HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201700066 Request of Modification, Variance, Waiver 2018-03-07COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
To: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
From: Tim Padalino, AICP
Date: March 7, 2018
Re: Request # 1 for Special Exception to Vary the application plan approved in conjunction with ZMA
2013-00016 Avinity Estates regarding "Street Design — Landscaping Easement"
and
Request #2 for Special Exception to Vary the application plan approved in conjunction with ZMA
2013-00016 Avinity Estates regarding "Yard Requirements — Front Yard Setbacks"
Tax Map Parcel(s): 09100000001400 (portion), 091000000016A0, 091000000016CO3 and
091000000016E0
Magisterial District: Scottsville Magisterial District
School Districts: Monticello H.S.; Walton M.S.; Cale E. S.
Zoning District: PRD Planned Residential Development
Summary of Requests for Variations:
The subject properties for the "Avinity Estates" development are zoned PRD Planned Residential Development,
per approved ZMA-2013-00016. Special exceptions to vary from the provisions contained on the approved ZMA
application plan for properties in the PRD district may be granted by the Board of Supervisors, pursuant to County
Code §§ 18-8.5.5.3 and 18-33.5.
The applicant (Mr. Scott Collins, P.E., Collins Engineering) has requested two special exceptions to vary the
application plan approved in conjunction with ZMA-2013-00016 Avinity Estates:
1. Variation request to modify (reduce) the width of the landscaping maintenance and access easement from ten
(10) feet to six (6) feet, pursuant to County Code § 18-8.5.5.3(a)(5); and
2. Variation request to modify (reduce) the depth of the front yard setback for portions of structures that are not
garages from eighteen (18) feet to six (6) feet, but still require a minimum setback dimension of eighteen (18)
feet between the sidewalk and all garages, pursuant to County Code § 18-8.5.5.3(a)(1).
Please see Attachment B for full details of staff's analysis.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment C) to approve the two special
exceptions.
Attachments:
A — Application Materials (Applications for Special Exceptions and approved ZMA Application Plan)
B — Staff Analysis
C — Resolution
J
•lMWA\M:
APPLICATION FOR VARIATION FROM APPROVED PLANS,
CODES & STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENT
What type of change is requested?
V Variation to the Application Plan FEaU5%_ it L
❑ Variation to the Code or Standard of Development
Fee= $425
Project Name: Avinity Estates
Name of Planned District: PRD - Planned Residential Development
Tax map and parcel: 91-16C, 91-16E, 91-16A, and 91-14
ZMA Number(s) ZMA2013-00016
Contact Person Scott Collins - Collins Engineering
Address 200 Garrett Street, Suite K City Charlottesville
Daytime Phone# ( 434 ) 293-3719 Fax# (
State VA
Zip 22902
Email scoff@collins-engineering.com
Specify the provision of the plan, code or standard for which the variation is sought, and state the reason for the
requested variation. The request may be rejected if it fails to include the required information.
Provide a copy of the existing plan (may be a reduced copy) illustrating the area for which the change is requested.
Provide a graphic representation of the requested change.
Submitted in conjunction with the Avinity Estates Initial site plan 1/22/2018
Describe the variation being sought (Attach separate sheet(s) as needed):
A VARIATION IS BEING SOUGHT FOR THE LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS EASEMENT. A 10' EASEMENT WAS ESTABLISHED DURING THE
REZONING REQUEST TO PROVIDE ROOM FOR STREET TREES OUTSIDE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIATION OF THIS
LANDSCAPING AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT DOWN FROM 10' TO A TOTAL OF 6'(5- OUTSIDE OF THE ROW, 1' FROM THE BACK OF CURB TO THE
ROW), PER THE TYPICAL PLANTING STRIP WIDTH EMPLOYED IN STANDAR ROAD SECTIONS.
What is the reason for each of the requested variations?:
1. THE REDUCED LANDSCAPING EASEMENT WILL PROVIDE THE SAME FUNCTION AT 10' WIDTH AS IT DOES WHEN REDUCED TO 6' WIDTH. THE
ADDITIONAL EASEMENT WIDTH IS NOT NECESSARY FRO THE STREET TREES TO BE INSTALLED ALONG THE ROAD SECTION.
2. ALLOWING A REDUCTION IN THE LANDSCAPING EASEMENT WIDTH WILL ALLOW THE PARKING BUMP OUTS TO REMAIN, AS THEY WOULD
CONFLICT WITH THE FRONT OF THE UNITS IF OFFSET 10' FROM THE BACK OF THE BUMPED OUT SIDEWALK AND CREATE CONFLICTS WITH THE
FRONT PORCHES, WHICH ARE REQUIRED BY THE REZONING TO PROTRUDE 3' IN FRONT OF THE GARAGES.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Fee Amount $ L� Date Paid /
By who? Receipt # q— ,z--- Ck# Jv By. F 121 4 , J �'� ft_� (�n (I - —f
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296-5832 Fax: (434) 972-4126
Revised 02/10/2015
41ilk, IILA012W!\W•
APPLICATION FOR VARIATION FROM APPROVED PLANS,
CODES, & STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENT
In accordance with § 8.5.5.3 c) of the Zoning Ordinance, the following 5 criteria must be met before a
recommendation for a variation may be considered by the Board of Supervisors. Please provide information about
these criteria for consideration (Attach separate sheet(s) as needed).
