HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201600021 Correspondence Major Amendment, Final Site Plan 2016-04-06 E
M1.
a) a) 73
c o 4-, v
=o ,_ a s_ 3
-c E a) fo
_0 4-, 73 73 73
0 c
X C a ) .,
a) `° C
C t C E >. 3
C
• 4-, (0 t6 t0 C
Q i Q C a)
cu+-, - .�, -0 .+-+ Q 7 0
ro a) v1 E Vf a) U N
✓ - — aJ — �+ to L
a a) > +� a)
M1• C O as _02 E u i Z i O a
3 v _ E
U O C O •C c a)
O O - — E a)
.., C O j 'O 'p 'p
>' U) u 0 C C no E O
to O ro ro c a) a)
.t= ••, Q C O C v) U
a) >-
c
C Q p m O C c0 C
a)as
-a n a C � 0- _a c c
O E Q X 0 X 0 U '7
-C 0 CO U
,n U rti• .O-, a) C a) > - (13
a) N ca •Q mp to O
• t — — U i- _c C
•� C Q t- a Q
C ce. ,n iV1 �n t0 3 :•
0to� O O O O O 4- a)
i +J .-, 4-' ., .., _ U +_'
aCa
-, Q O O O O O O `�4
oU vE o O a a a a Q
O
C
CV
10 U U U U U
}, a) a, a, a) a, v ,- � -o C
t313 4-• O �.., v O
C O C O O O O o N 73 1
v C c c c c po c 4- >p
CD - CO CO CO CO U UU 73 E
., CL 73
Q Q c
v) v 0
c x 4-, C C 0
O a, t 3 to 0
ro
U m >- -0 COct
Cno to Ln cn in 0 0 0 ri
Q U t9 .'. C .--i r-i r1 r1 0 0 0
O- 0 E • .— N N N N N N N
2 co m E C
tl `.- O '- to
Ln a) 0 U C 4.,
N N O p +, +''cc, O
l0 a) O ' ' v 0
O C .� O Q
N 0 a) v: 0.
� a) .0-, s- to
r-1 vi
tti
r-I U a) .., p 3 t 0 ,n
.0 � a Q ' i N oa is — U rr
O p C ca).) t)A a) >, O '4-' •.42
r — v C
z �•Q' a� o X E aco � 3 .Jco s_ — .�
.� a) - ^ + a) C L. 0 •X.
Q C C C +•, .,,., •O C f0 ra
> } •u a) n O ..c in to u as 2 c ,-I
c i C vUi �p C a) - t O t�A ' N a) • . Q 'CL
01 ,. V C
o H O +� pp Q 0 a O 0 N = U Cl.) `ir
C Q "O aTs 0` 0 Q
(C9 O C ra C j 'a m 2 cc
ra p ) N m a) to = 0 — rl
C C 4, 3 i .-• E E f�D 3 ro i
0 0 � N >- Q H v H v
>. -c ' I }, O to _o a Cs-
a4 'v :°
G)L.
E o ch r'• m U a U I V 0 0 `u° ►- cC
XI 0 v O p 0 4., L"
ro u0i > co m r\ CO v-I •-1 Cr) ✓.
';
Z E E N N Q U O L
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
�r
C E � co
O m L a E v 7' 2 0 0 O 0 0 0 ,2 4
t "' o co O U O .V E l0 ,-1-1 , -1 �- Po C
++ +, ra 3 — O. 3 0 0 0 0 O 0 C r.
R3 V N -O G z t1 t1 a a co a �'
`a a .,. �,
-C Li. of • N^ _ a) • • O (A 0 0 V) V) ~ Z
f
Nospi *4104
Johnathan Newberry
From: Stephen von Storch <svonstorch@s-vs.com>
Sent: Thursday,July 07, 2016 8:37 AM
To: Johnathan Newberry
Cc: Gale Brown
Subject: RE:Chapman Grove
J.T.
I will add notes as requested.
Margaret signed off only requesting I improve legibility/graphics which I will work on.
I will wait until the PC review to collect all needed revisions for a final submittal before BOS.
Steve
Original Message
From:Johnathan Newberry [mailto:jnewberry@albemarle.org]
Sent:Wednesday,July 06, 2016 5:12 PM
To:Stephen von Storch
Cc: Margaret Maliszewski
Subject: RE:Chapman Grove
Steve,
Attached are comments from VDOT.
J.T.
Original Message
From: Margaret Maliszewski
Sent:Tuesday,July 05, 2016 4:06 PM
To:Stephen von Storch<svonstorch@s-vs.com>
Cc:Johnathan Newberry<jnewberry@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Chapman Grove
Steve,
It appears that all ARB comments have been addressed.The only issue I see at this point is that parts of the site plan
(SP1)are not legible. Overlapping notes, notes overlapping hatching, and some notes on their own are difficult or
impossible to read. Is there any way to improve the legibility?
Thanks.
Margaret
Original Message
From: Stephen von Storch [mailto:svonstorch@s-vs.com]
1
11110
Sent: Monday,June 20,2016 9:35 AM
To: Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>
Cc: Gale Brown<gddent@yahoo.com>
Subject: Chapman Grove
Margaret,
This set reflects our revised submittal for the church as worked out for setbacks and other planning issues.You will see
the north Phase One addition was completely setback behind the existing sanctuary front corner allowing the entry
vestibule and bell tower to stand as is.
Let me know if you need print copies or anything else to achieve final approval.
Steve
2
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
ALIDepartment Community Development
$M700-ff.: Planning Services Division
,� +R( g►; 401 McIntire Road North Wing• Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596
Phone: (434)296-5823 • Fax: (434)972-4035
Transmittal
From: JT Newberry Date: 06/21/16
To: ORon Higgins - Zoning 0
OEngineering 0
OMargaret Maliszewski - ARB 0
OJoel DeNunzio- VDOT 0
Olay Schlothauer- Inspections 0
JOB#/FILE NAME:SP-2016-0007 Chapman Grove Baptist Church and SDP201600021 Chapman
Grove Baptist Church (Major)
We are sending you the following items: ® Attached or ❑ Under separate cover
❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Prints ® Plans
❑ Plats n Specifications [' Other
# of Date Description
Copies
1 6/20/16 Sheets SP1 (Site Plan),A-1 (Phasing Plan)
1 6/17/16 Sight Distance Profile (sent to VDOT and Engineering only)
These are transmitted as checked below:
® For review and comments ® For approval ❑ Other
Remarks: Please use these sheets to provide comments on both the special use permit and the site
plan.
Comments are due in City View or email by: 7/15/16 Signature: JT Newberry
Johnathan Newberry
From: Johnathan Newberry
Sent: Monday,June 20, 2016 12:37 PM
To: Stephen von Storch
Subject: RE: Chapman Grove
Thanks,Steve.
8 full-size copies of SP-1 and A-1.
3 full-size copies of the sight distance profile.
Original Message
From:Stephen von Storch [mailto:svonstorch@s-vs.com]
Sent: Monday,June 20, 2016 9:31 AM
To:Johnathan Newberry<jnewberry@albemarle.org>
Subject: Chapman Grove
JT
PDF set revised and inclusive of al comments except the Tier 3 report which we hope to have by end of this week.
Remind me again how many print sets you would like and I will deliver those today. Is full size(24x36) or half size
preferable?
Steve
1
OF A
111141
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,North Wing
Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596
Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126
May 19,2016
Stephen von Storch
P.O.Box 1332
Charlottesville,VA 22902
svonstorch(&s-vs.com
RE: SDP201600021 Chapman Grove Baptist Church—Major Site Plan Amendment
Dear Mr.von Storch:
The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Initial comments
for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as
applicable,are attached:
Albemarle County Planning Services(Planner)
Albemarle County Engineering Services(Engineer)
Albemarle County Information Services(E911)
Albemarle County Building Inspections
Albemarle County Zoning Services
Albemarle County Architectural Review Board
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue (to be forwarded upon receipt)
Virginia Department of Transportation (to be forwarded upon receipt)
Virginia Department of Health(to be forwarded upon receipt)
Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed,and should
not be considered final. However,the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that
will be required to be resolved prior to final approval of the Major Amendment.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
a.,4. iktu.litg.wer
J.T.Newberry
Planner
CC: Chapman Grove Baptist Church
c/o Gale Brown
2064 Stony Point Road
Charlottesville,VA 22911
gddentr>vahoo.com
Albemarle County Planning Services(Planner)—J.T.Newberry,jnewberry@albemarle.org
1. Please show the following changes on Sheet SP1:
a. Section 32.5.2(a)—Please add the following general information:
i. The magisterial district(Rivanna District);
ii. Label or note the setback lines(Front—75 ft,Side—25 ft,Rear—35 ft);
iii. Note the property lies in the Entrance Corridor(EC)Overlay district;
iv. Descriptions of the previously approved special use permit and variances and their
conditions thereof.In this case,it may be easiest to add a second sheet to the major
amendment showing.PDFs of the approval letters for VA1992-030,VA2000-031 and
SP2000-061.Alternatively,you can add a note with this information.
