HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201700062 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2018-03-16Phone 434-296-5832
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Memorandum
To: Justin Shimp Qustin(a shimp-engineering.com)
From: Paty Saternye, Senior Planner
Division: Planning
Date: December 27, 2017
FINAL Rev. 1: March 16, 2018
Subiect: SDP 201700062 Riverside Villaae Block 1 — Final Site Plan
Fax 434-972-4126
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the
following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been
identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.):
[Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless
otherwise specified.]
Initial Site Plan Comments (from conditional approval letter dated 12/28/16):
1. A site plan meeting all the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. See comments below.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. See comments below.
A site plan meeting all the requirements of ZMA 2016-19, its Application Plan and its Code of Development
(C.O.D). Also, because Block 1 is the last portion of Riverside Village to be developed ensure that any
remaining requirements and/or amenities specified for the other blocks within the development, as specified
in ZMA2015-3, its application, C.O.D. and/or its proffers must be provided with this site plan.
FINAL: Comment not addressed. It does not appear that any changes have been made in order to address
this comment. Either revise the site plan to address this comment or provide information to the plan
reviewer where on the site plan this information was already provided. As the last block to be developed in
an Neighborhood Model District in order to evaluate this site plan all of the requirements and/or amenities
specified in ZMA2015-3, its application, C.O.D. and/or its proffers tallies must be shown to have already
been provided with previous site plans or shown to be provided with this site plan. Until this information is
provided the site plan cannot be evaluated for conformance with the ZMA. Therefore, charts must be
provide, and expanded from what was provided with the ZMA approval, to show what has been already built
and/or platted for the other blocks and what is being proposed with this block. Revise the final site plan to
provide the required information. Address the following:
• Add columns to the "Minimum Green Space, Civic Areas, and Amenities by Block" chart for what
has already been Built/Platted/Provided and for those Proposed with this site plan.
• Ensure that all "Minimum Green Space, Civic Areas, and Amenities by Block" specified with the
ZMA have been, or with this site plan will be, provided.
• Revise the "Proposed Block Summary" chart to be the "Developed Square Footage Proposed" chart
as shown in the C.O.D. on Sheet No. 5 of 7 including all of the information shown there, and for ALL
blocks of the development. Also, expand it as specified below.
• Add columns to the "Developed Square Footage Proposed" chart for what has already been
Built/Platted/Provided as well as what is being Proposed with this site plan including number of
dwelling units, dwelling units per acre, and square feet of commercial.
• Ensure that all totals built/platted/provided or proposed in the "Developed Square Footage
Proposed" chart fall within the minimum and maximum values specified for there individual blocks
and for the NMD in general.
Page 1 of 17
• Add a "Land Use Summary" chart to the site plan. Include all of the information specified in the
Application plan on Sheet No. 4 of 7 and add columns for those that are already built/platted with
the previous blocks and what is proposed with this site plan for both acreage and percentage of the
total site. Ensure that totals are provided at the bottom of the chart, and added to the right side of
the chart.
• Revise the site plan to include an "Affordable Units by Type and Block" chart that includes a
provided column and show that the minimum of 15% affordable dwelling units has been met (C.O.D.
section VI.).
• Revise the site plan to include a "Landscape Treatment' chart that specifies each required
treatment and includes a column that specifies in which site plan or subdivision plat the treatment
was provided (C.O.D. section IX.) or if it has not yet been provided.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
• In the Lot/Parking/Building Regulations chart revise the following:
o Add "Tables X" to the ZMA note below the chart.
o Change "Constructed Max Bldg Height" to be "Proposed and Constructed Max Bldg
Height".
o Specify the REAL proposed height of the building for Block 1 and not the maximum
height allowed under "Proposed and Constructed Max Bldg Height".
o There appears to have been a typo in the C.O.D. Revise the "Min/Max Stories" for
"Accessory Structures" to read "(3)" because it was supposed to refer to note #3.
o Revise the notes to have only the notes shown in the C.O.D. The three (separate)
notes at the top are somewhat redundant and probably should have must been
removed when the 8 from the C.O.D. were added.
o Under "Front Build -To -Lines" change the content for each of the blocks to be what
was specified in the C.O.D. Address the following:
■ In Block 5 move "MF and Commercial" up to the top and remove "Trailside
Court.
■ In Block 6 remove any mention of "setback". Build -to -Line and setback are
not the same thing.
• In the Developed Square Footage Proposed & Provided chart revise the following:
o Add "Tables V & IV" to the ZMA note below the chart.
o Under "Max. Gross Density DU/Acre Per C.O.D" the total at the bottom should Must be
"5.7 Units/Acre". Do not include the "12.4" in this area. That was not part of the
C.O.D.
o Under "Built/Platted/Provided Gross Density/Acre" the total at the bottom should lust
be "4.99 Units/Acre". This is the GROSS density and is therefore 93 units/18.65
acres, which is 4.987 DU/AC.
o Under Permitted Residential Housing per C.O.D. address the following to
typographical errors:
■ In Block 2 it should be "SF Attached" and not "SDF Attached"
■ In Block 4 remove "Townhomes". That was not specified in the C.O.D.
• In the Required & Provided Green Space, Civic Areas, and Amentias by Block chart revise
the following:
o Add "Tables VII" to the ZMA note below the chart.
• In the Land Use Summary chart revise the following:
o Add the heading of "Land Use Summary" at the top of the table.
o Add "Proposed" to both the "Built/Platted Acreage" and "Built Platted Percentage of
Total Site".
o Change "Commercial Use" to "Commercial and Mixed Use" in the chart.
o Include the 2.41 acres of Block 1 in the calculations for the "Built/Platted Acreage".
o Include the 2.41 acres of Block 1 in the calculations for the "Built Platted Percentage
of Total Site".
o Clarify what the 0.31 and 1.69% values were supposed to represent. Please contact
the plan reviewer to discuss if these were existing uses from other parts of the
development or were meant to represent Block 1.
• In the Landscaping Treatments Required & Proposed chart revise the following:
o Add "Tables IX" to the ZMA note below the chart.
Page 2 of 17
[ZMA2016-19 Proffer #1] Provide as many affordable units within Block 1 as are necessary to meet the
remaining affordable housing requirement for all of Riverside Village. It appears that only 10 affordable
residential units have been provided in previously approved plans. The proffer specifies 15% affordable
units. If there will be a total of 93 residential units in all of Riverside Village then a total of 14 affordable
units are required and therefore 4 more affordable units must be provided in Block 1.
