Loading...
1982-01-27 adjJanuar~y_27~ 1982 (Afternoon Meeting-adjourned from January 25, An adjourned meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, was held on January 27, 1982, at 3:00 P.M. in Meeting Room 11, Fourth Floor, County Of£ice Building, Charlottesville, Virginia; said meeting adjourned from January 25, 1982. Present: Mr. James R. Butler, Mrs. Patricia H. Cooke, Mr. Gerald E. Fisher, Mr. C. Timothy Lindstrom, and Miss Ellen V. Nash. Absent: Mr. J. T. Henley, Jr. Officers Present: County Executive, Guy B. Agnor, Jr. and County Attorney, George R. St. John. The meeting was called to order at 3:12 P.M. by the Chairman, Mr. Fisher. Motion was immediately offered by Mr. Lindstrom, seconded by Miss Nash, to adjourn into executive session to discuss legal matters. Roll was called and the motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Mr. Butler, and Mrs. Cooke, M~. ~aher, Mr. Lindstrom and Miss Nash. NAYS: None. ABSENT: Mr. Henley. The Board reconvened into open session at 5:30 P.M. and motion was immediately offered by Miss Nash, seconded by Mr. Lindstrom, to adjourn to January 28, 1982, at 7:30 P.M. in the Auditorium, Second Floor, County Office Building. Roll was called and the motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Mr. Butler,~ Mrs. Cooke, Mr. Fisher, Mr. Lindstrom and Miss Nash. NAYS: None. ABSENT: Mr. Henley. CHAII~AN January 28, 1982 (Night Meeting--Adjourned from January 27, 1982) An adjourned meeting of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors was held on January 28, 1982, at 7:30 P.M., in the Albemarle County Office Building Auditorium, Charlottesville, Virginia. This meeting was adjourned from January 27, 1982. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. James R. Butler (arrived at 7:50 P.M.), Mrs. Patricia H. Cooke, Mr. Gerald E. Fisher, Mr. C. Timothy Lindstrom and Miss Ellen V. Nash. BOARD MEMBER ABSENT: Mr. J. T. Henley, Jr. OFFICERS PRESENT: Mr. Guy B. Agnor, Jr., County Executive and Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr., Director of Planning. Agenda Item No. 1. Call to Order. The meeting was called to order at 7:40 P.M., by Board of Supervisors Chairman, Gerald E. Fisher. Agenda Item No. 2. Charlottesville-Albemarle Transportation Study. Mr. Fisher noted that this was the first time in many years that the entire City Council, Board of Super- visors, City and County Planning Commissions and Highway Department representatives have met together to discuss a mutual problem; transportation. Mr. Fisher stressed that this is only a public presentation of the plan which has not been adopted. Next to speak was Dr. Wallace Reed, Chairman of the Charlottesville Area Transpor- tation Study Policy Committee. Dr. Reed reviewed the history of the CATS Committee and the many members who have served. Mr. Ken Lantz, Jr., Associate Transportation Planning Engineer with the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation, was next to speak. Mr. Lantz presented through the use of slides the findings of the CATS study. (NOTE: Complete text of Mr. Lantz's presentation is on permanent file in the office of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors.) Mr. Lantz noted that the area covered by the study includes all of the City of Charlot- tesville and those portions of Albemarle that are expected to exhibit major growth in population by the year 2000. The boundaries of the area are the Mechum River to the west, the Rivanna River to the north and east and 1-64 to the south; an area of 70 square miles. Mr. Lantz said this plan updates and replaces the Charlottesville 1985 Major Arterial Street and Highway Plan completed in 1967. Mr. Lantz stated three goals and objectives for the CATS study; those being: 1) To develop a safe, efficient and balanced transportation system for the movement of people, goods and services. 2) To promote the social, economic, physical and environmental objectives of the area jurisdictions. 3) To promote interjurisdictional cooperation in order to achieve the study's objectives. Levels of service were calculated for roadways in this area. Service levels de- signated as levels A (highest quality) through F (lowest quality) were established. Roadways below the minimum specified levels, identified as deficient, include: