HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA201600019 Correspondence Zoning Map Amendment 2017-05-10From: Ellie Ray <ellie@shimp-engineering.com>
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 1:55 PM
To: Elaine Echols
Subject: FW: Community Meeting - Riverside Village
Attachments: Untitled attachment 00022.htm; Community Meeting Guidelines.pdf;
Community Meeting Guidelines.pdf; Untitled attachment 00025.htm;
Notification List for Public Bodies.pdf; Untitled attachment 00028.htm;
PrintableMap.pdf; Untitled attachment 00031.htm; prop owners.xlsx;
Untitled attachment 00034.htm
Categories: Red Category
Elaine,
Can you give me advice on how to notify the HOA for Avemore and the City of Charlottesville as
mentioned in your email? Do you have a contact or address for the HOA? A specific person at the City?
Thanks,
Ellie Carter Ray, PLA, LEED GREEN ASSOCIATE
(434) 227-5140
From: Justin Shimp, P.E. [mailto:justin@shimp-engineering.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 10:22 AM
To: Ellie Ray
Subject: Fwd: Community Meeting - Riverside Village
FYI, can you take care of this?
Justin Shimp, P.E.
434-953-6116
Begin forwarded message:
Hi Justin,
Sorry to be so late in getting this information to you. As you know, you need to set up a community
meeting for this project. It would preferable for you to hold this meeting before the end of the first
week in November so that I can add comments from the CAC meeting to your letter with staff
comments. However, with the Thanksgiving holiday fast approaching I know that may be difficult.
Attached is the notification list for the required community meeting. (Please make sure you’re able to
notify the HOA for Avemore and the City of Charlottesville.) Per the attached guidelines I’ve copied
several other folks here that you’ll want to include in the conversation to find the most appropriate
date, time and place, including the Board and PC member for the Rivanna District, the chair of the
Pantops Advisory Committee, and our Community Engagement Specialist.
If this can fit into a CAC agenda that would be fine; however, if timing does not work you will need to
find a different date and possibly a different venue. I believe you are familiar with other venues in the
area and, of course, there is always the County Office Building.
Please let me know when you have a tentative date and time so I can confirm my availability to attend.
Also, feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Thanks.
Elaine
Elaine K. Echols, FAICP
Acting Chief of Planning
Albemarle County Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5823 x 3252
From: Elaine Echols
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 9:20 AM
To: Ron White
Subject: FW: Riverside Village Workforce Housing proffers
Categories: Red Category
Would you like for me to set up a meeting?
From: Justin Shimp, P.E. [mailto:justin@shimp-engineering.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 10:29 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Subject: Fwd: Riverside Village Workforce Housing proffers
Hi Elaine,
We imagine the workforce being priced the same way you do affordable, but with a higher
median income threshold and thus higher prices. See Kelly’s math below:
Do you have any time tomorrow to meet briefly or chat about this issue? I’ve got an 8:30
meeting and a 1pm meeting but otherwise am flexible.
Thanks,
Just in Shimp, P.E.
434-953-6116
Begin forwarded message:
Source: http://www.vhda.com/BusinessPartners/PropertyOwnersManagers/Income-
Rent-Limits/Pages/HUDMedianIncome.aspx#.WHeT2VMrJhE
HUD Median Income for Fiscal Year 2016
Albemarle County
MSA: Charlottesville, VA HUD Metro FMR Area
Median Income: $77,800.00
Click on a column header for sorting.
Percentage One Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight
30% $16,800.00 $19,200.00 $21,600.00 $24,300.00 $28,440.00 $32,580.00 $36,730.00 $40,890.00
40% $22,400.00 $25,600.00 $28,800.00 $31,960.00 $34,520.00 $37,080.00 $39,640.00 $42,200.00
50% $28,000.00 $32,000.00 $36,000.00 $39,950.00 $43,150.00 $46,350.00 $49,550.00 $52,750.00
60% $33,600.00 $38,400.00 $43,200.00 $47,940.00 $51,780.00 $55,620.00 $59,460.00 $63,300.00
80% $44,750.00 $51,150.00 $57,550.00 $63,900.00 $69,050.00 $74,150.00 $79,250.00 $84,350.00
Non-Adjusted Income Limits for Albemarle County
Percentage: 50% 80% 100% 150%
Income: $38,900.00 $62,240.00 $77,800.00 $116,700.00
Albemarle County Median Income for 2016 = $ 77,800
80% of Median Income for 2016 = $ 62,240
120% of Median Income for 2016 = $ 93,360
PITI for Affordable Housing = (0.3 x $ 62,240) / 12 = $ 1,556 per month (maximum)
PITI for Workforce Housing = (0.3 x $ 93,360) / 12 = $ 2,334 per month (maximum)
From: Justin Shimp, P.E. <justin@shimp -engineering.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 10:29 PM
To: Elaine Echols
Subject: Fwd: Riverside Village Workforce Housing proffers
Categories: Red Category
Hi Elaine,
We imagine the workforce being priced the same way you do affordable, but with a higher
median income threshold and thus higher prices. See Kelly’s math below:
Do you have any time tomorrow to meet briefly or chat about this issue? I’ve got an 8:30
meeting and a 1pm meeting but otherwise am flexible.