FINAL: Comment not addressed. It does not appear that any information on the affordable units that are
proposed has been added to the site plan. Revise the site plan to provide this required information. See
zoning comment for more details.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
4. [ZMA2016-19 Proffer #2] The status of the cash proffer specified in 42 will be reviewed as construction
continues.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. The status of the cash proffer specified in #2 will be reviewed as
construction continues.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment will be fully addressed prior to building permits. The status of the cash
proffer specified in #2 will be reviewed as construction continues. This does not impact the approval
of this site plan.
[ZMA2016-19 Proffers] Provide the correct, final and signed version of the proffers. There was a
modification made to the final version of the proffers that must be included. See the attached PDF.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. The final, signed, and approved version of the proffers must be
scanned and inserted into the plan set. Although the content of the proffers currently provided in the plan
may be correct the signed and approved version is what needs to be in the site plan.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
6. [ZMA2016-19] Because this is the final site plan that is required for the development ensure that all
requirements and amenities specified in the C.O.D. are provided within Riverside Village. In the Final Site
Plan provide the following:
• The "Minimum Green Space, Civic Area, and Amenities by Block" chart for the C.O.D. must be updated
to be a "Required and Provided" chart showing that all required items for all of Riverside Village have
been provided or will be with the approval of the site plan (C.O.D. section VII.).
• The "Proposed Block Summary" must be expanded to show all blocks, show totals for the development,
and show that the development as a whole has stayed within the Minimums and Maximums for the
Residential / Commercial uses (C.O.D. sections I.D. and V.).
• Provide an "Affordable Units by Type and Block" chart that includes a provided column and show that
the minimum of 15% affordable dwelling units has been met (C.O.D. section VI.).
• Provide a "Landscape Treatment' chart that specifies each required treatment and includes a column
that specifies in which site plan or subdivision plan the treatment was provided (C.O.D. section IX.).
FINAL: Comment not addressed. See comments #2 & #3 above.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. See comments #2 & #3 above.
7. [32.7.2.3(a)] Provide in the site plan an additional segment of sidewalk parallel to Route 20 between the east
entrance to the site and the east boundary line of the parcel along Route 20 (Stony Point Road).
FINAL: Comment not addressed. No additional sidewalk has been added to the site plan. This pedestrian
connection is required. If there are topographical challenges provide supporting documentation about the
sites restraints, as well as possible solutions, and discuss them with the plan reviewer prior to the next
submission. At the bare minimum a crosswalk and handicapped ramp must be provided so that a future
connection will be feasible. In addition, whatever portion of the sidewalk the reviewers considers
appropriate and realistic, prior to development to the east of the parcel, must also be provided.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
Page 3 of 17
[32.5.1(c) & 32.5.2(a)] Address the following:
• Revise the dimensions for the existing boundaries to include bearings for each portion of the boundary
and include all required curve data where appropriate.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Only one bearing and distance was added to the parcel
information and it was for the parent parcel and not Block one. Revise the site plan to include all of the
bearing and distance information for Block 1 specifically. All line and curb data is to be provided.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
o Provide a bearinq for the 4.43 boundary dimension.
o The deed book and page number under "Source of Boundary" is not a plat and
references other deed book and page numbers that are not the current plat. Provide the
deed book and page number for the recorded plat of Block1 under the "Source of
Boundary" on the Coversheet. The deed book and page number of the plat is specified
on the Existing Conditions sheet as DB 4632 PG 226-232.
• Provide the Tax Map number for the subject parcel in the Existing Conditions sheet
FINAL: Comment addressed.
• Show the setback lines in the site plan.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
Use two different linetypes for the Build -to lines and the parkinq setback lines.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
o The parking setback from route 20 is incorrect. It appears to be shown at 33' instead of 50'.
Revise this line.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The line has been moved and labeled as
"50' Parking Setback from Route 20". However, the lines is not drawn at 50' from the
Right of Way. Address the following:
• Move the line to be a full 50' from the right of way.
• Remove any parking spaces that does not meet this setback requirement. One
parking space will have to be removed.
o No parrii iy sCLUaL;r w iC is si iUvvi i n Ui I I RUdU /1. MUU L U pdi rm ig setback line for Road A to the
site plan.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
o The side setback line adjacent to TMP 78-58A (Elks parcel) appears to be incorrect. It scales at
about 6' instead of 5'. Revise this setback line.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
o Add a label and leader for the side setback line adjacent to TMP 78-58A. Since the building
and parking setbacks are identical along this property line include the Parking setback
information in this same label.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Revise the note for ALL of the side and
rear setbacks so that they do not have "Min. Build to" or "Build to" in the label. Instead
of "Min. Build to Setback" or "Build to Setback" they should read either "Building
Setback", "Parking Setback" or a combination of the two. By definition a Setback and a
Build -to -Line are two different things. Therefore the wording of the label is important.
o No rear setback line appears to be provide on the site plan. Add the line and a label and leader
to specify its location.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Revise the note for ALL of the side and
rear setbacks so that they do not have "Min. Build to" or "Build to" in the label. Instead
of "30' Min. Build to Setback" the rear setback line label should read "30' Rear Building
Setback".
Page 4 of 17
o Revise the site plan to provide both types of setback lines (parking & building) along the
boundary with TMP 78G-2G-28.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The buildinq side setback in Block 1 is 5',
not the 10' shown on the site plan. Address the following:
• Revise the side setback line to the adjacent parcel TMP 78G-2C-28 to be 5'.
• Revise the label for the side setback to TMP 78G-2C-28 to be "5' Side Building
Setback".
• Move the label to be on a portion of the setback line that will not overlap the
parking setback line.
• Adjust the parking setback line, at the corner of TMP 78G-2C-28 and the storm
water pond, so that it also is setback from the 4.43' property line. Once doing so
the parking setback line will no longer almost touch the property line in that
corner.
o [NEW COMMENTI Final Rev. 1: The only yard related "Lot Regulations" that has a
maximum and minimum value is the Front Build -To -Line. Therefore, for all side and rear
setbacks "Min." should not be part of the label. Ensure all side and rear setback lines
are not labeled with "Min.".
o [NEW COMMENTI Final Rev. 1: Show the Maximum Front Build -To -Line on the site plan
for both road frontages and include the appropriate labels.
o [NEW COMMENTI Final Rev. 1: Revise the Minimum Front Build -To -Line label so that it
no longer includes information on the maximum build -to -line as well. It should read "10'
Min. Front Build -To -Line".
o [NEW COMMENTI Final Rev. 1: Revise the label for the Trailside Drive Front Build -To -
Line to read "25' Min. Front Build -To -Line".
Provide all of the required "Abutting Parcel Information" including the names of owners, zoning district,
tax map and parcel numbers and present uses.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Only TMP 78-58A's parcel information has been provided.
