HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA201300016 Summary of Request for Variation 2018-03-07COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
To: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
From: Tim Padalino, AICP
Date: March 7, 2018
Re: Request # 1 for Special Exception to Vary the application plan approved in conjunction with ZMA
2013-00016 Avinity Estates regarding "Street Design — Landscaping Easement"
and
Request #2 for Special Exception to Vary the application plan approved in conjunction with ZMA
2013-00016 Avinity Estates regarding "Yard Requirements — Front Yard Setbacks"
Tax Map Parcel(s): 09100000001400 (portion), 091000000016A0, 091000000016CO3 and
091000000016E0
Magisterial District: Scottsville Magisterial District
School Districts: Monticello H.S.; Walton M.S.; Cale E.S.
Zoning District: PRD Planned Residential Development
Summary of Requests for Variations:
The subject properties for the "Avinity Estates" development are zoned PRD Planned Residential Development,
per approved ZMA-2013-00016. Special exceptions to vary from the provisions contained on the approved ZMA
application plan for properties in the PRD district may be granted by the Board of Supervisors, pursuant to County
Code §§ 18-8.5.5.3 and 18-33.5.
The applicant (Mr. Scott Collins, P.E., Collins Engineering) has requested two special exceptions to vary the
application plan approved in conjunction with ZMA-2013-00016 Avinity Estates:
1. Variation request to modify (reduce) the width of the landscaping maintenance and access easement from ten
(10) feet to six (6) feet, pursuant to County Code § 18-8.5.5.3(a)(5); and
2. Variation request to modify (reduce) the depth of the front yard setback for portions of structures that are not
garages from eighteen (18) feet to six (6) feet, but still require a minimum setback dimension of eighteen (18)
feet between the sidewalk and all garages, pursuant to County Code § 18-8.5.5.3(a)(1).
Please see Attachment B for full details of staff s analysis.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment C) to approve the two special
exceptions.
Attachments:
A — Application Materials (Applications for Special Exceptions and approved ZMA Application Plan)
B — Staff Analysis
C — Resolution
J
•lMWA\M:
APPLICATION FOR VARIATION FROM APPROVED PLANS,
CODES & STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENT
What type of change is requested?
V Variation to the Application Plan FEaU5%_ it L
❑ Variation to the Code or Standard of Development
Fee = $425
Project Name: Avinity Estates
Name of Planned District: PRD - Planned Residential Development
Tax map and parcel: 91-16C, 91-16E, 91-16A, and 91-14
ZMA Number(s) ZMA2013-00016
Contact Person Scott Collins - Collins Engineering
Address 200 Garrett Street, Suite K City Charlottesville
Daytime Phone# (434 ) 293-3719 Fax# (
State VA
Zip 22902
Email scoff@collins-engineering.com
Specify the provision of the plan, code or standard for which the variation is sought, and state the reason for the
requested variation. The request may be rejected if it fails to include the required information.
Provide a copy of the existing plan (may be a reduced copy) illustrating the area for which the change is requested.
Provide a graphic representation of the requested change.
Submitted in conjunction with the Avinity Estates Initial site plan 1/22/2018
Describe the variation being sought (Attach separate sheet(s) as needed):
A VARIATION IS BEING SOUGHT FOR THE LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS EASEMENT. A 10' EASEMENT WAS ESTABLISHED DURING THE
REZONING REQUEST TO PROVIDE ROOM FOR STREET TREES OUTSIDE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIATION OF THIS
LANDSCAPING AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT DOWN FROM 10' TO A TOTAL OF 6' (5' OUTSIDE OF THE ROW, 1' FROM THE BACK OF CURB TO THE
ROW), PER THE TYPICAL PLANTING STRIP WIDTH EMPLOYED IN STANDAR ROAD SECTIONS.
What is the reason for each of the requested variations?:
1. THE REDUCED LANDSCAPING EASEMENT WILL PROVIDE THE SAME FUNCTION AT 10' WIDTH AS IT DOES WHEN REDUCED TO 6' WIDTH. THE
ADDITIONAL EASEMENT WIDTH IS NOT NECESSARY FRO THE STREET TREES TO BE INSTALLED ALONG THE ROAD SECTION.
2. ALLOWING A REDUCTION IN THE LANDSCAPING EASEMENT WIDTH WILL ALLOW THE PARKING BUMP OUTS TO REMAIN, AS THEY WOULD
CONFLICT WITH THE FRONT OF THE UNITS IF OFFSET 10' FROM THE BACK OF THE BUMPED OUT SIDEWALK AND CREATE CONFLICTS WITH THE
FRONT PORCHES, WHICH ARE REQUIRED BY THE REZONING TO PROTRUDE 3' IN FRONT OF THE GARAGES.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Fee Amount $ L� Date Paid /
By who? Receipt # q— ,z--- Ck# Jv By. F�121 4 , J �'� ft_� (�n (I - —f
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296-5832 Fax: (434) 972-4126
Revised 02/10/2015
41ilk, IILA012W!\W•
APPLICATION FOR VARIATION FROM APPROVED PLANS,
CODES, & STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENT
In accordance with § 8.5.5.3 c) of the Zoning Ordinance, the following 5 criteria must be met before a
recommendation for a variation may be considered by the Board of Supervisors. Please provide information about
these criteria for consideration (Attach separate sheet(s) as needed).
