HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201700102 Approval - County 2018-03-12COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
Project title:
Project file number:
Plan preparer:
Owner or rep.:
Plan received date:
(Rev. 1)
(Rev. 2)
(Rev. 3)
Date of comments:
(Rev. 1)
(Rev. 2)
(Rev. 3)
Reviewers:
Road and Drainage Plan Review
Hyland Park
SUB -2017-00102
Collins Engineering [scott@collins-engineering.com]
Hyland Park LLC
30 June 2017
6 October 2017
12 December 2018
15 February 2018
24 August 2017
9 November 2017
9 February 2018
12 March 2018
Matt Wentland
Scott,
We have reviewed the plans and they have been approved. Please provide an additional hard
copy to be stamped by the County and sent to VDOT.
Engineering
1. Easements will be needed on sidewalks and trails that are outside of the VDOT ROW.
(Rev. 1) Comment addressed.
2. An easement will be needed on Lot 26 for pipe 37. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed.
3. I recommend getting a determination from Fire Rescue on the cul-de-sac radius (VDOT
comment 4) prior to resubmitting the plans. (Rev. 1) Comment addressed.
4. Any changes in the grading resulting from the review of these plans will need to be
reflected on the Final Grading Plan when it is resubmitted. Preserved slopes should also
be verified at that time. (Rev. 1) Comment not addressed. The County Engineer has
determined that certification from a surveyor will be required when preserved
slopes in the GIS overlay are shown to be less than 25% (this will apply to future
plans as well). Please contact Frank Pohl if further guidance is needed. (Rev. 2)
Comment partially addressed. On Exhibit 3 of 3, the downhill slope next to the
existing trail is shown as steeper than 25 % and will have to remain as a Preserved
Slope. The shading should be revised on the exhibit and we'd also like the extents of
the slopes shown on the exhibits (using the current view, you don't need to show the
slopes outside of those areas). It looks like this will also require the grading on the
VSMP plan and the road plans to be updated. (Rev. 3) Comment addressed.
Rev.1 Comments
5. Provide the Deed Book and page for the existing easements (on-site and off-site). (Rev. 2)
Comment addressed.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 2
ACSA, VDOT, Fire Rescue and GIS/E911 have no objections. Planning has no objections, but has the
following comment:
"No objection to the road plan as depicted; however, Lot 1 has a portion of the SWM access road across it.
An easement shall be granted for this access prior to or with the final plat. It would be preferable to remove
that portion of land from the lot to avoid issue."
File: SUB201700102 Hyland Park Review Comments Rev3 03-12-18.doc