Address the following:
o Revise the plan to include the abutting parcel information internal to the NMD.
o Revise the plan to include the abutting parcel information for TMP 78-8A.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
The "Sheet Index" on the cover sheet includes a sheet that is not part of the initial site plan. A "lighting
plan & details" sheet was not included. Also, the "site and utility details" sheet should be labeled as C7
and not C8 in the "Sheet Index".
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
U LIIQIIyt-, LIIC JIICCL LILIC IUI \-J to be `Existing LUIIUM0110 QIIU UCIIIU rlcui JU LIICIL IL IIICILL.11CJ the
information shown on the cover sheet.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
o Although C3 is specified to be "Existing Conditions and Demo Plan" the demolition information
is not included or not obvious. Also, the landscaping in the private landscaping easement on
Road A appears to not be shown in the landscape plan and yet is not noted as being removed
on this sheet.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Revise the label on the landscaping in the
landscaping easement to read "Existing Landscape To Be Removed & Replaced In
Another Location After Building Construction".
Revise the boundary information to include the required datum reference for the elevation
FINAL: Comment addressed.
Page 5 of 17
9. [32.5.2(b)] Address the following
• Provide the gross residential density for Block 1.
FINAL: Comment addressed.
• Revise the square footage of commercial uses so that they are consistent within the "Proposed
Use" and "Parking" portions of the site data. There appears to be a typo in the "Parking"
calculations.
FINAL: Comment addressed.
• Revise the maximum amount of impervious on the site to include the patios or specify the patios as
materials that are pervious.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Where the patios are included in the calculation is not
specified. The "new pavement" seems to have been reduced by about 5,000 and the "new sidewalk"
increased but about 3,000. Overall the total impervious area appears to have decreased despite
the response to the comment being that "The amount of impervious area has been revised to
include the patios". Revise the calculations to show specifically which area of the calcs include the
patios and either revise the totals or provide the plan reviewer with information to explain why the
impervious was reduced when large areas were added.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
• Revise the "new pavement" square footage on the coversheet to match the "paved parking and
vehicular circulation area" or clarify why these numbers should not be the same. The existing
paved area connecting the two existing roads/alleys should be included since it is part of Block 1.
This should be included in the calculations.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. The "new pavement" on the coversheet and "paved parking
and vehicular circulation area" on the landscape plan still to not match. Revise the plan in order to
correctly represent this information in both locations.
FINAL Rev. 1: Commer+ „lrlrn�oed.
10. [32.5.2(b), 32.5.2(e), 32.5.2(p), 32.6.2(j) & 32.7.9.4(c)] Provide a full landscape plan that provides all
required landscaping, calculations and meets the buffer & landscaping requirements for 32.7.9 and the ZMA
Code of Development. Address the following:
• The existing paved area connecting the two existing roads/alleys should be included in the
"parking and vehicle circulation area" since it is part of Block 1. Included it in the calculation or
clarify why is should not be included.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. The "new pavement' on the coversheet and "paved
parking and vehicular circulation area" on the landscape plan do not match. Revise the plan in
order to correctly represent this information.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
• Revise the provided landscape canopy so that it is the same or greater than the required tree
canopy.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
IIC LULQI QICQ UI LI IC JILC UI I LI IC UUVCIJI ICCL QI IU LI IC IQI IUZIUCI 1II ILy. JI ICCL UU I IUL IIIQLL.I I.
Revise accordingly and update calculation.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed
The street trees along Route 20 were planted, approved, and included in the calculations
for SDP2014-43. Those plantings cannot be changed without amending that site plan.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed. Once this site Dian is aaoroved a note will be
added to the file of the previously approved site plan stating that the landscaping
shown has must been relocated with this site plan.
Since the street trees were part of a previously approved site plan can cannot be utilized in
the canopy calculation also for this site plan.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The items previously discussed, and
for which exhibits were provided, are addressed and sufficiently labeled in order to
differentiate them. However, there are three Willow Oaks (QP) shown as proposed
but are existing on Trialside Drive. Address the following:
■ One is adjoining this lot and therefore should be included in the chart on
C13. This is the first QP as you enter Trailside Drive. Change its symbol
and label so show it as an existing tree and move it to the existing chart on
the next page.
Page 6 of 17
■ The other two are on the adjoining lot (TMP 78G-2C-28) and should be
removed from this site plan since they are existing and not in or adjoining
the subject parcel. They can be shown as existing trees, but they should not
be included in either the proposed or existing planting charts since they are
on another parcel.
■ Update the provided canopy calculation to remove these three.
■ Clarify why, prior to the changes above, 26,655 SF was specified as the
canopy. This number does not appear to match the canopy provided in the
proposed landscaping table. Ensure that the number provided is correct.
• Since this is a mixed -use site, and not purely commercial, utilize the canopy calculation for
residential uses.
FINAL: Comment addressed.
• There is a note just above the "Landscaping Required:" calculations that states "Approved
Landscape Plan 1" = 30"'. However, this landscape plan in not yet approved and the scale bar in
the lower right corner of the page shows a scale of 1" = 20'. Revise this note or clarify why all of
part of it is correct.
FINAL: Comment addressed.
• Revise the landscape plan so that, as III. D. states, the plazas are a balanced mixture of
hardscaping and landscaping and as stated in II. they have planting beds, benches and paving to
create harmonious areas for people to congregate.
FINAL: Comment addressed.
• There are benches specified in the C.O.D. for the patios in Block 1 that are not shown in this site
plan. Provide the required benches.
o III. D specifies a minimum of two benches per plaza.
o VII. specifies at least four benches in one of the plazas.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. The two central plazas do not have any labels specifying
where benches may be located, although there is some linework that may represent built in
benches. Add labels and leaders and ensure that the two central plazas also meet the bench
requirement.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
• Revise the landscape plan to include the flowering ornamentals specified for the plazas in section
IX of the C.O.D. They should be evenly spaced around the plaza.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. There appear to be only "ornamental deciduous trees" in
the two central plazas. Revise the landscaping in the plazas so that all four of the plaza's meet
this requirement.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The description of the flowerinq ornamentals
in the plazas lists trees that are not in the plazas, does not list all the ornamental in the
plazas, and includes a non-native species (Thuja occidentalis) that must be removed from
the landscape plan. Update the description to be correct and ensure that the description
and the landscape plan do not include any non-native species.
• Revise the landscape plan to include the 24" tall (at planting) shrubs specified for the plazas in
section IX of the C.O.D. They are to be interspersed between the trees and used to screen the
parking.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Add a label and leader for the three "FM" shrubs on the far
east front of the building.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
• As stated in II. the plaza furthest to the east will be a focal point aligned with Road "C" providing a
visual and pedestrian connection between Stony Point Road and the Rivanna River. Therefore the
pedestrian connection should be extended through the plaza and connect directly to the sidewalk
along route 20.
FINAL: Comment addressed.