b. Section 32.5.2(b)—Please add a note to clearly indicate the proposed use(e.g."Church
addition in two phases amending SDP2000-129.")
c. Section 32.5.2(c)—Please update the total building and disturbed areas for each phase once the
final design is determined.
d. Section 32.5.2(m)—Please show the distance to the centerline of State Route 20 from the
entrance.
e. Section 32.5.2(n)/32.6.2(i)—Please note the material for the new parking spaces.
f. Section 32.5.2(p)—If existing landscaping does not meet minimum requirements,then please
submit a landscape plan that complies with Section 32.7.9.
g. Section 32.6.2(h)—Please add a signature panel for signature by each member of the site
review committee. LT eiw
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer)—John Anderson,jnderson2@albemarlle..org
1. Area of disturbance estimated<5,000 ft2. Activity is not subject to the VESCP or VSMP[17-300.A.;
17-302.A,respectively],and is not required to prepare an Erosion and Sediment Control,or SWM
plan.
2. A Tier 3 groundwater assessment is required-ref. 17-1003 [sample Tier 3 GW Assessment].
3. Show stream buffer on site plan. Avoid stream buffer(ref.GIS image).
Albemarle County Information Services(E911)—Andy Slack,aslackOalbemarle.org—No objection
Albemarle County Building Inspections,Jay Schlothauer,jschloth@albemarle.org
1. Due to the total number of parking spaces,two of them must be barrier-free. Provide two barrier-free
parking spaces on the ramp side of the building. One of these spaces must be van-accessible. 7
Albemarle County Zoning Services(E911)—Ron Higgins,rhiggins(&albemarle.ora
1. Parking area is labeled as having "43 spaces"where there are only 39 spaces total on site.Please revise
this label and the note above it to be consistent with the parking shown.
2. Parking analysis is acceptable for pre&post expansion parking,both of which work out to slightly
more than one parking space per three seats.
3. Additional landscaping may be required for revised parking area frontage plantings.
4. VAR2000-031 included a condition that any new additions meet the front setbacks at the time of
proposal.Therefore,new additions will require a front setback of 75 feet.
Albemarle County Architectural Review Board—Margaret Maliszewski,mmaliszewski@albemarle.org
1. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the site and architectural plans. "Visibility of all
mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated."
2. Submit the manufacturer's cut sheet for the proposed wall fixtures. Identify choices for all the lighting
options.
3. Add the standard lighting note to the site plan."Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that
emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to
reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of
lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts
shall not exceed one half footcandle."
4. Correct the plan regarding existing trees on site. Show that existing trees meet or exceed frontage
requirements or add trees to meet required quantities and sizes,with species and spacing compatible
Noire `err
Johnathan Newberry
From: Johnathan Newberry
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 8:13 AM
To: 'Stephen von Storch'
Cc: Gale Brown
Subject: Site Review Committee comments for SDP201600021 Chapman Grove Baptist Church Major
Amendment
Attachments: SRC comments for SDP201600021 Chapman Grove- Major.pdf
Hi Steve,
Attached are comments from the Site Review Committee.