Thanks,
Justin Shimp, P.E.
434-953-6116
Begin forwarded message:
RE: Riverside Village Workforce Housing proffers
Source: http://www.vhda.com/BusinessPartners/PropertyOwnersManagers/Income-
Rent-Limits/Pages/HUDMedianIncome.aspx#.WHeT2VMrJhE
HUD Median Income for Fiscal Year 2016
Albemarle County
MSA: Charlottesville, VA HUD Metro FMR Area
Median Income: $77,800.00
Click on a column header for sorting.
Percentage One Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight
30% $16,800.00 $19,200.00 $21,600.00 $24,300.00 $28,440.00 $32,580.00 $36,730.00 $40,890.00
40% $22,400.00 $25,600.00 $28,800.00 $31,960.00 $34,520.00 $37,080.00 $39,640.00 $42,200.00
50% $28,000.00 $32,000.00 $36,000.00 $39,950.00 $43,150.00 $46,350.00 $49,550.00 $52,750.00
60% $33,600.00 $38,400.00 $43,200.00 $47,940.00 $51,780.00 $55,620.00 $59,460.00 $63,300.00
80% $44,750.00 $51,150.00 $57,550.00 $63,900.00 $69,050.00 $74,150.00 $79,250.00 $84,350.00
Non-Adjusted Income Limits for Albemarle County
Percentage: 50% 80% 100% 150%
Income: $38,900.00 $62,240.00 $77,800.00 $116,700.00
Albemarle County Median Income for 2016 = $ 77,800
80% of Median Income for 2016 = $ 62,240
120% of Median Income for 2016 = $ 93,360
PITI for Affordable Housing = (0.3 x $ 62,240) / 12 = $ 1,556 per month (maximum)
PITI for Workforce Housing = (0.3 x $ 93,360) / 12 = $ 2,334 per month (maximum)
From: Elaine Echols
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 2:21 PM
To: 'Justin Shimp, P.E.'; Ron White
Subject: Meet on Riverside
Categories: Red Category
I can meet next Wed. from 3-3:50. Justin and Ron, do you want to meet at CDD then?
From: Ron White
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 12:05 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Riverside Village Workforce Housing proffers
I’m not available today but next Wednesday is fairly open or next Thursday morning around 10. I will try
to do some calculations based on his proposed maximum payments to determine what sales price
would likely be supported. We need to identify a sales price not a mortgage payment amount.
From: Elaine Echols
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 9:20 AM
To: Ron White <rwhite2@albemarle.org>
Subject: FW: Riverside Village Workforce Housing proffers
Would you like for me to set up a meeting?
From: Justin Shimp, P.E. [mailto:justin@shimp-engineering.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 10:29 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Subject: Fwd: Riverside Village Workforce Housing proffers
Hi Elaine,
We imagine the workforce be ing priced the same way you do affordable, but with a higher
median income threshold and thus higher prices. See Kelly’s math below:
Do you have any time tomorrow to meet briefly or chat about this issue? I’ve got an 8:30
meeting and a 1pm meeting but otherwise am flexible.
Thanks,
Justin Shimp, P.E.
434-953-6116
Begin forwarded message:
Source: http://www.vhda.com/BusinessPartners/PropertyOwnersManagers/Income-
Rent-Limits/Pages/HUDMedianIncome.aspx#.WHeT2VMrJhE
HUD Median Income for Fiscal Year 2016
Albemarle County
MSA: Charlottesville, VA HUD Metro FMR Area
Median Income: $77,800.00
Click on a column header for sorting.
Percentage One Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight
30% $16,800.00 $19,200.00 $21,600.00 $24,300.00 $28,440.00 $32,580.00 $36,730.00 $40,890.00
40% $22,400.00 $25,600.00 $28,800.00 $31,960.00 $34,520.00 $37,080.00 $39,640.00 $42,200.00
50% $28,000.00 $32,000.00 $36,000.00 $39,950.00 $43,150.00 $46,350.00 $49,550.00 $52,750.00
60% $33,600.00 $38,400.00 $43,200.00 $47,940.00 $51,780.00 $55,620.00 $59,460.00 $63,300.00
80% $44,750.00 $51,150.00 $57,550.00 $63,900.00 $69,050.00 $74,150.00 $79,250.00 $84,350.00
Non-Adjusted Income Limits for Albemarle County
Percentage: 50% 80% 100% 150%
Income: $38,900.00 $62,240.00 $77,800.00 $116,700.00
Albemarle County Median Income for 2016 = $ 77,800
80% of Median Income for 2016 = $ 62,240
120% of Median Income for 2016 = $ 93,360
PITI for Affordable Housing = (0.3 x $ 62,240) / 12 = $ 1,556 per month (maximum)
PITI for Workforce Housing = (0.3 x $ 93,360) / 12 = $ 2,334 per month (maximum)
From: Elaine Echols
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 5:12 PM
To: Susan M. Stimart
Subject: RE: Comp. Plan info with relevance to Ec. Dev.
Categories: Red Category
Not every NMD has mixed use – they can apply for and receive an exception to this requirement. The
district has been used (sadly) by some because it has no minimum lot size and lot standards can be
customized to a site.
If you want to know more about any of these, you can use the application number and look at the ad in
CountyView to see if they are really mixed use.
Take care.
Elaine
From: Susan M. Stimart
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 5:17 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Comp. Plan info with relevance to Ec. Dev.
I can’t tell why Lofts at Meadowcreek are considered mixed use, are they meant to be live/work units?
How fun would that be!
Have a great weekend!
From: Elaine Echols
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 1:30 PM
To: Susan M. Stimart <sstimart@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Comp. Plan info with relevance to Ec. Dev.
Application
Number Project Name
ZMA200800003 Albemarle Place
ZMA200400007 Belvedere
ZMA200500017 Biscuit Run
ZMA200700014 Boars Head Inn Meeting Pavilion-ESCP
ZMA200200004 Cascadia
ZMA200200005 Foothill Crossing
ZMA200400016 Glenwood Station
ZMA201100005 Greenbrier Commons
ZMA200500007 Haden Place
ZMA200700001 Hollymead Town Center - Area A2
ZMA201000006 Hollymead Town Center, Area A2
ZMA200500005 Liberty Hall (Cross Property) - NMD
ZMA200700004 Oakleigh Farm
ZMA201500001 Old Trail Village
ZMA201200003 Out Of Bounds
ZMA200500008 Pantops Park
ZMA200600014 Professional Office Building at Hydraulic & Georgetown Roads
ZMA201300012 Rivanna Village
ZMA201500003 Riverside Village Neighborhood Model District
ZMA201300017 Spring Hill Village
ZMA201300001 THE LOFTS AT MEADOWCREEK
ZMA200400017 Wickham Pond
ZMA200500018 Wickham Pond - Phase II
ZMA200300008 Woodbrook Station
I believe that the list of projects above is the universe of NMDs. Some had amendments, so the
application number may or may not be the latest one. The names are complete, though.
Elaine
From: Susan M. Stimart
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 12:40 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Comp. Plan info with relevance to Ec. Dev.
Thanks Elaine, this is a really good reminder!
Can you confirm with me the “universe” of NMD rezoning we have approved,
1. Old Trail
2. Wickham Pond
3. Liberty Hall
4. Belvedere
5. North point
6. Hollymead Town Center
7. Keith Woodard’s Hydraulic/G’town corner (name?)
8. Albemarle Place/Stonefield
9. Glenwood Station - Condos in front of Fashion square Mall
10. Pantops Park (VNB)
11. Riverside Village
12. Cascadia
13. Biscuit Run
14. Haden Place
I don’t want to include Brookhill since it’s so new. Any others I’m missing?
Thanks,
Susan
From: Elaine Echols
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 11:29 AM
To: Faith McClintic <fmcclintic@albemarle.org>; Susan M. Stimart <sstimart@albemarle.org>
Subject: Comp. Plan info with relevance to Ec. Dev.
Hi there,
I know you are probably intimately familiar with the Ec. Dev. Chapter in the Comp. Plan, so I haven’t
included it in the info I pulled for you on statistics we used with the Comp. Plan and what is in the
Housing Chapter that is probably relevant.
In the attachment, I have highlighted info in yellow where I think it relates specifically to what we talked
about on Wed. I would encourage you to read all 11 pages (several are just charts) so that you know
what we have said to the world and how we have been dealing with the need for affordable housing.
Please let me know if you have questions.
Thanks.
Elaine
Elaine K. Echols, FAICP
Acting Chief of Planning
Albemarle County Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5823 x 3252
From: Elaine Echols
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 3:36 PM
To: 'Rex Linville'
Subject: RE: New Residential Units in the Piepline
Attachments: New Res. Units in Pipeline as of 11-10-16.xlsx
Categories: Red Category
Here you go.
From: Rex Linville [mailto:rlinville@pecva.org]
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 11:47 AM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Subject: Re: New Residential Units in the Piepline
Elaine,
This is a very helpful database of projects. Do you have this as a spreadsheet? If so, could you
send it to me in that format?
