Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201600013 Review Comments Initial Site Plan 2016-05-23Short Review Comments Report for: SDP201600013 SubApplication Type: Crozet Business Office - Initial Initial Site Plan Date Completed:04/28/2016 Reviewer:Johnathan Newberry CDD Planning Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:1. Section 32.5.2(a) - On Sheet 1, please note that two variances for signs have been approved on this property: VA1975000012 and VA1980000011. 2. Section 32.5.2(f) - On Sheet 1, please revise Note 12 to read that “This property lies in the South Fork Rivanna Reservoir water supply watershed.” 3. [Comment] A decision on whether or not to set a public hearing date for the ACSA request will be considered by the Board of Supervisors on May 4th. This request is item 19 on their agenda for this meeting. Division: Date Completed:03/22/2016 Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer CDD Inspections Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:Based on plans dated March 7, 2016. Relocate the barrier-free parking space, with its associated striped access aisle and curb cut, so that it is the closest parking space to the main entrance to the building. Division: Date Completed:04/21/2016 Reviewer:Joel DeNunzio VDOT Review Status:See Recommendations Reviews Comments:Please have the applicant contact me and I will find some time to meet with them. It's an important entrance. Thanks, Joel Division: Date Completed:04/18/2016 Reviewer:Alexander Morrison ACSA Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:I have reviewed the above referenced initial site plan. The applicant is proposing well and septic, but they have also submitted an ACSA Jurisdictional Area Map Amendment Request which should go before the board in May. This request is to amend the ACSA Jurisdictional Area for this parcel from “water only to existing structures” to “water only.” If this request is approved, the applicant shall show the existing ACSA water mina, fire hydrant and a proposed domestic connection. Division: Date Completed:04/11/2016 Reviewer:Matthew Wentland CDD Engineering Review Status:See Recommendations Reviews Comments:Based on plans date 3-7-16- 1. A WPO submittal will be required containing ESC and SWM plans and a SWPPP [17-300, 17-301]. 2. Provide a Tier 3 or Tier 4 Groundwater Assessment, depending on projected water usage [17-1000]. Division: Date Completed:04/12/2016 Margaret Maliszewski Page:1 of 2 County of Albemarle Printed On:June 23, 2018 Reviewer:Margaret Maliszewski CDD ARB Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:03/25/2016 Reviewer:Andrew Slack CDD E911 Review Status:Approved Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:04/16/2016 Reviewer:Robbie Gilmer Fire Rescue Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:Based on plans dated 3/7/16. 1. Fire flow test required before final approval. 2. Please add a note to the plans" Knox Box required, contact Albemarle County Fire Marshal office for location." Division: Date Completed:04/22/2016 Reviewer:Victoria Fort RWSA Review Status:See Recommendations Reviews Comments:Victoria Fort shared that if the Board amends the jurisdictional area, then a Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority Capacity Certification will be needed. Division: Date Completed:04/29/2016 Reviewer:Johnathan Newberry CDD Planning Review Status:See Recommendations Reviews Comments:I met with Joel and the applicants to discuss VDOT requirements. Division: Date Completed:05/06/2016 Reviewer:Johnathan Newberry CDD Planning Review Status:Approved Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:05/23/2016 Reviewer:Unassigned Health Department Review Status:Denied Reviews Comments:Stephen Vargo transmitted a denial letter and I emailed it to Kent Donahue. Division: Page:2 of 2 County of Albemarle Printed On:June 23, 2018 *tome 'gird Albemarle County Planning Services(Planner)—J.T.Newberry,jnewberryAalbemarle.org 1. Section 32.5.2(a) -On Sheet 1,please note that two variances for signs have been approved on this property: VA1975000Q12 and VA1980000011. 2. Section 32.5.2(f) -On Sheet 1,please revise Note 12 to read that"This property lies in the South Fork Rivanna Reservoir water supply watershed." 3. [Comment] A decision on whether or not to set a public hearing date for the ACSA request will be considered by the Board of Supervisors on May 4`''. This request is item 19 on their agenda for this meeting. Here is a link to their full agenda for this day. Albemarle County Engineering Services(Engineer)—Matt Wentland,mwentlandAalbemarle.org 1. A WPO submittal will be required containing ESC and SWM plans and a SWPPP [17-300, 17-301]. 