HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201800049 Correspondence 2018-06-28
28 Blackwell Park Lane, Suite 201
Warrenton, VA 20186
PHONE 540.349.4500
CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS • PROJECT MANAGERS • SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
WWW.BOHLERENGINEERING.COM
June 27, 2018
Via Federal Express
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
(434) 296-5832
Attn: Cameron Langille
Re: SDP201800021
Initial Site Plan (Block 3 A – Ice Rink)
Initial Site Plan Review Response
Brookhill Development
Route 29 (Seminole Trail Road) and
State Route 643 (Polo Grounds Road)
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Albemarle County
BE # V152000
Dear Mr. Langille:
Bohler Engineering is pleased to submit on behalf of Riverbend Development, the 1st Submission Final
Site Plan for the Brookhill Development project in Charlottesville, Virginia. The following is our
comment response letter addressing comments received from various departments. Each comment is
addressed and responded to as follows:
Comment 1: [32.5.2 (i)] Please address the following comments related to road improvements:
a. Per staff discussion with Ryan Yauger and Alan Taylor on May 18, 2018, Road
1B will be constructed and dedicated as a public street. Durin g a follow -up
conversation with Ryan Yauger and Alan Taylor on June 1, 2018, County staff
identified the “Neighborhood Street” cross section as the applicable road type for
Road 1B (Figure 8 on page 25 of the Code of Development). This street type
requires one side of on -street parking, in addition to two vehicle travel lanes. The
final site plan and road plans for Road 1B will need to include on -street parking
on one side of the street.
b. A variation to the Code of Development will need to be approved b y the
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors in order for Road 1B to be designed to
the “Connector Road” cross section as shown in Figure 9 of the Code of
Development. This cross -section requires bike lanes on both sides of the street
and no on-street parking. Please submit the following APPLICATION and all
supplemental materials to justify the request. Please be aware that the road plan
application for Road 1B and final site plan application for Block 3A cannot be
approved prior to Board of Supervisor approval of the variation request.
c. On Sheet C-100, please state the application numbers for the road plans under the
section titled “Road Improvement Plans.” Include the County approval date.
d. On the final site plan for Block 3A, please shade out all road improvements that
were subject to review/approval through the road plan application for the
Cameron Langille
Brookhill Development
Block 3A (Ice Rink) – Final Site Plan
Initial Site Plan Review Response
June 27, 2018
Page 2 of 11
CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS • PROJECT MANAGERS • SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
WWW.BOHLERENGINEERING.COM
proposed Road 1B. The final site plan for Block 3A will need to accurately
depict all improvements within the right -of-ways visible on the plans.
e. Please label all roads visible on Block 3A final site plan with a width
measurement and state whether the road is public or private. Prior to final site
plan approval, all street right of ways that have been dedicated to public use
should feature a label stating the deed book and page number of the recorded
instrument.
f. Road plans must be approved, and the road improvements must be constructed or
bonded for Stella Lane, Road A, and Road B1 prior to Block 3A final site plan
approval.
Response 1: a. Road 1B has been designed according to the Neighborhood Street cross section
and on-street parking has been provided on one side.
a. N/A – see response a.
b. The application numbers for the road plans have been added to the cover sheet.
c. The improvements associated with the road plan application for Road 1B have
been shaded back.
d. All roads visible on the Block 3A final site plan have a width measurement and
are designated as public roads.
e. Acknowledged.
Comment 2: [ZMA201500007] Based on discussions with County staff, the final site plan will show
different entrance door locations to satisfy the primary building entrance requirements of
Section 3.1 and relegated parking standards of Section 2.9 of the Code of Development.
Staff will evaluate this further at the time of final site plan submittal.
f. If the open space to the north of the proposed ice rink building will be a
civic/greenspace area, the primary entrance may be move there to meet the
architectural requirements of Section 3.1.
Response 2: The primary entrance has been shifted to the north of the building. Please refer to
Sheet C-301.
