Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201700034 Checklist - Project Closeout (Administrative) Preliminary Plat 2018-06-01 (3) tord Christopher Perez From: Matthew Wentland Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 1:30 PM To: Christopher Perez Subject: FW: Hyland Park Bonds and stormwater agreement From:Ana Kilmer Sent:Thursday,April 26, 2018 1:29 PM To:alan@riverbenddev.com; Robby Saady(RBD)<robby@riverbenddev.com> Cc: Matthew Wentland<mwentland@albemarle.org>;Jennifer Pritchett<jpritchett@albemarle.org>; Kenny Thacker <KTHACKER@albemarle.org> Subject: Hyland Park Bonds and stormwater agreement The following bonds have been posted and approved: 1. WPO-2017-00028—Hyland Park Early Grading and WPO Plan—VSMP The$367,790 water protection performance bond has been posted and approved. Stormwater agreement has been approved and it will be recorded soon. 2. Subdivision/Road Performance Bond—Hyland Park Phase 1-$501,430 3. Subdivision/Road Performance Bond—Hyland Park—Water and Sewer-$249,000 Jennifer will coordinate the DEQ permit and pre-construction meeting. Thank you Ana D. Kilmer Management Analyst II Community Development Department 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 434-296-5832 akilmer@albemarle.org 1 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 11:20 AM To: John Nedrud Subject: REwaiver-application: r connector roa• •- - land Park/Fontana 4c Attachments--- - CD3 SUB2017-102 Hyland Park Ian 2-8- o :.pdf �f. jOhn, The waiver was approved with my last review of the road plan(documented in the file w/the atta' ed comment letter dated February 8, 2018). The road plan was approved on 3-12-18. Christopher P.Perez Senior Planner Department of Community Development 1County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road 1 Charlottesville,VA 22902 • 4.296.5832 ext.3443 4, 41/10t p From:John Nedru. '•-.rud@yahoo.com> 1' `l Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 : • • To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject:wiaver applicatiion for connector road in Hyland Park/Fontana 4c Chris, abut 5 or 6 weeks ago(Feb 5) I asked you for an update on the waiver application by Riverbend on the connector road between Cascadia and Fontana Drive. At that time you replied that the waiver had been approved with conditions and that you were working to finalize the document. Can you now share the final waiver document along with maps with me, a member of the Fontana Board of Directors? Thank you. John Nedrud 1 SWO 4411111110 �� AL •t E" gpirda �t/RGIN County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville,VA,22902 Phone 434-296-5832 Memorandum To: Matthew Wentland,Engineer From: Christopher P.Perez,Senior Planner Division: Planning Date: February 8,2018 Ali r[� Subject: SUB2017-102 Hyland P. - - 'oad Plan 1. [ZMA2004- . Cascadia/Fontana Connector. As discussed in Megan's email dated 11-1-20 ,the goal for your • elopment is to have an emergency access connection with the full right-of-way ded a 'on, howe r not bond the full public road,which is what was approved on the Cascadia side. order to accomplish this,you will need to request a 14-409(D)exception for the extension require• ent. As a part of this request,the design will need to be 20' emergency access with bollards,built within . e publicly dedicated right-of-way.This emergency access will need to connect to where Cascadia's en•s to make it a full emergency access connection. These will be conditions of approval of the exception r••uest. A bond for the full public road will not be required. Hopefully,the grading for this smaller section will not require any easements on Cascadia's side and can be built within the existing right-of-way. You will need to update your road plans to reflect this •-sign section. This is the minimum design standard we will accept. If one of your goals is to have a desi y that does not necessitate getting an easement from Cascadia,a retaining wall may be required on yo side. You will need to weigh the cost of the retaining wall vs. obtaining an easement from Cascadia sho • it be needed. 'EV 3: Your Section 14-409(D)exception request has been ap'roved by t i • a•ent.The design c eria mentioned above and depicted/approved on the road plan ar• e conditions of approval for the e e'tion. 2. [Comment] - 'date the road plans t• - e new parcel boundaries and construction easements as approved on SUB2017-108.Additionally,on the plans please provide deed book page reference information for the easements and dedication. REV 3: Comment addressed. 3. [Comment] Planning has no further comments on the road plan;however,this review did not encompass nor certify,nor validate the revised lot layouts as depicted on the revised road plan. The preliminary plat, which is currently differed until May 1 2018,shall be resubmitted for staff review/approval for such consideration/review/action. Please contact Christopher P.Perez in the Planning Division by using cperez@albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext.3443 for further information. Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Thursday,April 26, 2018 2:26 PM To: Scott Collins Cc: 'Adam Long'; Matthew Wentland Subject: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park—Prelim Sub Plat Scott, SUB2017-34 Hyland Park—Prelim Sub Plat(formerly Fontana 4C) If you recall this plat was deferred till May 1, 2018 through the single extension the agent is permitted to grant [14-221(C)]. You need to resubmit this plat addressing all comments by Tuesday, May 1 otherwise the plat will be denied and you will need to submit a new application, fee,plat, and go back through SRC prior to approval. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 1 14"" 5ntana December 2, 2017 County of Albemarle—Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 Re: Hyland Park SUB2017-34—Letter of Support for Developer's Request for Authorization of a Waiver to Provide Pedestrian Connection and Emergency Vehicle Connection Dear Mr. Perez: The Fontana Owners Association, Inc.,the homeowners association for the Fontana neighborhood, hereby offers our strongest possible support for the application for a Pedestrian Connection and Emergency Vehicle Connection for the development proposed above, as described in the letter dated September 21, 2017 from Scott Collins, PE of Collins Engineering to you. Although we recognize the county's goal of interconnectivity between neighborhoods,we believe that limiting the connector road between Cascadia and Fontana to emergency vehicles and pedestrian/bicycle access as the waiver application from Collins Engineering/Riverbend requests is an appropriate way to do so. We believe that opening this connector road to regular traffic would not be a good idea. Specifically, Fontana already has an ongoing problem with cut-through traffic between Stony Point Road on one end and Richmond Road on the other, and we have very significant concerns that a fully built out Cascadia with 260 plus housing units would lead to dramatically increased cut-through traffic from the Cascadia through Fontana. Thus, we believe that it is imperative to avoid having a full road in this location, as many Cascadia residents would seek to avoid exiting on Stony Point Road along with existing Fontana, Avemore, Hyland Ridge, and the Montessori School traffic and would instead try to cut though Fontana. As Fontana itself has a lot of children in the development,and lacks sidewalks, the extra traffic that a full connector road would bring is a very real concern to us for the safety of our residents. Foitta , Ozers Asocial / k . . TT7 F Com C . CL esP ��r , �� °2977 ��� 4 ar- .00 6ntana We therefore respectfully request that you grant the Developer's application for this waiver. Thank you. Sincerely, FONTANA OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. By its BBoard of Directors Michael Smith John Nedrud q\4414, 01 .47 Emily Rowel rown la/ 6\xit.,- Andrew Fischer Faye OGerners Assacc2�co , ! • TTT Fa Court • CLAce6v4 °2°2977• G rp . r Christopher Perez From: Scott Collins <scott@collins-engineering.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 2:07 PM To: Christopher Perez;Alan Taylor Cc: Megan Yaniglos; Ashley Davies; Matthew Wentland Subject: RE: RE: Delphi Lane (formerly referred to as the Cascadia/Fontana Connector) Chris- Thanks. Please allow this email to serve as our written request to extend the deferral on the preliminary plat for 6 months. ' / Thanks. Scott Ilk a , ,/ l -�1m From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:04 PM To: Scott Collins<scott@collins-engineering.com>;Alan Taylor<alan@riverbenddev.com> Cc: Megan Yaniglos<myaniglos@albemarle.org>;Ashley Davies<adavies@williamsmullen.com>; Matthew Wentland <mwentland@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: RE: Delphi Lane (formerly referred to as the Cascadia/Fontana Connector) Scott/Alan, RE: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park—preliminary subdivision plat While putting the last email in the file I noticed your preliminary plat is set to expire tomorrow. The preliminary plat was deferred on May 2 for a period of six months, which is set to expire on Nov 2. The ordinance provides for a one-time extension of the deferral period but it must be received before the plan is automatically withdrawn. If you would like to extend the deferral period, please request an extension of the deferral for a period of no more than 6 months. You may email the request. Thanks Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development!County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 Sec. 14-221 Deferrral of review of preliminary plat;when application deemed withdrawn.The review of,and action on,a preliminary plat may be deferred,and an application for a preliminary plat may be deemed withdrawn,as follows: A.Request to defer by subdivider.A subdivider may request that review or action on its application for a preliminary plat be deferred for a specified period up to six(6) months.If during the deferral period the subdivider does not request the agent to take action on the preliminary plat as provided in section 14-222 within six(6)months after the date the deferral was requested,the application shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn. B.Failure to submit revised plat.If a subdivider fails to submit a revised preliminary plat to address all of the requirements within six(6)months after the date of the letter from the agent as provided in section 14-220,the application shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the subdivider. C.Extension of deferral period or period to submit revised plat.Before the deferral period in subsection(A)expires,the subdivider may request that the agent extend the period before the application is deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn.The request must be received by the agent before the deferral period expires.The agent may grant one extension for a period determined to be reasonable,taking into consideration the size or nature of the proposed subdivision,the complexity of the review, and the laws in effect at the time the extension request is made. • 1 From: Megan Yaniglos Sent:Wednesday, November 01, 2017 12:16 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Scott Collins<scott@collins-engineering.com>; Alan Taylor <alan@riverbenddev.com> Cc:Ashley Davies<adavies@williamsmullen.com>; Matthew Wentland <mwentland@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: RE: Delphi Lane (formerly referred to as the Cascadia/Fontana Connector) Good Afternoon: Christopher and I discussed the connection and issues just now and after talking with Alan this morning, I believe the goal for you all is to have an emergency access connection with the full right of way dedication, however not bond the full public road, which is what was approved on the Cascadia side. In order to accomplish this, you will need to request a 14-409(D) exception for the extension requirement. As a part of this request, the design will need to be 20' emergency access with bollards, built within the publicly dedicated right of way. This emergency access will need to connect to where Cascadia's ends to make it a full emergency access connection. These will be conditions of approval of the exception request. A bond for the full public road will not be required. Hopefully, the grading for this smaller section will not require any easements on Cascadia's side and can be built within the existing right of way. You will need to update your road plans to reflect this design section. This is the minimum design standard we will accept. If one of your goals is to have a design that does not necessitate getting an easement from Cascadia, a retaining wall may be required on your side. You will need to weigh the cost of the retaining wall vs. obtaining an easement from Cascadia should it be needed. Let me know if you have further questions. Thank you, Megan Yaniglos, AICP Principal Planner Community Development Department Planning Services ph: 434.296.5832 ext. 3004 From: Christopher Perez Sent:Tuesday, October 17, 2017 10:16 AM To:Scott Collins<scott@collins-engineering.com>; Alan Taylor<alan@riverbenddev.com> Cc: Megan Yaniglos<myaniglos@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org>; David Benish <DBENISH@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: Delphi Lane (formerly referred to as the Cascadia/Fontana Connector) Scott, RE: Delphi Lane (formerly referred to as the Cascadia/Fontana Connector) The attached waiver requests received on Friday and the recently revised road plan, depicting a 20' wide emergency access road w/bollards, are major changes in the direction you have been moving and is causing some confusion as how the applicant plans to move forward. Why have you placed bollards on this public road (Delphi Lane)? At a minimum, I do not believe VDOT will accept the roadway into the secondary state system w/bollards. Additionally, VDOT needs to review the waivers to assure waiving any of these design standards will not affect the acceptability of the roadway into the states secondary system as designed. 