HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO201600075 Review Comments WPO VSMP 2017-12-06COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
VSMP Permit plan review
Project title: Staybridge Suites
Project file number: WP0201600075
Plan preparer: Brian Brewer, Kimley Horn [Brian.Brewer@Kimley-Hom.com]
Owner or rep.: Neel Desai, Hollymead LLC [NDESAI@LTDHOSPITALITY.com]
Plan received date: Rev 1 - 21 Oct 2016
Rev 2
— 3 Mar 2017
Rev 3
— 27 Nov 2017
Date of comments: Rev 1 -
12 Jan 2016
Rev 2
—16 Mar 2017
Rev 3 — 5 Dec 2017
Reviewers: Rev 1 —
Bobby Jocz
Rev 2
— Bobby Jocz
Rev 3
— Bobby Jocz
County Code section 17-410 and Virginia Code §62.1-44.15:34 requires the VSMP authority to
act on any VSMP permit by issuing a project approval or denial. This project is approved. The
rationale is given in the comments below. The application may be resubmitted for approval if all
of the items below are satisfactorily addressed. The VSMP application content requirements can
be found in County Code section 17-401.
A. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
The SWPPP content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-405. A SWPPP must
contain (1) a PPP, (2) an ESCP, (3) a SWMP, and (4) any TMDL measures necessary.
Remove Section I from the SWPPP as it does not follow County Code [17-401].
Rev 2 - Addressed
2. A signed copy of the Registration Statement for DEQ General Construction Permit coverage will
need to be included before final approval [ 17-401 ] .
Rev 2 - Not provided, include in next submittal, complete with signatures.
Rev 3 - Addressed
3. A signed Certification Statement and Delegation of Authority form must be provided prior to pre -
construction meeting.
Rev 2 - Addressed
4. Provide a copy of DEQ Construction General Permit coverage letter when obtained.
Rev 2 - Addressed
5. Original Signatures of Professional Engineer must be provided on both the plan sheets and
Engineering calculations before final approval.
Rev 2 - Addressed
B. Pollution Prevention Plan (PPP)
The PPP content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-404.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 4
1. Describe procedures for providing pollution prevention awareness of all applicable wastes,
including any wash water, disposal practices, and applicable disposal locations [17-404.A.6].
Rev 2 - Sufficient
2. Provide response and reporting practices to minimize leaks and spills on site.
Rev 2 - sufficient
3. Identify locations for concrete washout, sanitary facilities, and potential sources of pollutants on
Phase I & II E&S plans. In addition, identify any potential staging areas on the Phase II E&S plan.
Denote between soil stockpile areas, and staging areas on site.
Rev 2 - Addressed
C. Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP)
VSMP Regulation 9VAC25-870-108 requires the VSMP authority to approve or disapprove a
SWMP. This plan is approved, and the reasons are provided in the comments below. The
stormwater management plan content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-403.
1. Remove Sheets CS -101, 501, 502; CU -101, 201, 202, 501, 502; CP -101, 102; CL -101; and RW
5.1-6.5. These sheets are not needed for Erosion and Sediment Control or Stormwater
Management review or installation.
Rev 2 - Addressed
2. Re -name cover sheet to identify the submission as a VSMP plan, make sure to include the WPO
submission number (WPO201600075).
Rev 2 - Addressed
3. Nutrient credits to account for 1.76 lbs of required phosphorous removal must be purchased (and
documentation provided) prior to VSMP approval.
Rev 2 - Letter of availability not provided, Credits will need to be purchased before VSMP
approval. Contact Ana Kilmer akilmer(&albemarle.org prior to purchasing credits.
Rev 3 — Addressed
4. Provide drainage area maps to match those used in the modified rational method calculations
included in the design report. There are no drainage areas provided that match the DA -W, DA -X,
DA -Y, and DA -Z, designations referenced in the calculations; thus preventing the confirmation of
water quality/quantity compliance for the proposed development. Provide limits of the Block VIII
drainage areas, or clarify areas if already provided.
Rev 2 - Addressed
5. Structures 02 and 05 have inlet/outlet pipe deflection angles of >90 degrees according to plan
views of the proposed stormsewer system; however, HGL calculations indicate that these junction
angles are at 90 degrees. Please clarify pipe angles and correct inconsistencies. Conduits should
not be designed to have bend angles greater than 90 degrees [VDOT Drainage manual 9.4.9.3.2.3].
Rev 2 - Addressed
6. Provide stormsewer structure details on stormsewer profile sheet (CG -501), including the structure
type (ex. MH -1, DI -313, etc.), drop inlet grate type, and inlet throat length.
Rev 2 — Addressed
7. Provide curb inlet computations for inlets on grade and/or in sump condition.
Rev 2 — Addressed
8. Rev 2 — Concrete inlet shaping is required for any structure with greater than 4' drop.
Rev 3 — Addressed.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 4
D. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP)
Virginia Code §62.1-44.15:55 requires the VESCP authority to approve or disapprove an ESCP.
This plan is approved, and the reasons are provided in the comments below. The erosion control
plan content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-402.
1. Remove Sheets CS -101, 501, 502; CU -101, 201, 202, 501, 502; CP -101, 102; CL -101; and RW
5.1-6.5. These sheets are not needed for Erosion and Sediment Control or Stormwater
Management review or installation.
Rev 2 - Addressed
2. Finalize inspection frequency and note in SWPPP and on E&S plans.
Rev 2 - Addressed
3. [Phase I] As drawn, diversion dikes will not be able to discharge into sediment trap due to
embankments being higher then discharge point of dike outfall.
