Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCP201800002 Application Comprehensive Plan Consistency 2018-06-19 ment artment lbE'tT axle + un '. 401 eCommunity Road Ch Charlottesville, :(43 4)296-5832 Fax:(434)972-4126 Planning Application PARC L/ OWNER INFORMATION TMP 04 1.„.„7..., `i a t s owner(s). CROCKEITCORPORATION Application• ... ,; PROPERTY INFORMATION Legal Description I • Magisterial Dist. R Land Use Primary Forest Current AFD Not in A/F District jJ Current Zoning Primary!Rural Areas— APPLICATION INFORMATION Street Address Entered By Application Typemire Plan Compliance _ v Jennifer Pritci' • 19` iB Project Rio Mlle 8oat!Landing and Trailhead Park Received Date 06/18/18 Received Date Final Submittal Date 06/18/18 Total Fees Closing File Date Submittal Date Final Total Paid Revision Number Comments e Legal Ad SUB APPLICATION(s) Type- AorAicatio , Comment APPLICANT/CONTACT INFORMATION TYPecasiste Z p Phone PhoneCe! chr f t"a y v s c�. . "s i A{I�f'ESS 4441,4040,4011 Primary Contact BOB CRICKENBERGER- DIRECTOR AC 401 MCINTIRE ROAD CHARLOTTESVILL 22902 -‘'..1-1342965134"4.-- Signature 342%5844 Signature of Contractor or Authorized Agent Date aunty of Albemarle Data DC -Room 218 Charlottesville,VA Jrcel Property Information 401 McIntire Road 22902-4595 TMP � Legal l l Description Parent TMP Tax Map 04500 Section 00 Block 00 Parcel 06680 GPIN 493555925133 Major Subdiv. IACittAGE - Total Acres 20.40 TMP Inactive? ACTIVE E-911 STREET ADDRESS INFORMATION MO .,. .n µ. u. , . _ I 1 . Citi Sate ZiPPIllie 1 OWNER INFORMATION ��r,.��}a. I I `v Apl f{ ,: d �`, „� 7y-lej.11. m+ 4 ' "{�' j•44 w.". 2'r 1 4m'd a�` ag.m:. i „', ' .;,, .-4,..Z.,- x�."` s. '' .ro ga � ,T,,,.-''#* "" �' i"41 '{.'.. ADDITIONAL PROPERTY INFORMATION Agricultural Forest District: Not in AIF Distfict tm, High School District: Albemarle Z. Traffic Zone: 104 Middle School District: Sutherland t.,,... Voter Precinct: Northsi AT1 Elem.School District: Hallvmead OI Magisterial District: pkt ht. Metro Planning Area?hv/ — Census Block Group: 3 CATS Areae./ Census Tract: 10 a Public Water Sewer: leo Service : it Water Supply Protection Area? NO Other Rural Land? YES Watershed: South Fork Riyanna(below rt A Development Area? NO Historical Significance World Heritage Site ( National Historic Landmark! Virginia Landmark Register 1 National Register of Historic Places! Parcel Has Proffers Parcel Has Easements Current Land Use Number of Structures Number of Dwelling Units Secondary: unassioned dri 0 0 Minor: itis .. fl L a i Comprehensive Plan Land Use Pian Area: Rural Area 1 Z. Primary: Rural Area Other2: Unassianed eg. X. Secondary: Unassioned tsTt Other3: Unassioned Minor: unasserted a Other4: Unassigned — > ri Other: Unassigned z Other5: Unassigned gl Zoning Current Zoning Zonine Adopted 1211980 Zimmer Prior to 1211480 Primary: Rural Areas Rural Areas A Aoricultural Secondary: Unassioned Airport Noise Overlay ; Unassioned Pi Minor: Unassioned z 1Flood Hazard Overlay •y Unassigned II Other: unassigned Natural Resource Extraction Overlay! Flood Hazard Overlay'.1 Airport Impact Area 1,{ Entrance Corridor Overlay kr Scenic Stream Overlay ACTIVITY INFORMATION PLANNING ACTIVITIES BUILDING ACTIVITIES 71 1 Spec Co tis 1 ApplicabnnNimb "I Ct�rr, Perrni#St I SpecialCoeditions 1 ; „ I Printed On: Wednesday,June 20,2018 Application for Comprehensive Plan Compliance 0' 7Rcty�� PROJECT NAME:(how should we refer to this application?): Rio Mills Boat Landing and Trailhead Park PROPOSAL(use separate sheet,if needed): The County of Albemarle proposes to develop and manage a boat launch and Trathead withiaa small river front trail nark_Historically thisorooerty has served the community as a canoe/kayak launch site for access onto the upper reaches of the Rivanna(both the annual Rivanna River Regatta and The Rivanna River Company,a private canoe livery service,launch from this site with owner's permission).Histoncally this site has been a popular destination for anglers.(I he Department of Game and Inland Fishenes ler.cnlly stu..Aed this arca will walleye)The Cumdy in Partnership with the Stale Def./ailment uftamc dud Inland Fisheries is prupusinytu legitimize these wnent uses with the e t hlishmmm„f a sings rivaAr ._patiLartri r-rakenmsy Tmillelseruing_susiafulMe f rw U..t,voil d faritioe in the aroa COMPREHENSIVE COMP PLAN LAND USE/DENSITY: Rural Area 1 LOCATION: Between the Northern bank of the Rivanna River's South Fork and Rio Mills Rd. TAX MAP PARCEL(s): TM45-P66B MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Rio Contact Person(Who should we call/write concerning this project?): Bob Crickenberger, Director Albemarle County Parks Address 401 McIntire Rd City Charlottesville State Va zip 22902 Daytime Phone(434) 296-5844 Fax#( ) E-mail bcricke@albemarle.org Owner of Record Crockett Corporation represented by Mr. Lair Dayton Haugh Address 435 Park St City Charlottesville State Va Zip 22901 Daytime Phone(434) 296-0185 Fax#( ) E-mail Applicant(Who is the Contact person representing?): County Of Albemarle Address 401 McIntire Rd City Charlottesville State Va zip 22902 Daytime Phone(434) 296-5844 Fax#( ) • E-mail • Does the owner of this property own(or have any ownership