HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA198900005 Other 1989-07-21w
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
July 21, 1989
Virginia Gardner
P. O. Box 6700
Charlottesville, VA 22906
RE: ZMA-89-05 Ann Horner
Tax Map 56A1, Section 1, Parcel 46A
Dear Ms. Gardner:
The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on
July 5, 1989, unanimously approved the above -noted request
to rezone 2.836 acres from R-2, Residential to C-1,
Commercial. Property, described as Tax Map 56A1, Section 1,
Parcel 46A, is located on the south side of Jarmans Gap
Road at the intersection with Rt. 1201. White Hall
Magisterial District. Approved CO, Commercial Office zoning
as requested by the applicant at this meeting.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the
above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sin Merely,
i
V. Way Cilimberg
Direc r of Plan ng
VWC/j cw
cc: Ann Horner
Kathy Dodson
Community Development
�� pti ALEk,Ei
p1 11- 't
VEEtGIN�P
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
June 29, 1989
Virginia Gardner
P. O. Box 6700
Charlottesville, VA 22906
RE: ZMA-89-5 Ann Horner
Dear Ms. Gardner:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on
June 27, 1989, by a vote of 4-2, recommended denial of the
above -noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please be
advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will
review this petition and receive public comment at their
meeting on July 5, 1989. Any new or additional information
regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of
the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your
scheduled hearing date.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the
above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
�Zuc&t
Ronald S. Keeler
Chief of Planning
RSK/jcw
cc: Ms. Lettie E. Neher
Ms. Ann Horner
ZMA-89-5 Ann Horner - Request to rezone 2,836 acres from R-2, Residential
to C1, Commerciaop Property, described as Tax M 6A1, Section 1, Parcel
46A, is located o the south side of Jarman's Gap oad at the intersection
with Rt. 1201. White Hall Magisterial District. Deferred from June 13,
1989 Planning Commission Meeting.
011 Mr. Keeler explained that this request had been deferred previously in
order for the applicant to submit a proffer. He noted the following
technical issues related to the proffer:
"The applicant proffers that 'all uses by right in CO districts
will be acceptable.' The County Zoning Ordinance is not a
cumulative ordinance and, therefore, only CO uses expressly listed
in the C-1 zone would be available."
"The applicant has proffered deletion of some or all of: 22.2.1.b.17,
22.2.1.b.18 and 22.2.2.2. These are public uses and public utility
types of uses which should not be deleted."
June 27, 1989 Page 2
Mr. Keeler explained the applicant's proffer.
The applicant was represented by Ms. Virginia Gardner. She offered
little additional comment except to say that the applicant had attempted
to delete those uses which might be objectionable to the neighborhood.
Mr. Keeler called the Commission's attention to a new piece of information
which was included in their packet, i.e. a petition, the signers of
which either (a) support Commercial Office zoning; or (b) do not
support any commercial zoning at all.
The Chairman invited public comment.
Mr. Leonard Tosto, an adjoining property owner, addressed the Commission.
He felt the re -zoning was premature. He was concerned about increased
traffic and public opposition. He felt the property was not suitable
for commercial development because of topographical considerations.
There being no further public comment, the matter was placed before
the Commission.
Mr. Jenkins stated that even though the Board has been under pressure to
come up with commercial area in Crozet that is not in the watershed, he
was still opposed to this property be designated as commercial because of
its proximity to residential development. He noted that he did not
know if he would be in support of commercial office either unless it
was acceptable to the residents.
Mr. Jenkins moved that ZMA-89-5 for Ann Horner be recommended to the Board
of Supervisors for denial.
Mr. Rittenhouse seconded the motion.
Discussion:
There was a brief discussion about the existing zoning on surrounding
properties.
(Two other neighboring property owners expressed their opposition to
the proposal.)
Mr. Bowerman pointed out that the Commission had recently denied a
rezoning for a shopping center on 250W based upon the recommendation
in the Plan that the commercial be in this area. He agreed, however
that the C-1 rezoning originally requested by the applicant (prior to
the proffer) was inappropriate. He stated he did not see much
difference in C-1 with the applicant's proffer, and CO. He felt the
use was not more intense though there was greater flexibility. He
concluded he could support the applicant's request for the rezoning.
Mr. Wilkerson agreed.
0 •
June 27, 1989
Page 3
Mr. Bowerman noted that he was sympathetic to Mr. Jenkins' and the
public's point of view.
Mr. Rittenhouse stated he felt "sensitivity of development" was an
issue in this case. He explained: "I think the flavor, although some
of the C-1 uses have been proffered out, is still one of a speculative
rezoning." He noted no particular use has been proposed. He also
pointed out that some of the uses which have not been proffered out
would not be allowed in CO zoning. He noted that there exists
a residential development with a proposal to rezone a portion of that
for some unspecified commercial use.
Mr. Jenkins indicated he could not support the proposal simply because
there is pressure for commercial area in Crozet, given the citizen
opposition.
Mr. Stark stated that if the developer had propos d a specific use that would
be beneficial to the neighborhood and had "sold'Ro the residents, then he
would have been able to support the request.
Mr. Michel stated he felt staff's recommendation for CO had been appropriate
from the beginning.
Mr. Bowerman stated he understood the concern, but he "had a problem
using the Comprehensive Plan in ways that are suitable to me at the time
and not trying to generally apply it in all cases, and this is a situation
where we looked at the maps and we looked at the uses for Crozet and
tried to understand the requirements the Crozet community would need
and we put those in place in the Comprehensive Plan. On a case -by -case
basis you can rezone anything but you don't look at it in terms of the
context of the Plan. I certainly recognize that there is decided
opposition to this rezoning in this particular location because of the
residential, but it has to start somewhere."
Mr. Michel stressed that staff had mach a very strong recommendation for
CO, but the applicant chose to meet it 75% of the way but did not
go all the way. ,He felt staff's recommendation was correct because
there is a difference between CO and C-1 and that difference is still
evident even with the proffer.
The Chairman called for a vote on the previously -stated motion for denial.
The motion passed (4:2) with Commissioners Bowerman and Wilkerson casting
the dissenting votes.
p: AL,,!
7
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
MEMORANDUM
TO: Albemarle County Planning Commission
FROM: Ronald S. Keeler, Chief of Planning %K-%
DATE: June 27, 1989
RE: ZMA-89-05 Ann Horner
Proffer of June 19, 1989
On June 20, 1989 you received the applicant's proffer to
limit C-1 uses as well as a petition from residents in the
area. This matter is before the Commission to evaluate
whether or not the applicant's proffer adequately reflects
the public interest. Therefore, staff comment is limited to
technical issues of the proffer:
1. The applicant proffers that "all use by right in CO
districts will be acceptable." The County zoning
ordinance is not a cumulative ordinance and, therefore,
only CO -uses expressly listed in the C-1 zone would be
available;
2. The applicant has proffered deletion of some or all of:
22.2.1.b.17
22.2.1.b.18
22.2.2.2
These are public uses and public utility types of uses
which should not be deleted.
RSK/jcw
Fe" -6
F,Vr-- Kedu.
June 22, 1989
Ms. Amelia Patterson
Department of Planning and Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Ms. Patterson:
RE 2MA- 89-0 5
I attended the June 13 hearing on the rezoning request
listed above and was surprised that the petitioner's agent was
neither informed of the current status of the request nor
prepared to speak concerning it. Both seem to me to be
obligations of the petitioner, and failure to fulfil these
obligations causes further inconvenience to the public as did the
failure to post the property properly.
Because consideration of the proposal has been delayed by
the petitioner, we will not be able to attend the hearing.
We still urge that no zoning change be made. No matter what
commercial operation is situated there, it will be, and will
contintue to be, surrounded on four sides by residences and
residential property. Note that the petitioner never considered
making the property commercial when she lived in the house facing
it.
