SDP201900010 Action Letter 2019-04-19�pF A
i
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
April 19, 2019
Scott Collins
Collins Engineering
200 Garrett Street, Suite K
Charlottesville VA 22902
SDP2019-10 Berkmar Overlook - Initial Site Plan
Mr. Collins,
The Agent for the Board of Supervisors hereby grants administrative conditional approval to the above referenced
site plan. This approval shall be valid for a period of five (5) years from the date of this letter, provided that the
developer submits a final site plan for all or a portion of the site within one (1) year after the date of this letter as
provided in section 32.4.3.1 of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle, and thereafter diligently pursues
approval of the final site plan.
In accordance with Chapter 18 Section 32.4.2.8 Early or Mass Grading may be permitted after the following
approvals are received:
1. Engineering approval of a VSMP plan meeting the requirements of Chapter 17 of the Code of the County
of Albemarle.
2. Approval of all easements for facilities for stormwater management and drainage control.
3. Submittal of a tree conservation checklist with areas for tree preservation identified.
The final site plan will not be considered to have been officially submitted until the following items are received:
1. A final site plan that satisfies all of the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code.
2. A final site plan fee of $1,613 & a Fire Rescue fee of $100.
Please submit 12 copies of the final plans to the Community Development Department. The assigned Lead
Reviewer will then distribute the plans to all reviewing agencies. Once you receive the first set of comments on the
final site plan, please work with each reviewer individually to satisfy their requirements.
The Department of Community Development shall not accept submittal of the final site plan for signature until
tentative approvals for the attached conditions from the following agencies/reviewers have been obtained:
SRC Members:
Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner) - 2 copies [Paty Saternye ext. 3250]
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) - 1 copy [Matt Wentland ext. 3458]
Albemarle County Information Services (E911) - 1 copy [Andy Slack ext. 3384]
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue - 1 copy [Shawn Maddox 434-326-2623]
Virginia Department of Transportation - 1 copy [Adam Moore 434-422-9894]
Albemarle County Building inspections — 1 copy [Michael Dellinger ext. 3228]
Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) - 3 copy [Richard Nelson 434-977-4511 ]
Albemarle County Planning Services (Transportation Planner) - 1 copies [Kevin McDermott ext. 3414]
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority — 1 copy [Victoria Fort 434-977-2970]
If you have any questions about these conditions or the submittal requirements please feel free to contact me at
Extension 3250, psatemye@albemarle.org.
Sincerely,.
Seni r Pla i
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Phone 434-296-5832
Memorandum
To: Scott Collins
From: Paty Saternye, Senior Planner
Division: Planning
Date: April 11, 2019
UPDATE: April 19, 2019
Subject: SDP201900010 Berkmar Overlook - Initial Site Plan &
SUB201900030 Berkmar Overlook - Preliminary Subdivision Plat
Fax 434-972-4126
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan & plat referenced above once the
following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this
time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded
by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.]
Comments to be addressed with the Final Site Plan and Final Subdivision Plat submission:
1. A site plan meeting all the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code.
2. [14-3031 Contents of final plat. Revise the plat to include and meet all requirements of a final plat.
[18-2.4, Comp Plan, 32.5.2(A), 14-302(A)(8)] Bonus Factors. Residential density bonuses are not available for these
parcels. The maximum number of residential units that will be allowed on for this development will be those allowed
for the R-6 zoning without the use of any bonuses. Reduce the number of residential units to 6 units per acre. The
Comp Plan does not designate residential as a primary use in Office/Research & Development (R&D)/Flex/Light
Industrial areas. 2.4 states "The provision of bonus factors is intended to encourage development which reflects the
goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan. Residential density bonuses are not available in areas where the
Comprehensive Plan does not designate residential as a primary use.
4. [32.5.2(b) & 14-303(G)1 Dedication of open space; Ownership of common areas. Provide the following note: "Open
Space is hereby dedicated to the HOA. " Provide information on the HOA that will be maintained the open space.
Ensure that the open space will be owned and maintained by an HOA.
