1993-12-01December 1, 1993 (Regular Day Meeting) 000261
Page 1
A regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia, was held on December 1, 1993 at 11:00 A.M., Meeting Room 7, County
Office Building, McIntire Road, Charlottesville, Virginia.
PRESENT: Mr. Edward H. Bain, Jr., Mr. David P. Bowerman, Mrs. Charlotte
Y. Humphris, Mr. Charles S. Martin and Mr. Walter F. Perkins.
ABSENT: Mr. Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
OFFICERS PRESENT: County Executive, Robert W. Tucker, Jr.; County
Planner, V. Wayne Cilimberg; and Deputy County Attorney, James R. Bowling.
Agenda Item No. 1. Call to Order.
The meeting was called to order at 11:01 a.m., by the Chairman, Mr.
Bowerman.
Agenda Item No. 2. Pledge of Allegiance.
Agenda Item No. 3. Moment of Silence.
Agenda Item No. 4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the
PUBLIC. There were none.
Agenda Item No. 5. Consent Agenda. Motion was offered by Mrs. Hum-
phris, seconded by Mr. Martin, to approve item 5.1, and to accept items 5.2
through 5.8 on the consent agenda as information. Roll was called and the
motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Perkins, Bain, Bowerman, Mrs. Humphris and Mr. Martin.
NAYS: None.
ABSENT: Mr. Marshall.
Item 5.1. 1994 Legislative Program, was approved as presented, by the
above recorded vote.
Item 5.2. Determination from the Zoning Administrator, Ms. Amelia
McCulley, that a special permit is not necessary for North Fork Business Park
flood plain activity, was accepted for information.
Item 5.3. October, 1993 Financial Management Report, was accepted for
information.
Item 5.4. Memorandum dated November 19, 1993, from Mr. Patrick K.
Mullaney, Director of Parks and Recreation, re: 1994 Bike Virginia Bicycle
Tour, was accepted for information.
Item 5.5. Letter dated November 15, 1993, from Mr. H. Bryan Mitchell,
Deputy Director, Department of Historic Resources, re: Longwood, Albemarle
County, was accepted for information.
Item 5.6. Letter dated November 15, 1993, from Mr. J. W. Wade, Superin-
tendent, National Park Service, to Mr. Robert W. Tucker, County Executive, re:
Copy of the study of "Shenandoah National Park: Economic Impacts and Visitor
Perceptions, 1992," was received for information.
Item 5.7. Letter dated November 23, 1993, from Mr. D. S. Roosevelt,
Resident Engineer, Department of Transportation, re: Secondary Traffic
Counts, Albemarle County, was received for information.
Item 5.8. Letter dated November 19, 1993, from Mr. Ray D. Pethtel,
Commissioner, Department of Transportation, re: Addition of Southside Drive
in South Fork Farms, Phase II, into the State Secondary System of Highways,
effective November 17, 1993, was received as follows:
"As requested in your resolution dated October 6, 1993, the
following addition to the Secondary System of Albemarle County is
hereby approved, effective November 17, 1993.
ADDITION LENGTH
SOUTH FORK FARMS, PHASE 2
Route 1011 (Southside Drive)
mile Northeast Route 710
From Route 710 to 0.10
0.10 Mi"
December 1, 1993 (Regular Day Meeting)
Page 2
000262
Item 5.9. Letter dated November 24, 1993, from Mr. D. S. Roosevelt,
Resident Engineer, re: monthly update on highway improvement projects
currently under construction, was received for information.
Item 5.10. Letter dated November 29, 1993, from Mr. Gerald G. Utz,
Contract Administrator, Department of Transportation, re: Notice of Location
and Design Public Hearing on Route 682 (Project #0682-002-P33, C501) on
December 7, 1993, at Meriwether Lewis Elementary School, was received for
information.
Agenda Item No. 7a. Other Transportation Matters.
Mr. Tucker made a report on a proposed pedestrian crossing at Albemarle
High School. Staff has met and came up with the following suggestions:
Look at pedestrian phasing at that intersection and see if it is
feasible; and
Move buses through the intersections and let them all leave at
once to solve the problem of pedestrians crossing the street.
Staff is to work with VDoT's staff to try and phase in a procedure
to block all lanes except Lambs Road so all buses can leave at the
same time.
Mr. Roosevelt said VDoT's traffic engineer agrees that crosswalks at the
intersection would aid in directing students and pedestrians to the safest
location to cross Hydraulic Road. The traffic engineer has agreed to paint
crosswalks across two sides of the intersection connecting three corners that
presently have curb and gutter. The crosswalks are to be painted from the
High School to the office park complex and from the office park complex to the
Mexican restaurant. VDoT discussed with school administration controlling the
traffic signal manually during departure times of the school buses which
presented a problem because if the phases are changed manually there would be
a liability if accidents occurred. VDoT is also reviewing changing the phase
links during the hour when school lets out to try and assist the buses when
departing on Lambs Road. Those discussions are still on-going and a decision
has not been made.
Mr. Roosevelt said he will continue to monitor this issue and bring more
definite details to the Board at its January 5, 1994 meeting.
Mr. Roosevelt reminded the Board that there is a public hearing on the
Route 682 project Tuesday night at Meriwether Lewis School.
Mr. Martin said residents of Route 795 (Presidents Road) requested that
he ask VDoT to install additional signs posting the speed limit to help reduce
speeding.
Mr. Roosevelt will review this request.
Mr. Tucker said he will ask the Police Department to do some selective
enforcement there to help with the problem.
Mr. Bain asked V DoT to consider installing guard rails on Route 250,
east of Mirador Intersection, where there is a 25 to 30 foot drop off.
Mrs. Humphris asked that the Police Department launch a campaign about
the rights of pedestrians in crosswalks.
Mrs. Humphris asked Mr. Roosevelt if he had been contacted about the
need for a stop light at the intersection of Massey Road and Alderman Road.
Mr. Roosevelt said "yes," and he has directed a traffic signal study be
done at the location. This road is located on the University of Virginia
grounds and VDoT doe's not have the same authority on roads located within a
state institution. VDoT is hired to repair and study these roads. Police
authority on those roads are the responsibility of the University Police. He
will contact them regarding the need for a signal at that location.
Mrs. Humphris said the new signal at the Georgetown Road.and Barracks
Road intersection has no left turn signal for east bound traffic from Barracks
Road turning left onto Georgetown Road.
Mr. Roosevelt said he talked with the traffic engineer about that and
expressed concern that a protected left turn was needed. The project is in
the one month traffic signal guarantee time and is still the responsibility of
the contractor.
December 1, 1993 (Regular Day Meeting)
Page 3
000263
Mrs. Humphris said when she drove into Charlottesville this morning she
noticed loose rock in the road at the rocky median near the Route 250 bypass
bridge. Mr. Roosevelt said he will check on this.
Mrs. Humphris said she received information through the Citizen Bypass
Committee that the design for the western bypass had been held up for nine to
12 months and, VDoT must do an environmental impact statement on both the
northern and southern terminus which would be done in-house instead of by
consultants. She asked that when schedules are changed for the local highway
plans that affect Albemarle County this Board be notified.
The Board then requested staff to contact VDoT to try and establish a
procedure to inform the County of any schedule changes relating to highway
plans in the County.
Agenda Item No. 8. Presentation: Architectural Review Board Design
Guidelines.
Ms. Marcia Joseph, Design Planner in the Zoning Department, distributed
an outline of the slides and gave a brief slide presentation outlining what
the Architectural Review Board (ARB) has been doing in the County. She also
introduced Mr. C. Timothy Lindstrom, Chairman of the ARB, and Ms. Diane Miller
and said they were present to answer any questions Board members may have.
Ms. Joseph said the ARB has been using interim guidelines since April,
1991, and they seem to be working well. The guidelines are general in nature
and allow architects flexibility in the design. The guidelines were distrib-
uted to the community in June and comments were received in October. The ARB
then composed a list of comments from all of the various agencies and respond-
ed to these comments. Applicants perception of the guidelines were also
discussed. The ARB concluded that it needed to talk to applicants before they
got into the guidelines in any great depth. Mr. Lindstrom also composed a
letter that would be attached to all ARB guidelines. An important element in
that letter states: "It is the intent of the members of the Architectural
Review Board to allow a broad latitude in developing a project and to make the
architectural review process as simple and efficient as possible, consistent
with the interests of the citizens of Albemarle County and the many persons
from around the world who are visitors here."
Ms. Joseph said there are two levels of review that the ARB currently
undertake: (1) preliminary conference; and (2) certificate of appropriate-
ness. At the preliminary conference, the applicant is encouraged to come in
as soon as a project is in the discussion stages with an idea of what to do
and what the building may look like. There is no fee for a preliminary
conference. The fee for the certificate of appropriateness is $160. The
certificate requires more information, i.e., materials, elevations of building
and site plan. The ARB has tried to be as accommodating as it can to the
applicant in processing applications.
Mr. Bowerman said he feels the ARB has been receptive to comments the
public has made.
Mr. Martin made motion, seconded by Mr. Bain, to set a public hearing on
January 12, 1994, to consider adoption of the ARB guidelines.
Mrs. Humphris said last week, for the first time she noticed the
lighting on Fontaine Avenue at the University of Virginia Research Park and
was shocked. The guidelines state that lights should be shielded, recessed or
flush bound to eliminate glare and achieve an incandescent effect and obvious-
ly that was not done here. She asked how this happened and is there anything
that can be done to fix the lighting. Ms. Joseph said the University of
Virginia Research Park was a complex project which was reviewed as a rezoning
request. She is not sure the lighting for the project was ever addressed.
Mr. Bowerman asked if the front lighting met the requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance for a site plan. Ms. Joseph said "yes." Mr. Bowerman asked
if there is a conflict between the ARB guidelines and the Zoning Ordinance.
Mr. Lindstrom said as part of the rezoning, the applicant also put
together a package of architectural design guidelines. The proposal was
confusing when it came to the ARB because the perception was that this Board
had approved, not only the rezoning, but as part of the package, it approved
the guidelines that took precedent, as any rezoning would, over the ARB
guidelines. The ARB stays clear of rezonings. If this Board accepts proffers
for design as guidelines or site plans, that supersedes the ARB's authority.
As a result of this request, all future requests for rezoning that are in an
entrance corridor is forwarded to the ARB for review before coming to this
Board. Mr. Lindstrom cautioned that the ARB comments should not be construed
as support for or against a proposal.
Mr. Martin said he thinks the ARB comments played a tremendous role in
the Planning Commission's and this Board's position on the Fastrax Entertain-
December 1, 1993 (Regular Day Meeting)
Page 4
000264
merit, Inc. request. Mr. Lindstrom said he feels strongly the ARB should only
comment on a special permit as it relates to the entrance corridor.
There being no further discussion, roll was called and the motion
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Perkins, Bain, Bowerman, Mrs. Humphris and Mr. Martin.
NAYS: None.
ABSENT: Mr. Marshall.
Board members then requested that staff provide a report on the role and
processes of the ARB with the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors
at its February 2, 1994, meeting.
Not Docketed. Mr. Tucker introduced Ms. Lynne Carruth, the newly
employed Housing Coordinator.
Agenda Item No. 9. Section 8 Housing Advisory Committee Report.
Mr. Vito Cetta, Chairman of the Section 8 Housing Advisory Committee,
said in December the Board formed a Section 8 Housing Advisory Committee. The
members of the Committee are: Vito Cetta and Gibson Powell (landlords), Kobby
Hoffman (TJPDC), Linda Bachman (VDHA, Richmond), Wayne Cilimberg (Director of
Planning), and Kathy Ralston and Bonnie Davies (Social Services). The
Committee has met approximately nine times. During this time, the Committee
interviewed area landlords who participated in a housing survey sponsored by
the Charlottesville Housing Foundation and the Thomas Jefferson Planning
District Commission, as well as Section 8 participants, about their views of
the program and suggestions for improvements. The Committee reviewed required
paperwork from Housing and Urban Development (HI/D) and Virginia Housing and
Development Authority (V~DA), as well as the proposed revisions to the Section
8 program published in the Federal Register. The Committee also reviewed
current Section 8 program rules and regulations. The Committee has divided
the recommendations into five categories for ease of presentation: 1)
marketing, 2) case management, 3) program, 4) evaluation and 5) availability.
Mr. Cetta then discussed the report and the recommendations.
Mr. Cetta also discussed certificate holders and the voucher system. A
voucher is a form of Section 8 housing which allows a person to go out and get
a unit that may be priced higher than the housing schedule and that tenant is
responsible for paying the difference. The program also teaches individuals
techniques in finding jobs and working their way out of the system. This
program has been outlined at a cost of approximately $140,000.
Mr. Martin said he prefers the voucher system to the certificate system
because he is a strong proponent of people helping themselves.
