Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201700134 Review Comments Final Plat 2017-12-15Phone 434-296-5832 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22902 Memorandum To: David Jordan (djordan@roudabush.com) From: Rachel Falkenstein, Senior Planner Division: Planning Date: October 6, 2017 Rev1 Comments 11/22/2017 Rev2 Comments 12/15/2017 (plat dated 11/28) Subject: SUB201700134 Wintergreen Farm Phase 3 — Final Subdivision Plat Fax 434-972-4126 The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plat referenced above once the following comments have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified. General Comments 1. L14-302(A)(3)] Ensure street names/spelling match on all sheets. Rev1: Comment addressed 2. [14-302(A)(5)] Provide a deed of easement for the public access easements and public drainage easements for county review and signature. Rev1: Do the previously recorded deeds also cover this parcel? If so, please confirm and provide DB & PG. [14-317] Provide supplemental declaration to the covenants and restrictions for any easements to be maintained by the HOA for review and approval by the County Attorney. Rev1: Does the previously recorded HOA agreement also cover this parcel? If so, please confirm and provide DB & PG. Rev2. In the chain of title provided I did not see a supplementary declaration to the CCR extending to this parcel (similar to as done in Ph 2 with db 4956 pg 304-308). If such a document has already been recorded, provide db & pg. If not, provide a declaration for review. 4. [18-13.4.1] Density information is confusing/redundant. Please simplify. Provide the following: a. General Development Area density calculation — show once b. General Rural Area density— show once c. Density Table: lots and acreage per phase; cumulative units, cumulative acreage, cumulative density. d. Open Space Table: Open space acreages, cumulative open space acreage and cumulative percentage; acreage and percentage of open space within flood plain. Rev1: Comment partially addressed. The tables at the bottom of the sheet are providing conflicting and out of date information. Please retain reference to the tree preservation exhibit (note F) but reference the phase 3 exhibit provided with this plat and provide updated acreages/percentages. Other information contained in the tables can be deleted. Rev2: Provide a total (acreage and percentage) of tree preservation area for all three phases on sheet 2 of the plat 5. Can open space lots be joined with open space in previous phases? If so, combine the following and revise boundary lines accordingly: a. Common Open Space 1-III and Common Open Space 1 b. Common Open Space 1F and 1B c. Common Open Space 1C and 1G Rev1: Comment addressed. 6. [18-13.4.1] Provide an exhibit demonstrating that all tree preservation areas meet the definition of a wooded area from Section 3.1 of the zoning ordinance. Please note the following: a. Show floodplain with the tree preservation areas, as they cannot overlap. b. From the easement plat, it appears that parts of these tree preservation areas are 5-feet wide. The shape and area of the tree preservation areas on lots 82, 83, 84, 85 and OS 3 are not conducive to tree preservation. For lot 84, the preservation area appears to be close to the potential building site. c. On lots 75, 76, 77 and 78 — it appears the tree preservation area overlaps with the existing Virginia Power Easement. This easement likely allows the power company the ability to remove any vegetation from their easement. Consequently, the tree preservation area cannot exist in this area. Reevaluate location of tree areas. Rev1: Comment partially addressed. Are HME VAR easements shown on sheet 5 intended to preserve other features besides trees? Please clarify. The tree preservation exhibit does not indicate tree preservation areas on any lots except lot 84. Also clarify what hatching on sheet 2 is intended to represent. Please label or include legend on this sheet. Rev2: I have the following comments: a. The tabulation on sheet 2 does not match the exhibit b. The areas shown for preservation on sheet 2 do match the exhibit c. The tabulation listed on the exhibit for Ph 3 does not match the acreage shown on the exhibit (1.5 acres shown, 2.11 listed) d. Ensure lot lines on exhibit match those on the plat e. HME-VAR easements should cover all areas of tree preservation identified even those areas in common open space. f. Please clarify the purpose of the HME-VAR easements shown on sheet 6. They don't appear to line up with preservation areas shown on other sheets. [14-303] ShUW Me �,ump rian ueveiuPrnenL /Area uuunuary. riease nuie, We ooundary has changed since the time of the approval for the preliminary plat for this project. Consult GIS Web to see new location. Update density calculations accordingly. Rev1: Comment addressed. Sheet 1—Cover Sheet [14-302(B)] 8. Note 15 — include Entrance Corridor overlay in zoning note. 9. Note 15 Setbacks — Minimum side setback is 10'. Revise note, show side SBL on plat. 10. Note 18 — reference deed book and page number for open spaces 1D & 1E Rev1: Phase 2A plat is approved. If this have been recorded, please update db & pg. Rev2: Comment addressed. Sheet 2 — Overall Exhibit [14-303 & Sec. 14-302 (B)] 11. The Area tabulations reference the wrong TMP numbers 12. The Area tabulations misname the parcels, compared to the plat Sheet 4 —Subdivision Plat 13. Show SBL on plat Rev1: Comment addressed New Comment: Provide evidence that all lots have a building site — please show slopes, tree preservation/HME easements, setbacks, stream buffer all on one sheet to demonstrate buildable area. This can be done on plat or a separate exhibit. Rev2: Comment addressed; however, easements shown on sheet 6 do not line up with areas identified for preservation on this sheet; please clarify and ensure consistency throughout. Sheet 5 — Miscellaneous Easement Plat 14. Above the label "Common Open Space 1-III," there is a line with the label "TE-X N." This is not identified in the legend on Page 11. Please clarify. 15. For lots 79 is there not enough room for a standard setback line? 16. For lot 74, it appears the front setback line could be closer to the street. Rev1: Comments addressed Sheet 6 — Miscellaneous Easement Plat 17. The hatching at the ingress/egress does not appear to match the legend on Page 11. Rev1: Comments addressed Sheet 9, 10 & 11— Storm Easement Plat & Tables and Tabulations 18. The following labels are not defined in the legend on Page 11: SAE-X, SWM-X, CL SAE Rev1: Comments addressed General Comment 19. This plat cannot be approved until Engineering, ACSA, and E911 complete their reviews and grant their approval. E911 and Engineering comments are attached. Additional reviewer's comments will be forwarded upon receipt. Rev1: ACSA approval still pending Rev2: ACSA has granted approval. Please contact Rachel Falkenstein in the Planning Division by using rfalkenstein@albemarle.org or 434-296- 5832 ext. 3272 for further information.