1. Is the variation consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan?
2. Does the variation increase the approved development density or intensity of development?
3. Does the variation adversely affect the timing and phasing of development of any other development in the
zoning district?
4. Does the variation require a special use permit?
5. Is the variation in general accord with the purpose and intent of the approved rezoning application?
§ 8.5.5.3 VARIATIONS FROM APPROVED PLANS, CODES, AND STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENTS
A site plan or subdivision plat for a planned development may be varied from an approved application plan,
standard of development and, also, in the case of a neighborhood model district, a code of development, as
provided herein:
The following provisions of an approved plan, code or standard may be varied:
I . Minor changes to yard requirements, build -to lines or ranges, maximum structure heights and minimum lot
sizes;
2. Changes to the arrangement of buildings and uses shown on the plan, provided that the major elements shown
on the plan and their relationships remain the same;
3. Changes to phasing plans;
4. Minor changes to landscape or architectural standards;
5. Minor changes to street design and street location, subject to a recommendation for approval by the county
engineer; and
6. Minor changes to the design and location of stormwater management facilities, minor land disturbance,
including disturbance within conservation areas, and mitigation, all subject to a recommendation for approval
by the county engineer.
An updated application plan and, in the case of changes to a code of development, a complete amended code of
development, reflecting the approved variation and the date of the variation may be required. If an updated
application plan or code of development is required, the granting of the variation shall be conditional upon the
applicant providing the plan or code within thirty (30) days after approval of the variation and a determination by
the director that the plan or code were revised to correctly reflect the granted variation.
Revised 02/10/2015
Revised 02/10/2015
WIIIk`kAVA91W!\0:
APPLICATION FOR VARIATION FROM APPROVED PLANS,
CODES, & STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENT
In accordance with § 8.5.5.3 c) of the Zoning Ordinance, the following 5 criteria must be met before a
recommendation for a variation may be considered by the Board of Supervisors. Please provide information about
these criteria for consideration (Attach separate sheet(s) as needed).
1. Is the variation consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan?
Yes, it helps pull the units eloser to the streets, while still ensuring an 18'driveway in front of the garages.
2. Does the variation increase the approved development density or intensity of development?
No, there is no proposed inciease in the overail intensity or density '-Ir the ddevelopinei it.
3. Does the variation adversely affect the timing and phasing of development of any other development in the
zoning district?
4. Does the variation require a special use permit?
5. Is the variation in general accord with the purpose and intent of the approved rezoning application?
§ 8.5.5.3 VARIATIONS FROM APPROVED PLANS, CODES, AND STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENTS
A site plan or subdivision plat for a planned development may be varied from an approved application plan,
standard of development and, also, in the case of a neighborhood model district, a code of development, as
provided herein:
The following provisions of an approved plan, code or standard may be varied:
1. Minor changes to yard requirements, build -to lines or ranges, maximum structure heights and minimum lot
sizes;
2. Changes to the arrangement of buildings and uses shown on the plan, provided that the major elements shown
on the plan and their relationships remain the same;
3. Changes to phasing plans;
4. Minor changes to landscape or architectural standards;
5. Minor changes to street design and street location, subject to a recommendation for approval by the county
engineer; and
6. Minor changes to the design and location of stormwater management facilities, minor land disturbance
including disturbance within conservation areas, and mitigation, all subject to a recommendation for approval
by the county engineer.
An updated application plan and, in the case of changes to a code of development, a complete amended code of
development,.reflecting the approved variation and the date of the variation may be required. If an updated
application plan oftode of development is required, the granting of the variation shall be conditional upon the
applicant providing'the plan or code within thirty (30) days after approval of the variation and a determination by
the director that the plan or code were revised to correctly reflect the granted variation.
Revised 02/10/2015
\\ I 0
T '
\ _—TIN. iea'UBFT R PAPER
f. AND aoo' LEFT TjURN SIP A ,E ,TIE------�
/
a
\IIII 5
I111 I_ i
I. ST�GSgq99�IGHTTI�RN TAP�R /
ANP zTzf WGHTTUR E I t o \\\ \
I yi
PAR
IIII,IED
III
I I I F
t AREA MOLIFICATIO
1NPN\
I PARALLELSPACES NT
I I g0 -J5L
d ZA!@MP�41/ / (6)PERPENDICULAR SPACE �•�.
\ \ I
gEVIW81
/I
"mow 6A as
°� E�pTE
J r
/ �N ��llllli III\` \� we a
/ l I I ' I I l l l / / l \ \ ` \ wTYP/C L PR/VATJ' STD SECT/ON u.rE aErrvovu
2
AN srVONLY �P C r( unow.THI9
ej PBo✓acT
___ STAN STREET TO ALLOW A BE D DRDANDE W H D PARKING COUNTY ONE FTHE ROAD_
AND RESOD
AOEQUATEIM TH TRAVELWAY AND NONE SIDE O
_' _-_-_- ='PROPOSED TRAFFlC fN.MI IFRE DAUMPS
_iT1a'ICAL)TOBFNSTALLE61F REOUESTEp.BY/ / \ \ \ D
\ / ApJNIT_YBOAT66CCORDANCEWNH / -/
_EVIIL�P
WGXr OF AYSWILL 'O TO // / ' \ _ ICIpITYMAP
/-90PERIV COR 9•XRR:B / ..w.. ,...�... w. www VALE:
B ■ 000'
RGgJNEgwRH,cAI.E,_� — m. SCALE: 1" = 2000'
/ // va^ /-_-- / iiElb.1ENTARIFSCH6041f\OESIr"' \ /\
i� / - i / I \ \ / — NOTES:
�'/ / / / / / / l I \ 90'PZCAL PA'/VATA'.9P.R6•zk`J'SACA/OA' 1. ALL STREETS SHOWN ON THIS APPLICATION PLAN SHALL
BE PRIVATE STREETS.
