The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP201700004 Correspondence Final Site Plan and Comps. 2018-02-26 PROJECT ENGINEERINGMANAGEMENT LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING February 26, 2018 Mr. J.T Newberry Senior Planner Albemarle County, Planning Division Regarding: Final Site Plan Submittal—Old Trail Blocks 5, 20, and 21 SDP 2017-00004 Dear JT, Please find attached the final copies for Old Trail Blocks 5, 20, and 21 which are ready for signature. If you have any questions or concerns or if you need anything further, please feel free to call me at (434) 227-5140 ext. 3 and we can discuss any questions that you may have in further detail. Best Regards, Keane Rucker, E.I.T. Shimp Engineering, P.C. r' PROJECT MANAGEMENT ENGINEERINGa C October 4, 2017 Adam Moore VDOT Area Land Use Engineer 1601 Orange Road Culpepper, VA 22701 CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING Regarding: SDP 2017-00004— Old Trail Blocks 5, 20 & 21— Final Site Plan Dear Mr. Moore, Thank you for your review of the final site plan for Old Trail Blocks 5, 20, and 21. We have reviewed and revised the plan per your most recent comments dated August 22, 2017. See below for detailed responses to each of your comments. 1. WP -2 has been extended to cover entire lane width on plans. 2. Old Trail Drive ADT has been increased following a 1% per year since 2015. The updated ADT is 3672 trips. This did not change the results of the warrant. Warrant has been updated on the plans, there were some display settings that made it difficult to understand, but we trust that the updated warrant is clear and easy to follow. If you have any questions or concerns about these revisions please feel free to call me at (434) 227-5140 ext. 3 or email Justin Shimp at iustin@shimp-eneineering.com and we can discuss any questions that you may have in further detail. Best Regards, Keane Rucker, E.I.T. Shimp Engineering, P.C. Page 1 of 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT SHIMCIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERINGf October 2, 2017 Ms. Emily Cox Albemarle County Engineering Regarding: Final Site Plan Engineering Comment Response — Old Trail Blocks 5, 20, and 21 Dear Emily, Thank you for your review of the final site plan for Old Trail Blocks 5, 20, and 21. We have reviewed and revised the plan per your most recent comments dated August 23, 2017. See below for detailed responses to each of your comments. 1. Comment Noted, WPO 201700016 remains under review and must be approved first. 2. Comment addressed with previous submittals 3. Comment addressed with previous submittals 4. Comment noted, additional notation added to site plan. 5. Per our meeting with Emily Cox and Frank Pohl on 9-14-17, the reviewer will waive the request for retaining wall design for site plan approval. Applicant understands this design is required as part of the building permit. 6. Retaining wall on C7 is close to the parking area but will not interfere with the parking overhang. 7. Sidewalks along the public streets all have easements. The associated plat is awaiting approval for recordation. All easement references will be included on the site plan in the final signed hard copy submittal. 8. SWM facility easements have been shown. See comment above. 9. We are awaiting word of entrance permit approval. Typically this step is finalized by the general contractor before site work begins. 10. Comment aaaressea wan previous suomttais. 11. Pavement details have been updated to show 2" and 3". 