Mr. Martin asked what is "inclusionary zoning." Mr. Cetta said inclu-
sionary zoning is a project approved for a specific number of units where a
certain percentage of those units are affordable housing, but that is not
legal in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
The Board requested that staff bring back an implementation plan at its
February 2, 1994.
Agenda Item NO. 13. 12:30 P.M. - Lunch in Cooperative Extension
Services.
Legislators Present: Mr. Peter Way, Mr. Ed Robb, Ms. Jo Blue (Assistant
to Mitch Van Yahres).
Extension Services Staff Present: Ms. Lovedy Papproth, Messrs. Macio
Hill, Jr., David Vaden, Charles Goodman, Mark Reynolds and Steven Meeks.
Mr. Charles Goodman, welcomed everyone and thanked them for coming to
the luncheon.
Extension Services staff then reviewed its list of on-going programs and
projects (copy on file).
Mr. Goodman also announced that Albemarle County was awarded the
outstanding unit for 1993 by Virginia Cooperative Extension Services.
Following some general discussion, Mr. Goodman thanked everyone for
attending the luncheon.
(The Board recessed at 2:00 p.m.)
The Board reconvened in Meeting Room 5/6 at 2:05 p.m.
December 1, 1993 (Regular Day Meeting)
Page 5
000265
Agenda Item No. 14. Work Session: 1994 Legislative Packet with State
Legislators.
Present: Mr. Peter Way, Mr. Ed Robb and Ms. Joe Blue (representing Mr.
Mitch Van Yahres), Mr. Mitch Van Yahres (arrived at 2:50 p.m.).
Mr. Bowerman thanked the legislators for coming to discuss Albemarle
County's legislative packet. He feels this Board is responsive to the needs
of Albemarle County citizens. The legislative packet basically includes the
same requests from past packets.
Mr. Way asked Mr. Robb if he had received the state mandates from the
education department. Mr. Robb said the mandates have been identified but the
funding and costs are 1991 figures and are not up-to-date. He has been trying
to address how much the mandates are costing Albemarle. He will do everything
he can to address the question of state mandates.
Mr. Bain said under finances there is a proposal to raise fees from $2
to $6 to provide equipment for the new family courts scheduled for opening in
1995. Mr. Way said he thinks the state should either provide funding or give
the locality the mechanism to fund any mandates.
Mr. Bain asked the legislators their opinion of the family court. Mr.
Robb said he supported creating the family court. He listened to a great deal
of discussion and debate relative to that issue. He thinks family courts will
provide better service to the community and may not cost much more since they
will provide relief to the other courts. There will be some consolidation of
services. Mr. Bain said he knows there is a lot of concern from the legal
community that the current system and personnel may be doubled instead of
consolidating what currently exists.
Mr. Robb said he met with every judge in the 25th District and they all
approve of the concept of family court. The only criticism he received was
from the Court Clerk's Association who thinks this would increase the cost and
operation of the Clerk's office. Mr. Robb said raising the fees for certain
costs, i.e. divorces, may be a way to fund the family court.
Mr. Bowerman said there is a proposal under finances to provide locali-
ties the flexibility to collect real estate taxes and the ability to recognize
at the local level, different financial situations of people who own real
property. He asked if the legislators see any reform which would allow
localities flexibility in assessing property tax. There were a lot of
complaints during the last budget session from citizens who simply do not have
the income to pay the taxes. Mr. Way said he could agree with the principle
of that.
Mr. Bowerman said this Board would be agreeable to a local option income
tax that is formulated to address rising needs in the area and reflective of
revenues raised by the tax to off-set personal property tax rates.
Mr. Robb said several months ago the issue of homestead exemption was
raised. He thinks that has some merit. He is agreeable to looking at a means
to reduce the tax burden for those people who are seriously affected by
property taxes and not in the category of disabled or elderly.
Mr. Bowerman said he would like to have more equality and equity in the
tax system than is currently available.
Mrs. Humphris said Albemarle County is faced with a lot of growth and it
is costing more money. The major source for that money is the property tax
and that is not a fair way to bring in revenue. There has to be a more fair
way to fund the costs that would not hurt the people who cannot afford it.
Albemarle is not the only county requesting other funding mechanisms.
Counties are growing and becoming more urbanized and continuing to have the
same needs to provide services as cities.
Mr. Robb said he thinks it is important to recognize that there are some
citizens who are not paying their fair share. He thinks the County should try
to look at ways to collect the money that is already owed from uncollected
taxes.
Mr. Bain said he does not disagree that there are people who are not
paying their fair share, but most of the uncollected taxes are from income
taxes. Mr. Bain said there is not current legislation which would allow the
County to collect income taxes. Mr. Robb said this is what needs to be dealt
with. Mr. Bain said if the County had the authority, he would be willing to
include the question of a local option income tax on the ballot.
Mr. Martin said he would like to see funding for the DARE program from
the Sheriff's offices and continuing support for the Opportunity Knocks
program. Mr. Way said that is fine as long as the efforts are coordinated and
not duplicated. Mr. Martin said both DARE and Opportunity Knocks are programs
that he is familiar with, and they accomplish goals and objectives.
December 1, 1993 (Regular Day Meeting)
Page 6
000266
Mrs. Humphris referred to administrative funding for the Comprehensive
Services Act under health and human services. Long-term care is in the
process of being mandated and she does not think there is any plan to pilot
this before it is made a state-wide mandate. She thinks it would make sense
to pilot this program before mandating it state-wide.
Mr. Robb said the Comprehensive Services Act was debated extensively in
the 1992 General Assembly session with the funding formula to be presented in
1993. The concept was similar to the concept of the family court and was
acceptable to the legislature. He agreed with the concept and still agrees
with it. This is an effort to stream line services. The funding formula that
was adopted to put this into effect came with the guarantee that at no time
would it cost localities any more than what each locality presently pays.
Mrs. Humphris said she is a member of VACo's Health and Human Services
Steering Committee and people who reported from various localities said that
the act had become a burden to their localities and the same applies to
Albemarle County. The Steering Committee has suggested that a meeting of all
social service representatives be held to share experiences of what this has
done, the outcome, the benefits and the problems. The Committee feels that if
this is not done and experiences are not shared, the legislators will never
know the negative and positive points. This needs to be known before long-
term care is mandated. Long-term care will cost an enormous amount of money.
Mr. Robb said the last comments he heard from local governments were
that this program was moving along extremely well and all localities were
delighted. He thinks Mrs. Humphris' points are important and well taken.
