Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201700031 Review Comments Minor Amendment 2017-08-17 Sari August 17, 2017 J.T. Newberry Senior Planner Community Development County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: SDP201700031 Brown Auto Group— Minor Amendment J.T.. The following is a response to the review comments in your letter dated July 21, 2017: 1. [General Comment] Per David Benish, Chief of Planning, this minor amendment will serve as the application plan for ZMA201600023, which is currently deferred. The purpose of that zoning map amendment (ZMA) is to reclassify the Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes located adjacent to the existing gravel areas at the back of the site to Managed Steep Slopes. The minor amendment will be reviewed until it is in a form suitable for use in the rezoning review. Doing so will ensure the minor amendment is consistent with the application plan considered by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. (Duly noted) 2. [General Comment] Staff has conducted an audit of the site plan amendments for this property and determined that there have been at least six (6) minor amendments approved since 1998 for this site without any approved major site plan amendments. County policy requires a major site plan amendment for changes to final site plans once three (3) minor amendments have been approved. Staff will accept this application as a minor amendment to facilitate the review of the zoning map amendment. However, the next application submitted for this site should be filed as a major amendment that incorporates all of the site changes that have been approved on the previous minor amendments and letters of revision. A link to the Albemarle County Site Plan Amendment policy can be accessed HERE. (Duly noted) 3. [32.5.2 (a)] On Sheet C1.0, please amend the site data table so that the owner names and addresses are clearly identified with specific tax map parcel numbers. (The parcels and tax map numbers are now appropriately related in the site data table.) B.Clark Gathright,P.E. B.Clark Gathright,LLC 100 10th St NE Suite 200 Charlottesville,VA 22902 434-971-8848 cgathright@dgarchs.com • 4. [32.5.2 (d)] Please provide the source and date of topographic information used to determine areas of existing Preserved and Managed Steep Slopes. (The sources of topography are added to the plans.) 5. [32.5.2 (a)] Please amend the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0 so that each TMP number and its applicable zoning/overlay districts are individually listed. Please be aware that the primary zoning district for all four parcels is HC Highway Commercial. (The zoning designations are now provided on a per parcel basis.) 6. [32.5.2 (a)] Per Comment #5, please state each zoning overlay district in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0. For example, TMP 78-14 is zoned Steep Slopes Overlay District (Managed and Preserved). (The overlay districts are now provided on a per parcel basis.) 7. [32.5.1 (c)] The current plans only label existing or proposed Preserved Steep Slopes. The plans need to include at least one exhibit that shows and labels the existing conditions, which include both Managed Steep Slopes and Preserved Steep Slopes within the area of rezoning. We recommend that Sheet C1.0 show all areas of existing Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes. Then, the exhibit on Sheet C1.1 could show the proposed Managed Steep Slopes per the rezoning. a. Areas of existing Preserved Steep Slopes proposed to be reclassified to Managed Steep Slopes with ZMA201600023 should be called out and labeled as "Existing Preserved Steep Slopes, Proposed Change to Managed Steep Slopes per ZMA201600023" on Sheet C1.1. (The slopes are re-designated per the comment above.) 8. [General Comment] In the "Revision to SDP200000049" table on Sheet C1.0, please amend the second bullet point to state "Rezoning to designate new Steep Slopes per ZMA201600023." (The ZMA number is added to the second bullet point.) B.Clark Gathright,P.E. B.Clark Gathright,LLC 100 10th St NE Suite 200 Charlottesville,VA 22902 434-971-8848 cgathright@dgarchs.com 9. [32.5.2 (b)] Please state the acreage of each property in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0. Please provide the acreage of the rezoning area, the total acreage of the disturbance proposed by the new grading, and the acreage of proposed open space. (The requested areas are now provided. The disturbed area in question refers to a previously disturbed area. No new grading is proposed.) 10. [32.5.2 (r)] Please include a legend showing all symbols and abbreviations used on the plan. (No symbols or abbreviations are used on the plans.) 11. [32.7.3 and 4.12] For future zoning compliance inspections, please provide a calculation of the existing and required parking spaces on TMP 78-14, 78-14C and 78-14E. (Parking requirements and the number of existing spaces is provided.) 