Rev 2 - Addressed
4. [Phase I] Extend diversion dike along south/southwestern portion of site. Be sure to extend along
areas currently being conveyed by rip -rap channel. Silt fence is not to be used across contours.
Rev 2 - Addressed
5. [Phase I] Provide diversion dike adjacent to silt fence along laurel lane extending from just above
the current silt fence start point, downhill to at least contour 596. A ROW diversion can be used to
cross construction entrance.
Rev 2 - Addressed
6. [Phase II] Clarify how stormsewer is to discharge into sediment trap prior to site stabilization. It is
unclear how this is to occur according to current plan.
Rev 2 - Addressed
7. [Both Phases] Recommend replacing standard silt fence with wire backed "Super silt fence" along
the eastern side of the LOD. This is due to extent of fill material being placed uphill from the
lower portion of the site.
Rev 2 - Addressed
8. [Both Phases] Extend silt fence around south/south-western portion of the site. This would
prevent runoff from demolished sidewalk areas from entering Timberwood Blvd.
Rev 2 - Addressed
9. [Both Phases] Height of embankment exceeds 5' maximum. Width of embankment is insufficient
as proportioned to embankment height per greenbook plate 3.13-1. Please correct.
Rev 2 - Addressed
10. [Both Phases] Provide detail for Paved Construction Entrance. The county requires paved wash
racks on construction sites [Design Standards Manual section 3.G].
Rev 2 - Addressed
11. [Both Phases] Provide detail for diversion dike. Currently only a ROW diversion detail is
provided.
Rev 2 - Addressed
12. [Both Phases] Narrative states no offside land disturbance is necessary with this project; however,
large amounts of fill material will be needed to complete final site grading. Provide
locations/extent of fill material transport to ensure no offsite unpermitted land disturbance is
occurring as a result.
Rev 2 — Addressed
13. Rev 2 - [General] Provide detail for tree protection.
Rev 3 — Addressed.
Engineering plan review staff are available from 2-4 PM on Thursdays, should you require a meeting to
discuss this review.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 4 of 4
Process;
After approval, plans will need to be bonded. The bonding process is begun by submitting a bond estimate
request form and fee to the Department of Community Development. One of the plan reviewers will
prepare estimates and check parcel and easement information based on the approved plans. The County's
Management Analyst will prepare bond agreement forms, which will need to be completed by the owner
and submitted along with cash, certificates or sureties for the amounts specified. The agreements will need
to be approved and signed by the County Attorney and County Engineer. This may take 2-4 weeks to
obtain all the correct signatures and forms.
After bonding and agreements are complete, county staff will need to enter project information in a DEQ
database for state application processing. DEQ will review the application information based on local
VSMP authority approval. At this time, the DEQ portion of the application fees will need to be paid
directly to the state. For fastest processing, this is done electronically with the emails provided on the
application. DEQ should notify applicants with instructions on how to pay fees. When DEQ approves the
application, they will issue a permit coverage letter. This should be copied to the county.
After DEQ coverage is issued, via the coverage letter, the County can hold a pre -construction conference.
Applicants will need to complete the request for a pre -construction conference form, and pay the remainder
of the application fee. The form identifies the contractor and responsible land disturber, and the fee
remaining to be paid. This will be checked by county staff, and upon approval, a pre -construction
conference will be scheduled with the County inspector. At the pre -construction conference, should
everything proceed satisfactorily, a joint VSMP and grading permit will be issued by the County so that
work may begin.
Bobby Jocz, EIT
Civil Engineer 1
(434) 296-5832 ext: 3283
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22902
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
VSMP Permit plan review
Project title: Staybridge Suites
Project file number: WP0201600075
Plan preparer:
Brian Brewer, Kimley Horn [Brian.Brewer@Kimley-Hom.com]
Owner or rep.:
Neel Desai, Hollymead LLC [NDESAI@LTDHOSPITALITY.com]
Plan received date:
Rev 1 - 21 Oct 2016
Rev 2 — 3 Mar 2017
Date of comments:
Rev 1 - 12 Jan 2016
Rev 2-16 Mar 2017
Reviewers:
Rev 1 — Bobby Jocz
Rev 2 — Bobby Jocz
County Code section 17-410 and Virginia Code §62.1-44.15:34 requires the VSMP authority to
act on any VSMP permit by issuing a project approval or denial. This project is Not Approved.
The rationale is given in the comments below. The application may be resubmitted for approval if
all of the items below are satisfactorily addressed. The VSMP application content requirements
can be found in County Code section 17-401.
A. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
The SWPPP content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-405. A SWPPP must
contain (1) a PPP, (2) an ESCP, (3) a SWMP, and (4) any TMDL measures necessary.
Remove Section I from the SWPPP as it does not follow County Code [17-401].
Rev 2 - Addressed
2. A signed copy of the Registration Statement for DEQ General Construction Permit coverage will
need to be included before final approval [ 17-401 ].
Rev 2 - Not provided, include in next submittal, complete with signatures.
3. A signed Certification Statement and Delegation of Authority form must be provided prior to pre -
construction meeting.
Rev 2 - Addressed
4. Provide a copy of DEQ Construction General Permit coverage letter when obtained.
Rev 2 - Addressed
5. Original Signatures of Professional Engineer must be provided on both the plan sheets and
Engineering calculations before final approval.
