Loading...
1995-03-15 adjMarch 15, 1995 (Afternoon - Adjourned Meeting) (Page 1) 000179 An adjourned meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, was held on March 15, 1995, at 1:00 P.M., Room 7, County Office Building, McIntire Road, Charlottesville, Virginia. This meeting was ad- journed from March 13, 1995. PRESENT: Mr. David P. Bowerman, Mrs. Charlotte Y. Humphris, Messrs. Forrest R. Marshall, Jr., Charles S. Martin, Walter F. Perkins and Mrs. Sally H. Thomas. ABSENT: None. OFFICERS PRESENT: County Executive, Robert W. Tucker, Jr., and County Attorney, Larry W. Davis. Also present were: Deputy County Executive, Richard E. Huff, II, and Assistant County Executive, Roxanne W. White. Agenda Item No. 1. The meeting was called to order at 1:07 ?.M., by the Chairman, Mr. Walter F. Perkins. Agenda Item No. 2. Budqet Work Session: 1995-96 County Budqet. School Division, Mr. William W. Finley, Chairperson, and Dr. Kevin C. Castner, Division Superintendent, were present. It was noted in the staff's report that the School Board submitted a balanced budget of $69.4 million, which is based on allocated revenues of $63.5 million in the School Fund and $5.9 million in Self-Sustaining Funds. This is a 4.4 percent increase in the School Fund and a 13.1 percent increase in Self-Sustaining Funds. Based on the September 30th enrollment figures, per pupil expenditures are $5710. A synopsis of the School Division's budget objectives and strategies was provided to each Board member along with a list of the School Board's funded initiatives and unfunded priorities. The General Fund transfer to the School Division is $38,833,182, an increase of $2,028,237 (5.5%) over the FY 94-95 appropriation. Mr. Perkins asked Mr. Finley to speak first. Mr. Finley said this was his seventh budget and procedures were so smooth that it was almost "boring". One of the primary reasons is that it was extremely well organized, and he expressed his appreciation to Dr. Carole Hastings and her staff; second, the review committees of the County and the School Division got together three times during the work. Also, there was the meeting between the School Board and the Board of Supervisors where the bonus percentage and scale increase were set. The remainder of the process after that was routine. Mr. Finley said the School Board took a vote at the beginning of the process where it decided that the budget submitted would be a balanced budget and the budget presented today is balanced against projected revenues. Built into the budget is a debt pay-off to the Virginia Retirement System (VRS) of about $2.2 million. This payment (the equivalent of ten teachers salaries and it goes on for the next nine years) is for the early retirement program which involved 32 employees. The School Board learned a lesson with this program. If it ever decides to do the same thing again, it should have some plan in effect in advance of approval. Mr. Finley said there is a reserve in the School budget for a bus fund which they hope to be able to hold anticipating a large expenditure in the next three years coinciding with the opening of the new high school. At the end of the next fiscal year, the School Board will decide if it is more financially feasible to hold this money as a bus reserve or use it to pay down the VRS debt. As to teacher's salaries, having scaled the bonus back from 2.5 percent to two percent, it freed up money that was then added to the top of the scale for teacher increases. It could amount to 2.8 percent for some teachers, and some could get an even higher percentage. One of the goals of the strategic plan is that the teachers be in the upper quartile of the State, and he believes they will be well within that figure if this proposed budget is adopted. Mr. Finley said the County has one of the finest instructional teams in the region, perhaps in the State, and having begun implementation of the new curriculum, and with the emphasis the School Board and the new administration are placing on instruction, he believes the real issue in the future, and the top priority in the schools, will be instruction, including textbooks and resource materials, classrooms and assessment. He said that future budgets will scrutinize more closely any proposal that does not enhance instruction or improve student performance. The priority is in the classroom. Dr. Castner said his part in the budget process this year was minimal. He was glad to come in where the School Board and the Board of Supervisors have such a close relationship. There was a genuine team effort between Roxanne White, Rick Huff (General Government personnel), Carole Hastings and Jackson Zimmerman (School personnel). He said the budget presented is a "maintenance of effort" budget because there Were not a lot of new monies. When 234 new students are projected for next year, it took all the money available to just maintain what was already in place. There are a number of unfunded priorities, but these need to be looked at to see if they are "must do" as opposed to "should do". 000 80 March 15, 1995 (Afternoon - Ad~°urhed Meeting) (Page 2) Dr. Castner 'sa'~ ~e be~~e S~h0Ol Division will be okay next fiscal year. He is concerned about the cost of replacing textbooks, and when there is a maintenance of effort budget, there are times when the infrastruc- ture can slowly get behind. The School Board has to be focused toward instruction, and has to be pro-active. He thinks the bus reserve fund is a very good idea. He said some money was taken from that reserve fund, but the School Board knows there will be some funds to correct that from the School Board's current fiscal year budget. He is pleased with the support given by the Board of Supervisors and hopes it is the type of standard that can be expected in the future. Mr. Perkins asked if any Board member had a question. Mrs. Thomas asked if the teacher scale has been increased to add two steps to the top. Dr. Castner said three steps were added, but the final decision is pending. Some adjustments may be made yet, but the amount of money that the Schools have to work with is fixed, it is a matter of how to distribute that amount. With no other Board member responding, Mr. Perkins said this has been the easiest work session with the School Board that he has ever attended. He thanked those who were present. Mr. Tucker said he would like to discuss the mandatory health screening issue. Mr. Mike Marshall from the School Board is also present to express his concerns° Mro Tucker said staff feels that a health screening is an important part of the County's wellness program. It is a preventative measure~ and times when problems have shown up through these screenings can be documented° In the long run, it has helped to contain health care costs. In FY 94-95, staff promoted a mandatory health screening feeling that the more employees who were a part of this screening, the better it would be for the total health care costs. Mr. Tucker said that some employees felt they did not know about this mandatory program soon enough. Monday night the School Board voted 5/2 not to have a mandatory health screening, and he has thought about it and now recommends that any screening be postponed this Spring, and it be taken up again in the Fall of '95 or the Spring of '96. He wants to put together, with the School System and the health advisory committee, some incentives and some disincentives for doing it. In order to take another look at the program, and do a better job of getting the information out, he recommends that the health screenings not be done in the Spring of 1995. Mrs. Humphris said she appreciates what has been done and she heard Mr. Mike Marshall speak at the School Board meeting, but she would like to say that a health screening is extremely important. First, the taxpayer support that is given toward health insurance is a benefit which does not have to be provided. Second, speaking from personal experience, a regular health screening can save your life; it happened to her and it happened to her husband, so she believes it could happen to many people in the building and in the school system. The Board does have to be careful about the way it spends taxpayers' dollars for these benefits, and the preventative part of this would save dollars. She is supportive of the health screening. Mr. Mike Marshall was present. He said he did not know Mr. Tucker would make the recommendation he did, today. He is not opposed to health scree- nings, but the issue of it being mandatory raises philosophical issues about government that the Board needs to address. The plan was set up so the "mandatory" aspect was only for the employee and not his/her spouse/dependent. If it is to mandatory, he believes it should be mandatory for all partici- pants. He believes the mandatory aspect raises privacy issues for some people. The government needs to protect the rights of minorities as a basic tenet of the democratic process. Not everybody will feel that they should be coerced by the loss of their health insurance premium into doing something that they see as a violation of their privacy as regards their body. Although he realizes that the County is trying to control costs, he believes the largest single factor in the growth of premium expenses is mental health costs, not physical costs. If this logic were to hold, it seems the County should require a mandatory mental health screening. It seems the logic of this gets into areas the County has no business getting into° Mrs. Thomas said she thinks that most of the mental health costs come from substance abuse, and that is an issue covered under most health scree- nings in a way that is not unduly intrusive and can lead to substance abuse classes that employers can have for their employees, and that is a reason not to include all dependent persons. She feels the County erred in the way it approached this issue. She agrees with the advise not to proceed with the health screenings in this fiscal year. She does feel it is a way the County should god and will support furtherance of the program in the near future. Mr.. Martin said he likes the idea of having incentives as well as disincentives. He thinks both should be strong because he believes in the health screenings. He does not particularly agree with them being mandatory. Mrs. Thomas said she was surprised that presentation of the Schools budget went by so fast. She wanted to comment that it is difficult for a Board member to say the School system