Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201700032 Review Comments Architectural Review Board Approval 2018-03-28 (2)Margaret Maliszewski From: Mike Myers <mmyers@dominioneng.com> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 6:33 AM To: Margaret Maliszewski Subject: RE: Spring h ill/Towneplace Suites Margaret, I am sorry I missed your phone call yesterday, got tied up most of the afternoon. Yes, we will be able to plant along that southern property line since the wall is gone. I will send a new grading plan with some mocked up trees on there. Also, to cut costs, we have sloped the parking garage away from the building to essentially bury the garage more into the hill. The garage is not visible from the EC, but figured I would point that out, ft probably isn't altogether relevant to the ARB review but part of the whole package! Stay tuned for a plan this morning, and we look forward to hearing from you after you run this by the ARB. Thank you! As always! Mike From: Margaret Maliszewski [mailto:MMaliszewski@albemarle.org] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:47 PM To: Mike Myers . Subject: RE: Spring hill/Towneplace Suites Mike, I would like to run this by the ARB on Monday to make sure they are OK with the 3' change. Can you tell me if the elimination of the retaining wail on the south side will allow for the row of trees on the southern perimeter to continue to the eastern property line? Thanks. Margaret From: Mike Myers [mailto:mmyers@dominioneng.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 12:45 PM To: Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Subject: Springhill/Towneplace Suites Margaret, We have been working with some construction costing issues and it makes sense to raise the building for site balance and to remove that retaining wall on the south side of the property. I have attached "before and after" pictures here which document the negligible effect on the street view of the building. Do you have a few minutes this afternoon where we can discuss to make sure we are on the same page? Thanks! Mike ati3.:hCi F. i$iy i'r, t=.E. President - Director of Engineering C,uminij.. Engin )raring and Design, LLC 434.906.3161 (mobile) 1 SET TRUNK PLUMB. see — PLAN5 POK M ACT LAYOUT AND SPACING. TREE TIES, SEE SPEC5.— I -12. 50. OM STAw,— SET 180 DEGREP5 APART FIN154ED GRADE AFFV 3' OF MULCN AFTER PLANTING AND WATER— TNOROUGNIY W COMPACTED EARTH — WATERING BERM ex6TJNG GRADE PLAMING MT. SEE SPECS PICK 0', KEOURZMENTS, PLANTING SOIL• AND PLANTING 501E MENDMENTS. REMOVE BURLAP 4 STRINGS FROM TOP I/3 OF RODT� BALL TM+O 11ME5 E,^ll UNDISTURBED 501E OLl (MIN) ;P)TREE PNNDETAIL (;PE 8RO L ItvY QLu^�' ®dLn)ra1F41Ln C-pRrpD N.— $I"IGI. C ripff 1T uI XoT74r1Ypp sNRIfB AA 18nbwl Red Glak 24• D 2.1.9?b >IB EWE— B 24' C 22.0% I0 To 72 S swI 'b • '5)A dLYN 85 S n 2244'' Sr:c.,. I DC .SX LANILtlCa1'+i MAINTENANCE NOT6c I •t '`.\ / \ 1ST\\ \\ ti 1k1;' , � \ C 1 s2. I. ALL SITE PLANTINGS OF TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL 9E ALL. TO \I .+...A.... 3,aNr NF.Agi AN BE MAINTAINED AT; MATGRE HEIGHT; THE raPPnc OF Tr+�s t' i 1 \L ,......-�..,-._ IS PROMOTED. SHRUBS AND TREES SMALL BE PRUNED MINAUILY MD \� �+.ra•u.+w.`.^r�.'.. '` C ggsao d L R'^u ONLY 70 SUPPORT SHOULD ObE E HEALTH OF DURING T PLANT. 