2. [If the County does not approve the jurisdictional amendment request] Provide a Tier 3 or Tier 4 Groundwater Assessment,depending on projected water usage [17-1000]. An example of an approved Tier 3 Groundwater Assessment can be found here: http://www.albemarle.org/weblink/O/doc/240113/Pagel.aspx Albemarle County Information Services(E911)—Andy Slack, aslack(ii albemarle.org—No objection Albemarle County Building Inspections,Jay Schlothauer,jschloth@albemarle.org 1. Relocate the barrier-free parking space,with its associated striped access aisle and curb cut, so that it is the closest parking space to the main entrance to the building. Albemarle County Architectural Review Board—Margaret Maliszewski,mmaliszewski@albemarle.org—No objection Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue—Robbie Gilmer,rgilmer(a,albemarle.org 1. Fire flow test required before final approval. 2. Please add a note to the plans"Knox Box required,contact Albemarle County Fire Marshal office for location." Virginia Department of Transportation—Joel DeNunzio,Joel.DeNunzioAVDOT.virginia.gov 1. An access management exception request for spacing from the entrance to Pro Re Nata will be required. 2. Provide projected trip information generated by the site for peak A.M.travel times to demonstrate that left and right-turn lanes are not necessary. Virginia Department of Health 1. No comments were provided,but their approval will be required prior to final site plan approval (JTN). 3 *44rr/ `rd ci A u4t609 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,North Wing Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126 April 28, 2016 Clyde Simmons 3015 Dumbarton Road Richmond, VA 23228 csimmons@FandR.com RE: SDP201600013 Crozet Business Office—Initial Site Development Plan Dear Mr. Simmons: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Initial comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Planning Services(Planner) Albemarle County Engineering Services(Engineer) Albemarle County Information Services(E911) Albemarle County Building Inspections Albemarle County Architectural Review Board Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue Albemarle County Service Authority Rivanna Sewer and Water Authority Virginia Department of Transportation(to be forwarded upon receipt) Virginia Department of Health(to be forwarded upon receipt) Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed,and should not be considered final. However,the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that will be required to be resolved prior to Final Site Plan approval.The Lead Reviewer will either approve with conditions or deny the Initial Site Plan within 15 days of the Site Review Meeting. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, aA. N.),4AA3....- J.T.Newberry Planner CC: Kent O'Donohue Balzer&Associates,Inc. 1561 Commerce Road, Suite 401 Verona,VA 24482 dodonohue@balzer.cc (1100 Albemarle County Planning Services(Planner)—J.T.Newberry,jnewberry@albemarle.org 1. Section 32.5.2(a) -On Sheet 1,please note that two variances for signs have been approved on this property: VA1975000012 and VA1980000011. 2. Section 32.5.2(f) -On Sheet 1, please revise Note 12 to read that"This property lies in the South Fork Rivanna Reservoir water supply watershed." 3. [Comment] A decision on whether or not to set a public hearing date for the ACSA request will be considered by the Board of Supervisors on May 4th. This request is item 19 on their agenda for this meeting.Here is a link to their full agenda for this day. Albemarle County Engineering Services(Engineer)—Matt Wentland,mwentlandAalbemarle.org 1. A WPO submittal will be required containing ESC and SWM plans and a SWPPP [17-300, 17-301]. 2. [If the County does not approve the jurisdictional amendment request] Provide a Tier 3 or Tier 4 Groundwater Assessment,depending on projected water usage [17-1000]. An example of an approved Tier 3 Groundwater Assessment can be found here: http://www.albemarle.org/weblink/0/doc/240113/Page 1.aspx Albemarle County Information Services(E911)—Andy Slack, aslackgalbemarle.org—No objection Albemarle County Building Inspections,Jay Schlothauer, jschloth(a,albemarle.org 1. Relocate the barrier-free parking space,with its associated striped access aisle and curb cut, so that it is the closest parking space to the main entrance to the building. Albemarle County Architectural Review Board—Margaret Maliszewski,mmaliszewskiAalbemarle.org—No objection Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue—Robbie Gilmer,rgilmer@albemarle.org 1. Fire flow test required before final approval. 2. Please add a note to the plans"Knox Box required,contact Albemarle County Fire Marshal office for location." Albemarle County Service Authority—Alex Morrison,amorrisonAserviceauthority.org 1. I have reviewed the above referenced initial site plan.The applicant is proposing well and septic, but they have also submitted an ACSA Jurisdictional Area Map Amendment Request which should go before the board on May 4th.This request is to amend the ACSA Jurisdictional Area for this parcel from"water only to existing structures"to"water only."If this request is approved, the applicant shall show the existing ACSA water main, fire hydrant and a proposed domestic connection. Rivanna Sewer and Water Authority—Victoria Fort, vfort@rivanna.org 1. If the Board amends the jurisdictional area,then a capacity certification will be needed. Virginia Department of Transportation—Joel DeNunzio,Joel.DeNunzioAVDOT.virginia.gov 1. Comments may be available following