[32.5.1, 32.5.2(a), 14-302(B)((8), & 4.191 Yards. Address the following:
a) Clarify what the rectangles on the rear of the buildings are with labels and ensure they meet setback
requirements. If they are decks they cannot go into the setback more than 4' and there appears to be multiple
lots where these rectangles extend further than that into the rear setbacks. This includes, but may not be
limited to, Lots 1, 2 & 6.
b) Add a note specifying the maximum encroachment allowed into the setback for items such as covered
porches, balconies, decks, etc.
c) Revised the "side setbacks" shown on the proposed residential lots. The side setback is "0" and not 5' as
shown on the site plan/subdivision plat. Side setbacks should be represented as zero. However, building
separation labels, as shown in a few places, should be added between each set of townhomes in order to
specify that requirement. Please note, building separation and building setbacks are not the same
requirements and should not be treated as such.
d) Ensure all garage setbacks are met. It appears that at least one, and possibly two, residential unit does not
meet the minimum 18' front setback for the garage.
6. [32.5.2(a), 32.5.2(b), 32.5.2(i)] Information regarding the proposed use. Provide the acreages for each proposed
residential lot and open space area. Address the following:
a) The acreage of the development lots should be included.
b) Provide the Open Space letter designation for Open Space B on sheet 1.
7. [32.5.2(g), 14-302(A)(5) & 14-303(L)] Onsite sewage system setback lines. Revise the existing conditions sheet to
show any existing sewer lines, drainfields, or water lines. There are existing buildings on this site, yet none of the
water or sanitary sewer/septic infrastructure is shown other than a well location. Included all existing information on
the existing infrastructure.
8. [14-302(A)(9)] Building site on proposed lot. Revise the Building Site note on the coversheet to state the correct lots
numbers and ensure it is revised once the number of lots is reduced based upon other comments.
9. [1 4-302(A)(1 1)] Building site on proposed lot. Revise the Building Site note on the coversheet to state the correct lots
numbers and ensure it is revised once the number of lots is reduced based upon other comments.
10. [14-302(A)(15)] Identification of all owners and certain interest holders. Revise the plat/plan to include the names,
addressed of each owner of record and holder of any easements affecting the site. Deed book and page references must
be included for all existing easements, and the owners of those easements must be specified.
11. [32.5.2(i) & (n)] Address the following:
a) Revise the internal road centerlines to be designed correctly for the areas that have parking on one side. The
centerline of the road should not be in the center of the paved drive aisle areas when there is parking only on one
side.
b) Provide a second road sections for those portions of the road that include parking on one side. Ensure that the
parking is shown properly and that the remaining drive aisles meet the minimum requirements for VDOT,
Engineering and Fire Rescue.
c) Dimension the width, and centerline radii, and corner radii of all roads and ensure that the roads meet or exceed
minimum road requirements. Note that although road centerline is provided on sheet 3 in a table the
corresponding labels are not provided in the plan on the same page. The labels must be provided.
d) Revise the label for Berkmar Drive to include the state route number.
e) Revise the label for the existing access easement to TMP45-112F to include the correct deed book and page
number. The information provided does not look correct.
f) Please note VDOT's comment on the proximity of the entrance to TMP45-112F to the existing road. The location
must be approved by VDOT, Engineering, and Fire Rescue or be revised in order meet all of their requirements.
g) Extend Sweede Street to the north and south to go to the edge of the parcel. It must extend all the way to the edge
of the parcel unless or it must be demonstrated that they cannot be built closer. Also, please note that although
VDOT has commented that the connection to the south should be removed they have clarified in an email to the
planning reviewer that they cannot "require" the connection, not that it must be removed. The County's
connectivity requirement supports its inclusion.
h) Ensure that the right of way location is shown correctly on Woodburn Road. The location of the property
line/right of way, and whether it is a right of way or prescriptive easement does not appear to match with the
County's GIS. Ensure if it is a prescriptive easement that sufficient width is provided between Woodburn Road
and the proposed residential lots so that they will not be considered double frontage lots, which are not allowed.
i) The internal road crosswalks are not supported by VDOT but should be included to meet County requirements.
Therefore, the HOA must maintain the crosswalks within the public road right of way. Ensure that that is included
in the HOA legal documents that must be submitted for County review.