needs more funds When the Superintendent says the Schools will be okay next fiscal year. She has been concerned that a March 15, 1995 (Afternoon - AdjOUrned Meeting) (Page 3) 000 L81 maintenance of effort budget is the kind of budget the Schools have been having, and feels "we may soon be eating our own seed corn" if not careful in what is being done. It will be difficult to talk about the unfunded priori- ties if this is a budget that the Schools can survive and thrive on in the coming year. Dr. Castner said he did not want the Board to misinterpret what he said. The School Division will be okay in the next fiscal year with the proposed budget, however, the School Board does have a list of unfunded priorities. He then handed out a copy of the following list: ALBEMARLE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD SUMMARY OF UNFUNDED PRIORITIES DISCUSSION February 27, 1995 PRIORITIES AND ASSOCIATED COSTS FIRST TIER PRIORITIES** Additional At-Risk Funding Materials for Revised Curriculum ~ Middle School Intramurals 20,600 341,842 41,280 SECOND TIER PRIORITIES*** Increase Merit Pool by 0.555 Middle School Foreign Language Special Education Staffing 63,052 110,000 535,500 THIRD TIER PRIORITIES**** CATEC Initiatives 54,068 Feeder Pattern Nurses 98,640 Gifted Resource Teachers 198,000 School Clerical Staffing 67,750 VRS Debt Reduction 358,185 TOTAL UNFUNDED TOP BOARD PRIORITIES 1,888,917 ** Mentioned by three board members *** Mentioned by two board members **** Mentioned by one board member Dr. Castner said he feels a need for additional at-risk funding and could make good use of additional funds. In the spirit of the way this budget was developed, and with additional revenues being known in the beginning, he could make a good case for any of the unfunded priorities if there are now additional revenues. If the Board wants additional input, he will be glad to answer any questions. Mr. Perkins asked if staff wanted the Board to take any action today. Mr. Tucker said "no". He suggested that the Board wait until next Monday's work session and discuss unfunded priority items for all departments and agencies at that time. Mr. Perkins asked if the School Board could use just one-half of the requested amount for an item such as "materials for revised curriculum." Dr. Castner said they would probably choose to focus on just one subject such as science, rather than priorities within a specific curriculum. The amount requested covers all areas of the curriculum. Mr. Martin said he feels it is a shame that "middle school intramurals" is a first tier priority when the County had such a good program in operation at one point. He feels mistakes were made by dropping that program. Mr. Perkins asked if staff wanted any action on the proposed mandatory health screening. Mr. Tucker said "no". He heard no objection to postponing the screening until staff has time to draft a new proposal. Mr. Perkins asked when the Board will receive the proposal. Mr. Tucker said it should be ready in June when the staff plans on presenting a proposal for total health care coverage. The discussion of the Schools budget ended at 1:42 p.m. At this time, Mr. Tucker handed to the Board a memorandum containing information to questions raised at the Board's work session last Monday° He noted that much of this information will not be discussed until next Monday's work session. The Board then continued immediately with presentations of other budget categories. March 15, 1995 (Afternoon - Adjourned Meeting) (Page 4) 000 82 Community A~encies Public Safety Juvenile Detention Home. Requested, $71,911; recommended $71,911. Mr. Tucker said the FY 95-96 request from the Shenandoah Valley Juvenile Detention Home increases by $5911 (9%) over FY 94-95 based upon Albemarle's share of detention days plus funding for emergency safety and security equipment as well as additional staff to operate the control room. The County Executive recommends funding at the requested level of $71,911. Mr. Tucker said there was a Board of Directors meeting at the Home last Friday, and there were some slight changes made in the budget. This figure could drop slightly. (Note: Before beginning the next presentation, Ms. White said that basically all of the agencies received a two percent increase overall° That is also in line with what the City is doing for these agencies.) Community Attention, Jack Gallagher, present. Requested $60,537; recommended $60,240. Ms. White said Community Attention is requesting $60,537, representing a $1477 (2.5%) increase over FY 94-95. Community Attention has increased its services and the number of children and families served while reducing its staff by five (an 18% reduction) over the last five years. The County Executive recommends funding in the amount of $60,240 based on the recommendation of the Program Review Committee. This reflects a recommended two percent increase over FY 94-95. Ms. White said Community Attention did a great deal of reorganizing and looking at services provided. They have been able to cut staff and yet make services more accessible to the families they work with. Mr. Martin said the Juvenile Court uses Community Attention a lot. Over the last couple of years they have catered their services to what is needed, more so than any other agency he works with. There was a change in philosophy. They have a group of capable people, so if quick, short-term services are needed, they can move a person to help with that situation. Charlottesville-Albemarle Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA). Requested $13,040; recommended $13,040. Ms. White said the FY 95-96 contribution to the SPCA is based on the previous year's costs for which the County is billed quarterly. The SPCA projects that they will handle approximately 510 stray and 20 biting animals in FY 95-96. Each stray is held for six days at a cost of $4.00 per day (510 x 6 days = 3060 days @ $4.00 = $12,240/year). Each biting animal is held for 10 days at a cost of $4.00 per day (20 x 10 days = 200 days @ $4.00 = $800/ year). The total request is for $13,040, equal to the sum $12,240 + $800. The County Executive recommends funding at the contracted level of $13,040. Mrs. Thomas said she is always keeping track of the costs of growth, and was surprised to see that the projection was for less than the current year. Offender Aid & Restoration (OAR), Patricia Smith. Requested $38,870; recommended $37,403. Ms. White said Offender Aid and Restoration is requesting $38,870 in funding from Albemarle County for FY 95-96. The requested $2200 (10%) increase over the current year is primarily to fund a three to four percent salary increase, a four percent benefit increase, and a two percent rent increase. No new or expanded programs are proposed for Albemarle County. There were no questions from Board members. Based on the Program Review Committee's recommendation, the County Executive recommends that the County continue funding OAR, a two percent increase over the FY 94-95 appropriation for a total of $37,403. Human Services Thomas Jefferson Health District. Requested $662,000; recommended $598,000. Ms. White said the County contribution requested by the Thomas Jefferson Health Department is actually $656,000 (they just submitted a revised re- quest), an increase of $72,000 (13%) over FY 94-95. Their total budget has actually reduced by approximately $27,200, but the requested increase in Albemarle's share is to make up for a reduction of $30,000 in State revenues, $98,000 in service fees, and $120,000 in grant funds. 00018;3 March 15, 1995 (Afternoon - Adjourned Meeting) (Page 5) Program changes which will have to be made to absorb this shortfall are: replacement of one full-time dentist with contract services at 25 percent of current level; loss of one environmental health specialist; loss of one or more nurses, and elimination of the home health program. Included in the budget request ia an average 6.1 percent increase in salary and benefit costs, which continues the raises granted December, 1994 and by funding 2.25 percent raises on December 1, 1995. They also have increased utility and maintenance costs for the expanded facility and a $5000 increase in rent. Included in the request is $13,000 to begin local funding for the Child Health Partnership Program, a program which is coordinated by the Health Department and the Monticello Area Community Action Agency (MACAA) to provide intensive case management to low-income families. The program promotes the mental, physical, and social well-being of low-income residents through a primary care physician and coordinated community resources. This program has been funded with a Federal grant and United Way for the past two years and is projected to expand services in Albemarle County. Services are projected to be provided to 100 Albemarle children in FY 94-95 and 140 in FY 95-96. They have asked for funds from the County and from the City in order to begin taking on the local share since some of their funding sources have asked to see a show of support from the localities. The County Executive recommends funding with a two percent increase for a total baseline allocation of $598,000. Not included in the County Execu- tive's recommendation is $13,000 to fund the expanded request for the Child Health Partnership Program; it is listed on the unfunded priority list. Mrs. Thomas referred to the number of programs the Health Department is losing and asked if the Child Health Partnership Program is their number one priority. Ms. White said she did not know. She does understand from Dr. McLeod that some of the State cuts have been restored, but it is not known how they will filter down to the locality. Mr. Marshall said there is not even a State Commissioner of Health at this time. There is only an acting commissioner who does not have the authority to hire assistants, and there are probably ten offices that do not have department heads. He said that everything is suffering from this lack of personnel. It looks great on paper, but things are not getting done. Ms. White suggested deferring this item until Dr. McLeod arrives at the meeting. Region Ten Community Services, James R. Peterson, present. Requested $250,104; recommended $250,104. MS. White said Region Ten's FY 95-96 region-wide operating budget of $9,369,311 increases by 3.7 percent, an increase of $333,921 over FY 94-95. Albemarle's requested share increases by a total of $8549 or 3.5 percent for a total FY 95-96 county request of $250,104. Included in this request is an allocation of $26,859 for child services, which incorporates the former Outreach Counseling Services program. Also included is an expanded request to fund the County's share ($7270) of the Child Aid Program grant. This grant is part of the original Community Services Act Trust Grant awarded to Albemarle and Charlottesville in 1993 to stabilize families in crisis and educate children and parents on available and appropriate community resources. Twenty-five percent of the trust fund grant requires a 39 percent matching requirement and approximately 50 percent of the families have been from Albemarle County. Region Ten's requested local funds of $649,650 from the six jurisdic- tions in the Planning District will draw down almost $6.3 million in State and Federal funds, an average of ten dollars in State and Federal dollars for every dollar of local support. The County Executive recommends funding in the amount of $250,104 which is a 0.05 percent baseline increase plus an additional $7270 for the expanded request to fund the County's share of the Child Aid Trust Fund Grant. Mr. James Peterson, Executive Director, was present. Mr. Perkins asked how many people (clients) are involved in all of Region 10's programs° Mr. Peterson said there were 5602 persons who received direct services last year. Of that number, 1256 were Albemarle County residents. Mrs. Thomas asked if that number includes all of the school children involved in various classes. Mr. Peterson said only the children in formal groups are not counted. The number he gave is of identified children or adults. Mr. Marshall asked if Region 10 had not sustained big budget cuts from the state. Mr. Peterson said at this time the General Assembly has restored all but $3000 or $4000. They are awaiting the Governor's action, but the Governor has said publicly that he does not intend to veto these amendments. With no further discussion, the Board continued to the next item on the agenda. 000 184 March 15, 1995 (Afternoon - Adjourned Meeting) (Page 6) Children and Youth Commission (CAYC), Rory Carpenter. Requested, $22,250; recommended, $22,250. Ms. White said the total operating budget for the Children and Youth Commission remains level at $71,000; the County's share also remains level at 31 percent or $22,250 of the total budget. The remainder of the budget is funded by 31 percent from the City and 38 percent from State funds from the Virginia Department of Youth and Family Services. The State funds were recommended for elimination in the Governor's budget, but have a good chance of being reinstated by the Legislature. As part of the legislation, it is recommended that funding be reduced over the next two years, so probably within two years there will be no State funding for youth commissions. The County Executive recommends funding for the County's share of the Children and Youth Commission's budget as requested. There were no questions from Board members. Charlottesville Free Clinic, Betty Newel1. Requested, $6795; recommend- ed, $5000. Ms. White said the Charlottesville Free Clinic projects a total FY 95-96 budget of $214,616, down three percent from FY 94-95. Eighty-nine percent of their FY 95-96 budget is from grants and contributions. They are requesting $6795 from the County (3% of the total budget) and $9176 from the City of Charlottesville (4% of the total budget). The County provided $4600 in funds to the Clinic in FY 94-95 while Charlottesville provided $10,000. The request represents 10 percent of the operating costs associated with residents from each respective jurisdiction. Although the requests to the County and City are relatively minimal, a contribution from the respective governing bodies represents a local commitment used to leverage other funds. The County Executive recommends a contribution in the amount of $5000 for the Free Clinic in concurrence with the recommendation of the Program Review Committee and in recognition of the excellent service provided to the community. There were no questions from Board memberse Sexual Assault Resource Agency (SARA). Requested, $19,600; recommended, $19,600. Ms. White said the Sexual Assault Resource Agency has requested a total of $19,600 from Albemarle County for two programs: $12,925 for client services, and $6675 for community education. This request reflects level funding over FY 94-95. SARA also submitted a level funding request to the School Division for the CAP program for a total of $36,000. Based on the Program Review Committee's recommendation to continue funding SARA's client services and community education programs, the County Executive recommended funding as requested in the amount of $19,600. There were no questions from Board members. District Home. Requested, $40,000; recommended, $40,000. Mr. Tucker said $40,000 was requested for the DiStrict Home, an increase of $2500 (6.67%) over FY 94-95. The FY 95-96 allocation request will fund 2190 days for six current Albemarle County residents. The County Executive recommends full funding for the requested amount of $40,000. There were no questions from Board memberse Jefferson Area United Transportation, Inc. (JAUNT), Linda Wilson. Requested, $335,464; recommended, $280,000. Ms. White said the Jefferson Area United Transportation network request- ed $335,464, an increase of $93,029 (38%) over the FY 94-95 appropriation. There are several reasons for the increase. 1) The administration section of JAUNT'S budget for Albemarle County (which includes RideShare) increases by $53,792 (32.2%), which includes a four percent merit increase, changing a part-time administrative assistant to full-time, an increase in insurance liability costs for the vans, and increased utilities for the new building. The increase is compounded by Albemarle County's increasing ridership, which increases Albemarle's share of admin- istrative expenses shared with the other localities° 2) There is a twenty percent projected increased in the urban demand/response program (basically in the urban ring), where fares for the disabled and elderly are being heavily subsidized. To March 15, 1995 (Afternoon - Adjourned Meeting) (Page 7) 000 85 meet this increase in revenue hours, five additional positions have been added to handle the overall projected ridership in- crease. 3) The rural demand/response has increased only $9587 (6%) over FY 94-95 projecting an increase of 535 revenue hours or 810 passengers. The County Executive recommends funding for JAUNT in the amount of $280,000, an increase of $37,565 or 15.5 percent over FY 94-95. Although the allocation does not meet JAUNT's request, the lower recommendation is based on three factors: 1) the administrative budget increase is high; 2) the rider- ship in the urban area may be overprojected since JAUNT has returned an average surplus of $55,000 each year for the past two years ($28,000 projected for FY 94-95); 3) that Federal/State revenues may be greater than anticipated, which would reduce Albemarle's required local share. The impact of not funding JAUNT's total request at this time may mean that JAUNT will need to come back to the County for additional funding should ridership increase as they have projected and if additional State/Federal revenues do not materialize. Major agency requests not funded in the County Executive's recommenda- tion. Unfunded additional ridership at 60 percent of total budget request - $33,280; unfunded administrative/Ride Share dollars at 40 percent of total budget request - $22,185. Mr. Marshall said rather than buying new vehicles, the JAUNT Board con- tracted out a lot of services to Yellow Cab Company. In this way, instead of paying for a vehicle to sit and wait for a demand, they are only paying for the services actually used. There being no further remarks from Board members, the Board returned to discussion of the budget for the Health District. March 15, 1995 (Afternoon - Adjourned Meeting) (Page 8) Health District. Dr. Susan McLeod. 000 . 6 Ms. White said staff had already presented the budget, but the Board members had some questions about state revenues, and about priorities should the County choose to put additional funding into this budget, particularly about the Child Health Partnership Program. Dr. McLeod said the biggest item affecting the Health Department is what will happen with the Work Force Transition Act (early retirement/voluntary buy-out program). Funding will be taken away from the agencies for those people who are accepted for participation in the program. Until applications are actually received and accepted, it is not certain what amount that will be. Although a one-step (2 1/4%) increase was approved for employees for December l, 1995, there is no State money for that increase. The State health departments are essentially starting with level funding which will be cut as positions are eliminated. It is difficult to predict what affect that will have on operation of the departments. Dr. McLeod said she does ask this Board's consideration of the Child Health Partnership Program. It is a collaborative program with MACAA, and is the first of that kind of program in this community. Funding has been through grants until this point, but all of the grant sources have been reduced, and the grants sources now want to see some expression of support and interest from the communities before they put in any money. This same request is being made to Charlottesville and Fluvanna County. As far as the other programs in the Health Department, no final decision has been made but since numerous people in the community are entering the home health field, she feels the Health Department will no longer be in the home health field. The other program to be cut back is the dental program. Mrs. Thomas asked if the Child Health Partnership would still be the top priority if the Board were to give additional funds. Dr. McLeod said this program works in conjunction with all of their other children's program. She has called together an advisory group from the community and wants them to look at the traditional nursing program and the child health partnership, and say which is the more important. Dr. McLeod said it is hard to say that the Child Health Partnership is her top priority, but it is something she would like this Board to recognize. Mr. Marshall recommended that the Board put an additional $13,000 into the Health District budget. Mr. Bowerman said, based on what Dr. McLeod said, maybe the County might offer