I / / / \ / 2. THE EXISTING YEPCO OVERHEAD POWER LINE SHALL BE
STI /56 POIN i l l I 1 / / l l/ \
q0 1 / / / / \ — ✓ / -� ''� RELOCATED UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD THROUGH THE
jG9�°PJNPgsEORE20WNrG / / / PROPERTY.
/ - I ✓ I _ / /� /N NNECTIOI�TF(TT NIN�TYI\ LRISTING- _ / / / / / / / _ -- / / / / J. DE ON.
DRIVEWAYS WILL TIE INTO THE NEW ROAD
x / •\ ry urn /' / / 4. THE PROPOSED RECREATIONAL AMENITIES SHALL INCLUDE
/ / / / A TOT LOT LOCATED IN THE AREA GRAPHICALLY DEPICTED
RE�AFDRACEVETDHFAOR]TIES / / / // // / / — — — J / / / / / OTHE REA. THE PASSIVENRECREATON AREAS SHA PLAN IN THE ACI'VE RECREATIONAL
BENCH
ST GSANRARY / / / D PICNIC TABLES THROUGHOUT THE OPEN
/ ES AN
SEW R SPACE AREA, AND NI DOG PARK. TRAILS AND OTHER
ExIRECREATIONAL AMENITIES SUCH AS FIELDS, A SECOND
AIN M / / AREA
_ ' 7 r * € . / /'; ' sea }•s �/ - ToR MASH CLUBHOUSE. AND PAVITIIES ARE PLANNED FOR THIS
m /
/ L IMP1.z� \ AS WELL FINAL AMENITIES NITHIN THE ACTIVE AND
iI� i�'. \ I 1 % I rwl /�/ -_ II `S• ' / ' • \ `I "/' al L T �/ JASP OL BS9 p`rgj RAm£'� — ` PASSIVE RECREATION AREAS SHALL BE DETERMINED AND
a J SHOWN S IH THE FINAL SITE PLAN.
I y Aocr T({ h' J68 PUT O.B. 618 P.
— — — I — �_
� � \ \ a ^ Lm " i I-' � .•- - l � _ — NOTE: EXISTING GRAVEL ORrvEWA 5. ALL LOTS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT
I \ \ \ \ II / g r I • , '[' RES:REATIONAL,' ' - PGRAOED TOAPAVEO2T EMERGENCY \ BOUNDARY ADJACENT TO ZONED RESIDENTIAL LAND SHALL
* l _ ,l I l o I H j • \\_ 1... 4 -, ` � µy, F,. ..ecce _,_T�_ _ _ 1 AECESS ROADWAY. EX—NGGMVEL — HAVE A 20• REAR SETBACK. AND ALL INTERIOR LOTS TO
DWVEWAYSNALL BEUEFUZEDASA THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL HAVE A 10' REAR SETBACK.
\`\"� CONSTRUCTIONF�NTtANCE FORTHE 6. ALL STREETS EXCEPT ROAD D (NO PARKING) SHALL HAVE
GRAB}\\'\ \ / / r 'ii 3c\\�III�IIII� ' I' �• - v — _ — — DEVELOPMENT OF THEAVINITY II SECTION. PARKING ON ONE SIDE ONLY.
_ - s' x/ _ \ T. AVINITY II DEVELOPMENT WILL BE ADDED TO THE AVINITY I
F. /�^/ / DEV LO
\I\ w\\ I g 1 \1 1 ;IIIIII III\\ / fi�F \\ \-.. SPG - _ _ - — -- \ THE AMENTIES.HOA TO UOPEN SH NSPACOMPLETE
E PAND MAINTENANCE
G ALL
P' I I V1 IIII 111 11 ,T7: -�� •- ,• '`,>, .�v — — \ RESPONSIBILITIES.
!\ \ / N/i AKYI'NpR e1-RI \ I III III III AV INITY I BLOC !•' •.. - '"' 91 T6G _ ESE PORTIONS OF BLOCK D WI E
0A INI R 2 \ e III, 1 11 l\ - \ PROPOSED i - -- ,'Jlp SyTIr�N 1[G \ / — \ REQUIRED TO BE
/1, a g1y�(4�� _ — — — \ SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED OR SINGE FAMILY DETACHED UNITS.
EX SWM FACILITY " } _ — — — THESE LOTS WILL NOT BE DEVELOPED AS TOWNHOUSE UNITS.
