HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201800066 Review Comments Architectural Review Board Approval 2018-05-10COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
May 10, 2018
Justin Shimp
Shimp Engineering, P.C.
201 E Main Street, Suite M
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: ARB-2018-66: 2300 Hunter's Way — Minor Site Plan Amendment, and SDP2018-33: 2300 Hunter's Way —
Minor Site Plan Amendment
Dear Justin,
We have received the above -noted applications for a County -wide Certificate of Appropriateness as well as a Minor
Amendment to SDP2016-12: Nationwide Homes, Major Amendment. The following revisions are requested to make the
proposal consistent with the design criteria that apply to the County -wide Certificate as well as the Minor Amendment.
1. Please revise the submitted Site Plan (Sheet C3 of 8, dated 5/7/18) to show just the proposed demolition plan.
2. Please revise the landscape plan (Sheet C5 of 8, last revision dated 10/18/16, prepared by Shimp Engineering) of the
approved Major Amendment to the Final Site Plan of Nationwide, SDP2016-121 to show the proposed additional
landscaping and proposed fencing. Include:
a. A revised landscape schedule that includes approved plants as well as proposed plants. Ensure that the
landscape schedule indicates plant species with both common and botanical names, quantity, size at planting,
and symbol used.
b. A fence detail and elevation that illustrates the appearance of the fence and stipulates material(s) and the
specific color(s) proposed. Include the plants in the fence elevation.
c. Identification of the 12 parking spaces that are dedicated to vehicles awaiting repair.
The submitted information does not clearly show how providing an 80' section of fence, projecting that section
forward 18" from the remaining fence, providing two corners, and adding 5 groups of 4 plants will be sufficient to
achieve an appropriate appearance for the EC. Please clearly show how the fence design, materials, color and planting
work together to establish an appropriate appearance. In particular, the quantity, type and spacing of the landscaping
material are critical to a successful design. The EC screening fence design criteria are copied at the end of this letter
for your reference.
Within 15 days of the date of this letter, please send me a letter (by email is acceptable) indicating whether you will or
will not proceed with these revisions. If you choose not to proceed with these revisions, staff will be unable to approve
your application. If you choose to proceed with the revisions, please forward me one set of revised drawings together with
a memo summarizing the revisions you've made. Your decision to make the revisions will suspend the 60-day review
period associated with your original submittal. However, I expect to complete the review of your revised proposal within
2 weeks of your re -submittal.
If you have any questions about this action, please contact me as soon as possible. I look forward to receiving your
revisions and completing this review with an approval letter.
Sincerely,
;A. pxbol—
Heather McMahon, Senior Planner
hmcmahon@albemarle.org
434-296-5832 x3278
cc: ARB File 2018-65
Heartrock Farm LLC
2521 Summit Ridge Trail
Charlottesville, VA 22911
(.'0tj'N"rY-wwE {.ERrlFjc, j,F OF APPROPRIATENESS
TENESS
SVVMnm tenerng
IIES]Gfti CRITERIA
HeilRht
Heko r shock! be as bursa
passible while maintaining
Full seremin
Skze kale
Lengths of W or rnme
Length -of fence should be
must provide uaristian 'by
mitigated through surface
using thaw in height,
relief, either in derail ar
different material.
massing.
cambinalions, projections
forward -or bacl4 piers,
ocher sindker futures, aQ a
comhinsiLoR ofthese.
Structure E"gm
Minuniu di, plaecOf the
Deisilingshauld be used in
ornamental screening
fence strucrurc in the
mitigate surface and texture.
fences may be approved an
laardscspc. dL—.jgn Sad
atase-bye bersrs.
detailing should bt simple.
Fens'es along lxti&strian
routes should Ix, scaled and
detailed relative to human
sire.
1laterlalg
Possible fence materials
No chain link with or widroui
Me Lal panrtl fenciing+xill
include woW, woad
vinyl. sLais. No barbed wire,
likely require plianting
aompositc. stone, bride
mean wire or siroi lar &vim.
along the fence for
deccaralivc concrete hlo*
Length and }ieihility of fence
miugatiorL
moat panels, w a
will be considered in
camhlnalionofthese
deterki ningappropriarc fence
mmmeriaLs
malerial.
Fence rm derial dwuld
march Of complemern the
mmcriaLs found on the
building and -or adjoining
itrucimres or ISnd-,ra
Fence rmaterialsshould
have a Kmen track rec rd
of durability and longevity
relalnle ra color retention
and avcrall EPPMa0ft.
f olars
CoLor should be neutral —
No shiny, reflective finishes_
6w example: gray, brawn.
Flay finishes are required
or Merl. A whine wmening
fence will rar6y be
aDwomiate.
pQMrjnR
Planting should be used io
Placement of planing shall. be
Fences longer than 40' shall
masses to mitigate the
sufficient m allow for proper
iochrde aneevergreen tree
visual impan ndthc 3engrb
plant growth.
or3 shrubs for each AM"
of dw 6enee.
secuoa ar por dan thcrcaf
planted on the public side.
Lacada■
ATemraquMag screening
should be pLaoed behind
buildings, as viewed from
the EC. if h4dings SreTm
available for screening,
are q and Fca&Fes ro he
scrcei" should be located
as far froin the EC as
PcHiNt.
L o"ibig screening fences
aLc,ng pedestrian paths
shouLd be I hnited.