The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutARB201700112 Application 2017-10-09Albemarle Coun,,, Planning Application 00f*=Lnib, DevelopmertCepartmed 4'v I F, ire Road Charlottes,: i le. VA 22 a02 - 4E6 mice 434],298-Ega2 Fax : .'4a4, 972-4126 Tl`vlPj 078GO-00-01-00OA0 :] Owner(s): RivERSIDE VILLAGE PROPERTIES INC Application #I ARB201700112 I Legal Description 'i RIVERSIDE VILLAGE ELK 1 RIVERSIDE VILLAGE Magisterial Dist. Rivanna Land Use Primary Unassigned Current AFD Not in A/F Districts Current Zoning Primary Neighborhood Model District 1APPLICATION INFOR TION Street A.ddress Entered E .pplication Type Architectural Review Board 1. Jennifer Smith v I Project jRIVERSIDE VILLAGE - BLOCK 1/MIXED USE - FINAL Date 11.0/09/17 Recei-ved 7 Received Date Final Submittal Date [fcfo-ii1Total Fees 1075 Closing File Dte Submitta l Date Final Total Paid 1075' Revision Number Comments Legal Ad SUB APPLICAT Final Site Development Plan APPLICANT / CONTACT INFORMATION Rr.'ERSIGE iiILLA.GE PROPERTIES INC i FRED WOLF - WOLF ACKERMAN DESIGN .......... ........... ... ... ...... ...... .. .... 10/09/17 .2CK' GARRETT ST STE S 1 10-B 2ND STREET NE, SUITE ........... - Signature of Contractor or Authorized Agent Date C ornrnent CHARLOTTES','ILL 225L'r2 ... .. ..... ... CHARLOTTESWLL 122902 14342964343 Architectural review Board Application `IlfN:1N/•: I Dart A: Applicant, Contact and Parcel Information I Project Name: Riverside Village -Block 1 / Mixed Use Tax map and parcel(s): 078GO-00-01-000AO Contact Person: Fred Wolf Physical Street Address: N/A Business Name: WOLF ACKERMAN DESIGN / architect Address 110-13 2nd Street NE, Suite 201 City Charlottesville State VA Zip 22902 Daytime Phone (__) 434-296-4848 Fax # E-mail fw@wolfackerman.com Owner of Record: Riverside Village Properties, Inc. / Chris Henry Address 200 Garrett Street, Suite S Daytime Phone L__) 540-353-0183 City Charlottesville State VA Zip 22902 Fax # E-mail chenry@stonypointdb.com Part B: Review Type and Fee Select review type Review by the Architectural Review Board Conceptual Plan/Advisory Review (for a Special Use Permit or a No Fee Rezoning) Preliminary/Initial Review of a Site Development Plan No Fee X Final Review of a Site Development Plan $1075.00 Amendment to an approved Certificate of Appropriateness $ 242.00 Building Permit Review $ 634.00 County -wide Certificate of Appropriateness Structures 750' or more from the EC, no taller than 5 stories No Fee Structures located behind a structure that fronts the EC No Fee Personal wireless service facilities No Fee Fencing or Equipment or Lighting No Fee Additions to ARB-approved buildings No Fee Minor amendments to site or architectural plans No Fee Building permits where the change is 50% or less of the altered elevation No Fee NOTE: For SIGNS, use the combined APPLICATION AND CHEKLIST FOR SIGNS. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY BP# ,' / ARB# Fee Amount $ l GJ Date Paid �v By who? Kam' r C B eipt # Check # �/ By County of Albemarle Dept of Community Development, 401 McIntire Rd, Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voke: (434) 296-5832 Fax: (434) 972-4126 10/2015 Page 1 of 2 OVER --> IPart C: Description of Proposal I Describe your proposal. Attach a separate sheet if necessary. I Part D: Applicant Agreement I Applicant must read and sign • Each application package must contain (S) folded copies of all plans and documents being submitted. Only (1) set of building material samples is required. All submittal items, including building material samples, become the property of Albemarle County. Applicants are encouraged to maintain duplicate copies of all submittal items in their own files. • Only complete application packages will be scheduled for ARB review. The application package is not complete without the appropriate checklist, completed, signed, and included with the required submittal materials indicated on the checklist. I hereby certify that I own the subject property or have the legal power to act on behalf of the owner in filing this application. *See submittal requirements below. I also certify that the information provided on this application and accompanying information is accurate, true, and correct to the best of my knowledge, and that the attached an ain all igiVrmation required by the appropriate checklist. October 9, 2017 Signatur6iof owner, owner's ref resentative Date or contr 't purchaser Frederick Wolf / architect 434-296-4848 Printed name, Title Daytime phone number of Signatory *Ownership Information: • If ownership of the property is in the name of any type of legal entity or organization including, but not limited to, the name of a corporation, partnership or association, or in the name of a trust, or in a fictitious name, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted certifying that the person signing above has the authority to do so. • If the applicant is a contract purchaser, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted containing the owner's written consent to the application. • If the applicant is the agent of the owner, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted that is evidence of the existence and scope of the agency. Attach the owner's written consent. 