Rex
W. Rex Linville, Land Conservation Officer
Piedmont Environmental Council
410 E. Water St, Suite 700
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Work: (434) 977-2033
Cell: (434) 466-8843
Web: www.pecva.org
Twitter: @RexLinville
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org> wrote:
Dear CAC Members,
Staff recently prepared the attached information on the development projects proposed/under
review countywide, which you'll find in the spreadsheet attached. This has been shared with the
Schools division to help with their enrollment projections. We thought we would pass it on to
you as well. As I mentioned at the Joint event in October, staff will be conducting a detailed
capacity analysis for the development areas. This work will begin in December so as to cover
all activity for calendar year 2016. We hope to have this information completed by M arch 2017
to provide to the Planning Commission with their annual report.
Please remember that this is a snapshot in time - sometimes the number of anticipated units
change. In addition, new units are completed every day. Please also remember that this is not
the full list of all possible development in your Development Area. It represents what we know
right now based on numbers of units proposed by rezoning and by special use permit and
numbers shown on final plats and site plans that have been noted in CountyView. Units
constructed for the same project have been taken from the County's GIS Web system.
If you think there is an error for a particular project, PLEASE contact me so I can check into it.
Also remember that I will plan on visiting your CAC in future months to go over where these
projects are located in your area. I visited Pantops in October and am visiting with Crozet next
week. I will show you the places currently not developed and what they are designated for on
the Land Use Plan and zoning map.
I hope you have a great weekend.
Elaine
Elaine K. Echols, FAICP
Acting Chief of Planning
Albemarle County Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5823 x 3252
From: Elaine Echols
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 5:47 PM
To: 'John Mastrandea'; Rosalyn Schmitt; Jackson Zimmermann; Dean Tistadt; Joe
Letteri
Cc: David Benish
Subject: RE: Projections
Attachments: New Res. Units in Pipeline as of 11-4-16.xlsx
Categories: Red Category
Hi all,
Attached is our updated list of projects. A map will be forthcoming.
Elaine
From: John Mastrandea [mailto:jmastrandea@k12albemarle.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 4:26 PM
To: Rosalyn Schmitt <rschmitt@k12albemarle.org>; Jackson Zimmermann
<jzimmerm@k12albemarle.org>; Dean Tistadt <dtistadt@k12albemarle.org>; Joe Letteri
<jletteri@k12albemarle.org>
Cc: David Benish <DBENISH@albemarle.org>; Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Subject: Projections
Attached are the projections.
________________________________________________
John H. Mastrandea
Albemarle County Public Schools
Fiscal Services Project Manager
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
Phone 434-296-5829 Fax: 434-974-8004
Email: Jmastrandea@k12albemarle.org
From: Ron White
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 11:57 AM
To: Elaine Echols
Subject: RE: Riverside Village - 24 units added
Categories: Red Category
Thanks for clarifying. It would be helpful to know what the proposed price points would be on the
“workforce” units.
Ron White
Chief of Housing
(434) 296-5839
From: Elaine Echols
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 11:41 AM
To: Ron White <rwhite2@albemarle.org>
Subject: Riverside Village - 24 units added
Hi Ron,
I hope you are having or have had very good holidays!
ZMA2015-03 Riverside Village has asked for 24 additional units through the current ZMA201600019.
They are not altering any of the previously approved proffers for affordable units. They are not offering
any cash proffers on the new units. (Legal said this qualifies as an “old” rezoning and they could make
such proffers.) They are not making any cash proffers because they are proffering 15% of the new 24 will
be affordable as for-sale or for-rent units. In addition, they are proffering that an additional 30% of the
new units will be workforce housing units. (I think that means there will be 4 affordable units and 7
workforce units).
We will deal with the issue of cash proffers on the non -affordable units over here, but I’m wondering if
you would comment on the attached proposed proffers, especially for the workforce units. You may
remember that the PC worked on a policy for giving some credit for workforce units but couldn’t finish
that work in time to get it into the Comp. Plan update so we have no official policy on workforce units.
We can talk further about this once you have had a chance to review the packet which is coming your
way in the pony. I thought I’d give you the headsup, though, and am attaching the proffers.
Thanks.
Elaine
Elaine K. Echols, FAICP
Chief of Planning
Albemarle County Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5823 x 3252
From: Elaine Echols
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 4:24 PM
To: 'Justin Shimp, P.E.'
Subject: RE: Riverside Village Workforce Housing proffers
Categories: Red Category
Could you please look into my questions below? I want to provide comments very soon, but need more
info.
Thanks.
From: Justin Shimp, P.E. [mailto:justin@shimp-engineering.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 11:21 AM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Cc: Rebecca Ragsdale <rragsdale@albemarle.org>
Subject: Re: Riverside Village Workforce Housing proffers
Hi Elaine,
I took a little time off over the holiday but will get back to you on this by the end of the week.
Thanks,
Justin Shimp, P.E.
434-953-6116
On Dec 30, 2016, at 12:03 PM, Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
wrote:
Hi Justin,
I hope you are having good holidays.
I am working with Ron White on the affordable housing proffers and he had some
questions for which answers would be helpful.
