SDP201900010 Correspondence 2019-05-15Patricia "Paty" Saternye
From:
Christoph Scharnbeck <cscharnbeck@mybrb.com>
Sent:
Friday, March 15, 2019 2:04 PM
To:
Michaela Accardi; Steven Hoffmann
Cc:
Rachel Falkenstein; brent@greenstonematerial.com; Patricia Saternye
Subject:
RE: P29 North March Agenda
Attachments:
AGENDA - Places 29N CAC - 2019 03-21.docx
Ok. Sounds good.
Agenda attached with updated portion.
Chris
-----Original Message -----
From: Michaela Accardi <maccardi@albemarle.org>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 1:46 PM
To: Christoph Scharnbeck <cscharnbeck@mybrb.com>
Cc: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>; brent@greenstonematerial.com; Patricia Saternye
<psaternye@a I bemarle.org>
Subject: RE: P29 North March Agenda
Hi Chris,
We could add it to the agenda "if time permits"? And if there's still interest, we can push it until April. I can come with a
slide of the site plan and high level info but I won't be able to answer detailed questions about the project.
Does that sound okay?
Thanks,
Michaela Accardi
Neighborhood Planner
Albemarle County Community Development
ph: 434.296.5832 ext. 3252
maccardi@albemarle.org
-----Original Message -----
From: Christoph Scharnbeck <cscharnbeck@mybrb.com>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 1:05 PM
To: Michaela Accardi <maccardi@albemarle.org>
Cc: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>; brent@greenstonematerial.com; Patricia Saternye
<psaternye@ albema rle.org>
Subject: RE: P29 North March Agenda
I have not had a chance to assess level of interest.
It falls into the P29N area. It came to my attention as I was looking for something else to round out/fill the agenda/the
hour that we have.
To me it is interesting in that it seems to be the first housing development planned off of Berkmar Extended or may not
have happened were it not for the extension of Berkmar.
I like the idea, Michaela, of you providing a fly -over, a high level overview of the project. I think the Site Review
Committee details would include some of the lay -out and scope. Great if it generates questions to bring back to Paty.
Having a second point I thought would be good particularly if the NIFI presentation wraps up with plenty time to spare.
Is that something you could easily have on the ready, in case needed. If NIFI needs or uses most of the time we can still
then do it next month?
What do you think?
And should you have it in your back pocket like that, do I need to add it to the agenda?
Thanks.
Chris
Chris Scharnbeck
AVP Business Banking - Charlottesville
Blue Ridge Bank
T 434.973.0617
NMLS #618230
cscharnbeck@mybrb.com
website I facebook I twitter
-----Original Message -----
From: Michaela Accardi <maccardi@albemarle.org>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 11:56 AM
To: Christoph Scharnbeck <cscharnbeck@mybrb.com>
Cc: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>; brent@greenstonematerial.com; Christoph Scharnbeck
<cscharnbeck@mybrb.com>; Patricia Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: P29 North March Agenda
Hi Chris,
Thanks for sending over the agenda - looks good to me. Paty Saternye is the lead reviewer on the Berkmar Overlook
project. While it is a bit premature in the review process for her to be available for feedback, she is also out of the office
on Thursday.
However, if there is high interest in the project, I'm happy to provide an overview of the project (based on the Site
Review Committee details) and then I can take questions to bring back to Paty?
Thanks,
Michaela Accardi
Neighborhood Planner
Albemarle County Community Development
ph: 434.296.5832 ext. 3252
maccardi@albemarle.org
-----Original Message -----
From: Christoph Scharnbeck <cscharnbeck@mybrb.com>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 10:30 AM
To: Michaela Accardi <maccardi@albemarle.org>
Cc: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>; brent@greenstonematerial.com; Chris Scharnbeck
<cscha rnbeck@ mybrb.com>
Subject: RE: P29 North March Agenda
Michaela
I have attached current agenda for our meeting next week March 21.
Brent Hall will be moderating since I cannot attend this one.
The agenda is skinny - I would prefer to have a second main agenda item.
I meant to ask you if you had any suggestions or thoughts.
I had noticed the Berkmar Overlook project proposal that have come before the county.
Might to too early and too short notice to add this month.
What are your thoughts?
Thanks.
Chris
PS:
I will update the agenda should you want any change or have a point to add to it.
If not, the attached agenda is it and good to go.
