HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201700195 Correspondence 2018-04-21 Brent Nelson
From: Brent Nelson
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 5:02 PM
To: 'Andrew Graff'
Cc: 'John Ashley Murphy'
Subject: SUB 201700195, Murphy Boundary Adjustment, Approval
Hi Andy - The above-noted boundary line adjustment application is ready to be signed by the County. Please provide
copies with the owner's notarized signature.One of the copies you provide will be for our files,the others will be for you
to pick up once signed.The copies you provide cannot be spliced like the review copies have been.
Please email me when you have dropped them off so I know to be on the lookout for them.
Thanks,
Brent
Brent Nelson
Senior Planner
Albemarle County
Department of Community Development
Planning Services Division
434-296-5832 ext. 3438
bnelson@albemarle.org
From:Andrew Graff<oldalbemarlesurveying@gmail.com>
Sent:Wednesday,April 04,2018 2:59 PM
To: Brent Nelson<bnelson@albemarle.org>
Subject: Murphy Boundary Adjustment
Hi Brent,
Would you give me a call to discuss this project. Mr Murphy gave me your comments and I have questions
on items #1, 3 & 5 (portion). Thank you! I had called and left you a message.
Wishing you a great day,
Andy
1
Brent Nelson
From: Brent Nelson
Sent: Wednesday,January 10, 2018 4:54 PM
To: 'John Ashley Murphy'
Subject: RE: SUB 2017-195, Murphy BLA, Staff Comments
Sounds good.
Brent
Brent Nelson
Senior Planner
Albemarle County
Department of Community Development
Planning Services Division
434-296-5832 ext. 3438
bnelson@albemarle.org
From:John Ashley Murphy[mailto:johnashleymurphy@gmail.com]
Sent:Wednesday,January 10,2018 10:30 AM
To: Brent Nelson<bnelson@albemarle.org>
Subject: Re:SUB 2017-195, Murphy BLA,Staff Comments
Hi Brent,
Thank you for the comments. I will try to reach you by phone to ask a couple of questions before sending this
over to Andy Graf.
Best Regards,
John
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Brent Nelson<bnelson@albemarle.org> wrote:
Hi John - Attached you should find my staff review comments on your boundary line adjustment application. I am
happy to meet if you need any further discussion or explanation.
Providing me with 2 copies of the revised plat should be sufficient for my review.
Sorry it took so long. Reviewing it with Francis made me realize some of my earlier comments did not apply.
1
firs
Brent
Brent Nelson
Senior Planner
Albemarle County
Department of Community Development
Planning Services Division
434-296-5832 ext. 3438
bnelson@albemarle.org
From:John Ashley Murphy [mailto:iohnashleymurphy@gmail.com]
Sent:Tuesday, December 26, 2017 10:06 PM
To: Brent Nelson<bnelson@albemarle.org>
Subject: Re:SUB 2017-195, Murphy BLA
Brent,
Can't remember if I responded to this,but I don't think so. My apologies.
Waiting until January 3rd or thereafter is fine . . . no problem!
I doubt you'll need any soils info for the parcel with our house. As you note, approved primary and reserve
drainfields already exist. The boundary line adjustment doesn't impact these drainfields. But, of course, it will
be your call.
My conversations with the surveyor and an attorney suggest that Parcel X will remain an unclaimed parcel. I
may try to claim it in the future,but that shouldn't have any impact on the boundary line adjustments for
parcels 55, 56, and 57.
That's my two cents!
2
Brent Nelson
From: Brent Nelson
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2017 1:26 PM
To: 'John Ashley Murphy'
Subject: SUB 2017-195, Murphy BLA
Hi John - I have drafted my comment letter for your above-noted application but would prefer to review it with Francis
when I return on January 3rd before giving it to you. I need to check on a couple things with him including:
• Just what soils information do I need regarding the parcel with your house on it. I know we need to verify that
each of the 3 parcels have a primary and reserve field with the new lot configuration—but what do I need for
this parcel since the fields are existing. I know we need it for the other two lots.