12. [4.20 (a)] Please amend the setbacks listed in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0. In the HC Zoning District, the minimum front setback is 10' from the right-of-way, and there is no maximum front setback since all structures existed as of June 3, 2015. The minimum side and rear setbacks should state "Primary structures shall be constructed and separated in accordance with the current edition of the Building Code." The maximum side/rear setbacks should state "None." (The setback information is revised.) 13. [32.7.4] Please refer to Engineering Comment#1 regarding submittal and approval of a WPO plan prior to site plan approval. (Duly noted) 14. [32.7.4.2] Please refer to Engineering comment #2 regarding approval and recordation of a stormwater easement plat and maintenance agreement prior to site plan approval. (Duly noted) B.Clark Gathright,P.E. B.Clark Gathright,LLC 100 10th St NE Suite 200 Charlottesville,VA 22902 434-971-8848 cgathright@dgarchs.com err' Albemarle County Engineering Services— Bobby Jocz, rlocz@albemarle.org— Requested Changes: 1. WPO plan will need to be submitted and approved prior to site plan approval. (A WPO plan will be submitted separately.) 2. 2.4 acres of SWM conserved forest and open space must be held in conservation easement. Plat with deed of easement and SWM maintenance agreement will need to be recorded prior to approval. (A plat and SWM maintenance agreement are being prepared and will be submitted separately.) 3. Provide source and date of topography information. (The survey and topographical information is added to the plan.) 4. Water quality must be addressed. Provide VRRM spreadsheet showing that holding 2.4 acres of conserved open space in conservation easement is sufficient to address water quality requirements. (The VRRM spreadsheet is attached.) 5. Show soil divides. (Soil divides are shown. Please note that no new grading is proposed.) 6. Provide inlet flow calculations to help ensure no flooding will occur onsite due to changes in land cover. (An Inlet flow calculation is attached. The inlet and inlet drainage area are existing and there are no changes to landcover.) B.Clark Gathright,P.E. B.Clark Gathright,LLC 100 10th St NE Suite 200 Charlottesville,VA 22902 434-971-8848 cgathright@dgarchs.com *400# some 7. Adequate outlet protection will need to be provided to prevent further erosion of receiving channel associated with discharge from proposed SWM facility. Please provide plan for adequate outlet protection. (Outlet protection is now shown on the plans.) Virginia Department of Transportation — Willis Bedsaul, willis.bedsaul@vdot.virginia.gov — Requested changes: 1. There is no change to the drainage areas received by the existing storm system. The proposed detention system will reduce the rate of runoff below current conditions. 2. The existing entrances will be taken into consideration if any future development is planned. Should you have any questions, don't hesitate to call me. Best regards, pAr Clark Gathright, P.E. B.Clark Gathright,P.E. B.Clark Gathright,LLC 100 10th St NE Suite 200 Charlottesville,VA 22902 434-971-8848 cgathright@dgarchs.com noe04.5 e_cq!� Qua►lab le 1-5 &CA-ol ei 10.01 cis c6.7 p c��E� w l l C k CV �I \,j *VN V'e� reycyd'-5 spf, Dc..u;a hers =l©_� C,� pry ( 5 ?�,iof -�r Z. A LI SJetet, L and 4:416d; z w be r►eccled 4( zmAa v uQQ1aii (lun. e5 � y County of Albemarle 5ta•460.4/ fet ny Set ) Department of Community Development \ocI Memorandum To: Clark Gath ight (cgathright@dgarchs.com) CC:01\ From: Cameron Langille—Senior Planner,J.T. Newberry—Senior Pla•'er /1C, `t Division: Planning Services Date: July 21, 2017 ;\-703J``-� C� i Subject: SDP201700031 Brown Auto Group—Minor Amendm•nt rat AA aiscb y `� -7 The Planner for the Planning Services Division will recommend a•proval of the plan referred to above when the following 1'5'11 items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following corn - is are those that have been identified at this time! '1g Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated base. • • •-r review. Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.) 1. [General Comment] Per David Benish, Chief of Planning,this minor amendment will serve as the application plan for ZMA201600023, which is currently deferred. The purpose of that zoning map amendment (ZMA) is to reclassify the Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes located adjacent to the existing gravel areas at the back of the site to Managed Steep Slopes.The minor amendment will be reviewed until it is in a form suitable for use in the rezoning review. Doing so will ensure the minor amendment is consistent with the application plan considered by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. 