Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201800038 Review Comments Architectural Review Board Approval 2018-07-09COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 July 9, 2018 Graham Murray Collins Engineering 200 Garrett Street, Suite K Charlottesville VA 22902 RE: ARB-2018-38: Flow Auto Final Dear Graham, Kurt Keesecker BRW Architects 112 0 Street, NE Charlottesville, VA 22902 I have reviewed your recent resubmittal for the above -referenced project, which included a site plan with revision date of 6/8/18. I have the following comments: Previous comments on the architectural design have not been addressed, but must be prior to issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness and final site plan approval: 1. The architectural elevations note Norman brick for some wall surfaces. Note on the drawing the brick manufacturer and color. Provide a sample for review. 2. Material samples were previously provided for new Ground Fiandre Anthracite Ground honed finish and Fibre C by Rieder. Clarify whether these materials are still proposed to be used. 3. The drawings note that the glass as Solarban 70 XL type EW-2. The glass sample previously submitted was Solarban 60. Please describe the difference in appearance between the, two glasses and indicate if the 70 XL is tinted. If it is tinted, or if there is any other difference in appearance, provide a sample of the 70 XL for review. 4. Note that the signs illustrated on the architectural drawings have not been reviewed and a separate sign application will be required. 5. The architectural elevations note an "embedded structural glass balustrade," a "guard rail with clear glazing infill," and a "glass guardrail with 1" aluminum cap". If these are intended to be the same design, revise the notes on the architectural drawings to use a consistent name. Provide the architectural detail(s) for review. Site 6. We requested that you revise the pole light color from gray to bronze. The revised plan specifies pole color as black, and you've indicated that adjacent properties will upgrade to black. The ARB's direction to switch to bronze was based on the need to coordinate with the existing context. Please revise the pole color to bronze. Architecture/Site 7. The site plan notes the glass balustrade at the retaining wall on the west side of the building and handrails at the retaining walls at the front and east side of the site. The architectural elevations note a glass guardrail at the retaining wall on the east side of the building, and show no railing at the wall on the west side. If there is a "handrail" with a design different than that of the glass balustrade, include the handrail detail in the site and architectural drawings and illustrate and label the handrail location(s) consistently throughout both sets of drawings. Illustrate and label the balustrade location(s) consistently on both sets of drawings. Please provide: 1. One set of revised drawings addressing each of these conditions. Include updated revision dates on each drawing. 2. A memo including detailed responses indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. Highlighting the changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval. 3. The attached "Revised Application Submittal_" form. This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. When staffs review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be issued. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Margaret Maliszewski Chief of Planning/Resource Management 434-296-5832 x3276 mmaliszewski@albemarle.org cc: File COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development REVISED APPLICATION SUBMITTAL This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. County staffhas indicated below what they think will be required as a resubmission of revisions. If you need to submit additional information please explain on this form for the benefit of the intake staff. All plans must be collated and folded to fit into legal size files, in order to be accepted for submittal. TO: Margaret Maliszewski ^ DATE: PROJECT NAME: ARB-2018-38 Flow Automotive Final Submittal Type Requiring Revisions O indicates submittal Code County Project Number # Copies Erosion & Sediment Control Plan E&S Mitigation Plan MP Waiver Request (WR) Stormwater Management Plan SWMP) Road Plan (RP) Private Road Request, with private/public comparison PRR Private Road Request — Development Area PRR-DA Preliminary Site Plan (PSP) Final Site Plan (or amendment) (FSP Final Plat (FP) Preliminary Plat (PP) Easement Plat EP BoundM Adjustment Plat (BAP) Rezoning Plan (REZ Special Use Permit Concept Plan SP-CF Reduced Concept Plan (R-CP) Proffers P Bond Estimate Request BER Draft Groundwater Management Plan (D-GWMP) Final Groundwater Management Plan (F-GWMP) Aquifer Testing Work Plan (ATWP) Groundwater Assessment Report (GWAR) Architectural Review Board (ARB) ARB-2018-38 Other: Please explain (For staff use only) Submittal Code # Co ies Distribute To: Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: ARB 1 Margaret Maliszewski COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 May 7, 2018 Scott Collins/Graham Murray Collins Engineering 200 Garrett Street, Suite K Charlottesville VA 22902 RE: ARB-2018-39: Flow Auto Final Dear Scott and Graham, Kurt Keesecker BRW Architects 112 41 Street, NE Charlottesville, VA 22902 I have reviewed your recent resubmittal for the above -referenced project. I have the following comments: Architecture 1. The architectural elevations note Norman brick for some wall surfaces. Note on the drawing the brick manufacturer and color. Provide a sample for review. 