2 Please answer the following questions and I will try to properly guide you. If after you respond to the questions and it is still not clear as to how you want to move forward it may be appropriate to meet with you, the applicant, and Planning staff to discuss further. 1) Question: Do you intend for Delphi Lane to be public; however,not fully built at this time; rather you only seek to build the emergency connection as depicted? If so, you need to also request a waiver to Section 14-409(D). If the waiver is approved you will be responsible to bond the full public road connection. (The bonding amount should not include any design standards granted waivers—such as to omit curb and gutter, sidewalks and planting strips—as long as VDOT is still able to accept the road into the secondary state system w/such waivers.) 1A) Question: Is your intent in requesting waivers to curb and gutter, sidewalks and planting strips merely to reduce the road design standards to reduce the bonding of the full public road? Yes or No If no, why are you requesting these waivers? If yes, then the right-of-way dedication plat as currently prepared is correct; however, the road plan needs to be revised to label the road as public and the bollards need to be removed as VDOT will not accept the roadway into the system w/bollards. If this is your intent, please submit revised road plans addressing these issues. Additionally, VDOT shall review and approve the revised road plan and the waivers to assure they will accept this new road as designed, for acceptance into the secondary state system. Before we move forward w/the waivers, we will need the waiver requests revised, as what you submitted is incomplete and shall not be processed until complete request are submitted. In order to request all or some of these items be waived you need to provide all the required justifications and information required by the ordinance under the applicable sections of the code for which you are trying to waive or modify. Your current request fails to do this. For example see yellow highlighting of required information still needed: Section 14-410(11) is the section that requires Curb, curb and gutter, sidewalks and planting strips. 1) To modify or waive requirements for Curb or Curb & Gutter you need to provide all requested info in Section 14-410(I) and Section 14-203.1 along with your request. [14-410(I)(1)].Information to be submitted. If such a request is made, it shall include: (i) a justification for the request; (ii) a vicinity map showing a larger street network at a scale no smaller than one(1)inch equals six hundred(600) feet; (iii) a conceptual plan at a scale no smaller than one (1) inch equals two hundred (200) feet showing surveyed boundaries of the property; (iv) topography of the property at five(5) foot intervals for the property being subdivided and on abutting lands to a distance of five hundred (500) feet from the boundary line or a lesser distance determined to be sufficient by the agent; (v) the locations of streams, stream buffers, steep slopes, floodplains, known wetlands; (vi) the proposed layout of streets and lots,unit types, uses, and location of parking, as applicable; and(vii)the maximum number of lots to be served by the rural cross-section street, the location of the nearest development and rural area boundaries, and a cross-section of existing streets to which the proposed subdivision streets would be extended, if any. 2. Consideration. In reviewing a request for a variation or exception under section 14-203.1 to allow a rural cross-section(no curb and no curb and gutter) instead, the commission shall consider: (i)the number of lots in the subdivision and the types of lots to be served; (ii)the length of the street; (iii)whether the proposed street(s) or street extension connects into an existing system of streets constructed to a rural cross-section; (iv) the proximity of the subdivision and the street to the boundaries of the development and rural areas; (v) whether the street terminates in the neighborhood or at the edge of the development area or is otherwise expected to provide interconnections to abutting lands; (vi) whether a rural cross-section in the development areas furthers the goals of the comprehensive plan, with particular emphasis on the neighborhood model and theapplicable neighborhood master plan; (vii) whether the use of a rural cross-section would enable a different principle of the 3 • neighborhood model to be more fully implemented; and(viii)whether the proposed density of the subdivision is consistent with the density recommended in the land use plan section of the comprehensive plan. Sec. 14-203.1 Variations and exceptions.The requirements of this chapter may be varied or excepted as follows: B.Variation or exception from any requirement of section 14-400 et seq. The agent or the commission may vary or except any requirement of section 14-400 through 14-441 expressly authorized to be varied or excepted by the agent or the commission, as the case may be, as provided herein: 1. Request for a variation or exception. A subdivider requesting a variation or exception shall submit to the agent a written request stating the reasons for the request and addressing the applicable findings in subsections (B)(2) and(B)(3) and all of the information required to be submitted by the applicable regulation. When a variation is requested, the subdivider also shall describe the proposed substituted technique, design or materials composing the substituted improvement. The request should be submitted before the site review committee considers the preliminary plat, if applicable. The agent may request that the site review committee provide information and a recommendation on any request for a variation or exception. If the commission is authorized to grant the variation or exception,the agent shall forward his and the site committee's recommendations to the commission. 2. Findings required for a variation. The agent or the commission may approve a request for a variation to substitute a required improvement upon finding that because of an unusual situation,the subdivider's substitution of a technique, design or materials of comparable quality from that required by the applicable regulation results in an improvement that substantially satisfies the overall purposes of this chapter in a manner equal to or exceeding the desired effects of the requirement in the applicable regulation. 3. Findings required for an exception. The agent or the commission may approve a request for an exception from any requirement of the applicable regulation upon finding that: (i)because of an unusual situation, including but not limited to, the unusual size, topography, shape of the site or the location of the site; or(ii) when strict adherence to the requirements would result in substantial injustice or hardship by,including but not limited to,resulting in the significant degradation of the site or to adjacent properties, causing a detriment to the public health, safety or welfare, or by inhibiting the orderly development of the area or the application of sound engineering practices. 4. Action by the agent on a request; conditions. The agent or the commission may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the request. If a request is approved, the agent, for himself or on behalf of the commission, shall prepare a written statement regarding the findings made. If a request is denied, the agent, for himself or on behalf of the commission, shall inform the developer in writing within five(5)days after the denial, and include a statement explaining why the request was denied. In approving a request, the agent or the commission may impose reasonable conditions deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety or welfare. C. Appeals. The decision of the agent or the commission may be appealed as provided in section 14-203.2. 2)To modify or waive requirements for sidewalk you need to provide all requested info in Section 14-422(E) and Section 14-203.1 along with your request. 1. Information to be submitted. If such a request is made, it shall include: (i) a justification for the request; (ii) a vicinity map showing a larger street network at a scale no smaller than one (1) inch equals six hundred(600) feet; (iii) a conceptual plan at a scale no smaller than one(1) inch equals two hundred(200) feet showing surveyed boundaries of the property; (iv)topography of the property at five(5) foot intervals for the property 4 being subdivided and on abutting lands to a distance of five hundred (500) feet from the boundary line or a lesser distance determined to be sufficient by the agent; (v) the locations of streams, stream buffers, steep slopes, floodplains, known wetlands; (vi)the proposed layout of streets and lots, unit types, uses, and location of parking, as applicable; and (vii) the location of any existing pedestrian network in the area, whether it is publicly or privately maintained, descriptions by widths and surfaces of the pedestrian ways within the existing pedestrian network, a proposed alternative profile and the intended ownership and maintenance. 2. Consideration. In reviewing a request to vary or except the requirement for sidewalks, the commission shall consider whether: (i) a variation or exception to allow a rural cross-section has been granted; (ii) a surface other than concrete is more appropriate for the subdivision because of the character of the proposed subdivision and the surrounding neighborhood; (iii) sidewalks on one side of the street are appropriate due to environmental constraints such as streams, stream buffers, steep slopes, floodplain, or wetlands, or because lots are provided on only one side of the street; (iv)the sidewalks reasonably can connect into an existing or future pedestrian system in the area; (v) the length of the street is so short and the density of the development is so low that it is unlikely that the sidewalk would be used to an extent that it would provide a public benefit; (vi) an alternate pedestrian system including an alternative pavement could provide more appropriate access throughout the subdivision and to adjoining lands, based on a proposed alternative profile submitted by the subdivider; (vii)the sidewalks would be publicly or privately maintained; (viii)the waiver promotes the goals of the comprehensive plan, the neighborhood model, and the applicable neighborhood master plan; and(ix)waiving the requirement would enable a different principle of the neighborhood model to be more fully achieved. 3)To modify or waive requirements for planting strip you need to provide all requested info in Section 14- 422(F) and Section 14-203.1 along with your request. 1. Information to be submitted. If such a request is made, it shall include: (i) a justification for the request; (ii) a vicinity map showing a larger street network at a scale no smaller than one(1) inch equals six hundred(600) feet; (iii) a conceptual plan at a scale no smaller than one(1)inch equals two hundred (200) feet showing surveyed boundaries of the property; (iv)topography of the property at five(5) foot intervals for the property being subdivided and on abutting lands to a distance of five hundred (500) feet from the boundary line or a lesser distance determined to be sufficient by the agent; (v)the locations of streams, stream buffers, steep slopes, floodplains, known wetlands; and (vi)the proposed layout of streets and lots, unit types, uses, and location of parking, as applicable. 2. Consideration. In reviewing a request to vary or except any requirement for planting strips, the commission shall consider whether: (i) a variation or exception to allow a rural cross section has been granted; (ii) a sidewalk variation or exception has been granted; (iii)reducing the size of or eliminating the planting strip promotes the goals of the comprehensive plan, the neighborhood model, and the applicable neighborhood master plan; and(iv) waiving the requirement would enable a different principle of the neighborhood model to be more fully achieved. Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 5 Name 7 3/Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 9:58 AM To: Amelia McCulley (1.7;v4:4 n C ` A- Cc: John Blair; Elaine Echols Subject: RE: Fontana 4 C trails VeT3i\S- _ Amelia, Understood. Thanks for the answer/response. I will run with it. (4-4d- ste, 140,4) � From:Amelia McCulley Sent: Friday,August 18, 2017 9:56 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:John Blair<jblair@albemarle.org>; Elaine Echols<EECHOLS@albemarle.org>;Amelia McCulley <AMCCULLE@albemarle.org> Subject: Fontana 4 C trails Hey there Chris, Happy Friday! So I understand you're still waiting for an answer on whether Fontana 4C has to be a part of the Fontana HOA or can they create their own HOA? Here's my understanding of the answer and analysis. I don't think we can require the original Fontana 4C to allow 4C (different property and different rezoning)to become part of their HOA. The proffer doesn't address HOA. The proffer is clear about what and when for the trails. I don't know if there are legal reasons for them to join the HOA. For example, if they are sharing stormwater or other drainage facilities and the like, it makes sense for them to have a common HOA. It is very different from a Planned Development situation like Briarwood. r► Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Thursday,August 03, 2017 8:10 AM To: 'Michael Powers' Subject: RE: Hyland Park questions/ meeting request Michael, See my responses below in red. From: Michael Powers [mailto:mpowers38111@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 4:47 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: Re: Hyland Park questions/meeting request Hi Chris,just a follow up on this. We had a productive meeting with Riverbend this week, which was prompted by your recent email to them—so thank you for helping with that connection. Based on the meeting, it is our understanding that Riverbend intends Hyland Park to remain part of Fontana as originally conceived. Ok, sounds good, I have yet to receive a response from the applicant but this will all flush out as the project moves forward. Scott Collins showed us updated site plan drawings and let us know that he had sent those to you a week or two ago. What he showed you must have been road plans (SUB2017-102), which were recently submitted and have yet to be reviewed by staff. The road plans are strictly for the road design and layout, utilities, and the grading. However, yes, road plans (these road plans included) depict all the lots and driveways in the proposal but that is not the document that approves the lot layout- that is the preliminary plat (which is currently deferred, pending a resubmittal). Does that constitute the"resubmittal" that you mentioned below? No, see above explanation. I am not seeing the new site plan PDF showing up at http://www.albemarle.org/weblink/search.aspx?dbid=3&searchcommand=%7b%SbCDD- Planning%5d:%5bApplicationNumber%5d=%22SUB201700034%22%7d&cr=1 . Is there a new link, or will the PDF show up at that link at some point? No, see above explanation. Lastly, some of the changes I saw in Scott's preview of the new site plan obviated some of the questions I had for you. Awesome. Yes, I will definitely be reviewing the road plan for all aspects of my comments on the preliminary plat, as well as the actual approved rezoning w/ proffers of Fontana 4C. So I can let you know that at this point, I no longer have a need to request a meeting with you. Sounds good. Thanks again for the helpful replies to date. Thanks, -Michael Powers 434-989-0599 END OF 8-3-17 RESPONSES From: Christopher Perez <cperez(a�albemarle.org> To: Michael Powers <mpowers38111yahoo.com> Cc: Amelia McCulley <AMCCULLECa)albemarle.orq> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 12:05 PM Subject: RE: Hyland Park questions/meeting request 1 Michael, RE: Hyland Park questions / meeting request I cannot do next week at all, as I am working on two large projects that are due next week; rather, the following week works best for me to meet with you. Notably this project is out on deferral and they have not resubmitted yet, thus we have time to get into the research and get you solid answers. The HOA conversation typically would come into play at the final plat once we actually receive the applicants HOA docs, but being you are asking these questions now we can begin to delve into it. have provided some quick feedback below in red based on my initial thoughts reactions to your questions. Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development (County of Albemarle, Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 Subject: Re: Hyland Park questions / meeting request To: "Christopher Perez" <cperez@albemarle.org> Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2017, 4:59 PM Chris, Thanks for this. Yes, my main initial question boils down to "is Hyland Park gonna be part of Fontana or not"? I do not know this answer; it would be good to field this question with the applicant (Scott Collins/Alan Taylor) as to their intent. Our understanding is that Phase 4C had always been zoned (I may not be using the terminology correctly, so thanks for bearing with me) as part of the Fontana subdivision. It may be the case that Hyland Park has administrative avenues to split from Fontana, but if that is their desire, are there affirmative steps that they must take, and are they taking or intending to take any of those steps? Fontana 4C's rezoning's staff report mentions "the residents will have access to the Fontana community center which contains swimming pool..."Which leads me to believe it shall be part of Fontana's HOA, or at least have provisions in their own HOA to utilize and pay towards the amenities and improvements in the rest of Fontana as well as their own. But this question will/would need to fielded by Zoning staff for a definitive answer. This has bearing on the planned new trails as follows. If Hyland Park is to be part of Fontana, then Fontana will have the responsibility for maintaining those trails going forward. This makes Fontana a stakeholder in those plans. In the past, Mark Graham, Ken Boyd, and other contacts have reiterated that the County considers the trails to be private amenities of the subdivision, and that we as the property owners have the ability to make changes to the trails once they are turned over to the HOA. It would be wasteful to cut down trees and grade slopes to construct trails if we can know in advance that the HOA would later wish to discontinue (some of) them. I understand your logic but the trails need to meet the requirements of the rezoning proffered trail plan for Fontana 4C. That means they get put in based on the trail plan, then once the HOA takes over if yall want to get rid of them it's up to/on the HOA to come to an agreement and omit them. Currently I don't know what the applicant is proposing for all the trail connections since it's in deferral and we have not received a resubmittal. This portion of the question is best left once we see what they are proposing on the revision. If Hyland Park is not to be part of Fontana, the question of interconnection is raised. Fontana, Hyland Ridge, Ashcroft, etc. all have signage stating that trails in their subdivisions are for the exclusive and 2 private use of their members. Since this is Fontana's policy, there would be no purpose in connections from Hyland Park trails to Fontana trails that may not actually be used by non-Fontana members. The trails must connect based on the rezoning and the proffered trail plan. Whether or not you agree entirely with that thought, Fontana should still be a stakeholder in discussions of plans for connection to its trails by outside subdivisions. The Fontana Board of Directors has asked me to learn more about the above issues and report to them. I should be clear that at this time, I am not stating any positions on behalf of the Board -- the above are my own individual thoughts. Understood. I do have a few more detail questions and so I appreciate your offer to meet by phone or in person. My thought was that in person would be more efficient because we could interactively point to maps, etc. But I'm happy to start via phone if you prefer. How would 3pm tomorrow work for you? I'll let you decide on in-person vs. phone, just let me know. Next week I am slammed with two other big projects I am currently working on, but the week after that works for me. Lastly, thanks for the info about getting a printout of the plat. If you are waiting for a revised version, I might as well wait for that update before printing. When do you expect to have that, and how can I know when it is publicly available? They must have it submitted within 6 months of the deferral — thus by Nov 2nd at the latest. I do not know when they plan on submitting but that is the period before it's acted on either way. Once I receive it I can send you an email with the link to the revised plat. Thank you,-Michael Powers 434-989-0599 3 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Friday,July 21, 2017 7:59 AM To: Rebecca Ragsdale; Amelia McCulley Subject: RE: Fontana 4C (now called Hyland Park)— HOA questions and trail questions Rebecca, RE: Fontana 4C (now called Hyland Park)-HOA questions and trail questions The preliminary plat is currently in deferral and I am awaiting a resubmittal of the plat; however, the applicant has submitted a road plan and a WPO/grading plan, which we are currently reviewing. Like I told the citizen below typically this type of conversation would be fielded/bridge crossed during the final plat review once we're reviewing the Coy & Restrictions docs for the HOA. But because the rest of the Fontana neighborhood is asking me these questions now and we're reviewing the road and WPO plans now, which depicts the trails for grading and bonding purposes. We need an answer sooner than later. Thus I'd like to have an answer prior to my 1 st round of comments on the road plan, comments are due Aug 14th. As to when the citizens/Fontana HOA needs or expects the answer I am sure they would like us to have an answer sooner than that as the citizen who contacted me wants to meet next week to ask me a bunch of other questions (but having an answer by next week is not expected nor warranted, thanks). Hope this helps. thanks Christopher P.Perez Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From: Rebecca Ragsdale Sent:Thursday,July 20, 2017 2:32 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Amelia McCulley<AMCCULLE@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: Fontana 4C(now called Hyland Park)—HOA questions and trail questions We haven't had a chance to look into this yet. What is your timeframe for needing a response?I'd like to have an answer no later than Aug 14tH From: Christopher Perez Sent: Friday,July 14, 2017 2:11 PM To:Amelia McCulley<AMCCULLE@albemarle.org> Cc: Rebecca Ragsdale<rragsdale@albemarle.org> Subject: Re: Fontana 4C (now called Hyland Park)-HOA questions and trail questions Amelia, Re: Fontana 4C (now called Hyland Park)- HOA questions and trail questions Who in Zoning would be able to research the following question and provide me an answer? • • Essentially, it is the same question Rebecca is researching w/John Blair on Briarwood -who the primary rec area is to serve and who has to pay to maintain it(should it be paid for and maintained by all residents in Briarwood or a subset of Briarwood who are closer in proximity to the park like Wendell has been doing). This specific question I'm asking about is coming up on Fontana 4C (now called Hyland Park)—The rest of the Fontana sections/their HOA is asking if Fontana 4C has to be a part of the Fontana HOA and pay into the dues or if they are permitted to be their own HOA and only maintain the improvements on their property. The big issue they have is with the trails,which they site are private and only for Fontana residents(see email below). Fontana 4C's rezoning has a trail proffer, additionally the staff report mentions "the residents will have access to the Fontana community center which contains swimming pool... "Which leads me to believe it shall be part of Fontana's HOA, or at least have provisions in their own HOA to utilize and pay towards the amenities and improvements in the rest of Fontana as well as their own. But I believe this question needs to fielded by Zoning staff for a definitive answer. Please advise. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From: Christopher Perez Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 12:05 PM To: 'Michael Powers' <mpowers38111@yahoo.com> Cc: Amelia McCulley<AMCCULLE@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: Hyland Park questions/meeting request Michael, RE: Hyland Park questions/ meeting request I cannot do next week at all, as I am working on two large projects that are due next week; rather, the following week works best for me to meet with you.Notably this project is out on deferral and they have not resubmitted yet,thus we have time to get into the research and get you solid answers. The HOA conversation typically would come into play at the final plat once we actually receive the applicants HOA docs,but being you are asking these questions now we can begin to delve into it. I have provided some quick feedback below in red based on my initial thoughts reactions to your questions. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development ICounty of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 Subject: Re: Hyland Park questions/ meeting request To: "Christopher Perez" <cperez@albemarle.org> Date: Tuesday,July 11, 2017, 4:59 PM Chris, Thanks for this.Yes,my main initial question boils down to "is Hyland Park gonna be part of Fontana or not"? I do not know this answer; it would be good to field this question with the applicant(Scott Collins/Alan Taylor) as to their intent. Our understanding is that Phase 4C had always been zoned(I may not be using the 2 •m= *Iwo 11.110 terminology correctly, so thanks for bearing with me) as part of the Fontana subdivision. It may be the case that Hyland Park has administrative avenues to split from Fontana, but if that is their desire, are there affirmative steps that they must take, and are they taking or intending to take any of those steps? Fontana 4C's rezoning's staff report mentions "the residents will have access to the Fontana community center which contains swimming pool... " Which leads me to believe it shall be part of Fontana's HOA, or at least have provisions in their own HOA to utilize and pay towards the amenities and improvements in the rest of Fontana as well as their own. But this question will/would need to fielded by Zoning staff for a definitive answer. This has bearing on the planned new trails as follows. If Hyland Park is to be part of Fontana, then Fontana will have the responsibility for maintaining those trails going forward. This makes Fontana a stakeholder in those plans. In the past, Mark Graham, Ken Boyd, and other contacts have reiterated that the County considers the trails to be private amenities of the subdivision, and that we as the property owners have the ability to make changes to the trails once they are turned over to the HOA. It would be wasteful to cut down trees and grade slopes to construct trails if we can know in advance that the HOA would later wish to discontinue(some of) them. I understand your logic but the trails need to meet the requirements of the rezoning proffered trail plan for Fontana 4C. That means they get put in based on the trail plan, then once the HOA takes over if yall want to get rid of them it's up to/on the HOA to come to an agreement and omit them. Currently I don't know what the applicant is proposing for all the trail connections since it's in deferral and we have not received a resubmittal. This portion of the question is best left once we see what they are proposing on the revision. If Hyland Park is not to be part of Fontana, the question of interconnection is raised. Fontana, Hyland Ridge, Ashcroft, etc. all have signage stating that trails in their subdivisions are for the exclusive and private use of their members. Since this is Fontana's policy, there would be no purpose in connections from Hyland Park trails to Fontana trails that may not actually be used by non-Fontana members. The'trails must connect based on the rezoning and the proffered trail plan. Whether or not you agree entirely with that thought, Fontana should still be a stakeholder in discussions of plans for connection to its trails by outside subdivisions. The Fontana Board of Directors has asked me to learn more about the above issues and report to them. I should be clear that at this time, I am not stating any positions on behalf of the Board --the above are my own individual thoughts. Understood. I do have a few more detail questions and so I appreciate your offer to meet by phone or in person. My thought was that in person would be more efficient because we could interactively point to maps, etc. But I'm happy to start via phone if you prefer. How would 3pm tomorrow work for you? I'll let you decide on in-person vs. phone, just let me know. Next week I am slammed with two other big projects I am currently working on,but the week after that works for me. Lastly, thanks for the info about getting a printout of the plat. If you are waiting for a revised version, I might as well wait for that update before printing. When do you expect to have that, and how can I know when it is publicly available? They must have it submitted within 6 months of the deferral—thus by Nov 2nd at the latest. I do not know when they plan on submitting but that is the period before it's acted on either way. Once I receive it I can send you an email with the link to the revised plat. Thank you,-Michael Powers 434-989-0599 3 0 • Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 2:31 PM To: 'Scott Collins' Cc: alan@riverbenddev.com; 'Michael Powers'; Amelia McCulley Subject: FW: Hyland Park questions Scott, RE: Hyland Park questions Does Hyland Park(formerly known as Fontana 4C) intend to be a part of the existing Fontana subdivision HOA? Or does your client intend to create a separate HOA for this section? Or do they intend to create a separate HOA w/clauses to cover maintenance and access of amenities in Fontana? The above questions are not intended to guide you to a decision either way but rather to start the conversation w/the Fontana HOA and answer some of their questions. We have yet to run into this question on this project be the previous owner developed the rest of Fontana and was rolling 4C into that Fontana HOA.If your intent is to roll it into Fontana's existing HOA then I am good here and can answer the HOA questions.If your intent is to create your own HOA for Hyland Park,more research will be needed to determine if that is possible based on the rezoning. Please advise. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Christopher Perez Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 12:05 PM To: 'Michael Powers' <mpowers38111@yahoo.com> Cc: Amelia McCulley<AMCCULLE@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: Hyland Park questions/meeting request Michael, RE: Hyland Park questions/meeting request I cannot do next week at all, as I am working on two large projects that are due next week; rather,the following week works best for me to meet with you. Notably this project is out on deferral and they have not resubmitted yet, thus we have time to get into the research and get you solid answers. The HOA conversation typically would come into play at the final plat once we actually receive the applicants HOA docs, but being you are asking these questions now we can begin to delve into it. I have provided some quick feedback below in red based on my initial thoughts reactions to your questions. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 1 '✓ Subject: Re: Hyland Park questions/ meeting request To: "Christopher Perez" <cperez@albemarle.org> Date: Tuesday,July 11, 2017, 4:59 PM Chris, Thanks for this. Yes,my main initial question boils down to "is Hyland Park gonna be part of Fontana or not"?I do not know this answer; it would be good to field this question with the applicant(Scott Collins/Alan Taylor) as to their intent. Our understanding is that Phase 4C had always been zoned(I may not be using the terminology correctly, so thanks for bearing with me) as part of the Fontana subdivision. It may be the case that Hyland Park has administrative avenues to split from Fontana, but if that is their desire, are there affirmative steps that they must take, and are they taking or intending to take any of those steps? Fontana 4C's rezoning's staff report mentions "the residents will have access to the Fontana community center which contains swimming pool... " Which leads me to believe it shall be part of Fontana's HOA, or at least have provisions in their own HOA to utilize and pay towards the amenities and improvements in the rest of Fontana as well as their own. But this question will/would need to fielded by Zoning staff for a definitive answer. This has bearing on the planned new trails as follows. If Hyland Park is to be part of Fontana,then Fontana will have the responsibility for maintaining those trails going forward. This makes Fontana a stakeholder in those plans. In the past, Mark Graham, Ken Boyd, and other contacts have reiterated that the County considers the trails to be private amenities of the subdivision, and that we as the property owners have the ability to make changes to the trails once they are turned over to the HOA. It would be wasteful to cut down trees and grade slopes to construct trails if we can know in advance that the HOA would later wish to discontinue(some of)them. I understand your logic but the trails need to meet the requirements of the rezoning proffered trail plan for Fontana 4C. That means they get put in based on the trail plan, then once the HOA takes over if yall want to get rid of them it's up to/on the HOA to come to an agreement and omit them. Currently I don't know what the applicant is proposing for all the trail connections since it's in deferral and we have not received a resubmittal. This portion of the question is best left once we see what they are proposing on the revision. If Hyland Park is not to be part of Fontana,the question of interconnection is raised. Fontana, Hyland Ridge, Ashcroft, etc. all have signage stating that trails in their subdivisions are for the exclusive and private use of their members. Since this is Fontana's policy, there would be no purpose in connections from Hyland Park trails to Fontana trails that may not actually be used by non-Fontana members. The trails must connect based on the rezoning and the proffered trail plan. Whether or not you agree entirely with that thought, Fontana should still be a stakeholder in discussions of plans for connection to its trails by outside subdivisions. The Fontana Board of Directors has asked me to learn more about the above issues and report to them. I should be clear that at this time, I am not stating any positions on behalf of the Board--the above are my own individual thoughts. Understood. I do have a few more detail questions and so I appreciate your offer to meet by phone or in person. My thought was that in person would be more efficient because we could interactively point to maps, etc. But I'm happy to start via phone if you prefer. How would 3pm tomorrow work for you? I'll let you decide on in-person vs. phone, just let me know.Next week I am slammed with two other big projects I am currently working on, but the week after that works for me. Lastly, thanks for the info about getting a printout of the plat. If you are waiting for a revised version, I might as well wait for that update before printing. When do you expect to have that, and how can I know when it is publicly available?They must have it submitted within 6 months of the deferral—thus by Nov 2nd at the latest. 