Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201800052 Approval - County 2018-09-07COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 September 7, 2018 Scott Collins Collins Engineering RE: SDP2018-052 and SUB2018-118 Brookhill BI 9-11- Initial Site Plan and Preliminary Subdivision Plat Mr. Collins: The Agent for the Board of Supervisors hereby grants administrative approval to the above referenced site plan and plat. See below and attached for conditions and process: SITE PLAN: This approval shall be valid for a period of five (5) years from the date of this letter, provided that the developer submits a final site plan for all or a portion of the site within one (1) year after the date of this letter as provided in section 32.4.3.1 of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle, and thereafter diligently pursues approval of the final site plan. In accordance with Chapter 18 Section 32.4.2.8 Early or Mass Grading may be permitted after the following approvals are received: 1. Engineering approval of a VSMP plan meeting the requirements of Chapter 17 of the Code of the County of Albemarle. 2. Approval of all easements for facilities for stormwater management and drainage control. 3. Submittal of a tree conservation checklist with areas for tree preservation identified. The final site plan will not be considered to have been officially submitted until the following items are received: 1. A final site plan that satisfies all of the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code. 2. Applicable fee outlined in the application. SUBDIVISION: This approval shall be valid for a period of five (5) years from the date of this letter, provided that the developer submits a final plat for all or a portion of the site within one (1) year after the date of this letter as provided in the Section 14-226 of the Code of the County of Albemarle, and thereafter diligently pursues approval of the final plat. The final plat will not be considered to have been officially submitted until the following items are received: A final plat that satisfies all of the requirements of section 14-303 and sections 14-304 through 14-318 of the Code, and the conditions attached to this letter. Applicable fee outlined in the application. Please submit 8 copies of the final plans to the Community Development Department for both the site plan and subdivision plat. The assigned Lead Reviewer will then distribute the plans to all reviewing agencies. The Department of Community Development shall not accept submittal of the final site plan or subdivision plat for signature until tentative approvals for the attached conditions from the following agencies/reviewers have been obtained: SRC Members: Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer)- 1 copies Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner)- 2 copies- Megan Nedostup (mnedostup@albemarle.org) Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue-1 copy- Shawn Maddox (smaddox@albemarle.org) Albemarle County Service Authority-1 copy Richard Nelson (rnelson@serviceauthority.org) Virginia Department of Transportation- 1 copy — Adam Moore (Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov) E911- 1 copy Inspections- 1 copy If you have any questions about these conditions or the submittal requirements please feel free to contact me at Extension 3004, mnedostup@albemarle.org. Sincerely, 11�1 7- 01 Megan Nedostup Principal Planner COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 August 20, 2018 Scott Collins Collins Engineering Via Email RE: SDP-2018-052 and SUB2018-118 Brookhill BI 9-11- Initial Site Plan and Preliminary Subdivision Plat Mr. Collins: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Initial comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner) Albemarle County Information Services (E911) Albemarle County Building Inspections (Building Official) Albemarle County Planning Services (Architectural Review Board) Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue Albemarle County Service Authority Virginia Department of Health Virginia Department of Transportation Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that will be required to be resolved prior to Final Site Plan approval. The Lead Reviewer will either approve with conditions or deny the Initial Site Plan within 15 days of the Site Review Meeting. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Megan Nedostup Principal Planner Planning Services County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Scott Collins From: Megan Nedostup- Principal Planner Division: Planning Services Date: August 20, 2018 Subject: SDP2018-OS2; SUB2018-118 Brookhill BI 9-11- Initial Site Plan and Preliminary Subdivision Plat The Planner for the Planning Services Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] Requirements: 1. Sheet 2 is not the approved Application Plan. Revise to include the approved plan that was modified at the Board of Supervisors meeting to not include the trailhead at Ashwood Blvd. Link to approved plan. 2. [Application Plan; COD; Proffers] The greenway buffer that is being shown appears to only include the WPO buffer, however the ZMA showed a larger greenway buffer that was outside of the WPO area and included slopes. Show the buffer that was approved with the ZMA. There are a number of lots being shown within the buffer and also have preserved slopes and the plan needs to accurately show the greenway/buffer areas, and adjust the lots to be located outside of the buffer/preserved slopes. In addition, these areas needs to state that they will be dedicated for public use per proffer #2. It is recommended that these dedications happen with final subdivision plat. See below and attached. 2.4 Greenspace and Amenities Brookhill will feature over 100 acres of Greenspace This Greenspace represents more than 35% of the entire community's land area, and includes the Buffer areas, the Greenway .and stream buffers, parks and civic amenity areas, and general open space The Greenspace will not only provide a linear trait system throughout the community, but shall also preserve environmentally sensitive areas such as steep slopes, streams, and stream buffers All of the Greenspace areas shall be located outside of private lots and fight -of -way All Greenspace within Brookhill, with the exception of the Greeenway, will be owned and maintamed by the Homeowners Association. Establisbment of the buffers, trails, and amenities within the Greenspace will be the responsibility of the developer UT)OR %rittcn rcgUCI l by the COUnty. but nor prior To the iswaoce of the five hundredth (�(}iltEtl P .mill for all dwelling within the Pro 'fect_ the 01vitcr sltaall dedicaic to the County an cnsenicnt for public use over the Greenway area, a+,, cIio%vn crn [hc Applicratiun flan- Prior to the (oLintv*s request to dedicate such cis mcnt. the t wnor may dedicate portions of thc Cireenway by easeinem concurrently %ith one or snore subdiais-qua plats '(-Jrttarcaas ling adjacenL to the. Cireenkwray: provided however, that 0WIler ittagl' rCSt!V4. ir, 3u41t rights of access for grading, utilities rind i71ait,tu1dDCL!. F ach subdivision plat shall depict the (;reenwav area to be dedicated and shall hear a noatioji ilia'. 1he CoreLwA,aay area is dedicated for public use, If, at the time rite Countiv rcqu,4"#; dt'dication of the. Gi—cenway..afny. part of the Clrcr:wxav Ilia( has n t. heett dedicated by siubdivision plat, shall be (wiilia7 six (6) month-: of such regklcst) att ti wlior`s cost, sur�cI ed.. plaited and recorded with ono or :n(mr c9eeds of eascn:.cnl dedication, 'r------------------------- r------__-n, BLOCK 9 Y BLCtCK yB I SbP_uiBeso[:u lit A ~ � .,4 t III TIAI C�4. ui. r. 4l i 1 _ f eavustu I I 1 PaGMrlsv� BLOCK ill � t' l TltA[4WAr BLOCK i3 ARfA(rYP) - t � ,•, Y JrvstusF�n,erar �` Y t� 1 It�81T. A' '= T� f•I.AN > E7f1571NG uoYFa� f '� 1 •— � �s f „"� i x% FEhW1 FLOODP'LAIN MP ✓'; BLOCK sg 1 iJ BLOCK 3. [COD] The units on lots 7 and 8 do not meet the maximum setback. Revise the units so that they are not so far from the street. 4. [COD Route 29 Buffer] Lots 1-12 are within the 29 buffer. Revise so the lots are not located within that buffer. 5. [14-419; 32.7.9.7] Lots 13-31 and 47-57 are double frontage lots. A minimum of 20 buffer/landscape area is required between the lots and the right of way to be planted in accordance with 32.7.9.7. This requirement is not being met, revise. 6. [32.5.2(a)] Preserved slopes, greenway area, etc should be shown on the layout sheets. In addition, label the 29 buffer on the grading sheets to ensure that grading proposed is within the 30' area only. 7. [COD; 32.5.2(a)] Show the height of all retaining walls. Make sure they are in accordance with the requirements stated in the COD on pages 23-24. 