Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201700092 Review Comments Road Plan and Comps. 2017-10-31Short Review Comments Report for: SUB201700092 SubApplication Type: Old Trail Village Blk. 7 Phase 1 - Road Plans New Private Use Road Plan Date Completed:07/20/2017 Reviewer:Emily Cox CDD Engineering Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:07/20/2017 Reviewer:Johnathan Newberry CDD Planning Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed: Reviewer:Elise Kiewra CDD GIS Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed: Reviewer:Jeremy Lynn ACSA Review Status:Pending Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:06/12/2017 Reviewer:Robbie Gilmer Fire Rescue Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Based on plans dated 6/5/17. 1. Show no parking signs on one side of Orion Lane. 2. Increase radii to 25' at the intersection of Alley A and Alley B. Division: Date Completed:07/13/2017 Reviewer:Adam Moore VDOT Review Status:Pending Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:06/22/2017 Reviewer:Elise Kiewra CDD E911 Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:see uploaded letter in Laserfische for Comments Division: Date Completed:09/12/2017 Reviewer:Emily Cox CDD Engineering Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:09/11/2017 Reviewer:Johnathan Newberry CDD Planning Review Status:Requested Changes Division: Page:1 of 3 County of Albemarle Printed On:January 26, 2018 Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:1. There are 14 AR trees shown in bold on Sheet 5. Please update the calculation and plant list accordingly. 2. Sheet 1 of the Initial Site Plan shows 35,430 SF of impervious area and 12,660 SF of turf area, whereas the Road Plan shows 39,864 SF of impervious area and 8,712 SF of turf area. The plans appear to propose identical development. Can you clarify which amounts are correct? Date Completed:08/29/2017 Reviewer:Adam Moore VDOT Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed: Reviewer:Jeremy Lynn ACSA Review Status:Pending Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:08/18/2017 Reviewer:Elise Kiewra CDD GIS Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:08/28/2017 Reviewer:Robbie Gilmer Fire Rescue Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:Based on plans dated 8/7/17. No comments or objections. Division: Date Completed:10/04/2017 Reviewer:Elise Kiewra CDD E911 Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:per site plan dated 6/5/17 Division: Date Completed:10/13/2017 Reviewer:Johnathan Newberry CDD Planning Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:[Section 32.7.2.3] Please extend the sidewalk adjacent to Block 6 for the full-length that Orion Lane is shown. Division: Date Completed:10/19/2017 Reviewer:Emily Cox CDD Engineering Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:10/18/2017 Reviewer:Shawn Maddox Fire Rescue Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:Fire Rescue has no comments or objections based on plans dated 9/25/2017. Division: Date Completed: Reviewer:Adam Moore VDOT Review Status:Pending Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:Page:2 of 3 County of Albemarle Printed On:January 26, 2018 Date Completed: Reviewer:Jeremy Lynn ACSA Review Status:Pending Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:10/31/2017 Reviewer:Emily Cox CDD Engineering Review Status:Approved Reviews Comments: Division: Page:3 of 3 County of Albemarle Printed On:January 26, 2018 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 Project title: Project file number: Plan preparer: Owner or rep.: Date Received: Rev. 1 Received: Rev. 2 Received: Date of Comments: Rev. 1 Comments: Rev. 2 Comments: Road and Drainage plan review Old Trail Village Block 7 Phase 1 — Road Plans SUB201700092 Roudabush, Gale & Associates [bledbetter@roudabush.com] March Mountain Properties LLC [dave@oldtrailvillage.com] 05 June 2017 07 Aug. 2017 26 Sept 2017 20 July 2017 12 Sept 2017 19 Oct 2017 We have reviewed the above referenced plans and have the following comments: Engineering (Emily Cox) 1. Ensure that all existing streets are labeled with DB & PG, route numbers, right-of-way widths and street names. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 2. Provide street names other than "A" and `B". Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 3. Provide stationing at 50' minimum. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 4. Provide pavement markings. Rev. 1: Ensure all stop bars are shown. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. 5. Ensure all traffic control signs are shown, including speed limit signs. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 6. Show all critical slopes. Managed slopes appear to be on this property. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 7. Show the sight distance at the southern side of the Orion/Ashlar intersection. Rev. 1: Please provide profiles to ensure there are no obstructions in the sight distance lines. Rev. 2: No profiles provided. Sheet 5 appears to show site distance lines going through trees. 8. Increase the radius at the intersection of Alley B and Alley A to be at least 25ft. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 9. Storm easements should be labeled public or private, not just storm easement. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 10. The K -value of 2.58 in Alley A is very low. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 11. Show the stone base depth for the roll top curb. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 12. Show that the proposed pavement design can handle the proposed traffic. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 13. Storm sewer from Str 254 to 146 should have a minimum slope of 0.5%. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 14. Add the approved SWM Master plan WPO Plan # on the cover sheet note about SWM. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 15. Rev. 1: WP0201700044 must be approved before this road plan can be approved. Rev. 2: Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 3 Comment addressed. 16. Rev 1: Provide handicap ramps for the sidewalks along Orion Ln. at all road entrances. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. 17. Rev. 1: Adjust c -factors for the storm design in the area of future block 6. C -factors should not represent existing conditions. They should represent the ultimate planned design. This ensures the storm pipes can handle the ultimate stormwater flow. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. 18. Rev 2: [Section 32.7.2.31 Please extend the sidewalk adjacent to Block 6 for the full-length that Orion Lane is shown. Planning (Jonathan Newberry) 1. There are 14 trees shown in bold on Sheet 5. Please update the calculation and plant list accordingly. Rev. 1: There are 14 AR trees shown in bold on Sheet 5. Please update the calculation and plant list accordingly. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. 2. Sheet 1 of the Initial Site Plan shows 35,430 SF of impervious area and 12,660 SF of turf area, whereas the Road Plan shows 28,195 SF of impervious area and 5,650 SF of turf area. The plans appear to propose identical development. Can you clarify which amounts are correct? Rev. 1: Sheet 1 of the Initial Site Plan shows 35,430 SF of impervious area and 12,660 SF of turf area, whereas the Road Plan shows 39,864 SF of impervious area and 8,712 SF of turf area. The plans appear to propose identical development. Can you clarify which amounts are correct? Rev. 2: Comment addressed. 3. Rev 2: [Section 32.7.2.3] Please extend the sidewalk adjacent to Block 6 for the full-length that Orion Lane is shown. VDOT (Adam Moore) 1. See attached comment letter dated 7/13/17. Rev. 1: See attached comment letter dated 8/29/17. Rev. 2: Approved (see attached letter dated 10/13/17). Fire Rescue (Robbie Gilmer) 1. Show no parking signs on one side of Orion Lane. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 2. Increase radii to 25' at the intersection of Alley A and Alley B. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. ACSA (Jeremy Lynn) 1. Still under review. Did not receive comments yet. Rev. 1: Still under review. Did not receive comments or approval letter yet. Rev. 2: Approved. See attached email dated 10/18/17. GIS (Elisa Kiewra) 1. See attached comment letter dated 6/22/17. Rev. 1: Comments addressed. No objection. Engineering plan review staff are available from 2-4 PM on Thursdays, should you require a meeting to discuss this review. Process; After approval, plans will need to be bonded. The bonding process is begun by submitting a bond estimate request form and fee to the Department of Community Development. One of the plan reviewers will prepare estimates and check parcel and easement information based on the approved plans. The County's Management Analyst will prepare bond agreement forms, which will need to be completed by the owner and submitted along with cash, certificates or sureties for the amounts specified. The agreements will need to be approved and signed by the County Attorney and County Engineer. This may take 2-4 weeks to Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 3 obtain all the correct signatures and forms. Stormwater Management Facilities Maintenance agreements will also need to be completed and recorded. The County's Management Analyst or other staff will prepare the forms and check for ownership and signature information. The completed forms will need to be submitted along with court recording fees. After bonding and agreements are complete, county staff will need to enter project information in a DEQ database for state application processing. DEQ will review the application information based on local VSMP authority approval. At this time, the DEQ portion of the application fees will need to be paid directly to the state. For fastest processing, this is done electronically with the emails provided on the application. DEQ should notify applicants with instructions on how to pay fees. When DEQ approves the application, they will issue a permit coverage letter. This should be copied to the county. After DEQ coverage is issued, via the coverage letter, the County can hold a pre -construction conference. Applicants will need to complete the request for a pre -construction conference form, and pay the remainder of the application fee. The form identifies the contractor and responsible land disturber, and the fee remaining to be paid. This will be checked by county staff, and upon approval, a pre -construction conference will be scheduled with the County inspector. At the pre -construction conference, should everything proceed satisfactorily, a joint VSMP and grading permit will be issued by the County so that work may begin. County forms can be found on the county website forms center under engineering; hllp://www.albemarle.or�z/deptforins.asp?department--cdengzno If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me either by email (ecox@albemarle.org) or by phone at 434-296-5832 ext. 3565. Sincerely, Emily Cox, P.E. Civil Engineer II Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E. Commissioner COMMONWEALTH of 'VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper, Virginia 22705 October 13, 2017 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Attn: Emily Cox, P.E. Re: Old Trail Village Block 7 Phase 1— Road Plan SUB -2017-00092 Review #3 Dear Ms. Cox: The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Roudabush, Gale, & Associates, revised 25 September 2017, and finds it to be generally acceptable. If further information is desired, please contact Justin Deel at 434-422-9894. A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process. Sincerely, N' 9 , (40u, Adam J. Moore, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Charlottesville Residency VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Emily Cox From: Jeremy Lynn <jlynn@serviceauthority.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 6:37 AM To: Shawn Maddox; Emily Cox Cc: Bill Ledbetter; Alex Morrison Subject: RE: Planning Application Review for SUB201700092 Old Trail Village Blk. 7 Phase 1 Road Plans. Emily/Shawn, The utility plans for this block have been approved by the ACSA. Jeremy M. Lynn, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22911 (434) 977-4511 From: Shawn Maddox [mailto:smaddox@albemarle.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 8:01 PM To: Emily Cox; Jeremy Lynn Subject: RE: Planning Application Review for SUB201700092 Old Trail Village Blk. 7 Phase 1 - Road Plans. Emily - I will take a look at them tomorrow and let you know. Shawn From: Emily Cox Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 4:43 PM To: Shawn Maddox; Jeremy Lynn Subject: Planning Application Review for SUB201700092 Old Trail Village Blk. 7 Phase 1 - Road Plans. Have you guys had the chance to review these road plans yet? Please let me know the status and any comments as soon as possible. It is a priority project for the county. Thanks! Emily Cox, PE Civil Engineer II (434) 296-5832 Ext. 3565 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesivlle, VA 22902 www.albemarle.org COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 Road and Drainage plan review Project title: Old Trail Village Block 7 Phase 1 — Road Plans Project file number: SUB201700092 Plan preparer: Roudabush, Gale & Associates [bledbetter@roudabush.com] Owner or rep.: March Mountain Properties LLC [dave@oldtrailvillage.com] Date Received: 05 June 2017 Rev. 1 Received: 07 Aug. 2017 Date of Comments: 20 July 2017 Rev. 1 Comments: 12 Sept 2017 Bill, We have reviewed the above referenced plans and have the following comments: Engineering (Emily Cox) 1. Ensure that all existing streets are labeled with DB & PG, route numbers, right-of-way widths and street names. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 2. Provide street names other than "A" and `B". Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 3. Provide stationing at 50' minimum. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 4. Provide pavement markings. Rev. 1: Ensure all stop bars are shown. 5. Ensure all traffic control signs are shown, including speed limit signs. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 6. Show all critical slopes. Managed slopes appear to be on this property. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 7. Show the sight distance at the southern side of the Orion/Ashlar intersection. Rev. 1: Please provide profiles to ensure there are no obstructions in the sight distance lines. 8. Increase the radius at the intersection of Alley B and Alley A to be at least 25ft. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 9. Storm easements should be labeled public or private, not just storm easement. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 10. The K -value of 2.58 in Alley A is very low. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 11. Show the stone base depth for the roll top curb. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 12. Show that the proposed pavement design can handle the proposed traffic. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 13. Storm sewer from Str 254 to 146 should have a minimum slope of 0.5%. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 14. Add the approved SWM Master plan WPO Plan # on the cover sheet note about SWM. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 15. Rev. 1: WP0201700044 must be approved before this road plan can be approved. 16. Rev 1: Provide handicap ramps for the sidewalks along Orion Ln. at all road entrances. 17. Rev. 1: Adjust c -factors for the storm design in the area of future block 6. C -factors should not represent existing conditions. They should represent the ultimate planned design. This ensures the storm pipes can handle the ultimate stormwater flow. Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 3 Planning (Jonathan Newberry) 1. There are 14 trees shown in bold on Sheet 5. Please update the calculation and plant list accordingly. Rev. 1: There are 14 AR trees shown in bold on Sheet 5. Please update the calculation and plant list accordingly. 2. Sheet 1 of the Initial Site Plan shows 35,430 SF of impervious area and 12,660 SF of turf area, whereas the Road Plan shows 28,195 SF of impervious area and 5,650 SF of turf area. The plans appear to propose identical development. Can you clarify which amounts are correct? Rev. 1: Sheet 1 of the Initial Site Plan shows 35,430 SF of impervious area and 12,660 SF of turf area, whereas the Road Plan shows 39,864 SF of impervious area and 8,712 SF of turf area. The plans appear to propose identical development. Can you clarify which amounts are correct? VDOT (Adam Moore) 1. See attached comment letter dated 7/13/17. Rev. 1: See attached comment letter dated 8/29/17. Fire Rescue (Robbie Gilmer) 1. Show no parking signs on one side of Orion Lane. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 2. Increase radii to 25' at the intersection of Alley A and Alley B. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. ACSA (Jeremy Lynn) 1. Still under review. Did not receive comments yet. Rev. 1: Still under review. Did not receive comments or approval letter yet. GIS (Elisa Kiewra) 1. See attached comment letter dated 6/22/17. Rev. 1: Comments addressed. No objection. Engineering plan review staff are available from 2-4 PM on Thursdays, should you require a meeting to discuss this review. Process; After approval, plans will need to be bonded. The bonding process is begun by submitting a bond estimate request form and fee to the Department of Community Development. One of the plan reviewers will prepare estimates and check parcel and easement information based on the approved plans. The County's Management Analyst will prepare bond agreement forms, which will need to be completed by the owner and submitted along with cash, certificates or sureties for the amounts specified. The agreements will need to be approved and signed by the County Attorney and County Engineer. This may take 2-4 weeks to obtain all the correct signatures and forms. Stormwater Management Facilities Maintenance agreements will also need to be completed and recorded. The County's Management Analyst or other staff will prepare the forms and check for ownership and signature information. The completed forms will need to be submitted along with court recording fees. After bonding and agreements are complete, county staff will need to enter project information in a DEQ database for state application processing. DEQ will review the application information based on local VSMP authority approval. At this time, the DEQ portion of the application fees will need to be paid directly to the state. For fastest processing, this is done electronically with the emails provided on the application. DEQ should notify applicants with instructions on how to pay fees. When DEQ approves the application, they will issue a permit coverage letter. This should be copied to the county. After DEQ coverage is issued, via the coverage letter, the County can hold a pre -construction conference. Applicants will need to