12. ST -5 and ST -4 slope is above 0.5%. Included with this letter is a digital copy of the revised site plan with revision date 10-2-17. If you have any questions or concerns or if you need anything further, please feel free to call me at (434) 227-5140 ext. 3 and we can discuss any questions that you may have in further detail. Best Regards, Keane Rucker, E.I.T. Shimp Engineering, P.C. HIMPROJECT MANAGEMENT CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING October 2, 2017 Mr. J.T. Newberry Senior Planner Albemarle County, Planning Division Regarding: SDP 2017-00004— Old Trail Blocks 5, 20 & 21— Final Site Development Plan Transmittal Letter Dear J.T., Thank you for your review of the final site plan for Old Trail Blocks 5, 20, and 21. We have reviewed and revised the plan per the most recent VDOT and Engineering comments received August 23, 2017. This site plan was also updated to the latest ACSA comments and copies are being delivered directly to the ACSA. If there are no outstanding comments on this site plan, we will submit signed physical copies. If you have any questions or concerns about these revisions please feel free to call me at (434) 227-5140 ext. 3 or email Justin Shimp at justin@shimp-eneineerine.com and we can discuss any questions that you may have in further detail. Best Regards, Keane Rucker, E.I.T. Shimp Engineering, P.C. Page 1 of 1 Johnathan Newberry From: Elise Kiewra Sent: Monday,August 07, 2017 3:48 PM To: Johnathan Newberry Subject: RE: Resubmittal of SDP20170004 - OTV Blocks 5, 20, and 21 - Final JT, I did not get a recent invite but have the original one in Bluebeam and it still works.They still haven't made the changes have asked (the continuation of the name Glen Valley Dr) but it is not a new road name so I'm not sure how critical this is. Do I just make the same comments for a 3rd time? ( Derek made them the 1st time) Or so I just say it is all ok? Elise Kiewra, GISP GIS Specialist Division of Information Services http://gisweb.albemarle.org ekiewra@albemarle.org 434-296-5832 ext. 3030 From:Johnathan Newberry Sent: Friday,August 04, 2017 7:23 PM To:Shawn Maddox<smaddox@albemarle.org>; Heather McMahon <hmcmahon@albemarle.org>; Emily Cox <ecox@albemarle.org>; Moore,Adam PE (VDOT)<Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov>;Alex Morrison <amorrison@serviceauthority.org>; Elise Kiewra <ekiewra@albemarle.org> Subject: Resubmittal of SDP20170004-OTV Blocks 5, 20, and 21- Final All, I've attempted to upload the latest version of this final site plan into Bluebeam. Please let me know if you don't receive an invitation to view it. Also, here are links to the comment response letters: Heather,ARB: http://cob-Ifiche03/WebLinkWA/2/doc/667020/Pagel.aspx?searchid=d92b4ca8-3b2f-493f-8167- 28b86f47b5df Adam,VDOT—see the file named "SDP201700004 Correspondence Final Site Plan and Comps. 2017-08-04 (4)": http://www.albemarle.org/weblink/search.aspx?dbid=3&searchcommand_%7b%5bCDD- Planning%5d:%5bApplicationNumber%5d=%22SDP201700004%22%7d Emily, Engineering: http://cob-Ifiche03/WebLinkWA/2/doc/667021/Pagel.aspx?searchid=d92b4ca8-3b2f-493f-8167- 28b86f47b5df Shawn, F/R: Here's Robbie's last comment-- "1. Relocate FDC's on Building 101 and 102 to face the parking lot." Please upload your comments into Countyview by 8/21/17. Thanks, J.T. Newberry 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT SHIMCIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERINGa August 3, 2017 Mr. J.T. Newberry Senior Planner Albemarle County, Planning Division Regarding: SDP 2017-00004— Old Trail Blocks 5, 20 & 21— Final Site Development Plan Comment Response 3 Dear J.T., Thank you for your review of the final site plan for Old Trail Blocks 5, 20, and 21. We have reviewed and revised the plan per your most recent comments sent via email June 7, 2017. See below for detailed responses to each of your comments. 1. The continuation of Glen Valley Drive has been labelled on the plans. If you have any questions or concerns about these revisions please feel free to call me at (434) 227-5140 ext. 3 or email Justin Shimp at Justin@shimp-eneineerins.com and we can discuss any questions that you may have in further detail. Best Regards, Keane Rucker, E.I.T. Shimp Engineering, P.C. Page i of 1 HIMPROJECT MANAGEMENT CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING August 3. 