2. [General Comment] Staff has conducted an audit of the site plan amendments for this property and determined that there have been at least six(6) minor amendments approved since 1998 for this site without any approved major site plan amendments. County policy requires a major site plan amendment for changes to final site plans once three (3) minor amendments have been approved. Staff will accept this application as a minor amendment to facilitate the review of the zoning map amendment. However,the next application submitted for this site should be filed as a major amendment that incorporates all of the site changes that have been approved on the previous minor amendments and letters of revision. A link to the Albemarle County Site Plan Amendment policy can be accessed HERE. 3. [32.5.2 (a)] On Sheet C1.0, please amend the site data table so that the owner names and addresses are clearly identified with specific tax map parcel numbers. 4. [32.5.2(d)] Please provide the source and date of topographic information used to determine areas of existing Preserved and Managed Steep Slopes. 5. [32.5.2(a)] Please amend the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0 so that each TMP number and its applicable zoning/overlay districts are individually listed. Please be aware that the primary zoning district for all four parcels is HC Highway Commercial. 6. [32.5.2 (a)] Per Comment #5, please state each zoning overlay district in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0. For example,TMP 78-14 is zoned Steep Slopes Overlay District (Managed and Preserved). 7. [32.5.1 (c)] The current plans only label existing or proposed Preserved Steep Slopes. The plans need to include at least one exhibit that shows and labels the existing conditions, which include both Managed Steep Slopes and Preserved Steep Slopes within the area of rezoning. We recommend that Sheet C1.0 show all areas of existing Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes. Then, the exhibit on Sheet C1.1 could show the proposed Managed Steep 1 Slopes per the rezoning. a. Areas of existing Preserved Steep Slopes proposed to be reclassified to Managed Steep Slopes with ZMA201600023 should be called out and labeled as "Existing Preserved Steep Slopes, Proposed Change to Managed Steep Slopes per ZMA201600023" on Sheet C1.1. 8. [General Comment] In the "Revision to SDP200000049" table on Sheet C1.0, please amend the second bullet point to state "Rezoning to designate new Steep Slopes per ZMA201600023." 9. [32.5.2(b)] Please state the acreage of each property in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0. Please provide the acreage of the rezoning area,the total acreage of the disturbance proposed by the new grading, and the acreage of proposed open space. 10. [32.5.2(r)] Please include a legend showing all symbols and abbreviations used on the plan. 11. [32.7.3 and 4.12] For future zoning compliance inspections, please provide a calculation of the existing and required parking spaces on TMP 78-14,78-14C and 78-14E. 12. [4.20(a)] Please amend the setbacks listed in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0. In the HC Zoning District,the minimum front setback is 10' from the right-of-way, and there is no maximum front setback since all structures existed as of June 3,2015.The minimum side and rear setbacks should state"Primary structures shall be constructed and separated in accordance with the current edition of the Building Code."The maximum side/rear setbacks should state"None." 13.032.7.4] Ple. se refer to ngineerin Comment#1 regarding submittal and approval of a WPO plan prior to site plan approval. Com.' 0E,k" &✓ibM rktI CO07. 2p(7 14 [32.7.4.2] Please refer to Engineering comment#2 regarding approval and recordation of a stormwater easemenq plat and maintenance agreement prior to site plan approval. 50b i.k',16 0 •ecc w,d' Vat. l:-oir,. �a keQ a`ll OCOQ3e.A MctA yA Sld 0E- -}-L . Sv,iM (s vak.icl'� Q rv�tnr Please contact Cameron Langille at the Department of Community Development at blangille@albemarle.org or 296-5832 ext. 3432 for further information. Albemarle County Engineering Services—Bobby Jocz, riocz@albemarle.org—Requested Changes: 1. WPO plan will need to be submitted and approved prior to site plan approval. 2. 2.4 acres of SWM conserved forest and open space must be held in conservation easement. Plat with deed of easement and SWM maintenance agreement will need to be recorded prior to approval. 3. Provide source and date of topography information. 4. Water quality must be addressed. Provide VRRM spreadsheet showing that holding 2.4 acres of conserved open space in conservation easement is sufficient to address water quality requirements. 5. Show soil divides. -- 6. Provide inlet flow calculations to help ensure no flooding will occur onsite due to changes in land cover. 7. Adequate outlet protection will need to be provided to prevent further erosion of receiving channel associated with discharge from proposed SWM facility. Please provide plan for adequate outlet protection. Albemarle County Building Inspections—Michael Dellinger, mdellinger@albemarle.org— No objection. Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue—Robbie Gilmer, rgilmer@albemarle.org—No objection. Albemarle County Service Authority—Alex Morrison, amorrison@serviceauthoritv.org—No objection. Virginia Department of Transportation — Willis Bedsaul, willis.bedsaul@vdot.virginia.gov — Requested changes (see attached). 