8. [ZMA; Preserved slopes] There is grading shown for lots within the preserved slopes. Grading is not permitted outside of what was outlined in the ZMA. Lots and grading for lots must not impact the preserved slopes. Revise. 9. [ZMA Application Plan; Proffer 2] There is a trail shown adjacent to Block 11 within the greenway area. This trail should be shown on the plan sheets. Has the trail started or been established? 3. [COD] The units on lots 7 and 8 do not meet the maximum setback. Revise the units so that they are not so far from the street. 4. [COD Route 29 Buffer] Lots 1-12 are within the 29 buffer. Revise so the lots are not located within that buffer. 5. [14-419; 32.7.9.7] Lots 13-31 and 47-57 are double frontage lots. A minimum of 20 buffer/landscape area is required between the lots and the right of way to be planted in accordance with 32.7.9.7. This requirement is not being met, revise. 6. [32.5.2(a)] Preserved slopes, greenway area, etc should be shown on the layout sheets. In addition, label the 29 buffer on the grading sheets to ensure that grading proposed is within the 30' area only. 7. [COD; 32.5.2(a)] Show the height of all retaining walls. Make sure they are in accordance with the requirements stated in the COD on pages 23-24. 8. [ZMA; Preserved slopes] There is grading shown for lots within the preserved slopes. Grading is not permitted outside of what was outlined in the ZMA. Lots and grading for lots must not impact the preserved slopes. Revise. 9. [ZMA Application Plan; Proffer 2] There is a trail shown adjacent to Block 11 within the greenway area. This trail should be shown on the plan sheets. Has the trail started or been established? 10. [Proffer 1] Polo Grounds construction for Phase 1 will need to begin prior to the 15t building permit and complete prior to the 50t" building permit/dwelling. Route 29 improvements must be substantially completed prior to the 50t" building permit/dwelling. 11. [32.5.2(a)] Sheet 5A does not show the extents and information for the civic/park area. It references Matchline sheet 7, however, sheet 7 does not show this information, it is shown on Sheet 8. Revise so the correct reference is shown. 12. [32.5.2 (a)] State the equipment for the playground area as well as what kind of sport court is being proposed. Show the materials and dimensions. 13. [32.7.9] The landscaping plan has none of the required information regarding the proposed landscaping, and is not clear. A detailed landscape plan in accordance with the ordinance is required for final site plan at a scale of 1"=30'. The park is also not shown on this sheet. See comments regarding double frontage lots. It appears that required landscaping is located with lots, if so, an easement on those lots will be required. Additional comments will be given at final site plan once a full landscape plan with more detail is submitted. 14. [COD; 32.7.91 It is not clear if the 30' buffer will need to be replanted in this area. If so, show proposed landscaping. 15. [COD page 11; 14-233; 14-234] Per the regulations the houses are required to primarily face public streets or amenity areas. There are private streets proposed that will need to be approved. Why are these private streets as opposed to public? A justification in accordance with 14-234 will need to be submitted for review. 16. [14-302(A)] All easements, proposed and required need to be shown, including dimensions, etc. 17. See attached direction from the Post Master regarding group mailboxes. Please coordinate location with the Poster Master. Please contact Megan Nedostup at the Department of Community Development 296-5832 ext. 3004 for further information. 3 -ry 13 F Gc�►J�c-r�vz ➢ 1 r i> / A ;40 D a PROPOSED ASHW OD BOULEVARD CONNECTION USE _� _ , MHO PROPOSED TRAILH'EAD ACCESS AREA TOE" , - "'�'D `� UFFER. SEE PROFFERS AND CODE OF DEVELOPMENT` _-�" RN %PROVIDE PARKING AN INFORMATION KIOSK ,r. AND A PEDESTRIAN ROAD CROSSING TO " r RE INFORMATION ON REQUIRED BUFFER FOR M� NF N _ ACCESS THE MULTI -USE TRAILWAY �"�� i ? \\\\ FOREST LAKES NEIGHBORHOOD AS! �O0 . r ROUTE 29 , • •�� SWCcy lC I IMPROVEMENT fi?1.4685-= rV „ G / SP SWM FACILITY #3 COUNTY OF �; 1 ` �` / � �o' MIN. NATURAL BUFFER �`' � c-),. ��BEMARLE , ROPOSED PRIMITIVE TRAIL WITH c� 1 CONNECTION TO FOREST LAKES J - «�i,•gir- ,�. .,:.. ..