interest in)any abutting property? If yes,please list those tax map and parcel numbers Yes. TM46-18C FOR OFFICE USE ONLY History: ❑ZMA's&Proffers: ❑Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan(CCP) ❑Letter of Authorization ❑Special Use Permits: ❑ YES ❑ NO ❑Variances: Concurrent review of Site Development Plan? 1 CCP# cOI8tnem� 09 • PRE-APPLICATION WORKSESSION FOR EARLY INPUT FROM PLANNING COMMISSION ON COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (CCP) Intent The Pre-application worksession process is for proposed development projects. Typically these projects will be ZMA's and SP's;however,they may also include by-right proposals. The purpose of this process is to provide information to the Planning Commission on a potential development and have the Commission provide guidance to applicants and staff on the viability of that project. THE"ACTION" OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS NON-BINDING AND PURELY ADVISORY but is intended to help applicants know whether a project is worth pursuing and,if so,what issues need to be addressed. Some of the key outcomes/benefits of this process are: • Establishing whether the concept of the project,is consistent with county policies(comprehensive plan policy). For example: Is the land use,mix of uses,and impacts of the development acceptable for consideration,prior to focusing in on more design related is issues. Are there major hurdles that must be addressed during the rezoning? • Establishing whether there are"non-starter" issues that will make approval of any discretionary request unlikely(For example:Without improvements to Rio Road or the construction of Meadow Creek Parkway the PC and BoS would be reluctant to approve any project which adds more traffic to the existing Rio Road). • Provision of guidance on further work session steps and public input processes,issues. For example: Are there past public issues/concerns that might be relevant to the proposal; suggestions of organizations/groups/representatives contacts,etc. Similar to a reviews for compliance with the comprehensive plan that the County undertakes for public projects(2232 Reviews),the process is used to determines whether the general use(s)is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and allied plans and policies. The focus is on the land use issues(consistency of the proposed uses,or mix of uses and general scale of development). In compliance reviews,there are times when"conditions"are identified which qualify the action,settings conditions which address any shortcomings with the projects consistency with the Plan(example—Wachovia building on Fifth Street found in compliance with the recommendation that the County implement transit service to the area...) Purpose The preliminary review is to identify: • Any major issues with the proposal as it relates to recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan and allied planning documents/policies. • Public concerns with the proposed project. An informational meeting to inform the public and receive input may likely be necessary to achieve this. • Other issues related to this area of the County or this type of project that will make the proposal a "non-starter."These could be political issues(past example: like City/County agreement on Meadow Creek Parkway construction);timing issues related to planning processes(a major rezoning request in an area under some level comprehensive plan review–CPA,neighborhood plan,major transportation study,etc.). Information to be Provided by the Applicant • A brief narrative describing the project—specifically what are to goals of the project and how they see it relating this area of the community. For example what is the target market(s)for the development?What are the phasing/completion goals? • Plan of property/site identifying adjacent properties,existing topography and physical features shown on the County's Open Space Plan as well as existing structures/development(roads,major utilities); • Very general plan showing areas where development is proposed and where existing features are to be retained,desired access,general descriptions of the type and mix of uses,and densities of development(typical land use table showing the ranges of use types,mix,total sq. ft./or total units for each use type,etc.) • Graphic(schematic/conceptual examples)depiction of the general type and character of the building development–NOT for detailed evaluation of the design but to understand what the overall concept would look and"feel"like in terms of mix/intensity/density. For example,a plan might show a rough/conceptual street pattern and for one or two blocks show an example of lots may be platted. This could be supplemented with examples of possible building types that would help the reviewers understand what the scale/character of the project might look like. The graphics could be photos of other existing development that are example of what the applicant would like to pursue. IF the applicant has undertaken"front-end"site evaluations and design work,then: • Rough grading of the site to understand the impacts to the existing site/to be able to analyze the resulting character from developing