\ \ \��\� - _ T \•' .+ i /J;µ�•�1 �. \ IN LIEU OF - i l I I FOR AV INITY I TO BE ENLARGED TO w .a _ AC'jIVE — +IOTF,._TNE ExISTNG MANAGED CWTCAI._ \
THISSI2ETOACCOMMODATE THE=• ^' RECREATIONAL EwSny MANA6'EOCt�RICALSLOPES(NPJ LOPES INTHISAeFATHATgRE 1
v,Y! �\ ' . �� r' ���n 11 J®n \ I I •I -I I i "I`'LC �I,�, IIlI/II I II�IIIIIII11I 11\11\/1'_ \ \'\ C\S\_R/O// �O _BL ,,-,...,. -, -'7" "/'_ , I1 // III I ::'.I -sve a. i AVINI.'.fY, II STOR
MANAGEMEMNW.T.A_.—P(ROPOSE. ACCO TUREBEFDS9 IPES RVAPPRODSTO
—
/
O
ORDIANLLMITHPMAXMUM -
V � I
I r { \ / i a t'i - GHr of B AFTTGRAo F_
• o>; �� �� I \ \ \ ,+, `Y. 1 //,. ,p .I 1 •r \ \0R'S50 P. 608 PUT HE i NGAT 3:1
_ •- -� z \�' - � L , l // ''� L � , " p' T P�' - _ \ 8LOPE.
AREAS TITER THE MANBF) IN \ \ \ or d
\ •<._, STRIRED SP,L I§ `� ^* ,4 �, `_-— _S ESE AREA3 WHERE THE MANpOED \/
' - «jc-•-II�_i \ _ �` ,... - .>_ ' I I.'/ A�f�.\S �,Ay+V "X' y�0. MICA FORACTNE\ LO — T \ r I \/ •' d / REBARE PRESEN � �
• � _ \ \ � _ , F\ F _ ` \ .T \ �.. � / '. � R I p.,, {' \HEACgEATio FACiLR1�E8D..Aool E AGTrvE
\'° rv\ �\ \ \ \ \\ �\ \ \ \\'\ ' / t`'* 'k'M 6""e'•{?f. s" ...,\MOTE. ENCYACE
N ESI _ `
"De OPOSEDEMERGC- 8�3 I 1 / / / / UTIIZE EXISTING ENTRANCE
TRNACCS TOAMEN TIER —'-- /
•.'Yi'II £ / / j m3i )TOBE NstALLEDIF REDuesreo3r y �/I J r# \ - _ _ -\\ \ / ,/ _ „x BIC, EDB D-T4BE_NBFAIL
III I I_ ; •I , , N ACEOR CEWITH \ ANar}NGpA EMENT DE MEETS THE •
\ \ \ O 8 R R THE EXISTING ANO \
\ E I Es\ / \ I I I
P1 I 1 / STING ACCES POI /
/Ll 7`\ \\ \ ; gp� I / ' i / v: nPRDPGS B�ocKw
PROPO D FIC 1NA1 LIMPS R'�1� / / / / i
IGL O NST LEDI FRE�UESTED BY '""'�'} J / 1 I / `, \\ \ \ \ B fOBP I 1i- l / \ /, % / DB WOWEN FENCE TD
\I T I I I \ \\ \ \ THEAV O I Nf C bR ELOP W4 P. 1 /MOUNT L I D I / \
M'R g.5561P. T101 / / �� `IIII /` t�IRA�F 111 NSALLEO5 FR0 REAR
Qa�PROFFE kORA N III EVI f11ENF / I // / 'pN ( \ 1 I �% ' OTB ALONp THE I / I ` \ //' • i / /
ffif
! Q' OINN J' I 1 I I 1\ \I \\ \I I ii `/ _=t `_ 1 I -LINE OF TH 5�FPROM THE PROP ILTV. E / l ' ' /
OfRAFFIC RD�UNP wBOUTN(ITHVTB NELIrrnTIQ/F1 I EE /
_ I ODWERTO OWNDIRAFFIC 1 \ / _ f.
FL W ¢ROUUGGHTHdAVIN ID LQrPM '4TI \\ I \ 1 I 111 \ - 4- I AND'TIHE-PROPERIY LINE. RS
L / 4\rE \\\� EXISTING INTE CONNEQTION \ // 1 //' / / / —_1 F US AND EVER TREES
- III Iy ryry\VV /ACCESS POINT / / 1 /� / € -T�-TI I \\\ DU7 IEEETROPERTY b
gPkS'cT/vP.7 '/ / S
HLL STREETS ON IT PLAN SHALL BE OPEN FO,R PUBLIC USE. I I / I IT
2, GARAGESI SHALL MEET THE RELEGATED PARKING REQUIREMENTS I / N/FH ANTIC SMJU Iu>'�rC/ / ,/ E I/GNES / PROPassD REROUniPOOFI
GARAGES SHALL`rgE SET BACK FROM THE FACET OF THE BUI1 DiMGSIOfE / I D.a / <: 0.(I`5lae P. 2 I _ ') ExIBrING OVERHEAD LEDTR ywE \ I I I J I d/ /' / �.✓ ' / / /
I 1 �-•__—__—__—__ - - - I _ - SET -THE RELEGATE6,P�t9MN� / / / y \ i I i II I I I J
Eu
�ORCHE$I A MINI-LbUM OFEET TO
RFLNEN111 /'/
ALTEREDIFINArI FROMATIHE LOCJ>, IONS StLOWN-OITTFIE PL�N
AND THEr AVINITO HOA.LL BE APPI OVED BY, 'BOTI{ ALB1�Ir1ARLE\COUNTY'
BLoe B
�
MMpp''- \ 1 N\ SCOiiTTS5 A0 GSU d, I /
C� R cTt}u1ENEs. / �_S ) \ /T
GENERAL NOTES I I I I I \ I \\ sraliC�T/UELPR ES ERIihL1 DPD'PHoTOGRAPHs.