12. [32.5.2(1) & 14-303(L)] Address the following:
a) Provide the location of any existing or proposed utilities and utility easements including drainage, sight distance,
water, sanitary sewer, telephone, cable, electric and gas. Indicate the deed book and page reference for all exiting
utility easements located on the property.
b) There is a proposed sanitary sewer easement that crosses Berkmar Drive and goes through TMP shown on this site
plan and plat. However, the parcels in questions are not include in the list of parcels for this plan/plat. Clarify
what if this has been, or will be, approved under a separate subdivision/easement plat. If so then show it as
"existing" if it is expected to be approved prior to this site plan and subdivision plat approval. The sewer line
depicted must be approved prior to, or as part of, this subdivision plat and site plan.
2
13. [32.5.2(b) & (n) & 14-302(A)(8)1 Proposed Lots; Information on proposed uses; existing and proposed
improvements. Address the following:
a) As specified above, the number proposed lots must be reduced since residential density bonuses cannot be
used on parcels with this comprehensive plan designation.
b) Revise all calculations based upon the reduced number of residential lots.
c) Dimension the parking, driveways, garages and on street parking spots. Ensure all meet the minimum
requirements. It appears at least one driveway does not meet the minimum depth requirement to be counted
as a parking space.
d) Provide all proposed lot dimensions. All rear, many sides and some front lot line dimensions have not been
provided on the site plan/plat.
e) A calculation for the required recreational areas has been provided, a tot lot area has been shown, and a
recreational field was mentioned in a note but not located. Ensure all of the required recreational area is
shown, the areas specified, and that all recreational requirements are met and provided, including the
maximum slope for any recreational area.
f) Provide and show pedestrian connections to the tot lot, and other recreational uses, that includes handicapped
ramps and warning strips in the final site plan.
g) Specify the maximum height and number of stories for the proposed buildings. See Fire Rescue comment on
the requirements if the buildings are above a specified height.
h) Revise the parking calculations based upon the reduction of residential units based upon R-6 zoning without
bonus densities.
i) Specify the maximum height of all proposed retaining walls.
j) Include all outdoor lighting, including front porch lights, on the site plan and provide a photometric plan,
specification, details and charts. Show the location of any outdoor lighting. Any free standing or building
mounted lighting, including front porch lights, must be shown in a photometric plan and meet all requirements.
Ensure all lighting meets County requirements.
j) If any signs are proposed show them on the site plan (approval of signage is approved by separate
submission).
14. [32.5.2(m)] Ingress and Egress. Revise the plan/plat to show the distance to the centerline of the nearest street
intersection in both direction and not just one.
15. [32.5.2(n) & 4.71 Ensure that the open space areas are not comprised of over 80% of the items specified in 4.7(c)(3)
Limitation on certain elements.
16. [32.5.2 a,14-302(B)(6)] General information; Tax Map and parcel number. Provide the current name of the owner,
zoning district, tax map and parcel number and present use of abutting parcels. Address the following:
a) No information is provided on sheet 2 for TMP 45-112F1 & 45-112F2. Provide all required information on sheet
2.
b) No uses are specified on any of the parcels on sheet 2. Provide that information for the subject parcel and the
adjoining parcels.
c) Revise the information from TMP 45-86A to be correct. It appears to show older ownership and Deed Book and
Page references.
d) The owner information for TMP 45-84A, 45-84A1, 45-85 & 45-85A does not appear to match those shown on the
County's GIS. Ensure all of this information is accurate and complete. It appears that two of the parcels have
more than one TMP associated with them. With each of the two TMPs associated with the parcel it also appears
there may be two different owners. Please provide the planning reviewer the appropriate documentation
specifying the ownership of each of these parcels and ensure all of the address information is complete on the
cover sheet.
e) Tax Map # 45-84A1 & 45-85A are not list in the "Tax Map No.:" area of the cover sheet. Either include this
information or clarify why it is not required to do so.
f) Provide a north arrow on Sheet 4.