> _-e.-.�. ,.� — — — — — - ,�. - v- .�.- .�... ...�,.. s... ,•., - ... i �, ... a ,. �.�c �..w �.:-....-.w-,�a.�.....,_'—'--'r"_c� - fl! © ;_. ,•. .e1;.,, .?R-. `:..'jx� - ,t%ti.';- _ 1" ------ ------ �a— ---"------�-- ------ -- ,a' ,.�� - -- ------,_'�� - - Gr •. ` t ` \ I asRO PROPOSED i� 6 1 ALBEMARLE COUNTY -- - AD )` PRIMITIVE BL K 1 1 ff . �' RESERVED STEEP SLOPE TRAILWAY OC 3 1 (TYP..) t^ p 1 = — TRAILS (TYP.) VICINITY MAP: SCALE: 1" 20'00' 0 AN COURT i O GENERAL NOTES DEVELOPMENT k B AREA (TYP.) I -wi OWNERS: TMP 04600-oo-oo-oi800 TMP 04600-oo-oo-oi8Ao J r � 1 , BLOCK 1 HAUGH, CHARLES R. & HAUGH, CHAR'LES R. & '' �- � ••._ \N�c�^� PO 5 '�^ i, '-_ % i ` - Q �, '� PARK ST z57S S \ R / >' BETH ANN OGLESBY H. E.J. OGLESBY JR TRUSTEES ELVZA �PS(1 R O 435 EMINOLE TRAIL `� ♦ � ' ` -> ' CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA zzgoz T.M. 46 - 28B HORNS LAND CORPORATION f; s C - ~ TMP 04600-oo-oo-oigoo OPEN -- ' � � CROCKETT CORPORATION SPACE ` Al C/O HAUGH & HELVIN (TYP.) �a�� 43S'PARK ST r PROPOSED CIVIC SPACE \� CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901 BLOCK 12 ��`°;'' ()� DEVELOPER: RIVERBEND DEVELOPMENT, INC. BLOCK io �5 p _ EASTERN POCKET PARK lak o', BLOCK 1 r .f , (LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED 455 SECOND STREET SE, SUITE 400 EXISTING 10o-YEAR 4 ` WITH FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN) ` CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22903 FEW FLOODPLAIN (TYP.) -f D BLOCK 9 - PRO EDPRIMITIV`. TRAILWAY "t n ROUTE 29 �l ' ��� j:; - 4 ` _ '�,, IMPROVEMENT ? `71 k .; - •� v OPEN PATHWAY ROPOSED CIVIC SPACE 4 SPACE' BLOCK 11 GREENWAY \ a 1� 1 (TYP.) ROUTE 29 (TYP.) — • y t "'bbbb • -.. I P V M NT SWM FACILITY #z � � i - ��.,,,,- GREENWAY • GREENWAY ° °"° .,Q ° {TYP.) L ! ° UPLAND �'tl n , .,4,.. PARK •ems` / ;.. o°f PROPOSED So' BUFFER AROUND VDOT STORMWATER r\ - - - - ',� t-'� i QQe, _ EXISTING ARCHAIC WOODLAND MANAGEMENT POND \ ._ �' ". °*� �` ,'; • . CAMPSITE AREA TO BE PRESERVED BLOCK 16 O _ ��,\ e EXISTING Zoo -YEAR Z) cc4= _z royk i„ p +� STREAM BUFFER (TYP. Q ie��- FLOODPLAIN (TYP.) ROPOSED RIGHT IN -RIGHT OU C,d BLOCK 4 0 — — _,� � �. a a JTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS. LU = 1 _ BLOCK 4 ,, SEE BROOKHILL TIA REPORT j �� �" TRAFFIC CIRCLE/ROUNDABOUT MAY ALBEMARLE 1fOUNTY `=• . , FOR FURTHER DETAILS: � ` 'MAIN STREET' BE CONSTRUCTED AT THE PRESERVED STEEP SLOPE BLOCK 3 v; BOULEVARD ENTRANCE INTERSECTION OF MAIN STREET AND P 5 W THE NORTH/SOUTH CONNECTOR ROAD BLOCK / ) I I 3 � / oPEN� � ' L s SPACE OPEN o _'� SPACE BLOCK 1 — (TYP.) 1 I 1 EXISTING ioo-YEAR1. i �,' , PROPOSED i i I FLOODPLAIN (TYP.) • ° RIMITIVE T.M.46 28D d TRAILWAY CRAFTON CORPORATION BLOCK 2 DEVELOPMENTAREA BOUNDARY (TYP-) PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER I � I ` ` -- (LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED I ° WITH FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN.) 1. — — — — — — — , BLOCK 17 sI o r PROPOSED Zoo' BUFFER ALONG RT. 29 ;EC 70' NATURAL LANDSCAPE BUFFER ° '. BLOCK 4 , ACRE HISTORIC r i BLOCK BROOKHILL PARCEL BLOCK S & 30' LANDSCAPE 'BUFFFER 1 ALBEMARLE COUNTY!°°` f I + ! I - - �4 of ` APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF I , , ANAGED STEEP SLOPE 1 _. OTE: A PROPOSED MULTI -USE PATH GREENWAY . HISTORIC MARKER FOR THE (TYP.) IS PROPOSED BY VDOTALONG THE i•r / (TYP.) ROUTE 29 FRONTAGE OF THIS ' BROOKHILL PROPERTY J ` �'--- -- D° — — — — — — I_ —PROPOSED zo' BUFFER PROPERTY. PATHWAY TO BE t -- LOCATED WITHIN THE VDOT R/W. LOCATION OF EXISTING ° D BLOCK 19 UNN CEMETERY TO °Q• ` REMAIN / LOCK LINE (TYP.) 1, I! `t,• BLOCK 6 ALBEMARLE COUNTY- ?° •✓,. / r p s BLOCK 8 I ` PRESERVED STEEP SLOPE �; ' (TYP.) NOTE: AREA WITHIN THE ioo' BUFFER X' © BLOCK ` AND OUTSIDE THE EXISTING TREE I l 7 LIMITS SHALL BE REPLANTED IN / EXISTING Zoo -YEAR VI, 1, ACCORDANCE WITH THE PILACES29 ,_J / DEVELOPMENT FLOODPLAIN (TYP.) V \ - FORESTED BUFFER REQUIIREMENTSG t r EXISTING BROOKHILL LIMITS OF i9TH CENTURY AREA (TYP.) �' i r HOUSE TO REMAIN) COMPONENTS OF BROOKHILL i s BLOCK $ 1 I DEVELOPMENT AREA _ . ` , BOUNDARY (TYP.) T- EXISTING too -YEAR, -`' •� ' ' FEMA FLOODPLAIN (TYP.) ,' OPEN t PROPOSED Zo PAVED SPACE MULTI -PURPOSE TRAIL (TYP.) IMPROVED INTERSECTION `,.r •'�+ r • z � _ AND STOPLIGHT. POC SEE BROOKHILL TIA REPORT — p ROPOSED IMPROVEMENT TO 'F P