1. Is the variation consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan?
2. Does the variation increase the approved development density or intensity of development?
3. Does the variation adversely affect the timing and phasing of development of any other development in the
zoning district?
4. Does the variation require a special use permit?
5. Is the variation in general accord with the purpose and intent of the approved rezoning application?
§ 8.5.5.3 VARIATIONS FROM APPROVED PLANS, CODES, AND STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENTS
A site plan or subdivision plat for a planned development may be varied from an approved application plan,
standard of development and, also, in the case of a neighborhood model district, a code of development, as
provided herein:
The following provisions of an approved plan, code or standard may be varied:
1. Minor changes to yard requirements, build -to lines or ranges, maximum structure heights and minimum lot
sizes;
2. Changes to the arrangement of buildings and uses shown on the plan, provided that the major elements shown
on the plan and their relationships remain the same;
3. Changes to phasing plans;
4. Minor changes to landscape or architectural standards;
5. Minor changes to street design and street location, subject to a recommendation for approval by the county
engineer; and
6. Minor changes to the design and location of stormwater management facilities, minor land disturbance,
including disturbance within conservation areas, and mitigation, all subject to a recommendation for approval
by the county engineer.
An updated application plan and, in the case of changes to a code of development, a complete amended code of
development, reflecting the approved variation and the date of the variation may be required. If an updated
application plan or code of development is required, the granting of the variation shall be conditional upon the
applicant providing the plan or code within thirty (30) days after approval of the variation and a determination by
the director that the plan or code were revised to correctly reflect the granted variation.
Revised 02/10/2015
Revised 02/10/2015
WIIIk`kAVA91W!\0:
APPLICATION FOR VARIATION FROM APPROVED PLANS,
CODES, & STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENT
In accordance with § 8.5.5.3 c) of the Zoning Ordinance, the following 5 criteria must be met before a
recommendation for a variation may be considered by the Board of Supervisors. Please provide information about
these criteria for consideration (Attach separate sheet(s) as needed).
1. Is the variation consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan?
Yes, it helps pull the units eloser to the streets, while still ensuring an 18'driveway in front of the garages.
2. Does the variation increase the approved development density or intensity of development?
No, there is no proposed inciease in the overail intensity or density '-Ir the ddevelopinei it.
3. Does the variation adversely affect the timing and phasing of development of any other development in the
zoning district?
4. Does the variation require a special use permit?
5. Is the variation in general accord with the purpose and intent of the approved rezoning application?
§ 8.5.5.3 VARIATIONS FROM APPROVED PLANS, CODES, AND STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENTS
A site plan or subdivision plat for a planned development may be varied from an approved application plan,
standard of development and, also, in the case of a neighborhood model district, a code of development, as
provided herein:
The following provisions of an approved plan, code or standard may be varied:
1. Minor changes to yard requirements, build -to lines or ranges, maximum structure heights and minimum lot
sizes;
2. Changes to the arrangement of buildings and uses shown on the plan, provided that the major elements shown
on the plan and their relationships remain the same;
3. Changes to phasing plans;
4. Minor changes to landscape or architectural standards;
5. Minor changes to street design and street location, subject to a recommendation for approval by the county
engineer; and
6. Minor changes to the design and location of stormwater management facilities, minor land disturbance
including disturbance within conservation areas, and mitigation, all subject to a recommendation for approval
by the county engineer.
An updated application plan and, in the case of changes to a code of development, a complete amended code of
development,.reflecting the approved variation and the date of the variation may be required. If an updated
application plan oftode of development is required, the granting of the variation shall be conditional upon the
applicant providing'the plan or code within thirty (30) days after approval of the variation and a determination by
the director that the plan or code were revised to correctly reflect the granted variation.
Revised 02/10/2015
\\ I 0
T '
\W6TNGLEy
ieR',',»R PAPER
�
f. AND aoo'�LEEFFTT TjURN STPA ,E ,TIE------�
/
a
\IIII 5
1111 I_ i
I.
I. ST�GSgq99�IGHTTI�RN TAP�R /Lj �� \I
ANP sTrf WGHTTUR E I t o \\\ \
I yi
ED PAR
IIII
t AREA FCICAISATDNIO \
(6)PERNONGS
INdA-J5L PARALLEL
�I I
SPACE �•�.
P
\ I
\., \ �j. £
/�__–+--Lsv(rvrvoT1t HOMIZF£oiTnEP gEVKIU81
�I
6AI If
4.
wTYP/C L PR/VATJ' STS SECT/ON uxc aErrvovu
2
KiAOTr �Avl Ar srVONLY �P F r( unpw.THI9
�j PRO✓SC('
___ STAN ARDS TO ALLOW A BE D DRDANDE W H DALDARKING COUNTYSTANDARDSFTHE FIRE AND RESOD
AOEQUATEI WI TH TRAVELWAY AND ON SMEO
_' _-_-_-='�RBPOSED TRAFFlC fN.MI IFRE DIiUMP9
_iT1a'ICAL)TOBFNSTALLE61F REOUEBTEp.BY/ / \ \ \ D
\ / AViNFGYBOA'16ALCOBDAN-EIENH
S1�P124FFFRFE98AYINLTYftH__g.1�Fli.
WGM OF AYSWILL 'OTO // / ' \ _ y INITYMAP
/� 90PERIV COR 9•XRR:B VICINITY I ■ 000'
RGgJNEgwNH,cAI.E,_� SCALE: 1" = 2000'
/ // Yr" /�--- i�iiElblEJiTAR118CH6041f\OESIr"' \ /\ `\ / w*
i� / - i / I \ \ / — NOTES:
I 6 _ �'/ / / / / / / l I \ 9YPJCAL PA'/VATA' ST.R6ET SACH/OA' 1. ALL STREETS SHOWN ON THIS APPLICATION PLAN SHALL
BE PRIVATE STREETS.
I / / / \ / 2. THE EXISTING YEPCO OVERHEAD POWER LINE SHALL BE
STI /SB POIN i l l I 1 / / l l/ \
q0 / -� ''UT RELOCATED UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD THROUGH THE
�dpp9gEORE20NING / / / PROPERTY.
/ - I ✓ I _ / /W /N NNECTIOI�TF(TTNIN�TYI\ EIjISTING- _ / / / / / / / _ -_ / / / / J. DE ON. DRIVEWAYS WILL TIE INTO THE NEW ROAD
x /
' , • / / 14 am // i / /// / WATERLINE /
•\� /' / / 4. THE PROPOSED RECREATIONAL AMENITIES SHALL INCLUDE
/ / / / A TOT LOT LOCATED IN THE AREA GRAPHICALLY DEPICTED
DPOS\�Ae8NEERE RE�AFORACEVETIDNFAORRIES / / / // // / / — — — J / / / / / / / OTHE REA. THE PASSIVENPLAN IN THE ACI'VE RECREATON AREAS SHA RECREATIONAL
BENCH
ST GSANNARY / / / D PICNIC TABLES THROUGHOUT THE OPEN
/ ES AN
SEW R SPACE AREA, ANDA DOG PARK. TRAILS AND OTHER
ExIRECREATIONAL AMENITIES SUCH AS FIELDS, A SECOND
AIN M / / AREA
' -/ r * € . / /'; ' sew }•s �/ - ToR MASS CLUBHOUSE. AND PAVdIES ARE PLANNED FOR THIS
m /
/ L IMP1.� \ AS WELL FINAL AMENITIES NITHIN THE ACTIVE AND
iI� i�'. \ I 1 / % I rwl /�/ -_ II gPovq •'S• / (' • \ I "/' • L T �/ PASSIVE RECREATION AREAS SHALL BE DETERMINED AND
J SHOWN S IH THE FINAL SITE PLAN.
I y bcr T({ 0"Y 168 PIAT
D.B. 618 P.
_ — — I — �_
� � \ \ a l Lm " I-� .•- � � _ � — NOTE: EXISTING GRAVEL ORrvEWA 5. ALL LOTS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT
I \ \ \ \ II / g r - I • , '[' RES:REATIONAL,' ' - FORAGED TOAPAVEO2T EMERGENCY \ BOUNDARY ADJACENT TO ZONED RESIDENTIAL LAND SHALL
* l _ ,l I l o I H j • \\_ 1... 4 -, ` � µy, F,. ..ecce _,_T�_ _ _ 1 AECESS ROADWAY. EX—NGGMVEL — HAVE A 20• REAR SETBACK. AND ALL INTERIOR LOTS TO
DWVEWAYSNALL BEUTIUZEDASA THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL HAVE A 10' REAR SETBACK.
\`\"� CONSTRUCTIONF�NTtANCE FORTHE 6. ALL STREETS EXCEPT ROAD D (NO PARKING) SHALL HAVE
GRAS}�\ \'\ \ / / w i��3�. \\llll�ll ' I' �•- — - — E PMENT OF THEAVINITY II SECTION. PARKING ON ONE SIDE ONLY.
_ - s' x� _ \ T. AVINITY II DEVELOPMENT WILL BE ADDED TO THE AVINITY I
F. /�^/ i DEV LO
\I\ w\\ I fi�F \\ \-.. SPG - _ _ - -- \ THE AMENTIES.HOA TO UOPEN SH NSPACOMPLETE
E PAND MAINTENANCE
G ALL
P' I I V1 VIII 11111 ,T7: -�� •- ,• '`,>, .�v _ \ RESPONSIBILITIES.
! \ \ / N/i AKW'NpR6wFR \ I III III III AVINITY I BLOC !•' I •.. - '"' 91 T6G _ ESE PORTIONS OF BLOCK D WI E
D 1991 R 2 \ w III, 111 11 l\ - \ PROPOSED i - -- ,'Jlp SyTI�N 1[G \ / — \ REQUIRED TO BE
/1, a g1y�(4�� _ — — \
SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED OR SINGE FAMILY DETACHED UNITS.
EX SWM FACILITY " } _ — — THESE LOTS WILL NOT BE DEVELOPED AS TOWNHOUSE UNITS.
\ \ \��\� - - _ i \•' .+ i /F;µ�•�1 �. \ IN LIEU OF - i l I I FOR AV INITY I TO BE ENLARGED TO :.µ .'. _ AC'RVE - — +SLOP,.'—TNN EJ(ISTING MANAGED
:, �`Yl! �\ 4 '�\`.� �° -�.toCr ."R.�\-n 11 J®ww \ \ I I •I -I I 1 i I "I`Y'LC _ �I,�,II'1lI/jyI 1 I^I�aIIIH{IIl I 11111\1I1\/11r '_ \\ \ '\ CA\S\A_RrRO// �TOM_BEL NT/ ,,-,...,, . -,s -'7" "/'_ - I, �I1r �l(' lI/II I I ::'.II ,,-. sve aC. i :,-:..'., MMWO.. AD._: TA.sET. RE THY. E=• ;:. ^' –/ 'R, EC..=RAERAETAIONAL "-, w ,I-, l'\\'�.- \ E`w_\ -Sny �MAsNcAC6OEOKOICa.LLaPREPppR1I2CD\gg59A1c LNIXSPF(F.LSpO��lMryIPE6PERS�SNl(ttNGP—J PRLOOPPEOSSIENDTTHOISARABFDCTHISSI2ETOACCOM
AVINIfYIISTOR
MANAGEMENTAOFEANCEESWIPTEs�VPPRODTOCA
—
,
1 /
/
O
ORDANW(ITHMMUM -
V
� I
GHr ofB AFTTERIN F_
• \ _ - - 0°� �� �� I ` \ \ ,+, `Y. 1 //,. ,p 1 .\ �D R'S50 P. 608 PUT HE ') NGAT 3:1
_ •--� c \�'-� L , l // ''� L�, " p' TP�' - _ � � — 8LOPEAREAS TTERWRLBMIAGEN
\ •<._, miIRED SP,L I§ `� ^* ,F �, : `_-— 9 ESE AREA3 WHERE THE MANpOED \J
' - «jc-•-II�_i \ _ �` ,... - .>_ ' i I.'/ A�f�.\S �,Ay+V "X' y�o. A1ICA FORACTNE\ LO � T \ I I \/ •' tl /
• \ _ � - \ - i F\ � �` L .T � �•• � { �� � R 1 P*- {' \HEACgEATio bFNACiLR1�E8D..Aool E AGTrvE
\'° rv\ �\ \ \ \ \\ �\ \ \ \\'\ ' / t`'* 'k'M 6""e'•{?f. s'"' ...,\MOTE. OPOSEDEMERGENCYACCEI _ `
"De - 8E I 1 / \ \ / / / / UTIIZE EXISTING ENTRANCE
TRNN ALCFSSTOAMEN TIER —'-- /
•.'Yi'II £ / / j mRi )TOBE NstALLEDWREDuesreoer y �/I J 1 – _ _ –\\ \ / ,/ _ „x BICY EDB D-T4BE.—EN. _—__ __ 1 / / / oM scoTrsWLLE Rodd
III I I_ ; •I , , N ACfDR CE WITH \ ANar}NGpA EMENT DE MEETS THE • -----1J \ I
\ \ \ O 8 R R THE EXISTING ANO \
P1 I 1 / STING ACCES POI /
/Ll 7`\ \\ \ ; gp� I 1 ' i / v: nPRDPOS B�ocKw
PROPO D FIC 1NA1 UMPs R'Tj�1� / 11 \ 1 '� i' SECTION / / / i
A 3 FI I ( c 1 \ \ SGL O NST LEDI FREC�UESTED BY '""'�'} J / I I / `, \\EN=-
T.
\ \ \ B ,ORIF I 1i- l / \ /, % / DB WOW
\I T I I I \ \\ \ \ THEAV O I Nf C bR ELOP W4 P. i /MOUNT L I D I / \
EY g.5561P. d101 / / �� `IIII /` t�IRA�F III NSALLEOS FRO
\ QFPROFFE kORA N III EVI ft1ENT J I P // / 'pN ( \ 1 I �% 'PREF OTB ALONp THE I / I ` \ //' • i / /
ffiI
\\\\ ! Q' OINN J' 1 1 I I 1\ \I \\ \I I ii `/ _ =t `_ 1 I -LINE OF TH 5�FPROM THE PROP I3TV. E / l ' ' /
7 OfRAFFIC RO�UNP wBOUTN(ITHVIB NELIrrnTIQ/F1 I EE /
_ I ODNERTO OWNDIRAFFIC 1 \ / _ f.
FL W ¢ROUUGGHTHdAVIN ID LQrPM NTI \\ I \ 1 I I I1 \ - 4- III AND'TIHE-PROPERIY LINE. RB
\\\� EXISTING INTE CONNEQTION \ // 1 //' / / / —_1 F US AND EVER TREES
- IIS Iy
ryry\VV /ACGESE POINT / / 1 /� / € -T�-TI I \\\ DU7 IEEETROPERTV b
/vP.7 '/ / S
No i
HLL STREETS ON (THIS PLAN SHALL BE OPEN FO,R PUBLIC USE. I I / I
2, ARAGESI SHALL MEET THE RELEGATED PARKING REQUIREMENTS I / N/FH AU!/C SMJU IUY�JO/ / ,/ O I/GNES / PROPassD REROUni80oFI
GARAGES SHALL`rgE SET BACK FROM THE FACET OF THE BUI1 DiMGSIOfE / I D.a / <: D.(I`5lae P. 2 I _ '\ ExIeTING OVERHBAD LEDTR ywE \ I I I J I d/ /' / �.✓ ' / / /
I I I �-•__—__—__—__ - - - I _ - SET -THS RELEGATE6,Pii,9IN� / / / 1 II I I I
Eu
ORCHE$I A 11111UMOFEET TO
� RFLNEN111 /'/
ALTEREDIFINArI FROMATIHE LOCJ>, IONS StLOWN-OITTFIE PLN
ANDTIF THEr AVINITO HOA.LL BE APPS LVED BY, 'BOTI{ ALBI"11LE\COUNTS'
DEM SHED \ BLoe B
No THE DMOLITIO OF THE (TY\
MMpp''- \ 1 N\\ SCOiiTTS5 AO GS LL d / 1 /
C� R cTt}u1ENEs. / --S 1 \
GENERAL NOTES I I I I I \ I \\ sraliCT'IELPERit'ij11hL1 DPD'PHOTOGRAPHs. \ \ INP 93587/
OWNERS MO55 ACWISTIONS UGHES IDA WALLACE @ I \ I \D oTMENTpTON 8}HALL INCLiJ IDES OF EACH N�gpU�
H
121 £ MA/N ST f0] CULPEPER ROAD I i T 85 ONnNG AL
\ \D .839
CHARLOT/£SWLLE, VA 22902 R/CHMONO, VA 23229 ( \ I \ F OORPIlgqNIJ TNEXT E S / I IS
'A pry II ftaPaesi:R i U s \ 1 ENTFVING
-TE"IB OCIyTIONBFSHO 8f� / IXTNG DHE/
AVON PROPERTIES, LLC Block pt[aSivclTeltl/Detalchetl I I BUBMITED p B
P.O. BOX 1461 TownMme yy1lLLONARL n,
ARLOTHESNLLE, VA 22902 Im mmax) i aOMMUNITV DEVELPMENT
RIORT
Nf OTH
DEVELOPER: RIV£RBEND DEVELOPMENT, INC. m n max I 1 _
A
321 E MAIN S. SUl )E 201 Avinit 6 8 , pF THEB RUCN�i S. L 00 1 ROOF ICY / NOjO SyORMWATER MAMA EC Ery /
CHARLOTIESNLLE, VA 22902AEG0-20 G -S1 E E Vy //,)
B o-30 0-15 / / I bROEERTY LINEFOHRAPOs81 // /r ,€'"' 61E41101® P 1 ') _ - _ - // OMMfR'I IN 'CEI I I
ENGINEER: C011INS ENG/NEER/NG / / INTERCONNECTSqN WITH THE FLLTURE sal YSYt ,I E%ISTNGC
200 GARRETT ST, SANE K C 0-30 0.15 I —FSTj",S 1{11911 I1 ' / ' • mN
CNARLOTIESVILLE VA 22902 D 0-39 ]2-'2 AAUU IM
TOTAL 0-122 / // V�PAIEFHI]F i ' TOKAPPASIGME%OPE ' I /
TAX MAP NO.: 09100-00-00-016C0 09)00-00-00-016£0
// / � / RARCyC-TO-TNE
ZONE R-1 RES/DENTJAL ZONE. R-1 RESIDENTIAL 1)WitNn Avn H1, a24unit—d1bWldllMis / / / / / / I I 1I , \ \ \
OB 4319 PG 24] OB 599 PG 239 / l o / / j ' /�: � \ S .,.PROPOSED
proposetl to be ellminatetl antl nits place,a ! PROPOSED '/' HEAD
09100-00-00-0 /6A0 09100 Co -CO -01-
-1
0 00 01400R -J RESIDENTIAL ZONE.' PFO PLANNED RES DEV maximum of (8)tOwnhouse un is are proposed -
/ �- FACILITY X -. p ERLINE
I
OB 396 PG 116 OB 34]2 PG 015 2) The overall tlemrylnumber of unitz)for / / / _ �e", c' ¥F -� *) �xs£ j/j� \ {' 7 \ \ \ 4 1 AVFOR II
TOTAL PROJECT AREA: - AvinitYl sM1all tlecrease from 124 un is to 106-108/ \ 3�-3n Nku ¥,,,f+/ i' y..'€ " €
0 9100-00-0 0-016C0 - 2.4]2 AC. uN[sw Mtheapprovalofthlsrezomng The _ YH' ( �> p ¥ ( .r ¥ ,=> F y1 €, 6F
0 9100-00-0 0-016£0 4.962 AC Original proposedeondominlumbuItlmgsM1IIb �arbi
091GO-GO-OG-OI6AO - K. 2 AC. replacetlwMlb) (8) townhouse un [z A ) 2T2 sp aces ..., - €r, „ .. .. •- "" '' 2 // ,/
09 /00-00-00-01400 IS45JSAC. TOTAL �O�J 3)The ProPosetl mmlmum number Ofunits h nt Park ng T A,&SPD
Avinity 11 sM1all be 60 units wRha maze— A Guests acesSF
ZON/NG: PRD - PLANNED R£SlO£NTAL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED abe Guert