Comment 3: [General Comment] Please be aware that the travelway that stubs to the north of Block
3A cannot be classified as a street that will satisfy parcel frontage requirements for future
uses to the north of the ice rink in Block 3A. New streets will need to be provided for
future lots created to the north of the Block 3A ice rink parcel.
Response 3: Acknowledged.
Comment4: [32.5.2 (a)] Please provide information on the proposed parcel/lot for Block 3A. Will a
new parcel be subdivided to contain all of the required improvements, landscaping, and
the building shown on the Block 3A initial site plan? Based on the “proposed ROW” line
shown on the drawings and the extent of Road 1B proposed to be constructed, it is
difficult to determine whether another segment of road will be constructed along the
“proposed ROW” line, or if that will be a parcel line.
a. Block 3A should be located in a parcel meeting the block characteristics
specified in Table 2.2.2 and Table 2.3.2.2 of the Code of Development. This
includes minimum/maximum block length, setbacks, relegated parking,
minimum required parking and landscaping, etc.
b. The south building wall which fronts the proposed Road 1B does not currently
meet the maximum 25’ front setback required by Section 2.3.2.2 of the Code of
Cameron Langille
Brookhill Development
Block 3A (Ice Rink) – Final Site Plan
Initial Site Plan Review Response
June 27, 2018
Page 3 of 11
CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS • PROJECT MANAGERS • SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
WWW.BOHLERENGINEERING.COM
Development. The building should be moved closer to the proposed right of
way/parcel boundary. Based on discussions with Ryan Yauger and Alan Taylor
on June 1, 2018, the Road 1B right of way will be straightened and moved
further north so that the south building façade meets the maximum 25’ front
building setback.
Response 4: All proposed property lines have been labelled to provide more clarity.
a. Acknowledged.
b. The road fronting the proposed building has been revised and the building is
within the maximum setback. Please refer to S heet C-301.
Comment 5: [32.5.2 (a)] The land area of all blocks in Brookhill may not be modified more than 15%
of the gross land area shown in Table 2 (page 6) of the Code of Development. Please be
aware that the proposed gross land area of Block 3A plus 3B is currently modified by
13% (0.7 acres less than the acreage specific in the COD), according to the Block Area
Summary on Sheet C-106. The Block Area Summary does not include the proposed
acreage of Block 4C, and the Phasing Plan on Sheet C -106 shows a much smaller Block
3B boundary than the ZMA201500007 Application Plan. Shifts in boundaries of Blocks
1-4 should be carefully considered to ensure that the acreage modifications do not surpass
the maximum 15% allowed by the Code of Development.
Response 5: Acknowledged.
Comment 6: [32.5.2 (a)] Prior to final site plan approval, please revise Sheet C -100 and Sheet C-102
so that the correct Tax Map Parcel numbers for the Block 3A Ice Rink are shown. All
TMPs within Brookhill are currently listed, but Block 3A appears to only be within the
parcel currently identified as TMP 46 -19B3.
a. Please revise the owner name listed on the Cover Sheet because it is incorrect.
Albemarle County GIS identifies the owners of TMP 46 -19A, TMP 46-19B1,
TMP 46-19B3, TMP 46-19B4 as Crockett Corporation, address of 435 Park
Street, Charlottesville, VA 22901.
Response 6: The tax map parcel numbers have been revised to apply only to those within Block
3A. The owner name has been revised as requested. Please refer to Sheet C-101 and
C-103.
Comment 7: [32.5.2 (a)] There is currently a two-lot division plat under review to create the Block 4B
parcel, and this may be approved and recorded prior to final site plan submittal for Block
3A. On the Block 3A final site plan, please show and label all existing parcel boundaries
with dimensions. Please be aware that the TMP numbers and parcel acreages may change
between the initial and final site plans for Block 3A. Staff may request that the tax map
numbers, parcel acreages, and ownership information be updated on the final site plan to
reflect any recorded plats that may be approved prior to the Block 3A final site plan
approval.
Response 7: Acknowledged.
Comment 8: [32.5.2 (a)] Please add pages 9 and 10 of the approved ZMA proffer statement to the
final site plan. These are currently missing between Sheets C -103 and C-104.