the site. The level/detail of information is hard for me to describe right now. • Conceptual road layout showing proposed accesses points and interconnections. • General identification of open space and amenity areas as may be warranted by the development. Staff Analysis and Report Staff will provide as part of the report: • A general evaluation of the proposal's consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. • An evaluation of how the area proposed for development relates,in particular,to any approved Master Plans,Master Plans under review,Area B studies,etc. • Information on known infrastructure and service deficiencies or issues that exist in the area and how they might relate to this proposal. • Public improvements called for in this general area and how they might relate to this proposal (Community Facilities Plan,CHART and other MPO studies,Greenway,Bike and Pedestrian/ Sidewalks plans and studies,CIP, Six Year Road Plans). • A general evaluation of the applicable neighborhood model principles (if in the Development Areas) and general direction of how they may need to be applied(such as general orientation of development,important interconnections to consider/provide.) • • Identification of associated approvals that will be needed. For example,does the proposed use require special use permits in addition to a ZMA?Is the project in the Entrance Corridor or other Overlay Districts? • Relationship between the proposed development and natural resources on the site. For example,will the development(including grading that likely will be needed)impact resources shown on the Open Space Plan such as streams,stream buffers,floodplain,critical slopes,wetlands,and other features? • Identification of transportation issues that will need to be addressed with a rezoning,such as interparcel connections and future traffic impact studies. • Identification of any on-site or nearby historical or archeologically important areas and their relative importance. Will additional studies be needed before decisions are made? • Identification of any impact important viewsheds which will need to be considered,such as the Monticello viewshed. • Other items which will be considered as part of a rezoning or special use permits. For example: a coffee roaster or bakery can generate smell concerns,a large group of lighted tennis courts can generate dark sky concerns,or a vehicle repair facility can generate aesthetic concerns. Process • Submittal is always on a Resubmittal Monday. • Approximately four(4)weeks from submittal,adjoining property owners will be notified of the CCP and the upcoming Planning Commission meeting. • Approximately five(5)weeks from submittal,a staff report is completed and provided to the applicant and Commission which covers the issues the applicant has requested be raised with the Commission as well as the items covered under"Purpose"above. • Approximately six(6)weeks from submittal,the project will be reviewed at the Planning Commission. • At the meeting,after receiving a staff presentation on the project,the Commission provides the applicant ten minutes to present his/her proposed project. The Commission will likely ask the applicant questions after the presentation to fully understand the nature of the request. • Public comment is solicited at the pre-application worksession to identify neighbors concerns that the applicant will want to address prior formal submittal of a project. • At present,there is no fee. The process is hoped to create efficiencies during a future ZMA review that should save both applicant and county money;thus,helping to recover initial costs. • One review with the Planning Commission is expected unless the project is highly complex and the applicant and Commission wish to pursue discussion further. • The staff report and minutes of the meeting will be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors for their information(consent agenda-information item). No action is expected,but Board Members could pull in information from the consent agenda to discuss,or request that a Board of Supervisors work session be scheduled. The County of Albemarle proposes to develop and manage a boat launch and Trail head within a small river front trail park. Historically this property has served the community as a canoe/kayak launch site for access onto the upper reaches of the Rivanna (both the annual Rivanna River Regatta and The Rivanna River Company, a private canoe livery service, launch from this site with owner's permission). Historically this site has been a popular destination for anglers. (The Department of Game and Inland Fisheries recently stocked this area with walleye) The County in Partnership with the State Department of Game and Inland Fisheries is proposing to legitimize these current uses with the establishment of a small riverfront park and Greenway Trailhead serving a network of future bike/ped facilities in the area. • PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES WWA PROJECT No.217049.04 SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR MONACAN LANDING PARK ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA • Rs :k , • • October 23, 2017 DRAFT Prepared by: ligM