numberof 102 urn[z. The denslry shall ran N Mng Spotz Onst -NU(iHEM� \ 1 I , / }/F "�" // / I I I
TOPOGRAPHY.' SURVEY h TOPOGRAPHY PRONGED BY ROUDABUSH GALE &ASSOCIATES between 5 DU/AC aM 30 DU/AC. Avr AvaiWble Guert Partln w th Fina15 to Plan / I \ / // 0.9 196 P. 1161 I 1 \ 1 \\ \ \\ \\ , I I // ( g / / , /Y M1' I,
ntyl M TBD \\ /yam \\
DATUM: NAO SJ SETBACKS FRONT 1B'MIN ' ¥ a{ h'0 PROPOSEO3B8MDFARM FENCE ALQINO
1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I 1 I A SCREENING FOarI AEDITICNAi
SIDE - 5' MIN TeMFKTRARY I. / 1 `L°. 1 \ i i l \ \ \ l • I / l
FLOODPLAIN: THERE IS NO FLOODPLAIN LOCATED ON THIS SHE FEMA MAP ID REAR - 10' MIN INTERIOR, 20' MIN WHERE LOTS ARE ADJACENT TO SHE " _.- , (y, �'\ \ \ ge \ \ \ \ \ I \
51G03C040]D B: 51CO3CO426D DATED FEBRUARY 4, 2005. PROJECT BOUNDARY TORN -AROUND `
SRTRMWA]£R MGMT.� STORMWAIER FOR ANNITY l AND 11 HILL BE HANDLED BY AN ENLARGED CLUBHWSE/PANUON - 8' MIN FRONT, 5' MIN SDS 10 MIN \\ I I I (
EXISTING STORMWAIFR MANAGEMENT FACILITY CURRENRY UNDER RENEW.: �(\ Lam" R v - /)\ rl i NO\.AP EDMORU\ OF
ADOIDWAL AVINITY /l STORMWATER WILL BE TREA IED BY A SECOND SWM SETBACKS SHALL INCLUDE A 4' FRONT AND REAR ENCROACHMENT OF ALL "-'_ ROPOS
FACILITY AT SHE SWTN OF THE S]E. SWIM SHALL MEET ALL STA)E SETBACKS MTFI PORCHES, EAV£5, AND OTHER ARCHIT£CNRAL ELEMENTS OF =-, / GCS- - - r `-
_ M � { yam£ qq FF.. I i
n c .: •. ,\.\ \ -F� \ / / Ill I, SHALOLBE\iS L pRGREN NSE8 I I I \ \ I
v
REGULABONS REWIRED MTIH THE OEV£LOPM£NT, THE HOMES SETBACKS SHALL ALSO ALLOW UP TO A 1' SIDE YARD : ,,.:; - EX. ROW ' `` , L\ =\ y T AWE'TgTT�
'\-'s' / / r 1 ` V gREggSBHOWNADJACEM TO THE I \ I
FIR£ dr RESCUE AS MINIMUMUIOF 1ALL 0-000 GPM AT 20 PSIm/AWIRONALLYXLE �FIR£ HYDRANTS SHAU BE THAT TN£NEN£CROACHMENTSI ARE/FTRE RAR➢RAL EN PER BUILOINGHDEP RTMENTD� -RS— ------ -� f \� \ T '^ ' ` / STFY MA GED CRITICALSL�PESj/\ lr /1 ' ROUTE fo ENTRANCE C RRIDOR. I II I I \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \
PROWDED ALONG 1HE STREETS FOR FIRE FORE PREVENTION AT A MAXIMUM REQUIREMENTS WHEN BU/LO/NG SEPARATION /5 REDUCED FROM 10'. A WAITER / I \ \
SPACING OF 5W FT PER TRAV£LWAY. IS REQUESTED IN ACCORDANCE MJH ALBLAHARLE COUNTY COLE SECTION / / I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \
4.11.3 To PERMIT THE AFOREMENTIONED BUILDING SEPARATIONS PROPOSED -y.. I ` '�' EkI3TING GgpVEL pR VEWA D
SUMMARY OF LAND USE.' SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED. AND TOWN'H UNITS WITH THIS PRO APPUCA RON. / i \ \ / 1A1 9 68 \ \ pO0E88 PPRC `W-56 F. 911-t\eB,
SHALL
BE PERM/TOED BY -RIGHT PER ALB£MARLE COUNTY CODE SECTION D.B�402 P.JB9
19.31. FLEXIBILITY SHALL BE MAINTAINED MM THIS APPLICATION TO UTILIZE BUILDING J E fE.� 35' MAXIMUM HEIGHT ' I /
LOTS IN
THE CHART OFF RANGES OF RESOENDAL UUSESOQV W/5 PAGE. ANY OF ACCORD—
LOTS MARKED PARK/NG- EACN PROPOSED LOT SHALL PRONG£ OFF-S—T PARK/NC
MIH A STAR SHALL BE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ONLY. TIHE DENSITY OF TH£ VEHICLLS IN A M/N/MUM 18' DEEP DRIVEWAY AND A CARAGF. ADO/PONALL Y,
OEF/�O SHAUN NOENT SNA BE NT EXCEED F, T.SMFUFNFIIT5 ER ACRE PFR ALB/ENABLE ROADWAYS
ON ONE SIDE gVMWAT£ OVERFLOW PARK/NG ON M7H ND E R�GNT OF WAY 8HPL`L EXTEND TO
CWNTY CWE SECTION 19.4. PA I THE PROPERTI' LINE FOR A POSSTURE I I I I \ \ \ I I 11 \1 I 11 II ' 1 �
PHASING THE PROJECT MAY BE COMPLETED MTH A MAX/NUM OF 4 PHASES AS SHOWN / ,I ` IMERCON KWi WITH THE TUBE I \ I I I I \ 1 J !
SIT£ AMENITIES CLUBHOUSE/PAHUW AREA (1,000 SF MIA) W WE APPLICATION PLAN I Q DEVELOPME I I I \ 1 I I I IISCUTR
A I11/!TOT LOT
(1
DOG PARK 40,000 SFMM/N) STREETS: 1, WT1ER PRIVATE SMEETS - SEE IH/5 SHF£T FOR SECTIONS
ACTIVE RECREATION GRA55 COURTYARD (1(6.-
1.. 00 SF MIN) / j£I III �II /-/\ / / FIIeA 73(I:QrZDIi 61(s / / I I
UTILITIES 5/1£ SHALL B£ SERVED BY PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER 1 , / / / / / I I 1 i / I I / / / / / -AppF6 ad by Me B •tl a pe mom. /
RIGHT-OF-WAY..' 224 ACRES CONSTRUCTION TRAFTTG ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC i- THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANNITY 11 SNALL / / I / // I 1 SPA6
ENTER THE SNE FROM TI/E EXISTING --YUIE20' ///`
OPEN CE 1.81 AC OPEN SPACE (A (ANN/TY /) DENSITY. TI1/5 PHASE (-TY BERY£EN 5 DU/ACACAND
10 10 DDU/AC, SEE UNIT CHART
3
16 OPEN SPACE (AA.11 ll) _
S69 / / 22.]1 AC TOTAL ANNNY l & l/ - 25.0R LANDSCAPING ALL PROPOSED ROADWAYS SHALL HAVE STREET TREES IN ACCORDANCEALD
IREMENTS. ALL 7RE� -ALL
LOTS S3] ACRES ROW FNMTI/IN AARLE O 10'' WIDETY QLANOSCAPING AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT AND ALL /� \ —"—
STREET ]BEES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY
SCALE DATE RMS10N DESCRIPRON
COLLINS ENGINEERING 1"=50'
200 GARNER STREET, SURE K, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 229D2 3.18.14 AVINITY II PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (PRD) APPLICATION PLAN N;
TEL434.987.1631 -Z93.2813
S('(,TTS\/TI I F MA1111FR1[AI fSTSTR7['.T Al RFMARI F ('CTIINTV. VT R( -,T NTA SHEET 1 OF 1 sW+LT4
ATTACHMENT B — STAFF ANALYSIS
STAFF PERSON: Tim Padalino
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: March 7, 2018
Staff analyses of these special exception requests to vary from the approved ZMA Application Plan were conducted
pursuant to the following applicable provisions and evaluation criteria contained in County Code § 18-8.5.5.3:
8 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS - GENERALLY
8.5 PROCEDURES FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
8.5.5.3 VARIATIONS FROM APPROVED PLANS, CODES, AND STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENTS
a. The director of planning is authorized to grant a variation from the following provisions of an approved
plan, code or standard:
1. Minor changes to yard requirements, build -to lines or ranges, maximum structure heights and
minimum lot sizes;
5. Minor changes to street design and street location, subject to a recommendation for approval by
the county engineer;
c. The director of planning is authorized to grant a variation upon a determination that the variation:
(1) is consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan;
(2) does not increase the approved development density or intensity of development;
(3) does not adversely affect the timing and phasing of development of any other development in the
zoning district;
(4) does not require a special use permit; and
(5) is in general accord with the purpose and intent of the approved application.
Staff Analysis — Request #1 for Special Exception to Vary:
Variation request to modem (reduce) the width of the landscaping maintenance and access easement from ten (10) feet
to six (6) feet, pursuant to County Code x'18 -8.5.5.3(a)(5).
Evaluation criteria per County Code §18-8.5.5.3(c): JL
(1)
Request does not contradict Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives. The requested width of six (6) feet for
the street tree landscaping easement would still enable the project to accommodate "landscape elements," as
called for in the Neighborhood Model Design Guidance and in accord with the approved "variation of the
planting strip" established with approval of ZMA-2013-00016. The applicant has noted that the requested
width of six (6) feet for the street tree landscaping easement would be consistent with "the typical planting
strip width employed in standard road sections."
Evaluation criteria met.
(2)
The requested Variation would not increase the approved development density or intensity of development.
Evaluation criteria met.
(3)
The requested Variation does not adversely affect the timing or phasing of development of any other
development in the zoning district.
Evaluation criteria met
(4)
The requested Variation does not require a Special Use Permit.
Evaluation criteria met.
(5)
The requested Variation is in general accord with the purpose and intent of the approved application plan,
which shows street trees planted along the private streets in a planting strip outside of the right-of-way.
Evaluation criteria met.
Additional
factors for consideration:
A. The staff report for the approved ZMA-2013-00016 for Avinity Estates recommended a six (6) foot landscape
easement for the street tree landscaping — the same width now being requested by the applicant.
B. The requested Variation would allow for consistency with the approved plans for the adjoining Avinity I
development, which received approval for a planting strip modification during the rezoning process for that
existing (built) project.
C. Please see the application for Variation Request #I (Attachment A) for the applicant's description and
justification.
Staff Recommendation — Request #1 for Special Exception to Vary:
With regards to the findings contained herein, inclusive of the criteria to be considered per County Code § 18-8.5.5.3(c),
as well as other additional factors, staff recommends approval of this Variation Request #1 with conditions.
Specifically, staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment C) to approve with conditions
Variation Request #1 for a special exception to vary the Application Plan approved in conjunction with ZMA 2013-
00016 Avinity Estates so as to modify (reduce) the width of the landscaping maintenance and access easement from ten
(10) feet to six (6) feet, pursuant to County Code § 18-8.5.5.3(a)(5).
Staff Analysis — Request #2 for Special Exception to Vary:
Variation request to modify (reduce) the depth of the front yard setback for portions of structures that are not garages
from eighteen (18) feet to six (6) feet, but still require a minimum setback dimension of eighteen (18) feet between the
sidewalk and all garages, pursuant to County Code §18-8.5.5.3(a)(1).
Evaluation criteria per County Code §18-8.5.5.3(c):
(1)
Request does not contradict Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives. The requested "modified front yard
setback" of six (6) feet would allow for the front porches to be extended closer to the landscaping strip and
sidewalk, while still requiring the garage to be a minimum of eighteen (18) feet from the sidewalk. This
configuration would be consistent with the "Buildings and Spaces of Human Scale" and the "Relegated
Parking" principles of the Neighborhood Model Design Guidance, by:
- bringing a portion of each structure (front porch) closer to the street, and contributing to a sense of (partial)
spatial enclosure along the streetscape;
- establishing a varying spatial rhythm along the streetscape, with front porches closer to the street and the
garages set back farther from the street; and
- relegating the portion of the structure associated with vehicular parking (garage) approximately twelve
(12) feet behind the primary entrance to the structure (front porch).
Additionally, the requested "modified front yard setback" is consistent with the "0-15' Building Setback"
recommendation in the "Recommended Guidelines for Setbacks, Sidewalks, and Urban Streets" (contained in
the Comp Plan Appendix).
Evaluation criteria met
(2)
The requested Variation would not increase the approved development density or intensity of development.
Evaluation criteria met.
(3)
The requested Variation does not adversely affect the timing or phasing of development of any other
development in the zoning district.
Evaluation criteria met
(4)
The requested Variation does not require a Special Use Permit.
Evaluation criteria met.
(5)
The requested Variation would maintain the required minimum distance of eighteen (18) feet between the
sidewalk and garage, so as to ensure adequate space for parking a vehicle outside of the garage without the
vehicle hanging over the sidewalk (as established during the approval of ZMA-2013-00016).
Evaluation criteria met.
Additional factors for consideration:
A. Please see the application for Variation Request #2 (Attachment A) for the applicant's description and
justification.
Staff Recommendation — Request #2 for Special Exception to Vary:
With regards to the findings contained herein, inclusive of the criteria to be considered per County Code § 18-8.5.5.3(c),
as well as other additional factors, staff recommends approval of this Variation Request #2 with conditions.
Specifically, staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment C) to approve with conditions
Variation Request #2 for a special exception to vary the Application Plan approved in conjunction with ZMA 2013-
00016 Avinity Estates so as to modify (reduce) the depth of the front yard setback from eighteen (18) feet to six (6) feet
for portions of structures that are not garages, but still require a minimum setback dimension of eighteen (18) feet
between the sidewalk and garage, pursuant to County Code § 18-8.5.5.3(a)(1).
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS
TO VARY THE APPLICATION PLAN
FOR ZMA 2013-16 AVINITY ESTATES
WHEREAS, the Owner of Tax Map Parcels Number 09100-00-00-01400 (portion),
09100-00-00-016A0, 09100-00-00-016CO3 and 09100-00-00-016EO (the "Property") filed requests for
special exceptions to vary the Application Plan approved in conjunction with ZNIA2013-16 Avinity
Estates to reduce the width of the landscaping maintenance and access easement from ten (10) feet to
six (6) feet and to reduce the depth of the front yard setback between the sidewalks and dwelling units
from eighteen (18) feet to six (6) feet.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, upon consideration of the foregoing, the
Memorandum prepared in conjunction with the special exception requests and the attachments
thereto, including staff's supporting analysis, and all of the factors relevant to the special exceptions
in Albemarle County Code §§ 18-8.5.5.3, 18-33.5, and 18-33.9, the Albemarle County Board of
Supervisors hereby approves the special exceptions to vary the Application Plan approved in
conjunction with ZMA2013-16 Avinity Estates as described above, subject to the condition(s)
attached hereto.
I, Claudette K. Borgersen, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a
Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, by a vote of
to , as recorded below, at a regular meeting held on
Ave Nay
Mr. Dill
Mr. Gallaway
Ms. Mallek
Ms. McKeel
Ms. Palmer
Mr. Randolph
Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
ZMA 2013-16 Avinity Estates — Special Exception Conditions
1. A modified front yard setback of six (6) feet may be applied to portions of dwelling units that are not
garages; but shall not be applied in any way which results in any garage being set back less than
eighteen (18) feet from the sidewalk in order to ensure that vehicles parked in the driveway and in
front of the garage do not obstruct the sidewalk.
2. A modified front yard setback of six (6) feet shall not include any encroachment, other than a one (1)
foot maximum encroachment for roof overhangs, in order to maintain sufficient space for the
required landscaping materials to be located within the six (6) foot landscaping easement. The
existing four (4) foot encroachment of all rear setbacks and one (1) foot encroachment of side yard
setbacks specified on the approved ZMA-2013-00016 application plan shall remain in effect.
3. The width of the landscaping maintenance and access easement shall be no less than six (6) feet.