Response 8: Pages 9 and 10 (signature pages) of the approved ZMA proffer statement are shown
on Sheet C-105.
Cameron Langille
Brookhill Development
Block 3A (Ice Rink) – Final Site Plan
Initial Site Plan Review Response
June 27, 2018
Page 4 of 11
CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS • PROJECT MANAGERS • SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
WWW.BOHLERENGINEERING.COM
Comment 9: [32.5.2 (a)] On Sheet C-100, please add the ZMA application number under the “Code of
Development” section. The approved application number is ZMA201500007.
a. On Sheet C-100, the revision date shown for the Code of Development is
incorrect. The approved Code of Development had a final revision date of
October 13, 2016. Please amend the label.
Response 9: The ZMA application number and revision date have been revised. Please refer to
Sheet C-101.
Comment 10: [32.5.2 (a)] On Sheet C-100, please state the Special Use Permit application number that
was approved to allow grading activities in the Flood Hazard Overlay District. The
approved application number is SP201500025 and the County approval date was
November 9, 2016.
Response 10: The SUP application number has been provided. Please refer to Sheet C-101, under
Notes.
Comment 11: [32.5.2 (a)] Please amend the “Zoning and Overlay Districts” in the Zoning and Site
Tabulations table on Sheet C-102. It should state Neighborhood Model Development
District as the primary zoning district. Block 3A also lies within the following overlay
districts: EC - Entrance Corridor Overlay, AIA – Airport Impact Overlay Zoning
Districts.
Response 11: The Zoning and Overlay Districts section has been revised as requested. Please refer
to Sheet C-103.
Comment 12: [32.5.1 (c)] Please show the boundaries and dimensions of all Managed and Preserved
Steep Slopes and wetland areas on the site plan that are within or adjacent to the Block
3A area. If none are within the vicinity of Block 3A, then add a note to Sheet C -102 in
the overlay zoning districts section stating that no Managed or Preserved Steep Slopes are
within Block 3A.
Response 12: There are no managed or preserved steep slopes within the vicinity of the proposed
improvements for Block 3A. Please refer to the Site Tabulations on Sheet C -103 for
note.
Comment 13: [32.5.2 (a)] Please amend the “Associated Plans” section in the Zoning and Site
Tabulations table on Sheet C102.It should be titled “Proffers and Code of Development
ZMA201500007” and should state the November 9, 2016 approval date by the County
next to the Brookhill Code of Development. It should also state “Special use Permit
SP201500025” with the approval date of November 9, 2016.
Response 13: The “Associated Plans” section has been revised with the requested tit les and dates.
Please refer to Sheet C-103.
Comment 14: [32.5.2 (a)] Please add a line to the Zoning and Site Tabulations table o n Sheet C -102
titled “Block Classification” with “Urban Density Residential” as the block type for
Block 3A, as stipulated by the Brookhill Code of Development.
Response 14: A line was added to the Zoning and Site Tabulations for the Block Classification as
stipulated by the Brookhill Code of Development. Please refer to S heet C-103.
Cameron Langille
Brookhill Development
Block 3A (Ice Rink) – Final Site Plan
Initial Site Plan Review Response
June 27, 2018
Page 5 of 11
CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS • PROJECT MANAGERS • SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
WWW.BOHLERENGINEERING.COM
Comment 15: [32.5.2 (b)] Per LOD201700025, the Zoning Administrator has determined that the
proposed Block 3A ice rink is considered an ancillary use, as described in Secti ons 2.2.2
and 2.3.2.2 of the Code of Development. Please amend the “Proposed Use” section in the
Zoning and Site Tabulations table on Sheet C -102. The proposed use should be
“Ancillary Uses – Ice Rink.”
Response 15: The Zoning and Site Tabulations table – proposed use section has been revised as
requested. Please refer to Sheet C-103.