Mr. Robb said he just attended a two day meeting of the Rehab and Social
Services Committee. He was assured that all of his previous concerns had been
considered. He will ask, after the General Assembly session begins, that
representative from localities be invited to come before the Committee to
share their experiences. Mr. Martin said this is a complex issue. He was 100
percent in support of this Act at the beginning, but now he would encourage
the legislators not to support anything further and vote against the proposal.
He is not sure the strategies are achieving the goals and concepts.
Mr. Bain said the issue of supplementing salaries of constitutional
officers has come before the Board on an annual basis. He wants to encourage
legislators to support the "true" funding of those positions. If the Common-
wealth's Attorney needs funds, those funds should not be supplemented by the
locality.
Mr. Bowerman then introduced Ms. Bonnie Fronfelter the legislative
liaison from the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission. She replaced
Ms. Andrea Trank.
Mr. Way asked that someone explain the legislative request regarding
withdrawal procedures from agricultural/forestal districts. Mr. Tucker said
there are some localities that already have this authority. Albemarle County
is requesting that it be granted this authority as well. Currently, individ-
uals can withdraw land from an agricultural/forestal district during the
period of the district. The Board sees this legislation as an opportunity to
review the basis for the withdrawal and the impact the withdrawal would have
on the existing agricultural/forestal district. This is a means to insure
that landowners are not adding parcels and then withdrawing them on a continu-
al basis.
Mr. Way said he did not know that landowners could withdraw land from an
agricultural/forestal district during the ten year period. Mr. Tucker said
there is certain criteria that must be met. Mr. Robb asked if this proposal
would remove the criteria. Mr. Tucker said "no," this proposal would allow
the Board to review the request. If this request were granted, it does not
mean that the Board would not authorize the withdrawal, but under current
legislation, the Board does not have the opportunity to review the request for
withdrawal. Mr. Robb asked what would happen if the Board did not want to
authorize the withdrawal. Mr. Tucker said the proposed legislation would give
it the authority to deny the request.
Mr. Bowerman said this would give the Board to authority to keep
agricultural/forestal districts from being abused. Mr. Robb asked why this
was not done when the agricultural/forestal districts were created. Mr.
Tucker said it was an oversight.
Mrs. Humphris said two other legislative proposals for Albemarle County
are state funding for the DARE program in Sheriff offices and allowing locali-
ties to receive recognition for local drug efforts by retaining any unclaimed
assets obtained by law enforcement personnel in the performance of their
duties. Mr. Way, Mr. Van Yahres and Mr. Robb said they would support those
requests.
Mr. Van Yahres asked if this is state-wide legislation for the DARE
program. Mr. Tucker said the legislation is particularly for those Sheriff
offices that have court and paper service responsibilities only, and do not
have law enforcement responsibilities. Sheriffs that have law enforcement
000267
December 1, 1993 (Regular Day Meeting)
Page 7
responsibilities use funding through law enforcement proceeds to provide for
the DARE program.
Mr. Robb said he will have the legislation prepared and presented to the
General Assembly regarding localities receiving recognition for local drug
efforts by being allowed to retain any unclaimed assets obtained by law
enforcement personnel in the performance of their duties.
Mr. Van Yahres said he will have the legislation prepared for the
agricultural/foresta'l districts withdrawal procedures.
Mr. Way said he will have the legislation prepared for state funding of
the DARE program within Sheriff offices.
Mr. Robb said a legislative proposal that concerns him, which has not
been addressed, is opposition to any state legislation that preempts local
zoning ordinances. He thinks there are efforts to develop a state-wide board
of zoning. He is not in support of such legislation.
Mr. Robb said Board members may have heard about the sub-committee that
is reviewing bingo and raffle laws. He has received calls from people who are
concerned because of a rumor that the state intends to eliminate fire depart-
ments' and charities' abilities to raise money through bingo and raffles. He
can assure the Board that is not the intent. The committee is trying to deal
with regulating professional bingo operators that take advantage of charities.
Mr. Bowerman thanked the legislators for meeting with this Board.
(The Board recessed at 3:05 p.m. and reconvened in Room 7 at 3:16 p.m.)
Agenda Item No. 11. Adopt Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of
$24,710,000 General Obligation School Bond, Refunding Series 1994 A of the
County of Albemarle, Virginia, to be Issued in Exchange for an Aggregate Like
Principal Amount of 'Certain Outstanding Bonds of the County of Albemarle,
Virginia, held, and a Lump Sum Cash Payment to be Made, by the Virginia Public
School Authority, and Setting Forth the Form and Details of Such Refunding
Bond.
Mr. Tucker gave the following summary:
"BACKGROUND: The County of Albemarle issued schOol bonds through
the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) in 1989 and 1991. The
total of these two bond issues was $29,745,000.
DISCUSSION: Based on current interest rates, VPSA has elected to
refund (refinance) a number of its outstanding bond issues. In
doing so, VPSA will realize a substantial savings in interest
which will be shared with the localities. It is currently pro-
jected that Albemarle County will receive a refund of $379,165 to
be received in January, 1994. In order to participate in this
refunding the County must adopt a resolution authorizing the
issuance of the refunding bond in exchange for the canceled bonds
of the County and the lump sum cash payment. The refund amount is
restricted to be used for capital projects and VPSA is requesting
that it be used for 'School' capital projects. Also, in order to
avoid any penalty or rebate liability this amount will need to be
expended within six months of receipt.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the at-
tached resolution (on file) to issue a VPSA replacement bond for
the 1989 and 1'991 canceled bonds. As the Board discussed at the
November meeting, the refund savings of $379,165 may be used to
fund a portion of the start-up capital costs associated with the
new middle school."
Mr. Martin made motion, seconded by Mrs. Humphris, to adopt the follow-
ing resolution to authorize the issuance of $24,710,000 General Obligation
School Bond, Refunding Series 1994 A of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, to
be issued in exchange for an aggregate like principal amount of certain
outstanding bonds of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, held, and a lump sum
cash payment to be made, by the Virginia Public School Authority, and setting
forth the form and details of such refunding bond. Roll was called and motion
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Perkins, Bain, Bowerman, Mrs. Humphris and Mr. Martin.
NAYS: None.
ABSENT: Mr. Marshall.