17. [32.5.1(c), 14-303(C), (E) & (I)] Dimensions, boundary lines, adjoining lot lines and Monumentation. Address the
following:
a) Ensure that all boundary lines for the property are shown correctly. There appears to be a boundary missing
between TMP 45-112F and TMP 45-84A.
b) Ensure all existing and proposed monumentation is included and shown. There appears to be property boundary
corners and intersections that do not have a pin found or proposed.
c) Be sure to include a bearing and distance for all existing property lines. There appears to be bearing and distance
measure missing along Berkmar Drive and between TMP 45-112F and TMP 45-84A.
d) Ensure that the adjoining lot lines are shown correctly. There appears to be an incorrect boundary TMP 45-112F.
3
18. [32.5.a(c), 32.5.2 d & 14-302(A)(12)] Topography and proposed grading. Address the following:
a) Ensure that the design regulations for managed -steep slopes are met.
b) Revise the line work for the managed slope hatch so that it is consistent. The different areas appear to be
shown differently, and the area further north is hard to see on Sheet because of this.
c) Provide labels for the elevation of the existing and proposed topography/grading. Sheets 2 & 5 appear to not
show any label for existing elevation and sheet 5 appears to have some errors in the placement of the elevation
labels on the grading lines.
19. [32.5.2(j), 32.5.2(k) & 14-302(A)(5)] Existing and proposed sewer and drainage facilities. Address the following:
a) There are existing buildings on the site, but no sanitary sewer connection or existing drainfield appears to be
shown on the existing conditions sheet. Ensure existing condition sheets shows all existing sewer and drainage
infrastructure.
b) Proposed sewer and drainage facilities. Indicate the direction of flow in all pipes and watercourses with arrows.
c) Provide the location and dimension of all existing and proposed private and public easements.
20. [32.5.2(o) & 14-302(A)14)] Areas to be dedicated or reserved. Add a note on the plan stating that "All new public
street right-of-way shown hereon are hereby dedicated to the County for public use."
21. [14-303(A), (I), (0), (P), (Q) & (S)] On the subdivision plat provide the following:
a) Statement of Consent to division (use wording provided in the 14-303(A).
b) Bearing and distance ties between not less than two permanent monuments. This includes proposed easement.
c) Signature panels for each owner.
d) Signature panel for County agent.
e) Notary Panels
f) A water supply note, using wording specified in 14-303(Q).
g) At least 4 control points.
h) Reference benchmarks for the survey
22. [32.5.2(r)] Symbols and abbreviations. Either revise the legend to include all linetypes or clearly label all linework to
specify what that linetype represents. Some labels along the linework are unable to be read.
23. [Comment] Provide a copy of all exiting off -site easements from off -site property owners or submit proposed off -site
easement plat for review. Any proposed required easements, and their legal documents, must be submitted separately
from the initial site plan, reviewed, approved and recorded prior to the initial site plan approval.
24. [Comment] Provide sight distance easement and linework for the entrance coming out of TMP 45-112F.
25. [14-303(G) & 14-3171 An instrument assuring the perpetual maintenance of the open space areas, and any other
improvements that are to be maintained by the HOA in perpetuity require County Attorney approval prior to final site
plan approval.
26. [14-316] VDOT approval of all entrances onto public streets is required prior to approval of the site plan or subdivision
plat.
27. [Comment] Provide a note on the site plan and subdivision plat that specifies the state requirement of right to access of
the cemetery.
28. [Comment] See the other SRC reviewer comments attached. All SRC reviewer comments must be sufficiently
address prior to final site plan approval.
Comments to be addressed with the Final Site Plan submission:
29. [32.7.9.5, 32.7.9.3 & 32.7.9.41 Provide street trees along Berkmar Drive and Woodburn Road. Street trees are required
along all existing and proposed streets. No trees are shown along Berkmar Drive. Woodburn Road is shown to have
tree preservation areas. However, the majority of the tree preservation area along the road are also within an overhead
easement. Also, it appears that most if not all of the trees along Woodburn Road may either be within the easement,
may not be healthy, or may not be correct type of trees for street trees. Provide all required information for existing
trees utilized to meet landscaping requirements.