Comment 16: [32.5.2 (b)] Per LOD201700025, the Zoning Administrator has determined that the ice
rink is classified as an ancillary use and thus is not subject to the maximu m building
footprint requirements in Section 2.3.2.2 of the Code of Development. Please add a line
to the Site Tabulations table on Sheet C -102 stating “Block 3A Ice Rink Maximum
Permitted Building Footprint: None, per LOD201700025.”
Response 16: A line for Block 3A Ice Rink Maximum Permitted Building Footprint has been
added to the Site Tabulations table. Please refer to S heet C-103.
Comment 17: [32.5.2 (f)] Please state whether the property lies within a water supply watershed on
Sheet C-102.
Response 17: The property does not lie within a water sup ply watershed. Please ref er to Sheet C-
103.
Comment 18: [32.5.2 (a)] Please add a line to the “Height of All Structures” on Sheet C -102 stating that
buildings greater than 3 stories must step back a minim um of 15’ after the third story or
provide a minimum 15’ front setback or side setback adjacent to the street, per Table
2.3.2.2 of the Code of Development.
Response 18: The requested statement was added to the “Height of all Structures” section. Please
refer to Sheet C-103.
Comment 19: [32.5.2 (a)] Please state the parking setbacks provided in the “Provided” column of the
“Off Street Parking/Loading Space Yard Setbacks” on Sheet C -102.
Response 19: Provided parking setback tabulations have been added. Please refer to Sheet C-103.
Comment 20: [32.5.2 (b)] Please state the square footage and acreage occupied by each use in this
portion of Block 3A on Sheet C -102. This includes the square footage of the propose use,
ice rink, and the overall building square footage. The parking calculation for the ice rink
states that it will measure 16,372 sq. ft., but the overall building will measure 35,000 sq.
ft. What other uses are proposed within the Block 3A building?
a. Please be aware that recreation areas a re classified as ancillary uses to residential
uses, per Section 2.2.2 (page 10) of the Code of Development. Per Table 5
Density Regulations (Page 15), ancillary uses do not count against the maximum
non-residential square footage permitted in each block.
b. Additional parking may be required to accommodate other uses that may occupy
this structure.
Response 20: The ice rink is 16,372 SF and the overall building is 35,000 SF. There are no other
significant uses proposed with the rink. Additional area is used for locker rooms, a
snack bar and an employee office.
Cameron Langille
Brookhill Development
Block 3A (Ice Rink) – Final Site Plan
Initial Site Plan Review Response
June 27, 2018
Page 6 of 11
CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS • PROJECT MANAGERS • SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
WWW.BOHLERENGINEERING.COM
Comment 21: [32.5.2 (b) and 4.12.13 (d)] Due to the nature of the use, a minimum of one loading
space should be provided within the Block 3A area. Loading spaces must meet the design
standards specified in Section 18-4.12.18 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Response 21: One loading space, measuring 12’ by 30’ has been provided in the rear of the ice
rink building. Please refer to S heet C-301.
Comment 22: [32.5.2 (a)] Per Table 2.3.2.2 of the Code of Development, please show the minimum
and maximum setback lines locations across all applicable drawings. Label each setback
line as a front, side, corner side, or rear setback and state the dimensions in the label.
Setbacks should be measured from the proposed right-of -way.
Response 22: Minimum and maximum setback lines have been shown and labelled. Please refer to
Sheet C-301.
Comment 23: [32.5.2 (n)] Please add sidewalks along the driveway entrance into ice rink parking lot
that connects to the 10’ sidewalk in front of the building.
Response 23: A sidewalk connecting the front of the building to the ROW has been added. Please
refer to Sheet C-301.
Comment 24: [32.5.2 (n)] Pedestrian crosswalks must be provided at all locations within the site where
ramps connect sidewalks on opposite sides of vehicular travel ways.
a. Please label the dimensions and surface materials in compliance with the
County’s design standards.
Response 24: Pedestrian crosswalks have been provided at all location s within the site where
ramps connect sidewalks on opposite side of travel ways. Please refer to S heet C-
301.