2. Material samples were previously provided for new Ground Fiandre Anthracite Ground honed finish and Fibre C by Rieder. Clarify whether these materials are still proposed to be used. 3. The drawings note that the glass as Solarban 70 XL type EW-2. The glass sample previously submitted was Solarban 60. Please describe the difference in appearance between the two glasses and indicate if the 70 XL is tinted. If it is tinted, or if there is any other difference in appearance, provide a sample of the 70 XL for review. 4. Note that the signs illustrated on the architectural drawings have not been reviewed and a separate sign application will be required. Site 5. The EC guidelines call for brown, bronze or black pole lights. Pole lights on adjacent properties appear to be bronze. Please revise the pole light color from gray to bronze. 6. The proposed area of work exceeds the parcel boundaries of 78-15E. Consequently, the project limits note that points to the parcel line on Sheet 2 is inaccurate. Eliminate or correct the note. Architecture/Site 7. The elevations note an "embedded structural glass balustrade," a "guard rail with clear glazing infill," and a "glass guardrail with 1" aluminum cap". If these are intended to be the same design, revise the notes to use the same name. Provide the architectural detail(s) for review. Show the balustrade/guard rail on the site plan and provide a label consistent with the architectural plans. Please provide: 1. Two full sets of revised drawings addressing each of these conditions. Include updated revision dates on each drawing. 2. A memo including detailed responses indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. Highlighting the changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval. 3. The attached "Revised Application Submittal" form. This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. When staffs review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be issued. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Margaret Maliszewski Chief of Planning/Resource Management 434-296-5832 x3276 mmaliszewski@albemarle.org cc: File COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development REVISED APPLICATION SUBMITTAL This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. County staff has indicated below what they think will be required as a resubmission of revisions. If you need to submit additional information please explain on this form for the benefit of the intake staff. All plans must be collated and folded to fit into legal size files, in order to be accepted for submittal. TO: Margaret Maliszewski DATE: PROJECT NAME: ARB-2018-38 Flow Automotive Final Submittal Type Requiring Revisions () indicates Submittal Code County Project Number # Copies Erosion & Sediment Control Plan (E&S) Mitigation Plan (MP) Waiver Request (WR) Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) Road Plan (RP) Private Road Request, with private/public comparison (PRR) Private Road Request — Development Area (PRR-DA) Preliminary Site Plan (PSP) Final Site Plan or amendment FSP Final Plat (FP) Preliminary Plat (PP) Easement Plat (EP) Boundary Adjustment Plat (BAP) Rezoning Plan (REZ) Special Use Permit Concept Plan (SP-CP) Reduced Concept Plan (R-CP) Proffers (P) Bond Estimate Request (BER) Draft Groundwater Management Plan D-GWMP Final Groundwater Management Plan (F-GWMP) Aquifer Testing Work Plan (ATWP) Groundwater Assessment Report (GWAR) Architectural Review Board (ARB) ARB-2018-38 Other: Please explain (For staff use only) Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: ARB 2 Margaret Maliszewski COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 March 30, 2018 Scott Collins Collins Engineering 200 Garrett Street, Suite K Charlottesville VA 22902 RE: ARB-2018-39: Flow Auto Final Dear Scott, I have reviewed your recent resubmittal for the above -referenced project. I have the following comments: Architecture I . The architectural elevations note Norman brick for some wall surfaces. Note on the drawing the brick manufacturer and color. Provide a sample for review. 2. Material samples were previously provided for new Ground Fiandre Anthracite Ground honed finish and Fibre C by Rieder. Clarify whether these materials are still proposed to be used. 3. The drawings note that the glass as Solarban 70 XL type EW-2. The glass sample previously submitted was Solarban 60. Please describe the difference in appearance between the two glasses and indicate if the 70 XL is tinted. If it is tinted, or if there is any other difference in appearance, provide a sample of the 70 XL for review. 4. Note that the signs illustrated on the architectural drawings have not been reviewed and a separate sign application will be required. Site 5. The site plan notes that the front retaining wall will be faced with Norman brick with a mottled color. Revise the notes to just state that the retaining wall brick will match the building brick. Repeat this note at the retaining wall on the east side of the building. 6. On the Existing Conditions & Demolition Plan, the project limits note points to the parcel line. Please correct to identify the actual project limits. 7. Shrubs were added at the west end of the display area, but they don't wrap the corner. Continue the shrubs around the northwest corner of the display area. 8. The lighting plan includes no photometrics. Fixture cut sheets are missing from the lighting plan. Please submit ;i complete lighting plan for review. 9. Increase the planting height of the shrubs along the retaining wall on the east side of the building to 24". Architecture/Site 10. The elevations note an "embedded structural glass balustrade," a "guard rail with clear glazing infill," and a "glass guardrail with 1" aluminum cap". If these are intended to be the same design, revise the notes to use the same name. Provide the architectural detail(s) for review. Show the balustrade/guard rail on the site plan and provide a label consistent with the architectural plans. 11. Notes on Site Plan Sheet 3 label two "proposed architectural courtyard features — see architectural plans." Please submit the architectural plans that address these features. If there are features other than the paving/surface and planting, show them on the site plan and label them. 12. A note on Sheet 3 states that the display area paver color is to match the building showroom tile. Revise the note to indicate the tile name, manufacturer and color. Provide a sample (if other than the previously provided Ariostea TeknoStone in Tobacco). 13. A note on Sheet 4 states that the pavers for the display area are to match the building material. Please see the comment above and adjust this note accordingly. 14. A note on Sheet 3 states that the sidewalk tile is to match the building finishes. Please revise the note to clarify which material the the will match. If other than the building brick, indicate the sidewalk material by name, manufacturer and color, and provide a sample for review. 15. Identify on the plan the element called out in the image below. If this element is above ground and visible, provide details. Please provide: l . Two full sets of revised drawings addressing each of these conditions. Include updated revision dates on each drawing. 2. A memo including detailed responses indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. Highlighting the changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval. 3. The attached "Revised Application Submittal" form. This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. When staffs review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be issued. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, 4 Margaret Maliszewski Chief of Planning/Resource Management 434-296-5832 x3276 mmaliszewski@albemarle.org cc: Kurt Keesecker, BRW Architects, 112 41h Street, NE, Charlottesville, VA 22942 File COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development REVISED APPLICATION SUBMITTAL This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. County staff has indicated below what they think will be required as a resubmission of revisions. If you need to submit additional information please explain on this form for the benefit of the intake staff. All plans must be collated and folded to fit into legal size files, in order to be accepted for submittal. TO: Marearet Maliszewski DATE: PROJECT NAME: ARB-2018-38 Flow Automotive Final Submittal T e Requiring Revisions () indicates submittal code CountyProject Number # Copies Erosion & Sediment Control Plan E&S Mitigation Plan MP Waiver Request (WR Stormwater Management Plan SWMP) Road Plan (RP) Private Road Request, with private/public comparison (PRR) Private Road Request — Development Area PRR-DA) Preliminary Site Plan PSP Final Site Plan or amendment FSP Final Plat FP Preliminary Plat (PP) Easement Plat (EP) Boundary Adjustment Plat (BAP) Rezoning Plan (REZ) Special Use Permit Concept Plan (SP-CP Reduced Concept Plan R-CP Proffers (P) Bond Estimate Request (BER) Draft Groundwater Management Plan D-GWMP Final Groundwater Management Plan (F-GWMP Aquifer Testing Work Plan (ATWP Groundwater Assessment Report (GWAR) Architectural Review Board (ARB) ARB-20 l 8-3 8 Other: Please explain (For staff use onlv) Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: ARB 2 Margaret Maliszewski