ENGINEERS SURVEYORS 3040 Avemore Square Place PLANNERS PO Box 4119 Charlottesville,VA 22911 ASSOCIATES Lynchburg VA 24502 Phone: 434-984-2700 Phone:434-316-6080 www.wwassociate s.net TABLE OF CONTENTS __lU Page SECTION 1 —Introduction 1.1 Purpose and Scope 1-1 SECTION 2 —Site Description 2.1 Existing Site Conditions 2-1 SECTION 3—Site Assessment 3.1 Site Feasibility 3-1 3.2 Boat Launch 3-5 3.3 Stormwater Management 3-7 3.4 Estimated Probable Cost 3-8 SECTION 4—Conclusions & Recommendations 4.1 Conclusions 4-1 4.2 Recommendations 4-2 APPENDICES Tab FEMA Flood Plain Map A VRRM Spreadsheet Summary B Project Cost Estimate C Albemarle County,Virginia Monacan Landing WWA Project No. 217049.04 i Site Assessment Report SECTION 1 -INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Scope The Albemarle County Facilities and Environmental Services Department has contracted with WW Associates to perform a site assessment for the proposed Monacan Landing Park. The purpose of the site assessment is to assist the County in determining the feasibility of developing the property for use as a public park offering the following amenities: • Canoe/boat launch, • Parking Area • Trails/benches • Picnic Areas • Fishing Areas The Monacan Landing park property is situated on Tax Map 45, Parcel 66B and comprises approximately 20.4 acres. The property is located on the South West corner of Route 29 and Rio Mills Road. Challenges for the site include: • Road access. • Critical slopes. • Potential for wetlands and stream impacts. • The project site is located within the floodplain and the 100 foot stream buffer. The site assessment for the feasibility of developing the property for use as a public park will comprise of the following elements: • Provide a site layout that takes into account the site challenges. • The development of concept graphic that depicts the proposed site improvements. • Evaluation of existing available wetlands information. • The preparation of a site assessment report with recommendations and conclusions. • The generation of an estimated total project cost for the recommended improvements. Albemarle County,Virginia Monacan Landing WWA Project No.217049.04 1-1 Site Assessment Report SECTION 2 - SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 Existing Site Conditions The Monacan Landing Park site is ---L� situated on the privately held property described as Tax Map 45, Parcel 66B and comprises approximately 20.4 acres. The property is located at the corner of Route 29 and Rio Mills Road along the South Fork of the Rivanna River below the reservoir. The property is designated as ea ,ga :e :�. Open Space and is located on properties designated as Rural Area per the Albemarle County Comprehensive Plan adopted June 10, 2015. The property is not within the watershed of the drinking water supply protection areas. The site is primarily forested with some clearing that was performed as part of the construction of Berkmar Drive. There is an additional clearing »-= area adjacent to Route 29 within the utility easement for the overhead utilities that run through the site. The site lies within the designated eating at•ante 2" floodplain as shown on FEMA Flood Plain Map number 51003CO280D with an effective date of February 4, 2005. A copy of the FEMA Flood Plain Map for the area is provided in Appendix A. The South Fork of the Rivanna River is provided with a 100 foot minimum stream buffer per the Albemarle County stream buffer ordinance. Since the property is located within the designated Rural Area the stream buffer for Moores Creek extends 100 feet from the Albemarle County,Virginia Monacan Landing WWA Project No.217049.04 2-1 Site Assessment Report SECTION 2 - SITE DESCRIPTION top of stream bank or the to the designated floodplain, whichever is greater as defined in section 17-600(B) of the stream buffer ordinance. Given that the project site is located within the FEMA floodplain it is therefore subject to the requirements of the Albemarle County Flood Plain Overlay District. This will require the completion of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision(CLOMR) to be submitted to and approved by FEMA for impacts to the flood plain associated with any proposed improvements. Per the 2016 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates for Albemarle County, the City of Charlottesville, and the Town of Scottsville the average daily traffic (ADT) for this section of Route 29 is 51,000 vehicles per day (VDP). The average daily traffic (ADT) for Rio Mills Road is 560 vehicles per day Rio Mills Road (VDP). Albemarle County, Virginia Monacan Landing WWA Project No.217049.04 2-2 Site Assessment Report SECTION 3 - SITE ASSESSMENT 3.1 Site Feasibility The existing clearing located below the �. Berkmar Drive Bridge was analyzed as a potential location for the proposed Iw parking area and boat launch for the Monacan Landing Park. Placement of the parking area at this location would allow for a majority of the proposed improvements to be constructed within the existing VDOT right-of-way procured clearing at Bridge as part of the extension of Berkmar Drive. S =.7 The existing clearing at the bridge was graded during