2 r� 'AL � IRGS?at� County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Clark Gathwright (cgathright@dgarchs.com) From: Cameron Langille — Senior Planner, J.T. Newberry — Senior Planner Division: Planning Services Date: July 21, 2017 Subject: SDP201700031 Brown Auto Group — Minor Amendment The Planner for the Planning Services Division will recommend approval of the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review. Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.) 1. [General Comment] Per David Benish, Chief of Planning, this minor amendment will serve as the application plan for ZMA201600023, which is currently deferred. The purpose of that zoning map amendment (ZMA) is to reclassify the Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes located adjacent to the existing gravel areas to Managed Steep Slopes. The minor amendment will be reviewed until it is in a form suitable for use in the rezoning review. Doing so will ensure the minor amendment is consistent with the application plan considered by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. [General Comment] Staff has conducted an audit of the site plan amendments for this property and determined that there have been at least six (6) minor amendments approved since 1998 for this site without any approved major site plan amendments. County policy requires a major site plan amendment for changes to final site plans once three (3) minor amendments have been approved. Staff will accept this application as a minor amendment to facilitate the review of the zoning map amendment. However, the next application submitted for this site should be filed as a major amendment that incorporates all of the site changes that have been approved on the previous minor amendments and letters of revision. A link to the Albemarle County Site Plan Amendment policy can be accessed HERE. 3. [32.5.2 (a)] On Sheet C1.0, please amend the site data table so that the owner names and addresses are clearly identified with specific tax map parcel numbers. 4. [32.5.2 (d)] Please provide the source and date of topographic information used to determine areas of existing Preserved and Managed Steep Slopes. 5. [32.5.2(a)] Please amend the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0 so that each TMP number and its applicable zoning/overlay districts are individually listed. Please be aware that the primary zoning district for all four parcels is HC Highway Commercial. 6. [32.5.2 (a)] Per Comment #5, please state each zoning overlay district in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0. For example, TMP 78-14 is zoned Steep Slopes Overlay District (Managed and Preserved). [32.5.1 (c)] The current plans only label existing or proposed Preserved Steep Slopes. The plans need to include at least one exhibit that shows and labels the existing conditions, which include both Managed Steep Slopes and Preserved Steep Slopes within the area of rezoning. We recommend that Sheet C1.0 show all areas of existing Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes. Then, the exhibit on Sheet C1.1 could show the proposed Managed Steep Slopes per the rezoning. a. Areas of existing Preserved Steep Slopes proposed to be reclassified to Managed Steep Slopes with ZMA201600023 should be called out and labeled as "Existing Preserved Steep Slopes, Proposed Change to Managed Steep Slopes per ZMA201600023" on Sheet CIA. [General Comment] In the "Revision to SDP200000049" table on Sheet C1.0, please amend the second bullet point to state "Rezoning to designate new Steep Slopes per ZMA201600023." [32.5.2 (b)] Please state the acreage of each property in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0. Please provide the acreage of the rezoning area, the total acreage of the disturbance proposed by the new grading, and the acreage of proposed open space. 10. [32.5.2 (r)] Please include a legend showing all symbols and abbreviations used on the plan. 11. [32.7.3 and 4.12] For future compliance, please provide a calculation of the existing and required parking spaces on TMP 78-14, 78-14C and 78-14E. 12. [4.20 (a)] Please amend the setbacks listed in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0. In the HC Zoning District, the minimum front setback is 10' from the right-of-way, and there is no maximum front setback since all structures existed as of June 3, 2015. The minimum side and rear setbacks should state "Primary structures shall be constructed and separated in accordance with the current edition of the Building Code." The maximum side/rear setbacks should state "None." 13. [32.7.4] Please refer to Engineering Comment #1 regarding submittal and approval of a WPO plan prior to site plan approval. 14. [32.7.4.2] Please refer to Engineering comment #2 regarding approval and recordation of a stormwater easement plat and maintenance agreement prior to site plan approval. Please contact Cameron Langille at the Department of Community Development at blangille@albemarle.org or 296-5832 ext. 3432 for further information. Albemarle County Engineering Services — Bobby Jocz, riocz@albemarle.org — Requested Changes: 1. WPO plan will need to be submitted and approved prior to site plan approval. 