Rev 2 - Addressed
B. Pollution Prevention Plan (PPP)
The PPP content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-404.
1. Describe procedures for providing pollution prevention awareness of all applicable wastes,
including any wash water, disposal practices, and applicable disposal locations [17-404.A.6].
Rev 2 - Sufficient
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 4
2. Provide response and reporting practices to minimize leaks and spills on site.
Rev 2 - sufficient
3. Identify locations for concrete washout, sanitary facilities, and potential sources of pollutants on
Phase I & 11 E&S plans. In addition, identify any potential staging areas on the Phase II E&S plan.
Denote between soil stockpile areas, and staging areas on site.
Rev 2 - Addressed
C. Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP)
VSMP Regulation 9VAC25-870-108 requires the VSMP authority to approve or disapprove a
SWMP. This plan is denied, and the reasons are provided in the comments below. The
stormwater management plan content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-403.
1. Remove Sheets CS -101, 501, 502; CU -101, 201, 202, 501, 502; CP -101, 102; CL -101; and RW
5.1-6.5. These sheets are not needed for Erosion and Sediment Control or Stormwater
Management review or installation.
Rev 2 - Addressed
2. Re -name cover sheet to identify the submission as a VSMP plan, make sure to include the WPO
submission number (WPO201600075).
Rev 2 - Addressed
3. Nutrient credits to account for 1.76 lbs of required phosphorous removal must be purchased (and
documentation provided) prior to VSMP approval.
Rev 2 - Letter of availability not provided, Credits will need to be purchased before VSMP
approval. Contact Ana Kilmer akilmernu,albemarle.org prior to purchasing credits.
4. Provide drainage area maps to match those used in the modified rational method calculations
included in the design report. There are no drainage areas provided that match the DA -W, DA -X,
DA -Y, and DA -Z, designations referenced in the calculations; thus preventing the confirmation of
water quality/quantity compliance for the proposed development. Provide limits of the Block VIII
drainage areas, or clarify areas if already provided.
Rev 2 - Addressed
5. Structures 02 and 05 have inlet/outlet pipe deflection angles of >90 degrees according to plan
views of the proposed stormsewer system; however, HGL calculations indicate that these junction
angles are at 90 degrees. Please clarify pipe angles and correct inconsistencies. Conduits should
not be designed to have bend angles greater than 90 degrees [VDOT Drainage manual 9.4.9.3.2.3].
Rev 2 - Addressed
6. Provide stormsewer structure details on stormsewer profile sheet (CG -501), including the structure
type (ex. MH -1, DI -3B, etc.), drop inlet grate type, and inlet throat length.
Rev 2 — Addressed
7. Provide curb inlet computations for inlets on grade and/or in sump condition.
Rev 2 — Addressed
8. Rev 2 — Concrete inlet shaping is required for any structure with greater than 4' drop.
D. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP)
Virginia Code §62.1-44.15:55 requires the VESCP authority to approve or disapprove an ESCP.
This plan is denied, and the reasons are provided in the comments below. The erosion control plan
content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-402.
1. Remove Sheets CS -101, 501, 502; CU -101, 201, 202, 501, 502; CP -101, 102; CL -101; and RW
5.1-6.5. These sheets are not needed for Erosion and Sediment Control or Stormwater
Management review or installation.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 4
Rev 2 - Addressed
2. Finalize inspection frequency and note in SWPPP and on E&S plans.
Rev 2 - Addressed
3. [Phase I] As drawn, diversion dikes will not be able to discharge into sediment trap due to
embankments beim higher then discharge point of dike outfall.
Rev 2 - Addressed
4. [Phase 1] Extend diversion dike along south/southwestern portion of site. Be sure to extend along
areas currently being conveyed by rip -rap channel. Silt fence is not to be used across contours.
Rev 2 - Addressed
5. [Phase I] Provide diversion dike adjacent to silt fence along laurel lane extending from just above
the current silt fence start point, downhill to at least contour 596. A ROW diversion can be used to
cross construction entrance.
Rev 2 - Addressed
6. [Phase Il] Clarify how stormsewer is to discharge into sediment trap prior to site stabilization. It is
unclear how this is to occur according to current plan.
Rev 2 - Addressed
7. [Both Phases] Recommend replacing standard silt fence with wire backed "Super silt fence" along
the eastern side of the LOD. This is due to extent of fill material being placed uphill from the
lower portion of the site.
Rev 2 - Addressed
8. [Both Phases] Extend silt fence around south/south-western portion of the site. This would
prevent runoff from demolished sidewalk areas from entering Timberwood Blvd.
Rev 2 - Addressed
9. [Both Phases] Height of embankment exceeds 5' maximum. Width of embankment is insufficient
as proportioned to embankment height per greenbook plate 3.13-1. Please correct.
Rev 2 - Addressed
10. [Both Phases] Provide detail for Paved Construction Entrance. The county requires paved wash
racks on construction sites [Design Standards Manual section 3.G].
Rev 2 - Addressed
11. [Both Phases] Provide detail for diversion dike. Currently only a ROW diversion detail is
provided.
Rev 2 - Addressed
12. [Both Phases] Narrative states no offside land disturbance is necessary with this project; however,
large amounts of fill material will be needed to complete final site grading. Provide
locations/extent of fill material transport to ensure no offsite unpermitted land disturbance is
occurring as a result.