PA
Regarding the agent's June 19 proposal, I was not aware that
property owners could, as it were, create their own "zones." She
proposes so many limitations on C-1 that it can hardly be
considered C-1. Two uses she would maintain, food stores and day
care centers, are most unsuited to the traffic situation of the
site. Both generate much traffic (with that of day care centers
clustered, as observation of any day care center will reveal)
which the already dangerous intersection on Jarman Gap Road
cannot bear. The operating hours of a "food" store (probably a
"convenience" store) would also be most disruptive to this purely
residential district.
We hope that the Planning Commission will not destroy the
integrity of our residential neighborhood by approving this
request for speculative, isolated commercial development of a
centrally located plat.
Sincerely your.
Jon and Mary Mikalson
Route 3, Box 430
Crozet, VA 22932
JUN 26 1989
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
ZONING DEPARTMENT
�H
As citizens of Crozet, we are opposed to rezoning of parcel 46A from R-2
residential to C-1 commercial. Numerous reasons have been covered in the many
letters sent to the Planning Commission. Most of our concerns stem from the
fact that all the surrounding land is zoned and developed residentially. We
prefer lot 46A to remain residentially zoned. But we are hopeful of finding a
solution that is acceptable to all and in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan.
Based on the Planning Commission Staff's report, we support the recommendation
to deny C-1 Commercial zoning, but that CO Commercial Office zoning.
appropriate. We request that you follow the Staff recommendation.
Vial JUN 20 1989
PLANNING DIVISION
/1n�„ .,.✓.�.� � h-� /r�7,f /�1.: f /.`!� �� l'S.'1� (,%7� �.�-/]''7..irf (/"�� :,1•�%C/ �i _
C frc Q- z Zci Z 2-
�`(LL%els , , i tt , —1 � 3 0
jj,,�-6A`
-1) � 04-
2 21 5; 3 -2-1
4 - 7 -11 41 j.
VJL
.a
•
VA Z,Zq 3 Z J
Oct
I /
0 r VG(
e)ox 3 ���Z �.
;��/ (ZA-lz� /y, -5 7geT-
J
61
•
f
3
An� �< 4� 7
6'�2-et
V n-
'
5
gc9—Y 4(41 7
r4.r_>7,,--
L,f1 -Z Z `� �� •2
0 0
A MEMBER OF THE SEARS FINANCIAL NETWORK
BAILEY
REALTY CO.
TO: Members, Albemarle County Planning Commission
FRUM: Virginia Gardner, agent
RE: ZMA -89-05
DATE: June 19, 1989
1L16S IRIU 14 )AD Pll HOX 6700
(,HAHi Ol R SVII I l VA 729116
Following the June 13 hearing, Mrs. Horner has reconsidered her request
to rezone her property from R-2 to C-1. She has taken the remarks of
adjacent property owners, the Planning Staff, and Planning Commission
under serious advisement and has considered the uses permitted by right
in C-1 in terms of probable hours of operation, and the potential for
noise and odor which may be a product of particular types of businesses.
She hereby petitions the Planning Commission's consideration of rezoning
this property from R-2 to C-1, with the following restrictions.
An Independently Owned and Operated Member of Coldwell Banker Residential Affiliates. Inc. ®M�s-
RE: 2MA-89-05
All uses permitted by right in CO districts will be acceptable.
Retail sales and service establishment uses permitted by right in C-1
districts will be permitted with the following exceptions:
J. uepartment store.
2. Grocery stores, milk dispensary.
3. Furniture and hone appliances (sales and service) .
4. Hardware store.
5. Musical instruments.
6. Newsstands, magazines.
7. Optical goods.
8. Photographic goods.
9. Visual and audio appliances.
10. Sporting goods.
The services and public establishments permitted by right in C-1 districts
will be permitted with the following exceptions:
1. Fire and rescue squad stations (reference 5.1.9).
2. Health spas.
3. Indoor theaters.
4. Laundries, dry cleaners.
5. Laundromat (provided that an attendant shall be on duty at all hours
during operation).
6. Automobile service stations (reference 5.1.20).
7. Electric, gas, oil and communication facilities excluding multi -
legged tower structures and including poles, lines, transformers,
pipes, meters and related facilities for distribution of local
service and owned and operated by a public utility. Water distribution
and sewerage collection lines, pumping stations and appurtenances
owned and operated by the Albemarle County Service Authority.
