Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201800057 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2018-09-18County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22902 Phone 434-296-5832 Memorandum To: Rusty Coan From: Paty Saternye, Senior Planner Division: Planning Date: September 18, 2018 Subject: SDP201800057 Caliber Collision— Final Site Plan Fax 434-972-4126 The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.] Initial Site Plan Comments (from conditional approval letter dated 6/8/18): 1. Final comments from some reviewers are still pending. Therefore, more information on whether there will be any comments to address prior to initial site plan approval with conditions is still pending. UPDATE: Comment addressed. See attached conditions of approval from other SRC reviewers. 2. A site plan meeting all the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code. FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. See comments below [SP2017-16] A site plan meeting all the requirements of the conditions of SP201700016. FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following: a) Approval of an Access Management Exception Request by VDOT is required prior to the final site plan approval. b) Revise the SUB Notes: #1 on Sheet 8 to precisely repeat the SP condition #3 of "Upon request of the County, the applicant shall dedicate land within the 100-year floodplain and stream buffers to public use near Moore's Creek for a potential future greenway trail. Actual trail planning, permitting, and construction is to be carried out by others." c) Please note that VDH has approved the construction permit for the installation of the septic system. 4. [SP2017-16 & 32.5.2(a)] Add the SP approval letter and attached conditions to the Site Plan. FINAL: Comment addressed. 5. [SP2017-16 & 32.5.2(a)] Add the plans that were listed in the SP conditions to the Site Plan. These are the: a) "Caliber Collision, Conceptual Site Plan, Conceptual Grading Plan, Conceptual Landscape Plan," last updated on March 8, 2018 and the b) "Caliber Collision Exterior Elevation" dated November 1, 2017 and last updated on March 12, 2018. FINAL: Comment addressed. [5.1.31] Add the following notes to the site plan: a) All parts, materials and equipment shall be stored within an enclosed building. FINAL: Comment addressed. b) No vehicle awaiting repair shall be located on any portion of the site so as to be visible from any public street or any residential property, and shall be limited to locations designated on the approved site plan. FINAL: Comment addressed. c) All services shall be performed within an enclosed building. FINAL: Comment addressed. d) No buildings in which services are performed shall be located closer than fifty (50) feet from any residential or agricultural district. FINAL: Comment addressed. [32.5.1, 32.5.2(a) & 4.201 Setbacks. Revise the setback descriptions to fully specify the setback requirements. There are maximums and minimums, there are special circumstances (such as from ROW versus from back of sidewalk outside of the ROW), there are special criteria based upon the adjoining properties and there are setbacks for parking and loading. The descriptions provided to not state the setback requirements fully, and therefore not correctly. Also note that the setback information is not consistent between sheet 1 or 1 and sheet 8. FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following: a) The setback descriptions on Sheet 8 do not fully match those shown in the code. Ensure the descriptions include the details and the possible options. b) The setback descriptions on Sheet 2 do not match those on Sheet 8. Ensure setbacks are described correctly on all sheets where they are provided. c) Revise the label for the rear setback to the RA zoned area to specify "50' Rear Setback to RA District Boundary". [32.5.1(c) & 32.5.2(a)] General information. Address the following: a) Label TMP77-IE as PD-SC zone. FINAL: Comment addressed. b) Label TMP77-10 as LI zone. FINAL: Comment addressed. c) Ensure that the bearings and distances, or required curvilinear data, is provided on all existing boundaries of the parcel. FINAL: Comment addressed. d) On Sheet 1 or 1, in the "Zoning Data" area, include all of the overlay districts for the parcel. It also resides in the Airport Impact Area, the Dam Inundation Zone, and the Flood Hazard Overlay districts. FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Please also add the Steeps Slopes — Preserved overlay district to the lists provided on the site plan. e) Proviae the mapswnai oisti-ict. FINAL: Comment addressed. f) Provide the state, next to the County (ex. Albemarle County, VA) and do not include "Charlottesville, Virginia 22902" in the title of the project. FINAL: Comment addressed. g) Provide a scale bar for the two Sheet No. 1 of 1. FINAL: Comment addressed. h) Provide the source of topography and survey. FINAL: Comment addressed. i) Revise sheet numbers. The cover sheet has no sheet number, there are two "Sheet No. 1 of 1" and then the next sheet is labeled "Drawing 4". These need to be consistent naming and linear numbering of all sheets. All of these need