HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201700063 Approval - County 2017-12-290
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
December 29, 2017
Rob Umberger, WW Associates
3040 Avemore Square Place
Charlottesville VA 22911
SDP2017-63 The Center at Belvedere - Initial Site Plan
Mr. Umberger,
The Agent for the Board of Supervisors hereby grants administrative conditional approval to the above referenced
site plan. This approval shall be valid for a period of five (5) years from the date of this letter, provided that the
developer submits a final site plan for all or a portion of the site within one (1) year after the date of this letter as
provided in section 32.4.3.1 of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle, and thereafter diligently pursues
approval of the final site plan.
In accordance with Chapter 18 Section 32.4.2.8 Early or Mass Grading may be permitted after the following
approvals are received:
1. Submittal of a tree conservation checklist with areas for tree preservation identified.
2. Engineering approval of a VSMP plan meeting the requirements of Chapter 17 of the Code of the County
of Albemarle.
3. Approval of all easements for facilities for stormwater management and drainage control.
The final site plan will not be considered to have been officially submitted until the following items are received:
1. A final site plan that satisfies all of the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code.
2. A fee of $1,613.
Please submit 12 copies of the final plans to the Community Development Department. The assigned Lead
Reviewer will then distribute the plans to all reviewing agencies. Once you receive the first set of comments on the
final site plan, please work with each reviewer individually to satisfy their requirements.
The Department of Community Development shall not accept submittal of the final site plan for signature until
tentative approvals for the attached conditions from the following agencies/reviewers have been obtained:
SRC Members:
Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner) - 2 copies [Paty Saternye ext 3250]
Albemarle County Planning Services (Zoning) — 1 copy [Rebecca Ragsdale ext. 32261
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) - 1 copy [Bobby Jocz ext 3283]
Albemarle County Information Services (E911) - 1 copy [Elise Kiewra ext. 3030]
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue - 1 copy [Shawn Maddox 434-326-2623.]
Virginia Department of Transportation - 1 copy [Adam Moore 434-422-9894]
Albemarle County Building inspections — 1 copy [Michael Dellinger ext. 32281
Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) - 3 copy [Alex Morrison 434-977-4511 ext 116]
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority (RWSA) - 1 copy [Victoria Fort 434-977-2970 ext 205]
If you have any questions about these conditions or the submittal requirements please feel free to contact me at
Extension 3250, psaternyepalbemarle.org.
of Al
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Phone 434-296-5832 Fax 434-972-4126
Memorandum
To: Rob Umberger (rmberger@wwassociates.net)
From: Paty Saternye, Senior Planner
Division: Planning
Date: December 20, 2017
UPDATE: December 29, 2017
Subject: SDP 201700063 The Center at Belvedere — Initial Site Plan
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the
following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been
identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.):
[Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless
otherwise specified.]
Comments to be addressed prior to the Initial Site Plan approval:
1. Pay the required notices fee of $215.
UPDATE: Comment Addressed.
Comments to be addressed with the Final Site Plan submission:
2. A site plan meeting all the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code.
3. A site plan meeting all the requirements of ZMA 2004-7, its Application Plan and its Code of Development
(C.0.D).
4. A site plan meeting all the requirements of variations to ZMA 2004-7, it's Application Plan and its Code of
Development (C.O.D), including Variations #49, #50 & #51. Address the following:
• Variation #49 requires that Table 10 of the C.O.D. be updated prior to Final Site Plan approval.
UPDATE: Comment previously addressed.
• Variation #50 requires that an update to the description of Block 1 in the C.O.D. be provided prior to the
Final Site Plan approval.
UPDATE: Comment previously addressed.
• Variation #50 requires that a "Pergola and Garden" feature along Belvedere Boulevard, as shown in the
variation exhibit, be provided. The initial site plan does not meet this requirement and therefore the
layout must be updated before final site plan submittal in order to address this. The final site plan will
not be approved until this requirement is met.
Page 1 of 5
Variation #51 has many requirements that must be addressed before final site plan approval.