Chris Scharnbeck
AVP Business Banking - Charlottesville
Blue Ridge Bank
T 434.973.0617
N M LS #618230
cscharnbeck@mybrb.com
website I facebook I twitter
-----Original Message -----
From: Michaela Accardi <maccardi@albemarle.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 4:30 PM
To: Christoph Scharnbeck <cscharnbeck@mybrb.com>
Cc: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>
Subject: P29 North March Agenda
Hi Chris,
I'm reaching out to see how things are going with the March CAC agenda. To meet FOIA requirements, I'll need to have it
posted by Monday morning at the latest.
I also wanted to give you a heads up that we are planning another all -CAC meeting on form -based code, tentatively
scheduled for the evening of Monday, April 29th. I will be sending out an email to chairs in the coming week about this.
But I bring this up because if there are no topics for discussion, please feel free to cancel the March meeting as there will
likely be two meetings in April.
Feel free to let me know if there's anything I can help with.
Thanks,
Michaela Accardi
Neighborhood Planner
Albemarle County Community Development
ph: 434.296.5832 ext. 3252
maccardi@albemarle.org
Patricia "Paty" Saternye
From:
David Benish
Sent:
Saturday, April 6, 2019 3:41 PM
To:
Patricia Saternye
Cc:
Bill Fritz, Rachel Falkenstein; Megan Nedostup
Subject:
RE: Are bonus densities allowed in a proposed development (SDP2019-19 &
SUB2019-30 Berkmar Overlook)
I agree with Zoning's interpretation that the residential density bonus is the not available in areas where the Comp Plan
does not designate residential as a primary use —I think this interpretation is consistent (not inconsistent?) with the
intent/recommendation of the Master Plan. I believe the interpretation of the land use recommendations for this
property and treatment of residential as a secondary use is correct. I think Amelia's comments in her e-mail to you
below summarizes the situation well. Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks.
From: Patricia Saternye
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2019 4:46 PM
To: David Benish <DBENISH@albemarle.org>
Cc: Bill Fritz <BFRITZ@albemarle.org>; Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>; Megan Nedostup
<m nedostu p@al bema rle.org>
Subject: FW: Are bonus densities allowed in a proposed development (SDP2019-19 & SUB2019-30 Berkmar Overlook)
David,
I had a question on my SRC review that I asked Bill. Then Bill and I expanded to Rachel.
When Bill & Rachel had opposite views they said I should ask Amelia, which I did and you can see her response below.
I'm forwarding this to you because today, in 2"" set of eyes, it was pointed out to me that although Amelia has to
interpret 2.4.1 Application of Bonus Factors you (and possibly the planning commission) would be the correct person to
interpret the Comp Plan.
My original email below (almost at the very bottom) explains the issue and links to the appropriate documents.
It is looking like the applicant cannot utilize any Bonus Factors.
I'm comfortable with this interpretation, and thought that might be the case when I started asking questions, but Bill
and Megan asked me to reach out to ensure that the Comp Plan is being interpreted correctly as well.
Thanks,
Paty Saternye
Senior Planner
Community Development
o11
u
`Y�R41ln�
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832 ext.3250
psaternve@albemarle.ore
www.albemarle.ora
From: Amelia McCulley
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2019 4:33 PM
To: Patricia Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org>
Cc: Francis MacCall <FMACCALL@albemarle.org>; Bart Svoboda <bsvoboda@albemarle.org>; Lea Brumfield
<Ibrumfield@albemarle.org>; Rebecca Ragsdale <rragsdale@albemarle.org>; Kevin McCollum
<kmccollum@albemarle.org>
Subject: Are bonus densities allowed in a proposed development (SDP2019-19 & SUB2019-30 Berkmar Overlook)
Paty,
Please see Francis' explanation below. It is our opinion that residential density bonus is not available in areas where the
Comp Plan does not designate residential as a primary use. Even if it were, there would be no limits on the density
bonus even though there are limits on property designated for residential use — and this would be an absurd result.
From: Francis MacCall
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2019 1:06 PM
To: Amelia McCulley <AMCCULLE@albemarle.org>
Cc: Bart Svoboda <bsvoboda@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Are bonus densities allowed in a proposed development (SDP2019-19 & SUB2019-30 Berkmar Overlook)
I agree with Bill on this one. We should start with the Intent of the bonus factors in 2.4 to help with deciding this. Are
they intended to be used in this area? We can't jump to applying the factors until we decide if they are intended to be
used in a particular area.
