HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201800054 Review Comments Initial Site Plan 2018-08-22COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
August 22, 2018
Scott Collins, P.E.
Collins Engineering
200 Garrett Street, Suite K
Charlottesville, VA 22902
scottncollins-en in�g com
RE: SDP201800054 and SUB201800119 Brookhill Block 8B -Initial Site Plan and Preliminary
Subdivision Plat
Dear Mr. Collins:
The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Initial comments
from the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as
applicable, are attached:
Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner)
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) (attached
Albemarle County Information Services (E911) (attached
Albemarle County Building Inspections
Albemarle County Architectural Review Board (attached
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue
Albemarle County Service Authority (attached
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority
Virginia Department of Transportation (attached
Thomas Jefferson Health District
Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should
not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that
will be required to be resolved prior to Final Site Plan approval. The applicant shall request the project be
deferred to allow required revisions if required.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Cameron/ Langille
Senior Planner
CC:
Alan Taylor
Riverbend Development
321 E. Main Street
Charlottesville, VA 22902
alan(a�riverbenddev. com
Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner) —Cameron Langille, blan ig lle(c-r�,albemarle.org —Required changes:
[32.5.2 (i)] Please address the following comments related to road improvements:
a. The final site plan for Block 8B will need to accurately depict all improvements within the right-
of-ways visible on the plans. The right of ways for new streets in Block 8B must be reviewed,
approved, and recorded prior to final site plan approval. The final plat must label the roads with the
correct recorded instrument deed book and page number.
b. [14-410 and 14-422] Alley A must have sidewalks and street trees along both sides of the street.
c. All roads shown within Block 8B are labeled as proposed private streets or private alleys. Per Section
2.8.1 on pages 24-25 of the Code of Development, all streets within Block 8B are required to follow the
"Neighborhood Streets — VDOT Public Roads" standard. The streets shown do not have the required
features for the Neighborhood Streets type, including parking along one side of the street. Please revise.
If the layout and design of Block 8B is affected due to widening the right of way to incorporate on -street
parking, the site plan and preliminary plat may need to go through the site review committee again. Staff
would like to discuss this further with the applicant at the SRC meeting on 8/23.
d. [14-233 and 14-234] Any proposed private streets trying to utilize the design standard of "Private Streets
— Private Streets and private streets serving Amenity -Oriented Lots" must obtain approval from the
Planning Commission, and this request must be submitted with the preliminary plat in accordance with
Section 14-234 of the Subdivision Ordinance. If the applicant wishes to pursue approval of these streets
as private streets, the authorization request must be submitted prior to the agent approving the
preliminary plat. The deadline for submitting the request is Friday, September 7, 2018. Please provide
a justification request for all proposed private streets in accordance with 14-234.
e. [14-410 and 14-422] Alley A must have sidewalks and street trees along both sides of the street.
f. Please label all roads visible on Block 8B final plat with a width measurement and state whether the
road is public or private. Prior to final plat approval, all street right of ways that have been dedicated to
public use or under private easement should feature a label stating the deed book and page number.
2. [General Comment] Lots 16-27 do not meet minimum frontage requirements because their driveway is shown
along Alley A and the other side of the lot fronts a private street. See page 30 of the Code of Development for
further information.
3. [ZMA201500007] Sheet 2 is not the approved Application Plan. Revise to include the approved plan that was
modified at the Board of Supervisors meeting to not include the trailhead at Ashwood Blvd. Link to approved
plan.
4. [Application Plan; COD; Proffers] When will the greenway easement within Block 8B be dedicated to
public use? Per proffer #2 of ZMA201500007, the greenway must be dedicated to the County.
2,4 Greens ace and Amenities
Broakhill wtl] feature ever 100 acres ofGreenspace T'h�s Greensgace represents mare than 35%
of the entu�e community's land area, and includes the Buffer areas, the Greenway and stream
i�uffers, parks and civic amenity areas, and general open space The Greenspace well not Drily
provtde a linear trail system throughout the community, but shall also preserve envu�onntentally
senstt�ve areas such as steep slopes, streams, and stream buffers A!1 of the Greenspace areas
shall be located outside of pnvate lots and right�f=-way All Greenspace within Brnvkhill, wEth
the exception of the Greeenway, will be awned and n�amtamed by the Homeowners Assoctatian.