Rev 2 — Addressed
13. Rev 2 - [General] Provide detail for tree protection.
The VSMP permit application and all plans may be resubmitted for approval when all comments have
been satisfactorily addressed. For final submittal please provide 4 copies of plan sets and 2 copies of the
SWPPP booklets with a completed application form.
Engineering plan review staff are available from 2-4 PM on Thursdays, should you require a meeting to
discuss this review.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 4 of 4
Process;
After approval, plans will need to be bonded. The bonding process is begun by submitting a bond estimate
request form and fee to the Department of Community Development. One of the plan reviewers will
prepare estimates and check parcel and easement information based on the approved plans. The County's
Management Analyst will prepare bond agreement forms, which will need to be completed by the owner
and submitted along with cash, certificates or sureties for the amounts specified. The agreements will need
to be approved and signed by the County Attorney and County Engineer. This may take 2-4 weeks to
obtain all the correct signatures and forms.
Stormwater Management Facilities Maintenance agreements will also need to be completed and recorded.
The County's Management Analyst or other staff will prepare the forms and check for ownership and
signature information. The completed forms will need to be submitted along with court recording fees.
After bonding and agreements are complete, county staff will need to enter project information in a DEQ
database for state application processing. DEQ will review the application information based on local
VSMP authority approval. At this time, the DEQ portion of the application fees will need to be paid
directly to the state. For fastest processing, this is done electronically with the emails provided on the
application. DEQ should notify applicants with instructions on how to pay fees. When DEQ approves the
application, they will issue a permit coverage letter. This should be copied to the county.
After DEQ coverage is issued, via the coverage letter, the County can hold a pre -construction conference.
Applicants will need to complete the request for a pre -construction conference form, and pay the remainder
of the application fee. The form identifies the contractor and responsible land disturber, and the fee
remaining to be paid. This will be checked by county staff, and upon approval, a pre -construction
conference will be scheduled with the County inspector. At the pre -construction conference, should
everything proceed satisfactorily, a joint VSMP and grading permit will be issued by the County so that
work may begin.
County forms can be found on the county website forms center under engineering;
http://www.albemarle.org/deptforins.asp?department--cdengMTo
Bobby Jocz, EIT
Civil Engineer 1
(434) 296-5832 ext: 3283
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22902
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
VSMP Permit plan review
Project title:
Staybridge Suites
Project file number:
WP0201600075
Plan preparer:
Brian Brewer, Kimley Horn [Brian.Brewer@Kimley-Hom.com]
Owner or rep.:
Neel Desai, Hollymead LLC [NDESAI@LTDHOSPITALITY.com]
Plan received date:
21 Oct 2016
Date of comments:
12 Jan 2016
Reviewers:
Bobby Jocz
County Code section 17-410 and Virginia Code §62.1-44.15:34 requires the VSMP authority to
act on any VSMP permit by issuing a project approval or denial. This project is denied. The
rationale is given in the comments below. The application may be resubmitted for approval if all
of the items below are satisfactorily addressed. The VSMP application content requirements can
be found in County Code section 17-401.
A. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
The SWPPP content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-405. A SWPPP must
contain (1) a PPP, (2) an ESCP, (3) a SWMP, and (4) any TMDL measures necessary.
1. Remove Section I from the SWPPP as it does not follow County Code [17-401].
2. A signed copy of the Registration Statement for DEQ General Construction Permit coverage will
need to be included before final approval [ 17-401 ].
3. A signed Certification Statement and Delegation of Authority form must be provided prior to pre -
construction meeting.
4. Provide a copy of DEQ Construction General Permit coverage letter when obtained.
(Acknowledged).
5. Original Signatures of Professional Engineer must be provided on both the plan sheets and
Engineering calculations before final approval.
B. Pollution Prevention Plan (PPP)
The PPP content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-404.
1. Describe procedures for providing pollution prevention awareness of all applicable wastes,
including any wash water, disposal practices, and applicable disposal locations [17-404.A.6].
2. Provide response and reporting practices to minimize leaks and spills on site.
3. Identify locations for concrete washout, sanitary facilities, and potential sources of pollutants on
Phase I & II E&S plans. In addition, identify any potential staging areas on the Phase II E&S plan.
Denote between soil stockpile areas, and staging areas on site.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 4
C. Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP)
VSMP Regulation 9VAC25-870-108 requires the VSMP authority to approve or disapprove a
SWMP. This plan is disapproved, and the reasons are provided in the comments below. The
stormwater management plan content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-403.
1. Remove Sheets CS -101, 501, 502; CU -101, 201, 202, 501, 502; CP -101, 102; CL -101; and RW
5.1-6.5. These sheets are not needed for Erosion and Sediment Control or Stormwater
Management review or installation.
2. Re -name cover sheet to identify the submission as a VSMP plan, make sure to include the WPO
submission number (WPO201600075).
3. Nutrient credits to account for 1.76 lbs of required phosphorous removal must be purchased (and
documentation provided) prior to VSMP approval.
4. Provide drainage area maps to match those used in the modified rational method calculations
included in the design report. There are no drainage areas provided that match the DA -W, DA -X,
DA -Y, and DA -Z, designations referenced in the calculations; thus preventing the confirmation of
water quality/quantity compliance for the proposed development. Provide limits of the Block VIII
drainage areas, or clarify areas if already provided.
5. Structures 02 and 05 have inlet/outlet pipe deflection angles of >90 degrees according to plan
views of the proposed stormsewer system; however, HGL calculations indicate that these junction
angles are at 90 degrees. Please clarify pipe angles and correct inconsistencies. Conduits should
not be designed to have bend angles greater than 90 degrees [VDOT Drainage manual 9.4.9.3.2.3].