11/2010 Page 2 of 2 DI' I%sT1 Architectural Review Board Puna/ Review of a Site Development Plan Submittal Requirements Checklist Part A: Anglicant. Contact and Parcel Information Project Name: Riverside Village - Block 1 / Mixed Use Tax map and parcel(s): 078GO-00-01-000AO Physical street address: N/A Contact Person: Fred Wolf Business Name: WOLF ACKERMAN DESIGN / architect Address 110-13 2nd Street NE, Suite 201 City Charlottesville Daytime Phone (43` } 296-4848 Fax # Part B: Submittal Requirements State VA zip 22902 E-mail fw@wolfackerman.con Important: Submittal packages must contain 8 collated copies of all information unless otherwise indicated. A. Written description of the proposal ® Provide a description of the proposal. Identify changes from the preliminary submittal. Indicate specifically how each ARB comment from the preliminary review has been addressed. If there are no changes proposed, then explain why. ® Explain how the proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and the Entrance Corridor. B. Site plan showing the following (drawn to the scale of 1 "=20. clearly legible and folded): ® Location(s) of proposed building(s) on the site. ® Location of proposed parking, travelways, walkways and other improvements. ® Mechanical equipment, trash containers, loading and service areas, other similar features and improvements, and associated screening. ® Existing and proposed topography drawn with contour intervals of 5-feet or less, and with sufficient off -site topography to describe prominent and pertinent off -site features and physical characteristics, but in no case less than 50-feet outside of the site. ® Location and size of existing and proposed utilities and easements. Identify type of utility and extent of easement. ® Stormwater management plan. ® Location of retaining walls indicating top and bottom elevations, maximum wall height, and proposed materials, with material and color samples. ® Sheet number, total number of sheets, date of the drawing, date and description of the latest revision, and contact information for the firm preparing the drawings in the title block on all drawings. For revised drawings, clearly identify revisions made. I OVER — C. Landscape plan showing the following (drawn to the scale of 1 "=20' or larger, clearly legible and folded): ® Proposed landscaping that meets or exceeds the requirements outlined in the ARB guidelines. ® Existing landscaping to be removed. Include the location, size, and species. ® Landscape key including all landscape symbols and a description of what they represent. ® Location of existing and proposed tree lines and tree save areas. ® Location of existing natural features. ® Location of individual trees of 6-inch caliper or greater and all significant groups of trees indicated by botanical name and caliper. ® Location and height of above -ground utilities and associated easements, and location of below - ground utilities and associated easements. ® Stormwater facilities. ® Provide a signed, tree conservation checklist with all checklist items drawn on the landscape plans. ® Include tree protection fencing and limits of work on the landscape, grading and E&S plans. D. Lighting plan showing the following (drawn to the scale of 1"=20' or larger, clearly legible and folded): ® Location of all proposed building and site lighting. ® Lighting schedule identifying all proposed light fixtures, poles and brackets. ® Manufacturer's cut sheets illustrating proposed lighting fixtures and information on illumination type, intensity, style, shielding, color, finish, and installation height. ® Photometric plan addressing all fixtures and indicating that lighting does meet the requirements of Section 4.17 of the Zoning Ordinance. ® Coordination of lighting with landscaping and other site elements. E. Appearance of the building(s) (architectural elevations, color perspective sketches, site sections): ® Dimensioned architectural elevations of the proposed building(s). Elevations must be drawn to the scale of 1/8"=1'-011. Include a building materials schedule and key on the elevation drawings. Submittal of elevations that are not visible from the Entrance Corridor may be required to clarify the overall building design. ® Site sections that clarify proposed changes in topography and illustrate the visibility of the proposed development from the Entrance Corridor. Site sections shall indicate the finish floor elevation(s) and roof height(s) relative to the natural elevations along the Entrance Corridor. ® One set of all building materials / colors. ® A floor plan adequate to show exterior walls, windows and doors. F. Additional material ® Provide labeled, color, 8 %" x 11" photographs of the site as seen from both directions on the Entrance Corridor. ® Color perspective images (for example: sketches, renderings, photosimulations, etc.) that show the proposed development as seen from the Entrance Corridor are often useful for gaining a clear understanding of the proposal. The ARB may require such images in certain cases when other submitted documents do not answer all questions of building form, building details, materials, context, topography, and/or visibility. ❑ Any additional material that is necessary to address comments made by the ARB at the preliminary review with a memo itemizing how each of the preliminary comments have been addressed. ❑ The applicant is welcome to submit any additional material that will make the final site development review more productive. Drawings or other submittal items that clarify topography, visibility, utilities, landscaping, or other unique or unusual conditions are welcome. 