HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201600076 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2017-05-05 `11•01 'Isturd
7„e t s p
c„� ilyDominion
anAVh, Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
�, Charlottesville, VA 22911
A'a
��� I, 434.979.8121 (p)
e ers 434.979.1681 (f)
c'ts DominionEng.com
May 5, 2017
Mr. JT Newberry
Senior Planner
Community Development
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Rd
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: Woolen Mills Light Industrial Park -Final Site Plan-Comment-Response Letter
Dear JT,
Please find enclosed for your review, nine (9) sets of Final Site Plan. These plans have been revised to
address the Final Site Plan comments dated April 14th, 2017.
Albemarle County Planning
1. Please update the plan to reflect the recordation of the boundary line adjustment DB 4893 PG
401.
RESPONSE: The plan has been updated to reflect the boundary line adjustment DB 4893 PG 401.
A note has been added to the cover sheet and the site data on SP2 has been updated to reflect
this change. The GIS has not been updated so the new parcel number has been designated as the
larger parcel number.
2. It appears that wheel stops are needed for the spaces adjacent to Building 12 and one space
adjacent to Building 10.
RESPONSE: Wheel stops have been added parking spaces for Buildings 10 and 12.
3. The landscaping schedule needs to match the number of trees shown on SP6.
RESPONSE: The landscaping schedule has been updated to match the number of trees shown on
SP6.
4. Because this site is adjacent to a residential district, please also add a note to SP7 indicating "All
outdoor lighting, regardless of the amount of lumens, shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light
away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads."As required by section
4.17.4(b)(2)
RESPONSE: The note has been added to sheet SP7.
We trust the above adequately addresses your comments. Please let me know if you have any questions
or require additional information.
Sincerely, 4.--7/1„
Dustin E. Greene, EIT
W go
low vud
"t,tg- 1 - ym24,&41i 1/) t'&.. Th-Ed J..14,4kA44i.O.
a.,..44A-, 4e.(4A--
?9444. oe ..„
CoR/l;41 OL.11.414.4s.1
- €.7.AsAjlA' d-4- 1144--e4.14?
444_, a 4 s•- >4.42eil (011.e44-,64'14"j
-- _
ro/A;;
eL-69"". 4 4A—t4
Yvi-oeeu., t-4
•
(.911-4"*‘-• J=± 7 /lay
______
Johnathan Newberry
From: Johnathan Newberry
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 8:14 PM
To: 'Dustin Greene'
Cc: 'Mike Myers'
Subject: RE:Woolen Mills Comments
Dustin,
I've added follow-up comments below in red. Let me know if you have any questions ahead of our meeting at 1pm on
Monday.
J.T. Newberry
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle, Planning Division
434-296-5832, ext. 3270
From:Johnathan Newberry
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 3:55 PM
To: 'Dustin Greene'<dgreene@dominioneng.com>
Cc: 'Mike Myers'<mmyers@dominioneng.com>
Subject: RE: Woolen Mills Comments
Hey Dustin,
Sorry for the wait.Here are comments from Planning:
. • • .. ., . . - : . . . . .. - . .
• . •- . . - - •. ' - . . • ' . Please
update the plan to reflect the recordation of the boundary line adjustment in D.B. 4893, PG. 401.
. , • -. .' - .. "- . . . . . . :" . . • - • - -
' .. . . 1 -- .. . - . • : - • - "• - " - - . •- - • - • . - . . . . . _
•
Lane:
these-niers:I will consider this comment addressed, but please note in the future that this section requires
"dumpster pad(s)do not impede any required parking or loading spaces, nor any pedestrian or vehicular circulation
aisles."
1
Build: g f{7
10. I. • • -. .- • -• - • - • • : : . . .. _ , _ ,!!
. .. - -- , •. •_ •.• . •- . , !! .. _ :.t .
•
- - . _ ... _ : •• . .. __ . • . - • - - - . • _ , -. _ . ... _ _. . . . •_ . • _
appears that wheel stops are needed for the spaces adjacent to Building 12 and one space adjacent to Building 10.
"•••" • " •" _. •• _ . . ► -. -• _ _ - - :' • ••
•
•
•
_ ._ • • _ .. • __ • • • _ • - . _- •• _ • . • -- - - •. . --
•
• - -- •• .: •- - : -• •• -•: : .The landscaping schedule needs to match the number of trees shown on
SP6.
appreved4,andseapti,_wan,n
19. I. • __ .. • • .._ • • . _ _ • _ 1 1 1 _ - . ._
• - . • : . Thank you for providing additional information. Because this site is adjacent to a
residential district, please also add a note to SP7 indicating"All outdoor lighting, regardless of the amount of lumens,
shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads."
as required by Section 4.17.4(b)(2).
Thanks,
J T. Newberry
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle, Planning Division
434-296-5832, ext 3270
From:Johnathan Newberry
Sent: Sunday,January 29, 2017 4:26 PM
To: 'Dustin Greene' <dgreene@dominioneng.com>
Cc: Mike Myers<mmyers@dominioneng.com>
Subject: RE: Woolen Mills Comments
Hi Dustin,
2
Attached are comments from Engineering and below is a comment from Fire/Rescue. I will have Planning comments to
you by Wednesday afternoon this week.
I've noticed some work at the corner of Franklin St. and Moores Creek Lane. Have you already received comments from
ACSA/RWSA?
Thanks,
J.T. Newberry
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle, Planning Division
434-296-5832, ext. 3270
Robbie Gilmer, F/R:
Based on plans dated 12-22-16.
1. Please add a note to the plans. "Knox boxes required on each building, contact Albemarle County Fire Marshal office
for location. Due to the design with retaining walls two boxes maybe required on buildings 3, 4, and 5."
From: Dustin Greene [mailto:dgreene@dominioneng.com]
Sent: Friday,January 27, 2017 11:26 AM
To:Johnathan Newberry<jnewberry@albemarle.org>
Cc: Mike Myers<mmyers@dominioneng.com>
Subject: Woolen Mills Comments
Hey JT,
I was wondering when we will receive comments from all the reviewers for the Final Site and VSMP plans?
Best Regards,
Dustin Greene, EIT
Dominion Engineering& Design, LLC
172 S. Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
434-979-8121 Phone Ext. 110
434-979-1681 Fax
dgreene@dominionenq.corn
3
tip/
oops
4 e 01 Dominion
4�f k Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
111,/
434.979.8121 (p)
e cis 434.979.1681 (f)
°ts DominionEng.com
March 6, 2017
Mr. JT Newberry
Senior Planner
Community Development
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Rd
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: Woolen Mills Light Industrial Park -Final Site Plan-Comment-Response Letter
Dear JT,
Please find enclosed for your review, nine(9)sets of Final Site Plan. These plans have been revised to
address the Final Site Plan comments dated February 10th, 2017.
Albemarle County Planning
[Question]—When does the applicant plan to submit a Boundary Line Adjustment plat to
consolidate the two properties?This combination could be completed while the final site plan is
being finalized.
RESPONSE: A Boundary Line Adjustment plat was submitted on 3/01/17.
vi [Section 32.7.9]— Please remove the"properties to be consolidated" label on Sheet SP6 since
the existing property lines are not shown.
RESPONSE:RThe label has remained because a BLA has not yet been approved.
•3. [General Comment]—On Sheet SP1, under the Project Narrative, please correct the name of
Moores Creek Road to Moores Creek Lane under the"Access"description. There is one more
label to be changed.
RESPONSE: The labeling for Moores Creek Lane has been updated.
[General Comment]—This site lies in the Monticello Viewshed. Per Liz Russell, Project and
Planning Assistant at Monticello, please employ design guideline#1 as listed on the attached
document. The Monticello Foundation believes this guideline is particularly important for the roof
color(s)on this site.
RESPONSE: The building colors and materials for the roof shall be earth-toned and muted. A
note has been added to sheet SP4.
els
,e. ms
if �.i . Dominion
NSI Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
1:4"%k PI
Charlottesville, VA 22911
o 434.979.8121 (p)
4_.-4,
'te ers 434.979.1681 (f)
°ts DominionEng.com
[Section 32.6.4/32.8.6]—This site lies in the Dam Break Inundation Zone. I have provided a copy
of the plan to Rob VanLier, Regional Dam Safety Engineer, Department of Conservation and
Recreation, to ask if an engineering study as referenced under this section is required. I will
forward his reply as soon as it is received.
RESPONSE: Per email from Robert VanLier the development does not impact the dam owner.
Nor does it require the developer to provide monies to expand the emergency spillway. See
attached email
4 [Section 4.15.14]—Please move the monument sign out of the sight distance line for the
entrance onto Moores Creek Lane.
RESPONSE:RThe monument sign has been moved out of the sight distance line.
I. [Section 4.12.13]—The table on Sheet SP2 shows there are 11 dumpsters, but I only count 9
dumpsters on the layout plan. Similarly, the table shows 16 loading spaces, but I only see 12
loading spaces on the layout plan. Please rectify these numbers.
RESPONSE: The numbers for loading spaces and dumpsters had been rectified with this
submittal.
vi [Section 32.7.9.7]—On the layout plan, please show the typical screening for each dumpster as
referenced on Sheet SP15 and shown for the dumpster adjacent to Building#2.
RESPONSE: The wooden screening fence has been shown on the layout plan for each dumpster
and the detail is shown on SP15.
./9. [Section 32.7.9.8]—On Sheet SP6, please move the location of the tree shown on top of the
dumpster adjacent to Building#2.
RESPONSE: The tree on top of the dumpster has been moved adjacent to building#2.
[Section 32.5.2(n)]—Please amend the label for Building 12 across all applicable drawings. It
currently states 600 square feet, but the building is 1,200 square feet.
RESPONSE: The label has been updated accordingly.
kli [Section 32.6.2(i)]—On Sheet SP4, please amend the parking space count label in front of
Building#4. There are 6 parking spaces provided, not 7 spaces. Similarly, please amend the
parking space count label in front of Building#10. There are 7 parking spaces provided, not 8
spaces. As a result of these changes, please update column 11 in the table on Sheet SP2. I
count 94 total overall parking spaces provided.
RESPONSE: All parking spaces provided and counts have been updated accordingly.
2 of 16
rs
441100 Dominion
a �?`I , Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
1,13.11k
o_`S �� 434.979.8121 (p)
it.eps434.979.1681 (f)
cts DominionEng.com
A'2. [Section 4.12.16(e)]—Please provide details of the wheel stops with dimensions, anchor sites,
and materials.
RESPONSE: Details for the wheel stops has been added to sheet SP14.
,d1‘ [Section 32.7.3]—Please specify all locations of mechanical equipment and other utility
hardware proposed on site. These features must be screened from public view with materials
harmonious with the building or they shall be located so they are not visible from the public view.
RESPONSE: At this time the locations of mechanical equipment and other utility hardware are not
known,therefore,A note has been added to sheet SP6 addressing this comment.
14. [Section 32.7.9.4(c)]—The note on Sheet SP6 states that all trees along the entrance roads will
be saved in lieu of providing street trees. Please show the location of the existing tree line and all
areas with groups of individual trees that are a minimum of 6"caliper or greater. Please provide
information regarding the heights, calipers, and density/spacing of the existing trees and
vegetated areas to be preserved in lieu of providing street trees.
RESPONSE: The tree line for tree protection has been shown. The existing trees in the tree
protection area have trees have been called out in detail on sheet SP6. Trees have been added to
Belle Monte Ave due to the extensive cut. Street trees have not been provided along Ford Rd due
to the saving of street trees as shown in the tree protection.
15. [Section 32.7.9.4(b)]—Please demonstrate compliance with the Ordinance in terms of protecting
the existing trees that will be preserved in lieu of new plant materials. The limits of clearing must
be shown on the grading plan and landscaping plan, and the location of the protective tree
fencing must be shown on each drawing in order for the agent to approve the site plan.
RESPONSE: Tree protective fencing and the limits of clearing are the same line and have been
updated on sheets SP5& SP6.
16. [Section 32.7.9.6(c)]—Please state the minimum caliper and height of the Acer Saccharum
parking lot trees at time of installation on Sheet SP6. This species is classified as a large
deciduous shade tree by the Albemarle County Recommended Plant List, and therefore must be
installed at a minimum 1 '/.inches.
RESPONSE: The landscape schedule is showing caliper and height for all trees provided.
17. [Section 32.7.9.6]—On Sheet SP6, please note that 13 trees are being provided instead of 12
trees and that 10 trees are required to be installed instead of 8 trees.
RESPONSE: SP6 has been updated to reflect the proper amount of required and provided trees.
18. [Section 32.7.9.9(c)]—Please add a note to Sheet SP6 stating "All landscaping and screening
shall be maintained in a healthy condition by the property owner, and replaced when
necessary. Replacement material shall comply with the approved Landscape Plan."
RESPONSE: Note 3 has been added to SP6.
3of16
t S
63 0
ei,s4ea • Dominion
:§1/ lb, Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
~a°'�,� "'I, 434.979.8121 (p)
"e ers 434.979.1681 (f)
°ts DominionEng.com
19. [Section 4.17.4(a)]—Since both models of light fixtures emit greater than 3,000 lumens, they
must be full-cutoff fixtures. The cutsheet details on SP7 do not demonstrate that the fixtures are
full-cutoff. Please provide additional information on the next submittal.
RESPONSE: The light fixtures are full-cutoff fixtures and have been labeled on sheet SP7.
Albemarle County Engineering
A. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
1. Provide a copy of the DEQ coverage letter when obtained
RESPONSE: A copy of the DEQ coverage letter will be provided when obtained.
2. Complete Section 6- PPP
RESPONSE: Section 6 has been completed with this submittal.
B. Pollution Prevention Plan
1. Provide a plan showing pollution activities and prevention practices; Refer to the minimum control
and prevention practices list shown in Section 6C.
RESPONSE: The E&SC plan shows pollution prevention practices listed in Section 6C.
2. Site stormwater will be discharging to impaired waters with TMDL's. TMDL requirements will
have to be met(Ref. 9VAC25-880-70, etc).
RESPONSE: The SWPPP contains information relative to the TMDL requirements. Nutrient
credits will be purchased to satisfy phosphorous reduction.
C.Stormwater Management Plan
1. Show/provide legend.
RESPONSE: A general legend has been provided on Sheet SW2 and SP2. An E&S control legend
has been added to sheets SW4 and SW5.
2. FEMA map and date labeled for FEMA floodplain.
RESPONSE: The existing 100-year floodplain -100-yr bfe=324.0' per FEMA map no 51003CO289D
dated February 4, 2005, last revised by FEMA case numbers 16-03-1207P-510006 and 1207P-
510033, both approved on 02/06/2017 has been shown and labeled throughout the plans.
4 of 16
some` %woe
Johnathan Newberry
From: Johnathan Newberry
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 3:55 PM
To: 'Dustin Greene'
Cc: 'Mike Myers'
Subject: RE:Woolen Mills Comments
Attachments: Guidelines for Development_one page.pdf
Hey Dustin,
Sorry for the wait. Here are comments from Planning:
1. [Question] —When does the applicant plan to submit a Boundary Line Adjustment plat to consolidate
the two properties? This combination could be completed while the final site plan is being finalized.
2. [Section 32.7.9] —Please remove the "properties to be consolidated" label on Sheet SP6 since the
existing property lines are not shown.
3. [General Comment] —On Sheet SP1, under the Project Narrative,please correct the name of Moores
Creek Road to Moores Creek Lane under the "Access"description. There is one more label to be
changed.
4. [General Comment] —This site lies in the Monticello Viewshed.Per Liz Russell,Project and Planning Assistant
at Monticello,please employ design guideline#1 as listed on the attached document.The Monticello Foundation
believes this guideline is particularly important for the roof color(s)on this site.
5. [Section 32.6.4/32.8.6] -y This site lies in the Dam Break Inundation Zone. I have provided a copy of the plan to
Rob VanLier,Regional Dam Safety Engineer,Department of Conservation and Recreation,to ask if an
engineering study as referenced under this section is required. I will forward his reply as soon as it is received.
6. [Section 4.15.14] —Please move the monument sign out of the sight distance line for the entrance onto Moores
Creek Lane.
7. [Section 4.12.13] —The table on Sheet SP2 shows there are 11 dumpsters,but I only count 9 dumpsters on the
layout plan. Similarly,the table shows 16 loading spaces,but I only see 12 loading spaces on the layout plan.
Please rectify these numbers.
8. [Section 32.7.9.7] —On the layout plan,please show the typical screening for each dumpster as referenced on
Sheet SP15 and shown for the dumpster adjacent to Building#2.
9. [Section 32.7.9.8] —On Sheet SP6,please move the location of the tree shown on top of the dumpster adjacent to
Building#2.
10. [Section 32.5.2(n)] —Please amend the label for Building 12 across all applicable drawings. It currently states 600
square feet,but the building is 1,200 square feet.
11. [Section 32.6.2(i)] —On Sheet SP4,please amend the parking space count label in front of Building#4. There are
6 parking spaces provided,not 7 spaces. Similarly,please amend the parking space count label in front of
Building#10.There are 7 parking spaces provided,not 8 spaces. As a result of these changes,please update
column 11 in the table on Sheet SP2.I count 94 total overall parking spaces provided.
12. [Section 4.12.16(e)] —Please provide details of the wheel stops with dimensions,anchor sites, and materials.
13. [Section 32.7.3] —Please specify all locations of mechanical equipment and other utility hardware proposed on
site.These features must be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building or they shall
be located so they are not visible from the public view.
14. [Section 32.7.9.4(c)] —The note on Sheet SP6 states that all trees along the entrance roads will be saved in lieu of
providing street trees. Please show the location of the existing tree line and all areas with groups of individual
trees that are a minimum of 6"caliper or greater. Please provide information regarding the heights,calipers, and
density/spacing of the existing trees and vegetated areas to be preserved in lieu of providing street trees.
15. [Section 32.7.9.4(b)] —Please demonstrate compliance with the Ordinance in terms of protecting the existing
trees that will be preserved in lieu of new plant materials.The limits of clearing must be shown on the grading
(1111100
411110
plan and landscaping plan,and the location of the protective tree fencing must be shown on each drawing in order
for the agent to approve the site plan.
16. [Section 32.7.9.6(c)] —Please state the minimum caliper and height of the Acer Saccharum parking lot trees at
time of installation on Sheet SP6.This species is classified as a large deciduous shade tree by the Albemarle
County Recommended Plant List,and therefore must be installed at a minimum 1 3 inches.
17. [Section 32.7.9.6]—On Sheet SP6,please note that 13 trees are being provided instead of 12 trees and that 10
trees are required to be installed instead of 8 trees.
18. [Section 32.7.9.9(c)] —Please add a note to Sheet SP6 stating"All landscaping and screening shall be maintained
in a healthy condition by the property owner,and replaced when necessary. Replacement material shall comply
with the approved Landscape Plan."
19. [Section 4.17.4(a)] —Since both models of light fixtures emit greater than 3,000 lumens,they must be full-cutoff
fixtures.The cutsheet details on SP7 do not demonstrate that the fixtures are full-cutoff.Please provide additional
information on the next submittal.
Thanks,
J.T. Newberry
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle, Planning Division
434-296-5832, ext. 3270
From:Johnathan Newberry
Sent:Sunday,January 29, 2017 4:26 PM
To: 'Dustin Greene'<dgreene@dominioneng.com>
Cc: Mike Myers<mmyers@dominioneng.com>
Subject: RE:Woolen Mills Comments
Hi Dustin,
Attached are comments from Engineering and below is a comment from Fire/Rescue. I will have Planning comments to
you by Wednesday afternoon this week.
I've noticed some work at the corner of Franklin St. and Moores Creek Lane. Have you already received comments from
ACSA/RWSA?
Thanks,
.I:11. Newberry
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle, Planning Division
434-29(i-5832, ext. 3270
Robbie Gilmer, F/R:
Based on plans dated 12-22-16.
1. Please add a note to the plans. "Knox boxes required on each building, contact Albemarle County Fire Marshal office
for location. Due to the design with retaining walls two boxes maybe required on buildings 3, 4, and 5."
From: Dustin Greene [mailto:dgreene@dominioneng.com]
Sent: Friday,January 27, 2017 11:26 AM
2
cAs
% 6 •u Dominion
N`I . Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
^� �,, ' 434.979.8121 (p)
4��`e eps 434.979.1681 (f)
°rs DominionEng.com
March 6, 2017
Mr. JT Newberry
Senior Planner
Community Development
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Rd
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: Woolen Mills Light Industrial Park -Final Site Plan- Comment-Response Letter
Dear JT,
Please find enclosed for your review, nine(9) sets of Final Site Plan. These plans have been revised to
address the Final Site Plan comments dated February 10th, 2017.
Albemarle County Planning
1. [Question]—When does the applicant plan to submit a Boundary Line Adjustment plat to
consolidate the two properties?This combination could be completed while the final site plan is
being finalized.
RESPONSE: A Boundary Line Adjustment plat was submitted on 3/01/17.
2. [Section 32.7.9]— Please remove the"properties to be consolidated" label on Sheet SP6 since
the existing property lines are not shown.
RESPONSE: The label has remained because a BLA has not yet been approved.