2 I do not know when they plan on submitting but that is the period before it's acted on either way. Once I receive it I can send you an email with the link to the revised plat. Thank you,-Michael Powers 434-989-0599 3 '`.d Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Friday,July 14, 2017 2:11 PM To: Amelia McCulley Cc: Rebecca Ragsdale Subject: Re: Fontana 4C (now called Hyland Park)—HOA questions and trail questions Amelia, Re: Fontana 4C (now called Hyland Park)—HOA questions and trail questions Who in Zoning would be able to research the following question and provide me an answer? Essentially, it is the same question Rebecca is researching w/John Blair on Briarwood-who the primary rec area is to serve and who has to pay to maintain it(should it be paid for and maintained by all residents in Briarwood or a subset of Briarwood who are closer in proximity to the park like Wendell has been doing). This specific question I'm asking about is coming up on Fontana 4C (now called Hyland Park)—The rest of the Fontana sections/their HOA is asking if Fontana 4C has to be a part of the Fontana HOA and pay into the dues or if they are permitted to be their own HOA and only maintain the improvements on their property. The big issue they have is with the trails, which they site are private and only for Fontana residents (see email below). Fontana 4C's rezoning has a trail proffer, additionally the staff report mentions "the residents will have access to the Fontana community center which contains swimming pool... " Which leads me to believe it shall be part of Fontana's HOA, or at least have provisions in their own HOA to utilize and pay towards the amenities and improvements in the rest of Fontana as well as their own. But I believe this question needs to fielded by Zoning staff for a definitive answer. Please advise. Christopher P.Perez Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Christopher Perez Sent: Friday,July 14, 2017 12:05 PM To: 'Michael Powers'<mpowers38111@yahoo.com> Cc:Amelia McCulley<AMCCULLE@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: Hyland Park questions/meeting request Michael, RE: Hyland Park questions/meeting request I cannot do next week at all, as I am working on two large projects that are due next week; rather, the following week works best for me to meet with you. Notably this project is out on deferral and they have not resubmitted yet,thus we have time to get into the research and get you solid answers. The HOA conversation typically would come into play at the final plat once we actually receive the applicants HOA docs, but being you are 1 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 10:01 AM To: 'Michael Powers' Cc: Paul Bjornsen Subject: RE: Hyland Park questions/ meeting request Michael, See my responses below in red. From: Michael Powers [mailto:mpowers38111@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday,July 10,2017 3:44 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: Hyland Park questions/meeting request Hello Chris, I am an Albemarle County resident of the Fontana subdivision. I have a few questions about the rezoning for the Hyland Park(formerly Fontana 4C)parcel and would appreciate a chance to meet with an appropriate County contact. Are you the lead planner for this project?Yes, I am the lead reviewer on this. Could you be available for about 20 minutes one day this week? I think a phone call would suffice to gauge your general questions and then we can move from there depending on your questions.Nevertheless,yes I am available. Let me know when and if you wanna meet before a phone call. As a preview, our HOA would like to understand whether the proposed rezoning would change the parcel's status with respect to its membership in the Fontana subdivision.Currently there is not a"proposed"rezoning; rather,the applicants have been moving forward with the existing approved Fontana 4C rezoning. With regard to the portion of the question "whether the ....would change the parcel's status with respect to its membership in the Fontana subdivision"it appears you're asking me whether or not this 4C phase needs to be tied to your HOA and pay dues to your HOA to maintain and utilize the trails throughout the already built out portion of Fonatana. Is that what you are asking?If so, I do not know the answer to that question. I have yet to cross that bridge with this project. Once I lock down your exact question I can run it by Zoning to have an answer before the project is approved. But my gut says 4C can create their own HOA and is only responsible for maintaining the improvements on this section of the development(4C). We also have some questions about the planned trails in the parcel. I have yet to see a revision to the preliminary plat but the applicant has been preliminarily approved to omit some of the trails throughout the parcel that are redundant and had issues with grading(as discussed at SRC). I'm pending a resubmittal of the plat to see what they are proposing. I won't be asking any questions about the connector road at this time! Lastly, I have a PDF of the Hyland Park-Preliminary Subdivision Plan. I would love to get a full-scale printout of page 1 (cover&layout plan)of this document. Is that something you could provide?You can request it be printed at T&N and then pay for it here at the County Office Building. You would need to request it from our records management coordinator Paul Bjornsen(He has been CCed to this email). SUB2017-34 Hyland Park—preliminary plat. Thank you, -Michael Powers 434-989-0599 1 Christopher Perez , ? "" From: Amelia McCulley Sent: Friday,June 23, 2017 3:30 PM To: Scott Collins; Christopher Perez Cc: Ashley Davies; Megan Yaniglos;Amelia McCulley Subject: RE: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park - Preliminary Subdivision Plat (VARIATION REQUEST) Scott, I've just researched the question of whether special exceptions are available to application plans for property zoned other than Planned Development. John Blair confirmed that there is no ACZO provision for a special exception in that case. I realize it sets a higher bar for proffered plans under a conventional zoning district (R-whatever) and that may not make sense. However, those are the current regulations. So aside from whether it's a major element or not,there is no provision short of a ZMA to amend the plan,that we are aware of. From:Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com] Sent:Tuesday,June 20, 2017 11:38 AM To:Amelia McCulley<AMCCULLE@albemarle.org>; Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Ashley Davies<adavies@williamsmullen.com>; Megan Yaniglos<myaniglos@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat (VARIATION REQUEST) Amelia- If it was such a major element, then that parcel information and owner signature would have been included on the application and proffers, which it was not. The truth of the matter is that it's just a residue parcel that was going to be "added" to the adjacent parcel to make the developer's lot larger. If it did not get added to that parcel,then it would have stayed open space to the development,which is what we are asking for. I agree that if that parcel was included with the proffers and signatures, then it would have been a "major element" of the development, but that's just not the case. I can also site plenty of other cases where things much more "major" than a simple BLA(small note on an application plan) has been varied without a rezoning. The most notable one being "Stonefield" and the stormwater management pond at Route 29 that was removed. Thx. Scott From:Amelia McCulley [mailto:AMCCULLE@albemarle.orgj Sent:Tuesday,June 20, 2017 11:31 AM To:Scott Collins; Christopher Perez Cc:Ashley Davies; Megan Yaniglos Subject: RE: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat (VARIATION REQUEST) Scott, In our opinion, this is a major element that cannot be varied. If you believe otherwise, it would be helpful to have your justification for that position. In the end if we disagree, we can render a determination that you can appeal. I'm not sure a meeting is the best way to proceed until we have your justification and consider it. 1 %NO • From:Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com] Sent:Tuesday,June 20, 2017 9:02 AM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Ashley Davies<adavies@williamsmullen.com>; Amelia McCulley<AMCCULLE@albemarle.org>; Megan Yaniglos <myaniglos@albemarle.org> Subject: RE:SUB2017-34 Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat(VARIATION REQUEST) Chris, Amelia- Can we set up a meeting to discuss this item and why it can not be a variation to the application plan. It would be worthwhile to have one final discussion on this topic. Please let us know a time when we can meet. Thanks. Scott From:Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org] Sent:Thursday,June 15, 2017 1:20 PM To:Scott Collins<scott@collins-engineering.com> Cc:Ashley Davies<adavies@williamsmullen.com>; Amelia McCulley<AMCCULLE@albemarle.org>; Megan Yaniglos <myaniglos@albemarle.org> Subject:SUB2017-34 Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat(VARIATION REQUEST) Scott, RE: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park - Preliminary Subdivision Plat (VARIATION REQUEST) I have since discussed this with Amelia and Mark. My initial guidance was correct. The request cannot be done through a variation. Such a request could only be considered through a rezoning. How would you/your client like to proceed? 1) Request withdrawal of your application and you will receive a full refund. or 2) Request deferral of your variation and then request an official zoning determination (separate application and fee required for that). Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Christopher Perez Sent:Thursday,June 15, 2017 7:17 AM To: 'Scott Collins'<scott@collins-engineering.com> Cc:Ashley Davies<adavies@williamsmullen.com>;Amelia McCulley<AMCCULLE@albemarle.org>; Megan Yaniglos <myaniglos@albemarle.org> Subject: RE:SUB2017-34 Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat(VARIATION REQUEST) Scott, Thanks for the response. I'll discuss it with Mark and Amelia but proffer 1 locks down the application plan,thus to modify this I believe you need to go through a rezoning be proffer#1. 2 slow/ From: Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 9:27 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Ashley Davies<adavies@williamsmullen.com>; Amelia McCulley<AMCCULLE@albemarle.org>; Megan Yaniglos <myaniglos@albemarle.org> Subject: Re: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat (VARIATION REQUEST) Chris- Thanks. I believe Mark Graham indicated to my client that this could be handled with a variation,but will confirm. Because it is shown just on the application plan, he his thoughts were that it could be handled with a variation. This is why the variation was submitted. Thx. Scott On Jun 13, 2017, at 9:56 AM, Christopher Perez<cperez(cr�,albemarle.org> wrote: Scott, RE: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park-Preliminary Subdivision Plat (VARIATION REQUEST) I just received your variation request for Hyland Park(Fontana 4C). Why is this being submitted as a variation? It is not variable. To modify this you would need a rezoning. Attached was the last guidance I provided Ashley, see comment#1. Who provided you guidance that this was variable? Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 <SKM364e-En 17061315590.pdf> • 3 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 7:19 AM To: 'David Oberg' Subject: RE: Fontana Owners Association David, SUB2017-34 Hyland Park—preliminary subdivision plat The applicant has been working on addressing the over lot grading requirement of the proffers with Engineering. Currently the plat has been deferred and is pending a resubmittal to address all the required changes. The applicant currently does not have any variations or waivers currently submitted in our office. While staff has discussed the connector road and waiver provisions with the applicant, no such application has been submitted. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development iCounty of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From: David Oberg [mailto:DOberg@jonesandgreen.com] Sent:Tuesday,June 20, 2017 5:26 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: Fontana Owners Association Dear Chris, I represent the Fontana Owners Association. We are trying to figure out what is happening with the request for a waiver of the connector road by Riverbend. We were under the impression that a waiver had been filed, but now are learning that maybe it hasn't. Could you give me a call at 434-296-4138 and let me know where this stands. Thanks, David David D. Oberg Jones Oberg & Green LLP 917 E. Jefferson Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 (434)296-4138 doberq(c jonesandgreen.corn ionesandgreen.com 1 *woe ‘sid Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Monday,June 19, 2017 3:18 PM To: 'John Nedrud' Subject: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park—preliminary subdivision plat John, SUB2017-34 Hyland Park—preliminary subdivision plat The applicant has been working on addressing the over lot grading requirement with Engineering. Currently the plat has been deferred and is pending a resubmittal to address all the required changes. They do not have any variations or waivers currently submitted in our office. thanks Christopher P.Perez Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:John Nedrud [mailto:jnedrud@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday,June 19, 2017 2:33 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject:any updates on Hyland Park/Fontana 4c? Chris, I am inquiring on behalf of the Fontana Board if there is any updated information on the status of Hyland Park/Fontana 4c, including Riverbend's request of a waiver for a connector road. Thank you for your time on this issue. 1 Christopher Perez From: Scott Collins <scott@collins-engineering.com> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:26 PM To: Christopher Perez Cc: Ashley Davies; Amelia McCulley; Megan Yaniglos Subject: RE: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park - Preliminary Subdivision Plat (VARIATION REQUEST) Chris- rthanks. Please allow this email to serve as our formal request to withdraw the application and receive a refund of the submittal fee. Thanks. Scott From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org] Sent:Thursday,June 15, 2017 1:20 PM To:Scott Collins<scott@collins-engineering.com> Cc:Ashley Davies<adavies@williamsmullen.com>; Amelia McCulley<AMCCULLE@albemarle.org>; Megan Yaniglos <myaniglos@albemarle.org> Subject:SUB2017-34 Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat (VARIATION REQUEST) Scott, RE: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park - Preliminary Subdivision Plat (VARIATION REQUEST) I have since discussed this with Amelia and Mark. My initial guidance was correct. The request cannot be done through a variation. Such a request could only be considered through a rezoning. How would you/your client like to proceed? 