2. 2.4 acres of SWM conserved forest and open space must be held in conservation easement. Plat with deed of easement and SWM maintenance agreement will need to be recorded prior to approval. 3. Provide source and date of topography information. 4. Water quality must be addressed. Provide VRRM spreadsheet showing that holding 2.4 acres of conserved open space in conservation easement is sufficient to address water quality requirements. 5. Show soil divides. 6. Provide inlet flow calculations to help ensure no flooding will occur onsite due to changes in land cover. 7. Adequate outlet protection will need to be provided to prevent further erosion of receiving channel associated with discharge from proposed SWM facility. Please provide plan for adequate outlet protection. Albemarle County Building Inspections — Michael Dellinger, mdellinger@albemarle.org - No Objection Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue — Robbie Gilmer, rgilmer@albemarle.org — No Objection Albemarle County Service Authority — Alex Morrison, amorrison@serviceauthority.org — No Objection Virginia Department of Transportation — Willis Bedsaul, willis.bedsaul@vdot.virginia.gov — Requested Changes, See Attached. Short Review Comments Report for: SDP201700031 SubApplication Type: Brown Auto Group - Minor Minor Amendment Date Completed:06/14/2017 Reviewer:Cameron Langille CDD Planning Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:07/21/2017 Reviewer:Johnathan Newberry CDD Planning Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:06/14/2017 Reviewer:Bobby Jocz CDD Engineering Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:Comments on plans dated 5-16-17 1.WPO plan will need to be submitted and approved prior to site plan approval. 2.2.4 acres of SWM conserved forest and open space must be held in conservation easement. Plat with deed of easement and SWMmaintenance agreement will need to be recorded prior to approval. 3.Provide source and date of topography information. 4.Water quality must be addressed. Provide VRRM spreadsheet showing that holding 2.4 acres of conserved open space in conservation easement is sufficient to address water quality requirements. 5.Show soil divides. 6.Provide inlet flow calculations to help ensure no flooding will occur onsite due to changes in land cover. 7.Adequate outlet protection will need to be provided to prevent further erosion of receiving channel associated with discharge from proposed SWM facility. Please provide plan for adequate outlet protection. Division: Date Completed:05/27/2017 Reviewer:Robbie Gilmer Fire Rescue Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:Based on plans dated 5/15/17. No comments or objections. Division: Date Completed:05/24/2017 Reviewer:Michael Dellinger CDD Inspections Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:06/13/2017 Reviewer:Willis Bedsaul VDOT Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:1. Please provide drainage calculations for the post development of the storm detention system into the existing pipe structures to show adequate cfs runoff. 2. The Existing entrances don’t meet current design and spacing standards. Any future development will require modifications to the existing entrances in accordance with Appendix F of the VDOT Road Design Manual. Division: Page:1 of 4 County of Albemarle Printed On:July 24, 2018 Date Completed:06/14/2017 Reviewer:Alexander Morrison ACSA Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:09/15/2017 Reviewer:Cameron Langille CDD Planning Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:1. [General Comment] Per David Benish, Chief of Planning, this minor amendment will serve as the application plan for ZMA201600023, which is currently deferred. The purpose of that zoning map amendment (ZMA) is to reclassify the Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes located adjacent to the existing gravel areas at the back of the site to Managed Steep Slopes. The minor amendment will be reviewed until it is in a form suitable for use in the rezoning review. Doing so will ensure the minor amendment is consistent with the application plan considered by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. Since the first review comments, staff and the applicant have agreed to separate this application into two separate documents: a minor amendment site plan, and a two page ZMA application plan. 2. [General Comment] Staff has conducted an audit of the site plan amendments for this property and determined that there have been at least six (6) minor amendments approved since 1998 for this site without any approved major site plan amendments. County policy requires a major site plan amendment for changes to final site plans once three (3) minor amendments have been approved. Staff will accept this application as a minor amendment to facilitate the review of the zoning map amendment. However, the next application submitted for this site should be filed as a major amendment that incorporates all of the site changes that have been approved on the previous minor amendments and letters of revision. A link to the Albemarle County Site Plan Amendment policy can be accessed HERE. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 3. [32.5.2 (a)] On Sheet C1.0, please amend the site data table so that the owner names and addresses are clearly identified with specific tax map parcel numbers. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Albemarle County GIS lists S&B Realty Venture LLC as the property owners of TMP 78-14A and TMP 78-14C. Please amend Sheet C-1.0 or provide documentation that Virginia’s First Family of Fine Cars owns TMP 78-14C. 4. [32.5.2 (d)] Please provide the source and date of topographic information used to determine areas of existing Preserved and Managed Steep Slopes. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Please provide the linear and curvilinear dimensions for the proposed outer boundaries of all Preserved and Managed Steep Slopes areas that will be changed through the rezoning on Sheet C-1.1 of the Minor Site Plan Amendment. 5. [32.5.2 (a)] Please amend the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0 so that each TMP number and its applicable zoning/overlay districts are individually listed. Please be aware that the primary zoning district for all four parcels is HC Highway Commercial. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 6. [32.5.2 (a)] Per Comment #5, please state each zoning overlay district in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0. For example, TMP 78-14 is zoned Steep Slopes Overlay District (Managed and Preserved). Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Sheet C1.0 should be amended to list the steep slopes overlay designations that will exist after the rezoning is approved, i.e. “Managed Steep Slopes” or “Preserved Steep Slopes” or both “Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes.” 7. [32.5.1 (c)] The current plans only label existing or proposed Preserved Steep Slopes. The plans need to include at least one exhibit that shows and labels the existing conditions, which include both Managed Steep Slopes and Preserved Steep Slopes within the area of rezoning. We recommend that Sheet C1.0 show all areas of existing Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes. Then, the exhibit on Sheet C1.1 could show the proposed Managed Steep Slopes per the rezoning. a. Areas of existing Preserved Steep Slopes proposed to be reclassified to Managed Steep Slopes with ZMA201600023 should be called out and labeled as “Existing Preserved Steep Slopes, Proposed Change to Managed Steep Slopes per ZMA201600023” on Sheet C1.1. Rev. 1: Please see comment #16 below. 8. [General Comment] In the “Revision to SDP200000049” table on Sheet C1.0, please amend the second bullet point to state “Rezoning to designate new Steep Slopes per ZMA201600023.” Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 9. [32.5.2 (b)] Please state the acreage of each property in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0. Please provide the acreage of the rezoning area, the total acreage of the disturbance proposed by the new grading, and the acreage of proposed open space. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 10. [32.5.2 (r)] Please include a legend showing all symbols and abbreviations used on the plan. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 11. [32.7.3 and 4.12] For future zoning compliance inspections, please provide a calculation of the existing and required parking spaces on TMP 78-14, 78-14C and 78-14E. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 12. [4.20 (a)] Please amend the setbacks listed in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0. In the HC Zoning District, the minimum front setback is 10’ from the right-of-way, and there is no maximum front setback since all structures existed as of June 3, 2015. The minimum side and rear setbacks should state “Primary structures shall be constructed and separated in accordance with the current edition of the Building Code.” The maximum side/rear setbacks should state “None.” Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 13. [32.7.4] Please refer to Engineering Comment #1 regarding submittal and approval of a WPO plan prior to site plan approval. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. See Engineering comments below. WPO is not yet approved and the minor amendment will not be approved until WPO approval. 