6. Provide stormsewer structure details on stormsewer profile sheet (CG -501), including the structure
type (ex. MH -1, DI -3B, etc.), drop inlet grate type, and inlet throat length.
7. Provide curb inlet computations for inlets on grade and/or in sump condition.
D. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP)
Virginia Code §62.1-44.15:55 requires the VESCP authority to approve or disapprove an ESCP.
This plan is disapproved, and the reasons are provided in the comments below. The erosion
control plan content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-402.
1. Remove Sheets CS -101, 501, 502; CU -101, 201, 202, 501, 502; CP -101, 102; CL -101; and RW
5.1-6.5. These sheets are not needed for Erosion and Sediment Control or Stormwater
Management review or installation.
2. Finalize inspection frequency and note in SWPPP and on E&S plans.
3. [Phase I] As drawn, diversion dikes will not be able to discharge into sediment trap due to
embankments being higher then discharge point of dike outfall.
4. [Phase I] Extend diversion dike along south/southwestern portion of site. Be sure to extend along
areas currently being conveyed by rip -rap channel. Silt fence is not to be used across contours.
5. [Phase I] Provide diversion dike adjacent to silt fence along laurel lane extending from just above
the current silt fence start point, downhill to at least contour 596. A ROW diversion can be used to
cross construction entrance.
6. [Phase II] Clarify how stormsewer is to discharge into sediment trap prior to site stabilization. It is
unclear how this is to occur according to current plan.
7. [Both Phases] Recommend replacing standard silt fence with wire backed "Super silt fence" along
the eastern side of the LOD. This is due to extent of fill material being placed uphill from the
lower portion of the site.
8. [Both Phases] Extend silt fence around south/south-western portion of the site. This would prevent
runoff from demolished sidewalk areas from entering Timberwood Blvd.
9. [Both Phases] Height of embankment exceeds 5' maximum. Width of embankment is insufficient
as proportioned to embankment height per greenbook plate 3.13-1. Please correct.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 4
10. [Both Phases]
11. [Both Phases] Provide detail for Paved Construction Entrance. The county requires paved wash
racks on construction sites [Design Standards Manual section 3.G].
12. [Both Phases] Provide detail for diversion dike. Currently only a ROW diversion detail is
provided.
13. [Both Phases] Narrative states no offside land disturbance is necessary with this project; however,
large amounts of fill material will be needed to complete final site grading. Provide
locations/extent of fill material transport to ensure no offsite unpermitted land disturbance is
occurring as a result.
The VSMP permit application and all plans may be resubmitted for approval when all comments have
been satisfactorily addressed. For re -submittals please provide 2 copies of the complete permit package
with a completed application form.
Engineering plan review staff are available from 2-4 PM on Thursdays, should you require a meeting to
discuss this review.
Process;
After approval, plans will need to be bonded. The bonding process is begun by submitting a bond estimate
request form and fee to the Department of Community Development. One of the plan reviewers will
prepare estimates and check parcel and easement information based on the approved plans. The County's
Management Analyst will prepare bond agreement forms, which will need to be completed by the owner
and submitted along with cash, certificates or sureties for the amounts specified. The agreements will need
to be approved and signed by the County Attorney and County Engineer. This may take 2-4 weeks to
obtain all the correct signatures and forms.
Stormwater Management Facilities Maintenance agreements will also need to be completed and recorded.
The County's Management Analyst or other staff will prepare the forms and check for ownership and
signature information. The completed forms will need to be submitted along with court recording fees.
After bonding and agreements are complete, county staff will need to enter project information in a DEQ
database for state application processing. DEQ will review the application information based on local
VSMP authority approval. At this time, the DEQ portion of the application fees will need to be paid
directly to the state. For fastest processing, this is done electronically with the emails provided on the
application. DEQ should notify applicants with instructions on how to pay fees. When DEQ approves the
application, they will issue a permit coverage letter. This should be copied to the county.
After DEQ coverage is issued, via the coverage letter, the County can hold a pre -construction conference.
Applicants will need to complete the request for a pre -construction conference form, and pay the remainder
of the application fee. The form identifies the contractor and responsible land disturber, and the fee
remaining to be paid. This will be checked by county staff, and upon approval, a pre -construction
conference will be scheduled with the County inspector. At the pre -construction conference, should
everything proceed satisfactorily, a joint VSMP and grading permit will be issued by the County so that
work may begin.
County forms can be found on the county website forms center under engineering;
hqp://www.albemarle.org/deptforms.asp?department--cdenMo
Engineering Review Comments
Page 4 of 4
Bobby Jocz, EIT
Civil Engineer 1
(434) 296-5832 ext: 3283
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Kimley»>Horn
November 21, 2017
Bobby Jocz
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
RE: WPO201600075 Staybridge Suites — VSMP Permit Plan Review
Staybridge Suites - VSMP Permit Plan Review
Comment Responses
Review Comments found on page:
Engineering............................................................................................................................................1
Engineering
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP):
1. A signed copy of the Registration Statement for DEQ General Construction Permit coverage will
need to be included before final approval [17-401].
Response: Signed copy attached.
Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP):
2. Nutrient credits to account for 1.76 lbs of required phosphorous removal must be purchased (and
documentation provided) prior to VSMP approval.
Response: Documentation attached.