a meeting on 4/29/16. Virginia Department of Health 1. No comments were provided,but their approval will be required prior to final site plan approval (JTN). Nome *NW Attachment D David Benish From: David Banish Sent: Tuesday,April 19, 2016 8:51 AM To: David Benish Subject: FW: F&R JA Request From:Alexander Morrison [mailto:amorrison@serviceauthority.org] Sent: Monday,April 18,2016 8:44 AM To: David Benish<DBENISH@albemarle.org> Subject:RE:F&R JA Request David, I have reviewed your request for information and would like to provide the following responses: • The information portrayed In this e-mail Is for Informational purposes only and shall not constitute a recommendation of approval or denial.The ACSA holds no position on the ACSA Jurisdictional Area Amendment Request presented by F&R and is presenting this information in response to a County request. • At this time the water main is flushed periodically through manual means(flushing through a fire hydrant)and a portable automatic flushing assembly.The flushing usually occurs during non-freezing months.A in-house design is underway to replace a section of main at the end of Hillsboro Lane to accommodate a permanent automatic flushing assembly.At that time the minimum daily flushing volumes will be determined. • In general the water main along Hillsboro Lane lacks sufficient usage.There is a cluster of services around Free Town Lane,but service taps from that section to the end of Hillsboro Lane are at a lower density for the length of water main. • Additional services beyond the services near Free Town Lane would slightly improve this situation. • The proposed connection at F&R may have a small benefit to this situation.Additional demand placed on this main would slightly reduce the volume of flushing required. • It is noted that F&R would use on average 10,000 Gal/Month.The existing F&R building is on public water and uses an average of 9,600 Gal/Month. It is unclear whether this would be an additional usage,or if it represents the existing usage. The ACSA will not have a representative at the May Board Meeting. Let me know if you have any questions. Alexander J. Morrison,P.E. Civil Engineer From: David Benish fmailto:DBENISHCaalbemarle.orul Sent: Thursday,April 07, 2016 5:24 PM To: Alex Morrison Subject: FW: F&R JA Request Alex, Would it be possible to at least get a written description of the of the current situation regarding this line. The applicant's original request and subsequent justification letter(both attached makes reference to the limited demand on this dead-end line and the Authority's"periodic release regimen." I typically attach the applicant's request to my staff report to the Board of Supervisors. Since the Board will see these letters, I believe they will want to at least have some 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Johnathan Newberry FROM: Margaret Maliszewski RE: Crozet Business Office Initial Site Plan DATE: April 12, 2016 Based on the ARB's March 21, 2016 action on ARB -2016-16: Crozet Business Office, I'm forwarding the following recommendations on SDP -2016-13: Crozet Business Office Initial Plan: Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18-30.6.4c(2), (3) and (5) and recommended conditions of initial plan approval: A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. Revised drawings addressing the following issues are required. 1. Add the standard window glass note to the architectural drawings: "Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the following criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%." 2. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the drawings: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." 3. If lighting is proposed, include the fixture locations on the site and architectural drawings and provide a photometric plan for review. 4. Show all new trees to be planted on site — not in the right-of-way. Eliminate the pipe conflict along the frontage. 5. If existing trees are to be applied toward landscaping requirements, locate the individual trees on the plan and identify size and species. Standard spacing for large EC frontage trees is 35' on center. 6. Provide large frontage trees at a minimum of 31/2" caliper at planting. The tree near the existing pole can be a medium size or ornamental tree. 7. Intersperse ornamental trees among the large frontage trees. 8. Resolve the grading and wooded area conflict at the southeast corner of the property. 9. Add trees along the eastern edge of the paved area. 10. Provide a complete plant schedule for review. 11. Provide the standard plant health note on the plan: "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant." 12. Clarify the discrepancy between the drawing and the project description regarding the location of the site entrance. 13. Show tree protection fencing on the plan. 14. Brick color shall coordinate with the approved brick for Restore'n Station with lighter color for the storefront. Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None. • Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit: 1. Show tree protection fencing on the plan.