8. Public water and sewer transmission, main or trunk lines, treatment
facilities, pumping stations and the like, owned and/or operated by the
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority (reference 31.2.5, 5.1.12).
9. Temporary construction uses (reference 5.1.18).
10. Automobile, truck repair shop. (Added 6-3-81).
11. Temporary nonresidential mobile homes (reference 5.8). (Added 3-5-86).
None of the uses permitted by Special Use Permit in C-1 districts will be
permitted by right or Specila Use Permit.
22 0 COMMERCIAL 'C-1
22.1 INTENT, WHERE PERMITTED
C-1 districts are hereby created and may hereafter be
established by amendment to the zoning map to permit
selected retail sales, service, and public use
establishments which are primarily oriented to central
business concentrations. It is intended that C-1
districts be established only within the urban area,
communities, and villages in the comprehensive plan.
In order to permit flexibility of development within
this district in conformance with the stated intent, the
commission may, in a particular case, modify, vary, or
waive certain requirements of section 21.0 as hereinafter
provided.
22.2 PERMITTED USES
22.2.1 BY RIGHT
The following uses shall be permitted in any C-1
district subject to the requirements and limitations of
these regulations. The zoning administrator, after
consultation with the director of planning and other
appropriate officials, may permit as a use by right, a
use not specifically permitted; provided that such use
shall be similar to uses permitted by right in general
character and more specifically, similar in terms of
locational requirements, operational characteristics,
visual impact, and traffic generation. Appeals from the
zoning administrator's decision shall be as generally
provided in section 34.0.
a.
USES
pV-0rFerzE.n
Ov i
3E-MA09 - 05
The following retail sales and service establishments:
1. Antique, gift, jewelry, notion, and craft shops.
2. Clothing, apparel, and shoe shops.
4. Drug store, pharmacy.
5. Florist.
6. Food and including such specialty
shops as bakery, candy,-milk-� and
wine and cheese shops.
ce
-145-
�M A; S� ' 0 5 USES �P2oFFER E-"D O uT
10. ipe and tobacco shops.
15. Retail nurseries and greenhouses.
b. The following services and public establishments:
1. Administrative, professional offices.
2. Barber, beauty shops.
3. Churches, cemeteries.
4. Clubs, lodges, civic, fraternal, patriotic
(reference 5.1.2).
5. Financial institutions.
7. Funeral homes.
ao accutc�i �e-J, ��'
h�.� vvev�� at dxx rr c r
12. Libraries, museums.
13. Nurseries, day care centers (reference 5.1.6).
14. Eating establishments.
15. Tailor, seamstress.
er s ruc u
including ers, p ,
-146-
L.. AL
i MDR g9 - 015 USES-FkZFFE12 aP D
1L 6. 1 �•
ppurten-
ances owned and operate y
18. Public uses and buildings such as schools,
offices, parks, playgrounds, and roads funded,
owned or operated by local, state or federal
agencies (reference 31.2.5)-
,
artn CLac ra r—ter�'iZz P14rr r� i T 1 G J D
r
20. Dwellings (reference 5.1.21).
21. Medical center.
b 1. Commercial recreation establishments includin but
not limited to amusement enters, bowling a eys,
of halls and dance halls (Amended 1-1-8
2. Electrical power substations, ransmis ion lines and
related,_towers; gas or oil transmisskon lines,
pumping stations and appurtenances;/unmanned telephone
exchange centers; micro -wave and;-r'adio-wave transmission
and relay towers, substations and appurtenances.
3. Hospitals.
4. Fast food restaurant.,
5. veterinary office an h spital (reference
i
6. Unless such uses re-otherw-Ise provided in thip
4ection, uses permitted in section 18.0 residerit� al -
RL 15 , in compliance with regulations set forth
therein, and, such conditions as m y be imposed
puruant td section 31.2.4.
7. Hotels, motels and inns.
8. Mo r ve cle sales and rental in communi es and the
u an area s designated in the comprehensi e plan.
Added 6-1- ).