Reference the variation approval for all requirements that must be addressed. Included in this list are:
o Revision of the road plans and approval of them by the County Engineer and VDOT.
o Work with the County Engineer to provide additional traffic calming measure along Belvedere
Blvd. to their satisfaction.
o UPDATE: Item added. Please note that the initial site plan did not provide as much traffic
calming and pedestrian safety as was shown in the exhibit that was submitted with the
approved variation request. A median, which would supply a safe refuge for the pedestrians,
was not proposed in this site plan. This median, and other pedestrian safety features, should
be considered for the final site plan. The initial site plan as submitted does not yet meet this
variation requirement. See bullet item above.
o Revision of the Water Protection Ordinance plan and approval by Engineering.
o VDOT acceptance of Belvedere Boulevard.
o An update to Table 8 of the C.O.D. showing all changes be provided.
UPDATE: Comment previously addressed.
[32.5.1(c), 32.5.2(a) & 32.6.1(e)(1)] Address the following:
• Provide the boundary information for all potions of the boundary including all required curve data where
appropriate. Boundary information along right of way should be provided and legible.
• Revise the setback information to specify "front build -to from street" for the front. Only the side and rear
are "setbacks". Also, include a note that specifies the content of, and references, Variation #49 which
allows a modification to that build -to distance when existing easements block the building from meeting
the required build to distance.
• The initial site plan does not meet the build to distance requirement specified above. Revise the plan so
that the building does meet this requirement or request a variation to change the build -to distance. Note
the following:
o Any portion of the building can meet this requirement. It does not have to be a full side of the
building.
o Check if an easement already exists around the transformer, or should be added around the
transformer. If it exists, or should exist and is added, then the build -to distance could be
measured from the easement.
o UPDATE: Wording modified. If a utility company requires a distance from an existing
structure, pipe or utility line that is in excess of the 2' specified in the variation provide
documentation to that affect from the utility company and their specified distance may be
allowed.
o UPDATE: Wording modified. Building overhang is considered in setback.
0 Provide all of the required "Abutting Parcel Information" including the names of owners, zoning district,
tax map and parcel numbers and present uses. Because of the improvements in the right of way this
should include the parcels on the far side of Belvedere Blvd. The information is provided but the owner
information has changed in the last year and must be updated appropriately.
0 Provide information on all variations that directly impact this parcel. This is primarily Variations #49, #50
and #51 that were requested specifically for this parcel. Notes with allowed changes should be
provided in the appropriate areas of the notes, data, and/or plan sheets.
Provide spot elevations.
6. [32.5.2(b)] Address the following:
• Revise the "Building Height" to specify the proposed building height for each of the two buildings,
and not just the maximum height, and specify the number of stories of each building.
• The parking spaces provided are more than 120% of the required parking (4.12.4(a) & 4.12.2(c)).
Therefore, the parking must either be reduced to 120% or less, a parking study submitted and
approved justifying a different parking calculation, or a waiver must be requested and approved.
Please note the comments on the requirements of Variation #50 are not yet being met. The area
utilized for the parking that is above the allowed amount of parking, within the subject parcel and
adjacent to the road, could be utilized to meet the requirements for Variation #50.
• UPDATE: See 12-29-17 comments from Zoning.
Page 2 of 5
7. [32.5.2(b), 32.5.2(e), 32.5.2(p), 32.6.20) & 32.7.9] Provide a full landscape plan that provides all required
landscaping, calculations and meets the requirements for 32.7.9, the ZMA Code of Development, and the
variations approved that impact this parcel. Also, address the following:
• Provide the calculation and the "landscaping required" to meet the minimums for the 5% of the
paved parking and vehicular area, the number of plantings based on number of parking spaces,
and the parking lot landscaping specifically outlined in the C.O.D. and zoning ordinance.
• On the landscape plan identify if any existing trees that will be utilized to meet any requirements of
this site plan. If so, provide a landscape table for existing trees so that they can be reviewed for
meeting requirements of the Code, ZMA and/or C.O.D.
• If any existing trees will be utilize to meet landscaping requirements then provide a conservation
checklist, conservation details, and tree protection fencing to ensure that the existing trees that are
to remain are preserved.