2017 Heather McMahon, County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, VA 22902 Regarding: RE: ARB -2017-38: Old Trail Village Apartments, Blocks 5, 20, 21— Final Site Plan Ms. McMahon, Thank you for your review and feedback on the plans for Old Trail. The following changes have been made in response to your comments: 1. All trees planted parallel to interior roads and in parking areas must be at least 2.5 -inch caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should be planted at least every 40 feet on center. All large shade trees along interior roads and on the perimeter parking areas have been adjusted to be a maximum of 40 feet apart. 2.5 -inch caliper trees have been specified on Plant Schedule (C17) and Note 4. 2. All shrubs must measure at least 24 inches in height. All shrub species have been adjusted to be 24" or higher. See Plant Schedule (C17). 3. Reduce the total number of Ilex Glabra'Shamrock' (IGS, 118) so that it is not greater than 25% the total number of shrubs. Ilex Glabra'Shamrock' plantings have been reduced to less than 25% of shrubs. See Plant Schedule (C17). 4. All light levels must be 30 foot candles or lower. There is one value of 31.1 f.c. which must be reduced. Light levels have been adjusted, and none exceed 26.1 f.c. across site. See Lighting Plan (C19). 5. If wall -mounted lights are proposed, they must be drawn on the architectural elevations and manufacturer's specifications, cut sheets, and a lighting schedule must be submitted for ARB review. Photometric values emitted from wall -mounted lights must be added to the lighting plan. No wall -mounted lights are proposed. 6. Add the standard mechanical note to the architectural drawings: Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated. Comment has been noted by architect. Thank you again for your time and please let us know if you have any additional questions about what is shown in this document. Best Regards, Peter Russell Shimp Engineering, P.C. HIMPROJECT MANAGEMENT CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING August 3, 2017 Ms. Emily Cox Albemarle County Engineering Regarding: Final Site Plan Engineering Comment Response — Old Trail Blocks 5, 20, and 21 Dear Emily, Thank you for your review of the final site plan for Old Trail Blocks 5, 20, and 21. We have reviewed and revised the plan per your most recent comments dated June 23, 2017. See below for detailed responses to each of your comments. 1. Comment Noted, WPO 201700016 remains under review and must be approved first. 2. This topography has been field verified on 5/3/2016 during a detailed survey of the Old Trail Drive curb and gutter performed by Roudabush, Gale & Associates, Inc. 3. The Master Plan Number was the original rezoning plan ZMA 2004-024. This is listed on the cover sheet. 4. This ground cover is shown in the landscaping plan sheets C15 -C18. Ground cover on these slopes is a wildflower mix. 5. Retaining wall plans will be submitted when received, we are awaiting the subcontracted wall design engineer to finish the plans. Safety rails have been to the appropriate walls. 6. The two foot overhang has been shown on the site plan sheets. 7. Sidewalks along the ROW have been placed in easements. 8. Roudabush, Gale & Associates Inc. are preparing the easement plats, these should be submitted soon. We will submit the SWM agreement separately before final approval. 9. We are awaiting VDOT approval. 10. Dumpster pad meets these requirements, see Detail 4 on Sheet C13. 