2.4 INTENT OF BONUS FACTOR PROVISIONS
The provision of bonus factors is intended to encourage development which reflects the goals and
objectives of the comprehensive plan. To this end, bonus factors are based on development
standards as recommended by the comprehensive plan.
2.4.1 APPLICATION OF BONUS FACTORS
Bonus factors shall be applied to the gross density -standard level in accordance with the
regulations of the applicable district, except that the resulting density shall not exceed the
recommended density shown in the comprehensive plan.
Unless otherwise specifically provided, bonus factors shall not be permitted for any improvement
or design feature required by this ordinance. Chapter 14 of the Code of Albemarle, or any other
applicable law or regulation. Where permitted, bonus factors shall be applied in into only.
(Amended 8.14-85)
As it states, the bonus factors are intended to encourage development which reflects the goals and objectives of the
comprehensive plan. So what are the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan for this area?
Here is what Chapter 4 of the Places29 Master Plan states
http://www.albemarle.org/upload/images/forms center/departments/community development/forms/Places29 Mast
er Plan/2011/February/Chapter4-FutureLandUseTrans FINAL 02 2011.pdf
Office/Research & Development (R & D)/Flex/Light Industrial. This designation allows a
range of employment -generating uses and is applied to the majority of the nonretail employment
areas within the Places29 area to create Employment Neighborhoods. These uses are the "new"
types of industrial uses that arc more employee -intensive and may be less involved with
manufacturing. As such, these uses are expected to have the fewest impacts on surrounding uses
(e.g., noise, vibrations, odors), although they may have a greater traffic impact due to the number
of employees. The designation is used in the areas around Centers (see Land Use Table LU2).
"Office" includes the typical commercial office buildings that may house a variety of users. It
may also include professional offices, such as medical or real estate offices, although these
offices may also be located in Commercial Mixed Use and Urban Mixed Use areas.
"Research & Development (R&D)" is applied to an administrative, engineering, and/or scientific
research, design, or experimentation facility that engages in research, or research and
development, of innovative ideas in technology -intensive fields. Examples include research and
development of computer software, information systems, communication systems, transportation,
geographic information systems, and multi -media and video technology. Development,
construction, and testing of prototypes may be associated with this use. Such a business does not
involve the mass manufacture, fabrication, processing, or sale of products. Many research &
development uses can locate in traditional office buildings or buildings that resemble office
buildings, rather than traditional industrial facilities.
"Flex" describes businesses that may include several uses, such as a manufacturing facility with
warehouse space for components and completed products, a showroom for sale of the products,
and office space where administrative duties for the business take place. Another example is a
business "incubator' that supports new businesses. A Flex use may include: research &
development, manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, office, retail, customer service, and
showrooms, among others. Different businesses would have different combinations of these uses
and in varying percentages. Another feature of Flex uses is the need for space that can be
reconfigured as a business grows or adds products.
"Light Industrial" is described below. Light Industrial uses that are combined with
Office/R&D/Flex uses would not usually have impacts, other than traffic, on adjacent uses. Care
needs to be taken that the impacts of light industrial uses are compatible with surrounding uses
and the character of the area.
Primary uses: office, research & development (R&D), and flex, light
manufacturing�storage/distribution uses.
Chapter a. Future Land Use Plan and Transportaft Network . Page 4-6
Places29: A Master Plan for the Northern Development Areas . Adopted February 2, 2011
Revised June 10, 2015
Secondary uses: retail, commercial, and light manufacturing uses that are associated with
the primary uses, residential, open space, and institutional uses.
As Bill notes and is noted in the linked Table residential is a secondary use in that land use designation. I would say that
residential is not a goal or objective for this area even though it is listed as a secondary use. Also, I would say we are
intentionally silent on the density because residential is not a goal or objective for this area. Even if we were to allow
residential in the area, it is intended to be small enough that we are probably not concerned with density. Thus, they
cannot apply bonus factors to the proposed by right residential development.
Francis
From: Amelia McCulley
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2019 11:44 AM
To: Francis MacCall <FMACCALL@albemarle.org>; Bart Svoboda <bsvoboda@albemarle.org>
Subject: FW: Are bonus densities allowed in a proposed development (SDP2019-19 & SUB2019-30 Berkmar Overlook)
Can you two please let me know what you think on this?
