); g. Within one (1) month after the completion of the pole, the applicant shall provide a statement to the Planning Department certifying the height of the pole, measured both in feet above ground and also measured ASL; h. The pole can never extend above the top of the tallest tree, except as described in condition number one (1) of these conditions of approval, without prior approval of an amendment to this special use permit; 3. The pole shall be located in accordance with the plan submitted by the applicants, dated November 7, 2000. The facility and the new access road shall be located according to the plan submitted by the applicant, entitled "Moyer propertyNJentworth Farm," dated November 7, 2000; 4. Antennas shall be attached to the pole only as follows: a. Antennas shall be limited to those shown on the attached plan entitled "Moyer PropertyNVentworth Farm;" b. No satellite or microwave dishes shall be permitted on the pole; c. Only flush mounted antennas shall be permitted. No antennas that project out from the pole beyond the minimum required by the support structure shall be permitted. However,in no case shall the antennas project out from the pole more than twelve (12) inches; 5. Prior to beginning construction or installation of the pole or the equipment cabinets, or installation of access for vehicles or utilities, a tree conservation plan, develOped by a certified arborlst, specifying tree protection methods and procedures and identifying any existing trees to be removed on the site both inside and outside the access easement and lease area shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Community Development for approval. All construction or installation associated with the pole and equipment building, including necessary access for construction or installation, shall be in accordance with this tree conselVation plan. Except for the tree removal expressly authorized by the Director of Planning and Community Development, the permittee shall not remove existing trees within two hundred (200) feet of the pole and equipment building. A special use permit amendment shall be required for any future tree removal within the two hundred (200)-foot buffer, after the installation of the subject facility; 6. The pote shall be disassembled and removed from the site within ninety (90) days of the date its use for wireless telecommunications purposes is discontinued; 7. The permittee shall submit a report to the Zoning Administrator one (1) time per year, no later than July 1 of that year. The report shall identify each user of the pole and certify that the height of the pole is in compliance with condition number one (1); 8. No slopes associated with construction of the pole and accessory uses shall be created that are steeper than 2:1 unless retaining walls, revetments, or other stabilization measures acceptable to the County Engineer are employed; 9. Outdoor lighting shall be limited to periods of maintenance only. Each outdoor luminare shall be fully shielded such that all Ught emitted is projected below a horizontal plane running through the lowest part of the shield or shielding part of the luminare. For purposes of this condition, a luminare is a complete lighting unit consisting of a lamp or lamps together with the parts designed to distribute the light, to position and protect the lamps, and to connect the lamps to the power supply; 10. The permittee shall comply with Section 5.1.12 of the Zoning Ordinance. Fencing of the lease area shall not be permitted; and 11. The applicant shall enlarge the access driveway entrance on the right side (exiting) to provide a safe access for vehicles turning right onto State Route 53. The finished overall width of the driveway entrance shall be a minimum of fourteen (14) feet and include extensions of drainage, as appropriate. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain approval of the driveway improvement plans from the Virginia Department of Transportation. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Appropriation - General Fund AGENDA DATE: January 10, 2001 ITEM NUMBER: ACTION: INFORMATION: SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Request approval ofApprbpriation #20043 in the amount CONSENT AGENDA: of $4,572.75 to recognize revenues from the Town of ACTION: X scottsville for Sheriff expenses for July, 2000. INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: STAFF CONTACnS): Messrs. Tucker, Breeden; Ms. White REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: The Sheriff's Department incurred salary and fringe expense for July, 2000 relating to services provided to the Town of Scottsville. This represents the final expenses incurred by the County relating to the contract between the Sheriff's Department and the Town. The expenses have been billed to the Town and the revenue has been recognized. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors approve the appropriations, totaling $4,572.75, as detailed on Appropriation #20043. c - (] <I v 00.271 APPROPRIATION REQUEST FISCAL YEAR: 00/01 NUMBER 20043 TYPE OF APPROPRIATION: ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW x ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED? YES NO x FUND: GENERAL PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: TOWN OF SCOTTSVILLE POLICE EXPENSES FOR JULY 2000. *** ******* ******** ********** ********************************** ****************************************** ******************* EXPENDITURE CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 1 1 1000 1000 31021 31021 110000 WAGES 210000 FICA $4,247.80 324.95 TOTAL $4,572.75 *** ******* ******** ********** ********************************** ****************************************** ******************* REVENUE CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 2 1000 16000 160308 RECOVERED COST $4,572.75 TOTAL $4,572.75 *** ******* ******** ********** ********************************** ****************************************** ******************* TRANSFERS *** ******* ******** ********** ********************************** ****************************************** ******************* REQUESTING COST CENTER: FINANCE DEPT APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE BOARD OF SUPERVISOR ~6~ DEC 27, 2000 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE /1'- {) I COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Appropriation - Education AGENDA DATE: January 10, 2001 ITEM NUMBER: ACTION: INFORMATION: SUBJ ECT/PROPOSALlREQUEST: Request approval of Appropriation #20044, in the amount of $194,676.92, for various contributions and SOL awards. CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: X INFORMATION: STAFF CONT ACT(Sl: Messrs. Tucker, Castner, Breeden; Ms. White REVIEWED BY: ATTACHMENTS: BACKGROUND: At its meeting on November 9, 2000, the School Board approved the following appropriations: Grant - State Department of Education Albemarle County Schools received a grant from the State Department of Education in the amount of $4,695.43. This grant is to be used to pay for postage for schools to mail School Performance Report Cards. Donation - Monticello Hioh School Monticello High Schooi received a donation in the amount of $1 ,200.00 from the Monticello High School Athletic Boosters Club, Inc. This donation will be lJsed to purchase a wrestling mat for the school. Donation - Greer Elementary School Greer Elementary Schooi received a donation In the amount of $516.00 from SUNCOM. This donation is to help with bus expenses for a field trip to Williamsburg for the 4th grade class. Donation - Stone Robinson Elementarv School Stone Robinson Elementary Schooi received a donation in the amount of $100.00 from NICHD: Study of Earty Child Care and Youth Development. This donation will be used to purchase instructional/recreational materials for the school. Donation -l3roadus Wood Elementarv School Broadus Wood Elementary School received a donation in the amount of $2,250.00 from the Broadus Wood PTO. This donation is to be used to pay the salary of the Spanish teacher at Broadus Wood Elementary School. Textbook Fund The textbook fund has collected $905.49 from the school for textbooks, which were lost, damaged or sold. It is requested this money be appropriated for the 2000-01 fiscal year to purchase replacement textbooks. Award _ Viroinia Standards of Learnino Trainino Initiative Fund Albemarle County Public Schoois has received an award of $185,010.00 from the Virginia StandardS of Learning (SOL) Training initiative Fund for tiscal year 00-01. The funds have been allocated to school divisions via the Standards of Learning Training Initiative for the implementation and evaluation of a comprehensive teacher training program to be conducted within the school division in the core content areas and leedership training for administrative staffing implementing the SOL SOL Training Initiative funds wili be used to support the following activities: graduate level courses for staff to support the division literacy recommendations; stipends for teacher training to support professional development efforts in the SOL's; consultant services in support of SOL training efforts; and educational materials and printing cost in support of the SOL training. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board of supervisors approve the appropriations, totaling $194,676.92, as detailed on Appropriation #20044. .-<,.:''': 01.001 APPROPRIATION REQUEST FISCAL YEAR: 00/01 NUMBER 20044 TYPE OF APPROPRIATION: ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW x ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED? YES NO x FUND: SCHOOL PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: CONTRIBUTIONS AND SOL AWARD. *** ******* ******** ********** ********************************** ***************************************** ****************** CODE EXPENDITURE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 1 2201 61411 520100 Postal Services $164.34 1 2202 61411 520100 Postal Services 117.38 1 2203 61411 520100 Postal Services 131.47 1 2204 61411 520100 Postal Services 178.42 1 2205 61411 520100 Postal Services 230.07 1 2206 61411 520100 Postal Services 183.12 1 2207 61411 520100 Postal Services 75.12 1 2209 61411 520100 Postal Services 70.43 1 2210 61411 520100 Postal Services 187.82 1 2211 61411 520100 Postal Services 112.69 1 2212 61411 520100 Postal Services 173.73 1 2213 61411 520100 Postal Services 56.35 1 2214 61411 520100 Postal Services 206.59 1 2215 61411 520100 Postal Services 89.21 1 2216 61411 520100 Postal Services 211 .29 1 2251 61411 520100 Postal Services 173.73 1 2252 61411 520100 Postal Services 230.08 1 2253 61411 520100 Postal Services 211.29 1 2254 61411 520100 Postal Services 230.08 1 2255 61411 520100 Postal Services 248.86 1 2301 61411 520100 Postal Services 610.43 1 2302 61411 520100 Postal Services 370.94 1 2303 61411 520100 Postal Services 28.18 1 2304 61411 520100 Postal Services 403.81 1 2304 61105 601300 Ed/Rec Supplies 1,200.00 1 2204 61101 420100 Field Trip 516.00 1 2210 61101 601300 Ed/Rec Supplies 100.00 1 2201 61101 132100 P-TWages -Teacher 2,077.87 1 2201 61101 210000 FICA 172.13 1 2114 61101 602000 Textbooks 905.49 1 3139 60607 152100 P-T Wages-Substitues 5,000.00 210000 FICA 312500 Consultants 5801 00 Dues 580500 Staff Dev 601300 Ed/Rec Supplies 382.50 101,969.50 6,000.00 60,000.00 11,658.00 TOTAL $194,676.92 CODE REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT *** ******* ******** ********** ********************************** ***************************************** ****************** 2 2000 24000 240351 State Grant-SOL Postage $4,695.43 2 2000 18100 181109 Donation 1,200.00 2 2000 18100 181109 Donation 516.00 2 2000 18100 181109 Donation 1 00.00 2 2000 18100 181109 Donation 2,250.00 2 2000 19000 190214 Textbook Fund 905.49 2 3139 24000 240354 VA SOL's 185,010.00 TOTAL $194,676.92 TRANSFERS *** ******* ******** ********** ********************************** ***************************************** ****************** REQUESTING COST CENTER: *** ******* ******** ********** ********************************** ***************************************** ****************** EDUCA TION APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE -......... DEC 29, 2000 /, II #" / BOARD OF SUPERVISOR COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Appropriation - Education AGENDA DATE: January 10, 2001 ITEM NUMBER: ACTION: INFORMATION: SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Request approval of Appropriation #20045 in the amount of $62,955.00 for various education contributions and grants. CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: X INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Yes STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Castner, Breeden; Ms. White REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: At its meeting on November 30, 2000, the School Board approved the following appropriations: Donation - Meriwether Lewis Elementary School Meriwether Lewis Elementary School received a donation from the Meriwether Lewis PTO in the amount of $3,500.00. This donation is to support the reading specialist working extra hours during the school year. Grant - VirQinia Commission for the Arts The Virginia Commission for the Arts has made grant awards to three Albemarle County Schools. Artist-in-Education Residency Program Grants were made to Crozet Elementary in the amount of $3,000.00 and Stony Point Elementary in the amount of $2,660.00. The Commission also awarded a Touring Assistance Grant to Broadus Wood Elementary in the amount of $495.00. These programs will involve interactive activities to include hands on learning experience for students with performing, visual, and musical arts. Grant - TechnoloQY Literacy Challenge Grant The Virginia Department of Education awarded Albemarle County Public Schools Technology Literacy Challenge Grant in the amount of $53,300.00. This award represents the fourth winning proposal submitted to the Department of Education. The project specified in this grant will allow for the implementation of a course designed by Albemarle County Schools, The University of Virginia's School for Continuing and Professional Studies, and The Curry Center for Technology and Teacher Education. The course will be offered for three graduate credits to seven teams of select teachers and other instructional personnel, and is designed to provide them with the knowledge and skills necessary to be effective technology instructors of teachers and administrators. Participants who successfully complete the three-credit course will deliver a series of one-credit technology courses through the UVA School of Continuing and Professional Studies. These courses will be available to Albemarle County educators as well as educators from neighboring public and private schools. These one credit mini-courses, designed to prepare teachers to demonstrate mastery of the Virginia Department of Education's Technology Standards for Instructional Personnel, will be conducted at schools throughout the County. Tuition for both the one and three credit courses will be provided by the grant. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors approve the appropriations, totaling $62,955.00, as detailed on Appropriation #20045. 01.002 vi Iv:::5 I<CVD ~,- ,,-.- APPROPRIATION REQUEST FISCAL YEAR: 00101 NUMBER 20045 TYPE OF APPROPRIATION: ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW x ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED? YES NO x FUND: SCHOOL PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: CONTRIBUTIONS AND GRANTS. CODE EXPENDITURE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT *** ******* ********* ********** *********************************** ****************************************** ******************* 1 2206 61101 152100 Sub-Wages Teacher $3,237.50 1 2206 61101 210000 FICA 262.50 1 3104 60203 312700 Prof. Servo Inst 3,000.00 1 3104 60211 312700 Prof. Servo Inst 2,660.00 1 3104 60201 601300 Instructional Supplies 495.00 1 3131 61311 312500 Prof. Servo Inst 48,500.00 1 3131 61311 580000 Misc. Expenses 4,800.00 TOTAL $62,955.00 CODE REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT *** ******* ********* ********** *********************************** ****************************************** ******************* 2 2000 18100 181109 Donation $3,500.00 2 3104 24000 240300 Comm. Grant-Crozet $3,000.00 2 3104 24000 240355 Comm.Grant-S-Point $2,660.00 2 3104 24000 240365 Comm.Grant-B-Wood $495.00 2 3131 24000 240312 Tech. Challenge Grant $53,300.00 TOTAL $62,955.00 TRANSFERS *** ******* ********* ********** *********************************** ****************************************** ******************* *** ******* ********* ********** *********************************** ****************************************** ******************* REQUESTING COST CENTER: EDUCATION APPROVALS: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE SIGNATURE ~~ DATE BOARD OF SUPERVISOR DEC 29, 2000 /. //. iN David P. Bowerman Rio Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr. Scottsville Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S. Martin Rivanna Walter F. Perkins While Hall Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller January 11,2001 Mr. Michael W. Graff, Jr. McGuire Woods LLP One James Center 901 East Cary Street Richmond, VA 23219-4030 Dear Mr. Graff: At its meeting on January 10, 2001, the Board of Supervisors adopted the attached resolution concurring with the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Harrisonburg to assist Virginia public television stations. If you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, "" ~ Ella W. Carey, ~ Clerk /ewc Enclosure cc: Larry W. Davis <>> Printed on recycled paper At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, held on the lOth day of January, 2001, the following members of the Board of Supervisors were recorded as present: PRESENT: David P. Bowerman Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr. Charlotte Y. Humphris Charles S. Martin Walter F. Perkins Sally H. Thomas On motion by Ms. Humphris, seconded by Mr. Bowerman, the attached Resolution was adopted by a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors by a roll call vote, the votes being recorded as follows: MEMBER Mr. Bowerman Mr. Dorrier Ms. Humphris Mr. Martin Mr. Perkins Ms. Thomas VOTE Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia (the "Governing Body") has been asked by the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Harrisonburg, Virginia (the "Harrisonburg Authority") to concur with a resolution of inducement adopted by the Harrisonburg Authority at its meeting held on December 12, 2000 for the benefit of the Virginia Public Broadcasting Board (the "VPBB") to assist in financing the acquisition of certain equipment for the conversion of Virginia's public television stations to the Federal Communications Commission's new digital standard (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, Section 15.2-4905 of the Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act, Chapter 49, Title 15.2, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Act"), provides that if a locality has created an industrial development authority, no industrial development authority created by a another locality may finance a facility located in the first locality unless the governing body of such first locality concurs with the inducement resolution adopted by such industrial development authority; and WHEREAS, a portion of the equipment constituting the Project will be located in the County of Albemarle, Virginia and operated by the Virginia public television station or stations serving the Albemarle County area and the Governing Body constitutes the highest elected governmental unit of the County of Albemarle, Virginia; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNfY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA: 1. The Governing Body concurs with the resolution adopted by the Harrisonburg Authority and approves the loan by the Harrisonburg Authority for the benefit of the VPBB, as required by Section 15.2-4905 of the Act. 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia this 10th day of January, 2001. [SEAL] McGuireWoods LLP One James Center 901 East Cary Street Richmond, VA 23219-4030 Phone: 804.775.1000 Fax: 804.775.1061 www.mcguirewoods.com Michael W. Graff, Jr. Direct: 804.775.4300 McGUIREWCDDS mgraff@mcguirewoods.com Direct Fax: 804.698.2068 December 15, 2000 BY FACSIMILE - 804-296-5800 AND BY REGULAR MAIL .> Ms. Ella Carey 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Public Television Financing Dear Ms. Carey: As I briefly discussed with Larry Davis, the IDA of Harrisonburg is assisting Virginia's Public Television Stations with a financing for equipment required for the Federal Communications Commission's mandated conversion to a digital broadcast standard. Under the IDA statute, the governing body of each locality in which this equipment will be located must concur in the Harrisonburg IDA's inducement resolution for the financing. Some of this new equipment will be used by WHT J at the Transmitter and Tower located on Carter's Mountain in Albemarle County. Therefore, we would ask the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached resolution at its January 10 meeting. Thank you for your assistance. Please call me with any questions you may have about this matter. Sincerely, ~~. Michael W. Graff, Jr. MWG,Jr./ds Enclosure cc: Larry Davis (by fax: 804-972-4068, w/encl) BOARD 0 F SUPERVISORS \\FINANCIAL SERVICES\mwgraffiPBB - Charlottesville Letter(#39895)\v. 1 SP 00-44 Moyer (Triton peS) Top of yellow balloon is at 80 feet View from Gobbler's Ridge driveway (just across Route 53 from proposed location of wood pole) looking south ~ COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Planning & Community Development 40 I McIntire Road, Room 218 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296 - 5823 Fax (804) 972 - 4012 December 21, 2000 Valerie W. Long McGuire, Woods, LLP POBox 1288 Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: SP-2000-44 (Triton PCS CVR361A); Tax Map 92, Parcel 5681 Dear Ms. Long: The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on December 12, 2000, unanimously recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions: " 1. The top of the pole, as measured Above Sea Level (ASL) shall never exceed seven (7) feet above the top of the tallest tree, as measured ASL, within twenty-five (25) feet of the pole. No antennas or equipment, with the exception of the grounding rod, shall be located above the top of the pole. 2. The pole shall be designed, constructed and maintained as follows: g. ,....,." a. b. c. The pole shall be a wooden pole, dark brown in color; Guy wires shall not be permitted; No lighting shall be permitted on the site or on the pole, except as provided by condition number nine (9) herein; The ground equipment cabinets, antenna, and all equipment attached to the pole shall be dark brown in color and shall be no larger than the specifications as shown on the attached plan entitled "Alltell/I-64 West Site." A grounding rod, not exceeding two feet above the top of the pole, and with a width not to exceed one-inch diameter at the base and tapering to a point, may be installed at the top of the pole. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a statement to the Planning Department by a licensed surveyor certifying the height of the tallest tree, as identified in condition number one. Within one month after the completion of the pole, the applicant shall provide a statement to the Planning Department certifying the height of the pole, measured both.in feet above ground and also measured Above Sea Level. d. e. f. Page 2 December 21,2000 h. The pole can never extend above the top of the tallest tree, except as described in condition number one of these conditions of approval, without prior approval of an amendment to this special use permit. r-'\ 3. The pole shall be located in accordance with the plan submitted by the applicants, dated November 7,2000. The facility and the new access road shall be located according to the plan submitted by the applicant, entitled Moyer PropertylWentworth Farm, dated November 7,2000. 4. Antennas shall be attached to the pole only as follows: a. Antennas shall be limited to those shown on the attached plan entitled "Moyer Property Wentworth Farms." b. No satellite or microwave dishes shall be permitted on the pole. c. Only flush mounted antennas shall be permitted. No antennas that project out from the pole beyond the minimum required by the support structure, shall be permitted. However, in no case shall the antennas project out from the pole more than 12 inches. 5. Prior to beginning construction or installation of the pole or the equipment cabinets, or installation of access for vehicles or utilities, a tree conservation plan, developed by a certified arborist, specifying tree protection methods and procedures and identifying any existing trees to be removed on the site both inside and outside the access easement and lease area shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Community Development for approval. All construction or installation associated with the pole and equipment building, ~" including necessary access for construction or installation, shall be in accordance with this tree conservation plan. Except for the tree removal expressly authorized by the Director of Planning and Community Development, the permittee shall not remove existing trees within two hundred (200) feet of the pole and equipment building. A special use permit amendment shall be required for any future tree removal within the two hundred-foot buffer, after the installation of the subject facility. 6. The pole shall be disassembled and removed from the site within ninety (90) days of the date its use for wireless telecommunications purposes is discontinued. 7. The permittee shall submit a report to the Zoning Administrator one time per year, no later than July 1 of that year. The report shall identify each user of the pole and certify that the height of the pole is in compliance with condition number one. 8. No slopes associated with construction of the pole and accessory uses shall be created that are steeper than 2: 1 unless retaining walls, revetments, or other stabilization measures acceptable to the County Engineer are employed. 9. Outdoor lighting shall be limited to periods of maintenance only. Each outdoor luminare shall be fully shielded such that all light emitted is projected below a horizontal plane running though the lowest part of the shield or shielding part of the luminare. For purposes of this condition, a luminare is a complete lighting unit consisting of a lamp or lamps together with the parts designed to distribute the light, to position and protect the lamps, and to connect the lamps to the power supply. ............ Page 3 December 21,2000 1"""\ 10. The permittee shall comply with Section 5.1.12 of the Zoning Ordinance. Fencing of the lease area shall not be permitted. 11. The applicant shall enlarge the access driveway entrance on the right side (exiting) to provide a safe access for vehicles turning right onto State Route 53. The finished overall width of the driveway entrance shall be a minimum of fourteen feet and include extensions of drainage, as appropriate. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain approval of the driveway improvement plans from the Virginia Department of Transportation. Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive public comment at their meeting on January 10, 2001. Any new or additional information regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, I"'"' ~~ Joan McDowell Senior Planner JMD/jcf Cc: Ella Carey Amelia McCulley Jack Kelsey Steve Allshouse Bob Ball """"1 STAFF PERSON: PLANNING COMMISSION: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: Joan D. McDowell December 12, 2000 January 10,2001 /~, SP 00-44 Moyer/Triton Applicant's Proposal: The applicant, Triton PCS, Inc., has proposed to construct a communication facility on a 30' by 30' lease area within an 8.92-acre parcel. The facility would consist of a wooden pole and ground equipment cabinets. Two directional flush mounted antennas and a two-foot high lightening rod would be attached to the pole. One additional flush mounted antenna, labeled "future antenna" has been requested, also (see Sheet C- 7, Detail 4 of the attached exhibit). An existing driveway on an adjacent property, under the same ownership, would serve as an entrance into the property. A new driveway along the Virginia Power easement would provide access to the site. The applicant has also requested a waiver from the required setback that would be equal to the height of the structure, as the proposed pole is 76 feet from the State Route 53 right-of-way (Section 4.10.3.1), as well as a waiver from the requirements to submit a preliminary site plan (Section 32.2.2). ~ Petition: Petition by Triton PCS, in a joint venture with AT&T Digital PCSto construct a telecommunication facility on a 900 square foot lease area of an 8.982-acre parcel. The property is zoned RA Rural Area and is within a Comprehensive Plan Rural Area 4 land use designation. The facility would be located on property described as Tax Map 92, Parcel 56B3 and the proposed access is located on property described as Tax Map 92, Parcel 52B 1. The site is located on the south side of State Route 53 between Cobblers Ridge Road and Mountain Brook Road in the Scottsville Magisterial District. Character of the Area: The parcel contains a single-family residence and is heavily wooded with primarily deciduous trees. Virginia Power transmission lines are located between the proposed site and State Route 53. The area has been developed f SP 00-44 12/05/00 1 with single family residences and has large expanses of wooded, unimproved 1""""\ lots. The site is within an Entrance Corridor Overlay District. The surrounding properties are also zoned RA, Rural Areas District. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the provisions of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance and with the Personal Wireless Service Policy and recommends conditional approval. Planninl: and Zoning History: The following project was concurrently processed with the subject application: ARB(BP)-2000-12. The Architectural Review Board approved a Certificate of Appropriateness for this application. Comprehensive Plan: Natural Resources and Cultural Assets (Chapter Two). Establishment of 1"1 the importance of the County's scenic resources is shown by the following goal: "Preserve the County' sscenic resources as being essential to the County's character, economic vitality and quality of life." Chapter Two implements this goal by providing measures to "Maintain the visual integrity of all of Albemarle's roadways." Among the implementation measures, the identification of local scenic highways has led to the inclusion of twenty designated arterial streets and highways within an Entrance Corridor overlay district in the Zoning Ordinance. The Architectural Review Board approved a Certificate of Appropriateness for this proposal, subject to the following conditions: 1. Indicate that no trees shall be cut within a 200' radius of the pole. 2. The height of the pole shall not exceed 1 0' above the tallest tree within a 25' radius, as certified by a surveyor. A balloon flown at the site could not be seen from any vantage point along State Route 53. '" SP 00-44 12/05/00 2 STAFF COMMENT: ~ In the following sections, Staff will address the issues of this request: 1. Provisions of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance are discussed below: The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the right to issue all special use permits permitted hereunder. Special use permits for uses as provided in this ordinance may be issues upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property. The trees surrounding the site would provide substantial screening of the equipment at the base of the tower from adjacent properties and from the nearby roads. A condition of approval would require a 200-foot tree protection buffer. The proposed 80 height of the wooden pole is based on a 73 foot tall Chestnut Oak tree located within 25 feet of the pole. The site topography is depicted on sheet C-6 of the application and the topography of the general ~ area is shown on an attached exhibit. The top of the 80- foot tower would be at 530.5 feet Above Sea Level (ASL) elevation and the top of the 73-foot high tree would be 525.0 feet ASL. Using the ASL measurement, the proposed pole would be five and one half feet above the top of the tallest tree. When advised of this information, the applicant has requested that the pole be maintained at seven above the top of the tree, as measured ASL. The application was filed prior to the preference for height to also include topography as a consideration. As this facility is virtually hidden by the surrounding trees, staff believes the request will not be of substantial detriment to the adjacent properties. It should be understood that, as the trees grow, the height of the pole might need to be extended also, in order to achieve desired coverage. If approved, this condition would allow the extension, without compromising the goal for limited visibility, as maximum pole height has a direct relationship with the tree heights. that the character of the district will not be changed thereby. ,~ SP 00-44 12/05/00 3 """'1 , ,. I Based on the limited visibility of the facility, the design and materials, and them~1'1im~lple~l1gre911ired to accoITIl11()d~te the ~a~ility, the proposed .. . facility would have minimal impact on the character of the district. and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance. The purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance, as stated in Sections 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6, with particular reference to Sections 1.4, 1.4.4, and 1.5, address, in one form or another, the provision of public services. The use of wireless telephones clearly provides a public service, as evidenced by the expanded and rapid increase in this technology. Section 1.4.3 states as intent of the Ordinance, "To facilitate the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community." The provision of the facility would increase the availability and convenience for users of wireless phone technology. The limited visual impact of the facility would not conflict with the attractiveness of the community. Therefore, this request complies with ~1 Section 31.2.4.1 of the Ordinance. ~ with the uses permitted by right in the district, The proposed tower would not restrict the current uses, or by right uses on any other property. The proposed conditions would limit tree clearing on this site in order to reduce any visual impacts of this tower from adjacent properties. Also, access to the site would generally be limited. The applicant has advised that a monthly maintenance visit is customary. As the site would not have any permanent lighting, there would not be any nighttime visual impacts. with additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance. Section 5.1.12 of the Ordinance contains regulations governing tower . facilities 'and appropriate conditions are proposed to ensure compliance with this provision of the Ordinance. and with the public health. safety and general welfare, SP 00-44 12/05/00 4 The provisions of increased wireless communication facilities may be considered consistent with the public health, safety and general welfare by providing increased communication services in the event of emergencies and by increasing overall general communication services. ~, The Telecommunications Act of 1996 addresses issues of environmental effects with the following language: "No state or local government or instrumentality thereof my regulate the placement, construction, and . modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission's regulations concerning such emissions." In order to operate this facility, the applicant is required to meet the Federal Communication Commission guidelines for radio frequency emission.s. This requirement will adequately protect the public health and safety, in regard to emissions. The Virginia Department of Transportation has advised us of a concern regarding safe egress from the site. The existing narrow driveway does not allow right turns without the vehicle crossing over the center lane, into oncoming traffic. Therefore, a condition of approval has been offered requiring the applicant to make driveway improvements to allow safe egress. 2. Section 704(a)(7)(b ) (I) (II) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: The regulation of the placement. construction and modification of personal wireless facilities by any state or local government or instrumentality thereof shall not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services. Neither the Comprehensive Plan nor the Zoning Ordinance prohibits the provision of personal wireless service. The purpose of this facility would be to provide additional service along the State Route 53 corridor, with an intent to eventually provide seamless service. However, the denial of this application would not prohibit the personal wireless services in this area. 3. County of Albemarle Personal Wireless Service Draft Facilities Policy Although, at the time of the writing of this report, the Board of Supervisors has not yet adopted the Wireless Facilities Policy, the wireless providers are ~ SP 00-44 12/05/00 5 voluntarily using the Policy as a guiding instrument. In concert with the 1"'""1 Policy, the proposed communication facility would implement the following summarized guidelines: Limited visibility: the proposed tower would be located at a height that would limit the visibility from adjoining properties, as well as from nearby roadways. With its natural mottled brown and black colors and textures. the proposed wooden tower would be unobtrusive. The equipment cabinets also would be painted dark brown, to blend with its surrounding environment. The flush mounted directional antennas are designed to be as inconspicuous as possible and would also be painted a dark brown color to match the wooden pole. No permanent lighting would be used on the site or the pole. Protection of ridgetops and ridgelines: The proposed site is not on a ridgetop or ridgeline. ,......" No adverse impacts to resources identified in the Open Space Plan or designated as Avoidance Areas: the proposed site would not create negative impacts on the area, as the use and traffic to the site would be limited. The impacts of this site on a designated scenic resource would be limited. Utilize existing structures: the applicant has determined that no existing facility within this area would permit the additional equipment. Appropriateness in any zoning district: the size of the pole would be limited by the tree heights surrounding the facility. The unlighted site and the natural, earthen colors used on the equipment, the directional antennas, and the limited height would be unobtrusive, thus, appropriate in the RA District. Ground based equipment in keeping with the area character: the proposed equipment cabinets would be consistent in size with the existing equipment cabinets. The dark brown color would aid in blending the cabinets into the surrounding environment. ~ Limited visibility of the antennas: the brown painted panel antennas would be approximately 45 inches long, 6 inches wide, and have a SP 00-44 12/05/00 6 mounting distance between the monopole 8.10 inches. A drawing of the proposed antenna is located on sheet C-7 of the application exhibit ~ attached for reference. 4. Waiver of a site plan in accord with the provisions of Section 32.2.2 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Commission may waive the drawing of a site plan if requiring a site plan would not forward the purpose of the Ordinance or otherwise serve the public interest. Generally, the Site Review Committee has endorsed the use of site plan waivers for the establishment of telecommunication facilities. This general endorsement has been based on the relatively small area impacted by the proposed use and the ability to obtain the required information through an erosion and sediment control plan and the building permits. Staff is able to support the request for a site plan waiver as the information submitted by the applicant generally meets the requirements for a site plan. Based on the review this application has received and will receive during the approval processes, staff is unable to identify any purpose that would be served by requiring the submission of a separate site plan application. ~. Therefore, staff recommends approval of a full site plan waiver, subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of an erosion and sediment control plan prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. Provision of one parking space. 3. A site plan application shall be required if activity on slopes of 25% or greater is proposed. 4. Staff review and approval to ensure that all conditions of the special use permit are reflected in the final revisions of the construction drawings, prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. Waiver of the setback regulations in accord with the provisions of Section 4.10.3.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Commission is being requested to waive the regulation set forth in Section 4.10.3.1 governing setbacks from property lines related to the height of structures. The Ordinance requires that structures, including towers, are setback from property lines at a distance equal to the height of the !~ SP 00-44 12/05/00 7 r"J structure. In this case, as the pole would be 76 feet from the right-of-way, a 5.5-foot waiver is being requested. In compliance with condition number one, the height of the tower is calculated to be 81.5 feet high. It is staff's opinion that the setback provision of Section 4.10.3.1 is designed to prevent undue crowding of the land and to prevent safety hazards if a structure should fall. There are no dwelling units located within the fall range of the proposed tower. Staff notes that the County has approved reductions in setback for similar tower proposals. Staffs opinion is that approval of the modification does not result in undue crowding of the land and does not represent a safety hazard, and that approval of this modification is appropriate. if the Commission is able to . support the special use permit application. Based on the evaluation of its compliance with the provisions of Section 31.2.4.1, staff is able to support this request for modification of the required 1: 1 setback. SUMMARY · Staffhas identified the following factors that are favorable to this request: ~ 1. The facility would provide increased wireless capacity, which may be considered consistent with the provisions of Sections 1.4, 1.4.4, and 1.5 of the Zoning Ordinance; 2. The facility would not restrict permitted uses on adjacent properties; 3. The design of the faCilitY wouldnot result in adverse visual impacts to adjoining land or roads. · Staffhas identified the following factors that are unfavorable to this request: The site is within the Entrance Corridor District. · The following factor is relevant to this consideration: There is an existing, reasonable use of this property. I"""", ~ ., SP 00-44 12/05/00 8 RECOMMENDED ACTION: ~ Special Use Permit. While this site is located within an Entrance Corridor, as identified in Chapter Two of the Comprehensive Plan, Natural Resources and Cultural Assets, the design of the facility and the existence of a road on the property reduce the impacts such that approval would not be inconsistent with the goal of protecting a Scenic Resource. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL of SP 00-44 subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The top of the pole, as measured Above Sea Level (ASL), shall never exceed seven (7) feet above the top of the tallest tree within twenty five (25) feet of the facility at or below the same base elevation as the pole, measured Above Sea Level (ASL). No antennas or equipment, with the exception of the grounding rod, shall be located above the top of the pole. 2. The pole shall be designed, constructed and maintained as follows: SP 00-44 12/05/00 a. b. c. The pole shall be a wooden pole, dark brown in color; Guy wires shall not be permitted; No lighting shall be permitted on the site or onJhe pole, except as provided by condition number nine (9) herein; The ground equipment cabinets, antenna, and all equipment attached to the pole shall be dark brown in color and shall be no larger than the specifications as shown on the attached plan entitled "Alltell/I-64 West Site." A grounding rod, not exceeding two feet above the top of the pole, and with a width not to exceed one-inch diameter at the base and tapering to a point, may be installed at the top of the pole. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a statement to the Planning Department by a licensed surveyor certifying the height of the tallest tree, as identified in condition number one. Within one month after the completion of the pole, the applicant shall provide a statement to the Planning Department certifying the height of the pole, measured both in feet above ground and also measured Above Sea Level. ~. d. e. f. g. /~ 9 rl h. The pole can never extend above the top of the tallest tree, except as described in condition number one of these conditions of approval, without prior approval of an amendment to this special use permit. 3. The pole shall be located as follows: a. The pole shall be located on the site as shown onthe attached plan entitled "Moyer Property Wentworth Farms." b. The proposed facility shall be located not more than 25 feet from the existing access road. 4. Antennas shall be attached to the pole only as follows: a. Antennas shall be limited to those shown on the atta911ed plan entitled "Moyer Property Wentworth Farms." b. No satellite or microwave dishes shall be permitted on the pole. c. Only flush mounted antennas sl1all be permitted. No antennas that project out from the pole beyond the minimum required by the support structure, shall be permitted. However, in no case shall the antennas project out from the pole more than 12 inches. ~. r'\ 5. Prior to beginning construction or installation of the pole or the equipment cabinets, or installation of access for vehicles or utilities, a tree conservation plan, developed by a certified arborist, specifying tree protection methods and procedures and identifying any existing trees to be removed on the site both inside and outside the access easement and lease area sl1allbesllprpitteciJ9Jl:1ypiry9t9Y<>fJ?la.gt!illg and Community Development for approval. All construction or installation associated with the pole and equipment building, including necessary access for construction or installation, shall be in accordance with this tree conservation plan. Except for the tree removal expressly authorized by the Director of Planning and Community Development, the permittee shall not remove existing trees within two hundred (200) feet of the pole and equipment building. A special use permit amendment shall be required for any future tree removal within the two hundred-foot buffer, after the installation of the subject facility. 6. The pole shall be disassembled and removed from the site within ninety (90) days of the date its use for wireless telecommunications purposes is discontinued. SP 00-44 12/05/00 10 7. The permittee shall submit a report to the Zoning Administrator one time per year, no later than July I of that year. The report shall identify each user of the pole and certify that the height of the pole is in compliance with condition number one. f""'\ 8. No slopes associated with construction of the pole and accessory uses shall be created that are steeper than 2: I unless .retaining walls, revetments, or other stabilization measures acceptable to the County Engineer are employed. 9. Outdoor lighting shall be limited to periods of maintenance only. Each outdoor luminare shall be fully shielded such that all light emitted is projected below a horizontal plane running though the lowest part of the shield or shielding part of the luminare. For purposes of this condition, a luminare is a complete lighting unit consisting of a lamp or lamps together with the parts designed to distribute the light, to position and protect the lamps, and to connect the lamps to the power supply. 10. The permittee shall comply with Section 5.1.12 of the Zoning Ordinance. Fencing of the lease area shall not be permitted. ~ 11. The applicant shall enlarge the access driveway entrance on the right side (exiting) to provide a safe access for vehicles turning right onto State Route 53. The finished overall width of the driveway entrance shall be a minimum of fourteen feet and include extensions of drainage, as appropriate. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain approval of the driveway improvement plans from the Virginia Department of Transportation. {In the event that the Board chooses to deny this application, staff offers the following comment: In order to comply with the provisions of the Telecommunication Act of 1996, staff requests consensus direction from the Board regarding the basis for denial of this application and instructions to return to the Board with a written decision for the Board's consideration and action. } r,. SP 00-44 12/05/00 11 1"""1 ~ ~ ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - Application - dated revised 11/7/00 Attachment B - Area Topography Attachment C - (2) ARB Comments SP 00-44 12/05/00 12 ~;",:,~';(';,~;:;j''';A!it2,'s,<;{*:\:,;;,,>*t;;;:/ ",' ',", i " / \' _, N N \ -- ATTACHMENT C ~ COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Planning & Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 218 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296 - 5823 Fax (804) 972 - 4012 December 1,2000 Valerie Long McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, LLP PO Box 1288 Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: ARB-P(BP)-2000-12 Triton PCS CVR-361A (Moyer) Dear Ms. Long: I have reviewed the plans with revision date of 11-7-00 submitted for the above- ('\ referenced project on November 13,2000. The information included in these plans meets the conditions of approval outlined in the ARB meeting of July 17, 2000. You may consider this letter your Certificate of Appropriateness. Approval received from the Albemarle County Architectural Review Board is predicated . on the fact that the design and materials, as proposed and exhibited for review, will be used. The acceptance of approval implies that the applicant has agreed to use the materials as indicated on the site plan, attachments, and samples submitted. Any change in the approved design or materials will require an amendment to the plan and must be reviewed and approved by the Architectural Review Board. If you have any questions regarding this action, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, - 7I/~ '7u < <-J41~ > Margaret M. Maliszewski Design Planner ~ 23 ATTACHMENT C Albemarle County Development Departments S P-2000-044 SPIN Submission and Comments Triton PCS CVR 361A (Moyer) I' Architectural Review Board revised plan dated [date] revision 1 reviewer Margaret Pickart received 7/5/00 reviewed 7/17/00 decision approved with conditions On July 17,2000 the ARB took the following action: ARB-P(BP)-2000-12 -Triton PCS CVR 361 A (Moyer) - Review of a proposal to construct a 74' wood monopole with associated equipment. The Board unanimously approved a Certificate of Appropriateness, pending staff administrative approval of the following conditions: 1. Indicate that no trees shall be cut within a 200' radius of the pole. 2. The height of the pole shall not exceed 10' above the tallest tree within a 25' radius, as certified by a surveyor. ./~ Page 1 of 1 f 12/4/0011:54 AM 2~/ I ; ". """.., ~ ~ /},. RE.VISION @-- DETAIL REFERENCE <!> KEY NOlE ~ ElB'ATION REFERENCE [N[] ROOII NUlI8ER 0;;0 /l'\. SECTION REFERENCE I!fl KEYEO NOlE ~ ~1lONS.ANl SYW30LS ,- DA1I: - l!m ~ ~ APPROK ASTIl AWG 8LOG C. :lfR ...... .'11; Bls . CLG ,> CLR CONC CONST CONT OBL OIA.- OIAG 0111 ON OTl.,OET\. OWG E EA El.EUV ElECT EO EQUIP EW EKIST EXT FIN FUJOR FLR FT GA GAi-V GC GRNO GWB 1M' BD HARO'WO HORIZ HR HT HVAC 10 IN INfO INSUL. INT LB(S) lIAK IIECH IIET.lIll. IIfR AIR CONDITIONING ADJUSTABLE NJCNE FINISH flOOR APPROKlMATEl.Y HlERICoIN SOCIE1Y FllIl TESIJIG NlO ~lERWS NolERICAH WIRE GNJGE BUIlDING BLOCK BASE 1I000LE RADIO BUIUllNC STANllARIl CElLlNG CLEAR CONCRETE coNSTRUCTION CONlINUOUS DOUBLE OIAIIEIER 01AGONAl. DIIIENSION DOWN DETAIL DRAWING EAST EACH EUVAllON ElECTRICAl. EQUAL EQUIPMENT EACH WAY EKISTING EXTERIOR FINISH flUORESCENT FlOOR fOOT GAUGE =IZ~ GROUNO GYPSUII WALL BOARO GYPSUII 1IOIoR0 HARDWOOO HORIZONTAL HOUR HEIGHT HEATING. vENTING & AIR CONomoNING INSIDE IlIA. INCH INfORllAnDN INSULATlON INTERIOR POUNO(S) IIAKIIIUII IIECHANICAL IIETAL MANUfACTURER ~ & l[ It o , lIGR MIN lollSC N NA .NIC NlS oc.o/c ,00 OPG OPP PLYWO PR PROJ PROP PT REO'O RIl RO S SHT SIM SPEC SO SS STl STRUCT SUSP SV lHRU TNNO roc TOM TYP UBC UNO VERT Vlf vr W wi WIN WiD WP ANGLE ANO CENTER LINE PROPERTY LINE AT NUIIBER IolANAGER MINIMUII MISCELlANEOUS NORTH NOT APPUCABLE NOT IN CONTRACT NOT TO SCALE ON CENTER Ol1TSIOE OIAIotEIER OPENING OPPOSllE PLYWOOD PAIR PROJECT PROPERlY PRESSURE TREATED REQUIREO ROOIol ROUGH OPENING SOUTH SHEET SIMIlAR SPECIF1CATION SQUARE STAINLESS STEEL STEEL STRUCTURAL SUSPENOED SHEET VINYL lHROUGH TINNED lOP Of CONCRETE TOP Of lIASONR'i TYPICAL UNlfORIl BUIlDING COOE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE \IERT1CAL VERIf'( IN FIElD VINYL TILE WEST WITH WINDOW WITHOUT WATERPROOf ~ - j;A;[ 70NINC CL.ASSI~T10N RA ]pNINC JIJRISOICnON COUNTY Of AUlEIoWlLE pARCrl NUUBf.R TAlC IolAP 92-5681 nN'n ROOK Ao: PAGE OB 529, PG 335 ntrRGfWr.v Nu..BE:R 911 ~Rw..' DISTRICT SCOTTSVlLLE PRO.ECT SUWAARV PRo.ECT DESCRPTION SlEET NlEX ~ ~ l'..FNE'RA1 INf:ORLtATION LAlTlUDE - 3758'45.341" LONGITUDE - 78'25'21.177" EUVATlON - 450.9' ~ITT DIRfcnoNS: fROIl COUNTY OmCES, TAKE 20 SOUTH PAST INTERSTATE 64. TURN LEfT ONTO ROUTE 53 SOUTH. TAKE ROUTE 53 SOUTH fOR APPROKlIlATEl.Y 3 IIILES TO 1863 ON THE RIGHT. SITE IS BEHINO HOUSE. CONSlL TANT TEAM I'IDB'f _. CClllSIIIUCIIIl - --- _.-c1\lII _ ...<<MD ~ ~ SPRINT 2211 HYIlRAUUC RIWl CHARLOTlESVIUE. VA 22901 ATTN: ENGINEERING OEPT. (804) 871-2211 .fllYiDl VIRGINIA ELECTRIC POWER CO. (VEPCO) 1718 HYIlRAUUC Ro.\O CHARID1TESVlLLE, VA 22901 ATTN: KAREN RODGERS (804) 972-6794 VICNTY MAP PRO..l[CT nrscRtP'TlON lHE PROJECT INCWOES: INSTAUAllON Of A 10'xI2' CONCREIE PAD WI EQUIPMENT INSTAUAllON Of A 110'-0" HIGH IolONOPOLE wmt TWO PANEL ANTENNAS (ONE PER SECTOR), ANO ONE fUlURE ANTENNA A NEW TElEPHONE SER\I1CE RUN TO SITE A NEW ELECTRICAl. SER\I1CE RUN TO SITE NO WATER SlJPPL Y OR SEWAGE RUN TO SITE miIIiWl o2wi,.... Solutlone 1081 CLASSIC Ro.\O APEK. NC 27!502 (818) 367-2210 tAlC (819) 367-2220 .suMmIl IIAl2ER & ASSOCIATES 1208 CORPORAlE CIRCLE ROoINOKE. VA 24011 JOHN Iolc:CADEN (540) 772-9580 tAX (540) 772-11050 .ElWIIJr&. 02"'''- SoIulIono 1081 ClASSIC Ro.\O APEK. NC 27502 (919) 317-2210 tAlC (918) 367-2220 CfOn:r.HNICAl FROEHLlNG & ROBER1SON, INC. 1734 SEIREL ORfoIE. N.E. ROANOKE. VA 24012 (540) 344-7939 tAX (540) 344-3657 ~ WENTWORTH fARII !;11T NUUBER CVR-361A S;rTF ADORrsS 1113 THOIolAS JEfFERSON PKWY. CHARLOTTESVILLE. VA 22902 .sIIUIWIiEII LEROY & HELEN IolOYER 1863 lHOIolAS JEfFERSON PAR'IIIIAY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 (804) 283-5543 ~ CROWN COIIIIUNlCAllONS. INC. 375 SOUTHPOINT BLVD CANONSBURG. PA 15317 (7241 411-2000 - Phone (724 411-2200 - fox ra:.Jlll. f.tLI'Jll, .fU'A . FlOOD ZONE C .MlD. .!ill. COIotIl' ;"'1lY PANELI: 51006..0375-B EfFEC'o1I1E DATE: DECEIolBER 16. 1980 I, I eMl IlRAWING C-3 C-4 C-5 C-I C-7 C-8 ~HF'FT NIJUBER b~RtPnnN T-l C-l C-2 SITE PlAN SITE OETAIL PlAN SITE ElB'AnDNS GRADING PLAN SITE DETAILS SITE DETAIlS PROJECT INfOflIIAllON, VICINITY 1olAP. SHEET INDEX GENERAL NOlES & SPEClF1CAllONS SITE SURVEY 1IIS_lSalP'IRIllIIIIIlNll1S1If:SlU PROPEIIIY Of !HE 0WNEIl IT IS PROIIUCED SlIlfLY flIR lEE III' 111' __ MID OS IffUI1IS, RD'lIOllIICOON OR lEE Of 1lIS __ MlD/OR 1If: _lION c:otlTAHD II II IS FllIIIdDI lIIIIIIUI1If: WIIT1Pl _ Of 1If: DIlIll DRAWN 8'(: CHS CHECKED 8'(: BTM SITE _ MUYER PRuPERTY WENTWORTH FARM SITE NUIIIIER CVR-361A SITE AIlORESS 1uGJ THOMA~; JEFF. PKWY L;HARLlJTTE:;VILLE, VA 22902 SHEET l1TlE PRuJEL;T INFORMATION, VI\;INITY MAP, =;HEET INDEX SHEET NUlIBER 13 T-1 - PlDT .SCALE: r- I I NO. DAlE I 1/22/00 _ PER lIIION PC$ 7/1/00 _ PER lIIION PC$ 1/1/00 _ lOIIEIllDlHT '/21/00 _ ACCESS RQ!O 11/1/00 _ ACCESS RQ!O I~ ~ 1111/00 ISSUED FllIl _ ISSUED FllIl ZIINIIG j - Tri n pes ME I COt&UICATION SITE 80' W OPOLE WITH ~ I..DiT'Ni ROD 1O'x12' rE PAD WI e ~ HAD CENTER · 80' Z~ .- sees- :AN)DATE NAtA:: MOY ~ PROPERTY SITE NAME: WENTWORTH FARM ITE #: CVR-361A E: ECHO #: 801474 EDWARDS #: 12266 1863 ~S 6FERSON PKWY. C ITTESVLLE, VA 22902 C o."OlO" SoluUo", 11l3r. :;LA3'3IC R'JAD lJlJlTE 1 U1 APEX. N'; 275Ql PhQr!t:t: (q1~"*} .3fi7w2:l1Ii F>lK: p1 DJ 3~7 -2llU ~ BEFORE YOU DIG I CALL UTIUlY LOCAllON SERVICES. IT'S lHE LAW I MISS UTIUlY 1-800-552-7001 AU. mMINGS NIl WIIIfIEN ~1EJIW. c:otlTAHD HEREIN ARE THE PROPERlY Of ENGINEER MID *Y NlII BE _1m, USIO OR III5QDSlD WIIHOUT lItE WIIIl1EN COIISOIl Of DGNWL ty~ ATTACHMENT A TrltonPCS lRIIllH pes 1211 --"'II pN<<fIIII( RICllIIOIlD. VA 2>>Je l=~ m:= fAX ~ s: EARTHWORK AND DRAINAGE PART 1 GENOW.. I. WORK INCLUDED I\. REFEl 10 THE lAND IlEVELOPIIENT PlAN AND SIlE PlAN FOR WORK INClUDED. 2. RElATED WORK I\. CONSTRUcl1ON OF BUILDING FOUNMTION B.INSTAUAllON OF lITIUJY . GROUNDING ~ C. ERECTION OF FENCE 3. DESCRIPTlONS I\. ACCEss ROAD, TURNAROUND AREAS, AND sms ARE CONSTRuC'lm 10 PRO\IIDE A WELL DRAINED. EASILY MAINTAINED, l\IEN SURFACE FOR MATERIAL AN/) EQUIPlIENT DElNERIES AND lIAINTENANCE PERSONNEl ACCESS. 4. QUAIJ1Y ASSURANCE I\. ~~~L STERIUZER IN ACCORIlMICE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOllllENMnON (USE AS B. GRASS . SEEDS 5HAU. BE APPUED AND lIAINTAlNED AS RECOllllENDED fr'( THE SEED PRODUCER (IF REQUIRED). C. \'EGETATION lANDSCAPING, IF INClUDED WITHIN THE CONTRACT, Will. BE PlACED AND lIAINTAlNED AS RECDlIlIENDED BY NURSERY INDUSTRY STANIWlOS (IF REQUIRED). 5. SEQUENCING I\. CONFlRlI SURVEY STAKES AND SET ELEVATlONS PRIOR 10 AHf CONSTRIJCT1ON B. THE COI.lPLETE ROAD AND SIlE AREA Will. BE GRUBBED PRIOR TO FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTloN OF PlACElIENT OF BACK Flll. OR SUB-BASE MATERIAL C. CONSTRuCT TElIPOIlARY CONSTRlJCTlON ZONE ACCESS DRIIIE D. THE SITE AREA Will. BE BROUGHT TO SUB-BASE CDURSE ElEVAOON AND THE ACCESS ROAD TO BASE COURSE ElEVATION PRIOR 10 FOAllING FOUNDAnON. E. APPLY SOIL STERIUZER PRIOR 10 PlACING BASE MATERIALS. F. GRADE. SEED FERTlUZER AND lIULCH OISTURBED AREAS 11I1IEDlATELY AfTER BRINGING SITE AND ACCESS ROAD TO BASE COURSE ElEVATION, WATER TO ENSURE GROWTH. G. RElIOVE GRAVD. FROI.l TElIPOIlARY CONSTRUcnON ZONE TO AN AlITliORIZE AREA OR AS DIRECTED fr'( PROJECT MANAGER. H. AfTER COlIPlEllON OF CONSTRUCTION BUT PRIOR TO THE FlNAl. PUNCH LIST INSPEcnoN, APPLY THREE (3) INCHES OF 1/4 INCH STONE TO ALl GRAVELED AREAS (REFER TO GRA\'EL PAVEMENT DETAIL). I. AfTER APPUCATlONS OF FlNAl. SURf'ACES. APPLY SOIL STERIUZER TO THE SlONE SURf'ACES. 5. SUBlIITTALS I\. BEFORE CONSTRUcl1ON I. IF lANDSCAPING IS APPLICABLE 10 THE CONTRACT. tWO COPIES OF THE lANDSCAPE PlAN UNOER NURSERY LETTERHEAD. IF A lANDSCAPE ALlOWANCE WAS INCLUDED IN THE COHIRACT, AN 1TE1I1ZED usnNC OF PROPOSED COSTS UNDER NURSERY lETTERHEAD (REfER 10 SIlE PlAN FOR lANDSCAPING REQUIRElIENTS). 2,5UBlIIT FOR APPROVAL. 1/2 CUBIC FOOT OF THE PROPOSED SURFACE COURSE MATERIAL B. AfTER CONSTRUCTION 1. MANUFACTURER'S DESCRIPTION OF PRODUCT AND WARRANTY STATElIENT ON SOIt STERIUZED. 2, MANUFACTURER'S DESCRlf'llON OF PRODUCT ON CRASS AND fERT1UZER 3. lANDSCAPING WARRANTY STATElIENT. ,. QUAUlY ASSURANCE: COlIPlY WITH PRO\IISIONS OF THE FOlLOWING CODES, SPECIIlCATlONS AND STANIWlOS. ExCEPT WHERE lIORE STRINGENT REQUJRElIENTS ARE SHOWN OR SPECIFlED: I\. ACI 301-59 "sPEClflCAnON FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE FOR BUILDINGS'. B. ACI 31S "BUILDING CODE REOUIRElIENTS FOR REINfORCED CONCRETE" (REVISED 1992) AND ACIJ1S-S9 'COllllENTARY" (REVISED 1992) C. CONCRETE REINFORCING STEEL INSTITUTE (CRSI)."MANUAl OF STANIWlD PRACTICE'. 2. REINFORCING MATER1AI.S: I\. REINFORCINC:ASTM A 51 5.GRADE SO DErORlIED. B. WElDING WIRE FABRIC:ASTM Ales wtLDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC. C. SUPPORTS FOR RElNFORCElIENT:8OLSlERS, CHAIRS, SPACERS AND OTHER DEV1CES FOR SPACING, SUPPORTlNG AND REINFORCING BARS IN PlACE. USE WIRE BAR TYPI: SUPPORTS COlIPl'tlNG WITH CRSI SPECIFlCATlONS. 3. CONCRETE MATERIALS: I\. PORTlAND CElIENT: ASTV C 1 SO, l'tPE I. B. UGHlWEIGHT AGGREGATES: ASTV C 3JO C. AIR-ENTRAINING ADMIXTURE: ASTV C 260 CERI1FlED BY THE MANUFACTURER 10 BE COlIPAnBLE WITH OTHER REQUIRED ADMIXTURES. 4. PROPORTIONING AND DESIGN OF 1I1XES: DESIGN 1I1X 10 PROVIDE UGHTWEICHT CONCREl1; WIlli THE FOI.lOWING PROPEI!TIES: I\. SOOD PSI 2S-DAY COlIPRESSIIIE STRENGTH B. WEICHT: 110 PeF. C. W/C RATlO: 0.44 lIAXllIUlI (NON AIR-ENTRAINED), D.35 IlAXJlIUII (AIR-ENTRAINED) CONCRETE WORKS-03310 DIVISION 3: DIVISION 2: SITE WORK-021oo -1 ! 1: STANDARD PROVISIONS ~ I GENERAl NOTES f'.' ,. DRAWINGS ARE NOT 10 BE SCALED. THESE PlANS ARE INTENOED TO BE DIAGIlAIolMATlC CONLY. THE WORK INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS SHAlL INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIALS. EQUIPlIENT AND APPlIRTENANCEs, AND lABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK. Q - \'ERIFY ALl EQUIPlIENT LOCAOONS WITH PROJECT lIANAGER. I I"' 2. PRIOR 10 SUBlI/TTJNG A BID, THE CONTRACToR SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITE AND BECOllE FAlIILIAR WITH ALl CONDmONS AFfEcnNG THE PROPOsED PROJECT, INCLUOING DElIOUT1ON. lIECIWllCAl. AND ELECTRICAl. INSTALlAnONS AND 5HAU. ADJUST BID ACCORDINGLY. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL \'ERIFY ALl FlElD CONDITIONS AND DllIENSIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND CONFlRlI THAT WORK I>S INDICATED ON THE CONSTRUCTION OOCUlIENTS (AlSO KNOWN AS CONSTRucnoN PlANS) CAN BE ACCOlIPUSHED AS SHOWN BEFORE PROCEEDING. I 4'~~=~~N~ ~~D~:~~~~~~~ BE ~ RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THIS ClARlFlCATION PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK ~ OR RElATED WORK IN QUESTION. Ii! 5.INSTALl ALl EQUIPlIENT AND MATERIALS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOllMENDATlONS UNlESS f SPEClFlCALl.Y OTHERWISE INDICATED, OR WHERE LOCAl CODES OR REGULAnONS TAKE PRECEDENCE. 5.COHIRACTOR SHALL VISIT JOB Sri[ 10 REVIEW SCOPE OF WORK AND EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING, BUT NOT UlIlTED TO, lIECHANICAl. SERVICE, ELECTRICAl. SERIIlCE ~ AND OVERAU. COORDINATlON. 7. ALl TEU:PHONE/RADIO EQUIPlIENT LAYOUT, SPEClflCATlONS, PERFORlIANCE, INSTAUAOON AND THEIR FINAl. LOCATlON ARE TO BE APPROVED fr'( PROJECT lIANAGER. THE CONTRACToR 5HAU. BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINAnNG HIS WORK WITH THE WORK AND ClEARANCE REQUIRED BY OTHERS RElATED TO SAID EQUIPlIENT. S. ALl WORK PERFORlIED AND MATERIALS 5HAU. lIEET THE HIGHEST TRADE STANIWlOS. AS A 1I1NIlIUlI STANIWlD, CONFORM WITH ALl APPUCABLE CODEs. REGULAOONS AND ORDINANCES HAVING JURISDICTION. COHIRACTOR 5HAU. GIllE ALl NOTICES AND COlIPLY WITH ALl L.\WS, ORDINANCES, RUlES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL OROERS OF ANt PUBUC AUTHORITY BEARING ON THE PERFORlIANCE OF THE WORK. 8. ELECTRICAL S'tSTEIIS 5HAU. BE INSTAlUD PER N,E.C. AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALl APPUCABLE lIT1lJ1Y COllPAHf SPEClflCATlONS, AND LOCAl. AND STATE JURISDICJ1ONAI. CODES. ORDINANCES AN/) APPUCAllL[ REGULATIONS. 10. CONTRACTOR 5HAU. PRO\IIDE CONl1NUOUS SUPERVISION WHILE ANt SUIlCONlRACTORS OR WORKlIEN ARE ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT ALl WORK. CONTRACToR SHALL BE SOlElY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALl CONSTRUCTION lIfANS. lIETHOOs, TECHNIQUES. SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND COORDINATING ALl PORTlONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. II.PRO\IIDE A PORTABLE FlRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RAnNG OF NOT LESS THAN 2-A OR 2-A 1 OBC WITHIN 75 FEET TRAVEl. DISTANCE TO ALl PORI1ONS OF THE PROJECT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. 12. ALl CONSTRuCTION 5HAU. BE IN ACCORIlMICE WITH UNIFORlI BUILDING CODE (UBe) 1895 EDITION, AlONG WITH 1886 UPe. UlIC. AND THE 1895 NEC. 13. CONlRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALl EXISTING FINISHES THAT ARE 10 RElIAIN. CONTRACToR SHALL REPAIR ANt llAlIACE THAT MAY OCCUR DURING CONSTRucnoN. 14. SEAL ALL PENETRATlONS THROUGH FlRE RATED AREAS WITH U.L LISTED OR F.lI. APPRDYED MATERIALS. IS. DErAILS AND SCHEllAnCS ARE 10 PROPOSE 10 SHOW END RESULT OF THE DESIGN. 1I1NOR lIODlflCATIONS MAY DEElI TO BE NECESSARY 10 SUIT JOB CONDITIONS AND OIl1ENSIONS. SUCH lIODIFlCATIONS 5HAU. BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE WORK. ,.15. VERIFY ALl FINAl EOU!PlIENT LOCATIONS WITH OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. -. DllIENSIONS ARE 10 FlNISH SURFACES UNlESS OTHERWISE NOTED. o. CLEANUP AND SAFElY: KEEP PROJECT AREA ClEAN, HAZARD FREE, AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT, DEBRIS, RUBBISH AND EQUIPlIENT REIIOVED AND NOT SPECIFlED AS RElIAINING THE PROPERlY OF THE OWNER. ETC. LEA\'E PRElIISES IN A VACUUlI AND BROOll CLEAN CONDITION: FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS. DUST. OR SlIUllCES OF AHt NATURE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR lIAlNTAlNING ALL SYSTElIS EQUIPIIENT IN A CLEAN WORKING ORDER UNTIl. ACCEPTANCE Of' THE PROJECT fr'( PROJECT lIANAGER. 18. THE GENERAL CONTRACToR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REDUNING THE CONSTRUCTION PlANS 10 IUllSTRATE THE AS-BUILT CONDITION OF THE SIlE. THS Will. BE OONE AfTER THE SIlE HAS BEEN AWARDED THE FINAl. INSPECTION. tWO (2) COPIES OF REllUNED DRAWINGS WIll BE PRO\IIDED 10 PROJECT lIANAGER AND lliE ENGINEER. (I EACH) PART 3 PRDDuC1S 1. MATERIALS I\. SOIL STERIUZERS TOTAL KIll. PRODUCT 910 - EPA 10292-7 Al.tBUSH HERBICIOE - EPA REGISTERED PHASAR CORPORATlON FRAlIAR INDUSTRIAl. PRODUCTS P.O. BOX 5123 1435 lIORR/S AVE. DEARBORN. 