HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201700038 Review Comments Architectural Review Board Approval 2017-08-15Comments for SDP2017-4/ARB2017-38: OTV Blocks 5, 20, 21
Provided to applicants at Friday, August 18, 201710 a.m. meeting
HNM 8/16/17
1. Please put the most recent revised drawing da-t-e-so-n-TWsite plan sets. -
2. The street and perimeter parking area trees - particularly the Willow Oaks (QP) on Old Trail
Drive and Golf Drive and the October Glory Red Maples (AROG) on Trailhead Drive - must be
planted 40 feet on center in order to meet ARB standards and criteria. Except for the instance of
two trees, the majority are in the same position as proposed in the previous submission, and the
distances average 50' or more on center.
3. Check the calculations in the landscaping notes at the top of page C17; they differ from the
previous notes as well as staffs calculations. Also, one note states that 54 trees have been
provided for parking but staff was able to locate 52 on sheets C15-C17. Please verify this
number (it may be beneficial to call out trees that address parking requirements on plans).
4. In the plant schedule, the number of Arapaho Crapemyrtles (LIA) was listed as 14 but only 13
were drawn on the plans; the discrepancy seems to result from the deletion of 1 LIA from C15
from the previous submission.
5. The number of Ilex Glabra Shamrock (IGS) was reduced to 75, according to the plant schedule,
but 75 is still greater than 25% of the total number of shrubs, which at 276 (total number)
should be under 69.
6. This number is suspect, however, as the plant schedule listed 75 IGS, yet 78 were found on the
drawing; it listed 38 JVGO, yet 42 were found on the drawing; and it listed 47 RMRR, yet 43 were
found on the drawing. Please verify your calculations with what appears on the landscape plans.
7. The tree symbols for the 12 gingkos (GBPS) which were on the previous submission have
disappeared, yet the GBPS call outs remain and the number is listed in the plant schedule on this
resubmission. Please address this omission.
8. The standard maximum for light levels in the EC overlay district is 20 footcandles. Two values
listed in this photometric plan exceed that maximum. However, previous staff comments were
in error and identified the maximum value as 30 footcandles. Please note that this is not correct;
however, the two values above 20 footcandles may stand given staffs previous error.
9. Note that the applicant responded to staffs previous comment that "no wall -mounted lights are
proposed." This conflicts with the architect's submittals, which include revised elevations
showing wall mounted lights as well as manufacturer's specifications and cut sheets for those
lights. the architect, however, has also stated that photometry for these lights is unavailable,
and so staff has struck the request to add the photometric values of these wall -mounted lights
to the photometric plan. HOWEVER, a condition of the CoA will state that ground -level
illumination from combined wall- and ground -mounted light fixtures shall not exceed 20
footcandles (unless otherwise noted) and shall not contribute to spillover on the property line
in excess of half (0.5) a footcandle.
� •U
� C
U V
.�
y Q
N
W C
�m3ocoo
coEp�o
O
a
N_ U
c �T
_ T `_ U O
�N ° 0L c m
a) �
LO
a
� �
�
N y
� �
CAD
_�
N
� _C y
C O d E= w
(n O
N
cL
m y "a
m 0 y X
CiB
N
w
t
n
_
ye32
�
s�oa�sm
C N- w
iB
O
N
_�
m ro
= C
N O N
l0
O Q1
ca
-
E
p o ,0
W D
c� E�� c X
0 0
O
'+- O
m ��
=O �. p 0 3 w N
a�mi
w �'
o
R
m W•E W
1 m� -E
E'am c
3
w
m G O
E
c
o
N
XX
ro
�Qo�
3 M 7 O
6 'L00
j X
O O E N
Q 7- 'G 0 y
�" C
�n N p
Cl)
Q
U
�•
N
C N +�. C
CL
0 0 6 V "G C O
M 'O T v a
th
M
m 0
°
m
•�• C
O N j,L
`O
Q axp+ y! y N
Q
Nto
60
N vCLi vmi
O E 3
ce
O
c 0
N
�Se
E� W°' o�
m
O
�
Y
z �
:3 van E
-r- O'L
o m ��,4 0
° oo'C
W
tea.
O
Q C
fA - E-
f° 0s
0. W W E U N 0cn
O
Z
O O
U qt
C
N
C
p N
� G
C
y
m
co
Y E
-C
~
A
N
C LD N
- 7 N
O
N
1 N
_
M m
C
E (u
ro o
3
o
y
� )
E
`
m a�
0
-
�-
N
wmrn
m•c.