From: Patricia Saternye
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2019 4:21 PM
To: Amelia McCulley <AMCCULLE@albemarle.org>
Cc: Bill Fritz <BFRITZ@albemarle.org>; Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>
Subject: Are bonus densities allowed in a proposed development (SDP2019-19 & SUB2019-30 Berkmar Overlook)
Amelia,
I have a bonus density question that I brought to Bill and Rachel.
Because they had differing opinions they suggested that I ask your opinion.
This is for my SRC review (SDP2019-19 & SUB2019-30 Berkmar Overlook).
It is currently zoned 116.
The Comp Plan area is Office/R&D/Flex/Light Industrial.
The ordinance (2.4.1) states "... except that the resulting density shall not exceed the recommended density shown in
the comprehensive plan."
Unfortunately Office/R&D/Flex/Light Industrial, in the current version of the Comp Plan, does not specify a maximum
density for residential and residential is only a secondary use.
The proposed plan is 100% residential.
Question: Can I allow them to use any bonus densities for residential uses?
Bill thinks they cannot, because no density is specified so anything would exceed the density. He also points out it is a
secondary use.
Rachel thinks that they can because the comp plan is silent on a maximum density then they are not limited (...of
course except where other sections of the code cap the %.)
Link to section of Comp Plan:
http://www.albemarle.org/upload/images/forms center/departments/community development/forms/Places29 Mast
er Plan/2011/February/Chapter4-Table LU2 AROUNDCenters BOSDraft 02 2011.pdf
Link to GIS for parcels:
http://gisweb.albemarle.org/GPV 51/Viewer.aspx?state=188117914615
Thanks,
Paty Saternye
Senior Planner
Community Development
;4
U
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832 ext.3250
psaternve@albemarle.org
www.albemarle.org
From: Bill Fritz
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2019 4:01 PM
To: Patricia Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org>
Subject: land use
http://www.albemarle.org/upload/images/forms center/departments/community development/forms/Places29 Mast
er Plan/2011/February/Chapter4-Table LU2 AROUNDCenters BOSDraft 02 2011.pdf
William D. Fritz, AICP
Development Process Manager/Ombudsman
434-296-5823 ext 3242
Patricia "Paty" Saternye
From: Patricia Saternye
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 1:10 PM
To: Amelia McCulley
Cc: Bill Fritz; Rachel Falkenstein
Subject: RE: Are bonus densities allowed in a proposed development (SDP2019-19 &
SUB2019-30 Berkmar Overlook)
Amelia,
Unfortunately it is an SRC item, and the meeting happened today.
I told the applicant that I was reaching out to you and would get what I could to them as soon as I heard back from
Zoning, but I did not tell them a time frame.
Would Monday or early Tuesday be possible? If not just let me know.
Sorry for not getting it to you sooner, but I just realized the issue yesterday.
Thanks,
Paty Saternye
Senior Planner
Community Development
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832 ext.3250
psaternye@albemarle.ore
www.albemarle.org
From: Amelia McCulley
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2019 11:45 AM
To: Patricia Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org>
Cc: Bill Fritz <BFRITZ@albemarle.org>; Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Are bonus densities allowed in a proposed development (SDP2019-19 & SUB2019-30 Berkmar Overlook)
What an excellent question! This is one of the things we love about zoning— brain teasers. I'd like to hear Francis and
Bart's opinion. What's your timeline so I can get back to you in a timely fashion?
From: Patricia Saternye
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2019 4:21 PM
To: Amelia McCulley <AMCCULLE@albemarle.ora>
Cc: Bill Fritz <BFRITZ@albemarle.ors>; Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.ore>
Subject: Are bonus densities allowed in a proposed development (SDP2019-19 & SUB2019-30 Berkmar Overlook)
Amelia,
I have a bonus density question that I brought to Bill and Rachel.
Because they had differing opinions they suggested that I ask your opinion.
This is for my SRC review (SDP2019-19 & SUB2019-30 Berkmar Overlook).
It is currently zoned 116.
The Comp Plan area is Office/R&D/Flex/Light Industrial.
The ordinance (2.4.1) states "... except that the resulting density shall not exceed the recommended density shown in
the comprehensive plan."
Unfortunately Office/R&D/Flex/Light Industrial, in the current version of the Comp Plan, does not specify a maximum
density for residential and residential is only a secondary use.
The proposed plan is 100% residential.
Question: Can I allow them to use any bonus densities for residential uses?