3. [General Comment]—On Sheet SP1, under the Project Narrative, please correct the name of
Moores Creek Road to Moores Creek Lane under the "Access" description. There is one more
label to be changed.
RESPONSE: The labeling for Moores Creek Lane has been updated.
4. [General Comment]—This site lies in the Monticello Viewshed. Per Liz Russell, Project and
Planning Assistant at Monticello, please employ design guideline#1 as listed on the attached
document. The Monticello Foundation believes this guideline is particularly important for the roof
color(s)on this site.
RESPONSE: The building colors and materials for the roof shall be earth-toned and muted. A
note has been added to sheet SP4.
%girl Now,
ets
co 40 AgoDominion
y` I k Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
coo�, �" 434.979.8121 (p)
e ecs 434.979.1681 (f)
cts DominionEng.com
5. [Section 32.6.4/32.8.6]—This site lies in the Dam Break Inundation Zone. I have provided a copy
of the plan to Rob VanLier, Regional Dam Safety Engineer, Department of Conservation and
Recreation, to ask if an engineering study as referenced under this section is required. I will
forward his reply as soon as it is received.
RESPONSE: Per email from Robert VanLier the development does not impact the dam owner.
Nor does it require the developer to provide monies to expand the emergency spillway. See
attached email
6. [Section 4.15.14] —Please move the monument sign out of the sight distance line for the
entrance onto Moores Creek Lane.
RESPONSE: The monument sign has been moved out of the sight distance line.
7. [Section 4.12.13]—The table on Sheet SP2 shows there are 11 dumpsters, but I only count 9
dumpsters on the layout plan. Similarly, the table shows 16 loading spaces, but I only see 12
loading spaces on the layout plan. Please rectify these numbers.
RESPONSE: The numbers for loading spaces and dumpsters had been rectified with this
submittal.
8. [Section 32.7.9.7]—On the layout plan, please show the typical screening for each dumpster as
referenced on Sheet SP15 and shown for the dumpster adjacent to Building#2.
RESPONSE: The wooden screening fence has been shown on the layout plan for each dumpster
and the detail is shown on SP15.
9. [Section 32.7.9.8]—On Sheet SP6, please move the location of the tree shown on top of the
dumpster adjacent to Building#2.
RESPONSE: The tree on top of the dumpster has been moved adjacent to building #2.
10. [Section 32.5.2(n)]—Please amend the label for Building 12 across all applicable drawings. It
currently states 600 square feet, but the building is 1,200 square feet.
RESPONSE: The label has been updated accordingly.
11. [Section 32.6.2(i)]—On Sheet SP4, please amend the parking space count label in front of
Building#4. There are 6 parking spaces provided, not 7 spaces. Similarly, please amend the
parking space count label in front of Building#10. There are 7 parking spaces provided, not 8
spaces. As a result of these changes, please update column 11 in the table on Sheet SP2. I
count 94 total overall parking spaces provided.
RESPONSE: All parking spaces provided and counts have been updated accordingly.
2of16
Skew' 'sled
ls
its‘:x€74— ' Dominion
hi Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
�a�,,, � 434.979.8121 (p)
"C 434.979.1681
(f)
`'ts DominionEng.com
12. [Section 4.12.16(e)]—Please provide details of the wheel stops with dimensions, anchor sites,
and materials.
RESPONSE: Details for the wheel stops has been added to sheet SP14.
13. [Section 32.7.3]— Please specify all locations of mechanical equipment and other utility
hardware proposed on site. These features must be screened from public view with materials
harmonious with the building or they shall be located so they are not visible from the public view.
RESPONSE: At this time the locations of mechanical equipment and other utility hardware are not
known,therefore, A note has been added to sheet SP6 addressing this comment.
14. [Section 32.7.9.4(c)]—The note on Sheet SP6 states that all trees along the entrance roads will
be saved in lieu of providing street trees. Please show the location of the existing tree line and all
areas with groups of individual trees that are a minimum of 6" caliper or greater. Please provide
information regarding the heights, calipers, and density/spacing of the existing trees and
vegetated areas to be preserved in lieu of providing street trees.
RESPONSE: The tree line for tree protection has been shown. The existing trees in the tree
protection area have trees have been called out in detail on sheet SP6. Trees have been added to
Belle Monte Ave due to the extensive cut. Street trees have not been provided along Ford Rd due
to the saving of street trees as shown in the tree protection.
15. [Section 32.7.9.4(b)]—Please demonstrate compliance with the Ordinance in terms of protecting
the existing trees that will be preserved in lieu of new plant materials. The limits of clearing must
be shown on the grading plan and landscaping plan, and the location of the protective tree
fencing must be shown on each drawing in order for the agent to approve the site plan.
RESPONSE: Tree protective fencing and the limits of clearing are the same line and have been
updated on sheets SP5&SP6.
16. [Section 32.7.9.6(c)]— Please state the minimum caliper and height of the Acer Saccharum
parking lot trees at time of installation on Sheet SP6. This species is classified as a large
deciduous shade tree by the Albemarle County Recommended Plant List, and therefore must be
installed at a minimum 1 ' inches.
RESPONSE: The landscape schedule is showing caliper and height for all trees provided.
17. [Section 32.7.9.6]—On Sheet SP6, please note that 13 trees are being provided instead of 12
trees and that 10 trees are required to be installed instead of 8 trees.
RESPONSE: SP6 has been updated to reflect the proper amount of required and provided trees.
18. [Section 32.7.9.9(c)]—Please add a note to Sheet SP6 stating "All landscaping and screening
shall be maintained in a healthy condition by the property owner, and replaced when
necessary. Replacement material shall comply with the approved Landscape Plan."
RESPONSE: Note 3 has been added to SP6.
3 of 16
tre Staid
is
o` ops
0146 1101 Dominion
s y I h Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
�, Charlottesville, VA 22911
d�, =• 434.979.8121 (p)
Fete srs 434.979.1681 (f)
°ts DominionEng.com
19. [Section 4.17.4(a)]—Since both models of light fixtures emit greater than 3,000 lumens, they
must be full-cutoff fixtures. The cutsheet details on SP7 do not demonstrate that the fixtures are
full-cutoff. Please provide additional information on the next submittal.
RESPONSE: The light fixtures are full-cutoff fixtures and have been labeled on sheet SP7.
Albemarle County Engineering
A. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
1. Provide a copy of the DEQ coverage letter when obtained
RESPONSE: A copy of the DEQ coverage letter will be provided when obtained.
2. Complete Section 6- PPP
RESPONSE: Section 6 has been completed with this submittal.
B. Pollution Prevention Plan
1. Provide a plan showing pollution activities and prevention practices; Refer to the minimum control
and prevention practices list shown in Section 6C.
RESPONSE: The E&SC plan shows pollution prevention practices listed in Section 6C.
2. Site stormwater will be discharging to impaired waters with TMDL's. TMDL requirements will
have to be met(Ref. 9VAC25-880-70, etc).
RESPONSE: The SWPPP contains information relative to the TMDL requirements. Nutrient
credits will be purchased to satisfy phosphorous reduction.
C. Stormwater Management Plan
1. Show/provide legend.
RESPONSE: A general legend has been provided on Sheet SW2 and SP2. An E&S control legend
has been added to sheets SW4 and SW5.
2. FEMA map and date labeled for FEMA floodplain.
RESPONSE: The existing 100-year floodplain -100-yr bfe=324.0' per FEMA map no 51003CO289D
dated February 4, 2005, last revised by FEMA case numbers 16-03-1207P-510006 and 1207P-
510033, both approved on 02/06/2017 has been shown and labeled throughout the plans.
4 of 16
�s
�docs
6,.,0 f+ Dominion
1 h Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
VO4• 11,/ 434.979.8121 (p)
e ens 434.979.1681 (f)
Cts DominionEng.com
3. CFR 60.3(b) requires a permit(the County's Floodplain Development Permit)for all
proposed construction and other permits in Zone A(floodplain). Any development activity
in the floodplain requires a Floodplain Development Permit. If there is a potential impact,
then a special use permit may be required according to the Zoning Ordinance.
RESPONSE: A county floodplain development permit was provided in last submittal.
4. Standard SL-1 Safety Slabs shall be required as part of the drainage design for manholes,junction
boxes and drop inlets with heights greater than 12 feet. On structures whose vertical height is 12'
or greater and Safety Slabs are not specified, the use of bolt down or lock down covers or grates
should be considered. The drainage descriptions should specify how many safety slabs are needed
for each structure and the quantity should be noted in the remarks column on the Drainage
Summary(VDOT Drainage Manual, 9.4.5.2.2).
RESPONSE: Safety slabs will be provided with drop inlets of 12 feet or more,see detail SP15.
5. The following General Note should be included on the General Note Sheet(VDOT Drainage
Manual, 9.4.5.2.2): D-18 St'd. SL-1 Safety Slab locations are based on the assumed use of precast
structures. If cast-in-place structures are utilized, and the interior chamber
dimensions(length and width, or diameter) are less than 4 feet, the safety
slabs shall not be installed.
RESPONSE: The general note has been provided on sheet SP2,SW2 under General Construction
notes#10.
6. Proposed slopes greater than 3:1 to have low maintenance (not grass) ground cover specified on
plan (Design Manual, sect. 8A).
RESPONSE: Proposed slopes greater than 3:1 will have low maintenance ground cover,see note
4 on SP6.
7. Proposed storm pipes must not disturb preserved stopes.
RESPONSE: Per attached email from the County Engineer dated 2/10/2017,the storm pipe
installation may disturb preserved slopes by right.
8. Show drainage easements (public)for where storm water is coming from existing/offsite(Design
Manual, sect. 6).
RESPONSE: Public drainage easements have been shown where appropriate.
9. Maximum pipe slope of 16% (only applies where drainage is in public areas, otherwise N/A).
RESPONSE: All storm pipes have been shown with a slope of less than 16%.
5 of 16
t*ies,
l5
,C
el
4,0 0o Dominion
„`I k Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
or
Charlottesville, VA 22911
^ad,�� 434.979.8121 (p)
41, eps 434.979.1681 (f)
°ts DominionEng.com
10. Existing critical (25%) slopes are not disturbed, unless a waiver has been granted by the Planning
Commission (18-4.1, 14-304).
RESPONSE: The disturbances of the preserved slopes for public utility purposes are all permitted
by right.
11. Label retaining walls with maximum heights (walls require building permits according to Building
Official policy).
RESPONSE: Retaining wall types and maximum heights have been provided with this submittal.
12. Engineering details and computations may be required on site plans where walls will
support or potentially conflict with stormwater facilities, travelways, parking, or present a
safety concern. This includes where walls are placed too close (a distance equal to the
wall height) to property lines, such that they may affect neighboring property. In such
cases the following items will be required.