1. What is meant by the words in parentheses on the 2nd page of the letter, “a ten
year investment that restricts 45% of the proposed units”? The proffers don’t
have any limitations on a term for maintaining affordability.
2. What are the proposed price points would on the “workforce” units?
Thanks.
Elaine
Elaine K. Echols, FAICP
Chief of Planning
Albemarle County Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5823 x 3252
From: Justin Shimp, P.E. <justin@shimp -engineering.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 11:21 AM
To: Elaine Echols
Cc: Rebecca Ragsdale
Subject: Re: Riverside Village Workforce Housing proffers
Categories: Red Category
Hi Elaine,
I took a little time off over the holiday but will get back to you on this by the end of the week.
Thanks,
Justin Shimp, P.E.
434-953-6116
On Dec 30, 2016, at 12:03 PM, Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
wrote:
Hi Justin,
I hope you are having good holidays.
I am working with Ron White on the affordable housing proffers and he had some
questions for which answers would be helpful.
1. What is meant by the words in parentheses on the 2nd page of the letter, “a ten
year investment that restricts 45% of the proposed units”? The proffers don’t
have any limitations on a term for maintaining affordability.
2. What are the proposed price points would on the “workforce” units?
Thanks.
Elaine
Elaine K. Echols, FAICP
Chief of Planning
Albemarle County Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5823 x 3252
From: Ron White
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 12:05 PM
To: Elaine Echols
Subject: RE: Riverside Village Workforce Housing proffers
Categories: Red Category
I’m not available today but next Wednesday is fairly open or next Thursday morning around 10. I will try
to do some calculations based on his proposed maximum payments to determine what sales price
would likely be supported. We need to identify a sales price not a mortgage payment amount.
From: Elaine Echols
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 9:20 AM
To: Ron White <rwhite2@albemarle.org>
Subject: FW: Riverside Village Workforce Housing proffers
Would you like for me to set up a meeting?
From: Justin Shimp, P.E. [mailto:justin@shimp-engineering.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 10:29 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Subject: Fwd: Riverside Village Workforce Housing proffers
Hi Elaine,
We imagine the workforce being priced the same way you do affordable, but with a higher
median income threshold and thus higher prices. See Kelly’s math below:
Do you have any time tomorrow to meet briefly or chat about this issue? I’ve got an 8:30
meeting and a 1pm meeting but otherwise am flexible.
Thanks,
Justin Shimp, P.E.
434-953-6116
Begin forwarded message:
Source: http://www.vhda.com/BusinessPartners/PropertyOwnersManagers/Income-
Rent-Limits/Pages/HUDMedianIncome.aspx#.WHeT2VMrJhE
HUD Median Income for Fiscal Year 2016
Albemarle County
MSA: Charlottesville, VA HUD Metro FMR Area
Median Income: $77,800.00
Click on a column header for sorting.
Percentage One Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight
30% $16,800.00 $19,200.00 $21,600.00 $24,300.00 $28,440.00 $32,580.00 $36,730.00 $40,890.00
40% $22,400.00 $25,600.00 $28,800.00 $31,960.00 $34,520.00 $37,080.00 $39,640.00 $42,200.00
50% $28,000.00 $32,000.00 $36,000.00 $39,950.00 $43,150.00 $46,350.00 $49,550.00 $52,750.00
60% $33,600.00 $38,400.00 $43,200.00 $47,940.00 $51,780.00 $55,620.00 $59,460.00 $63,300.00
80% $44,750.00 $51,150.00 $57,550.00 $63,900.00 $69,050.00 $74,150.00 $79,250.00 $84,350.00
Non-Adjusted Income Limits for Albemarle County
Percentage: 50% 80% 100% 150%
Income: $38,900.00 $62,240.00 $77,800.00 $116,700.00
Albemarle County Median Income for 2016 = $ 77,800
80% of Median Income for 2016 = $ 62,240
120% of Median Income for 2016 = $ 93,360
PITI for Affordable Housing = (0.3 x $ 62,240) / 12 = $ 1,556 per month (maximum)
PITI for Workforce Housing = (0.3 x $ 93,360) / 12 = $ 2,334 per month (maximum)
From: Elaine Echols
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 3:28 PM
To: 'Deel, Justin (VDOT)'
Cc: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT)
Subject: RE: Riverside Village ZMA201600019
Categories: Red Category
I don’t know what happened – I put the plan in the packet I sent – something must have occurred in
transit to separate it. I am glad to send you another plan.
Do you know if we deliver to you tomorrow?
From: Deel, Justin (VDOT) [mailto:Justin.Deel@vdot.virginia.gov]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 1:46 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Cc: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT) <Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov>
Subject: Riverside Village ZMA201600019
Elaine,
We did not receive the revised application plan, only the comment response letter and proffer
statement. While I agree with your note that there may not be anything of VDOT concern on the
resubmittal, since there has been revision can you send a copy of the plan so that we can confirm?
Thanks!