Bill thinks they cannot, because no density is specified so anything would exceed the density. He also points out it is a
secondary use.
Rachel thinks that they can because the comp plan is silent on a maximum density then they are not limited (...of
course except where other sections of the code cap the %.)
Link to section of Comp Plan:
http://www.albemarle.org/upload/images/forms center/departments/community development/forms/Places29 Mast
er Plan/2011/February/Chapter4-Table LU2 AROUNDCenters BOSDraft 02 2011.pdf
Link to GIS for parcels:
http://gisweb.albemarle.org/GPV 51/Viewer.aspx?state=188117914615
Thanks,
Paty Saternye
Senior Planner
Community Development
;4
U
`�/R41en�1
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832 ext.3250
psaternye@albemarle.org
www.albemarle.org
From: Bill Fritz
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2019 4:01 PM
To: Patricia Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org>
Subject: land use
http://www.albemarle.org/upload/images/forms center/departments/community development/forms/Places29 Mast
er Plan/2011/February/Chapter4-Table LU2 AROUNDCenters BOSDraft 02 2011.pdf
William D. Fritz, AICP
Development Process Manager/Ombudsman
434-296-5823 ext 3242
Patricia "Paty" Saternye
From: Patricia Saternye
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 4:17 PM
To: Scott Collins
Subject: FW: SUB2019-30 & SDP2019-10 Berkmar Overlook SRC comments for both the initial
site plan and preliminary subdivision plat.
Scott,
Below please see the VDH comment for SUB2019-30 & SDP2019-10 Berkmar Overlook.
Thanks,
Paty Saternye
Senior Planner
Community Development
`��R41N�N
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832 ext.3250
psaternye@albemarle.ore
www.albemarle.org
From: Kirtley, Josh <joshua.kirtley@vdh.virginia.gov>
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2019 2:32 PM
To: Patricia Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org>
Cc: Alan Mazurowski (VDH) (Alan.Mazurowski@vdh.virginia.gov) <Alan.Mazurowski@vdh.virginia.gov>
Subject: Re: SUB2019-30 & SDP2019-10 Berkmar Overlook SRC comments for both the initial site plan and preliminary
subdivision plat.
Good afternoon, Paty. It was good talking to you earlier.
If the proposed development will be served by public water and public sewer, then the Health Department has
no further comments regarding this project.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Josh
Josh Kirtley
Environmental Health Technical Consultant
Onsite Sewage and Water Programs
Thomas Jefferson Health District
(434)972-6288
Patricia "Paty" Saternye
From: Scott Collins <scott@collins-engineering.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 5:32 PM
To: Patricia Saternye
Subject: RE: Berkmar Overlook
Thanks. I am going to need your comments this evening. I have meetings in the morning and can not review planning
comments prior to the meeting if I don't get them this evening. It will not be a very productive meeting if I can not get
the comments before hand to review.
Thx.
Scott
From: Patricia Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 5:26 PM
To: Scott Collins <scott@collins-engineering.com>
Subject: RE: Berkmar Overlook
Scott,
I don't have them all, but I've attached what I have so far.
We are still missing VDH and the planning comments are not ready either.
I will have some questions for you tomorrow though.
Two of which I will mention now since they came from the CAC members, and they might be at the SRC meeting and
ask.
• They want to know the price point of the market -rate and affordable units.
• They also wanted to know about the feasibility of the future connections because of the grading.
Thanks,
Paty Saternye
Senior Planner
Community Development
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832 ext.3250
psaternye@albemarle.org
www.albemarle.org
From: Scott Collins <scott@collins-engineering.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2019 4:58 PM
To: Patricia Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org>
Subject: Berkmar Overlook
Paty-
Are the Berkmar Overlook Preliminary site plan comments ready yet?
Thanks.
Scott
Patricia "Paty" Saternye
From: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 4:36 PM
To: Tori Kanellopoulos
Cc: Bethany Velasquez; Brian Jamison; Patricia Saternye
Subject: Re: ACSA Sewer Plat TMP 45-112, 112E & 112G
Great. Thanks Tori! Sorry for the confusion patty.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:32 PM, Tori Kanellopoulos <vkanellopoulos@albemarle.org> wrote:
Hi All,
I believe this is in reference to SUB2018-155 Berkmar Drive easement plat. I gave the 'no review
comments left' comment on Oct 1, and have been waiting for signed plats since then, so they are ready
to be signed by Planning (and then it will be officially approved). I'll get them signed by Planning
tomorrow hopefully (assuming they're in my mailbox!).