more discretion to the Health Department in terms of use of funds and increase the $13,000 to some other even amount as a contingency depending upon needs of the Health Department. There are some services which are critical to the citizens of Albemarle County which he does not want to see eliminated. Since no one knows how the Health District will be affected by the changes, he would like to account for it in the budget. Mr. Marshall said the Health Department has been cut more than any agency in the State. He asked if Mr. Bowerman were suggesting a higher figure. Mr. Bowerman said "yes", but he does not know how to estimate that figure. He thinks Dr. McLeod should be given enough flexibility to meet the needs as she sees them. Mr. Martin asked if Mr. Bowerman wanted to put $20,000 in a contingency. Mr. Bowerman said "yes". Dr. McLeod said she appreciates the recognition and will give further information to the staff on happenings as they occur. Mr. Marshall said everyone needs to go and visit the new facility. Dr. McLeod said Mr. Perkins and Mayor Toscano are to cut the ribbon on Sunday, April 2, 1995, and everyone is invited. Jefferson Area Board on Aging (JABA), ~ordon Walker. Requested, $164,311; recommended, $132,630. Ms. White said the request for the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for FY 95-96 of $164,311 is $34,281 (26.4%) over FY 94-95, which reflects a 3.5 percent inflation factor on their base request (applies by using their general share formula) and, additional requests of: $16,600 for scholarships for Adult Day Health Care Center (an additional 15 Albemarle County residents); $3433 for the Home Safety Program (25 clients additional); $3408 for Informa- tion and Assistance Pilot Program (for Saturday hours from 9:00 a.m. until 3:00 p.m.); and $6213 for new Congregate Meal Sites in Scottsville and northeastern Albemarle County. Based on the Program Review Committee's recommendation to fund JABA at the current service level, a two percent increase is recommended for funding for a total allocation of $132,630. Also included is the recommendation to fund the Scottsville congregate meals site using funds from the meals program which is not longer operating at the Senior Center. March 15, 1995 (Afternoon - Adjourned Meeting) O001~7 (Page 9) Major agency requests not funded in the County Executive's recommenda- tion are: 1) 15 Partial Scholarships at the Adult Day Care Center, $16,600; 2) Home Safety Program for 25 additional clients, $3,433; 3) Information and Assistance Pilot Project, $3,408; 4) Northeastern County Congregate Meals Site, $6,900. Ms. White said she had forwarded to the Board an analysis addressing one of the concerns of the Program Review Committee, that of program costs and local share funding. It shows that the County has been funding $25,000 over what the actual program costs are. Ms. White said money was allocated for two years for a meals site in the Free Union area and that did not work out. Last.year money was allocated to a meals site that was supposed to be at the Senior Center, but that did not work out. The Program Review Committee did not recommend against funding the new meals site in the northeastern part of the County, but recommended that funding be allocated only if that group would come to the Board and say they wanted a center. That happened at the public hearing last week. Mr. Martin asked why the figure $6213 is shown in one place for two new meals sites, and in another the figure $6900 is shown for only one site. Ms. White said that in their request, JABA requested $6213 for the two additional sites. The Scottsville site was then funded from what was left from the Senior Center site, so the $6900 is the additional amount needed to fund the Keswick site. Mr. Martin said he thought the people involved made a good case, and have spent time organizing, so he would like to have this item moved to the unfunded priority list for reconsideration at the end of these sessions. Mr. Marshall said someone had spoken at the public hearing about the request for 15 partial scholarships at the Adult Day Care Center. There were no further comments from Board members. Mrs. Humphris asked that Ms. White elaborate on a hand-out about the Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) before it commits itSelf to too many items. The hand-out stated "The Program Review Committee recommended transferring County funds from the RSVP Program to the Congregate Meals Program for the following reasons: It is not that RSVP is not a valuable program for senior citizens, but the Committee does not see it as a priority for County tax dollars when weighed against other more pressing needs, i.e., meal sites, day care scholarships, etc. The RSVP Program provided a total of 17,904 volunteer hours to 26 agencies in Albemarle County. Of those total hoursr 12,152 (67.8%) were used to provide assistance to JABA's own programs and the Senior Center. Since the majority of the benefit went to JABA itself, the Committee did not feel that the other 5753 volunteer hours merited a subsidy of $6088 from the County. The Program Review Committee also felt that JABA should encourage physically and financially able senior citizens, particularly those within their own programs, to volunteer their time without a subsidy from other County taxpayers. Again, although the program has many benefits to senior citizens, it has been difficult for the Program Review Committee to consider it a priority program compared with many of the other needs being requested for senior citizens, as well as other children and youth programs. Mrs. Humphris said she thinks the priorities for funding should be decided before just adding a lump sum for the whole meals program. She asked that the Board discuss the whole issue later. Mrs. Thomas asked that this item be placed on the "short list". Mr. Tucker said when the Board looks at all of the priorities next Monday, it will probably focus the Board's atten- tion on these issues. Madison House, Cindy Frederick. Requested, $4335; recommended, $4205. Ms. White said the programs which Madison House operates in Albemarle County are: Alternatives for Better Living, Adopt-A-Grandparent, Big Sibling~ Boosters, Consumer Information, Day Care, Holiday Sharing, Open House Hot Line Medical Services, Open House Hot line Recreational Therapy, and Service Alter- natives. Volunteers also spend time in tutoring and other group projects. 000:1.88 March 15, 1995 (Afternoon - Adjourned Meeting) (Page 10) Based on the Program Review Committee's recommendation to continue funding for Madison House, a two percent increase is funded for a total allocation of $4205. There were no questions from Board members. FOCUS- Teensight. Requested, $19,615; recommended, $19,615. Ms. White said the requested amount funds a ten-hour per week position which serves all three County high schools and monitors the progress of the teen mothers in class work and attendance, as well as other problems they may encounter. The school liaison worker provides bi-weekly support groups where participants receive information on self-esteem, parenting and employability skills. It also provides funding for a child care stipend to participating students throughout the school year. In FY 93-94, during its second year of operation, Teensight served 42 pregnant and parenting Albemarle County students, 19 at Albemarle High School, 17 at Western Albemarle High School and six at Murray High School. Of those 42 students, 11 were seniors, ten of whom graduated. There were no second pregnancies among the 42 students. Based on the Program Review Committee's recommendation for continued funding, funding is recommended as requested at $19,615. There were no questions from Board members. Shelter for Help in Emergency (SHE), Yvonne Gardner. Requested, $58,242; recommended, $55,560. Ms. White said the requested $3772 (6.92%) increase for Albemarle is primarily to fund a four percent salary increase and an increase in operating costs associated with converting a renovated cottage on Shelter property into office space and furnishing newly-available residential space. No new or expanded programs are proposed for Albemarle County. SHE serves Planning District Ten residents. In addition, the agency serves residents outside the District for a fee. The Shelter served 457 people in FY 93-94, and projects serving 444 in the current year (both residential and nonresidential services). Based on the recommendation of the Program Review Committee to continue funding for SHE, a two percent increase in funding is recommended for a total allocation of $55,560. Mr. Martin asked for a break-down between the proposed salary increases and operating expenses since he would like to add the amount needed for operating expenses to the unfunded priority list. Mrs. Humphris agreed, but said she would be more enthusiastic if she had not read in the Program Review Committee's comments that other localities are not putting in their fair share. Ms. White said staff has suggested that the agencies approach the other localities and try to get them to bring up their funding level over a three or four-year period. Charlottesville-Albemarle Legal Aid Society (CALAS), Alex R. Gulotta. Requested, $15,655; recommended, $15,655. (Note: Mr. Marshall left the room at 2:42 p.m.) Ms. White said Charlottesville-Albemarle Legal Aid Society requested a total increase of $2625 (20%) from Albemarle County. This amount will be used to provide some salary increases and the addition of one paralegal to handle an increasing case load. This position would handle full representation cases as CALAS is only able to service fifteen percent of the requests in this category. CALAS projects that they will serve 784 Albemarle residents in FY 95-96, an increase of 84 over the current year. For the Planning District, CALAS projects serving a total of 2800 persons by FY 96-97. Based on the Program Review Committee's recommendation, funding is recommended in the amount of $15,655, which includes a two percent baseline increase and additional funding of $2365 for the County's share of the new paralegal position. Mrs. Thomas said she had intended to question this category if the Board had not put any of the child care/health care requests on the unfunded priority list, since it is a twenty percent increase. She will not protest this one because it is a small program, but she feels that health costs are more important than legal costs. She would hate for the County to go too far in the direction of providing legal services, especially since the Board has already discussed the public defender and pro bono work that is done in the County. Mr. Gulotta said he is the new director of CALAS. He said their program maximizes volunteer services from local attorneys. For this particular March 15, 1995 (Afternoon - Adjourned Meeting) 000189 (Page ll) position, JABA has agreed to commit $4000 of their Title III money (Federal money) which is earmarked for the provision of legal services for the elderly. This paralegal will be doing field outreach to be sure CALAS is reaching rural and homebound elderly people. There were no further comments on this budget request. (Note: Mr. Bowerman left the room at 2:45 p.m.) United Way Child Care Scholarship Program, John Nasziger. Ms. White said the United Way Child Care Scholarship Program helps low- and moderate-income working families in the Thomas Jefferson Planning Dis- trict, through direct fee-subsidies to pay for child care, enabling the parents to maintain employment. The program promotes quality child care for children, especially "at-risk" children, through the program's requirement that the parent select a licensed or certified provider. Scholarships of no more than 70 percent of the cost are awarded based on a sliding scale fee, with parents paying a portion of the cost. In an agreement signed in May, 1992 with the Albemarle Department of Social Services, the City of Charlottesville's Department of Social Services and the State Department of Social Services, United Way is now administering a local pool of funds that pulls down 50 percent matching Federal day care funds. In this way, Albemarle's FY 95-96 contribution to United Way of $31,825 will provide $63,650 of scholarship money to Albemarle County resi- dents. The United Way is requesting $43,680 from Albemarle County, an increase of 40 percent, to raise the current level of 10 scholarships to 14 for Albemarle County families. Each scholarship costs an average of $51 per week times 52 weeks, plus administrative costs (of up to 15 percent). In the past, Albemarle County appropriated funds to United Way to provide scholarships through its own program. However, with the new funding arrangement with the Department of Social Services, the City and United Way, and the separate fund now administered by the County, it is more efficient to simply transfer the dollars directly from the General Fund (this shows as a transfer to a day care line item in the Social Services budget) to the separate day care fund, rather than appropriating the contribution to the United Way. This change does not affect the total number of dollars available for day care scholarships. Based on the Program Review Committee's recommendation to transfer General Fund dollars directly to the County-administered special day care scholarship fund, funds for day care scholarships in the amount of $31,825 (a 2% base-line increase) will be funded out of the Services Program Division of the Social Services budget. The Committee did not recommend additional funding at this time because of the uncertainty that there will be extra Federal dollars to bring down local dollars. Mrs. Thomas said she does not believe the 34 names on the waiting list are an indication of how many people have been discouraged from using the program because there is an eight-month waiting period for a scholarship. Ms. White said the unfunded request is $11,800. At this point, it probably will not be funded by additional Federal dollars. (Note: Mr. Marshall and Mr. Bowe~an returned to the meeting at 2:51 p.m.) Mrs. Thomas asked if there is a chance that Federal moneys might be obtained. Ms. White said no one knows what kinds of funds will be available. Mrs. Thomas suggested putting some amount on the unfunded priority list so if Federal money becomes available, the County can take advantage of that fact. Mr. Tucker said if the Board is able to fund this after the meeting next Monday, the money could be placed in a contingency for this specific purpose. Ms. Thomas suggested putting the $11,850 on the "short list. Children, Youth & Family Services, Cathy Bodkin. Requested, $23,521; recommended, $18,229. Ms. White said Children, Youth & Family Services (CYFS) budget request is for $23,521 (154%) over the current year's funding. The request includes a 50 percent increase to double staff time for the Resource and Referral program, and an increase to begin funding the Runaway Shelter Program. The additional funding request is broken down as follows: Resource and Referral ($4840), Runaway Emergency Shelter Program ($3000) and the Family Partners Program ($6365). Based on the Program Review Committee's recommendation, the CoUnty Executive recommends funding a baseline increase of two percent, plus $6365 for Albemarle County's match requirement for the Family Partners Program (the City and the County are both required to provide a matching share) and $2500 for the Runaway Shelter Program (a local match is not required) for a total allocation of $18,229. Ms. White said the Runaway Shelter Program is a twenty-four hour program which takes in about 55 youths per month; 255 Albemarle County youth are March 15, 1995 (Afternoon - Adjourned Meeting) (Page 12) 000,190 projected to be served in FY 94-95. CYFS has had a Federal grant to fund that program, but that grant has now been capped. They are now asking for addi- tional funds from the localities to help meet expenses based on that fact. Ms. Cathy Bodkin, Director of CYFS, was present. She presented new statistics concerning her agency. Ms. Bodkin said this is a matching program, but she had made a mistake in the amount. It is a 39.37 percent match and 20 percent of that belongs to the County because the caseload has been consis- tently twenty percent County and eight percent City. The revised amount for the match is $7590. There were no questions from Board members. Association of Retarded Citizens (ARC). Re~ested, $3000; recomended, $-0-o Ms. White said the mission of the Association of Retarded Citizens of Charlottesville/Albemarle is to improve the quality of life for persons with, or at risk of, mental retardation or developmental disabilities through service, education and advocacy. The ARC operates the Infant Development Project and the Adult Activity Program and also owns three properties in the City of Charlottesville that are operated by Region Ten as residences for persons with mental retardation. The Infant Development Project serves families with infants ages birth to three with disabilities or developmental delays by providing counseling, guidance and education with the goal of reducing the severity of these delays. The Adult Activity Center provides day activities for adults with mental retardation who are not eligible for other day programs due to their intensive support needs. The ARC has made a first time request for $3000 from Albemarle County for their infant development project ($2280) and the adult activity center ($720). Funds for the infant development project will be used to purchase a portion of the services not provided by the United Way grant or the Region Ten contract. Funding for the activity center will be used to provide services to those who are not covered by Medicaid. Of the organization's total budget of $589,460, 70 percent comes from Federal and State funding, 12 percent from United Way, and 12.3 percent from contributions and donations. ARC has also requested $3956 from the City of Charlottesville° The County Executive does not recommend funding for ARC's budget request for $3000. The Region Ten Community Services Board is the designated communi- ty organization charged by the State and appointed by the localities to provide services to developmentally-disabled children and adults. This type of program should be under their direction and responsibility as a community board to determine if additional services are needed for these programs. It would not seem to be in the best interests of the County nor its retarded citizens to begin breaking apart small pieces of programs from a major community agency charged with that responsibility. There were no questions from Board members. (Note: At 3:00 p.m., the Board recessed, and reconvened at 3:10 p.m.) Parks/Recreation and Culture Jefferson-Madison Regional Library, Donna M. Selle. Requested, $1,583,685; recommended, $1,555,495. Ms. White said the total Regional Library budget, including the North- side Branch, increases by $150,562 (6%) for a total budget of $2,661,750. With the County's average share of reference services at 53.02 percent, the average share of the Charlottesville/Albemarle branches at 62 percent (which includes circulation figures for Greene, Louisa and Nelson counties), and the full costs of Scottsville and Crozet, the total county request is $1,583,685, a $96,490 (6.5%) increase over FY 94-95. Included in the operating increases is a projected three percent salary increase and a four percent rent increase, as well as the County's share of the Monticello Area Virtual Village (MONT- AVV) project and two additional positions at Northside. The County Executive recommends funding at an amount equal to a two percent increase over the FY 94-95 baseline budget, or $1,516,940. Also included in the County Executive's recommendation is expanded funding of $31,055 to fund the project coordinator position for the MONT-AVV project and $7500 to fund a part-time library clerk at the Northside Library. Major agency requests not funded in the County Executive's recommenda- tion are: Library clerk - unfunded share of requested full-time library clerk position - $7,500; Library assistant II needed to meet increases in circulation since staff levels are planned on the basis of one librarian for every 250,000 circulation and circulation is expected to grow to 400,000 in FY 94-95 - $24,228; March 15, 1995 (Afternoon - Adjourned Meeting) 000191 (Page 13) Business librarian at MONT-AVV - this request is for a business librarian and reflects the balance of MONT-AVV costs not recom- mended for funding by the County Executive. Ms. Donna Selle said she has impressive statistics about the operation of the Northside Branch Library. At the beginning of operations, it was predicted that the circulation would be over 200,000 by this point in time. In four years, circulation has increased by 81 percent and will reach 400,000 this year. The number of books added to the Library has doubled since