• If any existing trees will be utilize to meet landscaping requirements then provide all items required
on the conservation check list including the limits of clearing and grading and any grade changes
requiring tree wells or walls, trenching or tunneling proposed beyond the limits of clearing and
grading
• Provide landscape screening for all features with negative impacts including parking, dumpster,
loading areas, and storage areas.
• Provide all required calculations for require landscaping to meet the zoning ordinance, the ZMA,
the C.O.D, and the variation requirement. Note that Variation #50 has landscaping requirements
"in addition" to those specified in the other documents. Plantings for other requirements will not be
counted towards meeting the variations requirements.
• Note that the limited/partial landscaping shown on sheet L100 does not appear to be sufficient to
meet the minimum requirements. This has not been fully reviewed since it is not meant to be
complete. However, at this stage, two things to note are 1) the lack of parking landscaping
adjacent/near to the proposed Phase 2 building and 2) landscaping to meet any of the
requirements for Variation #50. All landscaping shown so far appear to be for street trees and
parking lot trees. Landscaping for Variation #50 is "in addition" to all other required landscaping.
• Ensure that the landscape plan is phased and that each phase can independently meet all
landscaping requirements.
8. [32.5.2(c)] Since a phase line is not being provided, and may be hard to delimitate, some other form of
documentation or graphic representation must be provided to clarify the changes that are being
implemented with Phase 2. This may be able to be handed by hatching the area not being modified or a list
of times changes.
9. [32.5.2(d) & 30.7.5] The managed and preserved slopes have been shown on the site plan. However, the
design standards for the steep slopes overlay district have not been applied. Address the following:
• Walls above 6' in height are not allowed in the steep slope overlay areas. If additional height is required
it must be met with multiple stepped walls that are the prescribed minimum distance apart and have the
required landscaping.
• There is some question on how the steep slopes overlay has been added to the site plan and whether it
is slightly shifted from east to west. Where the steep slopes areas impact the proposed walls on the
east and west sides of the property is in question.
• Check and clarify the locations of the steep slopes overlay graphics with the final site plan submittal and
show the steep slopes areas on at least one of the plan sheets that shows all (Phase 1 and 2) walls.
• Provide the maximum wall heights in the Phase 1 and 2. None are shown in Phase 2, and in that phase
one of the walls that impacts the steep slopes areas is being extended farther than in phase 1.
10. 132.5.2(i), (n), 32.6.2(f), & (k)] Address the following:
• Although it is specified in the road section the road right of way to be dedicated is not shown on the plan
views. Show it in the plan views of the site plan.
• The boundary line adjustment for the road right of way will have to be approved prior to the final site
plan approval because it is a requirement of Variation #51.
• Provide the Belvedere Blvd. road width information both in the existing conditions and the other plan
sheets.
• Dimension the centerline radii and corner radii of the proposed section of Belvedere Blvd. and the drive
aisles.
Page 3 of 5
• Provide appropriate bike lane markings.
• The proposed access easement must be extended to reach Belvedere Blvd.
• Provide dumpster containers dimension. Ensure that the dumpster pad meets or exceeds the minimum
requirements.
• Show the location of any outdoor lighting on all plan sheets and provide information on lighting under
the entrance canopy. Submit a photometric plan.
• Show the location of any service and loading areas. Two loading spaces are to be provided. If the
"Covered drop off" is to be used as loading ensure its width, depth, and height is sufficient to meet the
requirements and that it is show as hatched loading areas.
• If there is to be any new sign for the proposed use(s), on the final site plan depict and label the sign
location. (Depicting the sign on the final site plan is not approval of the sign location or type).
• Show all proposed signage on the site plan.
• Note that there does not appear to be sufficient space for handicapped signage in a few locations,
without blocking walkways. Address this issue.
• Provide directional arrows for the drive aisles.
• Provide a detail for any screening fencing/enclosure for the dumpster.
• Show the deed book and page number for the existing easements. The information does not appear to
be provided for the power and water easements.
• Provide a clear, and safe, delineation for the pedestrian connection the parking lot access ways, for
each parking lot sidewalk, to the main entrance.
• Provide appropriate crosswalk markings for each proposed crosswalk, both within the site and along the
Blvd.