1II <18125 TEL J1J 553-lIOOO UNION, NJ D70l1J TEL BOO 525-4924 B. ROAD AND SITE MATERIALS SHALL CONFOAlI TO VA OOT ROAD AND SPEClflCATlONS JAN. 1894 WHEN REfERENCED 10 FIll. MATERIAl. _ ACCEPTABLE SELECT FIll. SHALL BE IN ACCORIlMICE WITH VA DOT DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIf1CATION. C. SOIt STERlUZER SHALL BE EPA REGISTERED OF UClUID COlIPOSlTlON AND OF PRE ElIERGENCE DESIGN. D. SOIL STABlUZER FABRIC 5HAU. BE 1I1RAF1 - SOOX 2. EQUIPlIENT I\. COllPACTION SHALL BE ACCOlIPUSHED BY lIECHANICAI. lIfANS. 1. LARGER AREAS 5HAU. BE COllPACTm BY SHEEPS FOOT VlBRAlOR OR RUBBER nRED ROLLERS WEIGHING AT LEAST F1VE TONS. 2. SllAllER AREAS 5HAU. BE COlIPACTm BY POWER-DRIllER, HAND HELD TAl.tPERS. PART 4 EXEClITlON I. INSPECTIONS LOCAl. BUILDING INSPECTORS 5HAU. BE NOMED NO LESS THAN <18 HOURS IN ACNANCE OF CONCRETE POURS. UNlESS DTHERWISE SPECIFIED fr'( OWNER OR LOCAl. JURlSDICllON. 2. PREPARATION I\. CLEAR lREES. BRUSH AND DEBRIS FROII SITE AREAS AND ACCESS ROAD RIGHT OF WAY AS DIRECTED BY PROJECT lIANAGER. B. PRIOR 10 OTHER EXCAVATION AND CONSTRUCTION EfFORTS GRUB llllGANIC MATERIAL 10 A 1I1NIlIUM OF SIX (5) INCHES BElOW ORIGINAl. GROUND LEVEL C. UNLESS OTHERWISE INSTRUCJ[D BY PROJECT lWlACER TRANSPORT ALl RElDIED lREE, BRUSH AND DEBRIS FROlI THE PROPERlY TO AN AUTHORIZED 1.ANDF1LL. D. PRIOR TO PlACEIIENT OF FIll. OR BASE MATER1AI.S, ROll. THE SOIL E. WHERE UNSTABLE SOIL CONDJT1ONS ARE ENCOIJNTERED, UNE OF THE GRUBBED AREAS WITH STABIUZER MAT PRIOR TO PlACElIENT OF F1Ll OR BASE MATERIAL 3. INSTAUATION I\. lliE SIlE AN/) TURNAROUND AREAS 5HAU. BE AT THE SUB-BASE COURSE ElEVATlON PRIOR TO FORlIING FOUNDATIONS. GRADE OR FIll. THE SITE AND ACCESS ROAD REQUIRED IN ORDER THAT UPON EVEN OISTR1B11T1ON OF SPOILS RESULnNG FROII FOUNDATION ExCAVATlONS. THE RESULnNG GRADE Will. CORRESPOND WITH SAID SUB-BASE COURSE, ElEVATlONS ARE TO BE CALCULATED FROlI FlNISHED GRADES OR SLOPES INDICATED. B. IF AHf, EXCESS SPOILS Will. BE CLEARED FROlI JOB SITE AN/) NOT SPREAD BEYOND lliE UlIns OF LEASE PROPERlY UNlESS AUTHORIZE fr'( PROJECT lIANACER / AS AGREEMENT fr'( lANDOWNER. C. THE ACCESS ROAD SHALL BE BROUGHT TO BASE COURSE ElEVATlON PRIOR 10 FQUNDATION CONSTRlJCTlON 10 PERlIlT USE. COI.lPACTlON AND DBSERVATlON DURING CONSTRUCTION Of' THE SIlE. D. AVOID CREAnNG DEPRESSIONS WHERE WATER MAY POND. E. THE CONTRACT SHALL BE ASSUlIED 10 INClUDE GRADING BANKING, DITCHING AND UNlESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, COVERING tWO INCHES OF SURFACE COURSE. ALl ROADS OR ROUTES UTIUZED FOR ACCESS TO THE SITE COIIlIENClNG AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE NEAREST PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE. F. WHEN 11IPRO\IING AN EXISTING ACCESS ROAD, GRADE THE ExISTtlG ROAD 10 RElIOVE AHt ORGANIC MATTER AND SlIOOTH THE SURFACE BEFORE PlACING FIll. OR STONE. G. PW:E F1U. OR STONE IN SIX INCH lIAXllIUlI AND COllPACT BEfORE PlACING NExT un H. THE FINISH GRADE, INCLUOING lOP SURFACE COURSE, 5HAU. ExTEND A 1I1NIlIUlI OF ONE FOOT BEYOND THE SITE FENCE AN/) SHALL COVER THE AREA AS INDICATED. I. RIPRAP 5HAU. BE APPUED TO THE SIDE SLOPES OF ALl FENCED SITE AREAS. PARKING AREAS. AND 10 ALl OTHER SLOPES GREATER THAN 2: 1. J. RIPRAP 5HAU. BE APPUED 10 THE SIDES OF DITCHES OR DRAINAGE SWAlES. K. RIPRAP ENl1RE DITCH FOR SIX FEET IN ALl DIRECTIONS AT CULVERT OPENINGS. L SEED FEIlllUZER AND STRAW COYER 5HAU. BE APPUED TO ALl OTHER DISTURBED AREAS. AND DITCHES. DRAINAGE, SWALES, NOT OTHERWISE RIPRAPPED. II. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WU DITCHES, SWAlES. NOR CUlVERTS BE PW:ED so lliEY DIRECT WATER TOWAROS. OR PERlIlT STANDING WATER 11I1IEDlATElY AO.IACENT 10 RAII.JlOAD BAllAST. IF DESIGNS OR ElEVATlONS CONFlICT WITH THIS GUIDNlCE ALVAR SHOUlD BE ADVISED 1lI11EDlATElY. N. IN DITCH UES WITH SLOPES GREATER THAN TEN PERCENT, lIQUND DNERSIONARY HfADWALLS IN THE DITCH AT CULVERT ENTRANCES. THE HfADWALl SHALL BE POSITIONED AT AN ANGLE NO GREATER THAN SO DEGREES OFF THE DITCH UNE. RlPRAP THE lJPSTRfAII SIDE OF THE HEADWALl AS WELL AS lliE DITCH FOR SIX FEET _ THE CUL\'ERT ENTRANCE. ,. PRO\IIDE DOORS AND FRAIIES CDlIPlYlNG WITH STEEL DOOR INSlTME "RECOMlIENDED SPEClIlCATIONS FOR STANIWlOS STEEl. DOOR AND FRAIIES" (SDI 100). AND AS HEREIN SPEClFlED. 2. SUBlIlT SHOP DRAW1NCS FOR THE FABRICATION AND ERECTION OF HOLlOW lIETAL DOORS AND FRAlIES. INCLUDE DETAILS OF EACH FRAIIE TYPI:, ElEVATlONS OF DOOR DESlCN TYPES, CONDmONS AT OPENINGS, DETAILS OF CONSTRIJCTION, LOCATION AND INSTAUATION REQUIRElIENTS OF FINISH HARDWARE AND RElNFORCElIENT, AND DETAIlS OF JOINT CONNECTIONS. SHOW ANCHORAGE AND ACCESSORY /TEllS. J. WHERE FIRE-RATED DOOR ASSElIBUES ARE INDICATED OR REQUIRED. PRO\/IDE FIRE-RATED DOOR AND FRAlIE ASSElIBUES THAT COIIPLY WITH NFPA eo "STANIWlD FOR FlRE DOORS AND WINDOWS". AND HA\'E BEEN TESTED, LISTED AND LABELED IN ACCORIlMICE WITH ASTM E 152 "STANDARD lIETHOD5 OF FIRE TESTS OF DOOR ASSElIBUES" BY A NATIONAIl.Y RECOGNIZED INDEPENDENT TESTING AND INSPEcnoN AGENCY ACCEPTABLE 10 AUTHORmES HAVING JURISDICTION. 4. HOT-ROllED STEEL SHEETS AND STRIP: COllllERCIAI. QUAUlY CARBON STEEL PICKLED AND OILED. COllPl'tlNG WITH ASTV A 569 AND ASTM A 56l1. 5. COlD-ROlLED STEEL SHEETS: COIIlIERCIAI. QUAUlY CARBON STEEL COlIPl YlNG WITH ASTV A J55 AND ASTlI A 56l1. 5. SUPPORTS AND ANCHORS: FABRICATE OF NOT LESS THAN 15 GAGE SHEET STEEL. 7. INSERTS, BOlTS AND fASTENERS: MANUFACTURE'S STANIWlD UNns COlIPL'tING WIlli ASTV A 153, ClASS CORD AS APPLICABLE. S. HOP-APPUED PAINT: FOR STEEL SURFACES USE RUST-INHIBI11VE ENAlIEl OR PAINT. EITHER AIR-DRYING OR BAKING, SUITABLE AS. A BASE FOR SPECIFlED FlNISH PAINTS. 8. FABRICATE HOu.ow METAL UNITS 10 BE RIGID, NEAT IN APPEARANCE AND FREE FROII DEfECTS, WARP OR BUCKLE. WHEREVER PRACTICAL m AND ASSElIBLE UNns IN THE MANUFACTURER'S PLANT. WELD ExPOSED JOINTS CONTINUOUSLY, GRIND AND MAKE SlIOOTH, FLUSH AND ItMSlBLE. METALUC FIlLER 10 CONCEAL MANUFACTURING DEfECTS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. 10.COIIP.LY WITH SOt-lOll REQUIRElIENTS AS FOLlOWS: IIoIIERIOR DOORS SHAlL BE SOI-l00. GRADE U , HEAVY Dli1Y, lIODEL 1. 1I1NIlIUlI IS GAGE FACES. 11.EXPOSED FASTENERS: UNlESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, PRO\IIDE CQUNTERSUNK flAT PHIUJPS OR JACKsON HEADS FOR EXPOSED SCREWS AND BOLTS. 12.FlNISH HARDWARE PREPARATION: PREPARE HOLlOW lIETAL UNns TO RECEI\IE lIORTlSE AND CONCEALED FINISH HARDWARE, INCLUDING CUTOUTS, REINFORCING, DRIUJNG AND TAPPING IN ACCORIlMICE WITH FINAl. FlNISH HARDWARE SCHEDULE AND TElIPlATES PRO\IIDED fr'( HARDWARE SUPPlIER. COllPLY WIlli APPLICABLE REQUIRElIENTS OF ANSI A 115 "SPEClflCATIONS FOR DOOR AND FRAIIE PREPARATION". 1HIS _ IS CllP'IIIlGH1ID MIllS 111' SOlE PROPERlY Of THE OWNER. IT IS PROOIJC[J) SlIlRY IlIlUSE IJt lit: __ Nfl os NFU\1IS. RE1'ROOUCI1llN DR USE or 1HIS _ 1Ml/DR 1II'_lIOIIalNTMONIIIS~ IIIHllUT lItE IlRII1IIi _ or lItE llIIIO. DRAWN BY: CHS CHECKED BY: 81M 5IIE _ MuYER PRuPERTY WENTWuRTH FARM 5IIE _ CVR-361A SITE ADDRESS 1063 THuMAS JEFF. PKWY. CHARLuTTESVILLE, VA 2~Y02 SHEET TITLE =:J UENEP.AL NuTES Jj, SPECIFICA TluNS ~ E I SHEET NUlIBER 0: -:- C-1 I PlOT SCAlE: 14 I. PROYIlE JOINT SEAlDlS, JOINT FILLERS AND OTHER RElATED MATERIALS THAT ARE COlIPAnllLE WITH ONE ANalllER AND WITH JOINT SUBSTRATES UNDER CONDITIONS OF SERVICE AN/) APPUCATlONS. PRO\IIDE COLORS 10 IIATCH AO.IACENT SURFACES. PRO\IIDE BlACK OR OTHER NElITRAL COLOR WHEN NO OTHER COLOR IS AVAILABLE. 2. ONE-COlIPONENT POlYSUlJ1DE BASED. ONE PART EIASTOlIERIC 5EALANT. COllPl'tlNG WITH FS TT -S-0023O,ClASS A l'tPE U (NON-SAIl). FOR JOINTS AT PENETRATIONS THROUGH ExTERIOR WALLS. PIlOVIDE COlIPOUND BrARlNG THE THIOCOL CHElIICAI. CORPORATION SEAL OF APPROVAl. PROVoDE ONE OF THE FOlLOWIIlC OR AN APPROVED EQUAL: I\. FLEXISEAI.. 9DO SERIES BY IW', INC. B. HORNFLEX ONE - COMPONENT BY W.R. GRACE . CO. 3. ONE-COlIPONENT ACRYUC 5EALANT: ACRYUC TERPOLYlIER. SOl\'ENT BASED ONE-PART THERlIOPlAST1C S<ALANT COlIPOUND. SOUOS NOT lESS THAN 95" ACRYUC. COlIPl YlNG WITH FS TT -5-00230. ClASS B TYPI: U, FOR PERllIETER OF lIETAL AND DOOR FRAlIES, THRESHOlDS AT EXTERIOR DOORS, AND PIPE SLEEVES lliROUCH EXTERIOR WALLS AND FlOOR SLABS. PRO\IIDE ONE OF THE FOlJ.OWING OF AN APPROVED EQUAL: I\. IW' ACRYUc BY 0."'. INC. B. GACO AS-J BY GATES ENGINEERING/SlIC 4. OLEO-RESINS CAUUCING COlIPOUND: OIL BASED RESINOUS CAUU<ING. COlIPI. 'tING WITH FS TT -C-58S. NON-BlEEDING, PAlNTABLE. FOR ONE OF THE FOlLOWING OR AN APPRDYED EOUAL: I\. VULCATEX BY W.R. GRACE . CO. DIVISION 8: METAl. DOORS & FRAMES-08110 I REVISIlIN5 I I NO. or.1t I 5/'l2/OO Rl10lSIll PER lRlTllN PCS 7/7/00 Rl10lSIll PER lRlTllN PCS 5/8/00 Rl1olSIllllllllER_ 11/7 /DIJ IIOOIFY ICClSS RlMO DIVISION 7: ,. 2. QUAUlY ASSURANCE: COllPlY WITH PROVISIONS OF THE FOlLOWING CODES. SPECIFlCATlONS AND STANDARDS, EXCEPT WHERE lIORE STRINGENT REOUlRElIENTS ARE SHOWN OR SPECIFlED: I\. AlSC "CODE OF STANDNlD PRACTlCE'. B. AlSC "sPEClflCATlON FOR STRUCTURAL STEEl. BUILDINGS - ALLOWABLE STRESS DESICN AND PlASTIC DESlCN". INClUDING lliE "COlIlIENTARY" AND SUPPlEJolENTS. C. Al.tERICAN WELDING SOCIETY (AWS) DI.1-92,"STRUCTURAL wnDING CODE _ STEEL MATERIALS: I\. SJRUCTURAL srm PlATES, SHAPES AN/) BARS: ASTV A 35. B. HIGH STRENGTH THREADED FASTENERS: ASTV A 325. C. Il.ECTRODES FOR WELDING: DOXX. D. ALl STRUCTURAl. STEEL SHALL BE GALVANIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTV A 153. E. CElIENT CROUT: ElIBECO BY lIASTER BUILDERS OF AN APPROVED EQUAL F. NON-lIETAWC, SHRINKAGE-RESISTANT. 4000 PSI COlIPRESSII/E STRENGIH GROUT. PROVIDE ONE OF THC FOlLOWING OR AN APPROVED EQUAL: I. EUCO N.S. BY EUCUD CHElIICAI. CO. 2. lIASTERfLOW 71 J fr'( lIASTER BUILDERS DIVISION 5: I. CONCRETE BLOCKS: I\. STANIWlD BLOCK 5HAU. BE THE SIZE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS, UCHT GRAY OR NEl1IRAI. COLOR. AND SHALL CONF'ORlI 10 THE REQUIRElIENTS OF ASTV C 9D. l'tPE 1. GRADE N. UGHIWEICHT TYPI: WITH ExPAND SLAG AGGREGATE. 2. lIORTARo I\. All 1I0RTAR FOR CONCRETE BLOCKS SHALL CONFORlI TO ASTW C 270. l'tPE S AND SHALL HA\'E A COllPRESSIIIE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI IN 25 DAYS. 3. WIRE REINFORCING' IN BED JOINTS: I\. lRUSS l'tPE RElNFORCElIENT SHALL BE DUR-O-WALL. OR EQUAL FABRICATED WITH A SINGlE PAIR OF SIDE AND CONl1NUOUS DIAGONAl. CROSS-RODS SPACED NOT 1I0RE THAN S" ON CENTER. WIRE IN FABRlCATlON 5HAU. BE GALVANIZED ACCORDING 10 ASTV 115, ClASS J. SIDE ROOS 5HAU. BE 9 GAGE 3/15" 1I1NIlIUlI l.ENCTH SHALL BE 10'-0" WITH MATCHING CORPo;Eft AND TEE UNns. B. SPACING: lYPlCAL. IN BED JOINTS, AT 15' \'ERTlCAI. INTERvAL CT OPENINGS: _ AND C. AT OPENINGS: ABOVE AND BElOW EACH OPENING PLACE REINFORCING IN ONE ADDITlONAI. JOINT TO EXTEND J' -0" PAST THE OPENING EACH WAY. SPUCE lENGTHS FOR HORIZONTAL JOINT RElNFORCElIl:NT SHALL BE AT LEAST 5' FOR TRUSS AND 15' FOR STRAIGHT TYPE. 4. INSTALl STEE:L UNTELS ABOVE EACH OPENING. Flll. CORES WITH CROUT 3 COURSES BELOW UNTEl. BEARING. PART 2 DElIOUTION ,. DElIOlITION 5HAU. BE COtmlOUED TO PREVENT THE SPREAD OF DUST 10 OCCUPIED PORTlONS OR THE BUILDING. 2. ExiSTING WORK 10 RElIAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED FROlI lWIAGE. WORK lWIAGED BY COHIRACTOR 5HAU. BE REPAIRED TO IIATCH EXISTING WORK. 3. AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY AND DURING INCLElIENT WEATHER, a.OSE ALl EXTERIOR OPENINGS WITH WEATHERPROOf' COYER. 4. RElIOIIE DEBRIS AN/) RUBBISH FROlI THE SITE DoIILY. 00 NOT ALLOW DEBRIS AND RUBBISH TO ACCUlIULATE IN BUILDING OR ON SITE. 5. FOR FlOOR AND WALl PENETRATIONS: I\. CONTRACTOR lIUST LOCATE REINFORCING BARS IN ExISTING FlOOR SlABS USING A RElWILE NON-DESlRUCTIVE TESTING lIETHOO APPRMD BY THE OWNER. CORE DRIll. AS NECESSARY 10 ALlOW CABLE PENETRATlON WITHOUT CUTnNG ExiSTING REINFORCING BARS. B. FIll. OPENING AfTER CABLE INSTAUAllON WITH INSTA-FllAl,l'S INSTA-FlRE SEAL SllACONE R1V FllAIl. . STRUCTURAl STEEL-05120 DIVISION 7. WARRANTY I\. IN ADDmON TO THE WARRANTY ON ALl CONSTRUcnON COVERED IN THE CONTRACT DOC:UlIENTS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ALl lWIAGE AND REPAIR AREA BACK AS CLOSE 10 ORIGINAl. CONDITION AS POSSIBLE TO LEASE AREA PROPERlY .OR SURROUNDING CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION. B. SOIL STERIUZATlON APPUCATlON Will. GUARANTEE \'ECETATION FREE ROAD AND SITE AREAS FOR ONE YEAR FROlI DATE OF FlNAl. INSPECTION. . C. DISTURBED AREAS Will. REflECT GROWTH OF NEW GRASS COVER PRIOR TO FINAl. INSPECnON. D. lANDSCAPING, IF INCLUDED WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE COHIRACT, Will. BE CI.IARANTEED FOR ONE YEAR FROlI DATE OF FlNAl. INSPECTION. DIVISION 4: UNIT MASONRY-04220 13. PRO\IIDE STEEL REINFORCING AT HINGES IN HOU.OW METAL UNns 10 BE 7 GAGE . 1 D 1/2" . WIDTH REQUIRED. 14. PROVIOE HOU.OW lIETAL DOORS OF THE TYPES INOICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND COlIPl'tlNG WITH SDI-l00 1I1NIlIUlI MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIRElIENTS. IS. PRO\IIDE HOU.OW lIETAL FRAlIES OF THE TYPES AND sn'LES INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND COllPL'tING WITH SOl 100. PROvIDE 16 GACE fRAIIES AT INTERIOR LOCATIONS. NOTE: DOOR SHALL BE OPERABLE FOR ExmNG FROII THE INSIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR AHf OTHER SPECIAl DEVICE. TrltonPCS m~lIlJ/D. CNIllNS8IIIlG, M 15317 lmJ 411-2lIOO 411-2200 FAX .IU. _ IIIIlIRlITEIIl6\lE1IML COHTAHD HEREIN ARE THE PROPERlY Of' ENGINEER IMl I6\Y NOT II DlfU:ATfD, USED DR IIB10SID WIlHDUf 111' lIRII1tH COMSEIIT or ENGINEER. Owl"'l.... SolutIo., 1U8~ C:LA~~lr= ROAD :;UITE10l APEX, N': 2'5U2 PIII.Jf1Ij: (913) 3&7':2210 F'"" i319) 3&?-222U ~ ISSUED FOR RE.VIE1I ISSUED FOR ZOIINC SEALANTS AND CAULKING-079oo c a I~ ~2 ~ -------------------------------------------------- PAOI'OSVl I:'>' ACa:SS/IJT"UTY ~IIENT :NTER PRlJP05(O TOIlER IN . 38110131.23 (u.s. FOOT) 'IE. 11:'>0:'>241.:'>4 (!I.s. I'OOT) lAT . 37:'>11'4:'>.341 ,l,ONC . 711'2:'>'21.177' :!.tIt . 450,' .ftf! N/F LEROY" HELEN I. "'OYER 0.8. 529 PC. JJ5 TAX I 92-56(8) I ZONW: RA lANO USE.. RESIDENTIAl. LERO"f .. HELEN L MOYER U82 ACRES ~ RECOROS D.8. _ PC. 478 TAX' 82-58(8)3 LAND USE: VACANT I / I ---;;;r--- u-\ I ~,,~ _u-----. as "'~. ~ -----' TAX I 92-56 110 - - - _.~ ,m -- _""_'_ I"l ~.m --- Scale 1 = 60 / ~...'\~l\L'f1f o' ~:~ 'J<t b ~d.L f(. ~ Q~ R. McADEN ~ No. 002002 ~Jl"'7-tJ~ /.) "'<1 0"" ~~ J\lD S!-;S~~~ A: ':;'~~~':r SIYE f: CVR 311 -A,- SIYE NAME: MCMR SITUATED 011 THE ..-om Of' LERO"f .. HELEN L IGVER DEED llDOI( :.6:'> PIICE 471 DEED llDOI( :121 PIICE 33:'> N4J ACCtSSED fROU STATE ROuTE :'>3 !iCOTTSVIU.E l)ISTRICI' AI.lIEIINIlt ~, ~ HO\IEIIIIEll 7. 2000 $CAU: I' . 110' .lOB .IROO' 22 TEL: :'>40-7n-9!l8O FAX: :'>40-772-8050 ......... Jl, 811111 J ...~ Bolz... . Associo1es. InC'. ,~ Cotporote Circle Roanoke Yo. 4015 N/F CURnS CRAwroRO 0.8. 555 PC. 99 TAX I 92-56(0) ZONED: RA LANO USE: WOOOED LOT 1~ .' c c\ lLGM. DESCRIPOOH Of' PROPOSED I:'>' ACCESSJIITUTY EASEIlENT COUlI(HCIllC AT 1M IRON PIN SET AT THE ~ CORNER Of' THE PROPOSED LfJISE PARCEl.: THENCE N156"12'37" 7.50' TO THE TRIA: POINT Of' lIEGINIING(POI '3); THENCE THROUCH THE lJ\HOS OF LEllOY N4J HElEN l YOT[R. DEED llDOI( :.6:'>. PIICE 471 A: DEED llDOI( :121. PIICE 33:'> N4J COHlJNUINCl WITH THE C[NIEIlUItE OF THE PRlJP05(O I:'>' ACa:SS/UTlUlY EASEIlENT H2J'47"23"1: 2lI.22 FEET TO A POINT: THENCE 116:'>':,>1'11" 107,22 FEET TO A PONT: THENCE AlONG A CURVE 10 THE RIGHT .- A CHORD OF N63':'>4'4"" "-71 FEET, A RAOIUS OF 100.29 FEET. N4J 1M NC I,EHGTH Of' 100.97 FEET 10 A POINT: THENCE _J)'OJ" 21.3$ FEET TO A POINT: THENCE N670:'J'0lI" 1IO.1I4 mT TO A POINT: THENCE N72'OlI'3O" ll:'>.23 FEET 10 A POINT: THENCE AlONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT ""WIG A CHORD OF N32'3I'49" 14.97 FEET, A RAOIUS 01 11-'0 FEET, AHO 1M NC lLNCTH OF 16.31 FEET TO A POINT: THENCE 1lOll'O:'>'28"1: 4' FEET:t TO A POINT 011 THE SOUTHERN IWlQN 01 STATE ROuTE :'>3. N4J lIElHG THE END OF THE PROPOSED I:'>' ACCESSfVT'JN EAStllENT. _ A TOTAl LENGTH 01 462 FEET:t. lLGAI. DES(;RIPTlOH LfJISE PNlC!l COUIIENCING AT 1M ,_ PIN FQUNll (P.O.a. ") BEING THE ~RlY UOST PROP(RIY COANER 01 THE _ OR FORIIERl Y lLRO'I' N4J HEl.EN I. YOT[R. DEED 900K :l6:'> PIICE 47t1, S77~7'OO'" 1~.lI1 FEET TO 1M IRON PIN SET AT THE TRIA: POINT 01 lIECHlIHG (POI '2); THENCE WITH THE NEW LftE5 01 THE LfJISE PIlACEI. N4J COHlJNUINCl THAOuQt THE lJ\HOS OF $AID lLRO'I' N4J HElLN I, YOT[R N156"12'37" 30.00 FEET 10 1M IRON PIN SET; THENCE H2J'47'23"E 30.00 FEET 10 1M IRON PIN SET: THENCE _12'37"1: 30.00 FEET 10 1M IRON PIN SET: THENCE $23'47'23" 30.00 FEET 10 THE POINT 01 SEClHIING CONTAINNC 900 SOUNlE FEET 01 lNIO N4J lIElNG SITUATED" SCOTTSYUE OISTllICT, AI.lIEIoIARlE COUNTY. ...-. lLGAI. 0E$CllIPTI0N PllRENT TRACTS TAX YAP 92-~8)J lIEQOHHG AT 1M IRON PIN I'OUNO(P .0,8. I) AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER 01 - OR FORMERLY lLRO'I' N4J HElLN L YOT[R PROP(RTY. DEED llDOI( 16:'>. PIICE 771. TAX YAP PNlC!l 92-~8). $AID POINT AlSO lOCATED ON THE SOUTHERly RIGHT 01 WAY OF STATE ROuTE :'>J: THENCE WOIIHG $AID RIGHT 01 WAy AHO WITH THE WESTERN LINE 01 $AID YOYER PROP(RTY SUr37'19" 1463.7:'> FEET TO .. POINT lIElNG THE SQJTIfWEST CORNER OF $AID YOT[R PROP(RIY. SAID POINT AlSO lOCATED ON THE -'HERN LftE 01 - OR I"ORIIERlY QlIITlS ~ORO ..-om. DEED llDOI( ~, PIICE "' THENCE WITH THE -'HERN LftE 01 $AID ~ORO _RTY N74'48'>>'" ~.OO FEET 10 A PONT lIElNG THE SOUTHEAST COANER OF _ OR FORMERlY LEIlO'I' N4J HElLN I. YOT[R PROP(RIY. DEED llDOI( :121. PIICE J3:'>. TAX YAP PARCEl. 92-~8)1. $AID PONT AlSO lOCATED ON THE -'HERN LftE 01 SAID ~ORO PROP(RTY; THENCE lEAIIIHG $AID ~ORO PROP(RTY N4J WITH THE EASTERlY uHE OF $AID YOT[R PROP(RIY NI:'>'31'OO"l: 1!lOO.OO FEET TO A V.H,C. -.uIlENT AT THE ~ COANER OF SAID woYER PROP(RIY, $AID POINT AlSO lOCATED 011 THE SOUTHERN RIGHT 01 WAY 01 STATE AOuTE :'>J: THENCE WITH THE $AID RIGHT 01 WIlY OF STATE ROuTE :'>3 S6711':,>7"E 280.00 FEET 10 THE POINT 01 lIE_NC. CONT_HG 11.9112 ACRES OF LAND ~ RECORD N4J 8EINC SITUATED .. SCOITSVlLlE OISTRICT. AI.lIEIoIARlE ~, ...-. NOTES: I. <MItERS OF RECORD: LEllOY N4J HElEN I, YOT[R 2. lLGAI. REFERENCE: DEED 900K :.6:'> PIICE <71. DEED 900K :121 PAGE J3:'>. 3. TAX WI' Nl.N8ERS: 92-~8)1 _ 92-~8)J 4. PROP(RTJ(S ARE lONEO: RA :'>. 'If:RT1CAI. lIATW 1$ NINO-all. I. 9EJ\RIHCS ARE REFERENCED TO 11I_ STATE CIllO. 7, COORIllHATES BASED ON ...-", STATE CIllO. SOUTH ZONE. II. AU. EASEIIENTS 01 RECORD IHCH WERE PROIIIDED TO ~ ARE _ HEREON. NO TITlE REPORT WAS IlJRNISHEO TO ~ N4J THERE MAY lIE [NCUM8RANCES 011 SURVEYED PROP(RTY NOT _ HEREON. 9, lOCAl POWER c;ouPAHY: '" POWEll CO. PIlllNE lllIlI-667-JOOO. 10- LOCAl TElEPHONE COIoIPNl"r. SPlllNT PHONE :'>40-228-11101. II. CAll. YISS UT1UTY AT l-lIOO-:'>:'>2-7001 lIErORE COUIIEHCIHC CONSTRUCTION. 12. PROP(RIY 1$ lOCATED IN F,E."A FlOOD ZONE 'C. AS PER FlOOD YAP WITH A c;ouUUItllY-PNlEL Nl.N8ER 01 :'>IOODI OJ7:'> 8 WITH 1M EFfEC1l\IE DATE 01 DECEIoIllER ItI, IlIllO. ........ SQ<(OUU ot$ClllPOON ...."...-. ..-..oN ruw. ..-sSlON Uru1Y "'" ACCESS. PAQP(RtY . ADOlT'lOtW. TOPO ME HOCHT. l.>>IO lJ5(. TRfl: UHf: T(M{JI lOCATlON AllDll1OOW. _ HOCHT> R(N..JCN HXtSS tASOIE.N1. ~ TOPO RtMJCN ,tCC[SS EASO<<NT 5UrJr19"'W 1463.1:: ---~---------------- CiJiM c:l C. DELTA 'iTii'04" 111'14'29 LINE DATA I~' ACCESS/UT'L1lY EASEMENT NUIoI8ER OIlIECTION DISTANCE L:'> N23'47'23"E 29.22' III 116:'>':'>111". 107.22 l7 t64'J) OJ". 21.3$ LlI N67O:'J 09". 1IO.1I4 Lt N72'Ol13O.... 11:'>.23 liD 1lOll'O:'>2lIE 41t CURVE OATA I~' ACCESS/UTILllY ~MENT CHORD 9ENaIG 9UlI' NlIJ':'>4'4r'w 14.9 N32'31 49 LINE OATA lEASE PIJICEl OUIECTION OI$TAHCE _'2'3r'E 30.00' 523'47'23". 30.00 NI56"12'37"", 30.00 H2J'47'23"E Jo.OO ~ s. ( -( ~ ~ I ~ ( i f ~ '" ~ J SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN I SHEET NlIIIBER C-3 - PlOT SCAU:: EXIS'IINC 15' WIDE POWER lINE rASEMENT I I I LEROY .. ~ I. MO'YfR I I 0.8. 665 PC. 771 I TAX 10. 92-56(8) I 'ONElJ: RA . 142.5'% TO EQUlPMEHJ' lAND USE: 114~ I ---------------- SI6'37'19"WI463.7S' I /:-eo'FAU.RADIUS N/F LERO~& ~LEN ~OYER- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --1 L WOODED I 8~2 ~S . I ..... ~~ENTCONCIlEl'E 0.8. 565. PG. 476 I TAXI 92-56(8)3 ZONED: RA 8 /' LAND USE: VACANT Is! · N ..... ~ 1402.IS'% TO EllUIPIIENT .. - .., I; ", it z N/F 1 CURTIS CRAIW'tWO 0Pl 10' ~ 0.8. 555 PC. 99 I['" E1. DRM: ~ I 1M I 92-56(lJ) ZONW: RA lAND USE: VA~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -;;;;.,;;;;.,,~", - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - / -"~I.MO'YfR , lOS 0.8. 529 PC. JJ5 , III/ 1M I 92-56(8)/ / , ZONf:D:RA 1M lAND USe: RCSIDCNIIAi. ~ I I m / G MINIMUM SETBACK REOUIREMENTS FRONT: 75 FEET SIDES: 25 FEET ~RIVE REAR: 35 FEET .NQIE; 1. RA: RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" a 60' 60 JiO 1".60' IV) ll) /:!: :J~ o~ 0:: 4.10 ~ll) r:E CJ) 16 DRAWN BY: CHS CHECKED BY: BTM Slt[1WlE MoYER PRoPERTY WENTWORTH FARM:;; SIt[ NUIIIER CVR-361A SITE AIlOR[SS 1063 THUMA3 JEFF. PKWY. CHAP.lUTTE3VlllE. VA 4:4:110:1: &. 11/7/00 IlOOIFY ACCESS RlWl !lIS lIMIING IS alPl1lIGHIEI) NIl IS lIE 5lIIf PROPERTY Of THE OWNER. IT IS PRODUCID SWI.Y RlR US( ", 111: _ /HI OS 1mMlES. ~n:~m:.~ro:=: lII1HOUT lIE WIIfI1DI POlIIISS1ON Of lIE 011O. I Rl\'ISQI5 I I NO. IlI.lE I 5/15/00 _ ACCESS ORII'E 5/22/00 _ RlR lRIIllN PCS 7/7/00 _ RlR lRIIllN PCS 818/00 RE'IlSOl TllIlER H!lGlfT 8/21/00 IIDOlFY ACCESS RlWl TrIIonPCS 1llIIllN PCS 1211 MMR:IUII -'MY [IICIl!IOND, VA Z3238 l=:l ~ FAX / All ORAIIINGS Nfl WIIfI1DI ""1IRIIl. CllHTAINEIl HEREIN ARE THE PROPER1Y Of ENGINEER NIl IIoIY lIlT lIE DUPlJC.\1ID. US(J) OIl DI!l:UlSID WIIHllIIr THE WRITTEN CONSOlI Of _ 0."010" Solutio", 1i)!:n: CLAC!il:'; R(.;AO :;UITE lQl APEX. NG ,75U, P'tlJIE.:: W1~) :167.221u Fax: (313:) .,'.i7-:.!220 3 ISSUED FOR RE'IIEW ISSUED RlR _ DRAWN BY: CHS CHECKED BY: BTM I SITE - MOYER PROPERTY WENTWuRTH FARM I SITE NUlIIER CVR-361A I SITE ADDRESS 1363 THuMA3 JEFF. PKWY. CHAP.LUTTE3VILLE, VA 22902 I SHEET 1l1lE ) 't." 3ITE DETAIL PLAN ~ I SHEET NUIotIlER 17 :~ c-4 I PI.OT SCALE, TrltonPCS 1RIlllll PCS 1211 ~- RICIIIllHD, W. 23131 l=~ ~ FAll -"'! All. DR.lIIlGS NIlIlRll1Ell -. COIlIMED HEREIN olliE 1HE PROPERTY OF ENGINEER MIlI/AY NlII BE _lED, USfD CllllIIStIJ&II WIIHOUT lItE WIIITEII CONSOIf OF ENGINEIIl. 0......" Solutio", 10tift GLAG!jl;; RGAD :;UITE 101 APEX. NC :aso:< Pho",;: (31:1) .'67-221U Fax: (J1:1) ~1)7 -:<:<:<Q - ::3 ISSUED FOR _ - ISSUED FOR ~ - .- ) , IN:'IISIlII5 1 1 NO. Il/Jt I S/22/OO Al'ilSED PBI lRI10H PCS 7/7/00 Al'ilSED PBI lRI10H PCS 7/13/00 tal 'J1lE[ IEIGIlIS '/1/00 Al'ilSED TOlER HfICHT 1/21/fIIl IIODfY M:CESS ROiD & 11/7/00 _ ACCfSS RIWl 1115 _ IS aIP'/AIlIl1tD NIl IS lItE SClE f'll()PERIY OF lItE OWNER. rr IS PllOIlUCfI) SIIlII.Y f'CIIIlJI( 1'1 M __ MI ns IfJU1tS. REPAllIIUCllON CIIIIJI( OF 1115 .-~ lItE IIfOIlIMlDl CONTAINED II rr IS IIIIlOUT M _ PQlIISliIIl OF M -. IILMI IItIIT! <D ~:Pt~DS':tNT~ED DURING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING 10"' OAK 14"' 56' TAlL CHESTNUT OAK 10 BE REMO\IED \ \ PROPOSED lRIJllN ~~ v~- lRIJllN pes I ICE IIRIDCE I ~, I;B7 , , I I I I I EXISTING 12"' 70' TAlL MAPLE TO BE REMOYED ASL 10 BASE: 451.5' / ASL TO TOP: 521.5' / - lRIJllN pes H-fllAM[ IIEIER STAND I I / / / ..... / ..... - EXISTING 12"' 73' TAlL CHESTNUT OAK (]) ..... ASL TO BASE: 452' .......... ASL TO TOP: 525' sa:TllR 2 \yCWSTER IIOUNT (M>.) "' .; ANTENNI< ... ... .;.; AZ1MUlK 2I1r ..... "" .".""'" RAD CENJER 58' "-----------,.-*"'" SECIQR 1 AIfl'ENWI =-""caJJr sa' SECTOR 3 FUTURE ANTENNA i!i ~l '" ::> I!: CHESTNUT OAK <D EXiSTING 12"' OAK ~ , ..... ..... EXISTING .", 4/1' TAlL 1otAPLE. ~ ~ ~~ 4:~t (]) EXISTING 10"' ~ - -- 1~11 ~ '-- ..- EXISTING 12"' TRIPlE OAK. PROPOSED lDlF'CIRARY 1REE PROTECTION FENCE ~~ 11-7 EXISTlNG 12"' PINE .HlIIE: EXCEPT IS EXPRESSLY NOIED 10 THE CONl1WIY HEREIN. NO TREES OR SIllIIIFICNlT \/EllfJ'AllOH IS 10 BE REYlMJ) WIll4IiI 200' OF THE CEJllIRUNE OF lHE PROPOSED POLE. ~ ! I I .HlIIE: 1. Anll1IHS AlE llRIENTAlUl a..oa<WISE FROW TRUE NORTH. 2. CONTRACTOR SHAU. VERfY PROPOSED ~ IWl CENJER AND ORIENTA1IONS WITH TRITON PCS PRIOR 10 lNSTH.1AllOH OF AHIENNAS. PLAN 5 DETAIL SCALE: 1".5' o SITE 5 1"-5' .@.I .... ~ g 5:1 ELEVATION VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEAST ~;r:.... nw._ IDI' IBrA8 DAlE: 11 - - ~~~~E 1 SHm NUllll[R C-5 ~."T SCALE: 18 ~' .' h.. i 2 fl. I '1, ~I I, ! ~ ------ .~ - ~, '-~-JJ "-1 , L ( \ , --;J Q) Q) JID(o 1. IF THE COMPOUNO IS CLOSE TO " ROAll WHERE THERE IS " POSSIBIUTY THAT Nlf' EQUIPMENT CAN BE SEEN. ADDITIONAl. lANDSCAPING IS REQUIRED AND THE CONCRETE PAD MUST BE TINTED (NOT PAINTED) BROWN. to <0 II ~ " W :I: w W D:: l- METER STAND o . I o . I ~ ~ II II 8 _ ~ D:: " " o w ~ I :I: Z b D:: ~ 10 ~ g II w " l- U Z :I: ~ 0 !,2 => W .J :I: U III Z D:: U - W 0.. l- ~ Z :I: g 0 !,2 !:: W r: ~ 8 ~ :g t- o.. .J .J 0.. ~ ~ PUll IlIJII"! <D HEICHT Of' PROPOSED WOOD MONOPOLE SHAU. BE NO GRrATER THAN 7' NKNE TAUEST TREE WITHIN A 25' RADIUS Of' THE PROPOSED CENTERUNE OF THE WOOD MONOPOLE. 1115 _ IS 00PIRIlIfJED AND IS lIE SOl[ PfIOP[RJY Of lIE OWNER. rr IS I'IlODUCm SlIID.Y RlII USE Ilr lIE OIID AlII 115 AmlIltS. llEPROOU:IIlN OR USE Of 1115 ~ lIE _lIlN COIIIAINEll II rr IS IIlHOUIlIE IIIIIEII PUlIlISSION Of lItE _ DRAWN BV: CHS CHECKm BV: BTlA SITE _ MOYER PROPERTY WENTWuRTH FARM SITE NUIIIER CVR-361A SITE ADDRESs 136::1 THUMA;; JEFF. PKWY. CHAP.LfJTTE:>VILLE, VA 229U2 SHm T1TlE :>ITE ELEVATluN3 I RE\lSION5 I I NO. IlI\TE I &/U/OO IIf.\1SED PER 11lIIOII PCS 7/1/00 IIf.\1SED PER 11lIIOII PCS 8/8/00 IIf.\1SED TOllER IEJGHT 11/1/00 ADD ACCESS Rll\D I~ 5/22/OtJ ISSUED RlII Ilf.W.W 1/1&/00 ISSUED RlII 2llHINC AlL 0RMIINIlS AND WRfIIDI *1ERI!I. CONfAlNEll HEREIN ARE !liE PROPERTY OF ENGINEER NIl illY 1<<71 BE 1lIFI.r.A1fJl, USED OR DISCI.OSlD WIIHOUT lIE WRITIEN ClINSENT Of _ 0.''''10'' Solutio"' 11;~b '~LASGIS P.SAD 'JUITE 101 APEX. NC ~750:< Phollc: (313) :lti7.:<:<fu Fax: (313) 367.:<22U ~ 2' LIGHTNING ROD ~ 2 SECTOR TRITON PCS CLUSTER MOUNT ANTENNAS (flUSH MOUNT) PAINTED BROWN (EARTH TONE) AND ONE FUTURE ANTENNA LD \HJ TrltonPCS 1RIION PCS 1211 .--nJII _ ~~2323I ll::s m..- FAX ~ ~ I \ I . ---- -,- , , I I , , / / I I . , I I I C , , ( \ \ \ - - EXI5TlNC ASPIW.T DRIIIE ~ EXISllNG EXISllNG S-' 53' T, CHESTNUT ON< TO BE RElAllIIED EXISllNG 6-' 45' TALl lW'LE 1D-' ON< 12-' ON< I / / / EXISllNG 12-' 73' TALl CHESTNUT ON< / / / , jxlSTING )4-, 66' TALl CHESTNUT ON< / I / / / / / / ~I EXISTING 12-' 70' TALl lW'LE TO BE REMOVED I ~ EXISTING 14-' 66' TALl CHESTNUT ON< TO BE REMOVED 10-' ON< GRADING PLA}I J SCALE: 1-=10' 10 !l 10 1-.10' , , .-7'--I~ " / ~ / / / / / / / / / / / / IUJ/ 0AjI: / 1 , / , / " fF' OAK,tO BE REIoIllVEO , , , , , , / / JNE com:R OF PROPClSm WOODEN IIONOPOLE - f'RllPOS[D CONCREIE EllUIPWENT J:mIE; 1. THE SLOPE WITHIN LEASE AREA IS LESS THAN 25%. GRADING PLAN SCALE: 1-=20' 20 .!l :0 1-.20' DRl\WN BY: CHS CHECKED BY: BTIA I SIlE - MoYER PROPERTY WENTWORTH FARM I SIlE - CVR-361A I SIlE ADDRESS 1il6:1 THUMA" JEFF. PKWY. ..;HARLUTTESVILLE, VA 2291!2 I SHEET '11M - - tiP.ADIN\i PLAN - I SHEET NUlIIlER ::- (;-6 19 I PlOT SCAU:: ISSU!D RlR _ ISSU!D RlR ZOIING 0.,....... solutio", 1f)tiH :;LA~~jl:; Rt:AD WITE 101 APEX, N~ l75UZ Pho,"": (313) .,67-Z!1C Fax: (313) :,';7-XaIJ Hi llRIoIIIIIGS NIO WRlI1DI 1IA1DlI!I. ClIHToIINEIl HEREIN ARE lHE PROPERTY or ENGINEER NIl IMY lIlT IE 1lUI'UCA1ID, USED OR IIISQ.05O) WlIHOUf 1HE WRITTEII CONSEHI OF - I RlVI5llNS I 1110. OOE I ~ &/1&/00 IlI.'IISID MlCES$ RO!D ~ &/22/00 IlI.'IISID PUt 11IION PCS 7/7/00 IlI.'IISID PUt11llON PCS 7/13/00 100 lREE IEIGH1S &/1/00 IlI.'IISID TOWER HfDfI &,. 11/7/00 IIOIlIfY ACCESS RlWl 11IS _ IS COPllllCIfIEIl MIl 15 1HE $Olf PROPERlY OF 1HE OWNER. II IS PRODUCDl SllD.V RlR USE 'It M _ IHl ns 1IRM1IS. IlEPIIOOUCIIOII OR USE Of 11IS _~ M_1IOIICOIIloIINEIlIIITIS III1HllUIMlIIlI1lIII_OfM-. ~ ST~Tt 1l0VTr SO' 1l,IW 53 TrIIonPCS 1RlTDH I'CS 1211 ARIIORElUII -- RICHIIOND. VA 2J2J8 (=~ m:= FAll 8 s:1 CONCRETE PAD DETAIL ( (10'x12') JIDEI; 1. fe' - 3000 PSI, Fy - 60 kai 2. FOOTING TO EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 12' BELOW UNDISTURBED SOIL AND FROST UNE. 3. FlNAL SITE DESIGN IS THE RESPONSlBIUlY Of THE SITE CONTRACTOR. 4. SlAB FOUNDATION DESIGNED ASSUMING AllOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE Of 2000 PSF. 5. SlAB FOUNDATION DESIGNED ASSUMING lIAXlMUM PLASTICITY INDEX OF 27. 6. TINT CONCRETE: EARTKTONE ;>!;ALE NONE 5 1 TREE PROTECTION FENCE DETAIL 2. .IllllES: PROTECTION OF EXISTING VEGETA11ON: AT THE START OF GRADING INVOLVING THE LOWERING OF EXISTING GRADE AROUND A TREE OR STRIPPING OF TOPSOIL. A ClEAN. SHARP. VERTlCAL CUT SHALL BE IMDE AT THE EDGE Of THE TREE SAVE AREA AT THE SAME TIME AS OTHER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE INSTALLED. THE TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE SlDE OF THE CUT FARTHEST AWAY FROM THE TREE TRUNK AND SHALL REMAIN IN PlACE UNTIL All CONSTRUCTION IN THE VICINITY OF THE TREES IS COIoIPLETE. NO STORAGE Of MATERIAlS, FlLL. OR EQUIPMENT AND NO TRESPASSING SHALL BE AU.OWED WITHIN THE BOuNDARY OF THE PROTECTED AREA. CONTRACTOR TO INSTAll AT A RADIUS EQUAL TO l' RADlUS/" DIAMETER OF TREE TO RElIAIN. c. @ .t- 10'-0' '" I" "l. j 1. FENCE POSTS MAY BE 4" PINE OR 2"' OAK ORANGE W-RESISTANT HIGH TENSILE STRENGTH POLY BARRICADE FABRIC .IIDE: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SIZE OF BRACKET REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 2. PANEL ANTENNAS TO BE FLUSH MOUNTED TO WOOD POLE. 3. ANTENNA DIMENSIONS HxW,D- 44.7,6.3",2.7' BI-BRACKET MOUNT DETAIL PANEL MICROFLECT PIPE MOUNT PART , 81882 OR EQUAL 8"-10' MICROFLECT TRI-BRACKET PART , 81828 OR EQUAL ANTENNA MICROFLECT PIPE MOUNT PART , 81882 OR EQUAL PANEL ANTENNA \ I R!YIS1OIIS I I NO. bilE I I/U/lIO RI.\'IStD PER 1RITllH PCS 7/1/00 RI.\'IStD PER 1RITllH PCS 1/9/00 RI.\'IStD 1llWEIl IDlIfT 11/1/00 IIOOfY M:CESS RQlD - ISSUED FOR Rl\'IE1I ISSUED FOR ZONINC " EQUIPMENT SUPPORT PAD CROSS SECTION f4 STIRRUPS 0 8' C/C lYP. \6' CRUSHED ~ 20 MIL VAPOR BARRIER 0'-0' I ~ i C~ . ~ f 'f :1 ~) SLOPE STONE ~J.4'S 3" CLEAR (lYP.) , '" I io CABINET Ill: ~ t~ ICE BRIDGE POSTS (lYP.) J . 0 I .., TRITON PCS CABINET 1 PAINTED. BROWN (EARTH TONE: CONCRETE PAD 10 I ;., WWF6,6-W2.9x2.90MID OEPTH EDGE Of - CONCRETE 5'-< - b -,- I N - SUBGRADE - - - L .ll!.:::Q: - ;>!;ALE: I 31 - - - NONE CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PAD LAYOUT - FlITURE ANTENNA ;;~ALE NONE 1 ~ . o I ;., .. ~ .t:IllIE: 1. PIPE COLUMNS. WAVEGUIDE CHANNEL, AND PIPE HEAD AS MANUFACTURED BY ADVANCED UGHTNING TECHNOLOGY. 2, CONNECT fACH SUPPORT LEG TO GROUND RING 3. CABLE SUPPORT SPACING EVERY 3'-0' 4. COORDINATE CABLE ROUTE AND INSTALlAllON WITH CABINET. 108& I:LA:;:;I'': ROAD :;UITE 101 APEX, N': 2?5112 PI'JM: (919) 3~?-221U F,,,,: (9n) 3~'"222U illlllllllllllllllllllr :111-111=111-'" 1:--" 9" PREPARED STONE . o I io 124" I 1IIS_ISCOPI'RIllH1EIlNlllSlHESCtE PRllf'(JlJY 0( lItE OWNER. IT IS PIlOIlUCfD SOULY RIR USE BY lIE _ NIl ns NFUlIS. RIPROIlUC1DI OR USE CE 1IIS _ NIl/OR 1HE _1101I COHIAlNEll II illS f1lRIIIIOEN IIIIlOUIlHE _ _ CE lHE _ ~BY: CHS CHECKED BY: BTM MICROFLECT TRI-BRACKET PART , 81B28 OR EQlJAI. SITE _ 4 MOYER PROPERTY WENTWORTH FARM SITE _ CVR-361A SITE ADDRESS 1aG:S THUMA;; JEFF. PKWY. t;HARlUTTE:;VlllE, VA 22902 SHEET 1ITlE ::J ;;ITE DETAil:; = .. MLDIID DAlE: 11 I SHEET NUIotIl[R 20 - C-7; 6 PlDT SCAIL: ~ - 2 1 WAVE GUIDE BRIDGE DETAIL WOODEN MONOPOLE llAPA TR-5 MECHANICAL DOWNTJLT BRACKET AND llAPA FlX 805 PIPE MOUNT BRACKET 3-1/2" Oil\. METAl. POSTS EIotBEDDED IN CONCRETE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS All. DRoIIlINGS "., _ 1M1IJII\I. COHIoIND HEREIN ARE THE PROPERlY 0( ENCINEER NIl IMY IllJT IE 1IUI'IIl\1ED, IISED OR IISaJI5ID WIIHOUI lHE WRJITEN CONSENT Of EHGfIEER. TrIIonPCS tIImlN PCS 1211 ~ ~ I!ICHIIOND. "" 2J2JII l=l === FAX ~ s. ( __IS CllP'/RlGIf1IDNIl IS lIE SllLE PROPEIllY or lHE OIlNDl, If IS PROlllJC(I) SIlUlY RIR USE 11 lIE __ NIl lIS NfUlIS, _ 011 USE or 1115 _ NIl/Oll lIE __ alIlTMED .. If IS _ IIIIIIDUI lIE IIIlI1DI POIIIS9CIIOf lIE _ DRAWN BY: CHS CHECKID BY: BTI.I I SIIE - MuYER PRuPERTY WENTWuRTH FARM I SIIE NUIIIIER ~ CVR-361A I SIlE ADDRESS 1U6:1 THUMA;; JEFF, PKWY. ~HARLUTTE;;VILLE. VA 22902 I SHEET mu: - - ;;ITE DETAIL:; = I SHEET NUIlBER 21 ::- C-8 . PlOT SCALE: c I- I 111I. Droll: I '/WOO ReIISOl POt _ PCS 7/1/00 ReIISOl POt _ PCS 1/1/00 ReIISOlllllllll HEIGHT 1/21/00 ReIISOl ACCESS IlO!O 11/1/00 ReIISOl ACCESS IlO!O I ~ i ~ C~ "l ~ I f 1: GRAVEL ROAD SECTION DETAIL EXISllNG Ti\~l~~llllllllllmllllllllllllll rllllllllllllnlllfl 1IIIlnlllllllllfTllllllllllllllllfTlllllllllllfllll SLOPE 10'-0. 3. AGGREGATE lYPE I OR 21 OR 21^ COMPACTED TO 9511 - ASTM D1557 .. '2 COURSE N;G. 6: 2. Of 2A COMPACTED AND ROLlED ClASS . GEOTEXnLE .PROOf ROll 6: STABIUZE SUBGRADE TrltonPCS 1RIlllIl pes 1211 MIlDREIUII PIf<<WIt( NCHlIIlND. W. 23231 (::l m:= fAX AU. ..- NIO lIIIII1EN !M1DlW. COHTMO HEREIN ME. 1HE PR1lPER'IY or ENGINEER 1 NIl !MY lIlT II[ 1llRrA1tIl, USlD 011 lIISl:lOSID 1II1HlllIIlHE WRIT1fH CONSOIf or ENCINEa 0.,,",... Solutio", 108& ':LA:;:;I': ROAD 'JUITE 101 APEX, N': 47502 PI.JI...: (9n; 3&7,2210 F'..: (9n; 3&7,2220 ~ ISSl.O FOIl Rl\'D ISSl.O FIlII ZONIIIl ORDINANCE NO. 01..18(1) AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 18, ZONING, ARTICLE II, BASIC REGULATIONS, AND ARTICLE ill, DISTRICT REGULATIONS, OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 18, Zoning,. Article II, Basic Regulations, is hereby amended and reordained as follows: By Amending: Sec. 4.15.05 Sec. 4.15.0.6 Sec. 4.15.07.4 Sec. 4.15.12.1 Sec. 4.15.12.2 Sec. 4.15.12.3 Sec. 4.15.12.4 Sec. 4.15.12.5 Sec. 4.15.12.6 Sec. 4.15.12.7 By special use permit. Prohibited signs. Setback. Residential and agricultural districts (RA, VR, R-l AND R-2). Residential districts (R-4 and R -6). Residential (R-l 0 and R-15) and planned residential development (pRD) districts. Planned unit development (PUD) district. Commercial districts (C-1 and CO). Commercial (HC) and mixed commercial (pD-SC and PD-MC) districts. Industrial (HI and LI) and mixed industrial (PD-IP) districts. Chapter 18. Zoning Article II. Basic Regulations Sec. 4.15.05 By special use permit. The authority to administer signs by special use permit is hereby granted to the board of zoning appeals. The following signs shall be permitted by special use permit within any underlying district: a. Off-site advertising signs. b. Electric message signs. c. Signs in public rights-of-way; provided: (1) the subdivision or planned development to which the sign pertains abuts the public right-of-way; (2) the sign is either a subdivision sign or a sign identifying a planned development authorized by sections 19.0.,20..0., 25.0., 25A, and 29.0.; (3) the freestanding sign regulations, other than setback regulations, applicable to iliF lot with the use to which the sign pertains shall apply; and (4) if the. sign is located withincfu1 entrance corridor overlay district, a certificate of appropriateness is issued by the architectural review board. (Added 1-10.-01) Sec. 4.15.06 Prohibited signs. Signs with any of the fullowing characteristics are prohibited within Albemarle County. This includes any sign: a. Which violates any provisions of the law of Virginia relating to outdoor advertising, including sections 33.1..351 to 33.1-381, inclusive, and section 46.2..831 of the Code of Virginia. b. Which violates federal law related to the control of outdoor advertising, including but not limited to 23 D.S.C. S 131, or which violates federal or state law concerning Virginia byways. (Amended 1-10-01) c. Which obstructs free or clear vision, or otherwise causes hazards for vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian traffic by reason oflocatiou, shape, illumination or color. d. Which casts glare or light, directly or indirectly, on any public roadway, or on any adjacent property within a residential district. e. Which imitates an official traffic sign or signal, or conflicts with traffic safety needs due to location, color, movement, shape or illumination. f. Which is located or illuminated in such a manner as to cause a traffic hazard. g. Which outlines any building, sign or part thereof with neon or other Ught. h. Which uses exposed, bare or uncovered neon illumination. i. Which contains or consists of a searchlight, beacon or strobe light, or the like, unless by an authorized government activity. j. Which contains or consists of pennants, ribbons, spinners, streamers or other similar moving devices. These devices, when not part of any sign, are similarly prohibited. k. Which is an advertising vehicle. L Which contains or consists of strings of light bulbs, not part of a decorative display but used as a means of attracting attention. m. Which is a billboard. n. Which moves, flashes, blinks or changes color except as otherwise specifically listed. o. Which are moored balloons or other tethered Hoating signs. p. Which are banners, except as a permitted temporary event sign. q. Which is any sign, except those so placed by a duly authorized government agency, or as a no hunting, fishing, or trespassing sign, which is nailed, tacked, painted or in any other ., manner attached to any tree, cliff, fence, utility pole or support, utility tower, rack, curbstone, sidewalk, lamp post, hydrant, bridge or public property of any description. r. Which is any sound-producing sign intended to attract attention regardless of whether or not the sign has a written message content. s. Which is a roof sign. t. Which is erected in or over a public right-of-way unless the sign is authorized under section 4.l5.05(c). (Amended }"10-01) u. Which is prohibited along state scenic highways. Sec. 4.15.07.4 Setback. The setback shall be measured from the property line or, in the case of an access easement, from the edge of the easement, to the closest point of the sign. The setback for a sign within a public right-of-way shall be measured from the edge of the travelway to the closest point of the sign. The setback fur a pole sign shall be measured from the edge of the sign or the pole, whichever is closest to the property line. (Amended 1-10-01) Sec. 4.15.12.1 Residential and agricultural districts (RA, VR, R-l and R-2). The following are permitted within these districts as further regulated below: Sign Type FOR 1!:ACH LOT Freestanding 24sq ft 10 ft 10 ft 6ft 10ft Maximum height 20 ft Same as Wall 20 sq ft below top of building filscia or mansard 32 sq ft Subdivision aggregate 6ft lOft en1rance Temporary 32 sq ft 10 ft 10 ft Other 1 per highway right-of-way trontage N/A 2 per entrance 1 per lot per high- way right-of-way ftonta e See section 4.15.11 Signs by Special Use Permit: a) Off-site advertising signs; b) Electric message signs; c) Signs in public right-of-way. (Added 1-10-01) AU signage except subdivision signs refer to nonresidential uses only. Nonresidential uses including but not limited to: agricultural uses, church, fire/rescue squad, civic clubs, schools, daycare centers and retirement centers may be permitted. Forty (40) square feet in Rural AreaS District (WALL SIGN ONLY). *See section 4.15.12.d. (Adopted 7-8-92) ':\ See. 4.15.12.2 Residential districts (R-4 and R-6). The following are permitted within these districts as further regulated below: Sign Type Area Height Setback # Allowed Other <Maximum) (Maximum) (Minimum) (Maximum) FOR li:ACH LO'1' 1 per highway One sign is allowed fur each lot with 100 feet Freestanding 24 sq ft 10 ft 10 ft right-of,.way ~;~ntinuous highway frontage ri t-of-wav fr~e. * FOR EACH ESTABT .fSHMENT . Directorv 24 soft 6ft 10 ft Maximum 20 sq ft height 20 ft same as Wall below top of building NfA fascia or Mansard 32 sq ft Subdivision aggregate 6ft 10ft 2 per entrance oer entrance 1 per lot per 4 per year fur 60 days Temporary 32 sq ft 10ft 10ft highway right-of- See section 4.15.11 way front.lI,e Signs by Special Use Permit: a) Off-site advertising signs; b) Electric message signs; C) Signs in public right-of-way. (Added 1-10-01) All signage except subdivision signs refer to nonresidential uses only. Nonresidential uses including but not limited to: agricultural uses, church, fire/rescue squad, civic clubs, schools and daycare centers may be permitted. *See section 4.15.12.d. (Adopted 7-8-92) Sec. 4.15.12.3 Residential (R.. 10 and R..15) and planned residential development (pRD) districts. The following are permitted within these districts as further regulated below: Sign Type Area Height Setback # Allowed Other (Maximum) (Maximum) (Minimum) (Maximum) FOR Ji:ACB LO'1' 1 per highway One sign is allowed fur each lot with 100 fuel: Freestanding 24 sq ft 10ft 5ft right-of-way of continUOus highway frontage rioht-of,.wav frontal!e. * FOR EACH ESTABLISHMENT Directorv 24 sa ft 6ft 5ft Maximum height 20 ft same as 1 sq ft per lIinier ft Wall 32 sq ft below top of building NfA of building frontage fuscia or Mansard 32 sq ft Subdivision aggregate 6ft 5ft 2 per entrance ner entrance 1 per lot per 4 per year fur 60 days Temporary 32 sq ft 10ft 5ft highway right-of- See section4.15.11 way frontage Signs by Special Use Permit: ~ Off~neadvertisingsigm; b) Electric message signs; .4 c) Signs in public right-of-way. (Added 1-10-01) All signage except subdivision signs refer to nonresidential uses only. *See section4.15.12.d. (Adopted 7-8-92) Sec. 4.15.12.4 Planned unit development (POO) districts. The following are permitted within this district as further regulated below: Sign Type Area Height Setback # Allowed Other (Maximum) lMaxiDtum) (Minimum) (Maximum) l!'OR EACH LO".r 1 per highway One sign is allowed fur each lot with 100 feet Freestanding 24 sq ft 12 ft 5ft right-of-way of continuous highway frontage rillht-ofwav fro_e. * FOR EACH ESTABLISHMENT Directorv 24 sa ft 6ft 5ft Maximum height20ft 1 sq ft per 1 linear ft of Wall 32 sq ft belowtop of NfA building frontage filscia or mansard 32 sq ft Subdivision aggregate 6ft 5ft 2 per entrance per entrance 1 per lot per 4 per year for 60 days Temporary 32 sq ft 10ft 5ft highway right-of:. See section 4.15.11 wav frontage Signs by Special Use Permit: a) Off-site advertising signs; b) Electric message signs; c) Signs in public right-of-way. (Added 1-10-01) All signage except subdivision signs refer to nonresidential uses only. Projecting signs, however, shall only be allowed when wall or freestanding signs are impractical; except as provided in section 4.15.4. *See section 4. 15.12.d. (Adopted 7-8-92) Sec. 4.15.12.5 Commercial districts (C-l and CO). The following are permitted within these districts as further regulated below: Sign Type Area (M~um) nJ:'~ # Allowed Other (Maximum) . imum) (Maximum) FOR EACH LOT 1 per highway One sign is allowed fur each lot with 100 met Freestanding 32 sq ft 12 ft 5ft right-of-way of continuous highway frontage ri~ht-of-wav fronts"". * FOR EACH ESTABLISHMENT DirectolV 24 sa ft 6ft 5ft 1 ner intersection Maximum height 1 per highway Projecting 32 sq ft 20 ft below top of right-of-way fuscia or frontage Mansard Maximum height Per establishment. 1 sq Wall 100 sq ft 20 ft below top of N/A ft per 1 linear ft of maximum fascia or Mansard building frontage 2 perlot per 4 per year fur 60 days Temporary 32 sq it 10 ft 5ft highway right-of See section 4.15.11 way frontage " Signs by Special Use Permit: a) Off-site advertising signs; . b) Electric message signs; c) Signs in public right-of-way. (Added 1-10-01) Each establishment shall be limited to a choice of one (1) of the following: wall or projecting. *See section 4.15.12.d. (Adopted 7-8-92) Sec. 4.15.12.6 Commercial (HC) and mixed commercial (PD-SC and PD-MC) districts. The following are permitted within these districts as further regulated below: Sign Type Area Height n) (MS::::') ~~~~) Other (MlIximum) (Maximum FOa DCli LOT 1 per highway One sign is allowed fur each lot with 100 teet Freestanding 32 sq ft 12 ft Sft right-of-way ofoontinuous highway frontage rillht-of-vvav frontalle. * FOREAeR ESTABLISlfMENT Directorv 24$0 ft lOft Sft II'1P.r intersection Maximum height 1 per highway Projecting 32 sq ft 20 ft below top of right-of-way fuscia or mansard frontage Maximum height Per estabisbment, 1.5 Wall 200 sq ft 20 ft below top of N/A sq ft per 1 linear ft of maximum fitscia or mansard building frontage 2 per lot per 4 per year for 60 days Temporary 32 sq ft 10 ft 5ft highway right-of:. See section 4.15.11 wav fronfwre Signs by Special Use Permit: a) Off..site advertising signs; b) Electric message signs; c) Signs in public right-of-way. (Added 1-10-01) Each establishment shall be limited to a choice of one (1) of the following: Projecting or wall. *See section 4.l5.12.d. (Adopted 7-8-92) Sec. 4.15.12.7 Industrial (m and LI) and mixed industrial (PD-IP) districts. The following are permitted within these districts as further regulated below: Sign Type FOR EACH LOT Other Freestanding 32 sq ft 12 ft 5ft 1 per highway right-of-way ftontage One sign is allowed fur each lot with 100 feet of continuous highway right-of.wayfrontage.