opening. Reference services and inquiries have grown by 54 percent. The number of inter-library loans has gone up by 68 percent. Attendance at story times has increased in attendance by 59 percent, and last year the Summer Reading Program had an all time high of 1400 children and families attend. Therefore, she requests that the Board fully fund the Library Board's request for two additional positions at the Northside Library. Ms. Selle said the Library Board and City Council requested that she do an overview of what Monticello-AVV is without mentioning the word "computer°'° She handed out a sheet focusing on the services to be offered through Mont- AVV. She noted the unfunded Business Librarian position for Mont-AVV. She said the issue of economic development for Albemarle County is a concern, but this expertise is needed in the public library. She reminded the Board that the library at the Darden School primarily concerns large national, multi- corporations, global and international trade and business information. The public library's role is to help small businessmen in their development of marketing plans, loan applications, and linking to other resources. Small businesses (90% of the businesses in Charlottesville/Albemarle) are the life blood of the community. Ms. Selle said there is no employee with business expertise on the Library's staff and there is a tremendous need for that type of expertise. The Library Board put this new position into the development package for Mont- AVV because they see the need for local businesses to have access to the community information network and to be able to access and analyze its use in theireconomic and business development. Ms. Selle said community support for Mont-AVV has been overwhelming. Last week, the Library Executive Committee members were asked to testify before the Board of Jefferson National Bank about the need for development of a local node for low-cost, personal E-mail and development of local pages for local businesses. This is a new enterprise for the Jefferson National Bank because they have never funded a utility service before, but now state that they are willing to take the risk. Ms. Selle said this was a new role for the library, and a new interaction with the Bank. Mr. Perkins asked about money from other localities for Mont-AVV. Ms. Selle said they are not asking Louisa, Greene and Nelson for any funds at this time. The Library is going through major renovations of the Central Library to get the proper wiring and the fiber optic network in place. They plan to put Library access through the Internet to the rural libraries. They have no staff yet,. and would like to gain some expertise in dealing with the new computer volunteers. Mr. Perkins asked if the City is also funding Mont-AVV. Ms. Selle said the City will match whatever the County funds. Mr. Bowerman asked for an explanation of the business librarian posi- tion. Ms. Selle said someone with a masters degree in Library Sciences is needed who also has experience dealing with the small business community. The Library has no one on staff who can go out to the community, and they need someone who can take Mont-AVV out to local businesses to help them develop their resources and put them on Mont-AVV. It is part public relations and part business outreach. Mr. Bowerman asked where this person would have gotten their experience. Ms. Selle said in larger cities. Mr. Bowerman said he is having difficulty in understanding why the Chamber of Commerce would not want to fund this position as a direct benefit to the business community. Ms. Selle said the Library Board's negotiations with the Chamber are going to give the Library other services when Mont-AVV is "up and running". The commitment is there, but the Chamber sees on-going staff as the Library's responsibility. Mr. Bowerman said if his business wanted to be on Mont-AVV and have all of its equipment listed, why should the public sector pay for that? Ms. Selle said the Library will not necessarily be paying. It is the linkage that she is talking about. Mr. Marshall asked if every business will be put on Mont-AVV. Mr. Bowerman said only those wanting to be on it. Mr. Bowerman said that in his business he will need to learn how to develop his own home page. It can carry pictures of him and all of his stores. Anything that he wishes to put on. This Librarian would come to the business and tell him how it will work, what to look for, what to be aware of, etc. Mr. Bowerman said this person is actually working as a consultant who is also responsible for development of Mont-AVV. He said he has no problem with funding a Library Assistant II who works in the library. He is having trouble justifying this request in his own mind. Ms. Selle said this is something March 15, 1995 (Afternoon - Adjourned Meeting) (Page 14) 000: 92 that she is doing now. Mr. Bowerman said that normally the private sector jumps in and does something like that. If he has a problem, he calls someone who comes over and tells him what to do. Mont-AVV will give any citizen in the community access to information they did not have before. There will be places in the community where people who are not computer literate will be able to be trained to access this information. Mr. Martin said he would like to change the subject and suggested putting funds for the Library Clerk and Library Assistant II on the unfunded priority list. The Northside Library will soon be at 400,000 circulation, and all know that the northern part of town will continue to grow. That needs to be recognized now. Mr. Bowerman said he has no problem in funding those positions, but he needs more time to think about the other request. There was no further discussion of this subject at this time. Virginia Discovery Museum, Peppy Linden. Requested, $15,000; recommend- ed, $6,460. MS. White said the Virginia Discovery Museum's FY 95-96 budget request is for $15,000, a $5000 (3%) decrease over the FY 94-95 budget. The total appropriation for FY 94-95 included $12,415 in transitional funds to reduce the impact of the loss of the five-year matching grant of $20,000 per year from the County. (The matching grant, approved in FY 88-89, matched a $50,000 contribution from the Perry Foundation° FY 93-94 was the last year of the matching grant from the County). The total budget for the Virginia Discovery Museum of $144,330 reflects a $12,622 (9.6%) increase over FY 94-95. The increase is due to the need to fund additional sources of income and their accompanying expenses, such as the Museum Store ($12,000) and special fund raisers ($14,535). The County Executive recommends funding for the Virginia Discovery Museum at $6460 which reflects a two percent increase over FY 94-95's local contribution of $6335. This allocation maintains funding for the Museum at the same level as the Piedmont Council of the Arts. Both were equally funded in FY 89-90 when the matching grant for the Discovery Museum began. No transitional funding is recommended for the Virginia Discovery Museum although a Virginia Commission of the Arts Government Challenge Grant will be solicited for the Museum. Additional funds have not been included due to the uncertainty of State funding at this time. Mr. Perkins said he would like to see $5000 added to this item. He thinks they need a little longer to make the transition from the Perry Foundation grant to other types of funding. He has visited the Museum and feels this item should be a part of the Education budget because it is education for the schools. The Museum is making a strong effort to replace that money through the Museum Store and other fundraisers. Mrs. Humphris said she agrees that it should be added. Mrs. Thomas and Mr. Martin also agreed. Piedmont Council of the Arts, Cat Maguire. Requested, $7000; recommend- ed, $6460. MSo White said the Piedmont Council of the Arts requested an increase of $665 (10%) over their FY 94-95 allocation of $6335. The expanded request reflects the Council's desire to more accurately reflect the policies and objectives being defined in the Cultural Agency Plan to enable the Council to fulfill a leadership role for arts in the community. With the additional funds, the Council plans to add an additional full-time staff person, increase the emphasis on arts education issues, and to become a facilitator for community livability issues such as cultural tourism, economic development and growth in the community. Specific projects that increase the budget for FY 95-96 include an arts education training program, a facility development study and the creation of a resource library. The Arts Council expects to serve an additional 2300 County residents in FY 95-96. The County Executive recommends funding at the baseline level of $6460 which reflects a two percent increase in local funds over the FY 94-95 local contribution of $6335. There are no expanded requests. Although a Virginia Commission of the Arts Government Challenge Grant will be solicited for the Council, additional funds have not been included due to the uncertainty of State funding at this time. Mrs. Humphris said she called Ms. White and asked her questions based on telephone calls she has gotten during the year. There was a question about whether the mission of the Council as stated in the Board's materials is actually being carried out. She asked about the ARTS Alive Program and the ARTS in Education Program which are outreach programs the Board has been interested in. She found that the ARTS Alive Program, since the Spring of 1994, has been working with other groups to get grants and provide programs rather than providing programs themselves. ARTS in Education has been concentrating their energies on a three-year plan, but she understands that the Cultural Agency Plan has not been accepted by their membership. She feels March 15, 1995 (Afternoon - Adjourned Meeting) 000193 (Page 15) that when this Board funds outside agencies it needs to know that the taxpay- ers' dollars are going for what was intended to be funded. Ms. Maguire said the Cultural Agency Plan as the guiding document for the work of the Arts Council over the next five years has been accepted by the membership of the Council (comprised of 53 nonprofit arts organizations, and 200+ individual artists and associations). The Council spent the past year working on a new structure to insure the active participation and representa- tion of those organizations in implementation of the Plan. Ms. Maguire said there are two