construction of the Berkmar Drive extension and is relatively level. There are some locally depressed areas around the piers with standing water. It is likely from the visual inspection that these areas are existing wetlands. There is a 24-inch storm sewer discharging runoff from the extension of Berkmar Drive that may be contributing to the standing water at the piers. It is recommended that a wetlands and stream delineation be performed to determine impacts to jurisdictional wetlands that may be located within the area of any proposed site improvements. Jurisdictional wetlands are regulated by the Army Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. A Joint Permit Application will be required to mitigate wetlands impacts associated with the project. Albemarle County,Virginia Monacan Landing WWA Project No.217049.04 3-1 Site Assessment Report SECTION 3 - SITE ASSESSMENT There are existing steep slopes at the ■ edge of the clearing below the Berkmar Drive Bridge. The steep slopes are Nor located between the clearing and Rio ., Mills Road. The steep slopes will make access to any proposed improvements at this location difficult. A fill section would be required to accommodate the construction of an access road to a parking area in this location. As discussed in Section 2, the site is located within the FEMA defined floodplain. Per section 30.3.13 of the Albemarle County Code any fill within the floodplain area requires a special use permit. An additional site adjacent to Route 29 was evaluated as part of this assessment. There is an existing fill area located at the intersection of Rio Mills Road and Route 29. It is assumed that this area was created as a staging area for the bridge at the South Fork of the Rivanna River that constructed with the widening of Route 29 in this area. Placement of the parking area at this location would allow for the utilization of the existing at-grade access point R Nt NI therefore minimizing anyrequired , grading. This would provide access to the proposed parking area as shown on At the concept plan provided in this �, section. A 50 foot buffer stripis 6 .may c 3 provided between the parking area and Existing Entrance at Fill Area the South Fork of the Rivanna River. The buffer strip will provide a staging area for offloading of boats and equipment as well as assist in filtering stormwater runoff from the parking lot area. Albemarle County,Virginia Monacan Landing WWA Project No.217049.04 3-2 Site Assessment Report SECTION 3 — SITE ASSESSMENT The placement of the proposed improvements at this location will permit visibility of the proposed parking area from Route 29. This will provide an added sense of security for people utilizing the facilities and allow for easier monitoring of the area by law enforcement and park services. This portion of Route 29 lies within the Entrance Corridor for Albemarle County. Therefore the proposed improvements at the project site will require review and approval from the k .. Architectural Review Board (ARB). Landscaping for screening of the parking areas is shown as part of the Rio Mills Road at Route 29 conceptual layout in accordance with ARB requirements. There are existing overhead utility lines located on this portion of the site. The utility lines are approximately 12 feet off the ground at their lowest point. The utility lines could also be raised to provide more clearance for vehicles with the addition of a mid- span pole. Figure 3-1 presents a conceptual plan for the park. A trail extension to the east side of Route 29 is depicted on the conceptual plan. The trail extension would provide a connection point to any future development that occurs in this area. Restroom facilities are not depicted as part of the conceptual plan. Facilities could be provided with portable facilities or a permanent structure. Any permanent facilities provide would need to be located outside of the flood plain in accordance with the Albemarle County Stream Buffer Ordinance. Site distance on Rio Mills Road for the entrance location depicted is marginal. Further discussion with VDOT will be required on this subject to determine adequacy. Site distance for the parking access will be addressed with final design. Albemarle County,Virginia Monacan Landing WWA Project No.217049.04 3-3 Site Assessment Report • ( ( lI//� l 11 I I \ Ii /'' � l 11 '\ \ � /k: / :i / ////I i I 1 I ////// \\\// ./ I: I l( \ _ I Ill 1 111 I �\ � / / / i / ! / // 1�.( � � Jlllll if/If / // Iil (IIII �� � � ; - - -%% / / /� /1 1\�/�/// � \F:\� \ / — = I1 fll►IIIII IIi�� - - _ �� / IIII I I\\ \//`7// A\ \\\. \ i ��- - � ,� = .II IIIIIII, == — __ // _ //) 1 ^\\ s/// I \ \\� \ —___,T,_— -- ---/___ r IIII 1 — —__ 4/•/ / /// _�/ / /!.!\TRBARK "°L ACES ,.--"�- /„ , ," . t-e i � -- 'I ./ / BARK G 5 E y in ;rap /11111 —_� //„......-- �— �/ /�_ //: M'�{ UCAf(ONAL KI05\1C = LT= % .. fir+>��. .9>t'1 r1 I I I 1...1.'..."----- irw goo Fear rroor rnuN— i _ / ' - `� !I I II zo S II \ S . o �Y " IIIp _ -per � _. , c__ ' dv � + * , II_ * _ �-�/ j \ - ' , `,'tip AR Nt� j • III I -. . t a ;f ' ,. og I IIIA V `�� „_,,E„,„.„,, , W = 3 _� ( � �\ <" - ' '``4 ✓v Y _i _ RIVER ACCESS.TYP � I ( sunlit FORK BOAT LAUNCH -� ' \ - - __ _ TRAIL IDCiENS_ _ r RNA RIPER_ \ y d FUTURE UE7 . 