-1 � - (Supp. #31, 3-5-86)
9. arking structures located wholl _ partly above
grad ed 11-7-84)
10. Commercial s otherwise tted having drive-in
wi (Added 11-7-84)
22.3 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
In addition to the requirements contained herein, the
requirements o-f section 21.0 commercial districts, generally
shall apply within all C-1 districts. (Amended 3-17-82)
(Amended 7-10-85)
-147.1- (Supp.27, 7-10-85)
0
AFFIDAVIT
DATE /�v,, / % W
I, Ronald S. Keeler, hereby certify that the attached
notice(s) was sent on the above date to all persons listed
on said notice.
M�ek�
Ronald S. Keeler
Chief of Planning
Given un4er my hand )in the County of Albemarle, State of Virginia
( this ay of �--t=1.'(_'- .) '19F7.
N(akary Public
My commission expires 10.
FILE: ZMA-89-Horner
•
C�
June 14, 1989
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
Virginia Gardner
P. O. Box 6700
Charlottesville, VA 22906
RE: ZMA-89-5 Ann Horner
Dear Ms. Gardner:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on
June 13, 1989, unanimously deferred the above -noted petition
to its June 27, 1989 meeting.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the
above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
P':N -
Ronald S. Keeler
Chief of Planning
RSK/j cw
cc: Ann Horner
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
June 14, 1989
Central Virginia Builders, Inc
Nathaniel Crocker or Paula Norton
Ernest B. & Betty J. Dameron
Early I. & Maude Kent
Ellinore B. Kral
Nellie P. McAllister, Life Estate
Joanne L. G. Moyer
Leonard C. or Carol A. Tosto
Lyle A. & Nanie B. Wagner
RE: ZMA-89-5 Ann Horner
Dear Sir or Madam:
This letter is to notify you as an adjacent property owner
that the Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its June
13th meeting deferred the above -noted petiton to its June
27, 1989 meeting.
If you should have any questions, comments or observations
concerning this petition, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Sincerely,
FA (�
Ronald S. Keeler
Chief of Planning
RSK/jc
cc: Lettie E. Neher
ALBEMARLE COUNT
40 I
Ar jALBEMARLE COUNTY:
1 2F�
2
3
f
AC /
�� 4A
4
48
6
SECTION'738 U!
_ _� �UOAEL NILLS / j
/ /// t110xEi ELEw. sclgOL 10 73 �-
9 /
72
7AC 73C• 71 \
°
13
T8 \76 �A
75 2 2
15 126 /vv 80 114 °per
\ ` ) \6
82 p<. � III , 112 115
2
16
103A
10 1 12tk 9
8� 85 84 83, \ \2p2 1038 it 6 I B
�Bpv 6 Io1
q
II7 \
88 7 101A 103 110� 19 69/
9 `�C
2oc 95 99\I� 104 109 / 65'
8 12 QD 94 \ I w0 109A 120 , 4
t IP4
91 �t
2 1 19 ` I N I 24F ,90A 90B 92� - - 1 10�' 107� 12'..
4 3 RE - B3 _\T\ 102 102A 121
6 si 56E °E 22 . V 24A � 11k � 96 97 38 105 ,%104
21 24B 24C y0 91A
iB �. �[ . A 93A ` AVE.1 — ,
17B \ R IM1 ppAO
240 63
'64 �\17A\ �ISA'23 ,23
p' 24
4\/ —
17 37 \9 3A , CI 60p
15 16 27 28 36 38
41 57
26A
ISA \.��• /\ yy► .��, �45 S6
29 35/` 42 gA , CP p
I ` 34 3 �440 53
25\ / 44A4 I 52
26 33 y
3x Ati4 /\\'
\ !ZA ✓ �`. Aye'
26� 30 S
I i� \N 6
30A A 49
�Jc 31 AhA Q`. FOOI\�
/ zn�A B q— 5
SMALL ACREAGE 8 WAYLAND PARK EXT. y f
C(DEE)BOOK 409 pg.391)
®2 WAYLAND PARK — CROZET DEV. CO.