issues in the plan. The first was the notion of the Arts Council moving toward becoming a regranting agency (not to be considered until the year 2000) as a way to leverage Federal funds in the future. The local arts community did not like this idea. After the concern was addressed, it was found that the real concern was the role of the arts organizations in defining and shaping the mission of the Arts Council and its future direction. There are now seven arts organization representatives on the Board of Directors and a structure has been developed to insure a one- third to two-thirds relationship where one-third of the Arts Council Board of Directors will be nonprofit arts organization representatives elected by themselves, one-third will represent individual artists/associations of artists, and one-third will represent the community at large. Ms. Maguire said the second issue relates to the ARTS Alive Program which has been funded primarily through the Jefferson National Bank and a Community Development Block Grant through the City of Charlottesville. The idea of this program was to bring arts to the underserved populations. Now, they are working to empower the arts community itself linking it with its own direct sources of funding to provide that programming on their own without the ARTS Council administering those funds. This is what has been going on since the Spring of 1994. Ms. Maguire said they have made a commitment in the area of ARTS Education which has been identified as an area of concern for the community. Many parents of county children have come to them for aid and support, so they decided to focus their dollars on training teachers on integrating the arts into the curriculum of the classroom. They are partnering with the Virginia Foundation of Humanities and the GE Foundation to make that possible. Last year the program served 40+ classroom teachers, 20 of these were from County schools. This year they plan to double the size and the length of the program focusing on media arts, and a three-year pilot where the arts community will be trained to be trainers themselves. It is back to the thought of empowering and educating, and raising the standard of excellence of the artists in the community. This year, Kennedy Center artists are being used to come into the community and train the teachers. Next year, a mix will be used. By the third year of the program, it is the goal of the program to have the teacher training done by, with, and in collaboration with local artists so it becomes a totally local program. Mrs. Humphris asked if the monthly calendar of the arts is still being published. Ms. Maguire said it is now a postcard of the arts. It was found that there was too much information and it was not read° Mrs. Humphris asked about the ARTS Insight publication. Ms. Maguire said they continue to work with that each year and update it, but they are excited to be a part of the Monticello-AVV project. One of the first things they will do is go on line with the directory to make it more accessible and available. They still have the 1992 book with all of the updates in it. There were no further questions at this time. Literacy Volunteers of America, Jacqueline Dugery. Requested, $12,000; recommended, $12,000. Ms. White said the projected total budget for Literacy Volunteers of America for FY 95-96 is $90,018, a 12 percent increase ($9640) from FY 94-95. Literacy Volunteers is requesting $12,000 from the County for FY 95-96, an increase of $1940 (19%) from FY 94-95. The increase is to support expansion of the tutoring program by adding small group instruction. The need for expansion is demonstrated by a continuous waiting list of students, many of whom must wait two to three months due to an insufficient number of available volunteers. The budget increase will fund the cost of additional materials and space for a small group program, hiring of a part-time volunteer coordina- tor, and also increase the hours of the program coordinator. The County Executive recommends funding based on the Program Review's recommendation to fully fund the Literacy Volunteers. The County Executive recommended funding, which included $1940 in funding for the expanded small group instruction. Mrs. Humphris said this program does good work and gets little credit for its work. WVPT Public Television. Requested, $6804~ recommended, $-0-o March 15, 1995 (Afternoon - Adjourned Meeting) 000194 (Page 16) Ms. White said WVPT Public Television requested $6804, which reflects $0.10 per capita on the 1990 census population. The County Executive does not recommend any funding for WVPT. Mrs. Thomas said she was made aware that the person who was to come and speak about this request could not appear today because WVPT is in the middle of fund-raising, but can come next Monday. She would like to put the request on the unfunded priority list. Mr. Bowerman said he has supported this request in the past. Mr. Martin said it has been on the "short list" before. Mr. Marshall said he has supported it every year. Mrs. Humphris said she has also supported it every year, and thought she was the only one who did. Mr. Marshall said the County uses this station each day in the School system. He suggested putting it on the "short list", but said that does not guarantee he will vote for it. Visitor's Bureau, Bobbye Cochran. Requested, $104,661; recommended, $104,661. Mr. Tucker said the Charlottesville/Albemarle Convention and Visitors Bureau budget request for FY 95-96 totals $245,932, an increase of $9584 (3.9%) over FY 94-95. Based on the formula, the County's share of the total budget is $103,161. This represents an increase of $8191 (8.5%) over the FY 94-95 contribution based on the funding formula approved by the Board and City Council. Albemarle's share increases from 52.83 percent to 53.47 percent. However, an additional $1500 for concrete repair at the Visitor's Center is also being requested for a total County request of $104,661. The County Executive recommends funding at the baseline level of $104,661. There were no questions from Board members. Community Development Thomas Jefferson planning District Commission (TJPDC), Nancy K. O'Brien. Requested, $63,236; recommended, $52,844. Ms. White said the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission requested a total of $63,236 from Albemarle County, which breaks down into the following programs: Per Capita at $0.52 for 71,700 residents in PD 10 - $37,284 Legislative Liaison (including a .25 FTE increase) - $15,560 Mapping and Demography Center - $10,392 The County Executive recommends funding in the amount of $52,844, which represents funding for the TJPDC baseline budget of $50,898 and $1946 in additional funds to support a requested expansion of the legislative liaison's position from 0.5 FTE to 0.75 FTE. The County Executive did not recommend any funding for: The Mapping and Demography Center - $10,392; or The Regional Economic Development Partnership - $12,500. Mrs. Thomas asked what the situation is with State funding. Mrs. O'Brien said their money was reinstated by the General Assembly, so if the Governor signs off, they will be okay. Mr. Perkins asked if Mrs. O'Brien had requested funds for the Sustaina- bility Council. Mrs. O'Brien said the Sustainability Council requested the Planning District include S0.10/per capita for each of two years. The Commission felt that the legislative liaison was enough of an increase to bring forward. That did not change the need for money for the Sustainability Council, but it is not a Commission requested item. Mrs. Thomas asked for an explanation of the mapping and demography center. Mrs. O'Brien said they have the center, and if it were fully funded by each locality at $10,392, they would get 52 days a year of assistance out of that center. They could get maps (census maps) or geographic type of mapping out of that center. Basically what they already have in place is what Albemarle is working toward. They had thought it might bridge the gap between the internal mapping presently being done and where the County will be in the future. Two localities have bought in. They are developing for Louisa all of their census characteristics, and for Nelson, they are developing a layering of information in clear mylar that overlays the U.S. Quads so they can put on steep slopes, the flood plains, the wetlands, the zoning, and the future land use. Mr. Marshall asked about the census data. He asked about the use of this information by a business. Mrs. O'Brien said it is valuable information. Businesses who are coming into this area and know about the Planning District Office, call and ask for that information. If it is information that is already developed (maybe a map of the elderly populations), they have a simple charge system for that information. However, if the information has not March 15, 1995 (Afternoon - Adjourned Meeting) 000195 (Page 17) already been developed and it is complicated, they charge $30.00/hour to develop that information, Mrs. O'Brien said they do some mapping for locali- ties that way also. They have done some mapping for the County's Comprehen- sive. She finds it fascinating. Mrs. Thomas said she also was impressed with the information on Nelson County. The transparent overlays are very useful. Mr. Huff said one of the goals County staff has set for itself for next year is the reason for one of the additional positions in Information Servic- es. They want to look at all of the geographic information systems that are available. The County is using a quasi-GIS system to do bus routing in Transportation. A building locator system is being used in the Planning Department for the E'911 system and street addressing. If the two systems can be merged and then the information exported to the PDC mapping center or their information can be imported and manipulated in-house. The County has not bought into the Center because its system is not in operation and the integra- tion of the systems is not yet known. Mr. Huff said the Police Department is interested in putting its crime statistics on a GIS system so they can look at where calls for Service come from. Staff feels that some of this can be done with existing software. Mrs. Thomas said she sees no need to duplicate what is already avail- able, or develop things that are not intermeshable. Mrs. O'Brien said they have the County's CIS database and it has been linked to census blocks. When they did a build-out of the region, the smallest unit