'T � f ` ,___"-L-------__\______„*„,*----- __' - —_ --'---:_.----;_-----------v---- _ � = ENGINEERS SHEET � ' TLB PROJECT: ALBEMARLE �, FACILITIES AND ENWRONMENTAL SERVICES SURVEYORS oRawHI B" MONACAN LANDING PARK CONCEPT PLAN PLANNERS FIGURE 3-1 RENEWED BY: ALBEMARLE I ASSOCIATES JOB waclNUO11Nf1 .7„9 .,�;. .�. ,x:,.,,.. ,n, 1pj WWA NUMBER: FILE NAME: SCALE: REVISION: DATE: ',,, ,n.....e.a -� 217049.04 704904C_PRES.dwg 1'=120' I 10/23/17 2 SECTION 3 — SITE ASSESSMENT IJ 3.2 Boat Launch „� A boat launch will be provided adjacent toL117f'k`PK r the parking area. The existing embankments along the river are steep and difficult to navigate. Some areas of ; embankment within the project site are 4441 vertical due to stream bank erosion that Typical Boat Launch has occurred over time. It is recommended that the embankment at the area for the boat launch be graded to provide a gentler slope and allow easier access. The newly graded slopes should be armored with rip-rap or provided with another form of stream bank restoration to prevent future erosion. Figure 3-2 presents a graphic of a typical boat launch. Section 17-603(C) of the stream buffer ordinance states that the following with regards to acceptable uses within a designated stream buffer: "Water dependent facilities and miscellaneous. Water dependent facilities; water wells; passive recreation access, such as pedestrian trails and bicycle; historic preservation; archaeological activities; provided that all applicable Federal, State and local permits are obtained." A determination will need to be made by Albemarle County if the parking area for the proposed park meets this definition and is an acceptable use within the stream buffer. The boat launch is a"public water-oriented recreation area"and included in the definition of a"water-dependent facility"per section 18-30.3 of the Albemarle County Code. Albemarle County,Virginia Monacan Landing WWA Project No.217049.04 3-5 Site Assessment Report Ilk 3 vi a. oi 0 r a+a o .f `��e.,.a, tl"7�PAD ` LT3CI%.I'SSLO�Y a �LA44.H f aLS - W U OZ § _ _ Bt1A1 1AE NCH SIDE VIEW 0 n NOTE. Y 1 EXISTING BOAT LAUNCH SHOWN HEREON DEPICTS ACCESS TO SOUTH RIVER LOCATED AT a. RIDGEVIEW PARK IN THE TOWN OF WAYNESBORO, VIRGINIA. W 8 Ei m cC 3 Y W _ SHEET PROJECT: ALBFMARL£COUNTY IllgE�� ENGINEERS ' OF 1 FACILFflES AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DRAWN�` MONACAN LANDINGco PARK CONCEPT PLAN I.:, SLIRVEYO2S TLB 0i PLANNERS FIGURE 3-2 0 cn ASSOCIATES REVIEWED BY JON LBE ?G`NLAD11N1 ;71rM.., ,::: Q.+«.-m WWA NUMBER: FILE NAME: SCALE REVISION: DATE ,,,,.,.,,:,,,e,,., 217049.04 704904C_PRES.dwg AS SHOWN 10/23/17 2 SECTION 3 - SITE ASSESSMENT 3.3 Stormwater Management Stormwater management will need to be provided for the site in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The site was analyzed for stormwater management requirements based upon the conceptual layout. The total impervious area created with the layout is approximately 0.62 acres. The site data was entered into the DEQ Virginia Runoff Reduction Method New Development Compliance Spreadsheet. The spreadsheet indicates that the pollutant load reduction required for the improvements shown is approximately 1.12 pounds/year. A level 2 biofilter with a minimum surface area of 1,520 square feet would be required to treat the improvements shown and provide the required removal rate. In accordance with DEQ requirements soil borings would need to be performed for the construction of the biofilter to determine the percolation rate of the soils on the site and the depth to the groundwater table. A low percolation rate is anticipated for the existing soils and any biofilters constructed will need to be provided with underdrains. Conveyance channels would need to be provided to direct runoff from the areas not requiring treatment around the biofilter. Alternatively the forested area on the site could be placed into a conservation easement to satisfy the water quality requirements for the site. The impervious area created with the proposed layout is minimal in nature. An analysis of the entire parcel with the forested areas taken into account indicates that no pollutant load reduction is required for the site with this scenario. DEQ requires that any forested areas utilized for this scenario be placed into a conservation easement. This would not prevent the intended use of the property since recreational trails are allowed within the conserved areas. Based upon this analysis it is recommended that the forested areas on the site be placed into a conservation easement to satisfy the stormwater quality requirements. A summary report from the DEQ Virginia Runoff Reduction Method New Development Compliance Spreadsheet for this scenario is provided in Appendix B. Albemarle County,Virginia Monacan Landing WWA Project No.217049.04 3-7 Site Assessment Report SECTION 3 - SITE ASSESSMENT We do not anticipate that stormwater quantity facilities will be required for the proposed site improvements. The site improvements comprise less than I% of the contributing drainage area and flows to South Fork of the Rivanna River at the point of analysis. Based upon this analysis the site meets the requirements set forth in Virginia State Code • 9VAC25-870-66 for water quantity. 