3. Concrete inlet shaping is required for any structure with greater than 4' drop.
Response: Note provided on Sheet CG -100.
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP):
4. Provide detail for tree protection.
Response: Tree protection detail provided on Sheet CE -501.
1700 Willow Lawn Drive Suite 200. Richmond. VA 23230
Kimley)))Horn
Page 2
8. Identify locations for concrete washout, sanitary facilities, and potential sources of pollutants on
Phase I & II E&S plans. In addition, identify any potential staging areas on the Phase II E&S plan.
Denote between soil stockpile areas, and staging areas on site.
Response: Phase I and II USC plans revised to show concrete washouts and sanitary
facilities as shown on Sheets CE -101 and CE -102. Potential sources of pollutants identified on
SWPPP document Section On.
Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP):
9. Remove Sheets CS -101, 501, 502; CU -101, 201, 202, 501, 502; CPA 01, 102; CLA 01; and RW
5.1-6.5. These sheets are notnee d for Erosion and Sediment Control or Stormwater Management
review or installation.
Response: Acknowledged.
10. Re -name cover sheet to identify the submission as a VSMP plan, make sure to include the WPO
submission number (WP0201600075).
Response: Cover sheet revised to identify the submissio s a VSMP Plan and applicable
WPO submission number as shown on Sheet CA -001.
11. Nutrient credits to account for 1.76 lbs of required phosphorous removal must be purchased (and
documentation provided) prior to VSMP approval.
Response: Acknowledged. Letter of availability rovided as part of the design calculations.
Final proof of purchase will a provided prior to VSMP approval. >Ivo ?o»ks
12. Provide drainage area maps to match those used in the modified rational method calculations
included in the design report. There are no drainage areas provided that match the DA -W, DA -X, DA-
Y, and DA -Z, designations referenced in the calculations; thus, preventing the confirmation of water
quality/quantity compliance for the proposed development. Provide limits of the Block VIII drainage
areas, or clarify areas if already provided.
Response: Drainage area map sheets revised to clarify drainage area DA -Z as referenced in
the calculations. DA -W, DA -X, and DA -Y are irrelevant to the project and therefore removed
from the calculations. 13D
13. Structures 02 and 05 have inlet/outlet pipe deflection angles of >90 degrees according to plan
views of the proposed storm sewer system; however, HGL calculations indicate that these junction
angles are at 90 degrees. Please clarify pipe angles and correct inconsistencies. Conduits should not
be designed to have bend angles greater than 90 degrees [VDOT Drainage manual 9.4.9.3.2.31.
Response: Inlet pipe to Structure 2 revised so that no bend angles are greater than 90
degrees. Per discussith Mr. Jocz, the inlet pipe to structure 5 is acceptable.
0/G
14. Provide storm sewer structure details on storm sewer profile sheet (CG -501), including the
structure type (ex. MH -1, DI -36, etc.), drop inlet grate type, and inlet throat length.
Response: Storm sewer profiles revised to show structure type and inlet throat length. Refer
to Sheet CG -501. bA.-
15. Provide curb inlet computations for inlets on grade and/or in sump condition.
Response: Curb inlet comput do for inlets rovided as part of the Design Narrative.
��
1 1700 Willow Lawn Drive, Suite 200, Richmond, VA 23230
Kimley)))Horn
Page 3
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP):
16. Remove Sheets CS -101, 501, 502; CU -101, 201, 202, 501, 502; CPA 01, 102; CLA 01; and RW
5.1-6.5. These sheets are not needed for Erosion and Sediment Cpntrol or Stormwater Management
review or installation. \//
Response: Applicable sheets removed for the submittal.
17. Finalize inspection frequency and note in SWPPP and on E&S plans.
Response: Rpwised inspection frequency provided on Sheet CE -501 of the plans and in the
SWPPP.
18. [Phase 1] As drawn, diversion dikes will not be able to discharge into sediment trap due to
embankments being higher then discharge point of dike outfall.
Response: Diversio ekes revised to discharge into the sediment trap as shown on Sheet CE -
101 and CE -102.
19. [Phase 11 Extend diversion dike along south/southwestern portion of site. Be sure to extend along
areas currently being conveyed by rip -rap channel. Silt fence is not to be used across conto rs.
Response: Diversion dike extended as along south/southwestern portion of site. V
20. [Phase 1] Provide diversion dike adjacent to silt fence along laurel lane extending from just above
the current silt fence start point, downhill to at least contour 596. A ROW diversion can be used to
cross construction entrance.
Response: As discussed with Mr. Jocz, diversion dike along Laurr Park Lane is not needed. A
ROW diversion is provided across the construction entrance. ✓
21. [Phase II] Clarify how storm sewer is to discharge into sediment trap prior to site stabilization. It is
unclear how this is to occur according to current plan.
Response: Phase II E&SC plan revised. The sediment trap will no longer be a part of Phase II
plans. Storm sewer inlet protection will serve as the prima
the Phase II Sequence of Construction on Sheet CE -102. ry thod of control as detailed in
22. [Both Phases] Recommend replacing standard silt fence with wire backed "Super silt fence" along
the eastern side of the LOD. This is due to extent of fill material being placed uphill from the lower
portion of the site.
Response: Standard silt fence replaced with super silt fence shown on Sheets CE -101 and
CE -102.
23. [Both Phases] Extend silt fence around south/south-western portion of the site. This would
prevent runoff from demolished sidewalk areas from entering Timberwood Blvd.