Establishment of the buffers, trails, and amenities w�th�n the Greenspace will be the
respnnsibilrty of the developer
�JpoYt written rct;ucsl by the C'aunty, >7ut not prior to the issuarrcc iyf [hc fi�•c. hundrerltfa (Sf10tl�)
Pcnttii kor a dkvclling tivitkein tl3e l'rc�,je��t. t11e il��,'ner shall dcr�icatc io lFi i:.tlunty an c❑sc�nctt[ for
public use over the Cireenway area, :s, sl�o�•tt [�n ilec Applic�aiian 1']a3I- Prior to thG C'o�le3lr•'S
r�q�Iest to dedicate such rascment, the CJwnc�r tnay dedicate lrnrtiotis of t11c Green�•ay lyy
CA$i;111L:Ilt c[snClf�TCntly� with Uiie or more suhditiis%inn plays for an;a� 1}ing adjacent m the
�TY�`{`rlkk'ii}': pre+vidt:d however, tl;at (?vuner ttlay reserve in sacl� L'21y4111C:1Cti, R�,hTS 4f AGCi`SS t+.�r
bra[ling, ulili�ics :tnd mai[i[e3�afxce. r:ac17 stlbdj�'jsi.on pla[ shall dc}�i�;l the C,reenu'ay .area [o be
cedicated and shall bear a rlotatior� that ilrti Gr��Ilway urea is dedicated for �vblee use, EI-, .tt the
tin:e the C'ounry rulucsta <fi:dication [}f the Circcnway, �Iny EtaErt oftlie Grecliway that has not I�een
dedicated by sub[li��isi[I�t plot, sksak] be (���iihi3l six {fa} m<�r3th of sx,ckt rcilucsi) ai i]X�ner�s cnst,
sun•cyed. }Matted and recnrded �viti� nne nr rnpr�: dcccls tsf c:ascn3cnt dedication.
5. [14-419; 32.7.9.7] Lots 1-27 and 38-55 are double frontage lots. A minimum of 20' buffer/landscape area
is required between the lots and the right of way to be planted in accordance with 32.7.9.7. This requirement
is not being met, revise.
6. [ZMA201500007] In accordance with Section 2.14 on page 31 of the COD, lots 31-35 do not qualify as
amenity oriented lots because there is not an open area that is 50' in width from face of building to face of
building. These lots must be served by a public street. See comment #2 above for further information.
7. [32.5.2 (o) and ZMA201500007] Please expand the Block Area Summary on Sheet 3 to include all the columns
contained in Table 2 of the Code of Development. The required and proposed acreages of each feature should
also be stated so that staff can verify compliance with the minimum requirements for greenspace/amenities, as
well as the development area requirements.
a. The proposed acreages of each feature in Blocks 3 and 4 that are currently under site plan review should
also be stated even though they are not part of the Block 8B initial site plan/preliminaryptat review.
b. The Block Area Summary on Sheet 3 does not include the proposed acreage of Block 4C, please
revise.
[32.5.2 (a)] The land area of all blocks in Brookhill may not be modified more than 15% of the gross land area
shown in Table 2 (page 6) of the Code of Development. Please be aware that the proposed gross land area (20.7
acres) of Block 8A and 8B is currently modified by 20% (5.1 acres less than the acreage specific in the COD),
according to the Total Project Area on Sheet 1. This is not permitted.
a. The "Land Areas" and "Open Space Provided" sections on Sheet 1 do not match the "Total Project
Area" on Sheet 1, or the Block Area Summary on Sheet 3, or the Open Space Calculation on Sheet 5.
Please revise and comply with the requirements of Table 2 of the Code of Development.
9. [32.5.2 (a)] Please amend the watershed note on Sheet 1 to state whether that is a water supply watershed.
10. [32.5.2 (a), 32.5.2 (o) and ZMA201500007] Please expand the Block Area Summary on Sheet 3 to include
all the columns contained in Table 2 of the Code of Development for Block 8B. The required and proposed
acreages of each feature should also be stated so that staff can verify compliance with the minimum
requirements for greenspace/amenities, as well as the development area requirements.
a. Under "Land Areas" on Sheet 1, please state the acreage of land within the "development area" as shown
in Table 2 on page 6 of the Code of Development.
b. The "Land Areas" note should also contain the proposed acreage of amenity areas.
11. [32.5.2 (a)] Prior to final site plan approval and plat approval, please revise the Existing Conditions and all other
applicable drawings where adjacent properties are visible. The correct so that the correct Tax Map Parcel
numbers for the Block 3A Ice Rink and Block 4 apartments may exist by the time of final review and these
should be labeled with the correct deed book and instrument number.