* Projecting 32 sq ft 10ft Maximum height 20 :tl below top of fuscia or mansard Maximum Sft intersection Wall 200 ft 1 per highway right-of.way frontage N/A Per establishment 1.5 h maximum height 20 ft sq ft per 1 linear ft of belowtop of building frontage fuscia or mansard 32 sqft 2 per lot per 4 per year for 60 days Temporary lOft Sft highway right-o~ way ftontaee See section 4.15.11 Signs by Special Use Permit: a) Off-site. advertising signs; b) Electronic message signs; c) Signs in public right-of-way. (Added 1-10-01) Each establishment shall be limited to a choice of one (1) of the following: Wall or freestanding. *See section 4.15.12.d. (Adopted 7-8.92) I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of an Ordinance duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, by a vote of six to zero, as recorded below, at a regular meeting held on Janqary 10. 2001. Mr. Bowerman Mr. Dorrier Ms. Humphris Mr. Martin Mr. Perkins Ms. Thomas Aye Nay y - y --- -.:L -L y ~ y -- 7 r, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Planning & Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 218 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296 - 5823 Fax (804) 972 - 4012 December 21,2000 Steve Blaine LeClair Ryan POBox 2017 Charlottesville, VA 22902-2017 RE: ZTA-00-01 UREF Research Park, Inc Signs in Public Rights-of-Way Dear Mr. Blaine: The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on December 12, 2000, unanimously recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that this approval is for the following text: Section 4.15.05 By Special Use Permit a. Off-site advertising signs. b. Electric message signs. c. Signs in public rights-of-way; provided: (1) the subdivision or planned development to which the sign pertains abuts the public right-of-way; (2) the sign is either a subdivision sign or a sign identifying a planned development authorized by sections 19.0, 20.0, 25.0, 25A, and 29.0. (3) the freestanding sign regulations, other than setback regulations, applicable to the lot with the use to which the sign pertains shall apply; and (4) if the sign is located within an entrance corridor overlay district, a certificate of appropriateness is issued by the architectural review board. Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive public comment at their meeting on January 10,2001. Any new or additional information regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~;5f~ Jan Sprinkle Chief of Zoning Administration JS/jcf Cc:~?~la Carey Jack Kelsey Bob Ball Amelia McCulley Steve Allshouse 'i I ~ / STAFF PERSON: Jan Sprinkle PLANNING COMMISSION: December 12, 2000 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: January 10, 2001 ZTA 00-01: To Amend the Zoning Ordinance To Allow Certain Signs To Be Erected In or Over Public Road Rights-of-Way ORIGIN: Planning Commission resolution (Attachment A) based on an application from UREF Research Park, Inc. (Attachment B) PUBLIC PURPOSE TO BE SERVED: For both staff and Planning Commissio/"l recommendations, signs within the right-of-way on medians or along public roads in subdivisions and planned developments could be permitted by special use permit. For the staff recommendation only, signs within the right-of-way on medians or along public roads in cases with extenuating circumstances could be permitted by special use permit also. The latter could only be permitted by the County with prior Virginia Department of Transportation (V DOT) approval. r\ ( , '. PROPOSAL: To authorize certain privately owned signs to be installed in or over public rights- of-way by special use permit. The draft ordinance also establishes the method for measuring the setback for a sign in or over a public right-of-way and it updates terminology by amending the following: Section 4.15.05 By special use permit, Section 4.15.06 Prohibited signs, Section 4.15.07.4 Setback, Section 4.15.12.1 Residential and agricultural districts (RA, VR, R-1 AND R- 2), Section 4.15.12.2 Residential districts (R-4 and R-6), Section 4.15.12.3 Residential (R-10 and R-15) and planned residential development (PRO) districts, Section 4.15.12.4 Planned unit development (PUD) district, Section 4.15.12.5 Commercial districts (C-1 and CO), Section 4.15.12.6 Commercial (HC) and mixed commercial (PD-SC and PO-Me) districts, and Section 4.15.12.7 Industrial (HI and L1) and mixed industrial (PD-IP) districts. BACKGROUND: On November 7,2000, the Planning Commission discussed the proposed ordinance and adopted a resolution of intent. On December 12, 2000, they acted to delete part of staff's recommendation and to recommend approval for only the portion of the ZTA requested by UREF Research Park, Inc. STAFF COMMENT: Purpose and Intent of the Sign Ordinance as stated in the Zoning Ordinance: "The purpose of these regulations is to ensure that signs are appropriate to the land, building, or use to which they are appurtenant and are effective, yet not excessive for their intended purpose. These regulations are intended to accomplish the following goals: -To promote the general health, safety and welfare by regulating distracting signs that are not necessary for the identification of a business location; -To protect the public investment in the creation, maintenance, safety and appearance of its ~ streets and highways; ~,. ./ Page 2 ZT A-00-01 - Signs in or Over Public Road Rights-of-Way Report of December 12, 2000; Revised January 4, 2001 ,~, -To improve pedestrian and vehicular safety by avoiding saturation and confusion in the field of vision; -To enable businesses to promote and identify their establishments; -To protect and enhance the county's attractiveness to tourists and other visitors as sources of economic development; and ' -To implement the comprehensive plan goal of creating an "attractive and harmonious environment." The proposed amendment will make available by special permit, an additional sign provision for specific cases where the lay of the land prevents a currently permitted sign from being effective. VDOT has previously established guidelines for allowing subdivision signs in rights-of-way, provided they contain no commercial advertisement and are not illuminated. In a few specific cases, VDOT has also granted permission for signs identifying nonresidential uses such as churches, where the amount of VDOT right-of-way is excessive. Staff opinion is that controlling signs in rights-of-way by special permit will allow us to carefully consider each request on a case-by-case basis and make reasonable recommendations. VDOT has asked that we require their approval before accepting an application for a sign in the r/w, other than a subdivision sign, for two reasons: . With subdivision signs, they are careful to only grant their permission in specific cases that meet their guidelines. For commercial signs, they want signed agreements that include specific language regarding owner liability as well as the ability to retract their approval at any time they choose to use the right-of-way for their own purposes; and ;/'"""'t", . With other signs, they do not want the public to invest time and money in the County's process, obtain our approval, and then try to use that investment as leverage to convince VDOT to allow the sign. (The SP fee for an off-site sign is $95 and the process takes about 5 weeks.) Administration I Review Process: Currently, the Board of Supervisors has granted to the Board of Zoning Appeals, the authority to administer certain signs by special use permit. Should this amendment be approved, the BZA will hear requests for signs in the right-of-way just as they currently hear special permits for other off-site signs. Housing Affordability: The proposed amendment would not affect housing affordability. Implications to Staffing I Staffing Costs: Because we do not foresee many requests for signs in rights-of-way, we do not anticipate any need for additional staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends amending the Sign Ordinance Sections as shown in Attachment C. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approve the request for subdivision and planned development signs only. See Attachment D. ~'l ATTACHMENT A 1"""\ RESOLUTION OF INTENT WHEREAS, section 4.15 of the zoning ordinance prohibits private signs within public road rights-of-way; WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation ("VDOT") issues permits for private subdivision signs within public road rights-of-way, and the permitting process addresses sight distance and other traffic safety issues; and WHEREAS, with traffic safety issues addressed through the VDOT permitting process, it may be appropriate, under certain circumstances to be delineated in section 4.15, to authorize signs within a public road right-of-way by special use permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT for purposes of public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practices, the Albemarle County Planning Commission hereby adopts a resolution of intent to amend the Zoning Ordinance for the purposes described herein; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on this resolution of intent, and make its recommendations to the Board of r"~ Supervisors at the earliest possible date. ~:.. ~~ ~~. ~:. ~i-' ~ ZTA- ~()(Jt)- CM)1 DATE: ~? r-t'pdD county of Albemarle Department of Zoning 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 (804) 296-5875 FAX (804)" 972-4060 . ~ FEE: $6 5 00 STAFF: g~r I fJ/~ - I ~'t) (0 1- ATTACHMENT B .~ ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT OWNER (as currently listed in Real Estate) Name UREF Research Park" Inc. phone (804) 9~ - ~ Address 465 Crestwood Drive, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903 APPLICANT (if different from above) Name same as above Phone (_) -- Address CONTACT PERSON/DESIGNATED AGENT (if different from above) Name Steven W. Blaine, Esq. phone (804) 2l.L --..11ll Day Phone (=) Address c/o LeCl-air Ryan, P.C. ",-...." LOCATION: 108 Second Street, S.E. Charlottesville, VA 22902 PLEASE PROVIDE ACTUAL ORDINANCE LANGUAGE AND JUSTIFICATION OF YOUR REQUEST ON THE BACK OF THIS SHEET OR AN ATTACHMENT. OFFICE USE ONLY DATE OF PRELIM CONF/STAFF: ~fI0!OO I I ORDINANCE SECTION: Zoning Administrator Review ( initials) Jl)6 Planner: Recommendation Plann;no commission: /_/- Action: Board of supervisors: _/_/_ Action: ~ .,~.";:'';~,:,, "',-. ." .. ...,..; . . ... ': .r' :5": ,.._...:,.~~:- -:-. . _....:.."'"";:..i:...-.,.~.1_~.:'"~."*~:,.~~~ ..r~_:-:.:...'.:"';';~J '~::,':',""~.:.o:.:.:.i=::..L_,;....';~ .':_: .'. . -. -',' .";:-~-.'.""" . : ";,.1..;....r:~...... . . . .'-::-:"':.:-.:T".~~:~' ~''''''''''''':'.: ;~~~~~~-:-.:::. ",~ ~~".;.:-;- ~:- ...;:..... . " ',~~.... ~ ;;....~..... . U. JUSTIFICATION: attach addition~l information as necessary) ec-/Idc.il a d /(C:; ~r '.'r '~,'... j -.... .. -'. ...,: ;..;,;..,.~"" .. :,....~. ~:...,___J".;.."'!...:~ . . ...-:"l-~~.~ .....;:~-:'"~:-:::.L ;.~Y. :~.:"'~;ji~..... ...:.; _~ .'- -f"_ ,..':. '..:'." ""......" . ,:' '~~"-' .-..... '-.-""!'-,.... -.::- ':1:: .~~~~~~~~..~ . .,..! ~ ; ;'";to-~:."'t. .'r: ..'~. ....-.:.,~.....~.--::-....; . .~:lf....'.:'~',...~~.~....~~").~.~.;.?--~"'"}\.1!'t~~ A_~~~:; '. -. ......;:.;.,;..'Zr......;. .._...... ..'.-.,.... ..,....:':.~~~.~-:...::. ...~.- that the information provided information is accurate, true e nd belief. ~6: 22 O'wocers-.. ~~~n:b-!.Da on this application and correct to the 00 Receipt #. Date ~ LECLAIR RYAN BlACKS8URG OFFICE: TELEPHONE: (540) 961-2762 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAw POST OFFICE BOx 2017 108 SECOND STREET. S.E. CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22902-2017 TelEPHONE: (804) 971-7771 FACSIMILE: (804) 296-0905 STEVEN W. BLAIN'E RICHMOND OFFICE: TELEPHONE: (604) 763.2003 INNS8ROOK OFFICE: TelEPHONE: (804) 270-0070 EMAll: sbloine@leCloirryon.com ~, NOQ~8~j." Oq'CE TELEPHONE. (7:JI) 044-1454 ALEXANDRIA OFFICE TELEPHONE. (703) 664-6007 February 22, 2000 BY HAND Ms. Jan Sprinkle Department of Zoning, County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Research Park at North Fork; Zoning Text Amendment Dear Jan; This letter follows our meeting of February 18, 2000 with Bart Svoboda and David Benish. We discussed the University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation's interest in locating a sign in the median near the entrances to the North Fork project. This type of sign would identify the Research Park, and would not advertise any particular business or tenant located within the l~ Research Park. We also discussed the process involved in a Zoning Text Amendment in order to address the limitations within the County's Sign Ordinance that currently preclude such a sign. You indicated that the Sign Ordinance is undergoing a general revision and that the staff had not yet recommended to the Planning Commission a draft for the Commission's ~unsideration (aithough I understand that a draft may be currently under review by the C"",..,ty AttOrney's office). On behalf of the Foundation, we respectfully request that the revision to the Sign Ordinance set forth below be considered as part of the overall review of changes to the Ordinance. This approach would seem to be preferable to a separate consideration of our client's request after the new ordinanc~ 15 adopted It certainly would be more efficient in terms of the use of staff and Plannmg CommiSSIOn time cui,} effort to combil';: ~~je cOl1sider2.~ions . In view of our request. I nevertheless attach a completed Zoning Text Amendment form (with the application fee of $665) so that we may initiate the County's consideration. I believe that the text need only be revised to restate one of the specifically prohibited signs described in Section 14.15.06 (t) as follows: "Which is erected in or over a public right of way, except for signs identifying a business, /'\ ~ ~ ~ l:lli' Ms. Jan Sprinkle February 22, 2000 Page 2 corporate or research park which do not identify any particular business or tenant, and which satisfy the Virginia Department of Transportation road design criteria, " Please contact me at your earliest convenience to make certain that if there are concerns or other text language that should be addressed to accommodate this request, our client will have an opportunity to respond so that the request may stay within the Ordinance review schedule. I look forward to working with you on this request. Very truly ~ :7j![/" Ste<en ; .~ine SWB:tlm cc: Mr. Bruce S. Stouffer Mr. Gaylon Beights a....L J..Ll.\J.Lll'1....L......'.i- v Draft: 10/31/00 ORDINANCE NO. 00-18( ) AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 18, ZONING, ARTICLE II, BASIC REGULATIONS, AND ARTICLE III, DISTRICT REGULATIONS, OF THE CODE OF THE COtJNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA ,~ BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that . Chapter 18, Zoning, Article II, Basic Regulations, is hereby amended and reordained as follows: By Amending: Sec. 4.15.05 Sec. 4.15.06 Sec. 4.15.07.4 Sec. 4.15.12.1 Sec. 4.15.12.2 Sec. 4.15.12.3 Sec. 4.15.12.4 Sec. 4.15.12.5 Sec. 4.15.12.6 Sec. 4.15.12.7 By special use permit. Prohibited signs. Setback. Residential and agricultural districts (RA, VR, R-1 AND R-2). Residential districts (RA and R-6). Residential (R-10 and R-15) and planned residential development (PRD) districts. Planned unit development (PUD) district. Commercial districts (C-1 and CO). Commercial (HC) and mixed commercial (PD-SC and PD-MC) districts. Industrial (HI and LI) and mixed industrial (PD-IP) districts. Chapter 18. Zoning Article II. Basic Regulations .~ Sec. 4.15.05 By special use permit. The authority to administer signs by special use permit is hereby granted to the board of zoning appeals. The following signs shall be permitted by special use permit within any underlying district: a. Off-site advertising signs. b. Electric message signs. c. Signs in public rights-of-wav: provided: (l) the subdivision. planned development. or use to which the sign pertains abuts the public right-or-way: (2) the sign is either a subdivision sign: a sism identifving a planned development authorized bv sections 19.0.20.0. 25.0. 25A. and 29.0. or a sign d~monstrated bv the owner to be necessarv because an on-site sism would be ineffective to communicate its message off-site because of topographv or vegetation: (3) before the applicant files an application for a special use permit. the Virginia Department of Transportation approves the sign at its proposed location: (4) the freestanding sign regulations. other than setback regulations. applicable to the lot with the use to which the sign pertains shall applv: and (5) if the sign is located within an entrance corridor overlay district. a certificate of appropriateness is issued by the architectural review board. 1 .~ Draft: 10/31/00 Sec. 4.15.06 Prohibited signs. f) Signs with any of the following characteristics are prohibited within Albemarle County. This includes any sign: a. Which violates any provisions of the law of Virginia relating to outdoor advertising, including S-gections 33.1-351 to 33.1-381, inclusive, and S-gection 46.2-831 of the Code of Virginia. b. Which violates federal law related to the control of outdoor advertising, including but not limited to 23 U.S.c. & 13 L including U.S.c. Sec. 131 control of outdoor advcrtising and pro';isions or which violates federal or state law concerning Virginia byways. c. Which obstructs free or clear vision, or otherwise causes hazards for vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian traffic by reason oflocation, shape, illumination or color. d. Which casts glare or light, directly or indirectly, on any public roadway, or on any adjacent property within a residential district. e. Which imitates an official traffic sign or signal, or conflicts with traffic safety needs due to location, color, movement, shape or illumination, f Which is located or illuminated in such a manner as to cause a traffic hazard, ~ g. Which outlines any building, sign or part thereof with neon or other light. h. Which uses exposed, bare or uncovered neon illumination. i. Which contains or consists of a searchlight, beacon or strobe light, or the like, unless by an authorized government activity. j. Wl.;~l. :::ontains or consists of pennants, ribbons, spinners, streamers or other similar moving devices. These devices, when not part of any sign, are similarly prohibited. k. Which is an advertising vehicle. 1. Which contains or consists of strings of light bulbs, not part of a decorative display but used as'a means of attracting attention. m. Which is a billboard. listed. n. Which moves, flashes, blinks or changes color except as otherwise specifically o. Which are moored balloons or other tethered floating signs. ~ 2 Draft: 10/31/00 Signs by Special Use Permit: a) Off-site advertising signs; b) Electric message signs7~ c) Signs in public right-of-way. .~ All signage except subdivision signs refer to nonresidential uses only. Nonresidential uses including but not limited to: agricultural uses, church, fire/rescue squad, civic clubs, schools, daycare centers and retirement centers may be permitted. Forty (40) square feet in Rural Areas District (WALL SIGN ONLY). "'See section 4.15.12.d. (Adopted 7-8-92) Sec. 4.15.12.2 Residential districts (R-4 and R-6). The following are permitted within these districts as further regulated below: Sign Type Area Height Setback # Allowed Other (Maximum) (Maximum) (Minimum) (Maximum) FOR EACH LOT One sign is allowed 1 per highway for each lot with 100 freestanding 24 sq ft ] 0 It 10 ft right-of-way feet of continuous frontage highway right-of-way fronta2e. * FOR EACH EST ABLlSHMENT Directorv 24 sa ft 6ft 10 ft Maximum height 20 ft same as Wall 20 sq ft below top of building N/A fascia or Mansard 32 sq ft - Subdivision aggregate 6ft 10 ft 2 per entrance ner entrance I 1 per lot per 4 per year for 60 days Temporary 32 sq ft lOft 10 ft highway right-of- See section 4.15.1 ] wav frontage ~ Signs bv Special Use Permit: a) Off-site advertising signs; b) Electric message signs7~ c) Signs in public right-of-way. All signage except subdiyision signs refer to nonresidential uses only. Nonresidential uses including but not limited to: agricultural uses, church, fire/rescue squad, civic clubs, schools and daycare centers may be permitted. *See section 4.15.12.d, (Adopted 7-8-92) Sec. 4.15.12.3 Residential (R-10 and R-15) and planned residential development (PRD) districts. The following are permitted within these districts as further regulated below: 4 ~ f"'"'ij r'\ r') Draft: 10/31/00 Sign Type Area Height Setback # Allowed Other (Maximum) (Maximum) (M inimum) (Maximum) FOR EACH LOT One sllm is allowed 1 per highway for each lot with] 00 Freestanding 24 sq ft 10 ft 5 ft right-of-way feet of continuous frontage highway right-of-way frontal!e. · FOR EACH ESTABLISHMENT Directorv 24 sa ft 6 ft 5ft Maximum height 20 ft sa me as ] sq ft per] linier ft Wall 32 sq ft below top of building N/A of building frontage fascia or Mansard . 32 sq ft Subdivision aggregate 6 ft 5 ft 2 per entrance ner entrance ] per lot per 4 per year for 60 days Temporary 32 sq ft 10 ft 5ft highway right-of- way fronta"e See section 4.] 5.11 Signs by Special Use Permit: a) Off-site advertising signs; b) Electric message signs-:~ c) Signs in public right-of-wav. All signage except subdivision signs refer to nonresidential uses only. *See section 4.15.12.d. (Adopted 7-8-92) Sec. 4.15.12.4 Planned unit development (PUD) district. The following are permitted within this district as further regulated below: Sign Type I FOR EACH LOT Area T (MaXimum) I Other Height I , i (Maxi;;'um I Setback (Minimum) i # Allowed (Maximum) Freestanding J p.. ..."'. -J right-of-way frontage One sign is allowed 24 sq ft l2 ft 5ft feet of continuous highway right-of-way frontage. . FOR EACH EST A BLlS H M ENT Directory 24 sq ft 6 fl 5 ft Wall Maximum height 20 ft below top of fascia or mansard N/A I sq ft per 1 linear ft of building frontage 32 sq ft SubdiVIsion 32 sq ti aggregate per entrance 2 per entrance 6ft 5 1't Temporary ] per lot per highway right-of- wa V fronta l!e 4 per year for 60 days See section 4. 