Response: Silt fence extended around south/southwestern portion of thesite,.to prevent runoff
from the demolished sidewalk as shown on Sheets CE -101 and CE -102. ✓
24. [Both Phases] Height of embankment exceeds 5' maximum. Width of embankment is insufficient
as proportioned to embankment height per greenbook plate 3.13-1. Please correct.
Response: Sediment trap revised per Virginia ESC Manual guidelines as shown on Sheet CE -
25. [Both Phases] Provide detail for Paved Construction Entrance. The unty requires paved wash
racks on construction sites [Design Standards Manual section 3.G].
kimley-horn.com 1700 Willow Lawn Drive, Suite 200, Richmond, VA 23230
Kimley)))Horn Page 4
Response: Paved Construction Entrance detail added to Sheet CE -501.
26. [Both Phases] Provide detail for diversion dike. Currently only ROW diversion detail is provided.
Response: Diversion Dike detail added to Sheet CE -501.
27. [Both Phases] Narrative states no offside land disturbance is necessary with this project;
however, large amounts of fill material will be needed to complete final site grading. Provide
locations/extent of fill material transport to ensure no offsite unpermitted land disturbance is occurring
as a result.
Response: Location and extent of fill material transport details is undetermined. Complete
details will be provided during the pre -construction meeting.
MR
M
Kimley»>Horn
November 18, 2016
JT Newberry
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle, Planning Division
401 McIntire Road
North Wing
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: SDP201600047 Staybridge Suites — Final Site Development Plan
Staybridge Suites
Comment Responses
Review Comments found on page:
Planning..................................................................................................................................................1
Engineering............................................................................................................................................ 2
Departmentof Fire Rescue.....................................................................................................................2
ArchitecturalReview Board...................................................................................................................3
Albemarle County Service Authority.....................................................................................................4
VDOT..................................................................................................................................................... 5
Planning
1. Section 32.5.2(a) — On Sheet CA -001, under Site Statistics, please revise the zoning district to be
Planned Development — Mixed Commercial (PD -MC) and add Steep Slopes (Managed) to the list of
applicable overlay districts.
Response: The zoning district and overlay district have been revised to Planned Development
— Mixed Commercial (PD -MC) and Steep Slopes (Managed), respectively. Please see Sheet
CA -001 for more information.
2. Section 32.5.2(a) - On Sheet CA -001, under Site Statistics, please note this site lies within Block
VIII of Hollymead Town Center, Area C and is subject to the code of development and proffers
associated with ZMA200100020.
Response: The location of site and applicable proffers have been added under the Site
Statistics section on the Cover Sheet. Please see Sheet CA -001 for more information.
3. Section 32.5.2(a) — On Sheet CA -001, under Site Statistics, please note the build -to line for Block
VIII is 0-10' from the edge of sidewalk and this block permits a maximum of 76,000 square feet of
non-residential use.
kimley-horn.com 1700 Willow Lawn Drive. Suite 200 Richmond. VA 23230
fir' I.OW
Kimley>>> Horn Page 2
Response: The build -to line and maximum square footage information have been added under
Site Statistics section on the Cover Sheet. Please see Sheet CA -001 for more information.
4. Section 32.5.2(b) — On Sheet CS -101, 104 parking spaces are provided. Please update the count
on Sheet CA -001, CS -101, and CP -101.
Response: The parking count has been updated on all applicable sheets. Please see plan set
for more information.
5. Section 32.5.2(n) — Please note the maximum height of the retaining wall on Sheet CS -101.
Response: The maximum height of the retaining walls has been added to the notes section.
Please see Sheet CS -101 for more information.
6. Section 32.5.2(n / Section 32.7.8 / Section 4.17 — Please revise the lighting plan in accordance with
these sections and the comments from ARB (see below).
Response: The lighting plan has been updated in accordance with the applicable comments.
Please see Sheet CL -101 for more information.
Engineering
1. Planting plan does not have a scale or North Arrow on the sheet. Appears to be 1:20 scale. (18-
32.5.2)
Response: North arrow and scale added to planting plan as shown on Sheet CP -101.
2. 16' parking spaces require a 2' unobstructed overhang. (18-4.12.16.c.6) Planting plan appears to
show proposed plantings in this area.
Response: Plantings moved to accommodate 2' unobstructed overhang.
3. Approved VSMP plans will be required prior to final site plan approval. (18-32.7.4.1)
Response: Acknowledged.
4. Gutters shall be required where necessary to control or direct stormwater runoff. (18-4.12.15.8).
Response: Gutters have been added to direct and control runoff. Please see Sheet CS -101 for
more information.
5. Please address Comment #5 shown on the comments from VODT regarding radii.
Response: The entrance radii have been increased and received approval from the
Engineering and Fire Rescue Departments on 11/14/16. Please see Sheet CS -101 for more
information.
Department of Fire Rescue
1. Fire flow test required before final approval.
Response: The fire flow test information has been added to the plans. Please see Sheet CU -
501 for more information.
1700 Willow Lawn Drive. Suite 200. Richmond. VA 23230
Kimley>>> Horn Page 3
Architectural Review Board
1. Identify on the drawings the color of the smooth face panel and provide a sample for review.
Response: See architectural plans for more detail.
2. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the site plan. "Visibility of all mechanical
equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated."
Response: The standard mechanical equipment note has been added to the site plan. Please
see Sheet CS -101 for more information.
3. Revise the photometric plan to show that spillover does not exceed .5 fc, including along the edge
of pavement along Laurel Park Lane.