3.4 Estimated Probable Cost An estimated probable cost for the project was generated based upon the conceptual layout. The estimate includes the construction of the new access road, parking area, and the proposed site improvements. The estimated total project cost is approximately $700,000. A copy of the estimated total project cost worksheet is provided in Appendix C. The estimated total project cost does not include stream and wetlands delineation, mitigation, or permitting. Albemarle County,Virginia Monacan Landing WWA Project No.217049.04 3-8 Site Assessment Report SECTION 4 - CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Conclusions The purpose of the Monacan Landing site assessment is to assist Albemarle County in determining the feasibility for developing the subject property for use as a public park and boat launce. The project improvements consist of parking and access for 29 vehicles and pedestrian walking trails. The Monacan Landing property is situated on Tax Map 45, Parcel 66B and comprises approximately 21.67 acres. The property is located at the corner of Route 29 and Rio Mills Road along the South Fork of the Rivanna River below the reservoir. The following conclusions were determined for the project site: • The project area for the site lies within the 100-year FEMA Floodplain and stream buffer. • The 100-year FEMA Floodplain serves as the stream buffer for the site since it is located within the Rural Area as defined on the Comprehensive Plan. The 100- year FEMA Floodplain extends further than 100 feet from the top of the associated stream bank for Moores Creek. • A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) will need to be performed to determine the impacts to the FEMA Floodplain for any fill areas. • The site lies within the Entrance Corridor for Albemarle County and will require review and approval from the ARB. • A determination will need to be made by Albemarle County if the parking area for the proposed park is an acceptable use within the stream buffer. • A wetlands and stream delineation will need to be performed to determine the impacts to any jurisdictional wetlands and the South Fork of the Rivanna River. • A critical slopes waiver will be required for any impacts incurred as part of the proposed improvements. Albemarle County,Virginia Monacan Landing WWA Project No.217049.04 4-1 Site Assessment Report SECTION 4 - CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS • Permanent restroom facilities will need to be located outside of the 100-year FEMA Floodplain in accordance with the Albemarle County Stream Buffer Ordinance. • The estimated total project cost is approximately $700,000. The estimated total project cost does not include stream and wetlands delineation, mitigation, or permitting. 4.2 Recommendations Based upon the conclusions reached with the site assessment we offer the following recommendations: • Recommend placing the parking area adjacent to Route 29 to reduce the amount of any required fill as well as providing an extra sense of safety. • Recommend grading out the existing embankment at the boat launch area to provide easier access. • Recommend placing the forested area on the site into a conservation easement to satisfy the stormwater quality requirements for the associated improvements. Albemarle County,Virginia Monacan Landing WWA Project No.217049.04 4-2 Site Assessment Report APPENDICES Tab FEMA Flood Plain Map A VRRM Spreadsheet Summary B Project Cost Estimate C Albemarle County,Virginia Monacan Landing WWA Project No.217049.04 i Site Assessment Report • • f• J • •I ../ S HOLU M. ZONE X si k on 1���1I�. r • 9y MAP SCALE 1• = 1000' ` Doo.-- 0 tom D000 FEET w lo 9 `^'^L MO J MANOR RD, 47 3NE X y DD ERIE M t o .11DOENODD 7.�� Dw RD D R• Albemarle County //77 �� Unincorporated Areas �Yn li I u_I PANEL MOD -_- 510006 M� ... �N F�P) a , �Q FIRM N...✓ •iy� � " I ��S . FLRBO IRSRRANCE RAiE MAP y T > OI muxR.vucD�u :ONE AND THEINCnawromRPORATED ARMS dill AND THE INDEPffiIDENf OTY X 39j e • rI 0. `i c 1411 OC I I xnnem woe ens.DM 1 ,ter* .. eaaa ONE% ' 366 ZONE X II m ZONE�'' • III .nn .d O ZONE% LYVil fl'—IZ I I % [� .i :'�i ,'l ZONE 11�q v–...` ` y�P +',�!A#.9 .may �� o _ 355 e4: fi ,A,...0, tE p DDS F `R4, 3 x . F q 0 `,43:40,,,,,,..4,,....._C�, 359 1;l4` ��IIJ C9 if • iDEX -<._ . ZONE X '" *$ l O ,1 la I EAP M221N �n� .. Z AW3CE2Wf iii �� p- v� 3JD ZONE x © ax O E FRWMF IAIE a r'L. 42._ ZONE X eW (....:;:%..11. .ra�rr. I /q 08/ .14 75, ,. � _`�, ZONE � BMW 4,ZOE 1 � �t � �Z II'. P.M e.....,r..r�,w� j 6V4 43 SLUR 90• $. ''+ .0 . .a.�,3`� 'C.,*. sEsvvn- ONE X-4'.4,;,44,-y g am°,. ' ! � j'f • � ' ZONE x ZONE x ' o ./ �wffrJ P/4,,, bDii- N � . i �A-*°4.,:,,A` -AA .. �.`x� fi, u�y �s c + zONX T :n ..... .,. me"` �w'`m"w:,� � . ..