• Specify the specific height of each of the two proposed buildings.
• Specify the size of the footprint for each building on the plan sheets.
• The width of the sidewalk on the far side of the Blvd. is not shown consistently. The plan view shows 6'
and the section shows 5'. Ensure that they are consistent and at least meet the minimums specified in
Variation #51.
• Provide the full landscape plan including all required information, details, calculations and schedules.
11. [32.5.20) & (k)] Address the following:
• If the proposed storm drain is draining from the road through the site provide the appropriate drainage
easements.
• Ensure the directional flow arrows for all storm drains are shown.
• There is an existing stormdrain from the road, through the parcel, and leading to the stormwater pond.
It does not appear to have an easement. Address this issue.
• Provide required water and sewer facility information.
12. [32.5.2(1)] Ensure the location of any existing or proposed utilities and utility easements, including cable, on
all of the plan sheets including the landscaping plan. Ensure that the label for the power easement is
located where it is obvious what line its leader is point to.
13. [32.5.2(o)] Address the following in reference to open space.
• Show in the site plan the required amenities associated with Block 1 and that are to be between Block 1
& Block 2 that are specified in the Code of Development (COD) on described on pages 10 and in listed
in the table on page 15.
• Add a note that references the open space requirements and notes that the open space requirements and
amenities for block 1 are primarily provided outside of the subject parcel. The one exception to this is
likely a pedestrian connection between Block 2 and 1 that is specified in the "Block 2 Open Space 6.2
acres" on page 10. A linkage to this pedestrian connection is likely required within this parcel.
14. [Comment] Provide a copy of all off -site easements, or letters of intent to grant them from off -site property
owners. It appears that there are improvements proposed on the far side of Belvedere Blvd that may impact
an adjoining parcel.
15. [Comment] Required proposed easements, and deeds, must be approved and recorded prior to final site
plan approval.
Page 4 of 5
16. [Comment] Provide clear labels and information on any proposed connections between the two buildings.
17. [Comment] Required improvements be built or bonded prior to final site plan approval.
18. [Comment] See the attached comments from the majority of the other SRC reviewers. ACSA comments
will be forwarded to you once they have been received.
UPDATE: [NEW COMMENTI Zoning and ACSA comments have been attached. They had not been
available prior to the SRC meeting and had not been including in the draft comments.
19. UPDATE: [NEW COMMENTI Provide the appropriate note for the trimming of street tree within the
VDOT sight distance easement.
20. UPDATE: [NEW COMMENTI This initial site plan includes sheets that were revised on 12/13/17 to
include a "Voluntary Stream Buffer" as was discussed with the County Engineer. The sheets that
were revised to show this buffer are C-100, C104, C-105, C-106, C107, and L100.
21. UPDATE: [NEW COMMENTI Revise the Sheet Index on the Cover Sheet to provide "Drawing No."
that match those shown in the title block.
Please contact Pat a in the Planning Division by using psaternye(a)albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext.
3250 for further info m ti
i 1
Page 5 of 5
Review Comments for SDP201700063 11nitial Site Plan
Project Name: THE CENTERAT BELVEDERE
Date Completed: Monday, December 19, 2017 Department1DivisionfAgency: Review Status:
Bob Jncz � CDD En ineerin Requested Changes
Reviewer: b]+ 9 9
Comments on plans dated 11--1017
1_ VMP plan approval must occur prior to site plan
approval-
_ Some features, such as the SWIVI facility easement and stream buffer, are difficult to identify due to similarity to line
type used in topography data_ An updated line type/weight must be used_ Please address-
3- Slopes cannot be graded to be steeper than 2:1 (specifically to the southeast of the 'Gardens and Lawn" adjacent to
the SWIVI facility, and at the end of proposed sidewalk improvements at the south most corner of the development)- All slopes
steeper than 3:1 must have low maintenance, not grass, groundcover specified on plans
4_ Engineered plans, signed and sealed, must be provided for retaining walls greater than 4' in height_ Safety railing must
be provided-
5- Drainage plan must be provided_ Adrainage plan should include stormsewer calculations, pipe profiles, drainage area
maps, etc_ for proposed stormater improvements-
6- Islands within travelways in parking lot area should have curbing_ CG-12 with detectible warning surface should be
used on sidewalks in locations where anticipated travelway crossings are to occur_ Crosswalk should be provided for crossings
with adjacent to Handicap parking spaces-
7- Provide dimensions for parallel parking spaces along Belvedere Blvd.