14. [32.7.4.2] Please refer to Engineering comment #2 regarding approval and recordation of a stormwater easement plat and maintenance agreement prior to site plan approval. New Comments First Revision: 15. [32.5.2 (a)] Albemarle County GIS lists S&B Realty Venture LLC as the property owners of TMP 78-14A and TMP 78-14C. Please amend the ownership name and addresses on Sheet C-1.0 or provide documentation that Virginia’s First Family of Fine Cars owns TMP 78-14C. 16. [32.5.2 (d)] Please provide the linear and curvilinear dimensions for the outer boundaries of all proposed Preserved and Managed Steep Slopes areas that will be changed through the rezoning. The proposed dimensions should be shown on Sheet C-1.1 of the Minor Site Plan amendment with a note stating that the measurements are from the post-development site survey conducted by Commonwealth Surveying, LLC Dated 08-16-2016. An additional note may be required by the County based on what gets approved by the Board of Supervisors with ZMA201600023. Division: Page:2 of 4 County of Albemarle Printed On:July 24, 2018 8. [General Comment] In the “Revision to SDP200000049” table on Sheet C1.0, please amend the second bullet point to state “Rezoning to designate new Steep Slopes per ZMA201600023.” Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 9. [32.5.2 (b)] Please state the acreage of each property in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0. Please provide the acreage of the rezoning area, the total acreage of the disturbance proposed by the new grading, and the acreage of proposed open space. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 10. [32.5.2 (r)] Please include a legend showing all symbols and abbreviations used on the plan. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 11. [32.7.3 and 4.12] For future zoning compliance inspections, please provide a calculation of the existing and required parking spaces on TMP 78-14, 78-14C and 78-14E. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 12. [4.20 (a)] Please amend the setbacks listed in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0. In the HC Zoning District, the minimum front setback is 10’ from the right-of-way, and there is no maximum front setback since all structures existed as of June 3, 2015. The minimum side and rear setbacks should state “Primary structures shall be constructed and separated in accordance with the current edition of the Building Code.” The maximum side/rear setbacks should state “None.” Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 13. [32.7.4] Please refer to Engineering Comment #1 regarding submittal and approval of a WPO plan prior to site plan approval. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. See Engineering comments below. WPO is not yet approved and the minor amendment will not be approved until WPO approval. 14. [32.7.4.2] Please refer to Engineering comment #2 regarding approval and recordation of a stormwater easement plat and maintenance agreement prior to site plan approval. New Comments First Revision: 15. [32.5.2 (a)] Albemarle County GIS lists S&B Realty Venture LLC as the property owners of TMP 78-14A and TMP 78-14C. Please amend the ownership name and addresses on Sheet C-1.0 or provide documentation that Virginia’s First Family of Fine Cars owns TMP 78-14C. 16. [32.5.2 (d)] Please provide the linear and curvilinear dimensions for the outer boundaries of all proposed Preserved and Managed Steep Slopes areas that will be changed through the rezoning. The proposed dimensions should be shown on Sheet C-1.1 of the Minor Site Plan amendment with a note stating that the measurements are from the post-development site survey conducted by Commonwealth Surveying, LLC Dated 08-16-2016. An additional note may be required by the County based on what gets approved by the Board of Supervisors with ZMA201600023. Date Completed:09/15/2017 Reviewer:Johnathan Newberry CDD Planning Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:08/29/2017 Reviewer:Bobby Jocz CDD Engineering Review Status:See Recommendations Reviews Comments:1. WPO plan will need approval prior to Site plan approval. 2. Remove Stormwater management sheet from plan set as it is included in WPO plan. Division: Date Completed:08/29/2017 Reviewer:Willis Bedsaul VDOT Review Status:See Recommendations Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:07/18/2018 Page:3 of 4 County of Albemarle Printed On:July 24, 2018 Reviewer:David Benish CDD Planning Review Status:Approved Reviews Comments:J.T. Newberry was notified the WPO plan had been approved and therefore this site plan amendment could be approved. He stamped the plan and closed-out the file. Division: Page:4 of 4 County of Albemarle Printed On:July 24, 2018 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper. Virginia 22701 Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E. Commissioner June 09, 2017 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Attn: Cameron Langille Re: Brown Toyota -Minor Site Plan Amendment SDP -2017-00031 Review #I Dear Mr. Langille: The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section, has reviewed the above referenced Minor Site Plan Amendment, dated May 16, 2017, and offer the following comments: Land Use I. Please provide drainage calculations for the post development of the storm detention system into the existing pipe structures to show adequate cfs runoff. 