to match the sheet numbers specified in the "Drawing List:" on the cover sheet. FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. The roadway improvement plans are not listed in the "Drawing List:" the way they are numbered on the individual sheets. Also, Sheet 3 of the roadway sheets has no sheet number in the bottom right title block and "21B" in the upper right title block. Ensure the sheet numbers on the sheets match those shown on the "Drawing List:" j) Provide the present use for the abutting parcels. FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following: i. Revise the use for TMP 77-11. It is not vacant. ii. Provide the use for TMP 77-10. It is also adjacent. iii. This information could be provided on the existing conditions sheet. k) Revise vicinity map to be for the correct location. FINAL: Comment addressed. 9. [32.5.2(g)] Onsite sewage system setback lines. Show the location of the onsite sewage system setback lines from watercourses. FINAL: Comment addressed. 10. [32.5.2(h)] Floodplain and related information. Sheet 1 or 1, in the "Flood information" area and under the "Notes:" include the FEMA information for the whole parcel and not just the development portion of the site. As shown on Drawing 8, there are both AE and X zones within the boundaries of the parcel. FINAL: Comment addressed. 2 11. [32.7.4.2, 32.5.2(j) & (k)] Easements for stormwater management facilities; Drainage Easements; Proposed sewer and drainage facilities. Address the following: a) Depict, label, and dimension access easement to the stormwater management facility. FINAL: Comment addressed. b) On the plan depict, dimension, and label all drainage easements as either public or private. FINAL: Comment addressed. c) As specified in the engineering comments a stormwater easement plat and deed is required and must be submitted, reviewed, approved, signed and recorded prior to final site plan approval. FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. An easement plat has been submitted. Its approval and recordation of the plat and deeds of easement for all proposed easements, and a PDF scan of the circuit court receipt of recordation of Deed of Dedication, must be provided prior to final site plan approval. See the engineering comments. 12. [32.5.2(k)] Private & public easements. Provide the location and dimension of all proposed private offsite easements. Note that in addition to other possible easement there appears to be the need for offsite easements, construction and grading easements, landscaping easements and sidewalk easements. UPDATE: Comment still valid. Also note that required easement plats and deeds must be submitted, reviewed, approved, signed and recorded prior to final site plan approval. FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. An easement plat has been submitted and is under review. However, the easement plat does not appear to include all of the easements that will be required. Construction and grading easements on the adjoining parcels also appear to be necessary. Their approval and recordation of the plat and deeds of easement for the proposed easements, and a PDF scan of the circuit court receipt of recordation of Deed of Dedication, must be sent to Dlanning prior to final site Dlan approval 13. [32.5.2(1)] Existing and proposed utilities. Show all required proposed easement utilities. The submission, review, approval and recordation of a plat and deeds of easement for all proposed easements will be prior to final site plan approval. FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. An easement Dlat has been submitted. Its aDDroval and recordation of the plat and deeds of easement for all proposed easements, and a PDF scan of the circuit court receipt of recordation of Deed of Dedication, must be sent to planning prior to final site plan approval 14. [32.5.2(m)] Ingress and egress. Provide the distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection in both directions. FINAL: Comment addressed. 15. [32.5.2(n)] Existing and proposed improvements. Clearly label and/or delineate areas of sidewalk and walkways. The sidewalks along Avon Extended are not clearly marked and are not hatched as "Concrete Paving/Sidewalk" according to the legend. Also, there are areas that may be for pedestrian access, between the parking lot and the front door that are also not labeled or hatched. Ensure there is sufficient pedestrian access from all customer parking spaces to the main entrance to the building. FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Provide a pedestrian connection from the three Darkina spaces near the entrance to the sidewalk in front of the buildings entrance. 16. [32.5.2(o)] Areas to be dedicated or reserved. Address the following: a) Provide the following note on all sheets showing the 100-year floodplain and stream buffer: "Upon request of the County the land within the 100 year floodplain and stream buffers shall be dedicated to the County as specified in SP2017-16 condition #3 ". FINAL: Comment addressed. b) Provide information on the exact extent of the VDOT ROW dedication. Show ROW dedication area on site plan. FINAL: Comment addressed. c) Submission, review, approval, and recordation of the special lot subdivision plat for ROW dedication is required prior to final site plan approval. The special lot plat is done by separate, with an application and fee. FINAL: Comment addressed. Address comment. d) UPDATE: Label the area to be dedicated as VDOT ROW as "Dedicated to the County for Public Use". FINAL: Comment addressed. 3 17. [32.5.2(p)] Landscape Plan. Address the following: a) Ensure that all landscape plant labels are legible. There are some tree labels that cannot be read because of other plantings beneath them. Ensure all labels can be read. FINAL: Comment addressed. b) A label for Steep Slopes is provided in this sheet, but not hatching is shown to delineate the area specified by the label. Show the preserved slope hatch in this sheet as well. FINAL: Comment addressed. c) UPDATE: Provide all required information on existing trees, landscaping, limits of clearing and grading and tree protection fencing as specified in 32.7.9.4 FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Tree protection fencing is required not only to protect trees on the immediately adjacent site but also in order to ensure that the "20' No Disturbance Buffer" is not disturbed and that no trees within it are damaged. Tree protection fencing must be shown on the site plan and not must the ESC Plans. Provide the required tree protection fencing in both the landscape plan and the grading plan sheets. 18. [32.6.2(h)] Signature panel. A signature panel is required on the coversheet of the final site plan. FINAL: Comment addressed. 19. [32.6.20) & SP2017-161 Landscape plan. A landscape plan is required in the final site plan that complies with section 32.7.9 and condition 91 of the special use permit. FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following: a) Provide the required, filled out, and signed conservation checklist within the landscapes plan portion of the site plan. b) Show the location of the tree protection fencing on the landscape plan and the grading plan sheets in the site plan. c) Ensure that the street tree information (required and proposed) is correct and matches on all sheets. The street tree information on Sheet 8 does not match those shown on the Landscape Plan. Please note that landscaping was shown on the Special Use Permit (SP) exhibits/plans. The Landscaping Plan appears to match the SP and Sheet 8 does not. d) Clarify the location of the 13 LG. EVGR. SCREENING TREES" that are specified to be on the "west" side of the building. This may be a typographical error. Ensure the number specified matches the number shown. 20. [32.6.2(k)] Outdoor lighting. A photometric plan is required on the final site plan that meets all requirements of section 4.17. FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following: a) Provided specification sheets for each light fixture model number utilized. These specification sheets must be integrated into the site plan sheets. b) Ensure that all light fixture that emit 3,000 lumens or more meet the full cut off requirements. c) Provide the maximum lumens for all light fixtures in the fixture schedule and ensure those lumen correspond to the information provided in the specification sheets. d) Ensure the specification information for each fixture type specifies the lamp type (LED, etc.). e) Spill over lighting from luminaries onto public roads and rural areas shall not exceed one-half (1/2) foot candle. It appears that this ordinance may not be met along the proposed street right of way line. f) Ensure that all of the property lines, the proposed street right of way line, and the zoning line (between HC and RA on the property) are clearly shown and labeled in the photometric plan. g) Ensure that the foot candle information is provided at all property lines, the proposed street right of way line, and the zoning district line (between the HC and RA zones on the property). It appears the information is not provided at the entrance and it is uncertain if it is shown at the property lines or the zoning line since these lines are either not shown or are not labeled. h) All outdoor lighting, regardless of the amount of lumens, shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. 4 21. [Comment] Provide a detail for the gates in the screening fence. Ensure that the gates are opaque. FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following: a) Integrate the details into the site plan and not only as separate documents/plan sheets. Although the screening fence is included in the plan set the Sliding Ornamental Gate it not. b) Ensure the sliding gate works with the site plan. It appears that the gate is supposed to open in only one direction (detail provided). However, there is insufficient room for it to do so. Ensure the gate shown in the plan view of the site plan, and the detail that you will be adding to the site plan, match and have sufficient space to function. c) The pate in the "Sliding Ornamental Gate" separate exhibit that was submitted appears to be see-thru. Full screening of the vehicle storage is required. Ensure the gate provides full screening (that it is "Opaque" as specified above). 