HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP201800007 Review Comments Special Use Permit 2018-07-06COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
July 6, 2018
30 Scale, LLC c/o Mike Myers, PE, CFM
871 Justin Drive, Palmyra, VA 22963
mike@30scale.com / (434)-242-2866
ANG Holdings, LLC
175 South Pantops Drive, Charlottesville, VA 22911
aesaathoff(&Rmmail.com / (434)-989-6973
RE: Review Comment Letter for SP-2018-07 (1895 Avon Street Extended — Albemarle Limousine)
and SP-2018-08 (1895 Avon Street Extended — Virginia Auto Detailing)
Mr. Myers:
Your requests for Special Use Permit SP-2017-00007 (Albemarle Limousine) and for Special Use Permit
SP-2017-00008 (Virginia Automotive Detailing) have been reviewed by members of Albemarle County
staff and our partner agencies.
Review comments are provided below, organized by Department, Division, or agency. Community
Development Department (CDD) staff generally believe that the special use permit applications do not
require revision and resubmittal, and are ready to proceed to the Planning Commission public hearing.
However, you have the right to request a public hearing or to otherwise determine your course of action —
please review the attached "Action After Receipt of Comment Letter" document for detailed information
about your options.
As always, CDD staff remain available to provide assistance and discuss this comment letter, and any other
aspect(s) of your applications, at your request.
Page 1 of 14
Planning
In consultation with County staff and partner agencies, Planning staff has identified issues and questions
that you should be aware of; we remain available to assist you in addressing and resolving these issues,
which include the following:
• Visibility:
o Materials selection and specifications (such as height) for the proposed screening gate are very
important. If the intention for screening the vehicle storage and automotive detailing operations is to
utilize a combination of a screening gate with additional fencing and/or landscaping, then the selection
of fencing and/or landscaping materials is also very important.
Mobility and Pedestrian Connectivity:
o Providing a sidewalk across the front of the property along Avon Street Extended was identified as an
important element by the 5' & Avon Community Advisory Committee (CAC). This would:
■ advance the Neighborhood Model principles in the Comprehensive Plan;
■ help to address the Master Plan comment that "there are no sidewalks along Avon Street
Extended" (S+W. 27);
■ advance the specific Master Plan recommendations in the "Plan for Future Transportation
Network" to "provide curb, gutter sidewalks, street trees, and bike lanes along Avon Street to
the intersection with Route 20" (S+W. 61);
■ serve as a continuation of the sidewalk that was required as part of the County approval of the
Spring Hill Village development that adjoins the subject property to the south;
■ support the recent and ongoing public investments to provide expanded pedestrian
infrastructure, increased pedestrian connectivity, and safer pedestrian mobility along the Avon
Street Extended corridor; and
■ support Safe Routes to School efforts.
o Improving pedestrian connectivity and mobility is also one of the priority issues to be addressed
through the recently -initiated 5' & Avon Corridor Study.
o Staff acknowledge that the concept plan shows a "potential sidewalk," however, this cannot be
considered a commitment that the applicant is making, due to the "potential" language.
Stormwater Management:
o Managing stormwater runoff (water quantity and water quality issues) were raised during the 5t' &
Avon CAC meeting. The County Engineer and Zoning staff also identified questions about how
stormwater will be managed, noting that this issue will be affected by the applicant's decisions about
parking area locations, dimensions, and surface treatment, and by parking calculations. Please reference
Engineering and Zoning comments, below.
o Both the County Engineer and Deputy Zoning Administrator indicated that these issues can be
sufficiently addressed and resolved during the site plan review process (and during the corresponding
VSMP / WPO Plan review process, as may be applicable).
• "Additional Factors":
o Please be advised that the LI Light Industrial District includes additional evaluation criteria for
proposed special uses that are described as "general commercial use[s]," as contained in Zoning
Ordinance Section 26.3, as follows:
26.3 INDEPENDENT OFFICE AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL USES; ADDITIONAL
FACTORS WHEN CONSIDERING SPECIAL USE PERMITS
In evaluating a request for a special use permit for an independent office or general
commercial use as that use is described in section 26.2, the board shall consider the following
factors in addition to those delineated in [Zoning Ordinance] section 33.8:
Page 2 of 14
a. The purpose of the industrial district in which the use is proposed.
b. The proposed use and its proposed size should be consistent with the intent of the applicable
industrial district.
c. The use proposed should not be located on the lowest floor of any building having direct exterior
access to the ground surface in order to allow that floor to be used for industrial purposes.
d. The gross floor area of each establishment should not exceed three thousand (3,000) square feet.
e. The aggregate gross floor area of the independent offices or general commercial uses, or both,
should not exceed twenty-four thousand (24,000) square feet and should not exceed twenty-five
(25) percent of the gross floor area of the building.