1 5.11 32 sq ft 10 fl 5ft Signs bv Special Use Permit: 5 Draft: 10/31/00 a) Off-site advertising signs; b) Electric message signs~~ c) Signs in public right-of-wav. i~ All signage except subdivision signs refer to nonresidential uses only. Projecting signs, however, shall only be allowed when wall or freestanding signs are impractical; except as provided in section 4.15.4. *See section 4.15.12.d. (Adopted 7-8-92) Sec. 4.15.12.5 Commercial district~ (C-1 and CO). The following are permitted within these districts as further regulated below: Sign Type Area HeIght Setbac k # Allowed Other (Maximum) (Maxlmum) (Minimum) (Maximum) FOR EACH LOT One sign is allowed 1 per highway for each lot with 100 feet of continuous Freestanding 32 sq ft 12 ft 5 ft right-of-way highway right-of-way frontage frontage .* FOR EACH EST ABLlSHMEl"T DirectorY 24 so ft b ft 5ft 1 ner intersection Maximum height 1 per highway Projecting 32 sq ft 20 ft below lOp of right-of-way faSCia or Mansard fran tage MaXimum height Per establishment, 1 Wall I 100 sq fl 20 ft belo\>. top of N/A sq ft per 1 linear ft of maximum faSCia or Mansard building frontage 2 per lot per 4 per year for 60 days Temporary 32 sq ft 10 fl 5 ft highway right-of- See section 4.15.11 way frontage ~ Signs bv Special Use Permit: :1) Off-site advertising siins; b) Electric message signs7~ c) Signs in public right-of-wav. Each establishment shall be limited to a choice 0 fane (1) of the following: wall or projecting. *See section 4.15.12.d. (Adopted 7-8-9:) Sec. 4.15.12.6 Commercial (HC) and mixed commercial (PD-SC and PD-MC) district~. The following are permitted within these dlstricts as further regulated below: Sign Type Area I Hel~r1\ . Setback ;; Allowed Other (Maximum I (i'.13\lmU~1 (.\11n1mum\ (Maximum) FOR EACH LOT One sign IS allowed 1 per highway for each lot with 100 Freestanding 32 sq ft 1: f: 5 ft right-of-way feet of continuous frontage highway right-of-way ---.- I frontal2e .* /'"'" 6 Draft: 10/31/00 I""', . Sign Type Area Height Setbac k ;; Allowed Other I (Maximum) (Maximum) (Minimum) (Maximum) FOR EACH ESTABLISHMENT Directory 24 sa ft 10 ft 5 ft I per intersection Maximum I height 20 ft 1 per highway Projecting 32 sq ft below top of right-of-way fascia or frontage mansard I Maximum 200 sq ft height 20 ft Per estabishment. 1.5 Wall below top of N/A sq ft per I linear ft of G-;a\: l:~;';:--:~ fascia or buildtng frontage I mansard 2 per lot per 4 per year for 60 days Temporary 32 sq ft lOft 5ft highway right-of- See section 4.15.11 way frontage Signs bv Special Use Permit: a) Off-site advertising signs; b) Electric message signs7~ c) Signs in public right-of-wav. Each establishment shall be limited to a choice of one (1) of the following: Projecting or wall. *See section 4.15.12.d. (Adopted 7-8-92) Sec. 4.15.12.7 Industrial (HI and LI) and mixed industrial (PD-IP) district~. r'\ The following are permitted within these districts as further regulated below: Sign Type Area I Height I Setback ! # Allowed Other I (Maximum I IMaxlmuml (Minimum) I (Maximum) I FOR EACH LOT I ",.c o,~n is allowed I per highway for each lot with 100 Freestanding 32 sq ft I: ft 5 ft right-or-way feet of continuous frontage highway right-of-way frontage. * FOR EACH I I i EST ABLlSHVlE'\'T ! DIrectory 24 sa ft 10 II 5 It I I oer intersection MaXimum I height :0 It I per highway Projecting 32 sq ft belo" lap 01 right-of-way faSCia or I frontage I mansard \laxlmum ! I 200 sq ft height :U :'t ! Per establishment. 1.5 Wall below lOp 0: I N/A sq ft per I linear ft of maximum faSCIa Of I building frontage manS.1rJ I I 2 per lot per 4 per year for 60 days Temporary 32 sq ft 10 ft :- ! ~ highway right-of- i I way frontage See section 4.15.11 Si'gns bv Special Use Permit: a) Off-site advertising signs; b) Electronic message signs7~ c) Signs in public right-of-wav. ~ 7 Draft: 10/31/00 Each establishment shall be limited to a choice of one (1) of the following: Wall or freestanding. *See section 4.15.12,d. (Adopted 7-8-92) ~. I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of an Ordinance duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, by a vote of . _ to _, as recorded below, at a regular meeting held on ~ Nay Clerk, Board of County Supervisors Mr. Bowerman Mr. Dorrier Ms. Humphris Mr. Martin Mr. PerKms Ms. Thomas 8 ~ /~ rl r'>, "'" ATTACHMENT [ 01104/01 Revisions to Section 4.15.05(c) Recommended by the Plannin~ Commission Sec. 4.15.05 By special use permit. The authority to administer signs by special use permit is hereby granted to the board of zoning appeals. The following signs shall be permitted by special use permit within any underlying district: a. Off-site advertising signs. b. Electric message signs. c. Signs in public rights-of-way; provided: (I) the subdivision, or planned development, or use to which the sign pertains abuts the public right-of-way;(2) the sign is either a subdivision sign, or a sign identifying a planned development authorized by sections 19.0,20.0, 25,0, 25A, and 29.0, or a sign demonstrated by the ov;ncr to be necessary because an on site sign "vould be ineffccti'/e to communicate its message off site because of topography or '/egetation; (3) before the applicant files an application for a special use permit, the Virginia Department of Transportation approves the sign at its proposed location; (4~) the freestanding sign regulations, other than setback regulations, applicable to the lot with the use to which the sign pertains shall apply; and (~ ~) if the sign is located within an entrance corridor overlay district, a certificate of appropriateness is issued by the architectural review board. . I Draft: 01104/01 ORDINANCENQ.Ol-18( ) ,C'. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 18, ZONING, ARTICLE II, BASIC REGULATIONS, AND ARTICLE III, DISTRICT REGULATIONS, OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 18, Zoning, Article II, Basic Regulations, is hereby amended and reordained as follows: By Amending: Sec. 4.15.05 Sec. 4.15.06 Sec. 4.15.07.4 Sec. 4.15.12.1 Sec. 4.15.12.2 Sec. 4.15.12.3 Sec. 4.15.12.4 Sec. 4,15.12.5 Sec. 4.15.12.6 Sec. 4.15,12.7 By special use permit. Prohibited signs. Setback., Residential and agricultural districts (RA, VR, R-1 AND R-2). Residential districts (R-4 and R-6). Residential (R-10 and R-15) and planned residential development (PRD) districts. Planned unit development (PUD) district. Commercial districts (C-1 and CO). Commercial (HC) and mixed commercial (PD-SC and PD-MC) districts. Industrial (HI and LI) and mixed industrial (PD- IP) districts. Chapter 18. Zoning Article II. Basic Regulations /~ Sec. 4.15.05 By special use permit. The authority to administer signs by special use permit is hereby granted to the board of zoning appeals. The following signs shall be permitted by special use permit within any underlying district: a. Off-site advertising signs. b. Electric message signs. c. Signs in public rights-of-way; provided: (1) the subdivision or planned development to which the sign pertains abuts the public right-of-way; (2) the sign is either a subdivision sign or a sign identifying a planned development authorized by sections 19.0.20.0. 25.0. 25A. and 29.0; (3) the freestanding sign regulations. other than setback regulations. applicable to the lot with the use to which the sign pertains shall applv: and (4) if the sign is located within an entrance corridor overlav district. a certificate of appropriateness is issued by the architectural review board. Sec. 4.15.06 Prohibited signs. ~ 1 Draft: 01/04/01 ~ Signs with any of the following characteristics are prohibited within Albemarle County. This includes any sign: a. Which violates any provisions of the law of Virginia relating to outdoor advertising, including 8-gections 33.1-351 to 33,1-381, inclusive, and 8-gection 46.2-831 of the Code of Virginia. b. Which violates federal law related to the control of outdoor advertising, including but not limited to 23 U.S,C. & 13 L induding U.S.C. Sec. 131 control of outdoor advertising and provisions or which violates federal or state lawconceming Virginia byways. c. Which obstructs free or clear vision, or otherwise causes hazards for vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian traffic by reason of location, shape, illumination or color. d. Which casts glare or light, directly or indirectly, on any public roadway, or on any adjacent property within a residential district. e. Which imitates an official traffic sign or signal, or conflicts with traffic safety needs due to location, color, movement, shape or illumination, f. Which is located or illuminated in such a manner as to cause a traffic hazard. g. Which outlines any building, sign or part thereof with neon or other light. n h. Which uses exposed, bare or uncovered neon illumination. i. Which contains or consists of a searchlight, beacon or strobe light, or the like, unless by an authorized government activity. j. Which contains or consists of pennants, ribbons, spinners, streamers or other similar moving devices. These devices, when not part of any sign, are similarly prohibited. k. Which is an advertising vehicle. 1. Which contains or consists of strings of light bulbs, not part of a decorative display but used as a means of attracting attention, m. Which is a billboard. n. Which moves, flashes, blinks or changes color except as otherwise specifically listed. o. Which are moored balloons or other tethered floating signs, p. Which are banners, except as a permitted temporary event sign. ~ 2 Draft: 01/04/01 q. Which is any sign, except those so placed by a duly authorized government agency, or as a no hunting, fishing, or trespassing sign, which is nailed, tacked, painted or in any other manner attached to any tree, cliff, fence, utility pole or support, utility tower, rack, curbstone, sidewalk, lamp post, hydrant, bridge or public property of any description. ~ r. Which is any sound-producing sign intended to attract attention regardless of whether or not the sign has a written message content. s. Which is a roof sign. t. Which is erected in or over a public right-of-way unless the sign is authorized under section 4.15.05(c). u. Which is prohibited along state scenic highways. Sec. 4.15.07.4 Setback. The ggetback shall be measured from the property line or, in the case of an access easement, from the edge of the easement, to the closest point of the sign. The setback for a sign within a public right-of-way shall be measured from the edge of the travelwav to the closest point of the sign. The setback for a A pole sign shall be measured from the edge of the sign or the pole, whichever is closest to the property line. Sec. 4.15.12.1 Residential and agricultural districts (RA, VR, R-1 and R-2). The following are permitted within these districts as further regulated below: /~ Sign Type Area Height Setback # Allowed Other (Maximum) (Maximum) (Minimum) (Maximum) FOR EACH LOT One sign is allowed 1 per highway for each lot with 100 Freestanding 24sq ft 10 ft 10 ft right-of-way feet of continuous frontage highway right-of-way . frontage. * FOR EACH I ESTABLISHMENT Directorv 24 Sq ft hit I 10 It 1 T\.13.\llllU!1: I height ~1l11 i Wall 20 sq ft hd~~\\ tnp \I! S:.J.lllL" ~;-, I N/A l'~b...'I~ ll~ hlllldln~ I 1l1alh:.lfd 32 sq ft Subdivision aggregate () ft III It 2 per entrance per entrance 1 per lot per Temporary 32 sq ft I 1111.[ Illll high-way right- See section 4.15.11 of-way frontaoe Signs by Special Use Permit: a) Off-site advertising signs; ~ 3 Draft: 01/04/01 ~ b) Electric message signs~~ c) Signs in public right-of-wav. All signage except subdivision signs refer to nonresidential uses only. Nonresidential uses including but not limited to: agricultural uses, church, fire/rescue squad, civic clubs, schools, daycare centers and retirement centers may be permitted. Forty (40) square feet in Rural Areas District (WALL SIGN ONLY). *See section 4.15.12,d, (Adopted 7-8-92) Sec. 4.15.12.2 Residential districts (R-4 and R-6). The following are permitted within these districts as further regulated below: f'1 Sign Type Area Height Setback # Allowed Other (Maximum) (Maximum) (Minimum) (Maximum) FOR EACH LOT One sign is allowed 1 per highway for each lot with 100 Freestanding 24 sq ft lOft 10 ft right-of-way feet of continuous frontage highway right-of-)'Iay frontage. * FOR EACH ESTABLISHMENT Directorv 24 sa ft 6ft lOft Maximum height 20 ft sa me as Wall 20 sq ft below top 01" building N/A fascia nr Mansaru 32 sq ft Subdivision aggregate 61"t lOft 2 per entrance ner entrance I per lot per 4 per year for 60 days Temporary 32 sq ft 10 Ii lOft highway right-of- way frontage See section 4.15.11 Signs by Special Use Permit: a) Off-site advertising signs; b) Electric message signs~~ c) Signs in public right-of-wav. All signage except subdivision signs refer to nonresidential uses only. Nonresidential uses including but not limited to: agricultural uses, church, fire/rescue squad, civic clubs, schools and daycare centers may be pen11ittcd. *See section4.15.12,d. (Adopted 7-8-(2) Sec. 4.15.12.3 Residential (R-l 0 and R-15) and planned residential development (PRD) districts. The following are permitted within these districts as further regulated below: Sign Type FOR EACH LOT Area Maximum) lklghl {~la\lnll1mj Sethack I :'>.1 1I11111l1111 1 # Allowed (Maximum Other f\ 4 Draft: 01/04/01 One sign is allowed 1 per highway for each lot with 100 Freestanding 24 sq ft 10 ft 5ft right-of-way feet of continuous frontage highway right-of-way frontaO'e* FOR EACH ESTABLISHMENT Directorv 24 Sq ft 6 ft 5ft Maximum height 20 ft same as 1 sq ft per 1 linier ft Wall 32 sq ft below top of building N/A of building frontage fascia or Mansard 32 sq ft Subdivision aggregate 6 ft 5ft 2 per entrance ner entrance 1 per lot per 4 per year for 60 days Temporary 32 sq ft 10 ft 5ft highway right-of- wav fronta!!e See section 4.15.11 ~ Signs by Special Use Permit: a) Off-site advertising signs; b) Electric message signs7~ c) Signs in public right-of-wav. All signage except subdivision signs refer to nonresidential uses only. *See section 4.15.12.d. (Adopted 7-8-92) Sec. 4.15.12.4 Planned unit development (PUD) district. The following are permitted within this district as further regulated below: ~. Sign Type Area Height Setback # Allowed Other (Maximum) (Maximum) (Minimum) (Maximum) FOR EACH LOT One sign is allowed 1 per highway for each lot with 100 Freestanding 24 sq ft 12 ft 5ft right-of-way feet of continuous frontage highway right-of-way frontage. * FOR EACH ESTABLISHMENT Directory 24 sq ft 6ft 5ft Maximum height 20 ft 1 sq ft per 1 linear ft Wall 32 sq ft below top of N/A of building frontage fascia or mansard 32 sq ft Subdivision aggregate 6ft 5 ft 2 per en trance per entrance 1 per lot per 4 per year for 60 days Temporary 32 sq ft lOft 5f! highway right-of- way frontaO'e See section 4.15.11 Si!?:ns bv Special Use Permit: 5 ,~ Draft: 01104/01 ~ a) Off-site advertising signs; b) Electric message signs,:,~ c) Signs in public right-of-wav. All signage except subdivision signs refer to nonresidential uses only. Projecting signs, however, shall only be allowed when wall or freestanding signs are impractical; except as provided in section 4.15.4. *See section 4.15.12.d, (Adopted 7-8-92) Sec. 4.15.12.5 Commercial district~ (C-1 and CO). The following are permitted within these districts as further regulated below: r"'\ Sign Type Area Height Setback # Allowed Other (Maximum) (Maximum) (Minimum) (Maximum) FOR EACH LOT One sign is allowed I per highway for each lot with 100 feet of continuous Freestanding 32 sq ft 12ft 5ft right-of-way highway right-of-way frontage frontage. * FOR EACH ESTABLISHMENT Directorv 24 sa ft 6ft 5ft I oer intersection Maximum height I per highway Projecting 32 sq ft 20 ft below top of right-of-way fascia or Mansard frontage Maximum height Per establishment, 1 Wall 100 sq ft 20 ft below top of N/A sq ft per 1 linear ft of maximum fascia or Mansard building frontage 2 per lot per 4 per year for 60 days Temporary 32 sq ft 10ft 5ft highway right-of- See section 4.15.11 way trontaQ:e Signs by Special Use Permit: a) Off-site advertising signs; b) Electric message signs,:,~ c) Signs in public right-of-way. Each establishm~nt shall be limited to a choice of one (1) of the following: wall or projecting. *See section 4.15,12.d. (Adopted 7-8-92) Sec. 4.15.12.6 Commercial (HC) and mixed commercial (PD-SC and PD-MC) district~. The following are permitted within these districts as further regulated below: Sign Type Area Height Setback # Allowed Other (Maximum) (Maximum) (Minimum) (Maximum) FOR EACH LOT One sign is allowed 1 per highway for each lot with 100 Freestanding 32 sq ft 12 ft 5ft right.of.way feet of continuous fron tage highway right.of.way frontaQ:e* ~ 6 Draft: 01/04/01 Sign Type Area Height Setback # Allowed Other (Maximum) (Maximum) (Minimum) (Maximum) FOR EACH ESTABLISHMENT Directorv 24 sa ft lOft 5ft I per intersection Maximum height 20 ft I per highway Projecting 32 sq ft below top of right-of-way fascia or frontage mansard Maximum 200 sq ft height 20 ft Per estabishment, 1.5 Wall below top of N/A sq ft per I linear ft of maximum fascia or building frontage mansard 2 per lot per 4 per year for 60 days Temporary 32 sq ft 10 ft 5ft highwaYTight-of- See section 4.15.11 way frontage ... . . ...... .... H.. -.. . . ,~. Signs by Special Use Permit: a) Off-site advertising signs; b) Electric message signs7~ c) Signs in public right-of-wav. Each establishment shall be limited to a choice of one (1) of the following: Proj ecting or wall. *See section 4.15.l2.d. (Adopted 7-8-92) Sec. 4.15.12.7 Industrial (HI and LI) and mixed industrial (PD-IP) district~. .~~ The following are permitted within these districts as further regulated below: Sign Type Area Height Setback # Allowed Other (Maximum) (Maximum) (Minimum) (Maximum) FOR EACH LOT One sign is allowed I per highway for each lot with 100 Freestanding 32 sq ft 12 ft 5ft right-of-way feet of continuous frontage highway right-of-way frontal!e. * FOR EACH ESTABLISHMENT Directory 24 sq ft lOft 5ft I per intersection Maximum height 20 n 1 per highway Projecting 32 sq ft below top of right-of-way fascia or fran tage mansard Maximum 200 sq ft height 20 n Per establishment, 1.5 Wall below top of N/A sq ft per I linear ft of maximum fascia or building frontage mansard 2 per lot per 4 per year for 60 days Temporary 32 sq ft lOft 5ft highway right-of- See section 4.15.11 way frontal!e Signs by Special Use Permit: ~ 7 ~ o r'l Draft: 01/04/01 a) Off-site advertising signs; b) Electronic message signs-;-~ c) Signs in public right-of-wav. Each establishment shall be limited to a choice of one (1) ofthe following: Wall or freestanding, *See section 4.15.12.d. (Adopted 7-8-92) I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of an Ordinance duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, by a vote of _ to _, as recorded below, at a regular meeting held on Clerk, Board of County Supervisors Aye Nay Mr. Bowerman Mr. Domer Ms. Humphris Mr. Martin Mr. Perkins Ms. Thomas 8 , David P. Bowerman ", . Rio Undsay G, Dorri~Jr. Scottsville , Charlotte Y. Humphris . Jack Jouett COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S. Martin Rivanna Walter F. Perkins WhiteHall Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller January 16,2001 Mr. George R. Larie 107 Tally Ho Dr. Charlottesville, VA 22901 Dear Mr.~ / At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on January 10, 2001, you were reappointed to serve as the Jack Jouett Magisterial District representative on the Equalization Board, with said term to run from Janu.ary 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001. I have enclosed an updated roster for your convenience. On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to continue to serve the County in this capacity. Sincerely, y/ddy ~ Sally H. Thomas Chairman SHTllab Enclosure cc: James Camblos Bruce Woodzell * Printed on recycled paper , David B Bowerman , .Rio Undsay G. Dorrieft-Jr. Scottsville ( Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S. Martin Rivanna Walter E Perkins White Hall Sally H, Thomas Samuel Miller January 16, 2001 Mr. James E. Clark, Jr. 1130 Oak Hill Dr. Charlottesville, VA 22901 Dear Mr. Clark: At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on January 10, 2001, you were reappointed to serve as the Scottsville Magisterial District representative on the Equalization Board, with said term to run from January 1, 20C1 through December 31, 2001. I have enclosed an updated roster for your convenience On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportJnity to express the Board's appreciation for your willingness to continue to serve the County in this capacity, Sincerely, y(df9f(~ Sally H. Thomas Chairman SHTliab Enclosure cc: James Camblos Bruce Woodzell <1' Printed on recycled paper ~... . ~'"=."<I!' COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE . MEMORANDUM DATE: RE: Members of the Board of Supervisors Laurie Bentley, C.M.C.