RESPONSE: The applicant is aware of the concerns a-c below.
a. A typical detail. (VDOT standard walls are acceptable)
RESPONSE: The VDOT RW-3 wall detail has been added to sheet SP14. Contractor may submit
equivalent design at time of building permit
b. Specific details as required for unusual or possibly conflicting areas. An example is
where utilities are expected to go through walls or footings.
RESPONSE: As is commonly done,the wall designer will address possibly conflicting areas with
the wall design. See retaining wall notes sheet SP5.
c. Certified computations to support the design. All soil and bearing assumptions, as
well as reinforcement materials and assumed loadings must be included.
RESPONSE: Certified computations will be provided by others with the retaining wall design to be
submitted with the building permit. See retaining wall notes sheet SP5.
13. Show safety railing for walls over 4' high (building permit may be more strict).
RESPONSE: A note has been added to sheet SP5, requiring safety railing for walls over 4' high.
14. Guardrail with Vdot designation shown for retaining walls next to parking or travelways (18-
32.7.2).
RESPONSE: Guardrail (GR-2) has been provided next to travelways and parking.
6 of 16
C
"ttire "NIS
S
,C kms
®,e �•' Dominion
y` I Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
ir
Charlottesville, VA 22911
�4d.,��=, 434.979.8121 (p)
("4.i,
eps 434.979.1681 (f)
cts DominionEng.com
15. Drainage should not run across, though, or backwater in dumpster areas [18-4.12.19].
RESPONSE: Spot shots shown on the plan have been provided to show positive drainage awa
from the dumpster pads.
16. Show details on stilling basin.
RESPONSE: A detail for the stilling basin has been provided on SW11.
17. Show area of Forest/Open Space to be protected.
RESPONSE: Forest/Open Space protection is shown on the Landscape Plan.
18. Please contact Ana Kilmer for information about nutrient credit purchasing documentation and
requirements.
RESPONSE: The applicant will contact Ana Kilmer to begin the process of nutrient credit
purchasing.
D. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
1. Show/provide legend.
RESPONSE: A legend has been provided on SW4 and SW5.
2. Indicate staging area, any stockpiles, and show dust control symbols(DC); protection required for
all stages of construction.
RESPONSE: A staging area,stockpile area and DC symbols have been shown with this submittal.
3. Show seeding symbols (TS, PS).
RESPONSE: A TS and PS symbols have been shown with the E&SC plan.
4. Include paved wash racks and detail (Ref. Design Manual, Sect. 6).
RESPONSE: A paved wash rack has been provided with the E&SC plan, see detail SW11.
5. Show soils map/descriptions; Label property lines.
RESPONSE: A soils map has been provided on SW3 and a soil report has been provided with the
E&S narrative.
6. All watercourses to be protected and encroachments minimized.
RESPONSE: All watercourses are protected per the E&S Plan and encroachments have been
minimized.
7 of 16
V `4..r
el 5
X4,46 40 Dominion
e N I L Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
�' Charlottesville, VA 22911
"ad�,� � 434.979.8121 (p)
4'ee ep 434.979.1681 (f)
cts DominionEng.com
7. Show typ. section for each temp. channel or diversion, referenced for the plan sheets. Existing
ground should be shown at the maximum cross-slope on the plan.
RESPONSE: Typical section for diversion and note are shown on the detail sheet SW11.
Albemarle County Engineering
1. An approved WPO submittal and Floodplain Development Permit application will be required
before the Final Site Plan can be approved.
RESPONSE: A Floodplain Development Permit had been provided with the previous submittal.
1. An approved VSMP plan and road plan are required before final site plan (FSP) approval.
RESPONSE: A Road Plan has been provided with this submittal.
2. SP14 -- Remove SWM plans from FSP set.
RESPONSE: SWM plans have been removed from the FSP set.
3. Provide field verification of existing topography conditions for parcel TMP 77-40B: All topography
should be at least visually field verified by the designer within the last year(18-32.6.2).
RESPONSE: The designer has field verified the existing topography conditions visually. Refer to
note on sheet SP2& SW2.
4. Proposed slopes greater than 3:1 shall have low maintenance (not grass) ground cover specified
on plan (Design manual, sect. 8).
RESPONSE: Proposed slopes greater than 3:1 will have low maintenance ground cover,see note
on SP6.
5. Retaining walls: Any walls supporting roads, parking, infrastructure require engineered plans
and computations. Submit structural computations for walls over 5' high. Specify all dimensions.
All structural reinforcement, steal, or geogrids shall be specified. Show typical sections&details
for any pipes through wall, bridged utilities, or manholes through geogrid (Design manual, sect.
8).
RESPONSE: The applicant is aware that structural engineer plans are required to meet the
requirements of the design manual section 8, and to obtain a separate building permit for wall
construction. Refer to response 12a, b and c on VSMP comments.
6. Show wall foundations will not impact preserved slopes.
RESPONSE: See note on sheet SP5 and refer to responses 12a, b and c on VSMP comments.
8 of 16
el s
oeots
4440 40 Dominion
y i L Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
"4d�, � 434.979.8121 (p)
4�t�e ens 434.979.1681 (f)
cls DominionEng.com
7. The stormpipe leaving site does not appear to be discharging directly to a defined channel (MS-
19).
RESPONSE: The storm pipe now discharges into a proposed rip rap stilling basin and drainage
ditch that connects to the Moore's Creek Floodplain channel. Since the contributing drainage
area at Moore's Creel is greater than 100 times the site area,the outfall is adequate.
8. Show that sight distances are free from obstructions.
RESPONSE: The sight distances are shown to be free from obstructions, refer to sheet SP8.
9. SP5--Show landing labeled at road entrances.
RESPONSE: Landings have been labeled at road entrances on sheet SP5.
10. Show that road entrances meet 4% grade for 40' in any direction (18-4.12.17).
RESPONSE: The VDOT CG-11 design has been discussed with the County Engineer as being
acceptable even though the design manual suggestion may not be met. Refer to sheet SP9.
11. Show radii labeled at all road entrances.
RESPONSE: All radii have been labeled.
12. SP4,SP5-- FEMA floodplain limits and date labeled.
RESPONSE: FEMA floodplain limits and date have been shown on all sheets.
13. Confirm sidewalk is 5' wide in front of Building 9.
RESPONSE: The sidewalk is confirmed to be 5' in front of Building 9. It tapers to 4' across the
northern most three spaces,which has been labeled.
14. Proposed 'Aerial Crossing#1' shown in floodplain may require a special use permit.
RESPONSE: RESPONSE: Per attached email from the County Engineer dated 2/10/2017,the storm
pipe installation may disturb preserved slopes by right. Aerial crossings have benn removed from
the plan.
15. Clarify 'Storm 1' pipe size 24".
RESPONSE: Storm 1 pipe size has been shown properly.
16. Comments regarding SWM will be addressed with VSMP application.
RESPONSE: Comment noted.
9 of 16
*awe ftsil
ls
�c�o�s
(„0 �• Dominion
aha` 1 h Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
�"14,?.),� � 434.979.8121 (p)
ets 434.979.1681 (f)
cts DominionEng.com
Albemarle County Fire& Rescue
1. Please add a note to the plans. "Knox boxes required on each building, contact Albemarle County Fire
Marshal office for location. Due to the design with retaining walls two boxes maybe required on buildings
3, 4, and 5."
RESPONSE: A note has been added to sheet SP5.
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority -No comments received
Albemarle County Service Authority
Sheet SP1
1. Place P.E. stamp and signature on all sheets; original stamp and signature on cover sheet.
RESPONSE: A PE stamp and signature has been provided on all sheets with an original signature
on the cover sheet.
2. Provide water and sewer data sheets.
RESPONSE: Updated water and sewer data sheets are provided with this submittal.
3. The Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority (RWSA)will need to review and approve these plans. Be sure
to provide copies of the plans to Victoria Fort for their review.
RESPONSE: Final Site Plans have been provided to Victoria Fort and RWSA approval to be
provided under separate cover.
Sheet SP2
1. Provide updated ACSA General Water&Sewer Conditions.
RESPONSE: Updated ACSA General Water& Sewer Conditions have been provided on sheet
SP2.
2. Provide datum information. The difference in elevations related to the RWSA manhole is nearly seven
feet in comparison to RWSA data.
RESPONSE: The Sanitary Sewer elevations have been updated to reflect RWSA data.
Sheet SP4
1. Remove sewer pipe material from plan view.
10 of 16
�s
�c,ops
i„, 0• Dominion
,?y`I L Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
°A.°1) ,� � 434.979.8121 (p)
4ee�:e,s 434.979.1681 (f)
ets DominionEng.com
RESPONSE: Sewer pipe material has been removed from the plan view.
2. Comments related to water and sewer design will be included under Sheet
SP5.
RESPONSE: Comment Noted.
Sheet SP5
1. Call out 8"x8" Tapping Sleeve and Valve for water connection along Broadway Street. Be sure the
water main is fully on your client's property, including the easement to avoid obtaining an off-site
easement.
RESPONSE: 8"x8"Taping Sleeve and Valve for connection along Broadway Street has been called
out and the watermain has been moved so that the main and easement are fully on the property.
2. Call out all vertical and horizontal bends and fittings along water mains.
RESPONSE: Vertical and Horizontal bends haven been called out with this submittal.
3. Provide 8"x6"Tee and 6" gate valve for the fire line serving Building 1. The gate valve will be the end of
the public system.
RESPONSE: 8"x6"Tee and 6"gate valve has been provided with this submittal.
4. Provide water meters for each building. Fixture counts will be required for sizing purposes.
RESPONSE: Water meters have been provided for each building. Fixture counts will be provided
for sizing purposes prior to issuance of building permit.
5. Provide a fire hydrant across from Building 4,just past the Access Road.
RESPONSE: A fire hydrant has been added across from Building 4 as requested.
6. Explore the feasibility of relocating the water main serving Buildings 11 and 12 to the access road to
allow for easier access and less disturbance to Preserved Slopes. This will require a full 20' easement
granted to the ACSA.
RESPONSE: The waterline has been updated using option 1.
7. Relocate fire hydrant and water meters serving Buildings 11 and 12.
RESPONSE: See response 6.
• 8. Show proposed RWSA Meter Vault location at the intersection of Franklin Street and Moore's Creek
Lane.
RESPONSE: RWSA Meter Vault location has been shown with this submittal.
11 of 16
lS
i„4�• Dominion
4 y I 1, Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
"r'4.4,,,, � 434.979.8121 (p)
it-e 434.979.1681
r (f)
e°ts DominionEng.com
9. Relocate the water meter for Building 7 as shown.
RESPONSE: The water meter for Building 7 has been relocated based off of option 1 from
response 6.