• How do we handle Parcel X(unknown owner)?
I have set up a meeting with Francis at 10 a.m.on January 3rd -so I can hopefully get my letter to you later that day.
Brent
Brent Nelson
Senior Planner
Albemarle County
Department of Community Development
Planning Services Division
434-296-5832 ext. 3438
bnelson@albemarle.org
From:John Ashley Murphy[mailto:johnashleymurphy@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 6:36 PM
To: Brent Nelson<bnelson@albemarle.org>
Subject:soil report?
Hi Brent,
Do you know yet whether I will need a soils report for my boundary line adjustment application? I am getting
confusing and perhaps conflicting messages from my surveyor and soil scientist. The surveyor, Andy Graf, says
soils reports aren't usually needed for boundary line adjustments.
However, if a report will be needed, I can certainly provide one. I just don't want to incur the expense if it isn't
necessary.
With Thanks,
John
1
'fir/ s✓
Brent Nelson
From: Brent Nelson
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 5:32 PM
To: 'John Ashley Murphy'
Subject: RE:soil report?
John - Just wanted you to know I am working hard on it this week—so I can get back to you this week with my
complete review.
Brent
Brent Nelson
Senior Planner
Albemarle County
Department of Community Development
Planning Services Division
434-296-5832 ext. 3438
bnelson@albemarle.org
From:John Ashley Murphy[mailto:johnashleymurphy@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 6:36 PM
To: Brent Nelson<bnelson@albemarle.org>
Subject:soil report?
Hi Brent,
Do you know yet whether I will need a soils report for my boundary line adjustment application? I am getting
confusing and perhaps conflicting messages from my surveyor and soil scientist. The surveyor, Andy Graf, says
soils reports aren't usually needed for boundary line adjustments.
However, if a report will be needed, I can certainly provide one. I just don't want to incur the expense if it isn't
necessary.
With Thanks,
John
1
Margaret and John Murphy
823 Old Turner Mountain Lane
Charlottesville, VA 22901
434-242-1145
November 15, 2017
Albemarle County Community Development Department
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Planners,
This is to provide an overview of the attached application for boundary line adjustments to our
3 parcels on Old Turner Mountain Lane. (Parcels 58-55, 58-56, and 58-57. See map below).
This submission has been preceded by multiple meetings and email exchanges with staff from
the Community Development Department (Francis MacCall, Brent Nelson, Bill Fritz). Albemarle
staff have been consistently helpful and informative, and we have made every effort to follow
staff's guidance and County procedures in this application. If we have overlooked anything, the
fault is ours. Please don't hesitate to contact us if any additional information or steps are neede
to process this application.
Background
• The three parcels are contiguous, and each is a legal lot of record with one (1)
development right.
• One parcel (58-55) is already developed.
• The adjustments will not add any additional development rights.
• The adjustments will not increase non-conformity.
Intent and effect of the boundary line adjustments
• The new boundary lines will vastly reduce the length of driveway required to reach
parcel 58-57. This parcel currently has no frontage on either a public or private road. As
presently configured, the only practical option for reaching parcel 58-57 would be via a
newly constructed driveway of about 900 feet in length, much of it in critical slope (red
line in figure below. The proposed adjustment would move parcel 58-57 north so that it
has frontage on Old Turner Mountain Lane. With the new configuration, a short
driveway of about 40 feet would reach the parcel's best building site (green line in
figure below).
Niue
.,/,/,/,,,:k ,,,,cf::,,,i,,,,,,,',0;1,_,6,4.f 4,,,,,,,1 it ito,,,,,,,,;
'')Wk•.,\ '' " - ',"---* ""/ " / ,„re' 1,‘„1' iir "1 It,,
..,,,:iig,,, ___-„,,, \ 4. ,,,:4\,, -. ie."' 4,),, '' ',,'•A 4. ' r
, , ,,,,,,,„„,,,, - - , .14,4,,,„, ,.,„„ pi,
r„,„...)