11. Pavement design sections have been included with this submittal. See Sheet C12 for pavement thickness guideline plan. 12. Comment noted. Included with this letter is a digital copy of the revised site plan with revision date 6-23-17 and a PDF of the pavement design worksheet. If you have any questions or concerns or if you need anything further, please feel free to call me at (434) 227-5140 ext. 3 and we can discuss any questions that you may have in further detail. Regards,Best i Keane Rucker, E.I.T. Shimp Engineering, P.C. PROJECT MANAGEMENT SHIMCIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING NGINEERINGa May 8, 2017 Justin Deel, P.E. VDOT Land Development Engineer Regarding: SDP 2017-00004— Old Trail Blocks 5, 20 & 21— Final Site Development Plan Dear Mr. Deel, Thank you for your review of the final site plan for Old Trail Blocks 5, 20, and 21. We have reviewed and revised the plan per your most recent comments sent via email April 13, 2017. See below for detailed responses to each of your comments. 1. Public ROW's have been shown and labelled. Travelways within this plan shall be private. 2. Intersection site distance profiles have been shown on Sheet C12. Please note that the corresponding plan view lines are shown on Sheets C8 -C10 and that the left site distance line for Trailhead Drive that extends beyond these extents is shown on C12. Site distance easements have been added to the plans. 3. Our plans had omitted an existing DI -313 on Golf Drive adjacent to the new entrance. Current design for this entrance has not changed and this existing inlet will collect runoff and will remain in place. 4. Entrance CG -12's have been updated per modified CG -12 design drawing sent via email May 3, 2017. S. Turn lane warrant analysis has been included on Sheet C11. If you have any questions or concerns about these revisions please feel free to call me at (434) 227-5140 ext. 3 or email Justin Shimp at Justin@shimp-eneineerine.com and we can discuss any questions that you may have in further detail. Best Regards, ---------- ogk� Keane Rucker, E.I.T. Shimp Engineering, P.C. Page 1 of 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT SHIMCIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERINGa May 8, 2017 J.T. Newberry Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Regarding: SDP 2017-00004— Old Trail Blocks 5, 20 & 21— Final Site Development Plan Dear Mr. Newberry, Thank you for your review of the final site plan for Old Trail Blocks 5, 20, and 21. We have reviewed and revised the plan per the your most recent comments sent via email April 14, 2017. See below for detailed responses to each of your comments. Planning 1. The outstanding $215 notification fee has been paid with this submittal. 2. Note about the special exception added to Sheet C1. 3. Parking count note adjacent to building 103 has been updated. Total parking count for these three blocks is 347, meeting the requirement of 345. 4. Segmented block ret. Wall near the parking lot on C7 (and C10) has been shifted. This retaining wall will be stepped, the area that protrudes above the curb has been shifted back to allow a 2' overhang, the other part of the wall is level with the curb grading so vehicles will naturally overhang. Please note that the max height is 2'; since handrails are not required there is nothing on the wall to interfere with vehicle overhang. 5. Conservation checklist has been signed and dated. 6. Block 21 sidewalk has been extended to edge of property line along Old Trail Drive. Albemarle County Dept. of Fire Rescue 1. Building 101 and 102 FDC's have been moved to face the parking lot. VDOT Comment response sent as a separate document. Page 1 of 2 If you have any questions or concerns about these revisions please feel free to call me at (434) 227-5140 ext. 3 or email Justin Shimp at Tustin@shimp-engineerine.com and we can discuss any questions that you may have in further detail. Best Regards, Keane Rucker, E.I.T. Shimp Engineering, P.C. Page 2 of 2 Johnathan Newberry From: Johnathan Newberry Sent: Friday,April 14, 2017 6:19 PM To: 'Justin Shimp, P.E.' Subject: RE: SDP201700004 Old Trail Village BI 5, 20, &21 FSP 4-13-17 Also, here are comments from ACSA: Please instruct the applicant to submit a construction plan review submittal to the ACSA for water and sewer review. The submittal shall be made to the attention of Michael Vieira, PE, and shall include 3 copies of the plan along with water and sewer data sheets. Let me know if you have any questions. Alexander J. Morrison, P.E. Civil Engineer From:Johnathan Newberry Sent: Friday,April 14,2017 6:15 PM To: 'Justin Shimp, P.E.'