1 \ \ ` / •� �\bry r��� \\ `\ ...r C •� _ n y 2. TREES R SL AFT SHEAF BE POR EA YSPRI THE OORE O SEASON �\ i \ ` .....� �:':.... O W THE FALL AFTER LEAF DROP OR EARLY SPRING BEFORE BID EWEAIC �/p51 � Ff'CJ � \ \ I TREES E SHRUBS SHALL BE PIIRC}HASED FROM A CERTM SUPPLIER. H ;ir -m �� ,g Cw / ! • � • \ \'+. � tea\ • �'""„� oC _ dawwwwm. r -m ...d IC L + I AR - AMNUBSUII L • 5 AA - ARMARBUYIF6LfA WH / / / \ ! 5\ ��\```\\ ; \ \ , _ m. o �6 • ,.... .. n aa cNA¢ F. YPxs 10 rz ! QP - 9UEWO PALUS M BI - ®� MILLWdS ScF�kyyS A�y51 / / -./ / _ —� ` ♦`\ \ �'1\ \\\ 'alp- Fce Ica— - -- o OBn4/I7 IS710�CIAI, 5118 ABS6 = a7a As - z •x� /. / .' \ \ \ \ \ - U.5'AL PHOPDX9 cANGPr- MORK 9P �� -Ace vtastE�nE 1c - cue�e 1 �0 / T f r `\` \\\\ \ \ \ \\ \\\ \\ ALT OUG GARA E IS OT Pox lxsa CANOPY >�Ema» IB,PAB slP / . . \ \ 1mm um cANOPY — a1•eos or > 16.m sr 9S F — / , / / � c� - Lrot�TBs rnoernA � rB - wru»A i�¢o>ar � � / �� / i { r r \\ \ \ \ � VISIBLE FROM THE EC GRADE .1. ,.� , 1 'PRt� PH6 LO �AC�3 /'N►, rr7a"pc''` lad SPACES PHOPIDSO �w► Ps - eEceA ABn� ;y HN - MMM N>PPorr�A +53' i. �� j� : _ i +� t ; T\/\!\\\1tii i±y IVOW SLOPES AWAY FROM 'r1�s eaglmam = 19.z � � , '�=' � TM PB09EWS0 = aO 9K ® TB - UM EIMMA ; �'/ �` I� 1" I'I E WAL 0 N TH I N O RTH o �q i i i / // `A PROM" PABRIlEG MUKkMMEl 161.2D sS , _- +.N . -�. �. '� ' i i �� �� / - \ \\ o\ 5 : AANEDs aE•.AS7 FACE OF THE 61C P161PTRTG BH3QU WMD. `. , 24 9R \ l �\� GARAGE J'IdNIIIIG AREA PROP!lD: ll,424 9P > 3,207 3P 4$ .� \4s13•ir i' / 200. R NPIAANCE TIMID V" SME) '' yi \ _ _ _ �`•Q J_ / / / ///s ! f! ! O u,vl TS ' ` \ ,F1 + ` \\`\\\ \ ! IAA � o nm ImQUim = 8 �r ± 'EJ ` ` �� ~v — ' i a ,li . \ \ pRo f11A �pft ,19 r XN AR TEW PAOYmSO - 10 . T' `�U�T�� i 11.� " +rr :� f \\`\\ � A� PO �O VA \ \\ o '1 � ©ICY 4 - \ \ rG � .*' • _ ' XO PLANTING AREA �\ \ \ \ •\ �Q t"` ALONG TRANCE CORRIDOR y � •' m � � -w - y� ,. 2� ` of ,IEAIET,EDGE �\I 3 - ae � .... � ;. "• ,�° QQ � es - 2 C ' . W p pTBUIL ESMT Y N 1 P >� 5 .'S -_ ,IFF i_ �r O PN%T S °� I - k x.L .y _ `, r: e � ..;r �C•¢'• � _. � .�/ �—+� . — ° 5 � Z �! U 4 _�\�\y\ 5\t'I a :'\R ®� �^.\ � >�!Fia � 'F „O gn F+•1 V _ L•e" �__'— i �s' �c fl� ct� ttF�ses51p �Z L w Ear ,fir- _ ?�x�c �x3�°�►l�s ___� 9 �.�, c w T p�p°S L� g$glP' \�\ \ \`1\ ; P 'D co51oRE \ \ \ 01 \ L F=.L 91 A"op pg GAS` ;" i \\yti° —'\\\\ `\\\ \ \ \ .\ �� tipts gQ10E / ZUSg' m \\\ p;\\ \\ \ ° \ \ •\ \ \ \ (]$�' �/' / \ 1 \ 1 r DICK PROJECTNO:1& INDEX TITILF, SITE PLAN SHEET NO: 9 o1 15 �N 80 0 so Bo 90 SCALE 1• = 30' KCAL& 1- — f LxIrE> ElB/14/17 ,lFc✓�jpr('Fi, 7 a: F C Pic, al �4 f �I_ .ice ��_ -- ` �• - — — l,�l till 6-1's 1 A!r r i 4 - e- Margaret Maliszewski From: Margaret Maliszewski Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 5:02 PM To: 'Mike Myers' Subject: RE: Springhill/Towneplace Suites Mike, I reviewed this request with the ARB at yesterday's meeting. They are OK with the 3' difference, but they definitely want to see trees added in where the retaining wall is coming out. Margaret From: Mike Myers [mailto:mmyers@dominioneng.com] Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 5:00 PM To: Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Cc:'Mark Dowdy' <mark.dowdy@dalyseven.com>; 'Tom Murphy' <tom@olive-arch.com> Subject: RE: Springhill/Townepiace