£ Whether the structure or structure expansion will be constructed to the standards required for
industrial structures, regardless of its intended use.
Staff brings your attention to the square footage considerations contained in items d and e; however,
because these proposed uses would involve the redevelopment of an existing site, these criteria appear to
be less critically relevant and less applicable than if the proposals involved new development of a
greenfield site with new structures.
Community Meeting
Staff acknowledge that the required Community Meeting was conducted with the 5th & Avon Community
Advisory Committee on Thursday, June 28. A summary of the CAC review and discussion is provided
below by Mr. Andrew Knuppel, Neighborhood Planner:
What is the estimated number of chauffeured vehicles, limos, buses, etc. for rent?
o Applicant's response: Approximately 11-13 vehicles of various size, including 47-, 32-, 24-,
and 24-passenger coach buses, as well as several sedans and/or SUVs that will be stored
towards the rear of the property.
Will most of the property be used for parking/servicing?
o Applicant's response: Site will utilize the existing parking area to provide parking for
customers near the front (approximately 10 spaces).Company vehicles will be parked in the
rear, and a screening fence will block views from front of limos being stored in the back.
Materials for the fence have not been determined but it will be some sort of sliding gate,
with a goal of restricting visibility.
How will stormwater runoff be managed?
o Applicant's response: No additional stormwater management will be required since there
will be no change in impervious surface area, but we will have some sort of onsite water
quality facility (rain garden or purchase nutrient credits). Stormwater runoff will occur as
sheetflow off the edge of parking lot.
Will the runoff contain pollutants?
o Applicant's response: County requirements for impervious anticipates thatrunoff will
contain oils or other pollutants from vehicles. The State also has requirements for control of
pollutant production.
o The proposed automotive detailing use would not primarily involve intensive water use, but
would rather be more geared towards more deep cleaning, labor-intensive work on exterior
and interior of vehicles.
If permitted, the proposal does include any limit on the amount of washing that could be done. How
will the applicant address more sheet flow from the detailing services, including car washing and
engine deep cleaning?
o Applicant's response: Typically, from rain events, gully washes are major concern
o Staff comment: Proposed automotive detailing use would not require water capture and
reuse as a zoning requirement.
Page 3 of 14
■ Does the Zoning Ordinance consider car washes and automotive detailing to be different uses? If
so, what are the distinctions?
o Staff to conduct research and provide more information.
■ Will there be any indications of motor vehicle rental operations (such as gas pumps)?
o Applicants response: No — that is not a part of these proposals.
■ Concern about the number of car washes — how much water is being anticipated in runoff
calculations?
o Staff comment (7/6/2018): stormwater management computations and mitigation will be
addressed through VSMP and WPO plan review (as may be applicable).
■ Concerns about visual appearance, including a preference to see this development be "prettier than
Snow's."
o Applicant's response: We will have to install a sidewalk as a site plan requirement. We are
planning to install more landscaping towards the front, which will also be addressed during
the site plan process. The line of sight from Avon Street Extended is anticipated to go over
the vehicles, as shown on the plan submitted with the special use permit applications;
because of topography and the proposed screening fence, the rental vehicles won't be
visible. Additionally, the parking in front will not create significant visual impacts — it will
only be for customers which are not a high volume, and it will be minimized by the
existing topography (headlights would be pointing into the hill). There is also 200' of
wooded area in rear portion of property.
o Staff comment (7/6/2018): According to Web-GIS, there is significantly less than 200' feet
of wooded area in the tear portion of the property.
Will the proposed uses create a heavy increase in traffic? How are the average vehicle daily trips
calculated? Does this include employees and deliveries?
o Applicant's response: No, not a heavy increase — we are expecting low numbers from traffic
generation estimates. The ITE trip generation estimates show 8-14 vehicle trips per day
(VTPD) combined from both uses. That is based on square footage: 1,500 SF of existing
building plus the proposed new addition.
Sidewalk is very important infrastructure — is this potential improvement, or will this be required?
o Sidewalks were brought up in pre -application meeting by Community Development staff.
The development to the south (Spring Hill Village) is a Neighborhood Model Development
plan that includes a sidewalk on Avon Street Extended.
o Staff comment: Staff unsure if this is a requirement of the site plan process — but we will
keep this feature and this issue in mind.
o Staff comment (7/6/2018): Sidewalks can potentially be required by County staff pursuant
to Zoning Ordinance 32.7.2.3-(a).
Will the existing parking lot remain gravel surface, or be paved?
o Applicant's response: This has notbeen determined for the rear portion; we anticipate that it
will be paved in areas near the garages (to prevent the vehicles from getting dirty).
Are any bike lanes planned? Concern about how a sidewalk will fit into the larger plan for
connectivity in the area
o Applicant's response: No, not with this project. However, sidewalk is consistent with larger
section. A multi -use path has mostly been talked about on the west (opposite) side of Avon
Street Extended; bike lanes can be discussed as part of site plan process.
Has VDOT looked at these proposals? There is concern about the hill coming up to the property /
people pulling out of "blind" entrance.
o Applicant's response: There's an existing [northbound] right turn lane that helps the view.
Sight distances will need to be approved by VDOT as part of the site plan review process.
VDOT did not have any concerns re: sight distance at the pre -application meeting.
Page 4 of 14
■ Who received notice for this meeting?
o Staff comment: The list of recipients of the community meeting invitation including
surrounding property owners, including the Mill Creek HOA.
■ If permits are granted, what could happen with a future decision to increase the area of impervious
surface?
o If these special use permits get approved, we will have to come in for a site plan to get land
disturbance permit. We will have to comply with State Code and County regulations.
■ If Spring Hill Village is developed, is there a provision for the storm sewer for this project to
connect to Spring Hill Village stormwater infrastructure?
o Staff comment: Stormwater is typically managed on site.
■ Since this property is in the Development Area, would storm sewer be extended out like water? If
so, when?
o Staff comment: No information about whether this is planned, or not. There are questions
(uncertainty) about using someone else's storm sewer to convey.
Comprehensive Plan
Initial comments on how your proposal generally relates to the Albemarle County Comprehensive Plan
(Comp Plan) are provided below; additionally, comments regarding conformity with the Comp Plan will
be provided to the PC and BOS as part of the staff report.
The Comp Plan designates the subject property for "Office / R&D / Flex / Light Industrial" (ORDFLI)
land use(s) in the Future Land Use Plan for the Southern and Western Urban Neighborhoods Master Plan
(Master Plan). As noted in the "Land Use Categories and Guidelines" in the Master Plan (S+W. 34), this
ORDFLI designation represents "a category of employment -generating uses with the lightest impacts in
the industrial use category, although uses in this designation may generate significant employee traffic,
depending on the size and use of the facility."
Primary uses in the ORDFLI designation include the following:
■ "Office: includes commercial office buildings that may house a variety of users and professional
offices, such as medical or real estate offices.
■ Research and Development (R&D): includes design, experimentation, development of prototypes,
engineering, scientific applications, and administration, especially in the fields of medical
technology, communications systems, transportation, multi -media, and the development of
electronic technology, communication systems, or information systems. Development,
construction, and testing of prototypes may be associated with this use.
■ Flex: businesses with several integrated uses, such as very light manufacturing, warehosing, or
showrooms.
■ Light industrial: includes light manufacturing, fabrication, and distribution."
Secondary uses in the ORDFLI designation include "retail and commercial uses, which are supportive of
primary uses, residential, and institutional uses."
The Master Plan also provides additional information and recommendations regarding this area of Avon
Street Extended, as follows:
The "Other Areas of Importance" section states that "The [ORDFLI] designated land is expected
to be an area for further development, especially to provide for light industrial uses and
employment." (S+W. 45)
The "Priority Areas" section identifies "Avon Street to Route 20 South" as a priority area, and
states that "The area located south of Interstate 64, between Avon Street and Route 20 South has
Page 5 of 14
... aeas for [ORDFLI] use, and potential for redevelopment opportunities, especially in the
industrial areas."
The proposals to redevelop this property for use as the new headquarters and operations for Albemarle
Limousine, and for use as the new headquarters and operations of Virginia Auto Detailing, are generally
consistent with the Master Plan — including the ORDFLI designation in the Future Land Use Plan, and the
information contained in the Other Areas of Importance and Priority Areas sections.
