HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201700149 Review Comments Road Plan and Comps. 2018-09-18COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
Road and Drainage plan review
Project title:
Old Trail Creekside V — Phase I & II
Project file number:
SUB201700149
Plan preparer:
Scott Collins, Collins Engineering [ScottkCollins-engineering com ]
Owner or rep.:
Old Trail Creekside V LLC [N/A]
Date Received:
Rev 2 — December 21", 2017
Rev 3 — April 2"d, 2018
Rev 4 — Aug 28" 2018
Date of comments:
Rev 2 — February 1s', 2018
Rev 3— May 15r",2018
Rev. 4 — Sept 18r", 2018 (Engr. /CDD E911, 5-Sept)
Mr. Collins,
We have reviewed the plans and have the following comments:
Engineering — Requested Changes
10. Deed book and page references for Phase I and II are not consistent with content. D.B. 466 PG. 304
commonly referenced in Phase I, and D.B. 4472 PG. 138 commonly referenced in Phase 11, do not
SUB201700149, Creekside V, Phase I & II
Page 2 of 3
reference Deeds of Easement, but Deeds of Sale. Please correct/clarify. Referenced Deed Book and Page
numbers are also inconsistent between submitted Final Plats and road plans.
Rev 2 — Partially addressed. Drainage easements still incorrectly referenced. (Rev. 4) Not Addressed.
BK 4626 PG 578 does not appear to reference deed or plat dedicating drainage or SWM facility easements.
Please provide book -page references for Ex. recorded drainage and SWM facility easements. Recommend
comment review meeting, 20-Sept, 2018, to resolve /address this comment.
Additional Rev 2 Comments:
1. HGL calculations should be provided for stormsewer system downstream of proposed Phase I and
Phase II development to show pipe capacity is still adequate after addition of new impervious
area/runoff volume to existing system. (Rev. 3) Partially addressed. As follow-up: Sheet 6 includes
table titled Belvedere Phase IVA. Provide HGL data for existing (downstream) pipes showing effect of
proposed development on existing storm system. If existing storm system lacks capacity to accept
additional runoff, provide on -site treatment such that existing capacity of storm sewer is not
compromised. Note: There is risk in providing new storm system design for downgradient development
without sufficient capacity to accept future growth, upstream. If capacity of existing storm system
cannot be shown to accept additional proposed runoff within acceptable limits, propose alternative.
(Rev. 4) If Applicant provided comment response addressing comment, please resend. This is a critical
comment; for the moment, Not addressed. Recommend comment review meeting, 20-Sept, 2018, to
discuss this comment.
2. Road names are not consistent throughout submittal. Ensure road names are approvable by E911 and
that they are consistently labeled. (Rev. 3) Addressed.
New (Rev. 3)
3. Ensure T, Str. 126, sheets 4 and 6 match. Revise storm sewer system design, if necessary. (Rev.
4) Not addressed.
4. Revise sheet 4 Note reference to read 2016 VDOT R&B standards, not 2007. (Rev. 4)
Addressed.
5. At sag transition, Int. Birmingham Drive and Birmingham Court, Sta. 11+48.98, provide VDOT
Std. underdrain, since no entrance pipe. Daylight underdrain. (Rev. 4) Addressed.
6. Sheet 7: Delete reference to blasting; remove Blasting Notes. Residential neighborhood is a high
risk environment (a poor candidate) for blasting, and is not approved as a construction method. (Rev.
4) Addressed.
7. Sheet 9: Clarify sight distance profile schematics; proposed and existing grades do not provide
clear perspective of object, or viewer. Identify proposed grade (which street); identify sight line
directions (along which streets). (Rev. 4) Partially addressed. As follow-up: provide N arrow on all
plan view sheets.
8. - Provide horizontal sight lines, and easements, if required (sheet 3). (Rev. 4) Partially addressed.
As follow-up: confirm sight distance easement on Lot 57 is to be shown on final subdivision plat for
Creekside V, Phase II (Rev. 3, comment 8). Note: SUB201700146, Old Trail Creekside V —Phase II —
Final is listed Deferred. Status of sight distance easement is unclear.
�. Label all Ex. storm pipes /inlets between new development (new inlets /pipes) and existing SWM
facility. Also, see comment #1 ollow-u ) above. (Rev. 4) Addressed.
Plannine /Fire -Rescue /VDOT /ACSA arior comments removed: Rev. 4 comments will be forwarded when received.
(Rev. 4) ACSA comments, email received 9/12/2018 10:27 AM
"Collins Engineering hasn't addressed any of our comments from our April 13, 2018 Comment Letter."
Engineering recommends plan review meeting 20-Sept, 2018 to discuss delay of approval, and issue outlined in
ACSA email.
SUB201700149, Creekside V, Phase I & II
Page 3 of 3
CDD E911— Elise Kiewra — Requested Changes
The following road names are will need to be changed: JACKSON LANE, Roads named JACKSON LANE at
ready exists elsewhere in the County.
a. NOTE: We recommend providing three (3) candidate names for each road to our office for
review, in case your first choices are not acceptable.
Page 2 has Jarmans Lake Rd incorrectly labeled as Jarmans Lane Road
The developer should contact the Crozet Post Office to determine a location for a cluster box unit (CBU).
The Crozet Post Office is no longer able to provide curbside delivery. For questions concerning this,
contact Keith Smarte, the Crozet Postmaster, at 823-9847.
Rev 2 Comments
1. The following road names will need to be changed: Birchwood Hill LN [exceeds 16 character limit]
2. Pages 1, 4, 5, 8, and 11 still have Jackson Ln on them, they will need to be updated to the final road
name once confirmed.
3. While Jackson Ln was not allowed due to being an existing road Jackson Hill Ln would meet the
requirements, or some similar name using Jackson.
The developer should contact the Crozet Post Office to determine a location for a cluster box unit
TBU). The Crozet Post Office is no longer able to provide curbside delivery. For questions concerning
his, contact Keith Smarte, the Crozet Postmaster, at 823-9847.
Ale recommend providing three (3) candidate names for each road to our office for review, in case vour
irst choices are not acceptable.
Rev 3 Comments
No objection (email - 4/16/2018 10:28 AM)
Rev 4 Comments
No objection (A. Walker CV status 9/5/18)
Sincerely,
J. Anderson, PE
Civil Engineer II
SUB201700149_Old Trail Creekside_V_Phase_I_II_rev4_091818ja.doc