FOR FURTHER DETAILS GR POLO GROUNDS ROAD FOR ` S�ATCRT- 643(0B R8AD (So') TURN LANES - SEE THE POLO GROUNDS ROADWAY u - •'¢t 2' P_ 163) IMPROVEMENT PLAN APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF UPLAND CULVERTS PROPOSED 30' BUFFER ALONG FOR SALAMANDER ROAD CROSSINGS TO BE COORDINATED POLO GRO NDS ROAD DURING THE POLO GROUNDS ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS. SEE PROFFERS FOR FURTHER DETAILS M. 46 - 28C PROPOSED POLO GROUNDS ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS. CROCK T.CORPORATION SEE POLO GROUNDS ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN & TRAFFIC TIA. PROPOSED VEHICULAR- / ENGINEER: COLLINS ENGINEERING INTERCONNECTION ACCESS zoo GARRETT ST, SUITE K �� CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 TO THE MONTGOMERY '30' IVIIN. NATURAL BUFFER RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD ':' j 1 r / TAX MAP & ZONING: 04600-oo-oo-0.800 04600-oo-oo-ol8Ao 04600-oo-oo-olgoo D.B. 731, PG. 690 D.B.1333, PG. 450 D.B. 731, PG. 690 ALBEMARLE COUNTY R-1 RESIDENTIAL R-1 RESIDENTIAL ZONE: R-1 RESIDENTIAL MANAGED STEEP SLOPE �y (TYP) RV TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 04600-oo-oo-ol80o 42.55 AC. 04600-oo-oo-wSAo - 27.29 AC. BLOCK 1$ O GE�OP© 04600-00-00-02900 - 2o7.66AC. '�, 277.5o AC. TOTAL rJ PROPOSED ZONING: NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT-,' TOPOGRAPHY: TOPOGRAPHY WAS COMPILED FROM SURVEY BY LINCOLN AREA (TYP.) SURVEYING AND BELL LAND SURVEYS, JANUARY zoiS. BOUNDARY INFORMATION WAS COMPILED BY LINCOLN SURVEYING ON MARCH 7, zo15. DATUM: NAVD 1988 UTILITIES. COUNTY WATER AND SEWER Y FLOODPLAIN: THERE IS A FLOODPLAIN LOCATED ON THIS SITE. FEMA MAP ID 52003Co280D l DATED FEBRUARY 4, z005. IN ADDITION, A DAM BREACH INUNDATION ZONE EXISTS ON THE ---__ PROPERTY FOR THE SOUTH RIVANNA DAM, WHICH IS A FEDERAL DAM LOCATED UPSTREAM OF THE PROPERTY. MONTGOMERY RIDGE NOTES: i NEIGHBORHOOD 1. SEE CODE OF DEVELOPMENT FOR DETAILS ON THE PROPOSED STREETS AND STREET CROSS SECTIONS FOR THE BROOKHILL DEVELOPMENT. z. EXACT LOCATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY, ALLEYS, AND TRAVELWAYS SHALL. BE DETERMINED WITH THE SITE PLAN PROCESS. ?� 3. ALL PROPOSED ROADWAYS SHALL HAVE STREET TREES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ��. ALBEMARLE COUNTY REQUIREMENTS. ALL TREES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOA. 4. NO CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SHALL ACCESS THE PROPERTY FROM MONTGOMERY RIDGE OR FOREST LAKES, THE IMPROVEMENTS TO POLO GROUNDS ROAD AND THE CONNECTION OF THE 5 EASTjWEST CONNECTOR ROAD TO POLO GROUNDS ROAD BOTH REQUIRE FILLING WITHIN O� VO pPa THE FLOODPLAIN. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SHALL BE PROCESSED FOR THE MODIFICATION'S a f7 t JI pGti� J.TO THE FLOODPLAIN. 6. PARKING FOR THE PROPOSED BROOKHILL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED IN �- ACCORDANCE WITH ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE 18.4.12. EACH PRELIMINARY SITE AND rl IMITS OF PROPOSED REZONING SUBDIVISION PLAT WILL INCLUDE A PARKING AND LOADING NEEDS STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHOWN IN THE PRELIMINARY PLAN. i 7. ALL DEVELOPMENT SHALL HAVE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN THE SUNNY DAY BREACH INUNDATION ELEVATION, AND DWELLING UNITS BELOW THE PMP - INUNDATION ELEVATION WILL BE PART OF THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SAFETY ACTION PLAN. y J� 8. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHALL INCLUDE A MINIMUM OF (3) CIVIC AREAS, AS SHOWI ON THE APPLICATION PLAN. SEE THE CODE OF DEVELOPMENT FOR A DESCRIPTION OF THI 4 AMENITIES PROVIDED IN EACH PROPOSED CIVIC AREA. 9. THE PROPOSED OPEN SPACE AREAS MAY BE EXPANDED DURING THE DESIGN PHASES TO ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL AREA TO ACCOMMODATE UTILITIES, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, AS NECESSARY FOR THE °• ,i - - -- DEVELOPMENT. t , 10, CONNECTION PO'INTA)ON THE APPLICATION PLAN SHALL BE A FULL VEHICULAR INTERCONNECTION TO MONTGOMERY RIDGE. CONNECTION POINT OSHALL ONLY BE A y PEDESTRIAN/BICYLE ACCESS CONNECTION. 