10. Show the water meter for Building 4 along Belle Monte Avenue.
RESPONSE: The water meter for Building 4 has been shown along Belle Monte Avenue.
11. Relocate the fire hydrant.along Stockyard Lane across from Building 3. The water meter for Building 3
should be located beside the fire hydrant due to the lack of unpaved area in front of the building.
RESPONSE: The fire hydrant and meter for building 3 along Stockyard Lane has been relocated as
requested.
12. Provide water meter for Building 6.
RESPONSE: A water meter for building 6 has been provided.
13. Relocate the sanitary sewer for Building 5 to MH B1.
RESPONSE: The sanitary sewer lateral for Building 5 has been relocated to MH B1.
14. Provide a fire hydrant in the vicinity of Building 9.
RESPONSE: A fire hydrant has been provided in the vicinity of Building 9.
15. Provide water meters for Buildings 8-10.
RESPONSE: Water meters have been provided for buildings 8-10.
16. Eliminate the fire hydrant near Storm Structure 14.
RESPONSE: See Response 14.
17. Remove sewer pipe material from plan view.
RESPONSE: Sewer pipe material has been removed from plan view.
18. Show proposed stub-out at the intersection of Franklin Street and Moores Creek Lane. It is our
understanding that this water connection is being coordinated with the RWSA Wholesale Metering
Project.
RESPONSE: Proposed stub out for the intersection has been shown and coordinated with RWSA.
12 of 16
err'
I$
ticc�o0s
�,6 y Dominion
y`I h Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
ri
Charlottesville, VA 22911
"r'.`, 434.979.8121 (p)
4`�•er 434.979.1681
eCts DominionEng.com
19. Revise sewer laterals for Buildings 8-10.
RESPONSE: Sewer laterals for Buildings 8-10 have been updated with this submittal.
Sheet SP7
1. Since all of the lights are mounted on various buildings, the Lighting Plan can be eliminated from the
ACSA submittal.
RESPONSE: Comment Noted.
Sheets SP8 and SP9
1. Eliminate these sheets from the ACSA submittal.
RESPONSE: Comment Noted.
Sheet SP10
1. Make revisions to water profiles based on plan view comments.
RESPONSE: Comment Noted.
2. Show storm pipe crossing near Station 10+35 along Belle Monte Avenue.
RESPONSE: The storm pipe crossing near Station 10+35 along Belle Monte Ave has been shown
with this submittal.
3. Provide ARV at the high point along Belle Monte Avenue.
RESPONSE: An ARV has been provided at the high point on Belle Monte Ave.
4. Revisions to the sanitary sewer profiles need to be made to allow for water mains to cross above
sanitary sewer. Only under extreme circumstances should sanitary sewer mains cross above water
mains.
RESPONSE: Sewer mains have been updated as requested.
5. Label class of water main (8-inch and 6-inch can be Class 52; 4-inch must be Class 53).
RESPONSE: Watermain classes have been labeled with this submittal.
13 of 16
. `4rr'
1s
ceg�,��� Dominion
0 y sr L Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
°AI%
c.4%,• /� 434.979.8121 (p)
'et,e,.s 434.979.1681 (f)
°ts DominionEng.com
Sheet SP11
1. Elevations associated with the RWSA manhole need to be reviewed. Based on their information, the
Lid Elevation = 320.2' and the Invert= 311.67'.
RESPONSE: The elevations have been changed to show coordinated elevations with the next
downstream manhole sewer connection.
2. Show water main between MH A and the RWSA MH along Moores Creek Lane. A test pit may be
required at this location to determine the depth and if adequate separation is available.
RESPONSE: The water main between MH Al and MH A2 along Moores Creek Lane has been
shown. A test pit note has been added to sheet SP5 and SP11.
3. Sanitary sewer between MH's E and C shall be ductile iron.
RESPONSE: The sanitary sewer between MH's E and C has be called out as ductile iron on the
profiles.
4. Show water main crossing downstream of MH G.
RESPONSE: Since the watermain in Belle Monte Avenue has been revised,this crossing has been
removed.
5. The depth of MH B needs to be increased to allow for the sanitary sewer between MH's B and 81 to
cross above the proposed water main.
RESPONSE: The depth of MH B has been increased so that the water main will be placed above
the sanitary sewer.
6. The sanitary sewer out to MH Cl should be private. It will need to cross below the water main.
RESPONSE: The sanitary sewer from MH Cl to MH C has been removed and replaced with a
cleanout to MH C.
7. Sanitary sewer between MH's E and E2 shall be ductile iron.
RESPONSE: The sanitary sewer between MH's E and E2 has been labeled as ductile iron on the
profiles.
8. MH E shall be a 60-inch diameter to allow for an internal drop connection.
RESPONSE: MH E has been labeled as a 60-inch diameter MH on sheet SP11 to allow for an
internal drop connection.
14 of 16
. Niue
lS
��_QHS
�.�46�• Dominion
a,y I L Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
or,
' Charlottesville, VA 22911
"ads,.% 434.979.8121 (p)
Elie°Ps 434.979.1681 (f)
Cts DominionEng.com
Sheet SP12
1. Provide 18-inches of vertical separation between the water main and the storm between STR's 15 and
14.
RESPONSE: 18-inches of vertical separation has been provided between the water main and the
storm between STR's 15 and 14, now 20 and 21.
2. Show water main crossing on Belle Monte Avenue culvert. This crossing will need to have insulation at
the crossing.
RESPONSE: The culvert crossing the water main in Belle Monte Ave has been shown on the water
main profile with insulation at the crossing.
Sheet SP13
1. Show water main crossing downstream of STR 2. A test pit may be required at this location to
determine the depth and if adequate separation is available.
RESPONSE: See Response 2 SP11 .
2. Show sanitary sewer lateral crossing between STR's 10 and 11.
RESPONSE: The sanitary sewer lateral crossing has been shown between STR's 10 and 11, now
15 and 16.
Sheets SP14 and SP15
1. Eliminate these sheets from the ACSA submittal.
RESPONSE: Comment noted.
Sheets SP16 and SP17
1. Provide updated water and sewer details. These can be found on the ACSA's website at
www.serviceauthority.org.
RESPONSE: Updated water and sewer details have been provided with this submittal.
Sheets SP18 and SP19
1. Eliminate these sheets from the ACSA submittal.
RESPONSE: Comment noted.
15of16
is
�c docs
e„e • Dominion
any` Ili Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
(. •�• 1 434.979.8121 (p)
4'
'reps 434.979.1681 (f)
°ts DominionEng.com
We trust the above adequately addresses your comments. Please let me know if you have any questions
or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Dustin E. Greene, EIT
16 of 16
step' swe
Johnathan Newberry
From: Johnathan Newberry
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 3:55 PM
To: 'Dustin Greene'
Cc: 'Mike Myers'
Subject: RE:Woolen Mills Comments
Attachments: Guidelines for Development_one page.pdf
Hey Dustin,
Sorry for the wait. Here are comments from Planning:
1. [Question] —When does the applicant plan to submit a Boundary Line Adjustment plat to consolidate
the two properties? This combination could be completed while the final site plan is being finalized.
2. [Section 32.7.9] —Please remove the "properties to be consolidated" label on Sheet SP6 since the
existing property lines are not shown.
3. [General Comment] —On Sheet SP1, under the Project Narrative, please correct the name of Moores
Creek Road to Moores Creek Lane under the "Access" description. There is one more label to be
changed.
4. [General Comment] —This site lies in the Monticello Viewshed. Per Liz Russell,Project and Planning Assistant
at Monticello,please employ design guideline#1 as listed on the attached document.The Monticello Foundation
believes this guideline is particularly important for the roof color(s)on this site.
5. [Section 32.6.4/32.8.6] —This site lies in the Dam Break Inundation Zone. I have provided a copy of the plan to
Rob VanLier,Regional Dam Safety Engineer,Department of Conservation and Recreation,to ask if an
engineering study as referenced under this section is required. I will forward his reply as soon as it is received.
6. [Section 4.15.14] —Please move the monument sign out of the sight distance line for the entrance onto Moores
Creek Lane.
7. [Section 4.12.13] —The table on Sheet SP2 shows there are 11 dumpsters,but I only count 9 dumpsters on the
layout plan. Similarly,the table shows 16 loading spaces,but I only see 12 loading spaces on the layout plan.
Please rectify these numbers.
8. [Section 32.7.9.7] —On the layout plan,please show the typical screening for each dumpster as referenced on
Sheet SP15 and shown for the dumpster adjacent to Building#2.
9. [Section 32.7.9.8] -On Sheet SP6,please move the location of the tree shown on top of the dumpster adjacent to
Building#2.
10. [Section 32.5.2(n)] —Please amend the label for Building 12 across all applicable drawings.It currently states 600
square feet,but the building is 1,200 square feet.
11. [Section 32.6.2(i)] —On Sheet SP4,please amend the parking space count label in front of Building#4. There are
6 parking spaces provided,not 7 spaces. Similarly,please amend the parking space count label in front of
Building#10. There are 7 parking spaces provided, not 8 spaces. As a result of these changes,please update
column 11 in the table on Sheet SP2. I count 94 total overall parking spaces provided.
12. [Section 4.12.16(e)] —Please provide details of the wheel stops with dimensions,anchor sites, and materials.
13. [Section 32.7.3] —Please specify all locations of mechanical equipment and other utility hardware proposed on
site.These features must be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building or they shall
be located so they are not visible from the public view.
14. [Section 32.7.9.4(c)] —The note on Sheet SP6 states that all trees along the entrance roads will be saved in lieu of
providing street trees.Please show the location of the existing tree line and all areas with groups of individual
trees that are a minimum of 6"caliper or greater. Please provide information regarding the heights,calipers, and
density/spacing of the existing trees and vegetated areas to be preserved in lieu of providing street trees.
15. [Section 32.7.9.4(b)] —Please demonstrate compliance with the Ordinance in terms of protecting the existing
trees that will be preserved in lieu of new plant materials.The limits of clearing must be shown on the grading
1
plan and landscaping plan,and tie location of the protective tree fencing must be shown on each drawing in order
for the agent to approve the site plan.
16. [Section 32.7.9.6(c)] —Please state the minimum caliper and height of the Acer Saccharum parking lot trees at
time of installation on Sheet SP6.This species is classified as a large deciduous shade tree by the Albemarle
County Recommended Plant List,and therefore must be installed at a minimum 1 3/4 inches.
17. [Section 32.7.9.6] —On Sheet SP6,please note that 13 trees are being provided instead of 12 trees and that 10
trees are required to be installed instead of 8 trees.