OWNERS MO55 ACWlSTIONS RUCHES WALLACE@ IDA I \ I \DOTMENTpTON 8}HALLINOLiJIDESOFEACH
J21 £ MAIN ST f0] CULPEPER ROAD I I T RA 85 ONnNG ALL9
CHARLOT/£SWLLE, VA 22902 R/CHMOND, VA 23229 ( \ \ ��$''TTT RUCTU E.CONTTEEXXTT qq E S
'A II fta "e "igi U's I OORPIgN AND NBIG:TCH PIINH OF TH N.T. I
AVON PROPER RES, LLC NN IXm GORE/
P.O. BOX 1467
RLOTHESWLLE, VA 22902
DEVELOPER: RIVERBEND DEVELOPMENT, INC.
J21 E MAIN S. SUI IE -1
CHARLOITESWLLE, VA 22902
ENGINEER: COLLINS ENGNEERING
200 BARRETT ST. SUITE K
CNARLOTTESWUE VA 22902
\ 1 EN o lI G THE PROTTOOLOCAgTION3 OMIN / N
BE FPTE�. THIyS1L UMENTOAOTUONT 3H(.IL I TO BE RER FU
I I f='UNUY DEVEOPMENTNf RIORTOTH I / PROPOSED LE}/E
REOUES�I FORA OLTEO PERM T FO< ANY RY
, I pF THE 34RUCTU{tES. NOT I RIGHT OF WI � / SyORMWATEREMANA
ROPER Y LI AY SHA LEXTEND so
/ NEFORAPossl `/�j-,' _ - �_ _ [AU
INTERCONNEIT NWITH THE FLLTURE MI YSYt 'I„ "'TIifIYIIfi11911�116I1ii11011® U 1 �_ / /-'- ^4. i _ \ \ -- TOKAPPASIGME%IOFEmNTNMMCEI
II / DEVELOPMENTS RARCRL- THE
TAX MAP NO.: 09100-00-00-016C0 09)00-00-00-016E0 __T__ Y7EST / / / / / / I J-Z /4_�� _1r_1•— t., 1 ;—r 1' / r,'.r €:: /-` ` \ p:, -'.. T�,Y ////)i /'
ZONE R-1 RES/OENT/AL ZONE. R-1 RESIDENTIAL / / / / o ";:''T':+ - \ 1 \ 1 P( I I• C' / . / i / I / /
OB 4319 PG 24] OB 599 PG 239 ])witM1ln Avnryl,a24 urnt condo bWldllM iz / / / / / I I I ;y1j'PROPOSEDt
09100-00-00-016A0 09100-CO-CO-01400 FACILITY
RES -1PLA PFD PLANNED— Proposed to be eliminatedantl nRS Place,a - / / / / / I , *PS NOEORSED\ €TIP" \ '\ ' \ \O /' y .SWM '•, / r/ Ffil NG OVERHEAD
ZWE. R-1 RESIDENI/AL ZONE.' V maximum of (8)townhouse un is are proposed \ / G _ J' X f ERLINE
¥ �\ PR ) 1 � . \ }( 4�, FOR
OB 396 PG 116 OB 34]2 PG 0I5 2)The overall tlemty(numb-of unitz)for / / -, / / _ , z { £ /j� { 7 \\ \ \ " AVINITV
TOTAL PROJECT AREA: AvinitylsM1all tlecreasefrom 124unis to 106-108/ \ / / I ; S.•. 1 �*s y..J ,. §�T { 3f
09100-00-00-016C0 - 2.472 AC. uN[sw r.;D approval of this rezoning The YH' ',£ i°. h yp F t -3" 'A's,, €, 4` 6F �. € "' T�'gi�A '� '•+ ` ''($ f - x ,s /' / I
09100-00-00-016£O - 4.982 AG originalProposed conda,Wn builtlingsh IIb
091G0-G0-OG-016A0 - 4.432 AC. replacetlwM(6) (8)townhouse un [z A ) 2/2sp aces r.., '.' „-. .• .• r- ` // ,/
I S6J AC %ORTIWI ,`; .._Y :• `I \ I _T• T •� i ,^I \
1345J AC. TOTAL Avg itYll zM1all be 60 units wRha maxmum h Avn[ Guests acez5FA,&5FD 20 my tletl on ])ztle orstiz 1 1 1 II 1 I I \� 1 ' / / / /
ZONING. FRD - PLANNED R£SD£NTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED BLACK D 1\ \\ 1\ I \I 11 I I ll
numberof 102 urntz. The density shall ran N IAva lobe Guert Parkn6 Spotz On -street �BDwth FS aI SI[e plan reet /// �/ =t'd \\\i / 0e J86'P�16 MMO
TOPOGRAPHY.' SURVEY&TOPOGRAPHY PRONGED BY ROUDABUSH CALF&ASSOC/ATES between 5 DU/AC and 1.0 DU/AC. Avr AvaiWble Guert Partln M \
1 PROPOSED S B" FARM FENCE ALQNo /
DATUM: NAD SJ SETBACKS FRONT 18' MIN / / / ¥ a{ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ I I I / i 1' i (' 6 4' ROUTE 20 TO PR VIDE ADDITIONAL I
SIDE - 5' M/N Pow£\, I, -� -/ �° .. \ \ \ \ l ' \ \ \ l Q I A / SCREENING FOR THE
SWM FACIUTV
ROODPLAIN: THERE IS NO FLOODPLA/N LOCATED ON THIS SHE. FEMA MAP ID REAR - 10' MIN INTERIOR, 20' MIN WHERE LOTS ARE ADJACENT TO THE " �'\,'r
51G03C040]D & 51003CO426D DATED FEBRUARY 4, 2005. PROJECT BOUNDARY �1RN-AROUND `
I I 1
BE NANDLED BY AN ENLARGED CLUBHWSE/PAWUON - 8' MIN FRONT, 5' M/N SIDE 10
SRJRMWA]£R MGMT. EXISSnNGSTORMWASTORMWAIER ANAGEMENT FAC TY CI R R_Y UNDER RENEW.. _ \A \FE.