12. [32.5.2 (a)] On Sheet 1, please state the Special Use Permit application number that was approved to allow
grading activities in the Flood Hazard Overlay District. The approved application number is SP201500025 and
the County approval date was November 9, 2016.
a. Please add the approved conditions of SP201500025 to the final site plan and plat.
13. [32.5.2 (a)] Under Zoning on Sheet 1, please state the Board of Supervisors approval date of November 9,
2016 to the notes for both SP201500025 and ZMA201500007.
14. [32.5.2 (a)] Please amend the Zoning note on Sheet 1 to include all applicable overlay districts. It should state
Neighborhood Model Development District as the primary zoning district. Block 8B also lies within the
following overlay districts: EC -Entrance Corridor Overlay, AIA —Airport Impact Overlay, and Managed and
Preserved Steep Slopes Overlay Zoning Districts.
15. [32.5.2 (c)] The limits of managed and Preserved Steep Slopes are not shown on the drawings as stated in the
Note on Sheet 1. Please show the limits of these features.
a. Please be aware that all Preserved Steep Slopes areas must be located within open space and need to be
shown on the final site plan and plat.
16. [32.5.2 (a)] Please add a note to Sheet 1 titled "Block Classification" with "Neighborhood Density Residential"
as the block type for Block 8B, as stipulated by the Brookhill Code of Development.
17. [32.5.2 (b)] The Zoning Administrator and Director of Planning have determined that the proposed use in Block
8B is considered "Attached Single -Family Dwelling Units" as described in Sections 2.2.2 and 2.3.2.3 of the
Code of Development and the County Zoning Ordinance. Please amend the "Proposed Use" on Sheet 1 to state
"55 Attached Single -Family Residential Parcels —110 Total Dwelling Units. See attached email.
a. Please remove the use note on the drawings that states Block 8B is amulti-family condominium.
18. [32.5.2 (b)] Please state the maximum building footprint permitted on Sheet 1 in accordance with Table 2.3.2.3
on page 18 of the COD.
19. [32.5.2 (b)] Please state the minimum and maximum lot sizes permitted in Block 8B in accordance with Section
2.3.2.3 on page 18 of the Code of Development.
20. [32.5.2 (a)] Please amend the setbacks note on Sheet 1. It should state all permitted setbacks (including porches
and garages, as well as the notes column) in accordance with Table 2.3.2.3 from page 18 of the Brookhill Code
of Development.
a. The porches setback figure is incorrect, porches must be setback a minimum of 5' along the front
property lines.
b. Please revise the garage setback figures stated. The exhibit from page 30 of the Code of Development
should be added as an inset to the setbacks note. The garage setbacks are different depending on the road
scenario adjacent to a given lot.
21. [32.5.2 (a)] On Sheet 1, please state that the maximum building height permitted for Block 8B in accordance
with Section 2.3.2.3 of the COD. The maximum building height allow is 4 stories/50.'
22. [32.5.2 (a)] The minimum parking requirement calculation note on Sheet 1 is incorrect. Parking must be
provided in accordance with Section 2.9 of the COD, and the garage and driveway exhibit shown on page 30 of
the Code of Development.
a. Each single-family lot must have a minimum of toff -street parking spaces. Since each lot will have two
separate dwelling units, a minimum of 220 parking spaces total are required in Block 8B. There are
currently on 36 on -street parking spaces provided, with a presumed 110 parking spaces (two each lot)
on private lots. Please add the additional parking spaces as required.
23. [32.5.2 (b)] Please amend the "Allowable Density" note on Sheet 1. The allowable density for Block 8B is 2-6
dwelling units/acre.
24. [32.5.2 (b)] Please provide a calculation of the proposed units per acre for Block 8B and overall Block 8. The
"Proposed Density" note on sheet 1 does not state this.
a. Please be aware that the du/acre proposed within Block 8B is approximately 15 du/acre as proposed.
The Zoning Administrator has stated that the 110 dwelling units can be constructed in Block 8B as long
as the future uses in Block 8A are not dwelling units. Essentially, the overall density throughout the
entirety of Block 8 cannot exceed the 2-6 unit range.
25. [32.5.2 (a)] Per Table 2.3.2.3 of the Code of Development, please show the minimum and maximum setback
lines locations across all applicable drawings. Label each setback line as a front, side, corner side, or rear setback
and state the dimensions in the label. Setbacks should be measured from the proposed right -of --way.