D.B. Pg.215 /
�3 ST GEORGE ACRES D B 408 -416
SCALE IN FEET
0 600 �00
WHITE HALL DISTRICT
CROZET INSERT
SECTION 560)
ZMA-89-5 Ann Horner - Request to rezone 2.836 acres m R-2, Residential
to C1, Commercial. operty, described as Tax Map 4, Section 1,
Farcel 46A, is located on the south side of Jarman's Gap Road at the
intersection with Rt. 1201. White Hall Magisterial District. Deferred
from May 16, Planning Commission Meeting.
Before present the staff report, Mr. Keeler explained that staff had
received a letter which questioned whether proper notice had been given
for this petition, particularly that the property had not been properly
posted. Mr. Keeler explained that the Zoning Ordinance requires that
the property be posted at least 15 days prior to public hearing.
The Chairman invited applicant comment on this issue. Ms. Virginia
Gardner represented the applicant. She explained that the property
had been posted prior to the original hearing but had not been
posted again after the item was deferred.
•
June 13, 1989
Page 2
The Chairman asked Mr. Bowling to comment. (Mr. Keeler interjected that
the item had been deferred to a date specific so readvertisement was not
required.) Mr. Bowling determined that the posting had been made 15 days
prior to the original hearing date. He stated: "The intent of the Ordi-
nance is to post notice to the public —and if the applicant certifies
that the property was posted as required by the Ordinance then there
has been a good faith attempt to meet the requirements of the Ordinance
and that plus the published notice plus the letters sent to the adjoining
property owners I think meets the intent and spirit of the Ordinance
and statutes. ... I think the Commission can proceed."
Mr. Bowerman noted that the property should be posted again before the
Board of Supervisors hearing. Mr. Bowerman also confirmed that adjacent
property owners are re -notified when an item is deferred.
Mr. Bowerman determined that the item was properly before the Commission.
Mr. Keeler then presented the staff report. Staff's opinion was that
"unrestricted C-1 zoning may prove inappropriate to the area and that
CO Commercial Office zoning would be more appropriate."
The Chairman invited applicant comment.
Ms. Gardner addressed the Commission. She stated the applicant feels
CO zoning was very limiting and some of the CO uses are not as appropriate
as C-1 uses. She noted that the applicant is very concerned about
neighborhood objection, and had authorized her to discuss some'�estricted
usage." She was uncertain as to how this could be accomplished.
Mr. Bowerman explained the proffer process to Ms. Gardner. Noting that
it was apparently the applicant's preference not to consider CO, but
rather to pursue C-1 with restricted usage, Mr. Bowerman suggested that
the applicant request deferral to allow time to consider the issue
and present a written proffer. Ms. Gardner asked for some assurance that
this would not be a futile effort. Mr. Bowerman explained that he could
not speculate on what the Commission's action would be on a different
application.
Ms. Gardner requested that the petition be deferred. She indicated she
felt she understood the concerns and thought a compromise could be
reached.
Mr. Bowerman noted that he felt the Comprehensive Plan recommendation
for Crozet was valid and he felt he "could look favorably on a request
for commercial zoning in this area if it could be tailored in such
way to be compatible with the surrounding area but recognizing that
the plan calls for that." He stressed that he spoke for himself and not
for the entire Commission.
Mr. Jenkins expressed concern about the amount of negative citizen
input and noted that his future action on this proposal would be influenced
by how the proposal was received by the citizens.
0
. June 13 1989
0
Page 3
It was determined the item could be rescheduled for June 27 and Mr. Keeler
asked that a written proffer be in staff's hands by June 20.
It was determined there was no public comment.
Mr. Jenkins moved that ZMA-89-5 for Ann Horner be deferred to June 27.
Ms. Diehl seconded the motion which passed unanimously.