11. UNIFORM SIGNAG€ SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE TRAILWAYS TO IDENTIFY AND DELINEATE BOTH THE PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC ROUTES AND FACILITIES ON THE SITE. I', - f tl' , I°e \ NOTE: ALL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES o AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE LEGEND LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE PRESERVED SLOPES. ' a, ROPERTY BOUNDARY (TYP.) - GREENWAY PRESERVED SLOPES VEGETATIVE BUFFER MANAGED SLOPES I 1 OPEN SPACE ••° WITH HOA APPROVAL, A Zo° MULTI -USE PATH / GREENWAY IMPACTS &PRESERVED SLOPE IMPACTS SHALL BE EXTENDED TO THE ENTRANCE OF WETLANDS MONTGOMERY RIDGE. THE HOA WILL NEED Q TO APPROVE THE TRAIL AND EXECUTE ALL (� PARCEL WITHIN BROOKHILL ENCOMPASSING THE BROOKHILL EASEMENT DOCUMENTS ALLOWING THE L�J HISTORIC HOUSE & THE 1gTH CENTURY COMPONENTS OF �y CONSTRUCTION OF THE MULTI -USE PATH, BROOKHILL ON HOA PROPERTY. � PRIMITIVE TRAILWAY Zo' MULTI -USE PATH TO BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG / f THE NORTH SIDE OF POLO GROUNDS ROAD /-Cpartment PROPOSED TRANSIT STOP - TO BE INCLUDED WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER. FINAL ROPOSED PEDESTRIAN TUNNEL{ FILL —� r LOCATION TO BE COORDINATED WITH TRANSIT SERVICE. �Ool N pR\4ER Do roved b'/ :r _ .,- Supervisors 0 ®®a EXISTING soo YR FLOODPLAIN �1v PAN -_ ....... STREAMS anner LOCATION OF HISTORIC RESOURCE TO BE PRESERVED � GRAPHIC SCALE � PROPOSED LOCATION OF CIVIC SPACE c .� 10' MULTI -USE PATH 200 a 100 200 +no soo PROPOSED LOCATION OF HISTORIC MARKER ( IN FEET ) I. inch - 200 ft. PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Megan Nedostup From: Emily Cox Date: 17 Aug 2018 Subject: Brookhill — Sections 9, 10 & 11 — Preliminary flat (SUB201800118) The preliminary subdivion plat for Brookhill — Sections 9-11 has been reviewed by Engineering. The following comments will need to be addressed before approval: 1. WPO Plan must be approved before subdivision can be approved. 2. Road Plan must be approved before subdivision can be approved. Road plan must include all roads encompassed by this site plan. 3. VDOT approval is necessary before subdivision can be approved. 4. Ensure all critical slopes, buffers, etc. are shown as approved on ZMA 2015-007 on all applicable sheets. 5. Ensure the accurate FEMA 100 year floodplain is shown. The ZMA appeared to show the 500 year. 6. Note 1 on Sheet 4 says no floodplain exists on site, however, a floodplain is shown. Please clarify and correct. 7. The proposed greenway should not be located on any lots. Per the Code of Development (COD), page 18, the Greenway area will be a public space, dedicated to Albemarle County. Also, the Greensapce includes the Greenway, and the Greenway shall be located outside of private lots and right-of-way. 8. The 100' buffer is not existing, it is proposed as greenwaylopen space with the ZMA. Please label appropriately. 9. The County is not aware of anything that has be submitted regarding the preserved steep slopes. The note, "limits of existing...." is not accurate. Show the preserved slopes and their impacts as shown on the approved on the ZMA. New topographic information can be provided for evaluation, as outlined in county code, 30.7.4 b-1-h. However, this must be signed and seated by a surveyor. 10. SWM facility easements must be shown and recorded with a deed. 11. Clearly identify the areas being used as forest & open space for water quality purposes in an easement. 12. Include the following note, "The SWM Forest and Open Space Easement is subject to the guidance set forth by DEQ in the Virginia Stormwater Management Program. The areas will remain undisturbed in a natural, vegetated state, except for activities as approved by the local program authority, such as forest management, control of invasive species, replanting and revegetating, passive recreation (e.g., trails), and limited bush hogging to maintain desired vegetative community (but no more than four times a year)." County of Albemarle > Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 ti PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS G E911 APPLICATION#: SDP201800052 TMP: 04600-00-00-019134 DATE: 7/23/2018 FROM: Elise Kiewra ekiewraPalbemarle.org Geographic Data Services (GDS) www.albemarle.org/cids (434) 296-5832 ext. 3030 Acceptable Road Names: KOCH CT FLORA CT FLORA LN The following road names will need to be changed: FLORA DR FOXWORTH LN FLORA DR sounds too similar to an existing FLORDON DR. In an emergency situation these could sound similar on the