<justin@shimp-engineering.com> Subject: RE:SDP201700004 Old Trail Village BI 5,20,& 21 FSP 4-13-17 Here you go, Justin. a. [Comment] Prior to final site plan approval, please pay the outstanding$215 notification fee for the initial site plan (SDP201600033). vL [Section 32.5.2(a)] On Sheet 1, please note that "On October 5th, 2016,the Board of Supervisors approved a special exception for this area,subject to the following conditions: 1. The maximum number of units permitted in Block 20 shall be 90 units. 2. The minimum number of units permitted in Block 21 shall be five units." 01. [Section 32.5.2(n)] On Sheet C6,the row of parking adjacent to Building 103 shown as"21–9'x 18' Parking Spaces,2 -8'x 18'Van HC Spaces" is incorrectly labeled.Also on Sheet C6,the row of parking adjacent to the Clubhouse shown as"17–9'x 18' Parking Spaces,4-8'x 18'Van HC Spaces"is incorrectly labeled. Please revise on this sheet and Sheet Cl. I count a total of 347 parking spaces provided (including 12 van handicap accessible spaces) —4. [Section 4.12.16(c)(6)] Sheet C7 shows a "segmented block retaining wall (max. ht. 3 feet)" immediately adjacent to three parking spaces that have a reduced length of 16 feet.This reduction is permitted where an unobstructed overhang is present, but the wall prevents an overhang. Can the wall be moved back or can the // spaces be lengthened to 18 feet? A5. [Section 32.7.9.4] Please sign and date the conservation checklist shown on Sheet C17. [Section 32.7.2.3] Please extend the sidewalk within Block 21 to the end of the property line towards Route 250. From:Justin Shimp, P.E. [mailto:iustin@shimp-engineering.com] Sent:Thursday,April 13, 2017 2:24 PM 1 114111) To:Johnathan Newberry<inewberry@albemarle.org> Subject: Fwd: SDP201700004 Old Trail Village BI 5, 20, &21 FSP 4-13-17 Hi JT, Any word on the status of your review? • Justin Shimp, P.E. 434-953-6116 Begin forwarded message: From: "Deel, Justin(VDOT)" <Justin.Deel@vdot.virginia.gov> Subject: SDP201700004 Old Trail Village Bl 5,20, & 21 FSP 4-13-17 Date: April 13, 2017 at 2:12:58 PM EDT To: Johnathan Newberry<jnewberry@albemarle.org> Cc: "'Justin Shimp, P.E.'" <justin@shimp-engineering.com>, "Moore, Adam.PE (VDOT)" <Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov> J.T., Attached is our review letter for SDP201700004 Old Trail Village BI 5, 20,&21 FSP,which includes the following comments: 1. Please show and label the public right-of-way. 2. Intersection sight distance profiles are required. The intersection sight distance triangle for the entrance on Golf Drive has not been provided. Sight distance easements are required where the sight line is not within the right-of-way. 3. It appears as though the eastern side of the entrance on Golf Drive needs and inlet, as well as the northern side of the southern-most entrance on to Old Trail Drive. Provide adequate calculations to go along with any additional storm inlets. 4. CG-12's should be in-line with the direction of the sidewalk and should not be angled toward the center of the intersection. 5. Provide turn lane warrant analyses on plans. Justin Justin Deel, P.E. Land Development Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation 434-422-9894 540-717-1408 (c) 2 Johnathan Newberry From: Johnathan Newberry Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 8:21 PM To: 'Justin Shimp, P.E.' Cc: Megan Yaniglos; David Benish; Mark Graham; Ellie Ray Subject: RE: Old Trail Final? Attachments: Old Trail Blocks 5, 20&21 Justin, Unfortunately,this electronic plan was not distributed as I thought it had been. I believe it is now correctly distributed and I'll be following up with each of the reviewers tomorrow to