• r3 , ' , I. a Virginia Runoff Reduction Method Worksheet DEQ Virginia Runoff Reduction Method New Development Compliance Spreadsheet-Version 3.0 BMP Design Specifications List 2011 Stds&Specs Site Summary Total Ra6,0.11 v 43 inches Site Land Cover Summary Asoils BSoils CSoils DSoils Totals %of Total Forest/Open(acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Managed Turf(acres) 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.38 38 Impervious Cover(acres) 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.62 62 1.00 100 Site Tv and Land Cover Nutrient Loads Site Rv 0.67 Treatment Volume(ft') 2,442 TP Load(Ib/yr) 1.53 TN Load(lb/yr) 10.97 Total TP Load Reduction Required(1b/yr) 1.12 Site Compliance Summary Total Runoff Volume Reduction(fts) 1,600 Total TP Load Reduction Achieved(Ib/yr) 1.13 Total TN Load Reduction Achieved(lb/yr) 8.26 Remaining Post Development TP Load (lb/yr) 0.40 Remaining TP Load Reduction(lb/yr) 0.00 '•TARGET TP REDUCTION EXCEEDED BY 0,01 LB/YEAR•' Required • Summary Print r 1� ( Virginia Runoff Reduction Method Worksheet Drainage Area Summary DA.B D.A.C D.A.D D.A.E Total Forest/Open(acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Managed Turf(acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 Impervious Cover(acres) 0.62 000 0.00 000 0.00 0.62 Total Area(acres) 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.62 Drainage Area Compliance Summary D.A.B D.A.C DA.D D.A.E Total TP Load Reduced(lb/yr) 1.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 TN Load Reduced(Ib/yr) 8.26 0.00 000 000 0.00 8.26 Summary Print e Virginia Runoff Reduction Method Worksheet • Drainage Area A Summary Land Cover Summary A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Total %of Total Forest/Open(acres) 000 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0 Managed Turf(acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0 Impervious Cover(acres) 000 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.62 100 0.62 BMP Selections Managed Turf Impervious TP Load from Downstream BMP Treatment Untreated TP Load TP Removed TP Remaining Practice Credit Area Cover Credit Volume(fta) Upstream to Practice Ibs Ib I6 Treatment to be (acres) Area(acres) Practices(Ibs) ( ) ( /yr) ( /Yr) Employed 6.13.Bioretention R2 or Micro-Bioretention #2(Spec 09) 0.18 2,000.13 0.00 1.26 1.13 0.13 Total Impervious Cover Treated(acres) 0.58 Total Turf Area Treated(acres) 0.00 Total OP Load Reduction Achieved in DA. (Ib/yr) 1 13 Total TN Load Reduction Achieved in D.A. (Ib/y8.26 r) Summary Print • R - Virginia Runoff Reduction Method Worksheet Runoff Volume and CN Calculations • 1-year storm 1-year storm 10-year storm Target Rainfall Event(in) 2.97 3.60 5.43 Drainage Areas RV&CN Drainage Area A Drainage Area B Drainage Area C Drainage Area D Drainage Area E CN 98 0 0 0 0 RR(et') - 1,600 0 0 0 0 RV we RRtwsinl 2.74 000 000 0.00 0.00 1-year return period RVw RR(Wsinl 203 000 300 0.00 0.03 CN adjusted 91 0 0 0 0 RV we RRlwsinl 3.37 003 3.00 0.00 000 2-year return period RV VI Nes-in) 2.66 003 300 0.03 0.03 CN adjusted 91 0 0 0 0 RV wo RR 1.6-in) 5.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 10-year return period RV w RR(re-lel 4.48 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 CN adjusted 92 0 0 0 0 Summary Print it'iaa . :. , . '* ' r • Project:Monacan Landing Park 4 Location:Albemarle County WWA Project No:217049.04 ENGINEERS Date:23-Oct-17 SURVEYORS Estimate By:JDB PLANNERS Checked By: HFW ASSOCIATES Status: Ro.Sas aM ]ow.. Si**1.be. Page: 1 of I `" A Unit Total Unit Total Total Material Material Labor Labor Unit Total Item Units Quantity Cost Costs Cost Costs Costs Cost Mobilization LS 1 $0.00 $0 $15,000.00 $15,000 $15,000 $ 15,000 Saw Cut Existing Edge of Pavement LF 100 $0.00 $0 $8.00 $800 $8 $ 800 Mill Adjacent Lane 1.5"(To Exist.Centerline) SY 130 $0.00 $0 $10.00 $1,300 $10 $ 1,300 1.5"Asphalt Overlay Ton 10 $80.00 $800 $30.00 $300 $110 $ 1,100 Traffic Control Day 30 $0.00 $0 $1,200.00 $36,000 $1,200 $ 36,000 Road Signage EA 2 $1,000.00 $2,000 $250.00 $500 $1,250 $ 2,500 3"Asphalt Surface Course SY 2,670 $12.00 $32,040 $2.00 $5,340 $14 $ 37,380 6"Asphalt Intermediate Course SY 2,670 $20.00 $53,400 $4.00 $10,680 $24 $ 64,080 Aggregate Base CY 670 $25.00 $16,750 $8.00 $5,360 $33 $ 22,110 Site Excavation&Topsoiling CY 2,000 $0.00 $0 $8.00 $16,000 $8 $ 16,000 Earth Backfill CY 1,000 $0.00 $0 $12.00 $12,000 $12 $ 12,000 Wheel Stops EA 25 $400.00 $10,000 $100.00 $2,500 $500 $ 12,500 Boat Launch EA 1 $25,000.00 $25,000 $25,000.00 $25,000 $50,000 $ 50,000 Asphalt Path SY 5,000 $12.00 $60,000 $4.00 $20,000 $16 $ 80,000 Park Benches,Picnic Tables and Trash Receptacles EA 1 $16,000.00 $16,000 $1,000.00 $1,000 $17,000 $ 17,000 Park Signage and Plaques EA I $4,000.00 $4,000 $1,500.00 $1,500 $5,500 $ 5,500 Silt Fence LF 1,000 $1.00 $1,000 $2.00 $2,000 $3 $ 3,000 Fine Grading SY 3,300 $0.00 $0 $8.00 $26,400 $8 $ 26,400 Temporary Seeding SY 3,300 $0.50 $1,650 $0.50 $1,650 $1 $ 3,300 Permanent Seeding SY 3,300 $0.75 $2,475 $0.50 $1,650 $1.25 $ 4,125 Sediment Trap EA 1 $1,500.00 $1,500 $3,500.00 $3,500 $5,000 $ 5,000 Landscaping LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000 $15,000.00 $15,000 $35,000 $ 35,000 Subtotals: $246,615 $203,480 $ 450,095 5.3%Sales Tax on Materials $ 13,071 SUBTOTAL $ 463,166 CONSTRUCTION MARKUP @ 30% $ 138,950 CONTINGENCY OF 5% $ 30,106 I I SUBTOTAL $ 632,221 ENGINEERING FEES @ 10% $ 63,222 TOTAL AFTER CONSTRUCTION MARKUP $ 695,443 RECEIVED Mit 1 6 2618 VE pDEVLOPMENT