2 OVER > I Part C: Applicant Agreement Applicant must read and sign • Each application package must contain (8) folded copies of all plans and documents being submitted. Only (1) set of building material samples is required. All submittal items, including building material samples, become the property of Albemarle County. Applicants are encouraged to maintain duplicate copies of all submittal items in their own files. • All information in this checklist is required, unless specifically waived by the ARB, prior to processing a final site development plan review by the ARB. Additional submittal materials may be required, depending on the proposal. • Only complete application packages will be scheduled for ARB review. The application package is not complete without this checklist completed signed and included with the required submittal materials indicated on the checklist. In representing the above referenced firm submitting this application for review, l hereby state that the information provided in this application, and all accompanying information, is accurate, true and correct to , ,best of my knowledge, and that the attached plans contain all information required by this checklist. (/ October 9, 2017 of person completing c ecklist Date Frederick Wolf / architect t! 434-296-4848 Printed Name / Title Daytime phone number of Signatory County of Albemarle Department of Planning and Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 (434) 296-5832 Tel www.albemarle.org revised 10/24/2014 3 OVER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SHIMCIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING' October 91h, 2017 Heather McMahon, Senior Planner County of Albemarle Planning Division RE: SDP 201700038 Riverside Village Block I — Final Site Development Plan - ARB Ms. McMahon, Thank you for your review of the Final Site Development Plan for Riverside Village Block 1. We have reviewed and revised the plan per your most recent comments dated August 91h, 2017. Below is a detailed response to each of your comments. 1. Addressed by architect 2. A Provide all landscaping required by the previously approved site plan. Distinguish on the landscape plan in the final site plan submittal between the previously approved plants and new plants proposed with this phase of development. Also clearly identify any previously approved plants that are proposed to be eliminated from the plan. Landscape Schedule addresses landscape requirements. Previously approved landscape plantings addressed in site plan (C940), and planting schedule provided. Existing planting along Riverside Village entry and Route 20 will be removed because of extent of construction and be planted with current landscape plan. 3. Addressed by architect 4. Addressed by architect 5. Provide a site plan that shows all dumpster, loading and service areas, storage areas, mechanical equipment (ground -mounted), above -ground utilities, and any proposed fencing. Provide a roof plan and elevations that show roof -mounted mechanical equipment locations and sizes. Show how visibility of all equipment will be eliminated. All dumpster, loading and service areas, storage areas, mechanical equipment (ground -mounted), above -ground utilities, and any proposed fencing have been provided on Site Plan. 6. Provide landscape at the dumpster to integrate it into the surroundings. Landscape has been provided at the dumpster to integrate it into the surroundings. 7. Addressed by architect 8. Provide lighting plan that includes all proposed freestanding and wall -mounted lights with the final site plan. Lighting plan has been provided that includes parking lighting, exterior wall mounted lights, and landscape lighting. 9. Provide a landscape plan in a site plan format. Rectify the omission of plant quantity and symbol on the plant material schedule and coordinate symbols on the landscape plan for the final site plan submission. Plant quantities and annotation has been provided on the landscape plan. 10. Provide the heights and proposed materials of the walls encircling the plazas. Proposed wall heights have been provided in in site plan, and materials choices are included in architect's packet. 11. Add street trees in the gaps along the north side of Trailside Drive in the vicinity of the entrance into the Block 1 parking lot. Street trees have been added along Trailside Drive where previous gap were left. 12. Add shrubs along the eastern edge of the parking lot where buildings do not block parking spaces from the EC. Shrubs have been added along entry corridor to provide parking lot screening. 13. Provide at least two (2) benches in all plazas. Design the northernmost plaza as a focal point of the block. The northernmost plaza remains the focal point, by being the larges open space and providing direct access to Route 20.3 Benches in each interior plaza is provided, and additional benches and seating for the eastern and western plazas will be provided. 14. Correct the site plans so that the pedestrian connection is a single material. The pedestrian connection changes material, but is addressing material changes across the site. Exposed aggregate in concrete (ex. in architect's packet) will have a similar color as existing pavers beside residences, and will provide a texture change from the surrounding asphalt. The pattern of concrete and exposed aggregate will be the same language as the ground condition in the plaza designs. See sheet C9. 