December 1, 1993 (Regular Day Meeting)
Page 8
000268
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF
$24,710,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL
~BOND, REFUNDING SERIES 1994 A OF THE
COUNTY OF ~_LBEMARLE, VIRGINIA, TO BE
ISSUED IN EXCHANGE FOR AN AGGREGATE
LIKE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF CERTAIN
OUTSTANDING BONDS OF THE COUNTY OF
ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA, HELD, Ab~ A LUMP
SUM CASH PAYMENT TO BE MADE, BY THE
VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY, AND
SETTING FORTH THE FORM AND DETAILS OF
SUCH REFUNDING BOND.
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the
County of Albemarle, Virginia (the "County") has received a
written offer dated October 29, 1993 from the Virginia Public
School Authority (the "Authority") to exchange certain outstanding
general obligation school bonds of the County held by the Author-
ity for (i) an aggregate like principal amount of non-callable
bonds of the same tenor and (ii) a lump sum cash payment, and the
Board has determined to accept such offer and to issue its general
obligation school refunding bond in exchange for an aggregate like
principal amount of certain outstanding bonds of the County held,
and a lump sum payment to be made, by the Authority;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA:
1. Authorization of the Refundinq Bond. The Board hereby
determines that it is advisable to issue its refunding bond in the
amount of $24,710,000 (the "Refunding Bond") for the purpose of
refunding an aggregate like principal amount of outstanding
general obligation school bonds of the County the principal terms
of which are set forth in Exhibit A (the "Refunded Bonds"). The
issuance of the Refunding Bond in exchange for the Refunded Bonds
and a lump sum cash payment upon the terms established pursuant to
this Resolution is hereby authorized.
2. Details of the Bonds. The Refunding Bond shall have
the principal provisions set forth in, and shall be issued as a
single, typewritten bond substantially in the form attached hereto
as, Exhibit C. On twenty (20) days written notice from the
Authority, the County shall deliver, at its expense, the Refunding
Bond in marketable form in denominations of $5,000 and whole
multiples thereof, as requested by the Authority, in exchange for
the typewritten Refunding Bond.
3. Payment~ Pa¥inq Aqent and Bond Reqistrar. The follow-
ing provisions shall apply to the Refunding Bond:
(a) For as long as the Authority is the registered owner
of the Refunding Bond, all payments of principal of, premium, if
any, and interest on the Refunding Bond shall be made in immedi-
ately available funds to the Authority at, or before 11:00 a.m. on
the applicable Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or
date fixed for prepayment or redemption, if applicable, or if such
date is not a business date for Virginia banks or for the Common-
wealth of Virginia, then at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business
day next preceding such Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment
Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption, if applicable.
(b) Ail overdue payments of principal or interest shall
bear interest at the applicable interest rate or rates on the
Refunding Bond.
(c) Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia, is designated as
Bond Registrar and Payin9 Agent for the Refunding Bond.
4. Execution of the Bonds. The Chairman or Vice-Chairman
and the Clerk or any Deputy Clerk of the Board are authorized and
directed to execute and deliver the Refunding Bond in the princi-
pal amount of $24,710,000 and to affix the seal of the County
thereto.
5. Pledqe of Full Faith and Credit. For the prompt
payment of the principal of and interest on the Refunding Bond
authorized by this Resolution as the same shall become due, the
full faith and credit of the County are hereby irrevocably
pledged, and each year while the Refunding Bond shall be outstand-
ing there shall be levied and collected in accordance with law an
annual ad valorem tax upon all taxable property in the County
subject to local taxation sufficient in amount to provide for the
payment of the. principal of and the interest on the Refunding Bond
as such principal and interest shall be come due, which tax shall
be without limitation as to rate or amount and in addition to all
December 1, 1993 (Regular Day Meeting)
Page 9
0002 9
other taxes authorized to be levied in the County to the extent
other funds of the County are not lawfully available and appropri-
ated for such purpose.
6. Tax Covenant. The County covenants to take all
action, and to refrain from taking any action, necessary under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, to ensure that interest
on the Refunding Bond will remain excludable from gross income for
Federal income tax purposes to the same extent as it is excludable
on the date of issue thereof.
7. Certificate. The appropriate officers and agents of
the County are hereby authorized and directed to execute and
deliver the Certificate substantially in the form attached hereto
as Exhibit D, including the Form 8038-G appended thereto.
8. Exchanqe of the Bonds. It is determined to be in the
best interests of the County to issue the Refunding Bond to the
Authority in exchange for the Refunding Bonds and the lump sum
cash payment set forth in Exhibit B. The appropriate officers of
the County are hereby authorized and directed to exchange the
Refunding Bond with the Authority for the Refunded Bonds and the
lump sum cash payment. The Board hereby determines that it is in
the best interests of the County to authorize and direct the
County Director of Finance to participate in the State Non-Arbi-
trage Program in connection with the expenditure of the lump sum
cash payment.
9. Certification and Filinq. The Clerk of the Board is
hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this
Resolution with the Circuit Court of the County.
10. Further Actions. Each Supervisor and all other
officers, employees and agents of the County are authorized to
take such action as they or any one of them may consider necessary
or desirable in connection with the issuance and exchange of the
Refunding Bond for the Refunded Bonds and the lump sum cash
payment and to accept and comply with the terms of the offer of
the Authority.
11. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect
immediately.
(Ail Exhibits are on file in the Clerks office.)
Agenda Item No. 10. Discussion: Corville Farm Subdivision, central
well system, request for funding (deferred from November 17, 1993).
Mr. Tucker explained the request from Mr. Joseph Casero for $5,000 from
Albemarle County to assist in making a third well operational. He summarized
the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office, and described the
options available.
Mr. Tucker said should the Board choose to honor Mr. Casero's request,
staff suggests that Mr. Casero enter into an agreement with Albemarle County
that if the funds are appropriated, he will not increase the monthly fee for a
period of two years except to cover increased operational expense and that if
the system is sold within the same period of time, the funds would be repaid.
Mrs. Humphris said she reviewed the information carefully and came up
with some serious questions about what could happen. She thinks Mr. Casero
went into a speculative venture, with the intent of purchasing this subdivi-
sion to make a profit. That was fine as long as there was not much expendi-
ture required to make the profit. The problems are not clear to her. She
does not know exactly what the problem is with the third well. She asked if
the third well was upgraded in 1988 with the other wells. Ms. Jo Higgins,
County Engineer, said Mr. Casero did not develop the subdivision nor does he
own it. He purchased the well system, that is located on his farm and serves
the subdivision, because it also serves him and a farmhouse outside of the
subdivision. He was looking to protect his own water source. The idea that
he bought this for profit is probably valid but history will show that the
rates have not been raised, and he has operated and invested more money into
this system than whatever profit has been made. He is not trying to make a
profit. The problems are quantity of water and the third well. The third
well is not in operation. In the last couple of years, Mr. Casero has spent
approximately $14,000 to replace the other two pumps and added controls so the
pumps would not burn out. The system was upgraded to protect those two pumps.
He has been working with the residents in the subdivision to get them to
voluntarily conserve water. There. are no separate meters on the houses. Mr.
Casero looked into the cost of installing separate meters which was shown to
be quite expensive because the system was not installed the way it was
originally designed. She then explained the regulatory requirements.
December 1, 1993 (Regular Day Meeting)
Page 10
000270
Mrs. Humphris asked if the third well was upgraded in 1988 or after
1988. Ms. Higgins said she believes that the third well was taken out of
service in 1988. Mrs. Humphris said it is important to know why the well is
not in use.
Mrs. Humphris asked why the third well deteriorated. Mr. Bain said Mr.
Casero stated in his letter of November 9, 1993, that a third well exists
which was drilled back in the 1970's to a depth of 600 feet. However, prior
to his purchase of the system, the well was allowed to deteriorate to the
point where only the well was present. The well was never used for any water,
the well was just there. Ms. Higgins said the pump quit working and it was
never put back in service.
Mrs. Humphris said Mr. Casero's letter also states that the flows from
the first and second well have been decreasing. She asked what efforts has
Mr. Casero made to increase the flows on those wells. She contends that for
whatever reason Mr. Casero bought the well system, it was speculative. She
feels he purchased this for his own benefit. There is no evidence that
suggests Mr. Casero has tried other options. The total cost of the third well
is $10,000 and yet some of that cost is to provide for separating the two
systems. She has not seen any evidence that Mr. Casero cannot afford to do
this. This is his obligation. She understands that these are small lots and
these houses provide affordable housing to some low income people. She does
not think a case has been made for the taxpayers or water users to obligate
themselves to do this and she feels it would be a dreadful precedent to set.
There are 64 other central well systems in the County.
Mr. Bowerman asked the difference between this request and the request
for West Leigh. Mr. J.W. Brent, Executive Director of Albemarle County
Service Authority (ACSA) said he was not working for Albemarle County at that
time, but it is his understanding that the County loaned ACSA money to
purchase water companies and create a utility. ACSA purchased the Woodbrook,
Colthurst and West Leigh water services. Mrs. Humphris said the whole group
was purchased and West Leigh was the only water service that was failing, but
ACSA purchased those properties to create a business.
Mr. Bowerman asked what obligation does the stock company have to
continue to supply water to the 25 homes. Mr. James R. Bowling, Assistant
County Attorney, said the rates are regulated by the State Corporation
Commission (SCC) and the owners can ask the SCC to oversee whatever rates are
charged, but the stock company can go bankrupt and, at that point, the
residents would have to provide for themselves. Mr. Casero's obligation as a
stock holder is difficult to answer.
Mr. Bowerman said he is having a difficult time separating what other
options are available. Mrs. Humphris said some other options are insuring
that the owner has found out everything he needs to know about the ability of
the wells to produce. The storage of the water may be the problem instead of
production of water. She does not feel Mr. Casero has provided this Board
with enough information. She does not see how the Board could make a decision
based on the information available.
Mr. Bain said Mr. Brent mentioned water works operation fee and non-
viable systems through grants in his letter dated November 23, 1993 (on file)
and asked if this is possible or since this is a public stock company whether
that is an option. Mr. Brent said he does not know of any form of assistance
that is available.
Mr. Bain said he would not support including this property in the ACSA
service area boundaries unless it adjoined an urban or growth area. Mr. Bain
asked how the Board would handle other requests if this request were granted.
Mr. Tucker said he does not know how the Board would handle other requests,
but the Board may be faced with larger costs if Mr. Casero decides to abandon
the system.
Mr. Bain said Mr. Casero has the right to bail out and do nothing
legally.
Mrs. Humphris said there are other alternatives to stop people who abuse
the water use. Mr. Martin said Mr. Casero is trying to help these low-income
peoplet who could not survive on their own. He could drill a well on his
property and forget about the landowners. Mr. Bain said that was his impres-
sion and would be simple for him to do. Mr. Bain said he does not disagree
with Mrs. Humphris, but those alternatives will cost money. He does not like
the precedent this could set. He sees this request as something that can be
separated from other requests.
Mrs. Humphris said she has not heard any ideas as to how this request
can be separated or distinguished from similar requests. Mr. Bowerman said
this can be separated because it is a separate stock company and because of
the efforts Mr. Casero has made over the course of the last four or five years
to keep the system operating without passing additional costs on to the people
who live there. He has made a good faith effort to maintain the system and
recognize his obligation. He understands what Mrs. Humphris is saying
regarding Mr. Casero's purchase of the subdivision, but 25 other people
December 1, 1993 (Regular Day Meeting)
Page 11
00027
benefit from this central well system. Mr. Bowerman feels that ultimately the
County could become responsible for this system.
Mr. Perkins said one problem is that the lots are not large enough for
individual wells. Everything Mrs. Humphris has stated is true, and maybe
there are other techniques that need to be looked at regarding the other two
wells that are in operation.
Ms. Higgins said Mr. Casero is an engineer and he has impressed her. He
has looked at every alternative and came up with the cheapest way to accom-
plish the task. Mr. Casero has gone to the Health Department for help
numerous times. The residents from the subdivision have gone to the SCC and
the financial documents have been reviewed and the SCC has recommended that
the fees be increased. The option for Mr. Casero to charge the people more
has always been there. Several people go months without paying their bill
because they cannot afford to. She does not understand why Mr. Casero bothers
with doing this. Mr. Casero does not want to leave the people in a bind. He
does have the option to spend the money and figure out what he can do, then
assess it to the people living in the subdivision.
Mrs. Humphris said she understands that this is a decent, honest man,
who wants to do his best to help people of few means, however, this Board is
supposed to represent all of the taxpayers in Albemarle County and she would
not feel she had done her best to do that unless she knew that Mr. Casero had
made every effort. She is not satisfied that this Board has found out
everything that it needs to know.
Mr. Martin suggested that this item be deferred to December 8, 1993, and
asked if staff could contact Mr. Casero to see if he can attend that meeting
to discuss other options that have been explored and the costs involved.
Mr. Perkins asked Ms. Higgins if she had a cost estimate on installing
water meters for the users. Ms. Higgins said the cost would be between
$10,000 and $14,000.