confirm that is the case. I apologize for the all of the delay caused by my ineffective electronic distribution. I informed the reviewers that this application originally fell under the 2/6/17 submittal date and requested their review comments as soon as possible (with a deadline of 4/11/17). Again, my apologies and I'll do my best to prioritize this project as much as I can going forward. J.T. Newberry Senior Planner County of Albemarle, Planning Division 434-296-5832,ext. 3270 Original Message From:Justin Shimp, P.E. [mailto:justin@shimp-engineering.com] Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 6:00 PM To:Johnathan Newberry<jnewberry@albemarle.org> Cc: Ellie Ray<ellie@shimp-engineering.com> Subject: Old Trail Final? Hi JT, Any word on this? Thanks, Justin Shimp, P.E. 434-953-6116 1 Johnathan Newberry From: Johnathan Newberry Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 8:07 PM To: Moore,Adam PE (VDOT); Robbie Gilmer; Matthew Wentland; 'Alexander Morrison'; Derek Bedarf; Michael Dellinger Subject: SDP201700004 Old Trail Village Blocks 5, 20 and 21 - Final Site Plan - Electronic Review All, I have attempted to initiate a Bluebeam Session for the review of SDP201700004 Old Trail Village Blocks 5,20 and 21- Final Site Plan (Electronic Plan Review). Hopefully,you received an invitation from Bluebeam to join the session and review the plan. Please let me know if you did not receive a message from Bluebeam. For those of you that are not yet familiar with Bluebeam,you will also be able to access the file through our Laserfiche system. I will forward the link as soon as it is available. Please provide your comments by April 11th.(NOTE:This plan was actually uploaded to our FTP site under the February 6th submittal date and—to make a long story short—I know the applicants would greatly appreciate as fast of a review as possible!) Thanks, J.T. Newberry Senior Planner County of Albemarle, Planning Division 434-296-5832, ext. 3270 PROJECT MANAGEMENT SHIMCIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERINGa July 31, 2017 Adam Moore VDOT Area Land Use Engineer 1601 Orange Road Culpepper, VA 22701 Regarding: SDP 2017-00004— Old Trail Blocks 5, 20 & 21— Final Site Plan Dear Mr. Moore, Thank you for your review of the final site plan for Old Trail Blocks 5, 20, and 21. We have reviewed and revised the plan per your most recent comments dated June 18, 2016. See below for detailed responses to each of your comments. 1. Left turn lane warrant analysis: a. The ITE used for the analysis has been revised to #221 to match the cover sheet info. b. Directional factor of 0.65 is now used. c. ITE #221's directional distribution of 64% entering, 36% exiting has been used. d. Left turn entering trips has been estimated at 80% e. Right turns exiting has been added to the opposing traffic. f. All turn lane warrant analysis info is shown on C11. 2. VDOT WP -2 detail added to C11. Overlay locations shown on plan sheets. If you have any questions or concerns about these revisions please feel free to call me at (434) 227-5140 ext. 3 or email Justin Shimp at Justin@shimo-engineering.com and we can discuss any questions that you may have in further detail. Best Regards, Keane Rucker, E.I.T. Shimp Engineering, P.C. Page 1 of 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT SHIMCIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGIN EERINGa January 25, 2017 J.T. Newberry Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Regarding: SDP 2016-00033— Old Trail Blocks 5, 20 & 21— Final Site Development Plan Dear Mr. Newberry, Thank you for your review of the final site plan for Old Trail Blocks 5, 20, and 21. We have reviewed and revised the plan per the your most recent comments dated July 22, 2016. See below for detailed responses to each of your comments. Planning 1. Sheet C1 references have been changed to "Final". 