complete the request for a pre -construction conference form, and pay the remainder Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 3 of the application fee. The form identifies the contractor and responsible land disturber, and the fee remaining to be paid. This will be checked by county staff, and upon approval, a pre -construction conference will be scheduled with the County inspector. At the pre -construction conference, should everything proceed satisfactorily, a joint VSMP and grading permit will be issued by the County so that work may begin. County forms can be found on the county website forms center under engineering; htip://www.albemarle.org/deptfomis.asp?department--cdengWpo If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me either by email (ecox@albemarle.org) or by phone at 434-296-5832 ext. 3565. Sincerely, Emily Cox, P.E. Civil Engineer II Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E. Commissioner COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper. Virginia 22701 August 29, 2017 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Attn: Emily Cox Re: Old Trail Village Block 7 Phase I — Road Plan SUB -2017-00092 Review #2 Dear Ms. Cox: The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Roudabush, Gale, & Associates, revised 17 August 2017, and offers the following comment. • Runoff coefficients for undeveloped areas that are intended to be developed should be adjusted to a number more consistent with a developed state. Note that this comment may be addressed via email. If further information is desired, please contact Justin Deel at 434-422-9894. A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process. Sincerely, a4 -w- - qm--(- Adam J. Moore, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Charlottesville Residency VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOCIATES, INC. I aNn svRvsrll rG A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ENGINEERING Serving Vbginia Since 1956 LAND PLANNING 914 MONTICELLO ROAD CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22902 WILLIAM J. LEDB=ER, L.S. JIM L. TAGGART, P.E. DAVID M. ROBINSON, P.E. AMMY M. GEORGE, L.A. August 7, 2017 Mr. J.T. Newberry, Senior Planner County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Rm. 227 Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 RE: Old Trail Village, Block 7, Phase 1 (SUB2017-00092) Dear Mr. Newberry, PHONE (434) 977-0205 FAX (434) 296-5220 INFOCaROVI)ABUSH.COM BRIAN D. JAMISON, L.S- DAVIS A JORDAN, L.S. KRISTOPHER C. WINTERS, L.S. I have reviewed your comments from July 20, 2017, below are the individual responses. Engineering 1. Ensure that all existing streets are labeled with the DB & PG, route numbers, right-of- way widths and street names. All existing streets have been labeled with the DB & PG, right-of-way widths and street names. 2. Provide street names other than "A" and "B". Street names have been provided: Private Road A is now Fennel Road, Alley A is now Greenwell Lane and Alley B is Oldham Drive. 3. Provide stationing at a 50' minimum. Stationing marks has been provided at 50' intervals. 4. Provide pavement markings. Pavement markings have been provided where appropriate. 5. Ensure all traffic controls signs are shown including speed limit signs. Traffic control signs are shown on Sheet 3. The signs include Speed Limit Signs, Stop Signs, Street Signs and No Parking signs. 6. Show all critical slopes. Managed slopes appear to be on this property. Managed slopes have been shown on the plans (Sheets 2 and 4). 7. Show sight distance at the southern side of Orion/Ashlar intersection. The sight distance line has been added for the southern side of the Orion/AshIar intersection. OTV Block 7, Phase 1 SUB2017-00092 8. Increase the radius at the intersection of Alley A and Alley B to be at least 25'. The radii at the intersection of Greenwell Lane (Alley A) and Oldham Drive (Alley B) have been revised to be 251. 9. Storm easements should be labeled private or public, not just storm easement. The storm sewer easements have been labeled as private (Sheet 4). 10.The K -value of 2.58 in Alley A is very low. I have increased the vertical curve to 15' with a K -value of 3.80. I LShow the stone base depth for the roll top curb. The depth of the stone base under the roll top curb has been labeled on the Typical Sections (Sheet 10). 12. Show that the proposed pavement design can handle the proposed traffic. I have attached a worksheet for the pavement design with this submittal package. 