Neighborhood Model
Projects located within the Development Areas are typically reviewed for consistency with each of the
Neighborhood Model Principles found in the Comprehensive Plan. Comments are provided below on
relevant aspects of the Neighborhood Model.
Pedestrian
A "Potential Sidewalk" is shown on the concept plan. However, this improvement cannot
Orientation
currently be considered to be a commitment being made by the applicant, as the current
language ("potential") does not constitute a requirement that can be enforced. Providing a
sidewalk would be a valuable benefit for the numerous reasons articulated in the "Mobility and
Pedestrian Connectivity" comment in the Planning review comments section on page 2 of this
document.
Principle is technically not currently met. Clarification of the applicant's level of commitment
to the sidewalk shown on the concept plan could confirm whether this principle is met or not.
Mixture of Uses
The proposal(s) comprise two separate uses which provide distinct, yet complimentary,
services, and which provide multiple types of employment opportunities.
Principle is met.
Relegated Parking
The proposal would utilize an existing parking lot that is located in front of the building,
between the existing structure and the Avon Street Extended right of way. The proposed
location for additional parking areas for the proposed motor vehicle rentals use is in the rear
portion of the property; and the applicant further proposed to screen this rear parking with a
gate, fencing, and landscaping.
Principle is partially met, to the extent that it is applicable in this redevelopment scenario.
Buildings and
The proposal would utilize an existing one-story structure, and would include a one-story
Spaces of Human
addition in the rear. Due to the grade change (with the public street right of way being above
Scale
the property) and the low (one-story) height of the existing structure, it does not appear that the
building will contribute any spatial definition or other humanistic placemaking qualities to
Avon Street Extended corridor.
Principle is not met; however, in this redevelopment scenario, the evaluation of this principle is
largely determined by the proposal to reuse an existing one-story structure.
Redevelopment
The proposals would utilize an existing one-story structure on a previously -developed site
within the Development Area, without increasing impervious surface areas.
Principle is met.
Respecting Terrain;
Based on the concept plan and project narrative, grading will be minimal, impervious surfaces
Careful Grading
areas will not increase, and post -development drainage patterns will be the same as pre -
and Re -grading of
development drainage patterns.
Terrain
Principle is met.
Zoning
No written review comments have been received from Zoning staff as of 7/6/2018. However, the
Page 6 of 14
following questions and issues have been verbally identified by Zoning staff, at minimum, these will need
to be addressed and resolved during the site plan review process:
• More information is necessary to determine compliance with required minimum number of parking
spaces. For example:
— What are the estimated numbers of employees for each proposed use — specifically, full
time office employees (for each use), full time automotive detailing employees, and part
time employees?
— Where will drivers for Albemarle Limousine park while they are driving fleet vehicles —
on -site or off -site? If on -site, where?
Engineering
The following comments related to engineering have been provided by County Engineer Frank Pohl, PE,
CFM on 7/3/2018:
[ SP-2018-07 and SP-2018-08 ]:
These can be addressed as part of the site plan review:
• Car washing on a commercial site is not an exempt illicit discharge [17-701]. Treatment facilities
shall be provided.
• VSMP permitting will be required [17-302].
• Provide minimum design requirements and improvements required for parking areas [18-4.12.15].
VDOT
Mr. Adam J. Moore, PE, Area Land Use Engineer, provided the following review comments on 7/3/2018:
[ SP-2018-07 and SP-2018-08
1. The Department takes no exception to the proposed land use. However, if a site plan is required, the
entrance (location, geometery, and sight lines) will be evaluated at that time.
Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA)
The following comments related to ACSA have been provided by Richard Nelson on 6/18/2018:
[ SP-2018-07 and SP-2018-08 ]:
I recommend approval with the following condition:
Proposed fixture counts must be provided to ACSA to determine accurate existing meter size for proposed
building, prior to building permit approval.
Albemarle Fire -Rescue
The following comments related to Fire -Rescue have been provided by Assistant Fire Marshall Shawn
Maddox on 7/1/2018:
[SP-2018-07 and SP-2018-08 ]:
Both of these can be addressed during a site plan process if required.
1. A knox box will be required on the proposed gate. It can include the keys for the buildings as well.
2. An emergency apparatus access turn around will be required.
Page 7 of 14
Action after Receipt of Comments
After you have read this letter, please take one of the actions identified on "Action After Receipt of
Comment Letter," which is attached.
Resubmittal
If you choose to resubmit, please use the attached form(s). There is no fee for the first resubmittal. The
resubmittal date schedule is provided for your convenience.
Notification and Advertisement Fees
Prior to scheduling public hearings with the Planning Commission, payment of the following fees is
necessary (note - fees for each SP application are identified separately):
[SP-2018-00007] :
$294.00 = Cost for newspaper advertisement for Planning Commission public hearing
$215.00 = Cost for notification of adjoining owners (minimum $200 + actual postage/$1 per
owner after 50 adjoining owners)
$509.00 = Total amount due prior to Planning Commission public hearing for SP201800007
Prior to the Board of Supervisor's public hearing, payment of the newspaper advertisement for the Board
hearing is needed, as follows:
$294.00 = Additional amount due prior to Board of Supervisors public hearing for SP201800007
$803.00 = Total amount for all notifications for SP201800007 Fees may be paid in advance. Payment for
both the PC and BOSpublic hearings may be paid at the same time. Additional notification fees will not be
required unless a deferral takes place and adjoining owners need to be notified of a new date.
[SP-2018-00008] :
$280.00 = Cost for newspaper advertisement for Planning Commission public hearing
$215.00 = Cost for notification of adjoining owners (minimum $200 + actual postage/$1 per
owner after 50 adjoining owners)
$495.00 = Total amount due prior to Planning Commission public hearing for SP201800008
Prior to the Board of Supervisor's public hearing, payment of the newspaper advertisement for the Board
hearing is needed, as follows:
$280.00 = Additional amount due prior to Board of Supervisors public hearing for SP201800008
$775.00 = Total amount for all notifications for SP201800008 Fees may be paid in advance. Payment for
both the PC and BOSpublic hearings may bepaid at the same time. Additional notification fees will not be
required unless a deferral takes place and adjoining owners need to be notified of a new date.
Please contact me with any questions and/or requests for assistance you may have. I can be reached at
tpadalino(aalbemarle.org or 434-296-5832, ext. 3088.
Sincerely,
Page 8 of 14
Tim Padalino, AICP
Senior Planner
Planning Division
enc: Action After Receipt of Comment Letter
Resubmittal Form
Resubmittal Schedule
Page 9 of 14
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ACTION AFTER RECEIPT OF COMMENT LETTER
Within 30 days of the date of this letter, please do one of the following:
(1) Resubmit in response to review comments
(2) Request indefinite deferral
(3) Request that your Planning Commission public hearing date be set
(4) Withdraw your application
(1) Resubmittal in Response to Review Comments
If you plan to resubmit within 30 days, make sure that the resubmittal is on or before a resubmittal date
as published in the project review schedule. The full resubmittal schedule may be found at
www.albemarle.org in the "forms" section at the Community Development page. Be sure to include the
resubmittal form on the last page of your comment letter with your submittal.
The application fee which you paid covers staff review of the initial submittal and one resubmittal. Each
subsequent resubmittal requires an additional fee. (See attached Fee Schedule.)
(2) Request Indefinite Deferral
If you plan to resubmit after 30 days from the date of the comment letter, you need to request an
indefinite deferral. Please provide a written request and state your justification for requesting the
deferral. (Indefinite deferral means that you intend to resubmit/request a public hearing be set with the
Planning Commission after the 30 day period.)
(3) Request Planning Commission Public Hearing Date be Set
At this time, you may schedule a public hearing with the Planning Commission. However, we do not
advise that you go directly to public hearing if staff has identified issues in need of resolution that can be
addressed with a resubmittal.
After outstanding issues have been resolved and/or when you are ready to request a public hearing,
staff will set your public hearing date for the Planning Commission in accordance with the Planning
Commission's published schedule and as mutually agreed by you and the County. The staff report and
recommendation will be based on the latest information provided by you with your initial submittal or
resubmittal. Please remember that all resubmittals must be made on or before a resubmittal date.
Page 10 of 14
By no later than twenty-one (21) days before the Planning Commission's public hearing, a newspaper
advertisement fee and an adjoining owner notification fee must be paid. (See attached Fee Schedule)
Your comment letter will contain the actual fees you need to pay. Payment for an additional newspaper
advertisement is also required twenty-two (22) days prior to the Board of Supervisors public hearing.
These dates are provided on the attached Legal Ad Payments for Public Hearings form.
Please be advised that, once a public hearing has been advertised, only one deferral prior to the
Planning Commission's public hearing will be allowed during the life of the application. The only
exception to this rule will be extraordinary circumstances, such as a major change in the project
proposal by the applicant or more issues identified by staff that have not previously been brought to the
applicant's attention. As always, an applicant may request deferral at the Planning Commission
meeting.
(4) Withdraw Your Application
If at any time you wish to withdraw your application, please provide your request in writing.
Failure to Respond
If we have not received a response from you within 30 days, we will contact you again. At that time, you
will be given 10 days to do one of the following: a) request withdrawal of your application, b) request
deferral of your application to a specific Planning Commission date as mutually agreed to with staff, or c)
request indefinite deferral and state your justification for requesting the deferral. If none of these
choices is made within 10 days, staff will schedule your application for a public hearing based on the
information provided with your original submittal or the latest submittal staff received on a resubmittal
date.
Fee Payment
Fees paid in cash or by check must be paid at the Community Development Intake Counter. Make checks
payable to the County of Albemarle. Do not send checks directly to the Review Coordinator. Fees may
also be paid by credit card using the secure online payment system, accessed at
http://www.albemarle.org/department.asp?department=cdd&relpage=21685.
Page 11 of 14
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SP # or ZMA #
Fee Amount S Date Paid By who? Receipt # Ck# By:
Resubmittal of information for Special Use Permit or
Zoning Map Amendment Is
PROJECT NUMBER: S?741 w6bi PROJECT NAME: 18gli Avow ST ur (ALL. VAO.)
❑ Resubmittal Fee is Required ❑ Per Request l( Resubmittal Fee is Not Required
TM i {iDptVA0
Community Development Project
Coordinator
Signature Date
Name of Applicant
Signature
FEES
Phone Number
Date
Resubmittal fees for Special Use Permit -- original Special Use Permit fee of $1,075
❑ First resubmission
FREE
❑ Each additional resubmission
$538
Resubmittal fees for original Special Use Permit fee of $2,150
First resubmission
FREE
❑ Each additional resubmission
$1,075
Resubmittal fees for original Zoning Map Amendment fee of $2,688
❑ First resubmission
FREE
❑ Each additional resubmission
$1,344
Resubmittal fees for original Zoning Map Amendment fee of $3,763
❑ First resubmission
FREE
❑ Each additional resubmission
$1,881
❑ Deferral of scheduled public hearing at applicant's request — Add'I notice fees will be required
$194
To be paid after staff review for public notice:
Most applications for Special Use Permits and Zoning Map Amendment require at least one public hearing by the Planning Commission
and one public hearing by the Board of Supervisors. Virginia State Code requires that notice for public hearings be made by publishing
a legal advertisement in the newspaper and by mailing letters to adjacent property owners. Therefore, at least two fees for public notice
are required before a Zoning Map Amendment may be heard by the Board of Supervisors. The total fee for public notice will be
provided to the applicant after the final cost is determined and must be paid before the application is heard by a public body.
MAKE CHECKS TO COUNTY OF ALBEMARLEIPAYMENT AT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER
➢ Preparing and mailing or delivering up to fifty (50) notices $215 + actual cost of first-class postage
➢ Preparing and mailing or delivering each notice after fifty (50) l .00 for each additional notice +actual
cost of first-class. postage
➢ Legal advertisement (published twice in the newspaper for each public hearing) Actual cost
(minimum of $280 for total of4publications)
County of Albemarle Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296-5832 Fax: (434) 972-4126
1/24117 Page I of 1
Page 12 of 14
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SP # or ZMA #
Fee Amount $ Date Paid By who? Receipt # Ck# By:
Resubmittal of information for Special Use Permit or
Zoning Map Amendment � %,
PROJECT NUMBER: 51 2016 ooeo9 PROJECT NAME: lgir7 A4*4 k Str (,4A. Aym MM-a L•
❑ Resubmittal Fee is Required ❑ Per Request Resubmittal Fee is Not Required
_ -1-1M ?"pow
Community Development Project Coordinator
7f. - i8
Signature Date
Name of Applicant
Signature
FEES
Phone Number
Date
Resubmittal fees for Special Use Permit -- original Special Use Permit fee of $1,075
❑ First resubmission
FREE
❑ Each additional resubmission
$538
Resubmittal fees for original Special Use Permit fee of $2,150
First resubmission
FREE
❑ Each additional resubmission
$1,075
Resubmittal fees for original Zoning Map Amendment fee of $2,688
❑ First resubmission
FREE
❑ Each additional resubmission
$1,344
Resubmittal fees for original Zoning Map Amendment fee of $3,763
❑ First resubmission
FREE
❑ Each additional resubmission
$1,881
❑ Deferral of scheduled public hearing at applicant's request — Add'I notice fees will be required
$194
To be paid after staff review for public notice:
Most applications for Special Use Permits and Zoning Map Amendment require at least one public hearing by the Planning Commission
and one public hearing by the Board of Supervisors. Virginia State Code requires that notice for public hearings be made by publishing
a legal advertisement in the newspaper and by mailing letters to adjacent property owners. Therefore, at least two fees for public notice
are required before a Zoning Map Amendment may be heard by the Board of Supervisors. The total fee for public notice will be
provided to the applicant after the final cost is determined and must be paid before the application is heard by a public body.
MAKE CHECKS TO COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE/PAYMENT AT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER
➢ Preparing and mailing or delivering up to fifty (50) notices $215 + actual cost of first-class postage
➢ Preparing and mailing or delivering each notice after fifty (50) $1.00 for each additional notice +actual
cost of first-class postage
➢ Legal advertisement (published twice in the newspaper for each public hearing) Actual cost
(minimum of $280 for total of 4publications)
County of Albemarle Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296-5832 Fax: (434) 972-4126
1/24/17 Page I of I
Page 13 of 14
Albemarle County, Virginia
2018 Submittal and Review Schedule
Special Use Permits and Zoning Map Amendments
Resubmittal
Schedule
Resubmittal Dates
Comments to applicant
for decision on whether to
proceed to Public Hearing
Payment Due for Public
Hearing Legal Ad
Planning Commission Public
Hearing Date*
No sooner than
Monday
Wednesday
Friday
Tuesday
Dec 18 2017
Jan 17
Jan 26
Feb 20
Wednesday, Jan 3
Jan 31
Feb 9
Mar 6
Tuesday, Jan 16
Feb 14
Feb 23
Mar 20
Jan 29
Feb 28
Mar 16
Apr 10
Feb 05
Mar 7
Mar 16
Apr 10
Tuesday Feb 20
Mar 21
Mar 30
Apr 24
Mar 5
Apr 4
Apr 6
May 1
Mar 19
Apr 18
Apr 27
May 22
Apr 2
May 2
May 18
Jun 12
Apr 16
May 16
Jun 1
Jun 26
Apr 30
May 30
Jun 1
Jun 26
May 7
Jun 6
Jun 15
Jul 10
May 21
Jun 20
Jun 29
Jul 24
Jun 4
Jul
Jul 13
Aug 7
Jun 18
Jul 18
Jul 27
Aug 21
Jul 2
Aug 1
Aug 10
Sep 4
Jul 16
Aug 15
Aug 31
Sep 25
Jul 30
Aug 29
Aug 31
Sep 25
Aug 6
Sep 5
Sep 14
Oct 9
Aug 20
Sep 19
Sep 28
Oct 23
Tuesday Sep 4
Oct 3
Oct 5
Oct 30
Sep 17
Oct 17
Oct 19
Nov13
Oct 1
Oct 31
Nov 9
Dec 4
Oct 15
Nov 14
Nov 20**
Dec 18
Oct 29
Nov 28
Dec 21
Jan 15 2019
Nov 5
Dec 5
Dec 21
Jan 15 2019
Nov 19
Dec 19
Dec 21
Jan 15 2019
Dec 3
Jan 2 2019
Jan 4 2019
Jan 29 2019
Dec 17
Jan 16 2019
Jan 25 2019
Feb 19 2019
Jan 72019
Feb 62019
Feb 82019
Mar 52019
2019 Dates are tentative; shading indicates a different year
*Public hearing dates have been set by the Planning Commission; however, if due to unforeseen circumstances the
Planning Commission is unable to meet on this date, your project will be moved to the closest available agenda
date.
**Off -date to accommodate holidays.
Dates in bold Italics fall on a Tuesday due to a holiday.
Page 14 of 14