2. We have received approval for a Special Exception to this requirement. Block 21 contains 7 units, which meets the minimum of 5 defined in the Exception. 3. The following information was added: a. All applicable zoning info (Entrance Corridor Overlay) has been added to Sheet C1. b. Parcel info was added to Sheet C3. 4. Proposed uses per building and gross residential density have been added to C1. Passive Recreation Area square footage has been added to Sheet C4. 5. ROW lines and widths have been added. Engineering: Comment Response attached as separate document. E911 1. Upland Drive is shown as extending from the existing road to the extension between Block 5 and 20. 2. The proposed name of Trailhead Drive was chosen for this travelway. Alternate suggestions are Summit Drive and High Point Drive. Albemarle County Dept. of Fire Rescue 1. A hydrant has been added to the intersection of Upland Drive and Old Trail Drive. 2. Fire flow testis being requested, results will be added to plans when received. 3. FDC locations have been shown on the plans. Page 1 of 2 4. "Knox Box" note has been added to Sheet C4. VDOT Comment Response attached as separate document. If you have any questions or concerns about these revisions please feel free to call me at (434) 227-5140 ext. 3 or email Justin Shimp at Justin@shimp-engineering.com and we can discuss any questions that you may have in further detail. Best Regards, Keane Rucker, E.I.T. Shimp Engineering, P.C. Page 2 of 2 HIMPROJECT MANAGEMENT CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENG1 E. RI January 25, 2017 Matt Wentland Albemarle County Engineering Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Regarding: SDP 2016-00033— Old Trail Blocks 5, 20 & 21— Final Site Development Plan Dear Mr. Wentland, Thank you for your review of the final site plan for Old Trail Blocks 5, 20, and 21. We have reviewed and revised the plan per the most recent comments by John Anderson dated July 7, 2016. See below for detailed responses to each of his comments. Conceptual SWM design has been altered to comply with the Master plan. The Phosphorous reduction goal of 6.07 lbs/year has been achieved with the current design as well as the quantitative runoff requirements. A VSMP application satisfying the WPO will be submitted shortly. The Master plan planned for buffer disturbance. Since area within the 100' stream buffer will be disturbed, a mitigation plan will be added to the VSMP. VSMP submittal pending. 4. Critical slopes waiver request is not needed as the critical slopes that are disturbed with this plan were approved as part of the Old Trail ZMA. 5. Label changed to Golf Drive. 6. Street names added to plans. 7. Private travelway plan and profile design items have been added to the plans. 8. Pavement details, ramps, and traffic signs have been added to the plans. 9. One detention system has been removed, the other has an outfall at Biofilter D. 10. Detention and inlet profiles have been added to clarify this. 11. All practical walks have been added to the plans. 12. Walkways adjacent to curbs has been widened to 6'. 13. HC ramp for Clubhouse SW corner has been added. 14. CG -12 added to plans. 15. Min. radius is 3.0' as per design standards. 16. 3.5' planting strip has been accepted by planners, it will not be revised. 17. Adequate storm inlets have been provided, each inlet meets VDOT design standards. VSMP will have all storm calculations. Page 1 of 2 If you have any questions or concerns about these revisions please feel free to call me at (434) 227-5140 ext. 3 or email Justin Shimp at iustin@shimp-engineering.com and we can discuss any questions that you may have in further detail. Best Regards, Keane Rucker, E.I.T. Shimp Engineering, P.C. Page 2 of 2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT CIVIL ENGINEERING -HIM LAND PLANNING January 25, 2017 Adam Moore VDOT Area Land Use Engineer 1601 Orange Road Culpepper, VA 22701 Regarding: SDP 2016-00033— Old Trail Blocks 5, 20 & 21— Final Site Development Plan Dear Mr. Moore, Thank you for your review of the final site plan for Old Trail Blocks 5, 20, and 21. We have reviewed and revised the plan per your most recent comments dated June 18, 2016. See below for detailed responses to each of your comments. 