Comment 25: [32.5.2 (n)] On the site plan drawings, please label and call out the locations of the
primary and secondary building entrances to the building in accordance with the Urban
Density Residential block regulations Section 2.2.2 (page 10) of the Code of
Development.
Response 25: The primary building entrance has been labelled on the prop osed building. Please
refer to Sheet C-301.
Comment 26: [32.5.2 (k)] Please show the location of all proposed sewer and drainage easements.
Label as “proposed” with a size/width measurement.
Response 26: All sewer and drainage easements have been labelled as proposed with appr opriate
width. Please refer to Sheet C-301.
Comment 27: [32.5.2 (l)] Please label all utility easements as “proposed” with a size/width
measurement.
Response 27: All sewer and drainage easements have been labelled as proposed with appr opriate
width. Please refer to Sheet C-301.
Comment 28: [32.5.2 (n)] Please label the proposed surface materials for all parking lots, tra vel ways,
walkways, etc.
Response 28: The surface materials for all parking lots, travel ways, and sidewalks has been
labelled. Please refer to S heet C-301.
Cameron Langille
Brookhill Development
Block 3A (Ice Rink) – Final Site Plan
Initial Site Plan Review Response
June 27, 2018
Page 7 of 11
CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS • PROJECT MANAGERS • SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
WWW.BOHLERENGINEERING.COM
Comment 29: [32.7.9] All required street trees within the right of way of Road 1B will be reviewe d and
approved with the road plan application, SUB201700117. The final site plan should
contain labels stating which landscaping items are proposed with the Block 3A site plan,
and which are part of the road plan application.
Response 29: Acknowledged. Please refer to note 1 on Sheet C-701.
Comment 30: [32.5.2 (n)] Please state the height of all proposed fences and retaining walls in the labels
used on the drawings. Profile view details of all proposed fences, retaining walls, and
constructed screening measures will be required with the final site plan. Each will need to
show the types of materials used and dimensions.
Response 30: No fences or retaining walls are proposed with this plan.
Comment 31: [32.7.9] Please move the Landscaping notes in the Zoning and Site Tabulations table on
Sheet C-102 to the Landscape drawings.
Response 31: The tree canopy calculation has been included on Sheet C-701.
Comment 32: [32.5.2 (e)] Please provide more details about the existing landscape features as described
in Section 1832.7.9.4(c).
a. The Albemarle County Conservation Plan Checklist and Chapter 3.38 of the
Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control handbook. The Conservation Plan
Checklist will need to be signed by the owners and provided as an exhibit on the
final site plan for Block 3A.
Response 32: The existing landscape will be removed within the LOD. Erosion control measures
are shown in the WPO Plan under a separate cover.
Comment 33: [32.7.9] Please revise the calculations on Sheet C -702. The landscape schedules do not
include a column that states the canopy coverage area per plant species. The canopy area
for each species can be found on the Albemarle County Recommended Plants List and
Albemarle County Plants Canopy Calculations tables. PDFs of these documents can be
accessed through the Department of Community Development webpage: LINK.
a. Staff cannot verify if the provided trees meet the minimum 5% canopy required
for the parking lot without the canopy figures shown on the drawings.
Response 33: The landscape schedules have been revised to include canopy coverage per plant
species. Please refer to Sheet C-701.
Comment 34: [32.7.9.8 (a)] On Sheet C-702, please provide a calculation for the minimum tree canopy
required and proposed in Block 3A based on the use type. The minimum tree canopy is
10% for this portion of Block 3A.
a. [32.7.9.8 (b)] Please provide a Landscape Schedule on Sheet C -702 that lists the
Botanical Name and Common Name of each species is included, the proposed
caliper and height at time of installation, and the canopy coverage area per plant
species as stated on the Albemarle County Plants Canopy Calculations (this table
should be specifically for the 10% minimum tree canopy requirement).
Response 34: The landscape schedule has been revised to include the details requested. Please
refer to Sheet C-701.