Justin
Justin Deel, P.E.
Land Development Engineer
Virginia Department of Transportation
434-422-9894
540-717-1408 (c)
From: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT) <Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov>
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:43 PM
To: Elaine Echols
Cc: Deel, Justin (VDOT)
Subject: Re: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Categories: Red Category
Ok, I misunderstood what you were saying we couldn't require.
Adam J. Moore, P.E. | Assistant Resident Engineer/Area Land Use Engineer
VDOT - Charlottesville Residency
701 VDOT Way | Charlottesville | VA
main 434.422.9782
On Nov 28, 2016, at 3:41 PM, Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org> wrote:
You can. It just can’t be required on the plan. Not every ZMA includes a plan. You all
determine whether a TIA is needed and, I believe, can require it. The information
accompanies the request.
From: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT) [mailto:Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:39 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Cc: Deel, Justin (VDOT) <Justin.Deel@vdot.virginia.gov>
Subject: Re: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Elaine,
Traffic generation data is included in every TIA (which almost always accompany
ZMAs). This is information absolutely pertinent to evaluating the potential impact of the
amendment. So, why can't we ask for it?
Adam J. Moore, P.E. | Assistant Resident Engineer/Area Land Use
Engineer
VDOT - Charlottesville Residency
701 VDOT Way | Charlottesville | VA
main 434.422.9782
On Nov 28, 2016, at 3:35 PM, Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org> wrote:
This is not something that can be required for a SP or ZMA. I think you
can request it on a site plan or plat. I don’t think we can require it.
Elaine
From: Deel, Justin (VDOT) [mailto:Justin.Deel@vdot.virginia.gov]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Cc: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT) <Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov>
Subject: RE: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Thanks, Elaine. However, this still needs to be included on the plans.
From: Elaine Echols [mailto:EECHOLS@albemarle.org]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:31 PM
To: Deel, Justin (VDOT)
Cc: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT)
Subject: RE: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Sadly, I am finding that not every packet that went out for this ZMA was
complete. Here is what should have been sent, please ignore my
handwritten notes.
Thanks for your prompt attention.
Elaine
From: Deel, Justin (VDOT) [mailto:Justin.Deel@vdot.virginia.gov]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 2:16 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Cc: Justin Shimp, P.E. <justin@shimp-engineering.com>; Lauren Gilroy
<lauren@shimp-engineering.com>; Moore, Adam PE (VDOT)
<Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov>
Subject: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Ms. Echols,
Attached is our review letter for ZMA201600019 Riverside Village,
which includes the following comment.
The project narrative made reference to a daily trip generation
which shows a reduction in traffic volume. This was not found.
Please include the trip generation calculations on the plans.
Justin
Justin Deel, EIT
Land Development Engineer
Virginia Department of Transportation
434-422-9894
540-717-1408 (c)
From: Deel, Justin (VDOT) <Justin.Deel@vdot.virginia.gov>
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:40 PM
To: Elaine Echols
Cc: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT)
Subject: RE: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Categories: Red Category
Interesting. Everything else is included on this plan. Is it not all required?
From: Elaine Echols [mailto:EECHOLS@albemarle.org]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:36 PM
To: Deel, Justin (VDOT)
Cc: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT)
Subject: RE: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
This is not something that can be required for a SP or ZMA. I think you can request it on a site plan or
plat. I don’t think we can require it.
Elaine
From: Deel, Justin (VDOT) [mailto:Justin.Deel@vdot.virginia.gov]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Cc: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT) <Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov>
Subject: RE: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Thanks, Elaine. However, this still needs to be included on the plans.
From: Elaine Echols [mailto:EECHOLS@albemarle.org]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:31 PM
To: Deel, Justin (VDOT)
Cc: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT)
Subject: RE: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Sadly, I am finding that not every packet that went out for this ZMA was complete. Here is what should
have been sent, please ignore my handwritten notes.
Thanks for your prompt attention.
Elaine
From: Deel, Justin (VDOT) [mailto:Justin.Deel@vdot.virginia.gov]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 2:16 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Cc: Justin Shimp, P.E. <justin@shimp-engineering.com>; Lauren Gilroy <lauren@shimp-
engineering.com>; Moore, Adam PE (VDOT) <Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov>
Subject: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Ms. Echols,
Attached is our review letter for ZMA201600019 Riverside Village, which includes the following
comment.
The project narrative made reference to a daily trip generation which shows a reduction in
traffic volume. This was not found. Please include the trip generation calculations on the plans.
Justin
Justin Deel, EIT
Land Development Engineer
Virginia Department of Transportation
434-422-9894
540-717-1408 (c)
From: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT) <Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov>
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:39 PM
To: Elaine Echols
Cc: Deel, Justin (VDOT)
Subject: Re: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Categories: Red Category
Elaine,
Traffic generation data is included in every TIA (which almost always accompany ZMAs). This is
information absolutely pertinent to evaluating the potential impact of the amendment. So, why can't
we ask for it?