1. Site distance triangles have been included on the plans. Since the roads have recently been built to VDOT standards, vertical sight distance is not a concern as Stopping Sight Distance is always greater that Intersection Sight Distance. Landscaping is included for this site, and the triangles have been shown on these sheets. A note was added to trim branches of trees within the triangles to a height of 120" from the pavement elevation. 2. Proposed travelways are internal and shall be privately owned. This has been shown on the Final Site Plan. 3. Requested VDOT ROW information has been shown. 4. Intersection angle on golf drive has been added. See Sheet C11. S. The design vehicle is a standard car, the entrance radii of 25' match the existing private streets and public side streets within the existing Old Trail development. 6. Profiles have been shown, since these are private streets the 50' of 2% landing was not achieved for upland drive, however a slope of 4% was achieved through this drive, per CG -11. 7. Curb ramps have been shown on the plans and CG -12 details have been added to sheet C13. 8. Turn warrant analysis dated August 8, 2016 was approved by VDOT. 9. Entrances shall be VDOT CG -11 method of surface treatment, and all entrances slope away from the existing ROW so existing drainage will not be affected. All other inlets have been analyzed per VDOT LD - 204 calculations. Page 1 of 2 If you have any questions or concerns about these revisions please feel free to call me at (434) 227-5140 ext. 3 or email Justin Shimp at Tustin@shimp-engineerins.com and we can discuss any questions that you may have in further detail. Best Regards, Keane Rucker, E.I.T. Shimp Engineering, P.C. Page 2 of 2 n f _, in — I v+ -1 N v, cn cn V) (/1 cn V) 0 a a 0 S "'• H• :.. C C 0 0 0 0 D O • • a) v. tD 7 "I.' / NJ NN NJ N N N N Z oJ 0 0 0 O O O O C n n Vf V1 ni 3' 3 A O 0 O -< v. A U, U, 01 Cl 01 Cl r 0 C C CU 1..4 1. . o 0 0 00005 °+ m 3 -a - 020 3 = o 0 0 0 0 0 °• v o ? 0 3 3 Z i"'i w l0 a w NJ F•+ I-, O 0 0 F, " N v W F-' F-' W F-+ �I W 0 -< AO C 7r C a- — Cr C O 0 C ~ T S f1 (t) n W tp O D 1=1. O W i- Qon= Q QzO O c - „D G! fD H rD H 10 -< m rp Q . o 0 N D 3 3 -+ � , s c c c O v fD CO -+ O0 0) 'N-. 0 Cucn • (D S d O co_ Q v fD• — O 0 �_ • N O O N O rD O 3 p ►� .� W — • in fD 5. v fD fD (70 'C-r !D C 0- 30. - , , �, O N 0 0 [� 0 v v 0 ut 0 -n N rD -I, ZCU VI n cu rD .*a G o a, a C a) 0 �• _ CD = a) co n • a) 0 7. C p' (D + CuO Q lD (0 p' z a) 0 (O o• r7) ar �• O .< N 000 N 0CD O ON CQ '-. N rt. O I--, N "0 Cl) rD ,..' 0 0 4.4 0a) 'C-. O al' al C r. ,-•. C p N N s-P p fD (TD E. N *o ' ^r 0n O fD In a) (. 0 -, � N N NJ NJ NJ N) N a *•" 3 O -0, E O O O N F' h-' + 0 0 0 U, u, u, u, CD a = 7 F A W Q w 0, 01 O1 -1 r. I-, ,-r al (D O O 3 0 ,-. n 0 O fD v a) (1) • .-� • 0 -0 -0 . 0_ -0 r* 3 a n N n n n n n 0" O CD 0 (Awn) v ar ar 0" "" C 0 fD C 0 0 0 0 0 0 fD -• rD -, 0. n n n n n -< 0 Q- '•• N 0 0 0 0 0 0 t 0 • O (-13o a) 0'0 O Q. -< I--' CD CD CD rD co fD a •,J13 0 0 'n•. ,n•. 'n•. ,n•. ,n•. Q' v, a,0- O 0 .0 -0 -0 -0 -0 8' Es B CDCD, O 0 •z -, -, -I -, O O O O O O O '' 0 �D al a) CD ,-P 0 0 0 0 0 ' a) 66 -. a) V1 V) N ti, (D (/) • _ -0 -0 -0 -0 0 -. a- 0 0 12, nfD U° nrD v -, 0- 0 O v 0 �• O. v (1) fD CU 0- ,--. G 0 • ,=r .v n to n u9 fD 00 fD fD 0 a O C O0 n O n 3 C rD rD a; O 0 -o -o =- -o 0 ami Q- vl CD CD '•*• rD '••�. ar al 0 0 0 al Q j co 00 fD CD N 5 D. 0 a ' O v '•. o 3 ao 0 n p n N rD 3 v ° 0 0 n 0 rD ,-. 3. O 5 O rp n 3 a 0n Cr 0 - o 3 0 fD .-. v, n) < a) rD ro -' Cl, r•r fD 73 C-. N n fD v, 3 '-^• fD v �O �' Q r. A CT MM '•i• 0 "a "6 0' rD • '0•. a) a) a) ,-=1: r2 •G 3 0 0 S 0 0- C co 0 'x•. a. Q 0 0- CU fD 3 fD c Q (D 0 a) a) * GD Q N rD 'v -i 3