2. The Existing entrances don't meet current design and spacing standards. Any future development will require modifications to the existing entrances in accordance with Appendix F of the VDOT Road Design Manual. Please provide two copies of the revised plan along with a comment response letter. If further information is desired, please contact Willis C. Bedsaul at 434-422-9866. A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The owner/developer must contact the VDOT Charlottesville Residency Land Use Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process Sincerely, Adam J. M ore, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Charlottesville Residency VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING of n 4 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,North Wing Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126 Memorandum To: Clark Gathright From: J.T. Newberry, Senior Planner Date: September 23, 2016 Subject: Mandatory Pre-application Meeting for Brown Toyota on TMP 78-14 and 78-14E The following are County comments regarding the above noted pre-application meeting. Our meeting on September 12, 2016 satisfies the requirement for a pre-application meeting prior to submittal of a zoning map amendment application.The purpose of the meeting is summarized below: (i)provide the applicant and the county a common understanding of the proposed project; (ii)inform the applicant about the proposed project's consistency with the comprehensive plan, other relevant policies, and county regulations; (iii) broadly identify the planning, zoning and other issues raised by the application that need to be addressed by the applicant; (iv)inform the applicant about the applicable procedure;and (v)allow the director to identify the information the applicant must submit with the application, including the supplemental information delineated in subsection (c). Receiving the relevant supplemental information will allow the application to be comprehensively and efficiently reviewed. (i)provide a common understanding of the proposed project; In researching the question about how to expand parking at the back of TMP 78-14 and 78-14E, staff discovered the existing site conditions exceeded the limits of the last approved site plan.As a result, there is a violation of the Steep Slopes(SS)overlay district and a site plan violation.A rezoning application to amend the SS overlay district, followed by a site plan amendment will correct these violations. Our understanding is that the applicant would like to amend the SS overlay district to match the existing slope conditions and then amend SDP2000-00049 to match the existing site conditions. (ii)inform the applicant about the proposed project's consistency with the comprehensive plan, other relevant policies, and county regulations; if The site is designated in the Comprehensive Plan j .. ; for Commercial Mixed Use, Greenspace and Urban Mixed Use. It appears the portion of the site we q / discussed lies within the Commercial Mixed Use and , Greenspace designations adjacent to the rear K / property lines of Parcels 14 and 14E. The Master Plan for this area was adopted prior toIvatiLlm the addition of the Steep Slopes overlay district in 2014.The majority of the slopes at the rear of the site were likely designated as"preserved"steep slopes(shown below in green)because they have more characteristics of preserved slopes than ,% 1 managed slopes as defined in Section 30.7.3. You ,P°-- I can see there are a few islands of"managed"steep slopes(shown in yellow)that were not considered ,, preserved steepslopes because of their limited size ,,,, 14 and their separation from the overall system of 32;° ,. ` `: preserved slopes in this area. — A rezoning request to change the overlay district to '-. -e''%W ' match the existing site conditions and categorize . any new or existing steep slopes as preserved is =t- likely to be viewed as consistent with the . t' - ;- Comprehensive Plan. If you choose to request that P any new or existing steep slopes be categorized as a� A'r 4 --- managed, then please specifically explain how they meet more of the characteristics of managed slopes than preserved slopes.This explanation will be a critical ii - '11 part of the analysis of your request. }111 I r - if ' One aspect of the Comprehensive Plan that will require 1 ``,i r_ further analysis relates to the Parks and Green Systems • ., lit % . r` map for the Pantops area(shown on the right). The red dotted line indicates a"Possible Optional Roadway • • �"� --, �'"- Network(Beyond 2025).°This roadway would connect `` '\! (v) Identify the information the applicant must submit with the application, including the supplemental information. In addition to the application for a zoning map amendment, please include a copy of this letter and the completed checklist below. No additional information is needed to submit the site plan or site plan exception beyond the application and copies of the plans; however, the site plan amendment should not be submitted until the zoning map amendment application has been considered by the Board of Supervisors. Please contact me if you have any further questions. Sincerely, a.4 . Nw,Qpk,3,- J.T. Newberry Senior Planner inewberryt1�albemarle.org (434)296-5832, ext. 3270 3