• Provide a clear, and safe, delineation for the pedestrian connection that crosses the parking lot
and connects the plaza to the rest of Riverside Village.
FINAL: Comment addressed.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
Page 7 of 17
Revise the landscape plan to include the perimeter shade trees, ornamental trees and screening
shrubs specified for the parking areas in section IX of the C.O.D. Ensure that there are at least the
number specified in the C.O.D.
FINAL: Comment not addressed. Address the following
o Provide the required perimeter large shade trees. There are no perimeter large shade
trees on the north side of the parking lot and only one to the east.
o Provide the required ornamental trees in the islands and around the pedestrian crossings
within the parking lot.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
Revise the landscape plan to include the evergreens, ornamental trees and shrubs specified in
section IX of the C.O.D. along the foundations of the buildings.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Provide additional shrubs and the required evergreen and
ornamental trees along the exposed foundation and around window and door opening (see "Other"
portion of C.O.D. section).
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. No evergreen trees are located along the
front of the building as specified in the mix of plantings at the base of long buildings as
specified in IX of the C.O.D. under "Other" for "Commercial and Mixed -Use Buildings".
Provide at least a few native evergreen trees along the front of the building.
Revise the landscape plan to include the Ornamental trees, shrubs and ornamental grasses
specified in section IX of the C.O.D. at the "Entrance — Block 1".
FINAL: Comment not addressed. Address the following:
o These plantings were shown in a previously approved site plan. In order to remove them,
or replace them with anything different, the site plan in which they were shown and
approved must be amended. Until that site plan is amended this site plan that shows them
being removed cannot be approved.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed. Once this site plan is approved a note will be
added to the file of the previously approved site plan stating that the landscaping
shown has must been relocated with this site plan
o Landscaping cannot be utilized two meet the canopy calculation in two different site plans.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. See the comment above about three
existinq street trees that are shown as proposed in this site plan but cannot be
utilized to meet this canopy calculation because they already have been calculated
in a previous site plan.
o Show all existing landscaping on the site in the existing conditions sheet.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. See the comment above about three
existing street trees that are shown as proposed in this site plan. Since they are
existing they need to be shown as existing on the Existing Conditions sheet.
o No landscaping is being provided to meet this C.O.D. requirement. This requirement must
be met before the site plan can be approved.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Revise the note at the corner of Route
20 and Trailside Drive to specify "Native Grasses and Variable Plantings" since the
approved site plan specified "Native Grasses" in this planting bed.
o it ianascaping is proposea in a airrereni area inan snown on ine previously approvea siie
plan than the existing landscape easement for those plantings must be revised to include
the modified planting area.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed. Although the planting have been moved from
their previous location they are still within the landscape easement previously
platted.
Page 8 of 17
There are existing plantings near the entrance from Route 20 that are being impacted by a
proposed plaza. Specify how these previously approved plantings will still be provided, how they
will be preserved, and if necessary where they will be relocated to while still meeting the
requirements they were meant to meet.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. These plantings are required in C.O.D. IX for the "Entrance
— Main Road". Address the following:
nose Pianunys were snuwn in a PIUVIUU61Y appruveu sue Plan. in uIue< <u Ienwve Lneni,
or replace them with anything different, the site plan in which they were shown and
approved must be amended. Until that site plan is amended this site plan that shows them
being removed cannot be approved.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed. Once this site plan is approved a note will be
added to the file of the previously approved site plan stating that the landscaping
shown has must been relocated with this site plan.
o Landscaping cannot be utilized to meet the canopy calculation in two different site plans.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed. Although the planting have been moved from
their previous location they are still within the landscape easement previously
platted.
o Show all existing landscaping on the site in the existing conditions sheet.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. See the comment above about three
existing street trees that are shown as proposed in this site plan. Since they are
existing they need to be shown as existing on the Existing Conditions sheet.
o Nu ianusuapmy lb veiny Piuviueu w nieei uiib U.U.U. iequuenieiu. 1 nis iequnenieni must
be met before the site plan can be approved.
-1NAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
There are existing plantings at the corner of Route 20 and Trialside Drive that are not shown on
the site plan. Show these plantings and include them in the schedule for the existing landscaping.
Also, show how these plantings will be preserved.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. These plantings were shown in a previously approved site
plan. In order to remove them, or replace them with anything different, the site plan in which they
were shown and approved must be amended. Until that site plan is amended this site plan that
shows them being removed cannot be approved.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. See the comments above about modifications
needed to correctly show the existinq landscaping at the corner of Route 20 and Trailside
Drive.
There appear to be notes about "existing" landscaping that does not yet exist. Revise the notes so
that they correctly specify in which previously approved site plan the plantings were included and
in what time frame they will be provided.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. The plantings on the east side of the lot, adjacent to TMP
78-58A, have a note that specifies that they were required with SUP2015-00038. They were
actually required with SDP2014-43. Address the following:
o Revise the note to state "SDP2014-00043" instead of "SUB2015-00038".
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
o These plantings were shown in a previously approved site plan. In order to remove them,
or replace them with anything different, the site plan in which they were shown and
approved must be amended. Until that site plan is amended this site plan that shows them
being removed cannot be approved.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
o Landscaping cannot be utilized to meet the canopy calculation in two different site plans.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
o Show all existing landscaping on the site in the existing conditions sheet.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. See the comments above about
modifications needed to correctly show other existing landscaping in the site plan.
o No landscaping is being provided to meet this C.O.D. requirement. This requirement must
be met before the site plan can be approved.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Specify in the comment response
letter when the buffer landscaping adjacent to TMP 78-58A will be provided. At the
time of the site visit this landscaping had not vet been planted, despite being part of
the previously approved site plan.
Page 9 of 17
• If the plantings in the clouded area on the east side of Block 1 are meant to meet the "Northern
Buffer" requirements specified in section VII of the C.O.D. for Block 1 then include information on
those plantings. If they were specified in a previously approved site plan then they could be
included in a separate "existing" landscape schedule in this site plan in order to differentiate it from
plantings that will be provided with this site plan while still supplying the information required for
review.
FINAL: Comment addressed.
• Provide parking lot screening trees and shrubs between the existing residential units and open
spaces in Block 2 and the Block 1 parking lot.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. There is a gap in landscaping between the biofilter and the
parking lot. A residential lot is just on the other side of the biofilter from the parking lot.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. All of the shrubs between the parking lot and
Block 2 are deciduous shrubs and therefore will provide very little screening during the
winter months. Screening shrubs should be utilized to screen the parking lot. They were
shown as evergreen shrubs in the last submission.