26. [32.5.2 (n)] Pedestrian crosswalks must be provided at all locations within the site where ramps connect
sidewalks on opposite sides of vehicular travel ways.
a. Please label the dimensions and surface materials in compliance with the County's design standards.
27. [32.5.2 (n)] Please label and call out the locations of the primary and secondary building entrances to the
building in accordance with the Neighborhood Density Residential block regulations Section 2.2.3 (page 11) of
the Code of Development.
a. Lots 16-27 and 31-35 do not currently meet the required building entrance locations since they do not
front on a public street or amenity area. Final site plan and plat will not be approved until these lots front
on a public street or an amenity area.
28. [ZMA201500007] No setbacks lines are shown on Lots 32-37, please revise.
29. [32.5.2 (a)] Block 8B must provide the minimum recreation area and facilities specified in Section 4.16 of
the Zoning Ordinance. State the equipment for the playground area as well as what kind of sport court is
being proposed. Show the materials and dimensions.
30. [32.5.2 (k)] Please show the location of all proposed sewer and drainage easements. Label as "proposed" with
a size/width measurement.
31. [32.5.2 (1)] Please label all utility easements as "proposed" with asize/width measurement.
32. [32.5.2 (n)] Please state the proposed surface materials for all parking lots, travel ways, walkways, etc. in a label
on the site plan drawings.
33. [COD; 32.5.2(a)] Some retaining wall heights exceed the 6' maximum requirement specified in the COD
on pages 23-24. Please revise.
34. [32.5.2 (e)] Please provide more details about the existing landscape features as described in Section 18-
32.7.9.4(c).
a. The Albemarle County Conservation Plan Checklist and Chapter 3.38 of the Virginia Erosion and
Sediment Control handbook. The Conservation Plan Checklist will need to be signed by the owners and
provided as an exhibit on the final site plan for Block 3A.
35. [32.7.9] The landscaping plan has none of the required information regarding the proposed landscaping,
and is not clear. A detailed landscape plan in accordance with the ordinance is required for final site plan
at a scale of 1"=30'. See comments regarding double frontage lots. It appears that required landscaping is
located within lots, if so, an easement on those lots will be required. Additional comments will be given at
final site plan once a full landscape plan with more detail is submitted.
36. [32.7.9] Please provide individual landscaping schedules for required landscaping in accordance with Sections
32.7.9.5, 32.7.9.6, 32.7.9.7, 32.7.9.8 of the Zoning Ordinance. Each schedule should state the Botanical Name
and Common Name of each species proposed, the proposed caliper and height at time of installation, and the
canopy coverage canopy coverage area per plant species. The canopy area for each species can be found on the
Albemarle County Recommended Plants List and Albemarle County Plants Canopy Calculations tables. PDFs
of these documents can be accessed through the Department of Community Development webpage: LINK.
37. [32.7.9.5, and 14-410, and 14-422] Street trees are not shown along Roads F, E, and Alley A. Please revise the
landscaping plan.
38. [32.7.9.6] The 9 space parking lot at the south of Block 8B will need to be screened in accordance with Section
32.7.9.E and 32.7.9.7 of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff cannot verify if the provided trees meet the minimum 5%
canopy requirement.
39. [32.7.9.8 (a)] Please provide a calculation for the minimum tree canopy required and proposed in Block 8B
based on the use type. The minimum tree canopy is 20%based on the density of Block 8B.
a. [32.7.9.8 (b)] Please provide a landscape schedule that lists the Botanical Name and Common Name of
each species is included, the proposed caliper and height at time of installation, and the canopy coverage
area per plant species as stated on the Albemarle County Plants Canopy Calculations (this table should
be specifically for the 20%minimum tree canopy requirement).
40. [32.7.9.9] Please add a note to the Landscape plans stating "All landscaping shall be installed by the first planting
season following the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy within the development."
41. [32.7.9.9] Please add a note to the Landscape plans stating "All landscaping and screening shall be maintained
in a healthy condition by the current owner or a property owners' association, and replaced when necessary.
Replacement material shall comply with the approved landscape plan."
42. [32.6.2 (h)] Please provide a signature panel with a line for each member of the Site Review Committee. A copy
of the SRC signature panel template is attached.
43. [ZMA201500007] Per Proffer #9A-C and Section 2.13 of the Code of Development, the historic marker to
commemorate the Brookhill manor house shall be installed with the first phase of development. The marker is
shown in different areas on the road plans for Block 3 and the Block 8B plans. Please clarify the location.
44. [ZMA201500007] Notes 1 and 4 on Sheet 1 conflict with what is shown on the plans.
a. Drainage easements and required landscaping buffers (20' Polo Ground Road and the Block 19 buffer)
must be within private easements to be owned and maintained by the Brookhill HOA. These will not be
dedicated to public use, so Note 2 needs to be revised for clarity.
b. Note 4 needs to be revised. If any landscaping required by the Zoning Ordinance will be within open
space parcels, the HOA will maintain those features. All required street trees must be located within
public or private road right of ways.
45. [14-317] An instrument evidencing maintenance of all required improvements that will not be owned or
maintained by the County is required with the final. This includes private street and alley easements, sidewalk
easements (if applicable), buffer easements, landscaping easements (if applicable), etc.
46. [General Comment] Please provide a narrative regarding the timeline for installation of the required 20'
undisturbed and new landscaping buffer around the Brookhill manor house in Block 19 that is adjacent to
Block 8B. Please see Section 2.4.2 of the Code of Development for the manor house buffer requirements.
a. The Road 1B application (SUB201800115) proposes to disturb land and some existing trees
on/adjacent to Block 19. Some drawings delineate an "Existing 20' buffer" near Block 19. The
buffer needs to be located adjacent to but outside of the parcel boundaries of Block 19, per Section
2.4.2 and 2.13 of the COD.
b. Pending applicant response to this comment, western and southern portions of the buffer may need
to be shown on the Block 8B final site plan as required landscaping. The COD appears to allow the
Block 19 buffer requirement to be satisfied in two general methods:
i. Submit a subdivision plat to create the 3 +/- acre Block 19 parcel and include a buffer easement
around the parcel on that plat. A landscaping typical section for the buffer will need to be
provided as a plat detail specifying the types and quantities of vegetation to be planted in the
buffer easement.
ii. Install each side of the buffer as part of the subdivision plat, site plan, or road plan for adjacent
blocks, including Block 8B. The landscaping plan for these applications will specify the types
and quantities of vegetation to be planted in the buffer easement.
47. �4.17] Please provide a full lighting plan with the final site plan in compliance with Section 4.17 of the
Zoning Ordinance.
48. [General Comment] The plans label a Day Breach Dam Break Inundation Zone. However, Albemarle
County GIS shows no state dam break inundation zones within the development. Please clarify.
49. [General Comment] Please revise the Sheet List Table on Sheet 1 to match the sheet numbers provided
Please contact Cameron Langille at the Department of Community Development at blan.ig lle(a�albemarle.or� or 296-
5832 ext. 3432 for further information.
Comments From Other Reviewers:
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) —Emily Cox, ecox(a�albemarle.org— Requested Changes, see
attached.
Albemarle County Information Services (E911) —Elise Kiewra, ekiewranalbemarle.org —Requested Changes, see
attached.
Albemarle County Building Inspections —Michael Dellinger, mdellinger(a�albemarle.or� —Requested Changes:
1. Retaining walls greater than 3 feet in height require a separate building permit. Walls exceeding 4 feet in height
require an stamped engineered design also.
Albemarle County Planning Services (Architectural Review Board) —Heather McMahon, hmcmahon c_r,albemarle.org
— Requested Changes, see attached.
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue —Shawn Maddox, smaddox(a�albemarle.org —Initial site plan and
preliminary plat are still under review by Fire &Rescue staff. Comments or approvals will be forward to the
applicant upon receipt.
Albemarle County Service Authority —Richard Nelson, rnelson(a�serviceauthority.org — No Objection, see attached
recommendation.
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority —Victoria Fort, vfort(cr�,rivanna.org, 434-977-2970, ext. 205 —Initial site plan is
still under review by RWSA. Comments or approvals will be forward to the applicant upon receipt.
Virginia Department of Transportation —Adam Moore, Adam.Moore(awdot.vir ig nia.gov —Requested changes, see
attached.
Thomas Jefferson Health District —Alan Mazurowski, alan.mazurowski(awdh.vir ig nia.gov —Initial site plan is still
under review by VDH. Comments or approvals will be forward to the applicant upon receipt.
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Cameron Langille
From: Emily Cox
Date: 20 Aug 2018
Subject: Brookhill —Block 8B —Preliminary Plat (SUB201800119)
The preliminary subdivision plat for Brookhill —Block 8B has been reviewed by Engineering. The
following comments will need to be addressed before approval:
1. WPO Plan must be approved before subdivision can be approved.
2. Road Plan must be approved before subdivision can be approved. Road plan must include
all roads encompassed by this site plan.