4
30. [32.7.9.5 & 32.7.9.4(c)] Provide street trees at the required spacing and of the correct type along all streets. In addition
to the comment above, ensure that the correct type of trees (large shade trees) are included in the landscape plan and at
the correct quantity based upon the spacing requirements. Large shade trees are required at 50 feet on center for the
full length of all existing and proposed roads. If VDOT requirements and/or utilities restrict specific areas of the road
frontage the same number of street trees are required but they can be spaced closer together and/or when necessary, and
with approval, placed within landscape easements within the individual development parcels.
31. [32.5.2 (e), (n) 32.6.2(j) & 32.7.9.4 (c)] Address the following:
a) Provide a landscape plan that shows all required landscaping as well as the calculation, charts and tables showing
that all landscaping requirements are met.
b) Preserve all existing trees that are to remain. There are "Tree Preservation Areas" within the site. If they are to
remain include the following:
i. Areas and other features shown on landscape plan. The landscape plan shall show the trees to be preserved,
the limits of clearing, the location and type of protective fencing, grade changes requiring tree wells or
walls, and trenching or tunneling proposed beyond the limits of clearing.
ii. Conservation checklist. The applicant shall sign a conservation checklist approved by the agent to ensure
that the specified trees will be protected during construction. Except as otherwise expressly approved by the
agent in a particular case, the checklist shall conform to the specifications in the Virginia Erosion and
Sediment Control Handbook, pages III-393 through III-413, and as hereafter amended.
c) Do not include areas impacted by easements in the "Tree Preservation areas".
d) Since the full length of road frontage along Woodburn Road has an existing easement it appears that there is
insufficient tree preservation area to be allowed the tree preservation bonus. Although tree preservation areas not
within easement can be utilized to meet some of the required landscaping for the site plan please also note the
comment above in reference to residential density bonuses not being available within these parcels because of their
Comprehensive Plan designation.
e) On the existing conditions sheet label the area of existing trees with the type of trees (evergreen, deciduous, or a
mix of both) and show areas where existing vegetation will be removed.
f) Ensure that all "Tree Preservation Areas" have trees in them. Also, ensure areas which do not have woods are not
included in the preservation areas shown on the layout or in the calculation.
g) Ensure that the street trees shown will be allowed. If not, show that alternative locations are provided either within
or outside of the right-of-way. If the trees will be outside of the right-of-way landscaping easements will be
required with ownership and perpetual maintenance of the easements and landscaping put in place prior to the final
site plan approval.
32. [32.8.2] Infrastructure improvement plans. All infrastructure required to construct the development shall be reviewed,
approved, and built or bonded before the final site plan can be approved. This includes all offsite improvements
required to serve the development, including road plans, WPO plan, water and sewer connections.
Please contact Paty Saternye in the Planning Division by using psaternye c albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext.
3250 for further information.
5
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper, Virginia 22701
Stephen C. Brich, P.E.
Commissioner
April 2, 2019
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Attn: Paty Satemye
Berkmar Overlook — Irii ial Site Plan & Preliminary Plat
SDP-2019-00010
SUB-2019-00030
Review #1
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Collins Engineering, dated 4
February 2019, and offers the following comments:
1. Is Parcel 45-86A being redeveloped in the near future? It appears that the Albemarle
County SPCA acquired this parcel in October 2018. Unless this parcel is expected to be
acquired and redeveloped in the near future, this stubout is not necessary; therefore, the
intersection is not necessary and a curve should be used. Note that the proposed
development appears to meet connectivity requirements with proposed connections to
both Berkmar Drive and Woodburn Road.
2. Please provide an exhibit demonstrating the grading necessary to extend Swede Street to
*the North, and identify limits of temporary grading easements necessary should the road
be extended.
3. Marked crosswalks do not appear to be warranted and should be removed.
4. For cul-de-sacs with radii less than 45', approval of Albemarle County Fire & Rescue is
required.
5. The proposed intersection of Empire Street and Marsac Street does not meet corner
clear/spacing requirements.
6. The curve and reverse curve on the western end of Marsac Street and through the
intersection with Empire street do not appear necessary.
7. The proposed entrance to Parcel 45-112F does not meet corner clearance/spacing
requirements.