Cameron Langille
Brookhill Development
Block 3A (Ice Rink) – Final Site Plan
Initial Site Plan Review Response
June 27, 2018
Page 8 of 11
CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS • PROJECT MANAGERS • SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
WWW.BOHLERENGINEERING.COM
Comment 35: [32.7.9.9] Please add a note to the Landscape plans stating “All landscaping shall be
installed by the first planting season following the issuance of the first certificate of
occupancy within the development.”
Response 35: The note has been added to the landscape plan. Please see note #4, Sheet C-701.
Comment 36: [32.7.9.9] Please add a note to the Landscape plans stating “All landscaping and
screening shall be maintained in a healthy condition by the current owner or a property
owners’ association, and replaced when necessary. Replacement material shall comply
with the approved landscape plan.”
Response 36: The note has been added to the landscape plan. Please see note #5, Sheet C -701.
Comment 37: [32.6.2 (h)] Please add the attached Site Review Committee signature panel to the Cover
Sheet.
Response 37: The Site Review Committee signature panel has been added to the Cover Sheet.
Please refer to sheet C-101.
Comment 38: [32.7.8 and 4.17] The final site plan lightin g plan must meet the minimum requirements
of Section 4.17 of the Zoning Ordinance. Some footcandle measurements along the Road
1B exceed the maximum 0.5 footcandles permitted.
a. Please provide further documentation that luminaries proposed in Block 3A are
full-cutoff fixtures.
Response 38: The site lighting plan has been revised to avoid exceeding the maximum footcandles
permitted. Please refer to Sheet C-703 for the photometric plan.
Comment 39: [32.5.2 (o) and ZMA201500007] Please expand the Block Area Summary on Sheet C -
106 to include all the columns contained in Table 2 of the Code of Development. The
required and proposed acreages of each feature should also be stated so that staff can
verify compliance with the minimum requirements for greenspace/a menities, as well as
the development area requirements. Although no Greenspace/Amenities are required in
Block 3, providing updated versions of this table on all site plans and subdivision plats
will allow accurate tracking of land use acreages as each block develops.
Response 39: The Block Area Summary has been expanded as requested. Please refer to S heet C-
106.
Comment 40: [ZMA201500007] Section 2.13 of the Code of Development states that the historic
marker to commemorate the Brookhill manor house shall be installed with the first phase
of development. Please provide Planning & Zoning staff with information on whether
this marker will be installed and shown as a feature on the final site plan for Blocks
4A/4B or Block 3. As a reminder, the Code of D evelopment requires the marker to be
installed either within the public right of way or public open space, and it shall be
designed in accordance with DHR guidelines for design and character of the historic
marker.
Response 40: The historic marker commemorating the Brookhill Manor House will be installed in
the Block 3A Road Plans under separate cover.
Cameron Langille
Brookhill Development
Block 3A (Ice Rink) – Final Site Plan
Initial Site Plan Review Response
June 27, 2018
Page 9 of 11
CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS • PROJECT MANAGERS • SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
WWW.BOHLERENGINEERING.COM
Engineering Services – John Anderson
Comment 1: Please label CG6 collector or spill, per detail
Response 1: The curb has been delineated as collector or sp ill using a grey hatch along the gutter
line. Please refer to the legend on Sheet C-102 and Sheet C-301.
Comment 2: Label parking lot EP
Response 2: Parking lot EP has been labelled. Please refer to Sheet C-301.
Comment 3: 5’-0” [center of tree to storm pipe]
Response 3: Trees outside of the proposed ROW have been located away from proposed storm
utilities. Please refer to sheet C -701.
Comment 4: Final site plan approval requires: Approved Road Plan, Approved VSMP /WPO
Plan(Amendment).
Response 4: Acknowledged.
Comment 5: Show all necessary easements on Final Site Plan, i.e., drainage, sight distance.
Response 5: All relevant easements have been shown on the plan. Please refer Sheet C-301.
Comment 6: Several TC / G elevation values appear incorrect. Please verify.
Response 6: Grading has been revised. Please refer to Sheet C-401.
GDS - Elisa Kiewra
Comment 1: This site will require a one (1) new private road name for Road “A”. Per Sec. 7 -200-B of
the County’s Road Naming and Property Numbering Ordinance.