1) Request withdrawal of your application and you will receive a full refund. or 2) Request deferral of your variation and then request an official zoning determination (separate application and fee required for that). Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Christopher Perez Sent:Thursday,June 15, 2017 7:17 AM To: 'Scott Collins' <scott@collins-engineering.com> Cc:Ashley Davies<adavies@williamsmullen.com>;Amelia McCulley<AMCCULLE@albemarle.org>; Megan Yaniglos <myaniglos@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat (VARIATION REQUEST) Scott. 1 Thanks for the response. I'll discuss it with Mark and Amelia but proffer 1 locks down the application plan,thus to modify this I believe you need to go through a rezoning be proffer#1. From: Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com] Sent:Tuesday,June 13, 2017 9:27 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Ashley Davies<adavies@williamsmullen.com>; Amelia McCulley<AMCCULLE@albemarle.org>; Megan Yaniglos <myaniglos(caalbemarle.org> Subject: Re: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat (VARIATION REQUEST) Chris- Thanks. I believe Mark Graham indicated to my client that this could be handled with a variation,but will confirm. Because it is shown just on the application plan,he his thoughts were that it could be handled with a variation. This is why the variation was submitted. Thx. • Scott On Jun 13, 2017, at 9:56 AM, Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> wrote: Scott, RE: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park - Preliminary Subdivision Plat(VARIATION REQUEST) I just received your variation request for Hyland Park (Fontana 4C). Why is this being submitted as a variation? It is not variable. To modify this you would need a rezoning. Attached was the last guidance I provided Ashley, see comment#1. Who provided you guidance that this was variable? Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 <SKM 364e-En17061315590.pdf' 2 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Thursday,June 15, 2017 7:17 AM To: 'Scott Collins' Cc: Ashley Davies;Amelia McCulley; Megan Yaniglos Subject: RE: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park - Preliminary Subdivision Plat (VARIATION REQUEST) Scott, Thanks for the response. I'll discuss it with Mark and Amelia but proffer 1 locks down the application plan,thus to modify this I believe you need to go through a rezoning be proffer#1. From: Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com] Sent:Tuesday,June 13, 2017 9:27 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Ashley Davies<adavies@williamsmullen.com>; Amelia McCulley<AMCCULLE@albemarle.org>; Megan Yaniglos <myaniglos@albemarle.org> Subject: Re: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat(VARIATION REQUEST) Chris- Thanks. I believe Mark Graham indicated to my client that this could be handled with a variation, but will confirm. Because it is shown just on the application plan, he his thoughts were that it could be handled with a variation. This is why the variation was submitted. Thx. Scott On Jun 13, 2017, at 9:56 AM, Christopher Perez <cperez@albemarle.org> wrote: Scott, RE: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat(VARIATION REQUEST) I just received your variation request for Hyland Park (Fontana 4C). Why is this being submitted as a variation? It is not variable. To modify this you would need a rezoning. Attached was the last guidance I provided Ashley, see comment #1. Who provided you guidance that this was variable? Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 <SKM364e-En 17061315590.pdf> 1 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 3:56 PM To: 'Scott Collins' Cc: 'Davies, Ashley'; Amelia McCulley; Megan Yaniglos Subject: RE: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park - Preliminary Subdivision Plat (VARIATION REQUEST) Attachments: SKM_364e-En17061315590.pdf Scott, RE: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park - Preliminary Subdivision Plat (VARIATION REQUEST) I just received your variation request for Hyland Park(Fontana 4C). Why is this being submitted as a variation? It is not variable. To modify this you would need a rezoning. Attached was the last guidance I provided Ashley, see comment#1. Who provided you guidance that this was variable? Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 1 Christopher Perez From: Scott Collins <scott@collins-engineering.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 3:45 PM To: Christopher Perez Cc: Ashle Davi- Subject: Re: SUB201 - 'yland Park - Prellmin. ecliviston Plat Chris- please allow this email to serve as our formal request for a 6 month deferral for hyland park prelim; .ry 7 subdivision plat. Thank you. Scott Collins On May 2, 2017, at 3:42 PM, Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>wrote: Scott, RE: S 1 i I -34 Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat I need to take an action on this plan •y " s . ay 4th. As discussed at SRC please request the deferral and specify the time(up to 6 months). Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Christopher Perez Sent: Monday, May 01, 2017 9:37 AM To: 'Scott Collins' <scott@Collins-engineering.com> Cc: 'Davies, Ashley' <adavies@williamsmullen.com> Subject: RE: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat Scott, RE: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat I need to take an action on this plan by Thursday May 4th. As discussed at SRC please request the deferral and specify the time(up to 6 months). Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Christopher Perez Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 1:34 PM To:Scott Collins<scott@collins-engineering.com> 1 a111. 0 Cc: 'Davies, Ashley' <adavies@williamsmullen.com> Subject: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat Scott, SUB2017-34 Hyland Park-Preliminary Subdivision Plat Attached are the review comments for the above ref item to be discussed at tomorrow's SRC meeting. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 l I 1 2 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez %""m. Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 8:32 AM To: Scott Collins ra g Cc: Matthew Wentland Subject: RE: Trail Discussion Attachments: Trail_Modification.pptx Scott, RE: Trail Discussion I have done some digging post SRC about the trails. During the 1 s` go round of Fontana 4C Steve Driver requested Amelia & Glenn reconsider some of the trails depicted on the trail plan. The attached PDF is the result of their consideration of that request. Steve's plat and requests are the base layer of the PowerPoint slide and Amelia's guidance is layered ontop as: "Can remove", "previously removed", "provide trail or sidewalk", "keep this connection to existing trail". If you would like to utilize this previous decision let me know and then please do so on the revised plat & final grading plan. Anything additional would need a new request and consideration (but I highly doubt Amelia's going to omit any more of the trails). Hope this helps. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Matthew Wentland Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 9:46 AM To:Scott Collins<scott@collins-engineering.com> Cc: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject:Trail detail Scott, Here's a link to the design standards manual with the trail detail. http://www.albemarle.org/upload/images/forms center/departments/community development/forms/design standa rds manual/Albemarle County Design Standards Manual 2015-04-25 draft.pdf Thanks, Matt Wentland, P.E. Civil Engineer II From: Ellen Martin [mailto:ejmartin99@comcast.net] Sent:Sunday, April 23, 2017 7:40 AM To: scott@collins-engineering.com Cc: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Matthew Wentland <mwentland@albemarle.org>;Jeff Hawkins 14."1_, <jeffwhawk@gmail.com> Subject: Hyland Park Trails ( 0` 1 ._) �� , Hi Scott, �.r It was good to meet Op�fhursdyat the County Office Building. I advance of your application for waivers for the Hylend P4rhrojbct, I would like to express our concerns for the proffered trail immediately behind lots 104, 105, and 106 in Fontana phase 4B, Via Florence Road. We own the home on lot 106. My understanding that the trail spur connecting Glenleigh Road and Belluno Court shown on the plat is on a grandfathered proffer from the original developer. We appreciate the trails and use them nearly every day. However, this particular trail easement is on a steep slope that would not only be very disruptive to the natural landscape, but I imagine very expensive to construct. We would like to request that the trail plan be waived so that an alternate, primitive trail can be put in instead. In walking this area and the parallel primitive trail alongside Hyland Creek Drive, it appears there are two level areas that may be old fire roads that could be used for trails to connect Belluno Court to the Hyland Creek Drive trail and then from that trail back up to the cul-de-sac on Glenleigh Road. I would ask that you consider this approach if indeed this land is available to be used. If it is not, or if no other primitive alternative is practical, we ask that this trail be removed from the plan entirely. Thank you for your consideration. Best regards, Ellen Martin 1967 Via Florence Road 434-989-6489 2 1 1 r. rr a ti.• \ z, e •t � ted....\ . , . •. .. 1 r ' + - 4 ,E v1r r ,, ' A . 44, ....., 1,. - 4 ,r,{ " ; n Q) 1 (D 3 �^`° O I • a .I CV ----T1 CD 3 V tij 1 CD `V \✓ p 1-1 '-'I !r f C ,g. 4 x0 _ < O 9 P 't:24 g ' ''' 1"-*Akir Q+ ►►y�- nto `� +►� �s V1 r"+ 0 UI r' Zx >' -, X N. �4 V N 's, FF''r 0 0 (D rf 9 #3p N, Yv 1 fD = CD f.3 P9, (IQ •./..-4-___. r X n - Christopher Perez From: Amelia McCulley Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 1:54 PM To: Christopher Perez Cc: Matthew Wentland Subject: RE: Fontana 4C trails Wow,this is so old I can hardly remember it. hey should probably put something together in writing for us to consider. From: Christopher Perez Sent:Thursday, April 20, 2017 2:03 PM To:Amelia McCulley<AMCCULLE@albemarle.org> Cc: Matthew Wentland <mwentland@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: Fontana 4C trails Amelia, RE: Fontana 4C trails At today's SRC meeting for SUB2017-34 Hyland Park-Preliminary Subdivision Plat(AKA Fontana 4C), Scott Collins and some residents had concerns about some of the trails and the slopes/grades needed to locate these trails in certain locations. At the meeting I told Scott he'd need to make a request to you in order for you to consider omitting these sections of the trail, as I remember Steve Driver did this with you. After pulling my history from the 2014 review of this item I found the attached powerpoint and email (below) discussing trails your willingness to modify the required trails. These are the exact same locations of these trails Scott & the residents have concern over. Can the attached PDF guidance hold true today too for this new version of Fontana 4C OR would Scott need to make the request on his own w/his own justifications? Christopher P. Perez 1 Senior Planner Department of Community Development 1County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road l Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Amelia McCulley Sent:Tuesday,August 12, 2014 4:30 PM To:Steve Driver<sdriver@terraengineering.net> Cc: Elaine Echols<EECHOLS@albemarle.org>; Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Amelia McCulley <AMCCULLE@albemarle.org> Subject: Fontana 4C trails on Brunello Lane Steve, Please see the attached powerpoint to illustrate the administrative modification we're willing to do. I'll summarize it with the following: 1. Belluno Lane—urban section with sidewalks on one or both sides of the road 1 a. I have not agreed to removing the connection to the existing ontana trail that adjoins Ashcroft (between lots#3 and 4). You call it "redundant." How is it redundant and why should it be eliminated? b. Please label either trail or sidewalk along lot 11 frontage on Via Florence Road. This connection must remain. 2. Trail segment along rear of lots #104, 105 and 106 as well as segment along eastern side of lot#104 adjacent to lots #10 and 11—agree they have been eliminated by prior action. 