22. [Comment] The information required for the initial site plan has been reviewed. Additional information has been provided in this initial site plan that shall be reviewed as part of separate submissions (ex. VSMP Plan and Road Plan) or when submitted for the final site plan. UPDATE: Comment still valid. However, a separate road plan will not be required. FINAL: The information reauired with the final site Dian has been review. See other comments for items to address. 23. [Comment] Please note that business signs are reviewed by separate submission. FINAL: Comment did not need to be addressed. Ensure all business signage is submitted separately. 24. [Comment] See the majority of the other SRC reviewer comments attached. Other comments will be forwarded to you when they become available. At this time VDOT, and RWSA have not submitted comments. The final VDH comments are also still pending. All SRC reviewer comments must be sufficiently address prior to final site plan approval. UPDATE: See the other SRC reviewer comments attached. All SRC reviewer comments must be sufficiently address prior to final site plan approval. FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. See the other SRC reviewer comments attached. All SRC reviewer comments must be sufficiently address prior to final site plan approval. Additional comments for Final Site Plan: 25. [Comment] At the bottom of the title on Sheet 1 add the following site plan project number: SDP201800057 26. [32.6.2(i)] Parking and loading areas. Address the following: a) Relocate the handicapped parking signage to not block the handicapped parking spaces. The space between the wheel stop and the sidewalk is intended for vehicle overhang. Therefore the signage cannot be places within that distance. The signage should be place behind the sidewalk and/or mounted on the retaining wall at the correct height. See the additional information from engineering attached to these comments. Contact the engineering reviewer for any clarification on appropriate locations and heights. b) Add typical parking space dimensions in the two parking space areas outside of the gate that have 3 and 6 spaces in them. 27. [Comment] Revise the Grading Plan to include a label for the maximum wall height of each wall. Staff has provided references to provisions of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle. The Code is kept up to date by the County Attorney's office. The Code may found on the County Attorney's website which may be found under "Departments" at Albemarle.org. In accord with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code if the developer fails to submit a revised final site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter the application shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the developer. Please contact Paty Saternye in the Planning Division by using psaternye(a)albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext. 3250 for further information. 5 Review Comments for SDP201800057 Final Site Development Plan Project Name: CALIBER COLLISION - FINAL Date Completed: Thursday, August 23, 2018 aepartmentUvision/Agency: Review Status: Reviewer: Jahn Anderson CDD Engineerina Requested Changes 1. As follow-up to ISP Engineering review comment 10_h_ and in response to proposed Access easement, Engineering requests Applicant confirm that yellow highlight accurately identifies proposed SWM Facility /Access Easement —ref. photo image Attached to review email (SI2312018 4.31 PM)_ 2. As follow-up to Applicant request to approve S1NM easement location (ISP review comment 4_), location appears to encompass the proposed stormwater BMP, and appears acceptable. A 15' private drainage easement from proposed SWM facility to natural drainage feature is also provided with FSP_ Easements must be recorded, a .PDF scan of circuit court receipt of recordation of Deed of Dedication must be sent to Engineering prior to FSP approval. 3. As noted elsewhere, VSMP approval is required prior to FSP approval. VSMP iWPO is in process, and reviewer is in contact with Applicant re. VSMP fWPO plan status. No further WPO plan revisions are required, but nutrient credit purchase, tree conservation plan, SWM Maintenance Agreement, and Easements are required, and are for the moment outstanding. 4. As follow-up to ISP Engineering review comment 10.g., keynote V appears in legend, sheet 8, but unless overlooked; this symbol does not appear on the site layout. please include symbol at each location to receive a CG-12 ramp, on site layout; sheet 8. 5. As follow-up to ISP Engineering review comment 19_- Engineering defers to VDOT to request or require specific additional MUTCD traffic control measure detail, or Maintenance of Traffic Plan (if any), beyond level of detail presented with the FSP. Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: 10911772018 Patricia Saternye From: John Anderson Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 10:17 AM To: Patricia Saternye Subject: SDP201800057 -Caliber Collision FSP -- Reserved HC Parking sign palcement Paty, Thanks for thoughtful questions re. HC parking sign location relative to parking space bumper blocks —hope this note helps. No permanent fixed object may occupy space within 2' of the face of a bumper block —that is, immediately behind stop blocks. The intent is to ensure clear space for vehicle overhang with minimal risk of collision, or damage to sign, or vehicle. Placement of two signs behind sidewalk, and a third atop a RW appears reasonable —sign elevations are important (see, below). Please share this design requirement and illustrative photo/s with Applicant —please direct Applicant to contact Engineering if there are questions. Thanks Paty Examples: 2' clear space IF at - 1. Note: VDOT Memorandum (link: http://www.virginiadot.orgibusiness/resources/traffic engineering/memos/TE- 284 Disabled Parking.pdf ) specifies sign height requirements. It is important to note that lower edge of lowest reserved-HC parking sign should be 7' (nearly exactly) above grade in areas used by pedestrians. 4 John Anderson, PE, Civil Engineer II • (434) 296-5832 -x3069 Community Development Dept. I Engineering Division County of Albemarle 1 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Stephen C. Brich, P.E. Commissioner COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper, Virginia 22701 August 28, 2018 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Attn: Patricia Saternye Re: SDP-2018-00057-Caliber Collision- Final Site Plan Dear Ms. Saternye: The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section has reviewed the Caliber Collision- Final Site Plan, dated July 16, 2018 as submitted by Freeland and Kauffman, Inc., and offer the following comment Land use 1. Match pavement section of Avon St. to the right of way line can be accomplished with a note on plans. 2. Please provide inlet calculations for the curb inlet on Avon St. Please include spread calculations 4"/hr. rainfall event. Upon submission of the appropriate signed and sealed approval copies this office will perform a final review and, if acceptable, sign the plans. Please allow for this office to obtain two signature copies. A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The owner/developer must contact the VDOT Charlottesville Residency Land Use Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process. If you have further questions, please contact Willis C. Bedsaul at 434-422-9866. Sincerel , Adam J. ore, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer VDOT - Charlottesville Residency VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Review Comments for SDP201800057 Final Site Development Plan LJ Project Name: CALIBER COLLISION - FINAL Date Completed: Saturday, August 11, 2D18 aepartmenVIDivisionlAgency: Review Status: Reviewer: Shawn Maddox Fire Rescue H See Reoommendations El Thank you for addressing previous comments_ Please ensure the gate proposed does not impact the clear width of the travel lane. Thank you. Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 10911772018 Review Comments for SDP201800057 Final Site Development Plan LJ Project Name: CALIBER COLLISION - FINAL Date Completed: Tuesday, August 14, 2D18 DepartmenVDivisiorVAgency: Review Status: Reviewer: Richard Nelson ACSA Requested Changes Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: 10911772018 Review Comments for SDP2018OOO57 Final Site Development Plan 0 Project Name: CALIBER COLLISION - FINAL Date Completed: Thursday, August 09, 201 DepartmenVDiuisionlAgency: Review Status: Reviewer: Victoria Fort LJ RWSA No Objection RWSA has reviewed the Final Site Plan for Caliber Collision as prepared by Freeland and Kauffman, Inc_ and dated 7/16/2018 and finds no impacts to RWSA facilities. RWSA therefore has no comments on this site plan. Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: 10911772018 Review Comments for SDP2018OOO57 Final Site Development Plan LJ Project Name: CALIBER COLLISION - FINAL Date Completed: Thursday, August 02, 201 DepartmenVDivisionlAgency: Review Status: Reviewer: Elise Kiewra CAI] E911 No Objection per site plan dated 7/16/18 .A Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: 10911772018 Review Comments for SDP2018OOO57 Final Site Development Plan LJ Project Name: CALIBER COLLISION - FINAL Date Completed: Tuesday, July 31, 2018 DepartmenVDivisionlAgency: Review Status: Reviewer: Michael Dellinger CDD Inspections No Objection Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: 10911772018 Page I of Albemarle County Health Department VIRGINIA 1138 Rose Hill Drive DEPARTMENT � VHOF Charlottesville, VA 22903 HEALTH (434) 972-6219 (434) 972-4310 Fax Protecting You and Your Environment PE Sewage Disposal System Construction Permit Letter (COV 32.1-163.6) August 02, 2018 Caliber Collision Mae pae C/O Cross Development, LLC 4336 Marsh Ridge Road Carrollton, TX 75010 Tax Map: 77-I IF HDID: 101-18-0336 Reserve: 100%reserve area provided System Capacity: Non -Residential, 260 gallons per day System Description: AOSS to serve a Commercial Body Shop with estimated flows of 260 gpd Dear Cross Development, LLC: This letter and the attached drawings, specifications and calculations dated May 31, 2018 constitute your permit to install a sewage disposal system on the properly referenced above. Your application for a permit was submitted pursuant to §32.1-163.6 of