15. Provide standard health plant note to the landscape plan: All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant. Provided If you have any questions or concerns about these revisions please feel free to email me at Peter .shimp- en , ineering.com or you may contact Justin Shimp at JustinCo)shimp-engneerinq com or call us at (434) 227- 5140. 2 Best Regards, Peter Russell Shimp Engineering, P.C. ViYA WOLr ACKERMAN architecture + design Riverside Village - Block 1 / Mixed Use : Project Description This project is located on a commercial entry corridor near the intersection of Route 250 and Route 20 North. The site is part of a low to medium density commercial and retail while also adjacent to multi -family housing and new residential development. Beyond the immediate surrounding context, Route 20N leads to larger residential estates and farms and has a variety of aesthetic styles and forms that relate to an agrarian architectural style. This project's massing and form presents both a more modern commercial edge that corresponds with 20N and a more traditional side that speaks to more conventional roof forms and materials that could be found as part of the residential neighborhoods and the farms outside of town. We have used a gabled metal roof combined with a FA roof and parapet to break up the massing across the depths of the buildings across the width of the site. This means the sloped roofs and small exterior balconies face away from 20N towards the new single family homes in the Riverside Development while a more typical flat -roofed commercial envelop with aluminum storefront and canopies faces 20N. Small terraces allow us to step the buildings as they work down the sloped hill following the grade of 20N. These serve the commercial / retail levels as well as providing a break in the overall massing and allowing pedestrians to filter through the side at several points. These landscaped spaces, combined with a landscaped parking area will provide a semi -porous buffer between the noise and activity of 20N and the residential areas behind. Our material palette is simple and uses common materials but in a modern way. The buildings all have a brick base using a dark grey brick set in a stacked bond pattern. These sections of wall are articulated as panels with with cement board panels above any section of storefront at grade. Above we are proposing a synthetic wood product used in a vertical T&G siding w/ a 4" exposure. The orientation is similar to a board & batten application but the scale is more consistent with a residential siding. It also speaks to a modern application of a warm, familiar material - without the maintenance issues of real wood. The balconies and screen wall protecting the main stairs on each building will be a painted metal. Railings will use a stainless steel cable design. And we have proposed a green screen wall attached to a section of our building on each terrace elevation. The roof will be a standing seam metal roof. The buildings maintain a small footprint of approximately 4,300 SF However, they work together as a composition or small 'village' within their larger landscape along 20N. We feel these form work on the scale of the automobile and with the speed of vehicular traffic along this corridor while also providing a pedestrian -friendly scale and character for the residents and customers who will utilize these buildings as a neighborhood center. 110-B 2nd Street NE, Suite 201 Charlottesville, VA 22902 434-296-4848 LyiYA architecture = design Since the preliminary review, we have modified the windows facing 20N per staff and board comments. Additionally, we developed a canopy on the parking lot and terrace elevations that could accept retail or commercial signage in the future and provides cover and light for the commercial entries. This would only be minimally visible from 20N. For the most part, the building design has not changed materially. The courtyard terraces have been further developed and they are depicted in the civil / landscape / site drawings prepared by Shimp Engineering and included in this submission. Riverside Village - Block 1 / Mixed Use: Response to preliminary review comments outlined in a letter dated September 7, 2017 1. A materials sheet has been submitted. Material and color samples will be provided at the meeting. 2. Addressed by civil engineer's drawings and / or response 3. We explored alternative window groupings on the elevation facing the EC and have elected to increase the size of the smaller window bay windows at the outer corners of each buildings on the 2nd and 3rd story to match the double window bay shown. 4. The standard glass note has been added 5. Addressed by civil engineer's drawings and / or response 6. Addressed by civil engineer's drawings and / or response 7. A mechanical equipment note has been added to the drawings. 8. The lighting is shown in the civil engineer's drawings 9. Addressed by civil engineer's drawings and / or response 10. Addressed by civil engineer's drawings and / or response 11. Addressed by civil engineer's drawings and / or response 12. Addressed by civil engineer's drawings and / or response 13. Addressed by civil engineer's drawings and / or response 14. Addressed by civil engineer's drawings and / or response 15. Addressed by civil engineer's drawings and / or response 110-B 2nd Street NE, Suite 201 Charlottesville, VA 22902 434-296-4848