Response 1: Road “A” has been revised to Archer Avenue.
Service Authority – Richard Nelson
Comment 1: Submit 3 copies of site plan to ACSA for water/sewer review.
Response 1: Acknowledged.
Comment 2: RWSA sewer capacity certification will be req uired.
Response 2: Acknowledged.
VDOT – Adam J. Moore, P.E.
Comment 1: Please provide estimated ADT data on Road 1B.
Response 1: A Vehicles Per Day label has been provided for R oad 1B. Please refer to Sheet
C-301.
Comment 2: Please label prop. ROW to be dedicated to County for public use.
Response 2: The ROW line has been labelled, “PROP PUBLIC ROW”. Please refer to Sheet C-
301.
Cameron Langille
Brookhill Development
Block 3A (Ice Rink) – Final Site Plan
Initial Site Plan Review Response
June 27, 2018
Page 10 of 11
CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS • PROJECT MANAGERS • SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
WWW.BOHLERENGINEERING.COM
Comment 3: The applicant has stated the intention for Road 1B to be public. At this time road plans
have not been submitted. Therefore, the entrance has been reviewed assuming a public
street. Currently no aspects of the road have been reviewed or approved.
Response 3: Acknowledged. Road plans will be submitted under separate cover.
Comment 4: Please show sight distance lin es and profiles on plans. Projected sight distance lines and
profiles should be provided. The Department understands the road alignment may
change. Required sight distance will be checked in the asbuilt condition, and if not met
will preclude acceptance of Road 1B by VDOT.
Response 4: Sight distance lines and profiles have b een provided on the road plans under
separate cover.
Comment 5: Radi must be 25ft. or greater. Please refer to VDOT’s Road Design Manual, Appendix F,
Pg., F-125, figure 4 -10 commercial entrance designs along highways with curb and
gutter.
Response 5: Entrance radii have been revised to 25’. Please refer to S heet C-301 of the road
plan.
Comment 6: Please label streets as Public or Private.
Response 6: Road 1B has been labelled as a public street. Please refer to Sheet C-301.
Fire and Rescue – Shawn Maddox
Comment 1: Increase the width of the paved fire access drive to a minimum of 20’ for the entire
length. This will allow for access and turning around at the rear of the building.
Response 1: The paved fire access drive has been revised to be 20’ wide at a minimum. Please
refer to Sheet C-301.
Comment 2: Add a fire hydrant along the fire access road.
Response 2: A fire hydrant has been proposed along the fire access road in the rea r of the
building. Please refer to S heet C-501.
Comment 3: If this building is going to be sprinklered the FDC must be shown on the plans and be
located within 100’ of the hydrant. The FDC should be remote of the building and can be
located immediately adjacent to the hydrant to allow for use of the travel lanes during an
emergency.
Response 3: An FDC has been proposed adjacent to the proposed hydrant in the rear of the
building. Please refer to S heet C-501.
Comment 4: A knox box is required. A note shou ld be added to coordinate the installation with the fire
marshal’s office.
Response 4: A note has been added to the plans stating that installation of the knox box should
be coordinated with the fire marshal’s office. Please refer to note 1, Sheet C-501.
Comment 5: A fire flow test will be required prior to final acceptance.
Response 5: Acknowledged.
Cameron Langille
Brookhill Development
Block 3A (Ice Rink) – Final Site Plan
Initial Site Plan Review Response
June 27, 2018
Page 11 of 11
CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS • PROJECT MANAGERS • SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
WWW.BOHLERENGINEERING.COM
Should you have any questions regarding this project or require additional information, please do not
hesitate to contact me at (540) 349 -4500.
Sincerely,
Bohler Engineering VA, LLC
Ryan Yauger, P.E.
RY/bb
H:\15\V152000\Administrative\Letters\Block 3 (Ice Rink)\Final Site Plan Ice Rink\180627 Initial Site Plan (Block 3A - Ice Rink) Review
CRL.doc