8. Street trees cannot be within 30 feet of intersection curb radii.
9. Provide turn lane warrants for both Berkmar Drive and Woodburn Road.
10. Intersection sight distance lines and profiles must be provided for all intersections.
11. Note that the final site and subdivision (road) plan must show conformance with the
VDOT Road Design Manual Appendices B(1) and F, as well as any other applicable
standards, regulations or other requirements.
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
April 2, 2019
Paty Saternye
Page 2
Please provide two copies of the revised plan along with a comment response letter. If further
information is desired, please contact Justin Deel at 434-422-9894.
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The
owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process.
Sincerely,
GL ��
Adam J. Moore, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
Patricia Saternye
From:
Victoria Fort <vfort@rivanna.org>
Sent:
Friday, March 22, 2019 8:48 AM
To:
ricia Saternve
Cc:
hard Nelson
Subject:
rSDP201900010 Berkmar Overlook - Initial site Plan & SUB 201900030 Berkmar Overlook
eliminary Subdivision Plat
Attachments:
SA General Notes.doc; RW$A Utilities - Rerkma.r Overlook.pdf . , , , , , ,
Paty,
RWSA has reviewed the Preliminary Site Plan and Subdivision Plat for Berkmar Overlook as prepared by Collins
Engineering and dated February 4, 2019 and has the following comments:
Sheet No. 2 — Existing Conditions
1. There are existing RWSA water mains along three sides of the project area — along Woodburn Road (12" DIP &
CIP), between Woodburn and Berkmar on the northeast boundary of the project (12" CIP), and along Berkmar
Drive (30" DIP). These lines need to be shown correctly and labeled with ownership, size, and material (e.g. 12"
RWSA CIP WL). A GIS map is shown for general location of the water mains; but exact locations need to be field -
verified.
2. Show existing RWSA 15' wide easement where it intersects with TMP 45-12F1 and 45-112F2.
The applicant should note that the existing 12" and 30" water mains are on different pressure zones. The 12"
water mains have an HGL of 795' and the 30" water main has an HGL of 652'.
Sheet No. 3 — Layout & Utility Plan
1. Correctly show and label existing RWSA 12" water mains and easements this sheet. The 12" water line in
Woodburn Road is incorrectly labeled as an 8" water line.
2. A connection is shown to the existing 12" water main in Woodburn Road. See note 3 on Sheet No. 2 regarding
the two separate pressure zones located adjacent to the project area. The applicant will need to confirm with
RWSA and ACSA the allowable connection points to serve this development.
3. RWSA is in the preliminary stages of design of a future 36" raw water main that will be constructed along
Woodburn Road in front of the proposed development. The exact alignment is not yet determined; however,
RWSA may need to pursue easements along the frontage of Woodburn for the construction of the water main.
These easements may intersect the proposed tree preservation and open space areas along Woodburn Road.
Sheet No. 4 — Layout & Utility Plan
1. Correctly show and label existing RWSA 12" and 30" water mains and easements this sheet.
2. A connection is shown to the existing 30" water main in Berkmar Drive. See note 3 on Sheet No. 2 regarding the
two separate pressure zones located adjacent to the project area. The applicant will need to confirm with RWSA
and ACSA the allowable connection points to serve this development.
3. The utility plan shows three proposed crossings of existing RWSA water mains with sanitary sewer lines. All
crossings should adhere to AWWA and VDH guidelines regarding separation of water and sanitary sewer lines
and should be made with a minimum vertical separation of 18".
Sheet No. 5 — Grading and Drainage Plan
1. Correctly show and label existing RWSA 12" and 30" water mains and easements this sheet.
2. The proposed storm sewer doghouse manhole at the intersection of Berkmar Drive and proposed "Road A"
must be a minimum of 5' off the existing 30" water main (from the outside of the pipe to the outside of the
structure).