Adam J. Moore, P.E. | Assistant Resident Engineer/Area Land Use Engineer
VDOT - Charlottesville Residency
701 VDOT Way | Charlottesville | VA
main 434.422.9782
On Nov 28, 2016, at 3:35 PM, Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org> wrote:
This is not something that can be required for a SP or ZMA. I think you can request it on
a site plan or plat. I don’t think we can require it.
Elaine
From: Deel, Justin (VDOT) [mailto:Justin.Deel@vdot.virginia.gov]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Cc: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT) <Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov>
Subject: RE: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Thanks, Elaine. However, this still needs to be included on the plans.
From: Elaine Echols [mailto:EECHOLS@albemarle.org]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:31 PM
To: Deel, Justin (VDOT)
Cc: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT)
Subject: RE: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Sadly, I am finding that not every packet that went out for this ZMA was complete. Here
is what should have been sent, please ignore my handwritten notes.
Thanks for your prompt attention.
Elaine
From: Deel, Justin (VDOT) [mailto:Justin.Deel@vdot.virginia.gov]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 2:16 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Cc: Justin Shimp, P.E. <justin@shimp-engineering.com>; Lauren Gilroy <lauren@shimp-
engineering.com>; Moore, Adam PE (VDOT) <Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov>
Subject: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Ms. Echols,
Attached is our review letter for ZMA201600019 Riverside Village, which includes the
following comment.
The project narrative made reference to a daily trip generation which shows a
reduction in traffic volume. This was not found. Please include the trip
generation calculations on the plans.
Justin
Justin Deel, EIT
Land Development Engineer
Virginia Department of Transportation
434-422-9894
540-717-1408 (c)
From: Elaine Echols
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:36 PM
To: 'Deel, Justin (VDOT)'
Cc: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT)
Subject: RE: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Categories: Red Category
This is not something that can be required for a SP or ZMA. I think you can request it on a site plan or
plat. I don’t think we can require it.
Elaine
From: Deel, Justin (VDOT) [mailto:Justin.Deel@vdot.virginia.gov]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Cc: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT) <Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov>
Subject: RE: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Thanks, Elaine. However, this still needs to be included on the plans.
From: Elaine Echols [mailto:EECHOLS@albemarle.org]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:31 PM
To: Deel, Justin (VDOT)
Cc: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT)
Subject: RE: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Sadly, I am finding that not every packet that went out for this ZMA was complete. Here is what should
have been sent, please ignore my handwritten notes.
Thanks for your prompt attention.
Elaine
From: Deel, Justin (VDOT) [mailto:Justin.Deel@vdot.virginia.gov]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 2:16 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Cc: Justin Shimp, P.E. <justin@shimp-engineering.com>; Lauren Gilroy <lauren@shimp-
engineering.com>; Moore, Adam PE (VDOT) <Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov>
Subject: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Ms. Echols,
Attached is our review letter for ZMA201600019 Riverside Village, which includes the following
comment.
The project narrative made reference to a daily trip generation which shows a reduction in
traffic volume. This was not found. Please include the trip generation calculations on the plans.
Justin
Justin Deel, EIT
Land Development Engineer
Virginia Department of Transportation
434-422-9894
540-717-1408 (c)
From: Elaine Echols
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:43 PM
To: 'Moore, Adam PE (VDOT)'
Cc: Deel, Justin (VDOT)
Subject: RE: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Categories: Red Category
Sorry for the confusion!
From: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT) [mailto:Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:43 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Cc: Deel, Justin (VDOT) <Justin.Deel@vdot.virginia.gov>
Subject: Re: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Ok, I misunderstood what you were saying we couldn't require.
Adam J. Moore, P.E. | Assistant Resident Engineer/Area Land Use Engineer
VDOT - Charlottesville Residency
701 VDOT Way | Charlottesville | VA
main 434.422.9782
On Nov 28, 2016, at 3:41 PM, Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org> wrote:
You can. It just can’t be required on the plan. Not every ZMA includes a plan. You all
determine whether a TIA is needed and, I believe, can require it. The information
accompanies the request.
From: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT) [mailto:Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:39 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Cc: Deel, Justin (VDOT) <Justin.Deel@vdot.virginia.gov>
Subject: Re: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Elaine,
Traffic generation data is included in every TIA (which almost always accompany
ZMAs). This is information absolutely pertinent to evaluating the potential impact of the
amendment. So, why can't we ask for it?
Adam J. Moore, P.E. | Assistant Resident Engineer/Area Land Use
Engineer
VDOT - Charlottesville Residency
701 VDOT Way | Charlottesville | VA
main 434.422.9782
On Nov 28, 2016, at 3:35 PM, Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org> wrote:
This is not something that can be required for a SP or ZMA. I think you
can request it on a site plan or plat. I don’t think we can require it.
