Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB200400284 Request of Modification, Variance, Waiver Preliminary Plat 2004-09-27 ` PHONE(434)293-4251 RIX Sigel (434)977-0205 FAX(434)296-5220 ROUDABUSH,GALE &ASSOC.,INC. INFO@ROUDABUSH.COM LAND SURVEYING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ENGINEERING 914 MONTICELLO ROAD LAND PLANNING CHARLOTTESVILLE,VIRGINIA 22902 J.THOMAS GALE,L.S. WILLIAM S.ROUDABUSH,L.S. MARILYNN R.GALE,L.S. WILLIAM J.LEDBE I I ER,L.S EDWARD D.CAMPBELL III,L.S. September 27, 2004 Stephen B. Waller Senior Planner Department of Planning and Community Development County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Re: Avon Park, Preliminary Site Plan SDP 04-077 Request for Waiver of Section 4.2.3.2 of the Zoning Ordinance Dear Stephen, I am writing to request a modification of Section 4.2.3.2 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance; thereby, allowing us to dig and develop in some areas (as shown on the accompanying site plan) that currently have slopes in excess of 25%. I would like to address some of the concerns as they are outlined in Section 4.2 of the Ordinance. Soil Erosion: Our site plan indicates that we will only be disturbing a relatively small area with slopes of 25% or greater. These slopes will be very carefully protected during construction and thoroughly covered with the appropriate ground cover upon completion. Sedimentation: Development of these slopes should not result in an increase in silt and sedimentation. These slopes will be carefully planted with the appropriate types of groundcovers, so that in reality the post development vegetation on these slopes may very well be superior to what is there today. V Excessive Stormwater Run-off Excessive run-off should not be a factor in this development since we will be providing water quality control measures for all of our site improvements. Protection of Existing Streams and Public Drinking Water: There are no streams or reservoirs that are located immediately below any of the slopes that are to be disturbed; therefore, we do not see any potential threat to streams or public drinking water. Loss of Aesthetic Resource: Grading in these areas does not constitute the loss of an aesthetic resource. Encroachment Into Flood Plains: The slopes that are to be disturbed (as shown on the site plan) are not located within any floodplain. Rapid and/or Large Scale Movement of Soil and Rock: We do not anticipate any large scale removal of rock. In closing, we do not believe that the strict application of the requirements of Section 4.2.3.2 would forward the purposes of this ordinance or best serve the public's interest. We thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Matt Wentland