HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201700149 Review Comments Road Plan and Comps. 2018-02-01 (3)COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
Road and Drainage plan review
Project title: Old Trail Creekside V — Phase I & 11
Project file number: SUB201700149
Plan preparer: Scott Collins, Collins Engineering [Scot@Collins-engineering.com]
Owner or rep.: Old Trail Creekside V LLC [N/A]
Date Received:
Rev 2 — December 21sr, 2017
Date of comments:
Rev 2 — February Ist, 2018
Mr. Collins,
We have reviewed the plans and have the following comments:
Engineering — Requested Changes
1. Drnvirla SI IR niimher [SUB201700149] on the cover sheet.
Rev 2 - Addressed
c. w3ivw plan approval must occur prior to SUB road plan approval.
Rev 2 — VSMP submitted, under review
'3riation for Phase II must be approved prior to Road Plan approval.
Rev 2 — Special exemption approved.
scaling is indicated as 1:60, when it is presented at 1:50. Please
Rev 2 — Addressed
5. Kemove note on sheet 3 regarding distance from Jarmans Gap Road and Millstone Lane
intersection. Millstone lane is not in the area.
Rev 2 — Addressed
6. Ensure all easements (existing and proposed) are labeled with widths, type, and deed book and
page numbers (if available). Some easements are missing these items, or are not identified at all.
Rev 2 — Addressed
7. Provide drainage areas, calculations, and descriptions for existing structures receiving drainage
from Birmingham Court.
Rev 2 — Addressed
ins or street name and traffic control signs (stop, speed limit).
Rev 2 — Addressed
_,)ds into proposed 20' landscape and buffer easement as presented in the
Phase I final Plat. Please corr--t and include all proposed and existing easements to identify
fair+hor r nflj(t.
Rev 2 —Addressed
10. Deed book and page references for Phase I and II are not consistent with content. D.B. 466 PG.
304 commonly referenced in Phase I, and D.B. 4472 PG. 138 commonly referenced in Phase 11, do
not reference Deeds of Easement, but Deeds of Sale. Please correct/clarify. Referenced Deed
Book and Page numbers are also inconsistent between submitted Final Plats and road plans.
Rev 2 — Partially addressed. Drainage easements still incorrectly referenced.
Additional Rev 2 Comments:
1. HGL calculations should be provided for stormsewer system downstream of proposed
Phase I and Phase II development to show pipe capacity is still adequate after addition of
new impervious area/runoff volume to existing system.
2. Road names are not consistent throughout submittal. Ensure road names are approvable by
E911 and that they are consistently labeled.
Planning — Cameron Langille - Requested Changes
1. [General Comment] All Planning comments are for the Creekside V road plan application only.
The road plans should only show the improvements that will be approved, bonded, and constructed
within the street right-of-way. Rev. 1: The proposed sidewalks outside of the public right of way
will need to be bonded with the road plans. Easements and deeds of dedication and easement
for the private sidewalk easements will be reviewed and approved with the final plat. Please see
Comment #10 for additional information regarding HOA acceptance of the private sidewalk
easements.
3. [General Comment] The following information can be removed from the Site Data table on the
Cover Sheet: Phasing, Recreation. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
4. [General Comment] Please revise the proposed density and open space sections in the Site Data table
on the Cover Sheet. These sections should not reference or include the existing phases of Old Trail
Creekside. Please only state the density of Creekside V, Phase I and Creekside V, Phase IL Please
only state the acreage and percentage of open space in Creekside V, Phase I, and Creekside V, Phase
1I. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
[General Comment] On all applicable sheets, please add the words "public r/w" to all existing street
labels, and include the deed book and page number for the existing streets. Rev. 1: Comment
addressed.
[General Comment] Please call out and clearly delineate the proposed right of way lines for Jackson
Lane and Birmingham Court so staff can verify where the proposed sidewalks and street trees lie (i.e.
within the proposed sidewalk easements, or within the right of way). Rev. 1: Comment not fully
addressed. The road plans contain a label stating "6' planting strip." However, the strip
measures 5' in width when scaling the drawings at 1"= 50'. Please revise the planting strip
width so it meets the minimum 6' width required by 14-422.
7. [General Comment] Lot sizes and setbacks should reflect the lot sizes and setbacks shown on the
final plats for Creekside V, Phases I & II. Please amend the side setbacks on all lots so they are 10'.
Rev. 1: Please amend the setback notes on Sheet 1 so that they reflect the correct non- infill
setbacks stated in Section 4.19. The notes should be as follows:
Non-infill development
Front Minimum: 5 feet from the right-of-way or the exterior edge of the sidewalk if the sidewalk is
outside of the right-of-way
Front Maximum: None
Garage Minimum: 18 feet from the right-of-way or the exterior edge of the sidewalk if the
sidewalk is outside of the right-of-way Side loading garage: 5 feet from the right-of-way or the
exterior edge of the sidewalk if the sidewalk is outside of the right-of-way
Garage Maximum: None
Side Minimum: 5' minimum (10' building separation)
Side Maximum: None
Rear Minimum: 20 feet
Rear Maximum: None
[General Comment] Please amend the rear setback on Lot 6 in Phase II so it is 20'. Rev. 1:
Comment addressed.
[General Comment] Please identify Creekside V Phase I with a label on all applicable drawings.
