Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201700058 Correspondence Final Site Plan and Comps. 2017-11-15 Tim Padalino From: Tim Padalino Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 5:15 PM To: Chris Schooley; Keeler, Devin Subject: UVA Golf Final Site Plan/3rd review comments Attachments: SDP201700058_UVa Golf Indoor_Final Site Plan_3rd Review Comments_2017-11-15.pdf; SDP201700058_UVa Golf Indoor_Final Site Plan_3rd Review Comments_2017-11-15 _SUMMARY.pdf Hello gentlemen, Please find attached my most recent review comments, based on the revised plans (dated 11/8 and provided electronically on 11/9). Since the review comments are getting lengthy (due to updates), and since many of the prior review comments have been resolved, I've also provided a companion "summary" document listing (in brief) the outstanding review comments. If there are any questions or desire to discuss any of the comments in detail, please don't hesitate to call (or perhaps we can discuss tomorrow afternoon, Chris, when you're here at Community Development for the building permit meeting). Thanks --- Tim Padalino, AICP Senior Planner I Community Development Department County of Albemarle, Virginia https://www.albemarle.orq/department.asp?department=cdd (434)-296-5832 x. 3088 1 SDP2017-58: UVA Golf Indoor Practice Facility(Final Site Plan) The following is a summary of current (updated) review comments, as detailed in corresponding review comment letter dated 11/15/2017. This summary is for convenient reference only; please carefully review the corresponding comment letter in full for all pertinent details and requirements. • Please resolve discrepancy between Sheets C0.06, C3.02, and C3.06 (which show a curved berm on the eastern side of parking lot) and Sheet L1.02 (which shows a straight berm on the eastern side of parking lot). Either design/configuration is acceptable, but the berms must be shown consistently across all sheets. • Please resolve discrepancy between Sheets C0.06,C3.02, and C3.06 (which do show a berm on the western side of parking lot) and Sheet L1.02 (which does not show any berm on the western side of parking lot). • Please revise construction detail(or add corresponding notes) on Sheet C5.02 for"Earthen Berm" to specify a minimum height of 36 inches (not 18 inches) for the western berm(between Golf Course Drive and new parking lot). However, the eastern berm(between Birdwood Pavilion and new parking lot) may be specified for a minimum height of 18 inches. • Please further revise Sheet 2.02 to reference the newly-created"Sheet TP 1.01" (not "Sheet L1.01"). • Please further revise Sheet 3.06 to reference the newly-created"Sheet TP1.01" (not "Sheet L1.01"). • Please include a note on Sheet C0.01 in the "Plant Protection" section which provides reference to the newly-created Sheet TP 1.01 for detailed tree protection requirements. • Plan review is ongoing. Please contact staff when tentative approvals have been obtained from all reviewers.