Sheet No. 6 — Notes & Details
1. Include the RWSA General Water and Sewer Notes this sheet (attached).
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Victoria
Victoria Fort, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority
695 Moores Creek Lane
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(0): (434) 977-2970 ext. 205
(F): (434) 295-1146
45-
45-76D
45-76A
45-76
i �45-75
RO
�000BURN Q
659
45-85A+
45-85A+
45-74A
O
i 45-82
4RV- 13 I 45-82A
M-2
45-81
rW 054
45-112F1
45-112F2
I
45-112E
BLOW
-12 LV
Y-04
0 45 G 1
UWL-007
45-88 UWL-008 0 iUi - 45-112C
4 -109
1 of 1 Created by: VF 695 M a Water and Sewer Authority
9Moores Creek Ln, Charlottesville, VA 22902
R�VAN NA Berkmar Overlook Date: 3/21/2019 (434) 977-2970 www.rivanna.org
Map data is provided by the RWSA, Albemarle
1 inch = 150 feet County GDS, City of Charlottesville, ACSA, UVA
WATER&SEWERAUTHFeet FM, and VGIN, Duplication of this data without
0 75 150 300 RWSA Engineering Department permission is
prohibited.
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority (RWSA)
General Water & Sanitary Sewer Notes
Last Revised: April 2016
1. All materials and methods of construction shall comply with the latest version of the General
Water and Sewer Design and Construction Standards — Version 1.0, adopted in December 2015,
except as modified below or modified in special notes.
2. RWSA shall approve all construction materials and methods of construction. A preconstruction
conference shall be held with RWSA prior to the start of any work.
3. The contractor shall be responsible for notifying Miss Utility (1-800-552-7001).
4. RWSA Engineer (Victoria Fort at (434) 977-2970 ext. 205) shall be notified three business days
prior to the start of construction.
5. All work is subject to inspection by RWSA staff. No tie-ins to the existing system shall be made
without coordination with and the presence of RWSA staff. No work shall be conducted on
RWSA facilities on weekends or holidays without special written permission from RWSA.
6. For sanitary sewer line construction: RWSA may require bypass pumping for tie-ins to the
existing system. All doghouse manholes must be pressure -tested before a connection is made to
the system.
7. The location of existing utilities as shown on the plans is from data available at the time of design
and is not necessarily complete or accurate. The Contractor shall be responsible for the
verification of the location, size and depth of all existing utilities, both surface and subsurface.
The Contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of any discrepancies between the plans and
field conditions. The Contractor shall use due diligence to protect all utilities and structures from
damage at all times, whether shown on the plans or not. Damage to any existing utilities shall be
repaired by the Contractor to the original condition at no additional cost to the Owner.
8. Erosion and sediment control facilities shall not be permitted in the RWSA easement without
special written permission from RWSA. No grading shall be permitted in the RWSA easement
unless permitted otherwise by RWSA in writing.
9. No blasting shall be permitted within 100 feet of RWSA facilities without written permission and
RWSA approval of the blasting plan. Ground monitoring during blasting and a pre -blast survey
may be required. For blasting within 100 feet of any operative RWSA sewerlines, bypass
pumping and/or pre- and post -CCTV may be required. RWSA may also require certification
from a licensed professional engineer stating that the proposed blasting will not damage any
RWSA facilities. Damage to any utilities due to blasting shall be repaired by the Contractor to
the original condition at no additional cost to the Owner.
10. The contractor shall observe minimum separation requirements for utility crossings. When a
crossing is made under an existing facility, adequate structural support shall be provided for the
existing pipe. The area of the crossing shall be backfilled with compacted 57 stone to the
springline of the existing pipe.
11. New water main installations shall be pressure tested, chlorinated, flushed and have water
samples approved prior to making any permanent connection to the public water system.
Approved methods of filling and flushing new water mains will be required to prevent any
contamination of the public water system.
12. All easements for new RWSA facilities shall be recorded prior to placing the new facilities into
service.
13. No permanent structural facilities will be permitted in the RWSA easement. This includes
building overhangs, retaining walls, footers for any structure, drainage structures, etc.
14. Trees are not permitted in the RWSA easement.
Review Comm
Project N ame: I Berkmar Overlock - Initial
Date Completed:) Wednesday,
Reviewer: Richard Nelson
or SDP201900010 Initial Site Plan LJ
DepartmenVDivisiorMgency: Review Status:
LJ ACSA Requested Changes
2019-04-03: 1 recommend SDP2019-10 & SUB2019-30 Berkmar Overlook for approval with the following conditions- r
x Submit 3 copies to ACSA for review.
z Woodburn Road is a high pressure zone while Berkmar is a low pressure zone_ The RWSA water main along the property is
high pressure as well. If a loop is proposed, connect at Woodburn and the main on site_
z RWSA approval will be required for the water main connection.
Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed ❑n: 1 a4l0312019
Review Com
Project Name: Berkmar CverbsV - Initial
SDP201900010 Initial Site Plan
0
Date Completed:I Sunday, March M,M'I ' I aepartmenVIDivisiordAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Shawn Maddox Fire Rescue Requested Changes
1. Verify the hydrant spacing on Swede Street and Empire Street_ Consider adding a hydrant in the vicinity of lots 41 and 42 to r
ensure adequate spacing is met.
2. One of the streets as shown shall be marked no parking-
3- If the building heights are to exceed 30', plan indicates up to 35', then the travel ways must be increased to 26' of clear travel
width.
4. Afire flow test will be required prior to final acceptance of the site and prior to combustible materials being allowed on site
for construction.
Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: 04/03/2019
Review Comn
Project Name: Berkmar Overlot - Initial
Date Completed: I Tuesday, April 09, 201D
Reviewer: iCe n McDermott
r
SDP201900010 Initial Site Plan LJ
DepartmenVDiuisiorMgency: Review Status:
CBB Plannina Requested Changes El
A marked crosswalk will be necessary across Empire Street at the Berkmar Drive Intersection. At the Swede St/Empire St r
Intersection curb ramps should be installed across all four legs of the intersection and crosswalk paving markings are
recommended. Pavement markings at these local road intersections will require a maintenance agreement_ Traffic calming
designs should be considered along Empire primarily at the Swede St Intersection. This will likely see some cut -through traffic
between Woodburn and Berkmar and the grade will likely encourage speeding. Potential options might include bump outs at
the intersection or landscaped center island/roundabout treatment at the Swede St/Empire St intersection.
Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed ❑n: 04I10±2019
Review Commeat.9jor
Project Name: Berkmar Cverl fok - Initial
Date Completed:1 Friday, M
Reviewer: I Michael Dellinger
SDP201900010 Initial Site Plan
DepartmenVDiuisiorMgency: Review Status:
CDD Inspections Requested Changes
Add the fallowing note to the general notes page:
Retaining walls greater than 3 feet in height require a separate building permit. Walls exceeding 4 feet in height require an
stamped engineered design also.
Add the fallowing note to the general notes page:
Building or structures built before January 1, 1985 must have an asbestos survey performed in or -der to apply for a demolition
permit. Asbestos removal permits are required if positive for such. Contact VDCLI for additional requirements and permits for
demolition projects.
Note to developer:
Due to required distances from lot lines and structures as required by the NFPA, undergound propane tanks may be
prohibited. Plan accordingly.
Add the following note to the general notes page:
ALL water lines; sewer lines, and fire lines from the main to the structure MUST have a visual inspection performed by the
buildng department.
Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: 04/03/2019
Review Comments for
Project Name: Berkmar Overl�ak - Initial
Date Completed:1 Thursday,
Reviewer: I Matthew Wentland
SDP201900010 Initial Site Plan LJ
Department/DivisionlAgency: Review Status:
CIJIJ Enaineerina Requested Changes
include this in the
revise to provide as
Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: 04/03/2019
Review Vommi eSDP20190001O Initial Site Plan LJ
Project Name: Berkmar Oven ok - Initial
Date Completed: Thursday, Apri DepartmenVDiuisiorMgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Health Department No Objection
2019-04-04 If the proposed development will be served by public water and public sewer, then the Health Department has no r
further comments regarding this project.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed ❑n: 04I10±2019
Review Commguls4gr SDP20190001O Initial Site Plan E
Project Name: I Berkmar Overlo f- Initial
Date Completed:I Wednesday, MaDepartmenVDivisiorMgency:
Reviewer: Andrew Slack CIJIJ E911
No Objection.
Review Status:
No Objection El
.A
Page: 1 County of Albemarle
Printed On: 1 a4l0312019