3. Brunello Court—urban section with sidewalks on one or both sides of the road a. Trail segment from cul-de-sac between lots #27 and 28 that extends through the middle of lots segment between lot action and agree #12 and 106—was eliminated byg 13 and 12 and it's physically impractical and not necessary since the other trail segment to lot#106 is eliminated. I'll also note that you mentioned something about retaining walls and grading issues on some of the lots. Please keep the overlot grading proffer in mind for this. From: Steve Driver [mailto:sdriver@terraengineering.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 2:59 PM To: Amelia McCulley Subject: FW: Fontana 4C trails on Brunello Lane Amelia, Hope you're doing okay. We are about a day from being able to resubmit the Preliminary Plat and need an administrative finding from the County concerning the pathway related to Brunello Court.To our knowledge, only that remains the outstanding. Steve Steven L. Driver, PE, LS President Terra Engineering and Land Solutions, PC 2374 Stuarts Draft Highway Stuarts Draft, VA 24477 PH: (434) 244-0600 x103 PH: (540) 337-4591 x103 FX: (540) 337-5291 C: (434) 989-8786 From: Steve Driver [mailto:sdriver@terraengineering.net] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 4:21 PM To: 'Amelia McCulley' Subject: FW: Fontana 4C trails on Brunello Lane Amelia, Here's an updated exhibit for clarity. 2 Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Steve Steven L. Driver, PE, LS President Terra Engineering and Land Solutions, PC 2374 Stuarts Draft Highway Stuarts Draft, VA 24477 PH: (434) 244-0600 x103 PH: (540) 337-4591 x103 FX: (540) 337-5291 C: (434) 989-8786 From: Steve Driver [mailto:sdriver@terraengineering.net] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 3:13 PM To: 'Amelia McCulley' Subject: RE: Fontana 4C trails on Brunello Lane Amelia, Okay we'll add to the last exhibit what we described in our recent email and send to you. We are working on that now. In the mean time-we've attached a copy of the last exhibit for reference. Steve Steven L. Driver, PE, LS President Terra Engineering and Land Solutions, PC 2374 Stuarts Draft Highway Stuarts Draft, VA 24477 PH: (434) 244-0600 x103 PH: (540) 337-4591 x103 FX: (540) 337-5291 C: (434) 989-8786 From: Amelia McCulley [mailto:AM000LLE©albemarle.org] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 2:57 PM To: Steve Driver Cc: 'Anthony Nichols' Subject: RE: Fontana 4C trails on Brunello Lane Steve, As I mentioned in my email on July 18th, I only reviewed the trail revision for Belluno Lane. I asked that you provide a trail plan for Brunello Court that is consistent with the rezoning plan. I haven't seen a revised trail plan to respond to and had no idea you were waiting for me on anything. I'm happy to consider any 3 requested administrative modifications, but need to see where either sidewalks or trails will tie together. For any changes you are proposing to the rezoning trail plan, your description of those changes will be helpful. Are you proposing to follow the rezoning plan except for a path between the middle of lots 12 & 13? 4 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 7:22 AM To: Amelia McCulley; Rebecca Ragsdale Subject: Fontana Trails Amelia, Fontana trails - the trails in Fontana have been inspected and the bonds released. Thus these trails were never an issue during the review of Fontana 4C and were never commented on during the review. The documentation of the trails being acceptable to Glenn may be in the WPO file in order for him to have released the bonds. The trails in Fontana 4C are still in play and part of 4C's review. Christopher P.Perez Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Kenny Thacker Sent:Thursday,June 09, 2016 4:23 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: Fontana Chris, I spoke with Ana, and she said the County has no bonds on Fontana. 1 4, A .. Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 2:09 PM To: 'Ellen Martin' Cc: jnedrud@yahoo.com; Ellen Martin; Matthew Wentland Subject: RE: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park - Preliminary Subdivision Plat Attachments: Official Determination on the Connector 6-8-15 -from the Zoning Administrator.pdf Ms. Martin, RE: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat Sorry about that, the plat can be reviewed electronically at the link provided below. Give it 4 minutes to upload (slow county server). SUB201700034—Hyland Park-Preliminary Mr. Nedrud, Attached is the official determination from the Zoning Administrator on the requirement for the connection. I am providing this to you in advance to help answer some of your groups future questions. Christopher P. Perez Senior Planner Department of Community Development 1County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road 1 Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Ellen Martin [mailto:emartin@rivannamedical.com] Sent:Thursday,April 20, 2017 1:46 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:jnedrud@yahoo.com; Ellen Martin<ejmartin99@comcast.net> Subject: Re:SUB2017-34 Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat Hi Chris, Thank you for forwarding these documents. The link to the plat is not live. Would you please re-send that? Best regards, Ellen On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Christopher Perez <cperez(&,,albemarle.org> wrote: Mr. Nedrud &Ms. Martin, SUB2017-34 Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat Attached are the comments we discussed at today's meeting and the proffers associated w/the rezoning for the development. Christopher P. Perez 1 Senior Planner Department of Community Development 1County of Albemarle, Virginia 1 401 McIntire Road l Charlottesville,VA402 434.296.5832 ext.3443 Ellen Martin, Administrative Manager Rivanna Medical, LLC 107 East Water Street Charlottesville,VA 22902 0: 800-645-7508 x707 I F:434-483-5720 emartin@rivannamedical.com I www.rivannamedical.com Cl Ca 2 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Wednesday,April 19, 2017 1:34 PM To: Scott Collins Cc: 'Davies,Ashley' Subject: SUB2017-34 Hyland Park - Preliminary Subdivision Plat Attachments: SRC CD1 SUB2017-34 Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat.pdf Scott, SUB2017-34 Hyland Park-Preliminary Subdivision Plat Attached are the review comments for the above ref item to be discussed at tomorrow's SRC meeting. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 1 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 12:55 PM To: Robbie Gilmer Subject: RE: SUB201700034 - Hyland Park - Preliminary Subdivision Plat Robbie, RE: SUB201700034 - Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat I received your comments for the above referenced plat that is heading to SRC tomorrow; however, your comments are based on plans dated 2/13/17. Your comments were entered into CV on 3-25-17. This is the wrong version of the plat, you should not have reviewed this version. I emailed every SRC reviewer on March 20th to alert everyone to the 10 day denial and subsequent resubmittal of this plat with a revised date of 3-6-17 (see email below). One major difference between the two version is that the version you reviewed did not depict the Cascadia/Fontana Connector, whereas the revised version does. This is a major element of the proposal I need Fire & Rescue to weigh in/comment on. I doubt much will chance in your comment letter based on the level of detail in the prelim plat but who am Ito tell you this© Please review the revised version dated 3-6-17 and let me know when you have updated CV. If you have any questions give me a ring. Thanks Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From: Christopher Perez To: Matthew Wentland<mwentland@albemarle.org>; 'Moore,Adam PE (VDOT)'<Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov>; 'Deel,Justin (VDOT)'<Justin.Deel@vdot.virginia.gov>; 'Bedsaul,Willis C. (VDOT)'<Willis.Bedsaul@VDOT.Virginia.gov>; 'Alexander Morrison'<amorrison@serviceauthority.org>; Keith Huckstep <KHUCKSTE@albemarle.org>; Derek Bedarf<dbedarf@albemarle.org> Cc:Carla Harris-CDD<CHARRIS@albemarle.org> Subject: RE:SUB201700034- Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat SRC Reviewers, SUB201700034 - Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat I wanted to email every SRC review who will be reviewing the above referenced preliminary subdivision plat. You all were initially distributed a review set for the above ref project dated 2-13-17, do not review this version of the plat. That version was administratively denied by day 10 of the review and the applicant resubmitted a revised version for SRC review, which is dated 3-6-17. This 3-6-17 version is the plat you should be reviewing for SRC. SRC review comments are due 4-17-17. Hope this helps everyone avoid reviewing the wrong version of the plat. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia 1 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 11:10 AM To: 'Davies, Ashley' Cc: Megan Yaniglos Subject: RE: Fontana 4C Ashley, RE: Fontana 4C Per your request, in advance of the SRC meeting this Thursday, I offer the following answers to questions posed at our last meeting: 1. [14-302(A)(15),ZMA2004-18(Proffer#1/Application Plan)] The noncontiguous portion of TMP 78E-A, listed on the application plan as Lot"A"shall be combined with TMP 78E-118 to create one large lot. Prior to or with the first final plat for Fontana 4C these lots shall be combined. Basis for the requirement: TMP 78E-A is held to the application plan and the proffers (see proffer 1) associated with the Fontana 4C rezoning(ZMA2004-18). As such Lot A is required to be combined with TMP 78E-118 to create one large lot. 2. [14-422(E), 14-422(F), 14-410(1)] Cascadia/Fontana Connector(Delphi Lane). The requirements for sidewalks [14-422(E)],planting strips [14-422(F)],and the curb and gutter[14-410(I)] shall be considered for modification by the Planning Commission upon a complete request for these waivers. When making the request(s)assure the road plan provides two designs for Delphi Lane: A)a public road without any waivers considered in the design,which means it provides sidewalks,planting strips, and curb and gutter on both sides. This is being required to assure the ultimate width of the roadway is reserved for dedicated to public use in the correct location. and B)a public road with the waivers considered in the design,which means it does not provide sidewalks,planting strips,and curb and gutter. If the Commission approves all the waivers discussed above the applicant will be required to reserve for dedication upon demand of the County the full width of the public road as described in option A above,and will only be required to build the road taking advantage of the waivers as described in option B above. Staff reviewers involved in processing/consideration of the request: Planning,Engineering, Fire&Rescue,and VDOT. 3. [14-409(D)] Variation or exception by agent of extension requirement. If the applicant of Hyland Park decides they do not want to build the connection to the property line then the applicant needs to apply for the variation of the extension requirements as provided for in Section 14-409(D). If approved this would allow the applicant to merely design,plat the R/W dedication, and bond the connection. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 1 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From: Davies,Ashley [mailto:adavies@williamsmullen.com] Sent:Tuesday, April 18, 2017 10:08 AM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: Fontana 4C Hi Chris, Thanks for the feedback. We need to make a decision on how we are proceeding. Can you possibly email me those 2 responses today? Ashley Cooper Davies I Land Use Planner I Williams Mullen 321 East Main St. Suite 400 I Charlottesville, VA 22902-3200 T 434.951.5725 I F 434.817.0977 I adavies©williamsmullen.com I www.williamsmullen.com NOTICE: Information contained in this transmission to the named addressee is proprietary and is subject to attorney-client privilege and work product confidentiality. If the recipient of this transmission is not the named addressee,the recipient should immediately notify the sender and destroy the information transmitted without making any copy or distribution thereof. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org] Sent: Monday,April 17, 2017 2:31 PM To: Davies, Ashley<adavies@williamsmullen.com> Subject: RE: Fontana 4C Ashley, I received your voicemail. I plan to include the answers to the two questions Megan and I met with you about in the comment letter for the plat. From: Davies,Ashley [mailto:adavies@williamsmullen.com] Sent:Tuesday, March 28, 2017 2:16 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Megan Yaniglos<myaniglos@albemarle.org> Subject: Fontana 4C Hi Chris and Megan, I am writing you both, as Alan and I were hoping to meet with you regarding the Cascadia Connector. Megan, I believe you are well versed on the project history(according to Alan). We have many questions and would appreciate your guidance on the project. I am out of town next week for Spring Break, so I was wondering if there was any chance we might be able to catch the two of you this week? We have been working on a layout for the Connector Road and have come across a few snags, and have some practical questions about the road if Cascadia has already been granted a waiver. Thanks, Ashley Ashley Cooper Davies I Land Use Planner I Williams Mullen T 434.951.5725 I F 434.817.097/ adavies@williamsmullen.com Jww.williamsmullen.com NOTICE: Information contained in this transmission to the named addressee is proprietary and is subject to attorney-client privilege and work product confidentiality. If the recipient of this transmission is not the named addressee,the recipient should immediately notify the sender and destroy the information transmitted without making any copy or distribution thereof. 