8_ Provide greater differentiation between curbing and flush curbing
9_ Provide a greater sump depth for the northernmost stormsekver drop inlet_ Concern is that parking lot flow will bypass
inlet and flow down adjacent slope_
10_ Detail should be provided for structures related to stormse),%ier system.
11_ Proposed tree plantings along Belvedere Blvd_ adjacent to southern entrance appear to obstruct site distance_ Sight
distance profiles must be provided_
12_ Road plan amendment must be submitted for improvements related to Belvedere Blvd_ Additional traffic calming
measures may be required_
13_ Guardrail should be provided in between curbing and retaining wall adjacent to western entrance_
14_ Notes calling out surface material for SWIVI access road conflict_ Please clarify surface type, if surface type changes,
please indicate transition locations_
15_ Please contact Engineering to discuss VMP phasing Bonding issues may occur_
16_ Sidewalk should extend pas wester intersection Crosswalks should be provided_
Comments on amended plan sheets dated 12-13-17
1_ See above_
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: '12J20120'17
Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E.
Commissioner
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper, Virginia 22701
December 14, 2017
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Attn: Paty Saternye
Re: The Center at Belvedere- Initial site plan
SDP-2017-00063
Review #1
Dear Ms. Saternye:
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by W&W Associates, dated
November 02, 2017, and offers the following comments:
Land Use
1. Please provide trip generation data.
2. Traffic on Belvedere should be consistent with count data, with County.
3. Please provide right and left turn lane analysis; please refer to VDOT's Road Design
Manual appendix F, Pg., F-75 for details. Warrants for left and right turn lanes on two-
lane Highways.
4. Please provide drainage calculation for proposed drainage structures in parking lot.
5. Please remove DI-3B outside of pavement. The existing pipe must be extended.
6. Sheet# C110, entrance and sight distance Iines are shown incorrectly. Measured distance
needed from edge of travel lane should be 14.5' and line distance should be 330' for 30
MPH. Please refer to VDOT's Road Design Manual appendix, B1, pg., B (1)19 for the
appropriate procedures for measuring sight distance lines. The proposed parking spaces
on Belvedere that fall within the sight distance lines will have to be eliminated.
7. The typical section for Belvedere doesn't match what's drawn on sheet# C 105. Sidewalk
on typical section says 5' and sheet# C 105 says 6' ?
Please note that the final site plan must show conformance with the VDOT Road Design
Manual Appendices B (1) and F, as well as any other applicable standards, regulations, or
other requirements.
Please provide two copies of the revised plan along with a comment response letter. If further
information is desired, please contact Willis C. Bedsaul at 434-422-9866.
December 14, 2017
Paty Satemye
Page 2
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The
owner/developer must contact the VDOT Charlottesville Residency Land Use Section at (434)
422-9399 for information pertaining to this process
Sincerely,
Adam J. Moore, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
Review Comments for SDP201700063 11nitial Site Plan
Project Name: THE CENTERAT BELVEDERE
Date Completed: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 DepartmentlaivisionlAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Shawn Maddox LJ Fire Rescue Requested Changes
1_ What is the clearance under the covered drop off? It needs to be a minimum 1TV-
_ No FDC shovin -fire department connection must be shown on the site plan and located within 100 feet of a fire hydrant-
3- Please add a note to the plans that a Knox box is required with the location approved by the fire marshal's office-
4- Afire flow test will be required before final acceptance once a required fire flow demand is calculated_ Please provide building
construction type to allow for calculation-
5- Gravel and paved fire road shown in Phase 2 should be completed in Phase 1 due to the height of the phase 1 building_
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: l2 20120'17
Patricia Saternye
From: Rebecca Ragsdale
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 1:49 PM
To: Patricia Saternye
Subject: Planning Application Review for SDP201700063 THE CENTER AT BELVEDERE.