�q a�
AD +Y,
1
------------------------y-- -----------------
1
1
1
QQ
o Ri. 3IV t TO
1
i
1200
810
1
1
1
1
0
Py
1
1
1
1
1
1
76 810
1
1
1
1
1�
1
1
1
bF, 'Sy
0
78 �ti o
i
1
1 0
J
0. 1211
1
1
�e 684
788 789 . �0 1212
�'
1
1
p1�
1
1
1
1226
1202
1211
1
1
1
1225 1214 0� 010
1
1
1 0
1219 0 1213 810
1
1
1
1 C's+sO Q .1• 0
1
1too °
1218 A or, 8f
1
'
788
1
1 1206 °o�
ool 1202
1
1
1
1
1207 1203
1
1
1
11.16M1
0-20
��� p 1201 0 °i? �0 1216
1
1
q�
1206 0 179�9 Q0 1217 rozet 240
1
1
1
691 `O./o •07 °j3 1210 � �1L1'1'A
1
1
�� 691
1
1
1
1
1
1215 0 015 0.21 691
g+
1209
1
1
1
1
12 44 0'� 1205
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1204
240
1
1
1
1
1
1
1204
1
1
1
1220 1222
1
1
ab o 1221
1
1
1222
_
L----
---------------------- 0.56M1.
MRT.GM
1
1
1 .
1
1 795 e
1
1
1
1
1
i 2Q 0+
1 795 R
1 726 0
1
1
1 Q
1 ,�, 726 ob 864
11.ro M1. 10- \ 1 _ 117%
1 726 737
1
1
1
lo 1302
Qt 0.16
726 T• 1302
j T• 1304 (`G
T•1301
1
1 T• 1303 h
1 0
1 1301
1
1
1 T-13
-------------
0
Ms. Amelia Patterson
Department of Planning and Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Ms. Patterson:
G131 �5
PLANNING DIVISION
We wish to support the concerns of our neighbors that a
residential plot (ZMA-89-5) may be rezoned to place a commercial
development in the midst of our neighborhood. If done, the
commercial lot would be surrounded on tour sides by homes and
residential property. We understand the Planning Commission's
loyalty to its Comprehensive Plan, but we think that the brief
stretch of land designated commercial on Jarman Gap made sense
only in light of the Planning Commission's recent proposal to
designate aU of Blue Ridge Avenue, with its 20 residences,
commercial. Since the Commission gave up that proposal after
community opposition, we think it follows that the stretch on
Jarman Gap Road, which would have been contiguous with the
Commission's Blue Ridge development, should also be kept, as it
is, residential.
The intersections of Blue Ridge and Jarman Gap and of Carter
Street and Jarman Gap are already dangerous, and a business there
would significantly increase the danger. We are also concerned
for the protection of the creek running at the back of the
property. At the very least we ask that an environmental impact
2
study be done, and that any environmental limitations be placed
on the development of the property.
The owner of the property now lives out of state and sought
the zoning change only alter leaving. She is seeking the zoning
change for one purpose only: to get more money for the sale of
the property. The owner has no interest in bettering the
community, the neighbors are against the change, and the result
would be at best only another strip of unintegrated commercial
aevelopment. We ask that the Planning Commission recommend the
zoning change request be denied.
Ana, finally, we enclose an article from the May 31, 1989
Bulletin to show that the property has not been, as required by
law, properly posted ano community members have not been able to
identify the property under consideration.
Sincerely yours,
7 0 .
I
We-,
Jon and Mary Mikalson
Route 3, Box 430
Crozet, VA 22932
BAILEY
REALTY CO.
�- I LL, ACC ��� ('l � /71
/U 4f* j'L-'e-7t- GL k-
(,c
61C 6 1
'� -e-tom lcut
1455 E R 0 ROAD. PO BOX 6700
I( CHARLOTTESVILLE. VA 22906
MAY
PLANNING DIVISION
Ac'l -0 'WL t- .1 - )
z
60 C
' ILA -
It,
1/0
An Independently Owned and Operated Member of Coldwell Banker Residential Affiliates, Inc.