�a
�
C
+
0-6
t C
c
r+
o_L
(� Q-
N
��
N
a��i=
C
-
N .�
ro
2 Z
n
'�
O U-
y
m
C7
X�
N
`
O "O m
C m •C
�fl
Nr
C C 7
O m
T
0
D
QC-O
O m r
Z._�
U_ O
°psis
+,
m
.� `
°+;
O .
=
fx
c
E-0
Z
N y
N
N m
Cl
M E
ui3
N.�
Mco
r
r_
Eo
�va�i��
�cn
p"+� i3
ami
c C
W m
�Nrrm
E
*�
O
0ror
N
4g.o
E�
-ova.
maoo
V
��o`m���
row. rn�
E
W W
m�
� ' o °
��E
O. N N
y
CV)O
o a
y vi sts
N E C
o
U {0 (I)
O
V "�
C C
0,6
0 CO�
_ '
?�
Q m m
_
Q
Q' w
Q 7
N
AeK. Zo n — 3g = ow -?�' LKs 's--, Z-0 � -;;—I I
LIGHTING PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
F:6 g. L,�cL 1-461)Af7FJ'> LAE?tM anivl
CHECKLIST
ITEM
NOTES
Cut sheets
Lumen level (3000 or more must be
"A OLE µa bF-i. L-1 c-rtfr
full cutoff)
° N 1"I
Bulb/lamp location (must be totally
�rrp kSOvtr d6f-tFACX1T
within house to be full cutoff)
Luminaire schedule
Catalog # coordinated with cut sheets
o i�-
Fixture quantity/types coordinated
[ V A O T IVI Mar Gl W &W iN L.t eltt-r
❑
with quantity/ es on lighting plan
F�WTuwe '0UL5
Pole height/mounting height (ARB)
M/A (UjAU,- AOVMTEb 2.tc Cs�
❑
d
Colors/finishes (ARB)
AN-SgWE- - V-0d--�F-ZsizoNee
Tilt (must be 0 for full cutoff)
p
Fixture locations
Location conflicts with trees, utilities,
N/A� CwAtA-- +400mrET-�, Urat+-'s-)
❑
etc.
Coordination with other site plan
vA1-VES
❑
sheets
Ucgt -s
Shielding issues (freestanding signs,
o K--
wall fixtures, etc.)
Photometric plan
❑
Adjacent zoning
j{%A
❑
Property lines
14 /A
❑
Excessive spillover
N rA
❑
Excessive lighting levels (ARB) ru/
❑
Maintenance factor = 1.0
A/A
Standard lighting notes
.pKOV(t>Sp 6M AY2cN)Tec-Ta'0-AL
r
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
SHIM.�'� CIVIL ENGINEERING
,.. LAND PLANNING
ENGINEERING
Sb
August 3, 2017
Heather McMahon,
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Regarding: RE: MB 2017.38: Old Trail Village Apartments, Blocks 5, 20, 21— Final Site Plan
Ms. McMahon,
Thank you for your review and feedback on the plans for Old Trail. The fallowing changes have been made in response
to your comments:
1. All trees planted parallel to Interior roads and in parking areas must be at least 2.5-inch caliper (measured six
Inches above the ground) and should be planted at least every 40 feet on center.
All large shade trees along Interior roads and on the perlmeter parking areas have been adjusted to be a
maximum of 40 feet apart. 2.5•inch caliper trees have been specified on Plant Schedule (CM and Mote 4.
2. All shrubs must measure at least 24 inches In heNht
All shrub species have been adjusted to be 24" or higher: See Plant Schedule (C17).
3. Reduce the total number of Ilex Glabra'Shamrock' (IGS,118) so that it is not greater than 25% the total number
of shrubs.
Ilex Glabra'Shamrock' plantings have been reduced to less than 25% of shrubs. See Plant Schedule (C17).
4. All light levels must be 30 foot candies or lower. There is one value of 31.1 fc. which must be reduced.
Light levels have been adjusted, and none exceed 26.1 fc. across site. See Lighting Plan (C19).
5. If wall -mounted lights are proposed, they must be drawn on the architectural elevations and manufacturer's
specifications, cut sheets, and a lighting schedule must be submitted far ARB review. Photometric values emitted
from wall -mounted lights must be added to the Ilghting plan.
No wall -mounted lights are proposed.
6. Add the standard mechanical note to the architectural drawings: VislbW of ag mechancal egdlpment from the
Entrains Corridor shag be eliminated.
Comment has been noted by architect.