• Provide parking lot screening shrubs to the west side of the parking lot.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Additional screening from the road is required in this area.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The area in question is the area between the
parking lot and Trailside Drive. There are two paps in screening in this direction. One is
between the row of summer sweet and the travelway which enters the parking lot. The
other gap is between the dumpster and TMP 78-2C-28. Add appropriate screening shrubs
in these area.
• Nrovide landscape screening Tor the dumpster locations.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Address the screening of the eastern dumpster.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
• Show all required landscaping in the Landscape Plan and Landscape Schedule(s).
FINAL: Comment addressed.
• Include all landscaping in the landscape schedule(s) and provide all required information
on the landscaping in that table.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Provide "Planting Type" for all proposed trees and shrubs
and ensure that the plat is categorized properly.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
• Revise the required and provided landscaping calculations to accurately represent all requirements
of the zoning ordinance, the ZMA and the C.O.D.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
IUVIUUU uiU L;d1UU1duu1 16 1U1 uuui UIU IUquiiUU di1U UIU P1UVIUUU Ldiye endue �Lreet trees
(C.O.D. IX Street frontage).
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed on previous site plan.
o Provide a count of the required and provided required ornamental along Route 20 (C.O.D.
IX Street frontage). At this time no ornamental trees are shown along the street. The
C.O.D., the EC guidelines, and previously approved site plan all specify ornamental trees
interspersed along the road. Provide the required trees.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed on previous site plan.
o Provide a calculation for the provided landscape area. Please note that the landscape
area is the area of landscaping beds and not the canopy of the trees in the beds
(32.7.9.6).
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The landscape area of 17,543 appears
to be quite large. Either revise this number or clarify in the Comment Response
letter why it is correct. The "landscape area" is only the islands in the parking lot
and the planting beds, which have parking lot landscaping in them, directly adjacent
to the parking lot. This should not include more than 10' from the parking area.
o Provide a count of the canopy provided that does not include any canopy previous utilized
to meet the canopy requirement on previously approved site plans. See other landscape
comments about the need to amend previously approved site plans.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The canopy specified does not appear
to match that shown in the provided landscape schedule. Either revise this number
or specify in the comment response letter where the number is derived from.
Page 10 of 17
o Do not include proposed trees in the canopy count if they area outside of the project area.
The project area appears to be the parcel for Block 1 and does not appear to include the
two pocket parks that where part of Block 2. If these pocket parks are supposed to be part
of the project, and utilized to plant required landscaping, include them in the project area
and the "Total Area" utilized in the canopy calculation.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. See comments above on three
existing trees that still need to be removed from the proposed landscape schedule
and the calculation for the canopy provided.
o Ensure that all C.O.D and zoning ordinance landscaping requirements are met.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. See other landscaping comments for
details.
Ensure that the different species of existing and proposed plant and plant types are differentiated
by symbol and/or label.
FINAL: Comment addressed.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment no longer fully addressed. There are two labels on the
landscaping that do not match the number of symbols shown or the number specified in
the Landscape Schedule. Address the following:
o In the upper left part of the landscape plan there are 7 "VC" plantings but their label
specifies 10. Update the label to be correct.
o In the middle of the back of the building there are 10 "HA" plantings but their label
specifies 11. Update the label to be correct.
Ensure all species of trees and Shrubs conform to the "Native Plants for Virginia Landscaping" list
(C.O.D. Section IX. Restriction (1)).
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. It appears that half of the tree and shrub, as well as grass
and groundcover, species specified are native. Ensure all species of trees and Shrubs conform to
the "Native Plants for Virginia Landscaping" list as specified in C.O.D. Section IX. Restriction (1).
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Thuia occidentalis does not appear to be a
native species for Albemarle or even Virginia. Remove it from the landscape plan and
replace it with a native species.
Ensure that the required street trees are provided along Trailside Drive
FINAL: Comment addressed.
On the landscape plan identify the existing trees that have previously been planted to meet the
requirements of previously approved site and subdivision plans for Riverside Village. Provide a
landscape table for existing trees so that they can be reviewed for meeting requirements of the
Code, ZMA and/or C.O.D.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Landscaping from previously approved site plans may not
be removed or replaced with different plantings without amending the previously approved site
plan.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
o See the comments above about modifications needed to correctly show other
existinq landscaping in the site plan.
o Revise the three labels on the three existing trees specified above along Trailside
Drive to specify that they are existing.
Provide a conservation checklist, conservation details, and tree protection fencing to ensure that
the existing trees that area to remain area preserved.
FINAL: Comment addressed as long as existing landscaping is still to be replaced. Consider the
comments above. Provide the required information if any existing landscaping is to remain.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Also provide the tree protection fencing in
the Existing Conditions and Demolition and Grading sheets.
11. [32.5.2(i) & (n)] Address the following:
D1111UHS10H uie width, and centerline radii, and corner radii of the proposed eastern entrance and ensure
that the entrance road meets or exceeds minimum road requirements.
FINAL: Comment addressed. More information has been provided.
Page 11 of 17
Provide all road and alley names, and their letter designation from the Application Plan, on the site plan
FINAL: Comment not addressed. None of the roads or alleys internal to Riverside Village have names
provided on the site plan. Revise the site plan to show them as specified.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. None of the street names. other than Route 20.
appear in the Existing Conditions sheet and even Trailside Drive does not appear on many of the
sheets and the Riverwalk Xing label has been put on one of the alleys instead of on the correct
accessway. Revise the street names and add labels to the other sheets.
Provide all access easements.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
o Submit for review all easement plats.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not vet addressed. Submit for review all easement plats.
o Submit draft deeds of easement for all proposed easements.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not vet addressed. Submit draft deeds of easement for all
proposed easements.
o Easement plats and deeds must be approved by the County, signed, and recorded prior to
approval of the site plan.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not vet addressed. Easement plats and deeds must be
approved by the County, signed, and recorded prior to approval of the site plan.
o Provide an access easements along the main parking access, closest to the proposed building.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. An access easement has been provided
from the north entrance back to Block 2. However another access easement from
Trailside Drive, across the parking lot, and to the other new access easement also needs
to be provided. Provide the required access easements.
o Revise the "New v/w access easement to be dedicated" label to more clearly state what the
access easement is for and provide reviewer information on what the "v/w" means_
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
Provide trash containers and dimension the dumpster pad.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
Clarify is both dumpster pads will be built according to the Dumpster Pad Enclosure Detail on
sheet C10. The enclosure for the one to the east does not have a reference to the detail and is
of a different design.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
o Ensure that the Dumpster pads both will be "enclosed" and meet the size requirements.
Provide associated details and labels.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
o Revise the dumpster pad detail to not have the reduced viewport image of another detail within
it.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Revise the dumpster screening detail so
that it does not show brick below grade, unless that is what is desired.
Show the location of any outdoor lighting.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed (32.6.2(k) & 4.17). Address the following:
o There is one spot, along the property line with Route 20, where the foot candles are above'/z.
This may be an error in the lighting plan since no light fixture is directly adjacent to those
numbers. Revise the sight plan to ensure that at any property line adjacent to a road the
footcandles are '/2 or less.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
■ Revise the photometric plan so that the property line, and not the curb of the
road, is the edge of the area and where light levels cannot be above 0.5
footcandle.
■ Because the property line is right in between two of the data points, and in many
places the light levels are too high on one side (ex. 1.8) and low (0.2) on the other
side of the data point it cannot be determined whether it would be more than %
footcandle at the property line or not. However, if averaging the two it would be
over'/z footcandle and therefore above the allowed amount at the property line
along Route 20. Revise the light plan to ensure that the light levels will not be
above 0.5 footcandles at the property line with Route 20's right of way.
Page 12 of 17
o The items circled in the Philips Gardco detail do not match the catalog number specified in the
Schedule. 135LA-6470 is specified in the schedule and 215LA-641A is circled in the detail.
Ensure that the schedule and detail match.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
o The items circled in the WAC Lighting "Caliber" sheet does not match those shown in the
schedule. The schedule shows "BZ" and the sheet shows "AL". Ensure that the schedule and
detail match.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
o Revise the note under the schedule to specify that the other lighting fixtures can be found on
sheet C12.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
o Does note number 4 mean that light fixture "D" is not included in the photometric diagram?
Clarify why this cannot be done, or if it was just not able to be accomplished before first
submittal.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Add a note on the Photometric Plan sheet
that specifically states that the FM-W2612 light fixture will only be mounted ceilings and
under canopies and will not be mounted on any wall.
o Clarify the location of lights B9, B22, B23, B24, & 132b
o FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
o MEW COMMENTI FINAL Rev. 1: Revise note number 3 in the Photometric plan to also
specify that the WS-W36614-AL lights will have only one light fixture and that it will be
pointing down.
o NEW COMMENTI FINAL Rev. 1: Specify the amount of Lumens for the URA-40582-W30
light fixtures in the lighting schedule chart.
Revise the hatch for the walkways. There appears to be portions not hatched.
FINAL: Comment addressed.
Provide required Loading area(s).
FINAL: Comment not addressed. (4.12.13 & 4.12.18) No loading spaces appear to be provided and nc
loading space calculation is shown. Provide the required loading space(s) and an associated
calculation.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Loading spaces are not "parking spaces" and
should not be included in the parking calculations. Change the "Parking" heading to be
"Parking and Loading" and include the two calculations separately under that revised heading.
If there is to be any new sign for the proposed use(s), on the final site plan depict and label the sign
location. (Depicting the sign on the final site plan is not approval of the sign location or type).
FINAL: Comment not addressed. No information is provided for two structures at the entrance of Road
A onto Route 20. Label the existing monument sign and specify what the angled structure next to the
existing sign represents. Is it existing or proposed and what is it. Provide information on the site plan
about both of these structures that have no labels.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed. If any additional signaqe will be required for proposed
businesses they will need the appropriate approvals. The only signaqe shown on this site plan
is the existing monument sign at the intersection of Route 20 and Trailside Drive.
Show all proposed signage on the site plan.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. See engineering comments.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. See engineering comments.
Revise the parking calculation. There appears to be a math error.
FINAL: Comment addressed.
12. [32.5.2(j)] Revise the plan such that the existing pipes are visible. It appears some of the storm pipes and
sanitary sewer pipes are hidden behind the hatching for the parking lot and cannot be seen. Also, the
drainage system should include the direction of flow on all pipes and watercourses with arrows.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Provide direction of flow on the existing conditions sheet as well.
This includes pipes and ditches_
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed
13. [32.5.2(k)] Provide the proposed drainage facilities and channels. Include the direction of flow on all pipes
channels and watercourses with arrows.
FINAL: Comment addressed.
Page 13 of 17
14. [32.5.2(1) & 32.6.1(e)(5)] Provide the location of any existing or proposed utilities and utility easements
including telephone, cable, electric and gas. Indicate the deed book and page reference for all exiting utility
easements located on the property.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
• An underground electric (UGE) line appears approximately parallel to Route 20 and near the road on
the existing conditions sheet. It is not shown in the Utility Plan.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed
• No easement information is provided for this electric line. No other electric easement appears to be
proposed. Provide information on any existing or proposed electrical lines.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not addressed.
• Confirm that not telephone, gas or cable utility lines are existing or proposed on the site.
• FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not addressed. Confirm that not telephone, gas or cable utility lines are
existing or proposed on the site. Also, the Tinq line was relocated. Ensure that the easement is
shown on the site plan and that any deed and easement information is provided.
15. [32.5.2(n)] Provide the required handicapped parking signage.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Provide the required handicapped signage detail in the site plan.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed
16. [32.5.2(p) & 32.7.9.4(b)] Preserve all existing trees that are to remain. Include the following:
• Areas and other features shown on landscape plan. The landscape plan shall show the trees to be
preserved, the limits of clearing, the location and type of protective fencing, grade changes requiring
tree wells or walls, and trenching or tunneling proposed beyond the limits of clearing.
• Conservation checklist. The applicant shall sign a conservation checklist approved by the agent to
ensure that the specified trees will be protected during construction. Except as otherwise expressly
approved by the agent in a particular case, the checklist shall conform to the specifications in the
Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, pages III-393 through 111-413, and as hereafter
amended.
FINAL: Comment not addressed. Address the following:
• All existing landscaping along Route 20 and Road A cannot be removed or replaced with something
different without amending SDP2014-43 which is the site plan in which they were established. They
are a requirement of that previous site plan and the site would be in violation if they were removed
or replaced with different plantings. They could be temporarily removed during construction and
replaced, or replaced with the exact same plantings in the same location, if they are damaged but
they cannot be permanently removed or replaced without amending SDP2014-43.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed. Once this site plan is approved a note will be added to
the file of the previously approved site plan stating that the landscaping shown has iust
been relocated with this site plan.
• Since the existing landscaping is part of SDP2014-43 it cannot be used to meet requirements of this
proposed site plan.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
• The landscaping is now shown on sheets C11 & C12, not C9 & C10
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed. Comment no longer correct because of changes.
17. [Comment] Address the following:
• Provide reference benchmarks for the survey.
FINAL: Comment addressed.
• Indicate the available sight distance for the new entrance onto Route 20.
FINAL: Comment not addressed. There does not appear to be linework or labels on the site plan for
the proposed entrance onto Route 20. Either revise the site plan to include the required information or
specify to plan reviewer where on the drawing it was already located.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
Page 14 of 17
• Label the maximum height of all retaining walls.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Although the retaining walls now appear to be labeled there is at
least on location where the height of the retaining wall is above 6', which is not allowed in the Entrance
Corridor. Rework any walls above 6' in height, and their associated grading, to ensure that not retaining
wall is above 6' and that if necessary additional walls are terrace, spaced, and planted as required.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
• Indicate the deed book and page references for all existing utility easements located on the
property.
FINAL: Comment addressed.
• Provide a copy of all off -site easements, or letters of intent to grant them from off -site property
owners.
FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Provide a copy of all off -site easements, or letters of intent to
grant them from off -site property owners.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not addressed. Provide a copy of all off -site easements, or letters of
intent to -grant them from off -site property owners.
18. [Comment] Revise the "Parking Area PavPmPn+ q--fion" to fix the nnrtinn of the c,-r-finn that hac chiffpd.
FINAL: Comment addressed.
19. [Comment] The site plan has been submitted to Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation
(DCR) for review of its impact on the Dam Break Inundation Zone (DBIZ). Any comments received by the
reviewer will be forwarded to the applicant once they are received.
UPDATE: Comment above still valid. Also, show the state Dam Break Inundation Zone (DBIZ) line on the
site plan.
FINAL: Comment not addressed. Comment above still valid. Show the state Dam Break Inundation Zone
(DBIZ) line on the site plan_
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not addressed. According to Albemarle County GIS part of this lot lies
within the State Dam Inundation Zone (DBIZ) and therefore this comment is still required. In fact it
appears that at least part of one of the plazas will within the inundation zone. Show the state Dam
Break Inundation Zone (DBIZ) line on the site plan.
20. [Comment] See the attached comments from the majority of the other SRC reviewers. Fire/Rescue and
RWSA comments will be forwarded to you once they have been received.
UPDATE: See the attached comments from all of the other SRC reviewers.
FINAL: See the attached comments from the majority of the other reviewers. Others will be forwarded to
you when they are received.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. See the attached comments from the majority of the
other reviewers. The site plan cannot be approved until all reviewer have provided their approval.
21. 1urLjRi C: IVCyy l,uiy11yICIV I : z—,vIA2016-19 C.O.L. , jui. vj ruin, ividssuiy dnu riuNumun ui ouuaure.
Ensure that building facades facing a street do not exceed more than 80' in length without a change in
vertical plane. See C.O.D. VIII. A. for more details on the requirement.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Provide scaled elevations and building floor plans with the next
submission of the final site plan. Ensure that they show that the building meets this C.O.D. requirement.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment sufficiently addressed.
Additional comments for Final Site Plan:
22. [Commentl Revise the project number on the coversheet to be SDP201700062.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
23. [Comment: 32.5.1(c) & 32.6.1(e)(1)1 Revise the note on the coversheet of the site plan for setbacks to
specify the correct page of the ZMA documents in which the setback information is specified.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
Page 15 of 17
24. [Comment: 32.5.2(b)l Specify the specific height and number of stories for each of the buildings.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The only heights provided are the maximum allowed
heights. Include on the cover sheet of the site plan, and in the table on Sheet C2, the proposed
specific heights of the buildings. From the architectural plan 45' does not appear to be correct. The
definition of "Building, height of" can be found in the Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 18, Section 3) and
includes the following: "...or the mean height level between the eaves and ridge of a gable, hip or
gambrel roof." Provide the accurate building heights and do not must repeat the maximum allowed
when providing the "Constructed Max Building Height".
25. [Comment: 32.5.2(b), 32.5.2(e), 32.5.2(p) & 32.7.91 Hatching of parking planting areas should either be
changed to something more obviously representing landscape planting areas or a label and a leader should
specify "Landscaping Bed Typ." For those areas.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Specify in the site plan and clarify in general if all
landscape islands in the parking lots will be fully mulched or if they will have sod in areas not
directly adjacent to the tree trunks. Landscaping Notes 1 & 2 do not fully clarify this when the
islands are much larger then would normally be mulched must for a single tree.
26. [Comment: 32.5.201 There are labels for tops of walls (TW) that do not have a corresponding bottom of
wall (BW) value and there are some that have leaders that are not pointing at walls. Ensure all required wall
information is provided and that all labels and leaders are pointing at the appropriate walls.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
27. [Commentl The date in the title block is incorrect. This plan was submitted on10/30/17, with an official
submittal date of 11/06/17, and the title block date is from June. Ensure that a correct revision date is
provided, in the revision box, before resubmission.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
28. [Commentl Revise to remove the curb that is shown to be blocking the access way between the residential
units in Block 2 and the biofilter, or clarify with plan reviewer why it should stay.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
29. [Commentl Revise the width of the parking lot access ways to have sufficient width in all areas for two way
traffic. There is at least on location where the drive aisle appears to be reduced down to only 20' wide. This
is not sufficient for parking aisle where the spaces are 9' wide.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
30. [Commentl Revise the corners of the west most parking planting island to have sufficient radii
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
31. [Commentl Revise the hatch in the "Flush Curb to CG3 Nose". There are two different hatches. If the 2nd
hatch is to remain clarify with a label what it represents.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
32. [Commentl See the attached comments from other reviewers. Approval of each reviewer is required before
site plan approval.
FINAL Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. See the attached comments from other reviewers.
Approval of each reviewer is required before site plan approval.
33. [NEW COMMENTI Final Rev. 1: Revise Recreational use information on the Cover Sheet. The
recreational information on the coversheet does not match. Address the following:
• Remove the "Recreational Use:" information provided under "Proposed Use".
• In the "Land Use Schedule there is a section labeled "Recreational Space". If this is meant
to be the area of the plazas update this to be the correct size for the plazas. The sidewalks
that bisect two of the plazas should not be included in the amount of space for the plazas.
Page 16 of 17
34. [NEW COMMENTI Final Rev. 1: Revise the values shown in the "Land Use Schedule" so that they
actually total correctly. In this last submission there appears to be about a 900 SF difference from
the overall size of the parcel and the areas provided.
Staff has provided references to provisions of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle. The Code is
kept up to date by the County Attorney's office. The Code may found on the County Attorney's website which
may be found under "Departments" at Albemarle.org.
In accord with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code if the developer fails to submit a
revised final site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter the
application shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the developer.
Please contact Paty Saternye in the Planning Division by using psaternyeQ-albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext.
3250 for further information.