18. [Section 32.7.9.9(c)] —Please add a note to Sheet SP6 stating"All landscaping and screening shall be maintained
in a healthy condition by the property owner,and replaced when necessary.Replacement material shall comply
with the approved Landscape Plan."
19. [Section 4.17.4(a)] —Since both models of light fixtures emit greater than 3,000 lumens,they must be full-cutoff
fixtures.The cutsheet details on SP7 do not demonstrate that the fixtures are full-cutoff. Please provide additional
information on the next submittal.
Thanks,
J.T. Newberry
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle, Planning Division
434-296-5832, ext 3270
From:Johnathan Newberry
Sent:Sunday,January 29, 2017 4:26 PM
To: 'Dustin Greene'<dgreene@dominioneng.com>
Cc: Mike Myers<mmyers@dominioneng.com>
Subject: RE: Woolen Mills Comments
Hi Dustin,
Attached are comments from Engineering and below is a comment from Fire/Rescue. I will have Planning comments to
you by Wednesday afternoon this week.
I've noticed some work at the corner of Franklin St.and Moores Creek Lane. Have you already received comments from
ACSA/RWSA?
Thanks,
.I.T. Newberry
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle, Planning Division
4:34-296-58:52, ext. 3270
Robbie Gilmer, F/R:
Based on plans dated 12-22-16.
1. Please add a note to the plans. "Knox boxes required on each building, contact Albemarle County Fire Marshal office
for location. Due to the design with retaining walls two boxes maybe required on buildings 3, 4, and 5."
From: Dustin Greene [mailto:dgreene@dominioneng.com]
Sent: Friday,January 27, 2017 11:26 AM
2
To:Johnathan Newberry<inewberr @albemarle.org> `rrr
Cc: Mike Myers<mmyers@dominioneng.com>
Subject:Woolen Mills Comments
Hey JT,
I was wondering when we will receive comments from all the reviewers for the Final Site and VSMP plans?
Best Regards,
Dustin Greene, EIT
Dominion Engineering&Design, LLC
172 S. Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
434-979-8121 Phone Ext. 110
434-979-1681 Fax
d greene@dominioneng.com
3
i
Johnathan Newberry
From: Frank Pohl
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 12:23 PM
To: Bill Fritz;Johnathan Newberry
Subject: RE:Woolen Mills Light Industrial - aerial crossings
Thank you Bill, I agree and will forward along.
Frank
Frank V. Pohl, PE,CFM
County Engineer
County of Albemarle
(434) 296-5832 Ext. 7914
From: Bill Fritz
Sent: Friday, February 10,2017 11:23 AM
To:Johnathan Newberry<jnewberry@albemarle.org>; Frank Pohl<fpohl@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE:Woolen Mills Light Industrial-aerial crossings
I took another look at this question. The specific permitted use is"Distribution facilities". It then goes on to describe
the types and lists"water"without any description of the type. Energy and Communication are also permitted
uses. The special use listed is"stormwater management facilities". So the question is: Is a pipe carrying stormwater a
distribution facility for water or is it a stormwater management facility? Looking at the impacts created by the
installation of a pipe to carry stormwater or a pipe/conduit to carry water, sewer,energy,and communications I see no
difference. The management facility is really thought of as a pond, underground detention or other physical device to
treat and manage the rate of flow.
I believe it is reasonable to allow storm"water" distribution to be a permitted use provided that no other alternative
location is available and the slopes are preserved to the maximum extent practicable. If you have questions please let
me know.
30.7.4 PERMITTED USES The following uses and structures are permitted by right or by special use permit on managed
or preserved slopes, provided that the land disturbing activity to establish the use or structure complies with design
standards in section 30.7.5 and all other applicable requirements of the Code:
b. Preserved slopes.The uses permitted by right and by special use permit on preserved slopes are as follows, subject to
the applicable requirements of this chapter:
1. By right.The uses permitted by right on preserved slopes are the following:
f. Distribution facilities.Water, sewer, energy,and communications distribution facilities.To the extent that
distribution facilities are established on preserved slopes,the preserved slopes should be preserved to the
maximum extent practicable consistent with the intent and purpose of this overlay district,
1
(Id 11411114
2. By special use permit.The only use permitted by special use permit on preserved slopes are private facilities
such as accessways, utility lines and appurtenances, and stormwater management facilities, not otherwise
permitted by right under subsection (b)(1)(e),where the lot does not contain adequate land area outside of the
preserved slopes to locate the private facilities.
[e.Accessory uses and structures.Any uses or structures accessory to a dwelling unit authorized by subsection (b)(1)(a)
and (b)(1)(b).]
William D. Fritz,AICP
434-296-5$23 extension 3242
From:Johnathan Newberry
Sent: Friday, February 10,2017 9:07 AM
To: Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org>
Subject: FW:Woolen Mills Light Industrial aerial crossings
Can we discuss this when you have a chance?
From: Frank Pohl
Sent: Friday, February 10,2017 8:48 AM
To:Johnathan Newberry<Inewberry@albemarle.org>
Subject: FW:Woolen Mills Light Industrial-aerial crossings
JT,
FYI. Let me know if you have another opinion on this decision.
Frank
Frank V. Pohl, PE,CFM
County Engineer
County of Albemarle
(434) 296-5832 Ext. 7914
From: Frank Pohl
Sent:Thursday, February 09, 2017 6:46 PM
To: 'Dustin Greene'<dgreene@dominioneng.com>, Mike Myers<mmyers@dominioneng.com>
Cc: Emily Cox<ecox@albemarle.org>; David James<diames@albemarle.org>; Robert Jocz<rjocz@albemarle.org>
Subject:Woolen Mills Light Industrial-aerial crossings
Dustin,
As noted below in the Albemarle County Code, stormwater utilities must be located below ground for site plans.Also,
the County Design Standards manual requires that designs must meet the VDOT Drainage Manual and the Road and
Bridge Standards and I am not aware of VDOT having such a standard or detail for aerial stormwater crossings.
Considering these requirements, aerial crossings over the steep slopes will not be approved.
2
‘14.01 N.104
32.7.5.2 LOCATION OF UTILITIES ABOVE AND BELOW GROUND
All utilities,including but not limited to wires,cables,pipes,conduits and appurtenant equipment for electricity.
gas,water,sewer,telephone or similar service,shall be located within a site as follows:
a. Conforming to natural topography. Each utility shall be located, to the extent practicable, in a manner that
conforms to the natural topography,minimizes the disturbance of steep slopes and natural drainage areas.
and allows vehicular and pedestrian interconnections within the site and existing or future development on
adjoining lands.
b. r roa ch 'All new utilities shall be located underground except the following, which may be
WM ground: (i) electric transmission lines and facilities; (ii) equipment, including electric
distribution transformers, switch gear, meter pedestals, telephone pedestals, outdoor lighting poles or
standards, radio antennae and associated equipment, which is, under accepted utility practices, normally
installed aboveground; (iii) meters, service connections, and similar equipment normally attached to the
outside wall of a utility customer's premises:and(iv)satellite dishes.
c. Within public street right-ofway.If it is necessary to locate a new or existing public utility within the right-
of-way of a public street, the developer shall first obtain a permit from the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
d. Allowing street trees and landscaping. Installation of utilities in or adjacent to the right-of-way shall not
preclude the installation of street trees or required landscaping.
If you have any questions or comments,don't hesitate to let me know.
Sincerely,
Frank
Frank V. Pohl,PE,CFM
County Engineer
County of Albemarle
(434) 296-5832 Ext. 7914
3
**10
sive NS
Johnathan Newberry
From: Johnathan Newberry
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 4:17 PM
To: 'Dustin Greene'
Cc: 'Kevin O'Brien'; donalsonconstrco@aol.com; Mike Myers
Subject: RE: SDP201600059:Woolen Mills Light Industrial Park-Initial
Ron Higgins let me know that Zoning has determined the stepback regulations will apply. He said he can assist if you
decide to apply for a special exception.
One other bit of information I meant to include in the action letter relates to the State Dam Break Inundation Zone
(DBIZ).
Please review the applicable ordinances in Section 32 because it does apply here:
http://gisweb.albemarle.org/Map/Viewer.aspx?state=677111564493
ALBEMARLE Gly-web
COUNTY %1RI;INIA 5eerchestResuats »te loot updated on... CountsHorne
GIS-Web-limp I 1 nt“41 He,ac,n.e Pis Stotmw.rte, I ,on.n,t.
Q u �+ f Help Mobile
i
ABX
J � n4 , i
L
•
7
Y~ /t
# n-um
„,.- irk k
Kam -0Et
Charlottesville City ,�,� ���°"�.r�
.,..,..,
t/elnp m.Menelr toot. .rl� � x, 77 \..„
�Mswe yr city to launch ena City's d /%` �
/ ,
' 411r
Irior NW
� , / /.//elf ''' ,,, /3„,, ,40.0 Ll
,...,..„,:::::,_
axs —
'4 CA 1 e. # P
qi
'''' -/V/# / .** - / ' *4; N4f,,,,,,,,-Es,...?4,, ,
tS,-81,� .a• ♦
_
�� 41
.i, v 1,,, iffr • s7;:. . -<4, ,3.
--a Google Maps + Go
1
1.
From: Dustin Greene [mailto:dgreene@dominioneng.com]
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 4:12 PM
To:Johnathan Newberry<jnewberry@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE:SDP201600059:Woolen Mills Light Industrial Park- Initial
Thanks JT. Please let me know when the county figures out the step back issue.
Have a good weekend,
Dustin Greene, EIT
Dominion Engineering&Design, LLC
172 S. Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
434-979-8121 Phone Ext. 110
434-979-1681 Fax
clareene@dominionena.com
From: Johnathan Newberry [mailto:jnewberry@albemarle.orq]
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 4:10 PM
To: Dustin Greene
Cc: Kevin O'Brien; donalsonconstrco@aol.com; Mike Myers
Subject: RE: SDP201600059: Woolen Mills Light Industrial Park- Initial
Dustin,
Attached is the action letter for this initial site plan.
Thanks,
.l.T. Newberry
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle, Planning 1)nision
434-296-5832, ext. 3270
From: Kevin O'Brien [mailto:kaob@comcast.net]
Sent:Tuesday, November 29,2016 12:36 PM
To:Johnathan Newberry<jnewberry@albemarle.org>
Cc: Dustin Greene<dgreene@dominioneng.com>; Mike Myers<mmvers@dominioneng.com>;
donalsonconstrco@aol.com
Subject: Re: SDP201600059:Woolen Mills Light Industrial Park- Initial
Thanks JT
I believe Dustin Chris and I plan to attend.