of measurement they had was the census block. They used that data in developing a build-out analysis of what zoning allows, what the Comprehensive Plan calls for, what exists today, and what the potential of that mixture is. That is still being reviewed, so this Board has not seen that information ye. The next level, with the building locator system which has a tax map, parcel feature, is to tag those two information together and instead of it coming up in graph, it would come up in a map. Whatever information is contained in table that has a link to a geographic location can be portrayed in a map instead of a chart. That gives good information on how to serve the populace. Mr. Perkins said he thinks staff is suggesting that the County wait until its system is in place. Mr. Tucker said that is right. Mr. Bowerman said if the Board members wished to make a grant to the Sustainability Council, that would be all right with him. Mrs. Thomas said she was very impressed by the attendance at the Saturday forum of the Council° Mr. Bowerman said they were able to get $2000 from the private sector to fund the forum they had a month ago; the advertising, the publicity, the printing, but they really have no source of funding. They intend to do the same thing for the second forum. Mrs. O'Brien said they are operating the Council on a mere whisper. Mr. Martin asked why she had not approached the Board for funding. Mrs. Thomas said the Planning District Commission had voted against it. Mrs. O'Brien said it is a group that was put together by the Commission itself. Mr. Bowerman said the Council is in the process of making proposals to local foundations, and they are going back to companies and asking them to advertise in publications for the second forum. It is a poorly funded project at this time. Mrs. Thomas said she would not call it a conflict of interest if Mr. Bowerman asked to have funding put on the "short list". Mr. Bowerman suggest- ed the amount of $2500 would represent more money than they have been able to raise from the private sector, and would not be a significant source of funding for the Council nor would it be a significant cost to the County. Mrs. O'Brien cannot ask for this money because her Board told her not to, but it would be money that would go to the Planning District to be used by the Sustainability Council, it would not go directly to the Sustainability Council. Mr. Martin suggested the Board move on to the next agenda item, and make a decision on this item on next Monday. Jefferson Area Disability Services Board (DSB), Hannah Twaddell. Requested, $1286; recommended, $1286. Ms. White said the Jefferson Area Disability Services Board, is staffed by the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission, and is a volunteer group composed of citizens, persons with disabilities, and service providers. Its mission is to improve the self-sufficiency and support of people with disabil- ities by providing planning, research, information and support activities to promote coordinated services and public awareness of the needs and the contributions of citizens with disabilities in the community. The DSB was established in 1993 in response to a State mandate. It includes more localities than any of the other 43 boards in the state. In December, 1993 its board published a six-year plan which identified regional March 15, 1995 (Afternoon - Adjourned Meeting) (Page 18) 000196 service needs and possible improvements. Over 20 agencies assisted with the development of the report. The DSB is requesting $1286, which represents Albemarle County's share of a 20 percent match for a Federal fund in the amount of $13,738. Albe- marle's share of 34 percent is based on the number of elderly and disabled residents. Through this program the DSB will purchase and distribute simple devices to assist people with hearing, visual and reading disabilities in communicating with public and private service providers. Census data shows that there are 9997 elderly or disabled persons in Albemarle County. These devices will be distributed to interested public and private service providers such as police, hospitals, nursing homes, banks and human service providers. The program funds will support the purchase, development and distribution costs of the devices and informational materials, as well as the staff time needed to coordinate the project and conduct a follow-up evaluation. The County Executive recommends funding in the amount of $1286 for Albemarle's share of the matching funds. There were no questions from Board members. Charlottesville Transit Service (CTS), Helen H. Poore. Requested, $38,200; recommended, $38,200. Ms. White said the Charlottesville Transit Service budget request increases to $38,200, a $3400 increase to cover the reduction of state transportation funds to the City. The County Executive recommends funding at the requested level of $38,200. There were no questions from Board members. Monticello Area Community Action Agency (MACAA), Kenneth Ackerman. Requested, $45,790; recommended, $43,166. Ms. White said the Monticello Area Community Action Agency request is for $45,790, an 8.2 percent increase in County funding over FY 94-95. Additional funding is requested for base programs based on an inflationary factor of four percent. Funding in the amount of $14,555 is requested for Project Discovery, $880 for the Summer Youth Program and $655 for Hope House. Based on the Program Review Committee's recommendation to continue funding MACAA, a two percent increase is recommended for funding for a total allocation of $43,166. There are no expanded programs. Mrs. Thomas said there was a major program being cut at the State level (Opportunity Knocks). She asked what happened to that funding. Mr. Ackerman said those cuts were restored at the State level. He feels it is critical for the Board to know some of the Federal developments related to MACAA's programs, and the importance of their continuing role to this County and surrounding jurisdictions. One of the programs that is proposed for total elimination is the Summer Youth Employment Program. That has some serious implications for this and surrounding counties. He believes the role of MACAA is being heightened. With the notion of welfare reform that is before the State now, their agency would be at the forefront of much of this change. Mr. Ackerman said he would appreciate the Board's consideration of every dollar request they make because the State and Federal support is diminishing as the needs in the County are increasing. Later this month they are planning a meeting to advise people of the cuts in federal jobs programs and welfare reforms. MACAA brings in over $500,000 in services to Albemarle County so the $2000 that is not recommended for funding hinds MACAA in maintaining these services. Mr. Ackerman said over the past years, Albemarle has stressed to them the importance of putting in an equitable, local funding formula. That is in place, but every year that the County only funds MACAA two percent, and the other counties fund at the full level, so Albemarle is now behind. He does not feel it is a fair situation, and said MACAA really needs the money. Mrs. Thomas asked if the other localities have funded their entire request. Mr. Ackerman said they funded their base request. Albemarle County has been behind for a number of years. Therefore, when they ask for an increase based on their previous request, it looks like a big increase, but they are still making up for money they did not get last year, or the year before, it is only $2300. Mr. Martin said he thought the Board funded their full request last year. Mr. Ackerman said it must have been the year before because they have slipped in funding in Albemarle County. Mr. Perkins asked for the funding formula. Mr. Ackerman said it is based on the level of staffing in each jurisdiction, and in Albemarle County it equates to 27 percent for the core program. There are special projects that are separate from that amount based on participant levels. March 15, 1995 (Afternoon - Adjourned Meeting) (Page 19) 000197 Mr. Bowerman suggested putting the additional funding on the "short list" and do an analysis of this agency. Mrs. Thomas said she was at a meeting of the National Association of Counties and they were lobbying Congressmen. She was one member of a group that went to three Congressmen asking for the Summer Youth Employment Program and pointing out what Federal cuts do to local budgets. Mr. Ackerman said the Senate still has not taken up the issue, but the House Ways and Means Commit- tee has eliminated it from the budget. Beyond the dollars, Mr. Ackerman said they need to get together as leaders in the community, and decide what will be done should that program not operate. There were no further comments from Board members. Albemarle Housing Improvement Program, Theresa Tapscott. Requested, $377,307; recommended, $346,710. Ms. White said the Albemarle Housing Improvement Program is requesting a total of $377,307 from Albemarle County for FY 95-96. Of the total amount, $143,125 is for Administration, $156,434 for Housing Rehabilitation, $45,737 for Emergency Repair, and $33,630 for Housing Counseling. This represents a seven percent increase over last year's funding, primarily due to increased employee benefits costs and full-time funding for the housing counseling position. Based on the Program Review Committee's evaluation of AHIP, a two percent funding increase is recommended for AHIP for a total baseline budget of $346,710. Funding was not recommended for the expanded housing counselor position requested by AHIP. The funds that were in AHIP's budget in the current year for the part-time counselor position were transferred to the Housing Office budget and will be used to fund a part-time housing counselor position in that office beginning July 1, 1995. There were no comments from Board members. Agenda Item No. 3. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. Mr. Bowerman said he would like to add the Sustainability Council to the list of unfunded priorities so the Board will have it to discuss with the other items on Monday. He suggested that if any money is granted by this Board, it go to staff for production of materials that the Council needs. He knows there is a lot of paperwork involved, and it is coming out of Mrs. O'Brien's budget at this time. Agenda Item No. 4. Adjourn. With no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 4:29 p.m. Chairman