13. Storm sewer from Str. 254 to 146 should have a minimum slope of 0.5%. We have opted to maintain the minimum design slope of 0.20%. The Albemarle Design Standards Manual Section 6.A does not explicitly state the minimum slope for a storm pipe. However, VDOT Drainage Manual Section 9.4.8.6 states that the minimum pipe slope should be 0.2% for constructability purposes. Both governing standards rely on the minimum velocity of 3 fps. I have reviewed the Storm Sewer Design Computations (VDOT Worksheet LD -229) to ensure that all segments of the storm sewer system meet the minimum velocity requirements. 14.Add the approved SWM Master Plan WPO Plan # on the cover sheet note about SWM. The approved SWM Master Plan number (WP0201600009) has been added to the cover sheet. Planning 1. Sheet 5 shows 14 street trees in bold, but the planting schedule only shows 12 trees. Please only show the required trees in bold and confirm that the correct quantity of trees is included in the planting schedule. The line weights for the existing trees has been adjusted so that they contrast more with the trees that will be relocated. We will be relocating the street trees that conflict with the entrance locations and a water meter location. 2. Sheet 1 of the Initial Site Plan shows 35,430 sf of impervious area and 12,660 sf of turf area, whereas the Road Plan shows 28,195 sf of impervious area and 5,650 sf of turf The plans appear to propose identical development. Can you clarify which amounts are correct? The amount of impervious and turf areas have been rechecked. Both the Road Plan and the Site Plan now have the same numbers — 39,864 sf of impervious area and 8,712 sf of turf. OTV Block 7, Phase 1 SUB2017-00092 2 VDOT 1. All drainage details and calculations must be included on the plans, not submitted as a separate package. Acknowledged. 2. Without established land uses on both sides of the extension of Orion Lane, VDOT does not recommend a restricted parking section. In the previous plan set, the parking lane has been left off Orion Lane. Now, Orion Lane has been updated so that it reflects the Typical Section shown on Sheet 10. The parking spaces are now shown on the plan view. Fire & Rescue 1. Show no parking signs on one side of Orion Lane. No Parking signs have been added to one side of Orion Lane. 2. Increase radii to 25 feet at the intersection of Alley A and Alley B. The radii at the intersection of Greenwell Lane (Alley A) and Oldham Drive (Alley B) have been revised to be 251. E911 1. "Private Road A" will need to be a continuation of Fennel Road. Acknowledged, Private Road "A" has been relabeled as Fennel Road. 2. "Alley A" does not need a road name as it appears no houses will be addressed off of it. "Alley All has been renamed Greenwell Lane, a name that was reserved for Old Trail. 3. "Alley B" will also be Fennel Road as it appears that the road will curve around and connect back to Orion Lane. I have renamed Alley "B" as Oldham Drive for two reasons; (1) since it will be intersecting with Fennel Road in the future and (2) it is a similar situation as Private Road "A"Mennel Road, a continuation of Oldham Drive. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. Sincer ly, IM y Geor OTV Block 7, Phase 1 SUB2017-00092 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 Road and Drainage plan review Project title: Old Trail Village Block 7 Phase 1 — Road Plans Project file number: SUB201700092 Plan preparer: Roudabush, Gale & Associates [bledbetter@roudabush.com] Owner or rep.: March Mountain Properties LLC [dave@oldtrailvillage.com] Date Received: 05 June 2017 Date of comments: 20 July 2017 Bill, We have reviewed the above referenced plans and have the following comments: Engineering (Emily Cox) 1. Ensure that all existing streets are labeled with DB & PG, route numbers, right-of-way widths and street names. 2. Provide street names other than "A" and `B". 3. Provide stationing at 50' minimum. 4. Provide pavement markings. 5. Ensure all traffic control sings are shown, including speed limit signs. 6. Show all critical slopes. Managed slopes appear to be on this property. 7. Show the sight distance at the southern side of the Orion/Ashlar intersection. 8. Increase the radius at the intersection of Alley B and Alley A to be at least 25ft. 9. Storm easements should be labeled public or private, not just storm easement. 10. The K -value of 2.58 in Alley A is very low. 11. Show the stone base depth for the roll top curb. 12. Show that the proposed pavement design can handle the proposed traffic. 13. Storm sewer from Str 254 to 146 should have a minimum slope of 0.5%. 14. Add the approved SWM Master plan WPO Plan # on the cover sheet note about SWM. Planning (Jonathan Newberry) 1. There are 14 trees shown in bold on Sheet 5. Please update the calculation and plant list accordingly. 