K
On Nov 29, 2016, at 12:24 PM, Johnathan Newberry<jnewberry@a,albemarle.org>wrote:
2
Sore Noire
Hi Dustin,
I just wanted to provide an update of the meeting attendees on my end and confirm Mike's message below with you.
Stewart Wright from Zoning mentioned that height is measured from the average grade along the front of the building
to the midpoint of the roof line. These factors may be open to some interpretation on the site, especially for Buildings 3,
4 and 5.
Can you please confirm your acceptance of the meeting time?Just FYI, I may not be able to stay for the entire meeting,
but that should be fine because the outstanding questions relate to interpreting the Zoning Ordinance language.
Thanks,
.).T. Newberry
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle, Planning Division
434-296-5832, ext. 3270
<Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 1.jpg>
Original Appointment
From: Mike Myers (mailto:mmyers@dominioneng.com]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 7:57 PM
To:Johnathan Newberry
Cc: Kevin O'Brien; Dustin Greene
Subject: Declined:SDP201600059: Woolen Mills Light Industrial Park- Initial
When:Thursday, December 01, 2016 4:00 PM-5:00 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US&Canada).
Where: Room B,Community Development
JT, I have a conflict that afternoon and can not make this meeting, but Dustin will attend in my staid. Thanks! Mike
3
Now
kad
41011111
ig A
Ilii
47,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,North Wing
Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596
Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126
December 9,2016
Mike Myers
172 South Pantops Drive, Suite A
220 East High Street
Charlottesville,VA 22902
mmyers(adominioneng.com
RE: SDP201600059 Woolen Mills Light Industrial Park—Initial Site Plan
Dear Mr.Myers:
The Agent for the Board of Supervisors hereby grants administrative approval for the above referenced
initial site plan.
This approval shall be valid for a period of five(5)years from the date of this letter,provided that the
developer submits a final site plan for all or a portion of the site within one(1)year after the date of this
letter as provided in section 32.4.3.1 of Chapter 18 of the Albemarle County Code,and thereafter
diligently pursues approval of the final site plan.
In accordance with Chapter 18 Section 32.4.2.8 Early or Mass Grading may be permitted after the
following approvals are received:
1. Engineering approval of a VSMP plan meeting the requirements of Chapter 17 of the Code of the
County of Albemarle.
The final site plan will not be considered to have been officially submitted until the following items are
received:
1. A final site plan that satisfies all of the requirements of Section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code.
2. A fee of$1,613.
Please submit 9 copies of the final site plan to the Community Development Department. The assigned
Lead Reviewer will then distribute the plans to all reviewing agencies. Once you receive the first set of
comments on the final site plan,please work with each reviewer individually to satisfy their requirements.
The Department of Community Development shall not accept submittal of the final site plan for signature
until tentative approvals for the attached conditions from the following agencies/reviewers have been
obtained and forwarded to the Lead Reviewer:
Albemarle County Planning Services(Planner)—J.T.Newberry,jnewberrvAalbemarle.org
1. [General Comment]—On Sheet SP1,under the Project Narrative,please correct the name of Moores
Creek Road to Moores Creek Lane under the"Access"description.
2. [Section 32.6.2(h)]—On Sheet SP1,please list the other Site Review Committee members under the
signature block.
1
3. [Chapter 18, Section 27]—On Sheet SP2,under Site Data,please change the zoning district to"Light
Industry"(LI). Please also add the zoning overlay districts: Flood Hazard(FH)and Steep Slopes
(Managed and Preserved).
4. [Section 4.20(b)]—On Sheet SP2,under Site Data,please clarify that the front setback is 10' from the
edge of the right-of-way.
5. [Section 4.20(b)]—On Sheet SP2,under Site Data,please add the stepback information from this
section. Additionally,please add a note to specify which structures will be over 40 feet in height.
Following a meeting on 12/1/16,the Zoning Division confirmed the stepback regulations apply.Please
contact Ron Higgins(ext. 3225)if you intend to move forward with an application for special
exception from this requirement.
6. [Section 32.5.2(b)]—On Sheet SP2,under Site Data,please revise the proposed use from"industrial
park"to a use that falls under one of the categories listed in Section 26.Based on the narrative on
Sheet SP 1 and parking calculation,I expect the proposed use would be"Storage/Warehousing."
7. [General Comment]—On Sheet SP3,please accurately reflect the political boundary of the City and
County.The right of way line for Franklin Street adjacent to TMP 77-40B is the City/County boundary
line.
8. [Section 32.5.2(n)and Section 4.17]—Although Note 3 on Sheet SP5 indicates that no lighting above
3,000 lumens is planned at this time,a photometric plan may be necessary to confirm compliance with
Section 4.17.4(b).
Albemarle County Engineering Services(Engineer)—Matt Wentland,mwentlandAalbemarle.org
1. An approved WPO submittal and Floodplain Development Permit application will be required
before the Final Site Plan can be approved.
2. Provide bumper blocks in areas where the parking is adjacent to sidewalk less than 6'wide.
[18.4.12.16(e)]
3. Provide guardrail between the ends of travelways and retaining walls.
4. Storm sewer is not considered a public utility and is not allowed in preserved slopes unless there
is no other alternative. Please provide justification for the location of the storm sewer to be
reviewed by the Zoning Administrator and the Development Process Manager.
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue—Robbie Gilmer, rgilmer(aalbemarle.org
1. Fire flow test required before final approval,please attach a copy to the final plans.
2. Relocate the hydrant on Farish Road to the left side of the road prior to building 1.
3. Please check building codes to see if a sprinkler system is required for building 1. If a sprinkler is
required please show FDC on Address side of structure and with in 100'of the hydrant.
4. Please add a note to the plans. "Knox boxes required on each building, contact Albemarle County Fire
Marshal office for location.Due to the design with retaining walls two boxes maybe required on
buildings 3,4, and 5."
Albemarle County Information Services(E911)—Derek Bedarf,dbedarf@albemarle.org—See attached
Albemarle County Building Inspections,Jay Schlothauer,jschloth@albemarle.org_—No objection
1. No comments or conditions.
Note: Due to the proximity of exterior walls on Buildings 1 and 11 to a property line,all,or portions
of those walls must be of fire-rated construction.
Albemarle County Service Authority—Alex Morrison, amorrison@,serviceauthoritv.org
1. Water/Sewer Construction Plan Review by the ACSA will be required at the final site plan stage.
Submit 3 copies of the final plan along with water and sewer data sheets to the ACSA,Attn:
Michael Vieira,PE,to begin the review.
2. Call out all water valves,fittings,etc.
3. Call out the water main sizes and material.
4. Call out the sewer main material.
2
5. Proposed retaining wall#11 is in conflict with proposed water and sewer.
6. Proposed retaining wall along the Moores Creek Lane entrance is in conflict with proposed water.
7. Proposed retaining wall#5 is in conflict with proposed water.
8. Proposed retaining wall#6 is in conflict with proposed sewer.
9. Proposed retaining wall#7 is in conflict with proposed water.
10. Due to the number and locations of retaining walls a looped water system within the development
may not be practical.
11. Show water meters and sewer laterals for each building.
12. Will any building have sprinkler systems?
13. Is irrigation proposed on the site?
14. Is a fire flow test along Moores Creek Lane required?
15. Add water and sewer profiles.
16. City review and approval for the proposed sewer connection is required at the final site plan
stage.
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority—Victoria Fort,vfort(a,rivanna.org,434-977-2970, ext. 205
1. RWSA General Notes should be on the plans(see attached).
2. If the development is expected to produce over 40,000 gallons of sewage per day,a flow capacity
certification from RWSA will be required prior to final site plan approval.
3. RWSA has serious concerns about the proposed access driveway off of Moores Creek Lane.
There is significant truck traffic in and out of the RWSA Moores Creek Advanced Water
Resource Recovery Facility(MCAWRRF)at the end of Moores Creek Lane as well as Carter's
Bakery on Franklin Street. RWSA is concerned that the addition of a driveway so close to
Franklin Street and with such a narrow turning radius may result in traffic interruptions and/or
accidents at this location,with impacts extending out to Franklin Street.
4. All RWSA utilities within the scope of the project need to be shown on all sheets. This includes
the two future meter vaults located on Broadway Street and Moores Creek Lane near their
intersections with Franklin Street(see attached plan sheets)and the RWSA sanitary sewer main
which runs parallel to Moores Creek Lane(see attached GIS map). Include utility size,material
(if known),and ownership(RWSA).
5. All RWSA easements within the scope of the project need to be shown on all sheets. This
includes water line easements at the two meter vault locations(see previous comment,Deed
Book 4690,Pages 637-644,628-636),sewer easement over the RWSA sanitary sewer main
(Deed Book 342,Pages 197-203),and the access easement shown on sheet SP3 (Deed Book 331
Page 549).
6. RWSA's contractor is currently scheduled to install the two meter vaults located on the property
in early 2017. If there is any need to revise the vault locations to accommodate elements of the
proposed site design,that will need to be determined in the next few weeks.
Sheet SP3:
1. Show and label RWSA utilities and easements according to General Comments#4 above
2. Label RWSA manholes according to attached GIS Map(MCI-MH-03, -04).
Sheet SP4:
1. RWSA will not allow a fence or other obstructions directly over or adjacent to the meter vault at
the corner of Franklin Street and Moores Creek Lane
2. See General Comment#3 above regarding the proposed access driveway off of Moores Creek
Lane
3. RWSA would like to discuss with the applicant and the ACSA the option of installing an
additional water valve at the tee/tap location on Moores Creek Lane. At present,there is no inline
valve to isolate the section of ACSA water line through the MCAWRRF from the proposed
development connection.
4. Show and label RWSA utilities and easements according to General Comments#4 above
3
111100
Sheet SP5:
1. Show and label RWSA utilities and easements according to General Comments#4 above
Sheet SP7:
1. Show and label RWSA utilities and easements according to General Comments#4 above
Sheet SP8:
1. Show and label RWSA utilities and easements according to General Comments#4 above
2. The depth of the RWSA sanitary sewer line at the crossing with the proposed new 36"HDPE
storm drain will need to be shown on the storm sewer profile in the final site plan.
Virginia Department of Transportation—Adam Moore,Adam.Moore@,vdot.virginia.gov—See attached
If you have any questions about these conditions or the submittal requirements please feel free to contact
me at(434)296-5832 x3270,jnewberry@albemarle.org.