Please identify Creekside V, Phase 11 with a label on all applicable drawings. Rev. 1: Comment
addressed.
a. The proposed lots in Phase I should be numbered 1-4, and the lots in Phase II should be
numbered 1-5. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
10. [General Comment] Please provide documentation from the Old Trail Community Association that
they agree to take ownership of the sidewalk/landscaping easements and maintain all required
improvements within those easements. Rev. 1: Comment not addressed. No documentation has
been provided that states that the Old Trail Community Association agrees to take ownership
and maintain the improvements within the proposed private easements for sidewalks and street
trees outside of the right of way.
a. Please identify the proposed sidewalk easement as "private" as requested on the final plat
comments for Phases I & II of Creekside V. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The
"existing sidewalk easement" along Jackson Lane on Lots 45 in Old Trail Creekside III,
Phase IIIA is not labeled as "private." State the instrument number that created the
easement, and state that it is 10' in width and private. The "existing sidewalk easement
along Jackson Lane on Lot 46 in Old Trail Creekside III, IIIB is not labeled as private.
State the instrument number that created the sidewalk easement and state that it is
12.5' in width.
Additionally, state the width of all proposed private sidewalk easements outside of the
public right-of-way in Creekside V, Phases I & II.
11. [General Comment] The acreages shown for Open Space L and Open Space K do not match the
acreages given on the final plats currently under review. Please make sure that these figures match
across all plans and plats associated with Creekside V. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
12. [General Comment] Road plans cannot be approved until the special exception request for
coordination of streets, Section 14-409 (A), has been acted on by the Planning Commission. If the
request is denied by the Commission, Phase 11 of Creekside V may need to be redesigned, which
includes the road layout. The special exception request is going to the Planning Commission on
December 5, 2017. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. The Planning Commission approved the
exception request to allow the cul-de-sac in Creekside V, Phase 11 on December 5, 2017.
13. [General Comment] Road plans cannot be approved until the Board of Supervisors accepts the
proposed open space parcels. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Open space dedication is
scheduled to go to the Board of Supervisors for acceptance on February 14, 2018.
Fire and Rescue — Shawn Maddox — No Objection
No Objection
VDOT — Willis Bedsaul — Requested Changes
1. Please provide sight distance lines and profiles on the plans.
2. Please show mill and overlay on plans in accordance with WP-2 and show limits of mill and
overlay. Please insert WP-2 standard detail in plan set.
3. The mill and overlay will require work to centerline, so flagging operation will be necessary.
Please provide an MOT plan in accordance with the Virginia Work Area Protection Manual.
4. Birmingham Court Cul-de-sac, in order for radius to be 35' it needs to be specifically approved by
the locality in consultation with emergency services. Please see B (1)-25, figure 4 for details.
5. This plan will not be approved by VDOT until the Birmingham Drive entrance and easement
issues have been resolved.
6. Please provide two copies of the revised road plans along with a comment response letter. If
further information is desired, please contact Willis C. Bedsaul at 434-422-9866.
7. A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The
owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process.
Rev 2 Comments
1. Please provide a sight distance easement where the sight line leaves the right of way.
2. This plan will not be approved by VDOT until the Birmingham Drive entrance and easement
issues have been resolved.
ACSA — Alexander Morrison/Richard Nelson — See Comment
1. Water and Sewer Construction Plan Review by the ACSA is required. Submit 3 copies of the
utility plan, along with water and sewer data sheets, to the ACSA, Attn: Jeremy Lynn, PE, to start
the review.
2. Final Road plan approval is contingent on construction approval of the utilities by the ACSA.
3. Final plat review and approval is contingent on construction approval of the utilities by the ACSA.
4. RWSA Capacity Certification for wastewater is required prior to the ACSA granting construction
approval for the utilities.
Dedication of Creekside 3 Phase 3 is required prior to the ACSA granting construction approval
for the utilities.
Rev 2 Comments
Final water and sewer plans are required for review. Please submit 3 copies of water and
sewer plans directly to ACSA: ATTN: Alex J. Morrison.
CDD E911— Elise Kiewra — Requested Changes
i ne roiiowing roaa names are will need to be changed: JACKSON LANE, Roads named JACKSON
LANE at ready exists elsewhere in the County.
a. NOTE: We recommend providing three (3) candidate names for each road to our office
for review, in case your first choices are not acceptable.
Page 2 has Jarmans Lake Rd incorrectly labeled as Jarmans Lane Road
The developer should contact the Crozet Post Office to determine a location for a cluster box
unit (CBU). The Crozet Post Office is no longer able to provide curbside delivery. For questions
concerning this, contact Keith Smarte, the Crozet Postmaster, at 823-9847.
Rev 2 Comments
1. The following road names will need to be changed: Birchwood Hill LN [exceeds 16 character
limit]
2. Pages 1, 4, 5, 8, and 11 still have Jackson Ln on them, they will need to be updated to the final
road name once confirmed.
3. While Jackson Ln was not allowed due to being an existing road Jackson Hill Ln would meet the
requirements, or some similar name using Jackson.
4. The developer should contact the Crozet Post Office to determine a location for a cluster box
unit (CBU). The Crozet Post Office is no longer able to provide curbside delivery. For questions
concerning this, contact Keith Smarte, the Crozet Postmaster, at 823-9847.
5. We recommend providing three (3) candidate names for each road to our office for review, in
case your first choices are not acceptable.
Sincerely,
Bobby Jocz
Civil Engineer I