Page 17 of 17
Review Comments for SDP201700062 lFinal Site Development Plan
Project Name:
Riverside Village Block 1
Date Completed:
Monday, February 26, 2018
Department1DivisionfAgency:
Review Sys:
Reviewer:
Bob Jocz��
b]+
En ineerin
9 9
Requested Changes
Rev 2 Comments
1-Traffic control signs/stop bars needed for intersections of proposed parking lot travel ways and existing private
alleyslintersection with Trailside Drive_
Rev 2 — Partially Addressed_ Traffic control not provided for intersection involving East
alleyway-
_ afety railing must be provided for retaining }, alls taller than 4'_ Engineered designs, with PE seal and signature, must be
provided for retaining walls greater than 4'_ Building permit may also be required_
Rev 2 — Partially addressed_ Please note retaining walls taller than 4' must have safety railing_ Provide detail-
3-[Sheet C3] Identify areas with critical/managed/preserved slopes_
Rev 2 — Partially Addressed_ Label or provide managed slopes on all sheets-
4-[Sheet C5] Identify hatching located leading up to structure All on parcel 78-8A_ This hatching type is not called out, or
identified in key_
Rev 2 — Not addressed_ Provide callout on all sheets-
5-[Sheet C5] identify location of any proposed ditches/conveyance channels call out to related detail. calcrilations_
Rev 2 — partially addressed_ Ditch should be labeledlidentified on grading and utility sheets.
6-Dimension western most handicap parking spaces and access isle
7-Dimension loading space-
8-Provide elevation spot shots for surface elevation in dumpster areas to evaluate positive drainage from dumpster enclosures-
9-Provide details for 12' yard drain-
1 0_0n profiles, structure A9 is presented as 'existing" when it is to be nek5, structure replacing an existing manhole Please
correct_
11_Ensure curb cut for bio retention facility outfall properly aligns with the rip rap spillway_
1_On stormsewer profiles, provide location and spacing for waterline crossing stormsewer between structures All and A9_
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: I 0311612018
Stephen C. Brich, P.E.
Commissioner
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper, Vaginla 22701
February 27, 2018
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Attn: Paty Saternye
Re: Riverside Village-Blockl- Final Site Plan
SDP-2017-00062
Review #2
Dear Ms. Saternye:
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Shimp Engineering, dated June
16, 2017, revised February 06, 2018 and offers the following comment:
Land Use
Please provide sufficient plan sheet detail showing that appropriate geometry is provided
from the entrance east on Route 20. Please refer to Figure 3-4 page F-59 of Appendix F
in the VDOT Road Design Manual.
Please provide a copy of the revised plan along with a comment response letter. If further
information is desired, please contact Willis C. Bedsaul at 434-422-9866.
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The
owner/developer must contact the VDOT Charlottesville Residency Land Use Section at (434)
422-9399 for information pertaining to this process
Sincerely,
�f
dw4xL-
Adam J. Moore, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
APPLICATION#
TMP:
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS - E911
SDP201700062
078G00001000A0
DATE: 2/20/2018
FROM: Elise Kiewra
ekiewra@albemarle.org
Geographic Data Services (GDS)
www.albemarle.org/ads
(434) 296-5832 ext. 3030
STONY POINT COURT
Per Part I, Section 4-i of the County's Road Naming and Property Numbering Manual (page 7 of
PDF).
"No proposed road name shall be approved which begins with a word that appears as the first
word in five or more official road names."
1. STONY is the first word in over 5 road names in the County.
You could use Stony as the second word for the road name if you want to try and keep that in
there as long as the name plus spaces and designator do not go over 16 characters.
Please review the procedures in the Road Naming and Property Numbering Manual to decide upon
a road name.
We recommend providing three (3) candidate names for each road to our office for
review, in case your first choices are not acceptable.
A PDF version of the Ordinance and Manual can be found here:
httDs://www.albemarle.ora/unload/imaaes/Forms Center/Departments/Geographic Data Service
s/Forms/Road Namina and Property Numberina Ordinance and Manual.pdf
Please consult the County's Road Name Index to check your road names prior to submittal. The
Index can be found here: http://www.albemarle.org/albemarle/upload/images/webapps/roads/
Parcel and mapping information can be found here: http://gisweb.albemarle.org/
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Albemarle County
Service Auth4rity_ February 27, 2018
�— Y
Serving 6 Conserving
Shimp Engineering
Attn: Mr. Justin Shimp, P.E.
201 East Main Street, Suite M
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
Re: Final Site Development Plan for: Riverside Village Block 1
Dear Justin:
We have reviewed the plans entitled "Final Site Development Plan for: Riverside
Village Block 1," dated February 6, 2018. The following comments need to be addressed.
General
1. Provide fixture counts for commercial and residential space separation. These
counts will be used to size water meters.
2. Final Site Plan approval will not be granted until Riverside Village and Block 5
utilities are dedicated to the ACSA.
3. A fire hydrant is required to be within 100-feet of a building with a FDC. As a
suggestion, it is possible to move the FDC closer to the hydrant.
4. Remove sheets 10, 11, and 15 from ACSA submission.
Sheet C7
1. Shift island out of ACSA easement, as shown on plans.
2. Edit service lines for the proposed buildings. The ACSA would like to see
something like what has been marked in the plans.
3. Move water meter out of the sidewalk for the far -left building.
Sheet C12
1. ACSA will not be responsible for replacing Plant Ref.l, CD, deciduous shrub,
located in sewer easement.
2. Remove shrubs from ACSA easement around water meters.
3. Remove tree from ACSA FHA easement.
If you have any questions concerning this review feel free to call at (434) 977-4511,
Ext. 113.
Sincerely,
1j,r,1,4_- r,-i X .
Richard Nelson
Civil Engineer
RN:dmg
050601 Rive rsideVillageComments2022718
168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville, VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977-451 1 • Fax (434) 979-0698
www.serviceauthority.org
Review Comments for SDP201700062 IFinal Site Development Plan
Project Name: Riverside Village Block 1
Date Completed: Thursday, February 15, 2018 DepartmentlDivisionfAgency: Review Sys:
Reviewer: Michael Dellinger CDD Inspections No Obje-Ction
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: I 0311612018
Review Comments for SDP201700062 IFinal Site Development Plan
Project Name: Riverside Village Block 1
Date Completed: Saturday, February 24, 2018 DepartmentIDivisionfAgency: Review Sys:
Reviewer: Shawn Maddox FJ Fire Rescue oObjection
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: I 0311612018
Review Comments for SDP201700062 IFinal Site Development Plan
Project Name: Riverside Village Block 1
Date Completed: Thursday, March 01, 2018 DepartmentIDivisionfAgency: Review Sys:
Reviewe r:IHeather McMahon
DDD ARB No Objection
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: I 0311612018
Review Comments for SDP201700062 IFinal Site Development Plan
Project Name: Riverside Village Block 1
Date Completed: Friday, March 16, 2018 DepartmentlDivisionfAgency: Review Sys:
Reviewer: Rebecca Ragsdale CDD Zoning No Objection
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: I 0311612018