,,,,,,,,i.„)
\\,,,,,,_
"-s
_.A "
",-"«' k § g
'•,-,A10°•-- ,',,, ..z-z,Nsz ,
23 w.,,,,,-/„„/if i .
r
ir s
$4 k---- ''''''''''',,,,,„,\ '''''''' $4,4
•
, i f \
• The new boundaries will greatly reduce disturbance in critical slopes associated with
any future home construction. As currently configured, the only available building site
on parcel 58-57 would require significant disturbance in critical slopes. (The other
portions of the parcel are not buildable because they are either gully, wetlands, or
eased to Dominion Energy). With the new configuration, parcel 58-57 could be
developed with very little disturbance to critical slopes.
• In summary, the old boundary line configuration would result in an estimated
disturbance of at least 13,500 square feet of critical slope. The new configuration would
disturb just 500 square feet of critical slope. The relative impacts from impervious
surfaces would also be dramatically reduced (see table below).
Estimated environmental impacts of residential development associated with
respective boundary line configureations
Critical slope Critical slope
Impervious surface disturbed by
of driveway(sq ft) disturbed by home driveway
construction
construction
Old
9,000 7,500 6,000
configuration
New
400 500 0
configuration
Septic drainfields in critical slopes
County code requires the identification of primary and reserve drainfields for each
newly configured lot. For lot 58-55, we will retain our previously identified drainfields.
For lots 58-56 and 58-57, we contracted with soil scientist Jeff Loth to identify suitable
drainfields. We submit Jeff Loth's sketches with this application
The Health Department will not approve the drainfields without an indication from the
County that the boundary line adjustment will be allowed despite critical slopes.
However, the Josh Kirtley at the Health Department has stated that an email from the
county indicating the boundary line adjustment will be allowed will in turn be sufficient
for the Health Department to process its approval of the drainfields. County staff has
expressed a willingness to shepherd this communication with the Health Department
during the processing of the boundary line adjustment application.
Thank you for reviewing this application, and, again, please let us know if more
information is needed.
Sincerely,
*
Maggie Murphy John Murphy
e
6t°
,„,/ , .„:„
a � 1"
/.//,>„ /1/ if / //,,,,,),,„ '`,
ill\iii s , //„..,/iff„,1 s irli ii ii,c,::riii('" L
.i . ...,.., ' 1 /\ / / / , ' „- ,, / t, i i
I / , l
.1"-- t )w 1 \ ,C6,1,, j \\\\\ (
1 \ \:34 (,,,,, I
1 \ --,‘ ) Itiff /// 0 , / / //,,,) I I ' [
N
ii'l
o // 9 i 1 /f` f o" 'if{9-N-LN"
F4t, _, —A— ,,„-, s,,,,,,,,,, ,\
l CP
1.
\\\ \ \ \'''-t,, ''
_ .,
to
t
i : '''''N',,,------,::::--:::,--------:::1 t \\\\ \ —, 6'1" \
1 - 3 ,
1
f V ." i 1 i ; 14,E
-->-1`
ce. ` -.,��" ,. ��,.�� / i!S
I
� b �` \xW '''''''''\:,..:6:._-7,- ,_
. P; £ �
s,_:\,‘,__ \,,,,,,,,,,,,, _
-728-11.---\\ '\\'N„,,, ,, k
...4 ' /SS 4 I
1 i / o 01 -'4%/,- - ..
- '" �
/ t t -
,...," Da \ \ _,,,. ,,,,„\\ * `"F
x
:� ,
S.
i \,,, )'‘''\I---,_1 -.,,,
d est,
/ i c4 / 1 `''
',1 j \ /\//\,,.
,.• st i # ' 1 .,e'a-
9
3
I/No,
w T pilleb
o m
�'• I
u. /m f.,...