ADOIDWAL AWNITY R STORMWATER WILL BE TREATED BY A SECOND SWM SEIBA— WOI PORCHI� EA 425 AND OTHER AR F—T AND RHlTECONRAL�EMENTST OF LOF / I � - \ - - -L. _��-'^ _ t � -- � \ Lam' � / 1 � NEODUgUSAND EVERGNEEA TRFEES
FACILITY AT THE SWTN OF THE SITE. SWIM SHALL MEET ALL STA1£ PO —Er, GCS- a& sIR� - ` ^,- L\_—\ i\ 5�L I I SHALLBE\NSTALL DJ NTH 5 I I I l 1 \ \ \ I I
REGULA BONS REWIRED WITIH THE DEVELOPMENT. THE HOMES SETBACKS SHALL ALSO ALLOW UP TO A 1' SIDE YARD -'- - xa' e p x\ \ / / , \ 1 - t \ \ �� ` V I / /, gREggSBHOWN ADJA�'CTFTM
FIRE &RESCUE AS REQUIRED, ALL flRE FLOWS WIH/N THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE A ENCROACHMENT FOR ARCHI]ECTURAL ELEMENTS AND OL£RHANOS, PRO ND£D _- ' � _—______-- ----- -- —�---- ` f �- �� \� /` C , ` / yTl� r:1A GED CRITICALSL�PES \ Ir/I ' ROUTE fo ENTItANCEC RRIDOR?HE I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \
MINIMUM OF 1000 GPM AT 20 PSL AWITIONALL X. RR£ HYDRANTS SNAU BE THAT THE ENCROACHMENTS ARE FTRE RA)£O PER BUILDING DEPARTMENT (/ C ���{L!ry! / I \
PROWDED ALONG THE STREETS FOR FIRE FIRE PREV£NBON AT A MAXIMUM RFOUIREMENTS WHEN BUILDING SEPARATION /S REDUCED FROM 10'. A WAIVER /I / ` \ \ \\ \\ \ I ; rl) I /
SPACING OF 500 FT PER TRAV£LWAY. IS REQUESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALBLAHARLE COUNTY CODE SECTION / 1 \ \\ \ \ \ \ \
4.11.3 TO PERMIT THE AFOREMENTIONED BUILDING SEPARATIONS PROPOSED _t.. I ` EkI3TING GgpVEL VEWA D
SUMMARY OF LAND USE.' SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED. AND TOWN— UNITS WITH THIS PRO APPLICATION. \ / IM 9 68 \ \ \ pOOE88 FNB1-teB, SHALL BE PERMITTED BY -RIGHT PER ALB£MARLE COUNTY CODE SECTION D.8 402 P. ANd 91-1
IS.— FLEXIBILITY SHALL BE MAINTAINED WIN THIS APPLICATION TO UTILIZE BUILDING HEIGHT. 35' MAXIMUM HEIGHT ' I / I \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 �'
THE CHART OFANY OF F RANGES OF RE OENTIAL UUSESOLOTS IN QV W/S PAGE. ACCORD—
LOTS MARKED PARK/NG EACH PROPOSED LOT SHALL PRO ND£ OFF-STREET PARK/NC FOR TWI / / ` `� I II \ \ \\ \ \ \l II \I \ \\ '\ `\I \� I
W]H A STAR SHALL BE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ONLY. JHE DENSITY OF THE VEHICLLS IN A M/N/MUM 18' DEEP DRIVEWAY AND A CARAGF. ADO/PONALLY, \
DEF/�O SHALLI N NOFEV£NT EXCEED F,T.SMFUFNFI/]5 PER ACRE PFR ALB/EMARLE RORKING ON ONE SIDE �MWAI£ OVERFLOW PARK/NG ON -STREET N1TH I IrI O ND\ WGHTOF WAYSHPL`LETOENDTO
CWN]Y CWE SEGTIW 19.4. PA / ,I THEPROPERII'—VRTNE R A=Q REE
PHASING DIE PROJECT MAY BE COMPLE]£D W1H A MAX/NUM QU 4 PHASES AS SHOWN 71HERCON LIN WITH THE
SITE AMENITIES' CLUBHOUSE/PAWUW AREA (I. "I
SF MIN) W THE APPLICATION PLAN i Q DEVELOPME
DOG PARK (>TOT LOT 40, 000 SFMM/N) STREETS WRB & CUT— PRIVATE STREETS - SEE THIS SHEET FOR SECPONS � D�- .094 � / I J \ \ I I 1 1 I I i r I1 �I r � \ I \ / / / / / �omTunl�Y DevelopmenisEpa�
ACD'/E RECREATION GRASS ji
COURTYARD (161. 00 SF MIN) ��___ I I I / / I I j£I II �II /-/\ / / FIia4` 73(I:QrZDIi 61(s / / I I
UDL/TIE$: SNE SHALL BE SERVED BY PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER 1 , / / / / / I I ! I Ili l 1 / I I / / / / /-Appvved by Me B •tl af3uperWs mom. /
RIGHT-OF-WAY..' 224 ACRES CONSTRUCTION TRAFTTG ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC FOF TH£ DEVELOPMENT OF AWNITY Il SHALL//
£NTERTHE SNE FROM D/E EXISTING DRIVEWAY ATRWIE 20' `_�--/ __�__—/ /` 'lr /rf/er,Ill
OPEN SPACE 1.81 AC OPEN SPACE (AWN/TY /) DENSITY. THIS PHASE (AWNITY ll) BERY£EN 5 DU/AC AND 10 DU/AC, SEE UNIT CHART / _ neT/
3 76 / OPEN SPACE (AA 14NIT ll) _
568 / 22.]I AC TOTAL AWNITY l & l/ - 25.0R LANDSCAPING: ALD PROPOSED ROADWAYS SHALL REQUIREMENTS. A STREET TREES IN ACCORDANCE
LL 7RE� -ALL
LOTS 1 ACRES ROW FNWB/IN AARLE O 10'' 1— TY ANOS'CAPING AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT ANDALL
STREET TREES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE
SCALE DATE REV1510N DESCWMQN
COLLINS ENGINEERING
20U GARNER R STREET, SUE K, CHARLOTTE GUUE, VA 22902 3.18.14 AVINITY II PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (PRD) APPLICATION PLAN N;
TEL434.987.1631 FAX4 Z93.2813
S('I�TTS\/TI I F MA(�TSTFRTAI I�iSTR7['.T Al RFMARI F ('C)IINTV. VT R(-,T NTA SHEET 1 OF rv+v+a
®®e
ATTACHMENT B — STAFF ANALYSIS
STAFF PERSON: Tim Padalino
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: March 7, 2018
Staff analyses of these special exception requests to vary from the approved ZMA Application Plan were conducted
pursuant to the following applicable provisions and evaluation criteria contained in County Code § 18-8.5.5.3:
8 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS - GENERALLY
8.5 PROCEDURES FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
8.5.5.3 VARIATIONS FROM APPROVED PLANS, CODES, AND STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENTS
a. The director of planning is authorized to grant a variation from the following provisions of an approved
plan, code or standard:
1. Minor changes to yard requirements, build -to lines or ranges, maximum structure heights and
minimum lot sizes;
5. Minor changes to street design and street location, subject to a recommendation for approval by
the county engineer;
c. The director of planning is authorized to grant a variation upon a determination that the variation:
(1) is consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan;
(2) does not increase the approved development density or intensity of development;
(3) does not adversely affect the timing and phasing of development of any other development in the
zoning district;
(4) does not require a special use permit; and
(5) is in general accord with the purpose and intent of the approved application.
Staff Analysis — Request #1 for Special Exception to Vary:
Variation request to modem (reduce) the width of the landscaping maintenance and access easement from ten (10) feet
to six (6) feet, pursuant to County Code §18-8.5.5.3 (a) (5).
Evaluation criteria per County Code §18-8.5.5.3(c): JL
(1)
Request does not contradict Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives. The requested width of six (6) feet for
the street tree landscaping easement would still enable the project to accommodate "landscape elements," as
called for in the Neighborhood Model Design Guidance and in accord with the approved "variation of the
planting strip" established with approval of ZMA-2013-00016. The applicant has noted that the requested
width of six (6) feet for the street tree landscaping easement would be consistent with "the typical planting
strip width employed in standard road sections."
Evaluation criteria met.
(2)
The requested Variation would not increase the approved development density or intensity of development.
Evaluation criteria met.
(3)
The requested Variation does not adversely affect the timing or phasing of development of any other
development in the zoning district.
Evaluation criteria met
(4)
The requested Variation does not require a Special Use Permit.
Evaluation criteria met.
(5)
The requested Variation is in general accord with the purpose and intent of the approved application plan,
which shows street trees planted along the private streets in a planting strip outside of the right-of-way.
Evaluation criteria met.
Additional
factors for consideration:
A. The staff report for the approved ZMA-2013-00016 for Avinity Estates recommended a six (6) foot landscape
easement for the street tree landscaping — the same width now being requested by the applicant.
B. The requested Variation would allow for consistency with the approved plans for the adjoining Avinity I
development, which received approval for a planting strip modification during the rezoning process for that
existing (built) project.
C. Please see the application for Variation Request # 1 (Attachment A) for the applicant's description and
justification.
Staff Recommendation — Request #1 for Special Exception to Vary:
With regards to the findings contained herein, inclusive of the criteria to be considered per County Code § 18-8.5.5.3(c),
as well as other additional factors, staff recommends approval of this Variation Request # 1 with conditions.
