HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-09-18 adj000±45
September 18, 1996 (Adjourned Meeting)
(Page 1)
An adjourned meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia, was held on September 18, 1996, at 7:00 P,M., The Senior Center
Building, 1180 Pepsi Place, Charlottesville, Virginia. This meeting was ad-
journed from September 17, 1996.
PRESENT: Mr. David P. Bowerman, Mrs. Charlotte Y. Humphris, Mr. Charles
S. Martin, Mr. Walter F. Perkins and Mrs. Sally H. Thomas.
ABSENT: Mr. Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
OFFICERS PRESENT: County Executive, .Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr., and
County Attorney, Mr. Larry W. Davis.
CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY COUNCIL PRESENT: Mr. Maurice Cox, Ms. Virginia
Daugherty, Ms. Meredith Richards, Ms. Katherine E. Slaughter and Mr. David
Toscano.
RIVANNA SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS PRESENT: Ms. Jo. M.
Higgins, Mr. Gary O'Connell and Ms. Judith Mueller.
THE SOLID WASTE TASK FORCE PRESENT: Mr. David Booth, Mr. Clarence
McClymonds, Mr. Aaron Mills, Mr. Richard Morton, Ms. Nancy K. O'Brien, Ms.
Laurel E. Royse and Ms. Vivian Thomson.
OTHER STAFF PRESENT: Mr. Steve Chidsey, Mr. Preston Coiner and Mr.
Arthur Petrini.
Agenda Item No. 1. Call to Order. The meeting was called to order at
7:10 p.m., by Mrs. Humphris, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, Ms.
Slaughter, Mayor, City Council and Mr. O'Connell of the Rivanna Solid Waste
Authority Board of Directors.
Agenda Item No. 2. Joint Meeting with Charlottesville City Council, the
Rivanna Solid Waste Authority Board of Directors and the Solid Waste Task
Force.
After each person introduced himself, Ms. Nancy O'Brien, Executive
Director of the Thomas Jefferson Planning District and Facilitator for the
Solid Waste Task Force, explained that the purpose of this meeting was to
present the report of the Task Force to the governing bodies.
Item 2a. Work Session: Solid Waste Task Force Report.
Ms. O'Brien said in the fall of 1995, the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority,
the City of Charlottesville and the County of Albemarle appointed a Solid
Waste Task Force to study solid waste management in the area and develop a set
of recommendations for future guidance. Ms. O'Brien then presented the report
of the Task Force, and responded to questions from the Supervisors and
Councilors regarding information contained in the report.
Ms. O'Brien concluded her presentation by summarizing the following
consensus recommendations reached by the Task Force. She noted that two
members had additional items on which consensus was not reached. Following is
the set of recommendations:
Current directions in solid waste management are encourag-
ing, but additional changes need to be made in how solid
waste is managed in this community.
The unlined cell should be capped and closed as soon as
possible.
If Charlottesville/Albemarle municipal solid waste is
landfilled, it must go into a lined cell; new municipal
solid waste cells used must be Sub-Title D lined.
000146
September 18, 1996 (Adjourned Meeting)
(Page 2)
4 o
The adjacent community should be guaranteed safe drinking
water as defined in the Drinking Water Act. Air, noise and
dust should be controlled to meet applicable standards.
Ail monitoring, remediation must be done properly, under
public scrutiny, with assurances of the quality of the work.
The volume of waste to dispose of will be reduced between
50% to 70% per capita from what is presently disposed per
capita in five years by:
fo
expanding the education program;
placing emphasis, over the long term, on source
reduction and reuse;
implementing intensive, mandatory recycling of
residential and commercial municipal solid waste,
supported with adequate enforcement and public funds
in two years;
instituting wet stream composting;
continuing and expanding the construction demolition
debris separation, the leaf pile and leaf recycling,
mulch production, tire recycling, and the business
waste sort facility;
testing pilot programs using alternative technologies.
7o
A financing system should be put in place that will remove
the dependency on trash volume (tip fee income) for
financing education, recycling, and environmental control
costs, and which will distribute the costs throughout the
whole community.
A master plan for final uses of the Ivy Landfill site should
be developed now to insure the site is managed in a way that
will allow the planned-for uses.
9. A one-time air quality monitoring study should be conducted.
10.
The administrative structure should be changed to reflect
the mandate of a higher level of focus on the three R's
(Reduction, Reuse, Recycling) and the need to include more
citizens, particularly the Ivy Landfill neighbors in
information sharing and decision making by implementing the
following substantial changes in the voting membership of
the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority Board:
Expanding the Board by three members to include three
people elected by the Ivy Neighborhoods;
Changing the status of the Chair of the Citizens
Advisory Committee to voting member.
11.
Conduct an independent program audit now and every year of
the operations and projections under which solid waste is
managed.
12.
It is unacceptable:
a. To landfill the volume currently being landfilled;
b. Not to collect methane and other organic gases;
c. To use unlined cells;
d. To manage compost in the open;
e. To bury hazardous waste at the landfill.
13.
Implement Draper Aden recommendations regarding more
frequent surface water testing, including occasional viral
and bacterial testing.
14.
Conduct waste audits semi-annually for two years to develop
a solid base of information for taking actions and
evaluating progress in waste reduction.
September 18, 1996 (Adjourned Meeting)
(Page 3)
15.
The EPA National Priority List study makes it inappropriate
to make a statement regarding the future of the Ivy Landfill
at this time. There is also a large body of vital
information being developed which should be available during
the next nine months and which will affect any
recommendation regarding the Ivy Landfill's future. This
information includes the conclusions from the Risk
Assessment Study and the Fate and Transport Study being
conducted by Joyce Engineering, and the final Compliance
Plan being negotiated between RSWA and DEQ. Members of the
Task Force are willing to consider reconvening when the
study is complete.
It was the consensus of the Board of Supervisors and City Council that
Rivanna staff go back and prioritize the recommendations and prepare a report
on the implications of the recommendations of the Task Force.
Agenda Item No. 3. Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m.