~ / Senior Deputy Clerk ~ January 10, 2001 TO: FROM: Vacancies on Boards and Commissions I have included a current list of existing vacancies on boards and commissions through March 31, 2001. Please advise me if you want me to advertise any of the vacancies. Thank you, Cc: Bob Tucker Larry Davis ~I (City will rtise vacancy and make recommendation) BOARD OR COMMISSION MEMBER TERM EXPIRES NEW TERM EXPIRES WISH TO BE RE- APPOINTED? MAGISTERIAL APPOINTMENT? t, (One late application was given to Ms. Thomas on 1/3/01,) New committee (1-3 vacancies-up to Board to decide # of slots) David P. Bowerman Rlo Undsay G. Domer. Jr. Scottsville Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 January 8, 2001 Charles S. Martin Rivanna WaIter F. Perkins WhIte Hall Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miner The Honorable Blake Caravati, Mayor City of Charlottesville P. O. Box 911 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 RE: Meadow Creek Parkway Dear Blake: The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors has reviewed your letter of December 13, 2000 and appreciates the sharing of your correspondence with the Virginia Department of Transportation regarding the Meadow Creek Parkway. It is important that you know the Board of Supervisors continues to support the construction of the Meadow Creek Parkway under the guidelines that City Council proposed in Mayor Daugherty's letter of July 19, 1999. As part of that agreement, we hired a consultant at a cost of$124,000 to ensure that the design of that portion of the parkway within the County follows the same design principles of the City's portion of the parkway as proposed in 1999. In regard to your suggestions concerning a new transportation network, we share your interest in continuing to work to solve "increasingly complex transportation challenges." Under TEA-21, we are required to work together to create long range plans that support economic vitality, safety and security, accessibility and mobility, and that protect the environment, conserve energy, increase "intermodalism," promote efficiency, and preserve the usefulness of existing transportation systems. Within two months, City Council and the Board of Supervisors should have appointed a group of citizens and given them an assignment to create a new regional transportation network plan, just as your letter suggests. The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors suggests that specific concerns, such as neighborhood protection, be given to that group and its staff, with an expected intermediate plan by the end of this year and a twenty-year plan within some months after that. This is the legal, staffed, and funded method of making regional transportation network plans. More immediately, we suggest that City Council and the Board of Supervisors members participate in the February 8th (at Westminster Canterbury, 7:00 p.m.) Jefferson Area Eastern Planning Initiative worksession regarding land use and transportation north and east of the City. That is a $500,000 study that is developing plans and alternatives in exactly the area mentioned in your cover letter with its report expected by June of this year. Consultants and staff are willing to meet explicitly with the Council and Board, and/or the Planning Commissions if that is preferred. There are alternative transportation networks being tested, with a City/County consensus the desired outcome. Finally, our MPO representatives meet monthly with yours and this seems a logical group to carry on the conversation that you suggest. With regard to your suggestions concerning the parkland to accompany the parkway, we continue to support efforts to make this a true park with attractive and useable land. Our consultants, even in their most preliminary report, are making us aware of what an important amenity this will be for our joint communities. Until their report is fmished, we won't know what number of acres to recommend, but the 50-acre figure may turn out to be reasonable. We do not want to pre-judge their recommendation at this time. We will point out that last year we joined in the efforts, especially Meredith Richards's, to get legislative action on acquiring additional right-of-way for the parkland. (1) Printed on recycled paper The Honorable Blake Caravati, Mayor January 10,2001 RE: Meadow Creek Parkway Page 2 The Board of Supervisors fully understands the difficulty that City Council has been confronted with as it relates to the ultimate design of the parkway and its related intersections. However, it is vitally important that we move forward on this project. As our consultant completes its work and provides additional recommendations on the design of this parkway and related issues such as parkland, etc., we are requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation to move forward because the traffic conditions existing on Rio Road and Park Street cannot withstand any additional traffic until improvements are in place. We look forward to our continued working relationship on this and other matters facing our community and believe that it is time to fma1ize this segment of our transportation network. Should you or other members of Council have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me or other Board members. Sincerely, .d4#~ Sally H. Thomas Chair SHT/dbm 01.001 pc: ~ar1e County Board of Supervisors Charlottesville City Council The Honorable H. Carter Myers, III Mr. Donald R. Askew " ~ .-. ',..,\. COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA CHARLES D. NOTTINGHAM COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PO BOX 11649 LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA 24506 January 9, 2001 W.T. RAMEY, P.E. DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR Route 29 Corridor Development Study Project: 6029-963-FOl, PE-I00 From: 1-64 To: North Carolina State Line PPMS: TP26 File # - 1M-03-01 Amherst, Nelson, Albemarle, Pitt sylvania and Campbell Counties Public Workshops A Public Workshop will be held for the above mentioned corridor development study in the counties of Nelson, Campbell, Pitt sylvania, Albemarle and Amherst. The purpose of these workshops are to provide interested citizens an opportunity to informally review and discuss with Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) representatives draft recommendations for the Route 29 Corridor Study. This corridor extends from the North Carolina state line to. the City of Charlottesville. The different areas of concern and modes of transportation,. now and in the future, will be discussed. Your comments and concerns'will be an essential part of the outcome. County and date ofPubiic Workshops: (All Workshops will be held from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.) Nelson County Wednesday, January 17,2001 Tye River Elementary School on Route 29, 1.4 miles north Colleen in Nelson County Amherst County Wednesday, January 24,2001 Amherst County High School on Route 29 Business in the Town of Amherst Albemarle County Thursday, January 18, 2001 Red Hill Elementary School Red Hill School Road (Route 710) Just north of North Oar den, 0.25 mile east of Route '29 ' Pitt sylvania County Thursday, January 25,2001 Vocational Technical School on Route 29 near White Oak Mountain in Pitt sylvania Comity Campb~lIcotiniy' Tuesday, January 23, 2001 Vocational Technical School on Route 29 south (near Route 24) (~:N TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY ...... .. .".. ROUTE 29 CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT STUDY Counties of Nelson, Albemarle, Campbell, Amherst & Pittsylvania PUBLIC 'llVOR~S~OPS MEE TINGS: All meetings will be held from 4:00PM to 7:00PM Nelson County Wednesday, January 17, 2001 Tye River Elementary School on Route 29 1.4 miles north of Colleen in Nelson County. Albemarle County Thursday, January 18, 2001 Red Hill Elementary School Red Hill School Road (Route 710) just north of North Garden, 0.25 mile east ofRoute 29 in Albemarle County. Campbell County Tuesday, January 23,2001 Campbell County Vo- Tech Center on Route 29 (near Route 24) south of Lynchburg. Amherst County Wednesday, January 24,2001 Amherst County High School on Route 29 Business in the Town of Amherst. Pittsylvania County Thursday, January 25,2001 Pittsylvania County Vo- Tech Center on Route 29 near White Oak Mountain. PurDose: To provide interested citizens an opportunity to informally review and discuss with Virginia Departn,ent of Transportation (VDOT) repre- sentatives draft recOI'nmendations for the Route 29 Corridor Study. This corridor extends from the North Carolina stliteline to the City of Charlottesville. The different areas of concern and modes of transportation, now and in the future, will be discussed and your comments and concerns will be an essential part of the outcome. Comments: Written comments and other exhibits relative to the proposed project may be submitted at the meeting or sent to VDOT at any time within 10 days after the meeting, Special Assistance: If you require additional information or special assistance to attend and participate in these meetings, please call our HOTLINE (toil free) 1-888-ROUTE 29 (1-888-768-8329) Device for the Hearing Impaired (TDD): 1-800-307-4630 Project: 6029-963-F01,PE-I00 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of County Executive 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5841 FAX (804) 972-4060 FP0<(804)296-5800 January 10, 2001 Mr. V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director Department of Planning & Community Development County of Albemarle 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 RE: Routes 22/231 Corridor - Truck Traffic Issue Dear Wayne: Attached is a copy of a memorandum and a briefing on the issue concerning Routes 22/231 from Charles D. Nottingham, Commission of the Department of Transportation. Please have staff review this information and provide the Board of Supervisors with your comments/recommendations at your earliest convenience, preferably at one of their upcoming day meetings. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me or Jim Bryan, VDOT's Resident Engineer. Sincerely, Robert W. Tucker, Jr. County Executive RWTjr/dbm 01.003 Attachments pc: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors w/attachments COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, 23219-2000 CHARLES D. NOlTlNGHAM COMMISSIONER December 29, 2000 Albemarle County Clerk Ms. Ella W. Carey, CMC 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 Re: Truck Traffic Issues- Route 22/231 Corridor -Albemarle/Louisa/Orange County Dear Ms. Carey: Numerous Albemarle County residents along the Route 22/231 corridor between Shadwell and the Town of Gordonsville have contacted me through Senator Emily Couric regarding the level of truck traffic on the roadway and have requested the Department of Transportation to consider a restriction on through tractor trailers. As this corridor spans the three counties of Albemarle, Louisa, and Orange, and potential alternate routes travel through these three jurisdictions as well as the City of Charlottesville, Greene County, and Fluvanna County, it is our preference that the review of this request include input from such localities' boards of supervisors or equivalent. Enclosed is a briefing ofthe issues. Please, through your resident engineer, provide your comments on the request for a through truck restriction on the Route 22/231 corridor. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. 0L SiO~el?u Charles D. NOttingh~ Enclosures CC: Mr. W. L. Gentry, Resident Engineer @ Louisa Mr. D. B. Gore, Resident Engineer @ Culpeper Mr. J. Bryan, Resident Engineer @ Charlottesville Mr. H, W. Mills, Asst. Resident Engineer @ Charlottesville WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Transportation Culpeper District Traffic Engineering/Operations Program Re: BRIEFING: ThrouQh Tractor Trailer Traffic Issues 09 January 2001 Route 22/231 Corridor From: Route 250 (Shadwell) To: Town of Gordonsville South Corporate Limits (SCL) Albemarle/Louisa/Orange County BackQround In the past, a number of Albemarle County citizens residing along the Route 22/231 corridor between Shadwell and the Town of Gordonsville have expressed safety concerns over the number of trucks traveling this roadway. Their efforts have focused on obtaining a vehicular restriction which would prohibit through tractor trailers from traveling this corridor. Recently, representatives of those citizens have contacted me through Senator Emily Couric reiterating the same concerns. Past safety/operational studies conducted by the Department of Transportation have generated various mitigation to address the concerns along the corridor. In the 1980's, the speed limit on the section of Route 22 from Route 250 to Route 231 was reduced from the statutory 55 mph to 50 mph, Those earlier reviews and subsequent traffic classification studies did not indicate a significantly high truck percentage utilizing the corridor. More recently in 1994/95, the same concerns resurfaced. At that time, the Department's policy regarding truck traffic on the Primary System was such that trucks should be allowed to travel on Primary System Highways unless there were significant safety circumstances which would deem such travel inappropriate - extreme geometries, significantly high accident rate involving trucks, etc, At that time, two other county Boards of Supervisors (Orange County and Louisa County), whose jurisdiction the Route 22/231 corridor travels through, opposed any ban on trucks citing significant adverse economic impacts to their respective areas. A public meeting with various state and local government agencies, local industry, community representatives, and representation from the Virginia Trucking Association, was held with the conclusion that our combined efforts would shift focus to the following areas: 1. Examination of the accident patterns/trends occurring along the corridor for implementation of appropriate accident reducing mitigative measures for all vehicles. 2. Enforcement to reduce the number of illegal trucks traveling the corridor - single-trailer combinations over 65 ft in total length and double trailer combinations. 3. Voluntary industry reductions in truck/tractor-trailer trips along the corridor. At the meeting, one local industry volunteered to reduce their local trips on the corridor and committed to discussing similar voluntary efforts from other local industry representatives. Following the meeting, the Department conducted a comprehensive Safety/Operational Study to determine whether the truck volume percentages were abnormally high and to examine the accident history of all collisions to determine if any patterns/trends were evident. The data collected confirmed past indications that truck percentages ranged between 4% and 6%, relatively normal for a two-Iane/two-way primary facility. The number of accidents involving trucks at that time were somewhat elevated in calendar years 1994 - 1996 but not considered significant enough to restrict all trucks from traveling the corridor. The factors involved in the majority of the accidents of all vehicles, including trucks, were a result of the motorists experiencing difficulty in following the alignment of the road in various areas of the corridor where run-off-road accidents and accidents involving centerline encroachment were occurring. The Department identified those areas and implemented the following measures at such areas and throughout the corridor: 1. Enhanced advanced waming signing for curves, intersections, and other areas where accidents (mainly run-off-road) were occur~ing. 2. Installation of roadside vertical post delineation in areas where the motorists appeared to be experiencing difficulties negotiating the roadway. 3. Inclusion of this Route 22/231 corridor in a pilot of installing single indicated raised snowplowable pavement markers intended for two-Iane/two-way pavement primary roadways. The markers were subsequently installed. A follow-up study in 1998 indicated some positive results to the efforts in 1996-97: 1, A slight reduction of total trucks and tractor trailers traveling the roadway. 2. A reduction in the total number of accidents back to levels prior to the spikes in 1994 and 1996. Although the accident rates remained slightly higher than the statewide average, the number of accidents involving trucks and/or tractor-trailers, especially in those collisions where trucks/tractor trailers were cited at-fault, dropped. 3. There were reductions in some accident types - head-on and sideswipe opposite collisions, angle, sideswipe same, non-collision accidents, as well as collisions involving centerline encroachments. Current Issues: The community in Albemarle County has requested, through Senator Couric's office, that the Department of Transportation once again consider a vehicular restriction on the corridor, mainly tractor trailers. It is the Department's understanding that law enforcement is experiencing difficulty enforcing the statute which prohibits longer tractor-trailer combinations (exceeding 65 ft) and the double-trailer combinations from using Route 22/231 : Code of Virginia Section 46.2-1112 Length of vehicles, generally; special permits; tractor truck semi-trailer combinations, etc.; operating on certain highways. Consequently, the Albemarle County Police requested the Department install signs indicating that such trucks are not allowed on the roadway. These signs were installed in early December and will be evaluated regarding their effectiveness in the next few months. Note: Similar signing in other areas of the state is concurrently being evaluated for effectiveness as an emphasis on the noted statute. The sign texts generally read: T R U C K E R S +- Sign Panel: Black Text on Yellow Background TRACTOR TRAILERS OVER 65 FEET +- Sign Panel: Black Text on White Background PROHIBITED ON [Route Shield] In considering alternate routing for trucks and/or tractor-trailers, there are concerns with directing additional truck traffic to the three options for motorists traveling from Town of Gordonsville to Shadwell and vice-versa (refer to location map attached): "e'm~~~f!69.tEf~} Route 250 From: Route 22 (Shadwell) To: Route 29 (Charlottesville) City of Charlottesville/Alb. Co. Length: 6.73 miles Alfemafe'R0iJ1incfB:- Route 250 (or 1-64) From: Route 22 (Shadwell) To: Route 15 Albemarle/FluvannaJLouisa Co. Length: 10.40 miles Route 29 Route 15 From: Route 250 (Charlottesville) From: Route 250 To: Route 33 (Ruckersville) To: Town of Gordonsville SCL Albemarle/Greene County Fluvanna/Louisa/Orange County Length: 14.09 miles Length: 11.45 miles Route 33 From: Route 29 (Ruckersville) To: Town of Gordonsvill WCL Albemarle/Orange County Length: 12.41 miles Total Lenath Alternate A: 33.23 mi. Total Lenath Alternate B: 21.85 mi. Total Lenath of Route 22/231 Corridor: 14.89 mi. Preliminarv Considerations on Alternate Routes: Alternate A: AllernalEtRouHfiq'bt Route 20 From: Route 250 To: Route 33 Albemarle/Orange County Length: 15.07 miles Route 33 From: Route 20 To: Town of Gordonsville WCL Orange County Length: 5.60 miles Total Lenath Alternate C: 20,67 mi. Alternate A is currently the designated ST AA routing for the noted longer trucks, tractor trailer combinations (in excess of 65 feet) as well a double trailer combinations, and would be a sensible routing for those trucks traveling to the Gordonsville area from south and west of Charlottesville. However. for those originating from the heavy commercial areas east of Charlottesville, the alternate would force the trucks back through the heavy traffic areas within and immediately north of the City of Charlottesville. Such would create an additional 10 % miles to the length of the trip and significant time delays (traffic/traffic signals/etc.). These truck drivers would undoubtedly opt to use Route 20 to Route 33 to Gordonsville (described below as Alternate C) as a preferred routing rather than travel back into the City and into the heavy traffic on both Route 250 and Route 29. This option has its own complications as is noted below under the heading Alternate C, Should the truck driver travel the Alternate A routing, another complication could arise on the secondary system. Route 607 from Route 29 to Route 33 through Greene County and Orange County is currently the preferred commuter cut-through for those residing in western Orange County and working in Charlottesville. Within the past 5 to 7 years, traffic on this route has increased dramatically. It appears that truck traffic has increased as the Greene County and Orange County governments have expressed concerns and requested a review by the Department of Transportation. Such review will be initiated in early calendar year 2001. Alternate B: Alternate B already has a higher truck percentage, historically ranging from 6% to 7% on the Route 250 section and 6% to 12+% on the Route 15 section compared with 5:t % on the Route 22/231 corridor. The accident rates on the two sections of the alternate routes (for the last 5 Y:z yrs. -- Route 250 at 2.15 acc/mvm; Route 15 at 1.65 acc/mvm) are above that on Route 22/231(1.62 acc/mvm) the statewide average at 1.17 acc/mvm. The distance of the alternate route is approximately 22 miles versus the near 15 miles on the Route 22/231 corridor. In 1996 and 1998, the Department was reluctant to route additional trucks on these sections of roadways due to the existing higher truck percentages and higher accident rate. Alternate C: Due to certain sections of Route 20 where the vertical and h.orizontal alignment is more challenging - especially between Route 250 and Stoney Point -- routing additional truck traffic on Alternate C has not been recommended. The accident rate on this section of highway was 2.73 acc/mvm over the last 5 Y2 years (preliminarily, the previous 5 years appears to exceed 3.5 acc/mvm), relatively higher than Route 22/231 at 1.62 acc/mvm, the combined routes in Alternate Route 8 at 1.92 acc/mvm, and the statewide average at 1.17 acc/mvm. Truck traffic volumes have increased over the last decade from approximately 3Y2% to 5%. The Department has received past concerns regarding truck travel along this section of Route 20. (Special counts indicated truck traffic ranging in the 3% to 6% range.) Any re-routing of trucks on to Route 20 will be received adversely by those residents along the corridor. Alternate C, being a more circuitous route, is approximately 20 Y2 miles in comparison with the near 15 mi. for the Route 22/231 corridor. The Department would not recommend this as an alternate route for trucks. In its consideration of the request for a vehicular restriction, the Department of Transportation will be factoring the effects of such an action on the entire transportation network as well as requesting input from the localities through which the corridor IS located (Albemarle County, Louisa County, and Orange County). Input will also be sought from the localities through which the potential alternate routes are located (City of Charlottesville and Greene County). JSH:jh ~- "()"~O~ ".. ':"''''''',' L 0 'w i) u u. N . ftE ~~'~0 ~IS .\..~; ~~.~ '. \-:::-.....~ :>llLLIIUlltl .., n'F =,..IL~i:S .' ", - . ........==. _.....-.-.- .:.,.~~.'1 re,QIl:A riG"'A~"_ ~"'."III.( f5O' .... -I;:.O..'S ,..,.~I..i"l:1..Fr r . ,1) ,...J ..O~IJI~I ,.-';;:... J I I I 'w I' 'SO' .... J De.~.LANI:. ,~~ }: \::::-~ . ~:.~,;~ . RS_~~LAI~i A;;J ll3iI ~ljj . - 7~ sr -- :.-:0-.' r"'!&6i' . ':. "I;. ::" .-...~~:.@:A -.-<? ':' '- . -I: Ii'; ~ ., FI " .... r". I .