Suites Margaret, I have enclosed the updated grading overlaid on the landscape plan. I have highlighted the changes. FYI, we still need a wall on the far southeast corner because the grade drops off there (as shown on the attached). I am happy to come by and visit with you or the ARB to go over this with you if you have any questions, just let me know, thanks! Mike From: Margaret Maliszewski Finailto:MMaliszewski(a)albemarle.org] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:47 PM To: Mike Myers Subject: RE: Spring hiil/Towneplace Suites Mike, I would like to run this by the ARB on Monday to make sure they are OK with the 3' change. Can you tell me if the elimination of the retaining wall on the south side will allow for the row of trees on the southern perimeter to continue to the eastern property line? Thanks. Margaret Location: On the east side of Rt. 29 North, across from Lewis and Clark Drive The ARB held a work session to discuss revised designs for the townhouses in Blocks 1, 14, 18, 21 and 24. After discussion, the ARB determined that the proposed elevations were generally acceptable and could be approved with staff review and final approval, with an added condition. Motion: Mr. Binsted moved to approve the design of the townhouse elevations, with final approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for ARB-2017-39: North Pointe Northwest Residential Area Townhouse pending staff review and final approval of the remaining conditions outlined at the May 15, 2017 meeting, with the following additional conditions: 1. A maximum of two adjacent facades shall be co -planar. 2. Adjacent townhouses shall not have the same siding color. 3. Two townhouses having full brick facades shall not be adjacent. Mr. Stoner seconded the motion. The motion carried by a vote of 5:0. OTHER BUSINESS a. Springhill Towne Place: Raising the building 3' in height Following a discussion of the proposal to revise grading resulting in raising the building 3' and elimination of some of the retaining wall on the south side, it was the consensus of the ARB that the increased building height was acceptable. Motion: Mr. Missel moved to approve the grading resulting in raising the building 3' and elimination of most of the retaining wall on the south side. Mr. Van Der Werf seconded the motion. The motion carried by a vote of 5:0. b. Old Trail Village: Blocks, visibility, ARB review Following a consideration of the Old Trail Village block layout and a discussion about distance and visibility, it was the consensus of the ARB that development proposed in Blocks 3, 7, 13, 14, 22, 26, 28, 29, 30 and 35 would not require ARB review; that Blocks 6 and I I would require Initial Site Plan review by the ARB, followed by staff level review of the Final Site Plan; and that Blocks 19, 24, 25, 32,33 and 34 would require full ARB review. Mr. Binsted recused himself from the Farmington discussion. c. Farmington Country Club: New building After considering the building colors and additional landscaping proposed for the new Farmington golf club building that is under construction near Rt. 250, it was the consensus of the ARB that no additional information is required for review. Albemarle County Architectural Review Board Final Action Memo June 19, 2017