Elaine
From: Deel, Justin (VDOT) [mailto:Justin.Deel@vdot.virginia.gov]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Cc: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT) <Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov>
Subject: RE: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Thanks, Elaine. However, this still needs to be included on the plans.
From: Elaine Echols [mailto:EECHOLS@albemarle.org]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:31 PM
To: Deel, Justin (VDOT)
Cc: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT)
Subject: RE: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Sadly, I am finding that not every packet that went out for this ZMA was
complete. Here is what should have been sent, please ignore my
handwritten notes.
Thanks for your prompt attention.
Elaine
From: Deel, Justin (VDOT) [mailto:Justin.Deel@vdot.virginia.gov]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 2:16 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Cc: Justin Shimp, P.E. <justin@shimp-engineering.com>; Lauren Gilroy
<lauren@shimp-engineering.com>; Moore, Adam PE (VDOT)
<Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov>
Subject: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-28-16
Ms. Echols,
Attached is our review letter for ZMA201600019 Riverside Village,
which includes the following comment.
The project narrative made reference to a daily trip generation
which shows a reduction in traffic volume. This was not found.
Please include the trip generation calculations on the plans.
Justin
Justin Deel, EIT
Land Development Engineer
Virginia Department of Transportation
434-422-9894
540-717-1408 (c)
From: Elaine Echols
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 12:03 PM
To: 'Justin Shimp, P.E.'
Cc: Rebecca Ragsdale
Subject: Riverside Village Workforce Housing proffers
Categories: Red Category
Hi Justin,
I hope you are having good holidays.
I am working with Ron White on the affordable housing proffers and he had some questions for which
answers would be helpful.
1. What is meant by the words in parentheses on the 2nd page of the letter, “a ten year investment
that restricts 45% of the proposed units”? The proffers don’t have any limitations on a term for
maintaining affordability.
2. What are the proposed price points would on the “workforce” units?
Thanks.
Elaine
Elaine K. Echols, FAICP
Chief of Planning
Albemarle County Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5823 x 3252
From: Deel, Justin (VDOT) <Justin.Deel@vdot.virginia.gov>
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 1:46 PM
To: Elaine Echols
Cc: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT)
Subject: Riverside Village ZMA201600019
Categories: Red Category
Elaine,
We did not receive the revised application plan, only the comment response letter and proffer
statement. While I agree with your note that there may not be anything of VDOT concern on the
resubmittal, since there has been revision can you send a copy of the plan so that we can confirm?
Thanks!
Justin
Justin Deel, P.E.
Land Development Engineer
Virginia Department of Transportation
434-422-9894
540-717-1408 (c)
From: Elaine Echols
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 12:10 PM
To: Kevin McDermott
Subject: Riverside Village
Categories: Red Category
PROJECT: ZMA 201600019 Riverside Village Amendments
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Rivanna
TAX MAP/PARCEL(S): 078G0-00-01-000A0
LOCATION: Northwest quadrant of Stony Point Road (Rt. 20) and Trailside Drive. PROPOSAL: Increase
maximum number of dwellings from 69 to 105 and modify the application plan, proffers and the code of
development.
PETITION: Modify application plan, Code of Development, and proffers for 2.41 acres zoned
Neighborhood Model District, which allows residential (3 – 34 units/acre) mixed with commercial and
service uses in order to 1) increase the maximum number of units in Block 1 from 16 to 36 which results
in an increase in density from 6.6 units per acre to 13.4 units/acre; 2) reduce the min. commercial sq. ft.
from 16,000 to 8,000 sq. ft. in Block 1; 3) replace a single 5,000 sq. ft. plaza with multiple smaller plazas
totaling 5,000 sq. ft.; 4) modify proffers to provide 15% affordable units in Block 1; and 5) state that cash
proffers for impacts will not be provided on any units in Block1.
OVERLAY DISTRICT(S): Entrance Corridor
PROFFERS: Yes
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Neighborhood Density Residential – residential (3-6 units/acre); supporting
uses such as religious institutions, schools and other small-scale non-residential uses; and River Corridor
– parks, golf courses, greenways, natural features and supporting commercial and recreational uses in
Neighborhood 3 – Pantops Development Area.
POTENTIALLY IN MONTICELLO VIEWSHED: Yes
Elaine K. Echols, FAICP
Chief of Planning
Albemarle County Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5823 x 3252
From: Deel, Justin (VDOT) <Justin.Deel@vdot.virginia.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 8:54 AM
To: Elaine Echols
Cc: 'Justin Shimp, P.E.'; Moore, Adam PE (VDOT)
Subject: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-30-16
Attachments: ZMA201600019 Riverside Village - 11-30-16.pdf
Categories: Red Category
Ms. Echols,
Attached is our approval letter for ZMA201600019 Riverside Village.
Justin
Justin Deel, EIT
Land Development Engineer
Virginia Department of Transportation
434-422-9894
540-717-1408 (c)