phone. However, you could just update the designator to something other than Dr such as St, etc. and then it would be acceptable. Per Part I, Section 4-j of the County's Road Naming and Property Numbering Manual (page 7 of PDF). "No proposed name shall be accepted which is a homonym of an official road name or may be easily confused with an official road name (example: "Forrestview" and "Forestvue")," FOXWORTH LN will need to be changed as "Fox" has been used more than 5 times to begin a word. Per Part I, Section 4-1 of the County's Road Naming and Property Numbering Manual (page 7 of PDF). "No proposed road name shall be approved which begins with a word that appears as the first word in five or more official road names." A PDF version of the Ordinance and Manual can be found here: https://www.albemarle.org/upload/images/Forms Center/Departments/Geographic Data Service s/Forms/Road Naming and Property Numbering Ordinance and Manual.pdf Please consult the County's Road Name Index to check your road names prior to submittal. The Index can be found here: http://www.albemarle.org/albemarle/upload/images/webapps/roads/ Parcel and mapping information can be found here: http://gisweb.albemarle.org/ If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Megan Nedostup From: Richard Nelson <rnelson@serviceauthority.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 11:23 AM To: Megan Nedostup Subject: SDP201800052 and SUB201800118 Brookhill Blocks 9, 10, and 11 - Initial and Preliminary Megan, I recommend SDP201800052 and SUB201800118 Brookhill Blocks 9, 10, and 11 - Initial and Preliminary for approval. A revised master plan and updated hydraulic model will be required prior to final approval (which will be provided by the applicant for plans currently under review). Submit 3 copies of site plan to ACSA for water and sewer review. RWSA sewer flow capacity will be required prior to final approval. Thanks, Richard Nelson Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22911 (434) 977-4511 Stephen C. Brich, P.E. Commissioner COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper. Virginia 22701 August 16, 2018 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Attn: Megan Nedostup Re: Brookhill Blocks 9, 10, & I I— Preliminary Plat & Initial Site Plan SUB-2018-00118 SDP-2018-00052 Review #1 Dear Ms. Nedostup: The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section, has reviewed the above referenced plans as submitted by Collins Engineering, dated 9 July 2018, and offers the following comments: 1. Provide ADT for Foxworth Lane. 2. Provide a turn lane warrant analysis for the Stella Lane and Foxworth Lane intersection, as well as a level of service analysis for the number of egress lanes on Foxworth Lane. 3. Provide intersection site distance lines and profiles for all public road intersections and entrances. 4. The design speed for Stella Lane and Foxworth Lane is 30 mph. The section for Foxworth Lane will likely need to be widened, dependent on ADT, which is not provided. Note that the minimum width of travelway is 12' when ADT is greater than 2,000. 5. Provide a typical section for the portion of Stella Lane that is being tied in to. 6. The parallel parking spaces along on the public portion of Flora Drive must be removed as they will obscure the intersection sight distance lines for Flora Court and Flora Lane. 7. Note that the final site and subdivision plans must show conformance with the VDOT Road Design Manual Appendices B(1) and F, as well as any other applicable standards, regulations or other requirements. Please provide two copies of the revised plan along with a comment response letter. If further information is desired, please contact Justin Deel at 434-422-9894. VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING August 16, 2018 Megan Nedostup Page 2 A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process. Sincerely, 01 qortc-- Adam J. Moore, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Charlottesville Residency VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Review Comments for SUB201800118 Preliminar�,, Plat Project Name: Brookhill - Blks 9, 10- & 11 - Preliminary Date Completed: Tuesday, July 31, 2018 DepartmenVDivisiontAgency: Review Status: Reviewer: Michael Dellinger F-, Inspections on-9 ----7- Requested Changes Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: F08-120I2018 MANAGER, OPERATIONS PROGRAM SUPPORT UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 10UNITED STATES - POSTAL SERVICE Date: November 23,2015 Subject: New Developments In April 2012, the USPS revised regulation to clarify options for delivery and to provide the USPS greater autonomy in determining how deliveries are added to the Postal Service network. While curbline and sidewalk delivery remain viable and approved modes of delivery, the USPS will determine how and when to approve these modes of delivery consistent with existing Postal Operations Manual (POM) regulation regarding in -growth and both establishment and extension of delivery. Each year, new delivery addresses are added to our city, rual and contract routes which has a major impact to our delivery cost. To control costs, we need to ensure new residential deliveries are being made via centralized delivery. We must adhere to the guidelines that govern establishment of new delivery. The City/County authorities (Planning and Zoning) can not give approval of delivery service The Postal Service cannot honor agreements that have been made between Planning and Zoning and the developer. At a minimum, the USPS will work with the builders and developers to determine what the best mode of delivery is for the area prior to establishing or extending delivery service. However, as a national agency, the USPS reserves the right to establish delivery in the most consistent and cost effective means viable to meet our federal mandate of providing a free form of service that best meets the need to establish and maintain a safe, reliable and efficient national Postal Service. Please review the changes to the POM regarding Modes of Delivery and Delivery Equipment. The changes are designed to enhance our ability to increase centralized and CBU delivery. • Centralized and CBU delivery is now the default mode of delivery in business areas. Any exceptions to centralized or CBU delivery mode in business areas must be approved by the District. (631.2) • For new residential delivery, CBU is now the default. Exceptions to permit curbline delivery must be approved by the District. (631.32) • New deliveries within an existing block with an established mode of delivery no longer assume the existing mode of delivery. We can require a more efficient mode of delivery (sidewalk delivery, for example). (631.41) • While we do not control addresses for buildings, we do control the sequential ordering of addresses within any centralized delivery equipment. (631.442) • If more than one building in a complex has the same street address, the delivery equipment must be grouped at a single location even if some of the units are in a different building. (631.452) • Centralized delivery or CBU is the default option for delivery in mobile homes or trailer parks that are permanent residences. Any exceptions to centralized or CBU delivery mode must be approved by the District (631.462b) • For dormitories and residence halls not directly affiliated with colleges, the Postal Service determines the mode of delivery and can require the property owner to accept mail for all the tenants. We will not distribute mail into centralized delivery equipment. (631.52) • Delivery equipment must conform with the USPS standards for CBUs and high-rise delivery equipment, USPS STD 4C wall mounted mail receptacles. Local offices do not have the authority to approve any other centralized delivery equipment. (631.441) -2- • When obsolete delivery equipment is replaced in multi -unit buildings, it must be replaced with equipment that meets current standards. (632.621) The USPS standards include options for parcel lockers that we should ensure are provided. There was also great consideration regarding safety of delivery, which also resulted in the determination the the type of delivery warrented in your area. Keith Smarte Crozet Postmaster 1210 Crozet Virginia 22932 Work 434-823-9847 Cell 434-529-0241 Keith.A.Smarte(cDusps.gov Review Comments for SDP201800052 Initial Site Plan -1� Project Name: Brookhill - Blks- 9, 10, & 11 - Initial I Date Completed: Thursday, August 30, 2018 DepartmentlDivisionlAgency: Review Status: Reviewer: Shawn Maddox F-, Fire Rescue � Requested Changes Please add a hydrant in the vicinity of Lot 31 in the cul-de-sa-c- Page: County of Albemarle Printed Cn: FOO—.16T,'-2-018