Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201500035 Correspondence Letter of Revision 1 2016-11-04 Johnathan Newberry From: Johnathan Newberry Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 12:16 PM To: 'Ammy George'; David Jordan Cc: Bill Ledbetter Subject: RE: OTV Block 27 Am my, Thanks. I will draft the approval letter. Typically, we would request four full-size copies for approval, but I think we can get by with just two copies in this case. Can you provide two copies with the plat when it's submitted for signature? Thanks, J.T. From:Ammy George [mailto:AGeorge@roudabush.com] Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 8:26 AM To:Johnathan Newberry<jnewberry@albemarle.org>; David Jordan <DJordan@roudabush.com> Cc: Bill Ledbetter<BLedbetter@roudabush.com> Subject: RE: OTV Block 27 Good morning JT, I have updated the Zoning Information on the Cover Sheet to reference ZMA2015-00001. Let me know if you need anything else. A-%n J George From:Johnathan Newberry [mailto:inewberry@albemarle.org] Sent:Thursday, November 03, 2016 8:08 PM To:Ammy George<AGeorge(c@roudabush.com>; David Jordan <DJordan@roudabush.com> Cc: Bill Ledbetter<BLedbetter@roudabush.com> Subject: RE: OTV Block 27 Hello Ammy and David, Obviously,thank you for all your patience on these requests. I have very minor comments to provide. The LOR application states that "[you] are coordinating directly with ACSA" on the review of this proposal. Do you have any written approval from ACSA that you can forward to me? Here is the comment on the BLA plat (SUB201600168—Block 27, Lots 10-25): 1 4,„ 1. Section 14-302(6)(5)—On Sheet 1,the information under the heading"Zoning" is listed twice. Please remove one "Zoning" heading. Also, please replace references to ZMA200400024 with the latest rezoning number (ZMA201500001).This portion of Block 27 was included in the latest rezoning. Here is the comment on the LOR request (SDP201500035—Block 27 Final): 1. Section 32.5.2(A) -On Sheet 1, please revise the zoning information to refer to ZMA201500001 instead of ZMA200400024. I can review a .pdf of these changes if you have any questions. Thanks, ,l.T. 1\1( wb 'rr�- $t'nior Planner County of Albemarle, Planning Division 434-296-5832, ext. 3277 From:Johnathan Newberry Sent:Wednesday, November 02, 2016 6:53 PM To: Bill Ledbetter<BLedbetter@roudabush.com> Subject: RE: OT PARK ESMT PLAT Bill, I just got out of the Board meeting tonight. I'll do my best to wrap-up Block 27 tomorrow after our Divisional meeting. I'm trying... Thanks, J.T. From: Bill Ledbetter [mailto:BLedbetter@roudabush.com] Sent:Wednesday, November 02, 2016 10:25 AM To:Johnathan Newberry<inewberry@albemarle.org> Cc: Megan Yaniglos<myaniglos@albemarle.org>;Thayer Reback-Woods Rogers<treback@woodsrogers.com> Subject: RE: OT PARK ESMT PLAT Thayer will circulate the signed deed from ACSA once we get it back. I am copying her to remember to include both of us on the final deed scan. Will you complete Block 27 this morning? Thanks Bill Bill Ledbetter Roudabush, Gale and Associates 914 Monticello Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 2 Johnathan Newberry From: Johnathan Newberry Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 6:07 PM To: Stewart Wright; Rebecca Ragsdale Subject: Parking standards for accessory apartments Stewie and Rebecca, I'm reviewing a LOR in Block 27 of Old Trail that proposes accessory apartments on SFA lots(Lot 20 and 23)that will have a total of four parking spaces(two off-street spots in the driveway and a two-car garage). Can Zoning confirm whether or not this proposed layout meets Section 5.1.34(e)? In the currently approved plan, the lots with accessory units have a separate off-street spot separated from the main dwelling's parking spots. .1.�P. Newberry Senior Planner ('oiln0 of Albemarle, Planning Division 434- 96-5832, ext. 3270 1 ...... ... .. 7 451\i i q- f OPEN SPACE0 35.1 22.0' 22.0: 28.5" 10 I 28.514 51 SE 'BACK 1 ce) i 10 © 1 1 12 13 14 Z ' -..,4 . i ( 13 ct .\......„4. / VAR. WIDT r - -- -I I — - i I p / tIGH1 DIS I I I i (..) USPIT. I I I I I I I _ .1,_ _ 1 P . _ ....... ILLJ ..... - __ - - r i t\ ''' I PARKING C,''', ' , _ -c, '0 PARK! iii'cr,e) cc) 1 4:'. :1\i 'ec" -1 1 7, sr)' '7:1 0 2? 0 2F15' " 28.5' ,_ -c--) CP 1 ....,.... ‘ ,..... _.,_:........ ., _ .. CO R STOSIGN a I,. - TOP TO CG6- - ROLL':TOP P GuRg_4p4,44sITIoN +_-..* j_,N4 59.'56'15" E FENNEL CG 2STREET SIGN ...(TYR.) ' RL 24'24' Priv.* . 1 0 , . " . 22.6 ne--- 22.0' 4--- 28-.2' ", r_ ___ 5' SETBA 'NO PARKISIGN , i .,______ NO PARKIN SiIsl -1---t2\f--41:-. -,. 7: i i.---2i 1 i 22'.- . 1 _--22'---- - ---4. .1:e. ° i i 1 - i 1 C.A. :: 1 I 1 1 I CP ..11402, Ht._ , ..._ ...." L. „..._ ..., ..1 L J ""--- 2- -1"-----zzr- ----22.----4.---.~-2-2 '--...-- -.(D -- -,4 ....1 P P20 —4 P21 , 18 19 —....., 22 II ACCESSORY t i c I ' • 4.> 1 '1 II 5' SL ',ACK 1 , _ EET1 SIGN- '. •45" 44 22.64 22.0" 22.0' 28.2' 28.8i 2, ,...4.„,.. ! ., ,.,...... 4 ,..., s12 _ -4 rrli F.X CC-6 ASHLAR AVENO 2 'fir Section 5.1.34 Accessory Apartment Each accessory apartment shall be subject to the following: U a. An accessory apartment shall be permitted only within the structure of the main dwelling to whici Usage of freestanding garage or other accessory structure for an accessory apartment is expressly pr than one(1)accessory apartment shall be permitted within any single-family detached dwelling. U b. The gross floor area devoted to an accessory apartment shall not exceed thirty-five(35) percent o floor area of the structure in which it is located. ❑ c. The gross floor area of an accessory apartment shall not be included in calculating the gross floor dwelling unit for uses such as home occupations as provided in sections 5.2 and 5.2A and other sim chapter whose arca within a dwelling unit is regulated. (Amended 1-12-11) U d. An accessory apartment shall enjoy all accessory uses availed to the main dwelling, except that ni apartment shall be permitted as accessory to another accessory apartment. U e. Any single family dwelling containing an accessory apartment shall be provided with a minimum street parking spaces, arranged so that each parking space shall have reasonably uninhibited access to approval of the zoning administrator. ❑ 11 A single-family dwelling which adds an accessory apartment shall be deemed to remain a single-1 shall be considered one (I)dwelling unit for purposes of area and bulk regulations of the district in• is located. ❑ g. A guest or rental cottage shall not be deemed to be an accessory apartment. but shall be deemed t4 detached dwelling, whether or not used as such, subject to area and hulk regulations of the district ii is located. No accessory apartment shall be permitted within any guest or rental cottage. (Amended ❑ h. The owner must reside in any dwelling to which the apartment unit is accessory or the apartment ❑ i. The provisions of section 4.1.6 notwithstanding, for lots not served by a central sewer system, no shall he established without written approval from the local office of the Virginia Department of He and arca for both original and future replacement fields adequate to serve the main dwelling and ace U j. An accessory apartment shall be deemed to be a dwelling unit for the purposes of sections 14-234 Code. (Added 8-10-94, Amended 1-12-111 3 Sow Nftiol Johnathan Newberry From: Ammy George <AGeorge@roudabush.com> Sent: Thursday,August 11, 2016 8:36 AM To: Johnathan Newberry; Megan Yaniglos Cc: Bill Ledbetter; Dave Brockman Subject: Old Trail Village Block 27 Attachments: OTV Block 27 Revised Layout.pdf; OTV Block 27 Approved Layout Plan.pdf; Proposed_Development_Chart 08112016.pdf Good morning JT and Megan, I have attached a revised layout for Lots 10-25 on Block 27. The revised layout is for all of the single family attached units to be 22'wide by 41' deep. This revision does not change the number of lots or the outer boundary/private right-of-way for this area. I have attached the Layout Plan from the approved plan set for comparison. With this revised layout,the shared lot lines between the following lots shifts: Lots 10 and 11; Lots 11 and 12; Lots 12 and 13; Lots 14 and 15; Lots 15 and 16; Lots 16 and 17; Lots 18 and 19; Lots 19 and 20; Lots 20 and 21; Lots 22 and 23; Lots 23 and 24; and Lots 24 and 25. The other revision with this layout is the fact that we have reduced the number of affordable and accessory units; from 4 affordable units to 0 affordable units and 8 accessory units to 2 accessory units. As shown in the attached Development Chart,this revision will leave us 2 short of the required number of affordable units for this block. However,the overall number of affordable units within Old Trail Village will still meet the requirements.As shown in the attached Development Chart, Block 31B &C (SDP- 201600040) proposes 14 affordable units where only two are required.With this revision to Block 27, Old Trail Village will still have 7 banked affordable units. I believe that these revisions to Block 27 to comply with the requirements for a Letter of Revision in that it (i) adheres to the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and ZMA, (ii) complies substantially to the approved plans (iii) will have no adverse impacts on adjacent lands or public facilities..The revisions detailed above are minimal in nature and more importantly will require a minimal review. Do you agree with this assessment? Can I move forward with a Letter of Revision? ,4ntntr5. George, C[A Roudabush, Gale and Associates 914 Monticello Road Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 434-977-0205 office 434-296-5220 fax 1