Mr. Perkins said this is similar to when the Board spent funds to bring
public roads into the system that serve a limited number of people. If money
can be spent in that way, then it can be spent on this instance. He does have
a problem with this request, and wants to be sure that staff's recommendation
is adequate to protect the County from setting a precedent.
There was a consensus of the Board that this item be deferred to
December 8, 1993, to allow Mr. Casero an opportunity to be present.
Agenda Item No. 12a. Appropriation: Reappropriate FY 1992/93 Fund
Balance and Appropriate FY 1993/94 Funding for Brownsville Elementary School
Early Childhood Grant, $107,619.44 - (Form #930040).
Mr. Tucker said the Early Childhood Grant provides for the development
and implementation of both a fully articulated K-3 instructional program and
three support components which appear vital for effective early childhood
education. At its meeting on October 25, 1993, the School Board approved the
reappropriation of the remaining fund balance for the Early Childhood Grant
for Brownsville Elementary School and appropriated $74,956.00 for the FY 1993-
94 Early Childhood Grant for Brownsville Elementary School. It is requested
that the Board amend the appropriation ordinance to receive and disburse these
funds.
Mr. Martin made motion, seconded by Mr. Bain, to adopt a Resolution of
Appropriation (set out below) in the amount of $107,619.44 to reappropriate FY
1992/93 fund balance and appropriate FY 1993/94 funding for Brownsville
Elementary School Early Childhood Grant. Roll was called and the motion
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Perkins, Bain, Bowerman, Mrs. Humphris and Mr. Martin.
NAYS: None.
ABSENT: Mr. Marshall.
FISCAL YEAR:
NUMBER:
FUND:
PURPOSE:
930040
EARLY CHILDHOOD GRANT
REAPPROPRIATION OF BALANCE OF FY 92/93 GRANT AND
FUNDING FOR FY 93/94.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1311260202112100
1311260202114100
1311260202135000
1311260202152100
1311260202160300
1311260202210000
SALARIES-TEACHER
SALARIES-TEACHER ASSISTANT
P/T WAGES-CLERICAL
SUB/WAGES-TEACHER
STIPENDS-STAFF CURRICULUM DEV
FICA
$ 9,000.00
8,000.00
1,000.00
4,500.00
16,000.00
2,256.00
December 1, 1993 (Regular Day Meeting)
Page 12
1311260202312700
13112602023500'00
1311260202520301
1311260202550100
1311260202580500
1311260202600100
1311260202601300
1311260202800100
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES-CONSULT
PRINTING/BINDING
TELEPHONE
TRAVEL
STAFF DEVELOPMENT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
TOTAL
26,000 00
500 00
1,000 00
400 00
10,000 00
300 00
7,000 00
21,663 44
$107,619 44
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2311251000510100
2311224000240502
GRANT FUND BALANCE
EARLY CHILDHOOD GRANT FY 93/94
$ 32,663.44
74,956.00
TOTAL $107,619.44
Agenda Item No. 12b. Appropriation: Housing Coordinator Cost Center,
Transfer $36,105 (Form ~930042).
Mr. Tucker said in the FY 93-94 budget, the Board approved funding for
the full-time Housing Coordinator position including miscellaneous operating
costs and one-time capital equipment costs. These funds were budgeted in the
Department of Planning and Community Development's cost center. The requested
appropriation transfers the funds from Planning's budget to a new cost center
(81031) that has been set up to better identify and track the costs of the
County's housing program. Staff recommends approval of the appropriation that
transfers $36,105 from the Planning and Community Development cost center,
81010, to the Housing Coordinator cost center, 81031.
Mr. Bain made motion, seconded by Mrs. Humphris, to adopt a Resolution
of Appropriation (set out below) in the amount of $36,105 to transfer funds
from the Department of Planning and Community Development to the new Housing
Coordinator Cost Center. Roll was called and motion carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
Messrs. Perkins, Bain, Bowerman, Mrs. Humphris and Mr. Martin.
None.
Mr. Marshall.
FISCAL YEAR:
NUMBER:
FUND:
PURPOSE:
930042
GENERAL
TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO ESTABLISH COST CENTER FOR
HOUSING COORDINATOR.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY
1100081010110000
1100081010210000
1100081010221000
1100081010231000
1100081010232000
1100081010360000
1100081010520300
11000810105203'02
1100081010550400
1100081010580100
1100081010600100
1100081010601200
1100081010800200
1100081031110000
1100081031210000
1100081031221000
1100081031332100
1100081031360000
1100081031520100
1100081031520300
1100081031520302
1100081031550110
1100081031550400
1100081031580100
1100081031600100
1100081031601200
1100081031601600
1100081031601700
DESCRIPTION
SALARIES
FICA
VRS
HEALTH I NSLrRANCE
DENTAL INSURANCE
ADVERTISING
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE-LONG DISTANCE
TRAVEL- EDUCATION
DUES/MEMBERSHI PS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
BOOKS / SUB S CRI PT IONS
FURNITURE / FIXTURES
SALARIES
FICA
VRS
MAINTENANCE-DP EQUIP.
ADVERTI SING
POSTAL SERVICES
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE-LONG DISTANCE
TRAVEL- POOL CAR
TRAVEL - EDUCAT I ON
DUES/MEMBERSHI PS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
BOOKS / SUBSCRI PT IONS
DP SUPPLIES
COPY SUPPLIES
TOTAL
AMOUNT
($28,224.00)
(2,230.00)
(2,441.00)
(1,540.00)
(60.00)
(300.o0)
(15o.oo)
(50.00)
(200.00)
(lOO.OO)
(100 00)
(50 00)
(660 00)
29,000 00
1,875 00
2,170 00
280 00
300 00
150.00
150.00
200.00
600.00
600.00
80.00
200.00
300.00
50.00
150.00
$ 0.00
REVENUE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
REQUESTING COST CENTER
COUNTY EXECUTIVE
December 1, 1993 (Regular Day Meeting)
Page 13
000273
Agenda Item No. 12c. Appropriation: School Grant Appropriations
(Special Education Preschool Grant, Stony Point Competency Based Grant and
Carl Perkins Vocational Education Grant), $194,820 - (Form #930043).
Mr. Tucker said at its meeting on November 8, 1993, the School Board
approved appropriations of $72,600 for the Special Education Preschool Grant,
$20,900 for the Stony Point Competency Based Grant, and $101,320 for the Carl
D. Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology Education Act. The School Board
has requested that the Board of Supervisors amend the appropriation ordinance
to receive and disburse these funds in the amount of $194,820.