2 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 11:52 AM To: Matthew Wentland; Robbie Gilmer; 'Moore, Adam PE (VDOT)'; 'Deel,Justin (VDOT)'; 'Bedsaul,Willis C. (VDOT)'; 'Alexander Morrison'; Keith Huckstep; Derek Bedarf Cc: Carla Harris - CDD Subject: RE: SUB201700034 - Hyland Park - Preliminary Subdivision Plat SRC Reviewers, SUB201700034 - Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat I wanted to email every SRC review who will be reviewing the above referenced preliminary subdivision plat. You all were initially distributed a review set for the above ref project dated 2-13-17, do not review this version of the plat. That version was administratively denied by day 10 of the review and the applicant resubmitted a revised version for SRC review, which is dated 3-6-17. This 3-6-17 version is the plat you should be reviewing for SRC. SRC review comments are due 4-17-17. Hope this helps everyone avoid reviewing the wrong version of the plat. Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development 1County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road l Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 1 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 10:29 AM To: 'Scott Collins' Cc: 'Adam Long'; Megan Yaniglos Subject: RE:Cascadia/Fontana Connector as it related to SUB201700034 - Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat Scott, RE: Cascadia/Fontana Connector as it related to SUB201700034-Hyland Park-Preliminary Subdivision Plat A 14-409 waiver was granted to Cascadia allowing them not to build the small remaining portion of the road to the property line.This waiver utilized provisions of Section 14-409(D)—Variation of Exception by Agent of Extension Requirement. Hyland Park has two options: 1)If Hyland Park merely applies for the same waiver Cascadia did, 14-409(D),you'd need to dedicate the right-of-way, design the roadway on the road plan&the Final Grading plan, and build/bond it. 2)If Hyland Park wants to completely omit the connection&avoid designing and bonding it you would need to apply for the 14-409(C) -Variation or Exception by Commission of Coordination Requirement& go through a rezoning(bc it's required/depicted on the proffered application plan for the rezoning). Hope this helps. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From:Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com] Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 4:47 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Adam Long<adam@collins-engineering.com> Subject: RE:SUB201700034- Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat Chris- Thanks. We will resubmit the plan on Monday. Quick question,what's the deal with the Cascadia connector road. I understand that we need to show the r/w/access easement, but am I correct that we do not have to build the road. Just provide an area for access for the roadway to be constructed? Thx. Scott From:Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org] Sent: Friday, March 3,2017 4:03 PM To:Scott Collins<scott@collins-engineering.com> Cc:Carla Harris-CDD<CHARRIS@albemarle.org> Subject:SUB201700034- Hyland Park-Preliminary Subdivision Plat Scott, SUB201700034 -Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat After our conversation I completed the determination of completeness as provided for in Section 14-218 of the Albemarle County Subdivision Ordinance. During my review I noticed a lot of large items that this plat does not address as it relates to the rezoning on the property. It would be a disservice to you and County staff reviewers to allow the plat through the system as currently proposed. To aid in your revisions and continued development of this proposal I am attaching the proffers from ZMA2004-18 and ZMA2011-1, please review. Additionally,pursuant to Albemarle County Code §14-218(C)the above referenced preliminary subdivision plat is deemed incomplete and shall not be accepted for official submittal by the agent. In order for the preliminary subdivision plat to be accepted as officially submitted,please revise the plat to address the required changes within 15 days of this notice.If a revised plat is not received within 15 days, the plat shall be deemed to be disapproved and a new application and fee shall be required for submittal of the plat. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 2 roe vow Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 8:03 AM To: Bill Fritz; Megan Yaniglos Subject: RE: Cascadia/Fontana Connector as it related to SUB201700034 - Hyland Park - Preliminary Subdivision Plat Attachments: 14-409 Waiver CascadiaFontana Connector_SDP201200046 Action Letter 9-27-2016.pdf Bill/Megan, RE: Cascadia/Fontana Connector as it related to SUB201700034 - Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat As you know we have received a new preliminary subdivision application for Fontana 4C, which is now titled Hyland Park. I'd like to fully understand the waiver which was granted to Cascadia (attached) and how it related to Hyland Park. The way I understand it, the 14-409 waiver granted Cascadia permission not to build the 3. remaining portion of the road to the property line. This waiver utilized provisions of Section 14-409(D)— Variation of Exception by Agent of Extension Requirement. As we've said before Hyland Park still has to apply for the waiver. My questions are as follows: 1)If Hyland Park merely applies for the same waiver Cascadia did, 14-409(D), they would still need to dedicate the right-of-way, design the roadwa on the road plan & the Final Grading plan, and they still have to build/bond it. Is this correct? 2)If Hyland Park wants to completely omit the connection & avoid designing and bonding it they would need to apply for the 14-409(C) - Variation or Exception by Commission of Coordination Requirement & go through a rezoning (bc it's required/depicted on the application plan for the rezoning). Is this correct?ij Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development (County of Albemarle, Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From:Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com] Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 4:47 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Adam Long<adam@collins-engineering.com> Subject: RE: SUB201700034- Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat Chris- Thanks. We will resubmit the plan on Monday. Quick question, what's the deal with the Cascadia connector road. I understand that we need to show the r/w/access easement, but am I correct that we do not have to build the road. Just provide an area for access for the roadway to be constructed? Thx. Scott From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org] Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 4:03 PM To:Scott Collins<scott@collins-engineering.com> 1 Cc: Carla Harris -CDD<CHARRIS@albemarle.org> Subject: SUB201700034- Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat Scott, SUB201700034 - Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat After our conversation I completed the determination of completeness as provided for in Section 14-218 of the Albemarle County Subdivision Ordinance. During my review I noticed a lot of large items that this plat does not address as it relates to the rezoning on the property. It would be a disservice to you and County staff reviewers to allow the plat through the system as currently proposed. To aid in your revisions and continued development of this proposal I am attaching the proffers from ZMA2004-18 and ZMA2011-1,please review. Additionally,pursuant to Albemarle County Code §14-218(C)the above referenced preliminary subdivision plat is deemed incomplete and shall not be accepted for official submittal by the agent. In order for the preliminary subdivision plat to be accepted as officially submitted,please revise the plat to address the required changes within 15 days of this notice.If a revised plat is not received within 15 days,the plat shall be deemed to be disapproved and a new application and fee shall be required for submittal of the plat. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 2 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 4:03 PM To: 'Scott Collins' Cc: Carla Harris - CDD Subject: SUB201700034 - Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat Attachments: ZMA 2011-001 Fontana 4C Proffer 10 Amendment.pdf;ZMA2004-18 proffers.pdf; SUB2017-34 Hyland Park - Prelim Plat - deemed incomplete_3-3-17.pdf Scott, SUB201700034 - Hyland Park- Preliminary Subdivision Plat After our conversation I completed the determination of completeness as provided for in Section 14-218 of the Albemarle County Subdivision Ordinance. During my review I noticed a lot of large items that this plat does not address as it relates to the rezoning on the property. It would be a disservice to you and County staff reviewers to allow the plat through the system as currently proposed. To aid in your revisions and continued development of this proposal I am attaching the proffers from ZMA2004-18 and ZMA2011-1,please review. Additionally,pursuant to Albemarle County Code §14-218(C) the above referenced preliminary subdivision plat is deemed incomplete and shall not be accepted for official submittal by the agent. In order for the preliminary subdivision plat to be accepted as officially submitted, please revise the plat to address the required changes within 15 days of this notice.If a revised plat is not received within 15 days, the plat shall be deemed to be disapproved and a new application and fee shall be required for submittal of the plat. Christopher P.Perez Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road'Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 1 7 Nue No' Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 10:07 AM To: Frank Pohl Subject: SUB201700034- Hyland Park- Preliminary Attachments: ZMA 2011-001 Fontana 4C Proffer 10 Amendment.pdf;ZMA2004-18 proffers.pdf; Fontana 4C SUB201400063 Engineering Review Comments Preliminary Plat 2014-05-21.pdf; SUB2014-63 Fontana- Phase 4C-Prelim Plat- Disapproval_6-30-14.pdf Frank, SUB201700034—Hyland Park- Preliminary The above referenced prelim plat is the same general project that the County previously extensively reviewed and approved under SUB2014-63 Fontana 4C—prelim plat; however, the property recently sold and property owner/applicant has chosen to utilize a different Engineer and draw up new plans which are different than the previously version. Thus we're starting from scratch on this one. Once this project is distributed to an engineer reviewer please assure they have all the proffers associated with this project, which are attached and are:ZMA 2011-1 and ZMA2004-18. This will be a very extensive engineering review as the proffers really locked the County in for some very strict requirements prior to the 1St preliminary plat approval. See Proffer#2 from ZMA2004-18, which requires "the Final Grading Plan shall be approved by the County Engineer prior to the approval of the first preliminary subdivision plat". We had to deny the previous version of the plan 2 times b4 this proffer was satisfied(attached previous denial letter). Just for fun I'm attaching the initial review from Michelle Roberge (prey engineer here at the county) on her 1 St review of the prelim...obviously all these comments won't be the same be it's a completely diff plan, but it just shows you how much work this one is going to be. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Frank Pohl Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 8:55 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: FW: February 21, 2017 Submittal SRC Projects Chris, Do we need to do anything for this project review-wise or SRC-wise? Hyland Park subdivision plat. Frank Frank V. Pohl,PE,CFM County Engineer County of Albemarle (434)296-5832 Ext.7914 1 le 'two From:Carla Harris-CDD Sent:Friday, March 03, 2017 7:41 AM To:SRC-SDP SUB<SRC-SDPSUB@albemarle.org>;SRC-SP ZMA<SRC-SPZMA@albemarle.org>;SRC,Src Mailing List <SRCSrcMailingList@albemarle.org> Subject: February 21, 2017 Submittal SRC Projects Carla Harris BZA Clerk/CDD Assistant II County of Albemarle Community Development Department 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 434-296-5832 ext.3834 charris@albemarle.org 2