Specifically, staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment C) to approve with conditions
Variation Request #1 for a special exception to vary the Application Plan approved in conjunction with ZMA 2013-
00016 Avinity Estates so as to modify (reduce) the width of the landscaping maintenance and access easement from ten
(10) feet to six (6) feet, pursuant to County Code § 18-8.5.5.3(a)(5).
Staff Analysis — Request #2 for Special Exception to Vary:
Variation request to modify (reduce) the depth of the front yard setback for portions of structures that are not garages
from eighteen (18) feet to six (6) feet, but still require a minimum setback dimension of eighteen (18) feet between the
sidewalk and all garages, pursuant to County Code §18-8.5.5.3(a)(1).
Evaluation criteria per County Code §18-8.5.5.3(c):
(1)
Request does not contradict Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives. The requested "modified front yard
setback" of six (6) feet would allow for the front porches to be extended closer to the landscaping strip and
sidewalk, while still requiring the garage to be a minimum of eighteen (18) feet from the sidewalk. This
configuration would be consistent with the "Buildings and Spaces of Human Scale" and the "Relegated
Parking" principles of the Neighborhood Model Design Guidance, by:
- bringing a portion of each structure (front porch) closer to the street, and contributing to a sense of (partial)
spatial enclosure along the streetscape;
- establishing a varying spatial rhythm along the streetscape, with front porches closer to the street and the
garages set back farther from the street; and
- relegating the portion of the structure associated with vehicular parking (garage) approximately twelve
(12) feet behind the primary entrance to the structure (front porch).
Additionally, the requested "modified front yard setback" is consistent with the "0-15' Building Setback"
recommendation in the "Recommended Guidelines for Setbacks, Sidewalks, and Urban Streets" (contained in
the Comp Plan Appendix).
Evaluation criteria met
(2)
The requested Variation would not increase the approved development density or intensity of development.
Evaluation criteria met.
(3)
The requested Variation does not adversely affect the timing or phasing of development of any other
development in the zoning district.
Evaluation criteria met
(4)
The requested Variation does not require a Special Use Permit.
Evaluation criteria met.
(5)
The requested Variation would maintain the required minimum distance of eighteen (18) feet between the
sidewalk and garage, so as to ensure adequate space for parking a vehicle outside of the garage without the
vehicle hanging over the sidewalk (as established during the approval of ZMA-2013-00016).
Evaluation criteria met.
Additional factors for consideration:
A. Please see the application for Variation Request #2 (Attachment A) for the applicant's description and
justification.
Staff Recommendation — Request #2 for Special Exception to Vary:
With regards to the findings contained herein, inclusive of the criteria to be considered per County Code § 18-8.5.5.3(c),
as well as other additional factors, staff recommends approval of this Variation Request #2 with conditions.
Specifically, staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment C) to approve with conditions
Variation Request #2 for a special exception to vary the Application Plan approved in conjunction with ZMA 2013-
00016 Avinity Estates so as to modify (reduce) the depth of the front yard setback from eighteen (18) feet to six (6) feet
for portions of structures that are not garages, but still require a minimum setback dimension of eighteen (18) feet
between the sidewalk and garage, pursuant to County Code § 18-8.5.5.3(a)(1).
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS
TO VARY THE APPLICATION PLAN
FOR ZMA 2013-16 AVINITY ESTATES
WHEREAS, the Owner of Tax Map Parcels Number 09100-00-00-01400 (portion),
09100-00-00-016A0, 09100-00-00-016CO3 and 09100-00-00-016EO (the "Property") filed requests for
special exceptions to vary the Application Plan approved in conjunction with ZNIA2013-16 Avinity
Estates to reduce the width of the landscaping maintenance and access easement from ten (10) feet to
six (6) feet and to reduce the depth of the front yard setback between the sidewalks and dwelling units
from eighteen (18) feet to six (6) feet.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, upon consideration of the foregoing, the
Memorandum prepared in conjunction with the special exception requests and the attachments
thereto, including staff s supporting analysis, and all of the factors relevant to the special exceptions
in Albemarle County Code §§ 18-8.5.5.3, 18-33.5, and 18-33.9, the Albemarle County Board of
Supervisors hereby approves the special exceptions to vary the Application Plan approved in
conjunction with ZMA2013-16 Avinity Estates as described above, subject to the condition(s)
attached hereto.
I, Claudette K. Borgersen, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a
Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, by a vote of
to , as recorded below, at a regular meeting held on
Ave Nay
Mr. Dill
Mr. Gallaway
Ms. Mallek
Ms. McKeel
Ms. Palmer
Mr. Randolph
Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
ZMA 2013-16 Avinity Estates — Special Exception Conditions
1. A modified front yard setback of six (6) feet may be applied to portions of dwelling units that are not
garages; but shall not be applied in any way which results in any garage being set back less than
eighteen (18) feet from the sidewalk in order to ensure that vehicles parked in the driveway and in
front of the garage do not obstruct the sidewalk.
2. A modified front yard setback of six (6) feet shall not include any encroachment, other than a one (1)
foot maximum encroachment for roof overhangs, in order to maintain sufficient space for the
required landscaping materials to be located within the six (6) foot landscaping easement. The
existing four (4) foot encroachment of all rear setbacks and one (1) foot encroachment of side yard
setbacks specified on the approved ZMA-2013-00016 application plan shall remain in effect.
3. The width of the landscaping maintenance and access easement shall be no less than six (6) feet.