2. Sheet 1 of the Initial Site Plan shows 35,430 SF of impervious area and 12,660 SF of turf area, whereas the Road Plan shows 28,195 SF of impervious area and 5,650 SF of turf area. The plans appear to propose identical development. Can you clarify which amounts are correct? VDOT (Adam Moore) 1. See attached comment letter dated 7/13/17. Fire Rescue (Robbie Gilmer) 1. Show no parking signs on one side of Orion Lane. 2. Increase radii to 25' at the intersection of Alley A and Alley B. ACSA (Jeremy Lynn) 1. Still under review. Did not receive comments yet. GIS (Elisa Kiewra) 1. See attached comment letter dated 6/22/17. Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 2 Engineering plan review staff are available from 2-4 PM on Thursdays, should you require a meeting to discuss this review. Process; After approval, plans will need to be bonded. The bonding process is begun by submitting a bond estimate request form and fee to the Department of Community Development. One of the plan reviewers will prepare estimates and check parcel and easement information based on the approved plans. The County's Management Analyst will prepare bond agreement forms, which will need to be completed by the owner and submitted along with cash, certificates or sureties for the amounts specified. The agreements will need to be approved and signed by the County Attorney and County Engineer. This may take 2-4 weeks to obtain all the correct signatures and forms. Stormwater Management Facilities Maintenance agreements will also need to be completed and recorded. The County's Management Analyst or other staff will prepare the forms and check for ownership and signature information. The completed forms will need to be submitted along with court recording fees. After bonding and agreements are complete, county staff will need to enter project information in a DEQ database for state application processing. DEQ will review the application information based on local VSMP authority approval. At this time, the DEQ portion of the application fees will need to be paid directly to the state. For fastest processing, this is done electronically with the emails provided on the application. DEQ should notify applicants with instructions on how to pay fees. When DEQ approves the application, they will issue a permit coverage letter. This should be copied to the county. After DEQ coverage is issued, via the coverage letter, the County can hold a pre -construction conference. Applicants will need to complete the request for a pre -construction conference form, and pay the remainder of the application fee. The form identifies the contractor and responsible land disturber, and the fee remaining to be paid. This will be checked by county staff, and upon approval, a pre -construction conference will be scheduled with the County inspector. At the pre -construction conference, should everything proceed satisfactorily, a joint VSMP and grading permit will be issued by the County so that work may begin. County forms can be found on the county website forms center under engineering; hqp://www.albemarle.org/deptforms.asp?department--cdengMTo If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me either by email (ecox@albemarle.org) or by phone at 434-296-5832 ext. 3565. Sincerely, Emily Cox, P.E. Civil Engineer II COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper Virginia 22701 Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E. Commissioner July 13, 2017 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Attn: Emily Cox Re: Old Trail Village Block 7 Phase 1— Road Plan SUB -2017-00092 Review #1 Dear Ms. Cox: The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Roudabush, Gale, & Associates, dated 5 June 2017, and offers the following comments: 1. All drainage details and calculations must be included on the plans, not submitted as a separate package. 2. Without established land uses on both sides of the extension of Orion Lane, VDOT does not recommend a restricted parking section. Please provide two copies of the revised plan along with a comment response letter. If further information is desired, please contact Justin Deel at 434-422-9894. A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process. Sincerely, Adam J. Moore, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Charlottesville Residency VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING 11 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development`_ 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS - E911 APPLICATION#: SUB201700092 TMP: 055E0 -01-00-000A1 DATE: 6/22/2017 FROM: Elise Kiewra ekiewra@albemarle.org Geographic Data Services (GDS) www.albemarle.org/qds (434) 296-5832 ext. 3030 Comments for road names are below: 1. "Private Road A" will need to be a continuation of FENNEL RD 2. "Alley A" does not need a road name as it appears no houses will be addressed off of it 3. "Alley B" will also be FENNEL RD as it appears that the road will curve around and connect back to Orion Ln Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks.