HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201800007 Review Comments Initial Site Plan 2018-04-12Short Review Comments Report for:
SDP201800007
SubApplication Type:
NORTH POINTE - INITIAL
Initial Site Plan
Date Completed:04/16/2018
Reviewer:Christopher Perez CDD Planning
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:04/03/2018
Reviewer:Matthew Wentland CDD Engineering
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:1. A revised VSMP plan will need to be approved prior to final site plan approval.
2. Revised road plans will need to be approved prior to FSP approval.
3. All plans related to the Rt. 29 improvements will need to be approved prior to FSP approval.
4. The public road/ROW has been shifted about 20' SW of previously shown locations and
improvements are shown on an adjacent parcel. Please provide an easement and verify that the
connection to the rest of North Pointe is still viable.
5. Provide a turnaround at the end of Girard Lane that does not rely on the parking spaces being
unoccupied.
6. A revised CLOMR showing the change in the floodplain will be required before FSP/VSMP
approval.
7. Provide written verification from all easement holders that improvements and grading located
within said easements are acceptable.
Division:
Date Completed:03/30/2018
Reviewer:Adam Moore VDOT
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:03/18/2018
Reviewer:Shawn Maddox Fire Rescue
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:1. If building hieghts are to exceed 30' then aerial apparatus access must be provided. See code
sections below for access requirements.
2. A turnaround must be provided at the end of Girard Lane.
3. Streets shall be marked no parking in areas that would not allow for 20' of clear unobstructed
travel width with on street parking.
4. Fire flow test results will be required prior to final acceptance.
Code reference:
D105.1 Where required. Where the vertical distance
between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceeds
30 feet (9144 mm), approved aerial fire apparatus access
roads shall be provided. For purposes of this section, the
highest roof surface shall be determined by measurement to
the eave of a pitched roof, the intersection of the roof to the
exterior wall, or the top of parapet walls, whichever is
greater.
D105.2 Width. Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have
a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet (7925 mm), exclusive
of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or
portion thereof.
D105.3 Proximity to building. At least one of the required
access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a
minimum of 15 feet (4572 mm) and a maximum of 30 feet
(9144 mm) from the building, and shall be positioned parallel
to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on
which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall
be approved by the fire code official.
D105.4 Obstructions. Overhead utility and power lines shall
not be located over the aerial fire apparatus access road or
between the aerial fire apparatus road and the building. Other
obstructions shall be permitted to be placed with the approval
of the fire code official.
Division:
Page:1 of 2 County of Albemarle Printed On:July 13, 2018
of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or
portion thereof.
D105.3 Proximity to building. At least one of the required
access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a
minimum of 15 feet (4572 mm) and a maximum of 30 feet
(9144 mm) from the building, and shall be positioned parallel
to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on
which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall
be approved by the fire code official.
D105.4 Obstructions. Overhead utility and power lines shall
not be located over the aerial fire apparatus access road or
between the aerial fire apparatus road and the building. Other
obstructions shall be permitted to be placed with the approval
of the fire code official.
Date Completed:03/15/2018
Reviewer:Alexander Morrison ACSA
Review Status:See Recommendations
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:03/13/2018
Reviewer:Christopher Perez CDD E911
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:No objection per site plan dated 2/20/18
Division:
Date Completed:03/19/2018
Reviewer:Michael Dellinger CDD Inspections
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:No objection
Division:
Date Completed:04/05/2018
Reviewer:Margaret Maliszewski CDD ARB
Review Status:See Recommendations
Reviews Comments:See ARB action letter in ARB-2018-30
Division:
Date Completed:04/12/2018
Reviewer:Adam Moore VDOT
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Page:2 of 2 County of Albemarle Printed On:July 13, 2018
11144
c* ALfj�t
'`�•--ldl'IIIU
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,North Wing
Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596
(434)296-5832
April 11,2018
Scott Collins
200 Garrett Street, Suite K
Charlottesville VA 22902
RE: SDP2018-7 North Pointe—Northwestern Residential Area-Initial Site Pl.
Mr. Collins:
The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development prop s:• referenced above. Initial comments
for the following divisions of the Department of Commu.• Development and other agencies, as
applicable,are attached:
Albemarle County Planning Services
Albemarle County Engineering Services
Virginia Department of Transportation
Albemarle County Service Authority
Albemarle County Information Serv. es(E911)
Albemarle County Department of.'ire Rescue
Albemarle County Building In •ections
Comments reflect informatio •vailable at the time the development proposal was reviewed,and should
not be considered final. H. - ever,the Site Review Committee(SRC)has attempted to identify all issues
that will be required to b; resolved prior to final site plan approval. The lead reviewer will either approve
with conditions or den, the initial site plan by April 20th.
Please contact m- •t your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
147_,
Senior Planner
i
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville,VA,22902
434-296-5832
Memorandum
To: Scott Collins(scoff@collins-engineering.com)
From: Christopher Perez, Senior Planner
Division: Planning
Date: April 11,2018
Subject: SDP2018-7 North Pointe—Northwestern Residential Area- Initial Site Plan
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the
following comments have been satisfactorily addressed(The following comments are those that have been
identified at this time.Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.):
[Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference,which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless
otherwise specified.]
1. [4.11.4, SP2002-35, SP2002-47,ZMA2000-91 Access Easement to TMP 32-22K1. Improvements are
proposed within the existing access easements serving TMP 32-22K1. Retaining walls shall not be
placed within the 50' Temporary Construction Easement,nor the 30' Private Access Easement
serving TMP 32-22K1. These improvements impede the use of the easements and shall not be
permitted. Revise.
Additionally, stormwater pipes and drainage pipes/easements are proposed within the existing 30' and
50' easements. Prior to final site plan approval provide written documentation from the owner of TMP
32-22K1 that these improvements are permitted within the easements.
2. 132.7.9.7, 14-401]Double Frontage. Throughout the plan there are numerous lots which are proposed
as double frontage lots.This type of lot layout is prohibited. As discussed at the site review meeting,
the applicant plans to revise some of the private roads to alleys to avoid some of the double frontage
issues. Where double frontage is unavoidable because of the design/layout, either provide 20' of
common area between the lot and the second street or request an agent approved variation with
required justification in 14-203.1(B). Staff is not compelled to support such a waiver without a 20'
buffer planted with screening trees as provided for in Section 32.7.9.7.
3. [32.7.2.2, 14-410(H)] Sidewalks and Landscape Strips. Provide sidewalks and landscape strips on
both sides of all private streets throughout the development,regardless of driveways.
4. [32.7.2.2, 14-410(H), 14-422(D)] Sidewalk and Landscape Strip Design. The planting strips shall be
located between the curb and the sidewalk.
5. [32.7.2.2, 14-410(H)] Sidewalks and Landscape Strip. The necessary street improvements, sidewalks
and landscape strips,are located outside of the private street right-of-way and instead are located on
individual lots in proposed easements. If this design is to remain,all front setbacks shall be measured
from the edge of these easements. Staff recommends these improvements be placed within the private
right-of-ways.
11000 '44.096. [ZMA2013-14,ZMA2000-91 The road cross section from the rezoning specifies that Lewis and Clark
Drive shall provide 5' wide bike lanes on each side for the duration of the roadway. Additionally, 5'
meets VDOT's current standard. Revise.
7. [ZMA2013-14,ZMA2000-91 Provide a public access easement along the private street and sidewalks
for Aldrich Lane,which will connect to the publicly dedicated path within the greenway dedication
area.
8. [ZMA2013-14,ZMA2000-91 Proffer 5.3.1(c)(1). Phase III Road Improvements required to be
approved and either build or bonded before final site plan approval.
(c) Phase III Road Improvements. Prior to approval of a subdivision plat or
site plan for any development of the Neighborhood Investments Property or any portion thereof,
Owner shall obtain all associated permits and post all associated bonds required for the
construction of the following road improvements (collectively, the "Phase III Road
Improvements")to the extent any such road improvements have not already been completed:
(1) Northernmost Entrance (opposite Lewis & Clark Drive) on U.S.
Route 29:
(i) U.S. Route 29 Southbound -construction of left turn lane
with taper.
(ii) Northwest Passage from U.S. Route 29 to the south
property line of Tax Map 32,Parcel 22K as shown on the Application Plan.
(iii) U.S. Route 29 Northbound — construction of a right hand
turn lane,the geometries of which will be subject to VDOT approval.
(iv) If the traffic signal to be constructed by others is in place
prior to Owner commencing work on this Northernmost Entrance, and such traffic signal only
includes three legs. Owner shall add the fourth leg to the signal, which shall include additional
mast arms, signal heads and ancillary equipment necessary to support Northwest Passage's use
of the intersection, as determined by VDOT. If such traffic signal is not in place and the
vehicular traffic generated by the Project causes the VDOT signal warrants to be met,and VDOT
requires that a traffic signal be installed as a condition of the entrance permit,Owner shall install
such traffic signal.
9. [ZMA2013-14, ZMA2000-91 Proffer 5.3.3.
5.3.3 Prior to the approval of plans for improvements at any U.S. Route 29 intersection,
Owner shall provide VDOT traffic signal network timing plans that VDOT finds acceptably
address the impacts of the proposed traffic signals for peak traffic periods.
10. [ZMA2013-14,ZMA2000-91 Proffer 9.1. Prior to final site plan approval,demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the County Engineer that stormwater basin 10(currently labeled as SWM Facility A)
has enough room to be redesigned and enlarged to accommodate all stormwater from the future
elementary school lot located on TMP 32-23. Depict,label, and dimension all easements necessary for
this expansion on the facility,to also include access easements,temporary construction easements,
and permanent SWM facility easements.
Additionally,provide the slope for the SWM access road. This shall meet county design standards.
11. [ZMA2013-14,ZMA2000-91 Proffer 8.2. Affordable Housing. Label the 28 units that are to be
affordable.
12. [SP2006-34] Condition#1. County and VDOT approval of the final lane configuration for the
Northwest Passage over the stream crossing with the final road plans.
13. [SP2006-34] Condition#2. County and VDOT approval of final design plans and
hydrologic/hydraulic computations for the stream crossing.
14. [SP2006-34 Condition#3&ZMA2013-14,ZMA2000-9 Proffer 4.1.] A revised CLOMR showing
the change in the floodplain will be required prior to final site plan and VSMP approval.
15. [SP2006-34] Condition#9. All of the above noted landscaping shall be shown on the road plans
submitted for the Northwest Passage prior to final site plan approval. The plans shall include complete
planting schedule key to the plan. The plans are subject to approval of the Design Planner.
16. [SP2006-34] Condition#5. Provide a stream buffer mitigation plan for approval by the Natural
Resources Manager in accordance with this condition.
17. [SP2006-34,SP2002-72] Conditions. All conditions of the SPs remain valid and shall be complied
with prior to final site plan approval.
18. [ZMA2013-07 Application Plan] Provide written certification from a licensed surveyor or engineer
confirming that the conservation line shown on the application plan for ZMA 2013-07 and the
conservation line shown on this site plan are in the exact same location.
19. [ZMA2013-14,ZMA2000-91 To ensure the long-term implementation of the zoning for the North
Pointe development,prior to final site plan approval provide written documentation from the owner of
TMP 32-23,Violet Hill Associates C/O Great Eastern Management Co,which states that they are
aware and agree to the following,which affect the use of their property.
la. [ZMA2013-14,ZMA2000-9,SP2002-721 Unit Types. The North Pointe development is required
to have a minimum of 205 multifamily units. The application plan lists the units in this section of
North Pointe(Northwestern Residential)as multifamily units. Currently single-family attached
townhomes on individual lots are proposed for this section. This modification in unit type is
permitted; however, staff feels it pertinent to notify the other owner of this modification as they will
be required to develop the minimum number of multifamily units on their property. Please provide
written documentation from the owner of TMP 32-23,Violet Hill Associates C/O Great Eastern
Management Co,that they are aware of this modification.
lb. [ZMA2013-14,ZMA2000-9] Road Alignment. The alignment of Lewis and Clark Drive at the
shared property line of TMP 32-22K and TMP 32-23 is shifting locations from what was depicted on
the application plan. Provide written documentation from the adjacent property owner,Violet Hill
Associates C/O Great Eastern Management Co,that documents they are in agreeance with the shift in
alignment as proposed on the site plan under review.
lc. [ZMA2013-14,ZMA2000-91 Amenities and Open Space. The open space and amenities required
throughout the North Pointe development are to be accessible for use by all section of the
development. Provide written documentation from the adjacent property owner,Violet Hill Associates
C/O Great Eastern Management Co,that documents they understand this criteria. Each of the
developments Covenants and Restrictions documents and plans shall make note of this.
20. [Comment] Road Alignment. The current alignment for Lewis and Clark Drive crosses onto a small
portion of TMP 32-22P. Prior to final site plan approval a boundary line adjustment shall take place.
1604
21. [ZMA2013-14,ZMA2000-91 Revise the tracking of unit type throughout the plan. The proposed unit
types are attached townhomes,not multifamily,nor other, specifically list them as"Attached
Townhomes".
22. [4.12.16] Guest Spaces. Label all guest spaces on the plan.
23. [4.12.16] Parking Spaces. There is a typographical/math error for the parking provided. 409 is listed;
however, it should be 414,which equals parking required.
24. [Comment] Throughout the plan label and provide acreages of all open space, conservation,
greenway, and buffer areas.
25. [Comment] Because each driveway varies in size please dimension the driveways for each lot. Please
depict, label, and dimension the garages for each lot.
26. [ZMA2013-14,ZMA2000-9] Setbacks. Revise the setbacks to match the setbacks for the unit type
"Attached Townhomes": Front min 8' and"max 30', side 6',rear minimum 10' and max none. Garage
doorway 18'.
27. [Comment] Why is"Building 6"listed as a building type B,when building 1 and 13, located adjacent
to it are type A?Ensure all the building types are appropriately labeled throughout the plan.
28. [32.6.2(d)] Water and sewer facilities. Provide profiles and cross sections of all water and sewer lines
including clearance where lines cross.
29. [32.6.2(d)] Water and sewer facilities. Provide the station on the plan to conform to the station shown
on the profile and indicate the top and invert elevation of each structure.
30. [32.6.2(d)] Water and sewer facilities. Provide all sewer appurtenances by type and number.
31. [32.6.2(e)] Public facilities and utilities. All water and sewer facilities to be dedicated to public use
and the easements for those facilities and shall be identified by a statement that the facilities are to be
dedicated to the Albemarle County Service Authority.
32. [32.5.2(j)] Building 26 does not appear to be served by sewer,as a line does not run along its
frontage. Please verify.
33. [32.5.2(n)&4.16] Recreational requirements of section 4.16 are applicable to Planned Development
zoning districts. Demonstrate how the recreational regulations will be met and if substitutions will be
provided with this portion of the development.
34. [32.6.2(d)] Drainage easements outside of the public right-of-way shall not be dedicated to public use,
unless VDOT has agreed to accept and maintain these easements.
35. [32.6.2(j)] Landscape plan.A landscape plan that complies with section 32.7.9 is required with the
final site plan. Additionally, landscaping shall also be in conformity with the conditions of approval of
SP2006-34,ZMA2013-14.
36. 132.7.9.4(b)] Existing trees may be preserved in lieu of planting new plant materials in order to
satisfy the landscaping and screening requirements of section 32.7.9, subject to the agent's approval.
If you intend to use existing trees to satisfy any of the landscape plan requirements,please include the
following:
1. Areas and other features shown on landscape plan.The landscape plan shall show the trees to be
1110 4 '
preserved,the limits of clearing,the location and type of protective fencing,grade changes requiring
tree wells or walls, and trenching or tunneling proposed beyond the limits of clearing.
2. Conservation checklist.The applicant shall sign a conservation checklist approved by the agent to
ensure that the specified trees will be protected during construction. Except as otherwise expressly
approved by the agent in a particular case,the checklist shall conform to the specifications in the
Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook,pages II1-393 through III-413, and as hereafter
amended.
37. [Comment] The final site plan shall not be approved until! all SRC reviewers have approved the
plan.Their comments attached.
Please contact Christopher Perez in the Planning Division by using cperez@albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext.
3443 for further information.
Review Comments r r SDP201800007 Vial Site Plan -
Project Name: NORTH POlf jTE - INITIAL
Date Completed: Tuesday. April 03. 2018 Department/Division/Agency: Review Status:
Reviewer Matthew Wentland j COD Engineering Requested Changes
1-A revised VSMP plan will need to be approved prior to final site plan approval
2. Revised road plans will need to be approved prior to FSP approval
3. All plans related to the Rt 29 improvements will need to be approved prior to FSP approval.
4. The public road,ROW has been shifted about 20'SW of previously shown locations and improvements are shown on an
adjacent parcel Please provide an easement and verify that the connection to the rest of North Pointe is still viable
5 Provide a turnaround at the end of Girard Lane that does not rely on the parking spaces being unoccupied
6 A revised CLOMR showing the change in the floodplain will be required before FSP/VSMP approval
7. Providewritten verification from all easement holders that improvements and grading located within said easements are
acceptable
Page: '.1 County of Albemarle Printed On: 104/1112018
Review Comment for SDP201800007 Initial Site Plan
Project Name: NORTH POINTE - INITIAL
Date Completed: Sunday, March 18. 2018 DepartmentDivision?Agency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Shawn Maddox -j Fire Rescue Requested Changes
1. If building hieghts are to exceed 30 then aerial apparatus access must be provided See code sections below for access
requirements
2.Aturnaround must be provided at the end of Girard Lane
3. Streets shall be marked no parking in areas that would not allow for 20 of clear unobstructed travel width with on street
parking
4- Fire flow test results will be required prior to final acceptance
Code reference-
D105.1 Where required Where the vertical distance
between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceeds
30 feet (9144 mm), approved aerial fire apparatus access
roads shall be provided For purposes of this section the
highest roof surface shall be determined by measurement to
the eave of a pitched roof the intersection of the roof to the
exterior wall or the top of parapet walls whichever is
greater.
D105 2 Width Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have
a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet ((7925 mm). exclusive
}of shoulders in the immediate vicinity of the building or
portion thereof
0105.3 Proximity to building At least one of the required
access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a
minimum of 15 feet (4572 mm) and a maximum of 30 feet
(9144 mm{from the building. and shall be positioned parallel
to one entire side of the building The side of the building on
which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall
be approved by the fire code official
0105.4 Obstructions Overhead utility and power lines shall
not be located over the aerial fire apparatus access road or
between the aerial fire apparatus road and the building Other
obstructions shall be permitted to be placed with the approval
of the fire code official
Page: 1 County of Albemarle Frinted On: 104/0412018
•
Imre
OFA
sl_ ..�
1f1;11,0107..
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,North Wing
Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434)296-5832 Fax(434) 972-4126
April 5,2018
Scott Collins
c/o Collins Engineering
200 Garrett Street, Suite K
Charlottesville, Va 22902
RE: ARB-2018-30: North Pointe Initial Plan
Dear Mr.Collins,
At its meeting on Monday,April 2, 2018,the Albemarle County Architectural Review Board unanimously voted to
forward the following recommendations on the above-noted Initial Site Development Plan to the agent for the Site
Review Committee:
• Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per§ 18-30.6.4c(2),(3)and(5)and
recommended conditions of initial plan approval:
o Priorlto Initial Plan approval, the following items shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the ARB:
None.
• Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None.
• Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit:
1. Revise the plan to clearly show existing wooded area to remain and tree protection fencing throughout the
site plan.
• Regarding the final site plan submittal:
1. Submit architectural designs for review with the final site plan. The plans and elevations shall address the
following:
a. A maximum of two adjacent facades shall be co-planar.
b. Adjacent townhouses shall not have the same siding color.
c. Two townhouses having full brick facades shall not be adjacent.
d. Show how the side and rear townhouse elevations will have an appropriate appearance for the EC.
2. Include sufficient architectural features and detailing on all building elevations facing the EC to achieve an
appropriate appearance for the EC.
3. Provide architectural elevations for review.
4. Add to following note the site plan and the architectural plan:"Visibility of all mechanical equipment from
the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated."
5. Include with the final site plan a landscape plan that addresses the requirement for the 40' landscape buffer
along the EC frontage of the development.
6. Provide landscaping at the entrance to the development to establish an appropriate appearance for the EC.
7. Arrange utilities to allow for street trees consistently spaced 40' on center along interior roads.
8. Add the standard plant health note to the plan:"All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to
reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited Shrubs and trees shall be
pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant."
lisof Now
9. Revise the plan to clearly show existing wooded area to remain and tree protection fencing throughout the
site plan.
You may submit your application for continued ARB review at your earliest convenience.Application forms,
checklists and schedules are available on-line at www.albemarle.org/ARB.Please be certain that your ARB submittal
addresses the above-noted issues.
If you have any questions concerning any of the above,please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
17/4dx:crtitOf ��t
Margaret Maliszewski
Chief of Planning/Resource Management
cc: Neighborhood Investments—NP, LLC
810 Catalpa Ct
Charlottesville VA 22903
File
*me Nome
\iv If
L, �V
`!*'4-4
� J,
p e
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper,Virginia 22701
Stephen C. Brich, P.E.
Commissioner
March 30,2018
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Attn: Christopher Perez
Re: North Pointe Northwest— Initial Site Plan
SDP-2018-00007
Review#1
Dear Mr. Perez:
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Collins Engineering, dated 20
February 2018, and offers the following comments:
1. The Route 29 Improvements Plan (SUB201600196) for the entrance of this site, which
must be approved in conjunction with this plan, has not been approved.
2. The minimum horizontal radius in the GS-7 design standards is based on a super-
elevation of the street. Is that the intent and, if so, is there enough distance to return to
normal elevation before the Route 29 entrance? If the street is not super-elevated, the
minimum radius is 335' per the GS-SSAR.
3. Sheet 6 has a callout for GR-2 flush with face of curb along Lewis & Clark Drive. Are
guardrails warranted here? Also note that the guardrail at the Route 29 entrance crosses
the sidewalk.
4. Why is there a break in the median between Route 29 and Aldrich Lane?
5. A temporary turnaround is required at the end of Lewis &Clark Drive. See Appendix F
of the Road Design Manual for turnaround design standards, or acceptance will end at the
Aldrich Terrace intersection.
6. Where transit buses will be present, the minimum bike lane width is 5 feet.
7. There is a curb inlet in the bus pullout that needs to be shifted to the curb.
If further information is desired,please contact Justin Deel at 434-422-9894.
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
March 30, 2018
Christopher Perez
Page 2
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The
owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process.
Sincerely,
Itutt •hifiRt/
Adam J. Moore, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
Christopher Perez
From: Richard Nelson <rnelson@serviceauthority.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 4:00 PM
To: Christopher Perez
Cc: Alex Morrison
Subject: SDP201800007 - North Pointe - Initial
Chris,
I recommend approval for SDP201800007 - North Pointe—Initial. Three (3) copies of the site plan will need to be
submitted to ACSA for water and sewer construction review, as well as RWSA sewer capacity approval, prior to final site
plan approval.
Thanks,
Richard Nelson
Civil Engineer
Albemarle County Service Authority
168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22911
(434) 977-4511
•
1
Review Comment- for SDP201800007 Initial Site Plan .L
Project Name: NORTH POINTE - INITIAL
Date Completed:[Tuesday March 13. 2018 DepartmentDMsion/Agency: Review Status:
Elise Kiewra H CDD E911 LJ No Objection vi
Reviewer.� �
No objection per site plan dated 2120118
•
Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: 104104/2018
Review Comments '')r SDP201800007 tial Site Plan -1
Project Name: NORTH POINTE - INITIAL
Date Completed:[Monday. March 19. 2018 i DepartmentDivision+Agency: Review Status:
Reviewer. Michael Dellinger - CDD Inspections H No Objection
No objection
Page: 11 County of Albemarle Printed On: 104?04/2018