The Review for the following application has been completed:
Application Number = SDP201700063
Reviewer = Rebecca Ragsdale
Review Status = Requested Changes
Completed Date = 12/20/2017
This email was sent from County View Production.
2017-12-20: Zoning comments integrated into Planning comments with regard to compliance with conditions
of variations approved. 2017-12-29-.Zoning comments regarding parking:
Senior Center/Community center is an unscheduled use in the Zoning Ordinance and there is no specific
parking calculation for the use. The applicant's information previously provided detailed square footage
breakdown of the building and proposed to use ITE standard 495 Recreational Community Center for parking.
That request was reviewed and approved in accordance with Section 4.12.7 and the standard of 3.2 spaces/1000
square feet of gross floor was approved. Based on Section 4.12.4 the number of parking spaces in a parking area
may not exceed the number of spaces required by this section by more than twenty (20) percent. The applicant
may provide an updated parking study. If parking exceeds the required number of spaces by 20 percent, a
waiver or modification must be approved according to Section 4.12.2(c).
Patricia Saternye
From: Alexander Morrison <amorrison@serviceauthority.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 8:57 AM
To: Patricia Saternye
Subject: SDP201700063: The Center at Belvedere
Paty,
I have reviewed the above referenced application and hereby recommend approval with the following conditions for the
final site plan:
• Water and sewer construction plan review will be required. Submit 3 copies of the plan along with water and
sewer data sheets to the ACSA, Attn: Alexander J. Morrison, PE, to start the review.
• Provide a profile for the sanitary sewer (both existing and the proposed relocation).
• Correctly show existing water infrastructure along Belvedere Blvd.
• Relocate the proposed water meter so the fire hydrant is not on a dead-end line.
• Advise if an irrigation meter will be required for this site.
Alexander J. Morrison, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
Albemarle County Service Authority
168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22911
(0) 434-977-4511 Ext. 116
(C) 434-981-5577
(F) 434-979-0698
Review Comments for SDP201700063 11nitial Site Plan
Project Name: THE CENTERAT BELVEDERE
Date Completed: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 DepartmentIDivisionfAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Victoria Fort RWSA No Obje-:tion
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: '1220120'17
Review Comments for SDP201700063 11nitial Site Plan
Project Name: THE CENTERAT BELVEDERE
Date Completed: Thursday, November 16, 2017 DepartmentIDivisionfAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Elise Kiewra CDD E911 No Obje-Ction
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: '12J20120'17
Review Comments for SDP201700063 11nitial Site Plan
Project Name: THE CENTERAT BELVEDERE
Date Completed: Friday, December 01, 2017 DepartmentlDivisionfAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Michael Dellinger CDD Inspections No Obje-Ction
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: '1220120'17
Review Comments for SOP201700063 11nitial Site Plan
Project Name: THE CENTERAT BELVEDERE
Date Completed: Monday, December 04, 2017 DepartmentIDivisionfAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Margaret M al i szews ki 13 DDDARB No Objection
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: '1220120'17
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
In Cooperation with the Thomas Jefferson Health District ALBEMARLE CHARLOTTESVILLE
State Department of Health FLUVANNA COUNTY(PALMYRA)GREENE COUNTY (STANARDSVILLE)
1138 Rose Hill Drive LOUISA COUNTY(LOUISA)
Phone (434) 972-6219 P. O. Box 7546 NELSON COUNTY (LOVINGSTON)
Fax (434) 972-4310
Charlottesville. Virginia 22906
December 18, 2017
Patricia Saternye, Senior Planner
Albemarle County Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: The Center at Belvedere
Initial Site Plan
SDP2017-63
Mr. Saternye:
As requested, I've reviewed the Initial Site Plan, dated November 2, 2017, for the
proposed development, referenced above. Since both water and sewer will be provided
by Albemarle County Water & Sewer, VDH will have no involvement regarding new
construction.
Recommendation: Approval
Conditions: None
If there are any questions or you wish to discuss, please give me a call, 434-972-4306.
S incerely,
Alan Mazurowski
Environmental Health Supervisor
Thomas Jefferson Health District
alan.mazurowskikvdh.vir ig�nia.gov