Thanks!
Tori
From: Bethany Velasquez <Bethany@roudabush.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 4:25 PM
To: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>; Brian Jamison <BJamison@roudabush.com>
Cc: Patricia Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org>; Tori Kanellopoulos <vkanellopoulos@albemarle.org>
Subject: Re: ACSA Sewer Plat TMP 45-112, 112E & 112G
Hi Paty,
It should go to Tori. It has already been approved.
Thanks for the heads up,
Bethany Velasquez
Roudabush, Gale & Assoc.
434-977-0205
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 4:20 PM -0500, "Andrew baldwin" <andrew@corecville.com> wrote:
Patty it is. It's for the berkmar overlook project. Sorry. My assistant brought it down. We can sign the
application and bring a fee check down if need be. Just let me know.
Best
Andrew
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:17 PM, Brian Jamison <BJamison@roudabush.com> wrote:
I will look into this in the morning Patty.
Thanks for letting me know.
Brian
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:13 PM, Patricia Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> wrote:
Andrew,
Please see the email below.
Do you have any information on it?
Your name was also on the post -it note on the plat and I forgot to
include you when I sent the email below.
Thanks,
Paty Saternye
Senior Planner
Community Development
<image001.gif>
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832 ext.3250
psaternVe@albemarle.org
www.albemarle.org
From: Patricia Saternye
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2019 4:05 PM
To: Brian Jamison <BJamison@roudabush.com>
Subject: ACSA Sewer Plat TMP 45-112, 112E & 112G
Mr. Jamison,
A signed plat was dropped of with my first name on it Monday
without an application or fee.
It is an ACSA Sewer Plat on TMPs 45-112, 112E & 112G.
It has your seal on it.
I am uncertain why it was sent to me, since I don't have a project on
the site, or why it would be submitted without an application or fee.
Please provide whatever information you have on this.
It will need to be submitted officially with an application and fee and I
need to know if it associated with a site plan currently under review so
we will know what planner may be reviewing a project it is associated
with.
Please provide this information prior to submitting an application and
fee for it so that I can ensure our intake staff will have enough
information to process it properly.
For your reference I've attached the Easement Plat application and
check list.
Thanks,
Paty Saternye
Senior Planner
Community Development
<image001.gif>
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832 ext.3250
Psaternve@albemarle.org
www.albemarle.org
<Easement_Plat_&_Check) ist.pdf>
Patricia "Paty" Saternye
From:
Brian Jamison < BJamison@roudabush.com >
Sent:
Thursday, March 7, 2019 4:18 PM
To:
Patricia Saternye
Cc:
Andrew baldwin; Bethany Velasquez
Subject:
Re: ACSA Sewer Plat TMP 45-112, 112E & 112G
I will look into this in the morning Patty
Thanks for letting me know.
Brian
Sent from myiPhone
On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:13 PM, Patricia Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.ore> wrote:
Andrew,
Please see the email below.
Do you have any information on it?
Your name was also on the post -it note on the plat and I forgot to include you when I sent the email
below.
Thanks,
Paty Saternye
Senior Planner
Community Development
<image001.gif>
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832 ext.3250
psaternve@albemarle.orR
www.albemarle.ors
From: Patricia Saternye
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2019 4:05 PM
To: Brian Jamison <BJamison@roudabush.com>
Subject: ACSA Sewer Plat TMP 45-112, 112E & 112G
Mr. Jamison,
A signed plat was dropped of with my first name on it Monday without an application or fee.
It is an ACSA Sewer Plat on TMPs 45-112, 112E & 112G.
It has your seal on it.
I am uncertain why it was sent to me, since I don't have a project on the site, or why it would be
submitted without an application or fee.
Please provide whatever information you have on this.
It will need to be submitted officially with an application and fee and I need to know if it associated
with a site plan currently under review so we will know what planner may be reviewing a project it is
associated with.
Please provide this information prior to submitting an application and fee for it so that I can ensure our
intake staff will have enough information to process it properly.
For your reference I've attached the Easement Plat application and check list.
Thanks,
Paty Saternye
Senior Planner
Community Development
<image001.gif>
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832 ext.3250
psaternve@albemarle.ore
www.albemarle.ora
<Easement_Plat_&_Checklist. pdf>