HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201600152 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2018-03-13Phone 434-296-5832
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Memorandum
To:
Karl T. Lipscomb (klipscomb@cctownes.com)
From:
Paty Saternye, Senior Planner
Division:
Planning
Date:
September 22, 2016
FINAL Rev.1: December 22, 2016
FINAL Rev.2: August 17, 2017
FINAL Rev.3: December 14, 2017
FINAL Rev.4: March 13, 2018
Subject: SUB 201600152 Fairhill Estates - Final
Fax 434-972-4126
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will approve the plat referenced above once the following comments
have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time.
Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is
preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise
specified.]
Conditions of Preliminary Plat Approval (from approval letter dated 5/2/2006):
[14-303] The plat shall be subject to the requirements of section 14-303 (Contents of final plat), as identified
on the "Final Subdivision Checklist" which is available from the Department of Community Development.
FINAL: Condition not fully addressed. See the Code specific comments below.
FINAL Rev. 1: Condition still valid and not yet fully addressed.
FINAL Rev. 2: Condition still valid and not yet fully addressed.
FINAL Rev.3: Condition still valid and not yet fully addressed.
FINAL Rev.4: Condition still valid and not vet fully addressed.
2. Approval of all new road names by the E-911 Addressing Coordinator. FINAL: Condition has been met.
See the E-911 Addressing Coordinator's approval attached.
3. [903.B.6.a Design Standards Manual] The plat shall be subject to the Current Development Division's
engineering review for compliance with section 903.B.6.a of the County's Design Standards Manual.
FINAL: Condition not fully addressed. See the engineering comments attached. Approval of engineering is
required prior to the Final Subdivision Plat approval.
FINAL Rev. 1: Condition not fully addressed. See the engineering comments attached.
FINAL Rev. 2: Condition not fully addressed. See the engineering comments attached.
FINAL Rev.3: Condition addressed.
4. Virginia Department of Transportation approval for road plans in accordance with the requirements for
acceptance into the State System. FINAL: Condition has been met. Road Plans (SUB201500210) have
been approved.
5. [14-309 & 310] Written approval from the Health Department for all drain field locations. FINAL: Condition
has not yet been met. Submit a soil evaluation to the review planner. It will then be forwarded to the Health
Department for their review. Approval by the Health Department is required prior to the Final Subdivision
Plat approval.
FINAL Rev. 1: Condition addressed.
FINAL Rev. 2: Condition NO LONGER addressed. The boundary lines on the most recent
submission of the plat no longer align with those specified at the time of the preliminary plat
submission and approval, when the Department of Health (VDH) approved the drainfield location.
Also, the drainfields for lots 8 & 9 were location very close to the boundary line dividing them. Since
it is proposed to relocate the boundary line between lots 8 and 9, from its location in the preliminary
Plat, provide verification from the VDH that the approval of the previous drainfield still stands and
that the proposed changes in the boundary lines do not impact the proposed drainfields or submit
new documents to the County that will be forwarded to VDH for their approval.
FINAL Rev.3: Condition addressed.
6. [10.3.3.3.f] Approval and recordation of a preservation easement by the Public Recreational Facilities for
the Preservation Tract. FINAL: Condition has not yet been met. See the County's Rural Areas Planner
comments below. Approval of the Rural Areas Planner and the County Attorney is required prior to the Final
Subdivision Plat approval.
FINAL Rev. 1: Condition not fully addressed. See the County's Rural Areas Planner's comments below.
FINAL Rev. 2: Condition not fully addressed. See the County's Rural Areas Planner's comments below.
FINAL Rev.3: Condition not fully addressed. See the County's Rural Areas Planner's comments below.
FINAL Rev.4: Condition not fully addressed. See the County's Rural Areas Planner's comment #7
below.
Final Plat Comments (Rural Areas Planner and County Attorney):
Conservation Easement:
7. The draft conservation deed of easement provided by the applicants was forwarded to the County Attorney's
Office for their review. The County Attorney's office had a more recent version of the conservation deed of
easement. Once the additional information requested below is provided the County Attorney's office will
complete their review of the proposed deed and respond in detail about edits that need to be made. The deed
of easement must be completed and signed by all the parties before the final plat can be signed. (Eventually,
once the final plat and deed of easement have been signed, both will need to be recorded together.).
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The deed of easement must be completed and signed by all
parties (application, Public Recreational Facilities Authority Chair, and the agent for the Board of
Supervisors) before the final plat can be signed. (Eventually, once the final plat and deed of easement have
been signed, both will need to be recorded together/sequentially). See the revised attached conservation
deed.
FINAL Rev. 2: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
• The draft deed of easement for the preservation tract has been reviewed, but is not yet complete or
approved by the County Attorney's Office. The legal description of the property in the deed needs to
refer to the correct title of the final plat.
• Review of any corrections or changes to the deed of easement can continue independent of final -plat
resubmittals. However, in the end, the plat and the deed must have consistent references (as noted
above) and will likely be approved and signed at approximately the same time, rather than approving
the deed significantly ahead of the plat.
FINAL Rev.3: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
• On the first page the year should be changed from 2016 to 2017.
• Revise the property description so that it correctly describes plat, including the correct lots specified
on this plat and the date and revision information for the last version of the plat before recordation.
It appears that the document was not completely updated when the lots specified in the division
were changed.
• Review of this document is still in process and additional comments will be forwarded when they are
available.
FINAL Rev.4: Condition not vet fully addressed. Address the following:
• Remove the "Draft: 12/10/16" in the upper right corner of the document.
• Have the deed of easement signed by the owner's representative and notarized.
• Submit the signed and notarized document to the County for the Community Development
and PRFA signatures.
• This deed must be recorded with the plat.
8. Provide a map or plan that connects all the names for structures or structure parts (e.g., "1960's-era
structure," "1910's kitchen wing," etc.) listed in section 2(B)(2) to their actual locations. These labels may
be included on Exhibit B of the draft deed of easement, but the text on those exhibits is not legible. It is
recommended that after this information has been provided the County Staff meet with the applicant on site
and tour the existing buildings and building area.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
9. Sections 2(B)(1) and 2(B)(2) refer to Exhibit B. However, the text on Exhibit B is not legible, so we can't tell if it is
sufficient. Exhibit B is also in color —it needs to be in black -and -white to be recorded properly. On sheet 1 of Exhibit
B, some portions of the structures are cut off The images should be pulled back enough from the margins that they will
not cut off when being scanned for recordation.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
10. Section 2(13)(8)(A) of the proposed deed of easement addresses a possible access easement across the
property for the use of RWSA. Provide information on whether or not this easement has yet been put in
place. Show the easement on the final plat.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
11. Section 2(13)(8)(A) refers to an "Exhibit C," but that exhibit is not included in the draft and needs to be
supplied.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
Zoning Issues:
12. 18-10.3.3.3(f) states (in part) that "[e]xcept as specifically permitted by the director of current development
and zoning at time of establishment, not more than one (1) dwelling unit shall be located on any rural
preservation tract or development lot." The area proposed to be the preservation tract appears to have two
dwelling units, or at least two addressed structures (4680 and 4684 Fair Hill Lane). Zoning will need to
establish whether either or both of these structures are considered a dwelling unit.
• If both of these structures are dwelling units, then one of them will need to be downgraded to no
longer be a dwelling unit in order to meet requirement in 10.3.3.3(f) above before the final plat can
be approved.
• If one of these structures is not a dwelling unit, that fact should be verified in writing from Zoning
before the final plat is approved.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Prior to the signing of the conservation easement by the
PRFA chair and the BOS agent, and prior to the signing of the final plat, the applicants must establish that
there is only one dwelling unit on the preservation tract. (My understanding is that there are currently two.) I
would recommend that Planning staff visit the site with Zoning staff for Zoning to verify that only one of the
addressed structures is a dwelling unit.
FINAL Rev. 2: Comment addressed. Previous comment raised the question of whether or not there
were multiple dwelling units on the preservation tract. A subsequent staff site visit established that
the structure at 4684 Fairhill Lane is no longer a dwelling. This comment has been addressed.
Final Plat Comments (Planning):
13. [14-302(A)(1)] Name of subdivision. Revise the name of the subdivision plat to be "Fairhill Estates Lots 3, 4,
& 5 subdivision and preservation lot 14 boundary line adjustment".
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
14. [14-302(A)(3) & 14-303(M)] Existing or platted streets; Street names. Provide labels for Carlyle Place on
sheet 2 and Dylan Court on sheets 4 & 5.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
15. [14-302(A)5] Public easements. Revise the label for the 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement on sheet 2 to specify
DB 2376 PG 272. Add a label for the 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement on sheet 3. Deed book 1360 page 124
does not appear to be the correct reference for the 50' Sanitary Sewer Easement shown on sheet 4. Please
research and update this label as appropriate. If deed book 1360 page 124 is correct please provide the
recorded plat for reference.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
16. [14-302(A)(5), 14-302(A)(15) & 14-303(L)] Public easements; Identification of all owners and certain
interest holders; Dimension standards and information on all lots, streets, alleys, easements, and shared
driveways; Public utility, drainage and sight distance easements. Submit the deeds of easements for the
proposed slope & drainage and access easements. See the attached template for Deeds of Dedication and
Easement for the drainage easements. I've also attached the template for a Private Street Maintenance
Agreement that can be utilized if the 20' access easement is private. The deeds will be reviewed by the
County Attorney. The County Attorney's approval of the deeds is required before this subdivision plat will be
approved. Also, revise the note for the new 20' access easement to state that it is new and who the access
easement is for.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not yet addressed. A draft deed of easement for the proposed 20' ACSA access
easement has not yet been submitted for review. Submit a draft of this deed of easement for the County
Attorney's office to review. The final plat will not be approved until the County Attorney's office has
approved the deed of easement.
FINAL Rev. 2: Comment not yet addressed. A draft deed of easement for the proposed SLOPE AND
DRAINAGE easements was submitted for review on August 15, 2017 and has been forwarded to the
County Attorney's office for review. The final plat will not be approved until the County Attorney's office has
approved the deed of easement.
FINAL Rev.3: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
• Revise the County Executive's name to specify "Jeffrey B. Richardson" on the signatures pages.
• Before the final versions are signed the date(s) specified for the plat must be revised to match the
information that will be on the plat that will be recorded.
• Engineering is reviewing the deed of easement and any comments will be forwarded to you when
they are available.
FINAL Rev.4: Condition not fully addressed. Address the following:
• Have the owner's representative sign the deed and have it notarized.
• Submit the signed and notarized deed to the County for the County Executive's signature.
• This slope and drainage deed of easement must be recorded with the plat.
17. [14-302 (A)(5), 14-303 (E) & (L)] If there is a proposed access easement for RWSA, as specified in the
draft deed of easement, show it on the plat and provide all information required for a proposed public
easement. RWSA will be required to review the plat once this proposed access easement is shown. If the
easement is included on the plat RWSA's approval will be required prior to Final Subdivision Plat approval.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The plat has been submitted to ACSA/RWSA for their review.
Approval of the plat by ACSA/RWSA will be required before the final plat will be approved.
FINAL Rev. 2: Condition not yet fully addressed. See ACSA comments.
FINAL Rev.3: Address the following:
• ACSA/RWSA comments have not yet been received. They will be forwarded when they become
available. Impacts of the preservation tract limitations to current RWSA easements and future
expansion of facilities are being researched.
• On Sheets 4 of 5 and Sheet 5 of 5 revise the leader to state "NEW 30' RWSA ACCESS
EASEMENT".
• Provide boundary ties for the location of the new 30' RWSA access easement. The easement must
be located.
FINAL Rev.4: Condition not vet fully addressed. Address the following:
• It is our understanding that RWSA is still in discussion with the applicant in reference to the
wording of this deed of easement.
• Once that is finalized provide the signed and notarized deed of easement to the County.
• This deed of easement must be recorded with the plat.
18. [14-302(A)(7)] existing and departing lot line. -, wide the departing lot lines for TM 57-38 on sheets 2 and
3.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not addressed. It appears that there may not have been any change to the
departing lot lines specified. There are two lots, that show up on the County's online GIS, that do not
appear to be represented correctly on this plat. They are T.M. 57-38 and T.M. 57-38A. In that vicinity T.M.
57-38 is shown on the plat, but lot lines are missing and labels may not be in the correct locations. Provide
the missing lot lines between these two parcels and update the labels to show both lots on Sheet 2 of 5.
FINAL Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
19. [14-302(A)(9)] Building sites on proposed lots. Provide an exhibit that shows the 30,000 square feet building
site rectangle for each proposed development lot, the critical slope areas, the flood plain, and the Water
Protection Ordinance stream buffers.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. It does not appear that an exhibit showing rectangular 30,000
SF building sites has been submitted. The exhibit attached to the plat does not show rectangular building
sites. Building sites must be represented as rectangles and of the correct proportion and size as specified
in 18-4.2.2(a)(1). Provide rectangular building sites on an exhibit or the plat.
FINAL Rev. 2: Comment not fully addressed. The exhibit showing rectangular 30,000 SF building sites has
been submitted but the information for the different areas is hard if not impossible to read. The contour lines
appears to be the same linetype as both the WPO and Critical Slopes boundaries. Also, the WPO boundary
appears to disappear in a very important area. Revise the exhibit to make it legible and complete. Also,
ensure that the Building areas do not overlap any areas specified in 18-4.2.1(a). It appears that at least one
of the building areas partially lies in an area it is not allow to.
FINAL Rev.3: Condition addressed.
20. [14-302(A)(10)] Right of further division of proposed lots. Revise number 5 under "Notes" to state that "Lots
3, 4, 5, & 14 each may contain only one dwelling unit. Residual lots 1, 2 & 3 may only be subdivided as
shown in the approved Preliminary Subdivision Plat SUB200600022 and once subdivided each lot may only
contain one dwelling unit. There may not be any further division without Planning Commission approval."
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. There appears to be a typographical error on the note
provided. Revise note #5 to say "may" instead of "my".
FINAL Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
21. [14-302(A)(16)] Dam Break inundation zones. Provide the limits of the dam break inundation zone on the
subdivision plat. Add a note on the coversheet that states, "TM 57-35 lies partially within the dam
inundation zone."
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The "100 year breach" and "24 HR PMF" lines added to the
plat do not match the State "Dam Break Inundation Zone" shown on the County's GIS maps. The State
Dam Break Inundation Zone is the one required for this submission. Revise the plat to show the State Dam
Break Inundation Zone shown on the County's GIS or clarify why the lines provided on this submission of
the plat are correct. Please note that the inundation zone on the County's GIS does not appear to impact
any of the development lots, and therefore does not necessitate review by the Virginia Department of
Conservation and Recreation (DCR). See comment #38 below. The lines provide on this submission of the
plat extend the inundation zone into the development lots and would require DCR review and any fees and
studies required for their review.
FINAL Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
22. [14-302(B)(4)] Places of burial. Provide the location of any grave, object or structure marking a place of
burial located on the property. The plat included in deed book 3293 page 176 shows an existing cemetery
within TM 57-35.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
23. [14-302(B)(7)] Reservoir watershed; agricultural -forestal district. Provide a note stating that the parcels are
not within an agricultural -forestal district.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
24. [14-302(B)(8)] Yards. Revise the note on "Setback Requirements:" to include both the "Front (existing
public roads)" of 75' and the "Front (internal public or private road)" of 25' setbacks.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
25. [14-302(B)(10)] Stream buffers. Provide on the plat the location of the Water Protection Ordinance buffers.
The 100' buffers impact all three existing parcels; TM 56-100F, TM 57-35 and TM 57-35B.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The "Non -Impervious Easement" shown on this submission
of the plat is required by engineering and was part of the previously approved preliminary plat. However, it
does not replace or meet the requirement of the current Water Protection Ordinance (WPO). Therefore,
additional line work and/or hatching must be provided on the plat that shows the WPO buffers. WPO buffers
are a combination of a 100' Stream Buffer and the FEMA 100 year flood plain. These can be found on the
County's online GIS. Because you will be showing the "Non -Impervious" area, the State's "Dam Break
Inundation Zone" (see other comments), the 100' Stream Buffer and the FEMA floodplain lines the balance
of linetypes and hatches will be very important. Provide in legends all hatch and line types and specify what
each represents. Ensure that they are clear and that all linetypes and areas can be correctly interpreted.
FINAL Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
26. [14-303(A)] Statement of consent to division. Remove any additional language beyond the wording
specified for the "Statement of Consent to Division" in the County Code and listed in the submission
checklist, which is "The platting or dedication of the following described land [insert a correct description of
the land subdivided] is with the free consent and in accordance with the desire of the undersigned owners,
proprietors and trustees, if any." Also, revise the description to be "Fairhill Estates Lots 3, 4, 5 & 14".
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Remove the wording "Any reference to future potential
development is to be deemed as theoretical only." from the statement of consent.
FINAL Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
27. [14-303(C) & (E)] Boundary lines; Dimension standards and information on all lots, streets, alleys,
easements, and shared driveways. Provide the existing boundary lines and existing boundary line lengths
and bearings for the boundary lines to be extinguished. Also, provide all linear, angular, and curvilinear
dimensions for the lots and public easements on the plat. There are many road boundary lines that are
labeled but do not have corresponding data on the line table. Data is missing for L30 to L34, L36 to L38,
L40 to L42, L106, L107, L119, & L120.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
FINAL Rev.3: Comment no longer fully addressed. There is an entry in the Line Table that was not
previously included and it does not appear to be shown on the other sheets of the plat. Specify where L81
is shown on the plat. Revise plat and Line Table as appropriate.
FINAL Rev.4: Condition addressed.
28. [14-303(H)] Monuments. Provide the location and material of all permanent reference monuments found.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
29. [14-303(J)] Restrictions. Replace the WPO stream buffer note (#9) with the note included on the
preliminary subdivision plat that stated, "Stream Buffer & Critical Slope Deed Restriction Areas Note: Stream
buffer and critical slope protection areas are to remain undisturbed and preserved in their natural condition.
Outbuildings, lawns, crops, and regular mowing are prohibited. The stream buffer shown hereon shall be
managed in accordance with the Albemarle county protection ordinance.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
30. [14-303(0)] Signature panels. Clarify the ownership of the parcels and the names shown in the signature
panel. Deed book 3293 page 176 specifies the owners to be Southern Classic, Inc and Fair Hill Farm, LLC.
The real estate record, as shown on the County's GIS, shows only Fair Hill Farm, LLC as the owner. The
signature panels on the proposed subdivision plat list Southern Classic Inc. and David Mitchell as owners.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
31. [14-303(Q)] Water supply. Provide a note that states, "Under current county policy, public water and/or
sewer will not be available for this property."
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
32. [14-303(R)] Parent parcel access. Provide a note that states, "All subsequent divisions of the residue shall
enter only onto such street(s) shown on the approved final plat and shall have no immediate access onto
any public street."
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
33. [14-303(S)] Control points. Provide a fourth control point on sheet 2.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
34. [Comment] This plat cannot be approved until all road and WPO improvements are built or bonded.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. See Engineering comments.
FINAL Rev. 2: Comment not yet fully addressed. See Engineering comments.
FINAL Rev.3: Comment not yet fully addressed. See Engineering comments.
FINAL Rev.4: Comment not vet fully addressed. See Engineerinq comments.
35. [Comment] This plat cannot be approved until Engineering, VDOT and ACSA/RWSA grant their approval.
E911 has already approved the plat. Comments have been attached. The plat has been submitted to
ACSA for review. Their comments will be forwarded once they are received.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed.
FINAL Rev. 2: Comment not fully addressed. E911 has no objections. Although VDOT has specified that
they have no objection staff has asked for confirmation that VDOT has no issues with the shared driveway
circumstance created by the ingress/egress easement across Lot #9 which was added to the plat with this
most recent submission. The plat has been submitted to Fire/Rescue for review. Comments have either
been included, attached or will be forwarded to you once available. This plat cannot be approved until all
reviewers grant their approval.
FINAL Rev.3: Condition not yet fully addressed. VDOT has confirmed there is no issue with the shared
driveway circumstance. Fire Rescue's had no comments in the last submission. Comments from
engineering have been attached. Comments from the County Attorney's office, the County's Rural Planner
have been integrated into this document. Comments from ACSA and RWSA will be forwarded to you once
they are available. This plat cannot be approved until all reviewers grant their approval.
FINAL Rev.4: Condition not vet fully addressed. Comments from engineering have been attached.
Comments from the County Attorney's office, the County's Rural Planner have been integrated into
this document. Approval of the deed of easement by RWSA is still outstanding.
36. [NEW Comment] Revise the Tax Map number on Sheet 2 of 5, for the adjoining lot on the far left of the
proposed preservation tract, to be T.M. 56-100G and not T.M. 56-100.
FINAL Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
37. [NEW Comment] As specified by VDOT, revise note #8 to state "All roads are to be dedicated to the
County for public use."
FINAL Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
38. [NEW Comment] Ensure that the boundary line adjustment on the east side of the project, between
Residual 2, lot 3 and the preservation tract parcel does not contain any portion of the State Dam Break
Inundation Zone. If any portion of the Dam Inundation Zone will be within the development parcels the
Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) will be required to review the subdivision plan
and DCR will make a determination on potential impacts of the proposed subdivision.
FINAL Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
39. [NEW Comment: Rural Areas Planned During this round of review, staff became aware that a federally -
protected Bald Eagle nest is located on the Lickinghole Basin property, adjacent to this RPD. We are not yet
aware of any conflicts between federal requirements regarding the nest and the process of changing parcel
boundaries or of placing a conservation easement on the preservation tract. We will therefore continue with
the review of this proposed subdivision while we carry out further research into the issue. It is our
understanding that the applicant is in active communication with USFWS about future development of the
property and any federal requirements regarding the nest. Staff is investigating what types of land -
development activity (for example, "on -paper" divisions versus physical site work) are affected by federal
requirements in this case, and will pass on any information acquired.
FINAL Rev.3: Condition not fully addressed. Revise note 16 to state "Golden Eagle" and not "Gold Eagle".
FINAL Rev.4: Condition addressed.
40. [NEW Comment: 14-302(A)(4)1 Private easements. Address the following:
• With the addition of the Ingress/Egress Easement across Lot #9, in this last submission, a new private
deed of easement will be required. Submit a draft deed of easement for this ingress/egress for review
by the County Attorney's office. The final plat will not be approved until the County Attorney's office has
approved the deed of easement.
• Add a label and/or note specifying that Lot 9 and 14 will have a shared driveway off of Dylan Court.
FINAL Rev.3: Condition not yet fully addressed. Address the following:
o On page one it appears that in paragraphs two and three there may be some confusion as to
which "lot" is associated with which existing parcel. In paragraph three "Lot 14" seems to be
associated with "T.M. 57-35B" instead of "T.M. 57-35". Also, is it intended that the TMP for both
Lot 9 and Lot 14 be listed in both paragraphs? Revise as appropriate.
o On page two of the deed of easement, in the last paragraph, revise "Theses" to be "These".
o Once the deed has been approved by the County a signed and notarized copy of the document
must be submitted to the County prior to approval of the subdivision plat. This new deed must
be recorded with the Subdivision plat.
FINAL Rev.4: Condition not vet fully addressed. Address the following:
• Although the date on page 1 of the deed was updated the date on page 2, near the top, has
not vet been updated. Update this date.
• Submit a signed and notarized copy of the deed.
• This deed must be recorded at the time of the plat recordation.
41. FNEW comment: 14-3oz(B)(8)1 Yaras. The location of setback lines for cul-de-sac lots can be
problematic and the strange configuration of Lot #9 will complicate that matter. Therefore, setback lines
should be shown to the plat and not just listed on the cover sheet and shown on the buildable area exhibit
(see comment #19). Utilize the attached diagram and explanation on how to find the front and or rear
building setbacks when the lot width are not uniform for the entire lot. Also, once the setback location is
determined by this method provide a dimension on the plat that show how far from the front property line the
setback line will be. Please contact the plan reviewer with any questions you may have on how to use the
diagram to find the setback location.
FINAL Rev.3: Condition addressed.
42. [NEW Comment: 14-3081 Floodplain and topographic information; information to demonstrate that damage
from flooding will be minimized. Revise Note 7 to have the correct FEMA floodplain information and specify
the correct areas from the FEMA map. Portions of these parcels are within areas of flooding and floodways
and there appears to be a typographical area. Therefore, the note is not correct.
FINAL Rev.4: Condition addressed.
43. [NEW Comment: 14-302 (13)(10)1 Stream Buffers. Revise note 9 to specify "Water Protection Ordinance"
instead of "Protection Ordinance".
FINAL Rev.4: Condition addressed.
44. [NEW Comment: 14-302 (13)(4)1 Places of burial. Revise the label for the location of the cemetery to
specify "Cemetery" and not "Cemeterey".
FINAL Rev.4: Condition addressed.
45. [NEW Comment: 14-302 (13)(7)1 Reservior watershed; agricultural -forestal district. Revise Note 11 to state
that "These parcels are within the Lickinghole Creek Watershed which is in a Water Protection Area".
FINAL Rev.4: Condition addressed.
Please contact Paty Saternye in the Planning Division by using psaternye(d)-albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext.
3250 for further information.
Review Comments for SUB201600152 Final Plat
Project Name: Fairhill Estates - Final
Date Completed: Thursday, February 22, 2018 DepartmentlDivisionfAgency: Review Sys:
Reviewer: I Matthew Wentland
3 CDD Engineering I See Recommendations E
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: I 0311312018
Review Comments for SUB201600152 Final Plat
Project Name: Fairhill Estates - Final
Date Completed: Monday, February 26, 2018 DepartmentIDivisionfAgency: Review Sys:
Reviewer: Victoria Fort �I RWSA Pending
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: I 0311312018