Mr. Martin made motion, seconded by Mr. Bain, to adopt a Resolution of
Appropriation (set out below) in the amount of $194,820, for three school
grants: Special Education Preschool Grant, $72,600; Stony Point Competency
Grant, $20,900; and Carl D. Perkins Vocational Grant, $101,320. Roll was
called and motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Perkins, Bain, Bowerman, Mrs. Humphris and Mr. Martin.
NAYS: None.
ABSENT: Mr. Marshall.
FISCAL YEAR: '1993/94
NUMBER: 930043
FUND: GRANTS
PURPOSE: SPECIAL EDUCATION PRESCHOOL GRANT, STONY POINT
COMPETENCY BASED GRANT, CARL PERKINS VOCATIONAL
EDUCATION GRANT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1320561108112100
1320561108114100
1320561108132105
1320561108210000
1320561108221000
1320561108232000
1320561108390100
SALARIES-TEACHER $ 36,020 00
SALARIES-TEACHER AIDE 1,515 00
SALARIES-TEACHER/SUMMER SCHOOL 10,536 00
FICA 2,875 00
RETIREMENT 2,395 00
DENTAL INSURANCE 42 00
PUPIL TUITION-PRIVATE 19,217.00
1310460275114100
1310460275152100
1310460275160300
1310460275210000
1310460275231000
1310460275312700
1310460275350000
1310460275550100
1310460275580500
1310460275601300
1310460275800100
SALARIES-TEACHER ASSISTANT
SALARIES-SUB. TEACHER
STIPENDS-CURRICULUM DEV
FICA
HEALTH INSURANCE
PROF. SERVICES-CONSULTANTS
PRINTING/BINDING
TRAVEL
STAFF DEVELOPMENT
INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
4,500.00
600.00
2,500.00
400.00
600 00
1,500 00
1,000 00
600 00
2,500 00
3,700 00
3,000 00
1320761190350000
1320761190520100
1320761190550100
1320761190580100
1320761190580500
1320761190600100
1320761190601200
1320761190601700
1320760301114100
1320760301210000
1320760301221000
1320760301231000
1320760301232000
1320760301350000
1320760301520100
1320760301580500
1320760301601200
1320760301601300
1320760301601700
1320760301800100
1320760302114100
1320760302210000
1320760302221000
1320760302231000
13207603022320.00
1320760302350000
1320760302520100
1320760302580500
1320760302601200
1320760302601300
1320760302601700
1320760302800100
1320760303350000
1320760303520100
1320760303580500
PRINTING
POSTAL SERVICES
TRAVEL
DUES & MEMBERSHIPS
STAFF DEVELOPMENT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
BOOKS & SUBSCRIPTIONS
COPY SUPPLIES
SALARY-TEACHER AIDE
FICA
VRS
HEALTH INSURANCE
DENTAL INSURANCE
PRINTING
POSTAL SERVICES
STAFF DEVELOPMENT
BOOKS & SUBSCRIPTIONS
INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS
COPY SUPPLIES
MACH/EQUIP. -NEW
SALARY-TEACHER AIDE
FICA
VRS
HEALTH INSURANCE
DENTAL INSURANCE
PRINTING
POSTAL SERVICES
STAFF DEVELOPMENT
BOOKS & SUBSCRIPTIONS
INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS
COPY SUPPLIES
MACH/EQUI P. -NEW
PRINTING
POSTAL SERVICES
STAFF DEVELOPMENT
100 00
125 00
300 00
150 00
2,020 00
500 00
335 00
150 00
7,295.00
558.00
828.00
792.00
30.00
200.00
100.00
11,000.00
500.00
5,680.00
200.00
12,060.00
7,900.00
604.35
897.44
792.00
30.00
200.00
100.00
1,000.00
500.00
5,816.21
200.00
13,040.00
100.00
100.00
500.00
December 1, 1993 (Regular Day Meeting)
Page 14
000274
1320760303601200
1320760303601300
1320760303601700
1320760303800100
1320760410112100
1320760410210000
1320760410221000
BOOKS & SUBSCRIPTIONS
INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS
COPY SUPPLIES
MACH/EQUIP. -NEW
SALARY-TEACHER AIDE
FICA
VRS
TOTAL
200 00
2,500 00
100 00
3,500 00
17,113 00
1,264 00
1,940 00
$194,820 00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2320533000330111
2310424000240256
23207330003301'07
SPECIAL EDUC.-PRESCHOOL
STONY POINT COMPETENCY GRANT
CARL PERKINS GRANT
$ 72,600.00
20,900.00
101,320.00
TOTAL $194,820.00
Agenda Item No. 15. Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the
BOARD.
Mr. Tucker said a few weeks ago, he sent the Board a memo regarding
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority concerns about the reservoirs in the County.
He announced that after the rain last Saturday all reservoirs are full.
Mr. Tucker asked the Board to appropriate $1000 from its contingency
fund for the visions forums that the County, City and University are coordi-
nating for early next year for the update of the Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Martin made motion, seconded by Mr. Perkins, to adopt the following
Resolution of Appropriation in the amount of $1,000 for the visions forums
that the County, City and University are coordinating for the update of the
Comprehensive Plan. Roll was called and the motion carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Perkins, Bain, Bowerman, Mrs. Humphris and Mr. Martin.
NAYS: None.
ABSENT: Mr. Marshall.
FISCAL YEAR:
NI3MBER:
FUND:
PURPOSE:
1993/94
930044
GENERAL
FUNDING FOR VISIONS FORUM.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1100081010312700
1100095000999990
PLANNING-PROF SERVICES
BOARD CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
$1,000.00
(1,000.00)
$ 0.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
TOTAL $ 0.00
Mrs. Humphris said she needs to understand what the hold up was in
bringing forward a work session on the Meadow Creek Parkway. She was told
that the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) had not approved the socio
economic data and if this is the case, she would like to know the process in
getting it through to the MPO for approval.
Mr. Tucker said he was not aware of deferral having anything to do with
the socio economic data. He understood that the work session was deferred
because the state had not finished validating the traffic projections made by
the consultant.
Mrs. Humphris requested that staff find out what the actual reason for
the delay of a work session on Meadow Creek Parkway.
Agenda Item No. 16. Adjourn.
At 4:10 p.m., with no further business to come before the Board, the
meeting was adjourned.
Cha i rman