P7
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
May 18, 1989
Virginia Gardner
P. O. Box 6700
Charlottesville, VA 22906
RE: ZMA-89-5 Ann Horner
Dear Ms. Gardner:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on
May 16, 1989, unanimously accepted without prejudice, your
request for deferral of the above -noted petition. Therefore,
this item has been rescheduled as follows:
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: JUNE 13, 1989
ALBEMARLE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: JULY 5, 1989
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Sincerely,
k
lia Patterson
Senior Planner
AMP/jcw
cc: Ann Horner
_y OF ALBS.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
May 4, 1989
Central Virginia Builders, Inc
Nathaniel Crocker or Paula Norton
Ernest B. & Betty J. Dameron
Early I. & Maude Kent
Ellinore B. Kral
Nellie P. McAllister, Life Estate
Joanne L. G. Moyer
Leonard C. or Carol A. Tosto
Lyle A. & Nanie B. Wagner
RE: ZMA-89-5 Ann Horner
Dear Sir or Madam:
This letter is to notify you as an adjacent property owner
that the applicant for the above -noted item has requested
that this item be deferred from the May 16th Planning
Commission agenda. Therefore, this item has been
rescheduled for public hearings as follows:
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, TUESDAY:
June 13, 1989
ALBEMARLE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,WEDNESDAY:
July 5, 1989
If you should have any questions, comments or observations
concerning this petition, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Sincerely,
Amelia Patterson
Senior Planner
AMP/ jcw
cc: Lettie E. Neher
��I12(:INVP ,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
April 28, 1989
Virginia Gardner
P. O. Box 6700
Charlottesville, VA 22906
RE: ZMA-89-5 Ann Horner
Dear Ms. Gardner:
This letter is to notify you that your above -referenced
request to rezone 2.836 acres from R-2, Residential to C1,
Commercial; has been scheduled for public hearings as
follows:
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, TUESDAY:
May 16, 1989
ALBEMARLE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, WEDNESDAY:
June 7, 1989
Both of these meetings will be held at 7:30 p.m., Meeting
Room #7, Second Floor, County Office Building, 401 McIntire
Road, Charlottesville, Virginia. You will receive a copy of
the staff report and tentative agenda one week prior to the
Planning Commission meeting. YOU OR YOUR REPRESENTATIVE MUST
BE PRESENT AT BOTH OF THESE MEETINGS.
If you should have any questions or concerns about this petition
or schedule, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Ot�.et_" Ta'_kg_e�,
Amelia Patterson
Senior Planner
AMP/jcw
cc: Ms. Lettie E. Neher
Ann Horner
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
April 28, 1989
Central Virginia Builders, Inc
Nathaniel Crocker or Paula Norton
Ernest B. & Betty J. Dameron
Early I. & Maude Kent
Ellinore B. Kral
Nellie P. McAllister, Life Estate
Joanne L. G. Moyer
Leonard C. or Carol A. Tosto
Lyle A. & Nanie B. Wagner
RE: ZMA-89-5 Ann Horner
Dear Sir or Madam:
This letter is to notify you as an adjacent property owner of the
above -referenced request to rezone 2.836 acres from R-2,
Residential to C1, Commercial. Property, described as Tax
Map 56A1, Section 1, Parcel 46A is located on the south side
of Jarmans Gap Road across from the intersection with Rt.
1201. White Hall Magisterial District.
This petition will be reviewed and public comment received
according to the following public hearing schedules:
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, TUESDAY:
May 16, 1989
ALBEMARLE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,WEDNESDAY:
June 7, 1989
Both of these meetings will be held at 7:30 p.m., Meeting Room
#7, Second Floor, County Office Building, 401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, Virginia. Should you wish to attend these
meetings, you may call this office during the week of the meeting
to ask the tentative time the item is scheduled on the agenda.
ZMA-89-5
Page 2
April 28, 1989
You may review the file in the Planning
address above. If you should have any
observations concerning this petition,
contact me.
Sincerely,
Amelia Patterson
Senior Planner
AMP/ j cw
Department, at the
questions, comments or
please do not hesitate to
AFFIDAVIT
DATE
I, John T. P. Horne, hereby certify that the attached notice(s)
was sent on the above date to all persons listed on said notice.
dr6hn T. P. Horne
Director of Planning & Community
Development
Given under my hand in the County of Albemarle, State of Virginia
this Z- `�" day of
Notary Public
My commission expires %L%,Q, /P 19j.
FILE: ZMA-89-Horner