Response: Photometric plan revised to show that spillover over the property line does not
exceed 0.5 fc. Please see Sheet CL -101 for more information.
4. Revise the photometrics using an LLF of 1.0.
Response: Photometric values revised using an LLF of 1.0. Please see Sheet CL -101 for more
information.
5. Revise the lighting plan to make the OSQ-4MEwBLS fixtures easily legible.
Response: Lighting plan revised to make all fixture labels legible. Please see Sheet CL -101 for
more information.
6. Revise the lighting plan to include building -mounted lights.
Response: Lighting plan revised to show building -mounted lights. Please see Sheet CL -101
for more information.
7. Add the standard lighting note to the plan. "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits
3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect
light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting
from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not
exceed one half footcandle."
Response: Note added to Sheet CL -101.
8. Revise interior parking lot trees to large shade trees.
Response: Interior parking lot trees revised to large shade trees.
9. Identify on the plan the color proposed for the retaining wall block.
Response: Block will closely match brick from building and will be selected by architect. See
Note 11 on Sheet CS -101.
10. Revise the plant species so that the number of proposed plants for any one species does not
exceed 25% of the total proposed for that plant type (tree, shrub).
Response: Plant species revised so that number of proposed plants for any one species does
not exceed 25% of the total proposed for that plant type. Please see Sheet CP -101 for more
information.
11. Revise the cornice to more appropriately reflect the proportions of the building mass.
Response: See architectural plans for more detail.
804 673 3882
M
Kimley»>Horn
12. Consider slightly darker shades for the tan wall panels.
Response: See architectural plans for more detail.
13. Consider revising the light pole color to bronze.
Response: Acknowledged and will be reviewed with architect.
Albemarle County Service AuthoriitX
Page 4
1. Water and sewer construction review submittal will be required at the final site plan stage. Submit
3 copies of the plan along with water/ sewer data sheets to the ACSA, Attn: Michael Vieira, PE, to
begin the review process.
Response: Acknowledged.
2. A sewer capacity agreement will be required prior to the ACSA recommending final site plan or
construction plan approvals.
Response: Comment acknowledged. Sewer capacity agreement will be submitted under
separate cover.
3. Show a grease interceptor.
Response: A grease interceptor has been added to the utility plan. Please see Sheet CU -101
for more information.
4. Call -out the sewer connection as a core and boot.
Response: The sewer connection has been called out as a core and boot connection. Please
see Sheet CU -101 for more information.
5. Call out a 6" tapping sleeve and valve for the fireline.
Response: The fire line has been relocated to tee off from an existing 8" stub. Please see
Sheet CU -101 for more information.
6. Show the FDC location.
Response: The FDC has been added to the utility plan. Please see Sheet CU -101 for more
information.
7. Show additional fire hydrants (per Fire/Rescue coverage requirements).
Response: Two fire hydrants have been proposed on the site. Please see Sheet CU -101 for
more information.
8. Show a large service tap for the domestic water service.
Response: The domestic water service line connects to an existing 8" stub through a reducer.
Please see Sheet CU -101 for more information.
9. Call -out a water meter vault for the domestic service.
Response: A 3" water meter vault has been called out along the domestic service line. Please
see Sheet CU -101 for more information.
U
Kim ey))) Horn Page 5
VDOT
1. Please provide route numbers, ADT, design speed, public/private, and show and label right-of-way
for all streets that appear on the plan.
Response: Route numbers, ADT, and design speed information not available for all streets.
Right-of-way and public/private information for all streets shown on all applicable sheets.
2. Plan sheet #CS -101; please provide proposed drainage data tying into existing storm sewer pipe.
Please show that the existing system and outfall is adequate.
Response: See Sheets CG -101 and CG -102 for drainage area map and calculations.
3. Please conform to the pavement widening WP -2, 302_02 in the 2008 Road and Bridge Standards.
Please shown on plan mill and overlay.
Response: No pavement widening has been proposed with this project. Please see plans for
more information.
4. Provide sight distance line profiles. Please demonstrate that adequate sight distance is provided in
both horizontal and vertical.
Response: Sight distance line profiles provided on Sheet CG -502.
5. Plan sheet #CS -101, radii on both entrances are inadequate, please refer to the Road Design
Manual Appendix F, and page F-126, figure 4-11. Radii should be within a range of 25-50' the
selected shall accommodate the anticipated type of vehicle usage.
Response: The entrance radii have been increased and received approval from the Albemarle
County Engineering and Fire Rescue Departments on 11/14/16. The entrances are located on
Laurel Park Lane which is identified as a private street. Please see Sheet CS -101 for more
information.
6. Plan sheet #CS -101 proposed sidewalk is outside of right-of-way and VDOT will not maintain
Consider dedicating right-of-way for sidewalk or a land use permit will need to be obtained.
Response: Variable width right-of-way dedication for sidewalk shown on sheet CS -101.
7. It appears that Laurel Park Lane to be private, please confirm.
Response: Laurel Park Lane is private has been labeled as private on the plans. Please see
the plans for more information.
8. From Laurel Park Lane, please show sight distance left onto Meeting Street.
Response: Sight distance line profiles provided on Sheet CG -502.
9. Please extend photometric values to the surrounding street Timberwood Boulevard.
Response: Photometric values extended to Timberwood Boulevard. See Sheet CL -101 for
more information.
1700 Willow Lawn Drive, Suite 200, Richmond, VA 23230