3. VDOT approval is necessary before subdivision can be approved.
4. Ensure all critical slopes, buffers, etc. are shown as approved on ZMA 2015-007 on all
applicable sheets.
5. Ensure the accurate FEMA 100 year floodplain is shown. The ZMA appeared to show the
500 year.
6. Note 1 on Sheet 4 says no floodplain exists on site, however, a floodplain is shown. Please
clarify and correct.
7. SWM facility easements must be shown and recorded with a deed.
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Cameron Langille
From: Emily Cox
Date: 20 Aug 2018
Subject: Brookhill —Block 8B - ISP (SDP201800054)
The initial site plan for Brookhill —Block 8B has been reviewed by Engineering. The following comments
will need to be addressed before approval:
1. WPO Plan must be approved before final site plan can be approved.
2. Road Plan must be approved before final site plan can be approved. Road plan must
include all roads encompassed by this site plan. There appears to be a road between
sections 4A & 8A as well as through 8A.
3. VDOT approval is necessary before final site plan can be approved.
4. The minimum ROW (or easement width) is 30' per the Design Standards Manual.
VDOT subdivision street design guide —Appendix b, section B-4-B-3-d states that
the pavement width can be reduced to 22ft, but the right -of --way must still be 30
feet.
5. Ensure all critical slopes, buffers, etc. are shown as approved on ZMA 2015-007 on all
applicable sheets.
6. Ensure the accurate FEMA 100 year floodplain is shown. The ZMA appeared to show the
500 year. Also, Note 4 states there is not floodplain, however there is floodplain shown on
the plans.
7. Show how the proposed impacts to the steep slopes and Greenway compare to the
approved ZMA.
8. On sheet 4, an approved VSMP plan is referenced. Provide the approved plan #and
facilitiy ID's that are proposed to be modified or removed.
9. Show all proposed parking space dimensions (at each parking area).
10. Show top and bottom elevations of proposed retaining walls. Note that per COD, Page 23,
the maximum height is six feet.
11. Please label contour elevations.
12. 2:1 Slopes should be avoided wherever possible. The 2:1 slopes behind lots 1-15 are not
desirable.
13. Water quality and quantity requirements will be fully evaluated with the VSMP Plan
submission. Please note that all concentrated outfalls must be analyzed to comply with
state requirements. Also, water quality summary table for overall Brookhill Development
must be provided.
County of Albemarle '�"'`��'����
,� ;�,
-� 1�.,
Department of Community Development �`_-'
401 McIntire Road, North Wing �,�� <��,
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS - E911
APPLICATION#: SUB201800119
TMP: 04600-00-00-01800
DATE: 7/23/2018
FROM: Elise Kiewra
ekiewra@albemarle.org
Geographic Data Services (GDS)
www.albemarle.org/gds
(434) 296-5832 ext. 3030
Acceptable Road Names:
NOUSH LN
NOUSH CT
WESLEY CIR
Note: Road names must be on ALL pages of the site plan.
However, some things to note:
1. Noush Ln does not have anything addressed off it so it is technically not needed. If you are
going to extent it across the road, the road directly across from it on the site plan will also
need to be named Noush Ln.
2. It appears all the houses lots 1-15,38-55 appear to be facing Stella Ln. If this is the case
they will get Stella Ln addresses. Noush Ct can still be used but nothing will be addressed
off it.
3. Same for lots 16-27, if they are facing ROAD E, they will be addressed off that and it will
need a road name.
4. If this is the case for these roads you could potentially move Noush Ct to where ROAD E is
located and just have Noush Ct be an alley that does not need a name if all the houses are
addressed off Stella Ln.
A PDF version of the Ordinance and Manual can be found here:
httas://www.albemarle.ora/unload/imaaes/Forms Center/Departments/Geoaraphic Data Service
s/Forms/Road Naming and Property Numbering Ordinance and Manual.ndf
Please consult the County's Road Name Index to check your road names prior to submittal. The
Index can be found here: http://www.albemarle.org/albemarle/upload/images/webapps/roads/
Parcel and mapping information can be found here: http://gisweb.albemarle.org/
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
County of Albemarle '�"'`��'����
,� ;�,
-� 1�.,
Department of Community Development �`_-'
401 McIntire Road, North Wing �,�� <��,
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS - E911
APPLICATION#: SDP201800054
TMP: 04600-00-00-01800
DATE: 7/23/2018
FROM: Elise Kiewra
ekiewra@albemarle.org
Geographic Data Services (GDS)
www.albemarle.org/gds
(434) 296-5832 ext. 3030
Acceptable Road Names:
NOUSH LN
NOUSH CT
WESLEY CIR
Note: Road names must be on ALL pages of the site plan.
However, some things to note:
1. Noush Ln does not have anything addressed off it so it is technically not needed. If you are
going to extent it across the road, the road directly across from it on the site plan will also
need to be named Noush Ln.
2. It appears all the houses lots 1-15,38-55 appear to be facing Stella Ln. If this is the case
they will get Stella Ln addresses. Noush Ct can still be used but nothing will be addressed
off it.
3. Same for lots 16-27, if they are facing ROAD E, they will be addressed off that and it will
need a road name.
4. If this is the case for these roads you could potentially move Noush Ct to where ROAD E is
located and just have Noush Ct be an alley that does not need a name if all the houses are
addressed off Stella Ln.
A PDF version of the Ordinance and Manual can be found here:
httas://www.albemarle.ora/unload/imaaes/Forms Center/Departments/Geoaraphic Data Service
s/Forms/Road Naming and Property Numbering Ordinance and Manual.ndf
Please consult the County's Road Name Index to check your road names prior to submittal. The
Index can be found here: http://www.albemarle.org/albemarle/upload/images/webapps/roads/
Parcel and mapping information can be found here: http://gisweb.albemarle.org/
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
� �r���� �� ��rQ�QQ�� Preliminary Plat
Project Name: Brookhill - Blk_ 8B -Preliminary
Date Completed: Monday, August �0, �018 Departmentlai+risianfAgency: Review ��:
Reviewer: Heather McMahon � C��ARB � See Recommendations
This iterrr was placed on the �ONENT AGENDA of the 8-0-18 ARB meeting_ Motion= Mr. Binsted rrroved to approve the
consent agenda and forward the recommendations outlined in the staff reports for the Initial bite Plans to the Agent for the bite
Review Committee_ as follows_
ARB-�018-10�: Brookhill Block 8B —Initial bite Development Plan iTi��l+Parcel 04600000001800}
• Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per 18-30.6.4c(�}, (3} and (5} and recommended
conditions of initial plan approval=
1_ Plone_ C�lote that a Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval_
Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines= None_
Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit= None_
• Regarding the final site plan submittal=
1_ Architecture and landscaping will be reviewed with a future submittal_ A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior
to final site plan approval_
_ Provide site sections of Block 8B from the EC to determine visibilit}r of the proposed buildings and site structures_
3_ submit material and color samples, dimensioned elevations of the facades, and floor plans of the attached multi-famil}r
buildings on lots 1-15 and 38-55 for review_
4_ Provide the standard window glass note on the architectural elevations submitted for review= Window glass in the
Entrance Corridors should meet the following criteria= Visible light transmittance (LT} shall not drop below 40°r6_ Visible light
reflectance (VLR} shall not exceed 30°l�_
5_ Provide a roof plan and architectural elevations that show the placement and proposed heights of mechanical units. if
roof -mounted mechanical equipment is proposed ho}r5, how all visibilit f� of mechanical equipment from the EC will be
eliminated_
6_ If above -ground utilities are proposed, provide these and their easements on revised site plans_
7_ Include the mechanical equipment note on the revised site plans and architectural drawings= Visibilit}r of all
mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated_
8_ Provide in the site plan sufficient details to show that all proposed light fixtures meet the requirements of the lighting
ordinance_
9_ Provide a landscape plan for review at a scale of 1° = 30'_ Include utilities and their easements on the plan as }r5,ell as
a plant schedule_
10_ Provide street trees on the east and south sides of Road EIUVesle�r Circle_
11_ Provide shade trees on the eastern edge of the site around the four parking spaces_
1�_ Provide the standard plant health note on all landscape plans submitted for review= All site plantings of trees and
shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited shrubs and trees
shall be pruned minimall}r and onl}r to support the overall health of the plant_
Page: � County of Albemarle Printed On: 081�21�0'18
}%� r�����J f� �]�Q"�QQQ� Initial bite Plan
Project Name: Brookhill - Blk 8B -Initial
Date Completed: Monday, August 20, 2018 DepartmentlDivisionfAgency: Review S#a#us:
Reviewer: Heather McMahon
CDD ARB
See Recommendations
This iterrr was placed on the CC}NENT AGENDA of the 8-0-18 ARB meeting_ Motion= Mr. Binsted rrroved to approve the }
consent agenda and forward the recommendations outlined in the staff reports for the Initial bite Plans to the Agent for the bite
Review Committee_ as follows_
ARB-�018-10�: Brookhill Block 8B —Initial bite Development Plan iTi��l+Parcel 04600000001800}
• Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per 18-30.6.4c(�}, (3} and (5} and recommended
conditions of initial plan approval=
1_ Plone_ C�lote that a Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval_
Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines= None_
Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit= None_
• Regarding the final site plan submittal=
1_ Architecture and landscaping will be reviewed with a future submittal_ A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior
to final site plan approval_
_ Provide site sections of Block 8B from the EC to determine visibilit}r of the proposed buildings and site structures_
3_ submit material and color samples, dimensioned elevations of the facades, and floor plans of the attached multi-famil}r
buildings on lots 1-15 and 38-55 for review_
4_ Provide the standard window glass note on the architectural elevations submitted for review= Window glass in the
Entrance Corridors should meet the following criteria= Visible light transmittance (LT} shall not dreg below 40°r6_ Visible light
reflectance (VLR} shall not exceed 30°l�_
5_ Provide a roof plan and architectural elevations that show the placement and proposed heights of mechanical units. if
roof -mounted mechanical equipment is proposed ho}r5, how all visibilit f� of mechanical equipment from the EC will be
eliminated_
6_ If above -ground utilities are proposed, provide these and their easements on revised site plans_
7_ Include the mechanical equipment note on the revised site plans and architectural drawings= Visibility of all
mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated_
8_ Provide in the site plan sufficient details to show that all proposed light fixtures meet the requirements of the lighting
ordinance_
9_ Provide a landscape plan for review at a scale of 1° = 30'_ Include utilities and their easements on the plan as }r5,ell as
a plant schedule_
10_ Provide street trees on the east and south sides of Road EIUVesle�r Circle_
11_ Provide shade trees on the eastern edge of the site around the four parking spaces_
1�_ Provide the standard plant health note on all landscape plans submitted for review= All site plantings of trees and
shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited shrubs and trees
shall be pruned minimall}r and onl}r to support the overall health of the plant_
Page: � County of Albemarle Printed On: 081�21�0'18
Cameron Langille
From: Richard Nelson <rnelson@serviceauthority.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 11:22 AM
To: Cameron Langille
Subject: SDP201800054 and SUB201800119 -Brookhill Block 8B -Preliminary and Initial
Cameron,
I recommend SDP201800054 and SUB201800119 -Brookhill Block 8B -Preliminary and Initial for approval. A revised
master plan and updated hydraulic model will be required prior to final approval (which will be provided by the
applicant for plans currently under review). Submit 3 copies of site plan to ACSA for water and sewer review. RWSA
sewer flow capacity will be required prior to final approval.
Thanks,
Richard Nelson
Civil Engineer
Albemarle County Service Authority
168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22911
(434) 977-4511
Stephen C. Brich, P.E.
Commissioner
COMMONWEALTH o f VIRGINIA
DEPARTifAENT OF TRANSPORTATION
t6pt Orange Roed
Cu(pepBr, Viryinia 22701
August 16, 2018
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Attn: Cameron Langille
Re: Brookhill Block 8B —Preliminary Plat &Initial Site Plan
SUB-2018-00119
SDP-2018-00054
Review #1
Dear Mr. Langille:
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced plans as submitted by Collins Engineering, dated 2S
June 2018, and offers the following comments:
1. The entrance on to the proposed public road at the northern end of the site does not
appear to meet corner clearance requirements. This entrance does not appear on the
SUB201800115 plan, as noted on this plan.
2. Provide intersection site distance lines and profiles for all public road intersections and
entrances.
3. Note that the final site and subdivision plans must show conformance with the VDOT
Road Design Manual Appendices B(1) and F, as well as any other applicable standards,
regulations or other requirements.
Please provide two copies of the revised plan along with a comment response letter. If further
information is desired, please contact Justin Deel at 434-422-9894.
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The
owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process.
Sincerely,
Adam J. oore, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
VirginiaDOT.arg
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
APPROVALS
DATE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PLANNER/ZONING
ENGINEER
INSPECTIONS
ARB
DEPARTMENT OF FIRE RESCUE
ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY
VIRGINIA DEPARMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HEALTH DEPARTMENT