Sincerely,
Ntm.A6wJ�'
J.T.Newberry
Senior Planner
CC: Elemental Ecotech,LLC
do Chris Donalson
809 Bolling Avenue,Unit C
Charlottesville,VA 22902
donalsonconstrco(a,aol.corn
4
firNIIS
/
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
;� 401 McIntire Road, North Wing .,
Charlottesville,Virginia 22902
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS - E911
APPLICATION#: SDP201600059
TMP: 07700-00-00-040B0
07700-00-00-040C1
DATE: 11/10/2016
FROM: Derek Bedarf
dbedarf@albemarle.orq
Geographic Data Services (GDS)
www.albemarle.org/gds
(434) 296-5832 ext. 3031
The following road names will need to be changed:
1. FARISH ROAD
2. CANAL STREET
3. MILL LANE
Per Part I, Section 4-a of the County's Road Naming and Property Numbering Manual (page 6 of
PDF), "A proposed road name which duplicates an existing or reserved road name in Albemarle
County or the City of Charlottesville shall not be approved. An exception may be made for cul-de-
sacs which have the same name as the road from which they originate (example: "Amberfield
Court" which originates from "Amberfield Drive")."
1. A road named FARISH ST exists in the City of Charlottesville and FARRISH CIR exists
elsewhere in the County.
2. A road name of CANAL has been reserved for use in another development in the County.
Per Part I, Section 4-i of the County's Road Naming and Property Numbering Manual (page 7 of
PDF). "No proposed road name shall be approved which begins with a word that appears as the
first word in five or more official road names."
3. MILL is the first word in over 5 road names in the County.
New road names will need to be submitted. A suggestion that keeps "CANAL" could be CANAL
RUN ST or a similar name that has a word after CANAL. Please keep in mind, "A road name shall
not exceed more than sixteen (16) characters including spaces and the designator's
abbreviation." (Part I, Section 4-c).
We recommend providing three (3) candidate names for each road to our office for
review, in case your first choices are not acceptable.
A PDF version of the Ordinance and Manual can be found here:
https://www.albemarle.org/upload/images/Forms Center/Departments/Geographic Data Service
s/Forms/Road Naming and Property Numbering Ordinance and Manual.pdf
411110 44440)
Please consult the County's Road Name Index to check your road names prior to submittal. The
Index can be found here: http://www.albemarle.org/albemarle/upload/images/webapps/roads/
Parcel and mapping information can be found here: http://gisweb.albemarle.org/
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Irrr SOS
4.1 4 .
.
1�� o
AAa
, f
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper,Vag nla 22701
Charles A.Kilpatrick,P.E.
Commissioner
November 18, 2016
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Attn: J.T. Newberry
Re: Woolen Mills Light Industrial Park- Initial site plan
SDP-2016-00059
Review#1
Dear Mr. Newberry:
The Department of Transportation,Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section,has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Dominion Engineering,dated
October 07,2016,offers the following comments:
Land Use
I. Please show mill and overlay on plans in accordance with WP-2.
2. The mill and overlay will require work to centerline,so flagging operation will be
necessary.
Please note that the final site plan must show conformance with the VDOT Road Design
Manual Appendices B (1)and F, as well as any other applicable standards, regulations,or
other requirements.
Please provide two copies of the revised plan along with a comment response letter. If further
information is desired, please contact Willis C. Bedsaul at 434-422-9866.
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The
owner/developer must contact the VDOT Charlottesville Residency Land Use Section at (434)
422-9399 for information pertaining to this process
Sincerely,
tittAv_
Adam J. ore, .E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
=M.
vise
Johnathan Newberry lo -s w , w/ oma.
Dustin:We don't anticipate going above 40 feet on any of our buildings.
Stewart:We'd like better elevations to evaluate this request.
Kevin:These would not be sold individually.
Zoning will make a determination about stepback applicability?
30' buffer under Section 26.5c is measured from the centerline of Franklin Street, so it does not apply.
Is there a reasonable use of the property?This is debatable.
You have to bore under slopes... it would be a special use permit to disturb if it is determined to not be a public facility.
Dustin:We did not show the sewer laterals on the initial plan. We're discussing it with them now.
Dam break inundation zone.
J.T. Newberry
Senior Planner
Uonnty of Albemarle, Planning Division
434-296-5832, ext 3270
1
,
111.0111'
;;;
;.,
Johnathan Newberry
From: Cameron Langille
Sent: Tuesday,January 17, 2017 5:49 PM
To: Johnathan Newberry
Subject: SDP201600076 -Woolen Mills Light Industrial Park Final, 1st Review Draft Comments
Hey 1T,
Here is a draft of my comments.As you can see,a couple of them are incomplete(highlighted in red) because I'm not
sure what our protocol is. I'll talk to you tomorrow about this during our meeting.
01. [General Comment]- Per Planning comment#1 of initial site plan approval, please correct the name of Moores
Creek Road to Moores Creek Lane under the"Access"description on Sheet SP1.
.
provided exilai '._ , . - . - . . - ' .. . _ . . - . . --•
3. The property is located in the Monticello Viewshed Overlay District. Do we need to send this plan to the Thomas
Jefferson Foundation?
.d-4. Dam break inundation zone? 18-32.5.6 (initial) and 32.6.4 (final) Engineering study required �r ° tE.ws
5. Dumpster? Does the fence screening detail on Sheet SP15 meet the requirements on 32.7.9.7(b)?— ` 1� �
[Section 30.7.4]-The Cover sheet states that three crossings of preserved steep slopes are proposed.Where are co.-00"
these three crossings on Sheet SP5?Two aerial crossings are visible,and three additional crossings are also µ:ms
shown.These include two 8" sewer lines located east of building 7 and west of building 9,and one crossing for a
4p3\\' water line of unspecified width located east of building 7. Please verify all crossing areas in the Steep Slopes GF
Overlay District.
r
`off p., [Section 30.7.4(b)(2)]—Per the previous comment, utility lines that cross preserved slopes are only permitted
through a Special Exception. Or does this fall under Section 30.7.4.1(c) or 30.7.4.1(f) ??
C [Section 32.5.2(n)]—Please amend the label for Building 12 across all applicable drawings. It currently states 600
sq.ft. but the building is 1,200 square feet.
9. [Sections 32.5.2(n)and 4.20(b)]—Per Planning Services comment#5 of the initial review, is the maximum
building height of 40'that is stated on Sheet SP2 the maximum proposed building height?Since there are 12
individual buildings proposed in the development, please add a table to Sheet SP2 stating the proposed height in
�., order to demonstrate compliance with stepback requirements.As stated in the initial site plan approval,the
Zoning Division confirmed that stepback regulations apply to this site for any building exceeding the 40'
`r`N` maximum permitted height.An application for a special exception must be approved in order to exempt the
Woolen Mills Light Industrial Park from meeting stepbacks. Please reference Section 18-3.1 for the definition of
building heights based on the proposed roof type (i.e.flat, mansard,gable, hip,or gambrel).
iS 10. [Section 32.6.4]—The property is located in a Dam Break Inundation Zone. Please submit
11. [Section 32.6.2(i)]—On Sheet SP4, please amend the parking space count label in front of Building 4.There are
six parking spaces provided, not 7.
12. [Section 32.6.2(i)]—Please amend the parking requirement shown on Sheet SP2.There are 95 parking spaces
shown on Sheet SP4, not 93 as stated in the Parking Provided Tabulations table on SP2.
�� 13. [Section 32.6.2(i)]—The Parking Provided Tabulations table on SP2 states that 11 dumpster pads are provided,
C but only 9 are shown on the plans. Please verify how many dumpsters are proposed,and amend the plans as
necessary.
1it41. [Section 32.6.2(i)]—Please indicate the type of surfacing proposed for all parking areas and travelways.
,.45. [Section 32.6.2(i)]—Sheet SP2 states that 16 loading spaces are provided, but only 11 are shown on the plans.
Please verify how many loading spaces are proposed,and amend the plans as necessary.
1
(V. [Section 32.6.2(i)]—Sheet SP2 states that 93 parking spaces are provided, but 95 are shown on the plans. Please
amend the Parking Requirements table to reflect the correct number of spaces.
17 [Section 4.12.16]—The handicap parking space in front of building 6 overlaps with the curb and gutter and does
not appear to be the minimum 8' required width. Please amend the plans.
18 [Section 4.12.16(e)]—Please provide details of the wheel stops with dimensions, anchor sites,and materials.
[Section 32.7.3]—Please specify all locations of mechanical equipment and other utility hardware proposed on
site.These features must be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building, or they
shall be located so they are not visible from the public view.
20. [Section 32.7.9]—A tree is shown on top of the dumpster located in front of building 2 on Sheet SP6. Please
amend the tree location.
21. [Section 32.7.9]—Please remove the"properties to be consolidated" label on Sheet SP6 since the existing
property lines are not shown.
22. [Section 32.7.9.4(c)]—The note on Sheet SP6 states that all trees along the entrance roads will be saved in lieu
of providing street trees. Please show the location of the existing tree line and all areas with groups of individual
trees that are a minimum of 6"caliper or greater. Please provide any available information regarding the
heights,calipers,and density/spacing of the existing trees and vegetated areas to be preserved in lieu of
providing street trees.
23. [Section 32.7.9.4(b)]—Please demonstrate compliance with the Ordinance in terms of protecting the existing
trees that will be preserved in lieu of new plant materials.The limits of clearing must be shown on the grading
plan and landscaping plan, and the location of the protective tree fencing must be shown on each drawing in
order for the agent to approve the site plan.
24. [Section 32.7.9.4(b)(2)]—Please provide a conservation checklist signed by the applicant that verifies that the
existing trees will be protected during construction.The checklist shall conform to the specifications in the
Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, pages III-393 and III-413.
25. [Section 32.7.9.6(c)]—Please state the minimum caliper and height of the Acer Saccharum parking lot trees at
time of installation on Sheet SP6. .This species is classified as a large deciduous shade tree by the Albemarle
County Recommended Plant List,and as such must be installed at a minimum 13A inches.
26. [Section 32.7.9.6]—Please amend the Parking Lot Tree Requirements table on Sheet SP6.Thirteen trees are
shown on the drawings, not 12.
27. [Section 32.7.9.5(c)(a)]—Since 95 parking spaces are provided, 10 parking lot trees are required. Please amend
the Parking Lot Tree Requirements table on Sheet SP6. It currently states that 84 parking spaces are proposed,
and 8 trees are required.
28. [Section 32.7.9.9(c)]—Please add a note to Sheet SP6 stating"All landscaping and screening shall be maintained
in a healthy condition by the property owner, and replaced when necessary. Replacement material shall comply
with the approved Landscape Plan."
29. [Section 4.17.4(a)]—Since both models of lights emit greater than 3,000 lumens,they must feature full-cutoff
shields.The cut-sheet details on SP7 do not demonstrate that the models are full-cutoff. Please provide
additional verification on the next submittal.
Cameron Langille
Senior Planner
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Ph: 434-296-5832 ext. 3432
blangille(a�albemarle.orq
2