Below is my estimation of the schedule moving forward. I will need to confirm it with my supervisors and the Clerk for
the Planning Commission:
1. Community Meeting on May 23rd
2. SP comments given to applicant on May 25th
3. Resubmit site plan/special permit plans on May 31st
4. Comments on resubmittal/Decision to go to P.H. on June 21"
5. Legal ad payment for Public Hearing Notice by July 5th
6. Staff report available by July 15th
7. PC Meeting on July 26th
Thanks,
J.T. Newberry
Planner
County of Albemarle, Planning Division
434-296-5832, ext. 3270
1
ig A
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,North Wing
Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596
Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126
May 19,2016
Stephen von Storch
P.O. Box 1332
Charlottesville, VA 22902
svonstorch@s-vs.com
RE: SDP201600021 Chapman Grove Baptist Church—Major Site Plan Amendment
Dear Mr. von Storch:
The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Initial comments
for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as
applicable, are attached:
Albemarle County Planning Services(Planner)
Albemarle County Engineering Services(Engineer)
Albemarle County Information Services(E911)
Albemarle County Building Inspections
Albemarle County Zoning Services
Albemarle County Architectural Review Board
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue (to be forwarded upon receipt)
Virginia Department of Transportation (to be forwarded upon receipt)
Virginia Department of Health (to be forwarded upon receipt)
Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed,and should
not be considered final. However,the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that
will be required to be resolved prior to final approval of the Major Amendment.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely, " ne&Ma 13J2 . Ce,Cte (966.444 t,46M
aA 1\1414 . AZA- (//t.d<Apc,i3Lj geAA>o,A 5/ e cfr,,
J.T.Newberry
Planner
CC: Chapman Grove Baptist Church ler,' z
c/o Gale Brown n
2064 Stony Point Road VIM / 1 - ti4 r�x.e cJU�of 4
Charlottesville, VA 22911 P, _
gddent@yahoo.com
l�"' '"_
'Scw „aa 6,34 4 -- 06e4 s&K<J414.,A ria., w .
U7
Albemarle County Planning Services(Planner)—J.T.Newberry,jnewberry@albemarle.org
1. Please show the following changes on Sheet SP1:
a. Section 32.5.2(a)—Please add the following general information:
i. The magisterial district(Rivanna District);
ii. Label or note the setback lines(Front—75 ft, Side—25 ft,Rear—35 ft);
iii. Note the property lies in the Entrance Corridor(EC)Overlay district;
iv. Descriptions of the previously approved special use permit and variances and their
conditions thereof. In this case,it may be easiest to add a second sheet to the major
amendment showing.PDFs of the approval letters for VA 1992-030, VA2000-031 and
SP2000-061.Alternatively,you can add a note with this information.
b. Section 32.5.2(b)—Please add a note to clearly indicate the proposed use(e.g."Church
addition in two phases amending SDP2000-129.")
c. Section 32.5.2(c)—Please update the total building and disturbed areas for each phase once the
final design is determined.
d. Section 32.5.2(m)—Please show the distance to the centerline of State Route 20 from the
entrance.
e. Section 32.5.2(n)/32.6.2(i)—Please note the material for the new parking spaces.
f. Section 32.5.2(p)—If existing landscaping does not meet minimum requirements,then please
submit a landscape plan that complies with Section 32.7.9.
g. Section 32.6.2(h)—Please add a signature panel for signature by each member of the site
review committee.
Albemarle County Engineering Services(Engineer)—John Anderson,janderson2@albemarle.org
1. Area of disturbance estimated<5,000 ft2. Activity is not subject to the VESCP or VSMP[17-300.A.;
17-302.A,respectively],and is not required to prepare an Erosion and Sediment Control,or SWM
plan.
2. A Tier 3 groundwater assessment is required-ref. 17-1003 [sample Tier 3 GW Assessment].
3. Show stream buffer on site plan. Avoid stream buffer(ref. GIS image).
Albemarle County Information Services(E911)—Andy Slack, aslack@albemarle.org—No objection
Albemarle County Building Inspections,Jay Schlothauer,jschloth@albemarle.org
1. Due to the total number of parking spaces,two of them must be barrier-free. Provide two barrier-free
parking spaces on the ramp side of the building. One of these spaces must be van-accessible.
Albemarle County Zoning Services(E91 1)—Ron Higgins, rhigains@albemarle.org
1. Parking area is labeled as having"43 spaces" where there are only 39 spaces total on site. Please revise
this label and the note above it to be consistent with the parking shown.
2. Parking analysis is acceptable for pre&post expansion parking,both of which work out to slightly
more than one parking space per three seats.
3. Additional landscaping may be required for revised parking area frontage plantings.
4. VAR2000-031 included a condition that any new additions meet the front setbacks at the time of
proposal. Therefore,new additions will require a front setback of 75 feet.
Albemarle County Architectural Review Board—Margaret Maliszewski,mmaliszewski(&,,albemarle.org
1. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the site and architectural plans. "Visibility of all
mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated."
2. Submit the manufacturer's cut sheet for the proposed wall fixtures. Identify choices for all the lighting
options.
3. Add the standard lighting note to the site plan. "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that
emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to
reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of
lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts
shall not exceed one half footcandle."
4. Correct the plan regarding existing trees on site. Show that existing trees meet or exceed frontage
requirements or add trees to meet required quantities and sizes,with species and spacing compatible
Sae 4'4400
with the character of the rural area.
5. Accurately show existing trees and shrubs on the site plan. Clearly identify all trees and shrubs to be
removed.
6. Add a tree and/or shrubs at the east end of the parking row located just north of the building.
7. Add a plant schedule to the site plan.
8. Add the standard plant health note to the plan. "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed
to reach,and be maintained at, mature height;the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall
be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant."
9. Clarify the terrace and sidewalk connections on the site plan.
10. Revise the site plan to show the existing tree located near the front sidewalk. Show that it will be
protected with fencing during construction.
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue—Robbie Gilmer,gilmer(a albemarle.org
1. No comments were provided,but their approval will be required prior to final approval (JTN).
Virginia Department of Transportation
1. No comments were provided,but their approval will be required prior to final approval (JTN).
Virginia Department of Health
1. No comments were provided,but their approval will be required prior to final approval (JTN).
0
a m.
C
�� MZ 1 I
ik -1,,M
11
11
1= 1C' 1tj
" = 12
i ;iiiIwo Z 14 1
ILq
;3o
l:('i
, �,,r1 1
i.! = 1 1,
Mm= � ' �k&
Ni,\
\.- , :*,_1 N
d
,fir,pr,fF.- LP
N
, 5 r,
,.....
...
. I
I, „
, \,..._ 3 r-
-ilii I - - - - - - - E 1 IT-y
4 A - _ N! i____ .
I\H
_ _ n If
f':f1cj)' a• 141 gg
6 I �ti m
,:� ` co m O ,
€ 1 vmtI
i
F4 tal 0 10 1 Lt j
11
n= '
zU) " 1
II
II
El a 1
YF 11
-
5
s
D
N
Johnathan Newberry
To: Stephanie Mallory; Carla Harris-CDD
Cc: Megan Yaniglos; Margaret Maliszewski; Elaine Echols
Subject: RE: Chapman Grove Baptist Church (SP201600007/SDP201600021)
Schedule for Major Site Plan Amendment:
4/4
('/ G�� `
4/4—Submittal date l/ �t'�tt/
409 ri
5/13-Comments due to Review Coordinator /
5/16—ARB Meeting 5 416 kekm.6-C-
5/19—SRC meeting in Room 246
Schedule for Special Use Permit:
3/21—Submittal date
4/20—Draft comments and Interdivisional Meeting
4/29—Deadline for final written comments to Coordinator
5/6—Comments due to Applicant
5/23—Staff report due to Supervisor
6/7—PC public hearing(no sooner than)
From:Johnathan Newberry
Sent: Friday,April 01, 2016 12:53 PM
To:Stephanie Mallory<smallory@albemarle.org>; Carla Harris-CDD<CHARRIS@albemarle.org>
Cc: Megan Yaniglos<myaniglos@albemarle.org>; Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>; Elaine Echols
<EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Chapman Grove Baptist Church (SP201600007/SDP201600021)
Stephanie and Carla,
As I worked on the legal ad for SP201600007, I discovered there was a site plan amendment application included in the
SP submittal. I took it down to the front desk and got it a number and folder. So,timeline-wise, here's where we are:
3/21/16—Submittal date for SP201600007 (SP amendment for a church)
4/1/16—Discovered the site plan application included in the SP submittal, which became SDP201600021 - Major
Amendment. I'm not aware of any additional copies to distribute with the major amendment.
Here's my idea:The concept plan submitted with the SP is the same plan to be reviewed with the SDP. I would like to
email a transmittal page to all of the SP reviewers that informs them those plans are also to be used for the SDP review. I
would include all of the SDP review deadlines in the transmittal.
Does that plan work for the distribution side of things? Or should I just request 16 additional copies of the site plan and
give them to Carla for distribution?
Please let me know what you think. I will inform the applicant where things stand once we know the plan.
Thanks,
J.T. Newberry
Planner
County of Albemarle, Planning Division
1