the Code of Virginia, which requires the Virginia Department of Health (VDH) to accept designs for onsite sewage systems from individuals licensed as Professional Engineers (PEs). This law allows PEs to design onsite sewage systems that do not fully comply with the Sewage Handling and Disposal Regulations (12 VAC 5-610-10 et seq.) and requires VDH to accept such designs provided they comply with standard engineering practices, performance requirements set by the Board of Health, and certain horizontal setback requirements necessary to protect public health and the environment. VDH hereby recognizes that the design submitted by Brent E. Johnson, P.E. complies with the requirements of the Code of Virginia and the applicable regulations and grants permission to install the system as designed in the area shown on the attached plans and specifications. If modifications or revisions are necessary between now and when the system is constructed, please contact the PE who designed the system upon which this permit is based. Should revisions be necessary during construction, your contractor should consult with the PE. The PE is authorized to make minor adjustments in the location or design of the system provided that adequate documentation is provided to the Albemarle County Health Department. The PE that submitted the design for this permit is required by the Sewage Handling and Disposal Regulations to conduct a final inspection of this sewage system when it is installed and to submit an inspection report and completion statement to the Albemarle County Health Department. The health department is not required to inspect the installation, but may do so at its sole discretion. The sewage system may not be placed into operation until you have obtained an Operation Permit from the Albemarle County Health Department. Your PE did not submit an Operation and Maintenance Manual for review and approval with the plan package, and will be required to do so prior to issuance of an Operation Permit. Tax Map/GPIN: 77-1IF HDID: 101-I8-0336 Page 2 of 3 This Construction Permit is null and void if site and soil conditions are changed from those shown on your application or if conditions are changed from those shown on the attached plans and specifications. VDH may revoke or modify any permit if, at a later date, it finds that the system would threaten public health or the environment. This permit approval has been issued in accordance with applicable regulations based on the information and materials provided at the time of application. There may be other local, state, or federal laws or regulations that apply to the proposed construction of this onsite sewage system. The owner is responsible at all times for complying with all applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations. This construction permit is transferable until expired or deemed null and void. A permit transfer form may be found on the VDH website at htti):H/ .vdh.virpinia_gov/environmental-health/gap-2015-01-forms/ . If you have any questions, please contact me. This permit expires February 01, 2020. Sincerely, Josh Kirtley Environmental Health Technical Specialist Cc: Johnson, Brent E., P.E. Tax Map/GPIN #: 77-11 F HDID#: 101-18-0336 Page 3 of 3 WHAT YOU WILL NEED TO GET YOUR SEPTIC SYSTEM OPERATION PERMIT • Your system must have a satisfactory inspection at the time of installation. This will be done by the designer of your permitted system, a private OSE or PE. Your OSE or PE must submit a copy of the inspection results, complete with an as -built diagram, to the Health Department. • Please ensure that your contractor turns in a Completion Statement to the local Health Department after installation. • If your permit is for an alternative system, you must sign, have notarized, and record the attached Notice of Recordation in your locality's land records. Please bring proof of this recordation to the local Health Department IF YOUR PERMIT IS FOR BOTH A SEPTIC SYSTEM AND WELL YOU WILL ALSO NEED • Your well must have satisfactory inspection results after installation. Please give the Health Department several days notice to schedule this inspection before your Operation Permit will be requested. • The Health Department must receive a copy of your water sample test result being negative/satisfactory for coliform bacteria. You are responsible for performing this test and ensuring the results are received at the Health Department • Please ensure that your Well Driller submits a Uniform Water Well Completion Statement or GW-2 to the Health Department, including documentation of a proper well abandonment if required by permit Allow 5 business days after the last piece of documentation is received for the Operation Permit to be issued. To avoid delays, clearly label each piece of documentation with the property Tax Map number and HDID number shown above and on your construction permit. Please note that due to the individual circumstances of your permit there may be additional required items not covered by this checklist. If you have any questions about any of the items on this list, please do not hesitate to contact the Albemarle County Health Department at (434) 972-6219.